Of the sons of Issachar, men who understood the times, with knowledge of what Israel should do, their chiefs were two hundred; and all their kinsmen were at their command — 1 Chronicles 12:32
I have been warning about this and lo and behold as I read the Los Angeles Slimes this morning I see it beginning. In fact, we’ve already seen it begin.
Given that according to the doctrines of homosexual marriage, marriage is about “the right to choose” rather than about the fabric of the basic morality of a society and civilization as it had ALWAYS been throughout human history until now, and given that according to the dictates of abortion a child has the “right to choose” to kill her baby, what happens when young children want to “be” with older … lets just call them what they ARE– molesters???
The simple FACT of the matter is that every homosexual has ALWAYS had the very same right to marriage that I have had: a homosexual man, for example, has the right to marry any adult woman who will have him, the SAME AS ME. But homosexual marriage isn’t about “rights”; it is about perversion and imposing perversion on the rest of society and ultimately it is about the celebration of perversion as a society goes completely morally bankrupt before it collapses as all other morally bankrupt civilizations have always collapsed before.
If a little girl has the right to decide to kill her baby in abortion (presupposing that she already acted on her “right” to be sexual), how is it that she doesn’t have the right to be with the man who impregnated her??? Why is a girl who is obviously – in the eyes of liberals and in the eyes of liberal judges – “adult enough” to choose a dangerous medical procedure WITHOUT HER PARENTS’ CONSENT, denied the right to be with her lover??? And given homosexual marriage, let me simply put it this way: WHO ARE YOU TO SAY THAT SUCH A RELATIONSHIP IS “WRONG”???
Think about it: in many places, “conversion therapy” (intended to “convert” gays into straights has not merely been outlawed, but literally criminalized. Because #1 according to liberal theory, you can’t “convert” gays into straights, and #2 it is immoral to try to “convert” them because that is who they are. Now apply that to pedophiles – because at least #1 is EVERY BIT as true for pedophiles as it is for homosexuals – and see what happens:
Pedophilia, the sexual attraction to children who have not yet reached puberty, remains a vexing challenge for clinicians and public officials. Classified as a paraphilia, an abnormal sexual behavior, researchers have found no effective treatment. Like other sexual orientations, pedophilia is unlikely to change. The goal of treatment, therefore, is to prevent someone from acting on pedophile urges — either by decreasing sexual arousal around children or increasing the ability to manage that arousal. But neither is as effective for reducing harm as preventing access to children, or providing close supervision.
Recidivism among sex offenders is quite high, according to the United States Department of Justice. Although not all sex offenders reoffend, they are four times more likely than a criminal convicted of robbery, murder, assault or any other charge. Psychologists believe that recidivism is high among sex offenders because their desire to rape, molest or assault is a psychologically engrained predeliction.
When I was an undergraduate student at Portland State University (Piss U being one of the most liberal universities in liberaldom, as it so happens), I recall reading an article in the university journal which stated that some 80% of homosexual men had been molested as children. The article glossed over that as being a “bad thing,” instead taking the path that however homosexuals became that way, they were queer and they were here, deal with it. But of course first you turn somebody into a victim to create public sympathy for that person/group, and THEN you begin to assert that their behavior isn’t really all that bad and isn’t hurting anybody, and THEN you assert that their behavior is a right and even a positive thing.
Researchers push for APA to destigmatize pedophilia [Excerpts]
Several well-known researchers recently made unexpected arguments on pedophilia at an academic conference in Baltimore.
Liberty Counsel Action’s Matt Barber attended the conference, which was sponsored by B4U-ACT, a Maryland-based organization* of psychiatric practioners seeking to eliminate what it considers “tremendous barriers” among mental health professionals, the public, and “minor-attracted individuals” (pedophiles).
Barber says while at the conference he felt he was on a different planet, as the presenting professionals argued to remove pedophilia from the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). That, he believes, would mean pedophilia would no longer be considered a mental disorder.
“The entire focus of the event was on the victimhood of the pedophile,” Barber accounts. There was “very little concern for the children who are the victims of these individuals when they are raped, who these individuals lust after,” he adds.
And he says the experts’ discussions were focused on “destigmatizing pedophilia … removing the stigma, and [getting] the public to stop demonizing pedophiles.”
APA states it stands firmly behind efforts to criminally prosecute those who abuse and exploit children and adolescents. But Barber is concerned the APA is already moving toward declassifying pedophilia as a mental disorder “by saying that a pedophile is only a pedophile in their latest DSM…if they are distressed by their attractions or behaviors.”
Barber believes that would bring the APA one step closer to de-classifying pedophilia as a mental disorder, as they did homosexuality in the 1970s.
The celebration of pedophilia is coming, and when it comes, it WILL NECCESSARILY come from the left, from liberalism and from the Democrat Party. And how will that NOT happen, given that all of the same exact arguments apply? You can’t “cure” pedophiles; you shouldn’t stigmatize people for embracing their sexual orientation, children have a right to their own bodies, blah blah blah.
Francis Schaeffer – who understood the horror of postmodernism and the absolute dead-end it was for civilization – described a process that we are today seeing over and over again, called “moral velocitization.” Basically, what was unacceptable yesterday begins to be welcomed by some tomorrow, endorsed by more the next day, celebrated by the media culture the day after that, and then institutionalized by liberal judges the day after that.
The celebration of pedophilia will begin the same way it always begins when the left gets behind disgusting and evil behaviors: first you make your pedophiles sympathetic victims and frankly use whatever fictions you can to make your sympathetic victims as “sympathetic” and as much of a “victim” as you possibly can, in a spin narrative designed to elicit sympathy. Consider the case of Roe v. Wade – which was built on the lie that the woman had been GANG RAPED when she in fact hadn’t been raped at all. Decide for yourself: who is more “sympathetic” and who is more of a “victim”? A woman who has been gang raped or a woman who willingly had sex with nature taking its course? The left doesn’t care about “truth” because all they want is their ideology imposed on everybody else. And the same trick was applied to homosexuality, with homosexuals constantly described in terms of sympathetic victims who were having their “rights” taken away (even though they had the same rights to marry the same people that heterosexuals had the right to marry – they just refused and spurned their rights).
As an example, when I was searching the term “homosexual victims” I had to sort through an ocean of articles on homosexuals as “victims” of the Nazis. What of course you really have to search for to learn is that while homosexuals ultimately DID go to the death camps, they only did so AFTER LEADING THE CHARGE FOR NAZISM. We can likewise claim that Obama Democrats are “victims” of ObamaCare and simply ignore the fact that if it hadn’t been for them and their evil support, NOBODY WOULD HAVE BEEN VICTIMS OF OBAMACARE. The truth is that homosexuals DOMINATED the SA – the “Stormtroopers” – that Hitler used in his rise to power to crush rival ideologies. And the SA was gay, GAY, GAY.
NAMBLA has been a member of the International Lesbian and Gay Association for 10 years. We’ve been continuously active in ILGA longer than any other US organization. NAMBLA delegates to ILGA helped write ILGA’s constitution, its official positions on the sexual rights of youth, and its stands against sexual coercion and corporal punishment. We are proud of our contributions in making ILGA a stronger voice for the international gay and lesbian movement and for sexual justice.
In other words, the left ALREADY HAS pushed for the rights of pedophiles to be pedophiles and molest our kids. And they’re going to take it up their vile agenda again, count on it.
The first “gay president” is really also the first “pedophile president,” given that vile appointment of that vile man.
This nation already deserves to burn in hell for what it has already done, let alone what it will still do under the most wicked and demon-possessed president in our nation’s history. We can still turn it around if enough people stand up with enough moral outrage. But I believe it is too late for America. And I believe the beast is coming. And I believe that the Democrat Party will eagerly take the mark of the ultimate big government leader who will lead the world into literal hell on earth.
If you are a Democrat, you are in fact a baby-murdering sodomite worshiper. I don’t care what you say, that’s what you ARE IN FACT given the Democrat Party’s embrace of abortion and militant homosexuality. Don’t tell me you don’t personally support these things, that you just vote for the party and the politicians and the judges those politicians appoint who DO support it. And like it or not, you will all-too-soon be adding child molestation to your list of abominations.
Which is why I believe that a homosexual has the right to marry any legally competent adult of the opposite sex who is stupid enough to have them.
That’s because marriage is the union between one man and one woman – as Obama famously said not only in Rick Warren’s forum, but on the very eve of the 2008 election on November 3rd. But it’s one thing to have “the right to marry” and quite another thing for homosexuals to have the “right” to pervert and degrade marriage to make what was formerly holy matrimony as depraved as they are.
Of course Obama is now celebrated by the left for baiting and switching, much the same way he’s celebrated for demonizing George Bush as being “unpatriotic” and “un-American” for his $4 trillion in debt over eight years before racking up $6 trillion more in debt in only four years.
Under liberalism, abject moral hypocrisy is a virtue. That’s just the way these people are.
And that’s the way all RINOs are, too. They are people who hold up their finger to the political winds and, standing for nothing, shift in whichever direction those winds blow.
Republicans ran a RINO against Barack Obama in 2008. The RINO lost. They ran a RINO against Obama in 2012. And sure as shooting cow pies in place of skeet, the RINO lost.
Rob Portman is clearly hoping to be the RINO who gets to lose in 2016.
I love Portman’s reasoning. His son is homosexual, so he’s for gay marriage.
I mean, if Portman’s kid was a rapist child molester, would Portman suddenly support rape and child molesting? The answer, of course, is that he most certainly WOULDsupport rape and child molesting – if that’s what was popular.
That’s the thing about RINOs. They are morally weak people who stand for nothing.
I think Americans have proven they will vote for somebody who is authentically evil over somebody who is inauthentically a puff of fart gas in the wind.
I am sick to my guts of RINOs. I’ll never vote for a damn RINO again. If Rob Portman is the GOP nominee, I’ll be penciling in Bugs Bunny – who at least always had the virtue of ending up as the winner in all the cartoons.
NAMBLA has been a member of the International Lesbian and Gay Association for 10 years. We’ve been continuously active in ILGA longer than any other US organization. NAMBLA delegates to ILGA helped write ILGA’s constitution, its official positions on the sexual rights of youth, and its stands against sexual coercion and corporal punishment. We are proud of our contributions in making ILGA a stronger voice for the international gay and lesbian movement and for sexual justice.
Given the fact that judges can usurp the clearly expressed will of the people and impose their own “morality” as they choose, it is guaranteed that we will legalize the buggery of young boys down the road. Secular humanism simply doesn’t have the moral resources to prevent it.
Who are you not to allow your little boy to get married to some forty-year old “lover,” you intolerant pig?
Sodomizing young children used to be perfectly fine with the homosexual movement, and you can rest damn assured that it will be for it again – much the way Barack Obama was “for” gay marriage before he was “against” it before he was “for” it again.
Democrats would assure you that such a thing will never happened. Other than the fact that these liberal turds have ALREADY BEEN FOR IT aside, of course. But what happened with your Barack Obamas and your Bill and Hillary Clintons will happen with child molesters, too. Just remember a few facts: 1) pedophiles were born that way as much as homosexuals were born queer; and who are we to legislate against “nature”??? 2) Times have changed, and what was wrong when it was convenient for it to be wrong is now just as right as it used to be wrong. 3) If we allow young girls the choice to get legal and free abortions when their “old man” knocks them up, why shouldn’t we allow young boys the right to bend over for some older man??? And 4) when liberals do it it’s called “evolving” but when conservatives do it its called “flip flopping.”
So let me assure you that as part of Barack Obama’s “fundamental transformation of America” we’re soon going to have child molesters, practitioners of bestiality, and group marriages to be legal. Because, after all, we’re “tolerant,” aren’t we? And these people should all have the right to follow their hearts and marry whomever they wish. And of course if a guy wants to marry his canary, or if a woman wants to marry her stallion so she can be mounted the way she’s always dreamed, then who the hell are YOU to judge, you intolerant prick???
Liberalism guarantees all of this wickedness along with crap that my mind isn’t diseased enough to even imagine. Because that’s the essence of liberalism.
In Romans chapter one, a society continues to morally deteriorate until it sinks to the absolute lowest rock bottom level of moral sewage that sure enough the Democrat Party has sunk America to.
The United States of America used to call itself “one nation under God.” We used to say, “In God we trust.” We put our hands on Bibles when we took sacred oaths, as if we believed that the Book that called homosexuality an “abomination” actually meant something.
God blessed this nation as He has never blessed any other. And when God takes that blessing away, it will amount to a curse such that this nation will fall like no other nation has EVER fallen before. America’s fall will be cataclysmic and catastrophic simply by virtue of the dizzying heights from which we will fall.
When we voted for Barack Obama in 2008, we voted to inherit damnation such as no nation in all of human history has ever experienced. And when we re-elected this wicked man, we confirmed that demand to be “God damn America” as Obama’s reverend and spiritual mentor for over twenty years once screeched from the pulpit of Obama’s church.
This country is going to get the hell it voted for.
The beast is coming. The United States of America will be cheering when he arrives. And nobody will be cheering more loudly than Democrats.
I write this to you as one who sits on the gate of America the way Lot sat on the gate of Sodom, waiting for the brimstone and the fire to start falling.
I found this as laughable as I found it illustrative:
Re “L.A. adds parks to oust sex offenders,” March 1
I am not a sex offender and to my knowledge don’t know any sex offenders. I certainly don’t condone the illegal actions they committed. And under other circumstances, I would think creating more parks is good.
But when I read The Times’ article about L.A. creating a park in order to force sex offenders from their apartments, I was horrified. Sex offenders need homes like everyone else. These people are human beings and need more support from the city, not less. I’m sure most are trying to put their lives back together and to fight their own urges.
If the city wants to help society, it should assist former sex offenders to have decent housing, provide them with social services and help them get jobs, rather than force them onto the streets.
Rebecca RonaCulver City
The Los Angeles Times print version had the title (written by the newspaper) the headline “They’re people, too.” Which is of course a highly debatable assertion as far as most “people” are concerned – excluding liberals, of course. It turns out that government liberalism is FAR more compassionate than God – as long as other people’s money is used to pay for their generosity. God holds people accountable for their actions; God judges SIN. Liberalism, by contrast, is only capable of wanting to expand bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger to beget more liberalism (and thus more wickedness).
Is there anything some low-life, cockroach, pile-of-slime, morally-diseased predator of innocence can do to be denied free “decent housing,” free “social services” and free government-created “jobs”? No. There is not.
Jesus, out of His compassion healed the lepers and forgave the sinners; but that aint NOTHIN’ compared to Obama’s supernatural compassion: he gave the child molesting scum a check paid for by “taxpayers” with only about half of his largesse coming from money we’re borrowing from China but of course promise our children and grandchildren will pay back with plenty of interest.
Because Obama loves those child molesters so much, so big and so loving is his heart, that he will give them the inheritance of our future generations. Who – if they could vote today – would surely all choose to be aborted, according to liberal theology.
And because liberalism is all about growing the size of government which grows just as well when it’s doling out handouts to a degenerate pervert as it can when it’s doling them out to somebody who isn’t a piece of slime. Bureaucracies are needed which are as eternal as the God of Heaven. And the gates of Heaven shall not prevail against these bureaucracies.
The story being alluded to above – “Los Angeles adding parks to force out sex offenders living nearby” is funny because the uberliberal city of Los Angeles that so warmly invited all these pedophiles to come share their bread are now using the contrived government “service” of city parks to drive them out of the houses they gave them in the first place . It wasn’t like these perverts went flocking to Texas, you know. It’s also funny because apparently there’s nothing wrong with discriminating against people because of their sexual orientation, after all. Which is exactly what religious conservatives have been arguing all along.
Liberalism is the constant governing by crisis: they create one crisis (incredibly lax treatment toward pedophiles) and then exploit the failure of their own policy to enact yet another immoral policy. And then exploit that one to enact ANOTHER immoral policy, and so on ad infinitum.
There are idiot liberals who actually have to pay for their morally idiotic bullcrap out of actual budgets and there are the rest of the liberals who think that money can never be considered an object when a pervert is asking for a handout. And the liberal with the budget who doesn’t have Obama’s Federal Reserve Money-Fabricating Machine has to choose reality no matter how repulsive reality is to him.
Another thing that’s funny is that the article occurred on the front page of the March 1, 2013 Los Angeles Times an article on the White House involving itself in the Proposition 8 case before the Supreme Court on behalf of sodomy.
If I were an attorney for a child molester – another liberal profession whose status as “people” is highly debatable – here’s what I would do: I would argue that the City of Los Angeles is discriminating against my sexual orientation. After all, if nobody would choose to be gay, just how many people do you think would choose to be child molesters? Pedophilia isn’t a “choice” any more than homosexuality is a “choice”; these poor victims were born this way, every bit as much as those beloved homosexuals were. And it is moralistic and anachronistic to judge “people” for their sexual preferences.
Liberalism cannot withstand the light of individual personal responsibility any more than vampires cannot withstand the light of God’s sun. They simply must dispense with it all together.
Pedophiles were just born “queer” in a slightly different way, is all.
And of course while homosexual marriage has NEVER been practiced by ANY nation until this last, most wicked generation, pederasty – a.k.a. pedophilia – sure has.
We are a nation in decline amidst a culture that has already spilled right out into a toxic sewer. And Obama is demanding more and more tax hikes to fund more and more of his perversion.
And thanks to liberals, we’re going to be forced to keep paying for it until our complete economic collapse. And then a desperate, hungry people who have already proven how wicked they are will demand that government save them from the disaster that government created. And therefore they will choose more socialism to save them from the disaster of socialism.
There has been considerable controversy over recent comments by Dan Savage, a radical gay rights activist, when he said “we can learn to ignore the bulls–t in the bible..” The YouTube video of the event is below so you can watch it yourself. However this is not the first or the worst or most radical of this man’s hateful outbursts. He is also very outspoken on issues such as pedophilia.
One of many examples is a column where he wrote that “we need to acknowledge the existence of good pedophiles”.
I’m not stupid or evil, so I’m not gonna do anything. I’m not even gonna look at porn. I don’t even look at kids in public, and anyone of whatever orientation who’s been to a crowded beach knows how hard that can be.
So what the fuck should I do? Chemical castration? But I haven’t DONE anything and I don’t plan to. Am I obliged to tell anyone? Good way to lose friends and get the shit kicked out of me. Can I keep babysitting my friends’ kids when they need a hand? After all, if I were into adult women, people wouldn’t see anything wrong with leaving me alone with a couple of those.
My sex drive was put together wrong, Dan. What the fuck do I do? Live alone and hope Japan starts producing affordable sexbots before I’m too old to care?
You know, theoretically. If I were a pedophile.
Knows It’s Wrong
“My heart goes out to people to whom nature has given something as powerful and as distracting as a sex drive and no healthy way to express it,” says Dr. James Cantor, a psychologist and the editor in chief of the research journal Sexual Abuse. “Pedophiles are not the only folks in this position, but they are by far the most demonized, regardless of whether they have ever actually caused anyone any kind of harm.”
My heart is going out to you, too, KIW. As I’ve written before, we should acknowledge the existence of “good pedophiles,” who are burdened with a sexual interest in children but who possess the moral sense to resist acting on that interest. It’s a lifelong struggle for “good pedophiles,” and most manage to succeed without any emotional support—to say nothing of credit—whatsoever.
Unfortunately, science doesn’t know much about pedophiles like you, pedophiles who haven’t done anything, because the social stigma is so great that most nonoffending pedophiles never seek treatment. And what research has been done, says Cantor, isn’t very encouraging if you’re looking to free yourself from your attraction to children.
“There is no known way of turning a pedophile into a nonpedophile,” says Cantor. “The best we can do is help a person maximize their self-control and to help them build an otherwise happy and productive life.”
The psychotherapies that are available, says Cantor, “were designed to assist people who have already committed an offense. These therapies have less to provide to people who already have the skills and drive to keep themselves from ‘acting out.’” Your best option, according to Cantor, may be the one you’re clearly not too enthused about: “Castration, both chemical and physical,” says Cantor, “can indeed be used to eliminate or take the edge off one’s sex drive.”
“Nonoffender pedophiles have told me that chemical castration has given them relief,” Cantor adds. “So it’s unfortunate that we use the term ‘chemical castration,’ which evokes all kinds of emotions. When you get right down to it, we are talking only about taking the same medication used by, for example, prostate-cancer patients—some cancers are accelerated by testosterone, so blocking testosterone is part of the treatment.”
And as for babysitting …
“It is true that a regular, heterosexual man is not going to commit an offense against every woman he finds attractive; however, most women are capable of recognizing when an interaction is starting to go south. Most children are not. So although there is every reason to believe that there exist cats that can successfully be in charge of the canary, it’s not a good idea for the cat to be the one making that call.”
So no babysitting for you, KIW—to protect the kids, first and foremost, but yourself as well. If it ever comes out that you are a pedophile and you were in the habit of babysitting-without-touching, your friends are unlikely to take your protestations—you’ve never touched a child—at face value.
“I wish I had better news,” concludes Cantor. “I also wish that more people did good research on this so that one day I could have better news to give.”
One of the reasons given for the nomination of Pope John Paul II for sainthood is that he “whipped himself with a belt, even on vacation,” according to a new book. If that’s what it takes, why isn’t David Carradine a saint? What is the link between Catholicism and sadomasochism? As a former seminarian, perhaps you can explain this.
When Holiness Is Painful
First, I was in the preparatory seminary—a high school for boys considering the priesthood—not a full-blown seminary, WHIP. (I stopped considering the priesthood when it dawned on me that I could still wear dresses, fuck boys, and live in a big house filled with Catholic kitsch without becoming a priest.)
Good for you, Dan Savage: you despise Jesus Christ and Christianity and the Catholic Church as much as your Democrat Party and your war-on-religion president.
You’ve got to start somewhere, so follow the path of societal acceptance for depraved behavior the way the left has ALWAYS done it before: demand that they be viewed as “human just like everyone else” and demand that they be accorded rights and respect. THENyou later demand that since they’re decent, respectable people their vile behavior can’t be viewed as vile anymore. It’s been part of their playbook over and over again and it worked which is why America and Western Europe is so astonishingly morally-velocitized with behavior that was utterly unacceptable just a generation ago being openly celebrated now. So let’s “Play it again, Sam” with pedophiles.
We’re told over and over again that it is a “scientific fact” that homosexuals are born gay and therefore it’s clearly okay to be gay.
Well, if you’re born gay, you’re born pedophile too. And therefore it’s okay to sodomize your little Johnny while you’re not looking. And what if little Johnny wants to be sodomized? And it is not one iota less okay to be a pedophile than it is to be gay. Because the exact same justification for the one justifies the other.
Don’t you think for one nano-second that this incredibly vile and blatantly evil idea of promoting pedophilia is not right now at the heart of the Democrat Party today.
The Violence Gene Impulsive aggression can be inherited.
by Victor Limjoco
published online April 14, 2006
With swelling prison populations, researchers are trying to understand the biology behind aggressive behavior. National Institute of Mental Health scientist Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg is looking for clues to how genes wire our brains early in life.
“One of the most fascinating things,” Meyer-Lindenberg says, about this field of science called psychiatric genetics, “is how it is possible that genes [can] encode for molecules that affect something as complex as behavior, even psychiatric illness such as depression and social behavior.”
He’s focusing on a specific gene that was previously linked to impulsive violence. A study in 2002 found that subjects with a particular form of a gene had a significantly higher risk of violence, but only in certain populations.
Genes can affect complex behaviors like aggression, because they direct the production of proteins – the building blocks of living systems. Certain types of proteins, called enzymes, break down chemicals in the brain, most notably, serotonin – a chemical messenger in the brain that helps brains cells communicate to each other.
To isolate how a variation in this gene, called the L version of MAO-A, might affect the wiring of the brain, Meyer-Lindenberg took MRI brain scans of more than 100 healthy volunteers. Since this genetic variation is common in our population, some of the volunteers had this variation, and some didn’t.
He showed them pictures of angry and fearful faces and other disturbing images, like those of an angry dog or of a gun pointed towards the screen.
As he wrote in “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences” those with the aggression-related form of the gene responded to the pictures with increased activity in the amygdala – the brain area that detects danger, but less activity in the cingulate cortex – the brain region that is believed to control aggression.
These brain patterns have been linked to impulsive violence, but Meyer-Lindenberg cautions in his paper, ” …because our sample was psychiatrically normal, the variation observed is clearly compatible with normal mental health and does not imply or suggest increased risk for violence in our sample.”
There are many possible factors at work, he says, and violence is an extremely complex behavior. “Whether or not any given person in any given situation will become violent is known to be almost impossible to predict.”
But the findings are still significant, Meyer-Lindenberg says, because, ” …it gives us a handle for the first time into a genetic risk for violence.”
And so when I finally lose it and grab my baseball bat and beat every liberal I come across to a violent and gory death, you liberals had damned well better smile tolerantly and say, “I’m so happy that you’re finally free to express your true self.” And don’t you ever forget that you can’t blame a person for violent behavior any more than you can blame that homosexual.
I’ll bet that the same research proves that babies have a genetic predisposition to be aborted, too.
Unless you possess something called moral common sense – but that would automatically exclude you from being a Democrat, wouldn’t it?
For the record, I don’t doubt that people have genetic predispositions to crappy behaviors BECAUSE I’M A CHRISTIAN WHO READS HIS BIBLE AND READ ABOUT THE FALL OF MAN INTO SIN. But I also know that the same God who created us created us in His image. And part of the essence of the Imago Dei is personal freedom and personal responsibility. Maybe I was born with the deck stacked against me in some way or ways; but I guarantee you that somebody else was born with that same deck stacked even worse against him or her – and that person triumphed over that and a lot of other hereditary obstacles.
But it should be pointed out that consistent atheism, which represents itself to be the most rational and logical of all approaches to reality, is in actuality completely self-defeating and incapable of logical defense. That is to say, if indeed all matter has combined by mere chance, unguided by any Higher Power of Transcendental Intelligence, then it necessarily follows that the molecules of the human brain are also the product of mere chance. In other words, we think the way we do simply because the atoms and molecules of our brain tissue happen to have combined in the way they have, totally without transcendental guidance or control. So then even the philosophies of men, their system of logic and all their approaches to reality are the result of mere fortuity. There is no absolute validity to any argument advanced by the atheist against the position of theism.
On the basis of his own presuppositions, the atheist completely cancels himself out, for on his own premises his arguments are without any absolute validity. By his own confession he thinks the way he does simply because the atoms in his brain happen to combine the way they do. If this is so, he cannot honestly say that his view is any more valid than the contrary view of his opponent. His basic postulates are self-contradictory and self-defeating; for when he asserts that there are no absolutes, he thereby is asserting a very dogmatic absolute. Nor can he logically disprove the existence of God without resorting to a logic that depends on the existence of God for its validity. Apart from such a transcendent guarantor of the validity of logic, any attempts at logic or argumentation are simply manifestations of the behavior of the collocation of molecules that make up the thinker’s brain. — Gleason Archer, Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties, pp. 55-56
I simply point out to liberals that MY brain was the product of an intelligent designer and is fearfully and wonderfully made, whereas YOUR brain is the random agglomeration of molecules that happened to come together for no particular reason and I should therefore trust my opinions a lot more than I trust yours.
Liberals – be they political or theological (they’re invariably the same people, for what it’s worth) – have abandoned so many truths that it is becoming increasingly impossible for them to comprehend ANY truth at all. And that’s why we’re seeing more and more craven jackasses like Dan Savage crawling out of the left.
The Bible describes the progression into total depravity:
The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities–his eternal power and divine nature–have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles. Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator–who is forever praised. Amen. Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done. — Romans 1:18-28
And so we have the map of the degeneration of man from the Imago Dei to Democrat.
“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?”
– Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme
“A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States. De-development means bringing our economic system into line with the realities of ecology and the world resource situation.”
– Paul Ehrlich, Professor of Population Studies
“The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can’t let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the US. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are.”
– Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund
“Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control.”
– Professor Maurice King
“We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists and their projects. We must reclaim the roads and plowed land, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of acres of presently settled land.”
– David Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!
“Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it.”
– Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute
“The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet.”
– Jeremy Rifkin, Greenhouse Crisis Foundation
“Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced — a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level.”
– UN Agenda 21
“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
– Club of Rome, premier environmental think-tank, consultants to the United Nations
“It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true.”
– Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis…”
– David Rockefeller, Club of Rome executive member
“The goal now is a socialist, redistributionist society, which is nature’s proper steward and society’s only hope.”
– David Brower, founder of Friends of the Earth
“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?”
– Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme
“A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States. De-development means bringing our economic system into line with the realities of ecology and the world resource situation.”
– Paul Ehrlich, Professor of Population Studies
“Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control.”
– Professor Maurice King
“Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it.”
– Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute
“The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet.”
– Jeremy Rifkin, Greenhouse Crisis Foundation
“The big threat to the planet is people: there are too many, doing too well economically and burning too much oil.”
– Sir James Lovelock, BBC Interview
“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.” – Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!
“Mankind is the most dangerous, destructive, selfish and unethical animal on the earth.”
– Michael Fox, vice-president of The Humane Society
“Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.”
– John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal
“Humans on the Earth behave in some ways like a pathogenic micro-organism, or like the cells of a tumor.”
– Sir James Lovelock, Healing Gaia
“The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man.”
– Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point
“A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible.”
– United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment
“A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.”
– Prof Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb
“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
– Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor [and major DEMOCRAT PARTY DONOR]
I believe I have amply established that if you look at the left, you look at the heart of evil and the bottom “whale-crap” level of depravity as set forth by the Word of God in Romans chapter one.
Democrats are 100% responsible for the murder of FIFTY-FOUR MILLIONinnocent human beings through the abortion mills that they and they alone champion. The shocking moral crimes of the Democrat Party dwarf even Adolf Hitler’s. And Democrats who think that they aren’t responsible for that slaughter because they don’t believe developing children in the womb are human beings are going to be every bit as surprised as the Nazis who will be shocked to find out that JEWS are actually human beings.
And in their very own words they are literally out to exterminate at least half and as many as 95% of all the human beings who are living on planet earth right now.
When God said, “all those who hate Me love death” in His Word (Proverbs 8:36), He knew in His divine foreknowledge that the Democrat Party was coming in the last days.
You might be a Democrat saying, “I don’t support any of this crap.” I point out that you are in fact a liar and a fool: BECAUSE THE DEMOCRAT PARTY LEADERSHIP THAT YOU HAVE KEPT IN POWER DOES. And when you vote Democrat, you vote for the hellish leadership and the hellish agenda of the Democrat Party. And you will one day be held to account.
You read Romans chapter one and you see the complete degeneration of the human race into abject depravity and it reads “one day the Democrat Party will come.” Because the radical environmentalism and the radical homosexual agenda that God warned about are the heart and soul of the Democrat Party today. Isaiah 5:20 summed up the Democrat Party’s mindset in the words:
“Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!”
Micah 5:2 sets forth a similar warning – “You who hate good and love evil, Who tear off their skin from them And their flesh from their bones” – in words that ought to remind you of what happens to innocent babies during the horror of abortion.
Let me warn you: the beast is coming. I’ve warned about that soon-coming day many times on this blog. The policies of the socialist left – and most certainly the policies of American Democrats – has dramatically increased the pace by which the beast is coming. Soon the world economies will collapse, and the only question is whether that collapse will be led by socialist Europe imploding first or Obama’s God damn America imploding first. In Europe, countries that barely even TRIED austerity as the only possible means to deal with their socialist-caused debt crisis are now demanding that they dive further into socialism – in effect saying the answer to solving the problem of crippling debt is to dramatically accelerate the rate of debt-spending. France is poised to elect open socialists. That is the way to hell, and the rest of the world will ultimately follow France into hell. In the ruins that we can already see coming, just as we can already hear the coming hoofbeats of the four horsemen of the Apocalypse, there will emerge a man who will come to the rescue to save the world from the collapse that socialism created. The left believes government is the only solution to the problems of man and society. Essentially, they see big government as savior. Worship of the state is their real religion. And don’t mistake me: the Democrat Party in God damn America will gladly worship him and take his mark. It won’t take long – only seven years – for every promise and every premise of the “global unity” that the left has been hungrily seeking to turn into total hell on earth. And then every baby-murdering Antichrist-worshiping Democrat will get the eternity they sowed for themselves.
We live in an OWS/Occupy Movement versus Tea Party world. And we can see that a growing number of people in America and around the world are getting ready to worship the beast.
Start Thinking Right 