Posts Tagged ‘Marine’

Why Did Obama Trade 5 Terrorist Generals To Get Back An American Traitor And Then Leave Four Innocent Americans To Languish In Iran?

July 16, 2015

Barack Hussein Obama responded like the pissy, thin-skinned, malignant narcissist that he is when asked a question about why he abandoned four American hostages held in Iran so he could celebrate his horrible nuclear deal.

Remember that Bowe Bergdahl trade?  Remember all the lies that Obama told and told his thugs to go out and spread in his regime’s propaganda?

Remember Obama instructing Susan Rice – who is now using all the “integrity” she’s amassed to tell us the Iran deal is a very, very good deal for America – to tell the American people that a man that we now know was a deserter and a traitor “served the United States with honor and distinction.”

Do you remember the self-righteous, hoity-toity, how-dare-you-question-us, rationale Obama used to defend trading five terrorist generals with blood on their hands whom everyone knew would return to the battlefield for a traitor?  Obama said that we have:

made an ironclad commitment to bring our prisoners of war home.”

Well, the United States has been at war with Iran since 1979, when they seized our embassy (otherwise known as an act of WAR) and seized all embassy staff and our Marines and held them hostage for 444 agonizing days.

For the record, that is why the United States seized all Iranian assets on November 14, 1979: because Iran committed an act of war against the United States.

Iran has engaged in the most vicious kind of war by proxy against the United States ever since.  Just recently, the blood of at least 500 American servicemen was DIRECTLY LINKED to the nation of Iran.

One of the PRISONERS OF WAR illegally held in Iran was a former FBI agent who was working for the CIA when Iran abducted him.

Another PRISONER OF WAR illegally held in Iran was a U.S. Marine who went back to visit his grandmother.

Obama also shows his utter disdain and contempt for America and for the American way of life in his refusal to lift a finger to help the other two PRISONERS OF WAR.  Because one is a Christian minister who represents freedom of religion that Obama rabidly despises and the other is a reporter who represents the freedom of an objective press.

These PRISONERS OF WAR – a war that Iran has waged against the United States of America without abatement for 36 years – have been abandoned by Barack Hussein Obama.

Apparently because they are not traitors to the United States of America, because were they such they would merit opening up all of our jails for terrorist to release the rest of the men who have murdered Americans.

Obama’s ridiculous claim is that he didn’t want to somehow conflate the nuclear deal with anything that wasn’t directly related to nuclear weapons.

You know, maybe that would be a valid approach – HAD OBAMA ACTUALLY DONE THAT.

But here’s my question: the United States released $150 billion that had been held since Iran’s act of war against the United States in 1979.  What the hell did releasing that money have to do with “nuclear weapons”???  The United States is allowing Iran to amass a giant conventional weapon arsenal, which includes ballistic missiles.  Since when were conventional weapons the same thing as nuclear weapons?  And most egregiously, Obama allowed a known terrorist – Qassem Suleimani – to get a sweetheart deal.  What the hell does THAT have to do with nuclear weapons?

I mean, seriously, given that Iran showed their trustworthiness by JUST HAVING ILLEGALLY PURSUED WEAPONS THEY WERE NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE, AND HAS REPEATEDLY DEMONSTRATED A PATTERN OF IGNORING THEIR AGREEMENTS AND U.N. SANCTIONS, maybe, just maybe Obama should have added a couple of conditions of his own.

So apparently, Obama would allow NOTHING in the discussion to interfere with nuclear weapons unless it actually hurt the United States.  Obama would allow NOTHING that would help the United States or allow the United States to have the honor of getting its people back.

There are two nations that have demonstrated their complete abandonment of trust: Iran, for breaking its agreements, and the United States of America under Barack Hussein Obama for ignoring the violations of those agreements that he had a legal obligation to enforce.

We got absolutely NOTHING from this deal.  The moment Iran has a ballistic missile – which they may very well not have been able to buy or develop had it not been for this damned deal of Obama’s – Iran will become a full-fledged nuclear-weaponized country.

And Obama has already started a nuclear arms race in the craziest part of the world through his “deal.”  Thanks to Obama’s insane and immoral deal, Israel and Saudi Arabia actually are eye to eye: BOTH believe it’s awful and gives the worst regime on earth more power than they have EVER had in history.  And like Israel, our former Arab Allies – allies since the 1930s, for the record – are now walking away from a United States that they can no longer trust and entering into nuclear contracts with our other worst enemy, Russia.  There are now TWELVE Arab countries looking into going nuclear thanks to Obama and his damned deal.

Obama’s logic is this: if a traitor removes his uniform, leaves his base and goes to seek out the enemy, Obama will move heaven and earth to get him back no matter how many terrorist generals with American blood on their hands he has to free to do so.  However, if a US Marine ACTUALLY “serves his country with honor and distinction” – the way Obama’s mouthpiece dishonestly testified that a TRAITOR had done – and legally leaves to visit his grandmother, well, no soup for him.  And no soup for a CIA agent, and no soup for a Christian pastor and no soup for an American journalist, either.

Death to America, after all.  That’s what the Ayatollah said while Obama was giving him concession after concession, to the tune of at least a DOZEN concessions where we said absolutely not until Obama said, “Death to America.”  And death to everything America stands for.

Barack Hussein Obama and the Ayatollah had at least that to agree on as the basis for their deal.  And so the two least trustworthy men on planet earth were able to shake hands.

 

Advertisements

Obama’s Democratic Debate Goofs

April 18, 2008

During the 16 April Democratic debate, ABC’s George Stephanopoulos asked Senator Barack Obama the following question:

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: I want to give Senator Clinton a chance to respond, but first a follow-up on this issue, the general theme of patriotism in your relationships. A gentleman named William Ayers, he was part of the Weather Underground in the 1970s. They bombed the Pentagon, the Capitol and other buildings. He’s never apologized for that. And in fact, on 9/11 he was quoted in The New York Times saying, ‘I don’t regret setting bombs; I feel we didn’t do enough.

An early organizing meeting for your state senate campaign was held at his house, and your campaign has said you are friendly. Can you explain that relationship for the voters, and explain to Democrats why it won’t be a problem?

SENATOR OBAMA: “George, but this is an example of what I’m talking about.

This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who’s a professor of English in Chicago, who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis.

And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values, doesn’t make much sense, George.

The fact is, is that I’m also friendly with Tom Coburn, one of the most conservative Republicans in the United States Senate, who during his campaign once said that it might be appropriate to apply the death penalty to those who carried out abortions.

Do I need to apologize for Mr. Coburn’s statements? Because I certainly don’t agree with those either.”

What exactly can we say about a man who equates being a murderer and a terrorist bomber with being a pro-life conservative U.S. Senator? Isn’t that frankly over-the-top nuts? Not to a liberal, so it’s perfectly okay in the People’s Republic of Leftistan. Surprise, pro-lifers: you’re just as vile as terrorist bombing murderers! How dare you believe babies deserve to live!!! Quit clinging to your religion, you bitter people!

And the fact that Ayers bombed some 20 places forty years in the past (and, just to make sure we all know, Ayers has admitted his involvement in the bombings; he was arrested and tried for the crime, but was acquited on a technicality) when Barack Obama was “8 years old” should somehow mean its okay to be his buddy now?

Beyond the affirmation that Barack Obama and William Ayers “were friendly” comes the realization that Obama went to Ayers’ house to garner support for his campaign. The two men went to speaking engagements together. They served on the same board together. They had the sort of relationship that Americans would not expect between candidate for the office of President of the United States and admitted terrorist bomber of American targets.

Do you think it will be okay to be in a friendly relationship with an unrepentant al Qaeda terrorist who killed Americans in a few decades? Is that a guy you don’t mind being on friendly terms with? Apparently, if you are a liberal, it’s just not that bad.

Here was another magic moment during the debate:

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS (asking about Rev. Jeremiah White): But you do believe he’s as patriotic as you are?

SENATOR OBAMA: This is somebody who’s a former Marine. And so I have — I believe that he loves this country, but I also believe that he’s somebody who, because of the experiences he’s had over the course of a lifetime, is also angry about the injustices that he’s seen.

Well, Lee Harvey Oswald was a former Marine, too. And he was pretty darned angry about injustice, as well. Does that make Lee Harvey Oswald a patriot too, Senator Obama?

A liberal patriot, of course, is a person who dedicates his life to attacking and undermining America (oh, I’m sorry: AmeriKKKa).

Oh, as a follow-up question, as a white man living in poverty, could you please explain how Reverend Wright – who will be living in a 10,000 ft/sq house located on the fairway of an exclusive country club with a $10,000,000 line of church money – is angry? And what I did to him? I’m not sure I get that.

The resulting media firestorm has been both predictable and amusing. The New York Times – the flagship of the elite media – thought it entirely appropriate to write a front page story about a “relationship” Senator John McCain had with a female lobbyist. The story was clearly nothing more than an uncooborated hatchet piece alleging impropriety and sleeze against a Republican. But when there are genuine, documented events concerning Senator Obama’s pastor for 20 years, concerning a former Marxist terrorist whom his own campaign acknowledged as being a friend – these things should be completely off limits?

I have heard liberals ask, “How would John Mccain like it if the media looked into his pastor?” I honestly don’t think the man would mind. Unlike Barack Obama, I don’t think John McCain has been sitting under a Marxist preacher for twenty years. Nor do I think he’s friendly with terrorist bombers who attacked the United States.

This little allegory might help liberals understand why Barack Obama’s relationship with William Ayers is disturbing:

Senator John McCain was linked today with a former Army of God member who bombed a string of women’s health clinics that provided abortion, it was revealed today. In 1985, Michal Bray was charged with conspiracy, following a series of clinic bombings. The Maryland Metropolitan Medical Women’s Center, a Planned Parenthood office and also the Washington Office of the American Civil Liberties Union were bombed. Two doctors who performed abortions were killed in the attacks.

“Reporters verified that Senator John McCain served on a board with Mr. Bray, and the two attended a number of speaking engagements together. When his campaign was contacted for comment with the story, McCain campaign manager Terry Nelson acknowledged, “They’re certainly friendly with each other.”

Michal Bray has repeatedly acknoweldged taking part in the bombings, and several years ago said, “My only regret is that I didn’t bomb more abortion clinics” at the anniversary of Roe. V. Wade Decision.

And, again:
“In an unrelated story, we have just obtained video of Senator John McCain’s paster for the past twenty years, the Rev. Tom Robbe, engaged in a series of racist rants against African Americans. The Senator has been a member of Rev. Robbe’s congregation for the past twenty years. The church features a “White family contract” and preaches white separatism.

In one video-taped sermon, Rev. Robbe calls African-Americans “degenerate criminals, drug addicts, murderers, rapists, and gang banging thugs who have children like rabbits and inflict their animal behavior on white America.” In other videos he claimed that America deserved 9/11 for tolerating black behavior and for not shipping blacks off to Africa.

Contacted for comment, Senator McCain said he was shocked at the the racist comments, and claimed that he had not been in the church when the remarks were made.

I made up these stories. But imagine they were true. As a liberal, what would you think of Senator John McCain? Would liberals and the liberal media be saying, “Well, we can’t convict a man of guilt by association“? No friggin’ way!!! They would not only be demanding that Senator McCain suspend his presidential campaign; they would be hysterically demanding that he resign from the U.S. Senate!!! You KNOW they would.

And rightfully so. If John McCain had those associations, it would disqualify him from ever being president, and should frankly disqualify him from continuing to serve in the U.S. Senate.

But please tell me the difference between Senator Obama’s “associations” and the one’s I just made up (and realize, the only reason I have to make them up is because – unlike with Obama’s – they didn’t happen). It turns out that the only difference is the fact that Obama’s bomber bombed the Pentagon and New York Police headquarters (good targets from a liberal perspective) and my bomber bombed abortion clinics (bad targets from a liberal perspective). And it turns out that Obama’s pastor is an anti-American anti-white racist (good targets from a liberal perspective) and the pastor I desribed is an anti-American anti-black racist (bad targets from a liberal perspective).

It is time that liberals grew up and learned that hate is hate, and racism is racism, and it is simply unacceptable from anybody – particularly when it can be associated with a man who wants to be the president of the United States.

Any genuine candidate of reconciliation would not EVER have tolerated such people in his life. He would have confronted their racism, their anti-Americanism, and (in the case of Ayers) their violence against Americans, and they would have refused to associate with them. Period.