By The Time Obama Leaves Office, Terrorism Will Have Skyrocketed By 1,900 Percent. Time For ‘Extremely Careless’ Hillary? SERIOUSLY???

Another terrorist attack, folks.  Eighty-four dead in the French Riviera in Nice.  More than two-hundred others wounded and twenty-five are on life-support.

The terrorist was “somehow” able to get his hands on a gun in the most gun-outlawed country on the planet.  Because liberals are pathologically stupid people and when you ban guns only criminals can get them.  And the terrorist’s worst weapon wasn’t a gun, but a damn TRUCK that he used as a terrorist “mowing machine”: because it’s not ABOUT guns or our 2nd Amendment that we’ve had as a fundamental right since our nation was founded; it’s about EVIL that under Obama has skyrocketed out of control.

I know, I know, Democrat; you want to ban every single car and truck now, too.  Because you’re a fascist fool and banning is what you do.  The only thing we ought to ban is your foolish brain and all the contents of your foolish mind.

Democrats are amazing people: whether it’s guns or soda pop or you name it, they are willing to ban damn near everything but what the Bible declares are the very most monstrous and wicked sins of all.  Sixty million murdered babies which amounts to TEN TIMES the death toll of the Holocaust?  “Yes, we can!” Forget Psalm 139 and the fact that Democrats would have joyfully murdered Jesus in the womb even as baby John the Baptist leaped in the womb when he was near him.  Democrats cheer.  The homosexual agenda which the Bible declares as an “abomination” and “a detestable act”?  “Si, se puede!”  And forget the fact that the New Testament of the Holy Bible joins with the Old Testament in condemning Democrats’ new favorite act of wickedness.

So Democrats are the Party of Fools who declared that bringing down the wrath of God is good and protecting ourselves from terrorists and criminals is evil.

I recently pointed out in my own neighborhood, where criminal gangs were not only able to get their hands on guns; they were able to get their hands on so many guns that they were selling them to whoever wanted to buy them.  And they weren’t just selling “guns,” but illegal submachine guns equipped with illegal silencers AND EVEN TWO ROCKET LAUNCHERS.  I mean, a pissant local gang of thugs was able to get their hands on weapons capable of taking out tanks and armored cars!!!  And EVERY TIME the police do these major sweeps they find guns, EVERY SINGLE TIME!!!  Understand that California has gun laws about as strict as anywhere; so HOW DID CRIMINAL GANG MEMBERS GET THEIR HANDS ON THESE GUNS???  HOW DID THEY GET THEIR HANDS ON SO MANY GUNS THEY WERE SELLING THEM LIKE GRAMS OF CRANK???  HOW DID THEY GET THEIR HANDS ON MILITARY-GRADE WEAPONS THAT I AS A LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN CANNOT HAVE???

And when you have an Obama’s or a Clinton’s open damn border, PLEASE DON’T THINK FOR A NANO-SECOND THAT YOU CAN STOP GUNS FROM FLOWING ACROSS OUR BORDERS.

Why is it that Democrats believe that criminals ought to have all these guns just because criminals are willing to ignore laws the way Hillary Clinton ignored all our damn national security laws and Ruth Bader Ginsburg just violated all federal judicial ethics???

Don’t tell me that gun laws are intended to do ANYTHING but take guns away from law-abiding people so that they are rendered incapable of fighting back or defending themselves.

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton want you to be SHEEP, just helpless sheep.

Those sickening images of masses of people running in terror because they have absolutely no way to defend themselves or fight back, that’s our fate if we keep heading in this mindless direction.

What is it going to take???  What is it going to take before we realize that everything this blathering fool Obama says about how there is absolutely no connection between Islam and terrorism and that it’s just the weirdest kind of coincidence that 99.999 percent of all the terrorist attacks in the world are committed by Muslims IS AN INSANE MOCKERY OF REALITY???

Our national security and our entire foreign policy are on life support.

Let’s just start with the grim reality of Barack Hussein Obama’s disastrous fail.  And yeah, I’ve posted this several times recently BECAUSE I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW THE DAMN FACTS ABOUT BARACK OBAMA’S POLICIES CAUSING TERRORISM TO EXPLODE:

Look at that graph.  When George W. Bush was president, he kept this country safe and he kept the world safe because the United States used to be the mightiest nation in the history of the world.

So when Bush was president you got the bar on the far left and when Obama became president you got the bar on the far right and all the bars exploding up to that terrible bar of 30,000 people a year in 2015 being slaughtered by terrorists.  You see that graph taking off like a rocket ship; you read or see the news and you know what’s happening.  Barack Obama has proclaimed the flag should be at half-staff in mourning more than any president in history:

WASHINGTON — With his tenure in office marked by terror attacks and mass shootings, President Obama has reached a sad but remarkable milestone in his presidency: He has ordered the lowering of the nation’s flags to half-staff more often than any president in history.

On Sunday, Obama extended that unenviable streak even further, ordering all flags at federal buildings and ships at sea to be flown at half-staff to honor the 49 victims of the Orlando nightclub shooting.

Those flags will remain at half-staff until sunset Thursday, meaning that the nation will spend most of National Flag Week — proclaimed by Obama in a separate order last Friday— with the stars and stripes in a mournful pose.

The last time there was a massive terror attack in France Obama ordered the U.S. flag flown at half-staff for our ally; he’s not doing it now because his advisors are pointing out we might as well just fly it at half-staff until he crawls out of office.  Barack Obama is the half-staff president.

So again, consider that graph; consider how high that blue bar will explode the next time.  It’s exploding like the soon-to-be-detonated terrorist bomb in the shopping mall you or your children are walking through.  Anybody who doesn’t think we’re going to SMASH through the 60,000 deaths figure is a damn fool.  When Bush left office, there were 3,000 deaths due to terrorism and Obama and Hillary and Democrats DEMONIZED him for his failure.  So when Obama hit thirty THOUSAND a year what did those fools say?  And by the time he leaves office it will very easily be double that.  And then just do the math from that 3,000 Obama started with to that 60,000 Obama will walk out the door with: a 1,900 percent increase.  And it may very well be worse than THAT, because it is truly becoming exponential.

But hey, let’s not actually DO anything.  Obama will give a speech.  THAT ought to be painful enough for any terrorist who is forced to listen to Obama drone on for an hour.

As an example, this is now yet another major terrorist attack against France.  Last year, when the French president wanted to invoke Article 5 of the NATO charter that would have treated this terrorist attack as an act of war triggering all NATO nations to respond, Obama yawned.  And there was no question that Obama wasn’t going to do a damn thing to help France in its determination to fight terror.

Under Barack Obama and BECAUSE of Barack Obama, we now have more refugees fleeing bloodbaths than at any time in the entire history of the human species.  More than 65.3 MILLION refugees are fleeing Obama’s disastrous foreign policy failure.  The magnitude of that is beyond shocking.

Do you UNDERSTAND that????  Do you understand the ramifications given the fact that again and again, the people who are carrying out these vicious terrorist attacks that are Muslim immigrants and Obama is trying to bring in more than we have ever allowed.  And Hillary Clinton is vowing to increase Obama’s insane invitation to future radical Muslims tenfold, a hundredfold.  Obama and Hillary have left these Muslims with nothing but bitterness and hate; and they will take that bitterness and hate with them when they come here.  They are like living bombs, and too many of those bombs will ultimately blow up on us just as they are blowing up across Europe now.

Maybe, just maybe we ought to have gone in to the Iraq and the Syria that Obama opened the door and invited Islamic State to occupy and END those roaches.  Maybe if they’d been reduced to wailing things such as, “Surely Allah has forsaken us!” it would have been better than a 1,900 increase in terrorism and the worst refugee crisis in the documented history of the human species.

Hillary Clinton was the ARCHITECT of Obama’s foreign policy.  She was there when all the generals were saying to Obama, “What are you, STUPID!!!???”  And she sided with the failed fool who brought us this disaster and sided against the generals who understood the disaster that was in the making.

Just read this news article from February 2, 2009 when Obama assumed office and it will refute every stupid, dishonest, evil lie that Obama and his Democrat fools have tried to distract us with since.  This was NOT about “status of forces” agreements; this was about a metastic and depraved and arrogant fool who ignored the advice of his generals and began the process of melting down the world.

Bush left and we got Obama.  Lucky us.  And Obama went to Cairo and said everything was going to be different under his divine messiahship.  He arrogantly told us that his presidency would mark the moment “when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal.”   He went to Egypt and promised that the world – very much including the Islamic world – would worship and adore him.  And what we got was the damn “Arab Spring” as Obama and the morally idiotic leftist press enthusiastically framed it.  That article was in hindsight; at the TIME people who understood Obama’s “Cairo Speech” were calling it “The Cairo Disaster.”  Because that’s what Obama was and that is what he continues to remain.  He pulled all of our troops out of Iraq in spite of the fact that every single ONE of his generals BEGGED him to remain the same way we’d remained in Germany and Japan after World War II and in South Korea after the Korean War.

We are now truly in a world war, except we have a president, a Democrat Party and a candidate for president from the Democratic Party that will NOT acknowledge that Muslims and Islam are the enemy the way our better forbearers acknowledged that we were at war with Germans and Japanese and Nazism and Imperial fascism.  We are amazingly not allowed to acknowledge who our enemy is or why they are fighting us.  Rather than wisdom we have a metastic fool who actually called this face of our evil enemy “junior varsity” and mocked and denigrated the people who have defeated Obama and own his worthless soul – and then being a pathologically wicked and dishonest man, the fool lied about what he’d said.  Just as he tried to sound tough when he gave Syria and Russia a warning and told the world what he would do if they crossed his “red line” – only to prove the coward again and try to lie his way out of his own promise.  Kiss Obama’s credibility good-bye if anybody still thought he still had any at that point when it was already painfully obvious he had nothing.

We had left Iraq because of the wicked fool Obama and his star stooge Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.  We refused to get involved in Syria over a broken declaration that destroyed all American credibility because of those same two fools.

Islamic State created the first terrorist caliphate in the history of the world, fulfilling Osama bin Laden’s dream.

It is amazing how Obama takes so much responsibility for killing Osama bin Laden when he above all men gave birth to Osama bin Laden’s dream.  Obama is THE one who gave Islamic State the “space to destroy,” to put it in the words of that vile Democrat mayor in Baltimore who allowed rioters to burn and loot.  Obama gave birth to Islamic State and allowed his baby to grow.

And that baby AINT “JayVee.”

Just as the Democrat Party’s “space to destroy” created living, breathing, burning HELL in Baltimore, and just as Obama’s “Black Lives Matter” policies have “fundamentally transformed” any black urban city into a desperate war zone, we have a world on fire due to the same liberal puke policies that if we are just nice to terrorists and criminals they will become wonderful, peaceful citizens.

Barack Obama’s dismissive attitude on terrorism was enshrined forever in his casually dismissive remark that more people die in bath tub falls than are killed in terrorist attacks.

HEY OBAMA, YOU DEGENERATE WEASEL; FAR, FAR MORE PEOPLE ARE KILLED IN BATH TUB FALLS THAN POLICE SHOOT BLACK PEOPLE.  But somehow that’s different, isn’t it?

Because you’re NOTHING but a festering piece of degenerate political FILTH who believes in your chief of staff’s adage, “You never let a serious crisis go to waste.”  Not when you have a chance to exploit it and divide people and create rage to motivate your damn base, you don’t.

At the core, we all know that it is THE primary duty of a president to keep his nation SAFE.  And that one-thousand nine-hundred percent increase in your failure to fulfill that most basic duty is not exactly good for your spin, is it?  And so you spin terrorism into “work place violence” and demonize our 2nd Amendment and the rights of the American people to protect themselves.

And we now have a vile climate of sick hate in America and in the world because Obama exploited all his damn crises beyond the breaking point.

And who does Barack Obama – who by any reasonable measure is the WORST president in the history of the republic – want to hand off the reigns of his disaster to?

Why, “Extremely Careless”  Hillary, of course.

In his otherwise inexplicable refusal to recommend charges be brought against Hillary Clinton, FBI Director Comey invented a standard of criminal intent into the actual statute of “gross negligence” that has nothing whatsoever to DO with criminal intent, and argued that Hillary Clinton isn’t a criminal; she’s just profoundly ignorant and incompetent.  I mean, as she was squatting and pissing all over our national security for four years, she simply had no idea what she was doing.

Ignore the fact that Hillary Clinton installing a series of secret, unauthorized private servers to bypass transparency and accountability without any question whatsoever amounted to “INTENT.”  Ignore the fact that whenever a judge explains “gross negligence” to a jury, he or she uses the phrase “extreme carelessness” so they will understand what “gross negligence” is.  Just fixate on the fact that Hillary Clinton’s ENTIRE defense in her email and private server scandal amounted to, “I spent four years having absolutely no clue whatsoever what the hell I was doing.”

Hey, if you want the smoking ruins of the U.S. compound in Benghazi to be YOUR house, you go ahead and elect that wicked witch.

If you weren’t a wicked fool yourself, it would greatly bother you that FBI agents believe that Attorney General Loretta Lynch signed a secret deal with Bill Clinton during that secret private meeting they had.  It would greatly bother you that the same FBI bureaucracy that amazingly ignored the clear statute to clear Hillary of her blatant criminal conduct were mysteriously required to sign non-disclosure agreements, which was simply unheard of in a case like this (you know, a simple “security review” as Hillary kept falsely calling it).  You’ve got retired FBI agents throwing their remotes through their television screens when FBI Director Comey actually insinuated that he required a referral from Congress to investigate whether Hillary Clinton committed perjury when she lied again and again and again and again in her televised testimony before Congress; that the FBI can open an investigation based on a news story or even an anonymous phone call if they damn well want to.

The ONLY reason the FBI didn’t catch Hillary in lies was because they were instructed NOT to ask her any questions that would have prompted Hillary’s “ask me no questions and I’ll tell you no lies” response.

Director Comey himself pointed out only some of the numerous lies Hillary Clinton told the American people over and over and over again.  He spent 14 minutes laying out an unassailable case explaining why he should indict Hillary Clinton and then one minute saying he wasn’t going to.

Don’t EVER tell me again with a straight face that Democrats have anything whatsoever to do with “equal justice under the law.”  The Dodo bird of “equal justice under the law” is dead because Democrats drove the final stake through its heart.

And don’t EVER tell me with a straight face that Democrat judges are capable of being impartial: just listen to Ruth Bader Ginsburg on that one.  She just demonstrated a fact that every single American should know: that liberal “justices” is a contradiction in terms and that if you are a liberal “justice,” you are an outright partisan political hack and nothing but an outright partisan political hack.  You “fundamentally transformed” the Constitution into shifting sand that allows you to rule however the hell you want whenever the hell you want to.

And the mainstream media simply ignored her amazing ethical violation!!!  Because to be a liberal is to be pathologically dishonest and lawless.

And just as Hillary Clinton gets away and Ruth Bader Ginsburg gets away and Attorney General Loretta Lynch gets away with violating every rule in the damn rule book, realize that the Democratic Party is THE PARTY of the massive double-standard in which elites get treated one way, and everyone else gets treated another way.

We are in a world-war death struggle, and the Obamas and the Clintons who refuse to tell us who our enemy is have also so utterly divided this nation that we cannot even possibly stand together and fight any common enemy.  Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton divided this country, and divided we will fall and we SHOULD fall.  And if we elect this proven fraud and failure that our most failed president wants us to elect, we WILL fall.

 

 

 

This Sums Up The Demonic Hypocrisy Of The Democrat Party And Liberal Progressivism

You’ve got to just stand back and marvel at the STUNNING hypocrisy and dishonest and disgraceful deceit that are at the core of every so-called “liberal” and at the heart of every Democrat and at the heart of their false messiah Barack Hussein Obama.

How dare we publish material that would offend Muslims, they argue in the name of the multicultural pluralism that they gave birth to.

Okay, fine.  Every atheist who publicly claims there is no God ought to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.  Every liberal who espouses the radical secular humanist invention of a “separation of church and state” to annihilate their opponents’ religious influence ought to be publicly demonized.

But of course not.  Christianity is of course different and ought to be attacked and demonized because unlike other groups that all come from the totalitarian left we don’t resort to hate and violence.  I guess ultimately it’s Jesus’ fault for teaching His disciples to turn the other cheek and it’s the Holy Spirit’s fault for instilling in us the fruits of the Spirit rather than the hate of the left.

The French satirical paper that was attacked in France was a LEFT-WING magazine that generally attacked the political RIGHT, attacked Christianity and basically attacked opposition to liberalism.  NPR had this factoid:

Charlie Hebdo, the satirical French magazine that was the target of a deadly attack today, is part of a long tradition of French satire dating to the days before the French Revolution.

The left-wing magazine is known for its biting takedowns. Its past targets include the political right wing, capitalism, Christianity, Judaism and Islam.

The beauty of progressive liberalism, secular humanism and the Democrat Party which defends these engines of destruction in America, is it’s monolithic hypocrisy.  Liberals are pathologically dishonest hypocrites whose cry is invariably “It’s NEVER fascist when we do it” because they have conveniently pre-defined themselves as virtuous and their opponents as guilty.

The left have been viciously attacking Christians and Christianity for DECADES.  But of course now we shouldn’t have the right to employ the same standards that the left created to attack and undermine us to criticize their fellow “Government-as-God” worshipers in the Muslim religion.

Here is a piece that deliciously exposes this profound hypocrisy (and for the official record let me simply point out the fact that “Piss Christ” was funded by Democrats who had perverted the National Endowment for the Arts into something so vile it is beyond unreal):

AP Won’t Publish Muhammad Cartoons, Will Gladly Sell ‘Piss Christ’
Purchase link pulled after hypocrisy exposed
1.7.2015 |
Trey Sanchez

As reported through Breitbart, the Associated Press made clear that its official policy is to censor photos of the Prophet Muhammad. Apparently, though, disparaging images of Jesus Christ are acceptable.

The AP told The Daily Beast, “It’s been our policy for years that we refrain from moving deliberately provocative images.” And because of that policy, the cartoons of Muhammad seen in the Charlie Hebdo magazine were deleted from its commercial photo service.

But as was discovered, the infamous “art” photo of a crucifix immersed in urine, known as “Piss Christ,” could be purchased online through the news organization.

Once this hypocrisy was made known by The Washington Examiner, AP took the purchase link down.

A screenshot of the broken link is provided below:

Do you know what?

If you don’t want to offend Ismam, you shouldn’t elect a damn president who by definition of Islam is the worst kind of infidel because he was raised by his father as a Muslim and now (falsely) claims he’s a Christian.

Obama is the infidel who once claimed:

OBAMA: And what was the first thing the McCain?s campaign went out and did? They said, look, these liberal blogs that support Obama are out there attacking Governor Palin.

Let’s not play games. What I was suggesting — you’re absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith. And you’re absolutely right that that has not come–

STEPHANOPOULOS: Christian faith.

OBAMA: – my Christian faith.

I mean, “Ooops,” said the man who also said that the Muslim call to prayer was “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth.”

“Ooops,” said the man who was raised as a Muslim and who attended a mosque in Indonesia as a boy and was listed as a “Muslim” when he attended a Catholic school there.  Obama had a Muslim father, whether the man was a practicing Muslim or not.  And I can ASSURE you that that is ALL it takes to make one a “Muslim” in the eyes of Islam.  And our president is the worst kind of walking, talking betrayal and disgrace to Islam that there is and would be executed for his “crime of apostasy.”

Every Democrat directly participated in insulting Islam.  And yes you DID.  Look at parallel cases that document what I’m saying is true.

If Obama wanted to stop insulting the Prophet, he would resign from office in disgrace and face his punishment under sharia law.

I can’t say enough about the rabid hypocrisy and cockroach dishonesty of the left.

They claim they fight for the freedom of speech.  BULLCRAP.

NO president has EVER been so HOSTILE to free speech as messiah of secular humanist liberal progressivism:

Barack Hussein Obama is “the greatest enemy of press freedom in a generation.”  And that is a FACT.  Obama is assaulting journalism and has been for his entire presidency.

Barack Hussein Obama’s presidency is more restrictive and more dangerous to the press than any other administration in history.

Barack Hussein Obama runs “the most closed, control freak administration” in at least a generation including Richard Nixon’s regime.

Barack Hussein Obama’s regime is the most secretive White House that senior New York Times’ editors have ever covered.

At this point, the only difference between Democrats, i.e. between DEMOn-possessed bureauCRATS, and Nazis is that the Nazis dressed better.  And the scale of evil: Nazis murdered six million Jews and Democrats have murdered SIXTY million innocent babies in their death camp abortion mills.

And we see the hate of secular progressive liberal progressives for freedom and for the rights of others all the time.

Take a gander at this story, for an example for an example of the latest outrage directed against the rights of Christians to believe what thousands of years of the Word of God proclaims to be true, what the entirely of Western Civilization has believed to be true.  Because under these antichrist Democrat haters, deviant homosexuals have every right to drag their moral filth into churches and flaunt their lifestyles and the only people guilty of “bigotry” are the people who say in their own houses of worship, “our faith says that’s not right, and is there nowhere we can go to practice our religion?”  And NO, there is not in this age just before the Democrat Party worships the beast and takes his mark on their right hands or on their foreheads.

Liberal intellectuals – which means people who have carefully taught themselves to be the stupidest people on the face of the earth – have proclaimed free speech to be the greatest threat to liberalism.  Because nobody would ever believe this garbage called liberalism if they had all the facts presented to them – and thus the facts and the truth themselves become the enemy.

If you are a Democrat, you hate freedom and you rabidly despise the freedom of speech to say anything but what you have fascistically proclaimed to be politically correct.

If you are a Democrat, then you are a hypocrite and a liar and a pervert and a murderer.  And God has decreed that you will get yours.  Because if there is a God, there is a thing called justice.  But I know, you want to make those words first a thoughtcrime just like the book 1984 described and ultimately an actual crime.  It’s just who you are.

Biblical Christianity Vs. Cultural (Pseudo) Christianity, Socialism And Obama

As the discussion has raged over the mass murders of satirical journalists in France committed by Muslims in the name of Islam, I recently heard a Muslim make the “moral equivalence” argument and cite the murders committed by Anders Behring Breivik in Norway as being “Christian terrorism.”  And, of course, I had already written about that foolishness at the time it occurred and attempted to explain and show how this murderous psychopath was by no means a “Christian” in ANY orthodox sense of the word.  There was NOTHING in what he did that had ANY similarity WHATSOEVER to what Jesus did or taught.

Anybody who believes otherwise simply has to be demon-possessed; because no human mind could be that stupid and that deceived on its own without the manipulation of the devil.  Jesus said, “You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free.”  These people cannot comprehend the truth.  They are warped by lies.  Bad people prefer lies to the truth.  And so they hate Jesus and hate His followers just as He predicted they would: “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated Me first” (John 15:18).

I hope anybody who has the brainless idiocy to recite the garbage that Breivik was a Christian would read that article and learn the facts and the truth.  But I know that’s a pipe dream, because liberals are either a) utterly ignorant about the nature of reality or b) hypocrites and liars.  And so these people will continue to spout lies rather than understand that the truth refutes them and refutes everything they believe in and stand for.

There is a powerful difference between Christianity as it is revealed in the Bible and “Christianity” as liberals profoundly misunderstand it.

Liberals are completely bound in culture, and for them culture is a constantly evolving thing.  That’s why and how they can keep denying the fundamentals of the Christian faith and radically departing from the teachings and doctrines of the Bible and yet somehow claim that they are “Christian.”  When they have nothing to do with Christianity any more than Anders Behring Breivik has to do with Jesus or the Bible or Christianity.  I mean, if you can insanely rationalize that homosexuality is somehow good or abortion is somehow good, you can rationalize that murdering a bunch of innocent people in Norway or in France is good.

Which is why, for the record, militant Islam is no different from militant secular humanist progressive liberalism.  And that is simply a FACT, no matter how the über-socialist liberals want to deny it: because state atheist socialism murdered more than 100 million of their own people DURING PEACETIME.

I mean, the secular humanist liberals who sit there and have the balls to go back to the Crusades or the Inquisition and then argue that “religion” is what is somehow responsible for the murderous spirit are so historically ignorant and so deceived it is beyond belief.  If you read works like Rodney Stark’s For the Glory of God, and begin to understand how many myths have been perpetuated by radical secular humanist “reconstruction” of history, you’ll finally begin to understand what Jesus meant by his “the world will hate you because it hated Me first.”  Secular humanists, progressive liberals, atheists, socialists, etc. have so hated Jesus and so hated Christians and so hated Christianity, they have radically perverted history to slander everything Jesus and His followers and the Bible He taught and they follow stand for.

So what is biblical faith?

Look at this PDF handout and read the Bible verses.

Biblical Christianity versus cultural (pseudo) Christianity:

Christianity_Biblical vs Cultural

Now, you find Anders Behring Breivik in that.  And for that matter, you find Obama’s version of “Christianity” in that.  show me where Obama’s declaration of “collective salvation” –

“… working on issues of crime and education and employment and seeing that in some ways certain portions of the African American community are doing as bad if not worse, and recognizing that my fate remain tied up with their fates, that my individual salvation is not going to come about without a collective salvation for the country.

– can be found in the Word of God.  Because it CAN’T be found.  It is a lie.  What Obama is doing is claiming that only by his socialism, only by his economic Marxism, only by imposing his vile ideology onto the world and only by perverting true biblical Christianity with his socialist blasphemy and creating a “secular humanist theocracy” that makes Government the Savior and Provider rather than God and His people, can there be salvation.  That is a LIE from the devil.

I mean, let’s compare and contrast Obama’s “collective salvation” with what actual biblical Christianity teaches (as I’ve presented before):

What does Jesus say?  Consider Matthew 16:24-25:

Then Jesus said to His disciples, “If any one (individual) wishes to come after Me, he (individual) must deny himself (individual), and take up his (individual) cross and follow Me.  For whoever wishes to save his (individual) life will lose it; but whoever loses his (individual) life for My sake will find it.

Consider 2 Corinthians 5:10 for the thoughts of St. Paul:

For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one (individual) may be recompensed for his (individual) deeds in the body, according to what he (individual) has done, whether good or bad.

And again, St. Paul in Romans 14:12:

So then each one of us (individual) will give an account of himself (individual) to God.

Or consider Galatians 2:20:

“I (individual) have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I (individual) who live, but Christ lives in me (individual); and the life which I (individual) now live in the flesh I (individual) live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me (individual), and delibered Himself up for me (individual).”

And, again, in the words of Jesus as recorded in Revelation 3:20:

“Behold, I stand at the door and knock.  If any one (individual)  hears My voice and opens the door, I will come in to him (individual) and will dine with him (individual), and he (individual) with Me.”

Barack Obama is most certainly not a Christian to so miserably misunderstand that we are EACH INDIVIDUALLY saved by our PERSONAL faith in Jesus Christ through what He did for us on the cross.  This is not some esoteric “how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?” sort of question; it is a core fundamental of the Christian faith.

And that is why Barack Obama’s “individual salvation” will NEVER come about any more than Anders Behring Breivik’s will.  Unless these blasphemous heretics fall on their faces before God’s truth and repent of their deception and embrace the truth that is found only in Jesus Christ.

For Barack Hussein Obama and the most radical jihadist Muslim, “salvation” is the SAME thing: it is POLITICAL and PURELY political and NOTHING BUT political.

For Barack Hussein Obama and the most radical jihadist Muslim, both “faiths” want the exact same thing: the ability to dominate society and culture, the power to rule over a Government with all the prerogatives of God or Allah or the State or whatever the hell you want to call your ultimate power.

And Barack Hussein Obama’s socialism/economic Marxism has nothing whatsoever to do with the Bible or with God or with Christianity or with Christ.

Let me ask you: when the disciples came to Jesus and said, “Master, there are 5,000 men gathered here and they have nothing to eat,” what did Jesus tell them?

Did He say, “Go thee to King Herod and Governor Pilate and tell them to create a giant socialist government program to feed the people.”??? Or did He say, “YOU” – meaning His disciples – “feed them.”

There is only ONE place in Scripture where it is the government’s job to take care of the poor.  Do you know where that is?  In the Old Testament during the Theocracy where God rule the people through His prophet Moses and homosexuals and adulterers and godless liberals were all stoned to death lest their moral filth contaminate the rest of God’s people.  And if liberals truly want a Theocracy, then I’m all for it.  And let’s live by God’s Old Testament laws and start putting every blasphemous liberal to death according to those laws.  But otherwise, don’t you DARE say that the Bible tells us to care for the poor, and start forcibly redistributing the wealth according to the godless ideology of liberalism even as these same liberals wage a war against God, against faith, against the Church while they replace these with godlessness and then claim you are doing anything other than evil in the name of good.  Because if you want to know the true nature of progressive liberalism, it is found in these passages:

The LORD saw how great the wickedness of the human race had become on the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time. – Genesis 6:5

“Should you help the wicked and love those who hate the LORD? Because of this, wrath has gone out against you from the LORD” – 2 Chronicles 19:2

A wise man’s heart directs him toward the right, but the foolish man’s heart directs him toward the left. — Ecclesiastes 10:2

You love evil more than good, Falsehood more than speaking what is right. — Psalm 52:3

But he who sins against Me injures himself; all those who hate Me love death — Proverbs 8:36

There is a way which seems right to a man, But its end is the way of death. — Proverbs 14:12

Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter! — Isaiah 5:20

You who hate good and love evil, Who tear off their skin from them And their flesh from their bones — Micah 3:2

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools – Romans 1:22

For God’s wrath is being revealed from heaven against all the ungodliness and wickedness of those who in their wickedness suppress the truth – Romans 1:18

In their case, the god of this world has blinded the minds of those who do not believe to keep them from seeing the light of the glorious gospel of the Messiah, who is the image of God. — 2 Corinthians 4:4

Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron — 1 Timothy 4:2

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come…  — 2 Timothy 3:1

For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths. — 2 Tim 4:3-4

There is NO place for socialism – for the economic Marxism that socialism is – in God’s Word.  I’ve written about that, of course.  Socialism doesn’t come from God; it comes from GODLESSNESS.  It comes from a secular humanist-atheist hunger to replace God with human Government, and to replace God’s standard with man’s ways.  And it comes from a desire and a determination to replace TRUE religion and the true teachings and faith of and in Jesus Christ with something ELSE.

And again, here’s where Barack Hussein Obama and his radical jihadist Democrat Party and the radical jihadist Muslim terrorists are one and the same: because if you want to forcibly confiscate people’s wealth/income and redistribute it according to your political ideology, do you know what that is in the Bible?  In the Old Testament, during the Theocracy where the government was directly ruled by God.  There is NO PLACE in the New Testament where God’s Word commands human government to become Government and confiscate wealth and redistribute it.  Rather, it is the Christian Church and individual Christian believers – whom Barack Hussein Obama and his radical jihadist Democrat thugs despise and have tried to undermine with every policy and with every regulation and with every bureaucracy – that the New Testament and that Christianity empower to go and help the poor.

If you want a Theocracy that oppresses, you are one of two things: a Muslim jihadist terrorist or a member of the Democrat Party in America.

And I am frankly sick of all you terrorists trying to impose your wicked Government on me.

Barack Obama And His Party Belong To The Jihadist Terrorists, Race-Baiting Assassins and Every Totalitarian Group That Tramples Liberty

We just had a vicious terrorist attack in France.  A satirical newspaper was targeted as Muslim terrorists – and we know that because they clearly and repeatedly revealed themselves AS Muslim terrorists – entered the newspaper’s building, rounded up the occupants, singled out individual employees by name, executed them, killed everyone else and claimed, “We have avenged the Prophet Muhammad.”

Barack Obama immediately took the side of the vicious terrorist murderers and against the freedom of people to express their views without violence being directed toward them by saying:

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” — Barack Hussein Obama

Or in other words, a message from the President of the United States: “Death to the infidel.”  And “Let freedom be crushed; let free speech be crushed.  You have the right to worship the beast and to take his mark on your right hand or on your forehead.  And that is the ONLY freedom you ought to have.”

Okay, Obama actually said “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam,” all right.  That is a documented fact.  But he said it on September 25, 2012 when he was decrying the man who produced a Youtube video instead of decrying the vicious terrorist attack against United States territory in Benghazi, Libya that Obama left America totally unprepared for and then tried to cover up.

It is now a documented FACT that that Youtube video had nothing whatsoever to do with the terrorist attack that the Obama regime dishonestly called “a spontaneous protest” (see also here).  We know know that the claim made by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, etc. was a politically convenient lie and a criminal cover-up by which Obama’s politics trumped the national security of the United States.  That terrorist attack had nothing whatsoever to do with the free speech that Barack Obama demonized when he should have been defending it along with US territory on the anniversary of 9/11.

The real enemy – contrary to Obama’s lies – was terrorism.  The real enemy was the Obama regime which left America blind, helpless and weak to terrorist attack even as he falsely CONTINUALLY claimed that the terrorists were “decimated” and “on the run.”

But let it stand for the record that Barack Hussein Obama demonized free speech, demonized those who engage in free speech, and sided with Islamic terrorism in support of the terrorist murdering big-government worshiping totalitarians who  carried out the attack against free speech in France today.

Leftist intellectuals are now openly on the record claiming that free speech is a threat to their brand of “liberalism.”  The problem is that they are FASCISTS one and all.

Barack Obama is and has been the Terrorist-in-Chief.  No president has EVER been such a friend of terrorism or such an enemy of freedom as this one has been.

Barack Obama is – as we speak – trying to empty Gitmo of every terrorist murderer he can so they can be free to unleash the hatred of Islam against us once again.

Barack Obama is – as we speak – attempting to negotiate Iran’s right to have nuclear weapons so they can unleash Islamic Armageddon upon Israel and anyone who would take Israel’s side when the enemies of God attack this nation Obama hates above all nations.

Barack Obama is – as we speak – the ONLY president who actually used the IRS as his Internal Revenge Service to attack his political enemies whose “crime” was trying to exercise their right to free speech.  Nixon only TALKED about doing it; Obama DID it.

But the closest thing to what the jihadists in France did to murdering those satirical journalists has also been carried out by Obama, in his incessant rabid personal attacks against Fox News and his incessant attempts to use the political system to suppress Fox News.

Obama is a terrorist thug who got elected president and has new bombs and new bullets to use now.  Period.

It is beyond proven ad nauseam now that Barack Obama is THE most dangerous president to a free media in history.  Period.  Let’s put that title from The Washington Post up for you to see in nice big letters:

“USA Today’s Susan Page: Obama administration most ‘dangerous’ to media in history

Barack Hussein Obama is a totalitarian thug and the terrorists are probably actually more tolerant of free speech than our tyrant president is.  Obama can’t handle anybody having the right to criticize him any more than the most whackjob Muslim rabid dogs can handle their psychopath prophet being criticized.

Obama has done very little to deal with terrorist incidents in America – aside from constantly labeling them “workplace violence.”  But he sure has cracked skulls among reporters who dared to report something he didn’t like.

When a self-acknowledged “soldier of Allah” murdered fourteen American soldiers while repeatedly screaming “Allahu Akbar!” was NOT a terrorist according to Obama and the cowards who whisper lies into his dishonest ears, well, Houston, we’ve got a problem.  And that’s happened other times, too.  This is a great administration to be a terrorist in; it’s a lousy one to be a reporter seeking to report the truth.

The murderers of the French satirical journalists are no different than what Obama has already decided were just “work place violence.”  Because the terrorists who murdered a dozen people in France did NOTHING that Nidal Hasan didn’t do.  In both cases, the same vicious terrorist murders were carried out while praising the same Allah.

Now, why do liberals have a pathological need to protect radical terrorists???

I have pointed this fact out in the past: there is virtually NO difference between the radical jihadists and the Obama liberals; they BOTH want Government-as-God, Government with the divine power to crush all opposition.  Versus conservatives and evangelical Christians who want LIMITED government (small ‘g’) with LIMITED powers.  We evangelical Christian conservatives believe in God-given rights and freedoms; progressive liberals want to strip those rights and freedoms away in the name of secular humanism and the Islamic jihadists want to strip those rights and freedoms away in the name of an Allah who is nothing short of the devil.  The result is the same sort of totalitarian government dictatorship whether it’s an officially state atheist Stalinist regime or an Islamic theocracy.

What is Islam, or what has it metastasized into in the cancerous Age of Obama?  It is a political system masquerading as a religion.  The “jihadists” and Obama want the same identical thing: total dictatorial control to impose his will over any opposing voices.

Free speech is as much an enemy to the American left as it is to the jihadist terrorists.

Even pro-liberal sources acknowledge that leftist groups determined that when politics did not work for them, it was time to resort to violence (and see here).  That is every bit as true today as it was in the 1960s.  The essence of the left is fascism and violence and getting its way no matter what.

A few years ago the Tea Party was born – and viciously targeted for slandering by the left.  It didn’t matter that there was never a SINGLE act of violence or criminal behavior by ANY of the thousands of tea party protests, because the essence of progressive liberalism is fascist Nazi Joseph Goebbels-style propaganda.  Contrast that with the viciousness and the criminality of the leftist Occupy Movement that was nothing more than a demonic “Astroturf” attempt to copycat the Tea Party – except with rabid violence and terrorism.

First note there is a direct connection between Obama and the fascist Occupy Movement.  And then note the nature of the ugly, toxic viciousness and vileness of the American left:

Occupy Wall Street Movement Ranks Have Criminals, Rioters, Rapists, Terrorists And Now Murderers

Coming To America (Thanks, Obama!): Spain On Verge Of Collapse While Liberals Turn Violent In Streets

Liberals Are Not Quite As ‘Tolerant’ As Rabid Rats As They Keep Proving That THEY Are The True Fascists Threatening America

When Will American People Get Fed Up With Violent Occupy Fascists And The Democrats Who Endorse Them???

The Inconvenient Truth About The Lilly White Occupy Wall Street Movement And The Media Propaganda That Ignores Truth Altogether

Fascism A Socialist Leftwing Ideology: Communism, Fascism, Labor Unions, Workers And Students Exploiting ‘Crisis’

Call The Occupy Protest Movement And The Left That It Comes From What It Truly Is: Fascist

Occupy Movement Costs America UNTOLD MILLIONS ($2.3 Milion In L.A. ALONE) Versus Tea Party Movement Which MADE Cities Money

Read Up On USSR And Decide What You Think About It – Because Obama Is Trying To Bring It To America

Liberalism = Marxism. See The Occupy Movement Shutting Down Ports, Capitalism, Jobs To Get Their Way (Communist Russian Revolution Part Deux)

After Obama Deceitfully Demonized GOP For ‘Dirtier Air And Dirtier Water,’ His Occupy Movement Leaves Behind 30 TONS Of Diseased Filfth At Just ONE Site

Vile Liberal Occupy Movement Killed The Grass At L.A. City Hall – What Should Be Done Now?

Occupy Movement Officially A Terrorist Group Now

The American Left Personified By Occupy Movement: Vile, Violent Fascist Thugs

The American Left Personified By Occupy Movement: Vile, Violent Fascist Thugs

Occupy Movement Is Destroying Jobs And Hurting Little People

Consider The Fundamental Incoherence And Hypocrisy Of The Left And The Occupy Movement

Tea Party Vs. Occupy Protests: The Winners Of The Out-Of-Control Violence Trophy – For The Millionth Consecutive Time – Is The LEFT

Busting The 99% Vs. 1% Liberal Lie

Nazis, Socialists, Communists, Liberals, Democrats, Obama, Media Propaganda ALL Support Occupy Wall Street

If The Occupy Wall Street Crowd Had Any Integrity, They’d Be Attacking Obama (Who Has Raked In More Wall Street $ Than ANYONE)

And so it is all too easy to compare the vicious, ugly Occupy bowel Movement and its pathological fascism to the pathological fascism of the race-baiting riots and murderous climate that we see on the left AS WE SPEAK TODAY.

I don’t think I need to document that spirit of rabid hate that is coming out of core Democrat Party constituent groups against the United States of America, against freedom, against liberty and against the police who try to keep this nation, our freedoms and our liberty safe.  I need nothing more than marchers at an Al Sharpton event screaming over and over again:

“What do we want?  Dead Cops!  When do we want it?  NOW!”

The race-baiting rioting viciousness comes directly from the ideology of Barack Obama, Eric Holder, and Democrats like Bill de Blasio.

Al Sharpton is the cockroach link between Barack Obama and Bill de Blasio.  Race-baiting agitator Al Sharpton has been at Obama’s White House at least 72 times.  Mayor de Blasio had refused to meet with police after repeatedly demonizing them, but that cockroach met with Al Sharpton and gave him a place of honor and a platform to racially demonize the NYPD:

He [de Blasio] took the unusual step — unimaginable under the mayoralties of Rudy Giuliani or Michael Bloomberg — of inviting Sharpton to City Hall, seating him opposite Bratton at a table where the activist proceeded to strongly denounce the police. (“If Dante wasn’t your son, he’d be a candidate for a chokehold. And we got to deal with that reality,” Sharpton said to de Blasio as Bratton looked on.) Last week, de Blasio privately met with organizers of the Garner protests, another moment that antagonized police.

It is under AND BECAUSE OF the cancerous tumor that is the Obama fascist thug presidency that race relations have reached an all-time low in America according to polls as his regime does Satan’s work to inflame hatred.

Don’t forget that Rush Limbaugh understood the cockroach soul of Barack Obama and brazenly and ACCURATELY PREDICTED that race relations would become more toxic under this toxic fascist thug.  Limbaugh was RIGHT and liberals were liars as they are ALWAYS liars.

It’s the nature of Obama, the man who falsely promised he would rise above and transcend the political divide and the racial divide and has instead been the most ideological and racist president in American history.  Obama has poisoned America and he has poisoned the world with his toxic disease of radical leftist ideology and its fascist determination to impose itself upon the people at all costs.

Never forget that Obama is the president who said:

“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.” — Barack Hussein Obama

Barack Obama and his toxic Democrat Party and the evil, demon-possessed wicked and depraved ideology that has captured the Democrat Party are the heart of evil in America today.

Violence and hate and even murder are merely tools for monsters like the jihadist terrorists and the Democrat Party machine under Barack Hussein Obama’s “leadership.”

The essence of toxic Islam today is “Submission.”  That’s what Islam means – and it is no coincidence that that’s what Obama demands from his political opponents.

And do you know why the terrorist monsters who carried out this vicious hate crime against freedom were able to casually massacre a dozen people and then walk into a car and drive away?

Because the same toxic, vile liberals with the same insane policies who are polluting America have already polluted France, that’s why.

Look at liberal bastion Chicago.  Look at the damn murder rate.  Look at what has overtaken once well-policed New York due to Democrat Bill de Blasio’s morally idiotic policies.

Who pulled off this terrible crime?  The same sort of mass immigration wave that Obama has opened the floodgate to pour into America.  Obama isn’t just opening up America’s borders to MILLIONS of illegal immigrants who have absolutely ZERO loyalty to America; he’s opening us up to TERRORISTS who are able to infiltrate as easily as all the criminal illegal Democrats flooding across our unprotected borders.

France has the toughest gun-control laws ON PLANET EARTH.  And just like we Republicans who cling to our guns and our religion – as Obama demonized us – have kept saying, who had the guns and who was helpless?  The thugs had the guns because criminals DON’T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT ANTI-GUN LAWS BECAUSE THEY DON’T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT ANY LAWS, versus the law-abiding who were helpless sheep.  Even the COPS didn’t have the damn guns, versus the terrorists who had fully automatic weapons and even rocket launchers.

Remember Obama demonizing police for having too much militarization?  Damn, I sure bet the French police could have been shooting at Obama instead of the incredibly well-armed terrorists that “Obamanism” has produced.

Liberalism is the absolute worst of everything imaginable.  It results in out-of-control fascist government that simultaneously cannot protect its people.  It results in immorality and wickedness triumphing over morality and righteousness.  It destroys the family and the family structure and even the reason for the existence of families which results in out-of-control youth and the “perilous times” described by the Bible in the last days before the coming of the beast.  It produces schools that are only good for indoctrination in a system that protects unionized government teachers at the expense of children.  It results in a bitter, racially divided people who have been indoctrinated the left to believe that the system is stacked against them and racism is to blame and all they have is hate and violence.  And then it strips the police of the tactics and tools that they need to fight the ensuing chaos and violence.

If Spain Collapses, Europe Collapses. And If Europe Collapses, America Collapses. And Terrified Spaniards Are Bailing Out Of Spain As I Write This.

Be afraid.  Be very, very afraid.  Because to paraphrase Obama’s demonic reverend for 25 years, the chickens of socialism have come home to roost:

Fears Rising, Spaniards Pull Out Their Cash and Get Out of Spain
Published in the New York Times: Monday, 3 Sep 2012 | 9:22 PM ET By: Landon Thomas Jr.

After working six years as a senior executive for a multinational payroll-processing company in Barcelona, Spain, Mr. Vildosola is cutting his professional and financial ties with his troubled homeland. He has moved his family to a village near Cambridge, England, where he will take the reins at a small software company, and he has transferred his savings from Spanish banks to British banks.

“The macro situation in Spain is getting worse and worse,” Mr. Vildosola, 38, said last week just hours before boarding a plane to London with his wife and two small children. “There is just too much risk. Spain is going to be next after Greece, and I just don’t want to end up holding devalued pesetas.”

Mr. Vildosola is among many who worry that Spain’s economic tailspin could eventually force the country’s withdrawal from the euro and a return to its former currency, the peseta. That dire outcome is still considered a long shot, even if Spain might eventually require a Greek-style bailout. But there is no doubt that many of those in a position to do so are taking their money — and in some cases themselves — out of Spain.

In July, Spaniards withdrew a record 75 billion euros, or $94 billion, from their banks — an amount equal to 7 percent of the country’s overall economic output — as doubts grew about the durability of Spain’s financial system.

The withdrawals accelerated a trend that began in the middle of last year, and came despite a European commitment to pump up to 100 billion euros into the Spanish banking system. Analysts will be watching to see whether the August data, when available, shows an even faster rate of capital flight.

More disturbing for Spain is that the flight is starting to include members of its educated and entrepreneurial elite who are fed up with the lack of job opportunities in a country where the unemployment rate touches 25 percent.

According to official statistics, 30,000 Spaniards registered to work in Britain in the last year, and analysts say that this figure would be many multiples higher if workers without documents were counted. That is a 25 percent increase from a year earlier.

“No doubt there is a little bit of panic,” said José García Montalvo, an economist at Pompeu Fabra University in Barcelona. “The wealthy people have already taken their money out. Now it’s the professionals and midrange people who are moving their money to Germany and London. The mood is very, very bad.”

It is possible that the outlook could improve if the European Central Bank’s governing council, which meets Thursday, signals a plan to help shore up the finances of Spain and other euro zone laggards by intervening in the bond markets.

But right now, if anything, Spain’s picture is growing dimmer.

On Friday, the government’s bank rescue fund said it would need to pump up to 5 billion euros into the failed mortgage-lending giant Bankia, which the state seized in May. And on Monday, Andalusia became the latest of Spain’s semiautonomous regions to ask the central government for rescue money.

The wider prospects for the euro zone are also still bleak. Moody’s [MCO 39.72 0.12 (+0.3%) ] Investors Service said on Monday that it had changed its outlook on the AAA rating of the European Union to negative, and that it might downgrade the rating if it decides to cut the ratings on the union’s four largest budget contributors.

Spain’s gathering gloom comes despite a gradual return of capital to banks in Greece and the relative stability of deposits in those other euro zone trouble spots, Italy, Ireland and Portugal.

The continued exodus of money and people from Spain could be a warning to European policy makers that bailing out the country — a step now widely expected — may not stem the panic as long as the Spanish economy remains in a funk.

It was a lesson learned in Greece, where despite successive European bailouts, about a third of deposits have been withdrawn from its banks since 2009, as the public worried that Athens might have to return to the drachma.

Spain is still a far cry from a nearly bankrupt Greece: it has a much larger and more diverse economy, lower levels of debt and a bond market that is still functioning.

It might be more accurate to say that money is leaving Spanish banks at more of a jog than anything close to a sprint.

Although retail and corporate deposits are down 10 percent compared with those of July 2011, the country remains relatively rich in savings, with 2.3 trillion euros in overall deposits, according to data from Morgan Stanley.

But once under way, the flight of bank deposits can easily overwhelm rational facts and analysis.

Setting off the flight was the failure of Bankia, which came as a shock to Spanish savers who had been assured by government officials that the bank was in good shape.

Instead of calming fears, the state takeover prompted comparisons to Argentina in 2001, when peso bank accounts denominated in dollars were frozen in order to stem the flight of deposits.

The corralito, or corral, as the Argentine action is known, has become part of the public conversation in Spain. The million-plus Argentines who have since immigrated to Spain have provided ample and gory stories of desperate legal battles and wiped-out savings.

Eduardo Pérez, a Spaniard who was working in Argentina during that period, remembers the events all too well. He said he lost four-fifths of the money he had kept in an Argentine savings account, though he declined to say how much money was involved.

“Some of my friends lost everything,” Mr. Pérez said. “So yes, everyone in Spain knows about the corralito.”

Recently, Mr. Pérez, who lives in the northern city of Bilbao, removed about a third of his euros from his Spanish savings account and sent them to Singapore, converting them to Singapore dollars.

Having lost his job at a multinational company a few months ago, Mr. Pérez, 48, is trying to make ends meet by focusing on his travel Web site and blog, which aggregate Spanish-language travel videos.

But as the job outlook worsens, he is contemplating following in the path of his savings and starting a new life in Singapore with his wife.

“Two years ago, we never would have thought of this, but now I have real fears that there will be a breakup with the euro,” he said. “And when you keep hearing people saying, ‘Don’t worry, it’s not going to happen’ — well, that is when you have to start worrying.”

Analysts said that the record-high outflow from Spain in July was probably spurred in part by July’s being a taxpaying month for many corporations, which prompted them to withdraw cash from deposit accounts.

Also playing a role were investment funds that moved cash reserves to foreign banks in light of the credit downgrades at Spanish banks.

Still, as the examples of Mr. Vildosola and Mr. Pérez show, individual deposit flight is becoming more pronounced.

Some people are willing to fly to London for the day just to open an account there, as most banks in the city require such transactions to be made in person.

Spanish bankers working for British financial institutions say they have been hit with a barrage of questions about how to open savings accounts in London.

“It seems as if everyone I know in Spain is getting on an easyJet to come to London and open a bank account,” said one such banker, who spoke on condition of anonymity, citing his company’s policy.

That is what Mr. Vildosola did before he took the more drastic step of moving his family to England.

“It’s sad,” he said. “But I just don’t think there is a future for me in Spain right now.”

This story originally appeared in The New York Times

You want scary?  CNBC reported that the withdrawal rate is equal to 52% of the entire GDP of Spain:

The flight of capital from Spain is now worse than what Indonesia, one of the hardest hit countries during the Asian financial crisis, experienced in the late 1990s, according to analysis by Nomura.

On a three-month rolling basis, portfolio and investment outflows from Spain totaled 52.3 percent of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP), (that’s) more than double the outflows from Indonesia, which reached 23 percent of GDP at the time of the Asian crisis, Jens Nordvig, global head of G10 FX strategy at Nomura wrote in a note to clients on Tuesday.

Spaniards and foreign investors have been pulling money out of Spanish banks as the economy has worsened in recent months, and Nordvig said without the single currency and the flows from the ECB, Spain would already be going through a major currency crisis. (Read More: Depression, Suicides Rise as Euro Debt Crisis Intensifies)

We would stress that the broad-based nature of the capital flight, which involves both banking claims and securities and flows from both residents and non-residents, makes for a rather extreme overall outflow, and one that raises serious concerns about the implications for banking sector stability and economic growth,” Nordvig wrote.

For the record, the French are fleeing France and they are making it very clear that they are fleeing France because of the socialism that France just chose for itself:

Indigestion for ‘les Riches’ in a Plan for Higher Taxes
By LIZ ALDERMAN
Published: August 7, 2012 763 Comments

PARIS — The call to Vincent Grandil’s Paris law firm began like many others that have rolled in recently. On the line was the well-paid chief executive of one of France’s most profitable companies, and he was feeling nervous.

President François Hollande is vowing to impose a 75 percent tax on the portion of anyone’s income above a million euros ($1.24 million) a year. “Should I be preparing to leave the country?” the executive asked Mr. Grandil.

The lawyer’s counsel: Wait and see. For now, at least.

“We’re getting a lot of calls from high earners who are asking whether they should get out of France,” said Mr. Grandil, a partner at Altexis, which specializes in tax matters for corporations and the wealthy. “Even young, dynamic people pulling in 200,000 euros are wondering whether to remain in a country where making money is not considered a good thing.”

A chill is wafting over France’s business class as Mr. Hollande, the country’s first Socialist president since François Mitterrand in the 1980s, presses a manifesto of patriotism to “pay extra tax to get the country back on its feet again.” The 75 percent tax proposal, which Parliament plans to take up in September, is ostensibly aimed at bolstering French finances as Europe’s long-running debt crisis intensifies.

Europe is imploding.  Spain is one of the PIIGS (the ‘S’ in PIIGS, in fact) who are leading that collapse.  And Obama is pushing for an economic and environmentalist model that most copies collapsing Spain.

And liberals are DETERMINED to do the same thing here.  Go to Illinois, the king of the deadbeat states.  You watch a 60 Minute Story and you will be PISSED at what slimebag Democrat cockroaches have done.  Go to California, where Democrats have created a $500 BILLION unfunded pension black hole of doom.  Look at America under Obama and take note that America just passed the $16 trillion mark that was $10 trillion when Bush left office.  Barack Obama DEMONIZED George Bush for increasing the debt by $4 trillion over eight years – look what that Marxist weasel has done in HALF the time by piling on $6 trillion in debt in only FOUR years!!!  Oh, and America’s REAL debt isn’t a paltry $16 trillion; it’s actually a supermassive $222 trillion.  And all that debt was created by Democrat boondoggle-takeovers of what should have been privatized.

Democrats have murdered America.  And we are merely waiting for our turn to completely implode before the Antichrist comes and the Book of Revelation prophecy becomes the news story account of the end of human history.  You can hear the hoofbeats of the four horsemen of the Apocalypse riding hard toward us even now.

The last couple of years, as Europe has slowly imploded, the dollar has been given a boost as terrorized Europeans seek some haven from their weakening Euro.  But if Europe goes – and it WILL go – America will fall right afterward because Europe is our largest trading partner and there won’t be anybody to buy our stuff from us.  And because Obama has spent the last four years racing us toward that same direction and that same catastrophic collapse.  And when America goes the dollar will flush down the toilet right down with it.  And you better take a look at the terror on the faces of Spaniards; because YOU will have that same look on YOUR face soon thanks to your vote for Obama and Democrats in 2008.

In 1980, the last year of Jimmy Carter’s failed presidency, 300,000 businesses filed for bankruptcy.  In this last failed year of Obama’s failed presidency, 1.4 million – very nearly FIVE TIMES as many – businesses have filed for bankruptcy.  If we vote for Obama, we vote to die as a nation just as Spain previously voted to die and just as Europe previously voted to die.

Everything about this failed president is Marxist – including his damn Marxist slogans:

New Obama slogan has long ties to Marxism, socialism
By Victor Morton – The Washington Times
April 30, 2012, 06:56PM

The Obama campaign apparently didn’t look backwards into history when selecting its new campaign slogan, “Forward” — a word with a long and rich association with European Marxism.

Many Communist and radical publications and entities throughout the 19th and 20th centuries had the name “Forward!” or its foreign cognates. Wikipedia has an entire section called “Forward (generic name of socialist publications).”

“The name Forward carries a special meaning in socialist political terminology. It has been frequently used as a name for socialist, communist and other left-wing newspapers and publications,” the online encyclopedia explains.

The slogan “Forward!” reflected the conviction of European Marxists and radicals that their movements reflected the march of history, which would move forward past capitalism and into socialism and communism.

The Obama campaign released its new campaign slogan Monday in a 7-minute video. The title card has simply the word “Forward” with the “O” having the familiar Obama logo from 2008. It will be played at rallies this weekend that mark the Obama re-election campaign’s official beginning.

Vote for Obama.  March “forward” right into hell, you fools.  Because that’s what you’ve got to look “forward” to under your demonic false messiah Obama.

You just watch what will happen to the DOW the day Spain goes the way of the Dodo bird.  And you realize that we’re going down hard in our own day of reckoning because we chose the same stupid and immoral course that Spain chose.

What’s Obama’s “strategy” to deal with this crisis???  To try to call on Europe to not collapse until after he’s reelected so he won’t have to face the voters’ wrath over what hell has befallen America under his failed leadership.

The collapse is coming.  Democrats gave us that when they voted for Obama and let him kill America with his socialism.  The Antichrist is coming.  He’ll be riding in on his white horse to save the day from the disaster and collapse caused by the previous false messiah Obama.  And Democrats will welcome the beast even more enthusiastically than they welcomed Obama and they will worship him and they will take his mark.

Get ready for hell on earth.  And then get ready for hell itself.  Because the beast is coming.

Openly Socialist Hollande And Obama Share SAME Major Policies – So Obama Isn’t A Socialist WHY, Exactly???

“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” – Karl Marx

I have frequently on this very blog demanded liberals to explain in detail just how exactly Barack Obama isn’t for the same thing (i.e., the major economic element of communism).  But let’s start with the French and get to Obama later.

Planet France is a place where fools have pretty much run things ever since 1789.  Two words that define France today are “socialism” and “surrender.”

Who did Planet France just elect?  And just what is this particular cheese-eating socialist surrender-monkey saying he’s going to do?

Hollande defeats Sarkozy in French presidency vote
Updated 04:05 p.m., Sunday, May 6, 2012

PARIS (AP) — Socialist Francois Hollande defeated conservative incumbent Nicolas Sarkozy on Sunday to become France’s next president, heralding a change in how Europe tackles its debt crisis and how France flexes its military and diplomatic muscle around the world.

Exuberant, diverse crowds filled the Place de la Bastille, the iconic plaza of the French Revolution, to fete Hollande’s victory, waving French, European and labor union flags and climbing the column that rises at its center. Leftists are overjoyed to have one of their own in power for the first time since Socialist Francois Mitterrand was president from 1981 to 1995.

“Austerity can no longer be inevitable!” Hollande declared in his victory speech Sunday night after a surprising campaign that saw him transform from an unremarkable, mild figure to an increasingly statesmanlike one.

Sarkozy is the latest victim of a wave of voter anger at government spending cuts around Europe that have tossed out governments and leaders over the past couple of years.

In Greece, a parliamentary vote Sunday is seen as critical to the country’s prospects for pulling out of a deep financial crisis felt in world markets. A state election in Germany and local elections in Italy were seen as tests of support for the national government’s policies.

Hollande promised help for France’s downtrodden after years under the Sarkozy, a man many voters saw as too friendly with the rich and blamed for economic troubles.

Hollande said European partners should be relieved and not frightened by his presidency.

“I am proud to have been capable of giving people hope again,” Hollande told huge crowds of supporters in his electoral fiefdom of Tulle in central France. “We will succeed!”

Hollande inherits an economy that’s a driver of the European Union but is deep in debt. He wants more government stimulus, and more government spending in general, despite concerns in the markets that France needs to urgently trim its huge debt.

Sarkozy conceded defeat minutes after the polls closed, saying he had called Hollande to wish him “good luck” as the country’s new leader.

Sarkozy, widely disliked for budget cuts and his handling of the economy during recent crises, said he did his best to win a second term, despite widespread anger at his handling of the economy.

“I bear responsibility … for the defeat,” he said. “I committed myself totally, fully, but I didn’t succeed in convincing a majority of French. … I didn’t succeed in making the values we share win.”

With 75 percent of the vote counted, official results showed Hollande with 51.1 percent of the vote compared with Sarkozy’s 48.9 percent, the Interior Ministry said. The CSA, TNS-Sofres and Ipsos polling agencies all predicted a Hollande win as well.

Hollande has virtually no foreign policy experience but he will face his first tests right after his inauguration, which must happen no later than May 16.

Among his first trips will be to the United States later this month for summits of NATO — where he will announce he is pulling French troops out of Afghanistan by the end of the year — and the Group of Eight leading world economies.

Hollande’s first challenge will be dealing with Germany: He wants to re-negotiate a hard-won European treaty on budget cuts that Germany’s Angela Merkel and Sarkozy had championed. He promises to make his first foreign trip to Berlin to work on a relationship that has been at the heart of Europe’s postwar unity.

Germany’s foreign minister, Guido Westerwelle, congratulated Hollande on Sunday night and said both countries will keep on cooperating closely in driving the European Union’s policies and be “a stabilizing factor and a motor for the European Union.”

At home, Hollande intends to modify one of Sarkozy’s key reforms, over the retirement age, to allow some people to retire at 60 instead of 62. He also plans to increase spending in a range of sectors and wants to ease France off its dependence on nuclear energy. He favors legalizing euthanasia and gay marriage.

Sarkozy supporters call those proposals misguided.

“We’re going to call France the new Greece,” said Laetitia Barone, 19. “Hollande is now very dangerous.”

Sarkozy had said he would quit politics if he lost, but was vague about his plans Sunday night.

“You can count on me to defend these ideas, convictions,” he said, “but my place cannot be the same.”

His political allies turned their attention to parliamentary elections next month.

People of all ages and different ethnicities celebrated Hollande’s victory at the Bastille. Ghylaine Lambrecht, 60, who celebrated the 1981 victory of Mitterrand at the Bastille, was among them.

“I’m so happy. We had to put up with Sarko for 10 years,” she said referring to Sarkozy’s time as interior and finance minister and five years as president. “In the last few years the rich have been getting richer. Now long live France, an open democratic France.”

“It’s magic!” said Violaine Chenais, 19. “I think Francois Hollande is not perfect, but it’s clear France thinks its time to give the left a chance. This means real hope for France. We’re going to celebrate with drink and hopefully some dancing.”

Planet France is a place where liberalism lives forever.  Planet France is a place where foolishness is wisdom, where night is day and where evil is good.

The markets already plunged on the fear that Hollande could win; now he’s won.  And the finance markets aren’t happy with “we will spend other people’s money until there is no more of other people’s money left to spend” policies:

Euro falls to three and a half year low amid market jitters at French and Greek elections
The Euro hit a three and a half year low against the pound as financial markets reacted to the election of Francois Hollande as France’s first Socialist president for 17 years and the new threat to a eurozone break-up posed by the post-election turmoil in Greece.
By Roland Gribben, Henry Samuel and Bruno Waterfield
11:24AM BST 07 May 2012

The Paris stock exchange CAC 40 index dropped 1.52pc in early trading with investors nervous about the growing pressure for a eurozone economic policy switch from austerity to growth, reflected in the French and Greek election results and President Hollande’s priorities.
 
The euro fell heavily across the board on Monday. Traders said the euro’s losses, which saw it hit a three-month low against the dollar, its lowest in 3 and a half years against the British pound and a 2 and half month trough versus the yen, were likely to be extended in coming days.
 
Stocks in Italy fell 2.2pc, the main Madrid index slipped 1.76pc while a 2.02pc drop in the DAX index of leading German shares was blamed on a local election setback for Chancellor Angela Merkel.
 
Political stalemate in Greece after the failure of any party to gain a majority saw shares on the Athens market slump 7.6pc.
 
The strength of the opposition to the Greek bail-out programme has raised fresh questions about continued eurozone membership.

Alexis Tsipras leader of the Syriza party, a coalition of the radical left which emerged as the second biggest after winning 16pc of the Greek vote, immediately drew the battle lines declaring: “The people of Europe can no longer be reconciled with the bailouts of barbarism.”
 
The euro fell its lowest level for almost four months to $1.2954 before showing signs of a rally to $1.301 while the interest rate on France’s benchmark ten year bonds rose.
 
Traders said there was no panic but the rising yield is increasing concerns about a run on French debt and a threat to the French deficit reduction programme. A widening in the spread between French and German bonds was seen as a ‘flight to safety.’
 
Germany’s 10-year yield fell to as low as 1.552pc, the second record in consecutive trading days.
 
Ratings agency Standard and Poor’s said President Hollande’s victory would have no immediate effect on its French rating.
 
The agency infuriated former President Sarkozy when it stripped France of its top triple-A rating in January.
 
A number of analysts felt markets had already taken account of a Hollande victory while others argued that a combination of the French and Greek results would increase pressure on eurozone debt.
 
World stock markets hit as France votes for first Socialist president in 20 years and Greece chooses a parliament with a majority of MPs from anti-bailout parties.

Some say that the market has already taken a Hollande win – i.e. a win for socialism, a win for liberalism, into account.  These are pretty much saying that Hollande will govern far more pragmatically than his liberal rhetoric suggests.  They’re saying that the world financial markets will prevent true socialism from emerging in France, and that Hollande will have to face reality given that he’s simply boxed-in by simple reality.   But even those people are saying, “We are quite pessimistic about the euro area in the short-term. We think that the GDP contraction will amplify in the second quarter. So, things will get worse in the coming weeks.”

I think that’s hogwash.  I think that Hollande will now believe he’s got a mandate to export his brand of socialist-liberal belief in unicorns and fairy dust to Germany and to the world financial markets.  His win was by about the same margin that Obama won by, interestingly, and both Obama and Democrats sure as hell thought THEY had a mandate which they foolishly exploited until the voters gave them a historic ass-kicking in 2010.  I also think that Hollande’s “Our way out of our massive debt is for our government to pretend we’re not in debt and quadruple down on our reckless, insane spending” mantra is the way to ruin.  And that ruin will surely ensue.  And, lastly, I think that the Eurozone’s complete and utter collapse is all but guaranteed now.

I said “quadruple down on our reckless, insane spending” in honor of our own socialist fool: Barack Hussein Obama.  Because Obama has spent FOUR TIMES AS MUCH AS BUSH DID:

“Austerity can no longer be inevitable!”

Our socialist fools in the Democrat Party in America are as determined to ignore reality as the sociliast fools on Planet France.

Compare and contrast openly socialist Hollande’s major policies to Obama’s: both want huge government stimulus programs; both oppose any constraints on government spending; both demand that we tax the rich; and both want a special tax on banks.  That’s because Barack Obama is a damn SOCIALIST!!!

The French election previews the U.S. November election contest between incumbent Barack Obama and challenger Mitt Romney in the following four ways:

1). Both Obama and Hollande offer almost identical leftist platforms (details on this below).

2) The bland challengers (Hollande and Romney) ignite electoral passions less than their more colorful opponents (playboy Sarkozy with his celebrity wife and Obama, the first black president).

3) The sorry state of the economy gives both challengers a hefty leg-up.

4) The French and American elections are foreshadowed by electoral disasters for the incumbent party in off-year races in 2010 and 2011. In both, the incumbent party lost long-held majorities in one house of Congress or parliament.

Read more…

And it’s no surprise that America under Obama is looking more and more like Europe and having the same long-term problems that Europe has had:

EDITORIAL: Obama’s euro-style unemployment
Welfare-state mentality fosters permanent joblessness
By THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Tuesday, June 14, 2011

It’s no secret that President Obama wants America to look more like Europe. He desires expanded powers for labor unions, higher gas prices for commuters and a diminished role on the world stage. So far, he’s been effective in fostering the conditions for European-style unemployment on these shores. […]

As we speak the unemployment rate just went down.  Why?  Because 115,000 jobs were created – nowhere near enough to even keep pace with population growth, mind you – and 342,000 gave up trying to find a job in complete despair.  We live in our own version of planet France when nobody could have a job and our president could boast of a 0% unemployment rate.

George Will pointed out a couple of facts as to just how terrible Obama is managing our economy this week on ABC’s “This Week”:

JAKE TAPPER: George, the president kicked off his campaign yesterday. Thoughts?

WILL: He kicked it off a day after we saw the emblematic achievement of the Obama administration, which is to make a decline in the unemployment rate bad news. It ticked down from 8.2 percent to 8.1 percent because 342,000 of Americans succumbed to discouragement with the Obama economy and left the economy.
 
Male participation rate in the economy today is lower than it has been at any time since we began keeping this statistic in 1948. Indeed, if the workforce participation rate were the same today as it was when Mr. Obama was inaugurated, the real unemployment rate would be measured at about 11 percent. That’s no record to run on.

Barry Hussein has been a jobs holocaust.

Bay Buchannon later made a statement about the planet France-like FOOLS who were instrumental to Obama’s 2008 victory: college students.

People who are graduating from college, 53 percent, do not get jobs when they graduate. We are going to lose that whole generation because, you know, when the jobs do come back, they’re going to hire college graduates just coming out.

Those idiot socialist fools deserve to suffer; it’s too dang bad the rest of the nation has to suffer along with them because of their vote for Obama four years ago.

I point out how simply godawful Obama has been for America.  Two years ago, due to Obama’s wildly failed policies, the labor participation rate measuring how many working-age Americans are actually WORKING was at a 25-year low.  Last year that participation rate had decreased to a 27-year low.  This year it decreased to a 31-year low.  Millions and millions of jobs have simply been vaporized under Obama and there is no sign that they will be coming back.

If you vote for Obama’s version of planet France, I can guarantee you that that rate measuring how many working-age Americans have any chance whatsoever of getting a job will continue to plunge.

P.S. The funniest damn thing of all is what I read after I got through writing this article but before I published it: that Obama is advising Hollande NOT to raise taxes and increase spending for the sake of the European economy.  WHILE OBAMA HIMSELF IS CAMPAIGNING ON DOING THE VERY THINGS HE’S TELLING HIS FELLOW SOCIALIST NOT TO DO.

We Need More Socialists Running The World (How About NOT?)

It’s kind of interesting to see what’s going on.  We’ve got an avowed socialist international banker who has been incredibly generous with other people’s money being accused of trying to redistribute a poor immigrant woman’s body to satisfy his lusts.

A comment on this situation expresses the essence of how “fair” the proponents of “economic fairness” really are:

“The IMF booted Paul Wolfowitz (an American conservati­ve) over a consensual affair with a staffer, yet have remained silent while Strauss-Ka­hn (a European socialist) sits accused of r+ape.

As it has been reported, the IMF is weighing whether or not Dominique Strauss-Kahn is indicted as to whether or not to relieve him of his position.  For the record, there were no criminal charges filed against Paul Wolfowitz.  There was no indictment; they just canned him at the very first possible opportunity.  And while Strauss-Kahn may well end resign to avoid perpetuating the circus atmosphere more than absolutely necessary (i.e., it stands to reason that a former head of the IMF would probably generate less attention than the current head of the IMF), let it stand for the record that even following a very clearcut rape allegation where even Strauss-Kahn is acknowledging that sex occurred, he has not been fired.

Not very, it turns out.  If you’re a conservative, “fairness” means your head on a pike for what is clearly the tiniest infraction versus the socialist.  I guess that’s what they mean by “social justice”; it means “justice” that always somehow favors socialists.

Here’s the story in a nutshell:

NEW YORK — The maid came from one of the world’s poorest countries to the U.S., working to support the teen daughter she raised alone. The penthouse suite at the Sofitel Hotel was just another room. She says she had no idea the man was a famous French politician. She says he tried to rape her. In addition, the New York Post reports that the alleged sex-assault victim lives in a Bronx apartment rented exclusively for adults with HIV or AIDS. The man, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, remained jailed under a suicide watch Wednesday as a lawyer for the woman sought to rebut whispered allegations that her charges were a conspiracy and a setup.

You’d think the left wing socialists who always claim to be on the side of the poor and the oppressed would be on the side of this poor immigrant housekeeper who may well be suffering from AIDS (the sacred cow of left wing diseases).  But that would mean that left wing socialists wouldn’t be completely liars and hypocrites.  And that simply isn’t true.

With that said, only the biting irony of Ann Coulter can adequately describe this situation:

To Liberals, Every Woman Looks Like a Hotel Maid
by  Ann Coulter
05/18/2011

I suppose we’ll know the truth when the DNA testing comes back, but close observers of privileged liberal men are not shocked by the accusations against Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the socialist head of the International Monetary Fund. (And you thought you were getting screwed by your banker!)

Only in Hollywood movies are handsome lacrosse players from nice families seen as likely rapists. In real life, they look more like the 5-foot-2-inch Roman Polanski or pudgy, unathletic Bill Clinton — or the homunculus 5-foot-2-inch Strauss-Kahn.

But, it is argued, how could Strauss-Kahn possibly think he could get away with the violent rape of a chambermaid in a $3,000-a-night hotel room, booked in his name?

First of all, Strauss-Kahn has evidently gotten away with treating the fairer sex as his playthings for some time. No wonder his nickname among the French is “le grand seducteur,” which I believe roughly translates to “the short, tubby serial rapist.”

The New York Times reports that as far back as 2007, Brussels journalist Jean Quatremer remarked on Strauss-Kahn’s troubled behavior — “close to harassment” — toward women, saying the press knew all about it, but never mentioned it because “we are in France.”

When Strauss-Kahn was appointed to the I.M.F., Quatremer sardonically warned that the international institution was not the same as France, but instead had “Anglo-Saxon morals.”

Second, it’s not unheard of that a wealthy liberal would assume the law does not apply to him. Actually, let me restate that: Wealthy liberals always assume that laws don’t apply to them. After all the waivers the Obama administration has been dishing out like candy, are there any liberals left to whom Obamacare will apply?

We might also ask how a governor of New York could think he could get away with hiring prostitutes to service him in similarly pricey hotels, bringing them across state lines, and using his friend’s names to book the girls, year after year.

But Eliot Spitzer thought he could get away with that. Fortunately he has been brought to justice and sentenced to hosting a lame show on CNN.

Still, rape is a more serious crime than being a frenzied masturbator paying for sex. For that, I give you Andrew Luster, multimillionaire Max Factor heir, whose mother gives to every liberal cause under the sun from Barbara Boxer and Loretta Sanchez to Moveon.org, Emily’s List and pro-gay marriage groups. (If only her son had been gay!)

Her son not only drugged and raped a string of women, but made videotapes of his crimes.

On the tapes, Luster can be seen sodomizing unconscious women with lighted marijuana cigarettes, candles and plastic swords, and then talking into the camera about the unconscious women lying on his bed. The tapes were carefully labeled with titles like “Shauna GHBing,” referring to gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, known as a date-rape drug.

Luster was cataloging video evidence of his own criminal acts — and yet he thought he could get away with it.

He almost did, too, fleeing the country during his 2003 trial. He was caught and is now serving 124 years in prison, having been convicted, in absentia, of 86 crimes, including 20 counts of drug-induced rape, 17 counts of raping an unconscious victim, and multiple counts of sodomy and oral copulation by use of drugs.

Also out of Southern California we have Roman Polanski, the legendary director of two good movies and about a hundred unbelievably horrible ones, who drugged and anally raped an underage girl, according to the police report.

Not only did Polanski think he could get away with it, he did get away with it by fleeing the country (to France) when he discovered, to his shock and dismay, that in America, a person can actually be sentenced to prison for drugging and raping a 13-year-old. That was in 1977. He has never been brought to justice.

Liberals supported Polanski’s evasion of punishment for child rape, with the Hollywood left denouncing his arrest in Switzerland a couple of years ago, howling that he had suffered enough! Wasn’t he prevented from coming to the U.S. to pick up his Oscar in 2003?

You know who’s suffered enough? Anybody who sat all the way through “The Pianist.”

Liberal male misogyny goes back even farther than Polanski’s three-decades-old child rape.

As Phyllis Schlafly points out in her book “Feminist Fantasies” (with a stirring foreword by Ann Coulter), for centuries, famous left-wing men have treated “their wives and mistresses like unpaid servants.”

Their credo might well have been, “From each, according to my needs …”

Schlafly bases her review of liberal woman-haters on the book “Intellectuals” by historian Paul Johnson. Among the left-wing heroes highlighted by Schlafly from Johnson’s book are Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Ernest Hemingway, Henrik Ibsen, Bertrand Russell, Jean-Paul Sartre and Karl Marx.

Johnson writes that the pint-sized — 5 foot 2 1/2 inch — communist-sympathizing Sartre “was notorious for never taking a bath and being disgustingly dirty.” He said admiringly of the Nazis, “We have never been as free as we were under the German occupation.”

The flyweight Sartre famously turned Simone de Beauvoir into his “mistress, surrogate wife, cook and manager, female bodyguard and nurse.” (Sadly, she never learned how to give someone a sponge bath.) All the while, the smelly midget committed a stream of infidelities, viewing women “as scalps to add to his centaur’s belt.”

In “the annals of literature,” Johnson writes, “there are few worse cases of a man exploiting a woman.”

As he got older, Sartre’s sexual conquests got younger, including teenaged girls.

Like Spitzer, Luster and Polanski, liberal men seem driven by their massive insecurities (often based on physical defects, such as their diminutive size or soap allergies) to choose unconscious, illiterate, servant-class and teenage females as their sex partners. But let’s not drag pocket-sized Woody Allen’s name into this, as my column appears in many family newspapers.

Karl Marx kept a female slave from the time she was 8 years old, eventually using her not only as a servant but as his mistress, never acknowledging his child with her or paying her at all. She waited on him hand and foot while he explained to the world that profit is the stolen surplus value of the laborer. Like so many liberal icons, Marx seldom bathed and left his wife and children in poverty.

As Schlafly says, no wonder liberal women think men are pigs: Their men are pigs.

Maybe Strauss-Kahn is innocent, but students of liberal comportment base their suspicions of his guilt not on fairy tales from Lifetime: TV for Women, but on 200 years of disgusting sexual behavior by liberal men.

I was the one who boldfaced the two paragraphs above.  They were simply too delicious in their total accuracy of depicting the fact that “liberal men are pigs” not to.

I can understand why the left wing would decry the treatment of their fellow socialist hero Dominique Strauss-Kahn; the man truly epitomizes them.

MSNBC Adds Bigoted To Its Bias: ‘You’re Ignorant Because You’re White’

This is just absolutely stunning.

MSNBC‘s Lawrence O’Donnell shows us how totally over the top rabid liberal non-Fox News networks truly are.

Here is a transcript of what this fool passes off as “journalism” today:

O’DONNELL: Perhaps all of Michele Bachmann’s staff come from her district, which may be the most ignorant Congressional district in America. In 2010, 52 percent of that district voted for Michele Bachmann to represent them in Congress. Now, she had already proven time and time again to her district and to America that she is unworthy of representing any Congressional district in America. But 52 percent, the same percentage in that district who voted for John McCain for president, voted for Michele Bachmann in 2010.

What makes those voters so ignorant? Well, for starters, they are whiter than the average district. 92 percent white in fact.

Noel Sheppard at Newsbusters continues to take the “sane” out of O’Donnell’s insanity:

What? They’re ignorant because they’re white? Are you kidding? O’Donnell continued:

O’DONNELL: But that explains nothing. Missouri’s 8th Congressional district is 91 percent white and has been represented by Jo Ann Emerson since 1997. We do not have a litany of imbecilic comments by Congresswoman Jo Ann Emerson. In fact, we have none. If we’ve missed any, please submit them to our website, thelastword.msnbc.com, and we’ll see if they compare to Michele Bachmann’s.

Well, if that “explains nothing,” why bring it up? It’s almost like O’Donnell and his staff knew they were going too far with the 92 percent white remark, and felt they needed to soften it a little by bringing up Emerson’s district.

But the damage was already done. After all, imagine for a moment Bachmann was black, Emerson was black, these were black districts, and the commentator was a conservative:

What makes those voters so ignorant? Well, for starters, they are blacker than the average district. 92 percent black in fact. But that explains nothing. Missouri’s 8th Congressional district is 91 percent black and has been represented by Jo Ann Emerson since 1997. We do not have a litany of imbecilic comments by Congresswoman Jo Ann Emerson. In fact, we have none. If we’ve missed any, please submit them to our website, thelastword.msnbc.com, and we’ll see if they compare to Michele Bachmann’s.

You think that would have gone over well in the black community, or would there be calls Tuesday for said conservative commentator’s immediate termination?

I guess along with feeling comfortable attacking white women as long as they’re conservative, O’Donnell now feels it’s acceptable to go after all white people.

I am so sick and disgusted with liberals.  They are completely depraved people with a completely warped view of the world.

Liberals like Lawrence O’Donnell are totally committed to postmodernism, multiculturalism and pluralism.  It’s not that they are intellecutally brainless idiots as much as it is that they have totally committed themselves to totally false theories about the world.  Like the whole “Emperor’s New Clothes” story, these “intellectuals” have convinced themselves that their theories are the stuff of genius.  Only the more they try to explain their genius theories, the more utterly idiotic they start sounding.

Let’s talk about liberals and God; more specifically about MSNBC, Lawrence O’Donnell, and God.  Said O’Donnell on his MSNBC soapbox:

The book of Revelation is a work of fiction describing how a truly vicious God would bring about the end of the world. No half-smart religious person actually believes the book of Revelation. They are certain that their God would never turn into a malicious torturer and mass murderer beyond Hitler’s wildest dreams. Glenn Beck, of course, does believe the book of Revelation.

There is a reason why the Bible says, “The fool says in his heart, ‘There is no God'” (Psalm 14:1).  And that is because any worldview which does not begin with a divine worldview is already wrong, and can only go more and more wrong as it continues to postulate bad answers to fundamental questions.

Our founding fathers understood this, and their understanding enabled them to found the world’s oldest democratic republic.  They realized that democracy – a limited government of the people – demanded that people be able to govern themselves.  And that only a moral and religious people could pull that off. 

They fought a war over this principle encapsulated in the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” – Declaration of Independence

And so we have the words of Adams:

“We have no government armed with the power capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and true religion. Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” — John Adams

And Washington:

“Of all the habits and dispositions which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.  In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars.” — George Washington

But liberalism fundamentally denies this principle, and constantly seeks for the results of the French Revolution rather than the American Revolution.   They refuse to realize that the atheism-based French Revolution inevitably resulted in first chaos and madness, and then a dictator (Napolean seized power within a decade); and that France has had 11 separate Constitutions since 1793, and at least fifteen different governments.  Thomas Jefferson rightly said that, “With all the defects in our Constitution, whether general or particular, the comparison of our government with those of Europe, is like a comparison of Heaven with Hell.”

But multiculturalist, pluralist, postmodernist secular humanists that dominate liberalism like Lawrence O’Donnell literally seek hell.

Can a white man be an anti-white male-bashing bigot?  You’d assume not, until you realize that people like Lawrence O’Donnell are so damn arrogant that they view themselves as transcending their own race and gender even as they claim that everyone else beneath them is a slave to their own.  But the fact of the matter is – to quote Barack Obama – “yes, we can.”  We can believe a theory that necessarily makes us hate ourselves.

Take Karl Marx.  The man was profoundly anti-Semitic.  He was also a Jew.

Here are some quotes from the VERY Jewish “intellectual” Karl Marx:

“The Jews of Poland are the smeariest of all races.” (Neue Rheinische Zeitung, April 29, 1849)

“Ramsgate is full of Jews and fleas.” (MEKOR IV, 490, August 25, 1879)

“What is the Jew’s foundation in our world? Material necessity, private advantage.

“What is the object of the Jew’s worship in this world? Usury. What is his worldly god? Money.

“Very well then; emancipation from usury and money, that is, from practical, real Judaism, would constitute the emancipation of our time.” (“A World Without Jews,” p. 37)

“What was the essential foundation of the Jewish religion? Practical needs, egotism.” (Ibid, p. 40)

“Money is the zealous one God of Israel, beside which no other God may stand. Money degrades all the gods of mankind and turns them into commodities. Money is the universal and self-constituted value set upon all things. It has therefore robbed the whole world, of both nature and man, of its original value. Money is the essence of man’s life and work, which have become alienated from him. This alien monster rules him and he worships it.

“The God of the Jews has become secularized and is now a worldly God. The bill of exchange is the Jew’s real God. His God is the illusory bill of exchange.” (“A World Without Jews,” p. 41)

And what about the most rabid anti-Semite of all time?

Hitler ‘had Jewish and African roots’, DNA tests show
Adolf Hitler is likely to have had Jewish and African roots, DNA tests have shown.
By Heidi Blake 6:25AM BST 24 Aug 2010
 
Saliva samples taken from 39 relatives of the Nazi leader show he may have had biological links to the “subhuman” races that he tried to exterminate during the Holocaust.

Jean-Paul Mulders, a Belgian journalist, and Marc Vermeeren, a historian, tracked down the Fuhrer’s relatives, including an Austrian farmer who was his cousin, earlier this year.

A chromosome called Haplogroup E1b1b1 which showed up in their samples is rare in Western Europe and is most commonly found in the Berbers of Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia, as well as among Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews.

“One can from this postulate that Hitler was related to people whom he despised,” Mr Mulders wrote in the Belgian magazine, Knack.

Just as Caucasian and male “journalist” Lawrence O’Donnell is clearly related to people he despises.

Can you be of a certain race and yet actively despise that race?  I think we’ve established that you most certainly can, if you’re vile enough.

So yes, we’ve got Lawrence O’Donnell, anti-white bigoted man-despising white male.

Lawrence O’Donnell is a pathological liberal ideologue.  Progressive liberal pseudo-intellectualism is rabidly anti-white and anti-man.  And so O’Donnell is those things, too.  And the fact that O’Donnell is the very things he despises is at best a minor detail to him.  Because liberals NEVER worry about inconvenient things like facts.

I would add one other element to the mix: the ingredient of self-hatred which is so necessary to liberalism.

Understand: liberals constantly agitate for policies that will bring about their nation’s certain destruction.  You don’t do that sort of thing unless you hate yourself, hate the next generation, hate your country, and literally embrace your own extinction.

At some deep subconscious level, liberals like Lawrence O’Donnell recognize that they are swine, that they are nasty, nasty people.  And from that point forward everything else just sort of oozes out of them like toxic slime from a poorly-designed container.

MSNBC has the right to broadcast.  Unlike the fascist liberals who constantly agitate to force Rush Limbaugh and Fox News off the air with oxymoronic legislations such as “the fairness doctrine,” I accept that right.  But that doesn’t mean anyone but fools need to watch it.

Bu-Bu-But I thought Obama Was Making The World Love Us After Bush

The world just loves that Barack Obama, the lamestream media keeps telling us, and they love America because of Obama.

Other than the fact that they don’t.

Sarkozy cools toward Obama

Source: Global Times
December 29 2009]

French President Nicolas Sarkozy has gone cold on his US counterpart Barack Obama, the Financial Times (FT) reported Monday.

Sarkozy, whose pro-Washington stance has seen him nicknamed “Sarko the American,” stressed that France and the US were “the same family” during his first face-to-face meeting with Obama in April since the US elections last year.

But the French president has clashed since then with his US counterpart on a series of issues, raising the question of whether Sarkozy is reverting to the anti-US posture of his predecessor, Jacques Chirac.

“He has now shifted from a pro-Bush position to an anti-Obama position,” the FT quoted Jean-Christophe Cambadélis, international affairs spokesman for the opposition Socialists, as saying.

Obama’s irritation with his French counterpart began when Sarkozy tried to grab the limelight at the G20 summit in London in April and talked condescendingly of the US President in private.

Sarkozy told colleagues that he found Obama to be inexperienced and unbriefed, especially on climate change, according to The Times of London.

In September, the French president expressed his frustration over how to deal with Iran’s nuclear ambitions and the priority that Obama attaches to the long-term goal of a world free of nuclear weapons.

The French government also refused a US request to send more troops to Afghanistan, while several other European allies are planning to do so.

The French press often publishes Sarkozy’s unflattering comments about Obama’s lack of prior government experience, his alleged difficulty in reaching decisions or his domestic electoral setbacks.

“The paradox of the situation is that in terms of the relationship with the US, he can do a Chirac in that he can criticize the Americans but he can do it from a position that is 180 degrees different from Chirac,” the FT quoted François Heisbourg, an adviser to the Foundation for Strategic Research, a Paris-based think tank, as saying.

“He can play to a habitual anti-American standpoint but not from a position that is fundamentally anti-American,” he added.

Agencies – Global Times

“Pro-Bush position”?  “Anti-Obama position”?  Blasphemy!!!  “Objective” journalists across the nation tear their robes at this crime against He-Who-Makes-Their-Legs-Quiver.

This “anti-Obama position” didn’t just happen overnight.  It began with Obama’s reckless spending plan also known as the stimulus.  Many leaders of European countries that had already seen the socialist road to hell did not want to go over it again, as Obama demanded:

But it is not just Canada where the unemployed are faring better. Other countries, too, decided against a massive stimulus plan. In March, with German Chancellor Angela Merkel nodding in agreement at his side, French President Nicolas Sarkozy declared: “the problem is not about spending more.” Later that month, the president of the European Union, Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek of the Czech Republic, castigated the Obama administration’s deficit spending and bank bailouts as “a road to hell.” The Washington Post wrote that there was a “fundamental divide that persists between the United States and many European countries over the best way to respond to the global financial crisis.”

The unemployment rate in the European Union was higher than in the United States to begin with even before the Obama administration’s spending. By January, the EU unemployment rate stood at 8.5 percent — almost a whole percentage point higher than ours.  So what has happened since the big U.S. stimulus spending spree was passed? We more than caught up with the EU’s high unemployment rate.  By August, the last month data is available for the EU, the U.S.’s unemployment rate slightly exceeded the EU’s — 9.7 versus 9.6 percent.

And of course the leaders of Europe were right, and Obama is an  inexperienced, unqualified, and incompetent socialist nincompoop.  And watching your fellow leader on the other side of the pond fail doesn’t inspire either confidence or camaraderie.

Another issue has been the unrelenting march of Iran toward nuclear weapons while Obama dithered, pontificated, and showed his weakness while many European leaders are after years FINALLY beginning to understand the threat of a nuclear Iran.  From an article I wrote months ago:

And Obama is displaying his steely resolve…

Western diplomats had initially said the international powers would not accept any attempt to drag out the negotiations beyond Friday.

However, the United States said that it was now prepared to wait for Iran’s reply.

… by showing even less resolve than France.  In answer to the question, “Why Is a World Leader Distancing Himself From President Obama?”:

One major sticking point has been President Obama’s softer stance on Iran, while President Sarkozy prefers a more hawkish approach. Sarkozy said last month: “I support America’s outstretched hand. But what has the international community gained from these offers of dialogue? Nothing but more enriched uranium and centrifuges.”

This on top of other remarks Sarkozy has made about Obama’s naivete and weakness:

Sarkozy: “We live in the real world, not the virtual world. And the real world expects us to take decisions.”

Even pantywaist Europe is calling Obama a pantywaist.  And that is the definition of “pathetic.”

Our enemies have been smelling a weakling in the White House since Obama won the election.  Obama talked tough when he had to to win the election, but that tough talk was always a lie.

And of course Obama’s “deadline” for Iran to suspend its nuclear program has now come and gone without so much as a whimper from Obama.

With such profound differences on how to rebuild their economies and take care of their people (or not), and on how to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran and protect their people (or not), you can see why the honeymoon might be over.  Just because a thrill goes up Chris Matthews leg doesn’t mean that one goes up Nicholas Sarkozy’s.

Well, at least the terrorists don’t dare attack us under the beloved Obama.

Oops, wait a second.  I guess we’ve had a dozen attempted terrorist attacks in 2009, including two that were completely undetected on Obama’s watch.  Versus years of being safe under George Bush after he took measures (which Obama dismantled) to keep the country safe.

Not to mention two successful domestic jihadist terrorist attacks in 2009 that resulted in the deaths of Americans.

Obama vowed to completely and fundamentally change the way the world views the United States, and inspire global cooperation.  But when it comes to Europe, Obama gets to talk to the hand.  Obama wants Europe to massively tighten its security.  But it appears he’s fixating on the splinter in Europe’s eye rather than the gigantic log in his own:

NEWARK (CBS) ― It’s a tale of shocking ineptitude: CBS 2 has learned a series of missteps unnecessarily added to the mayhem at Newark Liberty International Airport on Sunday. The six-hour delay stranded thousands of people, creating extreme crowding and chaos.

The mistakes made at the airport give new meaning to the term “domino effect.” It was a cascading series of missteps that cry out for action.

The sign at the Transportation Security Administration screening post at Newark read: “Premises Under Constant Video Surveillance.”

What it should add is: “If We’re Lucky.”

The Post and Courier has this to say about Dear Leader Obama’s handling of the war on terror – oops – make that the “overseas contingency operation” (sans the “overseas” part):

President Obama replaced the top intelligence professionals installed by President Bush on the grounds that they were tainted by what he considered the unethical practices of the last administration in fighting the war on terror. He damaged morale in the intelligence community by reopening a closed investigation of allegations of detainee mistreatment. President Obama has shunned the very concept of a war and has shown a preference for treating terrorist attacks as criminal acts.

Whether the president’s actions gave terrorists an advantage isn’t obvious, but this year for the first time in eight years there have been two undetected terrorist attacks on the United States. The first came on Nov. 5 at Fort Hood, Texas, when Army Maj. Malik Hassan killed 13 and wounded 30 in an attack apparently inspired by radical Muslim views. Hassan was known by U.S. intelligence to be in frequent contact with Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen, the same man said to have counseled the unsuccessful Christmas Day bomber.

How’s that “the world loves us now because Obama is president” thing working for you?

I remember the words of Janet Napolitano as she changed “terrorist attack” to “man-caused disaster”:

“In my speech, although I did not use the word “terrorism,” I referred to “man-caused” disasters. That is perhaps only a nuance, but it demonstrates that we want to move away from the politics of fear…”

There’s still time to use replace “man-caused disasters” with the phrase, “bury-our-heads-in-the-sand-and-hope-it-all-goes-away.”

Maybe “the politics of fear” had the virtue of bearing at least some resemblance to reality.

Hmmm:

Or…

Obama Pathetically And Pitifully Wrong On Iran Going Nuclear While He Dithers

The United States under Barack Obama look like a ship of fools captained by the grand fool.  The only question is whether Iran made Americans look like fools, or whether Obama made Americans look like fools.

I submit that the latter is the case.  Because any fool knew what game Iran was playing.  And yet Obama – out of arrogance, ignorance, and naivete – utterly failed to understand.  And continues to fail to understand.

A full month ago Iran reneged on an apparent deal to provide its nuclear fuel to France to process it for them.  Even had Iran fulfilled the deal, it was based on a fools’ premise; that premise being that Iran had not secretly processed any other uranium.

Iran’s negotiators have toughened their stance on the nuclear programme, signalling that Tehran will refuse to go ahead with an agreement to hand over 75 per cent of its enriched uranium. . .

Iran has amassed at least 1.4 tons of low-enriched uranium inside its underground plant in Natanz. If this was further enriched to weapons-grade level – a lengthy process – it would be enough for one nuclear weapon.

But Iran agreed to export 75 per cent of this stockpile to Russia and then France, where it would have been converted into fuel rods for use in a civilian research reactor in Tehran. This would have been a significant step towards containing Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Before talks, however, Iranian officials signalled they would renege. “Iran wants to directly buy highly-enriched uranium without sending its own low-level uranium out of the country,” reported a state television channel.

What kind of people continue to negotiate with a country that has already said it would renege on whatever deal they subsequently make?  Does the word “fools” not seem in order here?

Three weeks ago we learned that Iran had secretly tested an advanced nuclear warhead design – a strange thing for a country that isn’t attempting to build nuclear weapons to do, one would think.

The UN’s nuclear watchdog has asked Iran to explain evidence suggesting that Iranian scientists have experimented with an advanced nuclear warhead design, the Guardian has learned.

The very existence of the technology, known as a “two-point implosion” device, is officially secret in both the US and Britain, but according to previously unpublished documentation in a dossier compiled by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iranian scientists may have tested high-explosive components of the design. The development was today described by nuclear experts as “breathtaking” and has added urgency to the effort to find a diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear crisis.

No harm, no foul.  And certainly no rush.  Remember, we’re fools.

Now the SAME IAEA which only a few weeks ago was saying, “Nothing to see here, folks,” is now saying that Iran has been systematically covering up what is very obviously a nuclear weapons program.

The outgoing head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said Thursday his probe of Iran’s nuclear program is at “a dead end” and that trust in Tehran’s credibility is shrinking after its belated revelation that it was secretly building a nuclear facility.

Mohamed ElBaradei’s blunt criticism of the Islamic Republic — four days before he leaves office — was notable in representing a broad convergence with Washington’s opinion, which for years was critical of the IAEA chief for what it perceived as his softness on Iran.

Six years of constant stonewalling all made up for by issuing one pitiful statement before leaving office.  Good job, ElBaradeid, you dirtbag.

If Iran does not comply this time, you can bet a politely-worded letter will surely follow.

JERUSALEM, Israel November 24, 2009
John Bolton Was Right After All

(CBS)   Richard Grenell served as the spokesman for the last four U.S. Ambassadors to the United Nations: Zalmay Khalilzad, John Bolton, John Danforth and John Negroponte.
I certainly don’t expect the New York Times to admit that one of their greatest bogeymen turned out to be correct about Iran’s nuclear game-playing. However, the Times Editorial Board did once say “John Bolton is right.  Kofi Annan is wrong.”

Unfortunately it wasn’t about the Iran nuclear issue they were talking about – it was about his opposition to the UN’s ineffective Human Rights Council.

Nevertheless, someone needs to say it now. John Bolton was right.

When the Obama Administration proclaimed victory on October 1st by announcing that a break-through had been reached in Geneva and that Iran had committed to shipping 2,600 pounds of fuel to Russia, expert Iran watchers were appropriately cynical. Bolton cautioned, yet again, that the Iranians had used some of the same diplomatic nuances they had been using for years to successfully buy more time to continue enriching uranium and fake cooperation with the international community.

Usually, the Europeans were the first to take the bait but this time the Obama Administration got hooked first. Bolton, however, was the first to stand up and call the Iranian pronouncement a sham – and he did it within hours of the announcement.

But as Obama officials were rushing to pat themselves on the back and the New York Times was proclaiming atop the paper “Iran Agrees to Send Enriched Uranium to Russia,” Iranian officials were telling reporters that they had not committed to anything. The Iranians called it “an agreement in principle” – code words for “we’d like to but…”

The Times’ reporter in Geneva, however, was taking what the Obama officials were saying and running wildly with the incredible news. Surprisingly, or maybe not, the Times had either not checked with Iranian officials or ignored their warnings in favor of the Obama Administration’s good news. Roughly a month later, the Iranian official statements confirmed the fact that the Obama Administration had been duped. The Times subsequently inched its way back to reality through multiple follow-up stories that increasingly showed skepticism in the Victory claims culminating with October 30th’s headline “Tehran Rejects Nuclear Accord.”

Today, while the Iranians reprocess more fuel, the Obama team continues to compromise and offer even more incentives to them. No wonder Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is waiting – the deal keeps getting sweeter. President Obama has offered the Iranians more time, more sites to place their illegal fuel, more personal correspondence with the Ayatollah, more excuses as to what happened to the original deal they announced and no Chinese and Russian arm-twisting. The Obama team also keeps claiming that if Iran ships 2600 pounds of fuel out to Russia for re-processing then Iran will be unable to pose a nuclear threat for at least a year.

This often told claim is a dangerous calculation based on an assumption that Iran doesn’t have more hidden fuel (we just found out about another reprocessing plant in September) and can’t quickly convert what would remain if the plan had been accepted. Additionally, the low enriched uranium in question was produced in violation of UN Security Council resolutions so any deal to help Iran convert illegal fuel undermines Security Council credibility. The naivety of President Obama could be chalked up to hope and inexperience in foreign policy matters if it wasn’t routinely and consistently happening.

Bolton should know. No American Ambassador has produced more Security Council Resolutions on the issue of Iran than John Bolton. Bolton was able to produce three UN Security Council resolutions on Iran, two with the increasing pressure of sanctions. The deadlines in the resolutions that Bolton insisted upon were kept mainly because he held his counterparts to their word.

When Iran tried to manipulate the process by asking for more time, more talks or giving empty and last minute commitments, Bolton enforced the deadlines. Bolton was incredibly patient and willing to have round the clock negotiations but in the end forced a vote of the Security Council to the dismay of the Europeans and the consternation of Russian and China. It’s true that John Bolton would not win the most popular Ambassador award at the UN but being popular shouldn’t be the priority.

I hope that the Obama team can now see that being popular at the UN doesn’t get us support from the Europeans on sanctions resolutions or an affirmative vote from Russia and China. If it did, President Obama would have passed another Security Council Resolution on Iran, North Korea and Sudan by now. Obama is so popular in foreign countries that one begins to wonder who is happier. But being popular only means you aren’t asking Countries to do anything different.

This month, the world is seeing the pressure turned down on Iran to give up its nuclear ambitions. France’s Foreign Minister has signaled their refusal to block shipments of refined fuel to Iran, Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov called sanctions “counterproductive when there are talks underway” and China needs Iran’s oil so badly that it not only is refusing to consider further sanctions but is cutting new energy deals with Iran.

Where is the Obama Administration’s pressure on Iran to stop enriching uranium? Sadly, the Americans are getting hoodwinked by Iran and Europe is happy that they don’t have to vote for more sanctions or enforce the ones that are in place now. While the President gives up our missile shield to Russia, relaxes financial restrictions on Cuba, allows North Korea to violate their signed agreements and breaks campaign promises on a Sudan no-fly zone, the world applauds the most popular American President in history.

And here at home, Fareed Zakaria continues to call for more American compromises and more talk while characterizing Conservatives as unwilling to talk. It isn’t that Conservatives think speaking to Russia about Iran is bad, a claim Fareed Zakaria erroneously tries to tag Conservatives with, it’s that giving something without getting something in return is foolish and naïve. Zakaria and the other elites blinded by Obama’s global reset button want America to compromise and negotiate but fail to expect the same from the other side. Zakaria is that typical internationalist that views diplomatic success as merely sitting down to talk. Talking is the goal for them.

And if America needs to compromise in order to ensure that there are more talks, well, then so be it. Talking is success, right?

What I find almost as laughable as Obama’s never-failing ignorance and naivete is his weakness.

There’s that whole, “Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me” thing.  How many times does Obama have to be fooled?

How did Obama get China to sign on to the meaningless IAEA censure that doesn’t offer any sort of call to actual action at all?

The Sniveller-in-Chief says that – unlike gutless ObamAmerica – Israel will actually do something if Iran continues its nuclear program.  Get a load of the headline:

‘US warned China that Israel could bomb Iran’
By JPOST.COM STAFF AND AP

Two senior officials from the White House, Dennis Ross and Jeffrey Bader, made a trip to China on a “special mission” to garner support in Beijing over the Iranian nuclear program, according to a Thursday report in The Washington Post. The officials visited China two weeks before US President Barack Obama arrived in Beijing.

The officials reportedly carried the message that if China would not support the US on the issue, Israel would be likely to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities. The paper quoted the officials as saying that Israel saw the issue as “an existential issue,” and that “countries that have an existential issue don’t listen to other countries.”

They stressed that were Israel to bomb Iran, the consequences for the region would be severe.

Here is Obama, leader of the free world, telling communist Iran that they’d better do what he says or big tough Israel will fight.

Just gag me.

At least Obama understands something, though.  Obama himself is a gargantuan fool and a pathetic weakling, but he does at least have a clue that genuinely strong and courageous people won’t just sit idly by and allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons.  And Obama thought he’d better warn China.  Because that’s just the sort of stand-up guy he is [HURL!].

I have one thing to differ with Richard Grenell over: the story isn’t that John Bolton is right.  The story is that Barack Obama is as wrong as he has always been.

Iran will have nuclear weapons soon.  And Obama will ensure that outcome – every bit as much as Neville Chamberlain ensured that Adolf Hitler would invade Czechoslovakia followed by Poland.