Posts Tagged ‘gun control’

Does Fact That Democrats Let Out 22-Year-Old Monsters With 6 Felony Convictions Out On Street Have Anything To Do With Violence In Our Cities?

August 29, 2016

We live in the most amazing time in the entire history of the human race.  Ignorant and depraved and pathologically narcissistic people who vote stupidly despite more information being available than at any time in history are rapidly plunging what used to be the greatest nation on earth into a dinosaur-type extinction.

Basically it comes down to this: we now have a majority of frankly bad people in America.  Bad people ultimately despise the truth and literally prefer to believe lies.  Bad people don’t care about any actual “justice” or “fairness”; if they can cynically exploit the power of an increasingly tyrannous government to confiscate the result of one group of people’s hard work to “redistribute” it to themselves, they’re all in.  Bad people are perennially “butthurt” and constantly emote in the Way of Cain who murdered his brother Abel and somehow still amazingly saw himself as the victim.

Bad people vote DEMOCRAT.  Democrats know full-damn-well that criminals and crooks and predators and murders and rapists and drug dealers and pedophiles and every other form of human cockroach vote DEMOCRAT.   And Democrats have proven it: the Virginia governor (lifelong Clinton associate Terry McAuliffe, Democrat) ordered criminally-convicted felons to have their voting rights restored so they could vote for the party of evil and allow a wicked political party to do to the nation in public what they do to helpless innocent people in the darkness.  The State Supreme Court overturned him the first time, but it’s really important to elect Democrats and only the most vile people will do it, so he came back and again ordered the worst human filth on earth to be able to say “I’m with her!” and vote for Hillary.  Oh, yes, that Democrat governor is getting out the vote for Hillary.  The more criminals, the more illegal immigrants, the more cheating, the better for Democrats.  That’s why they WILL NOT allow any system that will in any way, shape or form even make a slight attempt to ensure our elections are actually legitimate where elections would be determined by decent registered voters.

The most evil people in America are the most reliable Democrat base.  FACT.

And we are living in the aftermath of the hostile takeover of the decent by the vile.  With the decent being forced to shut up in imposed shame by the rhetorical bullying and slandering tool called “political correctness.”

It’s just amazing to watch the media work.  When Donald Trump changes his position on illegal immigration (and yeah, he did) he’s “flip-flopping” and the same media that demonized him for holding his original position are now demonizing him for changing that same position they demonized him for holding.  But when Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton change their position on gay marriage (and yeah, they DID) they are praised for “evolving.”

Getting close to where I’m going here, two brothers – two BLACK brothers, mind you – with a profound history of felony convictions (one was actually wearing an ankle bracelet at the time of the deed) – murdered famous basketball player Dwayne Wade’s cousin in Chicago (a city with the tightest gun-control regulations in the nation).

Donald Trump came out and tweeted something to the effect that this was yet another proof that black people were being totally and tragically failed by Democrats who have owned these criminal roachhole cities for decades and promised good and delivered only EVIL decade after decade.  And he got slammed for it because he was “cynically exploiting a tragedy.”

It didn’t matter that HELL, AT LEAST DONALD TRUMP WAS TALKING ABOUT IT.  Barack Obama said NOTHING.  Hillary Clinton said NOTHING.  Because this was another of millions of black-on-black violence cases where these Democrat beasts couldn’t demonize white people and it happened in a city where they couldn’t demonize the 2nd Amendment.  And so like MILLIONS of other black-on-black violence situations, it just never happened.  Crickets are chirping except for demonizing Donald Trump for talking about it.

Didn’t matter that the murder of that mother of four young children occurred in the most heavily gun-regulated city in America.

Didn’t matter that Dwayne Wade had already “cynically exploited” the same tragedy by using his cousin’s death for his political agenda of even more failed gun control.  I guess it’s okay to cynically exploit the senseless death of a mother of four for your political ideology as long as you’re a family member.  Oh, wait, I mean as long as you’re a DEMOCRAT.  That’s how the mainstream media frames this a thousand times out of a thousand cases.

Gold Star Family members like hard-core Democrat Khan are honored and their integrity are beyond question; Gold Star Family members like Patricia Smith are slandered and demonized.

Again, bad people prefer lies.  And journalists and the institution that makes their propaganda possible are overwhelmingly Democrat, and that’s all you need to know to understand that they are on the side of the criminals against the decent as already documented above.

Let me patiently try to explain THE reason why that murder and so many other terrible, tragic, evil murders just like it occurred: because of DEMOCRATS and their vile policies.

Here’s the story:

Brothers arrested in slaying of Dwyane Wade’s cousin
Nykea Aldridge shot to death in Chicago
UPDATED 7:37 AM EDT Aug 29, 2016
Darwin Sorrells Jr., 26, and Derren Sorrells, 22, have each been charged with first-degree murder and first-degree attempted murder, police said Sunday. Darwin Sorrells has also been charged with a count of criminal trespass, a misdemeanor.
Both men are gang members who were on parole for gun convictions, Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie T. Johnson said Sunday at a news conference. They are both being held without bond, a source with knowledge of the case told CNN Sunday.
Aldridge was killed Friday afternoon when she was caught in the crossfire of a shooting while pushing her infant child in a stroller near Dulles School of Excellence on the city’s south side, police said. The child, about 3 weeks old, was not injured, family members said. […]
Suspects were on parole
Derren Sorrels had six felony convictions and was on parole for motor vehicle theft and escape from custody when the shooting happened, Johnson said. He wore an ankle bracelet but had taken it off during a period in which he was allowed to look for work, Deenihan said.
Darwin Sorrells was on parole for a gun charge. He had been sentenced to six years in January 2013 but was released early, Johnson said.

So the Democrat notion of “punishment” for a seven-time felon is a removable ankle-bracelet and Democrats deal with hard-core criminals with about as much harshness as they have dealt with what will likely be our Criminal-in-Chief Hillary Clinton whose treatment has destroyed any sense of legitimacy in our justice system.

I want you to explain to me how Democrats can look you in the eye and tell you that guns kill people but 22-year-old gangbangers who already have SIX felony convictions and was out on the damn street awaiting trial for his seventh don’t.

If it weren’t for Democrats, we would be putting these rabid vermin behind bars.  And better yet, we would be hanging them, shooting them, injecting rat poison into their veins, or whatever else you do to euthanize creatures that have no shred of humanity in them because they have so completely absorbed the worldview of the Democratic Party.

You look at the population groups that commit almost all the murders in America and then you look at the political party registration of those groups.  For example, if you consider Hispanics as non-white the way the government does in every other statistic other than crime, nonwhites are responsible for over 90 percent of the crimes in America.  That’s true both nationally and in any liberal city you want to name.  It’s amazing: whenever butthurt Hispanics want to decry their victimhood, their Hispanic being oppressed by whites.  But when they viciously murder or rape someone, well, gringo must have done it.  And if you have any questions about that, well, No habla.  And when you consider the percentage likelihood that young adults vote Democrat and compare it to the percentage of the most shockingly violent and despicable crimes there are, and it’s pretty much 99.9999999999999 percent of all violent crime being committed by Democrat party groups.

Democrats – you know, between their chants of “black lives matter!” are letting the most vile, violent, human roaches imaginable back out onto the streets over and over and over again.

Just as Democrats aren’t even bothering to deal with illegal immigrants or any other DEMOCRAT PARTY GROUP of parasites and leeches.  Illegal immigration costs America more than $113 billion a year.  While illegal immigrants comprise 3.5% of the U.S. population, this group is responsible for 36.7 percent of ALL federal criminal sentences.  And f.y.i. illegal immigration is NOT a federal crime being considered here; we’re talking about murder, drug trafficking, money laundering, kidnapping and hostage-taking, etc.  More than 820,000 people walking freely around the streets of America are illegal immigrants who are CONVICTED CRIMINALS.  And while the liberal mainstream media isn’t reporting that startling and terrifying avalanche of illegal immigrant criminality, it was a liberal think-tank that revealed the fact.

It should be absolutely no wonder that the father of the terrorist murderer who murdered fifty and left dozens with terrifying wounds is a lifelong DEMOCRAT who was invited and attended in a place of honor a Hillary Clinton rally; just as the terrorist murderer himself was a lifelong registered Democrat.  Like father, like son, like Democrat.

Oh, we live in a cockroach media climate the screams “black lives matter!” and pouring out totally bogus statistics and even bogus police brutality claims to back up their fake butthurt claim.  When this story that I tell you in advance will make you want to puke tells the real story of which race is victimizing which race.  And that story coming right on top of this one where a black thug stabbed and murdered two white nuns for the crime of trying to help the poorest people in America.  Take a look HERE to see the FACT of which race is predators preying upon which race:

black on white crime

This table can be used for a number of interesting calculations.  First, we find that during the 2012/2013 period, blacks committed an average of 560,600 violent crimes against whites, whereas whites committed only 99,403 such crimes against blacks.  This means blacks were the attackers in 84.9 percent of violent crimes involving blacks and whites.

Let’s get to the REAL cause of violence.  It is NOT guns.  It is DEMOCRATS.  It is the incredibly evil policies of Democrats to release and keep re-releasing predators onto society to prey on the innocent again and again and again and again and again.

Again, a 22-year-old man with SIX felony convictions and on probation awaiting trial for a seventh and he is free to murder in THE most gun-controlled city in America.  And if you are a Democrat, it’s not the fault of your party for voting for and installing judges who rule for predators to be free to do the most vile things imaginable; no, it’s guns that somehow float around and pull their own triggers and the Democrat-released monsters who happen to be holding those smoking guns are “victims” just like Cain whose brother Abel’s blood screamed to God from the ground was a “victim.”

This isn’t about “race”; it is about CULTURE.  And in the case of African-American culture, it is about an incredibly vile, out-of-control, vicious, hateful, bitter poisonous, toxic culture.

I have come to know a woman whose parents are Danish.  She is biologically as white as you can get.  But her parents were Danish missionaries to Paraguay.  And she was born in Paraguay and grew up with Paraguayan children and then married another missionary to Paraguay who had come from Argentina.  So, in other words, she grew up Hispanic.  So here’s the question: is she white because she’s biologically/racially Danish or is she  Hispanic because she was immersed in Hispanic culture and lives and thinks like a Hispanic?  And the answer is obvious: she is FAR more Hispanic than she is white.  She is far more comfortable with Hispanics than with whites now as a result of that acculturation.

Race isn’t the issue.  Culture is the issue.

Democrats reject that.  They fixate on race while they poison every single culture they come to indoctrinate with their garbage.  Republicans are creationists and believe that God created human beings in His own image, and that male and female created He them.  Democrats believe in evolution: they believe in the title of Darwin’s book: On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.  That is a vile title for a vile worldview in which “favoured races” dominate the inferior races – or the politically incorrect races – in a struggle that they create and that they exploit as they pit the races against one another.

Democrats are also pathologically postmodernist and existentialist and fascist and reject the foundationalism that Republicans embrace that allows the belief in moral absolutes.  Instead, Democrats deny any actual, objective truth and create their own “truth.”  Which is to say they make up lies and then use those lies to create an ever larger web of lies that are shaping our culture in the most awful ways imaginable.

I’ve been talking about Democrats being murderers, and God in heaven will one day judge you as the murderers you are as you cower before His Great White Throne and explain why you murdered TEN TIMES more innocent human beings in the womb than the wicked Nazis murdered Jews in the Holocaust.  I have stated this before that I would literally rather die than vote Democrat and stand with you in that judgment accountable for the sixty million murders of innocent human beings that you will all stand guilty of as your votes created and sustained and continues that Holocaust.

Bringing it back to blacks, we find that 6 out of every 10 black lives that are snuffed out are snuffed out before that black life even escapes from his or her mother’s womb.  And Democrats will stand in judgment for that crime against black lives, too.

I would far prefer to be a roach than you on the last day, the coming Day of Judgment, Democrat.  And if you weren’t a completely wicked fool you would tremble for the ultimate eternal fate that awaits you as True, Ultimate Justice will one day finally and eternally prevail upon the earth.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Democrats (DEMOnic beauroCRATS) Ignited National Violence So They Could Cynically Exploit Crisis To Destroy 2nd Amendment

June 20, 2016

On 9/11/2001, Muslim terrorists hijacked three passenger jets with the intent of murdering as many Americans as possible.  Two of the planes slammed into the World Trade Center, ultimately bringing the twin towers down and murdering three thousand Americans.  The third struck the Pentagon.  A fourth jet was brought down by the desperate, heroic passengers that would have hit either the Capitol Building when Congress was in session or the White House itself.

According to the Democratic Party, apparently we should have blamed passenger jets and banned them.

Similarly, there is a rising incidence of automobiles being used as deadly weapons in terror attacks.  In December of last year, a woman screaming “Allahu Akbar!!!” intentionally drove an Oldsmobile onto a sidewalk in Las Vegas and mowed down forty people.  Just a few days ago, a man driving a Chevy pickup truck killed five bicyclists and injured four others in Kalamazoo.

According to Hillary Clinton’s theory on gun manufacturers, General Motors should be sued and put out of business.

Vote Democrat.  Walk the rest of your miserable life.  And don’t even THINK about riding a damn horse.  Horses produce methane and methane is a global warming gas.  And hence evil.

I’d personally be okay with banning guns.  As long as we started by disarming Barack Obama’s and Hillary Clinton’s security details and worked our way down from there.

Liberals are like roaches in many sundry ways, one of which is that you can safely know they will be the last ones with guns because only they alone are entitled to protection.  I’m pretty sure they’d keep their limousines and their terrorist-inducing and smog-spewing private jets, too.  Especially Hillary’s husband Bill, who very clearly loved flying with a convicted pedophile on his private jet to an island of sex with underage children.

Democrats are terrifying people today.  I’m literally more frightened of them than I am of the terrorists.  Because the terrorists can’t take away my rights or my freedoms and the terrorists can’t impose a totalitarian state on me; only DEMOnic beauroCRATS can do these things.

Today, people who love freedom and love our Constitution and its Bill of Rights stare on in horror as the Democrat Party goes to virtually every single event of the presumptive Republican nominee with the intent to suppress the American peoples’ right to free speech and to peaceably assemble to hear that speech.  And at the same time DEMOnic beauroCRATS do this – meeting the objective definition of fascist – they are out to seize the means of protecting ourselves and our households against ALL forms of tyranny that our Constitution enshrined.

Chicago just had an anniversary; they are celebrating their 300th homicide:

CHICAGO — Chicago recorded its 300th homicide this weekend and tallied six others over a 60-hour period that saw 55 people shot, 13 fatally, from Friday afternoon through early Monday morning.

So far this year, close to 1,800 people have been shot across the city and more than 200 of those wounded have died from their wounds, according to records kept by the Chicago Tribune. A total of 306 people have been killed this year, by shooting, stabbing or other means.

Happy Father’s Day, Democrat-Party-machine-run Chicago!!!  This Democrat Party bastion is on it’s way to breaking the record of 3,000 homicide victims a year.

And what should we do?  Well, Democrats say we should make the rest of the nation just like this demonic, psychotic hellhole of liberalism.  Because even the New York Times is forced to point out this fact:

Strict Gun Laws in Chicago Can’t Stem Fatal Shots
By MONICA DAVEYJAN. 29, 2013

CHICAGO — Not a single gun shop can be found in this city because they are outlawed. Handguns were banned in Chicago for decades, too, until 2010, when the United States Supreme Court ruled that was going too far, leading city leaders to settle for restrictions some describe as the closest they could get legally to a ban without a ban. Despite a continuing legal fight, Illinois remains the only state in the nation with no provision to let private citizens carry guns in public.

And yet Chicago, a city with no civilian gun ranges and bans on both assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, finds itself laboring to stem a flood of gun violence that contributed to more than 500 homicides last year and at least 40 killings already in 2013, including a fatal shooting of a 15-year-old girl on Tuesday.

The second one CAUSED the first one.  I know, liberals are Nazis who want to tell us that unless and until every Jew is hunted down, the danger remains, and therefore it’s other states that are to blame for THEIR gun violence (but… but if guns in other states cause violence, WHY THE HELL AREN’T THOSE STATES BLEEDING IN THE SAME VICIOUS VIOLENCE???).  The fact is that when guns are outlawed, they become a precious commodity and the means to power.  But since you have to be a criminal to obtain that means to power; ONLY THE CRIMINALS HAVE POWER.

Germany has THE strictest gun laws in the world.  Too bad that doesn’t stop the terrorists from getting guns.  Just had an attack at a German movie theater today.

When you have a “murder capitol,” it is ALWAYS a Democrat city and I mean ALWAYS:  In the 80s, the “murder capital” was Democrat Detroit, in the 90s it was Democrat D.C., in the 2000s it was Democrat New Orleans, and in the 2010s its been Democrat Flint.

Did you know this “more than half” fact that shouldn’t be a surprise to any decent American?

A new study from the Brennan Center for Justice reveals the murder rate rose by more than 13 percent in the 25 biggest cities in America in 2015 – and the common denominator among the three cities that “account for more than half” this hike is they’re run by Democrats who impose hefty gun controls on the populace.

Baltimore, Chicago and Washington, D.C., three Democratic political fixtures, are responsible for more than half the 13.3 percent hike of gun-related murders seen in the nation’s largest cities last year, and the fault lies with local policy, rather than national influence, the Brennan Center said.

How about another interesting fact about “gun violence” in America:

Did you know that of all the “gun violence” in America, seventy-seven percent of all deaths are SUICIDES???  Yes, more than three out of every four “gun violence” deaths are SUICIDES.  Now, combine that factoid with another factoid, that every single state with “right to die laws” in this country is Democrat:

On Oct. 5, 2015, California became the 4th state to legalize “assisted suicide,” following Oregon, Washington and Vermont — all “blue” states.

The Democrat Party is THE PARTY of suicide.  Everybody who truly hates themselves ought to be a Democrat.

So frankly, not only should guns not be a “bogeyman” for the left; they ought to be a welcome tool of release from the misery of life that Democrats in all other forms are doing everything possible to help free people from.  I mean, if these people had so much as a molecule of integrity in them.

But what do Demonic Bureaucrats do, being pathologically dishonest, slandering, fearmongering demagogues?  Why, they smuggle the very suicides THAT THEY CHERISH into their category of “gun violence” in obvious attempt to artificially incite fear in people.  Because if you are a DEMOnic burueaCRAT a.k.a. Democrat, you are a demonic liar without shame, honor, virtue, integrity or decency of any kind.  It is simply your nature to impose as much fascist evil as you can on as many people as you can.  And it frankly doesn’t matter how much of a twisted, pathologically dishonest hypocrite you have to be to accomplish your mission to force your government-as-god on a people who USED to have a Constitution to protect them from your vile ilk.

We find that this swath of ACTUAL gun violence is ALMOST ENTIRELY DEMOCRAT.

We find that Barack Obama gave birth to the most vile bowel movements in modern history, such as “Black Lies Matter” which boos anyone claiming that any other life matters (you know, like white people).  There is not one single Democrat on earth who will say “white lives matter.”  Not ONE.  Meanwhile the Democrat Party has initiated vicious riots in Democrat-owned-and-operated cities like Ferguson, Baltimore and New York.  And Democrats gave birth to the evil hellspawn otherwise known as “the Ferguson Effect,” in which local law enforcement has been intimidated out of doing their jobs for fear of being arrested and prosecuted and destroyed by liberals:

It’s all really quite simple. Cops and criminals alike are rational actors, weighing the potential risks and rewards of any contemplated action. When police officers on the street spot someone whose behavior is indicative of possible lawbreaking, they know that initiating a stop carries the risk of an altercation that may not unfold in a manner approved by cowardly superiors, rabble-rousing “community activists,” craven politicians, or perhaps even the president. Against that risk he weighs the benefits of driving on by and finishing his shift on time and in one piece, and without having played the villain in some new YouTube sensation.
And as for that possible lawbreaker, he feels the officer’s eyes on him as the police car slows in the street. But rather than stop, it drives on by, allowing him to continue on his way and complete whatever misdeeds he may have been considering. Multiply that scenario by the hundreds and thousands across the country and you have the conditions we see today in many cities: Crime is up, arrests are down.

“The Ferguson Effect” was began by an INNOCENT COP WHO DID NOTHING WRONG being abandoned by his own due to Democrat rioting.  Good cops are getting prosecuted for doing their jobs.  So they quit doing their jobs and they stay in their cars.  And criminals run rampant.  Especially in Democratic cities where ONLY THE CRIMINALS HAVE GUNS.

In Baltimore, liberals tried to literally lynch six police officers for doing their job.  Three officers have had their trials and three officers have been found entirely innocent.  Claims by the riot-igniting left, such as the infamous “rough ride” that Democrats used to incite riots, was a complete and total fabrication.  Video proved the exact OPPOSITE of liberal lies to have been the truth, with video proving the officer rolled through stops to avoid hard stops and made wide turns to cut down centrifigul force.  We also know that the liberal ideologue masquerading as Baltimore State’s Attorney illegally withheld evidence that exonerated the officers, and that the victim Freddie Gray killed himself trying to manufacture an injury so he could sue the police.

Even the Obama “Department of Justice” that in actual fact is the Department of INjustice acknowledges that “the Ferguson Effect” liberalism created is at the core of the skyrocketing surge of violence in America’s cities (see also here).

But what do we get?  An acknowledgment that liberal policies lead to horror?  NEVER.  Rather, they demand that every single American live in terror praying that Obama will descend from the heavenly heights of government and deliver them.  And Democrats are jealous about their god, and ye shall have no other gods before Government.

Only government ought to have guns, these true believers tell us.

Even as they have done absolutely EVERYTHING they possibly could to delegitimize local police departments.  Because what Democrats really want is brutally obvious: they want a Nazi-style Gestapo; they want a Soviet-style NKVD, a People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs.

Socialist Democrats who worship the State want the exact same thing that the most horrific regimes in human history wanted; and they are literally following the EXACT same script to obtain that evil result.  They confiscate the right of the people to have guns and defend themselves and protect themselves and their property from all forms of tyranny, and then they create the worst form of tyranny of all as the State becomes the brutal oppressor of human freedom.

Consider that if I can’t have a gun to protect myself; and if my local police department can’t be trusted to do its job, what the hell is left?  A national police force, that’s what.  A police force that an Obama can use the same vile way he used his IRS as an Internal Revenge Service to target conservatives.

And Democrats are literally exploiting the very violence THAT THEY CREATED to get what they want.

I think of the sheer hypocrisy and wickedness of socialism and the utter devastation this form of idiotic economics has on the people and in particular the poor and working class people whose lives suck the most whenever socialists are in power.  I think of the pressure that these poor and working class people are placed under due to this failed economic system.  I think of Venezuela where people are literally on the verge of starvation and the grocery store shelves are empty and I think of the fact that Hugo Chavez’ daughter is for some bizarre reason the richest individual in that incredibly socialist and ergo sum incredibly corrupt country.  I think of the fact that Hillary Clinton told us that they were “dead broke” when they left the White House, and now – after having used official government corruption to milk hundreds of millions of dollars from taxpayers and from corporations in return for selling America to the highest bidder, we have a similar system at work here.  I think of last month’s jobs report in which 38,000 jobs were added but HALF A MILLION PEOPLE GAVE UP IN DESPAIR OF EVER FINDING A DAMN JOB.  And so amazingly the unemployment rate actually went DOWN because it is a damn sick, twisted and frankly obscene JOKE.  I think of the fact that nearly 100,000 working-age Americans aren’t working and I think of the fact that our labor participation rate is the worst in very nearly forty years.  And I realize that Obama and Hillary Clinton are purely and simply hell on earth to anybody who ever wants to have any hope of earning an honest living.  And these DEMOnic bureauCRAT roaches have driven the American people to a level of rate and bitterness and despair that we have frankly never seen.

And Obama hasn’t merely failed us domestically and the Democrat Party isn’t merely inciting anti-Constitution and anti-America violence for our domestic violence; they have failed us globally and they are inciting their global failure to obtain the hell that they want.

At the current rate of expansion, by the time Barack Obama leaves office, terrorist deaths will have skyrocketed by over one-thousand seven-hundred percent.  That is a fact. When you look at the giant jump in terrorist killings between 2012-13 and 2014-15 – to the tune of a DOUBLING of deaths caused by terrorism – we can consider the trend and safely estimate that terrorism will create 60,000 deaths by the 2016-2017 statistic when it is released.  Which is to say that by the time Obama leaves office, he will be personally responsible for a 1,700=plus percent increase in terrorist killings during his watch. Terrorism has exploded exponentially every year since Obama utterly ignored the warnings of ALL Of his generals and decided to unilaterally withdraw from Iraq AFTER we had stabilized that country and gave the terrorists a safe-haven.  All we had to do was remain there with the same kind of force that we kept in Germany and Japan and South Korea after stabilizing those countries.  But Obama wouldn’t have it; he instead determined to cut-and-run while his generals pleaded with him in the name of common-sense and decency to remain where we could keep secure what we had fought to freeThese generals warned and accurately predicted what would happen if Obama’s fool plan was put in motion, just as President Bush had warned EXACTLY what would happen.  This is the process called “the scientific method,” where you predict what will happen and then what you predicted happens exactly as you predicted.  Versus Barack Obama and the Democratic Party, which was demonically wrong in their predictions.  In the very same way, Obama catastrophically gave a “red line” warning to Syria and then cowardly and pathetically refused to make good on his own words and so allowed Syria to similarly fall into the power of a terrorist army that basically didn’t exist until his degenerate presidency gave it life.  And so Islamic State now has the first terrorist caliphate in the history of the world.

Now, what SHOULD we have done with Islamic State?  We should have CRUSHED them and forced them to realize that their god Allah had abandoned them to a fate of being exterminated like the roaches they are.  Instead, Obama did NOTHING but dither and then dither some more while calling these terrorists who were OWNING HIS SKINNY ASS “JayVee” even as they seized major cities across the Arab world.  And oh, yes, you demon-possessed Democrat liars, Obama DID call Islamic State “JayVee” because he lied about the reality of this vicious terrorist threat as it metasticized and he ordered those at the top of the intelligence food chain to produce lies that substantiated HIS outright treasonous lies:

More than 50 intelligence analysts working out of the U.S. military’s Central Command have formally complained that their reports on ISIS and al Qaeda’s branch in Syria were being inappropriately altered by senior officials, The Daily Beast has learned.

The complaints spurred the Pentagon’s inspector general to open an investigation into the alleged manipulation of intelligence. The fact that so many people complained suggests there are deep-rooted, systemic problems in how the U.S. military command charged with the war against the self-proclaimed Islamic State assesses intelligence.

“The cancer was within the senior level of the intelligence command,” one defense official said.

Two senior analysts at CENTCOM signed a written complaint sent to the Defense Department inspector general in July alleging that the reports, some of which were briefed to President Obama, portrayed the terror groups as weaker than the analysts believe they are. The reports were changed by CENTCOM higher-ups to adhere to the administration’s public line that the U.S. is winning the battle against ISIS and al Nusra, al Qaeda’s branch in Syria, the analysts claim.

That complaint was supported by 50 other analysts, some of whom have complained about politicizing of intelligence reports for months. That’s according to 11 individuals who are knowledgeable about the details of the report and who spoke to The Daily Beast on condition of anonymity.

The accusations suggest that a large number of people tracking the inner workings of the terror groups think that their reports are being manipulated to fit a public narrative. […]

And look at the result of Obama’s catastrophic failure!

UN warns of ‘record high’ 60 million displaced amid expanding global conflicts

18 June 2015 – The international community is experiencing a dramatic shift in the situation facing the world’s refugees as a global surge in war, conflict and persecution has caused a record number of people to flee their homes in search of safety, the United Nations refugee agency reported today.

According to data gathered by Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) over the course of 2014, the number of people forcibly displaced during the reporting year swelled to a staggering 59.5 million people compared to the 51.2 million from the previous year. The figures, collected by the UN agency for its latest Global Trends: World at War, suggest that one in every 122 humans is now either a refugee, internally displaced, or seeking asylum. If this were the population of a country, says UNHCR, it would be the world’s 24th largest.

“We are witnessing a paradigm change, an unchecked slide into an era in which the scale of global forced displacement as well as the response required is now clearly dwarfing anything seen before,” UN High Commissioner for Refugees António Guterres declared in a press release issued earlier today and marking the report’s release.

“It is terrifying that on the one hand there is more and more impunity for those starting conflicts, and on the other there is seeming utter inability of the international community to work together to stop wars and build and preserve peace,” he added.

Do you comprehend this?  SIXTY MILLION REFUGEES are wandering around utterly displaced and without anything because Barack Obama ignited the world on FIRE with his catastrophic failure to lead or to have a strategy that had anything whatsoever to do with actual REALITY.

And what does Barack Obama and Hilary Clinton want to do with these sixty million Muslim refugees?  Do they want to make the Arab world safe for these people so they can go back to their homes?  NO!!! THEY WANT TO BRING THEM HERE!!!

Even though our FBI and our intelligence agencies say that there is no possible way that we can properly vet these people who are coming here with no documents and where no documents are even reliable.

Obama and Hillary Clinton and Democrats are trying to create a morally- and rationally-horrific thing called “reverse profiling” in which if you are a Muslim, YOU CAN’T BE INVESTIGATED.  Does it matter than 99.999999 percent of terrorist acts in this world are perpetuated by Muslims???  OF COURSE IT DOESN’T.

We go back to 2009 when Obama’s regime issued a bizarre report in which he demonized not only conservatives but veterans as potential terrorists.  And Obama has been demonically steadfast to brand his political opponents as the real terrorists even as his administration fails to protect us from the ACTUAL TERRORISTS.  Obama and his demonic priests and priestesses keep telling us that in spite of the overwhelming number of Islamic terror attacks it’s only the political right of this country that is actually a threat.

Demon-possessed people – we call them “DEMOCRATS” which again is short form for “DEMOnic beauroCRATS” – tell pollsters with the straight faces of the wicked-stupid that terrorism isn’t the problem; its our Constitution; it’s our Bill of Rights; it’s our 2nd Amendment; it’s our right of the people to keep and bear arms.  Because apparently guns never existed before Obama and it’s a tragedy that these tools of murder that no one has ever used for any other purpose BUT murder have tarnished Obama’s otherwise messianic legacy.

Obama and Hillary Clinton don’t want to wage war on “terrorism” (which they with their “magic words” re-labeled “overseas contingency operations.”  They don’t want to deal with acts of terror (which with their magic words they re-labeled “man-caused disasters.”  No, they want to wage war against the Constitution of the United States of America.

And that is what makes Democrats far more dangerous than any terrorist who ever lived.

I’ll shoot a damn terrorist or a damn criminal; unless a Barack Obama or a Hillary Clinton take away my right to be safe.

It comes down to this: Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton both have the identical same goal: “to degrade and ultimately to destroy” the Constitution of the United States of America.   Informed people will see that Obama actually spoke those words about Islamic State.  But he has done NOTHING to either destroy OR degrade Islamic State.  His very own handpicked CIA Director just stated that Islamic State is more dangerous and and virulent than EVER BEFORE.  There are now more than 65.3 MILLION crisis-displaced refugees with nowhere to go because Obama has catastrophically done NOTHING but yammer and blather and lie and slander.  We’ve never seen anything like this in the history of the entire human race and Democrats look you in the eye and tell you Obama has succeeded!!!?  His generals have stated over and over again Obama has and never HAS had ANY strategy whatsoever – and that terrifying fact remains true to this very day – to deal with what will become a not only civilization-ending threat but literally a human-race ending threat the moment they get their hands on nuclear weapons.  Because you rest assured that these monsters have already more than demonstrated that they will gleefully use them to exterminate hundreds of millions of people and ignite word war three because their stated goal is what the Bible prophesied as “Armageddon.”  Obama has done NOTHING but wildly fail against a threat he once with the stunning foolishness never before in history witnessed in a leader labeled as “JayVee.”  But guns?  But the 2nd Amendment?  Obama has gone ALL OUT in his war with our founding fathers (whom he slandered as “blind”), with our Constitution, with our very way of life.

Understand Obama and Hillary are following the socialist paths of Mao and Stalin and Hitler: and in order to follow that path, the people must be rendered incapable of resistance.

And THAT is the REAL “strategy” of Obama, of Hillary, of the Democrat Party: the strategy that will lead to Antichrist and to the Mark of the Beast.

 

 

Why Saying The ‘Magic Word’ ‘Radical Islam’ Matters: Even Obama’s Own CIA Says Obama Has Done NOTHING To Slow Down Islamic State

June 17, 2016

Just understand in preface that Barack Obama is a liar at heart and if he can’t lie about the nature of the “JayVee” threat of Islamic State terrorism because now hundreds of thousands of people have been tortured and murdered by beheading, by crucifixion, by being burned alive, just as they are dying in unprecedented numbers by bombs and shootings – if he can no longer minimize that horror – then he will lie about the extent to which that horror has succeeded by falsely and dishonestly claiming he has minimized a threat that in fact has EXPLODED because of his failed policies.  And if that doesn’t work he will lie yet again and claim it isn’t terrorism but guns.  Obama will argue that it is our founding fathers murdering us from the grave; it’s our Constitution that is murdering us; it is our Bill of Rights and specifically our 2nd Amendment that is murdering us.  And our only hope is to dive into the wisdom of Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin and Chairman Mao and confiscate the people’s right to defend themselves against the true threat that Obama has done NOTHING to so much as slow down.

And all the while this failed fool plays demonic games with WORDS to conceal REALITY.

If you don’t know who your enemy is, you can’t fight him, let alone have any chance of defeating him.  You can’t even know who he is or what he is doing.  What Obama has had us doing the last seven years is tantamount to a fighter putting a blindfold over his eyes and then going into the ring and swinging wildly in all directions while his opponent lines up his jaw for a vicious knockout.

Obama is denouncing “magic words.”  I can document that Obama has used more “magic words” than ANYBODY.  And this fascist thug is now upset that somebody else would dare use “magic words”???  And the difference between OUR words and Obama’s “magic words” is that OUR words are DESCRIPTIVE and describe REALITY whereas Obama’s “magic words” are DISINGENUOUS and mask reality.

Obama says:

(CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama rejected calls Tuesday for him to use the phrase “radical Islam” when talking about the war on terrorism, calling it “a political talking point” and “not a strategy.”

“There’s no magic to the phrase radical Islam. It’s a political talking point. It’s not a strategy, and the reason I am careful about how I describe this threat has nothing to do with political correctness and everything to do with actually defeating extremism,” Obama said in reaction to criticism by Republicans and notably presumptive GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump.

It is NOT “magic words” to denounce ISLAMIC TERROR as “Islamic terror.”  It is rather for the first time accurately describing the nature of our enemy so we can expose him for who and what he is and begin to combat our true enemy.

You keep reading and I’ll show you how Obama the prince of hypocrisy LOVES “magic words” when it comes to dealing with terrorism.  You need to understand why that statement is so beyond-pathologically stupid that it amounts to proof that Satan is alive and well for the simple reason that no human being could be that damn FOOLISH without a truly evil demonic intelligence using him like a puppet.

There’s that Dr. Phil question, “How’s that working out for you?”  So let’s examine the fruit of this failed fool’s “strategy”:

Terrorism Toll 800% Higher Since 2010
“I don’t think people have grasped how significant these numbers are.”
3.29.2016 |
News | Mark Tapson

A new report blames the rapid expansion of Islamist groups across the Middle East and Africa for the booming death toll of terrorism worldwide: a nearly 800 percent rise since 2010.

According to Fox News, terrorism expert Steven Emerson’s nonprofit Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) found that an average of nearly 30,000 people per year have been killed by terrorists since 2010, when terrorism’s death toll was 3,284. The study identifies two troubling trends: more attacks are happening, and they are deadlier than ever.

Emerson, the executive director of IPT, said,

“Everyone has known that terrorist attacks have generally been increasing yearly since 9/11. But the magnitude of the increase of the attacks surprised us, especially in the past five years. Even if you look back at the annual reports issued by the most senior analysts in the top five intelligence and counter-terrorism agencies, there is not one report that predicted or forecasted that we would likely see such a massive escalation of attacks.”

The study credits the rise in part to the fact that Islamist terror groups like Boko Haram in Nigeria, Al Shabaab in Somalia, a resurgent Taliban, Palestinian terrorists, and President Obama’s JB team ISIS are operating in more countries than ever, especially in the Middle East and Africa.

Fox reports:

IPT’s report used data collected by the University of Maryland’s Global Terrorism Database. Looking at various intervals following the 9/11 attacks, and sorting out deaths caused by clear acts of terrorism — not simply war involving known terrorist groups — IPT found annual terror deaths have jumped 774 percent since the 2007-11 average.

‘[The numbers] are striking when you take into account where the numbers were at the beginning period,” said Pete Hoekstra, who chaired the House Intelligence Committee when he represented Michigan in the U.S. Congress. “I don’t think people have grasped how significant these [death toll] numbers are.” […]

You keep reading and you’ll see WHY there hasn’t been “one report that predicted or forecasted” the stunning massive escalation of attacks.  Because Obama sugar-coated America’s intelligence so it would make this degenerate liar falsely appear to be succeeding when in actual fact he was radically failing.

If that isn’t enough, consider this from the UN News Centre:

UN warns of ‘record high’ 60 million displaced amid expanding global conflicts

18 June 2015 – The international community is experiencing a dramatic shift in the situation facing the world’s refugees as a global surge in war, conflict and persecution has caused a record number of people to flee their homes in search of safety, the United Nations refugee agency reported today.

According to data gathered by Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) over the course of 2014, the number of people forcibly displaced during the reporting year swelled to a staggering 59.5 million people compared to the 51.2 million from the previous year. The figures, collected by the UN agency for its latest Global Trends: World at War, suggest that one in every 122 humans is now either a refugee, internally displaced, or seeking asylum. If this were the population of a country, says UNHCR, it would be the world’s 24th largest.

“We are witnessing a paradigm change, an unchecked slide into an era in which the scale of global forced displacement as well as the response required is now clearly dwarfing anything seen before,” UN High Commissioner for Refugees António Guterres declared in a press release issued earlier today and marking the report’s release.

“It is terrifying that on the one hand there is more and more impunity for those starting conflicts, and on the other there is seeming utter inability of the international community to work together to stop wars and build and preserve peace,” he added.

In a detailed analysis exploring the range of conflicts that have given rise to the current mass diaspora of refugees, the UNHCR report notes that in the past five years, at least 15 conflicts have erupted or reignited.

Our enemies have never been more emboldened and our allies have never been stunned and shocked into worse apathy.  And Obama has done NOTHING but incite our enemies’ viciousness and degenerate our allies into cowardice.

It’s not enough to say that Barack Obama has utterly failed America; it’s not even enough to say that this fool has failed the world any more:  Barack Obama has failed the entire human species; he has failed any semblance of reason or morality whatsoever.  Barack Obama standing between those Greek columns as a god was literally Lucifer spreading his wings across the planet.

SO HOW HAS OBAMA’S OWN “STRATEGY” WORKED???  I MEAN, JUST HOW DAMNFOOL STUPID ARE YOU PEOPLE???!!!???

When you click on that graph and seriously consider it, one thing very quickly leaps out: terrorism has essentially been doubling every 2 years throughout the entire cancer a.k.a. the Obama presidency.  And so between 2012 and 2013 there were 15,000 deaths each year when there had been only 3,000 deaths a year back in 2010 before Obama’s failed policies had taken hold.  Compared with 30,000 deaths each year by 2014 and 2015.  So it is a simple matter of extrapolation to know how many deaths there will be each year due to terrorism by the next period of 2016 and 2017.  We are looking at 60,000 deaths a year and a 1,700-PLUS percent increase under Obama by the time this arrogant, depraved, degenerate, metastatic fool leaves office.

I mean, understand, if terrorism had merely doubled and increased a hundred percent, it would have proved Obama had utterly failed and Bush’s strategy worked and his didn’t.  But one thousand-seven hundred percent???

So let’s get to Obama’s love affair with “magic words”:

It is frankly beyond stunning even to me that the Democratic Party has become so pathologically demon-possessed that they actually view Obama’s wild FAIL as “success” in the “overseas contingency operation” against “man-caused disasters” that has mysteriously [to them] found our shores and is attacking us here.

This goes to show you how yes words DO matter.  Would you like to see what “magic words” actually look like?  Just consider it was OBAMA who refused to acknowledge we were in a “war on terror” and instead coined the euphemistic phraseology “overseas contingency operations” to replace it.  And now terrorism has SKYROCKETED.

Obama decided that if he quit referring to “terrorist attacks” and instead used the PC-phrase “man-caused disasters” it would somehow make the world a prettier place.  And we can now acknowledge the FACT that “prettier” here means fifty mangled bodies in an American nightclub gunned down by an “Allahu Akbar” laughing fanatic Muslim terrorist.

Now, those terrorism statistics are simply a grim FACT.  They are what liberals most despise because they are actual, cold-blooded REALITY.

Consider another reality: even Obama’s own hand-picked CIA Director now says unequivocally that Obama has wildly failed and his “strategy” amounts to a load of unicorn poop:

CIA director grave warning: ISIS dangerous as ever
By Barbara Starr, CNN Pentagon Correspondent and Ryan Browne
Updated 7:09 PM ET, Thu June 16, 2016

(CNN) — ISIS can draw on a “large cadre of Western fighters” that could attack in the U.S. and the terror threat posed by the group remains as dangerous as ever despite efforts to crush it militarily, the director of the CIA said Thursday.

“Unfortunately, despite all our progress against ISIL on the battlefield and in the financial realm, our efforts have not reduced the group’s terrorism capability and global reach,” CIA Director John Brennan testified to Congress using another acronym for the group.

“The resources needed for terrorism are very modest, and the group would have to suffer even heavier losses of territory, manpower and money for its terrorist capacity to decline significantly,” Brennan added. “In fact, as the pressure mounts on ISIL, we judge that it will intensify its global terror campaign to maintain its dominance of the global terrorism agenda.”

Brennan warned that the group already is preparing more attacks, including by infiltrating refugees into western nations.

“We judge that ISIL is training and attempting to deploy operatives for further attacks,” he said. “ISIL has a large cadre of Western fighters who could potentially serve as operatives for attacks in the West. And the group is probably exploring a variety of means for infiltrating operatives into the West, including refugee flows, smuggling routes, and legitimate methods of travel.”

The CIA director, appearing just days after the massacre in Orlando that left 49 people dead, told the Senate Intelligence Committee that lone wolf attackers who are inspired by but not under the direct control of terror groups represent “an exceptionally challenging issue for the intelligence community.”

Two giant, key admissions from Director Brennan: 1) Islamic State – which exploded into being under Obama and which Obama has done nothing to so much as slow down – is as powerful as EVER; and 2) Islamic State is using Obama’s Muslim refugee immigration program to infiltrate TERRORISTS into America.

Obama is even now plotting to escalate the pipeline of Syrian refugees into America.  And Hillary Clinton defiantly says she wants to massively INCREASE THE NUMBER OF TERRORISTS BROUGHT INTO AMERICA.  Now BOTH the CIA and FBI Directors have said that the terrorists will exploit this program, but Democrats literally don’t give a rat’s hairy ass how many mangled American bodies it causes; their political correctness trumps all rational thought.  FBI Director Comey has repeatedly said there is NO WAY we can screen the wave of Muslims Obama and Hillary are hell-bent on bringing into America.

So what does Obama do?  Fast-track the refugee process such that he’s let in more “refugees” in weeks than had been allowed in over months even though the FBI says there is absolutely no way to vet these people who have no papers especially when Islamic State has their own passport machines and thousands of blank official Syrian passports which they seized so they can make their own documents.  Democrats say no refugees have committed a terrorist attack here YET.  It doesn’t MATTER that “refugees” have already launched massive terror attacks in Europe and have boasted that they’re coming here and will be using Obama’s and Hillary’s refugee system to bring in terrorist killers.

Now, what does Obama do with the gargantuan refugee crisis that HE CREATED???  Remember the Democrat Party adage, “Never allow a serious crisis to go to waste” (especially when THEY created it); Democrats are now exploiting the crisis they created to export Muslim terrorism all over the world, including to America.

And so now let’s get to precisely WHYthere is not one report that predicted or forecasted that we would likely see such a massive escalation of attacks.”

What we find is that Obama and the Obama administration have been LYING to us about their “success” on what they for years even refused to acknowledge was “terror” and even now won’t rightly call “Islamic terror.”  Obama mocked Islamic State and called them “JayVee” EVEN WHILE THEY WERE OWNING HIS WORTHLESS ASS.

Then we found that somehow, somebody had ordered U.S. intelligence analysts to doctor their intelligence reports to make it falsely appear Obama was succeeding while in reality he was failing:

More than 50 intelligence analysts working out of the U.S. military’s Central Command have formally complained that their reports on ISIS and al Qaeda’s branch in Syria were being inappropriately altered by senior officials, The Daily Beast has learned.

The complaints spurred the Pentagon’s inspector general to open an investigation into the alleged manipulation of intelligence. The fact that so many people complained suggests there are deep-rooted, systemic problems in how the U.S. military command charged with the war against the self-proclaimed Islamic State assesses intelligence.

“The cancer was within the senior level of the intelligence command,” one defense official said.

Two senior analysts at CENTCOM signed a written complaint sent to the Defense Department inspector general in July alleging that the reports, some of which were briefed to President Obama, portrayed the terror groups as weaker than the analysts believe they are. The reports were changed by CENTCOM higher-ups to adhere to the administration’s public line that the U.S. is winning the battle against ISIS and al Nusra, al Qaeda’s branch in Syria, the analysts claim.

That complaint was supported by 50 other analysts, some of whom have complained about politicizing of intelligence reports for months. That’s according to 11 individuals who are knowledgeable about the details of the report and who spoke to The Daily Beast on condition of anonymity.

The accusations suggest that a large number of people tracking the inner workings of the terror groups think that their reports are being manipulated to fit a public narrative. […]

Any one who doesn’t realize that Obama is behind this is a pure fool.  HE IS THE ONE SPOUTING THE NARRATIVE.  HE IS ORDERING ANALYSTS TO LIE SO HE CAN REPORT THEIR LIES AS HIS TRUTH.

Still other intelligence analysts in other Obama Administration departments say the same thing, that they were and are being ordered to ignore reality to conform to an obviously LEFTIST political narrative that has been time-and-time again proved FALSE and DISHONEST.

News reports are just coming out now that FIFTY senior State Department officials in Obama’s OWN administration have signed a document notifying this failed fool of a president that his entire foreign policy is in absolute shambles.

And this apparently came BEFORE it was learned that Russia just cluster-bombed US-backed Syrian troops in total contempt of the United States and our totally failed commander-in-chief.  We find that the second massive Russian airstrike came AFTER a panic-stricken U.S. used all emergency channels to contact Russia and plead with them to stop.  But Russia couldn’t give less of a damn, because Obama deserves absolutely zero respect whatsoever from ANYONE wishing to do America harm.

The wheels of Obama are starting to come flying off as the United States of America under Obama struck another iceberg and is taking on water fast.

So now let’s go back to the article that describes the explosion of terrorist killings to the tune of over 800 percent and consider the quote, “if you look back at the annual reports issued by the most senior analysts in the top five intelligence and counter-terrorism agencies, there is not one report that predicted or forecasted that we would likely see such a massive escalation of attacks.”  Why is that?  Because Obama wouldn’t ALLOW his intelligence to produce an accurate report that depicted the situation the way it actually was.  He pimped the numbers because he is a liar and the father of lies.

Obama’s handpicked Attorney General – the same one whom we can safely say WON’T indict corrupt Hillary Clinton for her CRIMES AGAINST NATIONAL SECURITY – is on public record having directly threatened anyone who says anything bad about Islam.  In San Bernardino, citizens were AFRAID to speak out about what they knew.  We don’t DARE cross a demonic Barack Obama and his satanic Attorney General.  We now see the same damn thing as warnings were either ignored by the government or people were terrorized into silence by Obama and his leftist PC thugs.

The heroes who weren’t heroes because their warnings went ignored by the Obama Administration was a NON-PC GUN SHOP because they saw this Muslim terrorist was a psychotic murderer and refused to sell him ammunition and called the FBI to report him.

Warning after warning after warning went ignored because Barack Obama is our Terrorist-in-Chief and political correctness is the official religion of his realm.

Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee noted that Omar Mateen had been under not one but TWO FBI investigations that had both been dropped and forgotten.  Nothin’ to see here, folks.  And in spite of ALL KINDS of warning signs and people trying to warn the government about this radical Muslim thug, nothing was done.  Why?  Because he was a MUSLIM, that’s why.  Huckabee asks:

“So why in the world did they drop the investigation and walk away after 10 months? They bought his claim that he was teasing his co-workers because he thought they were trying to marginalize him for his Muslim faith,” Huckabee said.

And then Huckabee put the reality of the Obama administration’s “strategy” this way:

To sum up the Obama Administration’s counter-terrorism strategy in 13 words:

Feds: “If you see something, say something!”

Citizen: “I see something.”

Feds: “Bigot!”

We go back in time and in 2009 a terrorist Muslim Major named Nidal Hasan shot up his Army base screaming “Allahu Akbar!” and murdered thirteen soldiers and wounded another 30 and it was “workplace violence” to the Obama Administration even after it became known he was spouting terrorist gibberish to his fellow officers who were afraid to speak out due to political correctness; even after it became known he had been in email contact with known terrorist mastermind Anwar Awlaki; even after it became known that he was walking around with business cards identifying himself as a “Soldier of Allah.”  And we’ve seen these despicable lies and denials from Obama and his regime over and over and over again since then, because the truth is a very inconvenient thing when everything Democrats believe are lies, LIES, LIES.

And so ALL the Democrats have is a diversionary tactic: THEY HAVE FAILED AND IT IS OBVIOUS THEY HAVE FAILED AND ALL THEY CAN DO IS TRY TO DISTRACT STUPID PEOPLE FROM REALIZING THEY HAVE FAILED by waving a completely different red-herring in front of the news cameras (the 2nd Amendment and the guns our Constitution and our American way of life guarantees).

Howard Stern nailed it yesterday:

Howard Stern Dismantles Calls for Gun Control After Orlando Attack With Chilling ‘Sheep’ and ‘Wolves’ Analogy
Jun. 16, 2016 10:14am   Dave Urbanski

In the wake of the deadly Orlando terrorist attack, radio icon Howard Stern spent part of his Wednesday program berating those calling for gun control as the way to prevent further carnage in the future.

“I’m so upset about Orlando and what went down,” Stern said, “but I can’t believe these people would come out afterward and their answer to Orlando is to take away guns from the public. It’s f***ing mindblowing to me.”

Stern then illustrated his point with an analogy equating the public to sheep, the terrorists to wolves and the military and police as sheepdogs. And even as Stern humorously imitated a generally passive, sheep-like populace with bleating noises — baaaa — his analogy was chilling at a deeper level.

“Now, let’s say I walked up literally to a sheep herd, and they know that every night the wolves pick off a couple of them,” Stern said. “What if I went up to the sheep and I said, ‘You wanna have a shot at the wolves? I’m gonna give you a pistol. You can actually even the playing field with these wolves whose fangs are out — you could shoot them and save your family.’”

Stern then took on the role of the passive sheep: “Well, baaaa. We’re not gonna do that. We don’t want to fight baaaack. He didn’t hurt uuuus. He only hurt the family down the streeet. And the shepherd will protect us, the sheepdogs are out there, they’ll protect us.”

Stern’s hypothetical reply? “Well, the sheepdogs are protecting you, but some of them can’t be with you all day. There’s not a sheepdog for every citizen, and a wolf is still eating one of you every night.”

Against that backdrop, Stern continued the analogy with the sheep insisting on their guns being taken away as a way to protect themselves:

Now, why would the sheep — baaaa — say, “Oh, we’ve got an answer to all the terrorism, all these bad wolves that are coming after us. We’ll hand in all our guns. We’re gonna hand ‘em in. Baaaa. You know who’ll protect us? The government. Or the police. Baaaa.”

Stern then declared — now out of sheep mode — “That’s a baaaad f***ing idea.”

“I don’t like violence — I don’t like any of this stuff — but I consider myself a sheep, and I want the police to protect me. I support the police. And I want the government to protect me,” he explained. “But guess what? Most of your politicians … all have private security. … So they’re OK. Those are sheep that are very well protected. You on the other hand, you’re a sitting duck.”

“If you’re a sitting duck,” he asked, “do you want a fighting chance or not?”

“I’m not for taking away people’s rights. I’m not,” Stern continued. “I think the answer doesn’t lie in taking any kind of ability of the sheep to protect themselves from the wolves. I really don’t. I wish it was that simple.”

“In France they’ve done it very effectively,” he added, “the population is not armed — but unfortunately the wolves are.”

If you think that gun control works, then how do you explain the fact that it has wildly failed everywhere it’s been tried???  Chicago has gun-control laws as tough as any in the nation, but there are at least 3,000 shootings every single damn year because the criminals and gang members have been emboldened with the knowledge that THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES WITH ANY GUNS.  And it should not be shocking that liberalism failed to solve those gun crimes NINETY PERCENT OF THE TIMEIn San Bernardino, California kept the assault weapons ban, and yet somehow the terrorist had no trouble getting his hands on one.  In related recent news, we find that leftist Oakland – whose police department has been under federal control for the entire Obama presidency because of abuses and scandals up the whazoo – just fired their third police chief in about a week.  How does this not prove that “federal oversight” not a complete joke???

Meanwhile, the police in most of the rest of the nation are TERRIFIED to do their jobs and POLICE their neighborhoods because of a bowel movement spawned out of the wicked heart of Obama and the left called “Black Lives Matter.”  They have rioted all over everywhere and the FBI Director refers to the total police passivity in the aftermath of liberal cities cracking down not on the criminals but the cops as “the Ferguson Effect.”

In my own local newspaper JUST THIS MORNING we have this:

Authorities arrested 22 suspects on Thursday during the final sweep of a nine-month investigation that targeted gangs, guns and drugs in Desert Hot Springs.

Operation Desert Impact, the latest anti-gang effort in the Coachella Valley, led to the confiscation of 23 weapons – including semi-automatic military-style rifles, sawed-off shotguns and a silenced submachine gun – plus two empty rocket launchers. Most of these guns were bought by undercover police officers during months of investigation, but the final few were seized during early morning raids. [… The Desert Sun, Friday, June 17, 2016, p. 1A]

This is California where we have the toughest gun laws in the nation.  This is the Palm Springs area where we have the toughest local gun control laws in California.  HOW THE HELL DID THESE GANG MEMBERS GET THESE GUNS???  Are you a stupid enough Democrat jackass to believe that these criminal gang members bought them legitimately???  They had a silenced submachine gun.  Dude, it’s ILLEGAL to have a silencer OR a submachine gun.  They had a couple ROCKET LAUNCHERS.  Do you have any idea how freaking illegal those things are???

Criminals can get their hands on anything they want because there is something called a black market that law abiding people don’t have access to and they don’t obey laws BECAUSE THEY ARE CRIMINALS.  And these gangs have plenty enough guns of their own; these weapons are being SOLD to any criminal who wants to buy them.

The ONLY people who will be denied guns because of liberal gun laws is law-abiding people.  Because to be a Democrat is to demand that rich people like Hillary Clinton can afford to have armed body guards while the rest of us cower in fear praying to our god Obama to protect us.

So yeah, turn over your guns.  That way you can rest assured that the bullets will only be coming from ONE direction.  The bad news is it WON’T be from yours.

So the leftist argument is that what spectacularly fails to work locally and regionally ought to be imposed nationally so we can spectacularly fail nationally.  Because “Democrat” means “DEMOnic bureauCRAT” and these liberal fools are truly evil.

There is frankly only one possibility these days: the left – which on the one hand has practically shut down local law enforcement even as they are going after the 2nd Amendment right of the people to own and bear guns and protect themselves – is determined to create a national police force similar to the old Soviet-style People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs (NKVD).  That way an Obama or a Hillary Clinton can do to the “police” what Obama did to the IRS and turn it into an Internal Revenge Service against the left’s political enemies.

Democrats are just that evil these days.

I denounce these fools with the Word of God that they mock:  Isaiah 28:15 says, “You boast, we have struck a bargain to cheat death and we have made a deal to dodge the grave.  The coming destruction can never touch us, because we have built a strong refuge made of lies and deception.”  Colossians 2:8 says, “Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ.”  Everything these failed fools say amounts to “empty philosophies” and “high-sounding nonsense” if there ever was ANYTHING that has EVER amounted to nonsense.  Every so-called “strategy” these failed fools are spouting is nothing more than a bargain to cheat death and a deal to dodge the grave.  Barack Obama’s and Hillary Clinton’s ways are DEMONIC.  They are leading us to our doom.

We are literally voting this November on whether we want to continue to survive as a nation, or whether we want to perish by PC.

And PC was a rhetoric tactic invented by COMMUNISTS.  And it was the COMMUNISTS and the NAZIS who first took away guns from their people so they could terrorize their disarmed people who no longer had the power or capability to resist.

Hillary Clinton is pointing to her “experience” to argue that she would make a better president.  BUT SHE PRESIDED OVER THIS SKYROCKETING TERRORISM, SHE PERSONALLY FAILED IN BENGHAZI, AND HER “EXPERIENCE” IS GETTING EVERYTHING IMAGINABLE WRONG OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND VOWING TO REMAIN STUCK ON THE SAME SETTING OF DEMONICALLY STUPID.

 

PC Political Pope Says It’s Not Christian To Build Walls, Conveniently Forgets That His Vatican Is SURROUNDED By Walls

February 18, 2016

So read Psalm 139:13-16 and then explain to me how murdering sixty million innocent babies doesn’t make somebody “not Christian.”  Read Romans 1:18-32 and explain to me how celebrating homosexual marriage doesn’t make somebody “not Christian.”  But building a damn WALL disqualifies somebody from being a Christian in this leftist pope’s mind?  Seriously?

Do you have any idea how many passages in the Bible there are about the Amorite, the Jebusite, the Hittite, the Canaanite, the Philistine, etc. that involves driving them OUT of the land?  Read Deuteronomy 20:16-18 and explain to me how the Pope didn’t just say Jehovah GOD is “not Christian.”

And what about the Book of Nehemiah and how God tells the prophet to rebuild THE WALL???

This is not a good pope, unless being a “good pope” means being a PC leftist political ideologue.

You can count on this pope to ignore the fundamental teachings of Scripture and instead enter into every political issue under the sun, always reliably taking the politically correct side.

Global warming?  Sure.  This pope will take the side of uber-leftism.  We’ve now seen that you can reliably count on that.  It doesn’t matter that the Old Egyptian Kingdom and the Mayan civilization was destroyed at different historical periods by the very climate change that these idiots now assert was caused by factories and SUVs.  Just as it doesn’t matter that the Roman Empire flourished during “global warming” that is warmer than it is now and that it was when climate change brought an ice age that the barbarians who ultimately sacked Rome began to flee to warmer climes.

But hey, let’s just stupidly forget about the past and even more stupidly assert that it’s because of human activity, factories and cars and whatnot, that we have this darned climate change.  Let’s just put reality aside.  Political correctness is just so much better for fascists to slander their way into grabbing more government power.  What they lust for is 76 TRILLION dollars of Other People’s Money to fund their corruption where they get to hold the power to reward their friends and punish their enemies, pure and simple.

Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past,” we were assured in the year 2000 when the left still called their ideology “global warming.”  “Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” we were told.  Let’s just omit the fact that the same idiot pseudo-scientist frauds who predicted global warming and made these idiotic prophesies had previously predicted an ice age.  And they were wrong because they are ALWAYS wrong.

We’re told over and over again that man-caused global warming is “settled science” and that not one single scientist on planet earth disagrees.  It doesn’t matter that Nobel Prize laureates call it a load of bunk.

To be a liberal means to be pathologically ignorant of history, pathologically ignorant of reality and worst of all pathologically ignorant of God’s Word.  Even, or maybe especially, if that liberal happens to be the pontiff.

So this leftist PC pontiff is currently walking around Mexico wearing sackcloth and casting ashes on his head and weeping and wailing about the plight of people who want to break the law and walk into someone else’s country uninvited.

And to that end, he decided to do what NO other pope has done in modern times and become a crass politician demogoguing and demonizing political opponents.  And so he said of Trump:

“A person who thinks only about building walls — wherever they may be — and not building bridges, is not Christian,” Francis said Thursday, according to a translation from the Associated Press. “This is not in the Gospel.”

Yeah, but global warming and gay marriage IS in the Gospel.

Oh, wait.  They aren’t.

Well, it’s too damn bad you don’t yourself actually ever get around to talking about the actual Gospel, Francis.  Maybe you could arrange to fit that in between all of your leftist spouting off about socialism and global warming and gay marriage and illegal immigration.  But I won’t hold my breath.

Anyway, I certainly am NOT a celebrator of Donald Trump’s “Christianity.”  But don’t you DARE, foreign PC pope, intrude into the political process of my country.

Mind you, I can’t even IMAGINE the viciousness of the left had a pope said that Obama wasn’t a Christian.  But to be a liberal means to be a hypocrite.  So you can just forget the notion that any liberal will EVER apply the same standard to others that they apply to themselves, and vice versa.  So just recognize that religion should never have anything whatsoever to do with politics, unless of course it is leftist “religion” demonizing anything conservative or Republican or, you know, the kind of beliefs that come from actually picking up and reading a BIBLE.

So this comeback from the Trump campaign was pretty darned classic:

Trump Pope Response

If you click on the image to open up a larger version in another window, you will see a map of the Vatican (where the Pope resides and commands) featuring a GREAT BIG GIANT WALL SURROUNDING IT.  And a Trump guy pointing out the hypocrisy of Pope Francis by pointing out, “Amazing comments from this Pope, considering Vatican City is 100% surrounded by massive walls.”

That is absolutely awesome.  Donald Trump’s stump speech should now be, “We need to build a giant wall along our southern border, like Pope Francis’ wall at the Vatican…”

Vatican Wall

Just look at the size of that thing.  I mean, DANG!  Don’t you just WISH we had a wall like that???

Pope Francis, you hypocrite liberal!!!  Jesus told people like you to “first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye” (Matthew 7:5).  So when are you going to take that log out of your own eye SO YOU CAN SEE THAT GREAT BIG GIANT WALL OUTSIDE YOUR HOUSE???  Jesus told Christians that “you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free” (John 8:32).  So when are YOU going to get yourself some of that truth???

I feel like Ronald Reagan should come back from heaven and stand in front of the Vatican and say, “Mr. Francis, Tear down this wall.”

Oh, liberal.  It must sting to have your own standard imposed back in your face.  It would be like Obama telling the rest of us that we should all have our guns taken away… and then the Secret Service were to walk off the job and leave him to his well-deserved fate.  You know, while Obama crawls into the fetal position and starts crying like a pitiful child and pleading for the protection that he is trying so hard to deny to the American people who don’t get to have an armed Secret Service detail everywhere they go.

Upon hearing that he had just been put in his place, the pope first tried to lunge after and physically attack the Trump guy, diving headlong into a crowd to get at him…

When Popes Attack1

And then started screaming at him:

When Popes Attack2

and gave him the finger:

When Popes Attack3

Okay, I might not be accurately reporting the genuine context of what truly happened in that above sequence.  Which means I clearly ought to be working as a journalist at MSNBC.

Nevertheless, being a liberal means “being a hypocrite.”  Which means being a man who lives behind giant walls and calling himself the vicar of Christ on earth telling people that anybody who builds was is not a Christian.

The thing about illegal immigration is that it hurts everyone who tried to play by the rules.  The people who come into a country illegally flood the labor market, and there’s something called “the law of supply and demand.”  You know, the LAW of supply and demand, that tells us that if you increase the supply of something, such as, oh, I don’t know, cheap labor, that the value of that thing will invariably go down.  Which means suppressed and depressed wages for everyone else working in that same industry.  It is just a typical liberal lie from hell that illegal immigrants are all out picking crops in the fields and working jobs that no gringo would ever work because they’re just too lazy.  Nope, illegal immigrants are construction workers and contractors and home health care nurses and store employees and pretty much everything else under the sun.  And I also can’t help but empathize – apparently because darn it, I’m just not “Christian” enough I guess – with the people who tried to legally emigrate to this country, but have to wait for YEARS ON END because Democrats and liberals keep rewarding the lawless types who decide that they belong at the head of the line.  Because another characteristic of liberalism is that you are all too willing to harm good people in order to reward bad people for their bad behavior.

In any event, I am NOT a Donald Trump supporter and hope the man does NOT win the Republican primary, but I am now officially BEYOND ENRAGED at this pope who just became a cheap politician and inserted his fool mouth where it very clearly does not belong: in the American political process.

Part of Donald Trump’s response to the Pope was that Islamic State LUSTS to burn the Vatican to the ground and destroy the walls (you know, the great big one that the Pope can’t seem to see) the way they’ve destroyed every other religious structure such as the ancient tombs and the Baalshamin Temple at Palmyra, etc.  And Trump says when Islamic State comes for you, Pope Francis, you’ll be damn glad that I’m president.  Now, I’m hardly the one to tell you that Donald Trump would be the best president at protecting the Vatican or anyplace else, but I CAN tell you that one of the things this pope has done – in the liberal spirit of Obama – is decry just war and decry truly standing up against monstrous evil.  And it is because of the moral idiocy of Barack Obama and Pope Francis that we now have the worst refugee crisis in the entire history of planet earth.

And I’m beyond sick of your meddling.

You can’t walk this one back far enough or fast enough, Francis.  You just stuck your foot in your mouth right up to your hip bone.  You aren’t pope anymore; you’re a just a cheap politician now.  And it’s long-past time you quit pretending to be “humble” while you so outrageously and arrogantly lecture us on every topic under the sun that is TOTALLY OUTSIDE your alleged expertise.

Go back to preaching about the wonders of homosexuality and gay marriage and stay the hell out of my country’s political process, Mr. Pope.

Liberals: Obama Massively FAILED To Protect America From Terrorism; So Let Him Take Away Our Guns So We Can Be MORE Defenseless

December 7, 2015

The New York Times is morally outraged.

You know, much the way child-molesters probably get morally outraged from time to time.  Which is to say, SHUT THE HELL UP.

The New York Times editorial I’m reacting to is based on two hidden underlying premises: 1) that good people should be rendered helpless; and 2) that evil people obey laws.  Both premises are cockroach crap.

A third underlying premise to all liberal appeals for more gun control is this: that, like the caliphate, every new piece of ground we take, every new piece of legislation, is one more step toward total control.  Democrats want to “control the people“; they’ve ALWAYS wanted to control the people.  Just like the terrorists and their dreams of political caliphate who want to be able to forcibly impose their will on helpless people who would be stripped of any means to resist their tyranny.  Democrats therefore want nothing less than the total confiscation of guns in America – and I’m absolutely certain that every terrorist says “praise Allah!” to that happy thought.  And when you can know that there is a group of people who are committed to taking away your rights, the ONLY “right” thing to do is to fight them over every single inch of ground.  Every single NANOMETER.

A fourth underlying premise is that the left desperately needs to get behind Obama’s incredibly cynical attempt to try to divert and distract attention away from his impeachable failure to protect America by demagoguing a highly partisan liberal policy posture.  It basically comes down to, “Obama failed to protect America when Republicans were warning about his building failure for YEARS, but let’s just conveniently put that fact aside and just give him more of what he wants.”  Because if you can’t reward liberalism and liberals for failure, how in the world can they ever expect to be rewarded given the fact that fail is all they do?

What we saw on Wednesday was a supermassive policy failure on the part of a Democrat President who has failed to protect America from terrorism at every imaginable turn.  And what the New York Times in it’s front page op-ed scream is treasonously declaring is that Barack Obama ought to be REWARDED for his supermassive failure to protect the American people by giving him the uberleftist Nazi gun-control victory that his fellow fascists have been seeking for decades.  It’s like Rahm Emmanuel said: every crisis is an opportunity.  And therefore when Obama creates a crisis by his incompetence and his moral idiocy, it ought to be an opportunity for Obama to reward his failure by seizing the freedoms of his enemies who happen to love the Constitution he routinely urinates on with the frequency of an aging man with a watermelon-sized prostate.

As I pointed out in a recent previous article, the terrorists launched a massively deadly attack in Paris France – which has some of the strictest gun controls ON EARTH.  Gun control works GREAT in theory; if nobody has guns, then nobody can commit any violence with guns, right?  It just fails in actual reality because for some reason Democrats can’t fathom, criminals and terrorists don’t bother to follow their laws.  Only ordinary people follow the laws who are then rendered helpless – which of course emboldens the criminals and terrorists.  Consider also that poor Marine who got confused and unintentionally entered Mexico with a couple of guns and spent months rotting in prison; there’s ANOTHER country with strict gun control laws.  Which means only the murderous CARTELS have guns and the people are utterly helpless before them.  Gun control works out GREAT for the people who have the guns who get to terrorize and murder helpless, defenseless people.

Then consider that Obama has REFUSED to keep our southern borders safe, and imagine where the guns will come flooding in from when only criminals and terrorists will break the law to get them.

Gun control works for fascist governments that want to “control the people.”  And it works for criminals and terrorists.  It fails and ultimately murders everybody else.

Obama has failed America so badly it is beyond UNREAL: terrorist attacks skyrocketed 150% in the five years of his failed presidency leading up to 2014 and we aint seen NOTHIN’ yet as they surged ANOTHER 81% this year from last.  Next year you will see hell unleashed because of this fool president and his fool liberal policies that the New York Slimes endorses and re-endorses.

The only announcement that ought to come from Obama is the announcement that he is RESIGNING.

This lying fool Obama boasted that Islamic State was merely “JayVee” when they were already seizing city after city in Iraq. He’s flat-out lied to us from the start about these vicious murderers.  Just a few hours before the vicious murderous terror attack in Paris, Obama lied again and assured America that Islamic State was “contained” when they were very obviously anything BUT.  The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff basically told the American people that their commander-in-chief LIED to them in claiming Islamic State was contained.  He refuted Obama.  But Obama doesn’t give a flying DAMN what the actual intelligence is.  He’s been ordering his handpicked bureaucrat thugs to overrule the actual intelligence analysts and just impose Obama’s political narrative in place of the actual intelligence.  And so just days before the vicious terror attack in San Bernardino, Obama was yet again falsely and deceitfully assuring the American people that he was keeping us safe.  How safe should you feel about his worthless reassurances now?

Obama sent out Hilary Clinton and Susan Rice to REPEATEDLY lie about the TERRORIST ATTACK that resulted in the murder of American heroes and the first US Ambassador since 1979 to be killed like a dog.  We now KNOW from Hillary Clinton’s emails that she tried to destroy that the Obama administration KNEW that the attack was a terrorist attack and NOT the result of some stupid video.  But the 1st Amendment right to free speech is just ANOTHER basic American freedom that Obama and Clinton tried to destroy the way they’re trying to destroy our 2nd Amendment rights.

Last night, amazingly, Democrats are actually giving Obama credit for acknowledging that the Ft. Hood shooting was a terrorist attack.  Do you know what a sick JOKE that is?  When did that attack happen?  Nov 5, 2009.  Do you know how long it took ME to officially call that attack what it clearly was?  I wrote this article November 6 the very next DAY.  Let’s see, what did I already know that day?  Let’s see: we already knew about his numerous internet postings espousing jihad.  We already knew he got into loud arguments with co-workers declaring that “Muslims should stand up and fight against the aggressor.”  That’s you, by the way, if you happen to be an American.  We know that he was screaming “Allahu Akbar” throughout his murderous attack.  Again, that very SAME DAY on November 6 I wrote this article titled, “Newsflash: Obama Enlisted Future Terrorist To Label Rightwing As ‘Extremist’” because Obama had actually ENLISTED Nidal Hasan to demonize conservatives and write propaganda that it was conservatives who were the real threat, not radical Muslims.  It was within a matter of days that the authorities revealed that Hasan had business cards calling himself a “soldier of Allah” and had had numerous internet contacts with terrorist leader Anwar al-Awlaki.

Obama finally officially acknowledged Nidal Hasan was a terrorist last night?

It took Obama MORE THAN SIX YEARS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE OBVIOUS.

Let me put it this way: today is December 7th.  You know NOTHING about history if you don’t know what anniversary that is, the savage Japanese attack against Pearl Harbor.  What if it had taken FDR SIX YEARS to acknowledge that we had been attacked by a foreign ideology and that we needed to go to war against that ideology.  And I’ll tell you what would have happened: the eastern half of American would be speaking Nazi and the Western half would be speaking Banzai, that’s what would have happened.

For SIX YEARS Obama buried his head in the damn sand and refused to acknowledge we had a rising enemy.  He STILL refuses to acknowledge that that enemy is motivated by ISLAMIC THEOLOGY.

We are sitting ducks because he did NOTHING.

Now, I just got through mentioning that just a matter of a few damn days before the terrorist attack that was eerily similar to Paris, Obama said nothing like that could happen here.  Because he’s a deluded FOOL.  But hey, for that matter the same hoity-toity New York Times assured us that what happened in Paris can’t happen here.  Just days before it DID happen here to prove that those know-nothing fools are a bunch of know-nothing FOOLS.

How many times do these fools get to be completely WRONG?  How many times do they get to LIE to us?

Here’s another thing to point out what a massive FAIL Obama and his Democrat roaches are when it comes to keeping Americans safe: This terrorist attack is just another in a long, LONG string of mass shootings that were committed because of the wickedness of Democrats who want to render Americans helpless with their cursed “gun free zones.” And they want to make the entire NATION one giant gun-free zone.

Now, I don’t doubt thanks to our Failed Fool in Chief that there WILL come a point when terrorists are so emboldened that they go after our police and our military by launching direct attacks on police stations and military installations.  But up to this point, how many times have terrorists decided they wanted to go after a target where heavily armed people had an opportunity to defend themselves and shoot back?  Fool Democrats merely want to increase the number of potential terrorist targets from thousands of “gun-free zones” to HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS.

Democrats often talk about “hunting” and say you don’t need an “assault rifle” to hunt.  Of course, based on that “logic,” it won’t be long before they’ve regulated Americans to the point where the only gun they can use is a damned BLUNDERBUSS.  But here’s the thing, that’s a deceitful bait and switch and anybody who knows history knows it’s a bait and switch: the 2nd Amendment doesn’t guarantee the “right to hunt”; it never mentions “hunting” at ALL.  Rather, the 2nd Amendment guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear ARMS” and declares that that right “shall not be infringed.”

Where the hell did Democrats decide that when the first grocery store or the first McDonald’s came to exist, that somehow the 2nd Amendment didn’t apply anymore because we no longer needed to hunt to live?

All an “assault weapon” is just a clever marketing ploy to make the semi-automatic rifles that have been legal in America since semi-automatic rifles were INVENTED.  “Assault rifles” are defined as weapons capable of selective fire, either semi- or full-automatic.  “Assault weapons” are merely semi-automatic weapons that look really cool.  They are designed to look all scary and nasty, but they’re just basic semi-automatic rifles.  In fact, if you actually know your history, you’ll know that semi-automatic rifles were actually in the hands of civilians BEFORE the first semi-automatic rifles (the M-1 Garand) were issued to US servicemen.  American civilians were using semi-automatic rifles at least going back to 1906, a full thirty years before the military got them.  So the notion that the American people shouldn’t be allowed to have these guns is just plain BULL CRAP.  It is anti-American.

Actually, assault weapons are AWESOME weapons to hunt with.  They are awesome ALL-AROUND weapons in that they are great for target shooting, for hunting AND for defense.  When I go on my hikes, I see people shooting with them ALL THE TIME.  And yet because I’m not a coward liberal I never scream and run because oh-my-god that weapon is going to take over the mind of its owner and kill me!

The 2nd Amendment exists for one reason: so the government won’t EVER have the power or ability to hunt US the way the gun-confiscating Nazis hunted down the Jews.

The 2nd Amendment was enshrined by our founding fathers as A REACTION AGAINST TYRANNY.  And the tyranny that they were MOST worried about was the tyranny of our OWN government.  And they enshrined the 2nd Amendment to guarantee that at some safeguarding level, the government would be forced to fear the people so that the people would not have to live in fear of their government.  You know, the way they had to fear their damn government in so many places that enacted the sort of “gun control” the left wants, such as Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia.

I’m going to declare it this way: unless and until the Democrat Party officially and permanently declares that the 2nd Amendment is in fact a fundamental right for the people to keep and to bear arms and ANY attempt to infringe on that right is a federal crime subject to HEAVY prison time for ANY politician, judge, or voter who tries to usurp that right, I for one am not going to listen to their mewling about gun control.

As long as there is an Obama stenching up the White House with the moral sewer of his power-grabbing executive orders, I want what my founding fathers intended me to have to protect my life and my property from his evil.

Their hypocritical money quote is this: “No right is unlimited and immune from reasonable regulation.”

Except the right for illegal immigrants and criminals to vote without any damn ID check, of course.  The New York Times will fight to its last Nazi to stop that from ever happening.

Illegal immigrants are VOTING. YES THEY ARE!!!  Obama’s illegal – even illegal according to his own “Justice” Department just hours before he dictated what HE HIMSELF said he had absolutely no right to do executive actions have taken away the very few protection and enforcement measures America had to keep its elections safe from foreign manipulation.  And it is now beyond easy to document as a matter-of-fact that Democrats have been AGITATING and working toward the “right” of all illegal immigrants to vote IN RABID DEFIANCE OF OUR CONSTITUTION.

But ANY attempt to require ANY ID is met with rabid opposition and outright demonic slander.  You know, from the party that says Republicans aren’t “reasonable.”

And just for the record, if Democrats have any right whatsoever to ban the American people from owning guns because of what a FEW people do, then at least they ought to be “reasonable” enough to deport every single illegal immigrant in this nation because of what a few ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS do.  So you ban your guns and we’ll deport forty million undocumented immigrants.  And if the latter one is insane, the former one is even MORE insane because the former one is enshrined in our Constitution and our way of life.

Now let me talk more about “voting” and the UNLIMITED and IMMUNE FROM REASONABLE REGULATION “right to vote” that the Democrat Party has enshrined without ANY constitutional support.

The Nazis were ELECTED, chump.  Just like the terrorist organization Hamas was elected in the Palestinian territory.  Just like the terrorist organization the Muslim Brotherhood was elected in Egypt.  Just like the damn Democrat Party was elected in America.

Voting is THE most dangerous right on earth.  I’ll just put it this way: a whole hell of a lot more Jews were killed in Nazi concentration camps than all the Americans who exercised their 2nd Amendment rights throughout the entire history of the world’s oldest republic COMBINED.

But the same Democrats who demand our borders remain flooded with millions of illegal immigrants – and of course illegal guns coming in with them the exact same damn way they’re serving as mules for drug cartels now – won’t allow ANY “reasonable regulation” when it comes to their “unlimited” right from illegal immigrants to be “immune” from consequences of voting in US elections.

I’ll tell you what: the right to keep and bear arms isn’t merely a “right”; it’s a constitutional guarantee and it is a fundamental basis for ALL of our freedoms.  Because your freedom doesn’t mean a damn thing if somebody else wants to take your freedom away and they’ve got guns and you’ve got squat.  Versus the Democrat’s cynical and self-serving partisan demand for a “right” that is UNCONSTITIONAL and frankly ANTICONSTITUTIONAL in giving illegal immigrants the ability to override the will of the American people.

It comes down to this: as we speak, the President of the United States and his entire Democrat Party establishment are playing the most cynical and partisan political games in the entire history of the republic.  And if they win, the United States of America loses.

If you’ve got a gun, you better keep your powder dry, because Obama and his Democrat National Socialist Workers Party fascist thugs are DESPERATE to change the subject and they want your guns now more than EVER.

If Democrats don’t want to have guns, I’m all in favor of them not having them.  I am all in favor of any law that criminalizes anyone who has ever voted Democrat from owning guns.  If Democrats truly think gun control is such a wonderful idea, let them vote to take away their own damn guns and see what happens.

The worst problem with Democrats is that they invariably want to impose their fascism on everybody else.

Second Victim Pushed To Death Under Train This Month. We Must Crimalize All Trains NOW! Oh, We Only Treat Guns That Way???

December 28, 2012

I know the left has been pushing trains as a “green” form of transportation, but trains kill people and clearly they’re another thing that’s just too dangerous for society to be allowed to have.

December 27, 2012
Man Is Pushed to His Death Under Train in Queens
By THE NEW YORK TIMES

A young woman pushed a man to his death under an oncoming train at the 40th Street-Lowery Street subway station in Queens on Thursday evening, law enforcement authorities said.

The woman walked behind the man along the platform, mumbling to herself, witnesses told the police, before shoving him into the path of a northbound No. 7 train just after 8 p.m. Witnesses said the victim did not appear to notice her. The woman, whom the police described as Hispanic, in her early 20s and heavyset, fled and was being sought by all police officers in the area.

She was wearing a blue, white and gray ski jacket, the police said, and gray Nike sneakers. The man, who had not been identified, remained underneath the subway train late Thursday evening, spokesmen for the Police and Fire Departments said.

It is the second time this month that a man has been killed after being pushed onto the subway tracks. Ki-Suck Han, 58, of Elmhurst, Queens, died under the Q train at the 49th Street and Seventh Avenue station in early December. Naeem Davis, 30, has been charged with second-degree murder in that case. A lawyer for Mr. Davis said that his client had been trying to push Mr. Han away after an altercation.

If liberals were honest, they’d say, “Of course guns don’t kill people; that’s asinine and anybody who thinks anything that stupid is asinine.  People kill people with pretty much whatever is convenient – including the damn oncoming train.  And of course the Constitution clearly guarantees that no cockroach shall infringe upon your individual right as a citizen to keep and bear your guns.  You’ve got to be a complete dumbass to try to argue otherwise.  And we need to come to an agreement on those two facts as a nation so we can come together and maintain our constitutional freedoms while doing something to keep dangerous weapons of ANY kind out of the hands of psychos.”

But they’re not honest.  So we have the political equivalent of World War I-style trench warfare on guns and pretty much everything else.

So let’s apply their “logic” and start banning all passenger trains because they can be used by psychopaths to commit murders.  Starting with Amtrack and the New York subway system.

Oh, we might start banning racial minorities, too.  The first “train-waving murderer” was a black man and the second one was Hispanic.  The same argument used to demonize guns actually works equally well with both of these groups, too.  And if you talk about the Nazis – which stood for “National Socialist German Workers Party” (hint: which party is the “National Socialist American Workers Party” again????) – let’s remember they did both and first took away all the guns and then rounded up all the Jews who suddenly discovered they were absolutely defenseless.

Yesterday the Democrat governor of New York (Cuomo) used the word “confiscate” to describe his position on guns.

You want to know what true liberals have had to say about guns?

Regarding disarming a nation as the Democrat Party wants to do:

Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest.” – Mahatma Mohandas K. Gandhi, Autobiography, page 446

Regarding the individual right to defend yourself against violence with a gun:

If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun.” – Dalai Lama, Seattle, May 15th, 2001

I suppose you can pardon their attitudes as two great men who spent their lives watching an oppressive force systemically crush their people after said oppressive force took their guns away from them.

Here’s a third for the heck of it:

“As we have seen, the first public expression of disenchantment with nonviolence arose around the question of “self-defense.” In a sense this is a false issue, for the right to defend one’s home and one’s person when attacked has been guaranteed through the ages by common law.” – “Where Do We Go From Here:Chaos or Community?” by MLK Jr.

Said Dr. King, registered gun owner and registered Republican in addition to being a man who would have had his address published for public shame as if he were some kind of criminal if he’d lived in New York this week.  That of course was back in those good old days when “the right to defend one’s home and one’s person when attacked was guaranteed through the ages by common law.”  Goof times, those ages past.  Missing them already since Obama fundamentally transformed America.

Oh, that’s right.  Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was another one of those guys who took about a hundred beatings too many from an oppressive system that had the guns to go along with all the other force it had.

True liberals understand that the society that comes after your guns is going to be able to come after you and you won’t be able to do a damn thing about it when they do.

Which is to say that  Gov. Andrew Cuomo – who has the virtue only of being more honest about his intentions than Obama is – is a fascist rather than any true liberal in any historically accurate sense of the term.

My Response To Liberals About Gun Control (It’s Really Conservatives Who Ought To Read It, Though).

July 31, 2012

Liberals can’t understand why anyone would want an “assault weapon” (which many literally think is a fully automatic machine gun rather than the completely SEMI-automatic version of the military assault rifles which are actually of a fairly lightweight caliber).

“You don’t need one of those to hunt,” they’ll say.  As if they think rightwing Republicans are all like Jed Clampett out in the woods “shootin at some food.”

Obama says, “AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals.”  Let’s leave aside the fact that the AK-47s that actually ARE in the hands of soldiers are capable of fully automatic fire – which documents that Obama is one of the demagogues who are deliberately trying to confuse and mislead the American people into banning guns that have ALREADY been banned so he can fool them into supporting new restrictions on their constitutional rights.  Another couple of questions arise: 1) Does Obama not know which military he commands?  Because in point of fact only COMMUNIST soldiers use AK-47s.  Have his Marxist economic policies left him confused, or is he simply that astonishingly ignorant about this issue he’s lecturing us about?  2) A further thing that leaves me scratching my head is why Obama thinks that gun laws are going to keep guns out of the hands of criminals GIVEN THE FACT THAT “CRIMINALS” ARE THE ONLY PEOPLE BY DEFINITION WHO DON’T OBEY DAMN LAWS.  This takes us to the dilemma that if you criminalize guns, only criminals will end up having them.  Which is why in actual FACT liberal cities are far more violent than conservative cities.  Especially the cities like Chicago that have the most restrictive gun laws which prevent law-abiding people from protecting themselves.  And the only way to actually “ban” all of these “AK-47s” is to kick down every single damn door in America to confiscate them in what would be the most tyrannous day in the entire history of the republic (and keep reading to see below for WHY we have a right to keep and bear arms in the first place).

The reality is that the so-called “assault weapons” are excellent multi-purpose rifles, and many people who don’t have unlimited money particularly like these weapons for their multiple uses: you can use them for hunting; you can use them for home defense; you can use them to protect your rights as an American citizen against any who would seek to take those rights away; and boy are they ever fun to use for target shooting.  That’s what my dad would call a “four-fer.”  And add to all of that the fact that they are designed to be light weight.  If I weren’t a rich liberal like the ones who are trying to take away our ability to protect ourselves while they drive around in armored cars with their armed security details, and I could only afford to buy one gun, I would want an assault weapon.

I’d like to see a garden-variety liberal try to protect their property from a mob of looters during a riot with the sort of guns they say everyone should be limited to.  The term “neo-conservative” refers to “liberals who have been mugged by reality.”  If you are one of the people who have been forced to protect what you have spent your life building from those who want to take it away from you and burn what they leave behind, and when you look through the smoke there are no police around to protect you, then you are one of the people who understand that “assault weapons” have a very useful purpose, indeed.

Many of your self-considered “broadly tolerant” liberals believe that the 2nd Amendment only applies to the black powder smoothbore muskets that were in vogue the day the Constitution was signed.  Of course, there are plenty of liberals who would eagerly take even THOSE away from us.  The fact of the matter is that those black powder smoothbores that every American was not only allowed to have but encouraged to have when the Constitution was written were the most modern military firearms available at the time.  And the fact of the matter is that the 2nd Amendment – and think for a second why it would be the second most important thing the founding fathers believed in after they considered freedom of religion and freedom of speech – was a reaction against government tyranny.  The founding fathers wanted the government to fear the people rather than for the people to fear the government – which has as a matter of documented historical FACT been a terrible consequent of many states that have taken away the right to keep and bear arms.

Which is why James Madison said, “Americans have the right and advantage of being armed – unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.”

Which is why James Madison also said, “Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation. . . Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.”

Which is why Noah Webster said, “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.”

Which is why Alexander Hamilton said, “…but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights…”

Which is why Alexander Hamilton also said, “The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.”

Which is why Richard Henry Lee said, “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike especially when young, how to use them.”

Which is why Patrick Henry said, “The great object is that every man be armed” and “everyone who is able may have a gun.”

Which is why Patrick Henry also said, “Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?”

And which is why Patrick Henry also said, “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.

Which is why Samuel Adams said, “That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of The United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms…”

Which is why Thomas Jefferson said, “The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”

Which is why Thomas Jefferson also said, “What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.”

And which is why Thomas Jefferson also said, “No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”

Which is why George Washington said, “Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence … From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that is good.

And which is why even the wise philosopher Aristotle said, “Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people.”

It’s not like this is a matter of any question to any intelligent, educated person.  The founding fathers were crystal clear that the people have the necessary right to keep and bear arms.  And literally that any government that would try to take away those arms was a tyrannous government that in fact exemplified why arms should be in the hands of the people in the first place!

In fact, liberals, the very fact that you keep trying to use raw government power to take away our guns is why we should be all the more determined to keep our guns.  Because according to the founding fathers you are the very people that we should be armed against.

Liberals love to assert that the 2nd Amendment never really applied to “the people” but rather to a “militia.”  What is funny is that the very liberals who say that guns shouldn’t be in the hands of the people are also the most suspicious and intolerant of people in militias, too!  Which underscores the fact that these liberals are truly anti-gun AND anti-Constitution and merely cynically offer whatever pretense will get them what they want.  But leaving that aside, let’s example the argument:

The 2nd Amendment: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

Here’s what’s wrong with that view: To whom do the rights accorded in the 1st Amendment belong: to “the people” or to “a well regulated militia”?

If liberals want to be logically and morally and historically and grammatically consistent with their 2nd Amendment view about gun rights only belonging to militias, they must therefore concede that “the people” do not have the right to peaceably assemble or to petition the government for any redress of grievances (1st Amendment) or to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures (4th Amendment and see also the rights guaranteed by the 9th and 10th Amendments) – because only those in a “well regulated militia” would possess those rights and any other rights the Constitution claims for “the people.”  It is completely arbitrary and in fact downright irrational thinking to suggest that “the people” means one thing for the purpose of the 2nd Amendment but something entirely different for every other usage of the exact same phrase in the very same document.

To return to what I previously stated that liberals become the very people that our founding fathers warned us about, in trying to take away rights that clearly belong to “the people” are by so doing denying and undermining every other right that similarly belongs to “the people.”  And thank God I have guns as long as there are people who think that way.

Let me further mention a typical liberal view that guns are dangerous because “guns kill people.”

You could give me a nuclear bomb and I would do everything in my power to ensure that that nuclear bomb was used responsibly – which is to say that I would never use it in any situation I could possibly envision.  You could give me a fully automatic machine gun to carry around with me at port arms and I would never mow down a crowd. Conservatives are people who can own guns and not murder innocent people.  Liberals – by their own views – are apparently not such people.  Rather, if they had a gun, that gun, being inherently dangerous and evil, would immediately begin to leach away at their feeble liberal intellects and their gutless liberal moral wills.  Liberals affirm that they are bad people, weak people, who should not be entrusted with the responsibility that the founding fathers provided for free men.

This gets to the heart of the issue between liberals and conservatives.  It comes down to something that John Adams said:

“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

In their views of guns and their attitude toward the 2nd Amendment, liberals implicitly if not explicitly admit that they are NOT the kind of people that the Constitution was made for; they are bad people.  They are people who have no morality and no religion; and the Constitution and its protections enshrined in the Bill of Rights are therefore wholly inadequate for them.

Our Constitution was written to create “a new nation, conceived in liberty” as Lincoln would later say.  It was to be a nation different from the nations of Europe, in which all men were equal and men were free to think and believe and decide for themselves.  And Madison’s point was that only a moral and religious people could exercise the necessary self-restraint to have those kinds of freedoms.  Amoral and irreligious people, on the other hand, could be controlled only by ever-increasing levels of totalitarian government tyranny.

George Washington – the father of our country – was even MOREstridently clear. Washington said:

“Of all the habits and dispositions which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.” — George Washington, Farewell Address

If you want your politics to prosper, the two things you will not separate will be religion and morality. If you want your government to work well, if you want American exceptionalism, if you want the government to do right, if you want all this, then you won’t separate religion and morality from political life. And America’s greatest patriot gave a litmus test for patriotism. He says in the very next sentence (immediately continuing from the quote above):

“In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars.” — George Washington

Washington says, Anyone who would try to remove religion and morality from public life, I won’t allow them to call themselves a patriot. Because they are trying to destroy the country.

And the point here is that liberals again and again on issue after issue reveal themselves to be the kind of people that George Washington and the founding fathers of this country would have labelled “traitors.”  They are NOT patriots; they are men and women who “labor to subvert these great pillars” such as morality and religion and, yes, the 2nd Amendment protections provided for “the people.”

Consider one particularly infamous and evil example of the fact that Democrats routinely demonize the very “religion and morality” that George Washington and our founding fathers said was the defining foundation of our Constitution.

Liberals have worked hard for the last fifty years to take away our morality and our religion.  In so doing, they have given us the very violence that is now spiralling out of control.  Liberals are the kind of people who have taken away prayer.  Liberals are the kind of people who have refused to allow the posting of the Ten Commandments because “If the posted copies of the Ten Commandments are to have any effect at all, it will be to induce the schoolchildren to read, meditate upon, perhaps to venerate and obey, the Commandments,” and God-as-Government forbid that children be allowed to do something like that.  Liberals are the kind of people who have imposed godless abortion upon society to the tune of 54 MILLION innocent human beings butchered since 1973.  Liberals are the kind of people who have destroyed fatherhood, because according to liberals fathers did not father children, but strictly non-human lumps of biological goop such that they should not be allowed to have any influence whatsoever as to whether their own babies be allowed to even live.  Liberals are the kind of people who have imposed pornography on us because liberal justices are moral idiots who are morally incapable of differentiating between art and XXX-rated sex movies.  Liberals are the kind of people who imposed no-fault divorce without limit or condition upon us because breaking up families is more important than asking couples who took a vow to one another under God to work to resolve their differences.  Liberals are the kind of people who turned marriage itself into a perverted mockery by saying that the institution of marriage as the union of one man and one woman be adulterated to include whatever the hell politically correct understanding depraves the minds of the left next.

These are the people that George Washington said, “These people are NOT patriots.”  These are the people that the founding fathers said we needed to be armed to protect ourselves against as they take away the God-given rights of “the people” to protect ourselves against the very tyranny they continually seek to impose upon us.

If any liberal wants to regulate the guns which the founding fathers intended to protect ourselves against the very sort of tyranny that liberals continually seek to impose, let them first categorically affirm the right of the people to keep and bear arms.  By that, I mean require an Amendment to the Bill of Rights that for all time specifically states that the 2nd Amendment guarantees that the same people who have ever other right accorded to “the people” be allowed to be armed and to possess arms, with the further condition that ANY official whether he or she be a politician, a judge or a bureaucrat be IMMEDIATELY removed from his or her office with the forfeiture of all pay, all benefits and all responsibilities if he or she ever try to take away these rights from any law-abiding American citizen.

Until that day, “gun control” is a zero-sum game, with every limitation and restriction taking us one step closer to taking away ALL of our rights while those who believe in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and specifically the 2nd Amendment, receive NOTHING in return.  As long as there is one liberal who has any influence over the American people in any chamber of politics, any chamber of law, or any bureaucracy, who wants to take away our rights, the people need to continue to be armed to prevent that liberal from depriving them of their freedom.

If you as a liberal think I’m crazy to say that Democrats want to take away our guns, well, then, please join me in taking that issue I keep demagoguing off the table.  Demand that your party sponsor and vote for that constitutional amendment.  And then people like me will be forced to shut up, won’t we?

Liberals constantly demonize conservatives as the obstacles preventing every single nut from shooting somebody; I point the finger right back at them: because they are untrustworthy negotiating partners with too many having the open agenda that I described above.  As long as we have a president of the United States who appoints judges who say that citizens have a right to keep arms, but not to bear them – or to similarly brazenly deny the Constitution, you aint getting NOTHIN’ from me.  And frankly, if you don’t mind my saying so, you’re a slimebag for every trying.

When the 2nd Amendment as our founding fathers intended it is firmly engrained in American society once and for all time, I believe liberals will be surprised at how many conservatives will join them in enacting reasonable restrictions that will limit the abuse of guns.

But that day will not happen and should not happen until everybody who thinks like this is legally barred from holding ANY government office whatsoever.

And that is why this is true and has been true of Barack Obama:

I began this talking about Barack Obama not wanting AK-47s in the American peoples’ hands because he doesn’t trust us.  What is amazing is that this same president’s administration put those very AK-47s into the hands of Mexican drug cartel murderers.

‘Assault Weapons,’ Gun Control And The Myth Of Which Side Is To Blame For ‘Guns In The Hands Of Killers’

July 24, 2012

I am home following an argument with a liberal dumbass for whom idiot opinion trumps facts.

I heard a man state that James Holmes was using a fully automatic assault rifle to mow people down.  And, being me, I was compelled to correct his errors with facts.

“Based on the records we have reviewed, personnel in our Denver store correctly and fully followed all Federal requirements with respect to the sale of one shotgun and one handgun to the individual identified in this incident,” said a statement released by Bass Pro Shops. “Background checks, as required by Federal law, were properly conducted, and he was approved.”

Holmes purchased a third weapon, a semi-automatic AR-15 assault rifle, at the Gander Mountain store in Aurora just a mile from the movie theater where he allegedly mowed down dozens of unsuspecting moviegoers.

That, too, was bought over the counter, after Holmes passed a background check.

“In 95 percent of all gun-related crimes, the guns are bought illegally, not over the counter,” said Richard Taylor, a manager at The Firing Line, a gun retailer in Aurora. “This appears to be the rare exception.”

According to Taylor, all three of the weapons are commonly sold over the counter; the shotgun, a favorite of those looking to protect their home; the AR-15, a weapon used by small game hunters and shooting enthusiasts; and the glock perhaps the most commonly-used gun by law enforcement officers on the street.

James Holmes did NOT use a fully automatic assault rifle in his July 20 murder spree; he used a civilian version of the M-16 called an AR-15 that fired in one mode: semi-automatic.

The definition of an “assault rifle” is a weapon that is capable of selective fire, with two modes: semi-automatic and full automatic.  The latest military assault rifles that have appeared have modified the “full automatic” to a shorter 3-round burst with each squeeze of the trigger.  That modification was the result of trying to save bullets, not lives, for the record.

Years back, Democrats used a sleight of hand to refer to “assault weapons” and demonize them.  These “assault weapons” are merely semi-automatic versions of the military grade weapons.  Since then, both the Democrat Party and the mainstream media have repeatedly and deliberately attempted to confuse the public into believing that “assault weapons” are dangerous fully automatic weapons that no one ought to be allowed to have.

Which is another way of pointing out that in a way, the liberal jackass who refused to be corrected with the facts wasn’t completely to blame for his being a dumb ass; the media and the Democrat Party routinely and deliberately confuse people with the intent of ginning up manufactured outrage in order to ban weapons under false pretenses.

There are still plenty of damn liberals who want to demonize Republicans over every gun crime.  Oh yes there are.  And I’m sick of it.

I’m just a guy who starts getting increasingly pissed off whenever I hear somebody selling lies in place of the facts.

The biggest lie of all that liberals and Democrats routinely tell is that the 2nd Amendment doesn’t really give the people the uninfringed right to keep and bear arms.

The 2nd Amendment – and it’s “second” only after the right to free speech and the right to worship in a free society – is short, sweet and crystal clear:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

If “the people” means “a well regulated Militia,” as liberals and Democrats routinely assert, then “the people” do not have any rights at all UNLESS THEY SERVE IN A WELL REGULATED MILITIA.  In other words, according to the “logic” of liberalism, you do NOT have the right to keep and bear arms; neither do you have the right to free speech, nor the right to worship as you choose, nor the right to peaceably assemble, etc. etc. ad nasuem.  You do not have any rights at all if you don’t have the right to keep and bear arms.  Because “the people” are either “the people” or they are “a well regulated militia.”  One or the other.

But let’s, just for the sake or argument, pretend for a moment that liberals and Democrats are honest people who truly want to follow the Constitution.  And they are honest for thinking of “the people” as “a well regulated militia.”  That would mean that Democrats and liberals are all for “well regulated militias,” right?

Well, the fact of the matter is that Democrats and liberals are NOT for guns.  Period.  And so they’ve gone after militias as savagely as they’ve gone after individual people being able to own guns.  You see, if you love the Constitution and you hate government regulations, well, you’re an “extremist militia” by Obama’s Homeland Security Department definition and Democrats and liberals are going to do all they can do to come after you.

So Democrats and liberals are dishonest.  They say “the people” shouldn’t have the right to be armed because only a militia should have that right.  And then they tell the militias that THEY shouldn’t have that right, either.

That’s how the Nazis  and the communists were.  They took away “the people’s” right to be armed, too.  It was the very first thing they did.  If they hadn’t, quite frankly, there would have been a lot fewer murdered Jews and a lot more dead Nazi killers.  I think the state of Israel has amply demonstrated that armed Jews are more than capable of protecting themselves when liberal policies had them as helpless sheep waiting for their turn to be slaughtered.  Just saying.

If you read the Federalist Papers there is no question whatsoever that the founding fathers viewed the 2nd Amendment as a reaction against tyranny.  In the Britain that the first Americans had escaped, it was a crime to own a weapon.  There was no way to rise up and thow off whatever shackles of tyranny that government imposed upon them.  The founding fathers said that people should not fear their governments; governments should fear their people.  And an armed government has no need to fear a disarmed people.

I think there are ALL KINDS of things that American society can do to better regulate gun ownership.

But I just as firmly believe that there should be NO regulations of ANY kind until Democrats stop being fascists and fundamentally respect the Constitution and specifically the 2nd Amendment.  Until the Democrat Party IN ITS PLATFORM fundamentally swears to uphold the fight of the people to keep and bear arms without infringement, there can and should be no negotiations of any kind to limit guns in any way.  Because such negotiations would amount to a zero-sum game in which conservatives keep on giving up ground and rights and Democrats keep seizing ground and rights.

These are the first two “gun laws” that we need in America:

1) Any politician (ie., any Democrat) who publicly says that people do not have a right to keep and bear arms will be denied ANY and ALL money by his or her political party.  He or she will likewise be stripped of any and all leadership in the party.

2) Any judge – whether elected or appointed – who affirms that the people do not have a fundamental right to keep and bear arms will be immediately removed from his or her position on the grounds that they violated the Constitution which they took an oath to uphold.

We get those two “gun laws” passed, and I am very open to requiring more responsibility and more regulation of gun ownership.  But until then, we shouldn’t give those fascist Democrats who want to take away our guns so that we are as helpless as the Jews were before the Nazis one damn thing.

I will not allow my rights to be taken away or limited in any way, shape or form by any political body that has so much as ONE politician who is allowed to think, “That’s step ONE toward my goal to take away their guns.”  I will not agree with Democrats regarding ANY limitation of my fundamental right to keep and bear arms when it is a matter of public record that many Democrats do not respect the Constitution they took an oath to uphold.

If you want to come here and assert that Republicans are creating a climate of violence by refusing to limit guns, you’ve come to the wrong place.  Because YOU are the reason why we can’t have more gun control.  Because it is your unconstitutional and frankly treasonous determination to take away the people’s right to keep and bear arms that is the REAL reason we can’t come to an accord on smarter gun regulation.

As we speak, the Obama regime is attempting to take our guns away with the power of the United Nations.  Until you Democrats get this demonic turd out of the White House, don’t you DARE try to touch my right to my guns.  And don’t you DARE try to demonize me for fighting to protect the very Bill of Rights and Constitution that YOU are trying to take away.  Because I’m the one who will demonize YOU.

I’ll leave you with two facts.

Fact one: Crime rates in liberal cities shockingly higher than in conservative cities

Fact two: Gun Control Makes Cities Dangerous Places to Live

Update: here’s another interesting fact: gun sales are skyrocketing after the Aurora massacre (see also here).  And many people are buying “assualt weapons” before any possible ban or regulation limits them.  And this isn’t the first time people have bought assault weapons out of fear of the left.  So people are literally buying guns out of fear of liberals while liberals blame conservatives for all the damn guns.

Why I Blame Democrats For Gun Laws That Allow Crazies To Kill

January 11, 2011

This is in response to the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, the nineteen shooting victims, and the six murdered citizens, in Tuscon, Arizona on Saturday at the hands of someone who is clearly mentally ill.

It sounds rather crazy to have such a title to many, I’m sure.  After all, isn’t it Democrats who are constantly trying to criminalize gun ownership?  And isn’t it Republicans who are constantly trying to keep guns legal?

Yes.  Which is exactly why I blame Democrats every single iota as much as the most liberal Democrat blames Republicans for criminals or crazies with guns.

First of all, we have a constitutional RIGHT to keep and bear arms.  The 2nd Amendment:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Now, Democrats for years and years have argued that the 2nd Amendment essentially contains a typo, that “militia” should have appeared twice, but somehow the phrase “the people” got stuck in.

But “the people” really means “militia.”

So when you see “the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances,” it really doesn’t apply to citizens.  It only really applies to militias.  Militias have the right to assemble and redress the government.  You “people” just stay shut in your homes and leave the government alone.

And go through your Constitution and make the necessary corrections.  Replace every occurrence of the phrase “the people” with “militia.”  And see how many freedoms you would lose and just what an absurdly laughable interpretation the Democrats have for the 2nd Amendment.

The 2nd Amendment clearly and obviously provides militias AND the people (i.e., the citizens of the United States, you and me) with the right to keep and bear arms.  And then it all but tells the Democrats to keep their paws off our guns (“… shall not be infringed”).

But the Democrats DO infringe.  And infringe, and infringe some more.

So we run into a problem: every time Republicans – who actually care about their Constitution – do anything to restrict gun rights or gun ownership, it ends up being a net-loss for guns and for the 2nd Amendment.  And every significant act involving a gun becomes the next cause to take away guns, as the following Newsweek article exudes:

“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste,” Rahm Emanuel famously said in 2008. The same goes for a shooting spree that gravely wounds a beloved congresswoman. Congress won’t enact gun control, as it did in the wake of the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Robert F. Kennedy in 1968, but perhaps something positive can come from this.

If Republicans try to make it tougher for criminals or crazies to get their hands on guns, Democrats will use that measure to shut the door all the tighter on every single law-abiding citizen to exercise their constitutional guarantees.  As I will show later in this article.

So because of Democrat refusal to recognize the clear and obvious meaning of the 2nd Amendment, we have an impasse.  We have an impasse which prevents common-sense laws from being passed.

This is what should happen: Democrats should now and for all time recognize that every single law-abiding American in every single state and in every single town has the right to keep and bear arms.  And Republicans should in response begin to help make it tougher to get guns, so that criminals and the mentally ill do not fall through the gaping holes that the intransigence has imposed.

Unless and until that day happens, Republicans will have no choice but to fight every gun law, because they will continue to correctly see that Democrats and liberal judicial activists will continue to use every law passed to prevent “the people” from possessing guns.

Here’s the bottom line: liberals often repeat the principle stated by William Blackstone, “Better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer.”  Benjamin Franklin took it even further, and stated “that it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer.”

And here here.  Even though it creates a system in which the innocent too often are denied justice as the guilty go free.

But lets ALSO acknowledge that the same Constitution also clearly affirms that it is better that ten, or a hundred criminals and psychos get their hands on guns than that just one innocent Person should be deprived.

If you liberals like the first principle, quit being a hypocrite and like the second one, too.

For me, I do not want to be forced to wait helplessly for the police to maybe never show up as vicious criminals terrorize – or do worse – to my family.  Rather, if you try to enter my home, scumbags, I’ve got something for you.

It is every bit as evil for any society to deny a person (the singular form of “the people”, by the way) to be able to defend himself, or herself, or his or her family, from violence, as it would be to convict innocent people to make sure the guilty don’t go free.

Nor let me fail to mention that the founding fathers clearly intended an armed citizenry to be a powerful obstacle against government tyranny.  That the founding fathers would want a tyrannous American government overthrown as much as they would want a tyrannous British government overthrown.

Any good gun law that truly has a chance of preventing criminals or crazies like Jared Loughner from obtaining guns necessarily would depend on a strict registration and licensing of every single gun.  And Republicans will RIGHTLY refuse any such registration and licensing until Democrats codify it into the law of the land that such a registry can NEVER EVER be used to take away our guns.

What we need to see is this: a powerful understanding of the 2nd Amendment guarantee of the right to keep and bear arms such that, if any elected official, officer of the court, sworn law enforcement officer, or government employee undermines that law, they will immediately be recognized to have violated their constitutional oath and thereby disqualify themselves for their duties as politicians, judges, lawyers, law enforcement officers, or bureaucrats.  And let the anti-gun policies which include heavy taxation and burdensome regulation be expunged.

And when that occurs, then let every gun be registered.  Let there be a listing of every individual who owns a gun(s), with every serial number and even with every ballistic sample from every gun, be taken.

If someone is convicted of a felony, or if someone’s mental condition deteriorates beyond a legal threshhold, then immediately the list is checked: ‘does this individual have a gun?’  And if so that gun is removed.

That’s the kind of system we need.  And it is the system we cannot have as long as the future question of the constitutional guarantee of gun ownership is in any way, shape or form an open question.

We’ve seen the sorts of laws Democrats have proposed being used against “the people” before in many other parts of the world.  We have seen it in tyrannous, totalitarian regimes throughout history.  First they demanded the registration of weapons; then they came and confiscated those weapons.  And no one could stand up against them, because only they had the guns.

The other thing it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out is that if we pass laws taking away the right to keep guns, only the law-abiding would follow the law.  Criminals would not follow the law;  I mean, dang, just look up the definition of “criminal.”

Therefore, until our law is clearly and completely understood to guarantee the right of gun ownership by every single law-abiding and mentally sane citizen, you will never see the kind of gun control laws that our society obviously needs.

Which is why I rightly blame Democrats for the lack of gun control laws that would prevent crazies like Jared Loughner from getting their hands on guns.

Democrats, the “living, breathing document, open to interpretation” theory of the Constitution needs to go down the drain once and for all in order for meaningful gun regulations to ever succeed.

Because this is America.

New York Times Rips Obama on Character

July 5, 2008

When the New York Times rebukes the most liberal senator in Congress and the Democratic nominee for president, you know he’s got a problem with his base.

It is painfully common knowledge that Barack Obama has shifted dramatically in his policies to position himself as a liberal-moderate. Every politician tends to shift policies during the course of a campaign, but Barack Obama has reversed himself more quickly and more dramatically than any candidate in modern history (even John Kerry, whose “I voted for that bill before I voted against it” remark defined him as a serial flip-flopper). And Obama’s reversals are particularly glaring given his arrogant, self-righteous, holier-than-thou, smarmy self-serving rhetoric that he would be different and above it all when it came to such political tactics.

His abandonment of his public campaign finance pledge by itself proves that Barack Obama is not a candidate for the people, but rather a candidate for Barack Obama.

Many of his reversals have come at the cost of liberals, who want the most liberal Senator in the country to become the most liberal President in American history. They feel betrayed. So perhaps it should come as no suprise that the quintessentially liberal New York Times would take Obama to task for his betrayals.

I cite the entire July 4, 2008 New York Times editorial in its entirety:

July 4, 2008
Editorial
New and Not Improved

Senator Barack Obama stirred his legions of supporters, and raised our hopes, promising to change the old order of things. He spoke with passion about breaking out of the partisan mold of bickering and catering to special pleaders, promised to end President Bush’s abuses of power and subverting of the Constitution and disowned the big-money power brokers who have corrupted Washington politics.

Now there seems to be a new Barack Obama on the hustings. First, he broke his promise to try to keep both major parties within public-financing limits for the general election. His team explained that, saying he had a grass-roots-based model and that while he was forgoing public money, he also was eschewing gold-plated fund-raisers. These days he’s on a high-roller hunt.

Even his own chief money collector, Penny Pritzker, suggests that the magic of $20 donations from the Web was less a matter of principle than of scheduling. “We have not been able to have much of the senator’s time during the primaries, so we have had to rely more on the Internet,” she explained as she and her team busily scheduled more than a dozen big-ticket events over the next few weeks at which the target price for quality time with the candidate is more than $30,000 per person.

The new Barack Obama has abandoned his vow to filibuster an electronic wiretapping bill if it includes an immunity clause for telecommunications companies that amounts to a sanctioned cover-up of Mr. Bush’s unlawful eavesdropping after 9/11.

In January, when he was battling for Super Tuesday votes, Mr. Obama said that the 1978 law requiring warrants for wiretapping, and the special court it created, worked. “We can trace, track down and take out terrorists while ensuring that our actions are subject to vigorous oversight and do not undermine the very laws and freedom that we are fighting to defend,” he declared.

Now, he supports the immunity clause as part of what he calls a compromise but actually is a classic, cynical Washington deal that erodes the power of the special court, virtually eliminates “vigorous oversight” and allows more warrantless eavesdropping than ever.

The Barack Obama of the primary season used to brag that he would stand before interest groups and tell them tough truths. The new Mr. Obama tells evangelical Christians that he wants to expand President Bush’s policy of funneling public money for social spending to religious-based organizations — a policy that violates the separation of church and state and turns a government function into a charitable donation.

He says he would not allow those groups to discriminate in employment, as Mr. Bush did, which is nice. But the Constitution exists to protect democracy, no matter who is president and how good his intentions may be.

On top of these perplexing shifts in position, we find ourselves disagreeing powerfully with Mr. Obama on two other issues: the death penalty and gun control.

Mr. Obama endorsed the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the District of Columbia’s gun-control law. We knew he ascribed to the anti-gun-control groups’ misreading of the Constitution as implying an individual right to bear arms. But it was distressing to see him declare that the court provided a guide to “reasonable regulations enacted by local communities to keep their streets safe.”

What could be more reasonable than a city restricting handguns, or requiring that firearms be stored in ways that do not present a mortal threat to children?

We were equally distressed by Mr. Obama’s criticism of the Supreme Court’s barring the death penalty for crimes that do not involve murder.

We are not shocked when a candidate moves to the center for the general election. But Mr. Obama’s shifts are striking because he was the candidate who proposed to change the face of politics, the man of passionate convictions who did not play old political games.

There are still vital differences between Mr. Obama and Senator John McCain on issues like the war in Iraq, taxes, health care and Supreme Court nominations. We don’t want any “redefining” on these big questions. This country needs change it can believe in.

Too late: Obama has already begun his maneuvering to reverse himself on the biggest “big question: of all; Obama has backed off his previously iron-clad pledge to cut-and-run in Iraq within 16 months. Hillary Clinton – who had a more moderate and cautious approach to Iraq that hurt her in the liberal-oriented Democratic primaries, claimed that Obama would do exactly what he is in fact doing now. Obama said time and time again that “I will bring the troops home in 2009,” but he is now hedging behind the disclaimer that he will only do so with the military commanders’ blessing.

Obama promised he would pull out of Iraq within 16 months dozens of times without caveats when he faced a liberal electorate; now he is deceitfully “refining” his position in order to pander to the more conservative overall electorate. John McCain, by contrast, has been absolutely firm and absolutely clear on his Iraq position even when it cost him politically. He publicly and repeatedly urged President Bush to send more troops into Iraq in a surge campaign when the situation in Iraq was difficult and vulnerable, and when even Republicans were beginning to waver in their commitment to Iraq.

The New York Times makes it quite clear that they wanted this guy to win. They thought he was different, but he is revealing that “hope” and “change” was never anything more than a rhetorical ploy.

I would argue that Barack Obama truly is different: he is the most cynical presidential candidate in history. The man who got his start in politics by stabbing Alice Palmer in the back to become a state senator is revealing his true character. This man – who used byzantine legal tactics and insider personal relationships to invalidate the voters’ will and keep a candidate off the ballot who had previously won her district with 87% of the vote, and who literally threw his own grandmother under the bus for the sake of political cover – is showing that he will betray anyone and anything to obtain personal power.

The Latin description for Obama is Hypocriticus Maximus. I have seen that in this man with crystal clarity ever since the day his church’s incredibly radical theology was revealed. Liberals and Democrats have repeatedly complained about “guilt by association,” but tell me when you have ever seen a major candidate for president ever having had such “associations.” And when these associations are exposed, he dismisses one longstanding friendship and relationship after another as he continues his climb to the top.

I use the word “cynical” – which the New York Times itself uses to characterize Obama – because only an incredibly cynical man would attack the modern political apparatus even as he uses that same apparatus to maximum personal advantage; only the most cynical candidate would claim to be so different from any politician who has ever come before when he is anything but.