Of the sons of Issachar, men who understood the times, with knowledge of what Israel should do, their chiefs were two hundred; and all their kinsmen were at their command — 1 Chronicles 12:32
Dylann Roof is a demon-possessed turd. Period. While consistent Darwinism entails a belief in a master race – or let’s at least agree on Charles Darwin’s “favoured race” – all you have to do is take one look at Dylann Roof’s picture and you ought to instantly see that if there IS such a thing as a “master race,” well, a turd like Dylann Roof clearly doesn’t belong to it.
Is he a racist? I don’t doubt it for a second. But he didn’t just go to some black nightclub or one of many other places where he could have found a group of black people; he went to a CHRISTIAN CHURCH and he went to a BIBLE STUDY and PRAYER MEETING and the people he murdered were all CHRISTIANS.
Those murdered Christians aren’t merely “victims”; they’re MARTYRS of the Lord Jesus Christ.
It’s a hate crime, all right. But it’s yet another hate crime against CHRISTIANS during a time when more Christians are being martyred today than at any time in a history in which millions of Christians have been martyred.
Christianity ALONE unites people:
After this I looked, and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands. — Revelation 7:9
The Word of God ensures and assures us of the same thing over and over again. Race is NOTHING. We can all be BROTHERS and SISTERS in Jesus Christ:
Here there is no Gentile or Jew, circumcised or uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave or free, but Christ is all, and is in all. — Colossians 3:11
For there is no difference between Jew and Gentile–the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on Him — Romans 10:12
There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
We have the testimony of St. Peter who visited the home of a Gentile named Cornelius and said to the crowd of Gentiles that were gathered there:
He said to them: “You are well aware that it is against our law for a Jew to associate with or visit a Gentile. But God has shown me that I should not call anyone impure or unclean. — Acts 10:28
As for the people who are making this murder all about race or all about guns, well, they are only serving to perpetuate the very sorts of hatreds and divisions that motivated Dylann Roof to begin with. Such people are exploiting this tragic event to politicize it as a cynical means to stir up their base and pit one group of people against another in a hope of a “fifty-percent-plus-one” strategy.
If you are hurting by the division and the hate and the violence, I know THE ONLY PLACE where you can find unity and love and peace – in the Prince of Peace, in Jesus.
The Christian men and women massacred by Dylann Roof knew that unity and love and peace. Which is why they welcomed him into their midst to share their Precious Savior Jesus with him.
And they died for it. And they will be richly rewarded in heaven for their sacrifice.
The dead would far rather have been known as “Christians” than as “black people.” These precious saints will all inherit a martyr’s crown for what they suffered for the name of Jesus. Don’t you dare try to take that away from them.
I just wanted to point that out. Because the mainstream media has entirely omitted that fact.
Let me just start with an entirely separate incident to frame this story about the wickedness, dishonesty and vileness of liberals and liberalism before I move on to the elected Democrat official’s being wicked, dishonest and vile.
Mr. Hicks appeared to have a deep dislike of all religion. On his Facebook page, nearly all of his posts expressed support for atheism, criticism of Christian conservatives or both.
Last month, he posted a photograph that said, “Praying is pointless, useless, narcissistic, arrogant, and lazy; just like the imaginary god you pray to.”
Mr. Hicks’s wife, Karen, insisted at a news conference that her husband was not a bigot. “I can say with absolute belief that this incident had nothing to do with religion or the victims’ faith, but it was related to a longstanding parking dispute that my husband had with the neighbors,” she said.
His wife also pointed out his support for gay rights and the right to abortion.
[Video] Wife Says Gunman Believed in Equality
Karen Hicks, the wife of Craig Stephen Hicks, who is accused of murdering three Muslim students, said he championed individuals’ rights on his Facebook page and believed everyone was equal.
Okay, so the shooter is a rabid atheist who hates conservatives and Christians and is a rabid supporter of abortion and homosexual marriage. I know what you’re thinking: if this clown doesn’t spend all day getting his worldview fed to him by Fox News, then I’m the world’s greatest athlete.
Oh, you’re not thinking that because that would be idiotic, given that Fox News if anything presents the very opposite of this turd?
Well, that doesn’t stop the left from framing Fox News for the work of one of their own fascist slimeballs. I actually saw the coverage on MSNBC blaming Fox News, but here’s the work of CNN doing it:
Shafi Khan, a self-described friend of the Muslim students shot dead Tuesday in North Carolina, specifically blamed Fox News, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and Oklahoma state Rep. John Bennett for what he called the “dehumanization of Muslims.”
“Speaking as an American Muslim, I can tell you that we can’t deny there’s a sentiment in the community that we feel that we were being targeted for our faith,” Mr. Khan, a North Carolina native who co-founded United Muslim Relief, told CNN. “There is certain sections of the media and political apparatus that are constantly dehumanizing Muslims. And I want to take a minute and ask people like Fox News and Bobby Jindal to stop the dehumanization of Muslims. It’s really, really starting to take a toll.”
Craig Stephen Hicks, 46, was arrested and charged with three counts of first-degree murder after turning himself in to Chapel Hill authorities for the shooting deaths of Deah Shaddy Barakat, 23, his wife, Yusor Mohammad, 21, and her sister, Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha, 19.
Apart from the fact that the leftist press is trying to blame the ONE network we can safely assume atheist abortion loving sodomy worshiper Craig Hicks DID NOT watch, what else do we have? Of course we’ve got these rabid liberals screaming to take away our guns, but who are the murderous whackjobs that kill with guns? The very liberals who want to take them away. Which is another way of pointing out the fact that “liberal” or “Democrat” is a synonym for “liar” and “hypocrite without shame, honor or decency.”
I have made it clear that America will not base our entire foreign policy on reacting to terrorism. Rather, we have waged a focused campaign against al Qaeda and its associated forces – taking out their leaders, and denying them the safe-havens they rely upon. At the same time, we have reaffirmed that the United States is not and never will be at war with Islam. Islam teaches peace. Muslims the world over aspire to live with dignity and a sense of justice. And when it comes to America and Islam, there is no us and them – there is only us, because millions of Muslim Americans are part of the fabric of our country.
President Obama used the annual National Prayer Breakfast on Thursday to draw those in attendance to the “terrible deeds” committed “in the name of Christ.”
While speaking at the Washington event, Mr. Obama had harsh words for the Islamic State group, but he also put a spotlight on the Crusades.
“Unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ,” Mr. Obama said. SEE ALSO: Obama equates Islamic terrorism with ‘terrible deeds’ committed by Christians
The president added that members of the Sunni radical terror group are part of “brutal vicious death cult that in the name of religion carries out unspeakable acts of barbarism.”
The president’s speech came just days after Jordanian pilot Moaz al-Kassasbeh was burned alive by the Islamic State group. The member of the U.S.-led coalition had been held prisoner since December after his F-16 crashed.
So we catch Obama in the act of blaming religion in general and then specifically trying to create a false moral equivalence and point his finger at Christians while shielding the religion of Islam that is actually responsible for 99.999% of violent acts of terror today. You know, excluding the ones that atheists are responsible for.
Lenin said that religion is the opium of the people… [But] it is only by believing in God that we can ever criticize the Government. Once abolish the God, and the Government becomes the God. That fact is written all across human history; but it is written most plainly across that recent history of Russia; which was created by Lenin…Lenin only fell into a slight error: he only got it the wrong way round. The truth is that irreligion is the opium of the people. Wherever the people do not believe in something beyond the world, they will worship the world.
What has happened is that socialist – by which I mean a hybrid of fascist and communist – liberal Democrats such as Barack Obama have done everything they can to replace God with The State. And apart from God – and specifically the God of the Bible – The State is beyond question. It’s motives are simply “truth” because there is no greater power and no greater “truth” than Government left.
Radical Muslims and radical liberals want the same thing: the State elevated to the power of Deity and having complete control over our lives and our liberties and our freedom. They both have the exact same end and the only difference is the means to that end. And liberals such as Barack Obama and Maxine Waters believe that they can either negotiate with or appease radical Islam.
So with that setup that occurred after I had basically written the following, let me get to the story I initially intended to write about.
Rep. Maxine Waters, a multi-term elected Democrat in good standing, believes that if you don’t like sharia law, you are a bigot and you need to have your freedoms crushed.
She’s hardly the only Democrat holding this position: in her most recent appearance where she claims that any opposition to sharia law amounts to racism and bigotry, she cited a host of Democrats who were there with her supporting this insanity including Rep. Loretta Sanchez, Rep. Judy Chu, California State Controller John Chiang, among others.
The only refreshing thing here is that at least Maxine Waters is saying what Barack Hussein Obama clearly believes.
It is AMAZING how profoundly deceived and how frankly demon-possessed Democrats are today. Islam is THE most oppressive force on the planet today. There has NEVER been a democracy arise within Islam and there never WILL be an Islamic democracy that arises within Islam because of the facts about Islam as revealed in the great book, The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion (which is entirely available for FREE at the link as a PDF document). Or you can buy your own copy.
Islam murders homosexuals. Islam forces women into a life of ignorance where they walk around as living tents with only the slits of their eyes exposed if they don’t have to veil those, too. Islam enslaves blacks in numbers as great as anything Democrats – yes, DEMOCRATS – in America did when Lincoln and his fellow Republicans went to war to defeat the aforementioned Democrats to abolish slavery.
And yet these demon-possessed people, these DEMOn-possessed-bureauCRATS, have only hostility and slander for Christianity and for Christ.
10 Quotes By Barack Obama About Islam #1 “Islam has always been part of America” #2 “we will encourage more Americans to study in Muslim communities” #3 “These rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings.” #4 “America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles of justice and progress, tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.” #5 “So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed” #6 “Ramadan is a celebration of a faith known for great diversity and racial equality” #7 “As a young man, I worked in Chicago communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith.” #8 “I look forward to hosting an Iftar dinner celebrating Ramadan here at the White House later this week, and wish you a blessed month.” #9 “That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.” #10 “I also know that Islam has always been a part of America’s story.”
And now consider by way of contrast ten statements by Obama condemning and undermining Christianity:
#1 Ten interesting quotes by Obama regarding Christianity: 1 “Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation” 2 “We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation.” 3 “Which passages of scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is OK and that eating shellfish is an abomination? Or we could go with Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith?” 4 “Even those who claim the Bible’s inerrancy make distinctions between Scriptural edicts, sensing that some passages – the Ten Commandments, say, or a belief in Christ’s divinity – are central to Christian faith, while others are more culturally specific and may be modified to accommodate modern life.” 5 “The American people intuitively understand this, which is why the majority of Catholics practice birth control and some of those opposed to gay marriage nevertheless are opposed to a Constitutional amendment to ban it. Religious leadership need not accept such wisdom in counseling their flocks, but they should recognize this wisdom in their politics.” 6 From Obama’s book, The Audacity of Hope: “I am not willing to have the state deny American citizens a civil union that confers equivalent rights on such basic matters as hospital visitation or health insurance coverage simply because the people they love are of the same sex—nor am I willing to accept a reading of the Bible that considers an obscure line in Romans to be more defining of Christianity than the Sermon on the Mount.” 7 “I find it hard to believe that my God would consign four-fifths of the world to hell. I can’t imagine that my God would allow some little Hindu kid in India who never interacts with the Christian faith to somehow burn for all eternity. That’s just not part of my religious makeup.” 8 “Those opposed to abortion cannot simply invoke God’s will–they have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths.” 9 On his support for civil unions for gay couples: “If people find that controversial then I would just refer them to the Sermon on the Mount.” 10 “I believe that there are many paths to the same place, and that is a belief that there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people.”
And once you’ve “fundamentally transformed” Christianity – just as Jesus prophesied in Matthew 24:5 and 11 that false messiahs would do in His name – you can of course pervert it into a religion that embraces homosexuality and abortion and government-imposed socialism and illegal immigration that Obama has led America into embracing.
The left very clearly has an agenda from the very heart of the devil. Incredibly, stunningly, they are actually embracing radical Islam even as it is revealing itself as the ugliest worldview since Nazism. There is simply no question progressive liberalism as a movement is doing this; the only question is, why on earth are they doing something that flies in the face of their stated principles???
I have pointed out the reasons for that hatred by Democrats – who want a holocaust of murdered babies, the institution of homosexual sodomy and the exaltation of the State in place of belief in God, His Word and His Ways – as they impose ANYTHING but Christ and Christianity upon society and as they fight to ensure the defeat of the America that our founding fathers fought to create and Lincoln fought to preserve. I documented three reasons why liberal Democrats insanely and hypocritically defend and protect Islam even as they attack and undermine Christianity. The first is found in the words of Jesus about Christians and Christianity:
“If the world hates you, you know that it has hated Me before it hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, because of this the world hates you. Remember the word that I said to you, ‘A slave is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you; if they kept My word, they will keep yours also. But all these things they will do to you for My name’s sake, because they do not know the One who sent Me.” — John 15:18-21
Democrats hate Christians and despise Christianity because they hate Jesus. It is as simple as that and Jesus told us it would happen and why it would happen. And so while you would think that liberals would oppose the hate and intolerance of Islam that pisses in the eye of all their views as it murders homosexuals and tortures women, they embrace it simply because it’s better to them than the Jesus they hate with every fiber of their being.
The second reason is the stunning and frankly Luciferian arrogance of atheism and secular humanism. Liberals truly don’t believe that ANYONE actually believes in God. They believe that everyone has to ultimately think just like they do; and the unwashed masses who “cling to their religion” are just too stupid as herd animals to realize it. And so they believe with Marx that religion is merely an opiate for the masses – notwithstanding that Chesterton pointed out that in their prideful wickedness they actually got that ass-backwards – and that their economic socialism will turn the radical Muslims – whom of course they insanely repeatedly tell us have nothing to do with either Islam or even religion – to their view through some Obama process of appeasement and negotiation. And the third reason liberals defend jihadist Muslims is that Muslims actually ultimately want to have a government – just like progressive liberalism – a government that has all the power and prerogatives of God or Allah. And progressive liberals don’t really care what the means is to total government power as long as they have the end of total government power. Because they arrogantly and foolishly believe they will ultimately get their secular humanist way.
And so here we are, with Democrats insanely arguing that if we don’t like the sharia law that is increasingly going to be stuffed down our throats, it’s only because we’re “bigots.”
Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ. – Colossians 2:8 NLT
We are human, but we don’t wage war as humans do. We use God’s mighty weapons, not worldly weapons, to knock down the strongholds of human reasoning and to destroy false arguments. We destroy every proud obstacle that keeps people from knowing God. We capture their rebellious thoughts and teach them to obey Christ. – 2 Corinthians 10:3-5 NLT
You don’t have very much time left before Barack Hussein Obama, his Democrat Party and his “fundamentally transformed” America bring about the Antichrist prophesied in the Holy Bible who will impose a system of total government domination over the economy and over society –
He required everyone–small and great, rich and poor, free and slave–to be given a mark on the right hand or on the forehead. And no one could buy or sell anything without that mark, which was either the name of the beast or the number representing his name. Wisdom is needed here. Let the one with understanding solve the meaning of the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is 666. — Revelation 13:16-18
– just as these wicked Democrats have been working to impose for decades: a government system that has total power over us and has the power to force us to do what they want.
The beast is coming. Americans voted for it and then they re-elected it. And now it is close at hand.
In light of all the things the left has done against the right in terms of hate crimes (e.g., the mass murder attempt by a liberal at the conservative Family Research Council, the hate-based graffiti left at Chick-Fil-A, the lefty slimebag who filmed himself being a creep to a nice Chick-Fil-A employee at the drive-through window), it was interesting to see how liberals become victims:
A Nebraska woman who claimed she was the victim of a horrific hate crime in July and subsequently charged with making false claims to police pleaded not guilty to the misdemeanor charge Tuesday.
Police in Lincoln, Neb., who spent weeks investigating the case, arrested Charlie Rogers Tuesday for making a false report. Lancaster County Attorney Joe Kelly said a judge issued the warrant for her arrest earlier Tuesday.
Rogers, 33, of Lincoln, pleaded not guilty to the charge and was released on a personal recognizance bond after a brief court appearance Tuesday afternoon.
Rogers told police three men wearing black ski masks broke into her home during the early morning hours on July 22, bound her wrists and ankles with zip ties, beat her and carved anti-gay slurs into her arms and abdomen.
Rogers also alleged the men spray painted slurs inside the home and poured gasoline around the house before lighting it on fire.
Rogers said she was bound and naked when she escaped and managed to knock on a neighbor’s door at about 4 a.m. July 22.
Police said they interviewed Rogers on four separate occasions. Now, because of inconsistencies in her various accounts of the attack and forensic DNA evidence, a warrant was issued for her arrest.
“A great deal of time and resources were spent investigating Charlie Rogers’ claims in hopes of identifying and arresting the three suspects in this case,” Lincoln Police said in a statement. “As the investigation progressed and additional interviews were completed, the department received results from forensic analysts and experts making it apparent that the physical evidence conflicted with Charlie Rogers’ version of events.”
There was no apparent struggle in the room where Rogers said she was attacked on her bed, the warrant for her arrest says, which also described the bedspread as appearing “neat” and “evenly placed on the bed.”
“There was no apparent blood on the bedspread; even though Ms. Rogers reported she was rolled on to her stomach after she had been cut on her arms, abdomen, chest and front legs while being held down.”
Forensic tests of Rogers’ bedding at the University of Nebraska Medical Center found no traces of blood.
Additionally, the FBI sent photos of the cuts on Rogers to a coroner’s physician for Lancaster County, who consulted with Dr. Michelle Elieff, a forensic pathologist. According to the warrant, Elieff said Rogers’ cuts appeared to be self-inflicted.
“This opinion is based partially on the fact that the cuts appeared to be superficial and symmetrical, avoided sensitive areas of the body, appear that they would have taken considerable time to do and are accessible to the victim and follow the victim’s frame of reference for reading and writing.”
Elieff also noted Rogers had no bruising, even though she alleged the men beat her.
Police also found a pile of clothes, a pair of white knit gloves and a red box cutter on the living room floor. Rogers said the gloves did not belong to her, but DNA testing determined she was the “major contributor” of DNA inside of them, according to the warrant.
Investigators discovered that the gloves, zip ties, blades and a red utility knife were purchased five days before the alleged attack at a hardware store in Lincoln. During an interview, Rogers told police she shops at that store.
Police showed a clerk from the store a photo lineup and the clerk identified Rogers as the person who bought the items, the arrest warrant says.
Police said that they also discovered graffiti spray painted on the basement walls after Rogers told the initial responding officer about it the morning of her alleged attack. But in a subsequent interview with Rogers, police said she did not know anything about the graffiti because she left her house immediately after the attack, the arrest warrant said.
KETV
Rogers gave an interview shortly after her alleged attack, saying she wanted to counter those who doubted that the attack ever happened.
News of the alleged attack sparked multiple vigils attended by thousands of gay-rights supporters who donated money in support of Rogers in cities throughout Nebraska.
At the time, Rogers said she would not attend the vigils because she was in hiding and wouldn’t speak publicly about the details of her attack for fear of influencing the police investigation.
But after a week, police said they had found no suspects, leading some to question whether Rogers made it all up.
“I understand that people sort of have a hard time wrapping their heads around the things that have happened, as do I,” Rogers said. “But I’m a person with feelings, with concerns. For people to think that this doesn’t happen here, it does. It did.”
If convicted, Rogers could face up to one year in jail and/or a $1,000 fine, the Lancaster County Attorney’s office said.
It’s funny. Conservatives will grow to great lengths to – sorry, Obama – BUILD businesses and become personally successful. Liberals will go to even more radical lengths to “fundamentally transform” themselves into victims so people will feel sorry for them and validate their being pathetic people.
Which are you?
Personally, I believe that those who make false reports ought to be punished according to the degree that the REAL victim – the person arrested for “committing” that crime – would have faced.
As a P.S., here is an article by a mainstream media “news” outlet describing how Charlie Rogers was a victim of this terrible crime:
The victim of an LGBT hate crime in Lincoln, Nebraska has decided to come forward and make a public statement about her attack on local television. Charlie Rogers was attacked in her home when three masked men broke into her house, bound her wrists and carved offensive anti-gay words into her abdomen. The attackers also attempted to set her house on fire and painted more slurs on her wall before leaving.
The community of Lincoln, Nebraska has stood by Rogers during the entire week, holding a vigil to support her. The police confirmed that the attack was a hate crime directed at the LGBT community after they discovered the nature of the words in her home but many doubters have surfaced, suggesting that Rogers made up the whole event simply because no suspects have been unearthed yet.
Rogers came forward in a moving interview, speaking clearly and tearfully about the attack. She reaffirmed her humanity, her integrity and her support of victims of violence around the world in the statement.
She said regarding those who do not believe she was attacked:
Being a victim in a situation like this, or survivor, and then having your integrity questioned I guess… It feels very victimizing again. It feels very saddening. It makes an already difficult situation more difficult because my world has been changed forever by these events.
Rogers’ statement points out that those who don’t believe she was attacked are playing a game and injecting an essentially anti-LGBT agenda into an already traumatic situation. By claiming that Rogers is lying about her experience, doubters are belittling simultaneously Rogers (most likely because of her identity as a lesbian woman) and the serious nature of LGBT hate crimes. She continued in her statement:
I’m a person, you know, with feelings, with concerns and it’s just so…. It feels like a punch in the stomach, like a betrayal…
Instead of the focus being on safety and healing and the investigation, the whole thing turns into a defense, essentially. You know, it starts to feel like, you know, it doesn’t even become about the situation it becomes about something altogether different and then I start to feel like a pawn in a game.
People are people. Agendas are agendas. And I think it’s really important that we distinguish between those two things.
Rogers concluded her statement by thanking those that have stood beside her during this most difficult time and reaffirming the importance of awareness and compassion. “Everyone is worthy of safety, and justice, and fairness.”
Sarah Vrba ought to have her ideologue ass kicked right to the curb and anybody who continues to watch channel 2 in that area ought to be institutionalized as threats to themselves and others.
Note the self-righteous, sanctimonious tone: if you don’t believe this psychotic lesbian’s story, it is only because you are a bad person.
And who do the bad people turn out to be? Sarah Vrba and Charlie Rogers.
For the record, had Charlie Rogers actually been attacked the way she described, it would have been a truly hateful thing and the people who did it should have been hunted down like rabid dogs. But the very condemnation that those attackers – had they actually existed – truly deserves ITSELF screams an indictment at just what a truly wretched and vile human being Charlie Rogers and “journalists” like Sarah Vrba truly are. Because they participated in a demonic lie that truly trivializes the hate of such an event. And to add icing to just how truly despicable this fabrication is, the next time a homosexual person is TRULY victimized, there will be legitimate reason to doubt what happened BECAUSE OF THIS LIE. And the fact of the matter is that if people like me don’t believe that attack happened, it won’t be because WE’RE the bad people, but rather it will be because bad people like Charlie Rogers have falsified such attacks in the past and propagandists like Sarah Vrba have exploited those false accounts.
“Well, I grew up with an older brother and a very contentious twin sister, and I believe I can easily best you in any physical confrontation, be it noogies, swirlies or the classic Why Are You Hitting Yourself?”
That’s basically the game Obama’s shyster Eric Holder is playing with George Zimmerman: why were you hitting yourself, George? No matter how wrong or how unreasonable it is, it’s not just a stupid game when the federal government is the one administering the judicial equivalent of swirlies and noogies and “Why Are You Hitting Yourself?” tactics. You see, it turns out that George Zimmerman used his face to hit Trayvon Martin’s knuckles, and that’s a hate crime around these here parts when we’re running things.
Excerpted from WFTV: SANFORD, Fla. — WFTV has learned charges against George Zimmerman could be getting more serious.
State prosecutors said Zimmerman, a neighborhood watchman, profiled and stalked 17-year-old Trayvon Martin before killing him, so the FBI is now looking into charging him with a hate crime.
FBI investigators are actively questioning witnesses in the retreat at the Twin Lakes neighborhood, seeking evidence for a possible federal hate crime charge.
Martin was unarmed when he was shot to death, police said, and some accuse Zimmerman of targeting the teenager solely because of the color of his skin.
WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer said federal prosecutors would have to prove the hate crime to charge Zimmerman, though.
“What the government would have to prove is that Mr. Zimmerman acted out of hatred toward African-Americans. That’s why he came into contact with him. That’s why he shot and killed him,” Sheaffer said.
Sheaffer said a federal hate crime murder charge could bring more serious consequences than the second-degree murder charge Zimmerman faces now.
“Mr. Zimmerman could be punished by up to life in prison or even the death penalty,” said Sheaffer.
Zimmerman said he used deadly force in self-defense after Martin punched him, knocked him to the ground and repeatedly slammed his head against a sidewalk.
In the meantime, a photograph recently surfaced which is said to show Zimmerman’s mother in the arms of her grandfather, who is black.
Zimmerman’s mother testified at his bond hearing that she has met the black child whom he mentored and even risked his safety in a dangerous neighborhood to do it, because he didn’t want to abandon the child.
Okay, Obama sicked Attorney General Eric Holder who sicked the FBI on George Zimmerman. Because apparently “Never bring a lawsuit against a black” doesn’t go as far as these racist pigs want to go.
Never mind that pretty much ALL the evidence now completely conforms Zimmerman’s account:
A medical report compiled by the family physician of Trayvon Martin shooter George Zimmerman and obtained exclusively by ABC News found that Zimmerman was diagnosed with a “closed fracture” of his nose, a pair of black eyes, two lacerations to the back of his head and a minor back injury the day after he fatally shot Martin during an alleged altercation.
Zimmerman faces a second degree murder charge for the Feb. 26 shooting that left the unarmed 17-year-old high school junior dead. Zimmerman has claimed self defense in what he described as a life and death struggle that Martin initiated by accosting him, punching him in the face, then repeatedly bashing his head into the pavement.
Also today, a trove of documents are being examined by lawyers for both the defense and prosecution as part of discovery in Zimmerman’s trial — including 67 CDs worth of documents, video of Martin on the night of the shooting, his autopsy report and videos of Zimmerman’s questioning by police.
Zimmerman’s three-page medical report is included in those documents that the defense could use as evidence.
Watch World News with Diane Sawyer for the latest on the Trayvon Martin shooting and the trial of George Zimmerman.
The morning after the shooting, on Feb. 27, Zimmerman sought treatment at the offices of a general physician at a family practice near Sanford, Fla. The doctor notes Zimmerman sought an appointment to get legal clearance to return to work.
The record shows that Zimmerman also suffered bruising in the upper lip and cheek and lower back pain. The two lacerations on the back of his head, one of them nearly an inch long, the other about a quarter-inch long, were first revealed in photos obtained exclusively by ABC News last month.
But the report also shows Zimmerman declined hospitalization the night of the shooting, and then declined the advice of his doctor to make a follow-up appointment with an ear nose and throat doctor.
In addition to his physical injuries, Zimmerman complained of stress and “occasional nausea when thinking about the violence.” But he was not diagnosed with a concussion. The doctor noted that it was “imperative” that Zimmerman “be seen with [sic] his psychologist for evaluation.”
According to the report, prior to the shooting Zimmerman had been prescribed Adderall and Temazepam, medications that can cause side effects such as agitation and mood swings, but in fewer than 10 percent of patients.
A neighbor told ABC News that the day after the shooting he saw Zimmerman as he spoke to officers outside his home. He too recalled seeing black eyes and significant swelling — as well as a bandage over his nose.
Moments after the shooting Zimmerman told eyewitnesses he shot Martin in self defense. He later told officers his head was being pounded into the pavement and that he feared for his life, but that it was only when Martin seemed to reach for the gun wedges in his waistband that Zimmerman drew his weapon and fired directly into Martin’s chest — killing him.
The medical notes may bolster Zimmerman’s claim that he acted in self-defense because he was being attacked. However, the prosecution contends that Zimmerman instigated the confrontation after profiling the teen, who was walking home after buying skittles and ice tea. They prosecution says Martin was breaking no laws and was not disturbing anyone as he walked back to his father’s girlfriend’s home.
Zimmerman was granted a $150,000 bail and has since been in deep hiding since his April 20 bail hearing.
There has never been and never will be enough evidence for any liberal to ever believe anything other than what their authority figures tell them to believe, I know, but I saw a single picture taken at night by the officer at the scene that was broadcast on Fox News yesterday (5/17); and it showed George Zimmerman’s face. There was no question that his nose was clearly swelling from a fracture and his eyes were beginning to blacken.
I looked for that photo and could not find it online; but anyone who has ever had a broken nose (as I have) can take one look at that image and see the obvious.
But there’s still more:
Autopsy: Trayvon Martin Had Knuckle Injuries
Wednesday, 16 May 2012 11:06 AM Autopsy results show that Trayvon Martin, the 17-year-old whose shooting death in Florida has turned into a national controversy, had injuries to his knuckles when he died, Orlando TV station WFTV reports.
That evidence could back up George Zimmerman’s claim that Martin beat him up before Zimmerman shot and killed him. Zimmerman said that Martin broke his nose and slammed his head on the sidewalk before Zimmerman opened fire.
The autopsy found that Martin had broken skin on his knuckles. Zimmerman’s attorney, Mark O’Mara declined to comment on that evidence.
But WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer said it helps the defense, as Martin’s knuckle injury appears much less serious than Zimmerman’s bloody head wounds. “It goes along with Zimmerman’s story that he acted in self-defense, because he was getting beaten up by Trayvon Martin,” Sheaffer said.
But another explanation is possible for Martin’s knuckle injury too. “It could be consistent with Trayvon either trying to get away or defend himself,” Sheaffer said.
Zimmerman killed the unarmed Martin Feb. 26 after calling 911 to report that he was acting suspiciously. Zimmerman said Martin hit him first and that he shot in self-defense after no one acted on his cries for help.
I heard the actual audio testimony from this eyewitness; there is absolutely no question whatsoever who was on the ground getting beat (Zimmerman) and who was on top doing the beating (Martin). There is also no question who was shouting for help (Zimmerman).
No doubt who was screaming for help, eye witness account:
“In a statement to police the night of the shooting, witness 6 said he saw two men wrestling on the ground. He said he saw a man matching Martin’s description on top, punching Zimmerman on the ground.”
“The one guy on top in the black hoodie was pretty much just throwing down blows on the guy kind of MMA-style,” witness 6 told Sanford police within hours of the shooting.
“The guy on the bottom who had a red sweater on was yelling to me: ‘help, help…and I told him to stop and I was calling 911,” he said.
Trayvon Martin was in a hoodie; Zimmerman was in red.
“MMA-style” is mixed martial arts-style. Zimmerman was helplessly taking a beating that could have ended his life and absorbing one punch after another ad nauseum. Unless he used his gun in a blatantly obvious act of self-defense.
Just when it basically can’t be any more obvious that this case needs to be dismissed and George Zimmerman needs to be set free with about a million apologies from the state of Florida and so-called “civil rights leaders” such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, Obama dumps this “hate crime” crap on Zimmerman.
Now when pretty much every other loose end has emerged in George Zimmerman’s favor, we also find that Trayvon Martin had drugs in his system. Which is to say that any sense of “paranoia” that might have justified Martin’s physical attack on Zimmerman the resulted in Zimmerman’s shooting Martin was drug-induced psychosis rather than any reasonable sense of fear.
This case is just one more powerful reason Obama needs to be thrown out of office. It was beyond inexcusable and contemptible for Obama to publicly involve himself in this case in just a clearly racially-biased way. And it is clearly immoral for Obama’s thug Attorney General to be persecuting Zimmerman for a “hate crime” when the only “hate crime” is what the Obama federal government is doing to a clearly innocent man.
The official Obama administration policy: “Never bring a lawsuit against a black.” Because white people should be second-class citizens to pay for what they did, you know.
A white girl – who may or may not have been transgender – was beaten for an incredibly long time until she was lying near a trash can convulsing in seizure while numerous black McDonald’s employees and patrons did virtually nothing to stop the savage attack that just went on and on.
The attackers were two black girls who repeatedly kicked the victim in the head and at one point smashed her head against a wall.
I actually did, because the McDonald’s employee who posted it lyingly claimed that the victim was a transvestite wearing a wig. And I didn’t want to post this if it ended up being something other than what it very clearly is: a hate crime race beating against a white girl. One of the ways I know that scumbag (and anyone who didn’t punch those two vicious criminal girls in the face to stop their attack is a scumbag) is lying because one of the attackers actually dragged the girl across the floor by her hair. Some wig. [Updated 4/24: I leave my exact words but strike them in order to provide clarification. I was not trying to claim here the victim was NOT a transgender. I had already stated that as possibly being the case twice prior to this sentence (and then did so again after this sentence). And the reason I used the term “girl” was that I also could not be certain at the time I wrote this that “she” wasn’t a girl. The details emerged the day after I published what was known at the time. I am stating here that the employee who videotaped this savage incident while laughing about it (and who has been fired by McDonald’s) clearly lied about certain points, such as the “wig” which very clearly wasn’t a wig.
The other point I would make in this clarification is that if you’re a black person who doesn’t like my immediately jumping to the conclusion that the beating was a racially motivated “hate crime,” then please stop assuming that WHITE people are racists whenever there’s the slightest reason to come to that conclusion. I say more about the stupidity behind “hate crimes” in my subsequent comment on this article here].
PIX11 NEWSROOM
8:35 p.m. EDT, April 22, 2011
BALTIMORE (PIX11)—
Two women are charged after a video showing a brutal attack on a teenage girl at a Baltimore-area McDonald’s restaurant surfaced on the internet Friday.
According to the Baltimore Sun, police have charged a 14-year-old girl as a juvenile, and charges are pending for her 18-year-old accomplice. The attack reportedly occurred April 18 at the 6300 Kenwood McDonald’s location.
The Sun is also reporting that State’s Attorney Scott D. Shellenberger says that the assault may be classified as a hate crime because the attackers were both black, and the victim white.
The video, which was uploaded to LiveLeak.com, shows two black females kicking, punching and slapping a white female who at one point starts to have a seizure. Restaurant employees could be seen watching the fight and adding their own splash of commentary to the shocking scene, but only once half-heartedly trying to help the victim. One employee is even heard laughing.
A man who appears to be the manager at the fast food eatery, interjects between the victim and attackers about two times but ultimately gives up on separating the young women.
At first, the attackers appear to walk away from the battered victim with one of them uttering “she’s bleeding, yo.” The pair, however, emerge for a brutal second round where they drag the victim by her hair across the restaurant.
Finally a customer, an elderly white woman, attempts to rescue the victim but is pushed aside by the aggressive girls.
The video ends as the suspects flee the restaurant after having been told by restaurant employees that the police were on their way.
“Ya gotta go before the police come yo!” the worker is heard telling one of the girls.
The helpless victim is left on the floor where she is seen rolling around in convulsions as a result of what appears to be a seizure.
It wasn’t immediately clear when the incident took place or if the suspects were apprehended and charged. The condition of the victim is also unknown.
The identities of the women are also unknown.
Late Friday, the McDonald’s corporation issued a statement on the incident, expressing shock and outrage.
“We are shocked by the video from a Baltimore franchised restaurant showing an assault. This incident is unacceptable, disturbing and troubling. McDonald’s strives to be a safe, welcoming environment for everyone who visits.”
“Nothing is more important to us than the safety of customers and employees in our restaurants. We are working with the franchisee and the local authorities to investigate this matter.”
If McDonald’s thinks it is “welcoming,” they seriously need to rethink their slogan. Unless maybe it’s “Welcome to hell, I’ll be your beater, can I smash your skull open please.”
The first thing McDonald’s needs to do if it wants my business ever again is to fire every employee from the manager on down who allowed a woman to be beaten nearly to death in their restaurant.
But I’m not just pissed off at McDonald’s – as loathsomely as they acted (and I hope the chain loses a gazillion dollar lawsuit for not protecting that girl whether “she’s” a real girl or not) – as much as I’m pissed off at the fact that we now live in a society where our highest law enforcement officials say “Never bring a lawsuit against a black.”
This vicious attack may end up getting filed as a hate crime. But if it does, it’s only because the victim who was beaten nearly to death in public with about a dozen people doing nothing to stop it was homosexual.
To put it in O.J. trial terms, “If whitey aint gay, black attackers don’t pay.”
The moral of the story is this: if you are white, and you get the crap kicked out of you by black people, you tell the authorities and the media and everybody else that you are as queer as a three-dollar bill. Because otherwise your “hate crime” case will get round filed.
I suppose I have a better understanding of how black people used to feel: an oppressive illegitimate criminal thug justice system that didn’t do a damn thing to help victims because of the color of their skin. We’re still a ways off from the point where you’ll start seeing white people lynched on a public tree. That’s the kind of thing that would be more likely during Obama’s and Holder’s second term.
On the bright side, eventually white people actually might get to use the “white rage” defense when we they go postal and commit a spree of racist hate crimes.
At least us whiteys have the “gay thing” to fall back on. I’m pretty sure it wouldn’t have helped a black victim back in the 50s, you know. Nowadays, even Obama’s and Eric Holder’s policy of official racism can’t beat the hell out of THAT sacred cow.
Whether that victim is a transgender, or transvestite, or whatever, I’m praying for you to pull through and then hit the legal jackpot against that McDonald’s. I’m truly sorry there was no one there to help you except a little old white lady. Racism is an evil thing, even when it’s black people kicking the hell out of a white person while a whole bunch of black people stand around and laugh about it.
I’m going to say this, and a lot of black people aren’t going to like it. 200 years of white racism, and black people don’t get to call themselves “victims” anymore. Because what we see in this “Never bring a lawsuit against a black,” and the black Attorney General talking about “my people,” and a white woman viciously attacked by black girls while a bunch of black people stand around laughing, is that YOU WOULD HAVE DONE THE SAME EXACT CRAP HAD THE ROLES BEEN REVERSED.
Congratulations. You’re just as bad as “racist whitey.” And the only difference is that you haven’t got the power to unleash the evil that’s in your souls. At least not quite yet.