Posts Tagged ‘pro-life’

Don’t Like White Nationalism? Then Blame The Hypocrite Democratic Party And Mainstream Media That Are Most Responsible For Its Rise.

August 29, 2017

I’ll say two things at the very outset: 1) Racism of ANY kind is evil because God made human beings in His own image (which is why abortion is so vile) and we should therefore respect the image of God in all human beings.  And I can personally say that in my life I have seen some of the worst and some of the best in every color and creed, such that I have encountered, for example, some incredibly godawful black people and I have also known some of the noblest people on earth who were black, whose love and friendship this particular white guy was not worthy of.  The notion that “racism is an unequal power structure” doesn’t go anywhere NEAR far enough because most “white people” don’t have any “institutional power.”  I as a white man am now an oppressed racial minority in my own state of California according to this leftist screed, and as a conservative Republican in a state that is so rabidly leftist that California all by itself accounts for the difference in the popular vote between Trump and Clinton, I am a politically oppressed minority as well.  It is literally a crime against intelligence to claim that I have institutional power and only genuine fools say such idiotic things.  We individual “white people” are every bit as frustrated with the government and being on the outside looking through poop-stained windows of power as much as anyone else.  Frankly the only way the we will ever end “institutional power inequalities” is to abolish government and abolish the bureaucracies that make the leftist/liberal machine run given that the bureaucracies are staffed with hard-core union activists (see here for just one of a billion examples).  Which isn’t going to happen and which I as an individual “white person” have no more control of than anyone else.  In point of fact, if racism is institutional than I as a small-government conservative am far less guilty of the crime of racism than Democrats, because they WANT the racist institutions and I want them cut massively down in size and power.  Rather, I am an individual person and according to both my Judeo-Christian and conservative worldview (both of which are rabidly rejected by the left) I am responsible for what is in MY OWN heart and it must be in the individual human heart that true reform can begin.  And that aspect of genuine racism is completely ignored at this point by every other race BUT white people.  When they tell us that “black people can’t be racist” that is such an outrageously ridiculous lie that only an intellectual could have been stupid enough to have considered it.  By which I refer to George Orwell’s classic understanding of the stupidity of the intellectuals, that “Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them.”   The leftist demagogic narrative that I as a white person am ruling the world oppressing the black race is utterly ridiculous simply considering the fact that I live in California and I am constantly forced to leap through the hoops imposed by my liberal masters.  It is like the Hispanic liberal activist who is part of a mob surrounding and screaming at one man: “BECAUSE YOU ARE THE MINORITY!  F*CK YOU!”  The actual fact is that racism is every bit as real among blacks as it is whites.  As just one example, it is a fact that blacks are so much more racist than whites that black people frequently refuse to see white doctors because of the doctor’s race and the patient’s racism.  It is everywhere, all around us, in all kinds of people just as ALL sin is all around us in all kinds of people.

But liberals don’t believe in “sin” being possible other than for whites.  Sin according to liberals isn’t a matter of the human heart, but rather a matter of race.  Only whites are capable of “oppression.”  But sin is not merely “institutional” (not that I run any of the institutions they’re talking about, especially when Obama and Eric Holder were running them); it is INDIVIDUAL.  And it is because I am a true Christian and a true conservative, I am an INDIVIDUALIST and look at people as INDIVIDUALS rather than as members of racial groups as Democrats have been indoctrinated to do.  And related to that is 2) that identity politics – the division of people into groups by race, gender, sexual orientation, etc. – and then attempting to mobilize and pit those groups against other groups which are defined as evil – is itself EVIL.  And the Democratic Party is more responsible for this evil than anyone or anything else on the face of the earth today.  If it is in any way, shape or form appropriate for black people, or Hispanic people, or gay people, to mobilize into groups and then vote for their own rights or their own causes based on their membership in their groups, then it is equally appropriate for white people to do the same thing the left is doing with its groups.  But amazingly and incredibly hypocritically, the left cries in hysterical outrage when we finally do what they have been doing for decades.  In bottom-line terms, if an Obama can urge Hispanics to “punish your enemies,” then why the hell can a Trump not tell whites to go punish their enemies, also?  You know, aside from the fact that to be a Democrat is to be a hard-core hypocrite and then constantly rationalize your hypocrisy with goal-post-moving arguments?

I came across a statement that expresses it nicely.  Who qualifies as a “hate group”???

Do you think the Democratic Party made the list of “hate groups” on the bigoted extremist Southern Poverty Law Center’s hate site?  No.  Not on your life.  The Southern Poverty Law Center is an organization created to bully anyone it politically disagrees with, at times literally declaring “parents” as a hate group.  The left has politicized hate and turned its own hate into a political weapon.  The Southern Poverty law center five years ago attempted to violently attack the Family Research Council headquarters through one of their drones who obtained his hate from their website.  And the same thing recently happened when another of the Southern Poverty Law Center drones tried to murderously wipe out the Republican congressional baseball team.

Watch this video of the Democratic Party’s buddies the Antifa and tell me why they aren’t being considered a hate group by the Democratic establishment, by the Southern Poverty Law Center, by the mainstream media, by any of these fools who so self-righteously claim to be opposed to hate.  if conservative activists all over the country were screaming, “We hate Obama!” how would the media have framed that if not as racist and hateful and treasonous?  But even after THOUSANDS of such protests and worse yet “counter protests” where mobs show up intending to shut down conservatives’ rights to free speech “By Any Means Necessary,” the reporting on the ugliness of the left is a desert.

Reuters actually had the propaganda balls to call vicious leftist Antifa RIOTERS “peace activists” even after they had thrown bottles filled with urine and stones at police.  Joseph Goebbels at his Ministry of Propaganda would be smiling and rubbing his fingers together in satisfaction at these lies.

You’re not exactly going to get a fair or honest list of “hate groups” from them or they’d have to put themselves near the very top of their own damn list.  Just sayin’.  Because I will show you if you read on that that label genuinely and rightfully applies.

But you’ve got one more bright, shining example of what the left does: brand “the other” as hateful while steadfastly ignoring their own hatefulness.

So sit down while I show you what I am saying is true.  Because there is an awful lot to say about it.

I believe we begin to get to the real heart of President Donald Trump’s project following the car-ramming incident in Charlottesville: the left is determined to coerce Trump to admit that racism is entirely his fault and entirely the fault of those who support him and that the left and the racial groups that compose the rabid leftist hate base are thereby absolutely absolved from even the possibility of any form of racism.  Which is the project of the left.  Because the Russia they screamed about for the last eight months is now such an obvious nothing-burger lie, they’ve turned to a new way to try to demonize Donald Trump, and so they want him to hang the albatross of racism around his own neck or at least submit to their putting the albatross of racism around his neck.  The left doesn’t want to “come to the table” and have a meaningful dialogue about racism and what both sides can do to reach unity and accord and common ground; no, they rather want to take the table away and scream at us about racism while we submissively bow our heads in shame and publicly admit our shame and our guilt and to submit to a thousand years of “reverse racism” to pay for our collective sins whether we as individuals ever committed any racist sin or not.  And Trump is saying no freaking way.  Because there is no point attempting to have any meaningful kind of conversation with these people on these terms.

We just saw it in Berkeley what we’ve seen dozens and dozens of times now: a conservative organization – yes, one having absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with “white supremacists” and having seven of their eight speakers being NON-white – was violently disrupted by “counter-demonstrators” who showed up without any kind of permit armed with weapons and all the hatred and viciousness that is inherent in modern liberalism in their hearts.  A racist demagogue named Nancy Pelosi attempted to manufacture a riot by slandering the group to bring as much hate against the Patriot Prayer Rally as possible.  And so the conservatives, as the only group that did not want the violence that Nacny Pelosi yearned for (slanderously calling it over and over again “a white supremacist rally” in an attempt to bring leftist hate groups to attack them, backed down and cancelled their event to prevent violence, and instead held a press conference rather than a rally.

Ms. Pelosi had called on the National Park Service to reconsider Patriot Prayer’s permit, describing the event as a “white supremacist rally.”

“Reason has prevailed because the people of San Francisco have demonstrated our determination to protect the freedom of peaceful expression as well as public safety,” Ms. Pelosi said Saturday in a statement to the Mercury News.

But Mr. Gibson accused San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee and Ms. Pelosi of stoking unrest by labeling the event as a white supremacy fest, even though most of the scheduled speakers were not white and Mr. Gibson himself is half-Asian.

“To call us white supremacists made San Francisco way more dangerous,” Mr. Gibson said.

He also accused Democrats of hypocrisy on protester violence: “You have a mayor who says that we’re hateful, we’re violent, he doesn’t bring up any specific examples, but he doesn’t mention one word about antifa. Not one word.”

The rally was billed as a “day of freedom, spirituality, unity, peace, and patriotism,” and Mr. Gibson gave assurances on Facebook beforehand that “no extremists will be allowed in,” including Nazis, anti-fascists (antifa), the Ku Klux Klan and white nationalists.

Even so, he said he was being menaced Saturday by antifa and By Any Means Necessary activists who followed the Patriot Prayer organizers and used Twitter to announce their whereabouts.
“Basically all day, this is what it’s going to be like,” he said. “We’re going from spot to spot trying to hide from people who dress like ninjas, who run around, they want to burn stuff down, they want to commit violence, they want to use bike locks, they want to use clubs with nails through them.”

We call it “fake news” the way leftist hatemongers like Nancy Pelosi make false, slanderous claims that are picked up by “reporters” and “reported” as “news”:

Right-wing protester Johnny Benitez from Orange County says he came to Berkeley for peaceful dialogue, but got shouted down by the crowd.

“They still label me as a white supremacist,” he said. “I still get death threats. This is a false message.”

Benitez.  Obviously a white guy name.

It’s “fake news,” but the leftist hate is all too real.

Fascist Democrat Party thug organizations such as Antifa and By Any Means Necessary (especially violent means) were out in force with hatred for freedom and democracy and homicide in their little roach souls in Berkeley yesterday.  A conservative group held a “Rally Against Hate” that was viciously broken up by leftist hate:

Protesters from the poles of the U.S. political spectrum converged on another American city Sunday as violence erupted when left-wing protesters surrounded and attacked at least five right-wing demonstrators in Berkeley

The group of more than 100 hooded protesters, with shields emblazoned with the words “no hate” and waving a flag identifying themselves as anarchists, busted through police lines, avoiding security checks by officers to take away possible weapons.

Several thousand people had congregated for a “Rally Against Hate” in response to the planned right-wing protest that raised concerns of violence and triggered a massive police presence.

Berkeley police chief Andrew Greenwood defended how police handled the protest, saying they made a strategic decision to let the anarchists enter to avoid more violence. […]

Among those assaulted was Joey Gibson, the leader of the Patriot Prayer group, which canceled a Saturday rally and was then prevented from holding a news conference when authorities closed off the public square Gibson planned to use.

After the anarchists spotted Gibson at the Berkeley park, they pepper-sprayed him and chased him out as he backed away with his hands held in the air. Gibson rushed behind a line of police wearing riot gear, who set off a smoke grenade to drive away the anarchists, Fox 40 reported.

But for the most part, it is well-documented, the leftist police under orders of leftist bureaucrats who allowed the “anarchists” to enter stood down and then allowed the anarchists they’d let in to surround, attack, and viciously beat the legally-permitted free-speech demonstrators.   Which is another way of saying I belong to a minority that is being systematically institutionally oppressed and I am not only banned from exercising my constitutional rights but am viciously set upon by the modern equivalent of SA Brownshirt stormtrooper thugs while the police who are supposed to protect me stand and root for the Nazis who are beating me “By Any Means Necessary.”

Any one who is capable of even briefly entertaining the truth can see the vile hate of the left that was taking place well before Charlottesville and is only building up violent force now.

And so I support President Trump in this, regardless of how awkwardly he is going about it.  Primarily because the rabid, whackjob racist craziness of the other side is simply disregarded and ignored and denied.  If you want to have a conversation about race, don’t claim to be willing to have one until you’re willing to acknowledge the damn log in your own damn eyes while you’re laying the blame on us.  Not when I can detail all the racist crap that I am able to detail below.

Let’s talk about “political correctness” and what it is and how it works.  I’ve stated this before.  Political correctness is not just a leftist way to make overly-sensitive people feel better.  It was designed by early Marxist propagandists in Russia and the left continues to execute the Orwellian tactic today: if you can control words, you can control thought; if you can control thought, you can control actions. “PC” is an enormous, sophisticated and highly coordinated effort by elitist intellectuals to “fundamentally transform” Western culture as we know it by redefining it – by shaping the “acceptable” language people are allowed to use – and thereby dictating the parameters of cultural arguments, such that the people are banned from thinking outside of the artificial box they create for us. And people with incredibly radical agendas have been exploiting this tactic for decades and it has succeeded.

It’s kind of like insisting that we call American Indians “native Americans.”  If I don’t qualify as a “native American,” then exactly where the hell do I get to be a native of???  I am quite serious here.  It is racist to take my own homeland and the land of my birth and my ancestors’ birth away from me.  I am a native American and I don’t apologize for calling myself what I clearly have every right and reason to call myself.  My parents were native Americans.  My grandparents were native Americans.  Some of my ancestors climbed off the boat with the other Pilgrims.  Some of my ancestors fought in the Revolutionary War and established this nation.  Some of my ancestors fought in the Civil War and supported the Republicans as they defeated a violent, rabid Democratic Party to abolish slavery.  But some damn liberal through the prism of communist-manufactured “political correctness” decreed that all white people ought to be racially disqualified from their own country.  Not by any reasonable argument, but rather by rhetorical fiat and politically correct guilt-tripping.  It’s not about me hating American Indians; I love American Indian culture and participate in it and admire it at every opportunity.  Rather, it’s about giving one group a status that clearly does not belong to that group alone.  In the case of minorities that status is “victim” as though no white person has ever been poor, or oppressed, or a target of hate from another racial group.  Take me, for example: not only am I a “native American” who has had that status removed from me by rhetorical fiat, but I myself have also been a victim of racism when I was physically and violently attacked by five black men.  You want to call American Indians “Original Americans,” fine by me.  I recognize American Indians were here when my ancestors rowed ashore at Plymouth Rock.  But it is a crime of oppression against me to take away my right to be a “native American” when I absolutely AM one.  Which according to the left is impossible due to the same rhetorical sleight-of-hand race-baiting demagoguery.  And we’ve had this crap forced down our throats in too many ways too many times over and over again by one party for decades.  And finally enough people had enough.

In 2016, did white people – especially including the white people who actually voted for Obama TWICE “racist” or did something else take place?  Let me explain “what else” actually happened:

Barack Obama crushed and decimated middle class whites.  If a Republican president had done this to black people, it would be proclaimed and vilified by the mainstream media and the Democrat Party as the very worst kind of racist hate.  But because it was Democrats and particularly a black Democrat doing it to whites, it was okay.  Because we live in a world full of more hypocrisy than the oceans and seas are filled with water.  The middle class itself began to disintegrate under and as a direct result of Barack Obama’s presidency and his policies.  In the 2016 election, white people rose up because they literally began to comprehend their very survival was being threatened by a left that was openly hostile to them.  It wasn’t “racism” that made even middle class whites who voted for Obama in 2008 do this; it was systematic oppression BY a racist president and a racist party that created the oppression that they voted to free themselves of.   It is simply a statement of fact that Barack Obama decimated the white middle class and the white working class (see also here) and THAT is why they rose up to overthrow the party of the race-baiting Oppressor-in-Chief.

Frankly, even black people largely suffered – and suffered in virtually every economic category – under Obama because his socialist Democrat Party policies are failures and have never lived up to the utopian fantasies of the liberals who are incapable of learning from history no matter how many times their “solutions” fail to solve.   When the Democrat Party keeps inflicting hurt on the people they claim to care about while demonizing as “racist” the policies that would help the people they claim to care about, you should immediately understand that something is very wrong and very vile is going on within the Democratic Party machine.

When even a white liberal progressive female candidate gets shouted down at a liberal progressive function by people screaming, “Support black women!” you should immediately understand that something very wrong and very vile is going on within the Democratic Party machine.

When the House Minority Leader can slanderously demonize a conservative group as “white supremacist” and literally contribute to a violent counter-protest against that group when it has nothing whatsoever to DO with “white nationalism” and fully seven of its eight speakers are nonwhite, you should immediately understand that something very wrong and very vile is going on within the Democratic Party machine.  Similarly, in Boston, an upcoming conservative rally focusing NOT on “race” but on “FREE SPEECH” is being falsely and hatefully labeled as a “white nationalist” event by the political leaders who are literally inciting riot by doing so.  The leftwing Boston mayor is publicly saying that the city has to allow free speech no matter how “despicable” the group demanding free speech is.  Which is basically code for all his leftist hate groups to “come and punish your enemies.”  To put it in Obama terms.  And to quote some other revealing Obama political maxims: “If they bring a knife, you bring a gun”. “Punch back twice as hard.” “Get in their face.”  Obama is on the record as having said all of these things and it was marvelous in Democrats’ sight.

How about this one: when a black state senator can openly call for the assassination of the white president of the United States of America and then TWICE refused to apologize because she literally argued that the one she is demanding be murdered is more wrong than the one who calls for that murder, and she is STILL actually in office because every single Democrat refused to rise up and demand her resignation, you should immediately understand that something very wrong and very vile going on within the Democratic Party machine.  And for the record, this also tells you how godawful evil-wrong the mainstream media has become: because if it had been a white Republican calling for the assassination of President Obama, every single Republican in office would have instantly had microphones thrust into their faces demanding their reaction.  But “race-rage” only flows one way, from Democrats to Republicans.  No matter how evil-vile the Democrats truly are.  If every single Democrat does not vote to expel Democratic Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal from the Senate, IT IS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY THAT IS RACIST AND BIGOTED AND HATEFUL AND EVIL.  But the way this rigged party system works out, the Democratic Party will probably bribe Chappelle-Nadal to resign “on her own” so they won’t have to prove they are racist by refusing to vote her out by offering her some cushy job at a university or some other uber-leftist think tank.  She’ll be okay until she faces Jesus Christ at the Great White Throne judgment of the wicked, I assure you.

When a hard-core racist group is absolutely NOT challenged by the mainstream media and is even celebrated and endorsed by the Democratic Party and their propaganda wing the media, you should immediately understand that something is very wrong and very vile is going on within the Democratic Party machine and with liberalism.  White people have been presented with a list of 10 demands from Black Lives Matter.  The very URL is titled “white people.”  What I want to do is to simply switch the races BLM uses and you tell me if this is “racist” as HELL:

1. Black or brown people, if you don’t have any descendants, will your property to a white or Asian family. Preferably one that lives in generational poverty.
2. Black or brown people, if you’re inheriting property you intend to sell upon acceptance, give it to a white family. You’re bound to make that money in some other Obama-privileged way.
3. If you are a developer or realty owner of multi-family housing, build a sustainable complex in a white blighted neighborhood and let white people live in it for free.
4. Black or brown people, if you can afford to downsize, give up the home you own to a white or Asian family. Preferably a family from generational poverty.
5. Black or brown people, if any of the people you intend to leave your property to are racists assholes, change the will, and will your property to a white or Asian family. Preferably a family from generational poverty.
6. Black people, re-budget your monthly so you can donate to white funds for land purchasing.
7. Black people, especially black women (because this is yaw specialty — Nosey Jenny and Meddling Kathy), get a racist fired. Yaw know what the fuck they be saying. You are complicit when you ignore them. Get your boss fired cause they racist too.
8. Backing up No. 7, this should be easy but all those sheetless BLM, Black Panthers, NAACP and Other lil’ dick-black men will all be returning to work. Get they ass fired. Call the police even: they look suspicious.
9. OK, backing up No. 8, if any black person at your work, or as you enter in spaces and you overhear a black person praising the actions of BLM from yesterday, first, get a pic. Get their name and more info. Hell, find out where they work — Get Them Fired. But certainly address them, and, if you need to, you got hands: use them.
10. Commit to two things: Fighting black supremacy where and how you can (this doesn’t mean taking up knitting, unless you’re making scarves for white kids in need), and funding white and Asian people and their work.

Note: ALL I did was reverse the races in the racist hate-screed of Black Lives Matter.  The above list is evil, psychotic and frankly demonic racist hate.  And it is every bit as evil and psychotic and demonic and racist and hateful when it is examined in the words of Black Lives Matter.  Because Black Lives Matter is very clearly a racist hate group every bit as much as the KKK is a racist hate group.

Read this vile racist screed from Affinity Magazine titled “Dear White Parents of Biracial Children: Having Mixed Babies Isn’t Enough to Excuse Your Ignorance.”  The racist left has turned hatred and bitterness and meanness into VIRTUES.  And they are turning on THEIR OWN if their own even slightly deviate from their “purity.”  These angry, hateful, self-righteous liberals are even worse than the Pharisees who organized a mob to crucify Jesus.

Deal with both logs in the eyes of both sides, dammit.  But don’t accuse me of being a racist because I won’t do what you won’t lift a finger to do.  Because all that does is make you a hypocrite.

When white people are literally being denied the right to speak while “Black Lives Matter” is cherished by the same media that denounces them as “white nationalists,” please realize that somebody is guaranteeing and ultimate violent rise.

The ACLU issued a statement withdrawing their support for the free speech rights of white nationalists that breaks with their entire history of fighting for free speech no matter what kind of speech it is.  Not that they actually ever truly did that, but now their biased leftist ideology is fully and completely on display.  The ACLU has made it crystal clear that it will CONTINUE to protect hate, but only hate from THEIR side.  The problem is that “free speech” is a meaningless term if it doesn’t apply to all.  If one side gets to bring their “free speech” no matter how hateful it is – yes, and load up with weapons prepared for a violent brawl with the groups that legally filed for the permits to demonstrate as the leftists go in just like the jackbooted fascist Brownshirt stormtroopers from the Hitler era to break up the rallies of the opposition – and the ACLU will support one side and not the other, they are no longer for “civil liberties” but for leftwing fascist liberties.

In the last couple of days we have seen incredibly disturbing details as to just how rabid and racially unhinged the left truly is.  For instance, during the Charlottesville rioting, ESPN demonstrated such racial stupidity that they actually made at the highest levels the decision to yank an Asian broadcaster because his name happened to be “Robert Lee.”  And they were mental enough to believe that “Robert Lee, 21st century Asian-American broadcaster = Robert E. Lee, 19th century Confederate general.”  And then the ESPN president executive actually came out lying about why they had yanked the Asian broadcaster it in direct refutation of their own initial statement that they had in fact done it for racial reasons because of the trivial coincidence of his name and lambasted the people who were trying to tell the truth about this fascist leftist fool network.  And then it was the ACLU’s turn, posting an innocent image of a child – okay, they were evil because it was a white kid and he had a hated American flag that today’s liberals despise so much they refuse to stand an honor – which quickly became demonized as a Nazi image.  And the ACLU is so racially depraved and so amoral that they actually apologized for putting up such a despicable image as a white child holding a flag with the caption, “This is the future that ACLU members want.”  Because apparently ACLU members really want the future of a boot stomping on a human face forever, providing that face is WHITE.

According to the left, THIS is now an image of “hate”:

The face of hate is the liberal who is so evil that he sees hate in everything, including the innocent image of a little girl holding the flag of his country even when it’s their own side posting that image.  You can see her wearing her liberal ACLU shirt.  The left is a group of haters that rabidly refuses to tolerate even the tiniest departure from their Orwellian Two Minutes Hate campaign that will go on and on and on for years if necessary until it achieves its hateful agenda.  That’s what the real face of hate is.  And even a beautiful little child cannot escape this kind of hate.

And its violent hate.

Jeremy Beck said something very thought-provoking and historically proven time and time again: “You know, if you keep going further left, eventually you go left enough to get your guns back.”  The same way they had guns in the Soviet UnionThe same way they had guns in China.  The same way they had guns in North Korea.  The same way they had guns in Cuba.  They had guns in Cambodia.  And yes, the same way they had guns in Nazi Germany (NAZI = “National SOCIALIST German WORKERS PARTY.”  It is simply a fact that Nazism was the “far right” only of the extreme, radical LEFT).  Oh, the left was all for guns when they were fighting for power, as the ACLU is fine with THEIR side using guns and violence to attack their ideological opponents.  But as soon as they seize power, give up your guns!  And so the only problem being that they ended up with ALL the guns and liberalism/leftism WILL NECESSARILY end up with ALL the guns EVERY SINGLE TIME.  Because “liberalism” is ultimately the rabid determination to dictate all political power and crush and oppress anyone and everyone who stands against their total, dictatorial totalitarian power.  And history has proven this fact to be true EVERY SINGLE TIME the left has EVER been able to seize power and the most evil horror in all of human history has systematically resulted from it EVERY SINGLE TIME.  And so Nazi Germany embraced leftist gun control confiscations; as did every single communist regime so the people would be powerless which is exactly the reason our founding fathers – who are now all condemned as symbols of hate by the left – demanding the American people have the guaranteed constitutional right to keep and bear arms which the left has tried to take away for decades.

White people are increasingly started to become frightened by this climate of leftist hate.  Especially when even the very most innocent child among them is demonized as a hate symbol.

And so when you actually do have “white nationalism,” who is to blame for it?

Let me just first point out the fact that liberals say that radical Islamic terrorism – which of course they refuse to link in any way, shape or form to “Islam” because they are true moral idiots – is the result of marginalization and discrimination.  So if you keep shutting out a group of people’s access and call them evil all the time, then according to liberalism you create the climate of terrorism because if they are denied a voice they will violently lash out.  And so as we look at the left and how they have banned or blocked or denied white supremacists from having any voice or any rights, what is going to happen according to their own damn theory of terrorism???  Realize that it’s not just leftist-oriented businesses such as Google (whose mantra is “Do no evil” but has regularly participated in the fascist suppression of free speech in China and now in America), and FaceBook, and PayPal, and GoDaddy, and Airbnb, and Uber, and Discord, and GoFundMe, and Spotify, and even the WordPress that I use, but it is elected Democrat mayors and politicians across the country who regularly and routinely label, marginalize and discriminate.  It is simply what the left does.

Question; if the left isn’t doing absolutely everything it can to “marginalize” and “discriminate’ against white nationalists and the KKK and the so-called neo-Nazis, then what the hell are they doing???

So the answer to my question, if you are a liberal, is to look into the damn mirror.  Because just by your own view toward Islamic terrorism, YOU caused the attack in Charlottesville according to your own damn analysis by marginalizing the white nationalists and refusing to give them any voice and discriminating against them and labelling them with your hate and intolerance.  Compared to a free society where we were all supposed to be given the freedom to speak so we wouldn’t resort to violence that you no longer permit.  So stop marginalizing and discriminating against these groups.  Or at least shut down all the other hate groups on YOUR side.  If you want to stop the rise of white nationalism, where white people start standing up and taking back the rights that they forfeited by being intimidated by the constant demagogic and slanderous labels of racism applied to them every single time they said anything in favor of their self-interests the way the leftist groups have loudly done, then stop your racist crap.  Stop the “Black Lives Matter” crap.  Stop the La Raza (which means “The Race”) crap.  Stop the Congressional Black Caucus crap.  Stop the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People crap.  Stop race quotas.  Stop racist university acceptance policies that punish white people and Asians because they’re the wrong races.  Because this flagrant hypocrisy is immoral and it is wrong and it is racist and you are guaranteeing and you are in fact responsible for the White Congressional Caucus and the Nationalist Association for the Advancement of Caucasian People and White Lives Matter and The Race (meaning the white race this time).

This isn’t about me being a “racist”.  This is about me being a “fairist”: I just want a fair, honest exchange where everybody is able to look at themselves as well as their opponents.  I utterly despise hypocrite liars who constantly impose a different system on me than they apply to themselves.  And while no one is immune from that tendency, including myself and people and the groups I support, it is the left that embodies “hypocrisy” today like nothing ever before seen in human history.

One of the fascinating things is how liberals want to blame the United States for slavery and how they want to blame white people for slavery.  Both are total lies.  The United States had slavery, yes, JUST AS EVERY OTHER DAMN NATION IN THE WORLD HAD SLAVERY.  And the more “nonwhite” you got, the more slavery there was.  I look up the countries that still have slavery today, and have the most slaves, and sure enough that’s basically what I find to this very day.  And secondly, black liberals are so full of hate for whites blaming us for slavery, but exactly how did we get all our slaves in the first place?  Do you know what we did?  We went to Africa and bought them FROM THE BLACK PEOPLE WHO SOLD THEM TO US.  Even Obama’s dear friend Henry Louis Gates acknowledges that historical fact.  For the official historical record, it wasn’t a bunch of white people running around the bushes in Africa with big butterfly nets; rather, white people went to the coasts of Africa and simply purchased them.  Slavery was GIGANTIC in Africa, because one tribe would fight with another tribe and they would sell the victims they captured from the other tribe into slavery without a hinge of regret.  They were reducing the population of their enemies and earning a tidy profit at the same time.  We couldn’t go to Britain and buy white people as slaves; we couldn’t go to Ireland, or to Germany, or to France and buy slaves.  No white people sold their own into slavery because Europe was still Christian and that was unheard of.  But in Africa, it was a very different thing.  So why do you limit your hate to white people when black slavery wouldn’t have existed without black people???

Liberalism is the hatred of facts and the rabid hatred of history and truth.  Which is why they have to act like Islamic State now and tear down historical artifacts using mob frenzy whenever necessary.  And so you can go far and wide on the internet and see them claim the truth is a lie and the lie is their truth.  But the fact remains that apart from Africa and Africans, there would have BEEN no “black slavery.”  Which only makes liberals hate whitey all the more because by screaming their violent hate they don’t have to acknowledge the uncomfortable truths they turn their backs on while blaming “the other” for which they themselves bear a giant load of guilt.

If this country is going to survive, we need to stop blaming the past and start looking at what WE are doing right now today.

End the fake news reporting.  To only slightly paraphrase the Bible, “There is no righteous reporter, not even one.  There is no reporter who understands, there is no reporter who seeks God.”  I don’t care who is demonstrating or what their message is or how much other people don’t like it; the nanosecond someone or some people from “the other side” start any kind of violence, THAT SIDE THAT STARTS THE VIOLENCE IS ON THE SIDE OF THE DAMN NAZIS.  Report the damn TRUTH.  If you actually have any legitimate claim to oppose violence, then oppose the left that is routinely engaging in naked violence as a political tactic every single DAY now.

I’m just going to repeat what Donald Trump said about Charlottesville that applies here: there were bad people on both sides right from the very damn beginning and certainly at Charlottesville as well.  The list of violent liberal attacks of leftist mobs against conservatives is mind-blowing.  The simple fact is that liberal America has a rather terrible political violence problem.  But what we are seeing today is liberals and liberalism being completely blind to the giant logs in their own eyes and fixating on the specks in the eyes of the people they hate.  And it’s wrong.  And one of the primary reasons that black people have so failed to launch in America when other groups of people have done so well is that as a culture they are 1) Democrat and therefore believe evil is good and good is evil; and 2) because they are so mired in bitterness that they refuse to believe that hard work will allow them to improve their situations as the people who come here from all the rest of the world believe.

Martin Luther King, Jr. said that hate begets hate.  And liberals are proof of that.

We have a president who got elected in a contentious election, and as a result of his election an entire political party along with an army of the most vicious partisan radical haters declared total war on the president and upon everything that president campaigned upon and was elected to do.  Who am I talking about?  Guess what?  I’m talking about Abraham Lincoln.  Because there is a direct damn parallel between what the true party of hate – the Democratic Party which has ALWAYS been the party of hate – did in 1860 and what that same damn party of hate is doing today.

There’s a reason we ought to be forgiving and even forgive our enemies.  But don’t try to explain that to a leftist.  Because Obama didn’t teach his followers to reach out, but instead to lash out.  And we’ve seen Obama’s incredibly toxic effect on this nation as a result.  And that hate is now being vindictively poured out on Donald Trump and everyone who voted for him no matter how polarized and divided the left has to break this country in pieces to do so.  Because the demonic identity politics of separating people into groups and then pitting those groups against each other to create a fifty-percent-plus-one-vote coalition is at the heart of their toxic agenda.

Jesus told us that in the last days, race would rise against race.  And it is very obvious that the day that Jesus described in the very end times is upon us.  And in the United States of America, it will be because of and as a direct reaction to the Democratic Party’s racist exploitation of race as a cynical means of imposing socialist, fascist power.  And please don’t be so stupid as to fail to understand that in order to be a “fascist,” one first has to be a “socialist.”

Interestingly – when you look at all the rabid, frothing hype this issue is getting by the press relative to its actual impact on society by any meaningful measure outside the fake news one created by the media – this “rise” of white nationalists is actually kind of …. ho hum when you actually look at the numbers.  I had heard reported that there are fewer than 100,000 white nationalists in America – versus a national population of 325 million meaning that white nationalists represent an incredibly trivial .03 percent of the population.  And yet with all the frothing media hysteria you would think it was some whopping percentage of whites goose-stepping with Nazi salutes to the cadence of Donald Trump ranting in German.  I looked at what the left is saying about the actual numbers of white nationalists in America, and the numbers are so paltry as to be meaningless.  I mean, the only firm number they could provide was “between 5,000 and 8,000 members nationwide.”  But then you see the project of the entire left wing apparatus – the Democratic Party, the media, etc. – as they then proceed to state:

Although the members of these groups may be especially vocal, the presence of racism in the U.S. cannot be quantified strictly by data. Nearly 63 million people voted for Trump, which means those voters were willing to accept and tolerate a racist, misogynist, xenophobe for a president, emboldening the small minority of neo-Nazis among them.

So in other words a “white nationalist” is to be defined as “anybody who voted for the current president of the United States.”

Howard Dean, former Democratic governor, former Democratic Party presidential candidate, former DNC chairman, says, “If you vote Republican in 2018, you’re voting for racism.”

Well, there’s a nice, polite invitation to a respectful exchange of ideas.

Oh, I got that wrong, didn’t I?  That’s naked race-baiting hatred for half of the nation.  The Democratic Party is built on hate just as it has always BEEN built on hate.

So this “rise” has hardly happened yet in any kind of actual fact.  But the left and the mainstream media that serve as the left’s propaganda arm rather desperately need a boogeyman.  Even if that boogeyman is virtually nonexistent.  And the reason they need a bogeyman is the same reason that Islamic radicalism needs the bogeyman of the Great Satan and Little Satan and North Korea needs the bogeyman of the United States: because in all three cases, they have nothing to offer but lies, fear and hate.  And they need some kind of artificial narrative to disconnect people’s brains from being capable of receiving reality.

I am reminded of Obama dismissing terrorism with the left and the Democratic establishment completely behind him saying “that terrorism takes far fewer lives in America than handguns, car accidents, and falls in bathtubs do.”  Notwithstanding the fact that most bathtub makers aren’t trying to kill people by driving large bathtubs into crowds.  Notwithstanding the fact that intentional violence motivated by hatred does something to the psyche of human beings that slipping in bathtubs does not do.  But you simply need to realize the soul of the left yawns with boredom at the fact that tens of thousands of people are being murdered by terrorists every year and that under Obama deaths by terrorism rose by one-thousand, nine-hundred percent.  That revealing statement was and remains an incredibly stupid and morally wicked statement that dismisses the victims and the virulent hate that seethes with the desire to murder every single human being possible.  But if one actually compares the victims of white nationalism to the victims of Islamic terrorism, it becomes laughably obvious that the only rational response to the left over its “white nationalist” hysteria is to say, “You fools desperately need to get some kind of clue.”

But again, the left is a pathologically evil ideology and such ideologies need bogeymen to distract people from THEIR OWN vile agenda.  And if they don’t actually have one, they know how to fake news one.  I mean make one.

Being a Christian first and a conservative out of my Christian worldview, I am compelled by my love of and for the truth.  Which means I am capable of doing something no liberal is capable of doing: I am capable of comprehending reality.  Therefore, the moment I heard that somebody drove a car into a crowd at the protest and counter-protest in Charlottesville – without knowing which side had drove the car into which – I knew that it was a TERRORIST ACT.  And because no, I am NOT a rabid ideologue the way too many leftists are, when I discovered that the car was driven by a white nationalist into a crowd of leftist protestors, I didn’t readjust my awareness of that fact to conform to my ideology.  I still recognize that the white nationalist who drove the car into a crowd was a terrorist and ought to be treated like one.

But I now compare that, and compare Obama’s response to similar terrorist attacks and the left’s response to his statements to the frankly insane and rabid frothing hysteria generated by Trump’s frankly LESS provocative statement.  I could cite DOZENS of examples, but due to time and space I’ll only cite two, with one being close to the beginning of Obama’s degenerate presidency and one occurring near the end of his eight years of national cancer.  Think of Major Nidal Hassan.  Think of the fact that the guy had business cards identifying himself as a “Soldier of Allah.”  Think of how he gunned down 13 (actually 14, as one victim was the unborn baby of another shooting victim) and wounded 31 while screaming “Allahu Akbar!!!”  Think of how six months prior to his attack, he had already come to the attention of law enforcement officials due to his terrorist internet postings and think of the fact that he was in email contact with one of the worst al Qaeda recruiters.  Then think of the fact that Obama abjectly refused to acknowledge that it was a terrorist attack and particularly a terrorist attack inspired by rabid Islamic theology.  Think of the fact that the soldiers who were killed and wounded in that terrorist attack were systematically denied Purple Heart benefits for nearly the entire degenerate cancer of the Obama presidency and the abject refusal from Obama to treat this mass shooting as an Islam-inspired terrorist attack.

Here’s the other one near the end of Obama’s presidency, to document that even after eight years, this rabid fool was STILL a fool but STILL supported by the Party of Rabid Fools: a black hater armed with the ideology of racist anti-white hate at a “Black Lives Matter” – an obviously racist statement that white lives DON’T matter – systematically executed five police officers intent on murdering WHITE cops.  In the aftermath of the Dallas massacre did Obama ONCE take on black hate?  Not one the life of your little roach-soul, Democrat: Obama instead went to the farthest leftist demagoguery and blamed the 2nd Amendment for the massacre.  And the Democratic Party and the leftists and the mainstream media cheered that Obama refused to acknowledge the hate that characterized their ideological bowel movement.

Consider the direct comparisons:

In July of 2016, an avowed black nationalist murdered five police officers during a Black Lives Matter demonstration in Dallas, Texas. The act of violence was well-planned and was motivated entirely by the hate-filled ideology of the shooter, Micah Xavier Johnson.

With several officers dead by the hand of a committed black nationalist, one might think the Obama administration may have considered the assassinations domestic terror and launched an investigation into groups associated with this ideology.

Not at all.

Barack Obama condemned the shootings, but he did not call out or even allude to Johnson’s hateful views. He did, however, blame “powerful weapons” for the violence.

In her statement on the shooting, then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch exploited the tragedy to push for gun control and praise the cause of Black Lives Matter. No mention of Johnson’s ideology or “hate” in was made in her statement, but she did manage to directly name multiple cases of police-involved shootings — all after cops were the ones murdered.

Trump and his administration were urged to speak strongly against the alt-right on the presumption that there would further violence if none was taken.
In the case of the Dallas shooting, there was further violence from black nationalists following the attack. In the same month, three officers were gunned down in Baton Rouge, Louisiana by an adherent to this radical ideology. (RELATED: Baton Rouge Shooter Gavin Eugene Long Was Nation Of Islam Member, Railed Against ‘Crackers’ On YouTube Channel)

In a less violent case that also occurred in July of 2016, several churches in the area of St. Louis, Missouri, were vandalized and graffitied with rhetoric associated with black nationalism.

Once again, no demands for the Obama administration to condemn these actions — quite unlike how Trump is browbeaten to do so any whiff of extremism from the Right.

Let me just put it this way: Democrats love to label Republicans as the KKK, in spite of the historical FACT that the Klu Klux Klan was the invention of DEMOCRATS that had the mission of terrorizing blacks and WHITE REPUBLICANS.  It is and always has been DEMOCRATS who are the true KKK, but let me provide another 3-letter label for Democrats that is even more descriptive of the party’s actual platform and ultimate destiny: HHH.  And “HHH” stands for “Hellbound Hateful Hypocrites.”

It simply stands as a documented fact of history that Democrats and liberals are profound, pathological hypocrites.

Understand the demon-possessed hypocrisy of every single liberal in America as they scream that Donald Trump do something that their own Messiah of Hate refused to do even ONCE for eight demoniac years.  Had Donald Trump blamed Dodge Challengers for the attack, he would have been no different – and no more ideologically despicable and no more cowardly – than Barack Hussein Obama.

So when Donald Trump said that there were bad people on BOTH sides – having already gone far enough to acknowledge that there was evil in the white nationalist side after eight years of Barack Obama refusing to acknowledge that there was even anything called “black nationalism” or “leftist hate groups” it amounts to an appalling act of outrageous moral hypocrisy that the left that steadfastly ignores the giant log in its own eyes suddenly became morally indignant at Donald Trump’s refusal to go farther than a thousand miles further than Obama ever went.

I think of the left, the Democratic Party that is the political representation of the left, the mainstream media that is the propaganda mouthpiece for the left, the postmodernist denial of truth that is the philosophy of the left and the militant atheism that is the religious expression of the left.  I think of how the left framed the “science” of evolution: there IS no God and can BE no God, and therefore evolution is the only “reasonable” or acceptable way to understand our origins.  If you merely were open to the logical possibility that there COULD be a Creator God, and then considered the impossible complexity of the universe and the impossibility of chance to account for that universe, you would be compelled to come to a vastly different conclusion based on the evidence and to reality.  But instead the left simply ruled out a priori even the possibility of a Creator.  And although evolution is logical nonsense, logical nonsense prevailed because its rival explanation was denied any place in the debate.

In the same way, we have the left “defining” racism as “an unequal power structure.”  And thereby claiming that since blacks have no power, it is “impossible” for blacks to exhibit racism.  When what racism very clearly is to anyone who is NOT a fool is the hostility or distrust toward members of a given race as a group simply because of their race.

And for the official record, one very much CAN hate one’s own race.  Adolf Hitler’s father was half Jewish.  Adolf Hitler ordered his father’s birthplace complete with graves and birth registries to be forcibly evacuated and turned it into an artillery practice site to obliterate proof of his Jewishness.  DNA tests from known members of Hitler’s family prove it.  When Hitler hated Jews, he hated his own illegitimate genealogy.  In the same manner Karl Marx was a self-hating Jew who was the descendant of a long line of rabbis.  The Jerusalem Post piece gets it wrong when its writer claims he converted to Christianity: he was a philosophical materialist and an atheist and his worldview was purely atheistic and his statement about religion being the opiate of the masses is ample proof of this fact.  Yet this Jewish man wrote some incredibly hateful things about his own race.  And the author of the Jerusalem Post piece is entirely correct when he states that “The tradition of self-hatred was sustained by Jewish communists.”  Which is to say that being a leftist and despising one’s own race and one’s own past goes hand-in-glove.

I think of all these white liberals, consumed by the guilt that they had been indoctrinated to believe were pathological to their own race.  And pathetically attempting to disavow the racism that they themselves claim was literally part of their own DNA.  Which is probably why liberalism actually believes that owe can be physically and biologically be born a man but somehow actually be a woman with this poor, tortured soul somehow being a victim of his own DNA with that aforementioned DNA somehow being a liar and not representing who they truly are.  And so as ideologically indoctrinated liberals they turn on their own race and actually congratulate themselves for it to the praise and adoration of the echo chamber cocoon they live inside of.

And so in addition to or as a result of hating themselves, their ancestors, their own DNA, the left despise the cultural roots that created that which they hate: and so they must destroy all taint of the culture they so despise.  And yes, it is a pathological component of liberal/leftist ideology.  And so we go back to the Bolsheviks that the modern left today closely resembles in myriad ways:

In surveying the devastation of art wrought by the [Bolshevik] Revolution, a commission for artistic preservation, a commission for artistic preservation, headed by the noted art historian Igor Grabar and working closely with the Bolshevik government, reported a wave of destruction and burning in the summer of 1918 in which masses of art treasures perished or were stolen.  The Revolution and the Civil War, said the report, had resulted in “manor houses reduced to dust, slashed paintings, demolished statues, gutted palaces, and cathedrals destroyed by shells.”  Some of this was of course the offshoot of combat, but most of it was vandalism–the willful destruction or defacement of beautiful objects.  The beauty of these objects, lamented the commission, was not appreciated by the peasants who saw in “pictures, sculptures, antique furniture, and musical instruments not works of spiritual value but only characteristic features of landlord life–a life alien to them.” [pg. 5, Bolshevik Culture: Experiment and Order in the Russian Revolution, 1989, edited by Abbott Gleason, Peter Kenez, Richard Stites]

In the very same way Islamic State terrorists – whose vile ideology was at best benignly ignored and at worst actually protected by Barack Obama – destroyed all vestiges of any and every culture they did not like as a matter of routine.  And those who love history shocked and horrified by the ISIS destruction of Palmyra.

But where was the outrage over a liberal/leftist mob tearing down and then destroying a statue in Durham, North Carolina???  Where was the mainstream media outrage over this act of anarchy???

We have leftists saying things like:

“It’s going to happen,” promised Dyer, an artist. “This is a beautiful equestrian statue, and I don’t want to be like the Taliban or the Bolsheviks, but this has got to go. If the city does not move it, we will. Lickity-split.”

Which amounts to, “I don’t want to be like the Taliban or like the Bolsheviks, but what the hell, I am like them, so I’ll do the same thing and by destroying history actually repeat the very ugliest elements of history because I’m a liberal and that’s what I do.

An overwhelming majority of Americans want the Confederate statues to remain as objects of history to be contemplated, or just as objects of Southern cultural pride to be respected.  But liberalism is fascism, and fascism must violently tear down whatever it hates regardless of whether it is “lawful” or popularly supported or not.  They have learned like all vile ideologies that with enough violence and enough hateful and rabid resistance, they will ultimately triumph as an apathetic culture shrugs and says, “whatever.”

We live in a society where in city after city, the police have become political pawns, standing by while liberals and leftists violently confront any and all conservatives from not only demonstrating according to their 1st Amendment Constitutional rights, but simply having the right to SPEAK.  And this is happening because police at this point understand that the left will literally MURDER THEM if they stand up to the mobs.  It happened in Baltimore with the mayor literally saying, “We gave them space to destroy.”  It happened in Berkeley, with video documenting police standing down while leftist mobs violently attacked people and property they didn’t like.  Again, with the liberal mayor of Berkeley ordering police to stand down so conservatives could be violently attacked.  And yes, the same thing happened once again in Charlottesville, a liberal bastion whose mayor was among the very first in the nation to declare war on Trump and all those who supported him: police clearly stood down while the situation grew out of control, with even the ACLU pointing out the liberal mayor and the liberal governor were to blame for the ensuing violence that resultedThe streets were not barricaded as per the agreement with the city of Charlottesville.  The violent so-called Antifa were not penned in as per the agreement with the Charlottesville Police Department.  Rather, the violent leftists were permitted to freely roam the streets and block the entrance to Lee Park that the so-called “far right” group had a legally permitted right to march to.  And so what happened as a result with even the ACLU acknowledging the fact?

WASHINGTON – In the wake of the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, which left one dead and at least 38 injured, many members of the national media were quick to blame the “Unite the Right” rally attendees for the outbreak of street warfare between “alt-right” and “alt-left” protesters.

But according to the ACLU and reporters covering the rally, the violence escalated due to what many believe was an intentional lack of police oversight, with the blame aimed squarely at Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe.

“The police actually allowed us to square off against each other,” one counter-protester told CNN. “There were fights, and the police were standing a block away the entire time. It’s almost as if they wanted us to fight each other.”

I’ve heard all kinds of reports that the “right-wing” protesters showed up armed.  But have you heard this that I saw in the Los Angeles Times once and ONLY once in the ocean of reports of armed right-wing groups?

Redneck Revolt, an armed leftist group that brought rifles to Justice Park, one of the spots where anti-racist groups had gathered.

What do you call it when the mainstream media selectively reports one fact about one side that they don’t like but refuses to report the same fact about their own side?  We call this “bias.”

Was the left violent?  Or was only the “far right” violent?  Let’s see what a University of Virginia student named Isabella Ciambotti had to say about what she saw to decide whether Donald Trump was right to say that there were bad people on both sides.

I was on Market Street around 11:30 a.m. when a counterprotester ripped a newspaper stand off the sidewalk and threw it at alt-right protesters. I saw another man from the white supremacist crowd being chased and beaten. People were hitting him with their signs. A much older man, also with the alt-right group, got pushed to the ground in the commotion. Someone raised a stick over his head and beat the man with it, and that’s when I screamed and ran over with several other strangers to help him to his feet.

Ah, so what?  “Isabella Ciambotti” is a white Anglo-Saxon name if I ever heard one.  And I have to say for the sake of ignorant liberals that I am being facetious.  Because no, it isn’t.

When did the ugly car-ramming incident occur?

The crash occurred approximately two hours after clashes in which hundreds of people scramed, chanted, threw punches, hurled water bottles and unleashed chemical sprays on each other ahead of the scheduled noon demonstration.

It occurred AFTER scenes just like this one:

I mean, with due respect, the evil man has a flag; the morally sublime “anti-protester” has a freaking incendiary device to peacefully burn the evil man armed with the flag.

One side had a lawful permit to demonstrate.  The other side showed up armed to the teeth and ready to fight the side with the lawful permit whether the law permitted them to demonstrate or not.  Because the true fascist cannot abide anything that in any way disagrees with it.  You have to have the morally sublime SA stormtrooper with his flame thrower to burn out all heresy.

But what does the hater do?  He blames his victims for his own hate.  And so even though it is beyond obvious that it was HIS actions that caused this violence to escalate so out of control – reporters on the ground at the time reported that the police were actually funneling the white nationalists directly into the crowd of anti-protesters rather than keeping them separated from each other as common sense would dictate – he blames who?  Trump, of course.

Donald Trump said another entirely true fact other than the entirely true fact that yes, bad people showed up on both sides, both sides came ready for a fight, the city of Charlottesville and its leftist mayor were responsible for the violence getting so out-of-control that something truly horrible was GUARANTEED to happen.  He also asked the simple question as to when the left will be satisfied by its destruction of anything and everything that they don’t like and their many-times demonstrated willingness to use violence to do it.

We’ve been seeing this hate from liberals all along.  We saw it a few months ago when a liberal Democrat with an assault rifle showed up at the Republican congressional baseball practice, verified that it was the Republicans on the field, and then opened fire.  And the article I just linked to again shows the blatant, rabid hypocrisy of the Democratic Party and of the media because in the aftermath of that political violence, Democrats did NOT acknowledge the hate and the evil on their side; they just blamed Republicans and Republican policies.

So other than being a hypocrite, what reason do you have for demanding Donald Trump single out groups in any way, shape or form associated with him (mostly by liberal press fake news accounts) when you yourselves refused to single out YOUR hate groups and the hate on your OWN side???

There have been vicious, bloody attacks of Trump’s supporters by leftist hate groups.  At San Jose, where the mayor was a Black Lives Matter supporter who had the police stand down while the rights and freedoms of conservatives were systematically violently denied.   Go to Berkeley, where a professor used a bike lock on the head of a Trump supporter and another Trump supporter was beaten in the head by a liberal using his skateboard.  The media coverage tried to frame their narrative in “Trumpian terms,” telling us that “both sides” were involved in the fighting.  But it was liberals violently attacking conservativesConservatives were beaten and bloodied at BerkeleyWhen you watch the video you hear the audio the black-armored fascist thugs who call themselves “Antifa” for the euphemistic title of “Anti-Fascist” viciously surround and beat conservatives while shouting “Beat the fascist!”  And look at the pictures below of white Trump supporters afterward.

In all of these many cases, in these liberal cities, we have the vivid reminder of black protestors being attacked while the racist police stood and watched.  Only now the racist police are political pawns standing by while liberals violently attack conservatives.

This leftist violence has been going on for a good year.  It is because of that leftist violence that I became a Trump supporter in the first place, as I wrote about:

Democrats Truly Are Nazis, Or How The Left Actually Started Turning Me Into A Trump Supporter.

The Choice Is Now Clear, America: It’s Donald Trump Or It’s NAZISM. The Democrat Party Is THE Party Of Fascist, Nazi Thugs

The Nazis Are Already At It AGAIN: In These Last Days Before The Beast, Democrats are Sons And Daughters Of Hell, Pure And Simple

Democrats Are More ‘NAZI’ Today Than Actual NAZIS As Vicious Democrat Violence CONSTANTLY Physically Attacks Free Speech

Documented Fact: Obama And Clinton ORGANIZED PHYSICAL VIOLENCE AGAINST AMERICANS Who Support Trump Through Party Roaches

Another Day, Another VIOLENT RIOT By Proto-Nazi DEMOCRATS

This crap has been going on not just during and following the Trump election victory, but for years of Obama.  Before the vicious riots of Black Lives Matter where police officers were fair fame for assassination, it was the vile Occupy Movement.  It’s been the left organizing and exploiting violence all along.  We have a Democrat Party machine operative who was literally caught on video organizing political violence against conservatives visiting the Obama White House 342 times.

Don’t tell me that the left hasn’t been organizing violently.

President Trump said:

“What about the alt-left that came charging at the, as you say, alt-right? Do they have any semblance of guilt? Let me ask you this. What about the fact that they came charging with clubs in their hands, swinging clubs, do they have any problem? I think they do. So as far as I’m concerned, that was a horrible, horrible day,” Trump said.

But Donald Trump states an obvious FACT and the media goes nuts with hate.  It’s an amazing thing.

The left is now tearing down the history of the republic.  Gleefully using violence to do it.  In North Caroline in broad freaking daylight, liberals tore down a Confederate statue right in front of a government building with no one arrested for vandalism or for anything else.

So whose feeling marginalized and discriminated against right now???

Liberals who are utterly lawless defaced the Lincoln Monument with graffiti writing, “Fuck law.”  Because as I have documented they are utterly lawless and brazenly defy the law everywhere at every turn.

In Chicago, a Lincoln statue was defaced and burned by the left.  A liberal said “Fuck Abe Lincoln.”

This is a trend and it wasn’t just Trump predicting that the left wouldn’t stop at Confederate monuments.  They have a history-defacing agenda.

Trump argued “what’s next?  Washington and Jefferson?  They owned slaves.”  And yes, they are on the left’s hit list.  The left’s hate list.

“Is it George Washington next week and is it Thomas Jefferson the week after? You have to ask yourself where does it stop?” Trump said.

He continued, “George Washington was a slave owner. So will George Washington lose his status? Are we gonna take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? Do you like him, because he was a major slave owner.  Are we gonna take down his statue? So it’s fine. You’re changing history, you’re changing culture and I’m not talking about the neo-nationalists or the neo-Nazis because they should be condemned totally. But you had people in that group other than neo-Nazis, other than white nationalists, ok? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.”

The mainstream media falsely and dishonestly claimed that, no, the left was ONLY going after the hated Confederate memorials.  But that was a fake news LIE as I have already documented above.

There is a REASON that Lincoln – who is of course hated for it by the left now – demanded mercy and tolerance for the Confederacy that he gave his life to defeat: and the reason is that the damn war had to end.  And doing what the left is viciously and hatefully doing to us today in their self-denying fascist intolerance is the exact opposite of what Lincoln realized needed to be done to end the Civil War.  Which interestingly was started by Democrats after Republican Lincoln was elected.  Because the same party platform premise that states that we have a right to declare as nonhuman babies and murder them was the identical same party platform premise that declared that people had a right to declare as nonhuman blacks and force them into bondage.  The moral arguments justifying both are identical, and it is simply true that the Democrat Party always has been the party of hate, is today the party of hate, and always will BE the party of hate.

And so no, they WON’T stop.  They have an agenda to abolish the Constitution and first they have to demolish the symbols upholding it.  Destroy Thomas Jefferson and you destroy the Constitution that he participated in writing.  Take away George Washington and you not only destroy the Constitution that he served as president of the committee including Jefferson who wrote the Constitution, you destroy the Father of our Country and therefore you take away the foundation for the nation he founded.

And now the left will be finally free to impose their own country over the one they have hated since even before the founder of the ACLU declared, “Communism is the goal” back in 1920.

It is true and it’s been true for a long time: if people had known what Barack Obama’s real agenda was, they never would have elected him.  So he lied and the media colluded in helping him get away with his lie.  Obama intentionally presented himself as “a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.”  He was never honest.  We now know he lied like hell when he said he believed “as a Christian” that marriage was between one man and one woman.  His own chief political strategist has declared that Obama lied “for political reasons.”  We also know that Obama lied like hell to pimp ObamaCare by repeatedly declaring obvious lies such as “If you like your plan, you’ll be able to keep your plan and if you like your doctor, you’ll be able to keep your doctor.”  Obama was never honest with the America people.  He lied to get himself in office and he lied again in 2012 to stay in office.

It’s illuminating to hear a self-acknowledged liberal political expert declare that no, Obama would NOT have defeated Trump if he had been able to run again a third time as Obama also falsely declared.  Too many people whom he had let down were beyond fed up with his lies.

So you just watch.  The left has an agenda that they won’t tell you about until after it is too late to stop it.  But we already can see it coming.  Prominent black liberal Al Sharpton is already calling for George Washington and Thomas Jefferson to go.  And he did it right after Trump predicted that was coming next.  The Jefferson Memorial should come down.  And so the Constitution will stand on what?  Wishful thinking?  And we can see now why the left so despises the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.  The Constitution will have its feet firmly planted in mid-air the day before it is deemed by the left to stand for nothing and ought to be abolished just like all the other things these fascists despise.

Did you know that New York is named after a notorious slave trader?  Shall we now change the name?  Maybe call it Roachville to name it after its present inhabitants?  And then there’s our capitol city, Washington D.C. named after George Washington.  We used to think it was the “Redskins” part of “Washington Redskins” that was supposed to be offensive; but the left was already planning to make the “Washington” part offensive, too.

If you want to stop the hate, you’ve simply got to stop the Democrats.  They truly hate America.  They hate the Judeo-Christianity that forged the American worldview.  They hate the people who fought to make our constitutional democratic republic a reality versus tyranny.  They despise the nation that defeated Nazi and Imperial Japanese fascism.  They hate the country that stopped the cancerous spread of communism and successfully defeated the communist Soviet Union.  They want to replace it with something between the French Reign of Terror of the 18th century, the Stalinism that characterized much of the 20th, Maoism, the failed socialist state of Venezuela and the religion of Kim Jong Unism.  They hate our military that prevents these and other ideologies of hate from threatening us; they hate our small businesses that create the overwhelming majority of our jobs and instead favor the mega-corporations because they can more easily regulate them and make them conform to their ideologies.

This isn’t even about racism in terms of the agenda Democrats have.  They have ALWAYS been the party of racism on one hand.  We go back to the Civil War that Democrats viciously fought to keep blacks in bondage, then we think about the vicious postwar years after the Civil War when Democrats started the Klu Klux Klan to terrorize blacks and white Republicans as a means to continue to impose their brand of power in the South.  We think about the Jim Crow laws that Democrat-appointed justices decreed.  Then we get to the 20th century when Woodrow Wilson re-imposed the segregation that Republicans had banned; and from there we got to FDR segregating the labor unions to keep black people out.  We get to the 1924 Democratic National Convention otherwise known as “Klanbake” because it was utterly dominated by the Klan and the racist Klan agenda.  We get to the racist Democrat governor Orval E. Faubus.  At this point we’re a full century after the Civil War, and ONE racist party is still as hard-core racist as ever and the other party is still fighting them (Republican President Eisenhower imposed the right of black children to attend public schools over the Democrats cries of rabid hate).

The Democratic Party isn’t a party that suddenly changed it’s spots.  It’s a party that discovered a new way to own and dominate black people.

I stand against hate and violence.  Which is why I am a Judeo-Christian and follower of Jesus the Prince of Peace and which is why I vote for the Party of Lincoln that was just defaced by the Party of Hate.

 

 

Advertisements

All Lives Matter. But POLICE Lives Matter: In Fact Police Lives Matter Most Of All.

October 21, 2016

 

Last night I attended a “Glow Walk” to honor our police and take a damn stand against a depraved media liberal culture that routinely undermines and even demonizes them.

I put it this way to the chief who shook my hand and thanked me for coming: I pointed to the American flag over our heads – which was at half mast over the police station due to the assassination-murder of two police officers in an adjacent city – and I said, “I came because of THAT.”  Because every time I drive by and see that flag at half mast it makes me sick, it makes me seethe with rage, because I know what it represents.  We have to choose sides right now in this nation; and I’m choosing my side.  I’m choosing to side with law and order and justice and decency over murderous ideological vermin and the cultural elites who are supporting those vermin.

For the record, I have had several opportunities to spend time with my chief of police.  He is a truly wonderful man.  I have met his wife, and they are a loving, caring, dedicated couple.  He is a professional: if he were serving another city, he would serve that city to his utmost.  As it is, he is serving MY city.  And while I don’t get to see him work in the office as the chief, he never seems to miss an opportunity to be an ambassador for his department.  He is always affable, always listening, always caring.  And our crime rate has dropped dramatically in the time he has served.  We are lucky to have this man as our chief.  Period.

EVERY human life matters.

But ONLY people who are pro-life have any right whatsoever to say that.  Because ultimately either EVERY human life matters, or NO human life ultimately matters.  Because when you start parsing out human life, and arguing that this life matters, this one doesn’t: this human life is sacred because mommy wants her; but with this human life we can stick a tube in her head and suck her brains out and then crush her skull with forceps and pull her mutilated body out of what God intended to be the safest place for her on earth.  When we can do something like that, then NO LIFE MATTERS.  Because we ALL start from that same exact place in the womb.  And according to science – according to the branch of science which is specifically charged with classifying organisms into their proper categories – we never become more “human” than we are from the very moment of conception.

A zygote, in her mother’s womb, is:

homosapiens

I created that image just a few moments ago, under what I believe was divine inspiration.  Because the science on the left and the image of the baby in the womb on the right scream the identical same message: that baby in the womb is HUMAN.  A child in the womb is HUMAN by virtue of her parents; she is a BEING by virtue of the fact that she is a living thing: SHE IS A HUMAN BEING.

We are all equal as humans because we all have the same human nature which we had at the very first moment of conception.  And either human life matters because it’s human life or it doesn’t.  And if it doesn’t, then whoever is in power gets to start playing games with what ought to be sacred and sacrosanct.

Either that unborn baby’s life matters, regardless of her level of “intelligence” or “ability” or “accomplishment” or spatial location, or else there is nothing logically or morally preventing us from going the way of the Nazis, or the Stalinists, or the Maoists, or the Khmers rouges, or the North Koreans, etc. and just start killing by the millions, by the tens of millions, every single human being who fails to measure up to our a priori determination of what a valuable “human” is.

Senior citizens’ lives don’t matter: they are no longer producing, they are soaking up benefits that others could be putting to more productive use and to pay out those benefits undermines more viable “humans.”  Or black lives don’t matter: too many of these individuals are on welfare, producing nothing, only costing society, and now to make matters even worse they are creating societal unrest.  And so on.  Look at that damn cripple over there in that wheelchair.  What a waste of flesh!  Look at that dwarf!  It’s like a human head on a monkey body!  And therefore, “The members of these groups whose lives don’t matter should be euthanized in the most efficient and inexpensive process possible, so that more fit, more productive “humans” may live and flourish.  Which is the very heart of evil.

According to the so-called “science” of Darwinism, that is actually a FAR more scientifically valid argument than murdering healthy babies who have their entire lives before them and have unimaginable potential.  After all, who can demonstrate that we didn’t abort our next evolutionary link that would have made us better – and now our entire SPECIES will perish because we didn’t evolve when we needed to.  And all because we kept aborting our next step to evolutionary greatness…

It is an incredibly arbitrary, and murderous act to kill human beings merely because they have not yet reached the stage that they most certainly WOULD have reached had they merely not been killed yet.  Why don’t we kill five-year olds?  What good are THEY?  What do THEY produce?  I mean, hell, let’s wipe out the teenagers; they are FAR more trouble than they are worth according to most objective standards!!!

EVERY human life matters to anyone who truly believes the Bible, because the Bible declares in Genesis 1:26-27 that:

Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”  God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

The Bible is crystal clear regarding the unborn and their precious humanity:

You made all the delicate, inner parts of my body and knit me together in my mother’s womb.  Thank you for making me so wonderfully complex! Your workmanship is marvelous–how well I know it.  You watched me as I was being formed in utter seclusion, as I was woven together in the dark of the womb.  You saw me before I was born. Every day of my life was recorded in your book. Every moment was laid out before a single day had passed.  How precious to me are your thoughts, O God! How vast is the sum of them!  I can’t even count them; they outnumber the grains of sand! And when I wake up, you are still with me! — Psalm 139:13-18

When it comes to humanity, any morally sane being would err on the side of humanity; which is to say that no one would EVER harm something that even MIGHT be an innocent human life unless they were either truly insane or genuinely evil.  So if you are a mother, and you have several children, and you hear your oldest daughter say, “Mommy, can I kill this?” from behind you while you are cutting up vegetables, YOU LOOK TO SEE WHAT SHE IS TALKING ABOUT.  Because she might be talking about her little sister.  And in the same way, anybody who says, “Well, who is to say WHEN “human life” begins, so let’s leave it up to anybody who wants to make their own choice one way or another,” is no morally different than the Islamic State caliphate allowing its adherents to decide whether Yazidis are “human” or not: and you go ahead and kill ’em as you want to if you don’t think they meet the standard.

It’s particularly easy for Bible-believing Christians – who were demonized by liberal media culture well before that culture began undermining and demonizing our police officers – to realize that Jesus loves EVERYONE regardless of their race or anything else that has nothing whatsoever to do with our fundamental humanity as His image-bearers:

Jesus loves the little children
All the children of the world
Red, brown, yellow
Black and white
They are precious in His sight.
Jesus loves the little children
Of the world.
Jesus died for all the children
All the children of the world
Red, brown, yellow
Black and white
They are precious in His sight.
Jesus died for all the children
Of the world.
Jesus rose for all the children
All the children of the world
Red, brown, yellow
Black and white
They are precious in His sight.
Jesus rose for all the children
Of the world.

ALL LIVES MATTER.

I still recoil in SHOCK at the fact that the Democrat Party actually forced a candidate running for president – and the following statement destroyed that candidate’s chances of winning the nomination of the Democrat Party – to apologize because he made the “mistake” of saying that “ALL LIVES MATTER” to a group of liberals who demanded that only BLACK lives matter.  Those liberals can play all the damn pseudo-intellectual word-games they want; they can equivocate all they want; but the same Democrat Party that booed the statement that “all lives matter” is the same party that has systematically exterminated ten times more innocent human life than the Nazis did during the Holocaust.

EVERY human life is of what morally intelligent philosophers describe as “incommensurate value.”  There is no price, no amount of gold or gems or any other form of value, that can compensate for the life of a human being.

For the record, the death penalty itself – which is BIBLICAL – is itself a testimony of that above fact: if you murder another human being, there is literally NOTHING you can do or give that will compensate for the sheer magnitude of your moral crime.  YOU took a life – you STOLE a life – and YOUR life shall be taken in return.  The scales of justice will be BALANCED.  And that act of JUSTICE in recognition of the value and the magnitude of innocent human life will become an object lesson to us all.

All lives matter.  Even the lives of those who have been murdered, who have been expunged, who have been aborted.

But police lives matter MORE.

Why do I say that?

It is not that police lives are more valuable because police are somehow better “humans.”  That is not true.  Police officers are as “human” as the rest of us.  They too were zygotes, were embryos, were fetuses, were infants, were toddlers, were teenagers, and capable of making all the mistakes and errors that are prone to frail, imperfect, fallen humanity.

Police officers sweat.  Police officers feel fear.  Police officers have families and they want desperately to see their children grow up and grow old with their loved ones.

Police officers are human.  Nothing less.  Nothing more.

But a police officer wearing the badge, wearing the uniform, bearing the weapon that he or she is uniquely entitled to bear because that officer has been given the trust of a society to serve and to protect that society, becomes something even more special, even more sacred, to the flourishing of that society.

If I am murdered, it is a heinous crime.  Nothing on earth can purchase my life back, or properly compensate for the fact that I am now dead because someone made the decision to murder me.  And the person who murdered me ought to be hunted down by the police, placed on trial for his or her life by a court of law according to our laws, and imprisoned and ultimately executed after the proper appeals process determines that no grievous mistakes were made in the trial that would make that execution an act of injustice.

That is true of every single American: red, brown, yellow, black and white; male or female; young or old; disabled or abled; rich or poor.  Because all are precious in God’s sight.

But if a police officer is murdered in the line of duty, the statement I made above about the dignity and value of all human life is true, but there is something even beyond that: that officer’s murder represents an attack on our very system of justice itself, upon the society that has created that system of justice and ordains it, and literally an attack upon human civilization.

Police work has always been dangerous.  Officers pursuing fleeing suspects or attempting to apprehend dangerous criminals could very well use deadly force against the police.  But today we are seeing something radically different: we are witnessing ideologues assassinating police officers from complete ambush.

It’s literally like Vietnam where soldiers could never know who the enemy was or for that matter modern Iraq and Afghanistan where terrorists plant Improvised Explosive Devices to kill or maim without warning.

Police must therefore treat everyone like a potential assassin – which guarantees more shootings as terrified police with hair triggers try to stay alive knowing a target is on their back and they can be murdered for no reason other than they are police officers at any moment.  Which guarantees more shootings as frightened police see guns where otherwise they would have exercised more restraint.  Which then gives the ideologues more “justification” to kill more police.  Which the ideologues knowingly intend to create a vicious cycle.  And everyone who kills a police officer in the name of “Black Lives Matter” is in actuality guaranteeing that more black lives will be killed by terrified police.  And they actually WANT that!

Furthermore, the police – being “human” – will withdraw from communities that do not support them.  They will stay in their cars in the inner cities and innocent black people who could have been saved will die because the police are too frightened of being either killed or prosecuted for doing their jobs.  That too is part of the vicious cycle.

And this vicious cycle can only stop when society treats police with the respect they deserve and need to do their vital jobs.

As I said before, our police officers are human.  They are in a very nearly impossible job, trying to serve justice in situations that are so depraved, so confused, that it becomes impossible for any other being but God Himself to be able to know what to do.  Then you add in the next human factor of fear: that officer is in a situation in which his or her very life is at stake if he or she hesitates to pull that trigger at the right moment when the subject is about to take that officers’ life.  Did that officer shoot before he or she should have fired?  People come in after the fact who are themselves completely SAFE at that point and make that determination.  Which is why YES, it is REASONABLE to give that officer of the law the benefit of the doubt in complex situations.

The Bible, the Word of God, is crystal clear in this:

Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God.  Therefore whoever resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves.  For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have no fear of authority? Do what is good and you will have praise from the same; for it is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath on the one who practices evil.  Therefore it is necessary to be in subjection, not only because of wrath, but also for conscience’ sake.  — Romans 13:1-5

The police bear the sword of government for our own protection, for our own good.

That comes from the pen of St. Paul, who was beheaded by the unjust system of justice of the very government whom he was upholding.  Because under divine inspiration, St. Paul understood that, even in a wicked regime like ancient Rome, or modern-day North Korea or Iran, the police largely exist to ensure a stable, peaceful society.  God ordained them for that role.

For better or worse, this is the government we have, and if we are to change that government, or that system of justice, we are to do it PEACEABLY and through legitimate means.

And so yes, we all agree that there are times when an officer acts unjustly, when an officer acts in a depraved manner.  There are also times when JUDGES act in such unjust, depraved manner.  And there are times when the system that appoints those judges acts in an unjust, depraved manner.

By the very standards I have set above, when an officer, or a judge, or a politician, commits a violent act under the color of sacred authority, that officer should face even GREATER penalty.

But it is NOT up to ANY individual in ANY society to make that determination for himself or herself, that an officer of the law, that an officer charged with justice and peace for a society, should be killed.  Because that is the path toward anarchy and nihilism and the end of civilization.

All lives matter.  But no life matters more than the life of a police officer who is wearing the uniform and the badge and the weapon serving and protecting his or her community to the best of his or her ability.

And that is why I support and honor my police officers.

And anyone who claims otherwise is an agent bent upon the destruction of our society and everything it stands for.

As a military veteran, I urge veterans to see our police officers and introduce themselves and say, “Thank you for your service.”  Because police work is literally taking place in a war-zone, a modern-day battlefield, today in America.

 

 

 

A Deal Is A Deal – Unless Weasel Democrats Are Involved

November 16, 2009

Remember that House vote the other week?  220-215.  Three votes go the other way and it fails.

Democrats knew that.  So they allowed the Stupak Amendment banning federal dollars be spent on abortion.  And what would have failed instead passed.

In a surprise move after hours of tumultuous negotiations, the House Rules Committee, very early Saturday morning, approved rules for debate on the pro-abortion health care bill. Although it appeared Speaker Nancy Pelosi would deny one, it allows a vote on an amendment to remove abortion funding.

Pelosi’s hand appeared to have been forced when pro-abortion House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer announced earlier in the day that she did not have enough votes to pass the bill because of objections from pro-life Democrats.

The committee okayed a Rule that allows the House to vote on the Stupak amendment, offered by pro-life Rep. Bart Stupak, a Michigan Democrat, to the health care reform legislation.

Stupak had dozens of Democrats who threatened to vote against the Rule and the bill if he did not get a vote on his amendment. If the amendment is defeated, Stupak and pro-life Democrats will likely still oppose the bill because of the abortion funding.

Republicans could have simply voted “present” and the Pelosi version of Obamacare would have died an agonizing death as moderate Democrats voted against it.  But they remained true to their principles and did the honorable thing in voting for the amendment.

They passed up the opportunity to play politics and did what was right.

Which makes them better than the Democrats under Obama, Pelosi, and Reid will ever be.

Democrats got what they wanted in passing what The Wall Street Journal calls “The Worst Bill Ever.”  And then they turned around immediately and began discussing how they could stab the representatives who voted for the bill because it contained the Stupak amendment in the back.

Updated November 15, 2009
Axelrod Signals Obama Will Try to Strip Abortion Language From Health Care Bill

by FOXNews.com

White House Senior Adviser David Axelrod suggested Sunday that President Obama will intervene to make sure a controversial amendment restricting federal funding for abortion coverage is stripped from final health care reform legislation.

In doing so, the president would be heeding the call of abortion rights supporters like Planned Parenthood that have called the White House their “strongest weapon” in keeping such restrictions out of the bill.

The abortion amendment was tacked on to the House health care bill and was a key factor in securing the votes of moderate Democrats before the bill was approved by a narrow margin last weekend. The amendment, authored by Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., went beyond preventing the proposed government-run plan from covering abortion to restrict federal subsidies from going toward private plans that offer abortion coverage.

Axelrod said in an interview Sunday that the amendment changes the “status quo,” something the president cannot abide.

Sixty-four Democrats showed the courage of their convictions against heated opposition and voted for the Stupak amendment.  I hope they learned how dishonest their leadership is from this experience.  I hope next time they vote ‘no’ no matter what lies the Democrats promise.

Negotiating with Democrats is rather like negotiating with North Korea.  They are a bunch of dishonest Marxists.  They’ll break their word, and renege on whatever they agreed to once they get what they want.

P.S.  It’s fitting that the proponents of a bill that will result in death panels as seniors die by medical neglect that will be imposed by their own government demand that abortion be included.

Mind you, the Democrats’ bill isn’t just a death panel — it is 101 death panels.

It’s as simple as this: Democrats want a system by which people who traditionally have not bought health insurance – including healthy young people – are forced to purchase health insurance coverage.  If they do not purchase coverage, they will be forced to pay a fine.  The idea is to expand coverage and spread out the risks to bring down the unit costs of health care coverage.  But here’s the problem: in order to sell this government monster, Democrats gutted the amount of the fine.  It’s simply not enough to serve as a suitable deterrent.  Young people (and many others) will simply pay the fine and NOT purchase the considerably more expensive health care coverage, knowing that under the Democrat plan they can purchase it later, in the event they need it, and that they could not be turned down for their “pre-existing condition.”  The Democrats won’t get nearly as much revenue as they claim they will.  Per unit costs will necessarily skyrocket, and rationing of care will become an absolute necessity.  And old people will begin dying in droves.

Which is a big part of the reason The Wall Street Journal called this “The Worst Bill Ever.”

The late D. James Kennedy once said:

“Watch out, Grandma and Grandpa!  Because the generation that survived abortion will one day come after you!”

And that day has now come.

Will Mainstream Media Attack Left Over Murder Of Pro-Life Activist?

September 14, 2009

“Pro-Choice Terrorist Murders Pro-Life Activist.”

That would be a genuinely incredible headline to see on CNN, MSNBC, or, heck, even Fox News, wouldn’t it?

Not going to happen.  It would mean that the mainstream media actually had the capacity for balance – and it doesn’t.

A Factiva search for mainstream media articles on the murder of Jim Pouillon returned a total of 19 hits; by contrast, the murder of abortionist Dr. George Tiller turned up 643 hits.  That’s “balance” for you.  The mainline media’s project is to tarnish the right with intolerance, hate, and murder.  And they simply aren’t willing to entertain any facts that conflict with their chosen narrative.

The fact that the murder occurred on the anniversary of 9/11 makes the “terrorist” angle even more obvious – but the mainstream media will avoid that angle like Superman avoids kryptonite.

We’re told of the murderer: “Mr. Drake did not believe children should view the graphic material on the signs Mr. Pouillon carried.”  But it was a “crime of hate, not a hate crime.”  What a ridiculous rationalization!  They’re trying to say that the murderer wasn’t ideological about abortion, but simply quibbled over Pouillon’s sign.

Jim Pouillon was murdered because he was a pro-life protester.  Pure and simple.  To his credit (in pointing out the obvious), even Barack Obama – who had a 100% lifetime NARAL support record – recognizes the fact.  The mainstream media, which fell all over itself to condemn the “climate of hate” of the right and the pro-life movement, refuses to turn its lens on the left and the pro-abortion movement.

We have known for years that the mainstream media have been ideological supporters of the pro-abortion movement, and ideological opponents of the pro-life movement.  And the dishonest mainstream media is revealing how corrupt they are yet again as they virtually ignore the murder of a pro-life activist, and utterly refuse to see the murder as an act of leftwing hate.

A prominent pro-life activist was shot repeatedly and murdered outside of a high school, and the media that came absolutely unglued over “rightwing extremists,” ” intolerance,” “hate,” “domestic terrorism,” etc. etc. etc. will very likely not even mention it.  They just don’t have the integrity.  And they certainly will not use the “leftwing” pejoratives to denounce the murder of a pro-life activist the same way they denounced the “rightwing” for the murder of abortionist Dr. George Tiller.

Anti-abortion activist shot in front of Owosso High School
by Elizabeth Shaw | Flint Journal
Friday September 11, 2009

OWOSSO, Michigan — State police at the Corunna post have confirmed a well-known anti-abortion activist was shot multiple times and killed this morning in front of Owosso High School.

The victim’s identity has not yet been released but the shooting occurred around 7:30 a.m., after most students were off the buses and safely inside the building, said Owosso schools transportation supervisor Jayne Campbell.

State police also confirmed that a suspect was taken into custody about 8:15 a.m. at the suspect’s home.

Owosso High School secretary Wendy Smith said the students remain in lockdown this morning and confirmed that no students were involved and all are safe with classes going on as normal. The shooting did not occur on school property, Smith said.

Meanwhile, police have completely ringed with police tape a section of North Street in front of the school.

A black car can be seen parked at the corner of North and Whitehaven streets, where a portable oxygen tank is lying in a front yard next to a large sign bearing the image of a baby and the word “Life.”

Again, the victim has since been revealed to be James Pullion.

Here is a link to MSNBC’s senior cockroach Keith Olbermann loudly demonizing conservatives, Bill O’Reilly, the pro-life movement, rightwing extremists, hate speech, and whatever else the demons whispered in his ear for him to repeat.  And he was hardly alone in the hatefest.

Mind you, even the media’s presentation of this activist is typical of the left: one who favors the killing of babies in the womb is “pro-choice,” standing for something.  But one who stands up for life is depicted as being “anti.”  It would be nice if the media that likes the term “anti abortion” would choose a similar term such as “anti life” to describe what they invariably call the “pro choice” movement.

We’re seeing it depicted in the health care debate.  Liberals are “pro,” and conservatives are “anti.”  The fact of the matter is I’m actually “pro” a lot of things regarding health care.  I’m “pro” for tort reform, for ending mandates and allowing competition among the 1300 private insurers, for dealing with the problems caused by illegal immigration relating to health care, for keeping government socialism from taking over more of the system than it already has, and a lot of other things.  And liberals are “anti” a lot of things, aren’t they?  But it’s more rhetorically effective for the mainline media to describe me as a “health care opponent” belonging to “the party of no.”

One lone nutjob shot Dr. Tiller, and Keith Olbermann made an entire movement responsible for the act.  What do you want to bet this dishonest purveyor of propaganda at a dishonest network will somehow find the murder of a well-known pro-life activist as nothing to become concerned about?

Every single mainstream media, every single liberal blogger, everyone period, that used the murder of Dr. Tiller to attack the right will now either similarly demonize themselves for their “leftwing terrorist murderer,” or else stand forever condemned of hypocrisy, demagoguery, and propaganda.

Let me provide as an example the partial-birth-loving abortionist who is replacing Dr. Tiller – Dr. Leroy Carhart:

Dr. Carhart calls the murderer of his beloved colleague a “terrorist” saying his friend’s death is  “a declaration of war” on the part of radical anti-abortion activists whom he calls “fundamentalist terrorists . . . no different from al-Qaida, the Taliban or any of them.”

Is this guy going to have the intellectual and moral decency to demonize radical pro-abortion activists as a bunch of “fundamentalist terrorists… no different from al-Qaida,” et al, or is he going to be the hypocritical, dishonest ideologue slimebag that I fully expect him to be?

Obviously, that amounts to a rhetorical question, doesn’t it?

Well, allow me to provide a newsflash.  It is not “the left’s” fault that this pro-life activist was murdered.  It was the fault of one deranged man.

The left was despicable beyond the pale for not recognizing that fact when Dr. Tiller was murdered.

I suppose that is one of the big things that differentiates the right from the left.  For the left, individual identity, individual responsibility, amounts to a social construct.  If an abortionist is murdered, well, the blame must extend to everyone who in any way believes abortion is wrong and speaks out.  You can’t just hold one man accountable for his actions, after all.  Rather, you are a soulless meat puppet driven entirely by DNA and social conditioning.  “O’Reilly made me do it.”

At least, you can’t if he comes from the political right – and his actions are a convenient target for liberal propaganda and demagoguery.

Conservatives, on the other hand, believe profoundly in individual identity and individual responsibility.  Does the left pump out hatred by the tonnage?  Sure it does.  But when some nut commits murder or performs some other hateful act, it is THAT person who bears the full weight of responsibility for his or her actions.  And that person alone.

So allow me to pat myself on the back for my moral superiority to Keith Olbermann and everyone like him as I refuse to attribute their “anti-choice” characterization of this martyr for the pro-life cause as being the reason for his murder.  Because whoever shot this pro-life activist HAD a choice – and chose to murder.

I’m the one who affirms choice, while demagogues like Olbermann and Dr. Carhart – who call me “anti-choice” for my pro-life stand – in all actuality believe that people don’t really have a “choice” at all, but are merely robots programmed by Bill O’Reilly or some other favored bogeyman.

The simple fact of the matter is that the left is “pro-choice” when it suits their agenda, and profoundly anti-choice the rest of the time.

So, go ahead, Keith Olbermann.  I’m waiting to hear your “balanced” coverage of the murder of a pro-life activist.

I leave you with a profound statement from the “terrorist” “anti-choice” position:

“But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child – a direct killing of the innocent child – murder by the mother herself. And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another?” — Mother Teresa

Guns, Ammo, And The Only Jobs Being Created By Obama’s Politics Of Fear

May 21, 2009

People are stockpiling guns and ammunition in a way that no one has ever seen in this country.  And it’s not just conservative rightwing extremists who are bitterly clinging to their guns and religion and racist antipathies as Obama earlier mentioned, either; it’s ordinary people.  Even liberal Democrats are buying guns.

A CNN story puts it this way:

AURORA, Colorado (CNN) — Gun shops across the country are reporting a run on ammunition, a phenomenon apparently driven by fear that the Obama administration will increase taxes on bullets or enact new gun-control measures.

“Driven by fear.”  That’s probably the best way to put it.

Obama talked about “hope” during his demagogic run for the White House.  But a lot of Americans are now finding cause to be very afraid of what Obama hopes for.

I see Obama saying he has no intention of running the auto industry while he fires CEOs, picks boards of directors, converts to common shares of stock so his administration can have an inside presence to change company policies, dictates the advertising budget of an auto company, threatens hedge funds that owned secured debt in auto companies, and changes bankruptcy proceedings to favor politically connected unions.  If that’s what NOT wanting to run the auto industry looks like, I’d sure be terrified to see what Obama would do if he really wanted to run them.  And he’s doing even more to impose his will on the banking and finance industries.

I see such naked displays of fascism, and I am driven by fear.

The Obama administration uses the Department of Homeland Security to contact every police agency in the nation to inform them that returning combat veterans, pro-lifers, and opponents of illegal immigration are not citizens who can be trusted, but should be categorized as “rightwing extremists.”

I see such clearly ideological-driven partisan political branding, and I am driven by fear.

Barack Obama and key members of his administration have repeatedly demagogued guns and the U.S. gun industry by falsely claiming that “90 percent of the guns going into Mexico come from the United Stats.”  If this isn’t demagoguery and propaganda, what is it?

I see such demagogic and dishonest behavior coming out of an administration, and I am driven by fear.

And so we see movements by states to say, “We shouldn’t have to be afraid of our own federal government.”  We see unprecedented movements of states to assert their rights under the 10th Amendment.  And so Montana passes an in-your-face gun law intended to directly challenge the Obama administration.  Utah and Texas began to follow with their own versions of a firearms freedom act.  And the floodgates are opening, as Minnesota and South Carolina are also entering the revolt.  And numerous states are beginning to sponsor state sovereignty resolutions.

States, too, are clearly being driven by fear.

Obama could largely end this fear by simply clearly stating what his until-now twisted and contradictory stance on guns actually is.  The fact that he will not do so only stimulates MORE being driven by fear.

Well, there’s a single good thing coming out of Obama’s politics of fear.  To cite Vice President Joe Biden, all of Obama’s fearmongering is creating “a three letter word”: “J-O-B-S.” In the gun and ammunition industry.

The Obama administration has to make up numbers to justify how its stimulus program has failed.  They have to ignore the 2.6 million jobs they’ve lost and point to 150,000 jobs they can’t show they’ve created.

I think Obama is looking in the wrong place for his “jobs.”  He should point to the jobs in the gun and ammunition industry that he has inspired.

There’s no question that these industries owe their success to Obama and the fear he has created in millions of American hearts and minds.  Obama should take credit for it.

More stockpiling ammunition: Fear of potential Obama laws causing mass sales
By PERRY BACKUS Ravalli Republic

FLORENCE – Every day, Darren Newsom’s three Bitterroot Valley Ammunition facilities crank out 300,000 rounds of ammunition.

It’s not nearly enough.

“I’m going about 100,000 rounds in the wrong direction every day,” Newsom said. “We probably have about six months of back orders right now.”

Newsom has been in the ammunition manufacturing business for more than 20 years and he’s never seen demand this high.

Fearful of the Obama administration’s potential to tighten gun control laws, people from all over the country are stocking up on guns and ammunition.

“I went through the Clinton years and there was a bit of a scare then,” Newsom said. “This is like the Clinton years on steroids.  On the day of the election, our phones started going nuts. It hasn’t stopped since.”

As a master distributor for ATK – the world’s largest ammunition business – Bitterroot Valley Ammunition supplies other ammunition manufacturers around the country with the components needed to make bullets.

“I get a million primers in every other day and most are shipped out the very next day,” he said. “I have 100 million primers on back order right now. We just can’t get enough of them.”

At a recent gun show in Salt Lake City, Newsom sold somewhere between 300,000 and 400,000 rounds in the first two hours.

“It’s just unreal,” he said. “Somewhere in lots of basements around the country, there are millions of rounds of ammunition being stored.”

Local businesses have felt the ammunition shortage.

At Bob Ward’s in Hamilton, Mike Matteson said there has been quite a run on ammunition and reloading supplies like bullets and powder since the election.

“We are especially low right now with pistol ammunition,” Matteson said. “There are four or five calibers that we don’t even have on our shelves.”

Matteson said he didn’t believe manufacturers were prepared for the panic buying that’s occurred since the election.

“They tell us that they’re months behind on some calibers – .22 ammo is really tough to come by,” he said. “Our gun sales are up somewhere between 30 (percent) to 35 percent or better. A good percentage of those sales are pistols.”

Firearm and ammo sales aren’t the only place where concerns about gun control are cropping up.

Ravalli County Sheriff Chris Hoffman has seen a marked increase in the number of people applying for concealed weapons permits since November.

Montana is a “will-issue” state for concealed weapons permits. Any law-abiding citizen who fills out the application and can show they’ve completed some form of firearm safety course can obtain a permit.

The county is averaging about 38 requests for renewals or new permits a month. Last year, the requests averaged about 25.

“It’s definitely a noticeable increase,” Hoffman said.

The sheriff said he’s hearing from people who are concerned about what might happen over the next four years with the gun control issue.

“We are being asked what would be the stance of local law enforcement if the federal government calls for the confiscation of firearms,” Hoffman said. “That’s a very real concern for people.”

Gary Marbut, the longtime president of the Montana Shooting Sports Association in Missoula, said the seeds of the current ammunition shortage can be traced back almost a decade to the Y2K scare.

“Many people became concerned about their ability to get ammunition back then and they stocked up quite a bit,” Marbut said.

In the intervening years, China blossomed and bought up world copper supplies. Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan used up warehouses full of U.S. ammunition that needed to be replenished. That forced higher prices for civilian ammunition and people started using some of the bullets they had squirreled away after Y2K, Marbut said.

And now, with the current economic and political uncertainty, people are looking to restock their supplies at a time when most ammunition manufacturers aren’t willing to expand their operations.

“The whole demand side of this is so flexible and the supply side is not,” he said.

The ammunition shortage is creating a bit of an economic boon for Ravalli County.

Newsom plans to open a fourth manufacturing facility in Stevensville sometime in September. He employs about 50 people right now and could add up to another 100.

“There are a lot of people out of work right now,” he said. “Two years ago, I probably couldn’t find 10 people to go to work for us. Now I have 10 people a day coming in here looking for a job.”

Newsom believes the need for ammunition won’t go away. This scare is creating a whole new group of ammunition customers for the future, he said.

Need proof?

Take the .380 caliber pistol. A year ago, Newsom said there was hardly a demand for the ammunition. Since then, the .380 auto pistol has become very popular with women.

“One year ago, it wasn’t in demand and now it’s some of the most sought ammunition in the U.S.,” he said. “There are more people getting into shooting and that’s one thing about ammunition – you can only shoot it once.”

People need to understand that the Obamamania fear that is creating such an incredibly high demand for guns and ammunition is not merely fear of Obama gun laws; it is fear of the future that Obama’s out-of-control spending will have on our economy.

We may very well have a short-term recovery (which is what happened during the Great Depression following the stock market crash of Black Friday in October 1929); but that recovery will be devoured by the sheer massive weight of trillions and trillions of dollars in debt.  Obama will spend $9.3 trillion and nearly DOUBLE the national debt.  The administration has spent, loaned, or committed more than $12.8 trillion .  This year Obama is spending more than four times as much as George Bush did in 2008.  Obama is creating more debt than every single president from George Washington to George W. Bush – COMBINED.  And the Congressional Budget Office says that by 2019 a whopping 82 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) will be going to pay down the national debt.

That mind-boggling spending and that mind-boggling debt is a disaster weighting to happen.  It is only a matter of time before a ten trillion ton anvil falls on the American economy.

Trends Research Institute CEO Gerald Celente is on record predicting food riots by 2012 as massive spending creates massive inflation and devaluing of the currency.  If Celente is a nutjob, he is a nutjob that CNN, The Economist, USA Today, CNBC, The Wall Street Journal, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The New York Times, CBS News, The Detroit News, the Chicago Tribune, The Los Angeles Times, and the New York Post have all gone on public record to praise for his incredible predictive accuracy.

People are scared, and judging by the continuing massive purchases of people stockpiling guns and ammo, they’re not clearly not getting any less scared.

So you get your gun.  And lock and load.  Because the beast is coming.

Gallup: Four Months Into Obama Rule, Republicans Now Tied With Democrats

May 19, 2009

If you’re a conservative, you’ve just gotta like this.

In the wake of a poll released after April 24, 2009, Democrats were loudly proclaiming a study showing Republican identification had dropped to 21%. The mainstream media pundits all agreed that the Republican Party was clearly dead. What the talking heads failed to mention was the fact that both parties had declined in identification (with independents growing and now representing the largest group), and the actual difference from the earliest poll result shown from January 2008 showed the Democrats had only picked up two points.

But get a load of what has been happening since:

Selected Trend on Party Affiliation: 2004-2009

Republicans

Independents

Democrats

Republicans
(including
“leaners”)

Democrats
(including
“leaners”)

%

%

%

%

%

2009 May 7-10

32

34

32

45

45

2009 Apr 20-21

27

36

36

39

50

2009 Apr 6-9

24

40

35

34

53

Just who has been losing, and just who has been gaining? With independent leaners factored in Republicans have pulled even with Democrats. And Republicans have gained 8 points while Democrats have lost 6 in just a month’s span. If you go back to April 9 – just a little bit over a month ago – the Democrats (who were 16 points up) have lost 14 of those points. And while the polling isn’t specific enough regarding independents, I don’t doubt for a nanosecond that conservative federalist-loving Libertarians are swelling the exploding ranks of independents, either.

Where are all of you mainstream media talking heads? You know, you guys who pronounced – and who are STILL pronouncing – the death of the Republican Party and conservatism based on the other poll a month ago? Where are you now? Where’s your “fair, accurate, and objective” reporting? Are you still mocking the Tea Parties with sexual innuendo that only you perverts understood in the first place? Where are your pronouncements of the demise of the Democratic Party now? You damn nest of dishonest propagandist demagogue snakes.

Nothing revitalizes the Republican Party like Democrat control of both the executive and the legislative branches. In just a few short months of hyperactive and incredibly expensive liberal unchecked power, Democrats no longer represent a majority of the nation, for the first time since 2005.

We’ve seen the worm turn just like this before: following the disaster of Jimmy Carter in 1980; and again following the disaster of the first Clinton term in 1994. People begin to realize that giving liberals power is rather like giving kindergartners loaded guns.

This comes on the heels of another beautiful new poll that shows 51% of Americans now identifying themselves as “pro-life” versus only 42% who identify themselves as “pro-choice”.

Democrats and the mainstream media have been ever so eager to pronounce the death of conservatism, but we aint going anywhere.

Meanwhile, the Democrats have a Speaker of the House who is having an increasingly difficult time keeping her various stories straight even as she undermines national security by falsely claiming the CIA lied to Congress. The Democrats have a Senate Majority Leader who is very unlikely to win reelection in 2010. They’ve got a Vice President who stupidly revealed the location of the VP’s bunker. Most political analysts outside of the mainstream media establishment would likely agree that such behaviors are not the best way to build the party brand.

Obama also faces looming catastrophes on the international front. A single terrorist attack and the President’s own Democratic Party may turn on the commander-in-chief who relabeled the “war on terror” the “overseas contingency operation” and then relabeled “terrorist attacks” as “man-caused disasters” to save their own political skins. Iran will almost certainly develop nuclear military capability under Obama’s watch. Pakistan – along with its nuclear arsenal – is looking more vulnerable to collapse almost by the day. North Korea has thumbed its nose at the U.S. and has restarted its nuclear weapons program. And there are literally more international crises developing than you can shake a stick at.

It is with that background that Democrats – who relentlessly demagogued and demonized George Bush over Gitmo – are now cringing their way into the very Bush policy they previously worked so hard to undermine.

As the world collapses, don’t think that Americans will continue to listen to the Democrat’s claims that it is all George Bush’s fault. The world is their baby now.

But what will likely ultimately most undermine the Democratic Party is that Democrats rammed through a porkulus package which is accomplishing little or even nothing – and which is actually locking out the counties that needed stimulus the most while giving the most funds to counties that needed it least.

While many economists believe that the economy will recover (including many economists who predicted that the economy would recover as well or better without a stimulus), there is an increasingly likely probability that any recovery will be temporary. The more than $12.8 trillion the administration has spent, loaned, or committed will ultimately devalue the currency and lead to economy-crucifying stagflation (a condition whereby inflation rises while the economy remains stagnate seen in the 1970s under Carter).

There’s little question that the anvil will fall on the US economy due to the near doubling of the national debt as Obama adds a projected $9.3 trillion to the $11.7 trillion hole we’re already in. Obama is borrowing 50 cents on the dollar as he explodes the federal deficit by spending four times more than Bush spent in 2008 and in the process “adding more to the debt than all presidents — from George Washington to George Bush — combined.” And most terrifying of all, Obama’s spending will cause debt to double from 41% of GDP in 2008 to a crushing 82% of GDP in 2019.

What will be the result of all this insane spending, and not very far off?  A quote from a CNS News story should awaken anyone who thinks the future will be rosy:

By 2019, the CBO said, a whopping 82 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) will go to pay down the national debt. This means that in future years, the government could owe its creditors more than the goods and services that the entire economy can produce.

We may literally be already doomed.  How are we possibly going to repay this?

Obama promised again and again that 95% of Americans would get a tax cut (which actually just means more welfare for the 43.4 percent who already don’t pay any federal income tax at all even as our small business owners who employ most American workers are increasingly taxed into oblivion). But Obama is going to make your upcoming new car dramatically more expensive; he’s going to make your energy dramatically more expensive; and just for your information the average 30 year old will pay $136,932.75 just for the interest of just Obama’s 2010 budget over the course of his or her working lifetime. Americans will be paying FAR more of their money to the government – and we will have only Democrats to thank for it.

The only two questions are 1) how soon the ten trillion ton anvil will fall on the U.S. economy, and 2) whether it will be too late for conservatives to save the country by the time the electorate return to their senses and realize that they voted for a gaggle of fools in 2008.

What Was Wrong With Obama’s Notre Dame Speech On Abortion?

May 18, 2009

By the mainline media’s “oh, isn’t he just wonderful?” gushing accounts of Obama’s speech at Notre Dame, it was a grand slam home run.  He was conciliatory, gracious, and non-partisan – and did I mention wonderful?

Among his other remarks, Obama said this:

That’s when we begin to say, “Maybe we won’t agree on abortion, but we can still agree that this heart-wrenching decision for any woman is not made casually, it has both moral and spiritual dimensions.

So let us work together to reduce the number of women seeking abortions, let’s reduce unintended pregnancies. (Applause.) Let’s make adoption more available. (Applause.) Let’s provide care and support for women who do carry their children to term. (Applause.) Let’s honor the conscience of those who disagree with abortion, and draft a sensible conscience clause, and make sure that all of our health care policies are grounded not only in sound science, but also in clear ethics, as well as respect for the equality of women.” Those are things we can do. (Applause.)

Now, understand — understand, Class of 2009, I do not suggest that the debate surrounding abortion can or should go away. Because no matter how much we may want to fudge it — indeed, while we know that the views of most Americans on the subject are complex and even contradictory — the fact is that at some level, the views of the two camps are irreconcilable. Each side will continue to make its case to the public with passion and conviction. But surely we can do so without reducing those with differing views to caricature.

Open hearts. Open minds. Fair-minded words. It’s a way of life that has always been the Notre Dame tradition. (Applause.) Father Hesburgh has long spoken of this institution as both a lighthouse and a crossroads. A lighthouse that stands apart, shining with the wisdom of the Catholic tradition, while the crossroads is where differences of culture and religion and conviction can co-exist with friendship, civility, hospitality, and especially love.” And I want to join him and Father John in saying how inspired I am by the maturity and responsibility with which this class has approached the debate surrounding today’s ceremony. You are an example of what Notre Dame is about. (Applause.)

First of all, Obama’s statement that abortion is a “heart-wrenching decision not made casually” is simply not true for a LOT of women.  For example, abortion is the top birth control option for women in Russia.  Are they a different species there?  Are women in Russia not women?  Are they not human?  Are they not in fact very much like us?  Another study found numerous women in the UK who had had five or more abortions, with “30 teenage girls a week asking for repeat abortions.”  I looked for numbers regarding the United States, but the numbers are not nearly as forthcoming given that NARAL and mainline media propaganda seem to dominate.  Abortion is surely a difficult choice for some women, but it is most certainly not a difficult choice whatsoever for all.  And I’m not going to pretend it is.

Some women decide to have abortions out of fear for the future.  But many others decide to do so for their own convenience for the simple reason that they don’t want a child and aren’t willing to carry their baby to term so he or she can be adopted.  It is not women who are victims of abortion, but the babies whom they abort.  Don’t ever forget that.

Then Obama says, “let us work together to reduce the number of women seeking abortions.”  My question is why?  Because it sounds good coming out of the mouths of liberals talking the language of pro-lifers?  Why should a liberal care about reducing the numbers of abortions?  Isn’t abortion a sacrosanct right?  How many other sacred rights should be reduced? Would less free speech be a good thing?  How about fewer voters?  Maybe we can reduce the number of attorneys made available to those accused of crimes?

In the same vein, what of Obama’s description of abortion as “having both moral and spiritual dimensions”?  Really?  How does that make any sense whatsoever unless we are talking about a baby human being, rather than a blob of tissue?  Does having one’s tonsils removed have “moral and spiritual dimensions”?  Clearly it doesn’t.  There is clearly something more to the implications of abortion.  This use of language is nothing more than another example of Obama and those like him trying to use language in a deceptive manner to convey a false illusion of truth, of compassion, and of a genuine understanding the issues involved.

The fact of the matter is that pro-abortion folk speaking of wanting to reduce abortions or calling it a moral and spiritual decision is simply gobbledygook.

If pro-abortionists want to reduce the number of abortions, why on earth would they push so hard to make abortion more available?  Does anyone think that if we made drugs more available, the number of drug abusers would go down?  Should we offer crack cocaine in our schools, so that kids can be “pro-choice” on drugs and “reduce the number of addictions”?  How can you not spot the asininity of this rhetoric?

But it was when Obama spoke about honoring one another while we disagree on abortion that was the most insulting to moral intelligence.

Let me illustrate why I say the above thusly:

Suppose you have two little girls, and I kidnap one and kill her (to put in in abortionist terms, I “terminate her life”).  And it is my plan to soon do the same to the second daughter.  And I meet with the girls’ parents and I say, “Let’s not let our differences in opinion result in our hating one another.  I tell them, “The fact that I don’t believe your children are human beings worthy of life doesn’t change the fact that you shouldn’t ‘reduce those with differing views to caricature.'”  I beseech them to maintain “their open-hearts, their open minds, and their fair-minded words” as I dehumanize and terminate their precious babies.

Does anybody believe the parents would politely nod their heads in agreement?  After all, can’t we all just get along and disagree honorably about such things?

You know that isn’t what would happen.  Those parents would do anything to stop me.  And so would the police.  So would any passing citizen who had any moral decency at all and was in any position to prevent my harming those children.

The fact of the matter is, Obama’s rhetoric presupposes that this debate isn’t about the lives of babies, but rather some academic discussion regarding the rights of women over which we can disagree.  In other words, Obama’s call to “friendship,  civility, hospitality, and love” as we politely agree to disagree presume that babies aren’t being killed and no one is getting hurt.

For all the intelligence Obama is supposed to possess, listening to him is much more like eating candy than it is dining on profundity.  It’s junk food for the mind and the soul.

I don’t mind it one bit when pro-abortionists call me “anti-choice.”  I’m fine with their intensely hard feelings directed at me.  Because that’s the way it frankly should be: we are on opposite sides of the greatest life and death moral issue of all time (unless you can tell me something else that has ended more human lives than abortion).  It’s not supposed to be civil with such incredibly high stakes.

Which is why I’m not going to allow Barack Obama or anyone else to tell me, “Don’t get so worked up over abortion.  We’re all good people just trying to do the right thing.”

Sorry, Barry, but you are an advocate for baby killing.  You and people like you have murdered well over forty million innocent human lives, and one day a just and holy God will damn you to hell for it.  I’m not going to treat you with quit dignity and respect when you are systematically depriving millions of children of not only their dignity but their lives.  In the meantime, abortion and other child-reduction strategies have resulted in this nation going from about 16 workers for every retiree to only three workers for every retiree.  And within a matter of a relatively few years it will go down to only two workers for every single retiree.  And as our system breaks down we’ll get to enjoy hell early, and right here on earth, due to our abortion mindset.

With this in mind, consider another comment Obama made in his Notre Dame address, from the perspective of helpless unborn babies who have been dehumanized so that they can be killed by people who elevate convenience over another human being’s life:

Unfortunately, finding that common ground — recognizing that our fates are tied up, as Dr. King said, in a “single garment of destiny” — is not easy. And part of the problem, of course, lies in the imperfections of man — our selfishness, our pride, our stubbornness, our acquisitiveness, our insecurities, our egos; all the cruelties large and small that those of us in the Christian tradition understand to be rooted in original sin. We too often seek advantage over others. We cling to outworn prejudice and fear those who are unfamiliar. Too many of us view life only through the lens of immediate self-interest and crass materialism; in which the world is necessarily a zero-sum game. The strong too often dominate the weak, and too many of those with wealth and with power find all manner of justification for their own privilege in the face of poverty and injustice. And so, for all our technology and scientific advances, we see here in this country and around the globe violence and want and strife that would seem sadly familiar to those in ancient times.

A new poll gives cause for celebration and hope: 51% of Americans now identify themselves as “pro-life” versus only 42% who identify themselves as “pro-choice” according to Gallup.  It never mattered whether a majority of Americans believed abortion was murder or not to make abortion murder.  For example, there was a time in this country’s history when most Americans believed blacks weren’t fully human; were they therefore not fully human?  But it is marvelous that the “majority says” argument has now officially been taken away from abortionists.

Three articles detailing Obama’s own association with abortion and outright infanticide:

Why Barack Obama Is A Baby Killer. Period.

Jill Stanek On Why Barack Obama Voted For Infanticide

Obama Crossed The Line From Abortion To Genuine Infanticide

Sarah Palin Puts Her Money Where Her Mouth Is On Abortion

August 29, 2008

Character is revealed in crisis, and Governor Sarah Palin had a crisis that challenged her basic values when she learned that the child she was carrying – her fifth – would have Down Syndrome.

What would this pro-life wife and mother do?

For Sarah Palin, there really was no question: she would love her child.

Women who argue that men have no right to talk about abortion (as though ideas and morality have male or female genitalia), who argue that a child with Down Syndrome is the “poster child” for termination, are stymied in the face of this courageous woman.

Tim Graham wrote a magnificent article on the story, saying in part:

Immediately the family made this announcement: “Trig is beautiful and already adored by us. We knew through early testing he would face special challenges, and we feel privileged that God would entrust us with this gift and allow us unspeakable joy as he entered our lives.”

Trig Palin has Down syndrome. Early prenatal testing alerted the Palins to this chromosomal abnormality, as it is alerting more and more families in the early stages of pregnancy.

Unfortunately, because of early screening, more children with Down syndrome are aborted and fewer and fewer are being born.

Children with Down syndrome do bring “unspeakable joy” into this world. I know the laughter and blessings my 5-year-old nephew, Ethan, with Down syndrome, has brought to our family. But how do you explain this joy to a perfection-at-any-price world?

Sarah Palin didn’t want perfection; she wanted her child.  And, with a true mother’s heart, she loved her child no matter what, and – with her husband – was willing to fight for her baby.

And she chose to rejoice in her newborn baby even though he wasn’t “perfect.”  Who is?

The Nazis had a phrase that they used to justify the killing of all kinds of unwanted human beings – lebensunwertes leben – “life unworthy to be lived.”  Sarah Palin proved with in the most powerful way imaginable that she believes all innocent human life is worthy to be lived.

The liberal’s response?  That makes her a terrible, narrow-minded person.

She’s everything Barack Obama despises: she’s clinging to her guns and her religion, and add to that a baby that Obama would have gladly left out to die.

But the reaction to Sarah Palin is already revealing who really has “antipathy to people who aren’t like them.”

In Defense of Life

March 27, 2008

There are many people who oppose the abortion industry, but they generally can’t do a very good job explaining why. The Republican Party is officially pro-life in its platform, but I’ve never heard a GOP candidate offer a good reason for being pro-life. But there are excellent reasons for being pro-life, and it is way past time that society heard them.

Democrats and “pro-choice” proponents offer “a woman’s right to choose” as the primary reason to support abortion. But let us think about that for a moment: should women have “a right to choose?” Sure they should, up to a certain point. But should that right extend to anything a woman might want to do? What if she wants to drive her car through a crowd of people? What if she wants to hijack an airplane and fly it into a skyscraper? Clearly, a woman doesn’t – and shouldn’t – have a right to do anything she chooses. The first question needs therefore needs to be, “the right to choose to do what?”

If you were busily working on peeling potatoes over the kitchen sink when your oldest child came in and said, “Is it okay if I kill this?” What would you do? Would you say, “Sure! Go ahead! Since I’m not certain of the ontological status of whatever you’re considering killing, I’ll leave the decision up to you!” Or would you turn around and look to make sure your little gremlin wasn’t talking about your youngest child? (Or maybe it wouldn’t matter, because you’d figure your firstborn was exercising that sacrosanct “right to choose“?). The ability to use rhetoric to cast metaphysical doubt on the meaning of “being human” does not mean that ignorance is bliss, and one can abort at will. The fact of the matter is, we haven’t even begun to understand the miraculous – and it truly is miraculous – process of a baby forming in mommy’s womb. The age of viability has decreased dramatically; medical experts have been repeatedly proven dead wrong again and again in determining brain function in comatose patients who later recovered after being declared ‘brain dead’; the Hippocratic Oath recited by doctors for centuries explicitly banned the performing of abortions; and so on, and so on. When in doubt, why not choose life?

And there really is no doubt, once we truly consider the issues. Ever hear the argument that fetuses aren’t human beings, so it’s okay to kill them? Think again. Both science and logic assure us that – from the moment of conception – that thing in the womb of a human mother is fully a human being. Take a moment and consider the taxonomic system by which every living thing is rigorously categorized and classified. By that system a human embryo is of the kingdom Anamalia, of the phylum Chordata, of the class Mammalia, of the order Primate, of the family Pongidae, of the genus Homo, and of the species Sapiens – same as any other human being. Put even more simply, that embryo is a human by virtue of its parents, and a being by the fact that it is a living thing: it is a human being.

And then there’s that whole “It’s a woman’s body” line. That one falls rather flat as well. The fact is that that from the moment of fertilization there is a separate, distinct, unique genetic individual in the mother’s womb; every cell in its little body is different from that of its mother. Half of children are male, for goodness sake! We are clearly not talking about a woman’s body; we are talking about her child’s body.

Then there’s the notion of a woman’s rights to her own body, which views the baby in her womb as a hostile invader forcing itself upon her. Why should she carry it to term if she doesn’t want to? Well, for one thing, because it’s her child. The so-called “violinist argument” is fatally flawed from the outset by casting a woman’s child in terms of an unwanted intruder whom the woman has no moral obligation to care for. Furthermore, we would never consider that rather despicable line of moral reasoning after a child is born – when it actually requires a far greater sacrifice and burden to care for (ask a new mother whether her child required more chasing around the house before or after birth). We go from the rather passive act of “being pregnant” to the extremely active act of caring for a newborn – and that burden proceeds to continue for years as the child grows up. Leave your five year old at home and go gamble in Las Vegas for a week and see what happens when you come back home if you don’t believe me. See how far that, “But I have a right to my own body” line takes you. It ought to take you all the way to jail for abandoning your child.

If this isn’t enough to dispel the “woman’s right to her own body” argument, then let us think about the way they are using the term “rights.” We must realize that in virtually every case one person’s right presupposes someone else’s duty. One person’s right to freedom of speech imposes the duty upon the remainder of society to tolerate what might be offensive to them for the greater good of a free society. In other cases, the duty imposed is far more selective: When liberals describe the duty of the rich to pay their fair share of taxes, they are imposing a duty on a small class of people. The wealthiest 5% of Americans already pay 57% of the taxes, and the wealthiest 10% pay 68% of the tab. The top 1% earn 19% of the income but pay 37% of the taxes; meanwhile the “poorest” 50% of Americans earn 13% of the income but pay only 3% of the taxes. This introduces a legitimate question for some future discussion: just how much more should the wealthy be expected to pay? [Don’t allow the issue of taxation to distract you from my argument: I merely raise taxation as an issue in which certain advocates subjectively claim that a few should have a duty to pay more, while the majority should have a right to pay less]. But in the case of abortion, the right given to the mother presupposes the most extreme duty upon one single individual – her child – the duty to die for the convenience of its mother. On the side of the “right of a woman to choose” are not only women who suddenly find themselves pregnant and their anxious parents, but hedonistic men and women who want to abdicate any responsibility for their “sexual expression,” along with a powerful media culture that aggressively pursues the same end, a powerful abortion industry and its lobby, the stem cell research lobby, unelected judges who impose their will on society, etcetera. Who is on the side of the right of the unborn to live? The Constitution – which guarantees the right to life as preeminent over all others – but other than that, far too few allies. One side has sole access to the megaphone; the other cannot speak. If we were to stop focusing on the Constitutionally-invisible “right to choose” and focus just for a moment on the DUTY OF PARENTS to nurture and care for their children, we would have a very different discussion indeed. I cannot help but remember the slogan of the Ministry of Health vans that Nazi Germany used to haul away retarded children, epileptics, children with malformed ears, chronic bed wetters, and the like to their deaths: Lebensunwertes Leben – “Life Unworthy of Life.” Today I still see cars bearing bumper stickers with the equally oxymoronic – but far more deadly – slogan, “Pro child, Pro choice.” What a shame that so many Americans have so blithely come to champion Nazi morality.

Then there’s that, “It’s only a potential human being” pseudo-argument. First of all, I’m not even sure what it means to be “a potential human being” – and neither do those who are reciting it. I do understand what it means to be “a human being with potential.” Let us begin this discussion with the straightforward observation that had your mother decided to have an abortion during her pregnancy with you, that you would not have been born. It would NOT have been some potential you that perished; it would have been you. You would have been one of the nearly 50,000,000 babies in America alone who were killed by abortion. Just as you were once a child, once a toddler, once an infant, you were also once a fetus, once an embryo, once a zygote. Killing you while you in any of those stages would have killed you just as dead.

And let us pause for a moment to consider what murder actually does to the victim. The character Clint Eastwood played in Unforgiven put it pretty well: “When you kill a man, you take away everything he has and everything he’s ever going to have.” A human baby will naturally inherit every quality of human life unless someone steps in and unnaturally ends that life. It is simply his or her nature as a human being to do so. You merely have to contemplate your own life to consider what would have been taken away from you had you been among the abortion statistics. This idea of “potential” as some ambiguous term that allows a mother to kill her baby is as ridiculous as it is amoral. If I were to walk up to you in a parking lot as you got out of your car and shoot you to death, what would I be guilty of? I certainly didn’t take away your past, as it has already happened. And if your future – when is clearly merely “potential” – doesn’t count, all I truly deprived you of is the two or three seconds of immediate conscious awareness. And I could have deprived you of at least that much had I merely asked you for the time instead of shooting you! For murder to be a serious crime, “potential” has to be a real, tangible thing that has intrinsic, incommensurable value. To attempt to argue that an unborn baby’s potential is somehow meaningless but a born person’s matters is both a fundamentally irrational and immoral distinction that leads inevitably to a degradation in the value of human life. Tyrants have routinely made the same type of “status of humanity determined by selective criterion” distinction when they said that Jews, or blacks, or any other class of people should not matter.

Deep down, I believe that even the Democrats and other abortion advocates realize the immorality of abortion in their choice of language. They demonstrate this by reciting the new mantra, “Abortion should be safe, legal, and rare.” But why on earth should it be rare if it is a fundamental human right? How many other basic rights should be rare? Put “free speech,” “freedom of the press,” “the right to peaceably assemble,” or any other right that liberals hold as sacrosanct into this “____ should be safe, legal, and rare” equation and see how it flies. If abortion is a good thing, why on earth should it be rare? In point of fact, we should be encouraging more of it, not less.

During the Lincoln-Douglas presidential debates, when Douglas said that states ought to have a right to choose the institution of slavery, Lincoln famously said, “One cannot say that people have a right to do wrong.” Fortunately the country chose Lincoln’s moral reasoning over Douglas’. The Civil War was subsequently waged by a Confederacy which argued that their own rights were being systematically violated, even as they inhumanly violated the most fundamental rights of the blacks they oppressed. Apart from the fact that the party of Lincoln, the party of abolition, was the Republican Party and the party of Douglas, the party of institutionalized slavery, was the Democratic Party, I cannot help but see the parallels between the Party of Slavery and the Party of Abortion. For one thing, the Party of Abortion uses the identical arguments to justify its abominable institution that the Party of Slavery relied upon. For another, the Party of Abortion is just as insistent upon its “rights” as was the Party of Slavery, even as they systematically violate the rights of the most innocent and most helpless.