Posts Tagged ‘hate’

Hardcore Democrat Trump-Hater Commits Terrorist Act By Targeting Republicans BECAUSE They Are Republicans

June 14, 2017

I’ve been hearing a very constant theme from the left – which includes the media which is the propaganda wing of the political left – that Trump’s rhetoric and Republican positions are the cause of all the anger in this country.  They’ve been reporting this line of verbal diarrhea even as Democrats have violently rioted and violently attacked conservative rallies.  Their argument amounts to, “I had to savagely punch you in the face because you said something I didn’t like.”  We have the rise of the AntiFa, the so-called “Anti-Fascists,” people who claim the people they don’t like who hold political views they don’t like, are hateful and therefore evil, and that they are entitled to an increasingly mainstream liberal approach of “By Any Means Necessary” to stop the so-called “fascists,” including, of course, violence.  Given that they steadfastly refuse any dialogue, there is nothing BUT violence for these leftists.

Only a few days ago a liberal attacked a police horse with a nail-studded pole.

It’s not like the left hasn’t gone crazed with rabid hatred that will drive increasing numbers to the most vicious extremes.  It’s not like there haven’t been not dozens now, but HUNDREDS of incidents that prove this fact.

And yet Democrats continue to blame conservatives for their hate much the way the Nazis continued to blame the Jews.

We have seen an increasingly violent and rabid intolerance from the left.  It’s happening from coast-to-coast now.  And we are seeing it in THE most terrifying place to see rabid violent intolerance: on the now-leftist bastions of our college campuses as students are being indoctrinated into the ways of Nazi-style hate.

Democrats at the highest levels of politics and mainstream media “reporters” have been continually labelling Donald Trump as a traitor, as dangerous to America, as a Putin collaborator, as an A-hole.  And the interesting thing is that these Democrats and liberals CAUSED violence by the very pointing at Trump for his “hateful rhetoric.”  Because we just witnessed the work of a man who believed ALL these things that Democrats and mainstream media “news” sources had fed him.  He digested all these things and this hate worked its way through his system.

Which is why I point out now that anyone who identifies himself or herself as a “Democrat” at this point is proudly self-affiliating with a hate group.  I suppose we need to manufacture our own version of the Southern Poverty Law Center to label whatever we don’t like as “hate.”  As it is, the S.P.L.C. is itself a hate group, as it “labels” and incites violence at those it hates.

I am writing in response of the Republican specifically targeted for being a Republican and gunned down today.  This is what we now know:

The man identified by authorities as the shooter at a congressional baseball practice in Alexandria, Virginia, Wednesday was a Bernie Sanders volunteer who signed a petition to impeach President Donald Trump, his social media posts show. ”

Rep. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., told Fox News he left just before the shooting. As he walked to his car, a man asked DeSantis if it was Republicans or Democrats practicing. About 3 minutes later, at around 7:09 a.m., the shooting began, DeSantis said. He later told Fox Business he believed the man who approached him was the shooter.” NJ

According to witnesses describing the Republican victim, “he had crawled out to the outfield, leaving a trail of blood.”  But for ten minutes no one could help because the terrorist shooter was still a Democrat.

The shooter, now identified as Trump-hater James Hodgkinson, was killed as he tried to get into position to kill more Republicans who had taken shelter in a concrete dugout by good people who thankfully had guns.

And this Democrat WAS a terrorist because he utilized violence for a political purpose/agenda and focused his violent attack on one particular group of people (Republicans).

For the record, I became a “Trump supporter” ONLY after witnessing the Nazi-style tactics of Democrats.  And I wrote this to describe what I saw and what it meant:

Democrats Truly Are Nazis, Or How The Left Actually Started Turning Me Into A Trump Supporter.

But it was only a matter of days before still more violent episodes of Nazi machine Democrats had to be pointed out and remembered:

The Choice Is Now Clear, America: It’s Donald Trump Or It’s NAZISM. The Democrat Party Is THE Party Of Fascist, Nazi Thugs

Like I declared then: the Democratic Party was the party of rabid fascist hate before the election that they attempted to steal through violence and fraud.  And now they’re even MORE fascist than before.

We’re seeing that more than EVER now as butthurt fascists keep erupting in butthurt fascism.  We had an ELECTION and true democrats respect the outcome.  But the “Democratic Party” is no more “democratic” than the worst communist today.  They haven’t ONCE respected the will of the people since November 8.  Rather, they have done everything they can not only to stop the President’s agenda that he campaigned on and won on, but also to create a climate of rabid political hatred against the President personally, against even his family, and against Republicans in general.

James Hodgkinson is a product of the Democratic Party hate machine.

I say it is a “Democratic Party hate machine” because the facts of history reveal that yes, the Democrats under Obama and under Hillary Clinton manufacture hate and try to politically profit by it.  Such that a career Democratic operative named Robert Creamer, who visited the Obama White House 342 times, personally met with Barack Obama 47 of those times, and served the Hillary Clinton campaign by organizing hate and violence to infiltrate Republican rallies:

Documented Fact: Obama And Clinton ORGANIZED PHYSICAL VIOLENCE AGAINST AMERICANS Who Support Trump Through Party Roaches

When the Obama administration did their now infamous “Russian reset” and Hillary Clinton’s staff idiotically mistranslated the word “reset” and instead wrote the word “overcharged” on the button, neither the Democratic Party nor the mainstream media that serves them cared.  When Barack Obama was telling the Russian president who was serving as Vladimir Putin’s placeholder, “After my election I have more flexibility,” neither the Democrat Party nor the mainstream media that serves them cared.  When Barack Obama was mocking Mitt Romney for claiming that the Russians were our greatest geopolitical threat by saying, “The 1980s are calling and they want their foreign policy back,” neither the Democrat Party nor the mainstream media that serves them cared.  Nor does it matter that, seven months later, there is ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER THAT ANYONE COLLUDED WITH THE RUSSIANS TO HACK OUR ELECTION.  But the Democratic Party and the mainstream media that serves them doesn’t care.

We actually had a coordinated effort by the Democratic Party, by the current administration then in power and the Clinton administration that sought to succeed the Obama administration, collude in a violent effort to steal our election with fascist thugs.  We have abundant documented proof that Democrats conspired to violently interfere with the election process by violating the 1st Amendment rights of a candidate and his party to hold free speech events.  And neither the Democratic Party nor the mainstream media that serves them ever cared.

There should be an investigation as to whether or not James Hogkinson got his assault weapon from the same Obama Fast and Furious operation that put guns in the hands of the Mexican drug cartel murderers who gunned down US Border Patrol agent Brian Terry.  There is at LEAST as much evidence for that as there is of Trump conspiring with Russians

There was a time when I read about the exploits of Soviet soldiers fighting Hitler’s forces during WWII, the Chinese relying on human-wave assaults to attack dug-in and reinforced U.S. troops during the Korean War.  These despicable tactics were initially successful but in the end the Chinese and North Koreans were literally machine-gunned and blasted down by the tens of thousands.  And yet they kept coming, racing screaming to their deaths with nothing but the lust to kill driving them forward.  It wasn’t enough to point out that there were commissars behind every human wave with orders to shoot any soldier who didn’t fight for communism with suitable frenzy; that simply wasn’t enough to explain the fanaticism that compelled the frenzy of the communist soldiers.

But these guys were of course ATHEISTS.  It wasn’t like all the “soldiers of Allah” that we have today, who stupidly and pathetically and wickedly believe that if they kill a bunch of innocent people they will go to paradise.  The communists didn’t have any such motivation driving them.  All they had at the end of their banzai charges was hideous death followed by a dirt nap according to their own belief system.  So what was it driving them forward?  And the answer is sheer, rabid hate created by propaganda.  They attacked with such viciousness because they had been indoctrinated with vicious hate that would overcome any love they had for their own lives.  They were driven by hate because they had nothing but hatred to drive them.

It is what is driving Democrats today.  And all you have to do is witness the climate of mindboggling propaganda that we are seeing coming out of the leftist university systems (and I mean POURING out every single day!), out of the increasingly violent “protests” including numerous occasions where Democrats violently assaulted Republicans even for trying to hold a “free-speech” rally.

It’s been an avalanche of raw, fanatic hatred: A Democrat activist did her “cute” little photo-shoot of herself holding a viscerally lifelike effigy of the bloody decapitated head of the President of the United States, with other prominent Democrat activists openly supporting that sick, despicable, vile, rabid display of hate.  That was followed by a “Shakespearean play” openly celebrated and supported by the leftist New York Times, Time Warner and CNN roach Fareed Zakariah (who claimed the play was “brilliantly interpreted.”).  The Los Angeles Times published a “op-ed” titled “Corporate Cowards” in its print edition, stating, “Delta and BofA find the Bard to be in bad taste?  How rich,” to stupid and depraved to comprehend the “Bard’s” play was titled, “Julius Caesar” and not “Donald Trump” or even “King James I” – the monarch that was reigning when Shakespeare wrote his play  about an emperor who had lived and died fifteen hundred years before he was born.

This is what the Democrat Party propaganda machine celebrates and officially endorses as the “corporate cowards” realize this act of sick hate went so far beyond “too far” it was beyond unreal:

The counter-point to this was that the same leftist outfit that viciously butchered Trump with knives in a sequence that went on and on and on did the same thing to Obama.  But realize it wasn’t REPUBLICANS doing that, but liberals.  And realize that that play was NOT in attention-focused Central Park but in some nowhere-ville in Minnesota.  And realize that it wasn’t anywhere NEAR as gleefully and gratuitously vicious.

I remember a time when liberals gathered together in abject horror because a damn rodeo clown in some fly-over city did his rodeo-clown job wearing an Obama mask which was exactly the same as all the other president masks worn by literally millions of kids and adults alike bearing Reagan, Nixon, Bush faces.  And Democrats got that poor working man banned for life from his job.

There is nothing even remotely CLOSE to a “moral equivalence” between what Democrats and their media propaganda outlets are doing now and what ANY Republican was doing when Obama was president.

But to be a “Democrat” is to be a cockroach hypocrite.  “Democrat” stands for “DEMOn-possessed bureauCRAT.”

And so I remember when Rep. Gabriella Giffords was tragically shot and nearly killed by a lunatic named Jared Loughner.  It didn’t matter that the whackjob had never voted for a single Republican in his entire life; it didn’t matter that he was an “ardent atheist”; it didn’t matter that he read socialist crap in addition to atheist crap; it didn’t matter that those who knew Loughner stated that “he was left wing,” he was “quite liberal,” he was a “political radical.”  The ONLY thing that mattered to Democrats and to the lying Democrat mainstream media that creates fake news to support their political party in the guise of “journalism,” it was an opportunity to attack Republicans.  And so they took it right away:

Gabrielle Giffords shooting fuels debate over rhetoric
By Susan Page and Fredreka Schouten, USA TODAY

WASHINGTON — Has the nation’s harsh political rhetoric become more than just talk — to the point of being dangerous?

The attempted assassination of Arizona Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords as she spoke with voters outside a grocery store in Tucson fueled a debate Sunday over whether the sharp partisanship and anti-government language that now mark American politics have created a climate that makes violence against public officials more likely.

As a moderate Democrat who barely won re-election in a state torn by disputes over immigration policy, economic angst and growing mistrust in the government, Giffords was familiar with today’s increasingly nasty political rhetoric. Her opponent last fall accused her of betraying her district. Meanwhile, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin’s website posted a map with cross hairs on 20 Democrat-held congressional districts Palin was targeting for takeover by Republicans in the November elections. Giffords’ was one of them.

“You can’t say they’re just words; they have consequences,” said South Carolina Rep. James Clyburn, a member of the Democratic leadership. He said he worries about the effect of words on “people who may not be clicking on all cylinders.”

He cautioned, “We need to take a look at what we’re drifting into here.”

Jared Loughner had never once voted “Republican” in his life.  Versus this hardcore Democrat whackjob who was a RABID Democrat Party voter.

I remember well the climate of batpoop, hysterical hatred the Democrats immediately tried to dredge up against Republicans for that one.

You could see the mainstream media’s attempt to frame this turd as a “conservative” as they have wrongly done over and over again.  The guy was about as much of a “conservative” as Sen. Bernie Sanders is a conservative.

Oops.  Did I say the “B-word”???

Bernie Sanders has the pleasure of having the rabid Democrat who tried to murder Republicans after specifically asking and finding out it was the Republicans who were on the field just before shooting at them on his campaign staff.  Sanders came right out and acknowledged it to get ahead of the story and allow the mainstream media to label it “old news” when Republicans protest that this violent roach was an avowed leftist DEMOCRAT.

Um, but Bernie Sanders HIMSELF just outed himself as a shockingly ignorant, bigoted HATER when he shamelessly erupted hate at a Trump nominee who was seeking the position of deputy director of the White House Office of Management and Budget rather than Ayatollah.  And let’s not forget when we say “Ayatollah” that it was OBAMA who did a deal with that rat bastard religious murderer.

Bernie Sanders came out viciously screaming at Russell Vought in his demand that no Christian who actually believed in the central tenant of his or her faith should be allowed to serve the public.

Article VI reads in part, “no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”  But no Democrat today believes in the Constitution any more than they believe it is useful for toilet paper when they’ve got a particularly bad case of the runs.  Democrats are people who create whatever the hell right they want by seeing “penumbras and emanations” to justify whatever the hell they want to see while simultaneously militantly trampling on the clearly stated rights and freedoms and liberties that the Constitution clearly provides.

So let’s just state it for the official record: Bernie Sanders is a hater who inspires hate and haters love him for it.

In Democrat Party America, Christian football coaches are fired by public schools for praying even when they just pray by themselves in silence.  Christians shouldn’t have a right to pray: after all, they might be talking to the God of the Bible.  And there is no Book in the world hated more by Democrats than the Holy Bible, and there is no deity hated more by Democrats than the God the Holy Bible reveals.  Had this coach been a Muslim, there is no way he would have been so targeted.

In Democrat Party America, Christian wedding photographers and Christian bakers and Christian florists should be silenced and financially ruined for believing what their faith clearly states in the hated Word of God.  And in Democrat Party America, there are actually “judges” who openly urinate and defecate on our Constitution which is supposed to be the basis of our entire legal system and our laws.  And in Democrat Party America, nuns from the Little Sisters of the Poor are targeted for destruction by the most hateful president this nation has ever fielded.  But thank God those Little Sisters of the Poor ultimately defeated that hater of both God and the Constitution.

In Democrat Party America, a high school openly practices Stalinist-era photo-editing to remove “Trump” from student yearbooks.  Stalin used this tactic after former heroes became dead and had to be purged from photographs.  And Democrats adore Stalinism and won’t rest until they have it back.

Free speech is a hated, reviled thing by Democrats today.  Freedom makes the demons in Democrats begin to spasmodically twitch and they have to practice whatever destruction of truth at whatever level of violence and hate is required to stop it.

At this point every cultural source: our public schools and universities, our entertainment industry, our so-called “news,” our so-called “scientists,” our actively endorsing this hatred and contempt of whatever the hell they don’t like.

One of the things Democrats don’t like is the 2nd Amendment.  They don’t like Americans having the right to defend themselves and their families and their property.  Had it not been for the fact that the House Majority Leader was present and had an armed security detail due to his office, every single Republican congressman on that baseball field would have been systematically executed while the Democrats who believe Americans ought to be disarmed did NOTHING to help them.

The last time I checked, I didn’t qualify for a security detail.

If Democrats want to criminalize guns, let it apply to THEM.  NO DEMOCRAT OUGHT TO BE ALLOWED TO OWN A FIREARM OF ANY KIND.  But real Americans clearly need their 2nd Amendment rights more than ever before until that blessed moment occurs.

I watched Speaker of the House Paul Ryan do his “Kumbaya” thing and Democrats falsely joined in.  Notwithstanding that had it been a Trump supporter rather than a Trump hater who had shot a Democrat, these same Kumbaya Democrats would have been screaming for Republican blood.

You watch, by next Monday they will be screaming for our blood just as rabidly as they were the day before the Democrat act of rabid hate.

Therein lies the biggest difference between the two parties: one actually WANTS what’s best for the nation and is actively trying to seek reconciliation with the other side; but the other party wants to gleefully hold up our bloody, severed heads.

 

 

 

Advertisements

What’s Wrong With ‘White Pride’???

November 18, 2016

What’s wrong with black pride?  Or Latino pride?  Should we demonize people who celebrate these things?  The left and their propaganda allies in the media certainly don’t think so: in fact, they have led the way trying to instill all this “pride” in race, in gender, homosexuality.  You name it, the left wants you to have “pride” about it.

But pride in being white?  In being WHITE???  That is so…. so … so RACIST!!!  You HATER!!!

But wait a minute.  Wait a damn minute!!!  What about black pride and Latino pride???

Oh, that’s different.  You see, those people vote for us.

I came across an article in the Los Angeles Times entitled in the print edition, “‘White Pride’ Awakened” and that title all by itself cuts a decidedly visceral picture.  You know, Hitler, the Nazis, the Ku Klux Klan, that sort of thing.

And, you know, THAT doesn’t sound good, I mean, right?

And I’ve got my Christian Scriptures which state things like:

“The God who made the world and all things in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands; nor is He served by human hands, as though He needed anything, since He Himself gives to all people life and breath and all things; and He made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their habitation, that they would seek God, if perhaps they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us, for in Him we live and move and exist, as even some of your own poets have said, ‘For we also are His children.'” — Acts 17:24-28

Opening his mouth, Peter said: “I most certainly understand now that God is not one to show partiality, but in every nation the man who fears Him and does what is right is welcome to Him.”  — Acts 10:34-35

There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.  — Galatians 3:28

Here there is not Greek and Jew, circumcision and uncircumcision, barbarian, Scythian, slave and free; but Christ is all and in all.  — Colossians 3:11

But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors. — James 2:9

But the one who hates his brother is in the darkness and walks in the darkness, and does not know where he is going because the darkness has blinded his eyes.  1 John 2:11

So I see the phrase “white pride” and I get more than a little uncomfortable.  I have a sense that no, I’m not supposed to have “white pride,” pride on account of my race.

I was raised that way.  I was taught that way all my life.  My Christian faith assures me that it is right to think that way.

And yet – in its own twisted, despicable way – that is EXACTLY what the Democrat Party has banked on me thinking and believing and feeling for going on fifty wicked years.

I’m not supposed to go to “white pride.”  It’s wrong.  But THEY are free and even RIGHTEOUS for creating and pursuing and institutionalizing “black pride” and “La Raza” (“the RACE”), and for that matter allow me to include gays and women and every OTHER group that Democrats have assembled into a coalition based upon “Us Vs. Them.”

Why in the hell is their racial pride somehow correct and my racial pride is incorrect?

And it’s in that word “correct.”  As in “politically correct.”

Political correctness is the ability to hold two or more mutually contradictory things in your head at the same time without your head exploding.  So, for example, take the Ku Klux Klan, and take the historic FACT that the Ku Klux Klan was began as the terrorist arm of the DEMOCRATIC PARTY and that the Klan was still so deeply embedded into Democratic Party politics that even decades into the 20th century the Democratic National Convention was called “Klanbake.”  And the fact that WHICH PARTY last had a U.S. Senator who had been an “Exalted Cyclops” and a “Grand Kleagle” of the KLan???  And the fact that WHICH party’s candidate kissed and endorsed that high-ranking racist???  And then take into the fact that the Klan is now “right wing” and it is all somehow the party that waged war to defeat both the racist Democrats and their racist Klan that is to blame for the Ku Klux Klan.

Political Correctness is a fairly new term, but it dates back to 1949 when Orwell coined the term “doublethink” for his book about government run-amok titled “1984”:

Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.

So the same people who say that “white power” is the height of Nazi evil celebrate the “power” of every other race BUT white people.  While arguing that they of course cannot be racist for their racist doctrines that merely turn the race doctrines of the Nazis upside down all in the most cynical ideological way to create a political machine based on a race coalition.

And through the sledgehammer weapon of “political correctness” we who are “them” are not allowed to think of ourselves as “them” even as they themselves create the categories and viciously use them for political and moral attack.

Political correctness is not just an attempt to make people feel better. It’s a vast, coordinated effort on the part of the secular humanist, socialist left to change Western culture as we know it by  using rhetoric to redefine it. Early Marxists in Russia designed this game plan long ago and liberals continue to execute the tactic today: to control the argument by controlling the “acceptable” language. Those with radical agendas understand the game plan and are taking advantage of an oversensitive and frankly overly gullible public.

The central tenet of Political Correctness is that language shapes/controls thought and thought shapes/controls actions. And if you control what you say you ultimately control what you think and how you act. And there’s a good way to do that and a very, very bad way to do it. And the left is destroying the first (the GOOD way to control yourself and improve yourself through religion and morality) while using mass-mind-control techniques by shaping the culture and political discourse to THEIR narrative via the tactic of PC.

And Christians in specific and white people in general were literally TRAINED to participate in their own racial and cultural destruction if the other side is utterly amoral and willing to exploit race as a political weapon.  Which the Democratic Party has done TO THE HILT OF THE SWORD.

And white people finally assembled something of a rally and followed the leadership of Donald Trump to finally fight back fire with fire.

Jesus prophesied this: He said that in the very last days before this present age ran its course as it prepared for the coming of the beast:

Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom.Matthew 24:7; Mark 13:8

The word translated as “nation” is the Greek word “ethnos” (Strongs # 1484).  It is the root word from which we get the English word “ethnic.”  Its primary sense is ETHNICITY or RACE.  In the last days, ETHNIC GROUP shall rise against ETHNIC GROUP as we have never seen.

And that day is coming and is already here.

What is interesting is that the Nazis weren’t merely “racist” in the sense of “white people.”  Not at ALL!  The intellectual Nazis had a VERY SPECIFIC group of white people in mind: ARYAN white people, and even more particularly the Nordic/Germanic peoples.  The Nazis held that the Nordic race was the most superior of the “Aryan race” and therefore properly constituted a “master race.”  They categorized people in a “Us Vs. Them” formula that rated races from “Aryan” at the top to “Non-Aryan” at the bottom and grades in-between where one was a little more or a little less “Aryan” to not Aryan at all.  They were determined to subjugate the French (who were Normans when the Nazis were proudly Anglo-Saxon) and they were even more viciously hellbound to subjugate the Russians who were Slavic white people.  Hitler thought he could reach out to Winston Churchill and Great Britain on the basis of common Aryan racial identity, but Churchill and the English didn’t want any part of Hitler’s racial theory, enraging the dictator.

It was a racial theory that Hitler himself (who actually almost certainly had Jewish blood in him) and most of the people at the top of the Nazi hierarchy failed to racially qualify for.  But abject moral and intellectual hypocrisy never stopped people like these.

In my first sentence I mentioned “Hitler, the Nazis, the Ku Klux Klan, that sort of thing.”  It is fascinating to understand that the Nazis were SOCIALISTS and therefore on the far leftist end of the spectrum.  You could call them the right wing of the extreme radical left, but unless you are talking about communists who are on the very farthest fringe of leftism, the Nazis were WAY over on the side of the left.  And the Ku Klux Klan without any question in its origin was the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party that fought a vicious Civil War for the purpose of preserving human slavery.  The Democratic Party was still so completely and entirely indoctrinated with racism and the Ku Klux Klan that the 1924 Democratic National Convention was called “Klanbake.”  You can look this history up for yourself.

When you evaluate the racist history of the Democratic Party, you ought to truly be ashamed if you are a Democrat.  I’ve written about this many times before:

I mean, maybe you can go back to President Andrew Jackson and his vicious genocidal Trail of Tears.  But Andrew Jackson was a Democrat, too.  Or you could go back to President Woodrow Wilson who literally fired all the blacks in federal government and RE-segregated the military.  But you guessed it – Democrat.  We can go back to January 26, 1922, when Democrat Senators filibustered a Republican bill that had passed in the GOP-controlled House to make LYNCHING a federal crime.  Or we could mention the vile and evil political party that had a national convention in 1924 that was so dominated by the Ku Klux Klan that it is today known as “Klanbake.”  But, oops.  That was the 1924 DEMOCRAT PARTY CONVENTION.  Or we could consider that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was a bigger racist for put American Japanese citizens in camps for nothing beyond racism.  Or for allowing the infamous Tuskegee experiment to begin under his presidency.  Or allowing his New Deal program to be used to help Democrat-supporting labor unions hurt black people and shut them out of economic success.  Or for the fact that far more REPUBLICANS than DEMOCRATS voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act and had to overcome a Democrat filibuster to do it.  And in the same way, the Republicans were instrumental in passing the Voting Rights Act of 1965.  But, well, you know…

and:

We’ve got the racism of Bill Clinton who said of a black man named Barack Hussein Obama, “A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee.”  And clearly wishing for those good old days, so that his wife could win the Democrat nomination.  More recently, Bill Clinton – the former leader of the Democrat Party – said of former Ku Klux Klan Kleagle and “pillar of the Senate” Robert Byrd, said:

“They mention that he once had a fleeting association with the Ku Klux Klan, and what does that mean? I’ll tell you what it means,” Clinton said. “He was a country boy from the hills and hollows of West Virginia. He was trying to get elected. And maybe he did something he shouldn’t have done…”

Democrat Senator Robert Byrd was a “fleeting member” of the Ku Klux Klan the way Kobe Bryant was a “fleeting member” of the Los Angeles Lakers.  Former Exalted Cyclops and Kleagle Byrd wrote:

“I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side … Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.”

He wrote:

“The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia and in every state in the nation.”

He personally filibustered the 1964 Civil Rights Act on behalf of the Klan when he was nearing fifty years old.

So why was it that Democrat Senator Robert Byrd was “MAYBE” wrong for being a member of the Klan? The answer is as simple as it is frightening: because it’s always been okay for the Democrat Party to use racism and race-baiting and racial segregation in order to drive their agenda home.  And that is just as true today when the Democrats buy off blacks through welfare so they will act as the human shields of the Democrat Party as it was when the Democrat-created Ku Klux Klan was riding around with torches.

The Democrat Party is the historic proponent of racism in this country (see also my comment here).  Oh, they changed their tactics from threats to bribes, but they never abandoned their racist “progressive” values.

And that’s the hook: the Democratic Party has ALWAYS been racist to its core.  They just found a different tactic to employ their doctrine of racism as vicious political weapon.  After the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act – which was a DEFEAT for the congressional and senatorial Democrats – they got together in conclave and sharpened their knives and devised a new tactic: to ostentatiously pull of the trick that hey, leopards really CAN change their spots.  And so they began to devise increasingly RIDICULOUS “Civil Rights” acts that flew in the face of the Republican values of individual liberty and individual moral responsibility that led them to fight to end slavery in the 1860s and led them to pass the Civil Rights Act of the 1960s.  With that century in-between being nothing short of hard-core Democratic Party RACISM.  Until they realized it wasn’t working any more and created the “plantation” tactic whereby they got blacks BACK on their plantation by being the NEW party of racism that continued to use race as a weapon, but this time in a different warped way.  Now, in the way that ignorant and helpless non-combatant Muslims are the human shields of the terrorists who live among them, blacks are the ignorant and helpless human shields of the Democrat Party that exploit them primarily in inner cities and yet somehow after a CENTURY of Democratic Party control have NEVER done anything to actually help these people whose vote they pimp and exploit to the machine agenda.

The Democratic Party created a HARD-CORE racist agenda based primarily upon pitting blacks and Hispanics against whites.  It worked great for them.  Because white people had been taught that it is WRONG to be racist, to organize for a racist purpose against another race.  Only the most wicked, vile people on earth would do such a thing.

Oh, only the most wicked, vile people on earth … and Democrats who played the damn race card every year of my entire life – and I’m in my fifties now.

And it worked for Democrats.  Because the Republican Party was terrified to actually do or be what the Democrat Party branded them and demonized them and slandered them as being every single election anyway whether the Republicans did it or not.  Republicans were terrified to degenerate into the vicious racial tactics that Democrats had turned into an art form.

Until Donald Trump saw the devastation that Obama’s racist policies had wreaked on working-class whites and he saw his opening.

And the rest is damn history.

Damn the Germans for initiating the concepts of total war by targeting civilian population centers, of weapons of mass destruction through gas warfare as military tactic, etc, and force the Allies to determine that what is good for the goose is good for the gander and RETALIATE in kind.  And DAMN the Democrats for initiating the concept of race as a political weapon and assembling groups of people on the basis of “identity politics” and creating the infamous “Us Vs. Them” tactic to win by division and increasingly angry and bitter and hateful division.

You live by the sword and eventually you will PERISH by the sword.

And there is now no factual question whatsoever that under the RACE PIMP-IN-CHIEF Barack Obama the Democrat Party has perished by its own race sword as white people finally rose up just as Democrats had taught them to do by inciting and flaming the hate of blacks and Hispanics against them.

Under Barack Obama, the House Democrats lost 68 seats since he won election in 2008.  They had a filibuster-proof majority when Obama came, and now the Senate is firmly in Republican hands.  Thanks to Obama and the arguably even more vile successor in Hillary Clinton, Democrats have lost the White House.  But its when you look more closely that the ugly truth of abject rejection of the Democrat Party is truly and stunningly seen: Democrats have lost NINE HUNDRED AND THIRTEEN SEATS in State legislatures since Obama became president.  Consider:

Obama’s record for losses, at least through the 2014 midterms, is historically bad having overseen two horrible midterm elections for Democrats. Overall, Sabato wrote, Democrats during Obama’s presidency lost 11 governorships, 13 U.S. Senate seats, 69 House seats, and 913 state legislative seats and 30 state legislative chambers. (Our analysis of legislative seats is off from Sabato’s by three. The small discrepancy is likely due to run-offs and recounts.)

The shedding of U.S. House seats, state legislative seats and statehouse control is at least twice the average two-term losses from Truman through George W. Bush, Sabato said.

There are now only FOUR states in the entire NATION that have a Democrat governor and a Democrat legislature.

Look at the damn MAP, Democrat.  See the damn PICTURE!!!:

2016-election-map-by-county

I see a Republican nation infected and scarred by ugly pimples of diseased blue puss, that is what I see.

When Donald Trump targeted that Hispanic judge Gonzalo Curiel – albeit in a rather unfortunate way – I asked this question:

How do you feel about members of the white race determining to advance fellow members of the white race in exclusion of all other races???

How many Democrats have cheered the prospect of a “Congressional White Caucus” the way they have done with the Congressional Black Caucus?  How many liberals find themselves celebrating the “diversity” of a “National Association for the Advancement of Caucasian People” the way they have cheered the “National Association for the Advancement of Colored People” (a.k.a., the NAACP)???  Do white people get to have a WET channel – White Entertainment Television – and hand out awards exclusively to white entertainers and praising them for exalting the white race the way the other side does with BET???

For that matter, how many reporters are focusing on the racist angle of Hispanics waving Mexican flags, burning American flags, and then chasing down, surrounding, and beating white people at Donald Trump events???  How is it NOT racist when Mexican-flag-wielding Hispanic thugs beat down white people at political rallies they barged into to suppress???

Why is it okay to be a hard-core racist, providing that the race you are working to advance is a member of the Democrat Party race coalition???  Why does “racism” only work one way (i.e. the way that favors and ALWAYS favors the left)???

And the people and the electorate have spoken, and we now have our answer: white pride is back.

And if you are a Democrat and you think it’s terrible, get in your car, drive to the nearest field where a farmer is operating a combine, and throw yourself into its gears: BECAUSE YOU ARE ENTIRELY TO BLAME FOR IT AND YOU HAVE BEEN ENTIRELY TO BLAME FOR YOUR ENTIRE DAMN LIFE.

White people finally got fed up of the vicious, ugly, cynical racist double-standard hypocrisy that is at the VERY CORE of the Democratic Party.

And they rose up to protect their children and their grandchildren from Democratic Party HATE.

And you now face a damn choice, Democrat: you can stop being a divisive, Us-Vs.-Them-pimping, identify-politics racist hate-machine slave, or you can now choose to rise up as Democrats and end the race-pimp machine that is now at the cockroach soul of your party system.

As long as there is a Black Congressional Caucus, as long as there is a Black Lives Matter movement, as long as there is a La Raza, as long as there is a United Negro College Fund, as long as there are black colleges and universities – and there are more than ONE HUNDRED of them and tell me how liberals would react to a hundred damn WHITE colleges!?!? – then do not dare to even TRY to condemn us for our newfound “white pride.”

The Imperial Japanese admiral who masterminded the Pearl Harbor attack said in its aftermath when he realized the American carriers had not been hit:

“I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.”

The sleeping giant, once awakened, saw Pearl Harbor and saw the Rape of Naking and the Bataan Death March and was filled with the terrible resolve – a RIGHTEOUS resolve – to rip and shred chunks of the empire the Japanese won by viciousness until they could first firebomb Tokyo and ultimately drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

And they were RIGHT to do it, just as white people are right to rise up against the Democratic Party hate machine now.

For my part, I would love the race war ignited and inflamed by the Democratic Party and their racial coalition began to finally end and we could get back to just being AMERICANS.  But I will NOT stand down while hate triumphs.  And we saw during the campaign as Democrats viciously physically attacked Republicans just for attending peaceful GOP rallies; we saw that that political violence was INTENTIONALLY ORGANIZED AND PLANNED by a career Democratic operative who served on the Clinton campaign and who visited the White House to coordinate with the Obama machine 342 times; and now we are seeing the party of naked fascism violently rioting as they refuse the results of democracy all over again now.  And I will stand up against the party of hate, the Democrat Party.

White Americans are beginning to have that same terrible resolve because of YOU, Democrat.  You have awakened a monster, Democrat, and now you have a choice to make that had you been moral and decent people you would not have ever had to make in the first place.  Because it sure looks like Republicans aren’t going to let you lecture them for doing what you’ve done for fifty damn years any more.

My guess is that you’re not going to listen to wisdom BECAUSE YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF WISDOM.  So you will fulfill the prophecy of Jesus and double-down on your racism as tactic even as you scream about the terrible resolve of the sleeping giant you woke up in 2016.

 

I Demonize Hypocrite Liberal Cockroaches. Call Me ‘Indecent’ For Doing What THESE TURDS DO EVEN AS THEY WHINE ABOUT THE OTHER SIDE DOING IT.

June 14, 2012

There’s a guy out there attacking Rush Limbaugh as some kind of enemy of decency.  While he’s being incredibly indecent in his attack, mind you.  I have no doubt that he was desperately hoping that Rush Limbaugh would mention his name on air and give his meaningless existence some semblance of noteriety.  But alas and alack, it appears that Rush Limbaugh is just too big to care.

I’m not, though, so I’ll take a shot at Limbaugh’s rejects.

I’ll just produce the article and then comment on what I’m reading:

The decline of American decency
Written by THE BELLEFONTAINE EXAMINER STAFF  (Reuben Mees) 
Monday, 11 June 2012 10:18

Rush Limbaugh never fails to sicken me and his comments last week on our own local celebrity’s act of selflessness puts me at wit’s end.

While many readers who want to lump me in with the run-of-the-mill liberal journalist stereotype probably think I’m blowing off steam about Limbaugh’s overall conservatism, that is not the case at all.

The man is a complete idiot. Period.

In case you missed it, he stooped to an all-time low (quite possibly trumping even his illegal Viagra possession, pain killer addiction and entirely sexist attitude toward all women’s issues) in what he apparently saw as some insightful truth into the declining nature of the capitalist values he believes make the United States the end-all-and-be-all of human existence.

Specifically, he took the story of West Liberty-Salem long distance runner Meghan Vogel helping another runner cross the finish line and said the young athlete lacks the spirit of American competitiveness that makes our country strong.

What the dolt is missing about the true American spirit — and what Meghan demonstrated by pushing Arlington runner Arden McMath ahead of her in the state 3,200 meter track competition — is that life isn’t all about coming in first place in some athletic competition.

In fact, sometimes people do stop to help each other out.

Just the other day, I was walking to work and a man asked me for directions to the nearest gas station. Instead of blowing on by him so I could get to work and earn my cash — as Limbaugh wants all to believe is the only worthwhile pursuit in life — I took the time to point him in the right direction.

Recently, local businessman Robert Notestine spoke with me about giving a few bucks here and there to folks who are homeless or down on their luck.

These everyday acts of consideration for others may not equate to or garner the national attention of sacrificing a better placing in a state competition, or — as Limbaugh goes on to compare it to — Rory Sabbatini sacrificing the Memorial tournament so Tiger Woods can feel better about himself, but they do occur throughout our country on a daily basis.

As a matter of fact, if life were all about competition, Middle America probably wouldn’t exist at all.

We’d all be off running the rat race in New York or Los Angeles trying to be on top of the American dung hill Limbaugh and his ilk call home.

Quite frequently people ask me why I don’t aspire to work for a bigger newspaper, but I just don’t.

I was born right here in Bellefontaine. My family is here. People know me. And, honestly, I don’t know of any better place to ply my trade than right here in Logan County. And, trust me, I have ventured out.

So, according to the radio loud mouth, that’s just one more strike against me as a true American.

But in my opinion, it is the people of all the small communities who are not striving to be on top in Washington, the Big Apple or Hollywood that make America what it is.

And yes, we do frequently stop to help our neighbors or even complete strangers out, despite the fact that it may entail a sacrifice on our own part.

And this opinionated blowhard has the gall to say we’re the ones making America weak.

In my own opinion, the television and radio stations that feed us this endless stream of drivel from arrogant pundits like Limbaugh are much more to blame for the decline of America than the Meghan Vogels of this country.

Reuben Mees is an Examiner Satff Writer and vitriolic despiser of television-era punditry that serves no purpose in educating our society. He can be reached at rmees@examiner.org

Let’s stop and ponder the man’s title and compare it with his first sentence: “The decline of American decency.”  And then “Rush Limbaugh never fails to sicken me.”  If you have a big enough barf bucket to keep reading, a little later the liberal turd categorically states, “The man is a complete idiot. Period.”  He points out that Rush Limbaugh is a “dolt.”  Near the end of his piece he asserts, “We’d all be off running the rat race in New York or Los Angeles trying to be on top of the American dung hill Limbaugh and his ilk call home.”  And our defender of American decency concludes by proclaiming that Rush Limbaugh is an “opinionated blowhard.”    All of these things are examples of “decency” from our self-inaugurated defender of American decency.

I get confused: WHO ended American decency? 

It doesn’t seem to matter how completely black that pot is, it just can’t stand the fact that the kettle over there might be black.

Reuben Mees, the fellow who is complaining about “American decency” declining, repeatedly personally attacks – in incredibly indecent manner, mind you – the most popular radio personality on the planet.  And it never seems to ever once occur to him what an abject hypocrite he is.  It’s perfectly fine for the protector of civility and decency to state that those who he disagrees with live “on top of a dung hill.” 

This is nothing new.  Reuben Mees is way, WAY down the food chain, of course.  But household name liberal “journalists” are just as guilty of the same exact mental disorderJust consider Froma HarropPLEASE.

Here’s another one closer to the bone, as Rush Limbaugh was demonized by a movement that celebrates liberals who are FAR more vile than Limbaugh has EVER been.

When a liberal says something hateful, it can’t be hate by definition.  When a conservative says, well, pretty much anything, it can’t be anything BUT hate by definition.  This is precisely how the fascists and communists (leftist socialists both, by the way) reasoned in their various show trials.

Let’s either just pull out the knives and fight it out with no-holds barred, or stop the personal demonization.  One or the other.  But liberals won’t have it that way.  These aren’t civil, “decent” people who are confronted with mean-spirited conservatives.  Rather, these are people who personally and viciously attack conservatives on a daily, continuous basis while simultaneously just as daily and continuously whining about all the hate and intolerance.  What they in fact demand is the right to be able to demonize the opposition into silence so that they and they alone have the right to demonize.

What is Mees’ evidence that Rush Limbaugh is an idiot who lives on a dung hill along with everyone else Mees disagrees with?  Well, apparently Rush Limbaugh had issue with the pop-culture story of Meghan Vogel losing a race to help another runner cross the finish line.

Slam dunk case, I’m sure.  Only a dung-hill dwelling idiot could possibly ever hold such a view.  One day Mees’ fellow Nazis will surely line Limbaugh up against a wall and shoot him for that thoughtcrime.

I haven’t bothered to say anything about the Meghan Vogel story on this blog, but I will take the time now.  Limbaugh has a very good point.  Think of it this way: either that race was important or it wasn’t.  If it was important, then Meghan Vogel owed it to herself, her teammates and her high school to run the best race she could and win if it was possible for her to do so.  Particularly given the fact that such is the very point of having the race to begin with.  If it was NOT important, then it was frankly meaningless for her to help another girl cross the finish line for a meaningless event.  Why not just help her to the bleachers, instead (particularly AFTER crossing the finish line).

Let’s say that Meghan Vogel is in the Olympics and she does this.  She could have won America the gold, but hell no; instead, she decides to ignore the entire purpose of the race (to see who wins and award the winner) and decides to make it about some kind of personal charity.  She sacrifices America’s victory, but isn’t she nice?

Imagine LeBron James is inspired by Meghan Vogel.  He’s got a clear path to the basket to win with a slam dunk and win the championship for his team, his fans and his city.  But out of the corner of his eye he sees the defender behind him trip and fall.  So instead of winning the title, Lebron James ubergraciously stops and helps the opposing player to his feet.  And loses everything he was supposed to win.

But don’t you worry, sports fans.  Because the Miami Heat fans and the organization will wildly cheer Lebron for his niceness.  Who cares if that stupid trophy and championship banner are hoisted by the Oklahoma Thunder?

Nobody would dare say that maybe LeBron James should have stuck to sports and done his charity work off the court.  Because cockroaches like Reuben Mees would come crawling out to denounce them.

On Mees’ liberal theology, nobody ought to win.  EVERYBODY should be “winners.”  And anyone who tries to excel in anything ought to be punished.  It is only those socialist souls who crawl to the lowest common denominator and lose while helping others be better losers who ought to be celebrated.  “Fairness” means that fast runners should hamstring themselves to be slower; beautiful people ought to pour acid on their own faces to be no more beautiful than the ugliest people around them; rich people ought to have their wealth seized so that it may be redistributed to everyone equally.  Don’t you DARE try to be better, and most definitely don’t you dare try to be the best you can be.  And so had Meghan Vogel decided, “I’m going to be the best!  I’m going to run like hell and win this race for myself, for my teammates, for my high school, for my community!”  THAT is what would have been inexcusable.

Liberty and independence ought to be sacrificed for some bizarre leftist notion of “social justice.”

I cite at some length what Mark Levin had to say about that liberal Utopian theology not quite halfway down in this article.  You should read what this brilliant mind has to say about the kind of “extreme equality” that Mees demands, and why it is a dangerous concept that has absolutely NOTHING to do with America – whether “decent America” or otherwise.

Another issue to consider is that the girl Meghan helped cross the finish line might have had a serious medical problem. Imagine if she’d fallen down with a stroke or a heart attack. Out of misplaced compassion, Meghen could have literally contributed to the girl’s death.

For the record, these analogies are far, FAR closer to the Meghan Vogel example than the one that Reuben Mees provides.  Mine is an apples-to-apples comparison; Mees literally charges that Rush Limbaugh is telling us to say go to hell to anybody on the street who asks you for directions.  Which is to say that Mees bases his entire ad hominem on a non sequitur straw man.  In seeing the sort of issues I describe above with the Meghan Vogel story, Rush Limbaugh is actually saying that anybody who helps anybody anywhere is interfering with his “rat race” vision of America that he (in Mees’ rodent mind) cherishes.

Would you like to hear about a real hero?  Consider Stormy Rich, who stood up to a bunch of bullies to defend a mentally disabled girl on a bus – and got suspended for her noble behavior.  I want you to carefully notice that Rush Limbaugh didn’t diminish Stormy Rich and say that we shouldn’t help people in real genuine need.

The facts are that conservatives – you know, the people Mees demonizes as those who “blow by” others in need – are FAR more personally generous than liberals with their own resourcesEven liberal writers for the liberal New York Times are forced to acknowledge this now repeatedly documented FACT.  Which pretty much dumps about a ton of diarrhea manure on everything that Reuben Mees demagogues.

I am past fed up with vile hypocrites crawling out from under every rock on the left and spewing hate about us while at the same time decrying us for being spewers of hate.  If you don’t like us responding to your hate, THEN STOP YOUR DAMN HATING!  All conservatives like myself want is either a fair debate, or a fair fight.  And as long as hypocrites like Reuben Means are screeching, we’ll never get either one.

P.S. Hey, Reuben, the day that Rush Limbaugh calls Hillary Clinton or Michelle Obama a “cunt” and a “dumb twat” the way that liberal host Bill Maher did to Sarah Palin – without ANY serious condemnation from the left – you can demonize Rush Limbaugh.  Let me further point out that when Barack Obama accepted Bill Maher’s million dollar campaign donation, he put his presidential seal of approval on labeling conservative women as “cunts” and “dumb twats” along with all the other vile crap Maher has said.  The day that Limbaugh does that to a top Democrat on air, you can demonize Rush Limbaugh.  The day that Rush Limbaugh openly mocks Barack Obama’s heretical views on Christianity the way Bill Maher just mocked GOP nominee Mitt Romney’s Mormonism, you can demonize Rush Limbaugh.  Here’s another one for you, Reuben. When Rush Limbaugh’s EIB Netork features Barack Obama’s decapitated head on a pike like uberliberal HBO just did to George Bush, you can demonize Rush Limbaugh.  Until then, just shut the hell up, you worthless little hypocrite turd.

P.P.S. I decided to link to articles I’ve written that come under this topic as a reference of leftwing hypocrisy and simply couldn’t stop myself.  I used my search engine to pull out articles relating to “violence” and finally forcibly stopped myself at the year 2010.  This is what we’re up against:

Liberals Are Not Quite As ‘Tolerant’ As Rabid Rats As They Keep Proving That THEY Are The True Fascists Threatening America

Sarah Palin To Barack Obama: If Rush Limbaugh Was Offensive, Then WHY Are You Taking Money And Help From Bill Maher???

Obama Slams Rush Limbaugh For Calling Sandra Fluke A ‘Slut.’ It’s Strange That He Forgot To Denounce David Letterman For Calling Sarah Palin A ‘Slut.’

The Real Picture Emerges Of A Dangerously Biased Propaganda-Mill Media In Trayvon Martin Shooting Case

When Will American People Get Fed Up With Violent Occupy Fascists And The Democrats Who Endorse Them???

The Inconvenient Truth About The Lilly White Occupy Wall Street Movement And The Media Propaganda That Ignores Truth Altogether

Vile Democrat James Clyburn Smears Mitt Romney As The Guy Who Kept Rosa Parks In The Back Of The Bus (Romney’s Father MARCHED With MLK For Civil Rights!!!)

Call The Occupy Protest Movement And The Left That It Comes From What It Truly Is: Fascist

Occupy Movement Costs America UNTOLD MILLIONS ($2.3 Milion In L.A. ALONE) Versus Tea Party Movement Which MADE Cities Money

Liberalism = Marxism. See The Occupy Movement Shutting Down Ports, Capitalism, Jobs To Get Their Way (Communist Russian Revolution Part Deux)

Occupy Movement Officially A Terrorist Group Now

The American Left Personified By Occupy Movement: Vile, Violent Fascist Thugs

Vile Occupy Protests In Videos

Occupy Movement Is Destroying Jobs And Hurting Little People

Tea Party Vs. Occupy Protests: The Winners Of The Out-Of-Control Violence Trophy – For The Millionth Consecutive Time – Is The LEFT

Nazis, Socialists, Communists, Liberals, Democrats, Obama, Media Propaganda ALL Support Occupy Wall Street

Obama Fine With Unions Frothing To ‘Take The Sons Of Bitches Out’ In War With Tea Party

Glenn Beck’s Wife And Daughter Heckled And Assaulted By Vile Mob Of Liberal Cowards

Coming To America Soon: ‘Anti-Austerity’ (I.E., Pro-Reckless-Government-Spending Liberals) Protests Turning Violent In Greece

Remember How Liberals Said Every Aggressive Move Against Terrorists Was ‘A Provocation’? Why Is It A Good Thing Now?

Barack Obama Loves Racist Anti-American Preachers. And That Should Tell You Who He Really Is

Liberal Labor Unions: ‘Forget About The Law’

Liberal Calls Sarah Palin A “Cunt” A Week After Calling Her A “Dumb Twat”

Company Takes On SEIU Anti-Business, Anti-Job Extortion

Another Example That Liberalism Is The Ideology Of Hate And Violence

Liberal Fascists In Wisconsin: Show Me Crap Like THIS Coming From Tea Party Protests

Mainstream Media Propaganda Machine Turns Other Way As Democrats Now Want To ‘Get A Little Bloody’

Union Liberal Fascists Find Latest Crisis To Exploit In Wisconsin

Mainstream Media ‘News’ Is Another Word For ‘Leftwing Propaganda’: Look At The Difference In Coverage

String Up Clarence Thomas? Death Threats For Sarah Palin? Liberals Continue To Prove Just How Full Of Hypocrite They Are

Leftwing Violence And Media Propaganda/Coverup Continues Unabated

Kansas City Throat Slashing Liberal: Media Continues To Cover Up Leftist Violence

Before Demonizing ‘Crosshairs,’ CNN Used Word To Refer To Target Palin And Bachmann

Democrat Tucson Shooting Victim Arrested For Death Threat Against Tea Party Spokesman

On the Malicious Connection Between Conservatives And Hate

Gabrielle Giffords Shooting: Don’t Blame Sarah Palin, Blame Jerod Loughner (Who If Anything Is A Leftist)

On The So-Called Link Between ‘Rightwing’ Political Rhetoric And Violence

New York Snow Cleanup: Unions Once Again Prove They Are Un-American

Labor Unions: A Century Of Genuine Evil

When It Comes To Charges Of Racism And Violence, Democrats Need To Do A Lot More Shutting The Hell Up

AFL-CIO President With Brutal History Of Inciting Violence Attacks Sarah Palin For Inciting Violence

PC Police Unable To Determine If ‘Beat Whitey Night’ Attacks Racially Motivated, And The Growing Unrest

Racist Murderer Laments He Didn’t Kill More White People

Harry Reid Continues Race-Baiting Racist Democrat Tradition

Left Continues Whining ‘How DARE You Be Against The President!’ Chutzpah

The Catastrophic Obama Failure That The Mainstream Media Forgot (As Predicted)

‘Transparency’ In Action: Obama Blocks Media To Conceal Failures

Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama’s Mentor In Marxist Racism

Peggy West: Democrats Continue Psychologically Unhinged And Brain-Dead Stupid Denunciations Of Arizona Law

Pro-Illegal Immigrant Supporter Threatens Murder Of Americans With Axes And Shovels

Question: Should Democrats Confirm ‘General Betray Us’?

Why Does Left Demand Arizona Suffer Out-Of-Control Chaos?

Mexico Says Their Citizens Returning Home Are A Burden: How Were They Not A Burden To America?

Meet The People Who’ve Been Lecturing Tea Party On Protest Etiquette

When America Goes To Hell, Rest Assured It Will Be Leftists Resorting To Violence, Too

Demagogue Democrats Now Support Violence And Swastikas

Left Attacks Michelle Bachmann For Inciting Violence; Obama Told Crowds To Bring Guns

Amazing: Liberals Show They Are Even MORE Intolerant And Violent Than Neo-Nazis

Media Propaganda: Bush Was Despicably Uncaring For Golfing; Obama Merely Blowing Off Steam When He Golfs

Left Continues Violence; Media Continues To Demagogue Tea Parties

Actual Leftwing Violence Keeps Piling Up While Media Focuses On ‘Threat’ From Tea Parties

Tea Party Crashers As A Particularly Nasty Species Of Vermin

Racist Left Seeks To Employ Racist Plants To Falsely Depict ‘Evidence’ Of Tea Party Racism

Rabid, Frothing, Anti-Conservative Mainstream Media Once Again Shows How Full Of Hypocrisy They Are

Democrats Spew Hate While Whining About Hate

Hypocrite Sarah Palin-Denouncing Democrats Used ‘Targets’ On Their Maps

Hypocrite Sarah Palin-Denouncing Democrats Used ‘Targets’ On Their Maps

Hypocrite Sarah Palin-Denouncing Democrats Used ‘Targets’ On Their Maps

Harry Reid Invokes Slavery To Attack Republicans: The Real Story

Vicious Obama ‘They Bring a Knife, We Bring A Gun’ ‘Punish Our Enemies’ Tone In Wisconsin: ‘We’ll Cut Scott Walker’s Head Off!’

April 20, 2012

Barack Obama is the guy who said about his political opponents, “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.”  Obama is the guy who tried to demagogue racial tension in America by saying, “We’re gonna punish our enemies.”

And of course this same vicious, rabid little weasel tries to demonize his opponents as “extreme.”

Well, the Obama fascist thugs are at it again.

New Tone: Union Rally Speaker Tells Scott Walker ‘We Cut Your Head Off’
by Rebel Pundit 4/19/12

Tuesday, over 2000 union protesters rolled into Springfield, IL, to protest Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, speaking at the Illinois Chamber of Commerce.

Once again they came to chant and sing, and chant and sing they did. It was a typical sea of matching t-shirts—a favored strategy of intimidation—along with their placards of “solidarity” and profane signs. They scattered four giant inflatable rats throughout the crowd, with a gargantuan cardboard cut out of Governor Scott Walker standing out, as well.

Presidents of the AFL-CIO, Michael T. Carrigan of Illinois and Phil Neuenfeldt of Wisconsin, got the crowd riled up, along with the help ofTeresa Haley, President of the Springfield NAACP. But Pastor T. Ray McJunkins of the Union Baptist Church and President of the Faith Coalition for the Common Good and William McNary of USAction stole the show.

McJunkins delivered an energetic address he closed up metaphorically with the story of David and Goliath, ultimately declaring:

We are the Davids …and you may be a big giant, a big goliath, but David had 5 smooth stones that brought Goliath down … all he had was stones and a sling shot, and I just wonder out there among us, how many of you came with your sling today? … Load your slings up today when we leave here, putting a smooth stone of equal rights at the collective bargaining table and throw it at Goliath … And Goliath will come down, Scott Walker we send you back to Wisconsin as David did Goliath, we cut your head off and go back into town, singing a new song!

In addition to McJunkins’ suggestion to behead Scott Walker,William McNary delivered the keynote speech. McNary is a longtime ally of the Communist Party U.S.A. and President Obama. McNary is the President of USAction, a self proclaimed “aggressive progressive” and a frequent speaker at left-wing Union events in Illinois and around the Midwest, including the Communist Party U.S.A.’s 2005 annual convention.

McNary lit up the crowd as he warned the unions to be prepared, “they are gonna call us names now … they are gonna say we are engaging in class warfare … they say this as they lower our wages and cut our benefits, were engaging in class warfare, they say this as they lay off workers and send jobs over seas, we’re engaging in class warfare … They got the nerve that we’re engaging in welfare[sic]? But I got a message for ‘em, the bully Scott Walker and all the bully governors across this country. We didn’t ask for this fight, we didn’t pick this fight, but if it’s a fight you want, it’s a fight you gonna get. Knuckle up! Knuckle up! Knuckle up!” he shouted to the roaring crowd.

Oddly enough, you would think Illinois union members may be more inclined to ask Scott Walker to come to Illinois and bring some of his policies with him. As AFP Illinois points out, “Wisconsin taxpayers still pay much more for healthcare benefits per state employee. WI taxpayers pay $13,972 per employee for healthcare, while Illinoisans pay $11,149 per employee,” and “Wisconsin’s reforms prevented the layoff of thousands of government workers, while here in IL, Gov. Quinn is on track to lay off hundreds of government workers.” But thoughts like those don’t cross these unionists’ minds, and when they do, they are simply dismissed as lies.

Nothing beats a Tuesday morning in the sleepy state capitol of Illinois better than a “non-violent” group of unionists, collectivists and agitators expressing their grievances “peacefully.”

Mind you, things are starting to look up specifically due to Scott Walker’s policies in Wisconsin: property taxes went down for the first time in 12 years – and union thugs are mad as hell about it.

And when the vile little Democrat cockroaches aren’t scurrying around in Wisconsin, they are spreading their hate and their filth to the rest of America via the fascist Occupy Movement.

Democrats aren’t decent people who demand more civil discourse; Democrats are rabid partisan hypocrites who demonize Republicans for hate while simultaneously being far more hateful themselves.

There’s ALWAYS an example of what total abject hypocrites Democrats are.  So of course it was easy to find one that just happened as I’m writing this post.  Here’s Rep. Keith Ellison (D., Minn.) showing us what a Democrat looks like (i.e., a complete hypocrite):

In responding to Ellison’s question, one responder compared Romney to a feminine hygiene product: “A heartless douchebag who doesn’t like animals or small children. At least that’s what I’ve heard.”

Ellison, a vociferous proponent of civil discourse, subsequently promoted the message despite said calls for civil discourse.

Ellison, for instance, spoke at length about the need greater civility in politics during an event in February 2011. The congressman has also implored citizens from across the nation to sign a tolerance pledge.

That’s right.  Let’s self-righteously demand that conservatives – who we’ll all agree are total douche bags – treat us with tolerance and respect.

Personally, I’m fine with the anger and the vitriol.  The Democrats are trying to “fundamentally transform America” into a socialist utopia, and it’s way past time somebody was willing to stand up and get in their faces.   You want a fight?  BRING IT!  But what I utterly despise is the fact that the left is maximally hateful even as they constantly attack conservatives for being a fraction as hateful as they themselves are.

Christopher Hitchens And Billy Graham (Or Bill Maher Vs. Tim Tebow) As Missionaries For Their Religions. And Which One Was ‘The Intolerant Hater.’

December 28, 2011

Yes, for the record, atheism IS a religious view. Atheists have actually demonstrated this themselves in demanding to be included in the number of religious traditions, and atheism has been declared a religion in the courts. So please don’t post trying to argue that Christopher Hitchens wasn’t a missionary for his atheism.

I don’t write this with the intent of attacking the recently deceased, but rather to underscore a point that occurred to me as I scanned through an LA Times op-ed by liberal Meghan Daum.  Her piece began:

As fans of the late Christopher Hitchens cycle through the five stages of grief, it’s interesting to see which of his opinions can still inspire the kind of anger that is unlikely to ever fade into acceptance. There are, of course, the obvious candidates: his characterization of Bill Clinton as “a rapist” or his vilification of Mother Teresa as “a fanatic, a fundamentalist, and a fraud.” There is also his oh so chivalrous shout-out to the Dixie Chicks, whom he called “fat slugs” (or “slags” or “sluts” depending on your source) despite later admitting “having not the least idea of what any of them looked like.”

I actually hadn’t realized that Christopher Hitchens was such an equal-opportunity hater.  I mean, I thought he just hated religious or Christian people like me.

You could go on and on for quite a while, actually.  Here’s Christopher Hitchens pouring hate on the Republican Party and particularly on Sarah Palin:

This is what the Republican Party has done to us this year: It has placed within reach of the Oval Office a woman who is a religious fanatic and a proud, boastful ignoramus. Those who despise science and learning are not anti-elitist. They are morally and intellectually slothful people who are secretly envious of the educated and the cultured. And those who prate of spiritual warfare and demons are not just “people of faith” but theocratic bullies. On Nov. 4, anyone who cares for the Constitution has a clear duty to repudiate this wickedness and stupidity.

And I was thinking, “So it wasn’t just Christians and religion in general he dumped hate on.

I’ve cited Christopher Hitchens in a couple of articles:

Atheists Get The MOST Angry At The God They Claim Not To Even Believe Exists

Tolerant Leftist Academia Tries To Impose ‘Thought Reform’ On Christian Student

And a frankly irrational anger and a determination to impose an agenda by force rather than by consent were the scope of both pieces.

In the immediately above piece, Hitchens is quoted:

“How can we ever know how many children had their psychological and physical lives irreparably maimed by the compulsory inculcation of faith? Religion … has always hoped to practice upon the unformed and undefended minds of the young… If religious instruction were not allowed until the child had attained the age of reason, we would be living in a quite different world.”

Ah, if we could just forcibly remove the children of those Christians and those religious nutjobs and allow the state to indoctrinate them instead, you know, like the Soviet Union or North Korea, imagine what a “different world” we could have.

It occurred to me to wonder how many hateful and vicious quotes came from the mouth or pen of Christopher Hitchens’ most obvious counterpart, Billy Graham?

I found Billy Graham saying the following despicable thing about Bill Clinton:

[audio here]

Oops, I’m sorry.  Billy didn’t actually say anything hateful about Bill Clinton.  I’m sure it was only because they were both “Bills” rather than that Billy Graham isn’t hateful, though.

Oops, Billy Graham didn’t say anything hateful about ANY Democrat candidate for president, let descriptions such as “fanatic,” “boastful,” “ignoramus,”  as “those who despise science and learning,” as “morally and intellectually slothful people,” “who are secretly envious of the educated and the cultured,” as “theocratic bullies,” and as “wickedness and stupidity.”

I mean, the sheer tolerance of Christopher Hitchens as compared to Billy Graham is really something.

I mean, maybe I’ve been wrong about which side is so really intolerant.

I did find an article from an atheist entitled, “Dear Billy Graham: You’re A Hateful Bigot,” but if you click on that hoping for ammo against Rev. Billy, you won’t get very much.  Billy’s most hateful quote, the pièce de résistance, was:

Only God can give us the moral and spiritual foundation we need for our lives. This is why the most important step you can take is to turn to Jesus Christ and commit your life to him. When you do, God will forgive your sins and make you his child forever. He also promises to be with you in the future. By a simple prayer of faith ask him to come into your life today.

Jesus, that hater!  Forgiving sins and being a child of a loving God!  Just vile Atheists like Joseph Stalin, Chairman Mao, Pol Pot and Kim Jong Il were the lovers of humanity!

Yes, Joseph Stalin was a famously tolerant and loving atheist:

“God’s not unjust, he doesn’t actually exist. We’ve been deceived. If God existed, he’d have made the world more just… I’ll lend you a book and you’ll see.”

Mao Tse Tung was an atheist who was rather famous for his care for the poor and the little people:

“Our God is none other than the masses of the Chinese people. If they stand up and dig together with us, why can’t these two mountains be cleared away?” [Mao Tse Tung, Little Red Book, “Self-Reliance and Arduous Struggle chapter 21”].

You gotta love the comparison between these great leaders of their respective movements.  I mean, Jesus said ugly things like:

“But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also” — Matthew 5:39

“But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous” — Mathew 5:44-45

“Put your sword back in its place,” Jesus said to him, “for all who draw the sword will die by the sword” — Matthew 26:52

Just naked hate from that Jesus Bigot, I know.  I can only apologize for having repeated His dark and evil teachings.

Stalin and Mao, on the other hand, offered a far more glorious perspective for the world:

When Mao infamously expressed this attitude

“The atom bomb is nothing to be afraid of,” Mao told Nehru, “China has many people. . . . The deaths of ten or twenty million people is nothing to be afraid of.” A witness said Nehru showed shock. Later, speaking in Moscow, Mao displayed yet more generosity: he boasted that he was willing to lose 300 million people, half of China’s population.” [Annie Dillard, “The Wreck of Time” in Harper’s from January 1998].

– or when Joseph Stalin was similarly quoted as having said:

“One death is a tragedy; one million is a statistic.”

Ah, well.  What can you say?  War is peace!  Freedom is slavery!  Ignorance is strength!  Jesus is hateful!  Christianity is intolerant!

There is only one name under heaven by which we can find true love and true peace, and that is the name Jesus, the Prince of Peace.

And how about that tolerant lover of those who disagree with him, Bill Maher?

Here’s Bill Maher viciously ripping on Christian quarterback Tim Tebow:

Comedian Bill Maher drew the ire of Tim Tebow fans and Christians over the weekend after a profane tweet reveling in the Broncos’ blowout loss to the Buffalo Bills.

“Wow, Jesus just f***ed #TimTebow bad! And on Xmas Eve! Somewhere … Satan is tebowing, saying to Hitler “Hey, Buffalo’s killing them,” Maher tweeted.

Tebow, whose team suffered its second straight loss after a six-game winning streak, did not respond to Maher’s tweet.

After the disappointing 40-14 road loss, Tebow tweeted, “Tough game today but what’s most important is being able to celebrate the birth of our Savior, Jesus Christ. Merry Christmas everyone GB2.”

GB2 is a phrase Tebow has made popular that means “God Bless + Go Broncos,” according to his official website.

The tweet prompted some to call for a boycott of Maher’s HBO show “Real Time with Bill Maher.”

Maher, an atheist, made a 2008 documentary called “Religulous” that mocked organized religion, and he routinely jokes about religion on his show.

More of the same from the same sort of people.

String Up Clarence Thomas? Death Threats For Sarah Palin? Liberals Continue To Prove Just How Full Of Hypocrite They Are

February 7, 2011

How many times are conservatives forced to nod their heads like cheap stadium bobble-heads while liberals constantly harangue them for being racist and for being violent?

The only problem with this picture is that all the racism and violence keeps coming almost entirely from the left.

Remember that Black Panther who intimidated Republican voters in Philadelphia, in addition to being caught on video calling for the murder of white cracker babies?  A completely racist and hypocritical system whitewashed this case and employed an explicitly racist rationale in doing so.  Career Justice Department officials resigned in protest, but the racist hypocritical propaganda could care less when good people put their careers where their mouths are.

Remember the Gabrielle Giffords shootings, when the hysterical left came emotionally unglued made Sarah Palin responsible for the shootings because she did something that liberals had been doing for years with no one blaming them for it, and in fact had even done to Gabrielle Giffords herself?  Remember how it turned out that the only threats of death and violence related to the actual situation turned out to come from a self-professing liberal (on top of the death threats that piled up against Sarah Palin)???

Now this:

NAACP won’t directly address racism leveled against Clarence Thomas at progressive protest
By Matthew Boyle – The Daily Caller | Published: 2:16 AM 02/07/2011 | Updated: 12:41 PM 02/07/2011

The NAACP won’t directly address the racism displayed by progressive protesters outside a summit hosted by billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch at the end of January in Palm Springs, Calif., but the organization did call for an end to all “vitriolic language.”

In response to The Daily Caller’s request for comment on a video showing progressive protesters calling for somebody to “string up” African American Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, or “send him back into the fields” or “cut off all his toes and feed them to him one-by-one,” NAACP spokesman Hilary Shelton pointed to the organization’s recent resolution calling for a “civil political discourse.”

“Last summer, the NAACP passed a resolution calling for a civil political discourse,” Shelton said in an e-mail to TheDC. “We continue to call on all Americans to abandon vitriolic language. It serves as a distraction from the real issues our society need to address and distorts the challenges we as Americans have to confront to make our nation greater still.”

Shelton would not, however, address the content of the video directly.

WATCH: Progressive protesters make racist remarks at rally outside conservative summit

This isn’t the only time in recent years that the NAACP has chosen not to condemn racism directed against black conservatives, according to Deneen Borelli, a fellow with the black conservative group Project 21. Borelli has called on Shelton and the NAACP to denounce racist remarks she has received as recently as last summer.

Appearing together on Fox News Channel’s “Geraldo At Large” in mid-July, Borelli asked Shelton if he and the NAACP would issue a public statement condemning racist remarks that have been directed against her.

Shelton answered her by saying, “Why, yes, ma’am. Just give us some details. The very broad answer is: Yes, we repudiate anybody calling you a bad name in the political arena.”

WATCH: NAACP spokesman tells Project 21 fellow Deneen Borelli he would denounce racist remarks against her

Borelli says she sent the evidence of the racist remarks directed against her for being a black conservative to Shelton and the NAACP in late July 2010, but the self-described “civil rights” group has yet to release any statement. Shelton, according to Borelli, hasn’t even acknowledged receiving the documentation.

One of the sample e-mails Borelli sent to Shelton reads: “You faggot niggas need to be lynched by the Klan. I pray a nightrider strings up every one of you no count good for nothing niggas, it would serve you right for trying to think that these crackers love you. I hate a house nigga worse than I do a Klansman. Rot in hell you scurvy dogs. I would laugh to see you body strung up. It would save us real brothers the time and trouble to do it.”

One liberal at the liberal protest event said Clarence’s Thomas’ toes should be chopped off one by one and force fed to him.  Nothing hateful there.

Today – and frankly for most of my lifetime – the NAACP is a racist organization.  It cares only about “liberal people,” not “colored people.”  It’s very existence is an anathema and a demand to continue racism and racist policies (just what would the NAACP say if someone were to start a “National Association for the Advancement of Caucasian People” form of “the NAACP”???).

Violence?  It is at the very shriveled soul of the left.  And it always has been.  Sarah Palin was scheduled to show up at a charity event whose proceeds were to benefit our veterans.  The result?

Palin speech honoring service members canceled due to liberal hate
February 5th, 2011 7:32 pm PT.

Thanks to an “onslaught of negative feedback”, an event featuring Sarah Palin has been canceled.

The Sharon K Pacheco Foundation announced Saturday it was canceling its 2011 Patriots & Warriors Charity Gala out of concern for the safety of former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin.

Palin was scheduled to be the keynote speaker at the event, originally set for May 2.

According to the announcement on the group’s website:

Due to an onslaught of personal attacks against Governor Palin and others associated with her appearance, it is with deep sadness and disappointment that, in the best interest of all, we cancel the event for safety concerns, says the Foundations Director. 

Leo Pacheco, founder of the organization, expressed concern for the safety of military members and their families.  “Military members and their families have been through a lot due to the wars.  We have a responsibility to protect their emotional safety just as well,” he said.

“And unfortunately, some have overshadowed the purpose of this event by concentrating on their personal hatred of Sarah Palin, which is truly sad.”

The event was designed to honor service members and those who have served and/or sacrificed for the country.

Sarah Palin hasn’t just received one or two death threats.  It’s been an avalanche that has come from hypocrites who say she’s a hater while they are totally rabid with hate:

ABC News reports death threats against Sarah Palin have reached unprecedented levels.  That’s pretty amazing, given the smear campaign the Left waged against her in 2008 when she was a vice presidential candidate.

These despicable events would have been on the pages of every newspaper and television news station in America if it weren’t for the fact that the media is so shockingly biased.  If the Tea Party had done this to a prominent black liberal or a prominent female liberal, the coverage would have been so massive and last for so long that it would remain permanently ingrained on the American psyche.  The way the media made George H.W. Bush’s “Read my lips, no new taxes” a household word but never did so when Bill Clinton – and now Barack Obama – have repeatedly made similar statements.

Because of the demonic hatred by the mass media and the left that they represent, Sarah Palin has taken a real hit in popularity.  She was victimized, and then she paid for being a victim.  The media have verbally raped Sarah Palin again and again, and then called her a slut who deserved it.  And an increasingly stupid American people eat their manure like its a delicacy.

I used to read the book of Revelation and ponder at the Bible’s statement that “the whole world would worship the beast” (Reveation 13:8).  And I couldn’t understand how the American people would actually worship a vile dictator.

Since November 2008, and with further evidences coming each and every day, I no longer ponder that.  It is obvious to me that after the Rapture of genuine believers in Jesus Christ, a wicked people of a wicked United States of America will welcome a political tyrant and actually worship him.  And then this dictator, who will promise the same sort of leftist Utopia that leftist dictators have promised since the French Revolution, will bring about instead a literal hell on earth.

And the liberals who will have welcomed this bloodbath that unfolds in the pages of the Book of Revelation won’t have Sarah Palin or Clarence Thomas to blame any more.

On Why The Left So Viscerally Despises Sarah Palin

February 7, 2011

First, the accompanying brief as I discovered it on Politicons.net:

The very sound of her name provokes reactions that run from reverence to loathing. She has become for better or worse a hopeless tangle of causes and effects. Here is a woman who carries all the symbolic freight of America’s culture war. It has become her fate to symbolize everything that some people like, and others detest about this country’s red states.

Sarah Palin has been criticized not only for her record and positions but for her intelligence, her accent, her body, her clothes and even her fitness as a mother. And all this in a time of history celebrated as progressive and forward thinking on the issues of women and power. Many of us watched as her sudden rise provoked a kind of hysteria among liberals and media elite that can only be seen to the objective eye as venomous and cutting. The vicious snobbery and breathtaking double standards will certainly have media consequences for years to come.

Now for the seven minute Youtube video via the Atheist Antidote:

Here’s the latest despicable episode in the long, long list of despicable episodes of the left vs. Sarah Palin: more death threats by the very people who incredibly call HER the hater.

“Due to an onslaught of personal attacks against Governor Palin and others associated with her appearance, it is with deep sadness and disappointment that, in the best interest of all, we cancel the event for safety concerns.”

I also thought it interesting to read about where the political usage of the term “sheep” came from and why it applies so perfectly to liberals – especially media liberals.

This notion as to how the left – particularly liberal women – just viciously tears down Sarah Palin like rabid dogs in spite of the fact that what she is at her core is just a strong, successful woman made me think of this exchange:

Kirsten Powers is an analyst for Fox News.  She is a proven liberal.  But it turns out she is no friend of the N.O.W.

During the 5 September 2008 broadcast of the Fox News program “Hannity and Colmes,” Kirsten Powers said this:

It’s not the National Organization for Women, right?  But it’s not.  It’s really the National Organization for Liberal Women.  It’s not the National Organization for Women, because she’s a woman.  And they put out a statement saying, “Not all women speak for women.  Sarah Palin doesn’t speak for women.”  Well, look; this woman, when I look at her – even if I don’t support her, you know, a lot of her policies, she is the embodiment of what feminism was all about.  She’s a mother, she’s successful, her husband helps with the children.  You know, we should be exited about this, even if you don’t support her.

Alan Colmes then said:

If you support someone just because they’re a woman, and the National Organization for Women supports anybody whose a woman,then you’re saying we’re just supporting them because they’re a woman, and you’re not being discerning at all.  So you can’t have it both ways.

And Kirsten Powers responded:

I would agree with that if they had any kind of actual moral authority, but they don’t, because they don’t ever support any women who don’t support their very narrow agenda.  So they should just rename themselves and say what they’re really for, and stop pretending like they really care about the advancement for women.

I believe it’s becoming clear that the convoluted “feminism” of the N.O.W. is in trouble.  If it dies tough, successful, intelligent and independent women like Sarah Palin and Kirsten Powers will have been the ones that killed it.

I especially liked the part of this video where you have the speaker describing liberals accusing Sarah Palin of being “a retard” and then pointing out that if they really believed that, it should clearly engender a reaction of sympathy rather than hate piled on top of hate.

I have described Sarah Palin and liberals in terms of Jesus and demons.  Whenever a demon heard the mere mention of Jesus’ name, it just came unglued.  And that’s pretty much what happens every time a liberal hears the name of Sarah Palin: she just brings the devil right out of them so that any discerning eye can see who and what these people truly are.

Now Official: Arizona Shooter Jared Loughner A Bush-Hating Liberal

January 18, 2011

One can only look at the moral and psychological insanity of the left and whistle in amazement.

The demonic left heard that a Democrat U.S. Representative had been shot (never mind that she was one of the more conservative Democrats in the House) and immediately concluded that a Republican conservative tea party member – well, make that ALL Republicans, ALL conservatives and ALL tea party members – were guilty of the crime.

Democrats IMMEDIATELY resorted to the worst kind of demonizing, hatred and lies:

Arizona State Rep. Linda Lopez – a leftwing Democrat – stated:

”the shooter is likely, from what I’ve heard, an Afghan vet..”

Why would this vile woman falsely demonize our war veterans?

All you have to do is contemplate the title of an article I wrote on April 14, 2009: “Obama Administration Says Americans Should Fear Their Combat Veterans.” The article referred to an Obama DHS memo that warned that war veterans were to be considered dangerous rightwing extremists.

But that was a lie.  Jared Loughner never served a day in the military, let alone pull a combat tour.  In fact, the Army threw him out of one of their recruiting stations when they found out he was a pothead.

But let’s see.  According to the Gallup polling:

“Support for legalizing marijuana is much lower among Republicans than it is among Democrats…”

Rep. Lopez also immediately blamed the tea party for the assassination.

Paul Krugman demonstrated that all you have to do these days to get a Nobel Prize is be a far-left liberal ideologue.  His column demonizing conservatives for the Arizona shooting was published all of 2 hours after the event.  And like everything else the man has ever said, not a single word of it was anything short of propaganda (not to forget to mention the fact that Krugman has his own documented “gale of anger” problems).

For all the vicious hate and lies from the left, what we found when we actually looked at the facts is that Jared Loughner had a grudge against Rep. Gabrielle Giffords dating back to 2007.  That grudge predated Sarah Palin; it predated the Tea Party movement; it predated the so-called “rightwing rhetoric” against Barack Obama.  And to go further, we find that, in fact, Loughner’s hatred of Rep. Giffords actually occurred during the LEFTWING hatred targeting George W. Bush and Republicans.  And we find that while Loughner nowhere in any of his writings or videos mentioned Sarah Palin, the tea party movement, ObamaCare, conservatives, or anything “right wing,” he DID repeatedly mention his über-leftwing belief that George Bush was responsible for engineering the 9/11 attacks.

So let’s set aside the circumstantial evidence that Jared Loughner was far more leftwing than he was rightwing.  Let’s set aside the fact that he was a devotee of The Communist Manifesto.  Let’s put aside the fact that “A classmate of the man accused of shooting Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords this morning describes him as ‘left wing’ and a pot head.'” Let’s put aside the fact that Loughner never listened to conservative talk radio, surfed conservative sights, or read conservative writers like Mark Levin.  Let’s even put aside the fact that Jared Loughner loved far-left conspiracy theory documentaries such as “Zeitgeist” and “Loose Change”.  In the words of a friend:

“There was a lot of talk about lucid dreaming and understanding reality. . . . And there were a lot of books and movies . . . things that I never would have heard about or watched — things like Loose Change about the 9/11 conspiracy.”

According to reviews, Zeitgeist is anti-Christian, anti-George Bush and anti-capitalism.  And I just scratch my head bleeding wondering which of the two parties would be those three things.  The plot of Loose Change can be summed up in three words” Bush did it.

Let’s put aside that Jared Loughner never bothered with rightwing stuff.  Let’s put aside that Jared Loughner filled his sick mind with leftwing stuff.

Let’s just put aside the facts which all line up to say that if Jared Loughner was anything, he was a far-left liberal loon.

And let’s just put the icing on the cake.  Was Jared Loughner a conservative or was he a liberal?  Let’s ask the liberal “newspaper of record,” a.k.a. The New York Times:

He became intrigued by antigovernment conspiracy theories, including that the Sept. 11 attacks were perpetrated by the government and that the country’s central banking system was enslaving its citizens. His anger would well up at the sight of President George W. Bush, or in discussing what he considered to be the nefarious designs of government.”

Bingo.  If The New York Slimes says it, it clearly must be true.

Jared Loughner was a liberal.

If you listen to or watch or read any source that ever once mentioned that right wing rhetoric or conservative anger or any such thing contributed to the Tucson, Arizona shooting, you are tuning in to a demonstrated source of propaganda and lies.

Every Democrat politician (and like the demons who called themselves “Legion, for we are many” in Luke 8:30, they are legion) and mainstream media figure who alluded to conservative anger in this tragedy should be forced to resign in disgrace for their disgrace of the truth.

On The So-Called Link Between ‘Rightwing’ Political Rhetoric And Violence

January 1, 2011

See my previous article, “On the Malicious Connection Between Conservatives And Hate.”

Having documented that the left’s demonization of conservative “rhetoric” was nothing more than a hypocritical and immoral attempt to politically exploit a tragedy, I would like to go a little further and examine whether the 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech should be denounced – as the Democrats have clearly tried to do in the aftermath of the Tucson shooting.

Should angry political rhetoric be suppressed?  Our founding fathers clearly didn’t think so.  And, truth be told, they freely let a fair amount of “rhetoric” fly themselves, during their day.  Furthermore, they codified that belief in the Bill of Rights.

But that isn’t the question I intend to examine.  Rather, I want to go further and ask, “Does angry political speech – call it ‘rhetoric’ if you want – lead to violence in a democracy?”

Let me repeat what I wrote when I first learned of this tragedy on Saturday, January 8:

Whoever did this terrible thing, and for whatever reason he did it, we have to be able to disagree in America without resorting to violence.  Or our entire system of government will collapse.  There can be no democratic republic in a police state.

Pray for Gabrielle Giffords.  Pray for her staff, some of whom were terribly wounded or even killed.  Pray for the safety of every single politician in America.  And especially pray for the safety of those politicians with whom you most disagree.

And later in that same article:

This event is something that should transcend the political arguments and the debate over which party should run America that constantly goes on.  Because ANY act of violence which accompanies a political statement of any kind undermines our freedom and liberty.

Because, like I said above, you cannot have a democratic republic in a police state.  And the more politically violent any group or individuals become, the more police powers become necessary to impose order.

All that to point out that I, as someone who can easily be identified by the pejorative “right winger,” would in fact NEVER call for acts of violence.  And I do not oppose political violence in spite of the fact that I am a conservative, but rather BECAUSE I am a conservative.

The fundamental tenant of political conservatism is the belief in limited government.  Conservatives are not “anti-government” any more than are leftists.  The far-leftist communists overthrew the current government in Russia in 1917; American liberals were opposed to the government of the Bush administration just a short time ago.  Conservatives don’t want NO government, but rather they want a federal government which is limited in size, sphere and power.  The debate isn’t between “pro-government” versus “anti-government,” but rather small government versus expansive government.  And my point is that as a conservative I don’t want a Big Brother state.  I don’t want the police on every corner.  I don’t want myriad laws restricting my freedoms.  I don’t want government imposing its will on me in order to “restore order” or impose “social justice.”  And frankly, if any political ideology in this country wants those things, it is the left.

I would further point out that the reason we do not need to resort to violence in our American democratic system is because we have the ability to use persuasion in place of and instead of violence.  But if you take away the ability to use persuasion to change society, all that is left is violence.

For the record, it is not conservatives, but liberals such as former SEIU president Andy Stern (among many others) – who have repeatedly said things like, “If we can’t use the power of persuasion, we will use the persuasion of power” – who have an unfortunate record of conflating persuasion with the raw exercise of “power.”

But let me go even further than that.  Let me take the most visceral political issue of all – abortion – and examine that issue in light of the possibility of rightwing violence.

Let me state my position on abortion clearly: it is nothing short of murder.  It is the unjustified killing of an innocent human being.

When President Obama gave his speech at the memorial service in Tucson, which shooting victim did he single out for the greatest attention?  It wasn’t Rep. Gabrielle Giffords; it was the youngest victim, nine year-old Christina Taylor.  What did Obama say?  “I want America to be as good as she imagined it.”

For someone who is pro-life, it is no surprise that the president would have focused on the youngest victim.  Because 9 year-old Christina had so much unrealized potential, so many dreams that would never be fulfilled, so much life that was taken away from her.  And it is precisely that deprivation of potential that makes her death so much more tragic and heart-wrenching than the 79 year-old victim – whose murder was obviously also a tragedy.

Allow me to consider the fifty-three MILLION innocent human beings who likewise should have had their entire lives ahead of them but instead had their lives violently and ruthlessly snuffed out.  Entire lifetimes of limitless human potential were ripped and dissolved away with surgical scissors and saline solutions.

Let me say even more: Adolf Hitler treated six million Jews as being “less than human” and ruthlessly exterminated them.  One of the greatest monsters in human history, and he is only one-NINTH as murderous as the Democrat Party in the United States of America.  There’s a term the Nazis used – Lebensunwertes Leben (“a life unworthy to be lived”) – that with all due respect is every bit as much an ideology of the Democrat Party as it was of the Nazi Party.

I think of Democrats who call themselves “Christians” celebrating Mary the Mother of Jesus’ “right to choose” to kill “the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29) in her womb, and I want to puke.  Your theology would murder Jesus in His mother’s womb; your “god” is abortion.

And I believe that one day Democrats will stand before a just and holy God, Who will send them to burn in hell for voting in election after election for untold millions of the most innocent of all human beings to be slaughtered for the sake of convenience.

I agree.  These are pretty strong words.  And yeah, they’re harsh.  Truth isn’t always warm and fuzzy.

And yet I’ve never killed anyone, or ever even once advocated the killing of anyone, who was pro-abortion.

Do you want to know why?

I earlier mentioned Adolf Hitler.  Let me return to him now for a thought experiment that will help me make my point.

Suppose that I could go back in time and assassinate Adolf Hitler.  Would I do it?

Well, first let me ask, would you do it?  Take a moment and think about it before reading any further.

My answer is yes, I believe I would do so.  I believe that I would kill Adolf Hitler.  Not for sake of revenge; but for the sake of all living things.  I would kill Adolf Hitler to save millions of human lives and prevent human misery and suffering beyond imagination.

Ah, you say.  So why not apply that reasoning to abortion doctors, and prevent the murders of untold babies?  Wouldn’t that be consistent?

And I would answer no, it isn’t.  Because in the case of Adolf Hitler, we have the benefit of 100%, 20/2o hindsight.  We have the record of Hitler’s entire life.  We know what he did, and we know what he intended to continue to do.

Now consider abortion doctor George Tiller, aka “Tiller the baby killer.”  He was murdered – in a church, no less – by someone who said that “preborn children’s lives were in imminent danger.”  And yet it is important to recognize that the pro-life movement immediately denounced the murder.

Let me tell you what I don’t know about George Tiller’s life that I did know about Adolf Hitler’s life.

Just like every single one of those fifty-three million innocent human beings who were murdered in abortion mills, I don’t know what George Tiller’s future would have been.

Would George Tiller have changed his beliefs on abortion if he hadn’t been murdered?  It certainly isn’t impossible that he would have.  Take the case of former head abortion nurse and former active member of N.O.W. Joan Appleton.

What would have happened if had I killed Joan Appleton while she was still performing abortions?

Think of the potential for good that she has since done with her life that would have been snuffed out.

And, neither I or the murderer of George Tiller or anyone else knows what would have happened in George Tiller’s life had he not been murdered.  Imagine the testimony that the world could have heard had the most notorious abortion doctor in the country come out condemning abortion.

In point of fact, the man who murdered George Tiller in his moral ignorance committed the very same crime that abortionists commit which makes abortion so evil; he failed to consider the very essence of what he professed to stand for.

In effect, George Tiller’s murderer committed a retroactive abortion.  He put aside Tiller’s humanity, personhood and Imago Dei; he dismissed Tiller’s “right to life”; he ignored Tiller’s “potential.”  And he killed him.

Paradoxially, all the murderer of George Tiller did – condemned as he was by the pro-abortion movement – was use the exact same mindset that the abortion movement employs every single day.

I point out in a previous article:

And there really is no doubt, once we truly consider the issues. Ever hear the argument that fetuses aren’t human beings, so it’s okay to kill them? Think again. Both science and logic assure us that – from the moment of conception – that thing in the womb of a human mother is fully a human being. Take a moment and consider the taxonomic system by which every living thing is rigorously categorized and classified. By that system a human embryo is of the kingdom Anamalia, of the phylum Chordata, of the class Mammalia, of the order Primate, of the family Pongidae, of the genus Homo, and of the species Sapiens – same as any other human being. Put even more simply, that embryo is a human by virtue of its parents, and a being by the fact that it is a living thing: it is a human being.

I’ve heard the Nazi argument that Jews weren’t human beings.  I’ve heard the argument that unborn babies aren’t human beings.  Wrong, and wrong.

I’ve heard the declaration that conservatives such as Dick Cheney and Michelle Bauchmann don’t deserve to live.  I’ve heard the declaration that babies growing up in their mothers’ wombs don’t deserve to live.  Wrong, and wrong.

So, yes, I will be a voice crying out in the wilderness about the vicious evil of abortion.  I will cry out in despair about the tragedy of millions upon millions of little Christina Taylors who were eradicated as if they were diseases before they got any chance to live out the potential that they should have had.  But I won’t kill.  Because I believe in human life.

Governments have what St. Paul described as the power of the sword to carry out justice (see Romans 13:1-4).  But I, acting on my own authority, don’t have the right of either vengeance or vigilantism.  Because vengeance is not mine; and because justice for criminals is not mine to carry out.  It is for God and for the governments which He has ordained on this earth to carry out those tasks.

Let me now also say that there is no connection in a healthy mind, in a healthy society, between rhetoric and violence.  None whatsoever.

And what of an unhealthy mind?

I made the point in a previous article that I once had a mentally ill woman literally come unglued on me as I held a sign that merely said, “YARD SALE.”  And I concluded then what I point out here: that if we’re going to ban or condemn “angry political rhetoric” for its possible effects upon sick minds, we’re going to have to condemn far more than just political speech.  Because literally anything can set off a sick mind.  Even a yard sale becomes dangerous.

If we banish everything that could set off a diseased mind, we necessarily must become the Big Brother totalitarian state which I earlier described fearing.  Because what couldn’t set off such a mind, which would then mean what sphere of life would the government not need to control?

I believe that I have explained why a consistent conservative would never employ violence to advance a political cause.  I also believe I have done so by employing a worldview and an argument that Democrats not only don’t acknowledge, but frankly don’t even understand.

Which is why it is the political left – and not the political right – which has been responsible for the overwhelming majority of global political violence.  Whether it be Marxist or Maoist communist socialist violence or Nazi fascist socialist violence, whether it be union violence, or whether it be radical group violence (in the 1960s the FBI nearly exclusively identified leftwing groups as being violent even throughout Democrat administrations).  The political hatred and violence that we have seen has almost invariably been leftwing.

[For those who would like to see more regarding the relationship between Nazism and the political left, see my article on the connection between leftist thought and fascism; please see my comment on the connection between “fascism” and American liberalism, and see my articles on the connection between postmodernism and fascism here and see also here, especially before you post a comment trying to argue with me].

So it is long past time for liberals to stop denouncing conservatives and finally turn their examination upon themselves.

New Jersey Teachers’ Unions Show They Like Communism More Than Common Sense

May 30, 2010

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is showing he is even more fearless and determined to fulfill his promises than he is rotund.

Liberals – the demagogues and haters in this country – are relying on a vicious ad hominem campaign of hate over Christie’s weight because mean-spirited hate and ad hominem demagogic rhetoric is all they’ve got.

Big blunder cost New Jersey teachers years of goodwill
By Kevin Manahan
May 27, 2010, 5:05AM

My father spent nearly his entire career in public relations at AT&T, so he was always dispensing advice on how to handle personal crises, big and small. And when I would come home from my high school job of stocking shelves at King’s Supermarket, complaining about some ungracious customer, he would remind me:

“AT&T spends millions of dollars trying to shape the public’s opinion of us, but it takes only one rude telephone operator to flush all that money and ruin all of my hard work. The same thing could happen at King’s.”

His lesson was clear: One bad decision, one stupid miscalculation, can wreck years of good will.

Which brings us to the New Jersey Education Association.

In an astonishing fall from grace that has taken only months, teachers have gone from respected and beloved members of the community to some of the most reviled. In a blink, they have trashed years of good will.

Once the patient darlings who nurtured our kids, teachers now look like insensitive, out-of-touch, can’t-think-for-themselves union robots who, when forced to face economic realities, clung to an insulting sense of entitlement, heartlessly sacrificed the jobs of colleagues, called the governor naughty names and used students as political pawns.

All while blaming everyone else.

At Saturday’s rally in Trenton, teachers wondered when the Earth started spinning in the other direction.

“It’s like we woke up one morning and the world had changed,” said Linda Mirabelli, a music teacher in Livingston. “We were liked and respected, and now, overnight, people have turned against us.”

How did it happen? That’s easy: One bad decision, one stupid miscalculation: An overwhelming majority of teachers refused to accept a pay freeze. They could have won taxpayers’ eternal gratitude, but instead demanded their negotiated raises and fought against contributing a dime toward budget-breaking health insurance benefits. Teachers could have pitched in, but they dug in.

They thumbed their noses at taxpayers, who have lost their jobs, had their pay cut, gone bankrupt and fallen into foreclosure. As taxpayers made less, teachers demanded more. You do that, you become a villain. Fast. It doesn’t matter how many stars Junior gets on his book report.

Teachers listened to their overpaid brain trust, the architects of this disastrous public relations strategy. Together, NJEA president Barbara Keshishian, executive director Vincent Giordano and spokesman Steve Wollmer earn more than a million dollars. Keshishian, who has been outmaneuvered by the governor at every turn, earns $256,450 annually. Giordano, with salary and deferred compensation, earned $550,203 in 2009, and Wollmer makes $300,000.

Who says you get what you pay for? Union members are shelling out a lot of money for lousy representation. They should stage a coup. Instead they joined hands at Saturday’s You-And-Me-Against-The-World rally and tried to convince each other they’re doing the right thing.

To compound the troubles, the NJEA does something stupid almost every day. They insult the governor; teachers (and administrators) let kids walk out of class to protest cuts in aid; union members refuse to give up their seats to private-school students at a hearing in Trenton.

And now the NJEA is now running TV commercials, attacking Christie (again), this time using cops and firemen for cover, hoping the public still likes those guys. The firefighters union, realizing the teachers union is now toxic, says it never would have approved the commercial, but the NJEA never asked.

NJEA leadership should have seen the backlash coming. Tenure, raises, pensions, health care benefits and an aversion toward merit pay have irked taxpayers for years. The recession ignited that anger, and no last-gasp advertising blitz will change the perception of insensitive teachers who told taxpayers to eat chalk.

So, the question is: Was it worth it?

The average public school teacher makes $63,000, and the average raise this year was roughly 4 percent, so teachers traded $2,520 for these scars, which never will heal. And because Christie and taxpayers asked only for a one-year pay freeze, it’s money teachers could have recovered next year.

Imagine how differently teachers would be perceived today if they had agreed to a pay freeze and willingly offered a few bucks toward their health policies. They’d be heroes.

Heck, we would have staged a rally for them.

Kevin Manahan is a member of the Star-Ledger editorial board.

Want to hear how the public school teachers are responding to being asked to show some responsibility to a massive financial crisis that is threatening their state with bankruptcy?  Want to see how mature and tolerant they are?

Teachers Call Christie ‘Fat F**k,’ ‘A**hole’ On Facebook
GEOFF MULVIHILL | 04/19/10 09:43 PM

HADDONFIELD, N.J. — They’re the kind of obscenity-laced schoolyard taunts that could get a student suspended.

But the target of this tirade is New Jersey’s Gov. Chris Christie – and the perpetrators are the state’s teachers, irate over his calls for salary freezes and funding cuts for schools.

In Facebook messages visible to the world – not to mention their students – the teachers have called Christie fat, compared him to a genocidal dictator and wished he was dead. The postings are often riddled with bad grammar and misspellings.

“Never trust a fat f…,” read one profane post on the Facebook page, “New Jersey Teachers United Against Governor Chris Christie’s Pay Freeze,” which has some 69,000 fans, many of them teachers.

“How do you spell A– hole? C-H-R-I-S C-H-R-I-S-T-I-E,” read another.

The rhetoric has become ever more heated as residents of most of the state’s school districts get ready to vote Tuesday on property tax levies that support district budgets. And while many of the postings are emotional, most aren’t personal attacks.

Christie, a first-year Republican governor who inherited a state in dire financial straits, wants voters to reject the proposals in districts where educators won’t agree to salary freezes for the coming school year.

The acrimony intensified last month when Christie proposed cutting state and federal aid to districts by 11 percent, calling it a way to share sacrifice as the state tries to rein in spending.

That’s when the Facebook attacks really took off. […]

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: these are the loathsome, dishonest hypocrites who have repeatedly attacked the tea party people as being hateful bigots.  When THEY’RE the hateful bigots.

How about praying for Governor Christie to die?

TRENTON, N.J. — A teacher union’s memo hinting that New Jersey’s governor should die has escalated a war of words in a state already squabbling about public schools and how much they cost.

The memo from the Bergen County Education Association to its locals reads in part: “Dear Lord this year you have taken away my favorite actor, Patrick Swayze, my favorite actress, Farrah Fawcett, my favorite singer, Michael Jackson, and my favorite salesman, Billy Mays. I just wanted to let you know that Chris Christie is my favorite governor.”

Christie doesn’t care.  He knows these people are vile, loathsome, and hateful, and that they are selfish, greedy, little Marxist commissars who demand that the system keep paying them top benefits in their cushy 180-day-a-year jobs even as the people reel from high taxes and unemployment.

Here’s Christie on video confronting a teacher.  It’s edited for mainline media news consumption, but Christie still manages to shine through:

I love that exchange.  Teacher: “Bitch bitch bitch, whine whine whine.”  Christie: “Then quit.”

Politico has a brief write-up of the encounter:

New Jersey GOP Gov. Chris Christie told a disgruntled teacher that if she doesn’t like the pay, she doesn’t “have to do it.”

Christie was speaking to a small crowd in a church gymnasium in Rutherford on Tuesday when the Bergen County Record caught the exchange between Kearny teacher Rita Wilson and the governor.

Wilson claimed that if she were getting paid only three dollars an hour for the 30 students she teaches, her salary would be $83,000 a year, a much higher sum than her current take.

“You’re getting more than that if you include the cost of your benefits,” Christie pointed out.

The teacher responded by saying that she has a master’s degree and that her current salary isn’t compensating her for the value of her higher education as well as her experience.

To that, the governor responded: “Well, you know then that you don’t have to do it.

What doesn’t come out of this exchange is something that Chris Christie couldn’t have known: that Rutherford teacher Rita O’Neil Wilson actually makes $86,389 a year for her 180-day-a-year job, according to the records.  Like all liberals, she lied.  Like all liberals, she couldn’t even come up with an example that actually worked to attack the already-way-too-generous system.

Stop and think about this teacher’s demented, pathologically entitlement-minded demand for $3 an hour per student.  Where in the world does this “$3 an hour per child” mentality come from???  Say that she were teaching 15 students, and then started teaching thirty: did she actually double her work load?  Does she now spend twice the time preparing her lessons?  Of course not.  This woman is making $86,000 a year for a 180-day-a-year job.  And she thinks she should collect more because of some $3 an hour per kid figure some liberal loon pulled out of her butt?  I don’t think so.

But I’d take her up on her offer and have her teach just ONE kid at $3 an hour.  Because if you should get $3 an hour for thirty kids, you should get $4 an hour for one kid.  And that way she’d only get to destroy only one kid’s life through her socialist indoctrination.  Maybe after she left New Jersey could hire a less whiny and less self-centered teacher in her place, who would actually be delighted to teach children 180 days a year for over $86 grand.

Whether America crashes and burns into a failed socialist hellhole, or whether we’re able to pull ourselves up out of a mountain of debt, is up to whether people like union teachers or Chris Christie win the day.