Posts Tagged ‘hypocrisy’

Why Liberals And Democrats And The USA They Infest Should Be Subjugated And Enslaved According To Their Own Worldview.

June 6, 2017

Chelsea Clinton is the Great White Hope of the Democratic Party.  You can see that the way the liberal establishment keeps giving her award after award for doing nothing, much the same way they kept promoting and elevating Hillary Clinton for being married to Bill.  Bill was elected Attorney General of Arkansas where he could molest women with the help of State troopers, and the Rose Law firm rather mysteriously first found it expedient to hire a woman who had flunked her first bar exam as their very first female associate and then to just as mysteriously decide to make a lawyer with virtually no legal experience a full partner after Bill got elected Governor.  It’s also just a coincidence that Bill was elected Attorney General in November of 1976 and Hillary was hired by the Rose Law Firm less than a month after Bill assumed office in February 1977.  Just as it was just a coincidence that Bill was elected Governor of Arkansas in 1979 and Hillary suddenly became a senior partner of the firm in 1979.  Yes, leftist boys and girls.  It’s true.  Your Uber Woman is not the ultimate example of wonderfulness you believe: she flunked her exam.  The whole legal system had to degrade for her to pass the dang test.  But somehow there wasn’t a woman on the planet more capable than Hillary.  Either that or it was naked political bribery as a firm hires a wife to curry favor with an attorney general husband.  One or the other, and I very much think it’s obvious it’s the other.  So okay, it WASN’T a coincidence: every damn thing she did was derivative from her husband’s success.  And this pattern has been true Hillary Clinton’s entire without-her-husband-to-hang-on-to-nothing-burger career.

But what a feminist heroine, this woman who stayed by her man no matter how much he humiliated her.  In 1992, she had her “You know, I’m not sitting here, some little woman standing by my man like Tammy Wynette” line.  Only oh-yes-she-WAS “standing by her man” because her man was her meal ticket.  Only Tammy Wynette NEVER would have stood by a pathological lump of crap husband the way Hillary did to suck like a parasitic leach off of his career.  Because liberal feminism stands for feces and not much else.   And that’s the same hypocrite rationalizing process that feminists today have toward the Islamism that seeks to enslave them like no other ideology on the face of the earth but they support it anyway.

But enough of that sick-of-all-the-damn-lies rant about how Trump is an idiot and Hillary is this accomplished genius.  I shall proceed to move on to another fact and rant about that.

Our mainstream media is dominated by “reporters” like the “objective journalist” who publicly offered to give Bill Clinton a blowjob for keeping abortion legal.  Again, this was and still is a “journalist.”  Nina Burleigh is still out there “reporting” the news, folks.  It’s her way of getting on her knees and performing her function for Bill and all the elite white men like Bill.  Because THAT’S the true spirit of “feminism.”  And feminists are only too willing to betray womanhood, motherhood and femininity just for the “right” to murder that baby who depends for survival on the basic humanity and decency that you don’t have any of.

Based on how the news media is “reporting the news” (I call it “perverting the news”), fully 89% of “journalists” would gladly get on their knees and hungrily give Bill Clinton that blowjob.  And Harvard says it’s actually over 90%.  Because these people are warped and biased and have utterly and completely betrayed any sense of objective journalism.  They are using their jobs the same way Joseph Goebbels used his job, as propagandists rather than reporters.

Because it is the nature of liberalism to stand for nothing transcendent or objectively true or good or valuable.  They stand for the pursuit of fascist power and the ability to dominate others by government fiat, and for nothing else.

And in a long pattern of abject liberal hypocrisy, the Clinton Foundation just shut off the lights on their “charity” that was NOTHING but a political favors-for-funds operation based on the political power and influence of the Clinton brand.  Conservatives were screaming it for YEARS and the mainstream media just yawned and yawned, but the moment Hillary got destroyed by Donald Trump, all of a sudden all the wealthy people and human-rights-abusing dictatorships that were giving the Clintons BILLIONS suddenly shut down the “charitable donations.”  Oh, I know what you’ll say, liberal: it was just a coincidence that the whole operation shut down after Hillary lost; no “pay-for-play” here.  I mean, the honest, objective mainstream media would have reported that story and screamed about it for five months the way they’ve gone after Trump, right???  Oh, wrong.

And so now Trump tries to form a coalition to deal with the evil of our time – and that evil is Islamic terrorism – and all of a sudden the same liberal media that couldn’t have given less of a damn when Obama gave BILLIONS to dictatorship Iran, with Hillary and Bill receiving $100 million from human-rights and women’s-rights oppressing regimes – are all of a sudden aghast and appalled that Donald Trump would go to Saudi Arabia and try to get fifty Islamic Sunni states to join him in the fight on terror.  And dang I remember how silent they all were when the Clintons were raking in giant loads of cash from the same and even WORSE regimes.  Oh, and they’re butthurt about Russia having conveniently forgotten about all those deals the Clintons made with Russia and various Russian power-players.  These “reporters” are so far beneath “despicable” it’s beyond unreal.

We got the Anderson Cooper eyeroll to the point where the man’s pupils disappeared into his empty skull.

Here’s another “journalist who would gladly give Bill Clinton a blowjob, fwiw.  And had a conservative-minded journalist done that to Valerie Jarret, it would have instantly been decried as “sexist.”

Is it any surprise whatsoever that such a turd would host a program with a vile terrorist shrew like Kathy Griffen???

And oh, we find that this is a common point of view for CNN hosts.  That and eating human brains.

Liberals are rattlesnakes.  They are utterly incapable of any “charitable” instinct whatsoever.  They gave the Clintons billions which the Clintons set up as a front and siphoned funds at will, and that well kept flowing until the Clintons suddenly had all of their political clout taken away.

Because ultimately liberalism stands for NOTHING but the pursuit of raw power and the ability to shape and control people in their image and for nothing else.

You hypocrites.

So we get to Chelsea.  You need to understand: if there exists in this world a poster child for generational white-power privilege, Chelsea is the “It girl.”

This “feminist” who never did one damned thing for herself once famously said in the quintessential morally-self-unaware self-congratulation, “I was curious if I could care about [money] on some fundamental level, and I couldn’t.”

I was curious if Chelsea would be able to pass up the six-hundred-thousand-dollar-a-year “media” job from leftist NBC where she didn’t even have to bother to show up to get paid.  But she couldn’t.

On the liberal diatribe, that $600,000 could have gone to feeding the poor!  But liberals have never given one flying damn about the poor.

So they’ve given this chick who has produced NOTHING in her life that wasn’t derivative from her daddy’s political clout.

Because that’s liberalism.  To put it in Shakespearean terms: much ado about nothing.

But that hasn’t stopped the liberal establishment – which speaks about the poor from the vantage point of looking down upon the poor like interesting insects with telescopes from high lofty towers in media, in Hollywood, in entertainment, in both Washington and Wall Street, in academia – from giving Chelsea award after award.  Because she is the Great White Hope.

So what does she say that is a simple demonstration that liberals deserve to be subjugated and dominated and destroyed by their very own standards applied against them???

This:

Chelsea Clinton hasn’t won a lifetime achievement award in several weeks, but that doesn’t mean she’s off the speaking circuit. The Presidential progeny has been out promoting her children’s book about her mother, She Persisted, and Monday appeared at the annual conference for Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere (CARE).

Needless to say, the “activist, thought leader and change agent” as she was described in the program’s agenda,  had a number of worthwhile contributions to the discussion, which centered around empowering the oppressed—something with which the heir to the Clinton legacy has little practical experience.

Her advice to the legions of underprivileged women looking to affect change on a community level wasn’t particularly scintillating—”we have to always start by listening and calling out and giving a platform, and encouraging, particularly, those who are and have been structurally dis-empowered”—but the disgruntled Chelsea had some harsh words for those who don’t share her progressive ideology.

They should be silenced if they don’t agree with Chelsea Clinton.

“I think though that we also have to recognize particularly at this moment that sexism is not an opinion, Islamophobia is not an opinion, racism is not an opinion, homophobia is not an opinion, jingoism is not an opinion,” she told the panel.  

This appears to mean Chelsea doesn’t believe people who she considers racist, sexist, homophobic or Islamophobic—which could be practically anyone moderate-to-right-of-center lacks the basic right to speak their minds.

That could, of course, include her own parents who, at one time, were virulently opposed to the practice of gay marriage, were instrumental in implementing the bizarre “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy that kept gays from open service in the military, who spoke strongly against Islamic fundamentalism, and who once labeled a class of criminal, “super-predators.”

Her thoughts didn’t end there. Asked to comment on “global poverty,” Clinton suggested that climate change and global warming were somehow “interconnected” with child marriage, a practice performed mostly in the Eastern world, and mostly the result of backwards cultural norms, not rising ocean tides and extreme temperature.

Fortunately for Chelsea, CARE is a decidedly progressive organization, that prides itself on encouraging foreign aid and wealth redistribution in the name of social justice, so they didn’t ask too many questions.

These words are amazing: “We also have to recognize particularly at this moment that sexism is not an opinion. Islamophobia is not an opinion. Racism is not an opinion.  Homophobia is not an opinion.  Jingoism is not an opinion.”

Because let me just slightly alter them and let’s see what we get:

“We also have to recognize particularly at this moment that anything that in any way, shape or form contradicts the message of Prophet – blessings be upon him! – is not an opinion.  Refusal to follow peace by submission to Allah is not an opinion.  Disobedience to the caliphate is not an opinion.  Anything that contradicts sharia is not an opinion.”

Islam has the right to attack us, to kill us, to dominate us, to subjugate us.  And the most powerful “opinion” for that innate right does not come from the Qur’an, or from the Ahaddith.  No, it comes from the worldview of liberalism as it is being expressed right now today by Democrats, by liberals in the media, in entertainment culture, in academia and even in the halls of science.

They have the same right to declare that everything America stands for is “not an opinion.”  Not to be listened to.  Not to be acknowledged.  Not to be refuted or even rebutted.

If liberalism and the secular humanism that liberalism is based upon is all we have, we should perish and we most assuredly WILL perish.

We are teaching our children not to tolerate anything they do not want to hear.  We are encouraging them to violently refuse to tolerate anything they do not want to hear.

And I know about a system that does an even better job with violence and intolerance.  It’s called “Islamic jihadism.”

And when they come and blow you up until they have enough power to stand over you bound-and-helpless and saw your heads off with a knife because what you stand for “is not an opinion,” well don’t come crying to me.  Because all that is is your own view coming right back to saw your damn stupid demon-possessed head off and it is nothing more.

Let me try to explain something: liberalism is a posture of standing upon nothing with feet firmly planted in midair.  It is the assertion that they alone possess objective truth when these very same people have spent DECADES undermining that anything called objective truth even exists.

“Foundationalism” is a theory of knowledge seeking the answer to the question, “Can human beings know that something, anything is really true?”  And there are all kinds of reductionism- and minimalism-based experiments that would disprove that we in fact can even theoretically know anything is “objectively true.”  Because according to their thinking, we are purely subjective beings to begin with.  We are mere evolutionary animals, and as such products of a completely random, purposeless, valueless descent from the moment the cold, unthinking, unfeeling universe spat our mindless ancestors into existence until the same cold, unthinking, unfeeling universe swallows us all back up again and there is nothing remaining of human civilization but cold, lifeless space.  There ARE no “foundations” for truth, these people have assured us for decades: only cultural determinism (which WE determine!); only the apotheosis of nature (ignoring the fact that “nature” understood this way ought to produce what is commonly called “social Darwinism” where we CRUSH the poor and the weak and the sick as unfit rather than give them welfare for life); only power reductionism where we consider ONLY the aspects of “power” that we want to see and ignore everything else; and above all the project to deny objective, transcendent meaning and value in ever more sophisticated ways.

Foundationalism ultimately rests upon one truth: human beings CAN know truth because a truth-knowing God created us in His image to be able to know the truth, and to be set free by it.

That USED to be what our society and our culture believed.  Which is why our Central Intelligence Agency actually inscribed in their main lobby a passage of Scripture from Jesus in John 8:32 that “characterizes the intelligence mission in a free society“: “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

From free at last to free no more.

Freedom “is not an opinion.”  So shut it down.  Scream it down.  Burn it down.  And Democrats have done precisely that well over a hundred times all across the country just in the last few months.

A foundationalist believes in the correspondence theory of truth, which is this: “the correspondence theory of truth says that a proposition is true just in case it corresponds to reality, when what it asserts to be the case is the case. More generally, truth obtains when a truth bearer stands in an appropriate correspondence relation to a truth maker.”

Democrats are postmodern and anti-foundationalist.  Which means the denial of the correspondence theory, “claiming that truth is simply a contingent creation of language which expresses customs, emotions, and values embedded in a community’s linguistic practices. For the postmodernist, if one claims to have the truth in the correspondence sense, this assertion is a power move that victimizes those judged not to have the truth.”

At least until, of course, THEY can be the ones in power victimizing everyone else as not being able to have the right to even have a damn OPINION.

Years back, as I saw the horror that would be the Obama presidency, as I saw that true intellectual and moral cancer that was enveloping the Democratic Party through his ascension, I wrote three articles:

How Postmodernism Leads To Fascism (part 1)

How Postmodernism Leads To Fascism (part 2)

How Postmodernism Leads To Fascism (part 3)

And no one who sees the Democratic Party and the mainstream media that serves as its propagandist arm, along with the entertainment industry, the academic industry, etc. etc., psychologically unravelling into unhinged lunatic hysteria over the Donald Trump presidency can deny that I did not spake as a prophet in those articles.  Because everything I said would happen is now happening times about a thousand.

And so the same people who would have been self-righteous in holy anger had George W. Bush gone to Europe to undermine President Barack Obama as he went on his first foreign trip of his presidency to visit NATO headquarters are hypocritically lavishing praise on Barack Obama for doing that very thing to Donald Trump.

So Obama – a man personally responsible for a one-thousand-nine-hundred percent increase in terrorist-caused deaths since he took over the presidency – is the living embodiment of saying, “Peace, peace, when there IS no peace.”

Obama’s worldview has bathed the world in blood.  And this coward now says that cowardice is “courage.”  When no, it was the weak, pompous dithering of a pathetically stupid man who lied to the American people and caused his intelligence system under his control to feed the media lies to hide his failures.

And so in the aftermath of the cosmic failure that was Obama, the Department of Homeland Security chief is saying, “If you knew what I know about terror, you’d never leave the house.”

The Europeans know terror full damn well, as a necessary result of their multi-culturalism was the commission of suicide by inviting in people who wanted to dance in their blood as they metastasized their caliphate over the bodies of a people and a culture too stupid and too pathetic and too cowardly and just too damn smug to comprehend what they were doing.

I cited an essay above by J.P. Moreland (a former professor of mine, fwiw) as an expert in the difference between foundationalism and postmodernism.  And I just finished pointing out the nihilist doom the politically correct Postmodern and anti-foundationalist mindset that has overtaken Europe.  So let me end as Moreland ends:

In her provocative book entitled Longing to Know, Ester Meek asserts that humans as knowers exercise a profound responsibility to submit to the authoritative dictates of reality. Thus, “It is not responsible to deny objective truth and reality in knowing; it is irresponsible. It is not responsible to make the human knower or community of knowers the arbiters of a private truth and reality; it is irresponsible.” Again, Meek claims that “Good, responsible knowing brings blessing, shalom; irresponsible knowing brings curse.” In another place Meek warns that “…the kind of freedom implied by the thought that we humans completely determine our reality leaves us with a gnawing sense of the relative insignificance of our choices. I think it leads not to total responsibility but to careless irresponsibility, both with regard to ourselves and with regard to other humans, not to mention to the world. And, paradoxically, it leads not to a deeper sense of [communal or individual] identity and dignity but to a disheartening lack of it.” […]
Meek goes on to point out that the achieving of knowledge and the teaching of it as knowledge “…calls for courageous resolve. And this courageous resolve, when proven true, merits the deep admiration of others.” The need for such courage is especially grave today as we labor in an intellectual milieu in which the worldviews of naturalism and postmodernism both entail that there is no non-empirical knowledge, especially no religious or ethical knowledge.
Faced with such opposition and the pressure it brings, postmodernism is a form of intellectual pacifism that, at the end of the day, recommends backgammon while the barbarians are at the gate. It is the easy, cowardly way out that removes the pressure to engage alternative conceptual schemes, to be different, to risk ridicule, to take a stand outside the gate. But it is precisely as disciples of Christ, even more, as officers in His army, that the pacifist way out is simply not an option. However comforting it may be, postmodernism is the cure that kills the patient, the military strategy that concedes defeat before the first shot is fired, the ideology that undermines its own claims to allegiance. And it is an immoral, coward’s way out that is not worthy of a movement born out of the martyrs’ blood.
And yes, that’s EXACTLY what the secular humanist, postmodernist left has done for decades.  They have attacked the sacred and left us with nothing but the profane.  They have undermined our culture with their pretensions of truth-denying postmodernism and value-and-meaning-denying existentialism.  We are left with our feet firmly planted in midair, with no foundation to provide us with any footing.  And that’s why terrorism skyrocketed by one-thousand, nine-hundred percent under Obama’s catastrophically failed presidency.  We WON the in Iraq and had Islamic terrorists on the run – al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula stated in transmissions “We are defeated.  Don’t send any more foreign fighters.”  And Obama managed to steal defeat from the jaws of victory.  We needed courageous moral leadership and Obama gave us red lines that he backed down from over and over again.  Even Obama’s own Secretary of State acknowledged that Obama’s display of weakness “cost us significantly” by leading other nations to see America as WEAK.  We needed a commander-in-chief and we got Obama instead, who issued incredibly restrictive rules of engagement that literally murdered our troops.  And made it impossible to even fight, let alone win.
Obama is a fool because he is a liberal, and liberals believe in foolishness.  Liberals declared war on God and therefore war on truth.  And now these very hypocrite fools who declared that there IS no “truth” are now purporting themselves to be the ONLY way, the ONLY truth and the ONLY life.  And so they have waged war on the followers of Christ.
I want you to understand so I keep repeating this point: if evolution is all there is there IS no good that we should aspire to.  Rather, we ought to be watching Nat Geo Wild and trying to outdo the lions and the hyenas in predation upon ANY organism including our next-door-neighbors who are in any way sick or weak or unfit.  Because that IS nature; that IS life “under the sun,” as the Book of Ecclesiastes puts it.  And ONLY when we realize – and realize as a matter of official government policy as our founding fathers did and oh-yes-they-DID recognize that we were created in God’s image and as a result and ONLY as a result endowed with inalienable rights by our Creator – that there IS a GOD who CREATED us in HIS image and ONLY as a result of that Imago Dei are we are all precious.  If not, kill the weak rather than giving them welfare and be done with it.  But otherwise, humanity needs an enema and it needs to begin by flushing all secular humanism out of our collective colon.  Because it is moral fecal matter that leads to intellectual fecal matter such that the more degrees someone has today, the stupider they have become.  See Colossians 2:8: “Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ.”
I continue to remain appalled that the liberal witches on the view actually claimed that Christians – the primary victims of Islamic State horror – are “no different from the Taliban” because we believe in a God who loves us and gave His very life for us so we could be with Him and live like Him when all they believe in is crocodiles and a savage nature that does nothing but hate and kill.
It is simply a genuine fact that while not every Muslim is a terrorist, virtually every terrorist attack today is committed by a MUSLIM.  But like the fact that the emperor happens to be completely naked believing he’s wearing beautiful fashion because he’s a fool, the left is pathologically hell-bent on being oblivious to reality.
In Europe, which the American left dreams we would become because they vastly prefer Hitler’s and Stalin’s to George Washington’s and our founding fathers’ values, political correctness which emerges from postmodernism has become a death pact.  With liberalism, we don’t have “lone wolves,” we have “KNOWN wolves.”  We know who these people are and we know what beliefs motivate them to not only homicide but the intent to commit genocide.  We know over and over again EXACTLY who these people are.  But we can’t do anything about it because the left won’t let us do anything about it.  They can even appear on our television programs and tell us they want to kill us.  And the left demands that we keep importing more and more of them into our countries, importing thousands of them, tens of thousands of them, hundreds of thousands of them.  And ANY attempt to staunch that flood is “racist” or “Islamophobic.”  It requires 20 highly-trained intelligence agents to monitor just ONE terror suspect and there are now TENS OF THOUSANDS of terror suspects.
Terrorists and liberals want the same basic thing: totalitarian control.  And frankly Kathy Griffin let the head out of the damn bag.  Because it is now an indisputable fact that liberals want the President of the United States’ bloody severed head as much as Islamic State want it.  They are the same people with a slightly different crazy religion.
And liberals are THE leading apologists for Islamic terrorists.  Why do I say that?  Obama has done it.  Hillary has done it.  John Kerry has done it.  They’ve ALL along with many other Democrats decried America and American values and Western values as inciting terrorism.  Why shouldn’t we a travel ban?  Because it would be used to recruit more terrorists, they assure us.  Which is what they said about Gitmo.  Or hell just doing anything to fight back.  And consider the constant rhetorical jihad that “climate change” is responsible for terrorism.  So who caused climate change?  Why the WEST of course.  Which means WE cause terrorism.  And terrorists OUGHT to kill us because we’re killing the planet!!!  It goes back to Hitler: the victim is a monster and thetefore the monster who murders the victim is actually a hero.
When President Trump pulled the USA out of the idiotic Paris Accord the mainstram media actually called him a “murderer.” Want to know who the REAL murderer is?  Try the previous president responsible for that one-thousand, nine-hundred percent increase in terrorist-massacre under his regime.
  1. Mind you, electing a woman president as leader of the world where Islam won’t even allow a woman outside by herself or drive a car or get an education wouldn’t do any such thing because NOBODY but NOBODY is more tolerant toward women than Muslims, right?  What’s that, you say?  99.3% of Egyptian women say that’s crazy?  The women of Sweden who have seen sexual assaults skyrocket 500% as Muslim refugees have flooded into their country say that’s crazy?  Well, liberals don’t care about stupid facts.  But anyway, back to the point: the left blames us for terrorism.  They blame global warming they say we cause, income inequality they say we cause, travel bans, intolerance, whatever.  And so they are in the bizarre and frankly evil position of siding with the vicious predatory monsters who are murdering us.  Because Muslim terrorists are the victims and Western Civilization is the one causing all the problems.  It’s so amazing it’s beyond unreal, but here we are.
We are being killed and we are being terrorized.  And response of the same left that gave us and defended pornography and let’s not forget “Piss Christ” as “art” are now giving us this:

Covered-Up Chic: Big Brands Are Waking Up to Modest Fashion
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESSMAY 31, 2017, 4:15 A.M. E.D.T.

LONDON — When Ruba Zai uploaded her first video online, the Netherlands-based Afghan student just wanted to share with other Muslim girls and women how she styled her headscarf. She had no idea that her “hijab tutorials” would be an internet hit, watched by hundreds of thousands worldwide.

The 23-year-old now blogs full time, sharing ideas for how to look trendy yet covered-up with a million Instagram followers. Zai had tapped into a fast-growing market for so-called “modest fashion,” fuelled by young, style-savvy Muslim women from London to Malaysia who have long felt their needs ignored by mainstream designers.

“I just couldn’t relate at all to the clothes you see in the mainstream brands,” she said from her home in Rotterdam. “When we first started talking about our style on social media, there was no interest in the fashion world in this group of people: ‘They’re just Muslims, why should we target them?'”

Big brands have been waking up to that call, and covered-up chic is a niche that’s slowly making its way into mainstream fashion. From exclusive designers to fast-fashion chains, retailers are trying to court millions of Muslim consumers — especially around the month of Ramadan, which started last week, when many Muslims buy new clothes and dress up. In 2014, U.S. fashion house DKNY was one of the first Western brands to launch a Ramadan collection aimed at wealthy Arab shoppers.

Let’s call it what it is, just as we call out every other attempt of liberals to refuse to allow us to fight the war on terror: SUBMISSION.

 

Advertisements

Democrats Are Demon-Possessed Moral Cockroaches. Not By My Standards But By THEIR Standards.

February 1, 2017

I lived through the eight miserable years of Obamunist tyranny.  I lived through the eight years where a party that calls itself “Democratic” demonstrated again and again that it had NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with “democracy.”  I lived through the mainstream media gang-piling on anyone who in any way didn’t support Obama’s and the Democratic Party’s radical agenda as “obstructionists” and yes, even as “terrorists.”  Not to mention bigots and racists and every other hateful name under the sun.

For the Democrats, Barack Obama was “our president,” the “President of the United States of America.”  And Republicans OWED him their full loyalty and support.

I remember vividly the vicious riots that took place in Washington D.C. the day that Barack Obama was inaugurated as president.  Oh, wait a second.  That never happened.  It didn’t happen until butthurt Nazi liberal Democrats rioted the day Donald Trump was inaugurated. and 230 Democrats were charged with rioting as the protests got evil.

Amazingly, six “journalists” were among the rioters.  Because according to the mainstream media, to be a “journalist” today means to be a propagandist hack who rabidly hates Donald Trump and tries to ignite and incite mass violence against him.  Let’s be clear, they weren’t cleared of rioting because they didn’t riot; they were cleared of rioting because they were “journalists” and therefore allowed to riot.

“Based on the facts and circumstances, we determined that probable cause existed to support the filing of felony rioting charges,” said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia in a statement about the 230 arrested. The office, which enforces criminal laws in Washington, D.C., would not comment on the actions of the six journalists.

Most “journalists” have dispensed with even any PRETENSE of objectivity.  I love this title because it’s so illustrative of what is going on: “NY Times writer who urged journalists to abandon objectivity to defeat Trump now says media needs ‘new strategy to cover him.’”  Hell, one of the “new strategies” being joining in rioting.  It really doesn’t surprise me at all they would join in the rioting with the rioters.  I can almost hear them saying, “Based on our reporting, you should loot and burn THIS building next!”

In the same way, I remember the day AFTER the Obama inauguration when a million angry activist showed up to protest the very Obama presidency.

Oh, wait.  That was Democrats too.

And I remember how Republicans employed every single vile trick that doesn’t exist in any playbook but the devil’s to obstruct and block President Obama from being able to appoint his cabinent because, after all, Republicans are obstructionists, right???

Oh, crap.  No.  Geez, I’m sorry.  Republicans had most of Obama’s administration in their positions right away.  That spirit of obstructionism and treason where a party that has been voted out of power tries to block every single thing the elected president tries to do is the spirit of Butthurt Nazism a.k.a. the Democratic Party.  It’s Democrats who are blocking and obstructing.   And Democrats, being Democrats, are the ones taking partisan, obstructionist, butthurt Nazi hissy fit to a new level: they are now refusing to do their basic job and even bother to show up at committee hearings.  Because to be a Democrat is to say, “If I violate the Constitution, If I violate the legitimate political process, if I violate the will of the people, I’ll get my wicked way.”

But let’s get back to Obama and the vile, vicious tactics that he inspired as our nations very first “community organizer” president.

Back in 2009 I was pointing out what a total, abject LIE the heart of the Obama promise to America had turned out to be.  This guy was so damn partisan that it was beyond unreal from the moment he took office.  And yet  The New York Times had written of Obama as candidate:

WASHINGTON — At the core of Senator Barack Obama’s presidential campaign is a promise that he can transcend the starkly red-and-blue politics of the last 15 years, end the partisan and ideological wars and build a new governing majority.

To achieve the change the country wants, he says, “we need a leader who can finally move beyond the divisive politics of Washington and bring Democrats, independents and Republicans together to get things done.”

But this promise leads, inevitably, to a question: Can such a majority be built and led by Mr. Obama, whose voting record was, by one ranking, the most liberal in the Senate last year?

Was Obama EVER a man capable of rising above partisan politics?  No.  Not even CLOSE.  Absolutely not.  As an easy example of that, as a Senator he was one of THE most radical liberal-progressives and unsuccessfully tried to filibuster Samuel Alito for the Supreme Court.  Even Obama’s own party at that point acknowledged that what Obama tried to do was way, WAY too radical.

And so:

However, the truth is that, when they were senators, Obama, Biden, and Clinton all tried to filibuster Justice Alito’s nomination to the court – and other Democratic party leaders such as NY Senator Chuck Schumer reveled in the idea that they were able to block every Bush #43 nomination to the federal courts.

But the Democratic Party went über-fascist radical, and thus the toxic, divisive, polarizing Obama became the nominee of the Democratic Party and ultimately the president.  And the similarly über-fascist radical Joe Biden became vice president; and then the likewise über-fascist radical Hillary Clinton would sure-enough be the following rabid candidate for the Democrat Party machine.

Through his press mouthpiece, Obama as president would ultimately – and cowardly – come to say he “regretted” his decision to be one of the most leftist partisan members of the U.S. Senate when his own damn tactics were brought up in his face to reveal the utter and abject moral hypocrisy that is “Democratic Party.”

So it’s morally evil now to do what Obama did, you see.  Obama ought to be able to do it and get away with it, and later on when it becomes politically inconvenient, well, Obama ought to be able to retreat behind a press secretary mouthpiece and say that he now regrets it.  Such that Republicans have no right to do exactly what Obama himself did.

Let’s go back to Joe Biden: Because We also have the example of Obama’s vice president, Joe Biden who in 1992 said when there was just a POSSIBILITY that George H.W. Bush MIGHT be able to nominate a Supreme Court Justice:

“It is my view that if the president goes the way of Presidents Fillmore and Johnson and presses an election year nomination the Senate Judiciary Committee should seriously consider not scheduling confirmation hearings on the nomination until ever — until after the political campaign season is over.” — Sen. Joe Biden, June 25, 1992

President George H.W. Bush was in office until January 20, 1993.  So Biden didn’t even say this in a presidential election year – the way it was when our Hypocrite-in-Chief Obama demanded the divine right to replace conservative Scalia with a leftist of his choice – rather Biden said the Democrat garbage tactic applied even in the year BEFORE the election year.

Only Democrats are hypocrite enough to not be able to see what abject hypocrite roaches they are.

As we talk about the Republican response to Obama’s selection of Judge Merrick Garland to replace Justice Antonin Scalia in an election year and the consequences of the Republican response today, allow me to take you on a trip down hypocrite Democrat lane from what I wrote at that time:

Democrats have a LONG history of doing the very thing they now claim is so evil:

While Democrats in the upper chamber – including Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York and former Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, both of which called for blocking former President George W. Bush’s nominations – have slammed the GOP for its decision not to consider a nominee until after a new president is elected, Democrats have not always held that stance. The Democrat-controlled Senate passed a resolution in 1960 preventing a recess appointment, much to the dismay of Republicans.

As first reported by The Washington Post – S.RES. 334, also known as Expressing the Sense of the Senate That The President Should Not Make Recess Appointments to the Supreme Court, Except to Prevent or End a Breakdown in the Administration of the Court’s Business – passed the Senate in a 48-33 vote in an attempt to prevent former President Dwight Eisenhower from filling a seat last-minute.

Democrats have frequently played this same game.   New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, now the Senate Minority Leader and leader of all the Senate Democrats, said when a Republican was president that the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush “except in extraordinary circumstances.”

“We should reverse the presumption of confirmation,” Schumer told the American Constitution Society convention in Washington. “The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito.”

And so this incredibly dishonest claim from Obama and the Democrats is so much nonsense it is beyond unreal: if anything, it IS unprecedented, other than all the damn times THEY did the very thing they now so loudly and dishonestly and hypocritically insist that Republicans would be violating sacred precedent to do.

Let me keep going from my same article on just what hypocrite pieces of dishonest roach filth Democrats are:

Here’s another thing: the Senate is now firmly in Republican hands (after disgraceful Democrats were caught being evil maybe a million times too often).  But when Democrats owned the Senate, they shoved their crap right down the Republicans’ throats and changed the damn Senate rules to do it with a process that was so toxic to the Constitution that it was called “the nuclear option.”

On November 21, 2013, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid declared that “unbelievable, unprecedented obstruction” by Republican filibusters had made the confirmation process “completely unworkable.”[1] As a result, he said, Democrats were forced to eliminate virtually all nomination filibusters. […]

For nearly all of its history, proceeding to a final vote on a matter before the Senate required a supermajority.

But not when Democrats stole the show.  No, no, no, the rules of all propriety and decency and civility go right out the damn window every damn time it pleases them.  Just like the Nazi Party and Jews, the Democrat Party calls the Republicans “evil” and then justifies the most wildly partisan and cynical “final solutions.”

Ever since the Supreme Court became a “super legislature” thanks to the wicked Democrat Party, where they ruled by imposing massive societal change by finding “penumbras and emanations” that justified whatever the HELL they wanted to do, the SCOTUS has become a political branch.  And Obama just started another vicious war while blathering dishonest words that he was somehow above doing the very thing he is clearly doing.

Who “fundamentally transformed” “nearly all of the Senate’s history”???  Don’t EVER forget it was the DEMOCRATS.  Just as it was the DEMOCRATS who invented Borking and it was the DEMOCRATS who are the ones who actually FILIBUSTER judicial appointments.  Bill Clinton and Barack Obama BOTH did NOT have a Republican filibuster.  The ONLY two judges sitting on the court who didn’t receive sixty votes are Justice Thomas and Justice Alito.  Because the Democrat Party has been the official party of Butthurt for decades.

If you want to see what “unbelievable, unprecedented obstruction” truly looks like, look at what Democrats have done since Trump got elected.  These butthurt fascists are psychologically unhinged with rabid acts of “obstruction” taking place at every corner that no, you demon-possessed liars, the Republicans NEVER did.

It’s really not the “nuclear option”; it’s the “Harry Reid option”; it’s the “Democrat Party option.”  And it is a GOOD thing Republicans are now willing to use the same tactics Democrats used against them.  And it’s an evil, wicked thing that the mainstream media is FINALLY seeing this as an “extreme tactic” given that they somehow failed to think that way when their beloved Democrat Party was using the tactic to impose their will when THEY ran Washington.

And so, in that same vein, Charles Schumer – now the leader of the Democrat minority – controls a party that literally announced they were going to object to ANYONE Trump nominated simply because on their view, anyone who doesn’t think exactly like they do is “unqualified” to serve.

Democrats actually swore they would filibuster Trump’s nominee even before Trump nominated anyone.

Democrats promise they will use the slander-tactic that they invented now known as “Borking”: This infamous Ted Kennedy slander was the worst of the slanders:

“Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government, and the doors of the federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is often the only protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy.”

Robert Bork was a good man and eminently qualified to sit on the Court.  But Democrats are truly breathtakingly evil and hypocritical people.

In the same manner, Justice Clarence Thomas literally faced down the Ku Klux Klan as a child who grew up as the child of a poor sharecropper in a house with a dirt floor – only to find the Democrats’ more evil and more psychotic and more dishonest.  As an example, the modern Klan monsters are BLACK Democrats who were willing to lynch Thomas for the sin of having a white wife.  And Democrats said in their vote, “You don’t get to do that and survive, uppity negro.”  They manufactured the very first “high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves” by finding a backstabbing woman who had followed Judge Thomas from job to job for YEARS only to claim that he sexually harassed her the entire time that she had willingly kept following him.

And so, all the Obama crap about it being beyond the pale for a Senate to treat a nomination to the Supreme Court this way, all I can say in response is that now you get to eat Republican fecal matter right out of the toilet bowl, you wicked hypocrite butthurt LIARS.

When Barack Obama – after trying to community organize a filibuster against Bush SCOTUS appointees – appointed two far-left liberal progressive radicals to the Court, Republicans responded by allowing their nomination to go forward and even allowing their members to vote for her in a spirit of bipartisan compromise.  Because they believed a president ought to have a right to nominate judges out of his philosophy, especially on the Supreme Court, even when they personally disagree with those judges’ philosophy of jurisprudence.

So Democrats never had to exploit their own Harry Reid-invented “Democrat option” – a.k.a. the nuclear option – to get a vote for Obama’s SCOTUS picks because Republicans respected the process in a way that Democrats have now proven over and over again they are not capable of respecting.  It was Democrats who invented and then repeatedly used the politics of personal slander-destruction against Republican nominees.

Democrats are not human beings worthy of the name; they have abandoned as a matter of wicked philosophy any concept of the imago dei.  Democrats are evolved bugs, and they only capable of bug morality.  You could rescue a cockroach, nurture it back to health, feed it, but the moment it was time to reciprocate, that roach would happily EAT YOU ALIVE.

I have used the word “Nazi” to describe Democrats.  Because a modern-day Democrat IS a Nazi who has TEN TIMES the holocaust horror show in the abortion mills with sixty million murdered human beings.  I started seeing Democrats viciously attacking people who had merely exercised their 1st Amendment right to attend a peaceful campaign rally for the political candidate of their choiceI saw multiple examples of this across the nation.  I came to discover Democrats literally used the same tactics Hitler used in his own rise to power by employing goons and thugs to violently disrupt GOP political rallies.  They did that at the very highest levels, up to Obama, the White House, Hillary Clinton’s campaign.  Do you realize how utterly treasonous to the spirit of democracy, to our Constitution, to our way of life, that is???Democrats today are actually now even MORE violent than the people who still bear the name “Nazi.”  That’s how VILE these roaches are.  So when I call Democrats “Nazis,” it’s NOT merely allegorical, or figurative: it is a statement of proven fact as this Democratic Party has become an utterly rabid, toxic hate machine.

Democrats are people who will say one thing with a self-righteous frenzied rabidity.  How DARE you not support our president?  And then – because abject moral HYPOCRISY is the defining trait of every single Democrat in America – they will just as self-righteously and with just as much frenzied rabidity go back on everything they said when it had been convenient for them to say it.

Conservatives, and just plain ordinary decent people, have got to rise up the way our forefathers rose up against this kind of evil.  And yes, we have to be willing to fight these people on their own vicious terms.  You tried to bring hell to us, and it is past time for us to bring hell home to you Democrats where it truly belongs.

One of the things that most offends me is that, if Republicans win, we install judges who actually follow the Constitution.  But if Democrats win, they install judges who will read their extreme political agendas into every law they want to.    That’s kind of analogous to a football game where one team got to use machine guns against the other team; it creates a rather unequal playing field.  Justice Scalia described this history and issued a warning some years back:

He added that the role of a Supreme Court justice should be interpreting the law, not inventing it.
“Whether it’s good or bad is not my job. My job is simply to say if those things you find desirable are contained in the Constitution,” he said.
Discussing pro-abortion judges who created a right to abortion, Scalia warned her, “Someday, you’re going to get a very conservative Supreme Court and regret that approach.”

Even arch-feminist Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has repeatedly acknowledged that Roe v. Wade went “too far, too fast” and was a terrible decision in terms of our legal process.  She also acknowledged her own Democrat-racist view that Roe v. Wade was to eliminate undesirable members of the populace, or as she put it “populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

Why shouldn’t an arch-conservative justice not be able to impose a terrible law out of an immoral philosophy the way liberal judges like Ruth Bader Ginsburg did???

That regret Scalia described needs to start happening now.  Democrats need to be viciously punched hard in the face with their own system of interpretation that the Constitution is a “living, breathing document” that means whatever the hell the most rabid right wing judge WANTS it to mean.  When you have one side telling the other that a woman has the right to murder a man’s child and that man has no right whatsoever to stop it but has to support that child if the “mother” somehow doesn’t murder her own child; when you have one side telling the other that homosexuals and transgenders have every right in the book but Christians don’t even have the right to live according to their most deeply held morality according to a Bible that defined our entire civilization for two thousand years – all in rabid violation of every sacred Constitutional principle – something truly depraved and evil has occurred.  And it’s long past time to STOP it.  Thomas Jefferson WARNED this would happen.  And tragically the ONLY way to stop it now is to start fighting fire with fire: If a few right wing justices truly begin to show up who read their OWN intent into the Constitution the way liberal judges have done for decades, it will be the equivalent of what happened when the Allies started reciprocating with the same poison gas the Germans had inflicted on them, such that they both agree to cease-and-desist.

I would submit that we pass a law today that when Donald Trump is out of office, the next president will not have to face the kind of garbage that I have documented above.  That any Senator who tries to Bork or Thomas a nominee for the Supreme Court will go to prison and face hard time for abusing the power of the office through slander; to pass a law banning the filibuster or the nuclear option; to ban executive orders that defy the law and the clear intent of the Congress that alone is supposed to have the power to make the law, the way Obama kept imposing; that sort of thing.  I believe we should pass a constitutional amendment limiting the time of a Supreme Court appointment to a specified period of years.  And I say “After Trump” because Obama got to enjoy this power for eight years, and it is only fair and legitimate that the people that Democrats pissed on get to piss on them now.

I WARNED you liberal progressives that eventually a right wing president would come along who would make you scream in anguish; I IMPLORED you to stop being naked fascists.  But for eight years you allowed Obama to ram his agenda through by imperia fiat.  And now the shoe is on the other foot, because to quote Obama, “Elections have consequences, and at the end of the day, WE won.”  And so if President Donald Trump issues the following two executive orders: one declaring the Democratic Party is the party of treason and terrorism; and the other being the “Hunt Every Democrat Down with Dogs and Burn Them ALIVE Act,” then you shouldn’t even have the damn right to request an extension to the two-minute head start before we unleash the dogs.

Trump And Average American People Versus Meryl Streep And Hypocrite Hollywood

January 11, 2017

You look at a county-by-county map of the last election and this is what you see:

All the red counties voted for Donald Trump; all the blue counties voted for Meryl Streep’s choice of candidate.

Just so you know, California ALL BY ITSELF (Hillary won the state with 4,269,778 more votes than Trump) counts for the NEARLY TWICE the ENTIRE popular vote majority that Hillary Clinton voters keep saying matters so damn much (Hillary “won” the popular vote by 2,864,974 more votes than Trump).  You add in New York’s giant Hillary win (by 1,732,872 votes and a 59% to 36.5% margin) and Washington D.C.  (where Hillary won a staggering 90.9% of the vote!) and these three voting regions alone count for WAY OVER TWICE THE POPULAR VOTE DIFFERENCE that favors Hillary.  The founding fathers very deliberately crafted a system by which a president had to win states from across the nation and across the spectrum rather than merely winning a few lopsided ideological contests.

Now let’s turn to the Golden Globes, to Hollywood, to Meryl Streep and the political rants we heard.

This was the place where Jimmy Fallon had already come onto the stage and idiotically said:

“This is the Golden Globes: One of the few places left where America honors the popular vote”

Oh, man, you mean there was there a vote and I didn’t get my ballot?  Why not?  I’m registered to vote, Jimmy Fallon!!!  You know what?  I don’t remember voting or having any chance to vote for the Golden Globes and to give Meryl Streep a Lifetime Achievement Award.  I mean, it really – if you had something called “a functioning brain” – was not a whole lot different from the Electoral College System where Donald Trump sure enough won a very clear majority of the votes.

These damn lectures are idiotic.  The Hollywood hypocrites who give them are idiotic.  Their rhetoric is idiotic.  Their points are idiotic.  These fools literally despise our Constitution and our very democratic republic when they make such profoundly stupid and profoundly dishonest tirades.

I didn’t get to vote at the Golden Globes, Jimmy.  I wasn’t represented.  I was entirely shut out.  In fact, I was attacked for my vote by Meryl Streep and many other Hollywood celebrities.

And the very people who shut people like me out so that I didn’t get to vote, so that people like me didn’t ever have a CHANCE to be represented, are patting themselves on the back as the last honest bastion of democracy in action???  Seriously???

Next consider the economic power of those blue counties relative to that vast ocean of red:

According to the Brookings Institution analysis, the less-than-500 counties Clinton won nationwide combined to generate 64 percent of America’s economic activity in 2015, the Washington Post reported.

The more-than-2,600 counties President-elect Donald Trump won combined to generate 36 percent of the country’s economic activity last year.

It’s the “haves” vs. the “have nots.”  But Democrats lie like roaches under an oven when it comes to who the “have nots” actually are.

When you are in control of the nation’s ports – where everything related to commerce flows to and from – and when you get to control the media culture and the entertainment culture and the academic culture, well, you end up with what Democrats who use this term to apply to white vs. black racism as “an unequal power relation.”  Only the actual “unequal power relation” is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what Democrats falsely claim that it is.  We have almost nothing; they have nearly everything.  But because Democrats are bitter, butthurt people, “nearly everything” is not nearly enough.  They have to have it all; and they have to scream down or shut down or slander anyone or anything that gets in their fascist path.

So you take the ports: the Port of San Diego, the Port of Long Beach, the Port of Los Angeles, the Port of San Francisco, the Port of Oakland, and realize that ALL of these cities are today screaming leftist and you ask, “Did progressive liberalism and frankly socialism build these damn ports?”  And the answer is NO.  Not in ANY way, ANY shape or ANY form.  Rather they usurped control by promising wealth transfers to buy votes.  And when you have a massive guaranteed income such as ports or hi-tech centers (which they also control) and greedy Wall Street hedge funds (which they also control lock, stock and barrel contrary to what they always dishonestly claim) provide, literally more guaranteed wealth than a gold mine or diamond mine, it is easy to get corrupted and literally crazy because you can afford to do incredibly stupid things when you inherited filthy richness.

The Democrat Party is like Howard Hughes: absolute, raving nutjobs, but filthy rich enough to get away with sheer insanity that would have had anyone else buckled into a straitjacket and hauled off to a life in a rubber room.

Democrats control vast amounts of wealth for the very simple reason that they have an electoral stranglehold on the wealthiest port cities in America which they obtained through naked political bribery (vote for us and we’ll give you welfare for life and preferential treatment over other citizens and groups who don’t vote the way we want them to).

Our ports.  Our major cities that Democrats have won and turned into hellholes by being able to bus thousands of people whom they bribe to vote.  Our entertainment system.  Our “news.”  Our academic system where a disastrous thing called “tenure” and “unions” turned education into a politicized weapon.

When you look at education, realize that “education” was almost ENTIRELY CHRISTIAN in the United States of America when it was formed because true education depends on the recognition that we are Imago Dei.  Of the first 108 universities founded in America, 106 of them were established as profoundly and fundamentally “Christian Institutions.”  This is simply a documented fact of history.  In fact, the “university system” in GENERAL across planet earth was the result of Christianity and Christian foundations (see here and here and here).  Charlemagne turned to the Church as the ONLY POSSIBLE SOURCE for a higher education system capable of producing a body of educated people.  The very word for “university” was coined by Christian monks.  As an aside, the religion that secular humanist leftists so despise was the singular source of hospitals as well.  But continuing with education, when you read and understand the history of how our “public schools”, only then can you begin to understand the powerfully critical and essential role that Christians and Christianity played in our public education system for children.  And yet today, our learning centers that literally owe their existence to Christianity today try to totally shut out any mention of Jesus Christ or any sign of His values and priorities.  They got their foots in the door, used false promises and assurances to get Christians out, and then dishonestly and even viciously proceeded to slam the door shut in Christians’ faces.

How about the news media?  What do you say when you find out that 96 percent of “journalists'” campaign donations went to Hillary Clinton?  How in the hell can any reasonable person conclude that a media that is so biased can possibly be fair to Hillary Clinton’s opponent, Donald Trump???  What does that say about an institution that exists ENTIRELY to be OBJECTIVE???

Popular opinion confirms a leftist media bias (and see here); scientific studies confirm a rampant media bias; examining the actions of newspapers and television outlets confirms a leftist bias;  even cold-blooded computers detect an overwhelming and pervasive leftist media bias.

What is “racism”???  It is “an unequal power relation,” we are told.  And who in fact HAS the unequal power relations???  Why, the people that scream “racist” the most, of course.

And so we get to Meryl Streep’s “powerful Golden Globes Speech” and start laughing hysterically at the sheer appallingly dishonest butthurt hypocrisy.

She begins:

Thank you, Hollywood foreign press. Just to pick up on what Hugh Laurie said. You and all of us in this room, really, belong to the most vilified segments in American society right now.

Sorry, you dishonest peddler of victimhood, but no.  That’s not true.  It’s the people who voted for Donald Trump who are “the most vilified segment in American society right now,” as your own damn stupid speech confirms.

Remember Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables?”  All Meryl Streep does is steal the label and make it sound like Trump said it rather than the other way around.

She continues:

“Hollywood is crawling with outsiders and foreigners. If you kick ’em all out, you’ll have nothing to watch but football and mixed martial arts, which are not the arts.”

Well, first of all, when you look at football and the mixed martial arts’ ratings, you can see why Meryl Streep is so damn jealous: because they BURY your garbage, Hollywood.  And it’s always beyond unreal how dishonest the left is in its slander: because, yeah, right, Donald Trump said he was going to throw out every single outsider and every single foreigner.  This is called “fake news.”

It’s always funny to hear leftist Hollywood movie stars lecture us about guns and violence.  Just watch their stupid movies and see how many guns and how much violence there is and you’ll get my point.  mixed martial arts are not the arts, Meryl Streep smarmily decrees; but the movies that make all the damn money in Hollywood that glorify the violence that Streep looks down upon ARE “the arts.”

Please pardon me for putting this so crassly, but it’s kind of like saying if a chimpanzee made a great big giant bowel movement all over the zoo exhibit, it wouldn’t be “art”; but if a Hollywood makeup artist took that same great big giant bowel movement and smashed it onto Meryl Streep’s sanctimonious Hollywood face, well then it WOULD be “art,” because Meryl Streep is an “artist,” and she wears such things so very “artistically.”

Gun violence in Hollywood movies has more than TRIPLED since 1985; and even more hilariously hypocritically after one of the mass shootings we’ve had:

Like clockwork, before anyone had time digest the horror of the latest mass shooting, the left started finger-pointing and demanding more gun control – whether it would have prevented the crime or not. From President Obama on down, they immediately began railing against the NRA and gun owners.
Not surprisingly, entertainment industry liberals were among the most vocal. That also made them among the most hypocritical. TV, movies and music videos thrive portraying – and often glamorizing – violence, and gun violence in particular. And while actors were demanding gun control, the top 10 movies in theaters this past weekend were awash in violence – 334 separate violent acts, 121 of them involving guns. The on-screen body count was 39 dead out of 142 victims.

If we lived in the world of Hollywood liberalism, A HELLUVA LOT MORE PEOPLE WOULD DIE.  And die killed by GUNS, no less.

And that is a true, genuine fact of leftism in general.  Leftists are mass murderers.  Always have been, always will be.

Please don’t let their self-righteous, sanctimonious garbage fool you to the contrary.

Streep pats her industry on the back:

I was born and raised and created in the public schools of New Jersey. Viola [Davis] was born in a sharecropper’s cabin in South Carolina, and grew up in Central Falls, Rhode Island. Sarah Paulson was raised by a single mom in Brooklyn. Sarah Jessica Parker was one of seven or eight kids from Ohio. Amy Adams was born in Italy. Natalie Portman was born in Jerusalem. Where are their birth certificates? And the beautiful Ruth Negga was born in Ethiopia, raised in — no, in Ireland, I do believe. And she’s here nominated for playing a small town girl from Virginia. Ryan Gosling, like all the nicest people, is Canadian. And Dev Patel was born in Kenya, raised in London, is here for playing an Indian raised in Tasmania.

I just want you to realize that her great big giant pack on her sanctimonious back came following the disaster at the last year’s Oscars, which was described as “#OscarsSoWhite.”

I wonder why that is:

oscar-nominees-white

Oh, that was all the nominees for awards?  I mean, they’re all… they’re all… so WHITE.  And to talk about Meryl Streep’s blabbering, they’re from places like Whiteyland, Whiteville, Whitesburgh and Whitetown.

And by the left’s own understanding, Meryl Streep is nothing more than a privileged elitist white racist.

Chris Rock pointed out: “You realize if they nominated hosts, I wouldn’t even get this job!”  He said, “It’s the 88th Academy Awards which means this whole no black nominees thing has happened at least 71 other times.”  He called the Academy Awards “the white people’s choice awards.”

Just ask Meryl Streep how many black people’s Oscars she’s stolen in her white privileged career and that will shut her up real quick.

And so we get to the heart of Meryl Streep’s hypocrite hitjob:

There was one performance this year that stunned me. It sank its hooks in my heart. Not because it was good. There was nothing good about it. But it was effective and it did its job. It made its intended audience laugh and show their teeth. It was that moment when the person asking to sit in the most respected seat in our country imitated a disabled reporter, someone he outranked in privilege, power, and the capacity to fight back. It kind of broke my heart when I saw it. I still can’t get it out of my head because it wasn’t in a movie. It was real life.
And this instinct to humiliate, when it’s modeled by someone in the public platform, by someone powerful, it filters down into everybody’s life, because it kind of gives permission for other people to do the same thing. Disrespect invites disrespect. Violence incites violence. When the powerful use their position to bully others, we all lose.

Meryl Streep, one who personally knows a great damn DEAL about how to outrank most others in privilege, power and the capacity to fight back, is pretending there is no such thing as “the Casting Couch” where women who want a shot to put out a movie have to first put out in far more demeaning ways.

How many times have Hollywood liberals mocked and derided me and my evangelical Christian and conservative values???  Did Donald Trump mock a lousy, biased reporter in a manner that included his disability?  Probably, but for the record quite possibly NOT.  Also for the record, I personally am – due to my military service – significantly and permanently disabled.  And I don’t like being mocked for my disabilities or for anything else, but I’m mature enough to know that when you put yourself in the spotlight in a way hostile to someone else, you make yourself a target and enemy targets receive incoming fire as a matter of course.  Trump did other things (such as attack John McCain not as an unreliable, untrustworthy pseudo-ally – which he is – but as someone who doesn’t deserve “war-hero” status because he was shot out of the sky and terribly wounded and captured such that he rotted in one of the worst hells on earth for six years) that I didn’t like.  But I’ll tell you what: Hypocrite Hollywood has NO RIGHT to lecture ANYBODY for ANYTHING.

Meryl Streep is speaking on behalf of an industry that has ROUTINELY suppressed conservative actors from having any voice at the very risk of their careers.  Because as much as the left loves to demonize Republicans for McCarthyism, IT WAS DEMOCRATS WHO RAN WASHINGTON DURING THE MCCARTHY ERA AND IT IS HOLLYWOOD LIBERALS WHO ARE BLACKLISTING CONSERVATIVE ACTORS TODAY.  Joseph McCarthy himself was a Democrat nearly as long as he was a Republican.

Major celebrity performers are backing out of the Trump inauguration due to backlash and intimidation from leftistsTrump literally cannot book celebrities for his inauguration because Hollywood and the entertainment industry in general are Stalinist bastions.  Can you imagine that happening to Obama???  Can you imagine the unbridled HELL the news media would have showered down on the hateful, treasonous, in-American and anti-American attitude such despicable refusal to honor an American president as they would have surely depicted it and would have surely framed it had the president elect been Hillary Clinton???

It’s the same thing over and over again: how often did CNN – or Fox News for that matter – get into argumentative shouting matches with Barack Obama as president elect???  How often was Obama so profoundly disrespected???  The CNN reporter Jim Acosta later said he was being “politely demanding,” which is an oxymoron.  To wit: “I politely raped her.”  No, I RUDELY raped her and am merely too damn dishonest to state what I did accurately.  But I challenge you to show me footage of the press acting that way toward Obama especially before he took office but even afterward.

But it’s always okay when leftists do what they say is so evil for anyone else to do.  That is how they are because to be a leftist is to be a pathological hypocrite.

Meryl Streep is saying how dare you oppress marginalized people WHILE THERE IS NO INDUSTRY ON EARTH THAT MARGINALIZES MORE PEOPLE MORE OFTEN THAN HOLLYWOOD.

And where’s MY power when these people attack me and attack my values?  Where’s MY power to fight back when they have such a giant microphone?

When Democrats – particularly the minorities that Meryl Streep says are the most underprivileged of all – were routinely hatefully physically attacking Donald Trump supporters for the crime of participating in a rally or their candidate of choice, where was Meryl Streep to denounce the rabid hate that IS the Democratic Party?

When it was proven that in fact the vicious rodent thug that had organized these vicious physical attacks against Trump events was in fact working for the Hillary Clinton campaign and had visited Obama’s White House 342 times and had visited Obama personally, where was Meryl Streep to stand up for the little people who were victims of the terrible acts of Nazi brutality coming from her candidate and her party???

And when these Hollywood liberals attack, they do so with the same smarmy hypocrisy that they do when they screech about “climate change” and then get on carbon-spewing private jets that put out more global warming gasses in a single minute than I’ll put out in a year.

What you’re doing is evil, these Hollywood leftists keep screaming at us: and if we make millions of dollars doing the thing we say is so evil on movie screens and then do the very thing we say is so evil in our personal lives, no big deal.

How many Democrat Hollywood stars suffered for performing or attending Obama’s inauguration?  Zero.  But that aint true when it comes to Meryl Streep’s fellow Hollywood fascists when it comes to celebrities at Trump’s inauguration.

Just imagine if Republicans had planned an alternative event to the Obama inauguration.  But that’s what Hollywood Democrat celebrities are doing as they plan an event to upstage Trump’s.  It is a star-studded “We the Butthurt” concert.  And Meryl and all of her friends are going to be there to refuse to support the President of the United States and actively organize against this country and its system of government and its Constitution.  At no time did Republicans ever even come CLOSE to this kind of rabid hate against Obama.  There was a time when we legitimately called such behavior “treason.

Wages didn’t go up under Obama; they went down.  The gap between rich and poor, black and white under Obama got WORSE and in fact worse than under any under single president compared to his predecessor in history.  Obama loves to tell us drivel about how he’s been so wonderful for the economy and how he saved us from the Great Depression.  Bullcrap: this country is worse off between the richest and the poorest due to Obama’s failed policies since it was BEFORE the Great Depression!  How many people do you know that are at least 89 years old?  Because 89 years is how far back you have to go to find somebody who was even ALIVE during a worse damn presidency.

Democrats – and MOST ESPECIALLY DEMOCRATS LIKE MERYL STREEP – have the giant share of the wealth in this country and have frankly gone insane with it because they simply have no connection or contact whatsoever with the real, actual world that the rest of America lives in.  They have dictatorial, Stalinist, fascist control of the “news” industry – again, with NINETY-SIX PERCENT of journalists’ political contributions being FOR Hillary Clinton and AGAINST Donald Trump.  And this is an industry that has intentionally been fabricated into a rabidly biased and unfair unelected political body that literally betrays and undermines the very Constitution that enshrines it in the first place.  And then an Obama appeals for the public not to reject “facts.”  WHOSE FACTS???  The “facts” of the world’s most biased industry???

Obama in his Good Riddance Address said of the media:

And increasingly we become so secure in our bubbles that we start accepting only information, whether it’s true or not, that fits our opinions, instead of basing our opinions on the evidence that is out there.
And this trend represents a third threat to our democracy. Look, politics is a battle of ideas. That’s how our democracy was designed. In the course of a healthy debate, we prioritize different goals, and the different means of reaching them. But without some common baseline of facts, without a willingness to admit new information and concede that your opponent might be making a fair point, and that science and reason matter, then we’re going to keep talking past each other.

And who the hell’s FAULT is that???  When an industry can be so overwhelmingly proven to be so rabidly biased and dishonest as a political arm for Obama’s party???

In the same way, our public school and university systems have been hijacked and used and abused in a flagrantly partisan manner where institutionalized rabid political bias become “scientific facts.”  And the same dishonest, rabidly biased media I described above selectively reports these so-called “facts” in a rabidly biased manner.  Take for example the whole “global warming”-“climate change” fiasco is a dishonest case in point: Dr. Judith Curry just resigned as a professor at Georgia Tech citing literal insane bias against ANY legitimate science or questions with the bogus “consensus” model of man-blamed global warming the left is rabidly determined to maintain.  But what the hell: the rabidly dishonestly biased pseudo-scientists as reported in the rabidly dishonestly biased mainstream media have a “consensus” that the leftists who are politically exploiting that pseudo-consensus insist we all bow down to.

I MOCK the media that refused to report the scientific findings of scientists they identified as “climate change deniers” but were all to willing to bathe in the “unsubstantiated reports”unsubstantiated reports that were not only unverified but UNVERIFIABLE – that were generated by hostile and prejudiced opposition research and which are already documented to contain numerous clear factual errors.  Just as I MOCK the pro-climate change “scientists” who literally resort to Stalinist tactics and even freaking DEATH THREATS in “response” to legitimate science.

What I am pointing out – and I think have conclusively demonstrated – is that the left that has in Stalinist manner usurped everything and maintains that usurpation in a profoundly intolerant manner to anyone who has any fact or any question that might undermine them, are amazingly depicting themselves as the oppressed underclass.  It is such an amazing act of chutzpah it is beyond unreal.

 

 

Democrats Screaming About ‘Fake News’ CREATED ‘Fake News’, And Ran ‘Fake News’ Non-Stop Throughout Election Cycle And Obama Years.

December 20, 2016

So where is all this “fake news” about that I’m hearing about all the damn time now as Democrats try to explain why their candidate won 487 counties out of the 3, 141 counties in the United States???  And SERIOUSLY, the “fake news” angle is that somebody somewhere looked a map and stated she only won 57?

What about the “fake news” angle that Hillary Clinton laughingly represented “the people” when those few counties she won were only and all the damn BIG MONEY counties???

According to the Brookings Institution analysis, the less-than-500 counties Clinton won nationwide combined to generate 64 percent of America’s economic activity in 2015, the Washington Post reported.

The more-than-2,600 counties President-elect Donald Trump won combined to generate 36 percent of the country’s economic activity last year.

When you look at a map of the counties, look at the not sea but OCEAN of Trump victories versus the tiny number of Hillary county wins:

2016-election-map-by-county

Consider the fact that the states where Clinton won decisively were “port states” that feature by mere factoid of geography the largest and most economically powerful ports on planet earth where all the commerce in the world must pass through to get to or from the American people.  Consider that that is more than a damn gold mine; it is guaranteed money and with that kind of institutional wealth a man or a party can be complete and total morons and STILL be rich beyond imagination.

Just imagine California, with the Ports of Los Angeles, San Diego, Long Beach, San Francisco, Oakland.  Do you have any idea how powerful these ports are in global trade?  And its the same back east where Clinton also did well.  Do you have any idea how much of a total, utterly-divorced-from-reality MORON and FOOL you can be and STILL MAKE BILLIONS when you have these assets in your pocket???  When you have a major port under your control, you can impose ANYTHING and still make money – especially if all the OTHER major port cities are as irrationally leftist as you are.  And that is the case in California.  It is a LIE that the Democrats represent “the people” who are oppressed and harassed by wealthy Republicans; the reality IS JUST THE DAMN OPPOSITE.  As I just easily demonstrated in the article above and the election-by-county above.

How is it not “fake news” to have not covered that fact that IS the Democratic Party, that they are and have been the party of the rich and the powerful who exploit the rest of us???  I hear that demonically untrue statement all the damn time.  To not cover the FACT that the Democratic Party is the Party of rabid sociopathic cockroaches who are living in some disconnected reality and can only do so because other people built wealth FOR them that they took over to fund their operations???

What about the “fake news” angle that Hillary was going to win this damn election to begin with, given all the damn hideously and embarrassingly wrong media polls that were so terrible skewed in her favor in a rather blatantly “fake news” manner if hindsight and factual reality have anything to say???  How about the fact that these fake news polls generated by our “legitimate news media” consistently hyped a fact racial angle disproven by the fact that Trump won more blacks than they said, more Hispanics than they said and more women than they said???

Why do these people who keep being so damn WRONG insist on our respect???  Especially when they’re so wrong because they are such intolerant, narrow-minded BIGOTS who despise everybody in what they call “flyover country” as they look down on them in every way one can look down on other people???

Harkening back to my last article, the hard-core racist angle that the media and the Democratic Party pimped is the worst “fake news” story of all.

Bill Clinton – in his excuse-making for his wife’s failure to put his adulterous woman-abusing ass back in the White House – said this of Donald Trump:

He doesn’t know much,” Clinton said when asked if Trump was smart. “One thing he does know is how to get angry, white men to vote for him.”

Do you want to know who the “angriest white man” of ALL is?  Look in the mirror, Slick Willy!!!

And this race-baiting angle again: Bill Clinton is the one who said that “a few years ago, this guy [Obama] would be getting us our coffee” to Ted Kennedy when he was a rival to his wife’s political aspirations.  And Bill Clinton is the one who said in eulogy of the last Senator to ever hold the titles of Ku Klux Klan “Exalted Cyclops” and “Grand Kleagle”:

“He once had a fleeting association with the Ku Klux Klan, what does that mean? I’ll tell you what it means. He was a country boy from the hills and hollows from West Virginia. He was trying to get elected,” former President Bill Clinton said of Sen. Robert Byrd.

So hard-core, Klan racism is fine – as long as it helps a Democrat to get elected.

It’s only when “angry white men” vote REPUBLICAN that it’s somehow evil.  At least to Democrats like Bill Clinton who are the poster boys for “evil.”

But we’ve got so many stories of liberal Democrat “white shaming” going on it is beyond unreal.  In MANY of our universities, including the ones that WHITE PEOPLE are forced to pay for with their tax dollars.  And we just had MTV come out with a white shaming ad titled “2017 Advice for White Men”which is simply in-your-face-RACIST and MISANDRIST as Democrats target a group of people entirely based on their skin and their gender.

In a similar vein, you’ve got a leftist black lives matter turd named Tariq Nasheed who is going after Trump in the most hateful ways, calling him a racist, etc. ad nauseum.  The ONLY problem with this guy – okay, NOT the only problem, ’cause he’s got PROBLEMS – is that this self-righteous hypocrite wrote a book out of his profound hostility to women: how to lie to them, trick them, hell, RAPE them.  Whatever it takes for Tariq Nasheed to manipulate or coerce or force women to do the only thing he thinks they’re good for.

What about the “real news” angle that Democrats very much seem to composed of people who have no empathy whatsoever for anyone who is not directly like them???  What about the “real news” angle of the hypocrisy of these people who scream about the very things that they themselves do FAR MORE than the people they are always screaming at???

You tell me the major conservative media source – and I want the link that has the text or the video and if you show me the video include a transcript of what was said that was specifically in-your-face-offensive – in which we have black women being targeted for shame.  Because the right has nothing even CLOSE to this.  Just so you can see how blatantly hypocritical this is.

Where is the news media directing outrage the way they directed outrage when a two-bit nobody white supremacist endorsed Donald Trump and the media literally blamed Trump for a guy he’d never even heard of???  Where’s that kind of “righteous outrage” from the “journalists” when we publicly witness in your face, blatant racism???

What about the “fake news” angle of the electoral college vote yesterday.  The same media that generated so much hype with the intent of undermining and delegitimizing Donald Trump’s presidency before the man even takes office now acknowledges that there was absolutely no way in hell that 37 Republicans were going to vote against their president elect against the will of the people whose will they had sworn to represent.  In “fact,” since we talk about “fake news,” when that actual electoral college vote occurred, only two Republican electors voted against Trump versus FIVE who voted against Hillary Clinton.

What about the fact that the Clinton campaign (through campaign chairman John Podesta) was publicly trying to engineer an attempt to get electors to switch their votes???  Let’s understand this through the eyes of REAL news: if we have an election, and the people vote, and then ANYBODY gets the electors to switch their votes in a manner that contravenes the results of the election, you just contravened the will of the people.  Which is fascism.  Which from what even the left has led me to understand is supposed to be evil.

Kind of like the recount “fake news” where Donald Trump in the Clinton-endorsed recounts actually GAINED votes:

The recount, requested and paid for by Green Party candidate Jill Stein, produced a net gain of 131 votes for Trump out of nearly 3 million cast in the state.

It also ended any lingering uncertainty about the outcome of the presidential race, giving Trump a clear victory over his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton that the Electoral College is expected to affirm when it convenes next week.

Again, given hindsight and actual reality, it was “fake news” for the mainstream media to have covered this damn story the way they did, but they covered it in a blatantly “fake news” manner anyway.  Because they are CHEAP SHOT artists and that is ALL they are.

What about the “fake news” angle of Hillary winning the so-called “popular vote?  For one thing, to say that Trump not winning “popular vote” somehow makes him “illegitimate” is akin to claiming that Barack Obama taking the oath of office on a cloudy day made him illegitimate.  The popular vote doesn’t and never has had ANYTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH OUR CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM FOR ELECTING OUR PRESIDENTS.  But aside from that “fake news” bull crap, how about the REAL NEWS FACT that if you take out crazy whackjob California – which Californians and Oregonians (they have a major port too) now actually WANT so they can get the hell out of America now that Trump is the president of the American peopleit is Donald TRUMP who won the “popular vote” by near two million votes.

So, we’ve got the “fake news” meme that Hillary “won” the popular vote – even though that is entirely irrelevant to anything other than whiners’ whining.  But what about the REAL news fact that just three voting regions – California, New York and the District of Colombia – accounted for 13.6 million votes for Hillary Clinton versus 7.3 million for Donald Trump.  And that is a margin of 6.3 million votes.  Given that Democrats want to fascistically overturn our Constitution’s electoral college in favor of a “popular vote” that our founding fathers specifically rejected, and given that more than TWICE Hillary’s so-called “popular vote” victory came in less than six percent of our fifty-one electoral contests, is it not “real news” to point out the totalitarianism of the left???  But nope!  Instead the frame is of Trump “losing” the popular vote and therefore being undermined and delegitimized by “journalists” who have taken ideological sides and spin their stories in an incredibly and blatantly partisan manner.

Every single legitimate journalist is out there screaming in story after story about this shameful episode from Hillary Clinton and from the Democratic Party.  And since the silence is deafening, THERE ARE NO LEGITIMATE JOURNALISTS.

In addition to the wealthy coastal areas (due to PORTS not governance), Hillary dominated in the dense urban areas, the big cities, but did appallingly in the rural (less densely populated) areas.  You ought to soberly reflect what this means: Democrats want to be able to control where you live and how you live (because they own the buildings and dominate assisted housing projects); they want to control where you go and how you get there (because they are constantly working to undermine and delegitimize and ultimately criminalize private vehicles in favor of public transportation).  They want to crowd everyone into these dense urban cities where THEY control you.  And you compare that to the giant ocean of red that voted for Donald Trump who said, “Hell NO!”

If you favor totalitarianism, you voted for Hillary.  Otherwise you voted for Trump.

Have you ever seen that slant, that twist, that “spin” in ANY mainstream media presentation???  Of course you haven’t.  Because everything they write or say is framed through their partisan liberal ideological prisms.  It’s that Orwell line from Animal Farm:

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.

How about this, liberal: “White Lives Matter!”  “Men’s Lives Matter.”  “Rural Lives Matter.”  We are branded “intolerant” and “racist” and “misogynist” and hell, let’s just admit it, “racist” is their favorite word so it’s always their go-to play.  But they get to do the opposite and in their hypocrisy it’s fine.

Believe it or not, I’m actually STILL not done with the “fake news” from the mainstream media over the election!  What about what both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton said about “rigging the election” prior to the election:

  • “Every expert, regardless of political party, regardless of ideology, conservative or liberal, who has ever examined these issues in a serious way, will tell you that instances of significant voter fraud are not to be found,” Mr. Obama said. “There is no evidence that that has happened in the past or that there are instances in which that will happen this time.” — Barack Obama
  • “There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America’s elections, in part because they’re so decentralized and the numbers of votes involved,” Obama said.  “There’s no evidence that that has happened in the past or that there are instances in which that will happen this time,” he continued. “And so, I ‘d advise Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes.”
  • President Barack Obama has a blunt message for Donald Trump: “Stop whining.”
  • “I’d advise Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes,” Obama said. “And if he got the most votes, then it would be my expectation of Hillary Clinton to offer a gracious concession speech and pledge to work with him in order to make sure that the American people benefit from an effective government, and it would be my job to welcome Mr. Trump, regardless of what he said about me, or my differences with him on my opinions, and escort him over to the Capitol, in which there would about peaceful transfer of power.”
    “That’s what Americans do,” Obama said.
  • Every time Donald thinks things are not going in his direction, he claims whatever it is is rigged against him.” — Hillary Clinton
  • “We know the difference between leadership and dictatorship, and the peaceful transition of power is one of the things that sets us apart,” Clinton told a rally in Cleveland, Ohio, one of the key swing states up for grabs on November 8.  “Donald Trump refused to say that he’d respect the results of this election.  By doing that, he’s threatening our democracy.”

What about the “real news” angle that Hillary Clinton is so demented and so in a fake reality that she actually called Donald Trump on election night and asked him to concede the race that he was about to win???

What about the fact that Hillary Clinton gave her “threat to democracy” speech in a state that Donald Trump won by the most lopsided damn victory in 28 years????

And then she has the elephant balls to join the scam recount that she herself said amounted to a threat to democracy???

What about all the crap about accepting the damn results and welcoming the incoming president???

What about the real news angle that WHO THE HELL IS THE BUTTHURT WHINING THREAT TO OUR DEMOCRACY NOW???

Why is the media not EXCORIATING Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for their abject and immoral hypocrisy in which they have condemned themselves as worthy of conviction of treason by their own damn previous words before the election they thought they had in the damn bag???

As SOON as the election was over, the Democrats IMMEDIATELY began to organize their “resistance” that during the Obama years amounted to racist treason when one Republican said his goal was to make Obama a one-term president.  As SOON as the election was over, Democrats began to try to undermine the legitimacy of Trump’s election win by suggesting that the election had been “hacked” by Russia.

For the “real news” angle, first let me say that the term “hacked” is a loaded and baked term of slander: NO ONE HAS EVER SUGGESTED that ANY of the Clinton or Podesta or DNC emails leaked to WikiLeaks had been “hacked.”  They were NOT CHANGED.  There has NEVER BEEN A SINGLE INSTANCE WHERE WIKILEAKS HAS EVER CHANGED THE CONTENTS OF ANY EMAIL OR SECRET THEY HAVE PUBLICIZED.

And in fact – for all the crap about Russia – the Washington Times has revealed that the source of the LEAKS of Hillary Clinton was a DEMOCRAT WHISTLEBLOWER who was disgusted of Hillary Clinton’s appalling dishonesty:

A WikiLeaks figure is claiming that he received leaked Clinton campaign emails from a “disgusted” Democratic whistleblower, while the White House continued to blame Russian hackers Wednesday for meddling in the presidential election and asserted that Donald Trump was “obviously aware” of Moscow’s efforts on his behalf.

Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, said in the report by the Daily Mail that he flew to Washington for a clandestine handoff with one of the email sources in September.

He said he received a package in a wooded area near American University.
“Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,” Mr. Murray told the British newspaper. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”

WikiLeaks published thousands of emails stolen from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, providing a steady stream of negative news coverage of the Democratic presidential nominee during the final weeks of the campaign. Mr. Murray said the leakers were motivated by “disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.”

On that one, we KNOW that Democrats are perfectly capable of “rigging” an election; because that is precisely what Hillary and the DNC and numerous “journalists” actually did to Bernie Sanders!!!

And while I’m asking these questions, let me ask just what kind of rabid, morally schizophrenic fool ARE you not to believe that the Democrats who were PROVEN to have rigged an election against Bernie Sanders would rig an election in a damn heartbeat against a man they despise far, FAR more than Bernie Sanders???

Amazingly, Kool-Aid-drinking, screaming, hysterical, rabid Democrats are now pointing to the very emails that prove they themselves rigged an election to claim that the election was somehow rigged.  Because apparently to tell the truth or to allow the truth to be revealed amounts to “rigging” for these lying slandering perverts.

To whatever the hell extent Russia was involved, they were GIVEN access first to Hillary Clinton, and then through her to her campaign manager John Podesta, and from them to the DNC, by Hilary Clinton’s illegal and immoral use of a secret private server that she didn’t bother to protect.

What about THAT “real news” angle about the avalanche of FAKE NEWS that the Democrats, that Barack Obama, that Hillary Clinton, that the DNC, had been falsely perpetuating for MONTHS regarding Hillary’s email scandal where they claimed over and over again that there was no way the Russians had “hacked” a CRIMINALLY and TREASONOUSLY IRRESPONSIBLE AND RECKLESS HILLARY CLINTON SECRET SERVER.  And now these same cynical, lying fascists are out there screaming as they try to exploit Hillary’s criminal, treasonous reckless irresponsibility as their primary mans to undermine the presidency of the man who won the election???

What about the “fake news” of reporting this story purely from the eyes of the leftist roach and NEVER from the vantage point of the TRUTH???

All this “fake news” crap about Russia being responsible for this and Obama and his handpicked “intelligence professionals” refusing to allow Congress to see any “evidence” of that – when we have credible reports that no, it was NOT Russia, but a whistleblowing DEMOCRAT – have another “real news” angle that in their zeal to publish “fake news” report after “fake news” report the mainstream media has completely omitted:

What traitor to America allowed this disgrace to HAPPEN in the FIRST PLACE???  His name is Barack Hussein Obama, and at best the man is so incompetent that he should have been removed from office for mental deficiency.

Do you have any damn idea how many times the Russians hacked the Obama regime???  And what did our Disgrace-in-Chief DO about it????

This Washington Times headline says it all:

Obama Shrugs Off Russian Hacking – Until Donald Trump Elected President

I mean, gosh, that makes Obama’s pathetic response sound rather blatantly political, doesn’t it???

Russia played Obama for a fool and Obama was the fool who got played.  What Russia did – again, if they actually even DID anything at all – was to take the candidate who was leading in all the mainstream media’s “fake news” polls and who was therefore supposed to win the election and tell the truth about this evil sociopathic witch to undermine her presidency.  And, of course, in the crazy chance that Trump could win, count on the Democratic Party to treasonously undermine the Trump presidency.  It was win-win.  Which is to say that all the Russians needed for their master plan to succeed was to count on two things that were safe bets: the wickedness and the incompetence of Barack Obama and the Democratic Party.

Let me ask you a question, Democrat: if the next U.S. president is delegitimized – as you are so desperately trying to do with your every tactic since he won no matter how hypocritical or disgraceful by your own previous standards it is – do you or do you not realize that Russia benefits from a delegitimized American presidency???

You are HELPING Russia, you fools.  While screaming just the damn OPPOSITE.

And where is the reporting on THAT bit of “real news”???

I could go on and on and ON about “fake news.”  I could point out that Mark Zuckerberg of FaceBook is vowing to tackle fake news with “fact-checkers” notwithstanding the damn fact that Zuckerberg and his FaceBook were caught RED-DAMNED-HANDED creating “fake news” when it came to targeting and censoring pro-conservative news articles in favor of liberal ones.

Which makes it an amazing act of chutzpah that the primary generator of fake news would tackle “fake news.”

Why don’t we just allow the rapists and the child-molesters to police themselves, while we’re at it???  And as horrifying as that thought is, it still wouldn’t be as destructive to our democracy and to our very civilization as allowing “journalists” to police themselves given what they’ve been busted for doing.

I could talk about Obama and his “fake news” about his ObamaCare disaster that created giant increases in health care premiums amidst less actual health care even as Obama boasted about bogus “insurance” that meant NOTHING; about his failed economy that left millions and millions of middle-class Americans freezing in the mud even as Obama boasted about bogus economic statistics that had no connection to reality; about his failed strategy to cope with terrorism that will have increased by one-thousand, nine-hundred percent by the time he leaves office.

You want to avoid “fake news”?  Then disregard everything Obama says.  Disregard everything ANY Democrat says.  Disregard whatever the New York Times, or the network news stations, CNN, or pretty near anyone else, “report.”

To the extent that we have a problem with “fake news” misleading Americans, it comes down to this: the liberal, mainstream media destroyed all credibility in legitimate reporting due to their constant, over-the-top, partisan, ideological, biased “reporting.”

To the extent that you give liberals control over ANYTHING, they will destroy that thing.  And so we have the examples of health care, education, national security, and yes, most assuredly journalism.  I recall the George Orwell observation, “So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don’t even know that fire is hot.”  And so in their “good intentions” they fail to understand that the road to hell is paved with their damned good intentions and they burn down everything they touch.

If you want to know why “fake news” has become so prominent, look no farther than Democrats and the propagandists who today staff the overwhelming majority of our “news” coverage.  Look at how outrageously dishonest and partisan they are as a matter of routine.

But the heart of liberalism is intolerance, fascism and totalitarianism: and so it’s not that Democrats who still celebrate the “Liar of the Year,” Barack Obama; it’s that THEY want to be in solitary control of all the “fake news” they pump out.  They want to rival voices to be heard.  Just as they don’t want rival STATES to be heard in the electoral college which they therefore want to abolish.

As Obama himself said at the beginning of his presidency, I now say: “Elections have consequences, and at the end of the day, Donald Trump won.”

As Obama himself said – never realizing that his own words would apply to himself and his failed (bowel) movement – “Stop whining,” you pathetic losers.

 

 

 

 

A ‘Threat Against Clinton’? Seriously??? The Neverending Bias and Hypocrisy Of The Media

August 10, 2016

If Donald Trump were to say “Good morning,” the media would ignite a giant scandal, suggesting he said those words on a cloudy day – and worse yet said it with a hateful tone – and even worse still, clearly was implying that only white males deserved to actually have a good morning.

So it shouldn’t be any surprise that Donald Trump is in the hot seat again.  He will continue to be in that hot seat for another 3 months.  Because virtually every single “journalist” in America is a love child of Joseph Goebbels.

NBC covers the latest story this way:

Trump ‘Second Amendment’ Comment Seen as Veiled Threat Against Clinton
by Andrew Rafferty

Donald Trump’s comments Tuesday suggesting that “2nd Amendment people” could stop Hillary Clinton from making judicial nominations sparked outrage from opponents — but the campaign defended the remarks by arguing that Trump was referring to the group’s considerable political power.

“Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish the Second Amendment,” Trump said during a rally in North Carolina on Tuesday.

“By the way, and if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know.”

The Clinton campaign and other Trump opponents rejected Trump campaign’s explanation and blamed the GOP nominee for suggesting violence as a possible means of preventing Clinton from appointing judges if she is elected president.
“This is simple — what Trump is saying is dangerous. A person seeking to be the President of the United States should not suggest violence in any way,” Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook said in a statement.
And Sen. Chris Murphy, D-CT, responded on Twitter: “Don’t treat this as a political misstep. It’s an assassination threat, seriously upping the possibility of a national tragedy & crisis.”
And Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., took to social media to say: “@realDonaldTrump makes death threats because he’s a pathetic coward who can’t handle the fact that he’s losing to a girl.”
She added, “Your reckless comments sound like a two-bit dictator.”
One of the strongest voices condemning Trump was that of Gabby Giffords, who as a congresswoman from Arizona was shot in the head during a public event in January 2011.
“Donald Trump might astound Americans on a routine basis, but we must draw a bright red line between political speech and suggestions of violence,” Giffords said in a joint statement with her husband, astronaut Mark Kelly. “What political leaders say matters to their followers.”
But Trump’s campaign denied that he was suggesting violence, instead saying the real estate mogul was referencing the power gun rights advocates have at the voting booth.
“It’s called the power of unification — 2nd Amendment people have amazing spirit and are tremendously unified, which gives them great political power,” Trump campaign spokesman Jason Miller said in a statement. “And this year, they will be voting in record numbers, and it won’t be for Hillary Clinton, it will be for Donald Trump.”
And Trump running mate, Mike Pence, told reporters Tuesday afternoon that Trump “is clearly saying is that people who cherish that right, who believe that firearms in the hands of law-abiding citizens makes our communities more safe, not less safe, should be involved in the political process and let their voice be heard.”
Asked whether Trump was suggesting violence, Pence said, “of course not, no. Donald Trump is urging people around this country to act in a manner consistent with their convictions in the course of this election, and people who cherish the Second Amendment have a very clear choice in this election.”
Clinton obviously has Secret Service protection, and Cathy Milhoan, director of communication for the agency said they were “aware of the comments” but had no further statement.
It’s not the first time suggestions of violence have become part of the campaign. Last month, the Secret Service said it was investigating New Hampshire State Sen. Al Baldasaro, who serves as an adviser for Trump’s campaign on veteran’s issues, after he called for Clinton to be executed for “treason” related to her use of a private email server.
A Trump spokesperson said the candidate did not agree with those statements. Still, Baldasaro received a shout-out from the candidate at a campaign event last weekend.

Ooh, it’s so, so terrible.  Donald Trump is trying to arrange for Hillary’s assassination.  And neither Hillary nor any of her supporters have said one single thing suggesting a dark and terrible and terrifying future if Donald Trump were to be elected president, such that a crazed Democrat – Democrats and Democrat race-identifying groups being responsible for more than ninety percent of all violent crime in America – might actually assassinate Donald Trump.

As an example, consider what Hillary Clinton supporter Will Smith just suggested:

Actor Will Smith thinks Donald Trump’s presidential candidacy is a good thing for America — because now the country can “cleanse” itself of the Republican nominee and his supporters.

At a press event in Dubai to promote his latest film Suicide Squad, the 47-year-old actor said he believes it is important to “speak out about the insanity” of the 2016 presidential race.

“As painful as it is to hear Donald Trump talk and as embarrassing as it is as an American to hear him talk, I think it’s good,” Smith said, according to the Associated Press. “We get to know who people are and now we get to cleanse it out of our country.”

But so what?  That’s different.

EVERY SINGLE TIME IN HISTORY THAT WORD “CLEANSE” HAS BEEN USED IN ANY SIMILAR CONTEXT, IT WAS A EUPHEMISM FOR THE EXTERMINATION OF A GROUP OF PEOPLE FOR EITHER POLITICAL OR RACIST REASONS.  EVERY SINGLE TIME.  Hitler used it that way; Stalin used it that way; Chairman Mao used it that way; Pol Pot used it that way.  And one more than one hundred million human beings are DEAD because of words just like the words that Hillary supporter Will Smith just used.

And of course, you’ve just got to hand it to Hollywood liberals who make millions of dollars marketing themselves as gun-toting heroes and then campaigning to make everybody else poor as they disarm them.

How many Democrats will never again go to see a Will Smith movie because the man just morally disqualified himself from ever receiving so much as one penny from any American ever again?  Not ONE.

More important, how many mainstream media “journalists” will tie Will Smith directly to Hillary Clinton and associate his incredibly vile remarks to her???  Not ONE.

Another act of savage hypocrisy comes out in this story:

Imagine if Trump were ahead in the polls and one of his leading elected senatorial spokespeople mocked Hillary Clinton, personally attacking her for cowardice and then ending with by mocking that Hillary “can’t handle the fact that she’s losing to a man.”

It is a terrible, unforgivable thing to be a misogynist; but there aint nothing wrong in our culture with a woman openly being a misandrist (a hater of men).  And so the same media that rabidly froths at the mouth every single time Donald Trump or one of his supporters says something that smacks of male chauvinism merely yawns every single time Hillary Clinton or one of her supporters says something anti-male.

But the fact that if you are a journalist, you are a two-faced dishonest hypocrite guarantees that double-standards don’t need to be mentioned.

So Obama CIA-Director Michael Hayden continues with the demonstration of how “facts” work when he said this of Donald Trump:

The former head of the CIA, retired Gen. Michael Hayden, told CNN’s Jake Tapper: “If someone else had said that said outside the hall, he’d be in the back of a police wagon now with the Secret Service questioning him.”
US Secret Service communications director Cathy Milhoan told CNN the agency “is aware of Mr. Trump’s comments.”
Hayden added: “You’re not just responsible for what you say. You are responsible for what people hear.”

Let’s just categorically first state for the record that if “someone else had illegally installed an unauthorized and unsecured secret personal server in a bathroom closet and placed thousands of top secret emails on it so our worst enemies could easily hack the system and steal our most vital secrets, she’d be in GITMO getting WATERBOARDED.

But I guess we’re going to apply a different standard now.

Just as Hayden says, “You’re not just responsible for what you say.  You are responsible for what people hear.”

You know, unless you’re Hillary Clinton, in which case you get to brazenly violate our national security laws and then get away with it on the grounds that you had no idea you were actually doing what you were in fact caught doing.

Here’s a final one: in another so-far-over-the-top-remark it is beyond UNREAL, Hayden called Trump “a clear and present danger”:

MICHAEL HAYDEN: Look, we gotta call balls and strikes the way we see them, alright? We all felt strongly enough about what we believe to be a clear and present danger, that we felt compelled to say what we said…

JAKE TAPPER: You just called Donald Trump a clear and present danger.

You look at the parlance of what that phrase means: If somebody is declared “a clear and present danger,” it literally becomes the duty of every soldier to eliminate that threat by any means necessary.  So in other words, Michael Hayden just called for the assassination of Donald Trump.

But as blatant as all this crap is, we still don’t get to the REAL hypocrisy until we get to Barack Obama’s words:

Obama: ‘If They Bring a Knife to the Fight, We Bring a Gun’
By WSJ Staff
Jun 14, 2008 1:29 pm ET

[Editor’s note: This blog post was published in 2008. In the wake of Saturday’s shooting rampage in Tucson, Ariz., a number of lawmakers and others have called for toning down the political rhetoric and President Barack Obama led a moment of silence this morning for the victims. Click here and here for more. Also, check back with Washington Wire for updates.]

Amy Chozick reports on the presidential race from Philadelphia.

Mobster wisdom tells us never to bring a knife to a gun fight. But what does political wisdom say about bringing a gun to a knife fight?

That’s exactly what Barack Obama said he would do to counter Republican attacks “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said at a Philadelphia fundraiser Friday night. “Because from what I understand folks in Philly like a good brawl. I’ve seen Eagles fans.”

For what it’s worth, that “Saturday’s shooting rampage in Tucson, Arizona” was the very one that ended with Gabby Giffords – who is now all of a sudden “one of the strongest voices condemning Trump” – being shot.

She has never ONCE called out the wicked Barack Hussein Obama for his terrorist threat to use GUNS against Republicans.

Obama also infamously told Latinos on a racist basis “to punish your enemies.”

And to put those words into perspective, Donald Trump didn’t threaten with “guns” the way Obama did; he threatened with the “2nd Amendment.”  Which apparently is even more dangerous than guns.

If Donald Trump meant his threat, than Barack Obama meant his more direct threat.

The fact that Barack Obama said something he shouldn’t have said and got elected means that we have to elect Donald Trump for saying something he shouldn’t have said, just to be fair.

Hey, let’s go back to Hillary Clinton, 2008, explaining why she should remain in the race:

“My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right?” Clinton said. “We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California. I don’t understand it.”

Oh, oh.  Hillary Clinton suggested to her followers that it wasn’t too late yet to assassinate her political rival.

The media jumped all over her for that and Hillary was forced to apologize for her “assassination remark.”  But that was ONLY because the mainstream media was totally in the tank for Obama and treated Hillary like a Republican.

Just as now they’re all totally in the tank for Hillary and are treating Trump like an alien species of Nazi cockroach.

But did Trump use the word “gun” the way Obama did?  Nope.  Did Trump use the word “assassinated” the way Hillary Clinton did?  Nope.

Wouldn’t it be nice if the media actually gave you that history when they breathlessly reported on this story of Donald Trump going beyond the pale that only Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have ever gone beyond before?  Wouldn’t facts in context change the meaning of the story???  Which is why they’re not doing it.

If the media wanted to lambast Trump in a fair way, they could title their story thus: “Trump joins Hillary Clinton in suggesting the assassination of a political rival.”  But it appears that they don’t remember what Hillary did.  And they don’t want anyone else too, either.

The entire project of the mainstream media right now is to make Donald Trump absolutely unelectable by depicting him as an unhinged man.  If the American people understood that Barack Obama threatened to kill his opponents “the Chicago Way” and Hillary Clinton threatened to have her opponent assassinated, you’d have a very different view of Donald Trump’s supposedly “beyond the pale” remark.

Hillary Clinton just came out and said this regarding the “2nd Amendment” as “threat” remark:

“Words matter, my friends.”

You mean, except for every single word in every single one of the 33,000 emails you destroyed so the American people couldn’t see how much YOUR words would have mattered given that they would have put you in prison for the remainder of your natural life???

Mainstream media “journalists” will NEVER be fair.  You can understand that the media has driven in their aiming stakes so that the field of fire will always be directed at Donald Trump.

The only thing we can hope here – given the sheer number of Americans who believe in their 2nd Amendment right to protect themselves in a world that Obama and Clinton have allowed to careen wildly out of control – is the fact that people will rightly view this as proof that Hillary Clinton (who wants to allow any victim of any incident involving a firearm to sue the gun manufacturer thereby putting gun makers out of business and thereby taking away our guns by fiat) truly DOES want to take away our 2nd Amendment and the guns that keep our families safe in our own homes.  All we can do is hope that in their biased frenzy to demonize Trump, the media goes too far and inadvertently strikes a nerve in the American psyche.

Let’s consider what the media is “forgetting” to cover while they hyperventilate over Donald Trump allegedly calling for the assassination of Hillary Clinton…

As we speak, Hillary Clinton just got caught featuring the father of the terrorist mass-murderer at a gay Orlando nightclub proudly supporting the presidential candidate who is by far and away the most pro-terrorist and the most anti-American:

Hillary Terrorist Supporter

Hey kids, that’s “Seddique Mateen, whose son Omar killed 49 people at Pulse nightclub on June 12, was seen grinning as he watched the Democratic presidential nominee speak from the area behind the podium usually reserved for VIPs.”

Usually reserved for VIPs and ALWAYS carefully VETTED.

For the official record, the murderous son, Omar, was ALSO a registered Democrat.

If you’re a terrorist, there is absolutely zero question whom YOU’RE voting for.

Just as if you’re a cop-assassinating criminal, there is zero question whom you’re voting for.

The Democrat Party – especially the Democrat Party that will exist if Hillary Clinton is elected president – is an utterly vile, demonic entity.

But hey, we journalists are Joseph Goebbel’s love children; let’s refuse to talk about ACTUAL TERRORISTS WHO MASS-MURDERED AMERICANS and instead talk about some crap Donald Trump said that we could savagely attack him for.

As we speak, Hillary Clinton is being busted all over the place for quid pro quo deals in which she sold out America to enrich herself at the American people’s expense.  Even the leftist Huffington Post is openly asking, “Has Hillary Clinton won the email battle only to lose the corruption war?”  Even BEFORE this latest slamming indictment proving yet ANOTHER Hillary Clinton act of corruption came out, HuffPo was saying:

Hillary Corrupt Huffpo

You HAVE to click on that to read it: “The evidence showing clear-cut, stupid proof, quid-pro quo between Bill and Hillary Clinton donors and candidate Hillary Clinton is getting too obvious to ignore.”

Unless you are a mainstream media “journalist” love-child of Joseph Goebbels, that is.  Then you can easily ignore it by alleging that whatever quip Donald Trump said today rises to a level that forces us to give ZERO air-time to the documented treasonous criminal that Hillary Clinton is.

We are finding what are textbook examples of “quid-pro quo,” in which access, influence and favors were bought and sold.  In one stunning example, Huma Abedin, Clinton’s top aide – in spite of her now-provably false testimony that Hillary Clinton burned her schedules for security – is caught having an email exchange in which she’s asked for Hillary’s schedule (you know, so people who paid to play can “just happen” to show up where Hillary is) emails back basically saying, “I just happened to leave it on my bed in my hotel room and the door just happens to be unlocked and I just happen not to be there to physically see if you’re looking at it.”

Aside from the obvious sale of that schedule, who ELSE could have seen that schedule?  hen you see this blatantly cavalier attitude toward security when it comes to Hillary Clinton enriching herself, how is it NOT a surprise that the Russians and probably all our other enemies hacked Hillary’s unsecured server that was installed totally for Hillary’s a) convenience and b) ability to break the law and purge the evidence???

Why was Huma Abedin on both payrolls for the Clinton Foundation AND the State Department???  How is that not the very embodiment of “conflict of interest”???  Why did Hillary Clinton personally sign off on such an obvious blatantly dishonest and corrupt double-dip???  Despite signing a pledge that she would never ever EVER conflate State Department business with Clinton Foundation business????

Why did Bill Clinton’s value as a speaker-for-hire suddenly skyrocket so massively after Hillary Clinton became Secretary of State when every other president’s value rapidly declines after leaving office???  Nine years after leaving office, why does Bill Clinton’s value as a speaker suddenly soar from $100,000 a speech to $500,000 a speech???  Other than paying to play for Hillary’s influence as Secretary of State???  Why did the Hillary Clinton State Department approve of so many obvious conflicts of interests involving entities with business or policy interests with the U.S. State Department???

It is WRONG to say that none of this indicts Hillary; ALL of it indicts her.  She signed off on ALL of it.  She is literally the one who set up the entire criminal enterprise.

Donors pushed the Clinton State Department for access, favors, even JOBS.  And of course “jobs” as “favors.”  Pay-to-play.  Quid-pro quo.

Here is just one of MANY textbook dictionary definitions of quid-pro quo “pay-to-play”.

And by the way, NONE of these emails were in those that Hillary turned over to the State Department despite her swearing under oath that she turned over ALL emails involving the State Department to the State Department.

The fact that these emails even exist in and of themselves proves that Hillary Clinton is a criminal.

Most conservatives, myself included, have been pointing out all along that Hillary Clinton did not have a secret unauthorized private server installed to post national security secrets for our enemies to hack and view; rather, she did it as a criminal conspiracy to prevent the transparency that the law requires of our public servants and maintain the ability to destroy evidence – which she did to the tune of some 33,000 purged emails.  The legal theory of the spoliation of evidence inference holds that when a party destroys evidence, it is justifiable to infer that the party had “consciousness of guilt” or other motivation to avoid the evidence.  The destruction of evidence is itself evidence.

In any legitimate system of justice, a court would find Hillary Clinton guilty and respond to her protests by saying, “Well, then, it’s just too damn bad you destroyed all the evidence of your innocence, isn’t it”?

We all understand what Habitat for Humanity does.  What does the Clinton Foundation do?  It was ALWAYS murky.  And now we know with crystal clarity: the Clinton Foundation was a conduit for influencing federal officials at the State Department for the purpose of rewarding Clinton donors with jobs, with favors, with influence on a quid-pro quo basis.

Will the media report the facts?  Will the mainstream media create the drumbeat of saying to Obama and Hillary and all the tools who speak in their stead, “YOU DID WRONG!!!  AND WE ARE GOING TO HOLD YOU ACCOUNTABLE!!!”

NO.  Don’t hold your breath.

Instead, it’s like Trump says “It’s my duty to…” and the entire mainstream media is like, “Trump said ‘doody’!!!”

Realize whether we’re talking about ANY of the ENTIRE Hillary Clinton email scandal, the mainstream media has been WORTHLESS in reporting.  Do you know who forced this story open?  Judicial Watch and the Republican House.  Because the mainstream media that will crawl up Donald Trump’s rectum with a magnifying glass WILL NOT DO ITS JOB OR BE FAIR OR HONEST IN ITS COVERAGE.

No entity on earth is more evil than a biased media that distorts the facts and shapes their narratives.

You might see such a statement and think, “Wait a minute!  ISIS is worse than the mainstream media!”  And my contention is no it isn’t; because if the mainstream media had just done it’s damn JOB rather than spend the last eight years whitewashing for Barack Obama, Obama would NEVER have been allowed to get away with doing NOTHING while that terrorist army exploded into existence and created a caliphate.  The only way an Islamic State can get away with such disgusting and vicious evil is when a dishonest media refuses to report the truth and allows people to believe lies.  Just as the only reason Hillary Clinton is free to run for president rather than already having been convicted and serving a long sentence in PRISON is because the same corrupt, dishonest media will not hold Barack Obama responsible the way they would have had a Republican president tried to exonerate an obviously guilty successor.  Had the Democrats not been allowed to nominate such a terrible and yes, CRIMINAL candidate, the Republicans would not have angrily responded by nominating Donald Trump.  If history proves anything, it is that if you distort or warp history, you allow the most evil things to happen as lies triumph.  The media again and again has allowed the worst outcomes to become reality by playing political games with reality.  People cannot even POSSIBLY do the right thing if they don’t know the truth; and the mainstream media exists today to prevent people from knowing the truth.  And it is for that reason that I believe that journalists will one day scream as they burn in a lower level of hell than the Nazis.

 

 

No Riots? Crime In America By Race, And The Statistical Shenanigans Our Justice Department And FBI (Hillary Owes THEM Big) Play

July 12, 2016

I’m just going to state something right here at the outset: are there racist white people?  Yes.  Are there racist white people forming themselves into hate groups?  Yes.  Is it evil?  Yes.  But there is a stark difference going on in our incredibly toxic culture, because here’s the real question: are those racist white people and their racist hate groups demonized by EVERYBODY???  Yes.  Contrast that to the incredible hypocritical racism we now see coming out of vile hate groups from blacks and from Hispanics.  And then think about the whitewash these racist minority groups get every single damn day.  It’s only racist when white people form into groups: when black lives matter forms (think of the holy hell that would have erupted in our media if a “white lives matter” group gained a substantial following in America; when we have an NAACP (think of how it would be treated if “NAACP” stood for “National Association for the Advancement of Caucasian People”); when we have a Black Congressional Caucus (think of the righteous outrage of black congressmen if we had a “White Congressional Caucus”), etc. etc., ad nauseum.  There is such a massive hypocrite double-standard going on, it is UNREAL.

And the now-provably false argument has been if we just allow this massive hypocrite double standard, if we just give black people more power, more of what they want, they will fully join in with American society.  When what we are clearly seeing is BULL CRAP; rather, what they will do is angrily and bitterly demand more and more and more while feeling less and less and less as stakeholders who have duties themselves.  Blacks have been indoctrinated for the last fifty damn years by the Democratic Party and by the liberal media and by every other leftist source there is that they should have no stake whatsoever in this nation; that we owe THEM rather than they owe anybody else anything.    And so black people feel perfectly okay voting on a profoundly racial basis to get what they want for themselves as a race; but they would be hotter than HELL if white people did what they are doing every single damn day.  And so they have as a result of this kid-glove treatment felt not better and better, but rather worse and worse, more and more angry, more and more bitter.  And now more and more violent.

And it’s exploding now.

And it’s almost entirely based on pure lies.

I just came across something that really surprised me, given the fact that I live in a city that has a high percentage of Hispanics and which is beset with a significant Hispanic gang problem: according to Obama’s Justice Department and FBI – you know, the same people who just absolved Hillary Clinton for any criminal wrongdoing in her secret, private, unauthorized server being used to send and receive thousands of classified emails in violation of our national security, failed to send thousands of work-related emails even though it was her duty to do so and even though she swore under oath before Congress that she had made certain she had done, etc. – NO HISPANIC has EVER committed a single crime.

That’s news, of course, to many Donald Trump supporters who have received vicious beatings at the hands of Democrat Party Hispanic thugs:

6

Any Hispanic criminals out there?  “No habla, gringo! Y si, se puede!”

Pretty amazing, considering how often I’ll be watching the local news or reading my local newspaper and see Hispanic men with Hispanic names being either arrested, tried or sought for arrest; pretty amazing given how many times I’ve gone to jury duty and saw the Hispanic suspect sitting there next to his lawyer.

But true, unless we’re being lied to on such a massive scale it is beyond unreal.

How did this fraud happen?

Consider how the FBI breaks down crime by race:

Untitled

Let’s see.  According to the woman who met secretly with Bill Clinton while his wife was under criminal investigation by her department, according to FBI Director Comey who whitewashed her after acknowledging that she committed such acts of gross negligence and incompetence that she should never be allowed to ever hold ANY government job ever again, we’ve got the following racial groups living in America that we ought to track the criminality of: whites (of course Obama would want to keep track of that one); black or African-American (someone please explain the difference that we need that “or” there); American Indian or Alaska Native; Asian; Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander.

That’s it.  No one else from any other race needs to have their crimes tracked.

So let me introduce an outright lie straight from Planet Hell that Obama has redirected our planetary orbit to travel to and which Hillary Clinton now vows to steer the ship of Planet Earth.

Hispanics are white people whenever they commit a crime.  Somehow they only become “Hispanic” when a Democrat like Obama wants to incite them as a distinct racial group to “punish your enemies” (i.e. white people and Republicans).  And so every single time a Hispanic commits a crime, the FBI blames white people for it.  Every single time.  While every single time Democrats and liberals want these same people who are classified as “white” to castigate whites want them to be “Hispanic,” well, presto-bismo they become “Hispanic” again.

Which would mean, if you were honest, liberal, that every single damn time someone gets caught crossing the Mexican border illegally, another white person just got their justice taken away by the Obama administration.  And the government is actually truly out to get white people.  And liberals lie about it the way Hitler lied about his genocides.  It gets just diabolical if you accept this bullcrap statistical shenanigans we’re getting spoon-fed by liberal progressive government bureaucracies.

And if you actually simply identify Hispanics as NOT being white people – which believe me most Hispanic people are hardcore determined to NOT claim as they themselves daily demonize white people as horrible racists bound on enslaving them – NONWHITES ARE ACTUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR 90% OF ALL CRIMES COMMITTED IN THE UNITED STATES.

Every time a Hispanic robs someone, every time a Hispanic rapes someone, every time a Hispanic murders someone, every single Hispanic criminal thug and gang member and drug dealer there is, WHITE PEOPLE GET THE BLAME.

Nonwhites commit ninety percent of the damn crimes.  Amazing,

And so you see blathering bullcrap like this one that I post in its entirety at the bottom of this article in which whites get that leftist hate-blame and Hispanics are NOT EVEN MENTIONED AT ALL.

And here is the article preserved that points out the shocking percentage of our crime that is “nonwhite” and which correctly points out the shenanigans that the government plays to “fundamentally transform” the truth about nonwhite crime:

90% Nonwhite Violent Crime Rate: FBI
November 3, 2015 by TNO Staff— in North America

FBI-2014

Although the FBI and the US Census Bureau does its best to deliberately hide the nonwhite crime plague—by ascribing all Hispanic crime to whites, even this devious tactic cannot hide the full extent of black and Hispanic crime in America.

This fact becomes even more apparent when the crime rates for cities with majority nonwhite populations are compared, and when the FBI’s own “most wanted” lists are studied for racial categorization errors.

The official federal government’s definitions of race—as used by the FBI—only have the following categories: “white,” “black,” “American Indian or Alaska Native,” and “Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. All Hispanics are added to the “white” category, along with all North Africans, Arabs, Middle Easterners, and Jews.

The FBI’s own current (November 2015) list of most wanted murder suspects in the US is a case in point. It contains 71 suspects—of which only six are actually white, as can be seen from their mugshots.

FBi-Murder-wanted

Some 51 of the remaining suspects are nonwhite Hispanics. Nonetheless, the FBI has classified all 51 of these people as “white.” (The remainder are correctly classified as “black.”)

Some examples from the FBI’s “most wanted murderer” list serve to illustrate the point:

1. The FBI wanted list describes one Cesar Villarreal as follows:

DESCRIPTION Hair: Black, Eyes: Brown, Race: White (Hispanic)

cesar-villarreal-FBI

2. Santino Mario Garcia is described as follows:

DESCRIPTION Hair: Black, Eyes: Brown, Race: White (Hispanic)

santino-mario-garcia-FBI

3. Moises Galvan Gonzalez is described as follows:

Hair: Brown, Eyes: Brown, Race: White (Hispanic)

moises-galvan-gonzalez-FBI

The deliberate misclassification is done with the express purpose of boosting the number of crimes which the FBI ascribes to its “white” category.

This is done because the federal statisticians are aware that if they correctly identified these Hispanics as nonwhite, then it would be impossible for even the controlled media to hide the overwhelming nonwhite crime plague.

As the FBI refuses to correctly classify offenders by race, it is only possible to make assumptions based on their own “most wanted” lists.

Using, for example, the FBI’s “most wanted murderer” list, it would seem to be a safe assumption that only a fraction of the suspects identified as “white” by the federal agencies are in fact European-Americans.

FBIfeatured

Using this “most wanted murderer” list, for example, it would not be unreasonable to assume that only 11 percent (or 6 of 51 suspects) of all the murders crimes ascribed to “whites” by the FBI, were in fact committed by European-Americans.

Given the caveat that this assumption is based purely on the FBI’s “most wanted list,” and is therefore subject to a certain degree of variation, it is possible to undertake the following analysis of the FBI’s other statistics as outlined in their latest “Crime in the United States, 2014” report.

READ  Invaders Block Calais Roads

According to the FBI, there were an estimated 1,165,383 violent crimes (murder and non-negligent homicides, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults) in 2014.

For the category of “violent crimes there were a total of 8,730,665 arrests, broken down by the FBI as follows:

“White” 6,056,687 or 69.4%

“Black or African American” 2,427,683 or 27.8%

“American Indian or Alaska Native” 135,599 or 1.6%

Asian 100,067 or 1.1%

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” 10,629 or 0.1%

Using the “11% formula outlined above, it is safe to assume that European-Americans in reality only accounted for 666,235 arrests for violent crimes. This translated to 7.63% of all such arrests.

Nonwhites accounted therefore, for at least 92% of all arrestees for violent crime in 2014.

The FBI statistics for the individual crimes which make up the “violent crime” are as follows:

  1. Murder and non-negligent manslaughter

Total Arrests: 8,230, broken down as follows:

“White” 3,807 or 46.3%

“Black or African American” 4,224 or 51.3%

“American Indian or Alaska Native” 83 or 1.0%

Asian 107 or 1.3%

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” 9, or 0.1%

Once the “11%” formula is applied to these deliberately misclassified figures, it transpires that European-Americans committed 905 murders in 2014, or 10% of all such crimes.

  1. Rape

Total Arrests: 16,326, broken down as follows:

White 10,977 or 67.2%

“Black or African American” 4,888 or 29.9%

“American Indian or Alaska Native” 212 or 1.3%

Asian 222 or 1.4%

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” 27 or 0.2%

Once the “11%” formula is applied to these deliberately misclassified figures, it transpires that European-Americans committed 1,795 rapes in 2014, or 10% of all such crimes.

  1. Robbery

Total Arrests: 74,077, broken down as follows:

“White” 31,354 or 42.3%

“Black or African American” 41,379 or 55.9%

“American Indian or Alaska Native” 616 or 0.8%

Asian 617 or 0.8%

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” 111 or 0.1%

Once the “11%” formula is applied to these deliberately misclassified figures, it transpires that European-Americans committed 8,148 robberies in 2014, or 10% of all such crimes.

  1. Aggravated assault

Total Arrests: 291,600, broken down as follows:

“White” 185,612 or 63.7%

“Black or African American” 96,511 or 33.1%

“American Indian or Alaska Native” 4,372 or 1.5%

Asian 4,507 or 1.5%

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” 598 or 0.2%

Once the “11%” formula is applied to these deliberately misclassified figures, it transpires that European-Americans committed 32.076 robberies in 2014, or 11% of all such crimes.

READ  As Rumors of Immigration Amnesty Increase, Third World Invaders Send their Young Kids to America to Stake Their Claim

Of course, once the disproportionate population figures are taken into account (the fact that whites make up over 60 percent of the entire population), then the nonwhite crime figures leap out of all proportion in relation to their actual population numbers.

The FBI statistics showed further that the cities which are the least white, are the most dangerous. Figures contained in table 6 of the FBI statistics, “Crime in the United States by Metropolitan Statistical area, 2014” reveal the following:

Most Dangerous Cities with populations above 200,000.

No. 1: Detroit (93% nonwhite 2010)

No. 2: Memphis, Tennessee (67% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 3: Oakland, California (75% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 4: St. Louis, Missouri (57% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 5: Birmingham, Alabama (79% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 6: Milwaukee, Wisconsin (67% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 7: Baltimore, Maryland (72% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 8: Cleveland, Ohio (67% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 9: Stockton, California (78% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 10: Indianapolis, Indiana (US Census Bureau does not provide statistics for the city, only for the city and some 368.1 square miles around the city, called the “Indianapolis (city (balance)).” These figures say that the area was 43% nonwhite in 2010. An article in the Indianapolis Recorder of July 3, 2105, reported that “population growth in [Indianapolis] America’s 11th largest city continues to be fueled in large part by African-Americans and to a lesser extent by Hispanics and Asians.”)

Furthermore, the FBI figures showed that the biggest cities with the highest violent crime rates were as follows:

Detroit, Michigan 1988.63 violent crimes per capita

Memphis, Tennessee 1740.51 violent crimes per capita

Oakland, California 1685.39 violent crimes per capita

St. Louis, Missouri 1678.73 violent crimes per capita

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1476.41 violent crimes per capita

Baltimore, Maryland 1338.54 violent crimes per capita

Cleveland, Ohio 1334.35 violent crimes per capita

Stockton, California 1331.47 violent crimes per capita

Indianapolis, Indiana 1254.66 violent crimes per capita

Of America’s three biggest cities, Chicago had the highest violent crime rate at 884.26 violent crimes per capita.

New York City had a rate of 596.7 and Los Angeles had a rate of 490.71.

The biggest cities with the highest murder rates were as follows:

St. Louis, Missouri 49.91 murders per capita

Detroit, Michigan 43.52 murders per capita

New Orleans, Louisiana (70% nonwhite in 2010) 38.75 murders per capita

Baltimore, Maryland 33.84 murders per capita

Newark, New Jersey (90% nonwhite in 2010) 33.32 murders per capita

Buffalo, New York (55% nonwhite in 2010) 23.22 murders per capita

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (36% nonwhite in 2010) 22.43 murders per capita

Memphis, Tennessee 21.38 murders per capita

Atlanta, Georgia (66% nonwhite in 2010) 20.47 murders per capita

Cincinati, Ohio (52% nonwhite in 2010) 20.16 murders per capita

I don’t know if the “90 percent thing is in fact true,” but I DO know for an established, documented FACT that every Hispanic crime gets foisted on to “whites” and that liberals are exploiting that government LIE to demonize white people who are NOT guilty of what they are being slandered for.

I think I have established that a) the government is lying to us and the liberal news media is reporting propaganda as “fact,” and b) leftist ideologues are taking these lies to the streets and exploiting them to create the worst racial unrest this nation has seen in my fifty-year lifetime.  And both my parents likewise say they’ve never seen this kind of hate so widespread across the entire nation in THEIR entire lifetimes.

Obama dishonestly blathers on in Warsaw, Poland about how there we are as united as ever under his magnificent leadership and any one who tries to insinuate we’re divided is a liar out to tarnish his marvelous imperial legacy as emperor:

“You’re not seeing riots, you’re not seeing police going after people who are protesting peacefully,” he said.

Nope.  Nothin’ to see here, folks.  White people, please keep shuffling forward in the line labeled, “This way toward slaughterhouse.”  And don’t get anxious about that sign.  It doesn’t mean what you think it means and if you think it means something bad, it’s just because of your innate white racism.

I want you to stop and reflect what Obama does with this: he says “you’re not seeing riots.”  When yes you ARE.  But he puts a comma there, and adds what he describes would entail if we actually were seeing “riots.”  He says, “you’re not seeing police going after people who are protesting peacefully.”  Which is to say that as far as Obama is concerned, it’s not the viciousness and vileness of the rioter that determines whether there is a “riot”; because “rioting” is actually something he blames on POLICE when they go after peaceful protestors.

Does it matter that there IS no racial bias in police shootings, as proven by a Harvard study???  Of COURSE it doesn’t matter.

This is EXACTLY what Obama has done over and over and over again for the last toxic seven years of his regime: insinuate the real blame upon the police.  He’s done it ever since 2009 when he IMMEDIATELY went out and declared “the policie acted stupidly.”  And demonically “disgraced” and “smeared” the police.   And his Department of Injustice has carried on with his attack against the police every single time any black person was killed by a police officer or even just a citizen on his back being punched in the face over and over and over again.

Obama has created – exploiting race as the gasoline he could ignite – an incredibly vicious anti-police climate.  It’s right out of what the Bible said would happen in the last days, described as “the mystery of lawlessness.”   The Democratic Party is the engine of outright LAWLESSNESS in America today, bar none.

Obama SPAWNED this toxic “black lives matter” movement straight out of his roach soul.  And he’s making sure he never allows a serious riot to go to waste.  Even as he lies that we’re not seeing the riots that we’re clearly seeing.

Let’s contrast what Obama said with the goings-on in St. Paul, Minnesota and the words of the police chief to describe what happened:

 

St Paul MN non-riot

ST. PAUL, Minn. – Police arrested about 100 people in St. Paul during protests of the recent police killings of Philando Castile in Falcon Heights and Alton Sterling in Baton Rouge.

Authorities say 21 St. Paul officers and six state troopers were hurt during the protest that shutdown a part of I-94.

About half the arrests came during a blockade of the interstate.

About 50 arrests were made early this morning in another part of St. Paul.

St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman and Police Chief Todd Axtell both condemn the violence.

AXTELL said: “Last night really was the first time in my 28 years as a police officer that I have observed the level of violence that was directed towards our public servants.

The public servants that are there to protect all of us in this room and all of us in our community. And it’s really a disgrace.

And protestors last night turned into criminals. And I’m absolutely disgusted by the acts of some-not all-but some.”

Nope.  No “riots” under his divine magnificence-in-chief.

No riots here, either:

005

Or here:

001

Or here either:

no riots 1

If you see a riot in this picture, it’s actually a Rorschach test that just proved you’re a racist:

no riots 2

What you talkin’ ’bout rioting, Willis:

no riots 3

This is NOT a “riot,” it’s “lifeplace violence”:

no riots 4

PLEASE tell me you don’t see any “rioting” here:

no riots 5

Come on, WHAT “riots”???  The good citizens of Los Estados Unidos are too busy picking up the gold bricks that were left over from Obama paving all of our streets with gold to “riot.”  Who you been listening to, Fox News???

Oh, and no terrorist attacks, either.  It’s all “workplace violence.”  Probably committed by white people, of course.

Come on, please ignore the fact that under Barack Obama’s policies, terrorism has SKYROCKETED by 800 percent between 2010 and last year:

Deaths Due To Terrorism

Please don’t pay any attention to the fact that by the time Obama leaves office, by simple extrapolation of the previous six years, terrorism will have skyrocketed by 1,700 percent.

Violence is exploding across America.  Violence is exploding across our WORLD.  I am now calling Obama the “Half-mast president.”  Because his presidency is a time of national mourning where our flags are constantly at half-mast as he fails and fails and fails over and over and over again.

But he is a pathologically wicked man and he is like Cain and he is NEVER responsible for anything and it’s always Bush or the Republicans or guns or whatever he can demonize at the time.

It’s just lifeplace violence.  All over the world now.  And NONE of it has anything whatsoever to do with Obama or any of his policies.  And everything that is happening is all Bush’s fault.  And please don’t disturb Pharaoh Obama’s golf game until he’s finished when he will come out and slander the 2nd Amendment and the fundamental right that the American people have ALWAYS had throughout our history to keep and bear arms.

This is exactly what the Bible told us would happen under the demonic Antichrist.  The man will be the most arrogant liar and slanderer in all of human history.  And anybody who says otherwise will be branded by a demonic world and a demonic culture as a “racist” or some kind of horrible person.  Because the truth is horrible to the wicked and they will NEVER receive anything but the lies they want to hear.

So they will twist and distort the Holy Bible to “fundamentally transform” homosexual perversion and abortion-murder and LGBT crap and whatever the hell THIS is that is being forced upon our nation’s warriors who used to be able to protect us –

soldiers high heels

and whatever the hell THIS is that Obama did to our sailors as he sold us out to Iran:

Obama Navy Surrendering to Iran

– into “virtues.”  When the Bible declares “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil” and tells us that these things are “virtues” only to the most wicked kind of people who have placed themselves and their nation under the holy wrath of a righteous God.

There’s no virtues under Obama.  Only wickedness and judgment for our national wickedness that this wicked nation VOTED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR.

Police are openly saying they are on edge right now as they are being systematically targeted for assassination in ambush shootings by black lives matter “protesters.”  Blacks sit there and try to insinuate that police are death squads.  Holy crap, what liars they are: there are 8.7 MILLION arrests every single year as police try to keep our cities and our streets safe; and of those 8.7 million arrests, 1/10,000th of one percent of those end up as police shootings.  I mean, hell, yeah, they’re REALLY death squads, aren’t they???  And then add to that the fact that whites – when the racial distinctions are actually applied – constitute more of those “police shootings” than all the blacks and all the Hispanics COMBINED.

Stop and think about it for one second: you see the statistic that blacks as a percentage of their race are killed three times more than whites as a percentage of their race.  And this is offered as “proof” that police are targeting blacks for genocide.  And that’s exactly how the demonically evil black lives matter activists frame it.  But how about this fact: one out of three young black men are either in prison or on parole or are on probation at any given moment.  What the hell percentage of encounters with the police do you think blacks have as a population relative to whites as a population???  With every single one of these bad encounters adding to the likelihood that a shooting will ensue???

And right now, black lives matter, and Democrats, are forcing every single police officer to be forced to contemplate every single black person as a potential cop murderer.  And their trigger fingers are itchy because they just want to do their jobs and go home to their wives and to their kids.

You’re talking about more than ninety percent of all blacks murdered by other blacks.  And black lives matter and the roach “civil rights” leaders like Al Sharpton don’t give one flying damn about it.

They’re not going into the hell that was Barack Obama’s hometown before he sent his chief-of-staff to be the mayor who led it even further into hell on earth.

Black people feel like they are being singled out by police.  And I can’t deny that they aren’t.  But you’ve got to deal with the fact that police can’t HELP but treat black people different WHEN BLACK PEOPLE KEEP ACTING THE DAMN WAY THEY ARE ACTING.

It’s not “racist” for police to look at black people and be a little more wary any more than it is “racist” for me to look at a gray cloud and think it’s going to probably rain.  Because too many times when I see a cloud like that, rain comes.  Just as too many times when police encounter black people, crime comes.

And the simple fact of the matter is that black lives DON’T matter to “black lives matter.”

Black lives matter??? Seriously???  NOT TO BLACK PEOPLE, THEY DON’T!!!  As a result of their roach allegiance to the Democrat Party and its murder machine a.k.a. “abortion,” 6 out of every 10 black babies are murdered in their wombs by their mothers.  As a result of the Democrat Party and abortion, there almost IS no such thing as “a black family,” with seventy percent of black children growing up in a single parent household.  It is simply a FACT that the term “black father” is a contradiction in terms: and given the logic of abortion it OUGHT TO BE.  Because stop and think about the fact that at the moment of conception, every single person who believes in abortion categorically states that no “child” was “fathered.”  The “father” had NOTHING to do with any child and he is forced into the role of passive observer and is literally forced to sit there and passively watch while HIS VERY OWN CHILD IS MURDERED IN A DEMOCRAT ABORTION FACTORY.

This is TEN TIMES more evil than what the Nazis did.  Democrats have murdered SIXTY MILLION BABIES since they legalized infanticide in 1973.

Six out of ten times a black baby is born, a black woman murders that black baby.  And almost every single time a black person is murdered in America, another black person murdered that victim.

And this is the toxic, vile effect of this toxic, vile, Democrat-Party-OWNED race community is boiling over.

Black people made this bed.  They should either lie in it or get the hell out of it.

Instead, they blame everybody else for it and stay in that diseased bed while they piss in it and crap in it and puke in it.  They will NEVER get out of that bed because the Democratic Party OWNS them and TELLS them what to think and what to believe and what to say and what to do.

They will NEVER take personal responsibility for themselves.  Because you CAN’T take personal responsibility for yourself and be a DEMOCRAT.

Now, don’t think all of the above wasn’t done for a propaganda purpose.

And don’t think the decision to label “Hispanic crimes” as “White crimes” wasn’t done for propaganda purposes, either.

Consider this article that I will preserve lest it suddenly be deleted and purged the way more than 30,000 of Hilary’s emails mysteriously were deleted and purged.  Please understand that the following article is pure, unadulterated DRIVEL and I post it to simply document what abject lying roaches liberals truly are.  I challenge you to find the word “Hispanic” or any similar racial descriptive for “Hispanic” in this piece that lambasts whites for criminality:

The TRUTH About FBI Crime Statistics by Race

As more exposure is being given to the unjustified killings of black men by white police officers, the Black Lives Matter movement is gaining momentum. Consequently, many contend that the movement isn’t warranted because police officers murdering black people isn’t the real issue, but instead crime committed by blacks. As a matter fact, the notion that blacks are perpetrating the most crime in this country is said to be the real reason that police are obligated to scrutinize, even target them.

However, according to FBI crime statistics by race, it isn’t blacks who are driving criminal activity. Actually in 2014, blacks committed only 28.3% of all crimes. And it shouldn’t be bewildering that whites dominated commission of crimes by perpetrating 68.9% of them, considering they denote 77% of U.S. citizenry. But according to the media, blacks are the most perilous, and therefore, susceptible to violence.

In addition to suggesting that blacks commit the most crimes in general, it has become standard for the media to promote the misconception that blacks are overwhelmingly committing the most “violent” crimes in the country. However, according to the FBI, the most violent crimes are murders, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, all of which whites excessively perpetrate. In 2014, 390,233 violent acts were committed and blacks were responsible for only 37% of them. Contrary to what the media suggests, statistics prove that whites execute 59% of violent crimes in the U.S.

What source is the media referencing when proclaiming blacks as being the most criminal? The fact is that there is no such source. The media has used all communicative platforms to define black culture as violent, and therefore, are an imminent threat to white people. They use false statistics of criminality against blacks to reinforce the idea that blacks are lawless, and therefore, deserve every form of violence perpetrated against them.

The media completely circumvent actual facts that are publicly displayed on FBI.gov, in order to promote their racist agenda. Mediums such as Fox News, CNN, etc., commit a major disservice when they refuse to acknowledge and divulge the truth about blacks and crime. Falsely convincing society that black people are the most criminal only proves that this country has contempt for blacks, and consequently, view them all as threatening and inferior. The media’s one-sided, superficial, and exaggerated depiction of black people reduces the real variety, depth, and complexity of the entire race.

Furthermore, when the issue of white police officers murdering black people is addressed, mainstream society conspicuously attempts to deflect from the matter by challenging “why isn’t black on white crime discussed?” Well, let’s discuss it now.

FBI data shows that of all white victims of murders (3,005), only 13% (409) are actually committed by blacks.  84% (2,509) of the killings of white people are committed by white people. This fact is overlooked because by acknowledging it requires accepting that white on white crime is just as prevalent as their favorite topic, “Black on black crime.”

FBI statistics also prove that the highest offense charge is “Drug abuse violations.” The data reveals that approximately 69% of those violations were committed by whites and only 29% by blacks. However, there are more blacks in prison for drug related offenses than whites. Furthermore, how is it even possible for blacks to represent only 13.4% of America’s population, but maintain over 60% of the prison populace? This fact is designed to give the impression that blacks are more susceptible and prone to drug crimes than any other race, especially whites.

But it is a fact that marijuana use is roughly equal among blacks and whites, yet blacks are 3.73 times as likely to be arrested for marijuana possession.  It is also a truth that blacks are more likely to get caught with crack, unlike whites who tend to possess powder cocaine. Consequently, people convicted in federal court of possession of 5 grams of crack cocaine will receive a minimum mandatory sentence of 5 years in federal prison. On the other hand, possession of 500 grams of powder cocaine carries the same sentence.

The media will use the disproportion of mass incarceration of blacks to support their false claims that blacks commit the most drug related offenses. Meanwhile, they circumvent revealing the other side of the coin, which is that the prison industrial complex–a system of racist drug laws, and bias policing and court system used for economical and social advancement–is the primary reason that blacks receive stiffer sentences than whites.

The bottom line is that in America, whites kill whites and blacks kill blacks. Nevertheless, police officers are killing blacks significantly more than they are whites, even when whites prove to be more of a threat. Despite the media’s racist motives, the FBI statistics prove that whites are the most violent, and commit the most criminal acts, including murder and drug related offenses.

I am so beyond sick of the lies and the hypocrisy and the racism and the hate that is coming out of the Democratic Party and those whose souls they own.

 

 

The Now Beyond Sick, Ignorant And Evil Joke That Obama And Clinton Have Done Anything But Massively FAIL Against Terrorism

June 16, 2016

The way Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton frame the narrative, we cannot dare go back to the terrible days before Obama when the world was aflame with terrorism.  Barack Obama has succeeded magnificently in staunching terrorism and dragging the world from the precipice of destruction from Bush.  These fools will tell us that if we try to in any way, shape or form blame Islam for terrorist violence, or if we even have a Gitmo to keep terrorists prisoner and interrogate them, that we are to blame for the terrorist crisis because we inflamed the radicals and gave them a recruiting tool.

But let’s take a moment to examine their claims and see how utterly fallacious they truly are:

Today the word “bloodbath” is a properly descriptive term for Iraq, the nation Bush delivered from first Saddam Hussein and then al Qaeda in Iraq.  We go back to the past and we see what the world Bush handed to Obama was like even according to Obama himself and his Vice President Joe Biden: Obama boasted in February 2009, “This strategy is grounded in a clear and achievable goal shared by the Iraqi people and the American people: an Iraq that is sovereign, stable, and self-reliant.”  And Joe Biden was even more clear in his boasting about the “victory” we had won in Iraq: “I am very optimistic about — about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration.

What was the root cause of all that “optimism”:

“By the end of 2008 and in the beginning of 2009, President Bush’s surge strategy, led by General Petraeus and General Odierno, now the Chief of Staff of the Army, defeated the al-Qaeda in Iraq.  I saw the transmissions because I was advising Petraeus on the ground in Iraq.  They showed me the transmissions from al-Qaeda that they were intercepting.  They said: “We are defeated, don’t send any more foreign fighters.”  So we knew how to deal with this enemy in that category.” General Jack Keane, one of the architects of the successful surge strategy that caused the defeat of al Qaeda in Iraq

But something happened that turned victory into defeat and led to the bloodbath rather than the optimistic “great achievement” of a “sovereign, stable, and self-reliant Iraq.”  And that something was the incredibly foolish and frankly evil policies of one Barack Hussein Obama:

US-IRAQ: Generals Seek to Reverse Obama Withdrawal Decision
By Gareth Porter

WASHINGTON, Feb 2 2009 (IPS) – CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus, supported by Defence Secretary Robert Gates, tried to convince President Barack Obama that he had to back down from his campaign pledge to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months at an Oval Office meeting Jan. 21.

But Obama informed Gates, Petraeus and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen that he wasn’t convinced and that he wanted Gates and the military leaders to come back quickly with a detailed 16-month plan, according to two sources who have talked with participants in the meeting.

Obama’s decision to override Petraeus’s recommendation has not ended the conflict between the president and senior military officers over troop withdrawal, however. There are indications that Petraeus and his allies in the military and the Pentagon, including Gen. Ray Odierno, now the top commander in Iraq, have already begun to try to pressure Obama to change his withdrawal policy.

A network of senior military officers is also reported to be preparing to support Petraeus and Odierno by mobilising public opinion against Obama’s decision.

Petraeus was visibly unhappy when he left the Oval Office, according to one of the sources. A White House staffer present at the meeting was quoted by the source as saying, “Petraeus made the mistake of thinking he was still dealing with George Bush instead of with Barack Obama.”

Petraeus, Gates and Odierno had hoped to sell Obama on a plan that they formulated in the final months of the Bush administration that aimed at getting around a key provision of the U.S.-Iraqi withdrawal agreement signed envisioned re-categorising large numbers of combat troops as support troops. That subterfuge was by the United States last November while ostensibly allowing Obama to deliver on his campaign promise.

Gates and Mullen had discussed the relabeling scheme with Obama as part of the Petraeus-Odierno plan for withdrawal they had presented to him in mid-December, according to a Dec. 18 New York Times story. […]

Petraeus made the mistake of not realizing that Barack Obama was an unmitigated FOOL unlike Bush, who listened to his generals’ recommendations.  That’s the bottom line.

Every single general was absolutely and fundamentally and profoundly opposed to Obama’s cut-and-run policy and knew it would amount to a return of the very war we had WON with American blood and treasure.  But Obama did it anyway.  And NO, it had NOTHING to do with the “status of forces agreement” that Bush signed.  Bush signed that agreement having listened to his generals – something Obama has STILL never done – and understanding that the agreement would do nothing to constrain our policy objectives because there were plenty of ways for our troops to remain and keep the peace we had won.  Rather, Obama unilaterally determined to do something that his generals said was foolhardy and which history has since proven to have been foolhardy.

In 2011, General Jack Keane predicted the complete, unmitigated disaster that Obama’s policies would become:

President Obama’s decision to pull all U.S. forces out of Iraq by Dec. 31 is an “absolute disaster” that puts the burgeoning Arab democracy at risk of an Iranian “strangling,” said an architect of the 2007 troop surge that turned around a losing war.

Retired Army Gen. John M. Keane was at the forefront of persuading President George W. Bush to scuttle a static counterinsurgency strategy and replace it with 30,000 reinforcements and a more activist, street-by-street counterterrorism tactic.

Today, even with that strategy producing a huge drop in daily attacks, Gen. Keane bluntly told The Washington Times that the United States again is losing.

“I think it’s an absolute disaster,” said Gen. Keane, who advised Gen. David H. Petraeus when he was top Iraq commander. “We won the war in Iraq, and we’re now losing the peace.”

U.S. troops will be vacating Iraq at a time when neither Baghdad’s counterterrorism skills nor its abilities to protect against invasion are at levels needed to fully protect the country, say analysts long involved in the nearly nine-year war.

“Forty-four hundred lives lost,” Gen. Keane said. “Tens of thousands of troops wounded. Over a couple hundred thousand Iraqis killed. We liberated 25 million people. There is only one Arab Muslim country that elects its own government, and that is Iraq.

Obama gave up Iraq.  He abandoned Syria after making one of the most foolish threats in history and then proving he was a coward and a paper tiger by abandoning his own words when he declared a “red line” in Syria that Syria stepped across over and over and over again.  And in so doing Obama pissed away any shred of credibility he still had.  And he has NONE now in the eyes of either our enemies or our wavering allies.

And as a result of Obama’s absolute foolish and pathetic gutlessness, consider the results: and HOW DOES THIS NOT PROVE OBAMA HAS FAILED BEYOND CATASTROPHE!!!???

Terrorism Toll 800% Higher Since 2010
“I don’t think people have grasped how significant these numbers are.”
3.29.2016 |
News | Mark Tapson

A new report blames the rapid expansion of Islamist groups across the Middle East and Africa for the booming death toll of terrorism worldwide: a nearly 800 percent rise since 2010.

According to Fox News, terrorism expert Steven Emerson’s nonprofit Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) found that an average of nearly 30,000 people per year have been killed by terrorists since 2010, when terrorism’s death toll was 3,284. The study identifies two troubling trends: more attacks are happening, and they are deadlier than ever.

Emerson, the executive director of IPT, said,

“Everyone has known that terrorist attacks have generally been increasing yearly since 9/11. But the magnitude of the increase of the attacks surprised us, especially in the past five years. Even if you look back at the annual reports issued by the most senior analysts in the top five intelligence and counter-terrorism agencies, there is not one report that predicted or forecasted that we would likely see such a massive escalation of attacks.”

The study credits the rise in part to the fact that Islamist terror groups like Boko Haram in Nigeria, Al Shabaab in Somalia, a resurgent Taliban, Palestinian terrorists, and President Obama’s JB team ISIS are operating in more countries than ever, especially in the Middle East and Africa.

Deaths Due To Terrorism

Fox reports:

IPT’s report used data collected by the University of Maryland’s Global Terrorism Database. Looking at various intervals following the 9/11 attacks, and sorting out deaths caused by clear acts of terrorism — not simply war involving known terrorist groups — IPT found annual terror deaths have jumped 774 percent since the 2007-11 average.

‘[The numbers] are striking when you take into account where the numbers were at the beginning period,” said Pete Hoekstra, who chaired the House Intelligence Committee when he represented Michigan in the U.S. Congress. “I don’t think people have grasped how significant these [death toll] numbers are.” […]

The attack we just saw in Orlando, Florida – THE worst mass shooting in all of American HISTORY very much in spite of the fact that this is a nation that has been a gun culture from day ONE – ought to be all you need to prove that things are getting worse and worse and worse rather than better and better and better.

When you look at the giant jump in terrorist killings between 2012-13 and 2014-15 – to the tune of a DOUBLING of deaths caused by terrorism – we can consider the trend and safely estimate that terrorism will create at least 45,000 deaths in the 2016-17 year range and as many as 60,000 deaths.  Which is to say that by the time Obama leaves office, he will be personally responsible for a 1,270 percent increase to as much as a 1,707 percent increase in terrorist killings during his watch.

Question: How can these people say their policies and their strategies and their solutions have done anything but fail and then wildly fail and then demonically fail some more???  Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and the whole LOT of Democrats are now proven rabid fools by the only measure that matters: the measure of actual fact.

According to the United Nations, there are more refugees in the world today fleeing terror and horror and murder than at any time in all recorded human history.

Think about it: if you are a Democrat, you are actually so demon-possessed insane-stupid to believe these are good things, and that Obama making the world a thousand percent PLUS worse than Bush is a good thing.

That’s where we are at now: we are dealing with a Party that is lock, stock and barrel owned by Satan.  And Barack Obama is Allah’s Most Useful Idiot.

It is beyond amazing that we have had THOUSANDS of terrorist attacks with tens of thousands of deaths, and yet somehow the fact that 99.99999999999999999999 percent of these attacks have been from people claiming to be Muslims killing in the name of Allah is nothing but the most trivial coincidence.

It’s not enough that they dismiss the obvious link between terrorism and Islam and Islam and violence.  I’ve written about why it is a genetic, pathological condition that stems from the Prophet Muhammad himself as revealed in both the Qur’an and the history of Islam.  The very word “assassin” came from the first Muslim Fedayeen in the 11th century.  The Muslim terrorists we see today are as old as Islam.  That followed Muhammad’s reign of terror and violence in Arabia; that followed the vicious split between Sunni and Shiite over who should succeed Muhammad upon his death; that was subsequently followed by the invasion of Christian Europe by Muslims that was finally stopped in FRANCE on the opposite side of the continent by Charles “the Hammer” Martel one hundred years after Muhammad’s death (by poisoning by his own Muslim followers); and after that there was the Muslim attempted violent conquest of Spain until they were stopped by El Cid.  at some point, of course, rabidly intolerant Muslims built their Dome of the Rock DIRECTLY ON  TOP of the Wailing Wall that represents the holiest site in all Judaism.  And if Democrats had any integrity whatsoever, they would demand that Islam tear down that mosque and allow Israel to have the sacred site that was clearly there first BECAUSE MUSLIMS BUILT THEIR DAMN MOSQUE DIRECTLY ON TOP OF IT.  Again, our own founding fathers had to deal with Islamic terrorists, because that’s exactly what the Barbary Pirates were.

Islam is violence and it is terrorism.  And it always HAS been violence and terrorism unless it was cowed into being peaceful by the raw power of those who would otherwise be forced to submit to Islam.

That’s right.  Islam means “Submission.”  And because of Islam SOMETHING and SOMEONE is going to be FORCED to submit; either they will submit or they will submit us to their totalitarian political system masquerading as a peaceful religion.

But Democrats go even FARTHER, and slander and demagogue in such a manner that any attempt to point out the truth about the nature of Islam, or the demand that Muslims come to grips with the obvious violence that is routinely carried out by this “peaceful” religion, is somehow inciting and thereby being responsible for even more violence from these savage beheaders.  In fact, they tell us, even to try to put them in prison is itself an incitement; which is why we must first of all acknowledge that America is actually to blame for terrorism and then dismantle Gitmo.

PLEASE stop and think about that whackjob blather: think of how most of the 1.6 billion Muslims who live in Muslim countries treat women, treat gays, etc.  If you TRULY don’t want to incite and inflame Muslims, HOW THE HELL COULD YOU VOTE FOR A DAMN WOMAN PRESIDENT WHEN THAT IS PROBABLY THE ULTIMATE INSULT TO MUSLIMS???

THIS is what Hillary Clinton ought to be doing if she or her Democrat Party truly wants to respect Islam (standing there in her hijab because she doesn’t have the damn right to do anything else):

Hijab picture

This is how MOST Muslim women on this planet dress: WHY DON’T YOU DRESS THAT WAY, DEMOCRAT???  Because you WOULD, IF you had any honor or decency or virtue or integrity whatsoever based on your own constant denunciations against conservatives for “inciting” more terrorism.

I mean, at least Hillary doesn’t drive a car, because she is a rich elitist who has been chauffeured around most of her life.  But NO Democrat woman ought to be driving a car, or getting an education, or being viewed in public without a male relative to escort her and order her around, or being viewed at ALL because she will wear a hijab.

Oh, mindless liberal, you say Muslims are FINE with a female president as you keep (falsely and frankly idiotically) lecturing us that the only reason the Muslim terrorist attacked was because he was homophobic – you know, due to Republicans’ and Christians’ insistence on basic morality???  Well, listen to an imam who taught the Orlando shooter Omar Mateen:

A fundamentalist Muslim imam who hosted an online seminary course attended by Orlando terrorist Omar Mateen – but who denied ties to the “gay” nightclub murderer – told Greta Van Susteren during a Fox News interview that Hillary Clinton shouldn’t be president because according to his faith’s prophet, her anger during her monthly menstruation cycle would make her a poor leader.

“As a Muslim, I object to Hillary Clinton,” said Abu Taubah, who’s also gone by the name of Marcus Dwayne Robertson, a former U.S. Marine who’s worked as a bodyguard for Omar Abdel-Rahman, the “Blind Sheik,” Breitbart reported. The “Blind Sheik” was involved in the 1993 World Trade Center attack.

He expanded on his views of women in leadership roles, saying the idea wasn’t compatible with his religious beliefs.

“I don’t believe women should be the president of a nation. … [Our prophet] taught us that whenever a woman is in charge, is going to be problems,” he said. “What if she’s on her menses and it’s time to go to war, she going to press the button cause she’s angry? I like Bernie [Sanders].”

If you truly don’t want to offend Islam, VOTE FOR WHATEVER MAN IS RUNNING AGAINST HER.  OR AT LEAST PLEASE SHUT UP WITH YOUR PC BULLCRAP THAT CONSERVATIVES ARE “OFFENDING” MUSLIMS AND KEEPING THIS WAR GOING WHEN IT IS YOU WHO ARE OFFENDING MUSLIMS AND KEEPING THIS DAMN WAR GOING BY YOUR OWN LOGIC.

In the same way, given Koranic teaching, given the teaching embraced by the entirety of the Islamic world, how do you justify passing LGBT and gay marriage laws???  How is THAT not a giant, radical, massive act of defiant incitement against Islam???  If you want to show “tolerance” and “respect” for Islam, Democrats, you are STONING these depraved infidel perverts.  BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT MUSLIMS DO ALL OVER THE DAMN WORLD.

Bottom line, to the extent that Muslims have any right to hate us, any right to blame us, any right to attack us, it is because of DEMOCRATS and ONLY because of Democrats.

And yet the same demonic bureaucrats otherwise known as DEMOCRATS maintain that just as Obama has been “successful” in his strategy against terrorism (that has nothing to do with Islam; nope, nothin’ to see here, folks!) likewise believe that their own IN-YOUR-FACE-ISLAM liberal policies are anything other than justifications for continued Muslim terrorist slaughter of Westerners.

No human being could even possibly be that stupid unless “the god of this world” were “blinding their eyes so they cannot see” (2 Corinthians 4:4).  And yet we’re seeing this level of stupid all around us.

Lastly, there is this vile myth that somehow Obama and Hillary Clinton are these “voices of tolerance” against the rabid intolerance of Trumps and against conservatives and against Christians.  I am just so beyond SICK of it.  Donald Trump – responding to Obama’s childish rant – pointed out the fact that Obama was far angrier at Trump than he was at the Orlando terrorist shooter.  And other than demonizing guns and our Bill of Rights that guarantees Americans have the absolute constitutional right to keep and bear them, Obama is absolutely bloodless and passionless about decrying the terrorism that he still steadfastly refuses to identity the actual damn SOURCE of.  In his childish, unhinged rant he refers to demands that he acknowledge Islam as the source of terrorism as a “magic word,” as if it truly doesn’t matter whether or not we know who our enemy is and that it makes no difference if we blindfold ourselves and swing wildly in all directions rather than having a coherent strategy that will actually do something other than produce death tolls that increase over a thousand percent.  Because no you are NOT merely “calling it a different name”; you are finally correctly identifying its actual source which means we could finally DO SOMETHING TO DEAL WITH IT AND STOP IT.

Again, when terrorism has already increased over 800 percent during your failed watch, Obama, and is likely to have increased by over FIFTEEN HUNDRED PERCENT by the time you finally leave your wretched office, maybe, just maybe, you HAVEN’T done “everything to do with actually defeating terrorism.”  Maybe it’s YOU who ought to stop your “yapping” you craven, yapping hyena.

I want you to see the result of Obama’s and Hillary Clinton’s hateful rhetoric against Trump and against conservatives.  Because one political party in America today – the Democratic Party – has actually OPENLY EMBRACED political viciousness and violence and thuggishness and I dare say TERRORISM against the other party:

7

6

10

That’s what it looks like to be a conservative today as Democratic Party Nazi SA Brownshirt thugs surround you and start attacking you.

We are watching organized Democrat violence against the Republican Party.  And the Democrats, like the Nazis, actually make the Nazi claim that their victims deserve their vicious beatings.

Democrats are nothing short of the worst hypocrites who ever lived in all of human history.

Obama and Hillary Clinton are seemingly gleefully allowing terrorism abroad and terrorism from their own party.

In Greek mythology, there is the story of Cassandra, who was given a box by the god Apollo and told never to open it.  But curiosity got the better of her, and so she opened it and was able to clearly see the future.  But the gods, in their stratagem to solve the crisis, ordained it that while Cassandra would scream and rave of what would be, no one would ever believe her.

That is precisely what it is like to be a Bible-believing Christian and a conservative thinker in today’s mass -media-mindless world.

And so people like me sit here, stunned, having predicted for eight terrible years that Obama would fail in every way, and having been proven right over and over with every matter, realizing the horror of living in a world where truth means nothing, and reality means nothing, and morality means nothing.

 

Donald Trump’s La Raza (‘The Race’) Federal Judge: Why Is It Okay For Racists To Advance Their Race As Long As That Race Isn’t White?

June 6, 2016

You know that saying, “Two wrongs don’t make a right”?  It’s true, of course.  But Democrats love to think that three or four wrongs DO make a right – and so they love to point a finger of blame for “racism” and everyone is supposed to conveniently forget all the fingers pointing back at THEM.

You liberals want to think that all judges are “objective” or “fair”?  Good; then get behind the six month sentence that Brock Turner’s judge gave him for raping a young woman.  Because we very much live in a day when judges are unjust and unfair every single day.  Judge Persky is a graduate of one of the reliably leftist colleges in America (Stanford, which featured a record of having 90% of faculty stating a political party being Democrats); he belonged to numerous organizations that any good liberal would be proud for belonging to.  And he’s one of YOURS.  And so DONT YOU DARE QESTION WHETHER JUDGE PERSKY AND HIS UNIMPEACHABLE RECORD BEING BIASED OR UNFAIR.

I am so beyond SICK of the rabid hypocrisy that IS every single Democrat in America right now.

Okay.  Close your eyes and imagine the bat poop ape crap that the mainstream media would be in if Barack Obama found himself in trouble with a federal judge who belonged to a group called “The White Lawyers Association of Alabama” who had spent his career ensuring that members of the white race and ONLY members of the white race would get a helping hand into the legal profession.

How do you feel about members of the white race determining to advance fellow members of the white race in exclusion of all other races???

How many Democrats have cheered the prospect of a “Congressional White Caucus” the way they have done with the Congressional Black Caucus?  How many liberals find themselves celebrating the “diversity” of a “National Association for the Advancement of Caucasian People” the way they have cheered the “National Association for the Advancement of Colored People” (a.k.a., the NAACP)???  Do white people get to have a WET channel – White Entertainment Television – and hand out awards exclusively to white entertainers and praising them for exalting the white race the way the other side does with BET???

For that matter, how many reporters are focusing on the racist angle of Hispanics waving Mexican flags, burning American flags, and then chasing down, surrounding, and beating white people at Donald Trump events???  How is it NOT racist when Mexican-flag-wielding Hispanic thugs beat down white people at political rallies they barged into to suppress???

Why is it okay to be a hard-core racist, providing that the race you are working to advance is a member of the Democrat Party race coalition???  Why does “racism” only work one way (i.e. the way that favors and ALWAYS favors the left)???

If you are a liberal you are a hard-core, racist, bigoted hypocrite.  Period.  End of story.  Your political party has been a documented racist enterprise since the Civil War when it fought a vicious war to keep the institution of slavery.  And it doesn’t matter whether it’s black people or Hispanic people or women or homosexuals or what, you have this obscene, perverted way of setting one group against another group and exalting the interests of that group that you are exalting.  And as long as the other side never dares suggest that they should be able to do what you do every nanosecond of your perverted, depraved lives, everything is okay.

This Judge Gonzalo Curiel is a “judge,” a member of the American legal institution, who has actively assisted illegal immigrants – with the emphasis on that word “ILLEGAL” – to violate the laws of our land because of his racist preferences and his lifelong determination to advance the Hispanic race.

Why is that okay???  Why is ANY of that okay???

Judge Presiding Over Trump University Case Is Member Of La Raza Lawyers Group [VIDEO]
Alex Pfeiffer
Reporter
5:32 PM 06/01/2016

United States District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel, the man presiding over the class-action lawsuit against Trump University, is a member of the La Raza Lawyers of San Diego and oversaw the gift of a law school scholarship to an illegal alien.

In his 2011 judicial questionnaire to become a federal judge, Curiel revealed his history with La Raza. GotNews.com originally reported this Tuesday, and The Daily Caller has independently verified.

Curiel lists “La Raza Lawyers of San Diego” as a legal association he has been a part of in the questionnaire. Curiel’s office at the United States District Court for the Southern District of California confirmed to TheDC the judge’s membership in the group.

Curiel reveals more ties to the group in his questionnaire. He has spoken at two receptions held by La Raza Lawyers of San Diego, the most recent being in 2011. Last year, the group also held a reception for Curiel. The description of the event says, “This year we are proud to be honoring Judge Gonzalo Curiel at our reception and recognizing him for his leadership and support to the community and to our Association!”

United States District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel, the man presiding over the class-action lawsuit against Trump University, is a member of the La Raza Lawyers of San Diego and oversaw the gift of a law school scholarship to an illegal alien.

In his 2011 judicial questionnaire to become a federal judge, Curiel revealed his history with La Raza. GotNews.com originally reported this Tuesday, and The Daily Caller has independently verified.

Curiel lists “La Raza Lawyers of San Diego” as a legal association he has been a part of in the questionnaire. Curiel’s office at the United States District Court for the Southern District of California confirmed to TheDC the judge’s membership in the group.

Curiel reveals more ties to the group in his questionnaire. He has spoken at two receptions held by La Raza Lawyers of San Diego, the most recent being in 2011. Last year, the group also held a reception for Curiel. The description of the event says, “This year we are proud to be honoring Judge Gonzalo Curiel at our reception and recognizing him for his leadership and support to the community and to our Association!”

In addition, Curiel served on the selection committee in 2014 for the La Raza Lawyers of San Diego Scholarship Fund. Six of seven of the recipients of these scholarships ranging from $1500 to $1600 were born in Central America. One of them, Ricardo Elorza, described himself as “undocumented.”

Donald Trump has been critical of Curiel, calling him a “hater” over the weekend. “The judge was appointed by Barack Obama, federal judge. Frankly, he should recuse himself because he’s given us ruling after ruling after ruling, negative, negative, negative,” Trump said. (RELATED: Trump U Docs: Employee Calls Program A Huge Scam)

“What happens is the judge, who happens to be, we believe, Mexican, which is great. I think that’s fine,” Trump added.

“Our organization has not been involved in organizing any of the anti-Trump rallies, much less encouraged our members or anyone to participate in any illegal activity,” La Raza Lawyers of San Diego told TheDC in a statement Wednesday. “We help empower Latino attorneys, judges and law students, and provide services to the greater local Latino community.”

The National Council of La Raza is the largest Hispanic advocacy group in the nation and has taken a strong stance against Trump. They previously called Saturday Night Live a platform for “hate” for inviting on the New York businessman. La Raza translates to “the race” in English.

La Raza Lawyers of San Diego is not a local chapter of the national organization and take offense to the literal translation of the organization’s name. “Translating our name as ‘the race’ is not only inaccurate, it is factually incorrect. ‘Hispanic’ is an ethnicity, not a race. As anyone who has ever met a Dominican American, Mexican American, or Spanish American can attest, Hispanics can be and are members of any and all races,” the group writes on its website.

This last paragraph is political correctness at work as much as anywhere I’ve ever seen: There is ABSOLUTELY NO QUESTION that “La Raza” directly translates as “The Race.”  But go and ask somebody who is Mexican what “La Raza” means.  And while they have to agree that it certainly without any question formally and technically means “The Race,” they may well say by means of rhetorical colloquial excuse, “But in Mexico, it is used to say ‘The People.'”  It is used to describe “The Community.”  And that doesn’t necessarily sound so racist.  Not until you start probing a little bit and you start to narrow down how incredibly NON-inclusive “La Raza” truly is: for instance, when you use that phrase, “La Raza,” are you including Central American people?  Do Central Americans get to be “La Raza” in Mexico too?  Are they “The Community” too?  Not on your life, they aren’t.  Well, what about your fellow Norte Americanos?  What about the gringos?  Do they get to qualify as “The People”???  Absolutely not.

In other words, “La Raza” is pure racist.  It’s used in a racist manner by Mexicans on either side of the border.  And while there has never been and will never be a group of people more skilled at perverting the obvious meaning of words than Democrats – who literally coined the phrase, “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is,” yeah, it’s racist.

So let’s talk a little more about the Central Americans that NO Mexican describes as “La Raza.”  Do you know that Mexico deports more illegal immigrants (from Central America) than the United States deports illegal immigrants from Mexico???  By the very standard leftist Mexicans want to punch America in the mouth with – and America-hating Democrats are only TOO happy to help them do – Mexicans are a terribly racist people.  And oh my gosh, when you start learning how discriminatory, corrupt, and abusive the Mexicans are in how they treat their own illegal immigrants, you start to realize just how truly wonderful a man Donald Trump clearly is compared to the people who are pouring hate all over him.  Because, again, to be a liberal means to be an abusive perpetrator of the most vicious kind of giant hypocrite double-standard there is.  In Mexico, illegal immigrants from Central America are far too often robbed, raped and even murdered by the authorities and virtually nothing is ever done about it.

I belong to a few “communities” myself.  For instance, my main “community” is my CHURCH.  It has both an Anglo and a Hispanic congregation.  And ANYONE who knows me at my church knows that I spend every BIT as much time with the members of the Hispanic congregation as I do the Anglo congregation, if not more.  I also belong to the “community” of my gym as a weightlifter.  And I don’t care what color you are or what race you are or what your ethnicity is; if you like lifting weights and you’re at my gym, I’m probably your friend.  And so Democrats call people like me a “racist” because unlike them I don’t dedicate my life to embracing my race or my racial cause or fomenting divisions when we are all created in God’s image.

But you don’t believe in God, liberal: you believe in racism and socialism and sodomy and murdering six out of every ten black babies before they can make it out of their mothers’ wombs.

So you just go ahead and start scooping our your brains, liberal, because to you being “open-minded” means all your cerebral matter has to be on the ground and you have to stomp on it repeatedly to make absolutely certain that every single brain cell is dead.  Because only that way can you possibly believe the garbage that Big Brother tells you to believe.

That’s how Democrats manage to believe every new story that Hillary Clinton tells about her fascist secret email server even after events prove that every previous story she told about it was an outright lie.  Just as that’s how Democrats manage to believe that bringing in millions of unskilled laborers won’t undermine wages for American unskilled labor even though the LAW OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND is as certain as the law of gravity and when you bring in millions more unskilled laborers to compete with the unskilled labor pool already here, what the hell do you think will happen other than what has very clearly happened???  But that’s okay; as long as you’re racist enough you will somehow believe that illegal immigration is good for America as long as those illegal immigrants aren’t white people who would vote Republican.

Or, to put it another way, “How many white kids has ‘La Raza Lawyers of San Diego’ given a scholarship to???  ZERO.  What percentage of scholarships has “La Raza” given to members of the Hispanic race?  One hundred percent.  Fact.  Fact.  Fact.  Game.  Set.  Match.  And get your morally and intellectual idiotic “The Race” doesn’t mean “The Race” cockroach crap out of here.

This judge is a member of an organization known as “The Race.”  That should either bar him from having anything to do with our legal institution, or it ought to make racism fair game in our system.  Anyone who belongs to that kind of organization has NO business being allowed to even be a LAWYER in our legal system, let alone a sitting judge.  We live in an age of moral idiocy where we can have a judge who belongs to a group called “The Race” being fabricated into some kind of victim of the very thing he’s dedicated his life to.  Gonzalo Curiel has made it his mission in life to exalt and magnify the Hispanic race and pit his race against other races in the shell-game we today euphemistically call “our justice system.”

Donald Trump was hardly the first one to drag race into court and question whether a leftist Hispanic judge can fairly examine a Republican.  Let’s consider what Justice Sotomayor has said pointing out that race most definitely and defiantly affects decisions:

(1) “I accept the proposition that… to judge is an exercise of power and because … there is no objective stance but only a series of perspectives — no neutrality, no escape from choice in judging, I further accept that our experiences as women and people of color affect our decisions.” – Sonia Sotomayor, 2001

(2) “The aspiration to impartiality is just that — it’s an aspiration because it denies the fact that we are by our experiences making different choices than others.” – Sonia Sotomayor, 2001 

So they themselves are saying “there’s NO neutrality.”  And they themselves are saying at best neutrality is merely an “aspiration” that they can set aside as they make “different choices than others.”

Furthermore, we have Democrats PROUD of the fact that they OWN the black vote, the Hispanic vote.  The mainstream media crows about the fact that Hillary Clinton dominates nonwhite voters to the tune of 90% among black voters, and over 70% of Hispanic voters.  This Judge Curiel is a member of a race organization CALLED “The Race” who gives scholarship to illegal immigrants who are in this country in violation of our laws that he was supposed to uphold but refuses to because his racism takes priority ABOVE the law.  So frankly how on earth is it “racist” to say, “This person comes from a racial heritage that is partisan to the BONE and I’m on the other side of that partisan bigot and I’m about to get screwed”???

Justice is SUPPOSED to be blind.  But we have a record of leftist racist judges saying they can’t and they won’t be neutral and objective and fair.  The left, the Democrat Party, ripped the blindfold OFF of Lady Justice.  They did it gleefully; they’re GLAD they did it.  They have demanded that “Justice” be FORCED to see what Justice was SUPPOSED to be blind to.  Back when Justice was blind, a black persona and a white person could appear in court against one another and JUSTICE would decide; and if a rich person and a poor person could appear in court and JUSTICE would decide: ACCORDING TO THE LAW.  Because sometimes black people are BAD people and sometimes white people are GOOD people and sometimes poor people are BAD people and rich people are GOOD people.  And vice versa.  But now Democrats have imposed “racial justice” and “economic justice” on us.  And now the justice equation has been turned into a mockery by the left.

So we have a “judge” who belongs to a group called “The Race” meting out “justice.”  And we’re all supposed to pretend he has the capacity to actually be fair and objective.

“Justice” is now a game of “Wheel of Fortune” where you spin the wheel of judges and hope you don’t end up with one who wants to screw you.

This is literally biblical and America is heading for Old Testament-style JUDGMENT as a result:

Why do You make me see iniquity, And cause me to look on wickedness?  Yes, destruction and violence are before me; Strife exists and contention arises.  Therefore the law is ignored And justice is never upheld. For the wicked surround the righteous; Therefore justice comes out perverted.  “Look among the nations! Observe! Be astonished! Wonder! Because I am doing something in your days– You would not believe if you were told.  For behold, I am raising up the Chaldeans, That fierce and impetuous people Who march throughout the earth To seize dwelling places which are not theirs.  They are dreaded and feared; Their justice and authority originate with themselves.” — Habakkuk 1:3-5

Just as depraved and perverted liberal “justice” stems from ITSELF rather than from ANY legitimate moral source whatsoever.  And God will bring JUDGMENT on this nation.

This is the world we live in today in America: there is a certain race of people that are being hunted down and beaten in the streets with impunity because the system itself is inherently racist:

10

Their basic rights such as their fundamental 1st Amendment Right to peaceably gather, is being directly undermined and in fact directly threatened by race groups.  But no police are arresting the wicked; no court is prosecuting them; no judge sentences them for their brutal crimes and their violation of civil as well as basic human rights.

How do you think this white kid feels as he’s running for his life because he exercised his right to attend a free-speech event where he could exercise his right to support his major party political candidate?  Let’s see, there’s a feral judge who belongs to an organization called “The Race” – and not the kid’s race, mind you – trying to cut him off and hold him as a lawyer from Hillary Clinton viciously attacks him from behind.  And on that lawyer’s heels is the mainstream media hoping for a chance to kick the kid when he’s on the ground bleeding.

And there is no police and no REAL “justice” to protect that white kid.  Because even the POLICE acknowledge that they did nothing to protect that white kid because the racist liberal race mobs out to get him were so rabid they were willing to sacrifice Trump supporters like him rather than make that Hispanic and black mob of thugs even MORE vicious:

On Thursday, June 2, 2016, approximately 300-400 protestors gathered outside a Trump rally in San Jose…  However, officers were confronted by some protestors who became violent, aggressive and began to throw objects in their direction. A majority of the violence occurred at the conclusion of the event.   While several physical assaults did occur, the police personnel on scene had the difficult task of weighing the need to immediately apprehend the suspect(s) against the possibility that police action involving the use of physical force under the circumstances would further insight the crowd and produce more violent behavior.  — San Jose Police Department statement

And the Mayor of San Jose – a Hillary Clinton thug named Sam Liccardo – blamed the violence that HIS OWN PARTY’S NAZI STORMTROOPER THUGS WAGED ON INNOCENT PEOPLE TRYING TO PEACEFULLY EXERCISE THEIR FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY on Donald Trump.  It was like saying that it is YOUR fault your face got in the way of my fist and it’s YOUR fault your head got in the way of my jackboot.

Oh, and this is an interesting factoid: the San Jose Police Chief who instructed his officers to allow the beatings of Trump supporters by Hispanic and black thugs is himself affiliated with – you should have guessed it – La Raza.

Oh, and by the way, now that you mentioned La Raza again, SO IS THE HILLARY CLINTON-SUPPORTING LAW FIRM THAT IS BRINGING THE SUIT AGAINST TRUMP.

And Judge Gonzalo Curiel’s “La Raza” very much considers illegal immigrants members of “The Race” or it’s “community” or however the hell these wordgamers want to politically-correct-phrase their racist organization and it’s racist motives.

It was an abject disgrace and a total perversion of anything resembling “justice.”

There was a time in this country when the Klan – formed as the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party, for what it’s worth – would place a noose around a bound black man’s neck.  And as he stood there looking around at all the white, pointy hats before they kicked the stool away from under his feet, he had this vague sense that somehow the deck of “justice” had been stacked against him.

That is what Donald Trump has now seen about a hundred times over as Nazis storm event after event.  When the one damn time one of his supporters got fed up and hit somebody, the entire mainstream media rushed out to blame HIM for the violence.

This is what it looks like to be a white person living in America right now under the most corrupt, lawless, fascist presidency in American history:

6

A white man being chased down and surrounded by a racist mob of Hispanic thugs and beaten in the street while the police do NOTHING to protect him.

You tell me what would happen if a white mob had chased down and beaten a member of a minority group fleeing in terror from a Democrat Party event.

But rest assured that nothing will happen because that man fleeing to escape a brutal beating was white.  And according to the Democrat Party, the Party in Power, White Lives Do NOT Matter.

But you liberals who keep shouting, “It’s always fascist for thee to do as I do to thee!” is a living, screaming proof that we are truly in the last days and Democrats will very soon be worshiping the beast and taking his mark on their right hands and on their foreheads.

The Democrat Party and their thug fascist muscle is so vile that it is absolutely beyond any sanity.  And yet no one in power says or does anything to help the oppressed victims.  Because we have the same mentality the Nazis had with the Jews: “you deserve to get beaten because we don’t like what you represent.”

We live in a time when black thugs host a “Beat Whitey Night” and for some inexplicable reason the police just can’t figure out whether the attacks in which white people are sucker punched by black kids are “racial in nature.”

We live in a time when the Obama Administration issues instructions to “Never bring a lawsuit against a black.” 

We live in a time when the Obama Administration has been caught red-handed implementing a truly Stalinist effort to target and suppress conservative organizations.  And ordered his Internal Revenge Service to use hundreds of IRS lawyers to hide information from Congress.  And government reports tell us that Obama is still hell-bent on his fascist effort to keep targeting every organization that dares not agree with his warped religious and political views.  And the Obama Administration is still playing the most cynical games imaginable with the law.  Because the Obama Administration is a Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization if there ever was one.

But what does it matter when Democrats are the most racist hypocrites who ever crawled across the face of the earth???

We live in an age of race riots such as we’ve never before SEEN in America.  Racist leftist groups such as “Black Lives Matter” (as long as those lives aren’t the sixty percent of black babies whose murder is ignored, the overwhelming majority of murdered blacks who are murdered by other blacks, the black lives taken by drug addiction, etc., etc.,) have launched race riot after race riot across the United States.  They have all but shut down policing across America, such that Democrat cities like Chicago are now as bloody as any war zone on earth.  And these racist liberal organizations threaten to unleash race riot hell if Donald Trump is elected:

“Dear white people if Trump wins young niggas such as myself are fully hell bent on inciting riots everywhere we go. Just so you know.” – Prominent ‘Black Lives Matter’ activist and rapper Tef Poe

If this was NOT a racist society, Tef Poe would have been immediately arrested for inciting violence and convicted for making a terrorist threat.  And he would do hard, HARD time as a counter-example to anyone else who would foment race violence in the land of the free and the home of the brave.  But this IS a racist country with racist policies.

Because the Democrat Party today is very little different today than the Nazi Party was yesterday.  Their vicious Brownshirt thugs are EVERYWHERE.  And just like in Germany during the rise of Hitler, it’s only the OTHER side that gets slandered with hate.

This kind of wicked hypocrisy is going to cause a snap; it’s only a matter of time.  America is and has been the most ethnically and racially diversified culture in the history of the world.  And Democrats are cynically exploiting that diversity and fomenting it against the very culture that provided that diversity.  But it will all come crashing down one day: Jesus told us that in the last days, race would rise against race.  He actually prophesied that and I’ve described it before about this racist presidency.  At some point the white race will join the viciousness that has already been well under way, as racist Democrat blacks riot, as racist Democrat Hispanics riot, to get their way and advance their race against the white race in direct effort to suppress white children and seize from them what their parents worked to give them.  But by then it will have been too little, and too late.  And the only thing that will happen is more and more bloodshed as this country collapses into the racial viciousness that has been the heart of the Democrat Party’s plan for at least the last eight years under Obama.

Hillary Clinton Savagely Attacks Elizabeth Warren For Greedily Exploiting Poor, Oppressed Families (At Least, If She Weren’t A Hypocrite)

May 26, 2016

Hillary Clinton tore into Donald Trump when her mainstream media dirt-mining propagandists dug up a 2006 Trump quote:

“He actually said he was hoping for the crash that caused hard-working families in California and across America to lose their jobs,” she said at a campaign event outside of Los Angeles. “All because he thought he could take advantage of it to make some money for himself.”

Clinton ally Elizabeth Warren pounced on the story with a tweet:

Sen. Elizabeth Warren jumped in as well last night, saying Trump was “drooling over a housing meltdown” and asking her audience, “What kind of man does that?”

There’s only one problem, Hell-ery: Elizabeth Warren, the heart and soul of the left, DID THE EXACT SAME FREAKING that Donald Trump did that you say is so damn vile:

Elizabeth Warren Bought Foreclosed Homes to Make a Quick Profit
by Jillian Kay Melchior & Eliana Johnson May 27, 2015 4:00 AM
Before the crash that she blamed on speculators, Senator Elizabeth Warren made a bundle by flipping houses.
Nearly two years after Veo Vessels died, her daughter, 70-year-old Mary Frances Hickman, decided to sell the home her mother had left to her. A sprawling brick house in Oklahoma City’s historic Highland Park neighborhood, it was built in 1924, just a year after Mary’s birth.
Decades later, one of Vessels’ great-grandchildren fondly recalls the wood and tile floors, the fish pond, the butler’s quarters, and the multi-car garage where children played house.
“It was really, really nice,” says Hickman’s granddaughter, Andrea Martin. That’s part of the reason she’s so surprised her grandmother sold the home in 1993 for a mere $30,000. Despite a debilitating stroke, Martin says Hickman remained sharp, and she had always been business-savvy. As an Avon saleswoman, she had at times ranked among the top ten in the country. “So I don’t know why,” Martin says. “Maybe she just wanted out from underneath it, but to sell it for such a low number — I don’t know. Maybe she got bad advice, maybe she was just tired.”
The home’s new owner: Elizabeth Warren, today a Massachusetts senator who has built a political career on denouncing the sort of banking titans and financial sophisticates who make a buck off the little guy. Five months after purchasing Veo Vessels’ old home, Warren flipped the property, selling it for $115,000 more than she’d paid, according to Oklahoma County Property Assessor records.
Warren rose to political prominence in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis as a crusader against big banks and a dispenser of common-sense economic advice. She campaigned for the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, intended to shield people from the predations of the mortgage and credit-card industries, among others. In her 2006 book All Your Worth, co-authored with her daughter, Amelia, Warren lists as a top myth the idea that “you can make big money buying houses and flipping them quickly.” She has made a career out of telling people how to behave in financially responsible ways, and out of creating laws that will make it illegal for them to do otherwise.
Five months after purchasing Veo Vessels’ old home, Warren flipped the property, selling it for $115,000 more than she’d paid.
But Warren bought and sold at least five properties for profit at a different time in her life, before the cratering economy and a political career made her a star. Her life story has been the subject of much interest, and her 2014 memoir, A Fighting Chance, chronicled her rise from humble beginnings in small-town Oklahoma and her struggle to make ends meet. It didn’t much mention, though, the early 1990s, years when her children were teenagers and she was once again happily married. These are years when she wasn’t yet the multimillionaire she is today, and, she has said, she was voting Republican.
As a professor of law at the University of Pennsylvania, and later as a visiting professor at Harvard Law School, she was doing well for herself, building both her professional profile and her wealth. She owes at least part of her considerable financial success, it seems, to snapping up these properties in her native Oklahoma and turning them for a profit — though today that’s not a practice she endorses for the many people looking to emulate her success. The Boston Herald reported on these purchases during Warren’s Senate run in 2012, noting that she invested in “the often topsy-turvy real-estate market of the 1990s” and that her actions “don’t seem to square with her public statements about the latest real estate boom and bust.”
(By our deadline, Warren’s office did not respond to our request for an interview with the senator or for a request for comment from the senator’s spokesperson about the home sales.)
Hickman’s granddaughter Martin says of the home flip: “I don’t think it’s right, but I don’t really know much about it. . . . You flip houses to make a profit, so I can’t really fault [Warren] much. I think my grandmother made a mistake by selling it for so cheap. . . . She had worked hard all her life and was a self-made woman.”
Don Vessels — a grandson of Veo Vessels, and the nephew of Mary Frances Hickman — said he had not known that Warren had purchased the family home, but “my reaction is that it’s kind of par for the course.” He added: “What’s said and what’s done in politics are two different things. Mary Hickman, being the executor of the estate, should have sold it for the highest price on the market, which I’m not sure she did. But the house was not in fantastic shape, I can tell you that. It was a very nice house when it was purchased, but my grandmother kind of let it fall into disrepair.”
Records show Warren bought the house Hickman inherited from her mother, located at 200 N.W. 16th Street, in August 1993 and quickly obtained permits to do plumbing and electrical work, selling it five months later for a 383 percent gain.

The article goes on to describe what Democrats would call greedy profiteering in the remaining cases of Pocahontas doing the very thing she demonized.  It ends thus:

In her 2014 autobiography, Warren wrote of the events that precipitated the financial crisis that “everyone seemed to have a story about someone they knew who was getting rich by flipping houses.”

She omitted a crucial one.

Because she’s a Democrat and that’s what Democrats do like no one else in the history of mankind.

If you are a Democrat, you are nothing but a cockroach hypocrite slandering liar of the worst form imaginable.

The history of socialism has been consistent from day one: incredibly cynical demagogues claiming to be doing everything they do in the name of the people who exploit the very people they falsely claim to be helping and hypocritically enriching themselves.  In the communist Soviet days you had your political class living it up in their Black Sea vacation dachas while the people they lied to had NOTHING.  And that tradition continues with Elizabeth Warren and Hiller Clinton.

Elizabeth Warren – again the heart and soul of the uber-feminist left – is just utter slime.  And Donald Trump is using her face like a mop and just wiping her face in the filthy toilet that is her life.

He calls her “Pocahontas” because this deceiving liar – who in biological fact is about as WHITE as you can possibly get – manufactured a “Native American” ancestry based on her narcissistic belief that she had “high cheekbones” and then cynically and dishonestly exploited her own lie to get benefit after benefit that she didn’t deserve.

This is clearly a woman who took about 3 million self-adoring selfies of herself too many, and came to believe her own delusions as she photo shopped herself into a Native American.  Well, either that, or she is just the worst sort of liar there is.

And now he just destroyed this witless, slimy hypocrite fool yet again:

Trump-Warren-Flipping

I marvel at the dishonesty and hypocrisy that characterizes every single Democrat today as we enter the very last days just before Democrats worship the coming Antichrist and take his mark on their right hands, or on their foreheads.

The simple fact of the matter is that if every reporter covering Hillary Clinton doesn’t get in her face and ask if she thinks Warren should resign from the Senate due to her disgraceful past in which she “caused hard-working families in California and across America to lose their jobs” and “thought she could take advantage of it to make some money for herself.”  If they don’t, you can know for certain that every single mainstream media entity is on the same propagandist page as Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook and Katie Couric’s brand of rabidly biased “journalism.”

Just remember, if you see Hell-ery Clinton’s lips moving, whatever the hell is coming out of her mouth has nothing whatsoever to do with the truth, or with integrity.

And the same thing applies with her slick Willy husband Bill, who by her own words ought to be rotting in a prison cell right now for rape.  And Juanita Broadderick’s story is just another example of a dishonest media refusing to publish a story because to be a liberal is to be the worst kind of hypocrite.

Let’s sniff something called REALITY as we consider what Barack Obama has done to our economy and our way of life.  From the Los Angeles Times:

Shedding light on the precarious economic state of many American families, the Federal Reserve said Wednesday that nearly half of U.S. households reported they would have trouble meeting emergency expenses of just $400.

In addition, the Fed found that 22% of workers were juggling two or more jobs last year, higher than what government jobs data would suggest. And nearly one out of three Americans said that they have no retirement savings or pension.

Trump said about his 2006 comment that he is a BUSINESSMAN, and it is the essence of a good businessman to win whether things are good or whether things are bad.  If you want to elect someone who represents the status quo that two-thirds of Americans say is the wrong direction, who only knows how to make bad worse, then elect Hell-ery.  Because you deserve hell.

It Is Truly Amazing And Terrifying How The Political Left At EVERY LEVEL Distort, Deceive And Demonize Our Right To Hear The FACTS

May 23, 2016

I have documented multiple times how rank-and-file Democrats have done everything they could to use every means – including infiltration and outright acts of violence – to prevent Americans from participating in the political process according to their 1st Amendment rights to hear a major political figure offer his ideas at a political rally.  It has become so bad that at times, Donald Trump has been forced to climb walls and truck loading docks to enter venues through rear entrances to avoid violent Democrat “protesters.”  And the same media that was all over Donald Trump when ONE Trump supporter struck a Democrat fascist infiltrator who was trying to prevent Trump from speaking to his supporters have done exactly WHAT to confront Democrat candidates over their continuous violence as they go to Trump events and try to violently stop them???

I am so beyond SICK of the abject moral hypocrisy that IS the Democratic Party.  Recently, a bunch of thug Democrats turned violent in Las Vegas, Nevada because they have come to realize that the arbitrary way the Democrat Party picks its candidates is quintessentially fascist.  And while these people are perfectly fine with violent fascism, they want THEIR fascism and THEIR fascist candidate.  So they rioted and demonstrated that they “have a penchant for violence.”  So, being fascist thugs, they “shouted down the keynote speaker, Sen. Barbara Boxer, and others they thought were tilting the rules in Clinton’s favor.”  They “shouted obscenities and rushed the dais to protest rulings.”  And they created “a very dangerous atmosphere that ended in chaos and physical threats to fellow Democrats.”

Now, here’s the thing.  The same damn Democrat fascist thugs have been doing AND CONTINUE DOING the very same damn thing to virtually EVERY Donald Trump rally that they did to DNC crony-capitalist fascist mucky-mucks in Las Vegas.  And all of a sudden it’s “violent.”  But these Democrat Party Nazis already proved they are Nazis when they not only refused to call the violent Democrat thugs out but even praised them and turned them into victims when they were engaging in all the exact same tactics against Donald Trump and his supporters at Republican rallies.

By the same vile argument the Democrat Party and the propagandists masquerading as “journalists” offered, the Democratic Party is evil and violent.  Because after all, if Trump was responsible for the violence of these “protestors,” then surely the Democratic Party is just as responsible when these identical protestors “protest” the identical same way they “protested” Trump events.  Thrown chairs. Screaming speakers down.  Brute intimidation of people trying to exercise their 1st Amendment rights.  Leaked cellphone numbers. Substances intended to look exactly like anthrax people mailed to people.  Death threats spewed across the Internet.  You know, all the traditional Democrat Party Nazi thug tactics plus a couple of new ones.

You tell me how many times Hillary Clinton has been forced to low-crawl under a fence to attend a rally because violent rightwingers would attack her???

The answer to that question as well as the one I ended my opening paragraph with is ZERO to the ten thousandth decimal point.  Similarly, why is it that thousands of Democrats illegally blocking traffic at event after event, chaining themselves to cars at event after event, screaming to drown out speakers at event after event, resorting to frequent violence even against the police who are trying to keep the peace at event after event – and frequently doing ALL Of the above under a foreign country’s flag – is okay but when one Trump guy goes over the top trying to stop the fascist madness it’s an indictment of Trump???  Because we live in a society today that the left has shaped to be even more suppressing of truth and facts and objective process in media coverage and fairness in reporting than it was when Joseph Goebbels ran his Ministry of Propaganda for the Nazi Party.

The cat – which is actually a fascist ferret – is out of the bag now.  We can openly see the left’s intent to destroy the 1st Amendment even as they pursue the destruction of the 2nd Amendment and the clearly defined “right of the people to keep and bear arms” which “shall not be infringed.”  At least until fascists take over.  So we have a liberal writing for the liberal Harvard University saying this:

Harvard writer: Abolish free speech
Woman claims First Amendment threatens liberalism
Published: 1 day ago

A student writer at Harvard University is raising eyebrows after publishing her belief that free speech on campus should be abolished and professors with opposing views be fired.

Sandra Korn, a senior who writes a column for the Harvard Crimson newspaper, thinks radical leftism is the only permissible political philosophy, and the First Amendment only hinders colleges from brainwashing students with her viewpoint.

“Let’s give up on academic freedom in favor of justice,” states the subtitle of her Feb. 18 column, in which she insists Harvard stop guaranteeing students and professors the right to hold controversial views and conduct research putting liberalism in a negative light.

“If our university community opposes racism, sexism, and heterosexism, why should we put up with research that counters our goals?” Korn asks.

“It is tempting to decry frustrating restrictions on academic research as violations of academic freedom. Yet I would encourage student and worker organizers to instead use a framework of justice. After all, if we give up our obsessive reliance on the doctrine of academic freedom, we can consider more thoughtfully what is just.”

You don’t have the right to speak unless a liberal agrees with you.  They have the right to shut you down, to shout you down which includes destroying your career, to punch you down, and the ends justifies the means.  Whether it’s Donald Trump or gay marriage or LGBT bathrooms or anything else.

This is now the official attitude of every single Democrat in any position of influence whatsoever.  And bad, wicked people vote for these fascists.

So we just found out that Facebook – one of the largest sources of “news” for young stupid morons who frankly don’t know a damn thing about reality because liberalism is Satanism – is an outright leftist propaganda source:

Former Facebook Workers: We Routinely Suppressed Conservative News
Michael Nunez
Monday 9:10am
· Filed to: Facebook

Facebook workers routinely suppressed news stories of interest to conservative readers from the social network’s influential “trending” news section, according to a former journalist who worked on the project. This individual says that workers prevented stories about the right-wing CPAC gathering, Mitt Romney, Rand Paul, and other conservative topics from appearing in the highly-influential section, even though they were organically trending among the site’s users.

Several former Facebook “news curators,” as they were known internally, also told Gizmodo that they were instructed to artificially “inject” selected stories into the trending news module, even if they weren’t popular enough to warrant inclusion—or in some cases weren’t trending at all. The former curators, all of whom worked as contractors, also said they were directed not to include news about Facebook itself in the trending module.

In other words, Facebook’s news section operates like a traditional newsroom, reflecting the biases of its workers and the institutional imperatives of the corporation. Imposing human editorial values onto the lists of topics an algorithm spits out is by no means a bad thing—but it is in stark contrast to the company’s claims that the trending module simply lists “topics that have recently become popular on Facebook.”

These new allegations emerged after Gizmodo last week revealed details about the inner workings of Facebook’s trending news team—a small group of young journalists, primarily educated at Ivy League or private East Coast universities, who curate the “trending” module on the upper-right-hand corner of the site. As we reported last week, curators have access to a ranked list of trending topics surfaced by Facebook’s algorithm, which prioritizes the stories that should be shown to Facebook users in the trending section. The curators write headlines and summaries of each topic, and include links to news sites. The section, which launched in 2014, constitutes some of the most powerful real estate on the internet and helps dictate what news Facebook’s users—167 million in the US alone—are reading at any given moment.

“Depending on who was on shift, things would be blacklisted or trending,” said the former curator. This individual asked to remain anonymous, citing fear of retribution from the company. The former curator is politically conservative, one of a very small handful of curators with such views on the trending team. “I’d come on shift and I’d discover that CPAC or Mitt Romney or Glenn Beck or popular conservative topics wouldn’t be trending because either the curator didn’t recognize the news topic or it was like they had a bias against Ted Cruz.”

The former curator was so troubled by the omissions that they kept a running log of them at the time; this individual provided the notes to Gizmodo. Among the deep-sixed or suppressed topics on the list: former IRS official Lois Lerner, who was accused by Republicans of inappropriately scrutinizing conservative groups; Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker; popular conservative news aggregator the Drudge Report; Chris Kyle, the former Navy SEAL who was murdered in 2013; and former Fox News contributor Steven Crowder. “I believe it had a chilling effect on conservative news,” the former curator said.

Another former curator agreed that the operation had an aversion to right-wing news sources. “It was absolutely bias. We were doing it subjectively. It just depends on who the curator is and what time of day it is,” said the former curator. “Every once in awhile a Red State or conservative news source would have a story. But we would have to go and find the same story from a more neutral outlet that wasn’t as biased.”

Stories covered by conservative outlets (like Breitbart, Washington Examiner, and Newsmax) that were trending enough to be picked up by Facebook’s algorithm were excluded unless mainstream sites like the New York Times, the BBC, and CNN covered the same stories.

And fat chance of that because the New York Slimes, BBC and Clinton News Network are every bit as biased as Facebook with the same sort of arrogant, self-righteous Ivy League liberals running them that are running Facebook.

Oh, the fascist leftist propagandists deny this ideological and outright dishonest suppression of truth has been going on.  But we have Zuckerberg himself on the record demonizing Trump every bit as much as the most rabid Clinton staffer, and we have Facebook’s own internal communications in which they ask, “What responsibility does Facebook have to help prevent President Trump in 2017?”

Yeah.  It’s not like the site that 140 million Americans get their “news” is rabidly BIASED or anything.

To answer the Facebook question above, how about NONE?  Because if you’re reporting as a NEWS SOURCE, you have a moral and ethical DUTY to merely REPORT the facts according to your own established objective criteria rather than play shenanigans and distort the record with your bias???

Easily proven leftist ideologue Mark Zuckerberg hired leftist ideologues as his “journalists” who then put their thumbs on the scales of every story they weighed to see if it was “trending.”  That’s what happened.

Then there’s the Washington Post, one of the two leading flagships of quote-unquote “journalism.”  We just learned that the leftist WaPo assigned a literal ARMY in journalistic terms of TWENTY REPORTERS to dig up dirt in every phase of Trump’s life:

Woodward: Washington Post Assigns 20 Reporters to Dig Into Trump’s Past
By Greg Richter   |    Wednesday, 11 May 2016 06:56 PM

The Washington Post has assigned 20 reporters to look into every aspect of Donald Trump’s past as the presumptive GOP nominee seeks to become the next president of the United States, famed Post associate editor, Bob Woodward, said Wednesday.

“There’s a lot we don’t know,” Woodward told the National Association of Realtors convention, according to The Washington Examiner. “We have 20 people working on Trump, we’re going to do a book, we’re doing articles about every phase of his life.”

Woodward himself is looking into Trump’s real estate deals, he said, saying that “The New York real estate world is more complex than the CIA.”

Woodward said Jeff Bezos, the Post’s publisher and a Democratic Party donor, has urged the paper to cover all of the candidates thoroughly.

“He said, ‘Look, the job at The Washington Post has to be tell us everything about who the eventual nominee will be in both parties, 15-part, 16-part series, 20-part series, we want to look at every part of their lives and we’re never going get the whole story of course but we can get the best attainable,'” Woodward said.

Woodward, who first exposed the Watergate break-in with fellow Post reporter Carl Bernstein, told the group that the Post also is working to get the “essence” of Hillary Clinton, the expected Democratic nominee. But he said he doesn’t believe Clinton purposely tried to use her private email server to send classified information when she was secretary of state.

“I don’t think anyone feels that there was intent on her part to distribute classified information in a way that was illegal or jeopardized security,” he said.

It’s amazing how subjective bias plays into their “objective” thinking.  And how these self-professing geniuses are too morally stupid to realize what they are doing.  Objectively, Hillary Clinton not only broke but SHATTERED every damn law on the books in her paranoid and fascist determination to establish a secret personal server so she could bypass all public transparency and reporting laws and bypass all security national laws.  And for the damn record, “intent” is totally irrelevant according to the law here, just as “gross negligence” is not a defense.  The question is merely, did Hillary Clinton put classified information on a nonsecure nongovernment device?  And if the answer is “yes,” she committed a federal crime.  Even the leftist Daily Kos – which albeit obviously is rooting for her opponent Bernie Sanders – acknowledges this objective fact.  But what do liberals do?  Let’s put aside the objective facts and focus on the most subjective element of all.  I mean, did they ever give Mitt Romney the benefit of the doubt in terms of his “intent” on ANYTHING they blasted him for???

Consider the Washington Post is trying to tell us that Donald Trump is somehow a new figure and they need to vet him.  Did they assign 20 reporters to dig up every shred of dirt on the totally unknown Barack Hussein Obama in 2008???  Nope.  Have they ever assigned 2o reporters to investigate ANY of Hillary Clinton’s vast conspiracies?  Benghazi?  The secret server?  The hundred million dollars the Clintons siphoned off from the world’s worst human rights abusers?  The fact that Bill Clinton just got caught giving $2 million dollars described for the IRS as “charitable contributions” to a “friend” he is in all likelihood having sex with?  The fact that the Clinton’s have a rather longstanding pattern of giving the VERY SCANT “charitable contributons” from their corrupt Clinton Foundation to political allies?  Keep in mind it is a documented FACT that the Clinton Foundation – officially for tax purposes a charity organization – gives only TEN PERCENT of the billions it is raising for “charity.”  And now we’re finding it goes to whore friends and crony friends.

These are just the very most RECENT facts that we’re learning.

We’re now learning that Hillary Clinton had a longstanding, regular and documented pattern that “show Hillary Clinton could not care less about the security of her communications.”  We’ve got her on the record saying send what by definition was secure information “nonsecure.”  strip the identifying headers saying “classified” all over the top of the page out first, mind out.  To the damn extent that “intent” even matters, how the hell does that not show her INTENT to break the law???  Especially when she was briefed and told and signed her acknowledgement that she was briefed and told what the damn law was.  And broke it over and over and over again anyway???

Now we’ve got Hillary Clinton caught red-handed in the damn act of lying to the American people yet again for like the fifty-trillionth time.  She has steadfastly maintained that she is NOT under FBI investigation but that this is all just a “security inquiry.”

Hillary Clinton for months has downplayed the FBI investigation into her private email server and practices as a mere “security inquiry.”

But when asked Wednesday by Fox News about Clinton’s characterization of the bureau’s probe, FBI Director James Comey said he doesn’t know what “security inquiry” means — adding, “We’re conducting an investigation. … That’s what we do.”

It’s in their damn NAME.  The last I heard it was the “Federal Bureau of INVESTIGATION.”  Hillary Clinton is under criminal investigation by the FBI and both she and the damn media are so pathologically dishonest we can’t even be told the damn truth about THAT.

But where the hell are your twenty damn reporters covering the past of Hillary Clinton when there are so many rotting and fresh bodies, so much toxic waste, so many crimes, it is beyond UNREAL???

The same place they’d be if the Washington Post was part of Goebbels’ Ministry of Propaganda during Hitler’s day.  Nowhere.

This exchange reveals the essence of modern “journalism” and the despicable bias that masquerades as “reporting”.  And how they will go after Republicans tooth and nail and then fascistically back-flip on what they had just sworn was their divine duty the moment a Democrat gets elected in favor of a different objective:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Yeah, well, you know what? I want to do everything I can to make this thing work, this new presidency work, and I think that —

JOE SCARBOROUGH: Is that your job? You just talked about being a journalist!

MATTHEWS: Yeah, it is my job. My job is to help this country.

Matthews wasn’t done with his odd new job description . . . An incredulous Scarborough kept pressing, astonished at such a complete 180 from Matthews’s repeated insistence during the Bush presidency that he had to hold the government accountable.

SCARBOROUGH: Your job is the make this presidency work?

MATTHEWS: To make this work successfully. This country needs a successful presidency.

Matthews will hardly be alone in that sentiment. Once Obama assumes office, the “speaking truth to power” line we’ve heard so often during the past eight years will be a thing of the past.

It’s so damn dishonest and hypocritical, but to be a liberal, to be a Democrat, means having a soul that SWIMS in dishonesty and hypocrisy.

The thing that makes me so viscerally angry about this is that liberals spent – from the very outset when they tried to delegitimize Bush’s very election as president – eight vicious years savagely undermining every aspect of the Bush presidency, and now react in horror that a conservative would even think of doing the same thing to an Obama presidency.

You go back to the pioneers that liberal journalists built their field upon, such as Edward Bernays:

In describing the origin of the term Public Relations, Bernays commented, “When I came back to the United States [from the war], I decided that if you could use propaganda for war, you could certainly use it for peace. And propaganda got to be a bad word because of the Germans … using it. So what I did was to try to find some other words, so we found the words Counsel on Public Relations”.

Bernays explained his project this way:

“the very essence of the democratic process” is “the freedom to persuade and suggest,” what he calls “the engineering of consent.” If the freedom to persuade happens to be concentrated in a few hands, we must recognize that such is the nature of a free society.

UNLESS of course a conservative gets to say anything.  THEN he should be shouted down.  Because to be a liberal is to be a fascist hypocrite who lied and said it was a level-playing field when they were so slanting the field that it was beyond unreal.

Bernay’s daughter described her father this way:

“Democracy to my father was a wonderful concept, but I don’t think he felt that all those publics out there had reliable judgment.. that they very easily might vote for the wrong man, or want the wrong thing. So that they had to be guided from above. It’s enlightened despotism in a sense. You appeal to their desires and their unrecognized longings that sort of thing. That you can tap into their deepest desires or deepest fears and use that to your own purposes.”  Ann Bernays said, ““Anyone who disagreed with him, he used the word dope and stupid over and over.  And the masses, they were stupid.”

That’s what we get today from the elite media who call Republicans and especially Trump voters as ignorant and uneducated and stupid and worse.

And Walter Lippmann who defined “journalism” this way:

Walter Lippmann described a “revolution” in “the practice of democracy” as “the manufacture of consent”

Lippmann – the “journalist” par excellance, has a terrifying definition of his profession which could come right out of Lenin:

It follows that two political roles must be clearly distinguished, Lippmann goes on to explain. First, there is the role assigned to the specialized class, the “insiders,” the “responsible men,” who have access to information and understanding. Ideally, they should have a special education for public office, and should master the criteria for solving the problems of society: “In the degree to which these criteria can be made exact and objective, political decision,” which is their domain, “is actually brought into relation with the interests of men.” The “public men” are, furthermore, to “lead opinion” and take the responsibility for “the formation of a sound public opinion.” “They initiate, they administer, they settle,” and should be protected from “ignorant and meddlesome outsiders,” the general public, who are incapable of dealing “with the substance of the problem.” The criteria we apply to government are success in satisfying material and cultural wants, not whether “it vibrates to the self-centered opinions that happen to be floating in men’s minds.” Having mastered the criteria for political decision, the specialized class, protected from public meddling, will serve the public interest — what is called “the national interest” in the webs of mystification spun by the academic social sciences and political commentary.

The second role is “the task of the public,” which is much more limited. It is not for the public, Lippmann observes, to “pass judgment on the intrinsic merits” of an issue or to offer analysis or solutions, but merely, on occasion, to place “its force at the disposal” of one or another group of “responsible men.” The public “does not reason, investigate, invent, persuade, bargain, or settle.” Rather, “the public acts only by aligning itself as the partisan of someone in a position to act executively,” once he has given the matter at hand sober and disinterested thought. It is for this reason that “the public must be put in its place.” The bewildered herd, trampling and roaring, “has its function”: to be “the interested spectators of action,” not participants. Participation is the duty of “the responsible man.”

Which is to say that you have the right to shut up and stand aside if you are not hysterically screaming the same vileness that our elite, godless masters are spouting.  This has – as Noam Chomsky put it – “an unmistakeable resemblance to the Leninist concept of a vanguard party that leads the masses to a better life that they cannot conceive or construct on their own.”

Elsewhere Chomsky has this brilliant observation about the nature of the intellectual left:

Hume was an astute observer, and his paradox of government is much to the point. His insight explains why elites are so dedicated to indoctrination and thought control, a major and largely neglected theme of modern history. “The public must be put in its place,” Walter Lippmann wrote, so that we may “live free of the trampling and the roar of a bewildered herd,” whose “function” is to be “interested spectators of action,” not participants. And if the state lacks the force to coerce and the voice of the people can be heard, it is necessary to ensure that that voice says the right thing, as respected intellectuals have been advising for many years.

The end game of the left, of its’ “journalism,” of its’ twisted definition of “tolerance,” is this as I have defined it:

Political correctness is not just a leftist way to make overly-sensitive people feel better. It was designed by early Marxists in Russia and the left continues to execute the Orwellian tactic today: if you can control words, you can control thought; if you can control thought, you can control actions.  “PC” is an enormous, sophisticated and highly-coordinated effort by elitist intellectuals to “fundamentally transform” Western culture as we know it by  redefining it – by shaping the “acceptable” language people are allowed to use – and thereby dictating the parameters of cultural arguments.  And people with incredibly radical agendas have been exploiting this tactic for decades and it has succeeded.

Ultimately what these “respected intellectual” will advise will lead to this:

It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name. — Revelation 13:16-17

The unwashed masses are being betrayed by these elites who profess themselves to be wise, but are fools (Romans 1:22).  We were warned by the Word of God, “Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ (Colossians 2:8).  But these deluded fools hate the Word of God with a rabid passion.  And that is why they impose abortion when Psalm 139 among other passages clearly teach that the unborn babies that are being murdered are innocent human beings created in the image of God and literally formed by God in that womb.  That is why they impose homosexuality when Romans chapter one could not be more clear that any society that does this is demanding that the wrath of a holy God be poured out upon it.

We are now learning that THOUSANDS of emails that were just hanging fruit on Clinton’s unsecured server are now in the possession of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR).  They are hoping that the American people are stupid enough and wicked enough to elect Hillary so they can blackmail her into betraying the United States.

We are on the verge of actually electing a president who will be blackmailed into selling the soul of the United States of America to Vladimir Putin and Russia.  And NO ONE is talking about how Hillary Clinton betrayed America.

But don’t worry.  If Donald Trump every so much as tied his shoes improperly, you’ll know all about it on every television program, every newspaper and every magazine.