Posts Tagged ‘Bill of Rights’

Democrats (DEMOnic beauroCRATS) Ignited National Violence So They Could Cynically Exploit Crisis To Destroy 2nd Amendment

June 20, 2016

On 9/11/2001, Muslim terrorists hijacked three passenger jets with the intent of murdering as many Americans as possible.  Two of the planes slammed into the World Trade Center, ultimately bringing the twin towers down and murdering three thousand Americans.  The third struck the Pentagon.  A fourth jet was brought down by the desperate, heroic passengers that would have hit either the Capitol Building when Congress was in session or the White House itself.

According to the Democratic Party, apparently we should have blamed passenger jets and banned them.

Similarly, there is a rising incidence of automobiles being used as deadly weapons in terror attacks.  In December of last year, a woman screaming “Allahu Akbar!!!” intentionally drove an Oldsmobile onto a sidewalk in Las Vegas and mowed down forty people.  Just a few days ago, a man driving a Chevy pickup truck killed five bicyclists and injured four others in Kalamazoo.

According to Hillary Clinton’s theory on gun manufacturers, General Motors should be sued and put out of business.

Vote Democrat.  Walk the rest of your miserable life.  And don’t even THINK about riding a damn horse.  Horses produce methane and methane is a global warming gas.  And hence evil.

I’d personally be okay with banning guns.  As long as we started by disarming Barack Obama’s and Hillary Clinton’s security details and worked our way down from there.

Liberals are like roaches in many sundry ways, one of which is that you can safely know they will be the last ones with guns because only they alone are entitled to protection.  I’m pretty sure they’d keep their limousines and their terrorist-inducing and smog-spewing private jets, too.  Especially Hillary’s husband Bill, who very clearly loved flying with a convicted pedophile on his private jet to an island of sex with underage children.

Democrats are terrifying people today.  I’m literally more frightened of them than I am of the terrorists.  Because the terrorists can’t take away my rights or my freedoms and the terrorists can’t impose a totalitarian state on me; only DEMOnic beauroCRATS can do these things.

Today, people who love freedom and love our Constitution and its Bill of Rights stare on in horror as the Democrat Party goes to virtually every single event of the presumptive Republican nominee with the intent to suppress the American peoples’ right to free speech and to peaceably assemble to hear that speech.  And at the same time DEMOnic beauroCRATS do this – meeting the objective definition of fascist – they are out to seize the means of protecting ourselves and our households against ALL forms of tyranny that our Constitution enshrined.

Chicago just had an anniversary; they are celebrating their 300th homicide:

CHICAGO — Chicago recorded its 300th homicide this weekend and tallied six others over a 60-hour period that saw 55 people shot, 13 fatally, from Friday afternoon through early Monday morning.

So far this year, close to 1,800 people have been shot across the city and more than 200 of those wounded have died from their wounds, according to records kept by the Chicago Tribune. A total of 306 people have been killed this year, by shooting, stabbing or other means.

Happy Father’s Day, Democrat-Party-machine-run Chicago!!!  This Democrat Party bastion is on it’s way to breaking the record of 3,000 homicide victims a year.

And what should we do?  Well, Democrats say we should make the rest of the nation just like this demonic, psychotic hellhole of liberalism.  Because even the New York Times is forced to point out this fact:

Strict Gun Laws in Chicago Can’t Stem Fatal Shots
By MONICA DAVEYJAN. 29, 2013

CHICAGO — Not a single gun shop can be found in this city because they are outlawed. Handguns were banned in Chicago for decades, too, until 2010, when the United States Supreme Court ruled that was going too far, leading city leaders to settle for restrictions some describe as the closest they could get legally to a ban without a ban. Despite a continuing legal fight, Illinois remains the only state in the nation with no provision to let private citizens carry guns in public.

And yet Chicago, a city with no civilian gun ranges and bans on both assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, finds itself laboring to stem a flood of gun violence that contributed to more than 500 homicides last year and at least 40 killings already in 2013, including a fatal shooting of a 15-year-old girl on Tuesday.

The second one CAUSED the first one.  I know, liberals are Nazis who want to tell us that unless and until every Jew is hunted down, the danger remains, and therefore it’s other states that are to blame for THEIR gun violence (but… but if guns in other states cause violence, WHY THE HELL AREN’T THOSE STATES BLEEDING IN THE SAME VICIOUS VIOLENCE???).  The fact is that when guns are outlawed, they become a precious commodity and the means to power.  But since you have to be a criminal to obtain that means to power; ONLY THE CRIMINALS HAVE POWER.

Germany has THE strictest gun laws in the world.  Too bad that doesn’t stop the terrorists from getting guns.  Just had an attack at a German movie theater today.

When you have a “murder capitol,” it is ALWAYS a Democrat city and I mean ALWAYS:  In the 80s, the “murder capital” was Democrat Detroit, in the 90s it was Democrat D.C., in the 2000s it was Democrat New Orleans, and in the 2010s its been Democrat Flint.

Did you know this “more than half” fact that shouldn’t be a surprise to any decent American?

A new study from the Brennan Center for Justice reveals the murder rate rose by more than 13 percent in the 25 biggest cities in America in 2015 – and the common denominator among the three cities that “account for more than half” this hike is they’re run by Democrats who impose hefty gun controls on the populace.

Baltimore, Chicago and Washington, D.C., three Democratic political fixtures, are responsible for more than half the 13.3 percent hike of gun-related murders seen in the nation’s largest cities last year, and the fault lies with local policy, rather than national influence, the Brennan Center said.

How about another interesting fact about “gun violence” in America:

Did you know that of all the “gun violence” in America, seventy-seven percent of all deaths are SUICIDES???  Yes, more than three out of every four “gun violence” deaths are SUICIDES.  Now, combine that factoid with another factoid, that every single state with “right to die laws” in this country is Democrat:

On Oct. 5, 2015, California became the 4th state to legalize “assisted suicide,” following Oregon, Washington and Vermont — all “blue” states.

The Democrat Party is THE PARTY of suicide.  Everybody who truly hates themselves ought to be a Democrat.

So frankly, not only should guns not be a “bogeyman” for the left; they ought to be a welcome tool of release from the misery of life that Democrats in all other forms are doing everything possible to help free people from.  I mean, if these people had so much as a molecule of integrity in them.

But what do Demonic Bureaucrats do, being pathologically dishonest, slandering, fearmongering demagogues?  Why, they smuggle the very suicides THAT THEY CHERISH into their category of “gun violence” in obvious attempt to artificially incite fear in people.  Because if you are a DEMOnic burueaCRAT a.k.a. Democrat, you are a demonic liar without shame, honor, virtue, integrity or decency of any kind.  It is simply your nature to impose as much fascist evil as you can on as many people as you can.  And it frankly doesn’t matter how much of a twisted, pathologically dishonest hypocrite you have to be to accomplish your mission to force your government-as-god on a people who USED to have a Constitution to protect them from your vile ilk.

We find that this swath of ACTUAL gun violence is ALMOST ENTIRELY DEMOCRAT.

We find that Barack Obama gave birth to the most vile bowel movements in modern history, such as “Black Lies Matter” which boos anyone claiming that any other life matters (you know, like white people).  There is not one single Democrat on earth who will say “white lives matter.”  Not ONE.  Meanwhile the Democrat Party has initiated vicious riots in Democrat-owned-and-operated cities like Ferguson, Baltimore and New York.  And Democrats gave birth to the evil hellspawn otherwise known as “the Ferguson Effect,” in which local law enforcement has been intimidated out of doing their jobs for fear of being arrested and prosecuted and destroyed by liberals:

It’s all really quite simple. Cops and criminals alike are rational actors, weighing the potential risks and rewards of any contemplated action. When police officers on the street spot someone whose behavior is indicative of possible lawbreaking, they know that initiating a stop carries the risk of an altercation that may not unfold in a manner approved by cowardly superiors, rabble-rousing “community activists,” craven politicians, or perhaps even the president. Against that risk he weighs the benefits of driving on by and finishing his shift on time and in one piece, and without having played the villain in some new YouTube sensation.
And as for that possible lawbreaker, he feels the officer’s eyes on him as the police car slows in the street. But rather than stop, it drives on by, allowing him to continue on his way and complete whatever misdeeds he may have been considering. Multiply that scenario by the hundreds and thousands across the country and you have the conditions we see today in many cities: Crime is up, arrests are down.

“The Ferguson Effect” was began by an INNOCENT COP WHO DID NOTHING WRONG being abandoned by his own due to Democrat rioting.  Good cops are getting prosecuted for doing their jobs.  So they quit doing their jobs and they stay in their cars.  And criminals run rampant.  Especially in Democratic cities where ONLY THE CRIMINALS HAVE GUNS.

In Baltimore, liberals tried to literally lynch six police officers for doing their job.  Three officers have had their trials and three officers have been found entirely innocent.  Claims by the riot-igniting left, such as the infamous “rough ride” that Democrats used to incite riots, was a complete and total fabrication.  Video proved the exact OPPOSITE of liberal lies to have been the truth, with video proving the officer rolled through stops to avoid hard stops and made wide turns to cut down centrifigul force.  We also know that the liberal ideologue masquerading as Baltimore State’s Attorney illegally withheld evidence that exonerated the officers, and that the victim Freddie Gray killed himself trying to manufacture an injury so he could sue the police.

Even the Obama “Department of Justice” that in actual fact is the Department of INjustice acknowledges that “the Ferguson Effect” liberalism created is at the core of the skyrocketing surge of violence in America’s cities (see also here).

But what do we get?  An acknowledgment that liberal policies lead to horror?  NEVER.  Rather, they demand that every single American live in terror praying that Obama will descend from the heavenly heights of government and deliver them.  And Democrats are jealous about their god, and ye shall have no other gods before Government.

Only government ought to have guns, these true believers tell us.

Even as they have done absolutely EVERYTHING they possibly could to delegitimize local police departments.  Because what Democrats really want is brutally obvious: they want a Nazi-style Gestapo; they want a Soviet-style NKVD, a People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs.

Socialist Democrats who worship the State want the exact same thing that the most horrific regimes in human history wanted; and they are literally following the EXACT same script to obtain that evil result.  They confiscate the right of the people to have guns and defend themselves and protect themselves and their property from all forms of tyranny, and then they create the worst form of tyranny of all as the State becomes the brutal oppressor of human freedom.

Consider that if I can’t have a gun to protect myself; and if my local police department can’t be trusted to do its job, what the hell is left?  A national police force, that’s what.  A police force that an Obama can use the same vile way he used his IRS as an Internal Revenge Service to target conservatives.

And Democrats are literally exploiting the very violence THAT THEY CREATED to get what they want.

I think of the sheer hypocrisy and wickedness of socialism and the utter devastation this form of idiotic economics has on the people and in particular the poor and working class people whose lives suck the most whenever socialists are in power.  I think of the pressure that these poor and working class people are placed under due to this failed economic system.  I think of Venezuela where people are literally on the verge of starvation and the grocery store shelves are empty and I think of the fact that Hugo Chavez’ daughter is for some bizarre reason the richest individual in that incredibly socialist and ergo sum incredibly corrupt country.  I think of the fact that Hillary Clinton told us that they were “dead broke” when they left the White House, and now – after having used official government corruption to milk hundreds of millions of dollars from taxpayers and from corporations in return for selling America to the highest bidder, we have a similar system at work here.  I think of last month’s jobs report in which 38,000 jobs were added but HALF A MILLION PEOPLE GAVE UP IN DESPAIR OF EVER FINDING A DAMN JOB.  And so amazingly the unemployment rate actually went DOWN because it is a damn sick, twisted and frankly obscene JOKE.  I think of the fact that nearly 100,000 working-age Americans aren’t working and I think of the fact that our labor participation rate is the worst in very nearly forty years.  And I realize that Obama and Hillary Clinton are purely and simply hell on earth to anybody who ever wants to have any hope of earning an honest living.  And these DEMOnic bureauCRAT roaches have driven the American people to a level of rate and bitterness and despair that we have frankly never seen.

And Obama hasn’t merely failed us domestically and the Democrat Party isn’t merely inciting anti-Constitution and anti-America violence for our domestic violence; they have failed us globally and they are inciting their global failure to obtain the hell that they want.

At the current rate of expansion, by the time Barack Obama leaves office, terrorist deaths will have skyrocketed by over one-thousand seven-hundred percent.  That is a fact. When you look at the giant jump in terrorist killings between 2012-13 and 2014-15 – to the tune of a DOUBLING of deaths caused by terrorism – we can consider the trend and safely estimate that terrorism will create 60,000 deaths by the 2016-2017 statistic when it is released.  Which is to say that by the time Obama leaves office, he will be personally responsible for a 1,700=plus percent increase in terrorist killings during his watch. Terrorism has exploded exponentially every year since Obama utterly ignored the warnings of ALL Of his generals and decided to unilaterally withdraw from Iraq AFTER we had stabilized that country and gave the terrorists a safe-haven.  All we had to do was remain there with the same kind of force that we kept in Germany and Japan and South Korea after stabilizing those countries.  But Obama wouldn’t have it; he instead determined to cut-and-run while his generals pleaded with him in the name of common-sense and decency to remain where we could keep secure what we had fought to freeThese generals warned and accurately predicted what would happen if Obama’s fool plan was put in motion, just as President Bush had warned EXACTLY what would happen.  This is the process called “the scientific method,” where you predict what will happen and then what you predicted happens exactly as you predicted.  Versus Barack Obama and the Democratic Party, which was demonically wrong in their predictions.  In the very same way, Obama catastrophically gave a “red line” warning to Syria and then cowardly and pathetically refused to make good on his own words and so allowed Syria to similarly fall into the power of a terrorist army that basically didn’t exist until his degenerate presidency gave it life.  And so Islamic State now has the first terrorist caliphate in the history of the world.

Now, what SHOULD we have done with Islamic State?  We should have CRUSHED them and forced them to realize that their god Allah had abandoned them to a fate of being exterminated like the roaches they are.  Instead, Obama did NOTHING but dither and then dither some more while calling these terrorists who were OWNING HIS SKINNY ASS “JayVee” even as they seized major cities across the Arab world.  And oh, yes, you demon-possessed Democrat liars, Obama DID call Islamic State “JayVee” because he lied about the reality of this vicious terrorist threat as it metasticized and he ordered those at the top of the intelligence food chain to produce lies that substantiated HIS outright treasonous lies:

More than 50 intelligence analysts working out of the U.S. military’s Central Command have formally complained that their reports on ISIS and al Qaeda’s branch in Syria were being inappropriately altered by senior officials, The Daily Beast has learned.

The complaints spurred the Pentagon’s inspector general to open an investigation into the alleged manipulation of intelligence. The fact that so many people complained suggests there are deep-rooted, systemic problems in how the U.S. military command charged with the war against the self-proclaimed Islamic State assesses intelligence.

“The cancer was within the senior level of the intelligence command,” one defense official said.

Two senior analysts at CENTCOM signed a written complaint sent to the Defense Department inspector general in July alleging that the reports, some of which were briefed to President Obama, portrayed the terror groups as weaker than the analysts believe they are. The reports were changed by CENTCOM higher-ups to adhere to the administration’s public line that the U.S. is winning the battle against ISIS and al Nusra, al Qaeda’s branch in Syria, the analysts claim.

That complaint was supported by 50 other analysts, some of whom have complained about politicizing of intelligence reports for months. That’s according to 11 individuals who are knowledgeable about the details of the report and who spoke to The Daily Beast on condition of anonymity.

The accusations suggest that a large number of people tracking the inner workings of the terror groups think that their reports are being manipulated to fit a public narrative. […]

And look at the result of Obama’s catastrophic failure!

UN warns of ‘record high’ 60 million displaced amid expanding global conflicts

18 June 2015 – The international community is experiencing a dramatic shift in the situation facing the world’s refugees as a global surge in war, conflict and persecution has caused a record number of people to flee their homes in search of safety, the United Nations refugee agency reported today.

According to data gathered by Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) over the course of 2014, the number of people forcibly displaced during the reporting year swelled to a staggering 59.5 million people compared to the 51.2 million from the previous year. The figures, collected by the UN agency for its latest Global Trends: World at War, suggest that one in every 122 humans is now either a refugee, internally displaced, or seeking asylum. If this were the population of a country, says UNHCR, it would be the world’s 24th largest.

“We are witnessing a paradigm change, an unchecked slide into an era in which the scale of global forced displacement as well as the response required is now clearly dwarfing anything seen before,” UN High Commissioner for Refugees António Guterres declared in a press release issued earlier today and marking the report’s release.

“It is terrifying that on the one hand there is more and more impunity for those starting conflicts, and on the other there is seeming utter inability of the international community to work together to stop wars and build and preserve peace,” he added.

Do you comprehend this?  SIXTY MILLION REFUGEES are wandering around utterly displaced and without anything because Barack Obama ignited the world on FIRE with his catastrophic failure to lead or to have a strategy that had anything whatsoever to do with actual REALITY.

And what does Barack Obama and Hilary Clinton want to do with these sixty million Muslim refugees?  Do they want to make the Arab world safe for these people so they can go back to their homes?  NO!!! THEY WANT TO BRING THEM HERE!!!

Even though our FBI and our intelligence agencies say that there is no possible way that we can properly vet these people who are coming here with no documents and where no documents are even reliable.

Obama and Hillary Clinton and Democrats are trying to create a morally- and rationally-horrific thing called “reverse profiling” in which if you are a Muslim, YOU CAN’T BE INVESTIGATED.  Does it matter than 99.999999 percent of terrorist acts in this world are perpetuated by Muslims???  OF COURSE IT DOESN’T.

We go back to 2009 when Obama’s regime issued a bizarre report in which he demonized not only conservatives but veterans as potential terrorists.  And Obama has been demonically steadfast to brand his political opponents as the real terrorists even as his administration fails to protect us from the ACTUAL TERRORISTS.  Obama and his demonic priests and priestesses keep telling us that in spite of the overwhelming number of Islamic terror attacks it’s only the political right of this country that is actually a threat.

Demon-possessed people – we call them “DEMOCRATS” which again is short form for “DEMOnic beauroCRATS” – tell pollsters with the straight faces of the wicked-stupid that terrorism isn’t the problem; its our Constitution; it’s our Bill of Rights; it’s our 2nd Amendment; it’s our right of the people to keep and bear arms.  Because apparently guns never existed before Obama and it’s a tragedy that these tools of murder that no one has ever used for any other purpose BUT murder have tarnished Obama’s otherwise messianic legacy.

Obama and Hillary Clinton don’t want to wage war on “terrorism” (which they with their “magic words” re-labeled “overseas contingency operations.”  They don’t want to deal with acts of terror (which with their magic words they re-labeled “man-caused disasters.”  No, they want to wage war against the Constitution of the United States of America.

And that is what makes Democrats far more dangerous than any terrorist who ever lived.

I’ll shoot a damn terrorist or a damn criminal; unless a Barack Obama or a Hillary Clinton take away my right to be safe.

It comes down to this: Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton both have the identical same goal: “to degrade and ultimately to destroy” the Constitution of the United States of America.   Informed people will see that Obama actually spoke those words about Islamic State.  But he has done NOTHING to either destroy OR degrade Islamic State.  His very own handpicked CIA Director just stated that Islamic State is more dangerous and and virulent than EVER BEFORE.  There are now more than 65.3 MILLION crisis-displaced refugees with nowhere to go because Obama has catastrophically done NOTHING but yammer and blather and lie and slander.  We’ve never seen anything like this in the history of the entire human race and Democrats look you in the eye and tell you Obama has succeeded!!!?  His generals have stated over and over again Obama has and never HAS had ANY strategy whatsoever – and that terrifying fact remains true to this very day – to deal with what will become a not only civilization-ending threat but literally a human-race ending threat the moment they get their hands on nuclear weapons.  Because you rest assured that these monsters have already more than demonstrated that they will gleefully use them to exterminate hundreds of millions of people and ignite word war three because their stated goal is what the Bible prophesied as “Armageddon.”  Obama has done NOTHING but wildly fail against a threat he once with the stunning foolishness never before in history witnessed in a leader labeled as “JayVee.”  But guns?  But the 2nd Amendment?  Obama has gone ALL OUT in his war with our founding fathers (whom he slandered as “blind”), with our Constitution, with our very way of life.

Understand Obama and Hillary are following the socialist paths of Mao and Stalin and Hitler: and in order to follow that path, the people must be rendered incapable of resistance.

And THAT is the REAL “strategy” of Obama, of Hillary, of the Democrat Party: the strategy that will lead to Antichrist and to the Mark of the Beast.

 

 

My Response To Liberals About Gun Control (It’s Really Conservatives Who Ought To Read It, Though).

July 31, 2012

Liberals can’t understand why anyone would want an “assault weapon” (which many literally think is a fully automatic machine gun rather than the completely SEMI-automatic version of the military assault rifles which are actually of a fairly lightweight caliber).

“You don’t need one of those to hunt,” they’ll say.  As if they think rightwing Republicans are all like Jed Clampett out in the woods “shootin at some food.”

Obama says, “AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals.”  Let’s leave aside the fact that the AK-47s that actually ARE in the hands of soldiers are capable of fully automatic fire – which documents that Obama is one of the demagogues who are deliberately trying to confuse and mislead the American people into banning guns that have ALREADY been banned so he can fool them into supporting new restrictions on their constitutional rights.  Another couple of questions arise: 1) Does Obama not know which military he commands?  Because in point of fact only COMMUNIST soldiers use AK-47s.  Have his Marxist economic policies left him confused, or is he simply that astonishingly ignorant about this issue he’s lecturing us about?  2) A further thing that leaves me scratching my head is why Obama thinks that gun laws are going to keep guns out of the hands of criminals GIVEN THE FACT THAT “CRIMINALS” ARE THE ONLY PEOPLE BY DEFINITION WHO DON’T OBEY DAMN LAWS.  This takes us to the dilemma that if you criminalize guns, only criminals will end up having them.  Which is why in actual FACT liberal cities are far more violent than conservative cities.  Especially the cities like Chicago that have the most restrictive gun laws which prevent law-abiding people from protecting themselves.  And the only way to actually “ban” all of these “AK-47s” is to kick down every single damn door in America to confiscate them in what would be the most tyrannous day in the entire history of the republic (and keep reading to see below for WHY we have a right to keep and bear arms in the first place).

The reality is that the so-called “assault weapons” are excellent multi-purpose rifles, and many people who don’t have unlimited money particularly like these weapons for their multiple uses: you can use them for hunting; you can use them for home defense; you can use them to protect your rights as an American citizen against any who would seek to take those rights away; and boy are they ever fun to use for target shooting.  That’s what my dad would call a “four-fer.”  And add to all of that the fact that they are designed to be light weight.  If I weren’t a rich liberal like the ones who are trying to take away our ability to protect ourselves while they drive around in armored cars with their armed security details, and I could only afford to buy one gun, I would want an assault weapon.

I’d like to see a garden-variety liberal try to protect their property from a mob of looters during a riot with the sort of guns they say everyone should be limited to.  The term “neo-conservative” refers to “liberals who have been mugged by reality.”  If you are one of the people who have been forced to protect what you have spent your life building from those who want to take it away from you and burn what they leave behind, and when you look through the smoke there are no police around to protect you, then you are one of the people who understand that “assault weapons” have a very useful purpose, indeed.

Many of your self-considered “broadly tolerant” liberals believe that the 2nd Amendment only applies to the black powder smoothbore muskets that were in vogue the day the Constitution was signed.  Of course, there are plenty of liberals who would eagerly take even THOSE away from us.  The fact of the matter is that those black powder smoothbores that every American was not only allowed to have but encouraged to have when the Constitution was written were the most modern military firearms available at the time.  And the fact of the matter is that the 2nd Amendment – and think for a second why it would be the second most important thing the founding fathers believed in after they considered freedom of religion and freedom of speech – was a reaction against government tyranny.  The founding fathers wanted the government to fear the people rather than for the people to fear the government – which has as a matter of documented historical FACT been a terrible consequent of many states that have taken away the right to keep and bear arms.

Which is why James Madison said, “Americans have the right and advantage of being armed – unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.”

Which is why James Madison also said, “Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation. . . Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.”

Which is why Noah Webster said, “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.”

Which is why Alexander Hamilton said, “…but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights…”

Which is why Alexander Hamilton also said, “The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.”

Which is why Richard Henry Lee said, “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike especially when young, how to use them.”

Which is why Patrick Henry said, “The great object is that every man be armed” and “everyone who is able may have a gun.”

Which is why Patrick Henry also said, “Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?”

And which is why Patrick Henry also said, “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.

Which is why Samuel Adams said, “That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of The United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms…”

Which is why Thomas Jefferson said, “The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”

Which is why Thomas Jefferson also said, “What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.”

And which is why Thomas Jefferson also said, “No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”

Which is why George Washington said, “Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence … From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that is good.

And which is why even the wise philosopher Aristotle said, “Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people.”

It’s not like this is a matter of any question to any intelligent, educated person.  The founding fathers were crystal clear that the people have the necessary right to keep and bear arms.  And literally that any government that would try to take away those arms was a tyrannous government that in fact exemplified why arms should be in the hands of the people in the first place!

In fact, liberals, the very fact that you keep trying to use raw government power to take away our guns is why we should be all the more determined to keep our guns.  Because according to the founding fathers you are the very people that we should be armed against.

Liberals love to assert that the 2nd Amendment never really applied to “the people” but rather to a “militia.”  What is funny is that the very liberals who say that guns shouldn’t be in the hands of the people are also the most suspicious and intolerant of people in militias, too!  Which underscores the fact that these liberals are truly anti-gun AND anti-Constitution and merely cynically offer whatever pretense will get them what they want.  But leaving that aside, let’s example the argument:

The 2nd Amendment: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

Here’s what’s wrong with that view: To whom do the rights accorded in the 1st Amendment belong: to “the people” or to “a well regulated militia”?

If liberals want to be logically and morally and historically and grammatically consistent with their 2nd Amendment view about gun rights only belonging to militias, they must therefore concede that “the people” do not have the right to peaceably assemble or to petition the government for any redress of grievances (1st Amendment) or to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures (4th Amendment and see also the rights guaranteed by the 9th and 10th Amendments) – because only those in a “well regulated militia” would possess those rights and any other rights the Constitution claims for “the people.”  It is completely arbitrary and in fact downright irrational thinking to suggest that “the people” means one thing for the purpose of the 2nd Amendment but something entirely different for every other usage of the exact same phrase in the very same document.

To return to what I previously stated that liberals become the very people that our founding fathers warned us about, in trying to take away rights that clearly belong to “the people” are by so doing denying and undermining every other right that similarly belongs to “the people.”  And thank God I have guns as long as there are people who think that way.

Let me further mention a typical liberal view that guns are dangerous because “guns kill people.”

You could give me a nuclear bomb and I would do everything in my power to ensure that that nuclear bomb was used responsibly – which is to say that I would never use it in any situation I could possibly envision.  You could give me a fully automatic machine gun to carry around with me at port arms and I would never mow down a crowd. Conservatives are people who can own guns and not murder innocent people.  Liberals – by their own views – are apparently not such people.  Rather, if they had a gun, that gun, being inherently dangerous and evil, would immediately begin to leach away at their feeble liberal intellects and their gutless liberal moral wills.  Liberals affirm that they are bad people, weak people, who should not be entrusted with the responsibility that the founding fathers provided for free men.

This gets to the heart of the issue between liberals and conservatives.  It comes down to something that John Adams said:

“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

In their views of guns and their attitude toward the 2nd Amendment, liberals implicitly if not explicitly admit that they are NOT the kind of people that the Constitution was made for; they are bad people.  They are people who have no morality and no religion; and the Constitution and its protections enshrined in the Bill of Rights are therefore wholly inadequate for them.

Our Constitution was written to create “a new nation, conceived in liberty” as Lincoln would later say.  It was to be a nation different from the nations of Europe, in which all men were equal and men were free to think and believe and decide for themselves.  And Madison’s point was that only a moral and religious people could exercise the necessary self-restraint to have those kinds of freedoms.  Amoral and irreligious people, on the other hand, could be controlled only by ever-increasing levels of totalitarian government tyranny.

George Washington – the father of our country – was even MOREstridently clear. Washington said:

“Of all the habits and dispositions which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.” — George Washington, Farewell Address

If you want your politics to prosper, the two things you will not separate will be religion and morality. If you want your government to work well, if you want American exceptionalism, if you want the government to do right, if you want all this, then you won’t separate religion and morality from political life. And America’s greatest patriot gave a litmus test for patriotism. He says in the very next sentence (immediately continuing from the quote above):

“In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars.” — George Washington

Washington says, Anyone who would try to remove religion and morality from public life, I won’t allow them to call themselves a patriot. Because they are trying to destroy the country.

And the point here is that liberals again and again on issue after issue reveal themselves to be the kind of people that George Washington and the founding fathers of this country would have labelled “traitors.”  They are NOT patriots; they are men and women who “labor to subvert these great pillars” such as morality and religion and, yes, the 2nd Amendment protections provided for “the people.”

Consider one particularly infamous and evil example of the fact that Democrats routinely demonize the very “religion and morality” that George Washington and our founding fathers said was the defining foundation of our Constitution.

Liberals have worked hard for the last fifty years to take away our morality and our religion.  In so doing, they have given us the very violence that is now spiralling out of control.  Liberals are the kind of people who have taken away prayer.  Liberals are the kind of people who have refused to allow the posting of the Ten Commandments because “If the posted copies of the Ten Commandments are to have any effect at all, it will be to induce the schoolchildren to read, meditate upon, perhaps to venerate and obey, the Commandments,” and God-as-Government forbid that children be allowed to do something like that.  Liberals are the kind of people who have imposed godless abortion upon society to the tune of 54 MILLION innocent human beings butchered since 1973.  Liberals are the kind of people who have destroyed fatherhood, because according to liberals fathers did not father children, but strictly non-human lumps of biological goop such that they should not be allowed to have any influence whatsoever as to whether their own babies be allowed to even live.  Liberals are the kind of people who have imposed pornography on us because liberal justices are moral idiots who are morally incapable of differentiating between art and XXX-rated sex movies.  Liberals are the kind of people who imposed no-fault divorce without limit or condition upon us because breaking up families is more important than asking couples who took a vow to one another under God to work to resolve their differences.  Liberals are the kind of people who turned marriage itself into a perverted mockery by saying that the institution of marriage as the union of one man and one woman be adulterated to include whatever the hell politically correct understanding depraves the minds of the left next.

These are the people that George Washington said, “These people are NOT patriots.”  These are the people that the founding fathers said we needed to be armed to protect ourselves against as they take away the God-given rights of “the people” to protect ourselves against the very tyranny they continually seek to impose upon us.

If any liberal wants to regulate the guns which the founding fathers intended to protect ourselves against the very sort of tyranny that liberals continually seek to impose, let them first categorically affirm the right of the people to keep and bear arms.  By that, I mean require an Amendment to the Bill of Rights that for all time specifically states that the 2nd Amendment guarantees that the same people who have ever other right accorded to “the people” be allowed to be armed and to possess arms, with the further condition that ANY official whether he or she be a politician, a judge or a bureaucrat be IMMEDIATELY removed from his or her office with the forfeiture of all pay, all benefits and all responsibilities if he or she ever try to take away these rights from any law-abiding American citizen.

Until that day, “gun control” is a zero-sum game, with every limitation and restriction taking us one step closer to taking away ALL of our rights while those who believe in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and specifically the 2nd Amendment, receive NOTHING in return.  As long as there is one liberal who has any influence over the American people in any chamber of politics, any chamber of law, or any bureaucracy, who wants to take away our rights, the people need to continue to be armed to prevent that liberal from depriving them of their freedom.

If you as a liberal think I’m crazy to say that Democrats want to take away our guns, well, then, please join me in taking that issue I keep demagoguing off the table.  Demand that your party sponsor and vote for that constitutional amendment.  And then people like me will be forced to shut up, won’t we?

Liberals constantly demonize conservatives as the obstacles preventing every single nut from shooting somebody; I point the finger right back at them: because they are untrustworthy negotiating partners with too many having the open agenda that I described above.  As long as we have a president of the United States who appoints judges who say that citizens have a right to keep arms, but not to bear them – or to similarly brazenly deny the Constitution, you aint getting NOTHIN’ from me.  And frankly, if you don’t mind my saying so, you’re a slimebag for every trying.

When the 2nd Amendment as our founding fathers intended it is firmly engrained in American society once and for all time, I believe liberals will be surprised at how many conservatives will join them in enacting reasonable restrictions that will limit the abuse of guns.

But that day will not happen and should not happen until everybody who thinks like this is legally barred from holding ANY government office whatsoever.

And that is why this is true and has been true of Barack Obama:

I began this talking about Barack Obama not wanting AK-47s in the American peoples’ hands because he doesn’t trust us.  What is amazing is that this same president’s administration put those very AK-47s into the hands of Mexican drug cartel murderers.