Posts Tagged ‘Occupy Wall Street’

Par For The Liberal Hypocrite Course: Obama Supporter Spits In Face Of Old Woman After Disrupting A Republican ‘Wisconsin Women for Mitt’ Event

August 21, 2012

Do you remember all the media ginned-up brouhaha over the alleged incident in which a Tea Party protestor spat in the face of a black congressman?  Emmanuel Cleaver?  Ring any bells?  Republicans were depicted as these racist haters.

Even though the event never happened and after the evidence – make that the lack of evidence – came out Cleaver started changing his story.

Even though with ten thousand cameras and recording devices all around that day, nobody ever produced any footage of somebody deliberately spitting in anybody’s face that day.

Even though conservatives offered $15,000 for any proof of intentional spitting.  And never had to pay a dime.

What happened that day was a congressman getting too close to the face of somebody shouting “Kill the bill!”  That’s ALL that happened.  But you would have thought that a pointy-hood-wearing lynch mob had strung Emmanuel Cleaver up that day.

Let me show you what it looks like and sounds like for somebody to spit in someone’s face:

The local paper covered the story:

Protester spits on Romney supporter in Wisconsin
3:23 PM, Aug 17, 2012
Written by Nick Penzenstadler
Post-Crescent staff writer

GRAND CHUTEA bus tour event on behalf of Mitt Romney turned ugly Friday afternoon when a protester interrupted a rally and spit in a supporter’s face.

The event featured Wisconsin state Sen. Alberta Darling and Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch.

During Darling’s remarks, the protester, Mary Hoglund, 83, of Appleton, interrupted the event to ask about Republican opposition to Planned Parenthood.

A local Romney supporter began arguing with Hoglund, who then spit in her face. Hoglund was escorted out, and received medical attention for a scratch she received on her neck.

The supporter declined to give her name as she left the event, but said she was unharmed.

Hoglund said she was attacked inside the event, hosted at Hanson Benefits. The event was part of a statewide tour kicking off “Wisconsin Women for Mitt.”

Grand Chute police are reviewing the altercation for potential charges. Hoglund was taken away in an ambulance with what appeared to be minor injuries, including the scratch.

Chris Hanson, owner of the benefits provider, said the altercation caught her off guard.

“This is a private business and we invited a small group of clients and friends,” Hanson said. “Whatever happened to grace and mercy in politics? This isn’t a town hall meeting.”

Ben Sparks, a Wisconsin-based Romney spokesman, called the incident a “stunt” and said the woman refused to leave when asked.

Romney protester Kathy Lefebvre, of Green Bay, was escorted out with Hoglund.

“I’ve never experienced anything like that before, to me it’s unacceptable,” Lefebvre said. “Getting upset is one thing, but (Romney supporters) attacked Mary.”

Mary Jones, of Oneida, attended the event and was standing in the crowd of two dozen people near the altercation.

“It was very disrespectful,” Jones said. “One woman decided to be rude and was politely asked to leave. It was shocking.”

Kathy Lefebvre needs to find herself a functioning brain.  If somebody spits in my face I’ll be attacking that person, too, you libturd dumbass.  For this liberal idiot to try to depict Mary Hoglund as a “victim” after she just spat in somebody’s face is almost as unhinged as spitting in somebody’s face.

This reminds me of the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) roaches who create situations in which police have to respond and then shout “We won! We won!  They pepper sprayed us!” when the police finally react.

Republicans are the Party of the Tea Party and a lot of fed-up people peacefully assembling.

Democrats are the Party of the OWS movement that has had at least 7,387 documented arrests including for crimes such as rape, violence and terrorism.  And lest you misunderstand, these Occupy cockroaches are being blessed by and protected by none other than Barack Hussein Obama.  And this is what Obama’s movement looks like.

OWS fascists and illegal immigrant criminals.  That’s your “hope and change.”

We just had a liberal literally go into a conservative organization with a gun and start shooting.  That follows liberal fascist homosexuals demonizing and defacing Chick-Fil-A for the “crime” of defying these Nazis and standing up for their free speech rights.  And if follows that obnoxious puke who thought he was one righteous hero for being a pissy little jerk to a decent girl at a Chick-Fil-A drive-through window.

Mind you, even BEFORE the Occupy Wall Street movement came along liberals were the source of all the actual violence and hate.

If you are a Democrat and you want to see what a truly vile human being looks like, get off your ass and go look in the mirror.

Somehow, I have a feeling this incident of a rabid liberal spitting in the face of a conservative woman at a Republican event won’t make it into MSNBC’s “coverage.”

For the record, Fox News played the clip of the Emmanuel Cleaver “spitting” incident quite a number of times – and I suppose you could argue that they did that BECAUSE NOBODY INTENTIONALLY SPIT ON ANYBODY AND THE VIDEO CLEARLY SHOWED THAT.

Obama’s campaign is the most dishonest, the most vile and the most vicious in American presidential campaign history.  And that is because Obama’s supporters are dishonest, vile, vicious people and he is reaching out to the lowest and most loathsome element in America to try to win.

[Update, 8/21/12] I hope liberals don’t respond by citing the hate attack against lesbian Charlie Rogers.  Because it now turns out that this sick woman literally carved swastikas onto her own body to “fundamentally transform” herself into a victim.

Advertisements

Liberal God-Hater Who Went To Family Research Council To Murder Had His Life Spared By Man He Shot Because GOD Told Leo Johnson, ‘Don’t Shoot Him.’

August 20, 2012

I am constantly amazed that Christians are constantly accused of being “haters” by the very people who are easily demonstrated to be true, genuine haters.  It’s the way of the world whenever the left is involved, as exemplified by all the most vile nations that are constantly sitting on the United Nations’ “Human Rights” council.

I think of the Tea Party and all the accusations of hate that was poured on us.  It was amazing.  I saw peaceful, mostly older people protesting in complete law-abiding order.  But the left demonized us.  And then we saw the Occupy Wall Street movement (OWS) that was replete with numerous acts of rape, of violence, of rioting, of outright terrorism, complete with 7,387 documented arrests.

But those who literally DOCUMENT themselves to be violent and willing to resort to violence aren’t “hateful.”  Only Christians who read and follow their Bibles so qualify.

So we have ourselves a liberal who literally believes that those who believe what the Holy Bible and 2,000 years of Western Civilization clearly teach are “hateful.”  And those who murder people for practicing their right to believe as they will and speak as they will – as 230 years of our constitutional republic clearly teach – are “tolerant.”

Here’s another case in point:

FRC President: ‘Reckless Rhetoric’ Led to Shooting
By Paul Strand
CBN News Washington Sr. Correspondent
Friday, August 17, 2012

Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, is calling for an end to “reckless rhetoric” he believes is behind Wednesday’s shooting at the conservative group’s office in Washington, D.C.

Leo Johnson is recovering after he was shot in the arm in what federal authorities have labeled an act of domestic terrorism.

The Wednesday morning incident began when suspected shooter Floyd Corkins, 28, entered FRC headquarters off G Street, and reportedly made statements opposing the company’s policies.

He then shot Johnson, an FRC building operations manager who also serves as a security guard. Johnson was unarmed and not in uniform.

“Floyd Corkins was responsible for firing the shot that wounded our friend,” Perkins said Thursday.

“But Corkins was given a license to shoot an unarmed man by groups like the SPLC that have been reckless in labeling organizations ‘hate groups’ because they disagree with them on public policy,” he added.

Hate Group?

In 2010, the Southern Poverty Law Center put the FRC on the same “hate group” list as the Klu Klux Klan and neo-Nazis because of its stance in favor of traditional marriage.

Jerry Boykin, a retired Army general and FRC’s new executive vice president, was at the office when the shooting occurred.

“I tell you what, you couldn’t blow me out of here with a stick of dynamite now,” he told CBN News. “I am so determined that we are going to continue standing for biblical values, family values, freedom, faith.”

“I hope that this stimulates other Americans that have the same values to get involved in what’s going on in this country,” Boykins continued. “We’re not going away. We’re not going to back down.”

Since the incident, Perkins visited Johnson in the hospital. Despite his injury, the unarmed Johnson and others tackled the suspect and wrestle him to the floor.

“When I told him his actions were heroic in protecting his colleagues, he told me that he just reacted in the way he thought anyone at FRC would have responded,” Perkins said.

He added that his organization is grateful for the continued prayers and support from around the world.

A Dangerous Atmosphere

Corkins, who was taken into FBI custody, is a volunteer worker at a Washington community center for the homosexual and transgender population of D.C.

“Well, I’m very shocked. It’s very surprising,” a neighbor said of Corkin’s attack.

FRC is known as a conservative Christian lobbying organizations, especially well-known for its support of traditional marriage and stance against abortion.

The suspect was also reportedly carrying a Chick-fil-A bag. Chick-Fil-A’s president, Dan Cathy, has been under fire for opposing gay marriage and funding groups like FRC.

Some conservatives say if Wednesday’s attack was politically motivated, liberal and pro-gay organizations that keep labeling FRC a “hate group” for opposing gay marriage are partially to blame for the dangerous atmosphere.

We’d like to hear your thoughts on how liberal groups are labeling those who stand for biblical beliefs as ‘hate groups.’ join the discussion at our CBN News Facebook page.

“This has got to be a wake-up call to everybody in the conservative movement,” Media Research Center’s Dan Gainor said. “If it turns out early reports are accurate and this individual did this based on politics, it’s not that it’s new. It’s the culmination of years of leftie demonization of conservative groups.”

National Organization for Marriage President Brian Brown agreed.

“Such harmful and dangerous labels deserve no place in our civil society,” he said, calling on pro-gay organizations “to withdraw such incendiary rhetoric from a debate that involves millions of good Americans.”

Many liberals and gay rights activists often refer to those who disagree with them as “haters” or “hate groups.”

Stirring the Pot

Just this past Friday, gay Campus Pride leader Shane L. Windmeyer blasted Chick-fil-A for its support of traditional marriage in an Huffington Post editorial.

“Through its family-controlled nonprofit arm, Chick-fil-A profits have funded such groups as Eagle Forum, Exodus International, Family Research Council, and Focus on the Family,” he wrote.

“Chick-fil-A profits fund documented hate groups that aggressively work against LGBT people, advocating their criminalization, psychological abuse, or death,” he added.

The Southern Poverty Law Center said it labels FRC a hate group because it disseminates false information to defame gays.

But FRC senior fellow Peter Sprigg told CBN news that’s not true.

“I don’t expect everyone to agree with some of the things that we assert about the homosexual lifestyle,” Sprigg said. “But we do present evidence in support of those assertions, and they are certainly not falsehoods or fabrications.”

It’s like I said: I call the left fascist BECAUSE THEY KEEP DOCUMENTING THAT THEY ARE FASCIST.

Jesus put it in crystal clear terms:

“If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first.”

Everybody who hates Christians hates Jesus, and you hate us because of your hatred for Him.

MSNBC is so biased and so rabidly dishonest that they won’t even MENTION that a liberal activist tried to commit mass murder at a conservative organization.  Which is interesting: because if it had been a conservative trying to do the same damn thing at a liberal organization you would have had endless coverage, candlelight vigils, endless discussions about what to do about these conservative haters, etc.  Even when there was ZERO evidence that the conservative who was being demonized was actually to blame.  But here’s the most interesting thing:

Tony Perkins, the president of Family Research Council, had this to say on the Huckabee show (August 18, 2012) – and I typed it verbatim:

Tony Perkins: “And he [Leo] had the gun on the man.  I talked to Leo – in fact I talked Leo again this morning to make sure he is doing okay, and he’s doing fine, recovering well – He could have and would have been justified in shooting the man because he had no idea if he had another weapon, or what he planned to do.  But Leo told me this: he said that in that moment, “the Lord spoke to me and said, ‘Don’t shoot him.'”  And he didn’t.  He called for help and other members of the team came and held him until the police arrived.”

This liberal – like ALL liberals – utterly despises the God of the Bible.

But it was that very God who told Leo Johnson to spare that liberal’s life.

Just so you understand the sheer hypocrisy and cowardice of this particular liberal, there’s this:

Fox News is reporting that the incident occurred inside the FRC headquarters at approximately 10:45 a.m. yesterday. Sources said the shooter made statements regarding FRC policies just before opening fire and shooting Leo Johnson, a security guard, in the arm. Johnson and another guard managed to wrestle the man to the ground and take away his gun. While doing so, the shooter said, “Don’t shoot me, it was not about you, it was what this place stands for.”

Can you imagine saying that to the man you just tried to kill merely because of where that man worked? 

Hopefully God spared – and make no mistake that it was GOD who spared – Floyd Corkins in order that at least one liberal would realize that absolutely EVERYTHING he believes and thinks he knows has been completely wrong.

Obama Administration Demanded Police Not Be Allowed To Enforce The Law In Order To Help Its Fascist Occupy Wall Street Allies

August 8, 2012

Question: what does the American justice system stand for?

The answer that ought to be true: the justice system is the means by which all Americans are treated equally and fairly.  There is one law that all Americans – regardless of income, class, race, religion, etc. – are all held to and judged by.

What does the American justice system mean according to Barack Obama?

It is the means by which Obama can reward his friends and punish his enemies.  It’s the means by which Obama can say that “justice” means instructing his Justice Department to “Never bring a lawsuit against a black.” 

Read the following about the conduct of the president who actually once said: “‘We’re gonna punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us“:

Obama White House – Tells Law Enforcement to “Stand Down” and Not Enforce the Law Against Occupy Protestors According to Records Uncovered by Judicial Watch
August 07, 2012

(Washington, DC)Judicial Watch announced today that it has obtained records from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) indicating that the General Services Administration (GSA), with the blessing of the Obama White House, instructed law enforcement officers to “stand down” and not arrest “Occupy Portland” protestors who were in violation of the law.

The records, obtained pursuant to a November 11, 2011, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, include internal DHS correspondence. On November 6, 2011, an e-mail exchange between DHS/National Protection and Programs Directorate Chief of Staff Caitlin Durkovich and GSA Public Buildings Service Commissioner Robert Peck (who has since been fired) specifically related to Occupy Portland protests taking place on federal property in Portland:

I am sorry to be emailing you on a Sunday night, but wanted to let you know our Press Shop has received a couple of calls from Portland media outlets about a group of 11 protesters who again set up camp at Terry Shrunk Plaza in Portland last night. They have chained themselves to a large drum filled with concrete. GSA controls the permits and has asked FPS [Federal Protective Services] not to enforce the curfew at park and the prohibition on overnight encampments. Reporters have asked if we will be arresting the protestors as FPS did last week.

Our FPS Commander in Portland says they are standing down and following GSA’s request to only intervene if there is a threat to public safety.

Peck responds:

Caitlin: yes, that is our position; it’s been vetted with our Administrator and Michael Robertson, our chief of staff, and we have communicated with the WH [White House], which has afforded us the discretion to fashion our approach to Occupy issues…The arrests last week were carried out despite our request that the protesters be allowed to remain and to camp overnight…

Occupy Portland is part of the Occupy Wall Street movement, which has been beset with accusations of “crimes and dangerous behavior” during its protests.

According to the Oregonian, the week before this email exchange, on October 30, 2011, “Twenty-five Occupy Portland demonstrators were arrested…after refusing to leave Jamison Square. The arrests capped an intense hours-long standoff between police and dozens of protesters who refused to leave the Pearl District park after it was declared closed at midnight. Officers, some in riot gear and others on horses, faced off with protesters who remained in the square, despite being ordered to leave.” The protestors were reportedly arrested on accusations of “trespassing, interfering with a police officer and disorderly conduct for the noise complaints from neighbors.”

Robert Peck was at the center of a scandal involving the GSA in 2010, where the agency spent $823,000 on a lavish Las Vegas “training conference” that featured a clown, a mind reader and a $31,208 reception. Peck was fired as a result of the incident. Peck, who has donated thousands of dollars to Democrat candidates, including Barack Obama, was previously implicated in an unrelated GSA scandal for reportedly brokering a controversial lease deal for a Democratic donor and friend of former Vice President Al Gore. Per The Washington Examiner’s Mark Tapscott: “In Peck’s first go-round at GSA, controversy was sparked when it was learned that excessively high rent was being paid by the FCC to the owner of a building who also happened to be a Democratic donor. Peck was the official who made the deal possible.”

Peck was deposed by Judicial Watch today in a separate lawsuit on behalf of Linda Shenwick, a GSA whistleblower who Peck and others allegedly retaliated against because of Ms. Shenwick’s opposition to wasteful spending, such as parties, that have now caused so much controversy.

“We now have a new GSA scandal – one that involves the Obama White House,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These documents clearly show that federal agencies colluded with the Obama White House to allow the Occupy Wall Street protestors to violate the law with impunity. These documents tell us that the GSA and DHS can’t be relied upon to protect federal workers or property.”

To view the entire production click here.

Let’s see about this Occupy Wall Street movement that clearly is supported by Barack Hussein Obama:

Occupy Wall Street Movement Ranks Have Criminals, Rioters, Rapists, Terrorists And Now Murderers

Coming To America (Thanks, Obama!): Spain On Verge Of Collapse While Liberals Turn Violent In Streets

Liberals Are Not Quite As ‘Tolerant’ As Rabid Rats As They Keep Proving That THEY Are The True Fascists Threatening America

When Will American People Get Fed Up With Violent Occupy Fascists And The Democrats Who Endorse Them???

The Inconvenient Truth About The Lilly White Occupy Wall Street Movement And The Media Propaganda That Ignores Truth Altogether

Fascism A Socialist Leftwing Ideology: Communism, Fascism, Labor Unions, Workers And Students Exploiting ‘Crisis’

Call The Occupy Protest Movement And The Left That It Comes From What It Truly Is: Fascist

Occupy Movement Costs America UNTOLD MILLIONS ($2.3 Milion In L.A. ALONE) Versus Tea Party Movement Which MADE Cities Money

Read Up On USSR And Decide What You Think About It – Because Obama Is Trying To Bring It To America

Liberalism = Marxism. See The Occupy Movement Shutting Down Ports, Capitalism, Jobs To Get Their Way (Communist Russian Revolution Part Deux)

After Obama Deceitfully Demonized GOP For ‘Dirtier Air And Dirtier Water,’ His Occupy Movement Leaves Behind 30 TONS Of Diseased Filfth At Just ONE Site

Vile Liberal Occupy Movement Killed The Grass At L.A. City Hall – What Should Be Done Now?

Occupy Movement Officially A Terrorist Group Now

The American Left Personified By Occupy Movement: Vile, Violent Fascist Thugs

The American Left Personified By Occupy Movement: Vile, Violent Fascist Thugs

Occupy Movement Is Destroying Jobs And Hurting Little People

Consider The Fundamental Incoherence And Hypocrisy Of The Left And The Occupy Movement

Tea Party Vs. Occupy Protests: The Winners Of The Out-Of-Control Violence Trophy – For The Millionth Consecutive Time – Is The LEFT

Busting The 99% Vs. 1% Liberal Lie

Nazis, Socialists, Communists, Liberals, Democrats, Obama, Media Propaganda ALL Support Occupy Wall Street

If The Occupy Wall Street Crowd Had Any Integrity, They’d Be Attacking Obama (Who Has Raked In More Wall Street $ Than ANYONE)

You might read through those article titles of mine and say, “Dang, this guy says ‘fascist’ a lot.”  And I most surely do.  But here’s the damn thing: I keep calling Obama and the left “fascist” BECAUSE THEY KEEP ACTING LIKE FASCISTSSee this for what they were doing over just seven days last week.

And then realize what Obama’s doing here.  If this group had been the Tea Party, do you think Obama would have demanded that they be allowed to break the law???  Anybody show me a case in which Obama interfered to keep Tea Party protesters from being arrested?  Anybody?  Hello?  Is that the sound of crickets I keep hearing?  Anybody?

As of August 2 of this year, the vile Occupy Wall Street movement was involved in at least 7,385 documented arrests.  Versus ZERO for the Tea Party that Obama demonized.  These arrests have included several instances of attempted terrorist attacks.

And Obama is directly connected to this violent, fascist movement.  As his actions discovered and documented by Judicial Watch clearly prove.

This is the Cloward and Piven Presidency.  It is literally an administration that hates America and that seeks to implode this nation in order to impose a Marxist Utopia.  As Obama’s SEIU thug allies clearly were caught trying to do in advocating that millions of people refuse to pay their mortgage obligations in order to – and yes I am directly quoting – “put banks at the edge of insolvency again” in order “to destabilize the folks” and thus “literally cause a new financial crisis“.

Americans had better wake up.  Because one more Obama term and you’re going to get a “fundamentally transformed America.”

And by “fundamentally transformed” I mean a deliberately bankrupted and imploded America.

Busting The 99% Vs. 1% Liberal Lie

October 20, 2011

Barack Obama, most of the Democrat Party and pretty much all the Occupy Wall Street hooligans are Trotskying I mean trotting out the tired Marxist myth that Republicans only care about the rich and that the rich are a bunch of evil thieves who somehow stole “the people’s” money by somehow forcing them to buy stuff.  The entire movement is based on the servile, mindless philosophy of people who believe that somebody else owes them whatever they think they deserve to have.

I was glad to come across this editorial byInvestor’s Business Daily:

IBD Editorials
Busting The 1% Vs. 99% Myth
Oct 18, 2011

Inequality: President Obama’s class-envy strategy is built on a false premise — that the rich get richer at the expense of the poor. Amazingly, such zero-sum thinking is influencing public opinion.

Twice as many Americans support the anti-Wall Street protesters as oppose them. And even Rasmussen is polling that nearly half of Americans support proposals to soak the rich.

This is an emotional response to both the hard economic times and dishonest political rhetoric. People are buying into the notion peddled by the left that the rich steal from people. It’s a pernicious myth left over from preindustrial Marxism.

The left says current levels of income inequality echo the late 1920s and the Gilded Age. They’ve zeroed in on the richest 1%, citing Census Bureau data showing these top earners “grabbing” more income than the bottom 90%.

But the census stats are misleading.

For one, they are a snapshot of income distribution at a single point in time. Yet income is not static. It changes over time. Low-paying jobs from early adulthood give way to better-paying jobs later in life.

And income groups in America are not fixed. There’s no caste system here, really no such thing even as a middle “class.” The poor aren’t stuck in poverty. And the rich don’t enjoy lifetime membership in an exclusive club.

A 2007 Treasury Department study bears this out. Nearly 58% of U.S. households in the lowest-income quintile in 1996 moved to a higher level by 2005. The reverse also held true. Of those households that were in the top 1% in income in 1996, more than 57% dropped to a lower-income group by 2005.

Every day in America, the poor join the ranks of the rich, and the rich fall out of comfort.

So even if income equality is increasing, it does not mean income mobility is decreasing. There is still a great deal of movement in and out of the richest and poorest groups in America.

The beauty of our free-market system (what’s left of it), is that even among the thousands of Wall Street protesters thumping, “We are the 99%,” there are those who might not be able to say that a decade or so from now. Some might go on to profit from an Internet start-up. Others might get a rap contract. Anything’s possible in America.

One of those street agitators might even become president, following in the shoes of Obama, who’s now one of the 1-percenters he mocks.

Another problem with the census data is they don’t include the noncash income received by the lowest-income households. Each year, the poor get tens of billions of dollars in subsidies for housing, food and health care. None of these transfer payments, a lot of it paid for by the 1%, is counted as income by the Census Bureau.

One report estimates that the share of total income earned by the lowest-income group would rise roughly 50% if such welfare were considered.

Likewise, the share of total income earned by the top income quintile would drop about 7% if taxes paid to fund welfare were considered.

Census doesn’t take into account the equalizing effects of taxes. Though they earn more than 45% of total income, the top 10% of taxpayers pay over 70% of the total income-tax burden. The top 1%? They shoulder a whopping 40% of the tax load.

Federal Reserve and other data — which include all financial and nonfinancial assets, including bank accounts, investments, houses and cars — give a more complete picture of the gap. When you count all wealth, not just income, inequality has not gotten worse.

The top 1% account for 35% of total wealth, compared with 37% in 1922. In fact, the worst wealth disparity ever was in the 1990s under President Clinton.

That last sentence of the article bears repeating:

“In fact, the worst wealth disparity ever was in the 1990s under President Clinton.”

Democrats love lies.  Their souls swim in lies.  Lies and hypocrisy define Democrats.  Take away the lies and the hypocrisy and Democrats simply dematerialize like the Cheshire cat.

Democrats have fabricated the narrative that the streets were paved with gold under Bill Clinton.  They cite Clinton’s tax hikes as proving that high taxes and a healthy economy go hand in hand.

That it erally isn’t true doesn’t mean a thing to them.

For one thing, Bill Clinton LOWERED the capital gains tax even as he raised the income tax.  That offset is completely off the modern Marxist Democrats’ radar now, but it was an essential offset, a sine qua non without which there would have been no healthy economy.  Because low taxes HELP create a healthy economy.  It is simply a fact.

Another thing that is important to consider is that a primary cause of the economic health of the 1990s had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Bill Clinton.  The presidents who created that condition – the collapse of the Soviet Union and the opening of many markets that had previously been completely inaccessible to the United States – were Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush.

In the short-term aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union there was – unsurprisingly – a severe recession.  Why was this not surprising?  Two reasons:  Because 1) investors don’t like uncertainty; and the world was a very uncertain place the first few years after the U.S.S.R. imploded as breakaway republics and unaccounted-for nuclear weapons abounded.  And because 2) Western Europe went into a deep recession due to the fact that suddenly they were inheriting the shambles of the Soviet economy that had resulted from all the liberal socialism of the communist Soviet Union.  Our major trading partners got weaker, which reduced their purchase of American products, which in turn affected the American economy.  Obama has in fact been using that very same argument to try to claim that he wasn’t responsible for the failure of his economy the last three years.

By the time Bill Clinton was elected president in 1992, the world was beginning to recover from the collapse of the Soviet Union.  New markets were opening.  We were about to enter boom times.

But that still leaves a third thing to consider about the Clinton years.  They didn’t start out so well: remember 1994?  Remember that historic asskicking of Democrats in the midterm elections?  Things weren’t going well at ALL; and it wasn’t until after the American people wisely elected Republicans to take over both the House of Representatives and the United States Senate that things BEGAN to start going well.

Democrats give Bill Clinton total credit for “balancing the budget.”  But the fact of the matter is that balancing the budget was THE VERY FIRST PLATFORM OF THE FAMOUS REPUBLICAN CONTRACT WITH AMERICA.  Things that were instrumental to balancing the budget – such as welfare reform – were FORCED on Bill Clinton.  Clinton vetoed welfare reform TWICE before signing the same thing he’d vetoed into law.  And then Clinton took credit for the thing he’d twice vetoed that was ultimately shoved down his throat.  And with the help of a completely dishonest media, he managed to sell that lie.

But all in all, the 1990s (under the wise leadership of Republicans who controlled two of the three political branches of government after 1994) were good years.  And they were years in which the wealthy had the largest share of the wealth in America of ALL TIME.

Which simply proves that the demagogic, Marxist, dishonest tirades that Obama, Democrats and liberals are screaming about today about “the rich paying their fair share” is simply a flat-out lie.

After pointing out that Democrats are liars and hypocrites, let me also point out that they are stupid people.  Because believing lies and constantly putting up double-standards doesn’t make one more intelligent; it makes one more stupid.  And the problem with Democrats today is that they are radically committed to a depraved, dishonest and perverted view of the world which cannot possibly be true because everything they believe has been refuted by history time after time.

And so they claim that socialism works when in fact it has failed every single time it has ever been tried.  And they claim that Bill Clinton’s tax policies more fairly distributed wealth when in fact it did the exact opposite.

What we have seen again and again is that when taxes are lowered, the rich have more incentive to invest and risk their money creating jobs.  Why?  BECAUSE THEY ARE REWARDED FOR DOING SO AND THEY ARE ALLOWED TO KEEP MORE OF WHAT THEY EARN.  Conversely, when demagogues demand that “the rich pay their fair share” (when all dishonest lies aside the facts are that they already pay FAR more than their “fair share“), the rich shelter their money and the economy contracts instead of expanding.  The rich aren’t going to risk their wealth with job-creating investments if they are demonized.  And you tell me how many poor people have given you a job and made you rich.

Another way to put it is this: we tax cigarettes to reduce smoking; so why in the HELL do Democrats want to tax investment???

Even Bill Clinton has pointed out that raising taxes won’t work.  Hell, even BARACK OBAMA has said that raising taxes in a recession is bonehead stupid:

“First of all, he’s right. Normally, you don’t raise taxes in a recession, which is why we haven’t and why we’ve instead cut taxes. So I guess what I’d say to Scott is – his economics are right. You don’t raise taxes in a recession. We haven’t raised taxes in a recession.”

And yet here he is, trying to do what he himself said was “the last thing you want to do.”

Which is another way of saying the first thing the American people should want to do is throw this useless bum out of the people’s house.

This is breathtaking stupidity; and yet the stupider I believe Democrats are, the more right I turn out to be. 

Barack Obama understands that Democrats are unbelievably stupid people who live in a world of lies.  And he’s counting on that stupidity to try to lie his way to re-election.  That’s the bottom line.

If you want to see liberal hypocrisy in action, just look at the Occupy Wall Street movement and the liberal media coverage of the movement. These are people who have every single Apple gadget in their hands, but are decrying the very capitalism that Apple so profitably exploited. The fact of the matter is that Apple has a FAR higher profit margin than either the oil companies or the banks that these loathsome hypocrites demonize, but consistency is simply not a virtue they care about. Furthermore, they have nothing to say about the greatest crony capitalist boondoggle ever seen: the Obama-backed Solyndra fiasco. And if that isn’t enough to demonstrate the hypocrisy that the left wallows in, consider the fact that the “whiteness” of the Tea Party demonstrators was brought up by the mainstream media over and over and over again to decry the movement as “racist.” And yet where are all the charges of racism now when the leftwing Occupy Wall Street movement is every scintilla as “white” as the Tea Party was??? Ninety-nine percent of the Occupy Wall Street demonstrators are WHITE. And they are clearly racist, too as they blame all the problems in their terrible useless lives on the Jews.  But suddenly no one in the mainstream media seems to care about the whiteness of the mob – or this particular mob’s active racism – any more.

Nazis, Socialists, Communists, Liberals, Democrats, Obama, Media Propaganda ALL Support Occupy Wall Street

October 17, 2011

In preamble to the following article, I disagree with David Martosko that having Nazis and liberals together in any way counts as “strange bedfellows.”  If you understand the platform that brought the Nazis to power in the first place, and if you understand that “Nazi” itself stands for “National SOCIALIST German WORKERS Party,” and if you understand that Nazism was all about big government socialist tyranny, you know that it is absolutely within the character of the Nazis to support yet another leftwing movement.  Just as it is absolutely within the character of the left to embrace the support of the most vile organizations on earth.

Red, White and Angry
: Communist, Nazi parties endorse ‘Occupy’ protests
By David Martosko Published: 12:31 AM 10/17/2011 | Updated: 4:28 PM 10/17/2011

In a move that may redefine the term “strange bedfellows,” the American Nazi Party issued an official endorsement of the Occupy Wall Street protest movement on Sunday afternoon. The announcement put the organization, a self-described “National Socialist” political party, in company with the Socialist Party USA, which explained its own support for the left-wing protesters in a nationwide conference call last Tuesday night, crediting organized labor with the protests’ strength and sophistication to date.

The American Nazi Party is the most politically sophisticated U.S. remnant — but by no means the only one — of white supremacist Adolph Hitler’s murderous 20th century movement, which sought to establish socialism for Aryans, and to subjugate non-Aryans. The party calls Hitler’s Mein Kampf “an ideological blueprint for healthy Aryan survival.”

In its statement on Sunday, the Westland, Mich.-based Nazi party wrote that the Occupy Wall Street protests are “TAYLOR [sic] MADE for National Socialists, as well as WN [White Nationalists] who are serious about DOING SOMETHING.”

“I urgently URGE all of you,” the statement’s unnamed author added, “to TAKE PART and JOIN IN when these protests hit your neck of the woods. Produce some flyers EXPLAINING the ‘JEW BANKER’ influence — DON’T wear anything marking you as an ‘evil racist’ — and GET OUT THERE and SPREAD the WORD!”

While Nazis seem unenthusiastic about visibly linking their flagship organization to the vocal protests that have popped up in dozens of U.S. cities, the same can’t be said of the Communist Party USA.

John Bachtell, an Illinois-based community organizer and Communist Party USA board member, addressed the “Occupy Chicago” protest on Saturday.

“I bring greetings and solidarity from the Communist Party,” Bachtell said to hoots and applause. “We are here, marching side-by-side. We’ll sleep here. We’ll be with this movement ’til the very – ’til we make all the changes that we know we have to make.”

This is a movement that believes that sustantially believes that the U.S. government is no better than Al Qaeda.

There have been hundreds of arrests in this movement.  In fact, at least EIGHT HUNDRED leftists have been arrested at Occupy Wall Street events.  Versus almost ZERO arrests for the Tea Party – which has been demonstrating for going on three years.  And yet the liberal hypocrite cockroaches in both the mainstream media and the Democrat Party deceitfully depicted the Tea Party movement as “violent” while they depict the Occupy Wall Street movement as positive.  In the same way, the Tea Party was denounced as “racist” because the Tea Party demonstrators were mostly white; while the fact that the Occupy Wall Street movement is almost entirely white has gone completely unnoticed in the dishonest mainstream media propaganda machine.  Because they are liars without a scintilla of shame or integrity or honor.

I’ve been pointing out that Nazism was leftwing for years now:

Liberal Rallies Pimp Hard-Core Totalitarian Socialism

Why I Call Obama A Fascist

Mainstream Media Propaganda Machine Turns Other Way As Democrats Now Want To ‘Get A Little Bloody’

Leftwing Violence And Media Propaganda/Coverup Continues Unabated

Lest We Forget: Liberal Progressive ‘Science’ Was At The Core Of The Holocaust

Helen Thomas, Liberal Journalist, Useful Idiot And Typical Progressive Bigot

Liberals Really WOULD Like To Live Under Kim Jong Il’s Regime

The Democrat Party Is Different From The Communist Party How, Exactly???

The Manhattan Declaration As The New Barmen Declaration

Democrats’ Pseudo-Demonization Again On Display

Health Care Debate: As Charges of Nazism Abound, Which Side Is Right?

How Postmodernism Leads To Fascism (part 1)

Jeremiah Wright’s Stupid Views on Black and White Learning

It’s nice to have the validation of the American Nazi Party helping me prove my case.

If The Occupy Wall Street Crowd Had Any Integrity, They’d Be Attacking Obama (Who Has Raked In More Wall Street $ Than ANYONE)

October 11, 2011

I don’t want anyone to get hurt, so please make sure your seated before you read the next line.

The Occupy Wall Street mob, you know, the (what was that word Nancy Pelosi used to denounce the Tea Party movement?) Astroturfers manufactured by George Soros and Big Labor, are a giant gathering of hypocrites.

I know.  It’s just amazing, isn’t it?

But with all the outrage being directed at “Wall Street fat cats,” here is the actual truth:

Guess which President has raked in the most Wall Street bucks in a generation?
posted at 11:25 am on October 10, 2011 by Ed Morrissey

While the professional Left trashes Wall Street, they might want to consider how their current President got elected. The Sunlight Foundation reports that Barack Obama didn’t just win the Wall Street sweepstakes in 2008 over John McCain — he’s done better at getting Wall Street cash than any other President in the last 20 years:

Despite his rhetorical attacks on Wall Street, a study by the Sunlight Foundation’s Influence Project shows that President Barack Obama has received more money from Wall Street than any other politician over the past 20 years, including former President George W. Bush.

In 2008, Wall Street’s largesse accounted for 20 percent of Obama’s total take, according to Reuters. …

By the end of Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign, executives and others connected with Wall Street firms, such as Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Citigroup, UBS AG, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley, poured nearly $15.8 million into his coffers.

Goldman Sachs contributed slightly over $1 million to Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, compared with a little over $394,600 to the 2004 Bush campaign. Citigroup gave $736,771 to Obama in 2008, compared with $320,820 to Bush in 2004. Executives and others connected with the Swiss bank UBS AG donated $539,424 to Obama’s 2008 campaign, compared with $416,950 to Bush in 2004. And JP Morgan Chase gave Obama’s campaign $808,799 in 2008, but did not show up among Bush’s top donors in 2004, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

That’s not limited to the 2008 cycle, either. The same people under attack from Obama’s political allies are still lining up to dump cash on the incumbent — or at least were:

So far Wall Street has raised $7.2 million in the current electoral cycle for President Obama, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Obama’s 2012 Wall Street bundlers include people like Jon Corzine, former Goldman Sachs CEO and former New Jersey governor; Azita Raji, a former investment banker for JP Morgan; and Charles Myers, an executive with the investment bank Evercore Partners.

Those figures predate Obama’s sudden class-warrior pose of the last four weeks, though. After watching Obama incite these demonstrations aimed at intimidating investors and financiers, I wonder just how anxious they will be to continue funding Obama’s campaign. That impact won’t be clear until the 4th quarter numbers are released in January, but don’t be surprised if all of these “Occupy” protests don’t push those contributors towards an eventual Republican nominee — or maybe even a particular contender, perhaps one that comes from their world. Hmmmm.

In my maiden column for The Fiscal Times, I look at the eruption of class warfare in American politics and the irony of a generation shaped by Steve Jobs attacking the very investor market and private-property rights that made Jobs’ success possible:

As we honor Jobs, there is no small irony in the fact that Wall Street protests are coinciding with his death. Jobs was hardly a financial wallflower: Besides his extensive holdings in and control of Apple (part of a fortune estimated at more than $6.5 billion to $7 billion by Forbes), he was the largest individual shareholder in Disney, thanks to the sale of Pixar a few years ago, and a member of its board as well. It’s likely that a large number of the youthful protesters in the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations rely on products Jobs either invented or improved; many might even be using iPhones and iPads to help coordinate their efforts. None of that would have been possible without capital risk-taking and Wall Street investment in Apple, among other companies.

Think of the world before Jobs, before a handful of bright young minds began exploring the potential of small, relatively inexpensive computing. Communication meant either writing letters or picking up a phone – with service largely provided by a national monopoly. Having access to research materials meant buying an encyclopedia and subscribing to yearbooks for updates to already obsolete data, or spending plenty of time at the local library. News from around the world came to most people either from the only major newspaper in town or one of three national broadcast networks. Social networking meant going to cocktail parties and company events.

Compared with today, that sounds positively medieval, doesn’t it? …

Contrast the explosive success of personal computing, which lacked heavy government direction, to that of solar and wind power. Federal and state governments have subsidized and regulated these industries for decades, and they have deliberately handicapped other traditional energy-production technologies to make the renewables more competitive. According to Reason Magazine, each megawatt-hour of energy produced by wind and solar power in 2007 was delivered via more than $20 ofgovernment subsidies, as opposed to $2 for nuclear power and a dollar or less for coal and oil – most of those in the form of tax incentives rather than direct subsidies.

With all of that effort over several decades, are we closer to mass-produced solar and wind power? Have these industries even matured to the point of producing jobs? The industries that Jobs, Gates, and their colleagues created through private-sector innovation based on technological success employ millions of people around the world. In 2009, President Obama got $38.6 billion in job-stimulus funding to create a “green jobs” explosion that would also employ millions. Thirty months later, we have spent $17.2 billion of those funds, and created less than 3,600 jobs, roughly at a cost of $4.85 million per position.

Capital markets drive innovation, create and expand industries, and can rapidly improve our lives — if we keep government out of the way, and certainly out of the position of distorting markets to favor losers over productive use of capital and especially redistributive policies. As Wall Street has learned, three years of accelerated redistribution didn’t satisfy the Left — it only drove them to demand more of it. Time to end the war on capital by defunding the anti-capitalists.

And:

Cream of the Crop Gone Sour: America’s Troubled CEOs

The executives who ran the nation’s biggest banks and corporations were trained at some of the country’s top universities

The final tab: :

Harvard: 11
Columbia: 6
Chicago: 4
Duke: 4
Stanford: 4
American University: 2
MIT: 2
NYU: 2
Tufts: 2
University of Iowa: 2

Open Secrets Obama Top 20 Contributors in 2008:

University of California $1,648,685
Goldman Sachs $1,013,091
Harvard University $864,654
Microsoft Corp $852,167
Google Inc $814,540
JPMorgan Chase & Co $808,799
Citigroup Inc $736,771
Time Warner $624,618
Sidley Austin LLP $600,298
Stanford University $595,716
National Amusements Inc $563,798
Wilmerhale Llp $550,168
Skadden, Arps et al $543,539
Columbia University $541,002
UBS AG $532,674
IBM Corp $532,372
General Electric $529,855
US Government $517,908
Morgan Stanley $512,232
Latham & Watkins $503,295

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com

Barack Obama is owned lock, stock and barell by the very people whom the Occupy Wall Street fascists say are most responsible.  And the funniest thing of all is they’re going to go vote in 2012 for the very same corrupt bastards who brought America down and who paid Obama to KEEP bringing America down.

It would be funny if it wasn’t causing so much destruction to the formerly greatest nation in the history of the world.

Here’s a nice counter-protest sign for these hypocrites:

.