Posts Tagged ‘assault weapons’

I’m In Favor Of A 21-Year Minimum Age To Buy ‘Assault Weapons’ – The Day AFTER We Have The Same Minimum Age To Vote Or Serve In The Military

February 27, 2018

I didn’t register for Selective Services when I turned 18 as the law has required for now over a hundred years.  Do you know why?  Because I was already enlisted in the United States Army, that’s why.  And when I was in boot camp looking at all the newly shaved heads around me, do you know what I saw?  A whole lot of other 18-year olds.

Those 18-, 19- and 2-year olds form a giant chunk of our military.  Did you know that?  How about this one: 36.9% of our Marines are 21 or under.  If we didn’t have these “kids” bearing arms, we wouldn’t have the guys who rush enemy positions.  Not unless YOU’RE going to do it, you weak, limpy old fool.

But just stop and think about the logic for a second: let’s decide that people under 21 can’t have a gun because they’re not responsible enough.  Except for the military where they have proven for a thousand generations that yes, they ARE responsible enough and in fact we need the flower of our youth to be armed so they can fight our battles for us.

I was 18-years old with an assault rifle; I was 19-years old with an assault rifle; I was 20-years old with an assault rifle. And not your dumbass fake-news “assault weapon,” but an actual assault rifle capable of fully automatic weapons fire.  The term “assault weapon,” by contrast, is a purely leftist and media and Democrat Party created fake news.  “Assault weapons” in fact do not actually exist.  It is an arbitrary, aesthetic manufactured meme.  A sporting rifle with a walnut stock is just another garden variety sporting rifle; take that walnut stock off and replace it with a black plastic one with an L-shaped grip and presto bismo you suddenly have an “assault weapon.”  The actual characteristics of the rifle remain unchanged.

Further, assault rifles (and the so-called “assault weapons” marketed on the design concept) are chambered in far less powerful cartridges than most other sporting rifles. And the assault weapons favored by the left for demagoguery are actually far less lethal than other rifles. I happen to own a Browning BAR in .300 Winchester Magnum. And yeah, I know it’s not an “assault weapon” because it has that beautiful walnut stock on it! Do you know how devastatingly powerful that sucker is compared to an “assault weapon”? Compare between 3,600 foot-pounds of muzzle energy and a 1,500 meter maximum effective range for the 300 Winchester Magnum versus 1,600 foot-pounds and a 550 meter maximum effective range for the .223 caliber “assault weapon.” Back in World War II, the average soldier carried his M-1 which chambered a .30-06 round; again, the actual ballistics favor the M-1 over the “assault rifle” by amazing levels: again, a thousand-yard gun with twice the energy of an “assault weapon.” This “debate” is based on pure demagoguery at its very most cynical, disingenuous, dishonest level.

And my actual assault rifle was also sans bump stock. A rifle needs to be held securely and firmly against the shoulder in order to be accurately fired.  Anybody who knows a damned thing about rifles knows that.  But a bump stock requires a loose shoulder hold that creates the rattle to rapidly depress the trigger.  And that affects accuracy in a way that simply doesn’t exist with true assault rifles that are designed for select-fire.  A bump stock reduces your accuracy to virtually nothing.  Stephen Paddock was able to shoot into a giant crowd, but otherwise he couldn’t have hit the broad side of a barn with that stupid gadget.  I’m all in favor of banning bump stocks simply because they are a novelty that make guns less effective rather than more effective.  Me, I was entrusted with an actual assault rifle! And I carried that weapon for every single American citizen! And guess what else I had? Large magazines to carry lots of firepower. And every single day of my service I proved that I was capable of bearing arms in a responsible manner for the good of my society and my country.

The reason the left hates me so much is because I am a living refutation of their lies: I not only carried these weapons, and carried them in a responsible manner, but carried them to the benefit of my country.  As do millions of other responsible gun owners who use these weapons safely and responsibly.

If you ban “kids” from having these weapons, you might as well just ban the United States Marine Corps altogether.  It’s a damn shame.  No enemy on earth could defeat our Marines; except for despicable, pathetic, gutless, miserable liberalism and the pure moral stupidity and spirit of cowardice that permeates our nation because of these jackass fools.

But I’ll tell you what: if kids aren’t responsible enough to own weapons or fight in our military, then you snot-nosed little dumbasses are hardly responsible enough to do the most responsible thing one can do in our democratic society and VOTE. No own who can’t have an assault weapon should be trusted to vote, either.

Fifty years ago we had more guns per capita and we had a lot fewer gun laws per capita, and yet we had far fewer of these mass shootings.  Something has changed in our culture and it is NOT the guns.  And even since first Bill Clinton in 1993, then Barack Obama frightened Americans into buying guns before these fascists tried to take them away, in fact gun violence actually went DOWN even as gun ownership went UP.  Because it’s NOT the guns.  Again, for Stephen Paddock, it wasn’t his rifle that pulled the trigger; it was his secular humanistic atheism and the nihilistic spirit that entails from that cockroach worldview that pulled the trigger.  Liberalism put the REAL weapon in these murderers’ hands because they took God out and allowed the nihilistic emptiness in.  Stephen Paddock, like 98% of all mass shooters, deliberately identified “a gun-free zone” so that he would be the only one with the gun.  Only two mass shootings in the U.S. since 1950 have occurred in an area where citizens were not prohibited from carrying a gun.  We’re having these mass shootings because we have more crazies than ever and thanks to liberalism we can’t put them away for the same reason we can’t violate illegal immigrants’ “rights” and deport them.  We have no means to deal with mentally sick people now unless and until they explode and do something truly evil.  And even AFTER their crimes liberals try to help them avoid true justice by taking away the death penalty so that these murderers can find out that the atheism that liberals pumped into their skulls was fake news and there REALLY IS a God who judges evil.  JUST TODAY, liberals assured us yet again that theirs is a worldview that WILL NOT hold people who commit truly brutal and heinous crimes accountable for what they did to their victims.  And it is the same left who are pumping out incredibly toxic video games and movies and television programs that desensitize us to violence in the most appalling manner.

What is interesting is that WE ALREADY TRIED this “assault weapons” ban thing.  For ten years we did this starting with Bill Clinton in 1994.  Which by the way was the very act of government fascist tyranny that began the movement for Americans to start buying more guns lest their rights be usurped from them that I referred to above.  And do you know the effect the “assault weapons ban” had???  ZERO.

Do you know what the definition of “insanity” is?  Trying to do the same damn thing that didn’t work before again and again.  Which is a prima facia evidence that liberals truly are insane.  And that leads to another realization: if we eliminated guns just from the groups of people who overwhelmingly vote “Democrat,” our gun violence would drop by a good 90 percent overnight.  These are the actual factsThey surely are.  I’m serious, that’s what the actual facts when you truly begin considering crime and race show.

So I’m actually all in FAVOR of taking guns away.  By removing the right to own guns from the political party that wants to have them banned in the damn first place.  Because this would be a vastly safer nation if we just gave them what they wanted and took their guns away from them while those of us who know that we are responsible kept our 2nd Amendment right and used that right to safeguard our freedom.

Getting back to my main argument, and removing “assault weapons” from people under 21, what is frankly amazing in its hypocrisy is that the left – the liberal mainstream media and the Democratic Party – are trotting out and touting all these angry teenagers who have just been traumatized as being the very smartest, wisest and best informed liberals whom we should therefore listen to.  But here’s the damn thing: by their very own “logic” these kids aren’t psychologically or emotionally capable of handling this issue – because they’re saying none of these whiny little fools ought to be trusted with guns in the first place!!!  Which means I can simply tune you whiny little ignorant punks out.  Again, this is demagoguery at its very lowest level.

It was the left, it was liberalism, it was secular progressive humanistic atheism, that has created this horrible vacuum in which people are beginning to increasingly say, “I’m miserable and since we all just ‘evolved’ from pond slime there is no true, ultimate purpose, no real, ultimate value and no genuine, ultimate meaning and therefore my life doesn’t matter and therefore nobody else’s life matters and so what I’m about to do is nothing more than a mass retro-active abortion.

Hearken to the words of Blaise Pascal:

“What else does this craving, and this helplessness, proclaim but that there was once in man a true happiness, of which all that now remains is the empty print and trace? This he tries in vain to fill with everything around him, seeking in things that are not there the help he cannot find in those that are, though none can help, since this infinite abyss can be filled only with an infinite and immutable object; in other words by God himself.”
– Blaise Pascal, Pensées VII(425)

That “God-shaped” hole has been filled with something that is most definitely UNGODLY and the hole will get uglier and uglier until we turn away from liberalism and fill the hole in our soul with the God who formed us in His image to be morally and spiritually accountable to Him as He fulfills His plan for us in our lives.  If we don’t have God, we’re going to have something else.  And now we’re finding out what that “else” is.

 

Advertisements

Liberals: Obama Massively FAILED To Protect America From Terrorism; So Let Him Take Away Our Guns So We Can Be MORE Defenseless

December 7, 2015

The New York Times is morally outraged.

You know, much the way child-molesters probably get morally outraged from time to time.  Which is to say, SHUT THE HELL UP.

The New York Times editorial I’m reacting to is based on two hidden underlying premises: 1) that good people should be rendered helpless; and 2) that evil people obey laws.  Both premises are cockroach crap.

A third underlying premise to all liberal appeals for more gun control is this: that, like the caliphate, every new piece of ground we take, every new piece of legislation, is one more step toward total control.  Democrats want to “control the people“; they’ve ALWAYS wanted to control the people.  Just like the terrorists and their dreams of political caliphate who want to be able to forcibly impose their will on helpless people who would be stripped of any means to resist their tyranny.  Democrats therefore want nothing less than the total confiscation of guns in America – and I’m absolutely certain that every terrorist says “praise Allah!” to that happy thought.  And when you can know that there is a group of people who are committed to taking away your rights, the ONLY “right” thing to do is to fight them over every single inch of ground.  Every single NANOMETER.

A fourth underlying premise is that the left desperately needs to get behind Obama’s incredibly cynical attempt to try to divert and distract attention away from his impeachable failure to protect America by demagoguing a highly partisan liberal policy posture.  It basically comes down to, “Obama failed to protect America when Republicans were warning about his building failure for YEARS, but let’s just conveniently put that fact aside and just give him more of what he wants.”  Because if you can’t reward liberalism and liberals for failure, how in the world can they ever expect to be rewarded given the fact that fail is all they do?

What we saw on Wednesday was a supermassive policy failure on the part of a Democrat President who has failed to protect America from terrorism at every imaginable turn.  And what the New York Times in it’s front page op-ed scream is treasonously declaring is that Barack Obama ought to be REWARDED for his supermassive failure to protect the American people by giving him the uberleftist Nazi gun-control victory that his fellow fascists have been seeking for decades.  It’s like Rahm Emmanuel said: every crisis is an opportunity.  And therefore when Obama creates a crisis by his incompetence and his moral idiocy, it ought to be an opportunity for Obama to reward his failure by seizing the freedoms of his enemies who happen to love the Constitution he routinely urinates on with the frequency of an aging man with a watermelon-sized prostate.

As I pointed out in a recent previous article, the terrorists launched a massively deadly attack in Paris France – which has some of the strictest gun controls ON EARTH.  Gun control works GREAT in theory; if nobody has guns, then nobody can commit any violence with guns, right?  It just fails in actual reality because for some reason Democrats can’t fathom, criminals and terrorists don’t bother to follow their laws.  Only ordinary people follow the laws who are then rendered helpless – which of course emboldens the criminals and terrorists.  Consider also that poor Marine who got confused and unintentionally entered Mexico with a couple of guns and spent months rotting in prison; there’s ANOTHER country with strict gun control laws.  Which means only the murderous CARTELS have guns and the people are utterly helpless before them.  Gun control works out GREAT for the people who have the guns who get to terrorize and murder helpless, defenseless people.

Then consider that Obama has REFUSED to keep our southern borders safe, and imagine where the guns will come flooding in from when only criminals and terrorists will break the law to get them.

Gun control works for fascist governments that want to “control the people.”  And it works for criminals and terrorists.  It fails and ultimately murders everybody else.

Obama has failed America so badly it is beyond UNREAL: terrorist attacks skyrocketed 150% in the five years of his failed presidency leading up to 2014 and we aint seen NOTHIN’ yet as they surged ANOTHER 81% this year from last.  Next year you will see hell unleashed because of this fool president and his fool liberal policies that the New York Slimes endorses and re-endorses.

The only announcement that ought to come from Obama is the announcement that he is RESIGNING.

This lying fool Obama boasted that Islamic State was merely “JayVee” when they were already seizing city after city in Iraq. He’s flat-out lied to us from the start about these vicious murderers.  Just a few hours before the vicious murderous terror attack in Paris, Obama lied again and assured America that Islamic State was “contained” when they were very obviously anything BUT.  The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff basically told the American people that their commander-in-chief LIED to them in claiming Islamic State was contained.  He refuted Obama.  But Obama doesn’t give a flying DAMN what the actual intelligence is.  He’s been ordering his handpicked bureaucrat thugs to overrule the actual intelligence analysts and just impose Obama’s political narrative in place of the actual intelligence.  And so just days before the vicious terror attack in San Bernardino, Obama was yet again falsely and deceitfully assuring the American people that he was keeping us safe.  How safe should you feel about his worthless reassurances now?

Obama sent out Hilary Clinton and Susan Rice to REPEATEDLY lie about the TERRORIST ATTACK that resulted in the murder of American heroes and the first US Ambassador since 1979 to be killed like a dog.  We now KNOW from Hillary Clinton’s emails that she tried to destroy that the Obama administration KNEW that the attack was a terrorist attack and NOT the result of some stupid video.  But the 1st Amendment right to free speech is just ANOTHER basic American freedom that Obama and Clinton tried to destroy the way they’re trying to destroy our 2nd Amendment rights.

Last night, amazingly, Democrats are actually giving Obama credit for acknowledging that the Ft. Hood shooting was a terrorist attack.  Do you know what a sick JOKE that is?  When did that attack happen?  Nov 5, 2009.  Do you know how long it took ME to officially call that attack what it clearly was?  I wrote this article November 6 the very next DAY.  Let’s see, what did I already know that day?  Let’s see: we already knew about his numerous internet postings espousing jihad.  We already knew he got into loud arguments with co-workers declaring that “Muslims should stand up and fight against the aggressor.”  That’s you, by the way, if you happen to be an American.  We know that he was screaming “Allahu Akbar” throughout his murderous attack.  Again, that very SAME DAY on November 6 I wrote this article titled, “Newsflash: Obama Enlisted Future Terrorist To Label Rightwing As ‘Extremist’” because Obama had actually ENLISTED Nidal Hasan to demonize conservatives and write propaganda that it was conservatives who were the real threat, not radical Muslims.  It was within a matter of days that the authorities revealed that Hasan had business cards calling himself a “soldier of Allah” and had had numerous internet contacts with terrorist leader Anwar al-Awlaki.

Obama finally officially acknowledged Nidal Hasan was a terrorist last night?

It took Obama MORE THAN SIX YEARS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE OBVIOUS.

Let me put it this way: today is December 7th.  You know NOTHING about history if you don’t know what anniversary that is, the savage Japanese attack against Pearl Harbor.  What if it had taken FDR SIX YEARS to acknowledge that we had been attacked by a foreign ideology and that we needed to go to war against that ideology.  And I’ll tell you what would have happened: the eastern half of American would be speaking Nazi and the Western half would be speaking Banzai, that’s what would have happened.

For SIX YEARS Obama buried his head in the damn sand and refused to acknowledge we had a rising enemy.  He STILL refuses to acknowledge that that enemy is motivated by ISLAMIC THEOLOGY.

We are sitting ducks because he did NOTHING.

Now, I just got through mentioning that just a matter of a few damn days before the terrorist attack that was eerily similar to Paris, Obama said nothing like that could happen here.  Because he’s a deluded FOOL.  But hey, for that matter the same hoity-toity New York Times assured us that what happened in Paris can’t happen here.  Just days before it DID happen here to prove that those know-nothing fools are a bunch of know-nothing FOOLS.

How many times do these fools get to be completely WRONG?  How many times do they get to LIE to us?

Here’s another thing to point out what a massive FAIL Obama and his Democrat roaches are when it comes to keeping Americans safe: This terrorist attack is just another in a long, LONG string of mass shootings that were committed because of the wickedness of Democrats who want to render Americans helpless with their cursed “gun free zones.” And they want to make the entire NATION one giant gun-free zone.

Now, I don’t doubt thanks to our Failed Fool in Chief that there WILL come a point when terrorists are so emboldened that they go after our police and our military by launching direct attacks on police stations and military installations.  But up to this point, how many times have terrorists decided they wanted to go after a target where heavily armed people had an opportunity to defend themselves and shoot back?  Fool Democrats merely want to increase the number of potential terrorist targets from thousands of “gun-free zones” to HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS.

Democrats often talk about “hunting” and say you don’t need an “assault rifle” to hunt.  Of course, based on that “logic,” it won’t be long before they’ve regulated Americans to the point where the only gun they can use is a damned BLUNDERBUSS.  But here’s the thing, that’s a deceitful bait and switch and anybody who knows history knows it’s a bait and switch: the 2nd Amendment doesn’t guarantee the “right to hunt”; it never mentions “hunting” at ALL.  Rather, the 2nd Amendment guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear ARMS” and declares that that right “shall not be infringed.”

Where the hell did Democrats decide that when the first grocery store or the first McDonald’s came to exist, that somehow the 2nd Amendment didn’t apply anymore because we no longer needed to hunt to live?

All an “assault weapon” is just a clever marketing ploy to make the semi-automatic rifles that have been legal in America since semi-automatic rifles were INVENTED.  “Assault rifles” are defined as weapons capable of selective fire, either semi- or full-automatic.  “Assault weapons” are merely semi-automatic weapons that look really cool.  They are designed to look all scary and nasty, but they’re just basic semi-automatic rifles.  In fact, if you actually know your history, you’ll know that semi-automatic rifles were actually in the hands of civilians BEFORE the first semi-automatic rifles (the M-1 Garand) were issued to US servicemen.  American civilians were using semi-automatic rifles at least going back to 1906, a full thirty years before the military got them.  So the notion that the American people shouldn’t be allowed to have these guns is just plain BULL CRAP.  It is anti-American.

Actually, assault weapons are AWESOME weapons to hunt with.  They are awesome ALL-AROUND weapons in that they are great for target shooting, for hunting AND for defense.  When I go on my hikes, I see people shooting with them ALL THE TIME.  And yet because I’m not a coward liberal I never scream and run because oh-my-god that weapon is going to take over the mind of its owner and kill me!

The 2nd Amendment exists for one reason: so the government won’t EVER have the power or ability to hunt US the way the gun-confiscating Nazis hunted down the Jews.

The 2nd Amendment was enshrined by our founding fathers as A REACTION AGAINST TYRANNY.  And the tyranny that they were MOST worried about was the tyranny of our OWN government.  And they enshrined the 2nd Amendment to guarantee that at some safeguarding level, the government would be forced to fear the people so that the people would not have to live in fear of their government.  You know, the way they had to fear their damn government in so many places that enacted the sort of “gun control” the left wants, such as Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia.

I’m going to declare it this way: unless and until the Democrat Party officially and permanently declares that the 2nd Amendment is in fact a fundamental right for the people to keep and to bear arms and ANY attempt to infringe on that right is a federal crime subject to HEAVY prison time for ANY politician, judge, or voter who tries to usurp that right, I for one am not going to listen to their mewling about gun control.

As long as there is an Obama stenching up the White House with the moral sewer of his power-grabbing executive orders, I want what my founding fathers intended me to have to protect my life and my property from his evil.

Their hypocritical money quote is this: “No right is unlimited and immune from reasonable regulation.”

Except the right for illegal immigrants and criminals to vote without any damn ID check, of course.  The New York Times will fight to its last Nazi to stop that from ever happening.

Illegal immigrants are VOTING. YES THEY ARE!!!  Obama’s illegal – even illegal according to his own “Justice” Department just hours before he dictated what HE HIMSELF said he had absolutely no right to do executive actions have taken away the very few protection and enforcement measures America had to keep its elections safe from foreign manipulation.  And it is now beyond easy to document as a matter-of-fact that Democrats have been AGITATING and working toward the “right” of all illegal immigrants to vote IN RABID DEFIANCE OF OUR CONSTITUTION.

But ANY attempt to require ANY ID is met with rabid opposition and outright demonic slander.  You know, from the party that says Republicans aren’t “reasonable.”

And just for the record, if Democrats have any right whatsoever to ban the American people from owning guns because of what a FEW people do, then at least they ought to be “reasonable” enough to deport every single illegal immigrant in this nation because of what a few ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS do.  So you ban your guns and we’ll deport forty million undocumented immigrants.  And if the latter one is insane, the former one is even MORE insane because the former one is enshrined in our Constitution and our way of life.

Now let me talk more about “voting” and the UNLIMITED and IMMUNE FROM REASONABLE REGULATION “right to vote” that the Democrat Party has enshrined without ANY constitutional support.

The Nazis were ELECTED, chump.  Just like the terrorist organization Hamas was elected in the Palestinian territory.  Just like the terrorist organization the Muslim Brotherhood was elected in Egypt.  Just like the damn Democrat Party was elected in America.

Voting is THE most dangerous right on earth.  I’ll just put it this way: a whole hell of a lot more Jews were killed in Nazi concentration camps than all the Americans who exercised their 2nd Amendment rights throughout the entire history of the world’s oldest republic COMBINED.

But the same Democrats who demand our borders remain flooded with millions of illegal immigrants – and of course illegal guns coming in with them the exact same damn way they’re serving as mules for drug cartels now – won’t allow ANY “reasonable regulation” when it comes to their “unlimited” right from illegal immigrants to be “immune” from consequences of voting in US elections.

I’ll tell you what: the right to keep and bear arms isn’t merely a “right”; it’s a constitutional guarantee and it is a fundamental basis for ALL of our freedoms.  Because your freedom doesn’t mean a damn thing if somebody else wants to take your freedom away and they’ve got guns and you’ve got squat.  Versus the Democrat’s cynical and self-serving partisan demand for a “right” that is UNCONSTITIONAL and frankly ANTICONSTITUTIONAL in giving illegal immigrants the ability to override the will of the American people.

It comes down to this: as we speak, the President of the United States and his entire Democrat Party establishment are playing the most cynical and partisan political games in the entire history of the republic.  And if they win, the United States of America loses.

If you’ve got a gun, you better keep your powder dry, because Obama and his Democrat National Socialist Workers Party fascist thugs are DESPERATE to change the subject and they want your guns now more than EVER.

If Democrats don’t want to have guns, I’m all in favor of them not having them.  I am all in favor of any law that criminalizes anyone who has ever voted Democrat from owning guns.  If Democrats truly think gun control is such a wonderful idea, let them vote to take away their own damn guns and see what happens.

The worst problem with Democrats is that they invariably want to impose their fascism on everybody else.

Police Forensic Scientist At Newtown States As Expert That An Assault Weapons Ban Won’t Work

February 5, 2013

Facts are to a liberal what sunlight is to a vampire.

I want you to notice: not only are “assault weapons” not being used in crimes; but even weapons that share the same CALIBUR aren’t being used in crimes:

Police forensic scientist at Newtown hearing: ‘Assault weapons’ ban won’t work
3:46 PM 02/04/2013
Patrick Howley

The forensic scientist for the Bridgeport, Conn. Police Department sharply  criticized proposed assault weapon and high-capacity magazine bans and pointed  out the small number of crimes committed by high-capacity weapons in public hearing testimony last week.

Marshall K. Robinson, who said his area of expertise is “firearm and tool  mark identification,” testified at the Gun Violence Prevention Working Group, which  was convened at the Connecticut State Capitol in response to the Sandy Hook  Elementary School shooting. There he opposed statements from many of the other  1,300 speakers in attendance advocating for banning high-capacity AR-15 and  AK-47 firearms.

Robinson pointed out that less than two percent of the firearms he has  examined since 1996 that have been linked to violent crime in Bridgeport have  been the caliber of AR-15 or AK-47 weapons.

“Since November 1996, I have examined approximately 2,370 firearms. Of that  number 36 of them were either .223/5.56 mm or 7.62×39 mm,” Robinson said. “The  percentage of those guns was about [1.5 percent].”

“I did further research on homicides and assaults in the years 2006 to 2012  inclusive. Of the 217 such cases, there were 912 bullets and 466 cartridge cases  recovered. One assault involved .223 caliber and none involved 7.63×39 mm  caliber. The largest number cartridge cases recovered in one case was 37 and  that involved two guns. The investigations that involved the recovery of eleven  or more cartridge cases was 22. Of the 22 cases, 21 involved 2 or more guns,” Robinson added.

Robinson went on to criticize past gun control measures and argued that new  proposals will not work to reduce violent crime in any meaningful way.

“These are real numbers from real cases in a real city police department.  This is not something made up or fabricated. High capacity magazines have been ‘banned’ before. It proved nothing and the ban was lifted a few years ago,” he  said. “There are many guns in existence, since the 1860s, which hold more than  10 cartridges, the early Winchester lever action rifles, for example, and many  tubefeed 22 caliber rifles. There are some modern firearms for which no other  magazine exist. What do you propose we do with them?”

“In your infinite wisdom, you outlawed bayonet lugs, flash hiders, and  collapsible stocks,” he testified. “In over forty years of being a firearm and  tool mark examiner, I have never seen these components inflict any injury  whatsoever on any person. In your infinite wisdom, you outlawed fully automatic  firearms that have the capability of firing a single shot. Ladies and gentlemen,  I really need help with that one.”

“We all agree that the Newtown case is a tragedy. I submit to you that you  cannot legislate away insanity, which I think is the root cause of this case,” Robinson said. “Laws must be passed based on research and logical thinking, not  on emotions.”

Robinson also works at the state police forensic lab in Meriden, Conn.

Marshall K. Robinson testimony

A member of FreeRepublic posted these statistics on homicides around the world:

From the World Health Organization:

The latest Murder Statistics for the world:

Murders per 100,000 citizens

Honduras 91.6

El Salvador 69.2

Cote d’lvoire 56.9

Jamaica 52.2

Venezuela 45.1

Belize 41.4

US Virgin Islands 39.2

Guatemala 38.5

Saint Kits and Nevis 38.2

Zambia 38.0

Uganda 36.3

Malawi 36.0

Lesotho 35.2

Trinidad and Tobago 35.2

Colombia 33.4

South Africa 31.8

Congo 30.8

Central African Republic 29.3

Bahamas 27.4

Puerto Rico 26.2

Saint Lucia 25.2

Dominican Republic 25.0

Tanzania 24.5

Sudan 24.2

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 22.9

Ethiopia 22.5

Guinea 22.5

Dominica 22.1

Burundi 21.7

Democratic Republic of the Congo 21.7

Panama 21.6

Brazil 21.0

Equatorial Guinea 20.7

Guinea-Bissau 20.2

Kenya 20.1

Kyrgyzstan 20.1

Cameroon 19.7

Montserrat 19.7

Greenland 19.2

Angola 19.0

Guyana 18.6

Burkina Faso 18.0

Eritrea 17.8

Namibia 17.2

Rwanda 17.1

Mexico 16.9

Chad 15.8

Ghana 15.7

Ecuador 15.2

North Korea 15.2

Benin 15.1

Sierra Leone 14.9

Mauritania 14.7

Botswana 14.5

Zimbabwe 14.3

Gabon 13.8

Nicaragua 13.6

French Guiana 13.3

Papua New Guinea 13.0

Swaziland 12.9

Bermuda 12.3

Comoros 12.2

Nigeria 12.2

Cape Verde 11.6

Grenada 11.5

Paraguay 11.5

Barbados 11.3

Togo 10.9

Gambia 10.8

Peru 10.8

Myanmar 10.2

Russia 10.2

Liberia 10.1

Costa Rica 10.0

Nauru 9.8

Bolivia 8.9

Mozambique 8.8

Kazakhstan 8.8

Senegal 8.7

Turks and Caicos Islands 8.7

Mongolia 8.7

British Virgin Islands 8.6

Cayman Islands 8.4

Seychelles 8.3

Madagascar 8.1

Indonesia 8.1

Mali 8.0

Pakistan 7.8

Moldova 7.5

Kiribati 7.3

Guadeloupe 7.0

Haiti 6.9

Timor-Leste 6.9

Anguilla 6.8

Antigua and Barbuda 6.8

Lithuania 6.6

Uruguay 5.9

Philippines 5.4

Ukraine 5.2

Estonia 5.2

Cuba 5.0

Belarus 4.9

Thailand 4.8

Suriname 4.6

Laos 4.6

Georgia 4.3

Martinique 4.2

And

The United States 4.2

ALL the countries above America have 100% gun bans

If I cite Chicago and point out that the city with a complete BAN on handguns has out-of-control handgun violence, doctraire liberal ideologues (which basically means garden-variety liberals) will claim that we need a national gun ban in order for any ban to work.

Chicago and all the liberal cities with gun bans prove them wrong.  The rest of the world proves them wrong.

They are wrong.

This is another example of Obama shoving the stimulus through claiming millions of shovel-ready jobs.  After getting his pork-laden Democrat-benefitting boondoggle, he admitted that “Shovel-ready was not as … uh .. shovel-ready as we expected.”  It was governing by demagoguing crisis.  Then he did the same thing with his ObamaCare, shoving it through Congress with a whole array of lies that have been proven to have been outright lies about access, about cost, about everything.  It was governing by demagoguing crisis.

Now he’s doing it with guns.

Obama is the quintessential fascist.  He is exactly why the founding fathers provided the 2nd Amendment as a means to protect ourselves against tyrants.

If you truly want to ban something that is dangerous and evil, ban Democrats.

Dianne Feinstein’s Liberal Solution For Guns: Treat Criminals Like Citizens And Lawful Gun Owners Like Criminals

January 28, 2013

One of the bright, shining examples of liberalism in action has been our treatment of criminals in society.  The ACLU and most Democrats believe that it is better for a hundred guilty violent predatory criminals to go free than for one innocent person to be falsely convicted of a crime.

This piece from the Congressional Record gives us the perspective that liberals would now like to accord to lawful gun owners: criminalize them.  And it is better that a thousand lawful gun owners have their rights violated and usurped than it would be for one violent criminal  predator to be shot by a homeowner defending his or her property and family.

It will be an uphill battle–all the way. I know this.

But we need to ask ourselves:

Do we let the gun industry take over and dictate policy to this country? Do we let those who profit from increasing sales of these military style-weapons prevent us from taking commonsense steps to stop the carnage?

Or should we empower our elected representatives to vote their conscience based on their experience, based on their sense of right and wrong and based on their need to protect their schools, their malls, their workplaces and their businesses?

This legislation is my life’s goal. As long as I am a member of the Senate, I will work night and day to pass this bill into law. No matter how long it takes, I will fight until assault weapons are taken off our streets.

Put simply, we cannot allow the rights of a few to override the safety of all. That is not the America that our founding fathers envisioned. And that is not the America I want my children and grandchildren to live in.

So I ask everyone watching at home: please get involved and stay involved.

The success or failure of this bill depends not on me, but on you. If the American people rise up and demand action from their elected officials, we will be victorious. If the American people say “no” to military-style assault weapons, we will rid our Nation of this scourge.

Please, talk to your senator and your member of Congress.

By Mr. FEINSTEIN (for herself,) Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. BENNET, Mr.

It’s all summed up by the phrase that turns liberalism completely upon its head and proves once and for all time that liberalism stands for nothing but convenient hypocrisy: “we cannot allow the rights of a few to override the safety of all.”  Unless it helps Democrats, of course.

Tell you what, Democrat, if you want to take away “rights,” then please take away the “right” of the government to grow in size and power and debt.  Take away the “rights” of the government to practice Marxist class warfare and demonize and attack people for the crime of working harder to advance themselves and their families.  Take away the “right” of non-citizens and dead people and ineligible citizens the ability to vote.  Take away the “right” of foreigners to cross our border and enter our country illegally.  Take away the “right” of unions to collectively bargain and collectively strike and collectively shut down businesses while businesses have no right to collectively fire the useless lazy bums who keep demanding higher pay in exchange for less and less work.  Take away the “right” to have unemployment benefits forever.  Take away the “right” to enjoy welfare for five generations.  Take away the “right” for homosexuals to pervert marriage.  And please, PLEASE take away the “right” for a woman to decide to murder her baby and force the father of that baby to stand passively by while his son or daughter is brutally tortured and killed.

And if you really want less gun murders, geez, PLEASE take away the “rights” that the ACLU and Democrats have provided to proven violent animals by executing them like the monsters they are and instituting hard sentencing guidelines that liberals have banned.

There are PLENTY of “rights” you could take away that are not specifically cited in our Bill of Rights.

Just so you understand how incredibly cynical Democrats truly are, and how much they truly do not give one freaking DAMN about saving the lives of innocent children (55.7 million of whom they’ve already murdered in the abortion mills, fwiw), just look at liberals’ reaction to the Fontana Police Department buying a few AR-15s to protect schoolchildren in the event of a targeting of a school in their jurisdiction: outrage.  Liberals are outraged that good and decent people – even police officers – would be capable of protecting themselves against well-armed violent criminals.

This sentence from the LA Times sums up the crazy insanity that will manifest itself in trying to ban all guns:

The rifles are kept either in the trunk of the police officer’s vehicle or in a safe on campus.

“Still, Garcia worries that bringing such a weapon on campus could lead to it falling into the wrong hands.”

If even police departments can’t pass adequate muster to be armed, then what chance do the rest of us have to keep guns if Democrats are allowed the power to ban guns from us???

Mind you, some guns are stolen from gun owners’ homes by criminals because fascist liberals who would never publish the names and addresses of child molesters decided that legal gun owners were a far greater threat than the child molesters or the rapists or the violent murderers.

Police can’t bring guns on campuses that are “gun free zones.”  The mass-murdering psychos know that.  Which is why in every single case but ONE since 1950 in which three or more people were killed in a gun shooting, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM OCCURRED ON A GUN-FREE ZONE.

Democrats have turned our schools into well-stocked preserves where crazy murdering psychos can have plenty of helpless targets.  And they actually have the blue-whale-sized balls to demonize us for trying to prevent them from creating even more carnage as they pass laws to keep law-abiding citizens from defending themselves knowing full-damn well that the criminals won’t bother to follow their stupid and immoral and unconstitutional laws.

The fact of the matter is that there is absolutely NO relationship between confiscating guns from law-abiding citizens and gun crime.  The so-called “assault weapons ban” had ZERO effect of reducing gun crime of weapons that were largely arbitrarily banned.  And therefore what IS now a proven fact is that Democrats are fascists and hypocrites who want to take away the people’s rights to be safe from their government that is under the Democrat Party walking roughshod all over the Constitution.

Why target assault weapons – which was a deliberately misleading title with the intent to falsely connect fully automatic military “assault rifles” with their semi-automatic civilian counterparts so that Democrats could falsely demagogue a straw man?  Because the left is looking for precedents: if they can take away these weapons, they can go after the next batch of guns using their success against “assault weapons.”

You should realize that most of the weapons on Democrats’ confiscation lists are only different by weapons they currently allow by shades of degree.  For example, a Mini-14 rifle is completely legal; but it is virtually identical to many weapons that share the exact same platform that are on the ban list.  The Democrats are savagely attacking what amounts to cosmetic differences such as a pistol grip and a flash suppressor.  The pistol grip was never on any rifle until the first assault rifles.  Why not?  Because it only provided any help for a shooter who was spraying a target with full automatic fire; it is virtually useless for semi-automatic fire that all “assault weapons” have.  To this day, most hunting rifles have a traditional stock simply because the traditional stock provides for greater accuracy and thus greater deadliness.  Flash suppressors were placed on assault rifles so that a soldier fighting at night on a dark battlefield would not night-blind himself with his own weapons fire.  They do NOT make you invisible to detection by others.  If you’re shooting an assault weapon in a city or in daylight, a flash suppressor is useless to you.  All these things are for style, to make the weapons look like the ones soldiers use on the battlefields.  It’s a marketing gimmick, much the way people buy sports jerseys to look more like their favorite athletes.

Democrats are also targeting ammo magazines.  Their primary justification for doing so is to ask the question, “how many bullets do you need to kill a deer?”  As if the 2nd Amendment only somehow guaranteed nothing more than the right to hunt squirrels with an 18th century musket as opposed to its trule purpose to prevent government tyranny over a helpless people.  They are currently trying to ban any gun with more than seven rounds.  The thing is, they are knowingly setting up massive, MASSIVE collateral damage.  That’s because such a ban would criminalize 95% of all semi-automatic handguns.  Democrats are hoping they can ban handguns without even appearing to have tried to do so.

They view “assault weapons” as low-hanging fruit through which they can grab a branch and tear down the entire tree of the 2nd Amendment right.

If you allow them to do so, they will gladly tear down the tree of liberty while the rest of us stand there stupidly gawking.

Gun Control: Dianne Feinstein’s Assault Weapons Bill Reminds Of Her Abject Debacle To Control Meth Labs

January 15, 2013

Dianne Feinstein is in the news for being the senator who applied for and exercised a concealed weapon permit who also wants to take guns away from everybody else.

Her assault weapons ban is apparently the Democrats’ favorite monster to devour the 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution.  After Obama gets finished acting like a fascist and imposing gun control by executive order just like the worst leaders in history did.

As a result of Obama’s demagoguing and he and his Democrats’ lying and slandering to exploit the next crisis, gun sales have absolutely skyrocketed during Obama’s first term.  And that fever-pitch rush for the people to arm themselves now before it’s too late has only escalated as Obama begins his next term.

Let’s say Obama gets his overturning of the Constitution like he wants.  Explain to me how that fascist thug didn’t cause the greatest proliferation of guns as frightened people rushed to buy their guns before Obama’s new dictates took effect.

And a whopping load of those guns are so-called “assault weapons” – because everybody knows that Obama and the Democrats are fascists who are going to take our right to keep and bear arms away and they want to make sure they get the guns that Obama wants to seize from us first.

Hey, if you want to reduce the number of guns, do you think Obama’s presidency did a good job of that?  I mean, hell, Obama HIMSELF was dealing thousands of assault weapons by proxy to Mexican drug cartels.  That’s how you can know that gun sales under Obama have skyrocketed like nothing ever has skyrocketed before.

And this is going to make any kind of intelligent gun control so much more difficult.  Because there are 300 million plus guns in America.  And as long as a thug or a murderer can get his hands on one, I want to be able to get MY hands on one, too.  And gun laws disarm the innocent people while allowing the guilty people to buy guns illegally and then exploit the fact that they’re going to be the only ones with guns when they crash into your house and round up your family for their night of fun before they kill you all.

And Obama has now added massively to that giant stash of guns in America.  Since he was elected in November 2008, Obama has panicked Americans into buying 67 million more guns.  And I mean, to put it in perspective, in just the last two months of 2012, Obama panicked Americans into buying more than enough guns to arm both the 2.29 million active members in the Chinese Army AND the 1.13 million active members in the Indian Army.

Now, assuming that you’re not a rabid Obama worshiping ideologue but rather somebody who actually wants to see fewer guns on the streets, how can you argue that Obama did anything but create a mass panic???  How could you possibly argue that what Democrats have done was the right way to have a responsible discussion about gun control versus the 2nd Amendment???

Have we ever seen a failure like this before?

Yes.  And frighteningly, it was an even bigger failure because it started out as a giant success.

I want to point out a little bit of history.  Once upon a time shy of a half century ago, there was an illegal drug called “meth.”  Oh, you’ve heard of it?  And Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein decided to win that war with government regulation.  She made it harder than hell for all Californians to purchase any product containing pseudoephedrine.  Because pseudoephedrine was an ingredient in meth, you see.  And by exercising a fascist takeover of a private industry, Dianne Feinstein and Democrats believed that they could use raw government force shut down the meth problem.  You know, kind of like they think they can shut the gun problem down.

What happened?  Well, it’s interesting.  To begin with, you’re still a casualty of the war Democrats waged against pseudoephedrine.  You’ve got to fill our government paperwork and show ID up the whazoo.  And hence criminals will be unable to get the ingredient pseudoephedrine and the drug labs will shut down.  And of course they largely killed a thriving product by largely shutting it down so the government could solve the drug problem.

Was it a brilliant idea?  Is it a story that ought to give liberals hope about how good a job Democrats can be at taking away guns???  Nope.  Not even close.

You see, when meth labs had access to even more abundant supplies of pseudoephedrine, they used a process that generated an incredibly powerful ammonia odor that could be smelled from significant distances.  So the labs had to locate way out in the boonies to cook their product.  And that slowed down the manufacturing process considerably.

Then Dianne Feinstein and the Democrat Party stepped in with their government ban.  And helped the drug makers overcome their inability to manufacture their product in cities.

You want to know what happened?  The meth makers very quickly found a different way to make meth.  They now use a method that is virtually odorless – so the process can be kicked into high gear in ordinary households in ordinary cities.  And its so portable you can now manufacture meth in your car.  As a result, meth production and hence meth addiction have skyrocketed.  Now they can make it right across the street from your kid’s elementary school.  And so what if they blow up next door to you?

All because the same stupid Democrats who think they can solve the drug problem by attacking legitimate private industry can solve the gun problem by attacking ordinary Americans exercising their 2nd Amendment protection.

Here’s the story on what happened with the meth production:

More meth labs showing up in cities, suburbs
Not just a rural drug anymore: Experts say more meth labs showing up in cities, suburbs
By Jim Salter, Associated Press | Associated Press – Thu, Dec 27, 2012

ST. LOUIS (AP) — Methamphetamine lab seizures are on the rise in the nation’s cities and suburbs, raising new concerns about a lethal drug that has long been the scourge of rural America.

Data and interviews from an investigation by The Associated Press found growing numbers of meth lab seizures in cities such as St. Louis, Kansas City, Mo., Nashville, Tenn., and Evansville, Ind. Authorities are also seeing evidence that inner-city gangs are becoming involved in meth production and distribution.

“No question about it — there are more labs in the urban areas,” said Tom Farmer, coordinator of the Tennessee Methamphetamine and Pharmaceutical Task Force. “I’m seeing car fires from meth in urban areas now, more people getting burned.”

The increase in labs is especially troubling because meth brought into the U.S. from Mexico also is becoming more pervasive in urban areas. The Associated Press reported in October that so-called Mexican “super labs” are upping production, making meth more pure and less expensive, and then using existing drug pipelines in big cities.

Data obtained by AP shows that homemade meth is on the rise in metropolitan areas, too.

— St. Louis County had just 30 lab seizures in 2009, but 83 through July 31, putting it on pace for 142 in 2012. The city of St. Louis had eight in 2009 and is on pace for 50 this year.

— Jackson County, Mo., (which includes Kansas City) had 21 seizures in 2009 and is on pace for 65 this year.

— Meth lab seizures have tripled in the Nashville area over the past two years. In one case in late 2011, a man and his girlfriend were accused of recruiting more than three dozen people, including some who were homeless, to visit multiple pharmacies and purchase the legal limit of cold pills containing pseudoephedrine, a key meth ingredient. The couple and 37 others were indicted.

— The Evansville, Ind., area has seen a more than 500 percent rise in meth seizures since 2010, with 82 in 2011.

Authorities cite numerous reasons for meth moving into cities, but chief among them is the rise in so-called “one-pot” or “shake-and-bake” meth.

In years past, meth was cooked in a makeshift lab. The strong ammonia-like smell carried over a wide area, so to avoid detection, meth had to be made in backwoods locations.

As laws limited the availability of pseudoephedrine, meth-makers adjusted with a faster process that creates smaller batches simply by combining ingredients — mixing cold pills with toxic substances such as battery acid or drain cleaner — in 2-liter soda bottles. Shake-and-bake meth can be made quickly with little odor in a home, apartment, hotel, even a car.

“Bad guys have figured it out,” said Rusty Payne of the federal Drug Enforcement Agency. “You don’t have to be as clandestine — you don’t have to be in rural country to lay low.”

Niki Crawford, who heads the meth suppression team in Indiana, said that with shake-and-bake labs, “the odors are not as strong. And they’re just so portable. We find them in backpacks and gym bags.”

And inside stores: A woman was arrested inside a St. Louis County Wal-Mart earlier this year with a meth-filled soda bottle in her coat pocket.

Another reason for the rise in urban meth is a process known among law enforcement as “smurfing” —the abundance of pharmacies in cities attracts meth-makers from surrounding rural areas, who can bring in friends to help purchase pseudoephedrine pills.

“We know the fuel for domestic labs is pseudoephedrine,” Farmer said. “The source for that is pharmacies and the majority of pharmacies are in urban areas.”

Farmer also has seen an increase in meth activity involving inner-city Tennessee gangs, which tend to be better-organized than rural cookers when it comes to marketing and selling the drug. For the most part, the gang members work as smurfers, though Farmer worries they’ll eventually become involved in the manufacture and distribution of the drug. Sometimes, gang members and meth-makers first connect while in prison.

“They see there’s a market there to make money off of pseudoephedrine,” Farmer said. “Pseudoephedrine has become as good as currency.”

Missouri State Highway Patrol statistics are indicative of the growing urban concern: All four of the top meth counties in Missouri were in the metropolitan St. Louis area — Jefferson, St. Charles, St. Louis and Franklin.

Ed Begley, a St. Louis County meth detective, said the drug is attracting users from all socio-economic levels.

“Lower class all the way up to upper middle class,” Begley said. “We’ve even had retired folks who have become addicted. It’s a brutal drug.”

You see, the problem is that you can’t completely shut down pseudoephedrine production.  Why?  Because it’s simply the best drug for congestion ever made.  And Democrat politicians get colds, too, you know.  Also, how are the drug makers getting their pseudoephedrine?  Largely by getting the welfare-slacking life-failures the Democrats subsidize to purchase it for them in exchange for a few bucks a month.  Let’s call that welfare from meth makers.  And it’s shockingly pervasive and the problem is exploding out of control.  Feinstein and Democrats did absolutely nothing to reduce the drug trade with their nanny-state fascism and instead made the problem worse.  In the same way, you ought to know that you can’t shut down gun production, either.  Because what would they protect Obama and his family with if they absolutely banned guns???  As long as Democrats can get colds and need some pseudoephedrine, and as long as Obama needs the guns to protect himself and his family that he wants to take away from you, we’re going to have the same sorts of government-caused disasters.  And don’t think for a second that guns won’t find their way across the border on the backs of the illegal immigrants who are streaming into America with Democrats’ abetting.

The Obama City of Chicago has a complete ban on handguns.  And there are so many gun homicides from the criminals who know that they can prey on helpless people shooting more people than are dying in our worst war zone.  310 Americans were killed in Afghanistan with a total of 405 Coalition deaths.  That compared to 532 homicides in the Democrat-owned city of Chicago.  That ought to tell you how well Democrats’ fascist power-grabs to seize all the guns will have on gun crime.

Democrat Gov. Cuomo gave a speech in which he said:

“No one hunts with an assault rifle. No one needs 10 bullets to kill a deer,” Cuomo said. “End the madness now!  […]

“Let’s lead the way once again in saving lives,” Cuomo said in an often rousing speech that some observers said better positioned the Democrat for a 2016 run for president.   […]

“New York leads the nation, it’s time New York lead the nation in this,” Silver said. His priorities are bans on assault rifles and high-capacity magazines of ammunition.

Cuomo has also specifically said he supported the confiscation of legally-purchased and owned guns.

Well, first of all, where the hell does the 2nd Amendment limit the right to keep and bear arms in order to hunt and not to be able to defend yourself???  That genuinely idiotic statement dismissed, I can also personally testify as a hunter that I have seen a fair number of hunters using “assault weapons” to hunt.  They are excellent multi-purpose weapons and in fact they are excellent deer rifles.  As for Cumo’s statement about “ten rounds,” well, on that argument Cuomo’s fascist Democrats ought to ban all weapons but flintlocks on the view that “no one needs” more than ONE bullet.

But that said, Cuomo’s speech was also idiotic in claiming that New York “leads the way” in banning guns.  Chicago leads the way in banning guns.  And if Cuomo wants people to consider the effects of his stupid and immoral and unconstitutional and frankly fascist laws, they have only to look at that city on a hill for Obama’s policies, Chicago.

Oh, we just found a new way for criminals to get guns, by the way.  They can depend on liberals who staff newspapers such as the Journal News and the leftist blog Gawker to publish the names and addresses of gun owners.  So that criminals can break into their homes and steal the guns, we now know.

You still think these demoniacs can keep guns out of criminals’ hands, do you?

What Obama is demagoguing might seem to make sense to you.  I’m sure Dianne Feinstein’s takeover of the pseudoephedrine industry made sense to you, too.

Unfortunately, what Democrats are now demagoguing on guns not only won’t work, but it will make gun crime far, FAR worse than it ever was.

Which is why so many million Americans have rushed to buy their guns before Obama the dictator takes them away.

I believe that a great many Americans realize that something bad is coming.  The sheer number of gun purchases is unreal.  I think a lot of people realize that after Obama implodes America, the Antichrist from the Bible will come.

Fascists Playing Fast And Loose With The Constitution Before They Abolish It Entirely: Since When Did The 2nd Amendment Just Allow People To HUNT?

January 11, 2013

Barack Obama said something really, really stupid while he was demonizing the so-called “assault weapons.”

He called them “weapons of war” and declared that the American people don’t need them and therefore shouldn’t be allowed to have them.  Even though he demands that his Secret Service have fully automatic machine pistols to protect him and his family and his top political advisers.

First of all, however, Obama is either ignorant or lying about the “assault weapons” being “weapons of war.”  Because no they aren’t: they are strictly semi-automatic civilian versions of “weapons of war.”  The assault rifle – after which the so-called “assault weapon” is modeled – is a weapon capable of selective fire from semi-automatic to full automatic fire.  Actual “weapons of war” have not been sold in the U.S. outside of a rare few gun dealers for generations.

The reason Democrats coined the term “assault weapons” to describe these legal, civilian versions of guns was because they knew they could use the similarity of terms (“assault rifle” vs. “assault weapons”) and deliberately confuse and conflate the two in the minds of the public.  Democrats thrive best at games of rhetorical slandering.  It is all they know how to do well, given the fact that they are clearly incapable of governing or leading when they slander their way to power.

Obama was factually lying when he called the weapons we can buy in gun stores “weapons of war.”  That is simply a fact.  And sadly, it is the consistent, characteristic tactic based on lies and half-truths that the left has chosen in its campaign to join Nazi Germany, the U.S.S.R., and the worst regimes on earth that have banned and confiscated guns.

That said, Obama’s demagogic term – “weapons of war” – was EXACTLY what the 2nd Amendment guaranteed us the right to keep and bear.  Unless you are so breathtakingly stupid that you actually believe there were different types of guns in the America of the founding fathers, and that they only allowed some and specifically forbade the “weapons of war.”

When the founding fathers said that the right to keep and bear arms was a sacred one, THEY SPECIFICALLY INTENDED THOSE ARMS TO BE “WEAPONS OF WAR.”  And the liberals who deny that fact are either abject liars – or they are just the stupid people who are infamously called “useful idiots” in their desire to naively and stupidly help fascists and tyrants.

And no lying, slandering demagogue can change that fact – even if he deceives the people into surrendering their weapons the way Hitler and Stalin and Pol Pot deceived their people into surrendering their weapons.

This brings me to the point that many other lying, dishonest Democrats have been stating: that they aren’t out to take away hunting rifles and thus somehow are preserving the 2nd Amendment if they take away every OTHER kind of gun.

The 2nd Amendment was a reaction against government tyranny in the minds of the founding fathers.  They did not want America to be a repeat of the Britain they had just won their independence from.  They wanted an armed citizenry that the government would have to fear and respect.  They wanted a people who would be capable of rising up against tyrant government.  They wanted a people capable of rising up against abuses of power.

Obama and his ilk have been trying to take us back to the status of a disarmed and therefore helpless people ever since.

Patrick Henry in 1775 said, “They tell us that we are weak — unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Three million people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us.”

Noah Webster said, “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword, because the whole of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.”

Richard Henry Lee said, “Militias, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves and include all men capable of bearing arms. To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.”

Does that sound like he meant that Americans ought to have the right to shoot at squirrels but not the right to defend themselves from the far more dangerous vermin threatening them???

John Adams said, “Arms in the hands of the citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny or private self-defense.”  Thomas Jefferson said, “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”  And if that isn’t strong enough Jefferson also said, “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms in his own lands.”

And Patrick Henry again said, “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun.”

Thomas Paine said also in 1775, “The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms like laws discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. The balance of power is the scale of peace. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside. Horrid mischief would ensue were one half the world deprived of the use of them; the weak would become a prey to the strong.”

Which is another way of saying that if you don’t want to be a victim of a criminal thug or an even worse criminal thug government, exercise your right to keep and bear arms.  And anybody who tries to take away our guns is trying to take away our freedom and our security.

Samuel Adams said, “Among the natural rights of the colonists are these: first, a right to life, secondly to liberty, thirdly to property; together with the right to defend them in the best manner they can.”  We have seen how much Democrats value human life given the fact that they have butchered more than 55 million human beings conceived in America in their abortion mills.  And we have now seen that they don’t value the right to liberty, the right to property or the right to self-defense any more than these murderers value the right to life.

And which is to therefore to say that Obama and his ilk are precisely why the founding fathers enumerated the right to keep and bear arms in the first place.  Democrats are bad people who want to take away your ability to protect yourself so they can dominate and crush you with their totalitarian government system.  Period.  And they are the worst kind of liars who deliberately distort and fabricate history to get what they want.

There have been more than a hundred million human beings who could have told you that their governments first took away their guns and then took away their lives.  But alas, their governments murdered them and their voices are forever silent until Judgment Day.  But their silent testimonies scream to every non-fascist who yearns to be free from tyranny.  And to the extent that liberals give a damn about what Hitler did to the millions of disarmed Jews he murdered, to the extent that they care about the millions of disarmed Ukranians that Stalin starved to death, to the extent they understand how many tens of millions of disarmed Chinese Chairman Mao murdered with his incompentence and malevolence in his Great Leap Forward, well, one can only conclude that they want all that to happen here, too.  Because what liberals most cherish is the ideal of the American people being cowed and defenseless against giant government.

The founding fathers framed the right to keep and bear arms as a moral issue: you have a God-given right to defend yourself, your family, your home and your place of business.  Anybody who would try to take that right from you is an immoral person.  Liberals also frame gun control as a moral issue; but on their “morality” government is God, and if your god wants to deprive you and your family of liberty and life, you are an immoral person for wanting to have any means to protect yourselves from the State.  But they dishonestly bait-and-switch that their real moral argument with a different pseudo-argument: that guns kill people and if we take away the guns people won’t kill people.

It’s a lie no matter how you slice it.  Did you know that, “With just one single exception, the attack on congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson in 2011, every public shooting since at least 1950 in the U.S. in which more than three people have been killed has taken place where citizens are not allowed to carry guns”?????  Did you know that the Aurora, Colorado psycho who went to town in the movie theater chose the only movie theater among the seven that were close to him (he actually drove by movie theaters to get to his target!) that had been designated as a gun free zone???  Did you know that the states and the cities with the tightest gun control laws  lead the nation in gun crime???   Go to Obama’s and Rahm Emanuel’s Chicago and tell me what life is like there.  Why on earth do you think taking away guns from law-abiding people would do anything other than embolden the criminals and murderers to prey on the helpless victims???

The day that Obama succeeds in taking away your right to guns is the day that you declare that you, your spouse and your children do not deserve to live.  Because it will be the day that you agree with Obama that rather than being a human being with the God-given right of self-defense, you are nothing more than a farm animal – and if the government decides it is time to cull the herd, then off to the slaughter house you will meekly go.

Obama believes that only he and his family merit protection with guns.  The rest of you herd animals don’t deserve it.  The Journal News that published the names and addresses of gun owners along with a map showing how to get to their homes afterward decided that while the rest of the meat animals don’t have a right to be defended with guns, they do.  And they hired armed security like the hypocrite fascists that they as liberals are.

I made the point that liberals (a.k.a. fascists) have been playing fast and loose with the Constitution before they abolish it entirely.  Consider the recent liberal law professor from liberal Georgetown University who called on America to scrap its “archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil” Constitution.  Consider the Obama judge who ruled that the Constitution doesn’t give Americans the right to bear guns even though the 2nd Amendment very definitely says “keep and bear.”  The Constitution is merely an inconvenient document that needs to be thrown aside for the left to exalt in the power it seeks over the people.  Consider the incredible attitude that liberal justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has toward the Constitution.  Consider the cynical and manipulative attitude the collectivist Supreme Court liberals have displayed toward the Constitution.  Consider the mocking attitude that Democrats repeatedly displayed toward the Constitution in their ramming ObamaCare down the now-collectivist American throat.  Consider that Democrats don’t believe that their right to power by regulating the people has ANY constitutional limits.  Consider the Democrats who went on record boycotting the U.S. Constitution.  Consider how Democrats demand that government grow larger and more powerful and that religion grow smaller and more marginal when our founding fathers demanded the exact opposite.  Consider the abject dishonesty and hypocrisy of Democrats for refusing to allow ANY ID checks for voting so illegals can vote Democrat but demand restrictions up the whazoo for those who wish to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights.  Consider that whereas our Declaration of Independence clearly says that all of our rights and liberties are based on GOD, Democrats actually took God out of their party’s platform last year.  Which is to state that Democrats declared that God has nothing whatsoever to do with the rights they want to take away from the American people or the new “rights” they want to impose on the American people.  Consider that similarly, Obama demands the government-forced redistribution of wealth whereas our founding fathers had said, “Over our dead bodies!”  And consider Obama’s dismissive attitude toward the Constitution as a flawed document by deeply flawed people.  And realize that our Constitution is headed for the dung pile of history as Democrats who have already largely killed the tree of liberty by a death of a thousand cuts are now increasingly demanding that the dead husk of that tree be chopped down once and for all.

If Obama really wanted to deal with gun violence, he would come clean on what happened in Benghazi, Libya where the first American ambassador since Jimmy Carter was screwing up the planet was murdered along with the three other Americans who died trying to keep him alive.  If Obama really wanted to deal with gun violence, he would finally explain why his government ordered thousands of the very assault weapons he most demonizes to be placed in the hands of drug cartel killers in Mexico.  The fact of the matter is that Obama doesn’t give a damn about gun violence; he just wants to finally end the ability of the American people to protect and defend themselves against his next wave of fascist abrogation of the Constitution and the American way of life.

Democrats’ goal is to make certain that you are powerless and helpless against the coming Antichrist.  Obama’s most cherished goal is, to put it in Orwellian terms, “a government boot stomping on a human face forever.”

The Perilous Times St. Paul Prophesied In The Last Days Have Come: Sandy Hook Murderer Adam Lanza Worshiped Satan

December 20, 2012

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.  For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.  — 2 Timothy 3:1-5

And we’re there.

Adam was the first man, of course.  Adam Lanza is the first man of Obama’s “fundamental transformation” of America.

Some interesting facts about Adam Lanza:

‘I am the devil’: Former classmate reveals school gunman had ‘online devil worshiping page’ as childhood barber recounts how he never spoke and just stared at floors
By Meghan Keneally and Rachel Quigley
PUBLISHED:11:05 EST, 19 December 2012| UPDATED: 11:51 EST, 19 December 2012

The Sandy Hook gunman worshiped the devil and had an online page dedicated to Satan, a former classmate revealed, as his childhood barber recalls Adam Lanza never spoke and would stare at the floor every time he had his hair cut.   Lanza’s worshiping page had the word ‘Devil’ written in red, Gothic-style letters against a black background, Trevor L. Todd told The National Enquirer, something which he said was ‘weird’ and ‘gave him the chills’.

The FBI are trying to piece together his smashed up hard drive to see if his online footprint will reveal any motive for the killing, but they strongly believe he made use of devil-worshiping and suicide sites and boasted of his murder plans on message forums.

Don’t worry, though.  Democrats – which means “Demonic Bureaucrats” – will never turn their back on Lucifer.  Which is why they are working so hard now to demagogue so-called “assualt weapons” and guns in general.

It frankly doesn’t matter if the “I am the devil” part of this story turns out to be another media-generated dead-end.  St. Paul would have taken one look at this pathetic little punk and at the violent video game world he lived in and said, “Yep.  That’s what I tried to warn you about, all right.”

This passage chilled my soul:

Cutting Adam Lanza’s hair ‘was a very long half an hour. It was a very uncomfortable situation,’ stylist Diane Harty said. She said that she never heard his voice and that Nancy Lanza also hardly spoke.

Another stylist, Jessica Phillips, echoed their descriptions of the Lanzas and added that Nancy Lanza would give her son directions about what to do and where to go.

Adam would move only ‘when his mother told him to,’ Skuba said.

‘I would say, “Adam, come on.” He wouldn’t move,’ Skuba said.

‘And his mother would have to say, “Adam, come on, he’s ready.” It was like I was invisible.’

He said Adam also wouldn’t move from his chair after his hair was cut until his mother told him to.

If a stylist would ask Adam a question, Skuba said, his mother would answer.

‘He would just be looking down at the tiles … the whole time,’ Skuba said.

This product of the perilous times of the last days was a time bomb, just biding its time and waiting to go off like Michael waiting for his “Friday the 13th” moment.

The same psychologists who decided out of political correctness that homosexuals are just as “normal” as everybody else have also decided out of the same sense of political correctness that there is no such category as “evil.”  Unless guns are mentioned, that is.

If guns are evil, they should be kept out of the hands of the police and the military.  Forget the fact that this demonic turd killed himself only when people who could shoot back showed up.  And forget the fact that the areas with the strictest gun control laws have the highest crime rates because predators always target the helpless just the way that Adam Lanza targeted helpless children in an unarmed environment in a strict gun control state.  So you just forget the fact that Oama’s “model city on the hill” in Chicago has the very strictest gun control laws in the entire nation to go with the highest murder rate in the nation.

“Gun-free zones” are a synonym for “target-rich environments.”  And liberals – as always – are wicked in their stupidity and stupid in their wickedness.

Why not ban the überliberalmobile otherwise known as the Toyota Prius which is being revealed as a death trap?  Why not ban kitchen knives ?  I mean, has society learned nothing from the O.J. Simpson case?  Why not ban pieces of wood that could be used as clubs?  Why isn’t there a federal law requiring that all forks have corks to cover those incredibly dangerous prongs?

Biden_Ruprecht

Come ON, America!  Let’s finally deal with all of these murder weapons once and for all:

Murder weapons

The fact of the matter is that guns AREN’T evil; they are used for good as much as they are used for evil.  The problem is that PEOPLE are evil.  If you’ve got yourself set to try to ban anything, please ban yourself.

The problem is that liberalism has so completely depraved society that more people than ever are genuinely evil.  Thanks to liberalism, man is now merely an animal, the mindless and amoral product of random chance evolution.  Thanks to liberalism, society now believes there is no soul and there is no God who created man in His own image and will one day hold man accountable for his conduct on earth with hell.  Thanks to liberalism, humans are now merely things that have no intrinsic value and which can therefore be exterminated by the tens of millions in the abortion mills.  Compare the twenty little children who were murdered last week with an assault weapon to the fifty-five million babies who had their entire lives and futures stolen from them with abortion and explain to me why you have no tears and no heart and no compassion for those fifty-five million innocent babies.  It is insane; and it is an insanity that has warped and depraved our culture.  Thanks to liberalism, not only have mothers become murderers of their own babies, but fatherhood is dead.  Just what is a “father”?  Biologically, he’s a man who conceived a child.  But under the demonic doctrine of abortion, there is no such thing; because whatever you want to call the fetus that was conceived between a man and a woman, it is NOT a child.  It is an inanimate and lifeless lump of goop which has no value and no rights as a human being.  If a “father” loves his child and wants to hold that child in his arms, his will is utterly irrelevant in our liberal abortion culture that celebrates a demonic feminism that hates children as some kind of parasite.  Fatherhood is irrelevant in this toxic product of liberalism; and you wonder why men refuse to stay around the non-human lumps of goop just because their mothers decided not to murder them after all?  Thanks to liberalism, the government has decided that a “family” is a completely meaningless and arbitrary category that can be redefined as liberals see fit: marriage is dead, having been depraved by homosexuality, and in the same way when two homosexual men can adopt a child and inflict their broken lives on that kid and call themselves a family, family simply becomes another meaningless convention that is no longer worth preserving.

Joseph Stalin said:

“One death is a tragedy; one million is a statistic.”

And American liberals – the true intellectual inheritors of Stalin’s big government as replacement of God – are now telling us that twenty deaths are a tragedy and fifty-five million deaths is just a statistic.

As John MacArthur rightly pointed out, the Democrat Platform today comes right out of Romans chapter one.  And thus the Democrat Party demands one thing: for the wrath of God to be revealed (Romans 1:18).

Abraham Lincoln ended his most famous speech with the following words:

… that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Thanks to liberalism, America is no longer a nation one God.

Thanks to liberalism, America is now a nation that deserves to perish from the earth.

And the selfsame same liberals who brought us to this point of perilous times are cynically exploiting the morality-free secular humanist vacuum they created.  They are exploiting the monsters they’ve created to pervert our culture with still more liberal solutions.

I think of modern American liberalism and I think of Chairman Mao at his very most ideological:

LEE EDWARDS, CHAIRMAN, VICTIMS OF COMMUNISM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: In 1959 to 1961 was the so-called “great leap forward” which was actually a gigantic leap backwards in which he tried to collectivize and communize agriculture.

And they came to him after the first year and they said, “Chairman, five million people have died of famine.” He said, “No matter, keep going.” In the second year, they came back and they said, “Ten million Chinese have died.” He said, “No matter, continue.” The third year, 20 million Chinese have died. And he said finally, “Well, perhaps this is not the best idea that I’ve ever had.”

CHANG: When he was told that, you know, his people were dying of starvation, Mao said, “Educate the peasants to eat less. Thus they can benefit – they can fertilize the land.”

Only our liberals are seemingly pathologically incapable of ever experiencing that moment Mao finally saw where he finally said, “Well, perhaps this is not the best idea I’ve ever had.”  All of the ideas of American liberals are perfection; it is circumstances which just somehow happen to thwart them every single time.  Obama deceitfully promised four years of blessing under his regime; he has given us the precise opposite.  And all Obama has offered is blame and demagoguery and demonization and fearmongering to explain why his presidency has been a catastrophic failure and cancer.

Fifty-five million dead babies are excellent fertilizer, I suppose.

But it sure doesn’t appear that God is blessing our farmland as a result of out depraved wickedness.  The condition of our crops is now the worst since the government began keeping records in 1985.

We are now a nation of endless drought – with the withholding of rain being a key Old Testament sign that a nation has entered divine judgment.

We can be like the godless Soviet Union which before its collapse blamed its complete crop failure on seventy-two years of bad weather.  If you think that it’s inconceivable that American politicians could be as mindlessly incapable of understanding their role in the failure of their nation, realize that Obama has already followed that rhetorical tactic.

The night that Barack Obama and his demonic agenda were elected to the White House, I wrote “Obama Wins!  God Damn America!” And God has damned this perverted nation, indeed.

I think of Obama demonizing George Bush for “adding $4 trillion by his lonesome” over 8 years when this lying demonic demagogue has now added more than $6 trillion in merely four years.  I think of the Obama who demonized and slandered George Bush for trying to raise the debt ceiling who is now so incredibly deceitfully and hypocritically trying to slander Republicans for trying to in ANY WAY interfere with what he seems to believe is his messianic right to be “given the authority to raise the debt ceiling whenever he wants.”

And I lower my head in shame to think that this nation so wickedly voted to re-elect this lying, slandering hypocrite.

Meanwhile our actual debt has soared to well over $222 trillion and rose by $11 trillion just from last year alone.  And it is a FACT that the Democrat Party is responsible for over 99 percent of that staggering, insane, depraved, unpayable and unsustainable debt.

Obama has never led; he has merely found new ways to demagogue his political opponents and further and further divide America.  We’re about to fall off the fiscal cliff and Obama has completely failed to lead because he prefers that we DO go off the cliff so he can further demonize his opponents and politically benefit by further dividing America in order to seize another fractured piece of the electorate.  But that’s okay; Obama has a new tragedy that happened under his watch to exploit.  The mantra of fascism is “Never let a crisis go to waste.”

Christians are not supposed to hate their enemies, but let there be no mistake: liberals ARE our enemies.  Big government liberals of today are as much enemies of Jesus Christ as were the big government Romans who crucified Him and who thrust a spear through His heart while He hung on the cross.