On Independence Day, Americans Need To Fight Another Invasion By Illegal Immigrants And Go To War With Democrats Who Cynically Exploit The Invasion

Independence Days celebrates the first move toward driving out the British,  Cinco de Mayo celebrates the Mexicans driving out the French.

We’ve got a problem.  We’re being invaded right now today.

I watched with great interest a program focusing on Mao’s Cultural Revolution which resulted in the deaths on untold millions and likely tens of millions.  Mao’s leftist policies had failed so blatantly and so appallingly – some 50 million perished of starvation during his so-called “Great Leap Forward” – that the top Communist party leadership realized that this fool needed to be bypassed for the sake of the nation.  But Mao was a totally self-serving tyrant, rather than a leader who gave a flying damn about his own people.  He was completely wiling to launch a bloodbath that would burn half of his nation to the ground if he could rule the other half.  Mao had lost control of his own government, but not his power to poison with his propaganda.  Claiming that current Communist leaders were taking the party, and China itself, in the wrong direction, Mao called on the nation’s youth to purge the “impure” elements of Chinese society and revive the revolutionary spirit.  He basically authorized children to torture and murder their own parents, school children to torture and murder their own teachers and professors, and so on.  The Red Guard were everywhere, torturing and killing and burning.  It was a ten year long bloodbath the entire purpose of which was to restore Mao’s fanatic hold over a society  that would have found the setting of Orwell’s “1984” a peaceful, serene place.

The point that I am making is that you ought to consider that today’s Democrats are truly no different in their poisonous, completely selfish and self-centered spirit than Chairman Mao.  Like Mao, the Democrats are dictatorial demagogues who truly do not care about anything but their own power and their own raw political self-interests.  And they will do whatever is necessary to achieve their ends no matter how destructive are the means.  And to liberals, being that they have no God as the transcendent source for morality or genuine ethics that come from morality, the ends always justify the means.  We’ve already seen nascent versions of the Red Guard from our own communist left: the Tea Party never had one riot, never got so much as one ticket, let alone had one of their own arrested.  But the Red Guard spirit of the left launched the Occupy Wall Street bowel Movement, launched the bitter, seething Black Lives Matter bowel movement, and from their launched dozens of violent FASCIST attacks on Trump supporters merely for believing that in a democracy they had the freedom to support their party’s candidate for president.

Oh, we’ve got our own Democratic Party Red Guard today as something that literally JUST HAPPENED illustrates:

And guess what? This particular vicious fascist has the name of Kino Jimenez.  Democrats have been importing his ilk by the millions.

Just like the Red Guard, these vicious, fascist young people believe they not only have the right, but in fact the duty, to do these hateful things.  And they have been set upon decent people by the Mao-tse-tungs of liberalism, the Democratic Party and their propaganda machine, the mainstream media, telling -frankly screaming – at us on such a regular basis that Trump is so evil that we need to have our own Cultural Revolution to restore what Trump destroyed in America.

You’re going to see below that I’m now out to lay blame on the people who are trying to get into this country.  I’m very much out to point out that we have a treasonous, profoundly anti-American group of people who are doing everything possible to bring immigrants in by whatever means they can, legal or otherwise, to load the dice for the cynical, frankly wicked game they want to play with the American people powerless to stop them from playing it as they rig the system using Saul Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals from within of every branch of government and every bureaucracy of our government.  Just think of the liberal “judges” who think that the manufactured “right” of abortion based on invented “penumbras” and “emanations” is somehow “settled law” when the same wicked judges who clearly don’t give a damn about our Constitution believe the clear text of the 2nd Amendment can be overturned.  Over and over again, these fascist leftist judges have issued psychotic rulings that are as partisan as hell is hot.  Or try this one: Think of the top brass Obama installed in the FBI who texted each other with fascist treason such as this exchange between high-level FBI officials deeply involved with both the Hillary Clinton whitewash and the Donald Trump witch hunt:

PAGE: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”
STRZOK: “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.”

This is what we’re up against.  And when I say “we” I mean the American people.

A liberal author named David Faris wrote a Book titled, “It’s Time to Fight Dirty.”  Not that the Democrats have ever fought any other way, as it were.  But here’s what he said:

Republicans have always feared that immigration would change the character of American society.  Democrats should reward them with their very worst nightmare.

Tucker Carlson on his program pointed out, “Remember that paragraph.  It is the blueprint for what we are about to see.”  And in fact what we have already BEEN seeing.  Carlson went on to say, “They’re going to tell you it’s about civil rights, or about some other principle that they pretend to care about, but they are lying.  It’s about seizing power and holding it.  That’s their only aim.”

Let’s get one thing straight: a supposedly “American” political party that is intentionally loading up our nation with foreigners who have nothing to do with American values certainly and clearly don’t give one flying damn about “American society.”  They want to replace “American society.”  And they have lost the American people and so they have to import voters who AREN’T American in order to do it.  They’re actually even starting to admit that fact.

One treasonous, immoral major political party – the euphemistically called “Democratic Party” that we officially know after the numerous DNC scandals where they most certainly DID rig their primary election to favor Hillary Clinton has NOTHING to do with actual “democracy” – has cynically exploited this invasion and fanned the fire of illegal immigration to the explosion point.  On top of that fascism, we also now know that we have a deep state that is entrenched into every branch of government and every function of government and has its own incredibly amoral agenda.  But let’s focus on the Democrats and write about the massive evidence of a deep state leftist conspiracy against our democracy later.

Please remember a key fact about Democrats and the Democratic Party: they are nakedly evil.  That might sound extreme, but the Democratic Party has ALWAYS been at the forefront of wickedness and racism in America.  Always.  It is an easily documented fact of history.  And the fact of the matter is that they still are today.  An interesting article I came across bears the title, “23 maps that explain how Democrats went from the party of racism to the party of Obama.”  What is the Democratic Party?  It is the party of Andrew Jackson.  It was the party of Indian removal.  The Democratic Party was THE party of “Manifest Destiny.”  The Democratic Party was the party  of slavery and literally treasonously seceded from the United States when ant-slavery candidate and Republican Abraham Lincoln was elected (yes, history repeats itself in the current climate of rabid hate toward a Republican president).  The Democratic Party was purely and simply the party that waged the vicious Civil War against the United States of America.  Rabid Democratic Party ideologues assassinated Abraham Lincoln.  The Democratic Party was the incredibly racist political organization that dominated the racist South during the era of so-called “Reconstruction.”  Which was in reality Democrats “reconstruction” of the very same racist hate and racist policies that they had held before Republicans defeated them in the Civil War that Democrats started and were able to put in place once they had murdered a powerful, victorious president.  The Democratic Party was the party  of the Ku Klux Klan, which is rightly defined as the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party  and was organized to terrorize blacks and white Republicans.   We can go on and on.  The Democratic Party was the party of President Woodrow Wilson who literally fired all the blacks in the federal government and RE-segregated the military that Republicans had DE-segregated as Democrats were still very much the hard-core party of hard-core racism into the 20th century.  Woodrow Wilson, the godfather of the progressive movement, was a hard core racist and even the very leftist Atlantic acknowledges that fact of history.  The Democratic Party was the Party of “Klanbake,” the 1924 Democratic National Convention that was utterly dominated by the Ku Klux Klan a full 60 years after their defeat in the Civil War for the same racist hate.  The Democratic Party was the party of the racist FDR who cynically exploited the racist labor unions who excluded racial minorities with a vengeance (and the left acknowledges that unions are STILL “f-ing rabidly racist”, btw); the party that put Japanese-Americans into camps; the party that started the godawful Tuskegee experiment in which black men were intentionally and deceitfully left untreated with syphilis so the government could track the progression of the horrible disease.  As this nation continued into the 1950s, it was still the Democratic Party that was largely THE party of racist discrimination.  And as we enter the 1960s, the Democrats were still primarily racist and ONLY passed the most significant Civil Rights laws with the overwhelming supporting votes of Republicans (who somehow have been dishonestly denied credit for that fact ever since).

The bait-and-switch of a party that never changed its spots from its former days of evil to its modern days of evil can be summed up in a statement of President Lyndon Baines Johnson before two governors in 1963:

“These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days and that’s a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference… I’ll have them niggers voting Democratic for the next two hundred years”.

Oh, we’ve got LBJ using the N-word on a rather frequent basis.  We’ve got him doing the southern good-ol’-boy dance with racist governor George Wallace in 1965 using the N-word over and over.  This was the era of Democrats such as Arkansas’s Orval Faubus, Alabama’s George Wallace, Birmingham’s Bull Connor and Georgia’s Lester Maddox.  There were Democratic Party donkey ears sticking out of most every pointy white Klan hat.  Bill Clinton’s lionization of Grand Kleagle and Exalted Cyclops Robert Byrd is a telling fact, just as that Klansman’s endorsement of Obama was a telling fact that these people live and operate within such a massive double-standard it is frankly explainable only by Satan and demons.

But this was the period, matching the period of the time when the Democratic Party truly turned evil and violent as shown in its utter disgrace of a 1968 Democratic National Convention.  Democrats were losing a majority of whites because most whites weren’t and AREN’T racist, and this party with its utterly wicked history needed a new voter block to remain in power.  And they needed to create a plantation of socialist “entitlement” spending to build that plantation so the slaves would willingly come and happily remain.  The REAL Klan, the Klan that always has been and always will be a Democratic Party monster, had a new plantation for blacks and welcomed them onto that plantation just like Mr. Roarke at the beginning of a Fantasy Island episode.  It sounded so good, but there was something so damn sinister behind literally making naked pandering (“vote for us and we’ll give you other people’s money and food that other people paid for and places to live that other people are forced to pay for”) the very heart of their wicked political philosophy.  But what has that done for black people?  They get some money and food and a place to live, which creates an innate existential crisis as it saps their will to work and produce anything for themselves.  Other people have to work hard for their money and their food and a place to live, and that work-ethic ennobles them and allows them to build something better.  Add to that disincentive to work, understand that the Democrats have also propagandized and demagogued blacks into believing that whitey has rigged the system against them so there is no point in trying.  But here’s our plantation you can live on forever.  And so blacks vote and keep voting for the very people who are actually most keeping them down.  And the ruin of American blacks is complete as they succumb to drugs, to abortion to the tune of murdering 60% of their own babies, to fatherlessness, to gangs, to prison, at rates shockingly higher than any other group of Americans.  The cynical wickedness of the Democratic Party and the ramifications that wickedness has had on the very constituencies Democrats most claim to care about is beyond tragic.

Black unemployment has plunged to the lowest level in HISTORY under Donald Trump.  But there is literally not one single Democrat – and most especially not one rabid, toxic, race-hating, demagogue on the Congressional Black Caucus – who cares about black Americans.  Blacks are nothing but votes and a political platform to step on for these bugs who murder millions of babies.  If they start working for themselves, start earning their OWN money, they will get “uppity” and believe that they should be able to keep more of what they earn rather than have the all-knowing and all-good government decide they can spend it more wisely and forcibly confiscate it.  And maybe they’ll even realize as they create homes for themselves and families for themselves that their children ARE NOT bugs that can be murdered in a holocaust wherein 60% of black babies are butchered in the Democratic Party abortion mills.  And they will start voting the way their ancestors who were freed by Republicans FROM Democrats used to vote.

Let me give you one lower-than-roach example: Rep. Maxine Waters. She’s calling for a massive campaign of intolerance and hate for all Trump supporters. She demands that Trump supporters be shamed into using the back entrances of restaurants. Maybe she wants separate drinking fountains and separate bathrooms for Trump supporters. I guarantee she wants to force Trump supporters to sit in the back of the bus and give up their seat if a leftist wants it. Blacks of ALL people should be aware of what a low, dark, dangerous platform this vicious demagogue hater is spewing. Because if it’s right to do that to us, it was right to do it to you and damn you it will be right to do it to you AGAIN. The Black Caucus that supports this riot-spewing-hater needs to be banned and abolished. Or at least stop being racist hypocrites and demand the creation of a Congressional White Caucus that will openly preach the same race hate that Maxine Waters is allowed to preach in the halls of Congress from the white side. That ought to give any decent person pause. But there aren’t any decent people on the left.

One example of the fact that Democrats literally and simply do not care about the American people is in the economic numbers.  For instance, the manufacturing index hit a high that Obama never saw once in his entire miserable fool presidency.  As Trump cuts taxes, guts regulations, prevents the EPA from declaring economic warfare on job creators, guess what?  Factories are opening and jobs are being offered.  But Democrats don’t want you to work; they need you to be dependent on them.  They don’t want you to have a job and don’t want you to think that anyone will even offer you a damn job.  Stay dependent on us; remain wards of the state forever.  Keep voting for us.  Believe our damn lies.  And so hey, everybody, let’s look over here at the bright shiny thing we’re constantly screaming about.  Don’t look over there at how well your country is actually finally working under the man we despise.

Please don’t get fooled for one second: the Democratic Party was still very much a party of racism and the very same damn cockroach Democrats who are at the very forefront of screaming about Republican “hate” today were doing the exact same thing not too terribly long ago.  Let’s take a trip down memory lane and look at socialist California and its socialist governor, Jerry Brown, just for one example.

Let’s go back to 1975 when we had Asians desperately trying to flee the horrors of communism and the genocidal murder of communist dictator Pol Pot in Cambodia:

Despite today’s outrage over President Donald Trump’s refugee executive order, many liberals in 1975 were part of a chorus of big name Democrats who refused to accept any Vietnamese refugees when millions were trying to escape South Vietnam as it fell to the communists.

They even opposed orphans.

The group, led by California’s Gov. Jerry Brown, included such liberal luminaries as Delaware’s Democratic Sen. Joe Biden, former presidential “peace candidate” George McGovern, and New York Congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman.

The Los Angeles Times reported Brown even attempted to prevent planes carrying Vietnamese refugees from landing at Travis Air Force Base outside San Francisco. About 500 people were arriving each day and eventually 131,000 These people arrived despite protests from liberal Democrats. In 2015, the Los Angeles Times recounted Brown’s ugly attitude, reporting, “Brown has his own checkered history of demagoguery about refugees.”

Back in 1975, millions of South Vietnamese who worked for or supported the U.S. found themselves trapped behind the lines when the communists took over the country. Vietnamese emigre Tung Vu, writing in Northwest Asian Weekly, recalled the hardships the Vietnamese faced in 1975 as they tried to escape the communists.

“After the fall of Saigon, many Vietnamese chose to leave by any means possible, often in small boats. Those who managed to escape pirates, typhoons, and starvation sought safety and a new life in refugee camps,” Tung wrote.

Ironically, Republicans led by former President Gerald Ford were the political figures who fought for the refugees to enter the United States.arrived in the United States between 1975 and 1977.

Julia Taft, who in 1975 headed up Ford’s Inter-agency Task Force on Indochinese refugee resettlement, told author Larry Engelmann in his book, “Tears Before the Rain: An Oral History of the Fall of South Vietnam,” “The new governor of California, Jerry Brown, was very concerned about refugees settling in his state.”

National Public Radio host Debbie Elliott retraced Brown’s refusal to accept any refugees in a January 2007 interview with Taft. According to a transcript, which was aired on its flagship program, “All Things Considered,” Taft said, “our biggest problem came from California due to Brown.” She called his rejection of Vietnamese refugees “a moral blow.”

“I remember at the time we had thousands and thousands of requests from military families in San Diego, for instance, who had worked in Vietnam, who knew some of these people,” she told NPR.

Taft recalled another dark reason the liberals opposed the refugees: “They said they had too many Hispanics, too many people on welfare, they didn’t want these people.”

Did you notice that part about Republicans and military veterans in the spirit of the party of Lincoln who were the heroes of this terrible period of rabid, toxic, psychotic, evil Democrat Party and the People’s Republic of Californiastan and Jerry Brown hate???

So it turns out that the same hypocrite California and the same Cockroach King governor Jerry Brown were at the forefront of what they now claim was the very worst, very ugliest kind of hatred and racism and bigotry.  Not that there is one honest, virtuous, decent Democrat in California or in America, for that matter: they reelected Jerry Brown and gleefully allowed that self-proven demagogue to demagogue once again.

And yes, today, we still have open racism displayed by liberals toward Asians in the form of “affirmative action” that actually is outright BIGOTRY to Asian-Americans, to Asian-Americans being openly discriminated against as a result of the color of their skin by THE most liberal and leftist institutions in the nation.

Let me simply report a naked FACT: if Hispanics voted Republican, the Democrats would literally be screaming in the streets and rioting chanting for their violent deaths.  Because to be a Democrat is to be a cockroach.  These people aren’t capable of any genuine empathy any more than they are capable of any genuine morality: they murder their own babies.  Bugs do that.  These Democrats who drove God out of our nation and literally put Jesus Christ in a jar of urine and shamefully displayed Him in the guise of government-funded “art” long-ago betrayed any vestige of the image of God.  They chose to claim they had instead evolved from bugs.  The only problem is that they DEvolved from that point, rather than Evolved.  They’re not capable of human nobility and the only human emotions they have are also shared in common with the bug.

Democrats don’t give any more of a flying damn for illegal immigrants than they do for the 60 million innocent babies they viciously murdered in the womb.  One day, I tell you, the Nazis will stand in judgment against every single Democrat. pointing out the fact that they only denied the humanity of 6 million Jews and murdered them whereas Democrats are 10 times more evil.

I hear the cynical Democrats literally weeping their fake-news crocodile tears as they recount the horrors of Trump putting helpless children in cages like animals.  There was only one tiny problem with their fake-news and fake-outrage narrative:

On Sunday, photos of children laying inside a chain-link fence cage starting flying around the internet. New York Times Magazine editor-in-chief Jake Silverstein forwarded it to his followers, saying that “all of these photos are disturbing, but the first two are especially awful.”

CNN’s Hadas Gold described the pictures as “First Photos of separated migrant children at holding facility.”
Outrage quickly followed.

“This is happening right now,” said former Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau. “Speechless. This is not who we are as a nation,” said Antonio Villaraigosa, who is running for California governor. Actress Rosanna Arquette called it a “sick crime against Humanity”

Turns out the photos were taken in 2014 — when, ahem, President Obama was in the White House, a fact that nobody bothered to check before blowing a gasket. Once word of that fact got out, many of these same people deleted their tweets, rather than admit that the “sick crime” happened under their beloved Obama.

Next, there was a picture showing a bus outfitted with child safety seats being used at an ICE family detention center in Karnes County, Texas. ABC Houston reporter Antonio Arellano tweeted the picture on Sunday, describing it as “a prison bus just for babies.”

Again, outrage ensued.

“Unconscionable and inhumane, “said Texas Sen. Sylvia Garcia. “This is what we’ve come to under Donald Trump,” said Stephen King. Others tweeted: “your new gestapo at work,” “this is what fascism looks like,” “we live in a dark period of American history,” “moral abomination.” Etc., etc.

Oops. Turns out this picture, too, was taken when Obama was president. And, the bus was actually used to take the children on field trips to places like the San Antonio Zoo, a nearby park, the movies, as well as for medical treatment and court appointments.

So much for the Trump-era inhumane prison bus for babies.

There was not a single prominent Democrat who publicly attacked Barack Hussein Obama for his horrifying racist hatred toward poor Hispanic children.  And it is a telling and appalling fact that they had to go back to the now acknowledged vileness of their own Obama to fake-news slime the man they rabidly hated.

Again, the entire border crisis that Democrats have had a hysterical Nazi meltdown over was THEIR crisis just a couple of years ago and they did NOTHING to try to resolve it when they had not only the damn White House, but the House of Representatives AND a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.  These demagogic purveyors of hate did NOTHING when they could have changed the entire immigration system if they had cared enough about Hispanics or about illegal immigrants to lift so much as a damn pinky finger.  And anyone with a scintilla of historical awareness knows that these very same Democratic cockroach hypocrites did the very same thing that they are claiming is tantamount to Nazism to the Vietnamese who had fought to help us fight communism and who were physically suffering FAR more than any immigrant crossing into the United States from Mexico is today.  Which is to say that these bugs are demon-possessed cockroach evil not by my standards, but now by their OWN standards.

The blockquoted article above continues to expose patently demagogic lies that come from the colluding conspiracy between the Democratic Party and the mainstream media who have brought back the very worst days of William Randolph Hearst’s “yellow journalism.”  You know, where the powers-that-be gin up fake outrage and literally start wars with blatant propaganda.

We could see that from literally the very first day of the Trump presidency, when a “journalist” propagandist masquerading as a White House correspondent fake-news reported that Trump had removed the bust of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.  Is anyone truly stupid enough to think had the same turd “journalist” had his view of the bust blocked by a security guard during the Obama presidency he would have reported that Obama had booted MLK from the White House?  We saw on the very first day the patent, absurd bigotry of these “correspondents” that if anything got worse every day since.  It was the bigotry of a reporter who expected to see bigotry and saw exactly what he wanted to see regardless of what the actual damn facts were.  This is the essence of fake news: these people “report” what they want to see the way they want to “report” it.  This is exactly what they do a hundred times a day about a hundred stories a day every single day.  They report what they want to see the way they want to see it, rather than stepping back and taking time to look at things with the detached objectivity that any legitimate journalist would actually have.

The fact of the matter is, that even the despicable Obama administration fought against the wicked open-borders policies that the Democratic Party now openly embraces.  The Obama administration actually fought the ridiculous 9th Circuit Court ruling that made it virtually impossible by judicial tyrannous fiat to keep out the hordes of illegal immigrants who were pouring into this country.  Because at some point the man realized that to abandon our border security was to end the nation.  Even Obama understood the twin pillars of CRIMINALITY and SECURITY that current Democrats have forgotten and abandoned in their rabid hatred of Trump, of Republicans and frankly of basic decency and the ability of a nation to sustain itself.  Ideologue that Obama was, even he didn’t want the nation to collapse under the weight of illegal immigration under his watch.  But now that Trump is president, these traitorous vermin would like nothing more than to see America collapse so they can blame him for what they did.

Even the very reliably leftist New Republic acknowledges how dramatically the Democratic Party has turned on its head and abandoned its former working-class that it claimed to champion in a matter of less than 20 years.  They write:

Our modern immigration framework has its roots in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, which was signed into law by Clinton. It instituted many of the hallmarks of the criminalization regime, upping the number of people eligible for deportation while shrinking the opportunities to gain legal status. The law hasn’t aged well in progressive circles: During the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton had to denounce her own husband’s policies.

I can literally give you hundreds of quotes from Democrats who continue in power to this very day pointing out the FACT that illegal immigration HURTS American workers and takes away their jobs and suppresses their wages.  Which was  why they stood against illegal immigration in the interests of protecting the working class whom they claimed to stand for.  Again, the only problem was Obama came along, and the leftist, socialist policies that the Democratic Party now rabidly stands for crushed the working class.  And as the working class fled the Democratic Party war on their very lives, the Democratic Party began to focus more and more and more on the very illegal immigrants that they openly acknowledged harmed working Americans.

I personally call this an act of treason against the United States of America, the citizens of this nation, and the Constitution.

Today’s Democrats are both open borders AND socialist.  Does anyone with half a functioning brain comprehend what that means, as we allow MILLIONS, TENS OF MILLIONS, HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS – because I DEFY any liberal to tell me a NUMBER of exactly how many illegal immigrants is ENOUGH so that we start cracking down and kicking them the hell out of our country – to enter our nation and then receive a host of benefits that hard-working Americans will be forced to pay for.  It is by any sane definition unsustainable: to be a Democrat is to demand the implosion of America as a nation.  Again, this is the kind of thing BUGS do.  These aren’t people who are capable of loving their children and caring about their futures: they MURDER their children.  That is who they are by definition of what they most rabidly stand for (abortion on demand).  If you are a Democrat, you necessarily think of your child as a bug you could have killed and remained a “good” person because you were merely following a cherished doctrine of your bug religion.

Stop and consider the ugliness of the future Democrats have for this nation: BILLIONS of people living here, having long-since destroyed our way of life, our culture, our democracy, and consumed our wealth like a vast locust horde invading a field once green with crops but now stripped barren.  And again, liberal, if you want to argue with me about this, please document for me the prominent members of your wicked political party who have stated the number of immigrants who would be too many and what we would do to stop this invasion.

I wrote this piece a while back detailing how liberals are intentionally trying to crowd millions of people into densely-rat-packed cities and keep them helpless and dependent on government because that’s the only way their hateful, horrible policies can prevail.  The 1984-Orwellian character of what the Democratic Party has planned for this nation is truly stunning and terrifying.  It is an easy-to-prove FACT that liberals only win when they can jam people into packed cities and kill the American way of life.

And no, this is NOT a theoretical issue: this has already happened in Europe and in the United Kingdom as millions of Muslims have poured into these countries and changed the very culture and way of life of its citizens who are now afraid to walk the streets of their own cities.  Europeans are increasingly realizing that their “tolerant” immigration policies are completely unsustainable.  The problem is that this realization has probably come too late: these countries will never be the same and things are going to get far uglier and far nastier as a result as a rising percentage of unassimilated people already prone to bitterness and violence become increasingly unemployed and increasingly resentful and increasingly willing to pursue violent jihad as a result.

I’ve heard this number of 11 million illegal immigrants as the “official estimate” reported seemingly forever, at least since the 1980s.  We’re supposed to believe that just as many voluntarily go home every year as come here???  And where do these numbers come from that make them reliable?  The government?  Seriously?  I think of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the incredibly erroneous estimates they provided just with ObamaCare and basically every budget they’ve ever “scored.”  These people are fools and clowns and yes, ideologues.  The number of illegal immigrants hasn’t risen whatsoever in forty years, but in my decades of life in the state of California, somehow I am now surrounded by people who speak only Spanish when that was simply not true when I was a child.  But government-worshiping Democrats reassure me, “Don’t believe what your racist eyes and ears tell you.”

Only I believe I’ve already proven that it’s THESE bugs who are the actual RACISTS and all they’ve done is “fundamentally transformed” the targets of their racist hate.  The new target of Democratic Party racism shifted from the black man to the white male; the new target of hate has shifted from the Jew to the Evangelical Christian.  Just compare the number of Christians and even just plain religious people or people who believe in an objective source for morality between liberal godlessness and conservative belief in God and morality.  78% of conservatives believe in God with absolute certainty and another 14% believe with fair certainty.  83% of conservatives believe in heaven and 72% believe in hell.  And 48% of conservatives believe there are clear objective standards for what is right and what is wrong.  That is shockingly low, until you compare it with liberals.  Only 45% of liberals believe in God with “certainty” and only 24% believe with “fair certainty.”  Only 18% of liberals rely on religion for guidance on right versus wrong and only 19% of liberals believe that there is any clear, objective right or wrong with 79% of liberals believing that morality depends on a relative situation and whatever the hell they want right or wrong to mean.  And significantly more liberals don’t believe in hell than believe in it.  Which explains why they can be as evil as they are and not believe there will ever be any consequences for it.

The problem with secular humanist liberalism is that there is no moral “oughtness” to it.  There is no ultimate, transcendent, objective moral source of authority that tells me that I ought to do one thing and that I ought not do another thing.  They do what they want and they do whatever they want.  Which is why communism, which is simply the more common name for “official state atheism” that communism is, has as its central dictate in every single form it metastasizes in (Soviet communism versus Maoism, etc.) is that “the ends justifies the means.”  There simply are no moral compunctions for a liberal.  They can even murder 60 million of their own babies and feel as serene in their act of genocide as the baby they arbitrarily allow to survive feels sleeping in a crib.  But let us never forget that baby sleeping peacefully in a crib is merely a thing that could have been brutally and callously killed and that no human being has a transcendent right even to live, let alone to anything else.  In the same way, abortion demands that there is no such thing as a “father,” because if there was that father would certainly have the basic right to not have his child murdered against his will while the state forced him into a state of moral helplessness.  And so we understand that just as Democrats murdered 60 million of the very most innocent human beings, they also murdered fatherhood.  And millions of fathers walk away from their children because Democrats indoctrinated them to walk away and provided them with no right to do anything else.

The real explanation for the profound difference between conservatives and liberals isn’t that white people are conservatives; it’s that liberals are godless.  The religious difference is greater than the race difference, period.  And as we become a less and less “moral and religious people,” as John Adams put it, we become a more “Democratic Party” people.  And a people for whom our Constitution was suitable to govern.  The key truth John Adams was expressing was that a decent, moral, virtuous people could govern themselves without totalitarian restraints; but liberals are devoid of these qualities and therefore must have increasingly powerful government imposed over them to restrain their toxic hatred and viciousness.

These Democrats are simply appalling.  They have created the very worst and the very ugliest of the immigration debacle in this country with their stupid laws and their wicked judicial rulings.  They have created an arbitrary Catch-22 in which Donald Trump can either allow millions of immigrants to enter the country and simply fail to ever show up for their deportation hearings or hold them indefinitely while they wait for court hearings the left has decided everyone who comes to the border has the right to have.  And if you criminally charge the parent such that they can be subsequently deservedly can be charged with a felony for trying to illegally enter the United States twice, you have to separate the child from the parent in the same way that any American put in jail must be separated from his or her children.  This is simply true.  But the Democrats and their mainstream media propagandist fake news allies intentionally and deliberately distort and outright lie as they create a fake news picture with the hopes of dishonestly and cynically benefitting from a disastrous mess that they themselves created and will do nothing to help fix and change.

Democrats falsely claim to represent those who are helpless and cannot speak for themselves?  Tell that to the 60 million innocent helpless babies who couldn’t speak for themselves that these butchers callously murdered and literally murdered with PRIDE.  You ONLY matter to these bugs if there’s a naked political interest for you to matter to them.  Otherwise they couldn’t care less.  Like when they had total control of the White House, a filibuster-proof domination of the Senate and the House and illegal immigrants and their poor children didn’t matter one bit.

Think of it this way: whose constituents do Democrats claim Hispanics are part of, Republicans or theirs?  Theirs, obviously.  And so given that Hispanics and all of these illegal immigrants are THEIR constituency, THEIR group, shouldn’t they be willing to do something to help these people they claim to represent?  Shouldn’t they be willing to negotiate and compromise with Republicans to secure certain rights and privileges for the group they claim to represent?  But they DON’T.  They do NOTHING but demonize and demagogue and slander and lie.  They don’t give one flying damn about these people at ALL; they just cynically exploit them in the most grievous way, literally intentionally creating a situation in which they will suffer in order to point a finger at Republicans and blame them for the suffering that they actually have significantly themselves created.  Because the ends justify the means and the means are surely justified by the end to these godless immoral vermin.

The encouraging thing is that even many Hispanics are getting this: Hispanic approval of President Donald Trump rose an astounding 10 points during the very period of time that Democrats were hysterically and frankly psychotically, cynically race-baiting in their comparisons of Trump to Hitler and Republicans to Nazis.

We can only hope that this pathologically wicked party goes so over the top in its rabidity that enough people turn away from them to hand them the mother of all defeats.

As just one example, increasingly Democrats are openly declaring war against law and order by declaring war on ICE, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement arm of federal law enforcement.  This is the agency that goes after the vicious Latin American gang MS-13, who motto is “Mata, roba, viola, controla,” which translates to “Kill, rob, rape, control.”  When Donald Trump called them “animals,” the left went ballistic in its defense of the humanity and virtue of these vicious predators who in actuality won’t rise to the level of “animals” for another several trillion years of upward evolution assuming the bogus myth that evolution is.  Again, these monsters are BUGS and they need to be squashed with a vengeance until there aren’t any more of them.  And yet liberals are doing absolutely everything they can to stop that from happening.

And the most typical victims of these bug-monsters are Hispanics, and most typically illegal immigrant Hispanics.  Which amounts to yet another of so many proofs that Democrats don’t give one flying damn about the people they fake-news claim to care about.

We truly need a border wall and we truly need enforcement of our laws and a resistance against the lawlessness of Democrats who believe in their “ends justify the means” Stalinist mindset that they are entitled to only follow the rule of law if they feel like it but they are free to ignore any laws they don’t like even as they resist assisting Republicans in simply trying to govern and create a better system from the cynical, rigged, chaotic mess they have made it.

This nation and its citizens need to fight for their right to survive.  And July 5th is a great day to start fighting back.

Yes, Democrats Want Criminal Illegal Immigrants On The Streets Preying On U.S. Citizens. And Here’s Irrefutable PROOF.

Democrats – an amalgam  standing for “DEMOnic bureaCRATS” – are baby butchers responsible for literally TEN TIMES the genocidal mass murder of Adolf Hitler to the tune of sixty million murdered babies created in the image of God.  They are perversion peddlers responsible for our sexually depraved, morally velocitized, toxic culture.  Democrats are literally NAZIS, using the exact same vicious, rabidly anti-free-speech and anti-democracy tactics that the Nazi stormtroopers did as they violently break up their opponents political rallies.  They are the party of drug addiction as they demand more and more access to more and more hard-core drugs that enslave more and more people even as they demand lighter and lighter sentences for the drug pimps who push those drugs on victims.  All of these things are easily demonstrated to be facts about these vile people.

And now there is undeniable proof that they are the party of hard-core VIOLENT criminals being free to walk the streets and continue to perpetuate their crimes against victims they want disarmed and helpless.

First of all, we can see Democrats literally going batpoop insane over President Trump’s policy on illegal immigration, with violent protest rallies going on across the nation as Democrats exalt in how evil and vile and violent they can be.  But FACT:

Arrests of illegal immigrants are UP 35%, but the vast majority of those arrests are of “immigrants” with CRIMINAL RECORDS.

During the Obama years, nearly ONE THIRD of MURDERS in many states involved ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS as the MURDERERS.

Now – FINALLY!!! – we have a president who is doing sweeps taking down the worst of the worst in the form of the vicious, murderous FOREIGN gang MS-13.  In Long Island Park just the other day four young men were beaten and tortured to death.  And of the thirteen arrested for those murders, TEN of them were “undocumented immigrants.”  Only days before that, two “UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANT” members of MS-13 were arrested for the “Satanic ritual” murder of a woman in Texas.

Democrats actually WANT those vicious monsters to remain in the United States.  They are literally that depraved and that evil.  And here’s the proof of what I’m claiming:

Under Obama, ICE was forced to release 86,266 CRIMINAL ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS – yes, including murderers and rapists – just between 2013 and 2015.  I’m not kidding: yes, murderers and rapists.  It is AMAZING how much crime illegal immigrants released by Obama committed.  Just look at the toll in 2015 alone:

The Obama administration took fire at a House hearing Thursday for releasing back into society thousands of illegal immigrants who had committed crimes on U.S. soil – including those behind more than 200 murders.

“These are people that were here illegally, got caught committing a crime, were convicted of that crime and instead of deporting them, they were just released back out in the United States of America,” House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said.

According to a new report from the Center for Immigration Studies, Immigration and Customs Enforcement in 2015 “freed 19,723 criminal aliens, who had a total of 64,197 convictions among them.”

This included “8,234 violent convictions and 208 homicide convictions.”

And Obama – a proven serial liar – lied about the fact that the illegal immigrants he was releasing were committing TEN TIMES more crime than he was dishonestly claiming they were.

In all, Obama released 300,000 illegal immigrants who had committed criminal offenses.  And created a system whereby these and millions of other illegal immigrants could meld unnoticed and unapprehendable into our society.

This is Democrat Party politics driving Democrat Party policy.  And given the fact that the last two Democrat Party presidents are on the record expressing loathing for America, we can safely conclude that they don’t give one flying damn about the interests of the United States.

But let me continue with another story out of the leftist Los Angeles Times detailing Democrat Party policy using millions of dollars of mostly taxpayer money to do it:

Fearing mass deportations under President Trump, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and County Supervisor Hilda Solis stood together in December to unveil a $10-million fund to hire lawyers to defend local immigrants without legal status.

Modeled after programs in other cities, the L.A. Justice Fund will use city and county money and private donations to help those facing deportation proceedings.

But a proposal to bar immigrants with violent criminal convictions from using the fund is sparking protests from immigration advocacy groups, legal organizations and others in Los Angeles who argue that everyone has the right to an attorney.

The disagreement over who deserves legal representation is the latest issue to divide political leaders and progressive groups.

Some of the same groups fighting the L.A. Justice Fund’s criminal conviction provision also criticized Garcetti’s refusal to label Los Angeles a “sanctuary city.”

The debate over the L.A. Justice Fund mirrors the battle over a statewide legal fund under consideration by the state Legislature. That program, passed by the Senate earlier this month, also bars those with violent criminal convictions.

Garcetti spokesman George Kivork said in a statement the mayor wants the L.A. Justice Fund — which is expected to launch later this year — to prioritize children, heads of households and victims of domestic violence and human trafficking.

“The L.A. Justice Fund is designed to provide legal resources and services to those immigrant Angelenos who are Americans by every measure except the papers they hold, and are facing deportation proceedings without a lawyer,” Kivork said.

Garcetti’s position comes after he pushed for second chances for those with criminal pasts, signing a law in December that restricts employers from asking job applicants about criminal convictions until after a conditional offer of employment has been made. [blah, blah, blah]….

Immigration advocates cite similar programs in New York City that also use taxpayer dollars but don’t bar those with criminal convictions.

Excluding those with violent criminal convictions is “defining people by the worst things they’ve done,” said Steve Choi, executive director of the New York Immigration Coalition. “People have done their time. Why punish them again through the immigration system?” [more blah, blah blah]

You need to realize that it isn’t that Democrat politicians don’t want to include violent felons under their umbrella of protection, it’s just that as vile as California Democrat voters are, even they are not quite that rabidly vile.  YET.  But realize that New York Democrats are already doing it and California Democrats will be doing everything possible to keep criminal illegal immigrant monsters on the streets preying on the innocent soon.

It’s just what Democrats do.  Because Democrats are evil people who stand for the perpetuation of every single kind of evil.

The “progressive movement” that makes up the heart and cockroach soul of the Democrat Party machine is screaming for criminals to be allowed on the street as long as they belong to Democrat Party special interest groups comprised by blacks, illegal immigrants, homosexuals, feminists. and violent anti-Trump thugs who viciously attack and beat Trump supporters at legally-permitted pro-Trump rallies.  In liberal bastion Berkeley, liberals – and please let’s just call them what they are: NAZIS – have now twice viciously done just that.  See here for March 6 and here for just the other day on April 15.  This continuing a trend in which the most intolerant people on earth – Democrats – use violence as a political weapon against their political opponents.

And again, we have already seen the proof that this violence was organized and orchestrated at the highest levels with Obama and Clinton knowledge and participation.  And when Democrats didn’t bus in the fascist goons, they were using a tactic called “bird-dogging” to try to incite violence that they could then manufacture themselves into being victims of.

But as of today, if you are a woman employer who wants to hire someone and you would like to know if the man you’re going to hire would rape you in a hot second, you vote REPUBLICAN.  Because Democrats literally don’t want you to know you just hired a rapist.  Democrats have actually made it a matter of LAW to FORBID employers from knowing that they might be hiring violent criminals.

Democrats and their feminist allies BELIEVE in the rape of a woman – as long as that rapist is a black man or a criminal illegal immigrant.

Criminal illegal immigrants, drug addiction, rampant perversion and the murder of tens of millions of children are nothing more than political weapons for these moral monsters.

Democrats have managed to turn every other vile special interest group into “victims,” and now they have “fundamentally transformed” the people who make it their business to turn people into victims of their vicious criminal behavior into “victims”, too.  Because, you know, there are people out there who for some strange, twisted reason don’t want to hire violent predatory monsters and bring them into their homes or their businesses.  And Democrats, being the party of pure evil, are now forcing you to hire them and bring them into your homes and businesses.

As Democrats Come Psychologically Unglued Over Judge Gorsuch, Remember What Dishonest Hypocrite Pieces Of Rat Filth They Are

As we see Democrats now going completely batpoop over an eminently qualified judge who received a unanimous confirmation vote when he was confirmed to the federal judgeship that was his stepping stone to the Supreme Court because he was so obviously qualified and so obviously a great choice, let’s take a trip down memory lane to examine whether Democrats have any legitimate moral grounds whatsoever to oppose – let alone try to block or filibuster – his nomination.

Let’s call those days “B.O.” for “Before Obama.”  Because Barack Obama brought a spirit of division over this nation that will literally likely be the death of this country.

Barack Obama is THE most bitterly polarizing, divisive force this nation has ever seen.  And now what he’s doing is being called a “government in exile.”

The Nazis called it a “Fifth Column.”  I call it “treason” against the United States and against the will of the people as expressed according to our democratic values and principles.

The Democrats are now “justifying” their attempt to sink this nation to a new, bitter, divisive, polarizing low because Republicans refused to call Obama’s pick (Judge Merrick Garland) for a full vote after the death of sitting Justice Antonin Scalia.

The Democrats would have you believe that they would NEVER EVER have EVER done anything like this.  Let’s see if that’s true, or if Democrats truly stands for “DEMOnic bureauCRATS” as I maintain it does.

I wrote this a couple of months ago.  It’s a good time to quote the actual, factual record again:

But let’s get back to Obama and the vile, vicious tactics that he inspired as our nations very first “community organizer” president.

Back in 2009 I was pointing out what a total, abject LIE the heart of the Obama promise to America had turned out to be.  This guy was so damn partisan that it was beyond unreal from the moment he took office.  And yet  The New York Times had written of Obama as candidate:

WASHINGTON — At the core of Senator Barack Obama’s presidential campaign is a promise that he can transcend the starkly red-and-blue politics of the last 15 years, end the partisan and ideological wars and build a new governing majority.

To achieve the change the country wants, he says, “we need a leader who can finally move beyond the divisive politics of Washington and bring Democrats, independents and Republicans together to get things done.”

But this promise leads, inevitably, to a question: Can such a majority be built and led by Mr. Obama, whose voting record was, by one ranking, the most liberal in the Senate last year?

Was Obama EVER a man capable of rising above partisan politics?  No.  Not even CLOSE.  Absolutely not.  As an easy example of that, as a Senator he was one of THE most radical liberal-progressives and unsuccessfully tried to filibuster Samuel Alito for the Supreme Court.  Even Obama’s own party at that point acknowledged that what Obama tried to do was way, WAY too radical.

And so:

However, the truth is that, when they were senators, Obama, Biden, and Clinton all tried to filibuster Justice Alito’s nomination to the court – and other Democratic party leaders such as NY Senator Chuck Schumer reveled in the idea that they were able to block every Bush #43 nomination to the federal courts.

But the Democratic Party went über-fascist radical, and thus the toxic, divisive, polarizing Obama became the nominee of the Democratic Party and ultimately the president.  And the similarly über-fascist radical Joe Biden became vice president; and then the likewise über-fascist radical Hillary Clinton would sure-enough be the following rabid candidate for the Democrat Party machine.

Through his press mouthpiece, Obama as president would ultimately – and cowardly – come to say he “regretted” his decision to be one of the most leftist partisan members of the U.S. Senate when his own damn tactics were brought up in his face to reveal the utter and abject moral hypocrisy that is “Democratic Party.”

So it’s morally evil now to do what Obama did, you see.  Obama ought to be able to do it and get away with it, and later on when it becomes politically inconvenient, well, Obama ought to be able to retreat behind a press secretary mouthpiece and say that he now regrets it.  Such that Republicans have no right to do exactly what Obama himself did.

Let’s go back to Joe Biden: Because We also have the example of Obama’s vice president, Joe Biden who in 1992 said when there was just a POSSIBILITY that George H.W. Bush MIGHT be able to nominate a Supreme Court Justice:

“It is my view that if the president goes the way of Presidents Fillmore and Johnson and presses an election year nomination the Senate Judiciary Committee should seriously consider not scheduling confirmation hearings on the nomination until ever — until after the political campaign season is over.” — Sen. Joe Biden, June 25, 1992

President George H.W. Bush was in office until January 20, 1993.  So Biden didn’t even say this in a presidential election year – the way it was when our Hypocrite-in-Chief Obama demanded the divine right to replace conservative Scalia with a leftist of his choice – rather Biden said the Democrat garbage tactic applied even in the year BEFORE the election year.

Only Democrats are hypocrite enough to not be able to see what abject hypocrite roaches they are.

As we talk about the Republican response to Obama’s selection of Judge Merrick Garland to replace Justice Antonin Scalia in an election year and the consequences of the Republican response today, allow me to take you on a trip down hypocrite Democrat lane from what I wrote at that time:

Democrats have a LONG history of doing the very thing they now claim is so evil:

While Democrats in the upper chamber – including Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York and former Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, both of which called for blocking former President George W. Bush’s nominations – have slammed the GOP for its decision not to consider a nominee until after a new president is elected, Democrats have not always held that stance. The Democrat-controlled Senate passed a resolution in 1960 preventing a recess appointment, much to the dismay of Republicans.

As first reported by The Washington Post – S.RES. 334, also known as Expressing the Sense of the Senate That The President Should Not Make Recess Appointments to the Supreme Court, Except to Prevent or End a Breakdown in the Administration of the Court’s Business – passed the Senate in a 48-33 vote in an attempt to prevent former President Dwight Eisenhower from filling a seat last-minute.

Democrats have frequently played this same game.   New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, now the Senate Minority Leader and leader of all the Senate Democrats, said when a Republican was president that the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush “except in extraordinary circumstances.”

“We should reverse the presumption of confirmation,” Schumer told the American Constitution Society convention in Washington. “The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito.”

And so this incredibly dishonest claim from Obama and the Democrats is so much nonsense it is beyond unreal: if anything, it IS unprecedented, other than all the damn times THEY did the very thing they now so loudly and dishonestly and hypocritically insist that Republicans would be violating sacred precedent to do.

Let me keep going from my same article on just what hypocrite pieces of dishonest roach filth Democrats are:

Here’s another thing: the Senate is now firmly in Republican hands (after disgraceful Democrats were caught being evil maybe a million times too often).  But when Democrats owned the Senate, they shoved their crap right down the Republicans’ throats and changed the damn Senate rules to do it with a process that was so toxic to the Constitution that it was called “the nuclear option.”

On November 21, 2013, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid declared that “unbelievable, unprecedented obstruction” by Republican filibusters had made the confirmation process “completely unworkable.”^[1] As a result, he said, Democrats were forced to eliminate virtually all nomination filibusters. […]

For nearly all of its history, proceeding to a final vote on a matter before the Senate required a supermajority.

But not when Democrats stole the show.  No, no, no, the rules of all propriety and decency and civility go right out the damn window every damn time it pleases them.  Just like the Nazi Party and Jews, the Democrat Party calls the Republicans “evil” and then justifies the most wildly partisan and cynical “final solutions.”

Ever since the Supreme Court became a “super legislature” thanks to the wicked Democrat Party, where they ruled by imposing massive societal change by finding “penumbras and emanations” that justified whatever the HELL they wanted to do, the SCOTUS has become a political branch.  And Obama just started another vicious war while blathering dishonest words that he was somehow above doing the very thing he is clearly doing.

Who “fundamentally transformed” “nearly all of the Senate’s history”???  Don’t EVER forget it was the DEMOCRATS.  Just as it was the DEMOCRATS who invented Borking and it was the DEMOCRATS who are the ones who actually FILIBUSTER judicial appointments.  Bill Clinton and Barack Obama BOTH did NOT have a Republican filibuster.  The ONLY two judges sitting on the court who didn’t receive sixty votes are Justice Thomas and Justice Alito.  Because the Democrat Party has been the official party of Butthurt for decades.

If you want to see what “unbelievable, unprecedented obstruction” truly looks like, look at what Democrats have done since Trump got elected.  These butthurt fascists are psychologically unhinged with rabid acts of “obstruction” taking place at every corner that no, you demon-possessed liars, the Republicans NEVER did.

It’s really not the “nuclear option”; it’s the “Harry Reid option”; it’s the “Democrat Party option.”  And it is a GOOD thing Republicans are now willing to use the same tactics Democrats used against them.  And it’s an evil, wicked thing that the mainstream media is FINALLY seeing this as an “extreme tactic” given that they somehow failed to think that way when their beloved Democrat Party was using the tactic to impose their will when THEY ran Washington.

And so, in that same vein, Charles Schumer – now the leader of the Democrat minority – controls a party that literally announced they were going to object to ANYONE Trump nominated simply because on their view, anyone who doesn’t think exactly like they do is “unqualified” to serve.

Democrats actually swore they would filibuster Trump’s nominee even before Trump nominated anyone.

Democrats promise they will use the slander-tactic that they invented now known as “Borking”: This infamous Ted Kennedy slander was the worst of the slanders:

“Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government, and the doors of the federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is often the only protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy.”

Robert Bork was a good man and eminently qualified to sit on the Court.  But Democrats are truly breathtakingly evil and hypocritical people.

In the same manner, Justice Clarence Thomas literally faced down the Ku Klux Klan as a child who grew up as the child of a poor sharecropper in a house with a dirt floor – only to find the Democrats’ more evil and more psychotic and more dishonest.  As an example, the modern Klan monsters are BLACK Democrats who were willing to lynch Thomas for the sin of having a white wife.  And Democrats said in their vote, “You don’t get to do that and survive, uppity negro.”  They manufactured the very first “high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves” by finding a backstabbing woman who had followed Judge Thomas from job to job for YEARS only to claim that he sexually harassed her the entire time that she had willingly kept following him.

And so, all the Obama crap about it being beyond the pale for a Senate to treat a nomination to the Supreme Court this way, all I can say in response is that now you get to eat Republican fecal matter right out of the toilet bowl, you wicked hypocrite butthurt LIARS.

When Barack Obama – after trying to community organize a filibuster against Bush SCOTUS appointees – appointed two far-left liberal progressive radicals to the Court, Republicans responded by allowing their nomination to go forward and even allowing their members to vote for her in a spirit of bipartisan compromise.  Because they believed a president ought to have a right to nominate judges out of his philosophy, especially on the Supreme Court, even when they personally disagree with those judges’ philosophy of jurisprudence.

So Democrats never had to exploit their own Harry Reid-invented “Democrat option” – a.k.a. the nuclear option – to get a vote for Obama’s SCOTUS picks because Republicans respected the process in a way that Democrats have now proven over and over again they are not capable of respecting.  It was Democrats who invented and then repeatedly used the politics of personal slander-destruction against Republican nominees.

Democrats are not human beings worthy of the name; they have abandoned as a matter of wicked philosophy any concept of the imago dei.  Democrats are evolved bugs, and they only capable of bug morality.  You could rescue a cockroach, nurture it back to health, feed it, but the moment it was time to reciprocate, that roach would happily EAT YOU ALIVE.

So what goes around comes around, Democrats.  What went around a few months ago – when Republicans refused to consider replacing the most conservative justice with an Obama-picked liberal that would overthrow the balance of the SCOTUS in an election year when the will of the people as expressed in the presidential vote was the best way to determine what the balance of the court should be – went around BECAUSE YOU DEMOCRATS STARTED IT.  Just like every other outrage, YOU did it FIRST.  Republicans didn’t do anything relating to Judge Garland that Democrats didn’t announce that they were going to do.  So let what you said you would do be done according to your word, Democrats.  Only it’s NEVER fascism when a fascist does anything, is it?  And what is now going around is the nuclear option that your side invented to use against the Republicans who are using your damned “Democrat option” now.

There is NOTHING worse than hypocrisy.  And Democrats prove every nanosecond of every day that they are the living, breathing embodiment of abject moral hypocrisy.

We are now watching Democrats across the country openly defying the laws of our land, which makes them by definition “lawless.”  If Democrats like a law, then they demand everyone else be compelled to follow that law.  Consider the Christian baker and the Christian wedding photographer who were bankrupted by Democrats because they didn’t believe in homosexual marriage and didn’t want to be forced to participate in it or endorse it.  Democrats rabidly threw EVERYTHING that hate could throw at those people whose crime was trying to live according to their faith that was the foundation for America from day one.   Consider the county clerk who refused to certify gay marriages: this woman was literally put in JAIL by Democrats for following her conscience.  Consider the Arizona law and Obama suing the state and saying immigration was the jurisdiction of the federal government and states and lower districts simply don’t have a right to interfere with the president’s federal policies.  Remember the Democrats’ argument back then that federal law PREEMPTS state law and that the federal government had the right to impose its will onto the states when it came to immigration enforcement.  Remember all that?  And now look at Democrats turn on all of that with a feral, rabid snarl when it comes to illegal immigration and our LAWS and say that they should have a right to have sanctuary cities and sanctuary states and that Donald Trump should be compelled to give them federal money in spite of their defiance of the law.

We are either a nation of laws or we are not.  The same liberals who say that Christians have no right whatsoever to a religious conscience in spite of the 1st Amendment very clearly saying something different now say that the ONLY right one can have is based on a LIBERAL conscience.  Or what I call a cockroach conscience.

Democrats are more than just genocidal baby-murdering sexual perverts today: they are true fascists who are as rabidly and even violently intolerant of anyone or anything they disagree with as the Nazis were.  They now claim that they have the right to “safe-spaces” which amounts to anyone who disagrees with them having the right to cease to exist.  Meanwhile they show up at rally after rally with VIOLENCE even as they cry that they are the victims of “intolerance.”  Because they are the very worst hypocrites in the history of the world.

Use the nuclear option.  Seat Justice Neil Gorsuch.  And next time, understanding that we are in a war to the death with liberals in this country, that we are literally fighting over whether this nation WILL survive and whether this nation even DESERVES to survive, next time get a far-rightwing pick who will truly be to the right what ACLU hero Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been to the left.  The next judge should believe that the Constitution is a living, breathing document subject to change, believing that a judge ought to be the determiner of whether our society changes or not, and impose his hard right conservative Republican will on the law.  Because, after all, he’s a judge, and the law is after all whatever the hell a judge says it is.  And we should keep forcing judges like that now until the left finally understands that the only hope for this nation is a return to what our founding fathers demanded from judges: that they interpret the law according to the unchanging standards of the Constitution of the United States unless and until the Congress amends it according to the system the founders provided, rather than cite “penumbras” and “emanations” as their basis for imposing their preferences onto the law of the land.

When Most Dishonest, Most Divisive, Most Hypocrite, Most-Fawned-Over-By-Leftist-Press President Denounces Biased Press Who Adored Him

The Chinese came up with a curse: “May you live in interesting times.”  The subtle idea was, if things were going well, if there was peace, times would be nice and boring.  The worse things got, however, the more “interesting” they would be.

Which is why things are so damn interesting in our country and in our world now, thanks to the worst president in American history.

It’s just an amazing thing to be alive today, no two ways about it.

So we have Obama – who massively benefited from fawning press coverage when he was running for president as even the leftist HARVARD acknowledged –

[M]edia bias seems an obvious and inevitable phenomenon; serious analyses of media bias date back as far as the Lincoln-Douglas days over 150 years ago. But honest and objective analyses clearly indicate that such bias has only worsened.

During President Obama’s 2008 campaign, the overwhelming majority of news media was clearly and unabashedly behind the campaign of hope and change. Time‘s Mark Halperin called it “the most disgusting failure of people in our business since the Iraq War. It was extreme bias, extreme pro-Obama coverage.” Los Angeles Times writer Mark Barabak expressed similar sentiments: “I think it’s incumbent upon people in our business to make sure that we’re being fair. The daily output was the most disparate of any campaign I’ve ever covered, by far.”

Their statements were not only backed by traditional analyses of media coverage, but also by a more revealing statistic: the Democratic Party received a total donation of $1,020,816 from 1,160 employees of the three major broadcast television networks in 2008, while the Republican Party received only $142,863 from 193 donors.

After such blatant and self-admitted media bias in 2008, we might have expected this year’s election coverage to become far more balanced. Instead, news organizations remained blatantly in the bag for the president and his Democratic allies.

The Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism recently released its report on the 2012 election, and the numbers are clearer than ever. While Governor Romney and President Obama received approximately the same amount of coverage, the type and character of coverage provided were much different. In evening network news, for example, narratives of President Obama remained approximately balanced, while the negative exceeded the positive by 17 percentage points for Governor Romney. Coverage of Romney was also twice as negative as that of President Obama (23 percent versus 11 percent).

Of course, the go-to scapegoat for liberal critics will be the conservative-leaning Fox News Channel. There is no question that Fox News exhibited a right-leaning bias in its coverage: fully 46 percent of news coverage for the president was negative. However, not only was Fox News essentially the only media organization to not have a leftward skew, the bias in its coverage also paled in comparison to that of MSNBC, where coverage of Romney was 71 percent negative (over one and half times more negative than Fox coverage of President Obama). And perhaps the most telling statistic is from the final week, when MSNBC ran no negative coverage of President Obama and no positive coverage of Governor Romney, the most absolute bias of any of the cable news channels.

Even network television (ABC, CBS, NBC) exhibited an apparent bias for President Obama. While Romney received a roughly even amount of positive and negative coverage during the day, evening coverage (when the majority of viewers tune in to network news) saw a stark change, giving a positive three percent boost to President Obama while Romney received two-to-one negative coverage.

– now demanding that the press does to the other party’s guy what they never ONCE did when he was running???

Then you consider Obama’s unrelenting WAR on a fair and balanced press that had access and the ability to provide impartial coverage, and you just start BARFING.

The leftist website democracynow.org has an article titled, “Barack Obama: The Least Transparent President in History.” Here’s how it begins:

“My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government.” So wrote President Barack Obama, back on Jan. 29, 2009, just days into his presidency. “Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.” Now, six years into the Obama administration, his promise of “a new era of open Government” seems just another grand promise, cynically broken.

As the news industry observed its annual “Sunshine Week” in mid-March, The Associated Press reported that “[m]ore often than ever, the administration censored government files or outright denied access to them last year under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act [FOIA].” The AP report continued, “The government’s efforts to be more open about its activities last year were their worst since President Barack Obama took office.”

And on that topic that Obama is THE most fascist and anti-transparent and anti-press president in all of American history both the left and the right agree upon, given the Wall Street Journal’s piece titled, “The Least Transparent Administration: How Team Obama stymies freedom of information requests.”

How about the Associated Press? What do THEY say about Obama?  The AP published the damning results of its new analysis using federal data that finds the Obama administration not just to have failed to be “the most transparent administration in history,” but to in fact be less transparent than any recent administration. Data from the last two years also shows despite the repeated complaints from journalists and news outlets, the administration “has made few meaningful improvements” to its opaque M.O

So it is absolutely astounding that this despicable, vile roach-in-chief would come out and blast the media and blast Donald Trump benefitting in any way, any shape or any form from that media.

And yet that is precisely what the most pathologically dishonest and hypocritical human being in the entire history of the human race did:

WASHINGTON — President Obama delivered a forceful critique on Monday of politicians and the journalists who cover them, lamenting the circuslike atmosphere of the presidential campaign and declaring, “A job well done is about more than just handing someone a microphone.”

Speaking at a journalism prize ceremony in honor of Robin Toner, a longtime political reporter for The New York Times who died in 2008, Mr. Obama said the 2016 campaign had become “entirely untethered to reason and facts and analysis,” a coarse spectacle that he said was tarnishing the “American brand” around the world.

“I was going to call it a carnival atmosphere,” the president said, “but that implies fun.”

“The No. 1 question I’m getting as I travel around the world or talk to world leaders right now is, ‘What is happening in America about our politics?’ ” Mr. Obama continued. “They care about America, the most powerful nation on earth, functioning effectively and its government being able to make sound decisions.”

Mr. Obama’s references to Donald J. Trump, the New York real estate developer turned Republican front-runner, were unmistakable in his criticism of “divisive and often vulgar rhetoric,” frequently aimed at women and at ethnic and racial minorities. But he also turned his fire on the news media, saying it had given an uncritical platform to those pronouncements, in part because of relentless economic pressures that have changed the way news organizations operate.

The president suggested that the news media had not done enough to question the promises made by politicians — an apparent reference not only to Mr. Trump, but also to Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, the independent who is challenging Hillary Clinton, Mr. Obama’s former secretary of state, for the Democratic nomination. Mr. Sanders has promised free public college education and national health care coverage, ambitious social programs that critics say could never be enacted.

“When people put their faith into someone who can’t possibly deliver his or her own promises,” Mr. Obama said, “that only breeds more cynicism.”

The president denounced what he called the practice of drawing “false equivalences” between competing claims made by politicians. “If I say the world is round and someone else says it’s flat, that’s worth reporting,” Mr. Obama said. “But you might also want to report on a bunch of scientific evidence that seems to support the notion that the world is round.”

You mean like YOU did with all your false ObamaCare promises, just for one example?  Politifact called it “the LIE of the YEAR,” and there are at LEAST 37 instances in which Obama repeated that lie over and over and over and over again.

As we speak, we’re STILL learning just how rabidly dishonest Obama was:

In the latest report to undercut President Obama’s “If you like your health care plan, you can keep it” promise, the Congressional Budget Office projects millions of workers will leave employer-sponsored health plans over the next decade because of ObamaCare.

Some will opt to go on Medicaid, but others will be kicked off their company plans by employers who decide not to offer coverage anymore, according to a new CBO report titled,  “Federal Subsidies for Health Insurance Coverage for People Under Age 65: 2016 to 2026.”

“As a result of the ACA, between 4 million and 9 million fewer people are projected to have employment-based coverage each year from 2017 through 2026 than would have had such coverage if the ACA had never been enacted,” the report, released Thursday, said

The Hill reported that 2 million jobs’ worth of hours would be destroyed directly because of this roach law.

People aren’t even bothering to go into the ObamaCare exhanges; there is a giant surge of people pouring into Medicaid way, WAY beyond what Obama or any of his liars told us would happen which is massively increasing the cost.  That is OVERWHELMING an already tottering system.

In fact, try this title on for size: “Ninety-Seven Percent of Obamacare “Newly Insured” Medicaid Expansion Patients.”

FactCheck.org has routinely questioned the “nine million” number, pointing out that while around two million may have elected to pursue an application through a state or Federal marketplace, a large majority of the newly insured were likely adults and children eligible for the expanded medicare benefits, or young, uninsured individuals now eligible to stay on a parent’s plan until they turned 26 – hardly “new”  insurance applicants. According to newly released research from the Heritage Foundation, however, it looks as though an even greater percentage – 97% – of the “newly-insured” are those who benefited from Obamacare’s massive Medicaid expansion.

We were told that 48 million Americans lacked affordable health insurance and something had to be done, but even five years after the passage of Obamacare, 33 million Americans are still uninsured.

If you dig deeper into the actual numbers and realize what really happened with those 9 million “newly insured”, there’s little reason to cheer.

The number of Americans with health insurance increased by 9.25 million in 2014, the first year that two key provisions of Obamacare took place: the subsidies for coverage purchased through the exchanges and Medicaid expansion. And according to recent research by The Heritage Foundation, out of that 9.25 million, “the vast majority of the increase was the result of 8.99 million individuals being added to the Medicaid rolls.”

In other words, over 97 percent of last year’s newly insured Americans were from Medicaid expansion.

Medicaid is designed to assist people who lack the capacity to work, thus making them unable to access employer-provided insurance options, and those who are too poor to afford individual private health care plans. The Obamacare program, however, has expanded those parameters to include the young, the able bodied, and those who are capable of working but choose not to, exploding Medicaid’s ranks and taxing (pun intended) an already at-risk program running straight into bankruptcy. As Kristina Ribali of Uncover Obamacare points out, each dollar spent on those Medicare isn’t designed to serve is a dollar taken away from those who Medicare was designed to help: the truly poor and needy.

Of course, a Medicare expansion isn’t anywhere near ideal – in any way – but it’s interesting that the Obamacare program can, essentially, count as it’s only success a Medicare expansion, something that could have been accomplished without passing a multiple-thousand-page Federal law that has had such a disastrous impact on the way health insurance functions in America. According to the Heritage report, even the parts of the ACA that were supposed to help those in need have failed: while Obamacare counts 4.79 million new enrollments, the same program forced 4.53 million people off their employer-provided insurance, meaning a whopping net 260,000 people were actually served by Obamacare.

I can do all the same things on the subject of illegal immigration, where Obama is not merely a proven, vastly-documented liar without shame, honor or decency, but a facist roach according to his own statements in which he said he’d basically be a Nazi to do what he then turned around and did.

And here we have Obama – our Roach-in-Chief Par Excellence – at it again as he cynically uses federal tax dollars to weaponize non-citizens into voters to use against the American people.

Put those two things together: remember how a Republican congressman was vilified by Obama who postured like a martyr and by the most dishonest media machine since Goebbels when he shouted, “You lie!” at Obama during a State of the Union speech?

I pointed out who was telling the truth and who was lying at the time:

Joe Wilson’s ‘You Lie!’ Over Illegal Immigrants Most True Statement During Obama Speech

When Joe Wilson Shouted ‘You Lie!’ At Obama, IT WAS BECAUSE OBAMA WAS LYING

And so with that history in mind let’s look at a few article titles and see WHO WAS LYING LIKE HELL:

Senate Report: Illegals Benefited From $750 Million in ObamaCare Subsidies

Dem Congressman: Obamacare for All Illegal Immigrants: “The goal is to make integration and inclusion real.”

Hillary Clinton: Illegal Immigrants Should Be Allowed to Get Obamacare

There is a world where Joe Wilson is smiling and every single Democrat is screaming in the agony of eternal hell fire.  Fortunately that world is coming.  Because everybody who cares one flying DAMN about the truth knew where this vile ObamaCare law was going.  And Democrats lied about it like the future citizens of hell that they truly are.

So it shouldn’t be a surprise that even Politico – which was one of those propaganda mills for Obama when he was running in 2007-2008 – broke with this fascist lying weasel and said things like this:

• “The last person in the world who should be lecturing journalists on how to do journalism is President Barack Obama. Yet there Obama was last night at a journalism award ceremony, yodeling banalities about the role of a press in a free society, moaning over the dangers posed by “he said/she said” reporting, and—to the delight of the assembled audience—attacking Donald Trump in every way but name. The press-heavy crowd, convened by Syracuse University’s S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications to give the Toner Prize for Excellence in Political Reporting to Alec MacGillis, clapped at Obama’s 30-minute address, encouraging his best Trump-baiting lines about “free media” and the dangers of “false equivalence.”What they should have done is bombard Obama with rotten fruit or ripped him with raspberries for his hypocrisy.How do we hate Obama’s treatment of the press? Let me count the ways. Under his administration, the U.S. government has set a new record for withholding Freedom of Information requests, according to a recent AP investigation. FOIA gives the public and press an irreplaceable view into the workings of the executive branch. Without timely release of government documents and data, vital questions can’t be answered and stories can’t be written.Obama’s “Insider Threat Program“ has turned employees across the government—from the Peace Corps to the Social Security Administration to the Department of Agriculture—into information squelching snitches. If this isn’t Trumpian behavior, I don’t know what is.“Obama hates the press,” New York Times national security reporter James Risen said not long ago, “and he hates leaks.” Associated Press Washington Bureau Chief Sally Buzbee has decried the “day-to-day intimidation of sources” by the Obama administration, judging it worse than the Bush administration on that score. And in a 2013 piece, Politico’s Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen documented Obama’s mastery of “limiting, shaping and manipulating media coverage of himself and his White House.””
• “The deeper you study Obama’s relationship with the press, the more you want to ask what business he has giving out a press award. Was Trump himself busy that night?”
• “Shame on the Syracuse University’s S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications for allowing Obama—a documented opponent of the press—to pontificate on journalistic practice. The only press award he has any business awarding is special commendation to Trump, thanking him for making Obama look like a free-speech radical by comparison.”

The title of the above piece is “Spare Me Your Hypocritical Journalism Lecture, Mr. President.”  It is very much worth reading.

The only difference is that I knew Obama was like that eight damn years ago.

Donald Trump owes his rise to one loathsome, despicable man – and that man is Barack Hussein Obama.

Again, I TOLD you a Trump was coming.   My words on June 18, 2012:

Obama’s strategy is to set aside and flatly ignore the law for his own political benefit.  Every American who is not deeply troubled by that – troubled enough to not vote for this fascist – is UN-American.

What Obama has done is provide an example of out-and-out lawlessness on the part of the president of the United States.  And when we get a hard-core right wing president the way Obama has been a hard-core left wing president, Obama and the Democrat Party and all of those who voted for Obama and the Democrat Party will be entirely to blame for that president and his extremist actions.  You mark my words.  Because what goes around comes around, and if a Democrat can set aside the law the way Obama has now repeatedly done, well, guess who’s going to be stomping on your necks under your own president’s prior justification???  Conservatives are rising up in a spirit of righteous outrage.  You have repeatedly slapped us in the face through your messiah Obama, and the time is coming when we’re going to punch you hard in the nose and then keep on punching.  And when that day comes, liberals, look to yourselves for blame.

Obama set out to break the Republican Party.  And now this demon-possessed man claims that he’s in no way responsible for the party that he broke by imposing tyrannous executive orders that split a GOP desperately trying to react to outright fascism as Obama used the media in ways described above to distort and warp public opinion.  If a group of thugs breaks into a gathering by a group of decent people and starts slapping people, kicking them, punching them in the face, some people will want to fight back and others will want to call the police and still others will want to cowardly negotiate with their attackers.  That’s exactly what Obama did to the GOP with his sweeping tyrannous actions.  And all the while he divided America by race, divided America by income, divided America by gender, divided-divided-divided so he could conquer no matter how small the margin was.

The result was tens of millions of people – basically half the nation – who are rabidly enraged at Obama and literally ready to do what Democrats have done – first with their vile Occupy Movement and then with race riots and now with Black Lives Matter and fascist Brownshirt violent attacks against Trump rallies – and begin burning and rioting.

And so we have that until now bottlenecked rage incarnated in the rise of Donald Trump.  Right out of the toxic soul of Obama.

I can even show you with numerous headlines how Obama uses the same damn TACTICS that Trump uses to mock opponents and label them:

You click on that and you see 6,220,000 results of “Obama mocks Republicans.”

Is that presidential?  It sure is now, in the age of Obama (and the type Obama created, Donald Trump).

Obama made it a politically omnipotent tactic to demonize people – you know, the way he did when he claimed that Republicans were people who want dirtier air, dirtier water and children born with Down Syndrome and autism – and divide people and win by division – why shouldn’t a Trump learn from that and play ball the way Obama and Democrats play ball???

Obama as candidate: “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said at a Philadelphia fundraiser Friday night. “Because from what I understand folks in Philly like a good brawl. I’ve seen Eagles fans.”  But OH the hypocrisy when the left covers Trump!

Obama demagoguing race and saying to Latinos, “Punish your enemies!”

And I only WISH George W. Bush had personally demonized Barack Obama the way Obama is now publicly demonizing Donald Trump.

Meanwhile, there’s the historical lesson of the Nazis using thug tactics to break up their opponents’ political rallies while they were rising to power; and you’ve got the Nazis using the system to crush all opposition once they attained power: and you’ve got the Democrat Party simultaneously doing BOTH when it comes to their fascist, and yes NAZI tactics against Donald Trump.

When you have this kind of garbage such that a student at a university somehow doesn’t have a right to support a major candidate for president, you have the return of Nazism.

But what do you expect from the liberals who have literally called for open destruction of free speech???  What do you expect from Democrat-supporting “journalism” professors who teach their students how to call for “some muscle” against reporters trying to actually do their damn job and report liberal fascism???

The only reason there is a Donald Trump is because liberals spawned him.

Trump is to angry, pissed off white people EXACTLY what Obama was to the people he won over by preaching hate the same damn way his vile “reverend” for 23 years preached hate.

Is Donald Trump anything other than a despicable human being?  No.  But there are only TWO PEOPLE IN AMERICA who are even MORE despicable than Trump: Hillary Clinton, who belongs in prison and already would have been shoved into her cell and the cage slammed shut behind her had it not been for the other winner of “most despicable”: Barack Obama.

It’s that VERY RAGE that a roach like Obama can just defy justice and thwart the law that has enraged the electorate to the point of Trump.

At least the GOP establishment is trying to keep the despicable candidate from winning: versus the Democrat Party that openly celebrates the only two people on earth who are vastly more despicable.

 

 

PC Political Pope Says It’s Not Christian To Build Walls, Conveniently Forgets That His Vatican Is SURROUNDED By Walls

So read Psalm 139:13-16 and then explain to me how murdering sixty million innocent babies doesn’t make somebody “not Christian.”  Read Romans 1:18-32 and explain to me how celebrating homosexual marriage doesn’t make somebody “not Christian.”  But building a damn WALL disqualifies somebody from being a Christian in this leftist pope’s mind?  Seriously?

Do you have any idea how many passages in the Bible there are about the Amorite, the Jebusite, the Hittite, the Canaanite, the Philistine, etc. that involves driving them OUT of the land?  Read Deuteronomy 20:16-18 and explain to me how the Pope didn’t just say Jehovah GOD is “not Christian.”

And what about the Book of Nehemiah and how God tells the prophet to rebuild THE WALL???

This is not a good pope, unless being a “good pope” means being a PC leftist political ideologue.

You can count on this pope to ignore the fundamental teachings of Scripture and instead enter into every political issue under the sun, always reliably taking the politically correct side.

Global warming?  Sure.  This pope will take the side of uber-leftism.  We’ve now seen that you can reliably count on that.  It doesn’t matter that the Old Egyptian Kingdom and the Mayan civilization was destroyed at different historical periods by the very climate change that these idiots now assert was caused by factories and SUVs.  Just as it doesn’t matter that the Roman Empire flourished during “global warming” that is warmer than it is now and that it was when climate change brought an ice age that the barbarians who ultimately sacked Rome began to flee to warmer climes.

But hey, let’s just stupidly forget about the past and even more stupidly assert that it’s because of human activity, factories and cars and whatnot, that we have this darned climate change.  Let’s just put reality aside.  Political correctness is just so much better for fascists to slander their way into grabbing more government power.  What they lust for is 76 TRILLION dollars of Other People’s Money to fund their corruption where they get to hold the power to reward their friends and punish their enemies, pure and simple.

“Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past,” we were assured in the year 2000 when the left still called their ideology “global warming.”  “Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” we were told.  Let’s just omit the fact that the same idiot pseudo-scientist frauds who predicted global warming and made these idiotic prophesies had previously predicted an ice age.  And they were wrong because they are ALWAYS wrong.

We’re told over and over again that man-caused global warming is “settled science” and that not one single scientist on planet earth disagrees.  It doesn’t matter that Nobel Prize laureates call it a load of bunk.

To be a liberal means to be pathologically ignorant of history, pathologically ignorant of reality and worst of all pathologically ignorant of God’s Word.  Even, or maybe especially, if that liberal happens to be the pontiff.

So this leftist PC pontiff is currently walking around Mexico wearing sackcloth and casting ashes on his head and weeping and wailing about the plight of people who want to break the law and walk into someone else’s country uninvited.

And to that end, he decided to do what NO other pope has done in modern times and become a crass politician demogoguing and demonizing political opponents.  And so he said of Trump:

“A person who thinks only about building walls — wherever they may be — and not building bridges, is not Christian,” Francis said Thursday, according to a translation from the Associated Press. “This is not in the Gospel.”

Yeah, but global warming and gay marriage IS in the Gospel.

Oh, wait.  They aren’t.

Well, it’s too damn bad you don’t yourself actually ever get around to talking about the actual Gospel, Francis.  Maybe you could arrange to fit that in between all of your leftist spouting off about socialism and global warming and gay marriage and illegal immigration.  But I won’t hold my breath.

Anyway, I certainly am NOT a celebrator of Donald Trump’s “Christianity.”  But don’t you DARE, foreign PC pope, intrude into the political process of my country.

Mind you, I can’t even IMAGINE the viciousness of the left had a pope said that Obama wasn’t a Christian.  But to be a liberal means to be a hypocrite.  So you can just forget the notion that any liberal will EVER apply the same standard to others that they apply to themselves, and vice versa.  So just recognize that religion should never have anything whatsoever to do with politics, unless of course it is leftist “religion” demonizing anything conservative or Republican or, you know, the kind of beliefs that come from actually picking up and reading a BIBLE.

So this comeback from the Trump campaign was pretty darned classic:

If you click on the image to open up a larger version in another window, you will see a map of the Vatican (where the Pope resides and commands) featuring a GREAT BIG GIANT WALL SURROUNDING IT.  And a Trump guy pointing out the hypocrisy of Pope Francis by pointing out, “Amazing comments from this Pope, considering Vatican City is 100% surrounded by massive walls.”

That is absolutely awesome.  Donald Trump’s stump speech should now be, “We need to build a giant wall along our southern border, like Pope Francis’ wall at the Vatican…”

Just look at the size of that thing.  I mean, DANG!  Don’t you just WISH we had a wall like that???

Pope Francis, you hypocrite liberal!!!  Jesus told people like you to “first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye” (Matthew 7:5).  So when are you going to take that log out of your own eye SO YOU CAN SEE THAT GREAT BIG GIANT WALL OUTSIDE YOUR HOUSE???  Jesus told Christians that “you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free” (John 8:32).  So when are YOU going to get yourself some of that truth???

I feel like Ronald Reagan should come back from heaven and stand in front of the Vatican and say, “Mr. Francis, Tear down this wall.”

Oh, liberal.  It must sting to have your own standard imposed back in your face.  It would be like Obama telling the rest of us that we should all have our guns taken away… and then the Secret Service were to walk off the job and leave him to his well-deserved fate.  You know, while Obama crawls into the fetal position and starts crying like a pitiful child and pleading for the protection that he is trying so hard to deny to the American people who don’t get to have an armed Secret Service detail everywhere they go.

Upon hearing that he had just been put in his place, the pope first tried to lunge after and physically attack the Trump guy, diving headlong into a crowd to get at him…

And then started screaming at him:

and gave him the finger:

Okay, I might not be accurately reporting the genuine context of what truly happened in that above sequence.  Which means I clearly ought to be working as a journalist at MSNBC.

Nevertheless, being a liberal means “being a hypocrite.”  Which means being a man who lives behind giant walls and calling himself the vicar of Christ on earth telling people that anybody who builds was is not a Christian.

The thing about illegal immigration is that it hurts everyone who tried to play by the rules.  The people who come into a country illegally flood the labor market, and there’s something called “the law of supply and demand.”  You know, the LAW of supply and demand, that tells us that if you increase the supply of something, such as, oh, I don’t know, cheap labor, that the value of that thing will invariably go down.  Which means suppressed and depressed wages for everyone else working in that same industry.  It is just a typical liberal lie from hell that illegal immigrants are all out picking crops in the fields and working jobs that no gringo would ever work because they’re just too lazy.  Nope, illegal immigrants are construction workers and contractors and home health care nurses and store employees and pretty much everything else under the sun.  And I also can’t help but empathize – apparently because darn it, I’m just not “Christian” enough I guess – with the people who tried to legally emigrate to this country, but have to wait for YEARS ON END because Democrats and liberals keep rewarding the lawless types who decide that they belong at the head of the line.  Because another characteristic of liberalism is that you are all too willing to harm good people in order to reward bad people for their bad behavior.

In any event, I am NOT a Donald Trump supporter and hope the man does NOT win the Republican primary, but I am now officially BEYOND ENRAGED at this pope who just became a cheap politician and inserted his fool mouth where it very clearly does not belong: in the American political process.

Part of Donald Trump’s response to the Pope was that Islamic State LUSTS to burn the Vatican to the ground and destroy the walls (you know, the great big one that the Pope can’t seem to see) the way they’ve destroyed every other religious structure such as the ancient tombs and the Baalshamin Temple at Palmyra, etc.  And Trump says when Islamic State comes for you, Pope Francis, you’ll be damn glad that I’m president.  Now, I’m hardly the one to tell you that Donald Trump would be the best president at protecting the Vatican or anyplace else, but I CAN tell you that one of the things this pope has done – in the liberal spirit of Obama – is decry just war and decry truly standing up against monstrous evil.  And it is because of the moral idiocy of Barack Obama and Pope Francis that we now have the worst refugee crisis in the entire history of planet earth.

And I’m beyond sick of your meddling.

You can’t walk this one back far enough or fast enough, Francis.  You just stuck your foot in your mouth right up to your hip bone.  You aren’t pope anymore; you’re a just a cheap politician now.  And it’s long-past time you quit pretending to be “humble” while you so outrageously and arrogantly lecture us on every topic under the sun that is TOTALLY OUTSIDE your alleged expertise.

Go back to preaching about the wonders of homosexuality and gay marriage and stay the hell out of my country’s political process, Mr. Pope.

The Demonic Hypocrisy Of Democrats Who Invoke Reagan With The Words, “Why, Even Ronald Reagan [Fill In The Blank].”

I don’t know how many times I’ve heard “even Reagan” attacks on Republicans from liberals such as, “Even Reagan raised taxes,” or “Even Reagan granted amnesty to illegal immigrants.”

I mean, Reagan cut the damn taxes, okay?  Can we please stop the bullcrap?  The top rate went from 70% to 28% under the Reagan tax cut which ignited the economy like nothing ever has before or since.  You’ve got to be not only a fool but a DAMNFOOL – which unfortunately is a synonym for “Democrat” – to try to argue that Reagan “raised taxes.”  If some taxes went up, while most taxes went down and the overall tax rate went WAY down, it’s pretty pathetic to cling to the couple of times that Reagan raised some minor tax to try to argue against the FACT that Reagan cut taxes.  And yet the left does it all the time.

I googled the phrase (with quotes) “even Reagan” and got 27,700 hits, including the first one from the New York Slimes titled, “ObamaCare and Reagan.”  The author’s thesis is apparently that Reagan was a confused man who didn’t understand socialism (you know, because he only understood it enough to defeat the Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics against the steadfast resistance of the Democrat Party whose mantra had become, “If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em”).  If you search for “Even Ronald Reagan” you get another 33,800 results, with the first one being titled, “Even Ronald Reagan Agrees With Bernie Sanders.”  Oh yes, Ronnie would be a wild-eyed socialist today, wouldn’t he, you deluded liberals?

This actually isn’t about Reagan, although if any group of people on earth would refuse to allow a dead man to rest in peace, it would most assuredly be liberals.  This is about the current conservative view on policy issues and the left’s rhetorical game to take down those conservatives.

First of all, it’s kind of interesting for the left to play the “Even Reagan” game.  If you actually believe that what Reagan believed wasn’t right, why on earth would you ask someone to hold to the views of a guy you say is ignorant?  Isn’t that kind of crazy of you to do?  I mean, do you want to say “Even Hitler…” in a way intended to make one side hold more closely to Adolf Hitler’s policies?  It’s like virtually all other leftist talking points: it’s a word game.  It’s actually a pretty stupid one.

Let me explain what is so desperately wrong with this attack and why the left keeps advancing it by a parallel argument: “Even Jimmy Carter was opposed to abortion.”  As president, Jimmy Carter said, “I am convinced that every abortion is an unplanned tragedy, brought about by a combination of human errors and this has been one of the most difficult moral and political issues I have had to face. As president, I accepted my obligation to enforce the “Roe v. Wade” Supreme Court ruling, and at the same time attempted in every way possible to minimize the number of abortions.”  Hardly a triumphant shout of “women have the right to choose to kill as many of their babies as they want to and let the fathers of those babies rights be damned!” statement; it was a regretful, “This is wrong, but I have no choice” statement.  So even Jimmy Carter believed abortion was a “tragedy.”  And why shouldn’t you be flash-frozen to that view the way you want to flash-freeze me to Regan’s views?

Here’s another one: “Even President Jimmy Carter didn’t believe in same-sex marriage.”

Even Jimmy Carter didn’t believe in …” and you name it, you could certainly advance that thesis if you want to compare Carter’s stated views and policies to Obama’s.

But on the left’s incredibly disingenuous and profoundly hypocritical narrative, only Democrats have the right to have any evolution of their views.  Democrats have “evolved” a damn MILE, but let Republicans evolve an INCH and they are therefore on this incredibly hypocritical narrative without any question a bunch of extremists.

I mean, even REAGAN!

Let’s put aside the fact that EVEN JFK believed that reducing taxes caused increased opportunity and incentivized economic growth.  That is a FACT of history, and anyone who isn’t an idiot knows it.  But hell, Republicans are “extremists” for wanting a little more than what Reagan wanted, whereas Democrats are WHAT for doing a COMPLETE U-TURN AND WANTING SOMETHING FUNDAMENTALLY AND PROFOUNDLY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT THEIR GREATEST PRESIDENT WANTED????

Which party has actually wildly veered into extremism???  It sure couldn’t be the damn party that urinated on the entire history of the human civilization in imposing homosexual marriage, let alone their precious Darwinian evolution and it’s edict of “survival of the fittest” defined as “Survival of the form that will leave the most copies of itself in successive generations.”  Good luck fertilizing an egg by all the sodomy in the world, queers.  And if you’re a lesbian, keep licking furiously; but if you’ve got a functioning brain cell in your head, you ought to know naught will come from it beyond the hairballs you cough up.

One party not only utterly abandoned the history of civilization, not only abandoned the history of every major religion, but also abandoned the very pretense of science they claimed they held the mantle of.  But it’s not like they went “extremist” or anything.

I think we should “fundamentally transform” our calendars and start with BS: “Before Sodomy.”  Because one rabidly extremist political party wildly transformed the universe (in a shockingly depraved way).

If you’re a Democrat, you are at this point by definition a hypocrite to the last cell of your vile little cockroach brain, so there is absolutely NOTHING WRONG with MASSIVE SHIFTS in policy; if you are a Republican, however, any change is somehow defined as a “radical” and as an “extremist” shift toward some demagogic monster.

Since Democrats love the mantra “even Ronald Reagan…” let’s punch them in the mouth with a little bit of “Even Bill Clinton…”

Let’s look at what an actual QUESTION would have looked like had the one Democrat debate not been an example of the Democrat Party’s most powerful super PAC rather than legitimate journalism:

Mrs. Clinton, back in the 1990s your husband concluded the North American Free Trade Agreement, signed legislation repealing the Glass-Steagall restrictions on affiliations between banks and securities firms, and embraced welfare reform and cuts in capital gains taxes. In 1996, he famously declared “the era of big government is over.”

Today you are running on a pro-tax, pro-regulation, pro-spending platform that is almost the opposite of your husband’s economic record. If his policies worked so well in the 1990s, why are you running against them today?

I mean, EVEN BILL CLINTON…  not that Democrats give a flying damn about their wild swing into the most extremist policies imaginable even compared to their last Democrat president.

There is a constant, unwavering attempt by the mainstream media and the Democrat Party and in particular the most demagogic president in the entire history of the republic, Obama, to demonize and slander the Republican Party has having become “extremist.”  And their most darling argument to that bogus end is the “even Reagan” mantra.  Reagan was a great president.  But he was last president very nearly thirty years ago.

Ronald Reagan massively changed the social, political and economic landscape with policies that were fundamentally different from what had been done before.  He fought very hard for his core beliefs and was willing to do something that Barack Obama has proven to be pathologically incapable of doing: reaching out to the other side.  Reagan REGULARLY met with his Democrat Party opposites and worked out deals.  You tell me the number of times that Obama ever sought to meet with Republican leaders.  He was either arrogantly stating to them, “Elections have consequences, and at the end of the day, I won” or neither he nor anyone on his damn STAFF even had the Republican leaders’ phone numbers to reach them.

How about this one, “Even Reagan” leftist lecturers: how about “EVEN OBAMA”

On the debt:

Obama: The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving up our national debt from $5 trillion for the first 42 presidents – #43 added $4 trillion by his lonesome, so that we now have over $9 trillion of debt that we are going to have to pay back — $30,000 for every man, woman and child. That’s irresponsible. It’s unpatriotic. — July 3, 2008

What’s the damn debt again, you demon-possessed HYPOCRITE???  It’s $18.5 trillion and skyrocketing by the nanosecond.  You’ve added NINE TRILLION by your lonesome and you aint even DONE yet!

Or how about this one:

“I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. For me, as a Christian, it’s also a sacred union. God’s in the mix.”

Oops.  So much for gay marriage.  “Even Obama!”  I mean, holy crap, what about THAT “even Obama” compared to your current precise opposite “even Obama”!!!???!!!???

How about this “even Hillary” from Hillary, who now is actually trying to claim that her installation of a secretive private server giving her sole control over her emails so that she could purge tens of thousands of them without ANYONE being allowed to examine them even after her secret server and all of her emails on it had been lawfully subpoenaed by Congress?   Consider what Hillary said about the Bush White House that did NOT use secretive private servers:

HILLARY CLINTON: You know our Constitution is being shredded. We know about the secret wiretaps, about the secret military tribunals, we know about the secret White House email accounts.

So Hillary Clinton needs to be thoroughly investigated and convicted for her shredding the Constitution.  EVEN HILLARY agrees.  At least when she’s not being an abject cockroach hypocrite.

We’re not talking about a party “evolving” over thirty years; we’re talking about a party that swung wildly and radically extremist in ONE CANCEROUS PRESIDENCY that now seeks to further infest and infect America with THE NEXT CANCEROUS PRESIDENCY.

Every single Democrat or “journalist” who has ever used any phrase containing the words “even” and “Reagan” is simply demon-possessed.  There is no other way to explain such massive hypocrisy and such massive dishonesty and such massive depravity.

Barack Obama has just as massively “fundamentally transformed” the political landscape by his tyrannical determination to either get his way exactly the way he wants it or do what he wants through executive order without bothering to deal with the inconveniences of the House and Senate or the Constitution.  And Reagan’s way of doing things won’t work with that level of fascist hate for everything our republic stands for that the Democrat Party has degenerated into since Reagan left office.

This was frankly proven even in Reagan’s own time.  Consider what the Associated Press tried to do to Republicans by invoking Reagan’s “amnesty” for illegal immigrants in a manner that attempted to frame them as hypocrites for opposing Obama’s amnesty.  It’s just another example of “even Reagan..”  Hey, let’s ignore some major differences, such as the fact that Reagan signed a bill into law that had been duly passed by the House and Senate; whereas Obama IMPOSED an amnesty that had been explicitly voted down by Congress by act of sheer executive tyranny.  AFTER having repeatedly stated that he didn’t have the authority to do what he did, that it would violate democracy, that he would be an emperor, etc.  HOW ABOUT THAT EXAMPLE OF “EVEN OBAMA…”???  Let’s also consider the fact that Reagan’s amnesty FAILED by all accounts – so why the hell do more of what already has been proven not to work???  And let’s also consider the flat-out LIAR that Democrats proved to be given a condition for Reagan’s signing that law in the first place:

Rising levels of illegal immigration [led to] the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA).  It provided amnesty for 3 million illegal immigrants, in return for increased border security and penalties for companies “knowingly” hiring illegal immigrants.

Democrats dishonestly proved to be liars who refused to make good on either one of those two conditions.  They proved that they are utterly illegitimate negotiating partners.  And they have been dishonest negotiating partners ever since.

Even Reagan can’t be “even Reagan” when he could literally trust the pathologically dishonest Soviet Union more than he could trust the Democrat Party.

Again, this is just another example of “even Reagan,” so if Republicans oppose Obama doing what he did, it’s only because they’re “extremist.”  Because you see, it’s only fascist when Republicans evolve, at least it is if you’ve got enough legions of demons screaming in your insane brain.

To hold one party to a standard that old even as your own party has swung wildly and massively to the left is quite literally clinically insane both in terms of schizophrenic (by believing “facts” that are blatantly false) and sociopathic (by manifesting profound deceit and insincerity and an appalling absence of remorse or shame).

I am so sick of these sneering pseudo-intellectual HYPOCRITES creating “facts” by the despicable manipulation of rhetoric otherwise known as “political correctness.”

We now live in a time when liberals are so hypocritical and frankly so blatantly morally depraved that liberals believe that it is okay for their members to label police as “murderers” and that “law enforcement” is tantamount to “white supremacy” but it is somehow intolerable for a Republican to talk about the ACTUAL MURDERERS and criminals who are flooding into our nation via illegal immigration.

Liberal Hollywood tycoon Quentin Tarantino appeared on liberal MSNBC and doubled-down after calling police murders.  He said (“whined” being a more accurate term):

That’s the way they attack me …  for standing up for the rights of unarmed citizens who have been killed by the police.

They want to demonize me.  They want to slander me and imply that I said things I didn’t say.  And the reason is because they want me to shut up and they want to make sure that no other people like me, prominent citizens, will stand up for that side.

First of all, you turd, WHY ARE THE CITIZENS UNARMED AGAIN???  Oh, that’s right; because of liberals like YOU dedicated to denying us our 2nd Amendment freedom in spite of the fact that basically every single movie you ever made glorified gun violence – because, yeah, to be a damn liberal is to be a damn hypocrite.  And second, what about the left trying to destroy Donald Trump for pointing out the fact that “unarmed citizens” are rather routinely getting MURDERED by illegal immigrants that this administration refuses to deal with?  What about the far MORE fascist tactics that the left routinely uses to demonize any debate???

You can’t reason with or argue with a hypocrite.  Democrats constantly shift in their double-standards.  As I believe I’ve amply demonstrated above, the goal posts move on every single play with them while they demonize us for not PERFECTLY holding to the ideals of a man from three decades ago.

It is literally Satanic for the Democrat Party that has swung further to extremism than any political party has in American history to label the Republican Party as “extremists.”  Just as it is literally Satanic for the mainstream media to act as that extremist party’s most powerful super PAC by backing their demagoguery.

Democrats Ask Why Hasn’t KY Clerk Been Fired In Gay Marriage License Case? SAME REASON YOUR OBAMA HASN’T BEEN FIRED.

Democrats and liberals – otherwise known as “pathological rabid hypocrites” – are demanding to know why the Kentucky clerk who is refusing to sign gay marriage certificates hasn’t been fired.

The same damn reason your false messiah hasn’t been fired, you moral cockroaches.

Democrats say “If Kim Davis doesn’t want to certify same-sex marriages, she should quit her job.”  They say the law is on their side.

So where the hell were you moral roach hypocrites when the “law” very clearly stated that marriage was between ONE man AND ONE woman and Barack Hussein Obama refused to honor a law that had been passed by both the House and the Senate and signed INTO LAW by President William Jefferson Clinton???

We see that the “ACLU wants Kentucky clerk in contempt of court over denying gay marriage licenses.”  So I suppose what that means is that it is an act of “contempt” not to follow the law.

So where WERE you holier-than-thou Pharisees when you were cheering wildly as Barack Hussein Obama should have been held in contempt, impeached and forcibly removed from office from blatantly violating the law of the land that you are now so upset is being violated???

We can go back more than four years to see Obama:

Obama administration will no longer defend DOMA

You had the law of the land, you had somebody refusing to follow the law of the land.

Obama issued one of his Führer’s Directives and the same people who are now purple apoplectic with rage cheered wildly.  Because you lawless Nazi thug-punks were drunk with the power of being able to ignore any damn law you didn’t like and flat-out making your OWN laws when the actual laws of the land demanded or imposed something you didn’t like.

Politico described Obama’s policy.  Here it is:

Obama’s policy strategy: Ignore laws

And of course, Obama has played this lawless game over and over again.  For example, our Roach-in-Chief publicly stated at least TWENTY-TWO TIMES that he would be a lawless, unconstitutional, anti-democratic fascist thug EMPEROR to impose “laws” by executive order on illegal immigration.  And then did the very thing he said he legally was banned from doing.

I think of the sanctuary cities whose very intent is to fly in the FACE of federal laws on the books.  I think of Obama demonically refusing to do a damn thing to protect the border states against illegal immigration, and then suing them when they tried to enact their own laws arguing that laws pertaining to immigration status or borders are solely under federal jurisdiction.  Unless, of course, that is, unless Democrats do the opposite version of the same damn thing Obama went on the warpath to prevent Republican states from doing.

But of course it’s different when Obama flagrantly ignores the law, dontchaknow.  Being a lawless political fascist thug is a GOOD thing when Obama does it.

So fine.  In Kentucky a clerk has the SAME DAMN STRATEGY and all of a sudden it is this horrible thing and she needs to lose her job and be held in contempt and have her fingernails torn from her clutching hands while she screams in pain.

And all she’s doing is following YOUR policy strategy, Democrat.

In the Los Angeles Times editorial, the Times stated the following that I at least appreciate for the sake of candid acknowledgment:

Where ‘God’s authority’ ends

For Democrats, there is no real point where God’s authority should BEGIN, and it should as sure as they will burn in hell for eternity be ENDED immediately and at every point where it in any way, shape or form intersects with their wickedness.

The Times admits that:

Historically this country has been generous toward individuals whose religious beliefs make it difficult for them to comply with the law.

And then immediately counters with a “but”:

But the accommodation must stop at the point at which a public official refuses to discharge her legal duty by invoking “God’s authority,” as Davis has done.

The God of the Bible’s authority should END, they tell us; what should NOT end and what should not even be interfered with is the authority of THEIR god, the omnipotent human state, as it grows more and more and more powerful.

Unless, of course, someone other than one of THEIR high-priests-of-Satan are at the helm of that government.

Shouldn’t the same smarmy-pharisaical Lost Angeles Slimes editorial board have also said:

But the accommodation must stop at the point at which a public official refuses to discharge his legal duty by invoking his OWN “God authority,” as Obama has done.

Pathologically dishonest, hypocrite Democrats keep playing the “God game” where they invoke religion or God or even the Bible to pervert these when they can twist them into supporting their ideology.  Oh, yes, you pathologically dishonest hypocrite lying liberal Democrat:

Obama invokes Jesus more than Bush
By  Eamon Javers
06/09/09, 04:09 AM EDT
Updated 06/09/09, 03:12 PM EDT

He’s done it while talking about abortion and the Middle East, even the economy. The references serve at once as an affirmation of his faith and a rebuke against a rumor that persists for some to this day.

As president, Barack Obama has mentioned Jesus Christ in a number of high-profile public speeches — something his predecessor George W. Bush rarely did in such settings, even though Bush’s Christian faith was at the core of his political identity. […]

What is always fascist and wrong for thee is always right and good for me, Democrats believe as a matter of their religion of fascist emperor worship.

You listen to twisted liars like Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton and you’d think that Jesus was a fervent socialist when JESUS NEVER SAID A SINGLE WORD AFFIRMING THE EXPANSION OF HUMAN GOVERNMENT.  And when in fact it was human government that violated its own “laws” to put Jesus to death.  Just like Jesus was NOT a homosexual and Jesus HATES abortion murder.  And then these same Democrats ban religion from intruding into their unholy human government all the other times because all of the above flat-out refute everything-the-hell-they’re-doing and every-reason-the-hell-why-they’re-doing it.  Religion is a tool that demonic Democrats cynically exploit to impose their godless way even as they scream out against any who would legitimately follow its actual teachings.  Which is why Democrats have demanded that Christians be barred and banned from being able to exercise their religion and their religious freedom in every practical way imaginable, even as they impose THEIR religion of secular humanism time and time and time again.

And yes, atheism and secular humanism ARE religions:

Atheists Score Major Win In Federal Court
by Jack Jenkins Nov 3, 2014 9:59am

A federal district court in Oregon has declared Secular Humanism a religion, paving the way for the non-theistic community to obtain the same legal rights as groups such as Christianity.

On Thursday, October 30, Senior District Judge Ancer Haggerty issued a ruling on American Humanist Association v. United States, a case that was brought by the American Humanist Association (AHA) and Jason Holden, a federal prisoner. Holden pushed for the lawsuit because he wanted Humanism — which the AHA defines as “an ethical and life-affirming philosophy free of belief in any gods and other supernatural forces” — recognized as a religion so that his prison would allow for the creation of a Humanist study group. Haggerty sided with the plaintiffs in his decision, citing existing legal precedent and arguing that denying Humanists the same rights as groups such as Christianity would be highly suspect under the Establishment Clause in the U.S. Constitution, which declares that Congress “shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”

“The court finds that Secular Humanism is a religion for Establishment Clause purposes,” the ruling read.

The decision highlights the unusual position of the Humanist community, which has tried for years to obtain the same legal rights as more traditional religious groups while simultaneously rebuking the existence of a god or gods. But while some Humanists may chafe at being called a “religion,” others feel that the larger pursuit of equal rights trumps legal classifications.

Mind you, you can google the phrase, “Religion is man’s way to reach God; Christianity is God’s way to reach man” and find that many Christians reject that CHRISTIANITY is a “religion.”  But it is only Democrats’ atheists and secular humanists who get to play both sides of the field and represent themselves as NOT being a “religion” whenever it suits them as they tear down “religion” but they ARE a “religion” whenever it suits them as they apply the “if you can’t beat them, join them” in order to be a “Fifth Column and destroy religion from within” tactic.

Meanwhile they get to impose their atheist and secular humanist RELIGIOUS VALUES all over the damn place as they impose their tyrannous religion on everybody else.  All while loudly asserting that they’re somehow “protecting us from religion.”

Because to be a “Democrat” is to be a “moral cockroach hypocrite.”

When you’re screaming in hell, Democrat – and one day, soon, mark my words, you WILL BE screaming in hell – I just want you to remember that you’re not burning in hell for your blatant abandonment of MY morality.  No, you’re be burning in hell for your OWN hypocrite double-standards where what was right became what was wrong because you’re a twisted pervert and what was wrong became right because you’re a twisted pervert.  You’re going to burn in hell by your OWN standard, applied to YOU by the very God Whose authority you dedicated your life to trying to end.

So I’ll tell you what’s going to happen here: that poor virtuous Kentucky Clerk, Kim Davis, is going to be persecuted and punished in the name of “the law” by the same lawless thug system that has been running roughshod over the law for the past six damn years.  And our “justice” system is going to do it, because:

“The law has become paralyzed, and there is no justice in the courts. The wicked far outnumber the righteous, so that justice has become perverted.” — Habakkuk 1:4

Which is why I am now calling “judges” INjustices.  They have nothing to do with “justice” any more.

God announced that He was going to bring HELL to such a wicked nation.  Start reading from verse five on to see that.  And He’s preparing this country for the same fate.

But don’t worry.  Democrats have ended God’s authority.  The God of the Bible is now powerless, they triumphantly assert: only godless, wicked human government is omnipotent and has the divine right to crush any obstacle in its unholy path.

 

Liberals Don’t CARE About The Poor And Disadvantaged They Cynically Exploit

How do liberals hate and despise you, poor people?  Let me count the ways (in no particular order):

First, there is illegal immigration.  What does it do?  Does opening the floodgate of illegal immigration to pour over the United States help legal immigrants?  Absolutely NOT.  It suppresses wages for legal poor minorities.  This is simply something called a “fact.”  “Illegal immigration has tended to increase the supply of low-skilled, low-wage labor available.”  There is something called THE LAW of supply and demand: the greater the supply of something, the less the demand for that thing and the more the value of it goes down as a result.  This is literally again A LAW that will ALWAYS happen in ANY economic situation with no exceptions.  You cannot continue to increase the supply of something and have that thing continue to go up in economic value: the exact OPPOSITE will happen.  And so, for U.S. blacks, for example, we find that “six in 10 adult black males have a high school diploma or less, and are disproportionately employed in the low-skilled labor market in likely competition with immigrants.”  Again, the impact of illegal immigration on the wages and job opportunities for legal poor immigrants and minorities is simply a FACT.

It simply boils down to this question: how – and I defy a liberal to explain this to me – does bringing in more poor people to compete with the poor people already here for a limited number of jobs – do anything other than undermine the poor people who are already here???

Liberals tell us about migrant field laborers and how nobody else will do those jobs.  This argument is contingent upon your being stupid enough to believe that every single illegal immigrant is out in the fields picking our crops and no illegal immigrants have any other kind of job.  They idiotically overlook the fact that most agricultural zones are considerable distances from the urban population centers – so there is simply no one reasonably close enough to take those jobs.  And the migrant laborers largely live in deplorable conditions and, yes, MIGRATE to the various fields to do the jobs.  And they send a great deal of the money they earn back home to their families in other countries such as Mexico.  That’s one thing.  But another thing is that it is simply a categorical fact today that MOST, IF NOT THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY, OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ARE NOT IN THE FIELDS.  THEY ARE WORKING JOBS THAT AMERICAN POOR PEOPLE DO WANT TO WORK.  My church has a Hispanic congregation.  Many of them are not here legally.  I know many of these people.  I know what many of them do for a living.  Very FEW of them EVER work in ANY field around these parts.  No, they are home care assistants, they are tree trimmers, they are construction workers, they are contractors, they cut our hair.  And they are in stores and businesses working in jobs that YES LEGAL IMMIGRANTS AND POOR MINORITIES WOULD HAVE TAKEN.

So I ask the question again: how do Democrats do ANYTHING other than undermine and hurt the poor when they demand that more poor people be allowed to keep flowing in to compete for the scarce jobs here???

Why did liberals open the floodgate of illegal immigration?  Why do they stupidly refuse to see the obvious and crystal-clear distinction between “legal” immigrants and “ILLEGAL” immigrants?  Because there is absolutely ZERO question that the Democrat Party politically and incredibly cynically benefits from a violation of the law that undermines the nation as a whole.  And Democrats are nothing if they are not political cockroaches who crawl to any and every dung pile that feeds them.  It is a simple fact that Hispanics as a whole overwhelmingly vote Democrat, so therefore the more illegal immigrants – especially given the fact that Democrats have made it IMPOSSIBLE to prevent people from registering to vote and from voting illegally – the better for Democrats.  And Democrats couldn’t give less of a DAMN if what they are doing hurts the people who they are keeping ignorant enough to keep voting for them.  Democrats count on ignorance and they count on their ability to keep ignorant people on their plantation through propaganda that has ALWAYS been the tool for abusive governments to control their people.

So Democrats actively pursue political strategies that suppress wages for poor people.  This is a FACT.  And what do they DO about the crisis they created?  Why create ANOTHER crisis, of course.

So second, there is the outcry to forcibly raise minimum wages as the left exploits one crisis it created in order to create another crisis.  We therefore have the movement to artificially and forcibly raise wages by government fiat.  But does that create more jobs and therefore more opportunity or does it do what common sense ought to tell you it does and do the precise OPPOSITE:

In a National Bureau of Economic Research paper published last December, University of California-San Diego professors Jeffrey Clemens and Michael Wither, found that increases in the minimum wage were responsible for 14% of the decline in the percent of the working-age population employed between 2006 and 2012. Minimum wage increases significantly reduced the probability of low-skill workers reaching the middle class.

This is simply a fact validated by study after study.  Employers – faced with paying artificially high wages, will either go to higher-skilled and therefore more productive labor or they will switch to machines to do jobs that used to be cost-effective for low-skilled workers to do before liberals destroyed those jobs with their stupid demagogic policies.

Aside from the fact that forcing employers to pay more money than they can afford or that the job they would otherwise offer is worth to them, you have another giant dilemma of unintended consequences: artificially imposing higher labor costs ipso facto means imposing higher prices for products and services that poor people have to pay:

… it’s a safe bet that virtually all of the cost of this minimum wage hike will be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. You might think that, well, this isn’t a huge deal if it’s rich people who are paying these higher prices.

But of course it will often be poor people who pay them…  This makes poor consumers worse off in a direct sense, in that they can purchase less with their earnings. And if consumers are at all sensitive to prices, at least some of them will choose to spend less on labor-intensive goods and services now that they are more expensive. That could reduce the number of minimum wage jobs available.”

Another term for that is “vicious cycle.”  We artificially impose higher wages which artificially increases prices, which makes goods and services artificially more expensive to pay those higher wages, which reduces consumers’ ability to purchase those goods and services, which reduces the amount of goods and services purchased, which undermines the job market further.  And further.

It’s an easy bogus case to make for demagogues: we’ll force other people to pay you more money.  Nothing could be easier.  The sad fact – “sad” because liberals hate and despise facts – is this: the BEST way to have a good, well-paying job is to start out in a lousy, sucky-paying job and work your way UP as you demonstrate and document a good work ethic and develop more experience.  But when there are fewer and fewer jobs available because fewer and fewer employers can afford to pay for more workers, well, so much for hard work and experience.

And so we have a THIRD way Democrats hatefully hurt the poor: income inequality.

Income inequality, you say?  Isn’t that a Democrat issue?  Aren’t Democrats campaigning to end this hateful disparity of income and wealth that Republicans want to maintain?  Why yes, at least, if you are a truly stupid, ignorant, propaganda-fed sheep.  In fact, income inequality has EXPLODED under Barack Obama’s liberal economic policies.  It is a FACT that Barack Obama has taken America back to Great Depression-levels of income inequality.  Yes, I said FACT: under Obama and because of Obama, income inequality is the WORST since 1928.  Why is this?  Well, we can go to Obama’s supermassive debt.  Deficit spending necessarily ultimately forces internal devaluation, which deflates worker wages.  Wealthier people can invest and stave off this debt-inflation which eats the poor alive.  We can go back to illegal immigration again: “illegal immigration exacerbates income inequality by adding mostly low-wage earners and thereby, depressing wages for those workers. This is especially harmful to minorities — often immigrants themselves — that have larger shares of their populations living in poverty.”

Here’s another nuance of this vicious income inequality for you: poor people tend to try to save toward a better life; wealthy people tend to invest their wealth.  Barack Obama and the Democrat Party machine have created a giant debt apparatus that sucks savings.  What interest do you get when you put your money in the bank?  You get ZERO.  Poor people cannot afford to invest and make money the only way the Obama-Democrat-debt machine have built for someone to make money off his or her money.  They have created a system – and keep in mind that Wall Street overwhelmingly supported Obama in both of his elections – where the Fed keeps pumping money into the system and the banks lend it at low rates to the big businesses.  But if you are poor, if you are on a fixed income, Obama has left you high and dry.

Democrats are simply vile, venal people: they create godawful pain, they literally take a 2X4 and viciously whack somebody on the back of the head, and then they blame the nearest Republican knowing that their ideological counterparts in the mainstream media will duly report the “fact” that Republicans are responsible for the crimes perpetuated over and over and over again by Democrats.  It’s called propaganda, and it’s the one and only thing the left has always excelled in.

Poverty and homelessness has skyrocketed under the cancer of the Obama presidency.  Poverty has smashed a fifty year record under Obama.  Homelessness is skyrocketing. And you should stop wondering why.  But whose fault is it?  Well, gosh, we can’t blame Bush anymore, so it’s got to be the Republican Congress’ fault, doesn’t it?  I mean, yes, we blamed Bush for the economic meltdown even though Democrats were in lock-step control of both the House and the Senate because the president is responsible.  Unless of course the president is a demagogic Democrat and then Congress is responsible even when it held only one branch of government.

And so fourth, let’s talk about how incredibly cynical and depraved Democrats are in regards to homelessness.  There’s a New York Post story with a picture of a man urinating right in the middle of a public street.  The title says it all: “20 Years of Cleaning Up New York City Pissed Away.”  It is absolutely pathetic and despicable what Democrats have done to piss away progress and decency.  Back when Mayor Rudy Giuliani led New York, for example, the police took an active and proactive role in dealing with homelessness.  They would show up with a social worker and not only get that person off the streets, but also HELP that person.  But liberals, being hateful, said, no, no, no, these people have a right to be here, blah-blah-blah.  The didn’t view them as human beings who needed real help, but as ideological abstractions and as pawns in a leftwing propaganda war.

Here’s an article that perfectly illustrates what I’m talking about:

Team Obama’s fight to keep the homeless living on the streets
By Betsy McCaughey
August 18, 2015 | 8:07pm

America’s homeless are lawyering up to fight for a “right” to live on the street — your neighborhood and personal safety be damned.

From Fort Lauderdale to Los Angeles, cities are struggling with a surge in people living in cardboard boxes and doorways. Local lawmakers are trying to ban “camping out” in public, and ordering police to clear the fetid encampments.

But lawyers for the homeless are pushing back. They’re demanding that “sleeping rough” be legally protected. In Denver, where living on the street is outlawed, lawyers for the homeless want to guarantee vagrants “the right to use and move freely in public spaces without discrimination.”

Outrageously, the Obama administration is siding with vagrants against local governments. Obama’s Justice Department is trying to block Boise, Idaho’s ban on sleeping in public. Cities around the country are worried their own laws may be next.

Not New York, of course. In our city, lawyers for the homeless already run City Hall. One of Mayor De Blasio’s top advisers is Steven Banks, a lawyer who spent three decades at the Legal Aid Society and has sued the city numerous times on behalf of the homeless.

Under de Blasio’s tenure, 311 calls complaining about the homeless are up nearly 60 percent. The mayor dismisses that as “hysteria,” insisting the vast majority of homeless “don’t bother anybody.”

Los Angeles — the homeless capital of the nation — is trying to halt the spread of cardboard shanties: Obamavilles. But the city has lost a string of lawsuits, as judges ruled the homeless have constitutional rights to sleep in cars and store their possessions on the sidewalk. […]

The reason the left wants all the crazy people to be walking around free is because otherwise there would be no one to vote DEMOCRAT.

Depravity and chaos and slum is taking over.  You’ve got Obama to ENSURE it.  The modern Democrat Party wants it, welcomes it, YEARNS for it.  They THRIVE on the chaos and the bitterness they create.  They incite it and exploit it to keep pushing for more and more and more and worse and worse and worse.  They are “progressives” who are progressing America right off the cliff and into hell.

And there’s a consistent pattern if you have eyes to see and ears to hear.

Fifth, there is the terrible, despicable evil that Democrats perpetuated decades over regarding mental illness.   Liberals called the horror they imposed in the name of their progressive moral stupidity a broad-based movement called “deinstitutionalization.”  So-called “compassionate” liberals came up with the “humane” plan to move patients from long-term commitment in state mental hospitals into community-based mental health treatment.  There was the progressive religious faith in science: the Kennedy Administration optimistically described how the days of long-term treatment were now gone forever because newly-developed drugs such as chlorpromazine meant that two-thirds of the mentally ill “could be treated and released within 6 months.”  I am accurately quoting Kennedy from his message on mental illness given on February 5, 1963.  A liberal can argue that Ronald Reagan signed something – passed by Democrat majorities in both houses of the legislature – along these lines.  But Ronald Reagan ALSO signed a bill that same year legalizing abortion in California.  Which is to say that in 1967 he wasn’t very conservative by any modern standard.  And there is simply no question that the national trend toward deinstitutionalization of the mentally ill was dominated by progressive liberals.  At about the same time, two more ideas came to the forefront of American progressive thinking that continue to haunt society today: 1) that there was a right to mental health treatment, and 2) that there was a right to a more substantive form of due process for those who were to be committed to a mental hospital. If there was a right to mental health treatment, then liberal activist judges could use the threat of releasing patients as a way to force reluctant legislatures to increase funding for treatment.  ACLU attorneys such as Bruce J. Ennis successfully claimed before moral idiot liberal judges that less than 5 percent of mental hospital patients “are dangerous to themselves or to others” and that the rest were improperly locked up “because they are useless, unproductive, ‘odd,’ or ‘different.’”  But these progressive ideas backfired terribly.  These two new “rights” imposed by leftists (the “right” to treatment plus the “right” to impose impossible legal burdens on the system) had the horrifying and hateful result of suddenly making hundreds of thousands of seriously mentally ill people homeless and helpless.  And it was all done in the name of the same progressivism that we see in Obama and Hillary Clinton today.  Because again, the left doesn’t actually give a flying damn about these people; they are like “fetuses,” non-human abstractions that can be destroyed for the sake of some greater leftist cause.  Mentally ill people fell through the cracks, living shorter, more miserable lives, and often greatly degrading the quality of urban life for everyone else.  And liberals moved on to their next project of collapsing and imploding America.

We USED to get these crazy people of the streets and put them in mental institutions.  We used to protect both the mentally ill and society as a whole.  But the left said, no, no, no, you can’t do that, you can’t lock these people up against their will.  Well, they’re wandering around out in the streets now.  They’ve been wandering the streets for decades, ignored by Democrats, because Democrats dishonestly and slanderously use the heinous crimes that the mentally ill commit with the freedom that liberals gave them to decry guns.  As if a gun picked itself up and started shooting versus a Democrat releasing a psychopath onto the streets who picked up a gun and started shooting.  And so now they’re shooting up movie theaters, etc. etc. and whose fault is the consequences?  Republicans for allowing law-abiding citizens to maintain their God-given and constitutionally guaranteed right to defend themselves, their homes and their property from all the whackjobs and criminals liberals have running around on the streets.

Sixth, Black Lives Matter.  Well, NO THEY DON’T.  Not to liberals, anyway.  Do you know how we’ve just had riot after riot because black lives matter so much whenever a black person gets killed by a white cop?  Well, that’s the ONLY time “black lives matter” to these horrible political demagogues – and the fact of the matter is a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction of way under one percent of all black lives are killed by white cops.  We just had a nine-year old girl murdered by black thugs while she was on her mother’s bed doing her homework; she died in her grandmother’s arms, and her life didn’t matter AT ALL to anyone in the “Black Lives Matter” bowel movement.  Because they don’t give a flying DAMN about “black lives,” save as how they can cynically exploit a tragedy for the sake of their rabid and venal political ideology.  THAT’S all that actually matters to them.  The truth is that police kill far more whites than blacks, but Black Lives Matter is about NOTHING but ginning up outrage and bitterness and hate for the sake of their precious political screed.

More than sixty percent of all black lives are snuffed out by liberals in the abortion mills that were literally established by a racist eugenicist to encourage black people to engage in self-genocide.  This racist Nazi sympathizer is today Hillary Clinton’s hero.  But nobody cares about such depravity.  Black lives don’t matter to the damn left.  324,000 black lives have been snuffed out by other blacks in just the past 38 years – and NONE of those lives matter to the leftist Black Lives Matter movement.  93 percent of all black lives snuffed out are snuffed out by other blacks – but those lives don’t matter one damn bit to the left.

The left is trying to manufacture a “distinction” to explain why they don’t give a damn for the vast majority of all the black lives callously ended by their own that they don’t give a damn about.  They claim that they’re decrying the “state-sponsored murders” of black men.  Bullcrap.  Unless the black mayor of Baltimore ordered the black states attorney to order the black police chief in Baltimore to gun down black men, THERE ARE NO STATE-SPONSORED KILLINGS.  There are rather individual tragedies as some black men are legitimately killed because they tried to face down armed policemen, while others are illegitimately killed in unfortunate accidents as individual untrained or scared cops lost their professional composure in one tragic moment.

A black woman named Peggy Hubbard had enough and showed what real decency looks like as she took down this bowel movement by exposing it for the abject disgrace it truly is.

And Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson had an article that just documents that “Black Lives Matter” is marching in the completely wrong direction as he exposes the REAL tragedies facing the black community that the leftist black leadership doesn’t want anyone to notice about the godforsaken place they’ve brought their people.

And just to further expose “Black Lives Matter” for the lie that it is, we now find that it is led by a white man masquerading as black.  Because being black means being a VICTIM to the left, and being a VICTIM is the most coveted status by the left.  And until black people truly decide they want to be VICTORS rather than VICTIMS, they will live in a sordid condition.

Seventh, consider the hatred generated by the left against law enforcement by the above Black Lives Matter organization as well as pretty much the entire damn left.  I mean, holy crap, the murder and violent crime rates are SKYROCKETING.  This “sudden spike” has been entirely the creation of leftists who have racially agitated every single instance – regardless of how entirely justified most of those instances have been – in which a white police officer has killed a black suspect.  In the uber-leftist city of Baltimore, we are watching an aftermath that would make you think Boko Haram had just been there.  And it is going on in liberal city after city – Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, Ferguson, St. Louis, Dallas, Atlanta, Milwaukie – as the liberal policies in which “we gave them space to destroy” have utterly failed.  And who is suffering the most?  The very poor and minorities that the left is shrieking in the name of!  Black lives don’t matter to the left – that’s just another cynical political lie; Democrats MURDER more than SIXTY PERCENT OF ALL BLACKS in the abortion mills.  And Pro-Democrat blacks are doing 99.999% of all the gunning down of other blacks.  Police are pulling OUT of poor minority communities because they are now terrified of being prosecuted for trying to do their jobs.  A cop literally ought to be more terrified of a damned Democrat politician than he is of a gangbanging murderer pointing a gun in his face.  And it is the poor who the liberals really hate who are suffering the most as a result.

They used to call it “white flight” in the mainstream media “reporting,” which of course meant it was obvious somehow racist.  I mean, how DARE that white family – seeing criminality and thuggery overtake their neighborhood – just up and move out and find a better neighborhood for their kids?  But now sane, decent people understand that it never had anything to DO with racism; black people and Hispanic people, et al do it to: if you want to be a decent person and raise a decent family and you see low-brow, criminal elements moving in, you either have a community that deals with the scourge or your decent families get the hell out of that budding hellhole.  And so we have whole cities that have been dominated by liberalism for a hundred damn years looking like World-War-II-Europe after the heavy bombers leveled them.

Like I said, there is a CONSISTENCY and a PATTERN to what Democrats are doing as they seek the destruction and collapse of the United States of America.

Eighth, consider college tuition.  Can’t get a damn job because the Obama economy has crushed the American Dream into the Marxist Utopia hellhole?  Well, why not be a college student the rest of your life?  I mean, ultimately you’ll be crushed with mindboggling debt because the more liberals drone on – whether that be in a classroom or in the Oval Office – the more it’s gonna cost you in debt you can never possibly hope to ever repay.  Don’t ever think for one nanosecond that conservatives have anything to do with the massive cost of college: liberals dominate; conservatives are shown the door because liberals are rabidly intolerant fascists.  But now the liberals who made college so astronomically expensive are saying they’ll fix the disaster the created by creating, yes, ANOTHER disaster that will be even MORE expensive.  I hear Bernie Saunders and Hillary Clinton trying to outdo each other making college more “free.”  But college tuition has skyrocketed under Obama.  As colleges and universities have become more and more dominated by liberal-progressive socialism, it has – surprise, surprise – gotten more and more expensive.  Now, liberals say it should be FREE for college students.  Okay, poor dude who never had a chance to go to college: YOU GET TO PAY FOR ALL THOSE PEOPLE WHO GOT TO GET WHAT YOU DON’T GET TO HAVE.

Even other committed liberals who actually understand money realize that Hillary Clinton’s plan is a stupid demagogic political stunt that won’t do a damn thing to lower the skyrocketing cost of tuition.  Billionaire Mark Cuban said, “[Hillary’s plan] stands a better chance of increasing the amount of money students owe than decreasing it.”

The fact of the matter is that college and universities are dominated by liberalism whether it is in the faculty lounges or in the administration buildings.  Liberals are by definition people who constantly whine for more money for themselves in the name of some greater cause.  And so there is a one-to-one correlation between how much federal money gets poured into colleges and universities (and ipso facto into liberals’ pockets) and how much tuition keeps going up.  The more you allow students to borrow, the higher the tuition price you can suddenly afford.

It’s what’s known as a vicious cycle.  Because liberals are vicious.

Ninth, I’m going to talk about women and how the “War on Women” narrative is a despicable charge by the left that is waging the actual war on women in our society.  And I’ll end with a discussion of how anyone who actually wanted HEALTH CARE rather than some “insurance card” with a tiny network and sky-high deductibles is a victim of the left.  I’ll finish up when I get back from some meetings.

Of Donald Trump’s Rabidly Stupid Remarks And His Pig-headed Determination To Stand By Them

Let me just begin by prefacing thus: there are a LOT of reasons to attack John McCain.  For simple starters he’s a RHINO – which for politically illiterate is an acronym meaning “Republican In Name Only” – who has made a career out of splitting the difference by betraying conservatives.  I voted for him in the general election, because my alternative was a backstabber or the damned devil, but no way was that turd my primary vote.

So there are a LOT of ways that a reasonable person could reasonably attack John McCain.  Heck, one of those ways involves the very category of “prisoner of war” that Donald Trump attacked McCain on.  Certainly Trump had every right to go after John McCain for saying that 15,000 American citizens living in McCain’s own state of Arizona were “crazies.”

But for the official record the way that Donald Trump viciously attacked John McCain simply for BEING a prisoner of war is beneath the pale of decency or dignity.  And Donald Trump seriously needs to be fired by every decent American for his stupid idiotic indecency.

Donald Trump said the following about John McCain:

Luntz: “He’s a war hero. He’s a war hero …”

Trump: “He’s not a war hero …”

Luntz: “He’s war hero.”

Trump: “He is a war hero …”

Luntz: “Five and half years in a Vietnamese prison camp …”

Trump: “He’s a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren’t captured. So he’s a war hero …”

Luntz: “Do you agree with that?”

Trump: “He’s a war hero, because he was captured, okay? I believe, perhaps, he’s a war hero. But right now he said some very bad things about a lot of people. So what I said is John McCain, I disagree with him that these people aren’t crazy.”

Okay, Trump had his say.  But here is something called the ACTUAL DAMN FACTS as to how John McCain became a P.O.W.:

On October 26, 1967, McCain was flying his twenty-third mission, part of a twenty-plane strike force against the Yen Phu thermal power plant in central Hanoi^[102][103] that previously had almost always been off-limits to U.S. raids due to the possibility of collateral damage.^[101] Arriving just before noon, McCain dove from 9,000 to 4,000 feet on his approach;^[104] as he neared the target, warning systems in McCain’s A-4E Skyhawk alerted him that he was being tracked by enemy fire-control radar.^[105] Like other U.S. pilots in similar situations, he did not break off the bombing run,^[62] and he held his dive until he released his bombs at about 3,500 feet (1,000 m).^[106] As he started to pull up, the Skyhawk’s wing was blown off by a Soviet-made SA-2 anti-aircraft missile fired by the North Vietnamese Air Defense Command’s 61st Battalion,^[101][104] commanded by Captain Nguyen Lan^[104] and with fire control officer Lieutenant Nguyen Xuan Dai.^[101][104] (McCain was later awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for this day,^[100] while Nguyen Xuan Dai was awarded the title Hero of the People’s Armed Forces.^[101] Decades later, Soviet Army Lieutenant Yuri Trushechkin claimed that he had been the missile guidance officer who had shot McCain down.^[107][108] In any case, the raid was a failure, as the power plant was not damaged and three of the Navy planes were shot down.^[104])

McCain being pulled out of Trúc Bạch Lake in Hanoi and about to become a prisoner of war,^[109] on October 26, 1967.

McCain’s plane went into a vertical inverted spin.^[110] Bailing out upside down at high speed,^[111] the force of the ejection fractured McCain’s right arm in three places, his left arm, and his right leg at the knee, and knocked him unconscious.^[111][112] McCain nearly drowned after parachuting into Trúc Bạch Lake in Hanoi; the weight of his equipment was pulling him down, and as he regained consciousness, he could not use his arms.^[105] Eventually, he was able to inflate his life vest using his teeth.^[105] Several Vietnamese, possibly led by Department of Industry clerk Mai Van On, pulled him ashore.^[113] A mob gathered around, spat on him, kicked him, and stripped him of his clothes; his left shoulder was crushed with the butt of a rifle and he was bayoneted in his left foot and abdominal area.^{[105][111][112]} He was then transported to Hanoi’s main Hỏa Lò Prison, nicknamed the “Hanoi Hilton” by American POWs.^[114]

McCain reached Hoa Lo in as bad a physical condition as any prisoner during the war.^[114] His captors refused to give him medical care unless he gave them military information; they beat and interrogated him, but McCain only offered his name, rank, serial number, and date of birth^[115][116] (the only information he was required to provide under the Geneva Conventions and permitted to give under the U.S. Code of Conduct).^[104] Soon thinking he was near death, McCain said he would give them more information if taken to the hospital,^[115] hoping he could then put his interrogators off once he was treated.^[117] A prison doctor came and said it was too late, as McCain was about to die anyway.^[115] Only when the North Vietnamese discovered that his father was a top admiral did they give him medical care,^[115] calling him “the crown prince”.^[114] Two days after McCain’s plane went down, that event and his status as a POW made the front pages of The New York Times^[92] and The Washington Post.^[118] Interrogation and beatings resumed in the hospital; McCain gave the North Vietnamese his ship’s name, squadron’s name, and the attack’s intended target.^[119] This information, along with personal details of McCain’s life and purported statements by McCain about the war’s progress, would appear over the next two weeks in the North Vietnamese official newspaper Nhân Dân^[104] as well as in dispatches from outlets such as the Cuban news agency Prensa Latina.^[120] Disclosing the military information was in violation of the Code of Conduct, which McCain later wrote he regretted, although he saw the information as being of no practical use to the North Vietnamese.^[121] Further coerced to give future targets, he named cities that had already been bombed, and responding to demands for the names of his squadron’s members, he supplied instead the names of the Green Bay Packers‘ offensive line.^[119][122]

It’s not like John McCain did a Bowe Bergdahl and abandoned his fellow soldiers to seek out and subsequently provide aid and comfort to the enemy.  John McCain is a combat veteran who had honorably served his country in time of war in 22 previous missions before being shot out of the sky, terribly wounded, and pulled out of a lake where he nearly drowned.  He was easily taken prisoner because his arms were too injured to move and one of his legs was useless.  The obvious implication is “JUST WHAT THE HELL WAS THE GUY SUPPOSED TO DO?”

Let me ask some follow-up questions of Donald Trump:

1) Are you seriously telling me that you possessed – in spite of your own lies about dodging the draft and your five damned deferments – that you possessed far superior fighter jet aviator training such that there is no way you could have ever possibly been shot down out of the sky by an anti-aircraft missile?  Is that your story, The Donald?  That had it been YOU in that cockpit the man who repeatedly obtained deferral after deferall rather than serve in the war that you insinuated John McCain was some kind of coward for having actually FOUGHT in you would have used your superior hair weave to duck and dodge the missiles that took McCain’s aircraft out???  Because you are Trump the CHUMP if that’s your testimony, you worthless boastful punk.

2) Is it your suggestion that John McCain would have been braver had he done what YOU would have done – because YOU’RE the one who dodged fighting in a war with your superior skills in compiling an impressive number of student deferments – and by simply refusing to serve in the first place???  Is THAT what you’re saying?  That cowardice is the better part compared to valor???  Are you saying that at the first sign that you were being tracked by enemy radar, that you would have bailed on your mission as John McCain failed to do because unlike you he actually IS a war hero???

3) Or maybe you’re suggesting to us that had it been YOU that had been shot down by a missile, had it been YOU who were shot down “in as bad physical condition as any prisoner during the war” – that you would have tied your ridiculously expensive business-suit’s accompanying necktie around your head like the businessman-version of Rambo and killed 10,000 North Vietnamese with your bare hands as you crawled your way to the border on your ruined knee???  Maybe THAT is what you’re saying, you pathetic little turd???

But actually I think what Donald Trump is really telling us is that 4) Trump the Chump looks at Adolf Hitler and says, “Now there is one awesome badass great LEADER!”  Allow me to provide illustrations of what I mean before I explain myself further:

Regarding Adolf Hitler: the Führer had a nasty habit of giving orders to his soldiers such that “Every man shall fight or fall where he stands.”  He REPEATDLY ordered his units to die fighting rather than surrender or even merely withdrawal rather than be overrun.  As one US military analysis of Hitler’s “leadership” we have the following typical statement (see page 22):

Hitler’s unrelenting policy of no retreat at Stalingrad cost thousands of German soldiers’ lives. According to James Duffy, “It was a policy of fanatical resistance. On October 14, 1942, Hitler issued this order to his troops: ‘Every leader, down to squad leader must be convinced of his sacred duty to stand fast come what may even if the enemy outflanks him on the right and left, even if his part of the line is cut off, encircled, overrun by tanks, enveloped in smoke or gassed.’”

One of Hitler’s own generals said of his “leadership”:

And there were, for Hitler the commander, some deeper flaws as German Field Marshal Erich von Manstein observed: “He was a man who saw fighting only in terms of the utmost brutality. His way of thinking conformed more to a mental picture of masses of the enemy bleeding to death before our lines than to the conception of a subtle fencer who knows how to make an occasional step backwards in order to lunge for the decisive thrust. For the art of war he substituted a brutal force which, as he saw it, was guaranteed maximum effectiveness by the will-power behind it…. Despite the pains Hitler took to stress his own former status as a frontline soldier, I still never had the feeling that his heart belonged to the fighting troops. Losses, as far as he was concerned, were merely figures which reduced fighting power. They are unlikely to have seriously disturbed him as a human being.”

Another German general, Alfred Jodl, described “Hitler’s almost mystical conviction of his own infallibility as leader of the nation and of the war.”  Which I personally see fitting Donald Trump to a “T” when you listen to Trump’s idiotic and fanciful statements that he’d build a border wall and make Mexico pay for it or from a position of weakness and debtor (WE owe THEM trillions of dollars) somehow end up owning them because of course he’s just that darn great.

And just before he shot himself to death like a coward rather than actually die fighting the way he had ordered millions of his own men to do, Hitler decreed:

‘The armed forces have lied to me and now the SS has left me in the lurch. The German people has not fought heroically. It deserves to perish.

‘It is not I who have lost the war, but the German people’.”

So under a Hitler – and yeah, under a Trump the Chump – you pretty much have two choices as a soldier: die fighting or just die.  Otherwise you’re a coward.

Now, Hitler said he couldn’t fight because he might get merely wounded instead of killed and then be captured:

“He said that he could not go out and die fighting on the barricades as he was afraid of merely being wounded and captured by the Russians. He would therefore shoot himself.”

And we couldn’t have that, could we?  So he ordered his men to die rather than give one inch of ground while he himself cowered in the concrete bunker that the millions serving him were ordered to die to protect.  And then there’s Trump the Chump, who in spite of his four student deferments before finally managing to find some doctor who was willing to say that Trump was too much of a pathetic little physical wuss to serve, that somehow John McCain should have died fighting in spite of having just sustained terrible wounds after being shot out of the sky by a missile.

I think it’s 4), myself.  Not that the other three make Trump look like anything other than an outright idiot, but personally I find 4) the most terrifying indictment of Trump the Chump of all of the above.

Under a Trump the Chump Führer-in-chieftainship, if President Trump the Chump orders a fascist-style banzai charge, you run into machine gun fire screaming and you die.  But what you are NOT allowed to do under ANY circumstances possible is to allow yourself to be captured for any reason under the Rising Sun.

In the aforementioned Imperial fascist Rising Sun mentality, we have soldiers that a President Trump the Chump could approve of:

LAURENCE REES: And how can we understand the reasons for what you call the ‘suicidal mentality’ of the Japanese?

AKIRA IRIYE: Some people trace it back all the way to the feudal ethos. I think it seems to be a combination of two things. One is belief in Japanese national uniqueness, again this is an insular mentality, summed up in the sense that Japan is a unique country unlike any other country that can do things that no other country can do, and things like that. And this sense of uniqueness is combined with the Emperor worship. Again this is rather a recent origin: in the 1870s and 1880s the government decided to rally national opinion around the image of the Sacred Emperor, because this Emperor system seemed to be a long living line of Emperors; that is the longevity of the imperial line. Japan was unique and you died for your country but in fact you died for your Emperor, everything was in the name of the Emperor.  In war, in battle, [soldiers] fought for the sake of honouring the Emperor, that kind of thing. That is one, mental attitude.

And the second reason is a more material kind of reason. That is that the Japanese army is much more poorly equipped. So the Japanese say, well, maybe we’re not as good in producing so many weapons as the Americans, but we have this spiritual aspect to it, that we can fight not simply with guns, but we can fight with our spirit. That spirit is the spirit of our selflessness and this is nothing that is part of your fighting. You know this famous exhortation not to be taken prisoner of war because they say to be taken prisoner of war is a shameful thing. Why? Because it shows that you have not fought till the very end. To fight to the very end is to honour the Emperor and to show that you can compensate for meagre weapons by using yourself, perhaps as a human shield, or in a suicide attack.

For these reasons I think even as early as the Russian/Japanese War you get lots of Japanese casualties because they believe in it, that death in battle is an honourable thing. I would think that there were so few Japanese prisoners of war taken by the Russians because they either committed suicide or they just fought to the very end before the Russians could capture them. The same is true in the 1930’s as well. I think you brought dishonour to your family and to your parents if you were caught prisoner during the war, so for these reasons I think there is a sense that the war is never finished until the last man dies. And the last man dies because that’s what they’re supposed to do.

LAURENCE REES: How can we understand here in the West this phenomenal cultural pressure on the individual to conform?

AKIRA IRIYE: I think there is no question about that. I think a kind of collective mentality, or collectivist mentality, and also the idea that you are a member of this family, and what you do brings dishonour to your parents, but not only that, to the Emperor too. This is the whole idea of the nation as one family with the Emperor as the Divine Head. So whatever you do you are bringing either honour or dishonour to the Emperor. There’s nothing in between. So to die is more honourable than to live. I think the conception of life and death, things like that, are maybe at the basis of this. No individual thinking here. Of course there were people who were not that way, but they would not be able to express their opinion more clearly or more frankly during the war because of the mentality of wartime Japan.

Under the Western and American concept of warfare, you are ordered to place yourself at risk.  You are ordered into harm’s way.  You are ordered to fight the enemy.  But in the face of certain death, you are NOT required to die.  Americans are individuals, not herd animals.  You fight honorably, but you have the right to surrender when you have no other option but certain death.

But Trump the Chump’s remark which was tantamount to an assertion that every single prisoner of war was somehow a failure has nothing whatsoever to do with the Western or American concept of a soldier honorably serving on a field of battle; it is straight out of Hitler and it is straight out of Imperial Japanese fascist emperor-worship.

So under Emperor Trump, you die fighting for the glory and honor of “The Donald.”  A Trump the Chump cannot understand why you would not be willing to take a few hundred bullets for him.

To allow a Donald Trump to be anywhere NEAR the office of the president of the United States is simply evil.  We fought a terrible war to kick people like Donald Trump out of their dictatorships.

And the man is so pig-headed that he cannot admit that he made a mistake any more than the CURRENT DISGRACE-IN-CHIEF contaminating our White House.

Allow me to now point out that this isn’t the first incredibly wrong thing that Donald Trump has said.  What Donald Trump said about illegal immigrants was beneath the pale of dignity, as well.

Understand, I am fiercely opposed to illegal immigration.  I believe that we should be fighting with everything we’ve got to dismantle a system whereby people are encouraged to essentially put themselves at the head of the line ahead of all the people trying to enter America from all around the world LEGALLY by ignoring our laws and just flooding into this country.  BUT my beef is NOT with the people coming into America, but with ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.  Whereas Trump the Chump personally demonized the character of pretty much nearly ALL illegal immigrants.

Allow me to contrast my own belief about illegal immigrants vis-à-vis the system tolerating and even encouraging illegal immigration from a prior article to Donald Trump’s vindictive statements:

Let me assure you of something: if Hispanic illegal immigrants voted Republican, you would see the rabid, poison-dripping FANGS of Democrats come out in a spirit of rage and hate unlike nothing you’ve ever seen on the faces of Republicans as they went completely poop-flinging nuts over the invasion of our border.

I attend a church that has an English and Hispanic congregation.  And I regularly take part in ministry to Hispanics, quite a few of which are here illegally.  As a true Christian, I DON’T hate illegal immigrants.  I realize as a moral human being that if I were a poor Mexican or Central American living in a completely failed state the way these people are, I would come to America too – either legally or illegally.  I recognize that for many illegal immigrants, work is a good thing that they are grateful for.  And that they send a lot of the money they earn home to their families.  These are virtuous things.  What I rabidly despise is a cynical and dishonest liberal ideology that wants to politically benefit from these poor people’s misery and ignorance.  I blame the left for its hostility to America as they seek to cynically grab further political advantages by exploiting these people.  Liberals are like drunken braggarts in a bar, buying drinks for everyone in order to be popular and then refusing to pay the tab when the bill comes.  America cannot afford to continue living so wildly and wickedly beyond our means.  We are going to completely economically and socially collapse because of the vile wickedness of Democrats.  And then you will see suffering as you have never seen before – suffering that Democrats forced upon the America that they destroyed.

I believe, therefore, that we ought to treat the illegal immigrants who are coming here as human beings.  And that we should protect our nation, protect our borders, protect our culture, protect our way of life by controlling our borders and enforcing our laws.

You see the difference?  I recognize that many, MANY illegal immigrants are good and decent people whose ultimate crime is to give themselves and their families a better life than they could ever get in the pathologically broken system that is Mexico and much of Central America.  Are there terrible criminal illegal immigrants?  Okay, yes.  But on the same token, are there terrible criminal LEGAL immigrants?  Yep.  And for that matter, are there terrible criminal native-born American CITIZENS?  Oh, you betcha, there are.

My theory on illegal immigration is that we need to profoundly reform our SYSTEM.  We need to begin by first changing the law that BROKE our system: the 1965 law that “reformed” our system that had previously favored immigrants with vital job skills that this nation desperately needed in order to maintain the best industrial base in the world to one whose central purpose was reuniting families.  Should we have a system that emphasizes more doctors, more engineers, more mechanics, more skilled workers, more trained people who can help build America, or should we bring in every single family member of the immigrants who are already here?  Democrats broke our system by preferring the latter over the former.  And that inaugurated a flood of immigration that has NOT made America better, but worse, not richer, but poorer.  We certainly also need to aggressively patrol our borders and deport the people who should not be here.

But we shouldn’t demonize the millions of people who came here seeking a better life.  And I believe that if I were a Mexican and my country was broken the way Mexico was broken and America gave me a chance for building a better life for my family, I would come here to.  And no I would NOT be a “rapist” for doing so, contrary to Trump the Chump.

As a conservative and as a Republican, I demand that we continue to make a distinction between being “anti-illegal immigration” versus being “anti-immigrant.”  And I believe Donald Trump stupidly crossed a line and should have apologized immediately rather than “doubling down” as is apparently the only trick of this one-trick pony.

If you exclude Donald Trump’s giving since 2012 – when he decided he was a “Republican,” Donald Trump has actually given more money to the DEMOCRAT Party over the previous 26 years.  Prior to 2012, Trump gave $581,350 to DEMOCRATS versus only $497,690 to the GOP.  But even when you factor in Trump’s total giving, the man hardly stands as a genuine Republican.  Politifact acknowledges that “Trump has actually been relatively evenhanded in doling out cash to the two parties” and that “The difference in donations is almost entirely captured in Trump’s recent giving” when Trump went from 1989 to 2012 giving MORE to Democrats to giving $463,450 to Republicans against $3,500 to Democrats.  Personally, I would just assume that my Republican president hadn’t only been one for three years and had been a Democrat prior to that.

The man clearly is NO spokesman for the Republican Party or Republican Party values.  And as just one shining example of the hypocritical and opportunistic demagogue that Trump the Chump truly is, he actually attacked Mitt Romney’s very moderate position on illegal immigration as “mean-spirited” in 2012.  Which may mean that while he isn’t the racist he’s coming off as being, what he in fact is is a dishonest demagogue who will say whatever the hell will get him the attention that this arrogant blowhard narcissist clearly seems to need.

Donald Trump needs to be made to shut up and go away.  And yes, anybody who actually thinks that this fool ought to be president IS certainly a “crazy” from this point on, if he or she wasn’t one already.

What A Difference A Hypocrite – Actually Just The Whole Hypocrite Democrat Party – Can Make When It Comes To Shutting Down The Government

Last year, Obama and the entire Democrat Party came unglued over Republican obstructionism – and literally anarchy and even hostage-taking and terrorism – because the Republicans were prepared to vote against the Democrat Party agenda and risk a government shutdown.

I mean, do you remember this crap out of Obama’s White House a year ago?

White House compares GOP to terrorists as government shutdown nears
By Dave Boyer – The Washington Times – Thursday, September 26, 2013

Senior White House adviser Dan Pfeiffer on Thursday compared Republican lawmakers to suicide bombers as the showdown over a possible government shutdown intensified.

“We are for cutting spending, we are for reforming our tax code, we are for reforming entitlements,” Mr. Pfeiffer told CNN’s Jake Tapper. “But what we are not for is negotiating with people who have a bomb strapped to their chest.”

Here was Obama:

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Good morning, everybody.  At midnight last night, for the first time in 17 years, Republicans in Congress chose to shut down the federal government.  Let me be more specific:  One faction, of one party, in one house of Congress, in one branch of government, shut down major parts of the government — all because they didn’t like one law.

This Republican shutdown did not have to happen…

Last night Democrats in the House did absolutely everything they coul to shut down the government.

But in a world and in a political party that despises truth, such facts are irrelevant.

And of course the mainstream media – being the NAZIS they are – duly drooled out the Democrat Party talking points in lieu of the actual news.

But what a difference a year makes.  And now where are all the cockroach “journalists” who had horrible labels for Republicans because they were acting like Democrats acted just last night???

They’re hiding under the refrigerator, of course.  BECAUSE LIBERALS ARE ROACHES.

Elizabeth Warren was against government shutdowns before she was for them
By Doug Powers  •  December 11, 2014 02:56 PM

Last year, Elizabeth Warren tomahawked those in the GOP “Anarchy Gang” for bringing the government to the point of a shutdown:

Warren telling GOPers last year that “this democracy has already rejected your views” is an overdose of retro-irony considering the results of last month’s election. But anyway, fast forward to this week:

Congressional Democrats objected on Wednesday to controversial financial and political campaign provisions tucked into a $1.1 trillion U.S. spending bill, keeping the risk of a government shutdown alive.

The complaints from House of Representatives Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and other top Democrats clouded the chances for passage of the funding bill as a midnight Thursday deadline drew near.
[…]
Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, a staunch advocate for tougher regulation of Wall Street, called for Democrats to withhold support from the bill due to the derivatives provision, which would effectively strike down a portion of the Dodd-Frank financial reform law enacted in the wake of a financial crisis fueled partly by complex mortgage derivatives.

Shutdowns are now … whatever the socialist hypocrite opposite of “anarchy” is:

So now the Democrats are calling Republicans “blackmailers.”

Nancy Pelosi: This is ‘blackmail’
By Lauren French
| 12/11/14 2:31 PM EST
| Updated 12/11/14 9:13 PM EST

Nancy Pelosi is “disappointed” in Barack Obama for backing a bill she described as a form of “blackmail” on the part of Republicans.

Because to be a Democrat is to be a pathologically unhinged lying hypocrite.

So now voting to pass a damn budget is “blackmail” when a year ago it was the essence of patriotism and virtue.  And to vote to shut down the damn government is the essence of patriotism and virtue, when a year ago it was the essence of treason and the heart of right-wing racist darkness.

This abject, despicable display of rabid hypocrisy is nothing new.  It’s par for the course from the party that decreed “elections have consequences.”  Unless they lose said election.  This is par for the course from the party that supported the Iraq War and voted for it only to treasonously betray their very own votes the moment the political winds changed.  58% of Democratic senators (29 of 50) voted for the Iraq War Resolution, including Joe Biden (D-DE), Hillary Clinton (D-NY), John Kerry (D-MA) and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA).  Only to turn on the American troops they themselves had voted to send to war.  This is par for the course for the party that was fully briefed on waterboarding with NO OBJECTIONS – AND OH, YES THEY WERE BRIEFED – only to later lie about it and disown the truth the way the disowned the CIA officers whose “crime” was to follow the laws as the laws were at a very dark and frightening time when 3,000 innocent Americans had just been viciously murdered and no one knew whether another massive attack was imminent.  Now they put America at risk in a “report” that amounts to a giant whine in which the informed professional officials like Obama’s own handpicked CIA Directors Leon Panetta and John Brennan directly refute.  Just imagine what would have happened to their $40 million hit job if they’d actually bothered to interview the professionals who WEREN’T Obama political appointees, given what even the political appointees say.

This is par for the course from the party whose fascist president bitches at Bush for waterboarding three vicious terrorists when this aforementioned fascist bitchy president has murdered more American citizens without one scintilla of due process than Bush waterboarded terrorists.  Meanwhile, Obama’s drone strike victims number in the THOUSANDS with scores of innocent women and children numbered with the guilty.  And this Nazi dares to stand in judgment of a period of time when the New York Times was reporting that al-Qaeda had obtained a 10-kiloton nuclear weapon and smuggled it into New York City.  You sanctimonious tube of slime.

Democrats are officially outraged that the people tasked with protecting America would aggressively interrogate people who saw the heads off of children.  I can’t even begin to describe how much Democrats outrage me.

You want to talk about “betrayal of American values,” Democrat?  I’ve got an idea for you; bring to light what Obama is doing TODAY rather than what Bush did to keep the nation safe ten damn years ago.   Expose what Obama did when he covered-up his fiasco in Benghazi with lies that made a grotesque mockery of our national security; help us expose Obama’s criminal abuse of the IRS as a weapon to target his political opponents; help us expose the cynical lies that were behind the passage of ObamaCare.  Expose Obama’s violation of the separation of powers as Obama himself assured us he would be committing if he issued the executive order on amnesty for illegals that he treasonously went ahead and issued anyway.  Do that and then maybe you’d have a shred of credibility – because you sure don’t have any now.  You want to make America “transparent”???  Fine; just help us expose the wrongs of the LEAST TRANSPARENT PRESIDENT IN HISTORY even according to many doctrinaire liberals.

Democrats don’t want to talk about ANY of the MYRIAD disgraces of American values perpetuated by Obama.  And their rabid protection of the most criminally opaque administration in American history proves the don’t give a flaming damn about “transparency.”

Every day in every way, Democrats are liars and hypocrites.