Posts Tagged ‘cheating’

Voter Fraud Is Real: And Barack Obama, Eric Holder And EVERY Democrat In America Is A Dishonest Cockroach

March 14, 2012

Project Veritas put out an undercover video showing how easy it is to get a ballot and vote under someone else’s name without showing any photo ID:

That video is part of a series of investigative articles on voter fraud and how easy it is to undermine the democratic process.  I accessed it through this one:

Project Veritas Investigates: Voter Fraud
January 11, 2012

Dead men tell no tales, but as Project Veritas found in New Hampshire, they can still vote.

On New Hampshire Primary Day, Project Veritas sent a team of investigators into polling places with a list of deceased voters to see if they would be permitted to vote.

We tested more than a dozen polling places, simply walking up and stating the name of the deceased, and in all but one instance — where an alert poll worker actually knew the recently deceased — we were handed ballots.

While our investigators cast no votes and returned the ballots, there was nothing stopping our team, or anyone else, from illegally influencing the outcome of a presidential primary.

In fact, as shown in the video, Project Veritas investigators insisted on presenting identification in order to vote, but were told repeatedly, “you don’t need it.”

With the 8 vote margin in the 2012 Iowa Caucus, it is clear that voter fraud can influence the outcome of an election. It is important to note that Project Veritas’ team had the ability to cast more than a dozen votes in this latest investigation.

Watch the video for yourself here.

More to come . . .

(Unlike the establishment media, Project Veritas works to release full, unedited versions of its investigations and stories. To see the unedited videos from part one of the Voter Fraud investigation, click here.)

We just had an example of a Democrat Sheriff pleading guilty to voter fraud:

Former West Virginia sheriff, county clerk plead guilty to attempting to steal election
By Eric Shawn
Published March 07, 2012 | FoxNews.com

As the sheriff of Lincoln County, W.Va., Jerry Bowman is sworn to uphold the law. But the 58-year-old law enforcement veteran stood in a federal courtroom in Charleston on Wednesday and pleaded guilty in a shocking voter fraud case that has stripped him of his job and could send him to prison for a decade.

Prosecutors say Bowman and former Lincoln County Clerk Donald Whitten, 62, were part of a scheme to steal the May 2010 Democratic primary by stuffing ballot boxes with illegal absentee ballots.

Bowman admitted to falsifying more than 100 of the absentee ballot applications and even voting with some of the ballots himself, while Whitten, who also pleaded guilty Wednesday, acknowledged lying to investigators about the plan to try to throw the election.

“It makes you mad,” said Charles Brumfield, who ran against Bowman for Lincoln County circuit clerk, about having the election stolen from him. “It was hurtful. You just didn’t think that would happen in today’s society.”

Brumfield told Fox News that on election night, he was ahead by about 235 votes. That is, until additional batches of absentee ballots started mysteriously appearing, repeatedly, throughout the evening.

“We knew something was wrong, because the post office closes at 4:30 … you don’t go to the post office at 9 o’clock at night and find ballots.”

But for several hours on election night, “They kept coming out and saying ‘we found some more ballots’ … and they did this about three times from 7 to 11 p.m., and when the final tally was taken, we lost,” Brumfield said.

Brumfield was suspicious leading up to election night because he says he heard that more then 800 absentee ballot applications had been requested for the race, nearly six times more than normal number. He took the case to court, and after a judge threw out more than 300 ballots, he was declared the winner and was sworn in as the Lincoln County circuit clerk.

“An absentee ballot is a good thing, if it’s used correctly, the way it’s supposed to. And it wasn’t used that way,” Brumfield said.

The voter fraud allegations were investigated by U.S. Attorney Booth Goodwin in West Virginia and West Virginia Secretary of State Natalie Tennant. An FBI agent and an investigator from Tennant’s office even allegedly had a gun pulled on them by one absentee ballot voter who is charged with making threats to kill them.

“We won’t tolerate elections violations,” Tennant told Fox News. “It makes me angry that someone would take our process, which is a good process, and attempt to manipulate it for their own good. … It is disappointing.”

“Voter fraud in southern West Virginia goes far and wide. It’s been bad my whole life,” the Lincoln County Republican Party Chairwoman Lisa Ramey said. She is now running for sheriff, and told Fox News that she once “saw someone buy a vote and get a bottle,” meaning whiskey.

“I’m appalled, disgusted,” she says. “We have good citizens in Lincoln County and we would like to have one, decent, fair election in our county, but I’m not sure that will be able to occur unless the federal government takes over the election process.”

She calls this voter fraud case, “the tip of the iceberg.”

[...]

After the plea hearing, Goodwin issued a statement saying, “A citizen’s right to vote is at the very foundation of our constitutional democracy. When votes are bought, sold or obtained by fraud, democracy itself is in peril.”

Some other stories I’ve done in the past about Democrat voter fraud:

Obama’s Chicago Political Way Continues To Play: Democrats Engaged In Massive Voter Fraud In New York

Mainstream Media Propagandists Refuse To Do Their Jobs; Up To A College Kid To Expose Democrat 2008 Election Cheating In Indiana

Wisconsin Judge Election: City Caught Destroying Uncounted Ballots

Democrats Abandon All Respect For American Voter And Electoral Integrity

Democrats Caught Cheating, Undermining Democracy, In New Jersey Race

Philadelphia: Liberal Judge Removes GOP Poll Watchers While lack Black Panthers Intimidate Voters

Obama’s $Half Billion In Small Donations Masking SERIOUS FRAUD.

Barack Obama’s ACORN Registers Dallas Cowboys To Vote In Nevada

Obama: From ACORN Organizer to Audacious Hypocrite

And my own personal favorite title:

Election Fraud: If You Vote Democrat, You Are A Corrupt Dishonest Cheat By Proxy

Because you are.

And yet Obama Attorney General Eric Holder is bitterly fighting to prevent Texas from upholding it’s already passed and signed into law voter ID law.  Even though the Supreme Court has already ruled that voter ID laws are 100 percent legal and legitimate.

I say it again: if you vote Democrat, you are a corrupt and dishonest cheat and you want corrupt dishonest cheats to trample over America.

And all you have to do to prove me wrong is to (finally!!!) demand measures to weed out voter fraud.  But you won’t: because you are corrupt dishonest cheats right down to the cores of your shriveled little depraved cockroach souls.  And you want to benefit from fascist election theft because fascism is at the very core of your being.

And just to throw it in, if you are a Democrat, you are un-American according to scientific studies:

Just a brief exposure to an image of the American flag shifts voters, even Democrats, to Republican beliefs, attitudes and voting behavior.

A new Harvard University study finds that July 4th parades energize only Republicans, turn kids into Republicans, and help to boost the GOP turnout of adults on Election Day.

And there’s a damn good reason for that, you treasonous roaches.

Panicked Obama Campaign Accuses McCain Of Cheating At Saddleback

August 18, 2008

Well, it’s official: Barack Obama did poorly at the Saddleback Debate forum, and John McCain did tremendously well.

I don’t have to state this as an opinion: I can turn to the Obama campaign’s own reaction in the aftermath of the event.

The liberal Andrew Sullivan of the liberal Atlantic has this:

“The Obama people must feel that he didn’t do quite as well as they might have wanted to in that context, because what they are putting out privately is that McCain may not have been in the cone of silence and may have had some ability to overhear what the questions were to Obama. He seemed so well-prepared.”

NBC’s Andrea Mitchell stirred up the dirt with the completely unsubstantiated claim:

Mitchell reported that some “Obama people” were suggesting “that McCain may not have been in the cone of silence and may have had some ability to overhear what the questions were to Obama. He seemed so well prepared.”

A McCain aide said that is not the case: “Senator McCain was in a motorcade led by the United States Secret Service and held in a green room with no broadcast feed.”

Mitchell made the comment in the context of saying McCain did better, and that the Obama camp was defensive. In response to the campaign’s letter, she pointed out that journalists get criticism from both sides.

“I wasn’t expressing an opinion,” Mitchell said. “I was reporting what they were saying.”

I wonder if she would have given the McCain campaign charge as much “impartial” coverage.

In any event, we are learning that John McCain was not actually inside the “cone of silence” the entire time Obama was speaking. He did not actually enter his “cone of silence” until half an hour into the program. He had been in a Secret Service motorcade, and then proceeding to the forum, for that half an hour.

Was McCain gaining an advantage by listening in during part of that half hour?

Let me point some things out:

First of all, let it be stated for the record that there is no possible way that McCain could have been listening for the entire half hour, but only for about half of that time when he was actually in the motorcade. During part of that time, Rick Warner was introducing the event. And the first couple questions were fairly personal.

Given the fact that McCain could not even possibly have listened in to the entire program, how do those who claim McCain cheated account for the fact that McCain’s answers were strong throughout the event? McCain wasn’t just “well prepared” for a few minutes; he was razor-sharp throughout.

Saddleback spokesman Larry Ross has said that the first couple of questions were released to the candidates in advance so they wouldn’t be nervous, and that the categories of question were also released beforehand. In fact, Larry Ross said that he actually gave Obama the third question beforehand (and Obama actually admitted “I cheated on this”) but was not able to tell McCain the question.

Finally, I would argue that, had John McCain actually listened to Barack Obama’s answers, it would only have rotted his brain with Obama’s long, drawn-out pontifications and actually harmed him.

Did anyone notice how many more questions McCain answered – because his answers were concise and to-the-point – than Barack Obama? How – by the Obama claim of listening in and cheating – did McCain prepare for those?

What I find most interesting is the panic from the Obama camp that this charge would come out, which implicitly acknowledges that their boy flopped, and the vindictiveness that making the claim of cheating without any actual evidence represents.

Barack Obama proved he is not only a loser, but a sore loser.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 493 other followers