Posts Tagged ‘manifesto’

Christopher Dorner And The 2nd Amendment: I Bet Some KGB Thugs Went Nuts After Soviets Took The Guns Away From The Russian People, Too

February 7, 2013

There’s a theory advanced by liberals that since we have police to protect us, we really don’t need our 2nd Amendment freedom and our rights to keep and bear arms can therefore be infringed, infringed away.

Given the fact that a whole host of police officers have demonstrated that they’re as crazy as the rest of us, maybe that’s not such a wonderful premise.

I’ll get to Christopher Dorner and the mayhem this former police officer is causing.  But first, let me say a few preliminary things.

What Democrats want – the only kind of society that they say wouldn’t be truly evil, in fact – is for guns to be confiscated from the law-abiding people and entrusted entirely to the state in order to prevent the terrible shootings we have come to expect since Democrats kicked God out of the schools and declared human life worthless via their mass their abortion mills.  Democrats worship the state the way Christians worship God, and place their trust in the State.

Jesus Christ is my Savior; Democrats’ savior, crassly put, is Obama.  It is Big Government that they turn to.  Deuteronomy 15:4 says that there should be no poor in a nation that turns to God because the LORD will bless them.  Democrats say that’s a giant load of crap and say Obama will bless us; Obama will take care of us; we don’t trust God to take care of us, we trust Marxist class warfare and redistributionism to provide for our needs and we trust Obama to dole it out to us.

God pointed out in 1 Samuel chapter 8:10-18 that trust in big government and the king who rules over amounts to flagrant distrust in God.  And if we actually place our trust in God, we distrust any human government that would rise up to eclipse Him.  I’ve said that before and I’m already planning a more detailed article to say it again.

In the same way, the spirit of redistributionism is likewise flagrant distrust in God.

Let me go back to the soul of redistributionism, as expressed in Karl Marx’s famous statement:

“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”

And I challenge any Democrat or liberal to explain to me how the party of the left isn’t the party of socialism.

There is another spirit of Marxism that Democrats have channeled: the spirit of class warfare and the bitterness, envy and hatred that results from it.  Karl Marx put it this way to sum-up how profoundly anti-Christ it truly is:

Religion is … the opium of the people.  The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions.”

What did Karl Marx mean by this?

Basically, Marx taught that the world is divided into the haves and the have-nots – which is everywhere being shouted around us today.  And the have-nots were being oppressed by the haves.  But rather than the people rising up in rage and taking what is theirs by force as Marx wanted them to, the people were happy in their religion, which had been invented by the rich to keep the proletariat in bondage.  Since God and religion is an illusion, and materialism is all there actually is, the happiness that the people had in their Christianity was nothing more than a narcotic that kept them in bondage.  The only “real” reality is economic reality.  And therefore the solution presented by Marx was for the people to set aside their shackles of religion and rise up in a spirit of rage and take what was theirs by force.  Only then could the people have actual, “material” happiness as the wealth of others was redistributed to them by Marxist government.

This demonic spirit of class warfare, redistributionism and the hatred of God upon which it is based, is the heart and soul of the Democrat Party.

Anyway, Christopher Dorner turns out to be a poster boy for the spirit of entitlement and the rage that goes along with it.  This is a black police officer from a liberal Los Angeles Police Department who strangely believed he was entitled to his job.  He’s a guy who literally writes in his manifesto that goes on and on and on that it’s the police department’s fault that he didn’t get to have a family so he is therefore entitled to kill the families of other cops.

And you’ve got to understand: this guy was a cop.  He was deemed as a top marksman as a cop.  He was given SWAT training because he kept demanding that he was entitled to more and more training.  And now he’s on the loose shooting people.

I never had the opportunity to have a family of my own, I’m terminating yours.

And I never had the opportunity to get off my lazy ass and get a job.  I’m redistributing your wages.

And if you can’t even trust a black, liberal police officer from a liberal city not to go nuts and prove to anyone with a mammalian brain that we need our 2nd Amendment protection, who CAN you trust???

And wah, wah, wah.  I’m entitled to be a cop and the police department was wrong to fire me just because I shredded my credibility by falsely slandering a training officer who gave me a bad evaluation.  So I’m going to prove they’re wrong by shooting people.  At least if I can’t get all the stuff I’m “entitled” to.

This Christopher Dorner spent his whole life before writing his manifesto manifesting extrme liberal entitlement syndrome.

Don’t worry.  You don’t need to have any means of protection.  Trust the police with your life.  Keep chewing that cud of yours.  Everything is fine.  Obama keeps you as safe as he kept our ambassador to Libya.

Oh, wait a minute.  This guy WAS the police just a short time ago.  In fact, he was a member of every group that Obama would have handpicked as THE guy whom you should throw away your weapons and trust to protect you.  He was black.  he was a cop in the most liberal police department in America.  Why do you think you need guns when you’ve got cops like Christopher Dorner keeping you safe???

This kind of raises an interesting question: if guns should be taken out of the hands of all the law-abiding citizens because a tiny, tiny small percentage of people have gun nuts and killed people with guns, then shouldn’t we take the guns away from the law-abiding police when a tiny, tiny small percentage of cops go nuts and kill people with guns???

I’ve got my Democrat thinking cap on.  It comes to a point at the top.  It’s made out of tinfoil.  But if LAPD officer Christopher Dorner wasn’t allowed to have a gun in the first place, then he could never have killed these people, right?

And think about the growing number of wrongful shootings police officers are engaged in.  If they didn’t have guns, they couldn’t have wrongfully shot anybody, could they have?

And let’s think about Obama.  Forget the abject personal moral hypocrisy of a man who has massive armed protection of himself and his family while demanding that everyone else without such protection be denied the right to have guns that are capable of providing them such protection; think about the danger that Obama is in with all those guns around him.

We’ve had Secret Service agents wrongfully shoot people.  And I mean Secret Service agents who were part of Obama’s protection.  Just like a tiny, tiny minority of law-abiding gun owners have ever had any problems with gun violence, a few Secret Service agents are bad people who snap.  And Secret Service agents even plot to break the law in groups at times.  We’ve got to keep Obama safe, don’t we?  We need to make sure there are absolutely no guns whatsoever around him.  Guns are dangerous.  Either guns are dangerous or Democrats are dangerous.

I bet you that there were quite a few of these issues during Stalin’s day, too.  I mean, he took away all the guns from the rest of the people, armed to the teeth his internal security forces so they could crush the rest of the disarmed people, and you’ve got to imagine that more than a few of them went nuts just like Christopher Dorner did.  You wonder how many defenseless people were shot by psycho KGB thugs.

Let’s make sure that if we’re going to be morally stupid enough to take away guns – or any segment of arms that we have a constitutional right to keep and bear – from the people, that we embrace the same “logic” of taking away guns from the people to apply to the police, the military, and everybody else.

It’s amazing: the United States is by FAR and away #1 in gun ownership.  But we are #28 in gun homicides (see also here), with basically all the nations ahead of us having extremely strict gun control laws.  Democrats are pure, lunatic fools for asserting that guns are the problem.  Statistics and actual facts refute them.  Yet they persist.

Interestingly, in America itself, over half of all of our gun homicides, of course, are committed by just a tiny 6% sliver of a demographic group who vote 98% Democrat.  So in trying to confiscate guns, Democrats implicitly acknowledge that the reason we have such a violence problem is because Democrats are truly evil and vile people who cannot control themselves and must therefore be treated like animals.

If Democrats wish to disarm themselves, then that’s fine with me.  It would be fine if Democrats merely insisted on baring their own throats to the next predator and pleaded, “Kill me, only PLEASE don’t hurt me!”  But the rest of us aren’t irresponsible psychos the way Democrats are.

I’m not a farm animal who should be herded into an enclosure and guarded by guards who could themselves snap just as easily as any of the rest of us.  I’m an individual with a constitutional right to keep and bear arms without being infringed upon by the government.  And by the way, unless AR-15s, AK-47s and M4s are somehow not “arms,” then I have a right to protect myself, my property and my family with such “assault weapons” as I see fit, too.

Update: It turns out that Christopher Dorner is even more of a liberal than I thought he was, as documented in the leftist ramblings of his manifesto.  A few examples (I did not delete his frequent use of profanity for the sake of accuracy):

You disrespect the office of the POTUS/Presidency and Commander in Chief. You call him Kenyan, mongroid, halfrican, muslim, and FBHO when in essence you are to address him as simply, President. The same as you did to President George W. Bush and all those in the highest ranking position of our land before him. Just as I always have. You question his birth certificate, his educational and professional accomplishments, and his judeo-christian beliefs. You make disparaging remarks about his dead parents. You never questioned the fact that his former opponent, the honorable Senator John McCain, was not born in the CONUS or that Bush had a C average in his undergrad. Electoral Candidates children (Romney) state they want to punch the president in the face during debates with no formal repercussions. No one even questioned the fact that the son just made a criminal threat toward the President. You call his wife a Wookie. Off the record, I love your new bangs, Mrs. Obama. A woman whose professional and educational accomplishments are second to none when compared to recent First wives. You call his supporters, whether black, brown, yellow, or white, leeches, FSA, welfare recipients, and ni$&er lovers. You say this openly without any discretion. Before you start with your argument that you believe I would vote for Obama because he has the same skin color as me, fuck you. I didn’t vote in this last election as my choice of candidate, John Huntsman, didn’t win the primary candidacy for his party. Mr. President, I haven’t agreed with all of your decisions but of course I haven’t agreed with all of your predecessors decisions. I think you’ve done a hell of a job with what you have been dealt and how you have managed it. I shed a tear the night you were initially elected President in 2008. I never thought that day would occur. A black man elected president in the U.S. in my lifetime. I cracked a smiled when you were re-elected in 2012 because I really didn’t think you were going to pull that one off. Romney, stop being a sore loser. You could’ve exited graciously and still contributed significantly to public service, not now. Mr. President, get back to work. Many want to see you fail as they have stated so many times previously.

========

Mr. Vice President, do your due diligence when formulating a concise and permanent national AWB plan. Future generations of Americans depend on your plan and advisement to the president. I’ve always been a fan of yours and consider you one of the few genuine and charismatic politicians. Damn, sounds like an oxymoron calling you an honest politician. It’s the truth.   Hillary Clinton. You’ll make one hell of a president in 2016. Much like your husband, Bill, you will be one of the greatest. Look at Castro in San Antonio as a running mate or possible secretary of state. He’s (good people) and I have faith and confidence in him. Look after Bill. He was always my favorite President. Chelsea grew up to be one hell of an attractive woman. No disrespect to her husband.

========

Wayne LaPierre, President of the NRA, you’re a vile and inhumane piece of shit. You never even showed 30 seconds of empathy for the children, teachers, and families of Sandy Hook. You deflected any type of blame/responsibility and directed it toward the influence of movies and the media. You are a failure of a human being. May all of your immediate and distant family die horrific deaths in front of you.

Chris Matthews, Joe Scarborough, Pat Harvey, Brian Williams, Soledad Obrien, Wolf Blitzer, Meredith Viera, Tavis Smiley, and Anderson Cooper, keep up the great work and follow Cronkite’s lead. I hold many of you in the same regard as Tom Brokaw and the late Peter Jennings. Cooper, stop nagging and berating your guest, they’re your (guest). Mr. Scarborough, we met at McGuire’s pub in P-cola in 2002 when I was stationed there. It was an honor conversing with you about politics, family, and life.

========

Ellen Degeneres, continue your excellent contribution to entertaining America and bringing the human factor to entertainment. You changed the perception of your gay community and how we as Americans view the LGBT community. I congratulate you on your success and opening my eyes as a young adult, and my generation to the fact that you are know different from us other than who you choose to love. Oh, and you Prop 8 supporters, why the fuck do you care who your neighbor marries. Hypocritical pieces of shit.

So our murderous cop from the liberal bastion of Los Angeles worships the Obamas and Joe Biden and celebrates liberal lesbians and lionizes all the most leftist “journalists” who fed him his fascist liberal propaganda in the purest form.  And of course this liberal police officer with his love of liberal politicians and liberal journalists and liberal celebrities hates and despises Wayne LaPierre and the National Rifle Association.

And of course all of those “journalists” are as busy pointing out what a liberal this cold-blooded gun psycho is the way they rushed to try to frame the Tea Party when one of the last psychos started shooting up a movie theater in Colorado.  That’s one of a good dozen times liberal propagandists using the guise of “journalism” have wrongfully tarnished conservatives for these psychos.  And here’s their chance to actually report the truth for a change: liberalism equals fascist psychosis.

What do you want to bet none of the mainstream media reporters decides its “newsworthy” to report this disgrace to the gullible public the way they have so often tried to tie every killer to conservatism no matter how flimsy the possible connections???

They’re as likely to report Christopher Dorner’s liberalism and support for Obama and Hillary Clinton as they are to cover the fact that the man who went into the Family Research Council headquarters and shot a guard used a liberal Southern Poverty Law Center hate map to get to his destination.  Will they cover that actual fact the way they covered the malicious lie that Sarah Palin somehow “targeted” Gabrielle Giffords?

You’re damned right they won’t.

As long as there are liberals, Americans need to have guns to protect themselves from the resulting fascism.

Advertisements

Obama’s Democrats: The Party Of Van Jones

September 5, 2009

Van Jones is an acknowledged radical black nationalist.  He is an admitted communist.  He is on the record as an anti-white racist.  He is an ANTI-bipartisan radical figure.  And so is Barack Obama and the Democrat Party as long as he is allowed by them to remain in his position as “green jobs czar”

He was arrested for rioting following the Rodney King verdict.

He is a communist:

[Van] Jones had planned to move to Washington, DC, and had already landed a job and an apartment there. But in jail, he said, “I met all these young radical people of color — I mean really radical, communists and anarchists. And it was, like, ‘This is what I need to be a part of.’” Although he already had a plane ticket, he decided to stay in San Francisco. “I spent the next ten years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary.” In the months that followed, he let go of any lingering thoughts that he might fit in with the status quo. “I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th,” he said. “By August, I was a communist.”

He tried to purge the evidence as his radicalism and communism began to become public knowledge, but the record survives.

Van Jones wrote in his manifesto:

We agreed with Lenin’s analysis of the state and the party,” reads the manifesto. “And we found inspiration in the revolutionary strategies developed by Third World revolutionaries like Mao Tse-tung and Amilcar Cabral.” […]

“We also saw our brand of Marxism as, in some ways, a reclamation.”

The night after the horrible 9/11 attack against the United States – during which time the United States suffered more casualties from a foreign enemy than at any time since the War of 1812 – Van Jones took the side of the terrorists against America.  Are we the good guy?  Not according to Van Jones and those who share his ideology:

Jones was the leader and founder of a radical group, the communist revolutionary organization Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement, or STORM. That group, together with Jones’ Elle Baker Center for Human Rights, led a vigil Sept. 12, 2001, at Snow Park in Oakland, Calif.

STORM’s official manifesto, titled, “Reclaiming Revolution,” surfaced on the Internet.

A WND review of the 97-page treatise found a description of a vigil that Jones’ group held Sept. 12, 2001, at Snow Park in Oakland, Calif. The event drew hundreds and articulated an “anti-imperialist” line, according to STORM’s own description.

The radical group’s manual boasted the 9/11 vigil was held to express solidarity with Arab and Muslim Americans
and to mourn the civilians killed in the terrorist attacks “as well as the victims of U.S. imperialism around the world.”

Van Jones took part in the convicted cop murderer Mumia Abu Jamal.  Go here for more on that vile relationship and it’s vile fruit.

Van Jones signed the 9/11 “Truther” document that demanded the Bush Administration prove it did not engage in a high-level conspiracy to attack the World Trade Center on 9/11 and blame Muslims for it. In the petition that Van Jones signed, he demanded an “immediate inquiry into evidence that suggests high-level government officials may have deliberately allowed the September 11th attacks to occur.”  Now he doesn’t deny signing the statement; he just says he doesn’t agree with it.  As Hot Air puts it:

That’s the second apology he’s made in two days; at this rate, it’d be faster and easier to issue a statement retracting everything he ever said in his life prior to being hired by Obama.

The other apology refers to publication of statements denoting his militant brand of political partisanship that guarantees that Republicans and Democrats will continue to be at the most bitter warfare until the Obama Administration is an unpleasant memory.  In a question regarding Republicans, Van Jones offered this:

Berkely, Calif., Feb. 26, 2009: Jones took audience questions in Berkeley, Calif., during a lecture on energy issues.

Van Jones: “Well, the answer to that is: they’re assholes.”

Female questioner: I was afraid that that was the answer.

Van Jones: That’s a technical, political science term. And — Barack O — Barack Obama’s not an asshole. So — now, I will say this: I can be an asshole. And some of us who are not Barack Hussein Obama are going to have to start getting a little bit uppity [to get things done]. How’s that capitalism working for ya?

In addition to calling Republicans to be “a@@holes,” he essentially called for Democrats to be even more militant and radical than they already are.

That in addition to his Marxist hatred for the capitalism that made this country great.

If all that isn’t bad enough, Van Jones is a also a radical racist who will use his position to punish whites for deliberately poisoning people of color.

January 2008

Van Jones: “The environmental justice community that said, ‘Hey, wait a minute, you know, you’re regulating, but you’re not regulating equally.’ And the white polluters and the white environmentalists are essentially steering poison into the people-of-color communities, because they don’t have a racial justice frame.”

See the video here.

How does he plan to do that?  By fundamentally transforming the system.

Uprising Radio, April 2008

Van Jones; “Right after Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat if the civil rights leaders had jumped out and said, ‘OK now we want reparations for slavery, we want redistribution of all the wealth, and we want to legalize mixed marriages.’ If we’d come out with a maximum program the very next day, they’d been laughed at. Instead they came out with a very minimum. ‘We just want to integrate these buses.’

But, inside that minimum demand was a very radical kernel that eventually meant that from 1964 to 1968 complete revolution was on the table for this country. And, I think that this green movement has to pursue those same steps and stages. Right now we say we want to move from suicidal gray capitalism to something eco-capitalism where at least we’re not fast-tracking the destruction of the whole planet. Will that be enough? No, it won’t be enough. We want to go beyond the systems of exploitation and oppression altogether. But, that’s a process and I think that’s what’s great about the movement that is beginning to emerge is that the crisis is so severe in terms of joblessness, violence and now ecological threats that people are willing to be both pragmatic and visionary. So the green economy will start off as a small subset and we are going to push it and push it and push it until it becomes the engine for transforming the whole society.”

See the video here.

We are talking about a radical communist who has been empowered for the purpose of “transforming the whole society” by Barack Obama.

Van Jones said at the Powershift Conference in MARCH 2009:

“This movement is deeper than a solar panel! Deeper than a solar panel! Don’t stop there! Don’t stop there! We’re gonna change the whole system! We’re gonna change the whole thing! […] And our Native American sisters and brothers who were pushed and bullied and mistreated and shoved into all the land we didn’t want, where it was all hot and windy. Well, guess what? Renewable energy? Guess what, solar industry? Guess what wind industry? They now own and control 80 percent of the renewable energy resources. No more broken treaties. No more broken treaties. Give them the wealth! Give them the wealth! Give them the dignity. Give them the respect that they deserve. No justice on stolen land. We owe them a debt.

See the video here.

If you are white, you are blight.

Let me tell you something; if you are a white Democrat, I hope you lose your job.  I hope it is “redistributed” to a person of color, and your children (who, being part of the oppressive white race deserve to starve) go hungry.

Obama talked about “hope” and “change.”  You want to know what I hope?  I hope that white Democrats finally get to bear the brunt of the policies that their party has been pushing.  I hope the change is that they will get to experience what “redistribution” is really all about.

That’s what they call “poetic justice.”  It’s time to eat the crap you shoveled for everyone else, white Democrats.  And you’d better smile while you swallow it, or you’ll be labeled a “racist” along with everyone else who has opposed the radical and racist Marxist liberal agenda.

Is all that behind Van Jones like he said in his “apology” that amounts to one of those “If anything I said offended anybody, I’m sorry that you are an oppressive white devil”?  I mean, some of the things he said occurred all the way back to March of 2009.

As you listen to Van Jones’ denials and the White House’s whitewashing, consider Van Jones said this:

“I’m willing to forgo the cheap satisfaction of the radical pose for the deep satisfaction of radical ends.”

He said that statement in the same breath in which he claimed that we have “eco-apartheid.” His intent being to use his position to redistribute wealth and punish white people and help people of color.

But his main point is this: I’ll tone down my radical rhetoric so I can better attain my radical objectives.  So whatever he says to distance himself from his previous history is just a ruse to masquerade his past so he can continue pursuing his radical, anti-white, anti-capitalist, pro-Marxist, pro-Islamicist ends.

Just like one Barack Hussein Obama, who spent 23 years in a Marxist “black liberation” church that preached anti-white racist hatred and anti-Americanism.  As I pointed out back in March of last year:

Liberation theology was developed in the early 1970s to pave the way for the communist Sandinistas to infiltrate – and subsequently dominate – Nicaraguan society. The Sandinistas understood full well that they had no hope of installing a Marxist regime in a country that was well over 90% Roman Catholic unless they could successfully subsume Catholicism into their cause of Marxism. And the wedding of Marxism with Christianity was brought about in a clear effort of the former to crush the latter.

And all “black liberation theology” does is repackage that same brand of Marxism for blacks.

Barack Obama’s preacher, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, screamed:

“No, no, no! Not God bless America!  God damn America!”

while Obama’s fellow congregants leaped to their feat and cheered.

Obama was forced to leave the church after it became politically untenable for him to remain.  But the history of Obama’s long membership and association with Trinity Church and with Jeremiah Wright cannot just be swept under the rug with a politically motivated speech.  He left that racist anti-American cesspool 23 years too late to matter.

Barack Obama pirated a speech from his friend Deval Patrick titled, “Just Words.”  I had a few things to say about a few other things that were “just words”:

When Barack Obama’s pastor for some 23 years said:

“It is this world, a world where cruise ships throw away more food in a day than most residents of Port-au-Prince see in a year, where white folks’ greed runs a world in need, apartheid in one hemisphere, apathy in another hemisphere … That’s the world! On which hope sits.”

Just words.

When Jeremiah Wright said:

“The government gives them [African Americans] the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God Bless America.’ No, no, no, God damn America, that’s in the Bible for killing innocent people. God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme.”

Just words.

When Wright said of the United States:

“We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back into our own front yards. America’s chickens are coming home to roost.”

Just words.

“We’ve got more black men in prison than there are in college,” he said. “Racism is alive and well. Racism is how this country was founded and how this country is still run. No black man will ever be considered for president, no matter how hard you run Jesse [Jackson] and no black woman can ever be considered for anything outside what she can give with her body.”

Just words.

When the Rev. Wright said:

“America is still the No. 1 killer in the world. … We are deeply involved in the importing of drugs, the exporting of guns, and the training of professional killers. … We bombed Cambodia, Iraq and Nicaragua, killing women and children while trying to get public opinion turned against Castro and Ghadhafi. … We put (Nelson) Mandela in prison and supported apartheid the whole 27 years he was there. We believe in white supremacy and black inferiority and believe it more than we believe in God.”

Yep. Just words.

When Wright shouted out to his cheering congregation:

“We started the AIDS virus. … We are only able to maintain our level of living by making sure that Third World people live in grinding poverty.”

“The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color. The government lied.”

Just words.

And, of course, when Wright said:

“We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians and branding anybody who spoke out against it as being anti-Semitic. … We care nothing about human life if the end justifies the means. …”

Those were just words.

This past weekend, when Father Michael Pfleger – a longtime friend and spiritual mentor of Barack Obama, said from the pulpit of Obama’s church:

When Hillary was crying, and people said that was put on, I really don’t believe it was put on. I really believe that she just always thought, ‘this is mine. I’m Bill’s wife. I’m white, and this is mine. I just gotta get up and step into the plate.’

Then out of nowhere, ‘I’m Barack Obama!’

Imitating Hillary’s response, screaming at the top of his lungs again, he continues, ‘Ah, damn! Where did you come from? I’m white! I’m entitled! There’s a black man stealing my show!’

(mocks crying)

She wasn’t the only one crying, there was a whole lot of white people crying!

Just words.

When Father Pfleger said in the pulpit of Obama’s church:

“Honestly now, to address the one who says, ‘Don’t hold me responsible for what my ancestors did.’ But you have enjoyed the benefits of what your ancestors did … and unless you are ready to give up the benefits, throw away your 401 fund, throw away your trust fund, throw away all the monies you put away into the company you walked into because your daddy and grand daddy. …”

Shouting, Pfleger continued, “Unless you are willing to give up the benefits then you must be responsible for what was done in your generation, because you are the beneficiaries of this insurance policy.”

Just words (well, unless you mind having everything you own taken away from you and given to someone else to make up for “historic injustices”).

And when Obama’s good friend Father Pfleger said:

“Racism is still America’s greatest addiction. I also believe that America is also the greatest sin against God.”

Just words.

Now, when Barack Obama opined to a wine-sipping, cheese nibbling crowd in San Franscisco:

You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

Just words.

Van Jones’ views aren’t an anomaly.  They accurately reflect Barack Obama’s own views, and what Van Jones intends to do is what Barack Obama intends to do.

Van Jones is the face of the Democratic Party.  Pure and simple.  Otherwise, you explain to me why Barack Obama picked him.  You explain to me why Barack Obama has kept him at his side as all of these facts about him came out.

John F. Kennedy is dead, and has been for more than 45 years.  The Democrat Party of John F. Kennedy used to be a party that believed in a powerful military that Democrats today mock and attack; it used to be a party that staunchly and steadfastly opposed the very Marxist/communist agenda that Democrats today are now openly embracing; it used to be a party that believed in low taxes as the foundation for economic growth (and see him on video).

John F. Kennedy is rolling in his grave as his former party becomes the very sort of abomination that he fought to oppose under the leadership of Barack Hussein Obama and the vile characters that he has chosen to surround himself with to implement his incredibly radical agenda.  John F. Kennedy and Barack H. Obama are anathema to one another.

Please read Thomas Sowell’s article, “Stop and Think.”

It is long past time that “Kennedy Democrats” (and I mean JOHN, NOT TED) to wake up and turn on the Obama administration before it is too late.