Posts Tagged ‘prisoners’

Why Did Obama Trade 5 Terrorist Generals To Get Back An American Traitor And Then Leave Four Innocent Americans To Languish In Iran?

July 16, 2015

Barack Hussein Obama responded like the pissy, thin-skinned, malignant narcissist that he is when asked a question about why he abandoned four American hostages held in Iran so he could celebrate his horrible nuclear deal.

Remember that Bowe Bergdahl trade?  Remember all the lies that Obama told and told his thugs to go out and spread in his regime’s propaganda?

Remember Obama instructing Susan Rice – who is now using all the “integrity” she’s amassed to tell us the Iran deal is a very, very good deal for America – to tell the American people that a man that we now know was a deserter and a traitor “served the United States with honor and distinction.”

Do you remember the self-righteous, hoity-toity, how-dare-you-question-us, rationale Obama used to defend trading five terrorist generals with blood on their hands whom everyone knew would return to the battlefield for a traitor?  Obama said that we have:

made an ironclad commitment to bring our prisoners of war home.”

Well, the United States has been at war with Iran since 1979, when they seized our embassy (otherwise known as an act of WAR) and seized all embassy staff and our Marines and held them hostage for 444 agonizing days.

For the record, that is why the United States seized all Iranian assets on November 14, 1979: because Iran committed an act of war against the United States.

Iran has engaged in the most vicious kind of war by proxy against the United States ever since.  Just recently, the blood of at least 500 American servicemen was DIRECTLY LINKED to the nation of Iran.

One of the PRISONERS OF WAR illegally held in Iran was a former FBI agent who was working for the CIA when Iran abducted him.

Another PRISONER OF WAR illegally held in Iran was a U.S. Marine who went back to visit his grandmother.

Obama also shows his utter disdain and contempt for America and for the American way of life in his refusal to lift a finger to help the other two PRISONERS OF WAR.  Because one is a Christian minister who represents freedom of religion that Obama rabidly despises and the other is a reporter who represents the freedom of an objective press.

These PRISONERS OF WAR – a war that Iran has waged against the United States of America without abatement for 36 years – have been abandoned by Barack Hussein Obama.

Apparently because they are not traitors to the United States of America, because were they such they would merit opening up all of our jails for terrorist to release the rest of the men who have murdered Americans.

Obama’s ridiculous claim is that he didn’t want to somehow conflate the nuclear deal with anything that wasn’t directly related to nuclear weapons.

You know, maybe that would be a valid approach – HAD OBAMA ACTUALLY DONE THAT.

But here’s my question: the United States released $150 billion that had been held since Iran’s act of war against the United States in 1979.  What the hell did releasing that money have to do with “nuclear weapons”???  The United States is allowing Iran to amass a giant conventional weapon arsenal, which includes ballistic missiles.  Since when were conventional weapons the same thing as nuclear weapons?  And most egregiously, Obama allowed a known terrorist – Qassem Suleimani – to get a sweetheart deal.  What the hell does THAT have to do with nuclear weapons?

I mean, seriously, given that Iran showed their trustworthiness by JUST HAVING ILLEGALLY PURSUED WEAPONS THEY WERE NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE, AND HAS REPEATEDLY DEMONSTRATED A PATTERN OF IGNORING THEIR AGREEMENTS AND U.N. SANCTIONS, maybe, just maybe Obama should have added a couple of conditions of his own.

So apparently, Obama would allow NOTHING in the discussion to interfere with nuclear weapons unless it actually hurt the United States.  Obama would allow NOTHING that would help the United States or allow the United States to have the honor of getting its people back.

There are two nations that have demonstrated their complete abandonment of trust: Iran, for breaking its agreements, and the United States of America under Barack Hussein Obama for ignoring the violations of those agreements that he had a legal obligation to enforce.

We got absolutely NOTHING from this deal.  The moment Iran has a ballistic missile – which they may very well not have been able to buy or develop had it not been for this damned deal of Obama’s – Iran will become a full-fledged nuclear-weaponized country.

And Obama has already started a nuclear arms race in the craziest part of the world through his “deal.”  Thanks to Obama’s insane and immoral deal, Israel and Saudi Arabia actually are eye to eye: BOTH believe it’s awful and gives the worst regime on earth more power than they have EVER had in history.  And like Israel, our former Arab Allies – allies since the 1930s, for the record – are now walking away from a United States that they can no longer trust and entering into nuclear contracts with our other worst enemy, Russia.  There are now TWELVE Arab countries looking into going nuclear thanks to Obama and his damned deal.

Obama’s logic is this: if a traitor removes his uniform, leaves his base and goes to seek out the enemy, Obama will move heaven and earth to get him back no matter how many terrorist generals with American blood on their hands he has to free to do so.  However, if a US Marine ACTUALLY “serves his country with honor and distinction” – the way Obama’s mouthpiece dishonestly testified that a TRAITOR had done – and legally leaves to visit his grandmother, well, no soup for him.  And no soup for a CIA agent, and no soup for a Christian pastor and no soup for an American journalist, either.

Death to America, after all.  That’s what the Ayatollah said while Obama was giving him concession after concession, to the tune of at least a DOZEN concessions where we said absolutely not until Obama said, “Death to America.”  And death to everything America stands for.

Barack Hussein Obama and the Ayatollah had at least that to agree on as the basis for their deal.  And so the two least trustworthy men on planet earth were able to shake hands.

 

Democrat Dick Durbin Gives His ‘Legitimacy’ To Terrorists

March 30, 2011

We are at a point where Democrats ought to have zero credibility, and the worst thing that should ever happen to someone’s reputation would be getting caught with your face in the same picture as a known or suspected Democrat.

But while we OUGHT to be there, we’re certainly not there yet.  There are fools and communities of fools who actually respect Democrats, and stupidly and naively believe they’re decent people.

So, as asinine and in fact as outrageous as it might seem, Democrats can add their “credibility” to others.

But being truly despicable people, Democrats have a tendency to lend said “credibility” to the very worst sorts of people.  Like terrorists.

For the record, I added the labeling to make it easier to identify both the terrorists and the dumbass in the photo.

Here’s a quick description of these guys Dick Durbin says are A-OK in his book:

Pictured with Senator Durbin [that’s the dumbass in the middle] is Jamal Said [the terrorist on the left], an unindicted conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror funding case that led to criminal conviction. Said also reportedly raised money 11 years ago at an Islamic conference by asking for donations in name of a suicide bomber. More recently, he told a gathering of Muslim leaders in 2009, “We need to raise our children to know the martyrs of Gaza.”

Also in the photo [the terrorist on the right] is another unindicted terror trial coconspirator named Kifah Mustapha. According to the IPT, Mustapha serves as an imam for the Illinois Mosque Foundation. Last year days after becoming Illinois first state police chaplain, his appointment was revoked after ties to terror groups became public.

According to IPT, the Mosque Foundation has a long history of ties to terror organizations, even sponsoring a rally for a Hamas operative arrested in Israel. 

So we’ve got the cheerleader for suicide bombers and a guy who wants to radicalize our rapidly growing Muslim inmate population.

The guy who wants to raise money for suicide bombers’ families so terrorists can murder away knowing their families will be taken care of, the guy who wants the children to know these “martyrs” as heroes so the hate can continue to the next generation, is part of a murder plot against Israel’s innocent children going back decades.

And the guy who sought to be a “chaplain” so he could radicalize our prison population is part of a long effort to get the hate of Allah into our prison systems.  From an article in the Oxford Journal titled “Prison Islam in the Age of Sacred Terror“:

Research indicates that Islam is the fastest growing religion among prisoners in Western nations. In the United States, roughly 240,000 inmates have converted to the faith since the 9/11 attacks. According to federal law enforcement, Saudi-backed Wahhabi clerics have targeted these prisoners for terrorist recruitment.

An article on how state prisons are a breeding ground for radical Islam begins:

The four men accused of plotting to blow up synagogues and shoot down a plane all did stretches in state prisons – a major breeding ground for Islamic radicalization.

At least two of the suspects, James Cromitie and Onta Williams, entered the system as Baptists and were paroled as Muslims.

The concern about prisons incubating jihadists has been heightened in the debate over releasing Guantanamo terror suspects to facilities across the U.S.

FBI Director Robert Mueller has called America’s prisons “fertile ground for extremists.”

A 2006 study called “Out of the Shadows” found “tight-knit communities of Muslims in prison are ripe for radicalization, and could easily become terrorist cells.”

And the entire organization for which Durbin is lending his “credibility” is waaaaayyy beyond merely dubious.

Confronted with this, Durbin was unapologetic.  These people are perfectly fine.  What they’re doing is great.  And if you don’t want to be murdered in a giant explosion by a suicide bomber, you’re just a racist anti-Muslim bigot.

So just why do Democrats want to legitimize terrorists who want nothing more than your hot sticky jugular-vein blood all over their filfthy hands?  I now say “dumbass Democrats” rather than just “dumbass Dick Durbin” because this is just so par for the Democrat course.

Here’s Durbin’s rationale, complete with it’s own refutation:

U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., in an attempt to address what he claims is an increase in anti-Muslim bigotry, is relying on questionable statistics and a witness with a record of opposing virtually all law enforcement attempts to deal with Islamist-inspired terrorism.

In a statement, Durbin said his hearing Tuesday on the state of Muslim civil rights in America comes “in response to a spike in anti-Muslim bigotry in the last year including Quran burnings, restrictions on mosque construction, hate crimes, hate speech, and other forms of discrimination.”

While hate crime data for 2010 has not yet been released, FBI reports in recent years show no spike in anti-Muslim attacks. Those statistics show 107 anti-Islamic incidents reported in 2009, compared to 156 anti-Muslim crimes in 2006. In both reports, race related crimes dominated, and religiously-targeted attacks involved Jews as victims about nine times more often than Muslims in 2009 and more than five times more in 2006.

Durbin is literally championing the violent Muslims who are victimizing Jews at nine times the rate in America and calling the victimizers the “victims.”

Which is to say, Democrats are consistent, in that they are always fools all the time.

And what is the Fool-in-Chief up to?  He’s joining Osama bin Laden in siding with the Libyan rebels which include al Qaeda fighters, and who are led by Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi – a man who fought Americans troops in Afghanistan

No one knows a whole lot about these Libyan rebels, and everything we do know is bad.  Jonah Goldberg quipped yesterdat that this Libyan rebellion is kind of like Pelosi’s approach: “We have to pass this rebellion so you can find out what is in it.”

A Politico story covering Durbin’s hearing said:

Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin said it wasn’t a response to Republican Rep. Peter King’s hearings this month on post-9/11 Islamic radicalization and terrorism — but it sure felt like it.

And that’s exactly what it was, of course.  And all King’s hearings tried to do was ask a question about the domestic radicalization of American Muslims.  And even the left-leaning Washington Post acknowledged that Democrats embarrased themselves in their coming unglued over simply asking a question and seeking information.

This is not just an unfortunate moment immortalized in a picture.  This is a demonstration of the morally bankrupt philosophy of not only Dick Durbin, but the entire Democrat Party.

And as usual, the mainstream media propaganda does not want you to know which side is right and which side is wrong.

It’s Official: Palestinians Recognize One Jew Is Worth One Thousand Palestinans

December 21, 2009

What’s a Jew worth these days?

According to Hamas, a Jew is worth one thousand Palestinians.

Israeli Cabinet ministers debate whether to trade 1,000 Palestinian prisoners for lone soldier

By AMY TEIBEL , Associated Press
Last update: December 21, 2009 – 2:44 PM

JERUSALEM – Negotiations for an Israel-Hamas prisoner exchange entered a crucial stage Monday, with Israeli Cabinet ministers huddling to decide whether to accept Islamic militants’ demand to swap 1,000 Palestinian prisoners for a lone Israeli serviceman.

A decision to pay that lopsided price for 23-year-old Sgt. Gilad Schalit could reshuffle Mideast politics in unpredictable ways and possibly ease a punishing blockade of the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.

Netanyahu and six Cabinet ministers convened again after nightfall Monday, the latest in a series of sessions over the past two days in a frenzy of activity that suggested a deal could be close. The group was divided, however, with some ministers opposed freeing Palestinians convicted in fatal attacks, arguing they could kill again.

It seemed likely the prime minister would bring the final decision to a vote in his full Cabinet. As the Monday evening meeting began, Netanyahu’s office issued a statement saying, “The prime minister will continue to protect Israel’s security and the lives of its citizens as the most important factor” in a decision over the soldier, a possible hint that he was leaning against approval of the deal.

A Palestinian close to the negotiations said a German mediator carrying a proposal approved by Hamas has set a Wednesday deadline for Israeli action. The Palestinian, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said there would be no further negotiations. […]

That’s not very good for Palestinians, to be worth only one-one thousandth of a Jew.

I mean, it’s not just sub-human, it’s sub sub-human.

I suppose if they are willing to officially acknowledge this, then I should, too.

I also suppose it could forge a new understanding in Israeli-Arab relations: for every single Jew killed, one thousand Arabs should die to balance the scales.

It is beyond a moral crime that Palestinians have so little regard for the value of their own lives that they send their children out to blow themselves up to murder other lives.

Human beings and legitimate governments value the lives of their citizens.  That’s why Israel would even consider this crazy and frankly evil one-sided trade.  And it’s why a loathsome and vile terrorist state would issue such immoral demands recognizing the total lack of value for their own people.