If you are a Democrat, you are the lowest form of hypocrite there is, there ever has been or there ever will be.
Let me simply point out the fact that the Democrat Party voted to support George Bush’s War on Terror after the 9/11 attack, and then treasonously cut-and-ran on their duty WHILE OUR TROOPS WERE IN THE FIELD FIGHTING FOR THE WAR THEY VOTED FOR. In fact, now-President Obama and President wanna-be Hillary Clinton BOTH voted to cut off all funding for our troops while they were still in the field fighting on foreign soil while hoping that traitors wouldn’t abandon them at home. And at this point it is beyond obvious that the only way the United States will actually be able to end this war on terror with victory will be to hunt down every single Democrat with dogs and burn them all alive.
Allow me to present the list of Democrat Senators who voted for George Bush’s Iraq War Resolution. I made the list easier to see by pasting in only those Democrats who voted “yes.” Note that the final tally of 29 Democrats voting yes – which represents very nearly 60% of all Democrats in the U.S. Senate – is cited:
Senate Roll Call: Iraq Resolution
Friday, October 11, 2002
Following is an alphabetical listing by state of how each senator voted on President Bush’s Iraq resolution. A “yes” vote was a vote to grant President Bush the power to attack Iraq unilaterally. A “no” vote was a vote to defeat the measure. Voting “yes” were 29 Democrats and 48 Republicans. Voting “no” were 1 Republican, 21 Democrats, and 1 Independent.
Arkansas Blanche Lincoln (D): Yes California Dianne Feinstein (D): Yes Connecticut Christopher Dodd (D): Yes Joseph Lieberman (D): Yes Delaware Joseph Biden (D): Yes Thomas Carper (D): Yes Florida Bill Nelson (D): Yes Georgia Max Cleland (D): Yes Zell Miller (D): Yes Indiana Evan Bayh (D): Yes Iowa Tom Harkin (D): Yes Louisiana John Breaux (D): Yes Mary Landrieu (D): Yes Massachusetts John Kerry (D): Yes Missouri Jean Carnahan (D): Yes Montana Max Baucus (D): Yes Nebraska Ben Nelson (D): Yes Nevada Harry Reid (D): Yes New Jersey Robert Torricelli (D): Yes New Mexico New York Hillary Clinton (D): Yes Charles Schumer (D): Yes North Carolina John Edwards (D): Yes North Dakota Byron Dorgan (D): Yes South Carolina Ernest “Fritz” Hollings (D): Yes South Dakota Thomas Daschle (D): Yes Tim Johnson (D): Yes Washington Maria Cantwell (D): Yes West Virginia Jay Rockefeller (D): Yes Wisconsin Herb Kohl (D): Yes
Notice also that all of the top Democrats of the time voted “yes” including Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Joe Biden and Harry Reid.
But just like Bush? Not on your life. Bush stayed the course; Democrats cut and ran like the cut-and-run roaches that they are. Bush had integrity; Democrats had cynical exploitation.
And let me point out the fact that to the extent that George W. Bush failed in his war on terror, maybe – just maybe – we ought to do something DIFFERENT and not follow in the same basic fallacy that Bush pursued. I submit that Bush made two fundamental mistakes: 1) he refused to consider the religious motivation of the Islamic jihadists and confront Islam with its profound and possibly pathological problem of religious-inspired violence; and 2) Bush wrongly believed that “democracy” was an intrinsic good and that any people who voted would vote for freedom when the fact of the matter is that bad and ignorant people will vote in a bad and ignorant way. And I further submit that since Barack Obama’s strategy has now failed about a thousand times worse than Bush’s – realize that Islamic State emerged COMPLETELY out of the failure of Obama to fight the “war on terror” that he steadfastly refused to even acknowledge and we’ve paid DEARLY for his foolish mistake – maybe we need to pursue a completely different policy and recognize Islamic terrorism and the roots that are sustaining it for what it clearly is.
Anyway, here’s the current story framed the way Democrats want you to see things now:
On Muslims, Democrats Find an Unlikely Ally: George W Bush
By josh lederman, associated press
·WASHINGTON — Dec 25, 2015, 1:00 PM ET
Taunted by Republicans to declare war on “radical Islamic terrorism,” Democrats are turning to an unlikely ally: George W. Bush.
President Barack Obama, under pressure to be more aggressive on terrorism, regularly cites his predecessor’s refusal to demonize Muslims or play into the notion of a clash between Islam and the West. It’s a striking endorsement from a president whose political rise was predicated on opposition to the Iraq war and Bush’s hawkish approach in the Middle East.
As Hillary Clinton put it, “George W. Bush was right.”
Don’t you DARE try to grab hold of Bush’s coattails now, you miserable ROACHES.
I just want to keep pointing out what I’ve been saying for the official record. Go back in time to early 2011 – when Obama was claiming he had healed the planet – and you’ll find me having said this. Note in particular the bold-face and italicized paragraph:
Basically, the Judeo-Christian worldview – “Christendom,” if you like – has been treated like a salad bar in the Western Civilization that had been forged by Christianity, and secular humanists can pick out the parts that they like and throw away the rest. But it’s not a salad bar; Judeo-Christianity as both a religion and a worldview is far more like the foundations of a great building. And what these secular humanists have been doing is pulling out the foundational pillars one block at a time until there is nothing left to sustain the surrounding structure.
Which is precisely why the West – which used to be called “Christendom” – is now on the verge of complete collapse on virtually every level.
I see the war on terror, and from the start I have seen the glaring flaw in our strategy (yes, even when George Bush was waging it). Basically, we have confronted totalitarian Islam on the military, political and economic fronts. But we have utterly ignored the religious front – which is precisely the major front by which totalitiarian Islam has been attacking us. Like it or not, 9/11 was a religious act. And there has been no major movement whatsoever – either by the Western powers or by the movements within Islam itself – to confront the religious grounds of the totalitarian Islamists.
And the reason is because we have nothing to confront them with. Secular humanists/atheists have undermined public religious expression at every turn, while cultural relativists have contextualized religion in such a way to strip it of any spiritual power whatsoever. Now when we truly need true spiritual power to confront the demonic power motivating radical Islam, basically all we’ve got is allegorical dirt clods.
In the sphere of Islam, jihadists have the superior Qu’ranic argument that it is THEY who are carrying out Muhammad’s vision for Islam, not the liberal Westernized contextualizers who want to make very clear claims of Muhammad into metaphors and allegories representing something else. Muhammad was a man of genuine violence; he had been in some thirty military campaigns in his life; he had committed numerous genocidal campaigns against “infidels”; and he had another thirty military campaigns planned at the time of his death, including the conquest of Western Europe as the means to spread Islam (“submission”) and the call of Allahu Akbar (a comparative which means “Allah is greater”). If Muhammad is in any way, shape or form a representative paradigm of what it means to be “Muslim,” then the jihadists are right.
And liberalism – whether it be religious/theological or political/cultural liberalism – has exactly what to answer that? Other than mocking or trivializing it?
Did political liberals – like the liberal rabbis from the LA Times article above – truly believe that we overcome the threat of terrorism by simply changing the name to “overseas contingency operation” from “war on terror”?
As bad as the religion of Allah may be for a free society, it has a great deal of force when the competition is cultural nothingness, the decaying leftovers of “salad bar pseudo-Judeo-Christianity.”
Notice I point out I’d argued this many times before, but I just don’t have the time to go back and search for my earliest argument for the fact that ignoring the very clearly Islamic tie to terrorism is and has been a giant mistake and that we cannot win if we don’t understand why our enemy keeps wanting to see us spitting blood as they jubilantly cut our heads off.
And Bush was also fundamentally wrong in his insistence that bringing “democracy” to the Middle East would make that region a better place given the simple fact that bad people will vote in a bad way. I’ll simply put it in the words of founding father James Madison who said, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” And I’ll further point out that while Islam might be “religious” it is NOT “moral” by any Judeo-Christian standard that values human dignity and freedom. It is no accident that while democracy emerged out of Judeo-Christianity and every single “Christian” nation has become a democracy, not one single Islamic country has EVER become a democracy in the 1,500 year history of Islam. Asking Muslims to create a democratic republic is like asking elephants to build a space ship. Neither is going to happen without a massive transformation in either the elephant or the Muslim.
So I just want to point out for the factual record that I don’t CARE what Bush said. BUSH WAS WRONG. I said it YEARS ago back when it mattered. I said it before Obama’s horrible, godawful foreign policy that made Bush’s look like the greatest thing since sliced bread had the wheels completely fall off and we started watching in horror as Obama has since kept trying to drag the wheel-less cart by sheer undying moral idiocy rather than simply admit he was wrong.
Here are a number of article titles I came across while I was searching for the above quote that highlight rather key differences between Bush and Obama and conservatives and liberals:
- Liberal Democrat Message: Americans Who Oppose Sharia Law Being Imposed On Them Are Bigots
- This Sums Up The Demonic Hypocrisy Of The Democrat Party And Liberal Progressivism
- Do You Want To Be A Hunter And Killer Or Do You Want To Be A Hider And Cowerer? (It’s Moot: Obama Has Chosen For You)
- Obama Honors Osama Bin Laden As True Muslim Holy Warrior, Gives Him State Funeral (and please remember the hypocrisy of doing this after all the damn DENIALS that Osama bin Laden was in fact a damn MUSLIM)
- Libyans Facing Down Dictator Gaddafi Are Seriously Missing George Bush – this one is interesting because it records the statement of desperate moderate Muslims as saying “Bring Bush! Make a no fly zone, bomb the planes,” shouted soldier-turned-rebel Nasr Ali, referring to a no-fly zone imposed on Iraq in 1991 by then U.S. President George Bush. Because Bush would have imposed that no-fly zone and Obama refused to do so like the coward he has always been and always will be. And Libya completely melted down and ended up in terrorist hands as a result of that difference between Bush and Obama.
- Well, At Least Obama Didn’t Say ‘Endowed By Allah With Certain Inalienable Rights’
- ‘One of the prettiest sounds on earth’: A Quarter Of Americans Now Think Obama Is A Muslim
- Mainstream Media Wishes Times Square Terrorist Had Been Hated ‘Tea Bagger’ Rather Than Muslim
- Obama Allows Muslims To Opt Out Of ObamaCare; Christians Still Screwed
- Another Milestone Day For Obama: The Monstrous Mistake Of Trying Foreign Terrorists Like U.S. Citizens
- Ft. Hood Massacre: Obama Confronted By SECOND Successful Domestic Terrorist Attack
On the article from the liberal “journalist” who wishes a terrorist had been a conservative tea party member, let’s just realize how COMMON that vile attitude is among liberals. Samual L. Jackson, actor, liberal and demonic turd, just got through telling the world that when he heard about the San Bernardino terror attack, his very first thought was “how much I really wanted that to just be another, you know, crazy white dude, and not really some Muslims.” Because like ALL Democrats he is a pathological RACIST BIGOT who hates Americans and therefore lives in an alternate reality where it is the American white people he so despises who are guilty of all the sins in the world. He goes on to label the sort of people who just murdered 14 human beings as ” the new young black men.”
No, don’t be comparing Obama to Bush or Democrat-fool foreign policy to Republicans. Just DON’T. You damn hypocrite liars. You damn and damnable liberals are SO wrapped up and enmeshed in the Muslim Monsters who are trying to murder us it makes me sick. You both want the same damn thing: the State worshipped as God and the people trampled upon as they are compelled to do your bidding by force.
“I know some in Washington would like us to start leaving Iraq now. To begin withdrawing before our commanders tell us we are ready would be dangerous for Iraq, for the region and for the United States. It would mean surrendering the future of Iraq to al Qaeda. It would mean that we’d be risking mass killings on a horrific scale. It would mean we’d allow the terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq to replace the one they lost in Afghanistan. It would mean increasing the probability that American troops would have to return at some later date to confront an enemy that is even more dangerous.” — President Bush, 2007
Which is EXACTLY what happened because our Fool-in-Chief began his fool presidency doing the following:
US-IRAQ: Generals Seek to Reverse Obama Withdrawal Decision
By Gareth Porter
WASHINGTON, Feb 2 2009 (IPS) – CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus, supported by Defence Secretary Robert Gates, tried to convince President Barack Obama that he had to back down from his campaign pledge to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months at an Oval Office meeting Jan. 21.
But Obama informed Gates, Petraeus and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen that he wasn’t convinced and that he wanted Gates and the military leaders to come back quickly with a detailed 16-month plan, according to two sources who have talked with participants in the meeting.
Obama’s decision to override Petraeus’s recommendation has not ended the conflict between the president and senior military officers over troop withdrawal, however. There are indications that Petraeus and his allies in the military and the Pentagon, including Gen. Ray Odierno, now the top commander in Iraq, have already begun to try to pressure Obama to change his withdrawal policy.
A network of senior military officers is also reported to be preparing to support Petraeus and Odierno by mobilising public opinion against Obama’s decision.
Petraeus was visibly unhappy when he left the Oval Office, according to one of the sources. A White House staffer present at the meeting was quoted by the source as saying, “Petraeus made the mistake of thinking he was still dealing with George Bush instead of with Barack Obama.”
So don’t EVER let ANY Democrat cite Obama now.
Bush didn’t do that. Bush warned AGAINST doing that. It was OBAMA who foolishly abandoned Iraq against every single one of his generals’ recommendations and them demonically and deceitfully tried to blame it on Bush and on a status of forces agreement that had NOTHING to do with Obama’s stupid decision-making.
Bush WON the war in Iraq: Vice President Joe Biden claimed that fact, saying:
“I am very optimistic about — about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You’re going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You’re going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government,” said Biden.
Bush WON the war in Iraq. Barack Obama claimed that fact, claiming in 2009 “an Iraq that is sovereign, stable, and self-reliant.”
Bush WON the war in Iraq. OBAMA LOST IT BECAUSE OBAMA IS A WICKED FOOL.
Terrorism has EXPLODED under Obama by EVERY metric you want to use. Deaths from terrorism have already QUADRUPLED under Obama; and the wicked fool’s still got over a year left that we can already see are going to be so much worse it’s not even REAL. Realize that in the first five years of Obama’s failed rule, terrorism exploded 150 percent. But that’s NOTHING because terrorism under Obama exploded by ANOTHER 81 percent just last year alone. How do you think 2015 is going to look, you Democrat FOOL???
Because Barack Obama is the most demon-possessed FOOL who has EVER LIVED, we are now seeing the worst refugee crisis in the entire recorded history of planet earth.
No, Barack Obama is NOTHING like George Bush.
And the Democrat Party is the party of Satan himself. And Satan is laughing and laughing and maniacally laughing as evil EXPLODES because he owns the soul of every single Democrat. And that is why these sodomy-worshiping baby butchering Marxists are one day going to share Satan’s ultimate eternal destiny.
So just to recap, Democrats who demonically, treacherously and in fact treasonously betrayed and back-stabled their commander-in-chief and the troops they had voted to authorized to fight under him before they abandoned their duty are cowards and liars of the very lowest sort to now try to argue that they are the ones who are the true bearers of Bush’s mantle.