Of the sons of Issachar, men who understood the times, with knowledge of what Israel should do, their chiefs were two hundred; and all their kinsmen were at their command — 1 Chronicles 12:32
How many blatant, obvious lies can an accuser who has ZERO corroborating evidence and who was literally refuted by all of her own witnesses tell and still be believed?
The answer should be one lie is way too many to believe such an accuser, especially when someone’s entire life and entire career is hanging on that accuser’s credibility alone.
One tweet simply referred tot he transcript of the interview between the prosecutor Mitchell and Blasey Ford:
Mitchell: How did you get to Washington, D.C., today?
Ford: On an airplane.
Mitchell: When were here in August, how did you get here?
Ford: On an airplane.
Mitchell: You’ve been to Hawaii and Tahiti?
Ford: Yes.
Mitchell: How’d you get there?
Ford: On an airplane.
It is a testimony to how truly bad our news media is that this isn’t front-page and leading news in newspapers and news programs across the nation, but here is the gist:
During her public testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday, Christine Blasey Ford admitted that she has flown often for business and pleasure in recent years despite citing her fear of flight in requesting that the hearing regarding her allegations against Brett Kavanaugh be delayed.
In explaining why their client could not grant Committee chairman Chuck Grassley’s request that she travel to Washington, D.C. to testify on September 17, Ford’s lawyers cited her unwillingness to fly, which they claimed stemmed from her fear of enclosed spaces. Ford’s attorney’s further alleged her claustrophobia was brought on by the alleged assault.
Rachel Mitchell, the Arizona sex-crimes prosecutor retained by the Committee to ask questions of Ford and Kavanaugh, established during the hearing that Ford traveled by plane to Washington, D.C. to testify regarding her claim that Kavanaugh pinned her down and tried to remove her clothes when they were in high school.
“May I ask, Dr. Ford, how did you get to Washington?,” Mitchell asked.
“By airplane,” Ford responded.
“I ask that because it’s been reported by the press that you would not submit to an interview with the Committee because of your fear of flying, is that true?” Mitchell asked.
“Well I was hoping that they would come to me but then I realized that was an unrealistic request,” Ford responded.
Mitchell went on to establish that Ford flies frequently as part of her work for an Australian consulting firm, to visit family on the East coast, and to pursue her interests in Hawaiian culture, oceanography, and surfing.
“In fact, you fly fairly frequently for your hobbies and you’ve had to fly for your work, is that true?” Mitchell asked.
“Correct, unfortunately,” Ford answered.
So citing this “fear of flying” which her attorneys represented as being directly due to her alleged sexual assault by high-school kid Brett Kavanaugh, Christine Blasey Ford claims she can’t possibly fly to Washington to testify for any hearing because flying reminds her of the tight, enclosed space reminiscent to her sexual assault. And, of course, as much turmoil as it is going to cause an entire nation and as much personal pain as a week-plus delay going to cause Brett Kavenaugh, Blasey Ford cannot possibly fly. It’s just too traumatic.
Unless she’s going on vacation, of course. Then she can fly for hours no problem.
I mean, Christine Blasey Ford is saying I don’t give a flying damn about the rest of the United States, I’m not flying, I’m just to afraid of flying because I’m the victim of a sexual assault. But, you know, if it’s my vacation, or if there is pretty much ANY other reason to fly, I’m fine with it.
But of course impossible when the entire United States of America is breathlessly waiting for you to show up and spew your spewage if the rabidly and vindictively partisan Democratic Party wants you to use every cheap and dishonest trick in the book to stall.
You liar. You lying liar.
Democrats got ten days of stall and delay out of that dishonest bit of credibility destruction. And because Blasey Ford calls herself the most pathetic of all victims who ever endured victimhood, the fact that she’s a personally dishonest liar who lied out of sheer political partisan expediency isn’t being reported.
Rather, the focus of most mainline media reports – otherwise known as “propaganda” – is that “fear of flying doesn’t mean that Ford can’t fly.” And very intentionally skipping the part that goes, “Really? Then why couldn’t she fly to Washington and testified ten days earlier???”
If she can fly for all of these other reasons,, surely the woman was capable of sucking it up to prevent the nation from twisting in the wind in this debacle for over a week, right?
Judge Kavanaugh in his highly emotional hearing testified that this fraud perpetuated by his bogus accuser literally tortured him, his wife, his daughters and his mother as all kinds of the most disgusting hell imaginable was unleashed on him and on his family during these days while Ford was lying about why she couldn’t be there.
And again, her lie is tied directly to her testimony about her alleged sexual assault.
On Sept. 21, the Judiciary Committee published the text of a proposal sent to Ford’s lawyers offering to fly committee members to California to speak with Ford:
“The Chairman has offered the ability for Dr. Ford to testify in an open session, a closed session, a public staff interview, and a private staff interview. The Chairman is even willing to fly female staff investigators to meet Dr. Ford and you in California, or anywhere else, to obtain Dr. Ford’s testimony.”
In the hearing, when Ford was asked if anyone, including her lawyers, had relayed to her the committee’s offer to visit her in California, Ford refused to answer when her lawyer objected:
Question: “Okay. Was it communicated to you by your counsel or someone else that the committee had asked to interview you, and that they offered to come out to California to do so?”
Counsel: “I’m going to object, Mr. Chairman, to any call for privileged conversation between counsel and Dr. Ford.”
Question: “Could you validate that the offer was made, without her saying a word? Is it possible for that question to be answered without violating any counsel relationships?
Ford: “Can I say something to you? Do you mind if I say something to you directly? I just appreciate that you did offer that. I wasn’t clear on what the offer was. If you were going to come out to see me, I would have happily hosted you and been happy to speak with you out there. I just did not — it was not clear to me that that was the case.”
If Blasey Ford is telling the truth here and not lying – just as she also lied and destroyed her personal credibility when she lied about her fear of flying as an excuse to do PRECISELY what the most partisan Democrats have been demanding from the moment Kavanaugh was nominated and delay, delay, delay some more – then her attorneys chosen by Sen Diane Feinstein are THE nastiest species of cockroaches ever identified under any disgusting fecal matter on planet earth.
This just goes to the narrative that, whatever the hell this woman’s issues are, the Democratic Party has been professing to care so deeply about her, only to cynically leak her letter at the most cynical possible Democrat-favorable moment when she supposedly begged for privacy and confidentiality, and then refused to inform her that she could spare herself not to mention her country a world of pain by having her testimony conducted in her private residence.
What you see clearly revealed here – if Christine Blasey Ford isn’t simply telling another credibility shattering lie – is the genuinely evil and depraved soul of the Democratic Party machine.
Which all further goes to utterly discredit her sexual assault at the hands of Brett Kavanaugh as nothing more than the very ugliest and very most cynical stunt by the most hateful people who ever lived, I’m not so sorry to say.
This is all so damn wrong in so many damn ways.
Christine Blasey Ford sent her letter to Dianne Feinstein on July 30.
President Trump had nominated Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court on July 9.
The 2012 notes, even in redacted form, are relevant because they are the first time Ford says she described the alleged assault in any detail. According to the Washington Post, the notes say that there were four male attackers–a discrepancy Ford attributes to the therapist–and did not mention Kavanaugh by name. Ford’s husband told the Post that she mentioned Kavanaugh at the time in 2012 and expressed concern Kavanaugh might be nominated to the Supreme Court. Kavanaugh had been profiled in the New Yorker that year, when Ford was piecing together memories of the alleged assault, as the most likely next Supreme Court justice if a Republican won the 2012 presidential election.
So the reason the notes haven’t been revealed is because, apparently, Blasey Ford did NOT reveal Kavanaugh by name. The ONLY person we have saying she had EVER said Brett Kavanaugh had attacked her is her husband, who I am frankly not inclined to trust as a non-biased source for very obvious reasons.
But, let’s go with the husband’s story just for the sake of argument: why the hell didn’t Blasey Ford write this letter the day Trump was elected???? Think about it: if Christine Blasey Ford actually did NOT want Brett Kavanaugh to actually ever be confirmed, don’t you think the time for her to write her stupid letter would have been BEFORE Trump actually nominated her alleged attacker??? If the Trump team had had any kind of heads-up whatsoever that this accusation was coming, do ya think they might have nominated somebody the hell ELSE????
This is a woman who named four witnesses to her alleged attack, one her closest friend. All four say they frankly don’t know what the hell Blasey Ford is talking about, that they never attended such a party; one says there is no possible way that Kavanaugh ever did anything like this, and her best friend says she doesn’t even remember ever even MEETING Kavanaugh.
3) Worse, the four other people she identified as attending the party, including Kavanaugh, all deny knowledge of the gathering in question, including Leland Ingham Keyser, who she calls a “lifelong friend.”
Keyser’s lawyer told the Senate Judiciary Committee: “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with or without Dr. Ford.”
The other two potential witnesses — Mark Judge and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth — also deny any recollection of attending such a party. The committee took their sworn statements “under penalty of perjury.” “These witnesses directly contradict Professor Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley advised Ford’s attorneys last week.
There very simply comes a point where YOU SHOULD NOT BELIEVE SOMEBODY. And Christine Blasey Ford crosses that line and then some.
Now, I can’t not fail to point out just how slanderingly dishonest the mainstream media is when it professes to “fact check” something. The AP has such a piece that professes to fact check Kavanaugh and says this highly respected jurist “misrepresented the record” when he said Blasey Ford’s three witnesses refuted her allegation. Which is to say they manage to use rhetorical ju jitsu to switch the story from what it actually is – that Ford states that these people were at the party where she was assaulted and in fact all four unequivocally state that they were not at such a party and did not see any such assault as Ford describes – into a highly technical word-game. Because, given the fact that Ford refuses to ever actually say WHAT party or WHERE the party was located, it is therefore impossible for any honest witness to say “no attack ever happened.” I mean, how the hell could they possibly say such a thing unless they knew precisely which party was the party in question which they don’t know because Ford didn’t specify???
Let’s just say for the categorical record that Ford says witnesses saw something that not one of them saw. And it is amazing how dishonest the AP was in their rhetorical quibble piece.
The last of the so-called “allegations” against Kavanaugh released by Creepy Porn Lawyer of Kavanaugh having a “gang rape ring” and having a minimum of ten gang rape parties is so shockingly and so transparently false that it ought to forever end the bogus narrative that no woman would ever falsely make a charge of sexual assault. I mean, think about it: the FBI did six separate background checks on this guy and asked all the people in his inner circle, all of his friends and acquaintainces about him, all of his neighbors, over and over, and you’d kind of think the “Well, he DID have that gang rape ring” would have come out. I mean, this woman claims she herself went to TEN of Kavanaugh’s “gang rape ring” parties. And you’ve kind of got to ask, “Just how many gang rape ring parties do you think YOU would have gone to – you know, especially after you yourself had been gang raped – before realizing that this wasn’t your scene??? And this wouldn’t just be a testimony to Brett Kavanaugh’s criminality; his whole TOWN, hell his whole STATE of Maryland, would have been revealed in shocking criminality. This is the kind of thing you send in the United Nations forces to stop because all legitimate law and order has broken down.
In other words, this is so laughably false it’s beyond unreal.
And when we stop and think about all the ways – apparently at least eight of them from that story I cite above – Blasey Ford’s story collapses, so is hers.
We come to what the Democrats demanded over and over again: an FBI investigation. Because I’m sure the Democrats are hoping this honest, unbiased FBI agent investigates Kavanaugh:
“The next person who refers to an FBI report as being worth anything obviously doesn’t understand anything. FBI explicitly does not, in this case or any other case, reach a conclusion, period. Period.”
To be a Democrat is to be a hypocrite. One cannot BE a Democrat and not be a hypocrite.
What do the Democrats want? Well, Diane Feinstein sat on the Blasey Ford allegation and even repeatedly talked to Kavanaugh and never once mentioned Blasey Ford in any of her questions. There was a bipartisan investigative process within the Judiciary Committee that would have kept the matter confidential, but that wasn’t in Feinstein’s naked partisan interest.
They didn’t want an investigation two months ago when there could have and maybe even should have been one because they KNOW FULL DAMN WELL an FBI investigation won’t turn up anything that would disqualify Judge Kavanaugh. I mean, again, Joe Biden said it himself. Again, think about it: Maryland does not have a statute of limitations on sexual assault, so Christine Blasey Ford could walk in – you know, because she claimed she was so dang terrified of flying in, I mean, right? – to the police department and file a complaint. But do you know what would happen if she did that? Absolutely NOTHING. Because Blasey Ford doesn’t provide enough detail of a specific crime to even justify an arrest warrant, let alone a successful prosecution.
They want time. They want time because they believe they can take enough of the Senate 38 days from now on November 6 to make a Kavanaugh confirmation impossible. And these cynical, professional liars know that if they have that extra time, more and more liars like Creepy Porn Lawyer’s client will crawl out of the woodwork.
I think the FBI ought to investigate why Christine Blasey Ford said she couldn’t fly to testify in Washington because she was so afraid of flying when she is obviously not very afraid of flying given how many other times in FAR less important situations she has flown. I think the FBI ought to investigate how the hell that doesn’t destroy this accuser’s credibility and render her story moot. I think the FBI ought to investigate whether Blasey Ford is lying or if her highly partisan Democrat Party activist legal team was demonically exploiting her by not telling her that the Judiciary Committee would have traveled to her house. On Blasey Ford’s own characterization, this was a betrayal of her, but it was just what the rabidly partisan Democrats wanted. I think the FBI ought to be investigating precisely who leaked Blasey Ford’s letter and why the letter was leaked when it was in a manner that, again, just happens to correspond to THE most cynical partisan Democrat goal.
So if you’re going to actually “investigate,” FBI, PLEASE INVESTIGATE.
On the demonically insane belief of the Democratic Party, they need a new FBI investigation because of course the last SIX FBI investigations into Judge Kavanaugh were so incompetent that they missed a gang rape ring that was operating right under their noses and gang raped scores of young girls. And so the Democrats are putting their bets on the FBI that missed this godawful gang rape ring to finally get an investigation right this time.
Either that, or every single Democrat is insane and evil.
It was a terrible event that forever scarred my life: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagen once fondled me at a party. I can’t recall where the party was or what year the party happened, I don’t remember how I got there or how I got home. And all the witnesses I name whom I say saw it happen actually swear under oath that they hadn’t seen any such thing and my story is “nuts.” But these three judges need to step down and resign. After all, an accusation was made, and an accusation by itself ought to be more than enough to destroy someone’s life because, after all, these three justices cannot prove that they WEREN’T at a place I claim I can’t remember during a time I claim I can’t recall. This is the very black roach heart of lawlessness that violates every due process protection that is at the heart of what makes our Constitution great. And cockroach fascist Democrats are pissing all over those protections as we speak.
Give me your name and I’ll find someone to accuse you of a terrible, despicable sexual act, date unspecified, time unspecified, place unspecified, and if you cannot prove that you were never at a date that isn’t specified and a time that isn’t specified and a location that isn’t specified, by your very own toxic ideology you ought to be destroyed if you cannot prove what is impossible for you to prove no matter whether you’re completely innocent or not. How can you prove you weren’t at a particular place when your accuser won’t tell you where the place is? Or how can you prove you weren’t even at a damn party on a particular night because you can show you were somewhere else when your accuser doesn’t have to bother to say when the alleged assault took place?
And so yes, we actually have the direct quote of the Democrat Party’s current strategy: “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime.” These boastful words that come right out of current Democrat activist thought were spoken by Joseph Stalin’s deputy premier, Lavrentiy Beria. Stalin frequently stayed up late into the night signing thousands – ultimately millions – of death sentences based on evidence such as is being proferred by these Democratic activists. They just made up crimes for whoever they wanted to based on their political needs at the moment.er how innocent you actually are of the allegation.
In Communist China, which cockroach Democrats yearn to have here, the accused is guilty until proven innocent as an essential component of their legal system. And if the State wants you to be guilty, you are guilty regardless of whether you are innocent or not. That is precisely what Democrats want here.
Democrats keep claiming “this isn’t a trial.” Yeah, right. It’s way more akin to this:
This scene from “The Crucible” was written by a man named Arthur Miller who was using witchhunts as political analogy to describe what was going on during a period we today call “McCarthyism,” when just an accusation was enough to get a completely innocent person destroyed.
Brett Kavanaugh is being used in a vicious, partisan, toxically-political way as the stand-in for EVERY female accusation. If ANY woman EVER has EVER ONCE been sexually assaulted, then Brett Kavanaugh is somehow guilty and ought to be destroyed.
Any woman who has a father, or a brother, or a little boy, desperately needs to go out and vote Republican in droves. Or watch their men be destroyed by a rabidly evil Democrat Party system of “justice.”
I want you to realize that the Democrats who are saying “This isn’t a trial are the very people who as Senators have the privilege of confirming JUDGES. And what Democrats are screaming right now is that the rule of law is not necessary for any judge to bother following; the presumption of innocence is not necessary for any judge to follow; due process is not necessary for any judge to follow. If the Senate that confirms judges doesn’t have any such requirements, then the judges they confirm sure as hell don’t, either. Good damn luck if you appear before a traffic court judge who has chosen to follow Democrat Party standards and judged you guilty just because that judge didn’t need any actual evidence to destroy your life.
It’s not enough to suggest that Judge Brett Kavanaugh would be convicted on the so-called “evidence” presented against him that he is a would-be rapist; he wouldn’t even be ARRESTED by any legitimate legal process given the fact that there have been ZERO damn facts and ZERO damn witnesses presented to corroborate ANYTHING these slanderers have claimed.
Our Constitution enshrines two concepts as sacred to our legal proceedings: due process and a presumption of innocence until proven guilty. The fact that Democrats are rabidly attacking BOTH of these sacred aspects of our Constitution ought to terrify any decent human being. These people are now far worse than McCarthyism ever was and are on the verge of reaching the psychotic level of the French Revolution just before the Reign of Terror when a meritless accusation meant a death sentence.
Democrats have also thrown out in addition to due process and presumption of innocence the rule of law. Let’s consider that Dianne Feinstein made an incredibly cynical and vile decision to sit on this allegation for seven full weeks. What should she have done if the rule of law were followed rather than the mystery of lawlessness being revealed?
When Senator Dianne Feinstein received very serious allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, she could have—and should have—handled those concerns through the committee’s normal protocols. This process, which applies not just to Supreme Court nominees but to hundreds of judicial and Justice Department appointments, is specifically designed to protect the interests of both accusers and nominees. The process is both confidential and bipartisan. Its goal is to pursue the truth, not political advantage. That Senator Feinstein inexplicably chose not to handle the serious allegation Dr. Christine Blasey Ford made against Judge Kavanaugh according to these procedures has had terrible consequences for all the individuals involved and has done lasting damage to the Senate and the Supreme Court as institutions.
The Democrats chose to “fundamentally transform” what was supposed to be an orderly process into a monkey-poop-throwing contest. What they have proven is that they are rabid perverts of everything our nation was supposed to stand for when it came to how accused people are constitutionally required to be treated.
But there is so much more in this toxic betrayal by Democrats out of very simple, visceral political ideology and tactics: Dr. Ford through her legal team has steadfastly been demanding that Judge Kavanaugh be required to speak first and then she be allowed to speak afterward and rebut whatever he says.
That method of “getting to the truth” actually DOES have historical precedent: it was how Spain handled accusations during a very grim, very dark period known as “The Spanish Inquisition.” The accused would be required to defend himself or herself against accusations that had not yet formally been made. Which means it was nearly impossible for any kind of defense. It was a wicked time. And Democrats very badly want to go back to the periods and tactics of the very most wicked regimes and periods in history. Democrats are literally invoking the same standard used in the Spanish Inquisition to produce the same wicked results the Inquisition produced. That’s who these vile people are.
How is Judge Kavanaugh supposed to defend himself against a charge that he did something, time never mentioned, time never mentioned, place never mentioned. How is he supposed to have any chance whatsoever to prove that he wasn’t at that particular place at that particular time???
Imagine this was your son being destroyed like this, liberal. And for the record, I mean, imagine this happened to one of our sons that you DIDN’T murder in the abortion mills. I mean, imagine you had any capacity for any human love for your offspring at all. Oh, what the hell, I’m wasting my time asking for human empathy for Democrats: they’re bugs. They murder their own babies. They have bug souls. Of course they cannot be reached with any human appeal to empathy.
Amazingly, Democrats demand that we throw out actual convictions on the basis that the prosecutors or the judge or the jury was somehow “racist” or “biased,” even as they themselves right now are demanding that an entire group of people – men – are guilty merely by virtue of the fact that they are “men” “and we all know how them people are.” The Democrats and their rabid media propagandist have slobbered all over themselves framing the Republicans as “a bunch of white men.” What the hell does this have to do with RACE??? Both the accused and the accusers are WHITE. But Democrats are the very worst kind of demagogues and they play every red-herring fiddle they have in their arsenal of demonic tricks whether those demonic tricks have anything the hell to do with their case at hand or not. So they use the word “white” just because they know they can inflame their followers with even more rabid hate than these haters already have. And the funniest thing of all is, virtually every Democrat playing the “white” card were THEMSELVES WHITE!!!
I’m going to put the essence of the world the left wants to create in terms of the Aryan and the Jew: when an Aryan accuses a Jew of committing a crime – any crime with or without any evidence whatsoever – the Jew is presumed guilty even if there is some way to prove the Jew innocent. And all you’ve got to do is substitute a couple of words to see that what I’m claiming is true: exchange “Aryan” for “feminist woman” and “Jew” for “conservative man.”
If a liberal woman accuses a conservative man of rape or sexual harassment or just being a bad man, that woman is to be believed regardless of any or all lack of evidence and even if that woman’s accusation is literally destroyed by any witnesses she claims saw the alleged event. Which is precisely what is happening to Judge Kavanaugh.
Still another issue that needs to be mentioned is the Democrats’ demand that this allegation be investigated by the FBI, which has made a public statement that the FBI doesn’t the hell investigate these kind of political charges. It should at this point be mentioned that the Democrats have been rabidly screaming themselves into padded-rubber-room hysteria crying for any delay they can call for since Kavenaugh was brought forward to begin the confirmation process. The fact is that Democrats were screaming to delay the process from the moment the process began even before anyone (but Diane Feinstein, who concealed the allegations for obvious political reasons I’m about to point out) KNEW about any sexual allegations. Which amounts to a cynical opportunity from the most cynical people on the face of the earth to cynically scream for the same cynical delay they’ve already been screaming for. They have been stalling and stalling, hoping they can draw out the nomination process long enough for the upcoming election to change the political landscape in a manner that would mean that Judge Brett Kavenaugh never be confirmed.
And so Diane Feinstein sat on allegations that should have gone to the subcommittee for a fair and impartial hearing and investigation had there been any fairness or impartiality in any Democrat on the face of the earth. Had they actually given ONE FLYING DAMN about any actual investigation, they would not have wasted SEVEN WEEKS THAT COULD HAVE AND WOULD HAVE BEEN SPENT INVESTIGATING. Instead, they pissed away any ability the Republicans had to be able to spend significant time investigating just so they could frame Republicans with the bogus and false charge of refusing to investigate. These people are the worst kind of liars and the worst kind of manipulators there are or ever have been.
But it gets better, because had the FBI actually DONE an investigation, we have these words from former Senator and former Obama Vice President Joe Biden;
Joe Biden snarled back then:
“The next person who refers to an FBI report as being worth anything obviously doesn’t understand anything. FBI does not in this or any other case reach a conclusion…”
So why do they want what they mocked when the FBI investigated the bogus sexual allegations against the last Justice the wicked pervert Democrats tried to demonically frame??? The same damn reason Diane Feinstein threw the rule of law and 230 years of Senate custom out the window when she sat on allegations for seven weeks, had multiple opportunities to question Brett Kavanaugh about these allegations herself and refused to mention the allegations at any time to any one during the entire conformation hearing, only to leak them after the hearing had already ended: to create as much of a climate of rabid, toxic hatred as this wicked woman from a wicked party could possibly foment. To stall for time, using the cheapest, most dishonest, most vile imaginable stuns to do what the legitimate democratic process and Constitution prevents them from doing and destroy a Supreme Court nominee with the worst slanders.
Another witness that Ford says was there – Patrick J. Smyth – also says Ford is simply not telling the truth:
“I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post,” Smyth says in his statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.”
Both men have now sworn under oath, under penalty of perjury, that what Dr. Ford claims to have happened did not happen as she claims. Because she claims they were there and they say under penalty of perjury that that is false.
These men and Judge Kavanaugh himself were questioned under penalty of perjury. You would think Democrats would want to be part of such a session, but they were completely and utterly disinterested in truth or anything close to searching for the truth. Not one single Democrat appeared at the hearing because there is literally not one single decent or honest Democrat.
Another person claimed by Christine Blasey Ford to have attended a gathering decades ago during which, Ford claims, she was sexually assaulted by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh has denied any recollection of having attended the party.
In an email to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Saturday, Leland Ingham Keyser, a former classmate of Ford’s at the Holton-Arms all-girls school in Maryland, said she doesn’t know Kavanaugh or remember being at the party with him.
“Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford,” lawyer Howard J. Walsh III of Bethesda, Md., conveyed in an email to the committee that was obtained by Fox News.
At what point do you dismiss Ford’s fake allegation as what it is – a politically-motivated slander – and vote to confirm a justice who has an unimpeachable record??? At NO point, if you are a demon-possessed cockroach, A.K.A. a Democrat.
Amazingly, the Democrats’ main talking point is that “Dr. Ford has no motivation to lie!” Which is as false as the claim that they have no motivation to lie. Let me just put it this way: is it literally the claim of every Democrat that the Democratic Party and the left are NOT fired up in protest of the Kavanaugh nomination??? Are they actually pretending that leftist women like Dr. Ford couldn’t care less whether Justice Kavanaugh would take away abortion rights??? Not only are these leftists surrounding Ford demonstration that, yes, Dr. Ford and these leftists SURE AS HELL DO have a motivation to lie, but that in fact they are actually LYING when they claim they don’t have a motivation to lie.
Dr. Ford testifies that she is afraid of flying as a result of her horrible attack by that horrible man, Judge Brett Kavanaugh. She stole a week of the nation’s time stalling – strangely EXACTLY like the Democrats want her to do which is strange unless she’s a militant liberal activist … oh, that’s right, she IS a militant liberal activist! – claiming that she couldn’t fly to Washington D.C.BUT STRANGELY THAT DIDN’T BOTHER HER WHEN SHE MOVED TO HAWAII and apparently forgot all about this lifelong trauma that made her so terrified of doing what she made a conscious decision to do and get on an airplane and FLY when it was convenient.
Abortion and the other liberal issues like abortion are what this is all about. And so all of a sudden a judge who had just sailed through his nomination hearing is viciously slandered with an attack that he attacked a woman at a party, place unknown, year unknown, but let’s not let facts get in the way of our slander of a judge who has an unimpeachable record and who has gone through six different FBI background checks in his life.
My contention, for the record, is this: Dr. Ford might possibly be telling the truth recounting some sexual assault she experienced at some point in her life, but she is flagrantly lying about who her assaulter was. It was NOT Brett Kavanaugh, and the reason she has to “disremember” every single other relevant detail other than her contention that she was assaulted is that Kavanaugh was never anywhere where he could have assaulted her. My contention is that Ford is lying because she literally believes it is noble to lie if lying will stop Judge Kavanaugh from becoming a Supreme Court Justice and overturning the political values we know for a FACT Ford espouses.
What party is Ford talking about? Well, that’s kind of impossible to be certain about, given that Ford does not have to say what party, or where the party supposedly was, or what day the party was on, or what month the party happened, or even what dang freaking YEAR the party happened.
Other than a naked political show trial, I doubt very much that a single prosecutor would take on such a detail-free case without any ability to verify or substantiate any part of her story, or that any judge would agree to hold court to such a case. The FBI doesn’t want anything whatsoever to do with it, arguing completely correctly that taking on such an investigation is not part of their lawful perview because the alleged act would be a state rather than federal crime. But the Democrats claim that President Trump should do something that is nothing more than a hardcore partisan Democrat delaying tactic and order the FBI to investigate. And I don’t doubt that Democrats also demand that disgraced and fired Trump-hating former FBI agent Peter Strzok and his paramour Lisa Page be the lead investigators, too. This is that damn ridiculous.
Interestingly, Prof. Christine Blasey Ford initially claimed she wanted to have the right to be heard. But when the Republicans gave her the opportunity, all of a sudden the story changed, and she didn’t want to be heard as she ignored not one but more than ELEVEN SEPARATE ATTEMPTS TO REACH HER TO GIVE HER PRECISELY THE OPPORTUNITY SHE HAD CLAIMED SHE WANTED. No, her lawyers were taking their orders from the Democratic Party which was demanding a full FBI investigation that would take months and delay the nomination until after the election when they believe they will have the numbers to block it forever. Not that Ford or any of her lawyers have any political motivation whatsoever, of course (just gag me).
Another fun claim by the left is that Dr. Ford passed “a lie detector test.” For the record, there is no such thing as a “lie detector test.” It is a polygraph, which does NOT measure whether a person is lying, but rather measures physiological responses such as blood pressure, pulse, respiration, and skin conductivity while under questioning. Basically, all a polygraph actually does is measure how physiologically threatened a subject feels during the procedure. It is actually based on a theory that is itself not even proven: There is no actual evidence that any pattern of physiological reactions is unique to deception; and an honest person may therefore be nervous when answering truthfully while a dishonest person may be non-anxious. It is not admissible in courts because it has been proven over and over again to be unreliable as an indicator of whether a subject is actually being truthful or deceitful. It most definitely can be beaten if someone knows the tricks of the test. It HAS been beaten and has been documented to have been beaten.
Do you know who would be in the best position to defeat a polygraph? Think hard. A trained psychologist, like Dr. Christine Blasey Ford.
Christine Blasey Ford was a year or so behind me. I did not know her personally but I remember her. This incident did happen. Many of us heard a buzz about it indirectly with few specific details. However Christine’s vivid recollections should be more than enough for us to truly, deeply know that the accusation is true.
Hi all, deleted this because it served its purpose and I am now dealing with a slew of requests for interviews from The Wash Post, CNN, CBS News. Organizing how I want to proceed. Was not ready for that, not sure I am interested in pursuing. Thanks for reading.
Then, Miranda wrote this (now deleted): “To all media, I will not be doing anymore interviews. No more circus. To clarify my post: I do not have first hand knowledge of the incident that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford mentions, and I stand by my support for Christine. That’s it. I don’t have more to say on the subject.”
Why Delete It?
So why would Miranda delete her posts? Most likely, because Ford, as the Washington Post reported on Sunday in its story that revealed her identity, “told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband.”
Oopsie. Did a woman just prove the lie that “no woman would EVER lie about sexual assault”??????????????
Yes, it turns out WOMEN LIE.
Tawana Brawley LIED about being raped. This notion that no woman would EVER tell a lie about a sexual assault is ITSELF A LIE. Democrats are demon-possessed liars. That’s what “Democrat” means: DEMOnic bureauCRAT.
FACT: it’s NOT just men who lie; women lie just as much and just as bad. And we have numerous factual proofs that yes, women will make up false accounts of sexual assaults. We just had an example of this in the news as the Oregon Innocent Project freed a man convicted of sexual assault of his daughter and sentenced to fifty years in prison. Only his daughter LIED and they could PROVE that she LIED.
We have a WOMAN LIAR just in this Judge Kavanaugh story ALONE. It is just as easy for Dr. Ford to lie as it is for Miranda to have lied as we KNOW she lied. This woman who claimed to back up Ford’s story is a LIAR just as Ford is lying.
And, again, we now as a matter of FACT that Dr. Ford has EVERY ideological MOTIVATION to lie in order to prevent Judge Kavanaugh from sitting on the Supreme Court.
Deborah Ramirez actually was calling Yale classmates and asking if any of them remembered anything and stated that she herself could not remember:
“Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself,” The New York Times reported.
“The Times had interviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story, and could find no one with firsthand knowledge,” the report also stated.
Ah, hell, he’s obviously guilty anyway.
But amazingly, it gets even MORE whackjob. There is no end to Democrat hate, Democrat hypocrisy, or Democrat psychosis.
This woman named Swetnick claims that Judge Kavenaugh while a high school student actually operated a gang rape ring. She says she went to ten of Kavenaugh’s gang rape parties apparently expecting maybe next time she WOULDN’T be raped, according to her story, but of course she was each and every time. I mean, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and getting raped every time you keep doing the same thing over and over.
I’m being facetious here, but this is beyond nuts.
This woman Swetnick by her own account is a criminal who should immediately be arrested for her role in the rapes of numerous underage girls. On her own account, she was a legal adult, and children were being raped all around her, and she never said ANYTHING such that more girls kept getting raped.
Another problem is that Creepy Porn Lawyer’s client’s story is laughably false. I mean, imagine having a rape ring and gang raping girls at a minimum of ten different gang rape parties. The problem is that if nobody knew about it, then how could anyone actually show up??? And if anyone knew about it, then EVERYONE knew about it. I mean, “gang rape ring party” isn’t the kind of topic that inspires yawns and disinterest. But in more than 35 years, NOBODY but this demented freak woman know about them!!!
“We have seen reports today that Julie Swetnick, who says she graduated from Gaithersburg High School, submitted a declaration to the Committee alleging that Brett participated in horrific conduct during high school, including targeting girls for gang rape,” reads the letter addressed to Chairman Chuck Grassley and ranking committee Democrat Dianne Feinstein from 64 classmates.
“Nonsense. We never witnessed any behavior that even approaches what is described in this allegation. It is reprehensible.”
The group said none of them recall meeting an individual named Julie Swetnick.
“Brett Kavanaugh is a good man. He has always treated women with respect and decency,” the classmates said. “He is a man of honor, integrity, and compassion. These shameful attacks must end. This process is a disgrace and is harming good people.”
Ah, what the hell, he’s obviously guilty. I mean, if a billion people say you’re a wonderful human being and one Democrat says you’re evil, you can count on the mainstream media “news” report to confirm that you are evil as a fact confirmed by witnesses.
So much for Creepy Porn Lawyer’s demented client. Hopefully Swetnick will gang rape Creepy Porn Lawyer all the way to being elected president. This nation apparently deserves a rat bastard like Creepy Porn Lawyer as president, judging on how we are treating Judge Brett Kavenaugh.
Pretty much EVERY lawyer involved with Judge Kavanaugh fake victims is a creepy porn lawyer.
Let’s take Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s creepy porn lawyer, Debra Katz. You can see through the creepy porn lawyers that represent Kavanaugh’s bogus victims how partisan, how truly demonically political, these creepy Democratic Party porn lawyers truly are.
Debra Katz proves what the Democratic Party REALLY thinks about women and about sexual harassment and sexual violence in who ELSE she has represented. And she was as a good creepy Democratic Party porn lawyer perfectly willing to viciously side AGAINST female victims when the accused piece of filth was a DEMOCRAT:
But while her client’s claims have raised bipartisan concerns about Kavanaugh, Katz, a longtime Democratic donor known for representing sexual harassment accusers, also has a history of downplaying or dismissing accusations made by women against Democratic politicians — including former President Bill Clinton and former Minnesota Sen. Al Franken.
“Paula Jones’ suit is very, very, very weak,” Katz said on CNN’s “Talkback Live” in March 1998 in a discussion about Jones’ claims against Clinton, according to a show transcript. “She’s alleged one incident that took place in a hotel room that, by her own testimony, lasted 10 to 12 minutes. She suffered no repercussions in the workplace.”
Jones, who worked as a government employee in Arkansas, accused Clinton, while governor of Arkansas in 1991, of propositioning her for sex. Clinton settled a lawsuit with Jones in 1998. …
”If a woman came to me with a similar fact pattern, that is someone in the company above her propositioned her but only once and she suffered no tangible job detriment,” Katz told The New York Times in 1998, ”I would probably tell her that I’m sorry, it’s unfair, but you don’t have a case.” …
In more recent years, Katz also downplayed the wave of sexual misconduct allegations against Franken, who denied some of the allegations but eventually resigned from the Senate over them.
“Context is relevant,” Katz said of Franken, who was a comedian before his election to the Senate. “He did not do this as a member of the U.S. Senate. He did this in his capacity of someone who was still functioning as an entertainer.”
By the very standard that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s own damn creepy Democratic Party porn lawyer has used before, Ford doesn’t have any case whatsoever. After all, Ford’s allegations don’t even have Kavanaugh doing anything for anywhere near ten to twelve minutes, and of course, not only was Kavanaugh not a member of the U.S. Senate, he wasn’t a judge. Hell, he would have been a high school kid. No harm, no foul, move on.
But a characteristic of a creepy Democratic Party porn lawyer is a constantly-shifting double-standard.
“I got one better than that, Shifty,” said Ms. Broaddrick in a Friday tweet. “[Your] party elected a sexual predator/rapist as President & when the evidence was put under their nose, they refused to read it.”
She referred to the 1999 impeachment hearings against President Bill Clinton that ended with all Senate Democrats — including Sens. Dick Durbin, Dianne Feinstein and Patty Murray — siding with the Democratic president, despite multiple allegations of sexual misconduct.
Ms. Broaddrick said Senate Democrats refused to read her deposition in which she accused Mr. Clinton of raping her in a Little Rock hotel room during his 1978 campaign for Arkansas governor, an allegation which he has denied.
Democrats have a vile, despicable tradition ignoring their own brutality and rape toward women whenever it suits them. This tradition of vileness is at least as old as Ted Kennedy, “the lion of the Senate,” who left a helpless woman to slowly and miserably die so he could live on to invent the vicious cockroach tactic known as “Borking” whereby good Republican Supreme Court nominees are slandered with lies by pathetic little roach pukes like Ted Kennedy. It survived fat and healthy through the Bill Clinton rapist years, and continued through the Hillary Clinton rapist-enabling years. And now we have a brand new breed of sexual predators such as Keith Ellison.
And we’re also seeing the literal destruction of 2000 years’ of Western Civilization and nearly 250 years of Constitutional governance in order to do it.
Start Thinking Right 