Posts Tagged ‘racist’

Remember The Firestorm Over Mitt Romney’s 47 Percent Remark? Hillary’s Deplorables Remark Was DEPLORABLE

September 12, 2016

First the story as the New York Times puts it:

Hillary Clinton Calls Many Trump Backers ‘Deplorables,’ and G.O.P. Pounces

Republicans from the presidential ticket on down pounced Saturday on Hillary Clinton’s remarks that half of Donald J. Trump’s supporters fit into a “basket of deplorables,” saying it showed she was out of touch with an economically hard-hit electorate.

Mrs. Clinton’s comments Friday night, which were a variation of a sentiment she has expressed in other settings recently, came at a fund-raiser in Manhattan.

“You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?” she said to applause and laughter. “The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up.”

By Saturday morning, #BasketofDeplorables was trending on Twitter as Mr. Trump’s campaign demanded an apology. His supporters hoped to use the remark as evidence that Mrs. Clinton cannot connect to the voters she hopes to represent as president.

“Wow, Hillary Clinton was SO INSULTING to my supporters, millions of amazing, hard working people. I think it will cost her at the polls!” Mr. Trump wrote on Twitter.

By Saturday afternoon, Mrs. Clinton had acknowledged her stumble. “Last night I was ‘grossly generalistic,’ and that’s never a good idea,” she said in a statement. “I regret saying ‘half’ — that was wrong.” […]

The first thing I can’t help but notice is the title the New York Slimes chose to run this story under, fixating on the “… and the G.O.P. Pounces” part.  That signifies that they are saying that this is just political posturing; Hillary didn’t say anything truly bad.  It’s like her emails and her illegal secret server and her Clinton Foundation pay-for-play proofs; nothing really wrong.  It must just be Republicans going after her over sheer politics.  So let’s move on.

But now let’s see how the same New York Slimes covered Mitt Romney when he did something that actually wasn’t as bad either in terms of numbers (he said 47%; she said HALF) or nastiness (he insinuated that poor people would vote to get stuff without demonizing their characters; she said half of the American people are EVIL):

In Video Clip, Romney Calls 47% ‘Dependent’ and Feeling Entitled
By Michael D. Shear and Michael Barbaro
September 17, 2012 6:51 pm
12:26 a.m., Sept. 18 | Updated
WASHINGTON — During a private reception with wealthy donors this year, Mitt Romney described almost half of Americans as “people who pay no income tax” and are “dependent upon government.” Those voters, he said, would probably support  President Obama because they believe they are “victims” who are “entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it.”
In a brief and hastily called news conference Monday just after 10 p.m., Mr. Romney acknowledged having made the blunt political and cultural assessment, saying it was “not elegantly stated,” but he stood by the substance of the remarks, insisting that he had made similar observations in public without generating controversy.
The video of Mr. Romney, the Republican presidential candidate, was made in May, offering a rare glimpse of his personal views. Mr. Romney told reporters that he had been “speaking off the cuff in response to a question” at the fund-raiser, and said he wanted “to help all Americans — all Americans — have a bright, prosperous future.”
Democrats quickly condemned the remarks as insensitive, and Mr. Obama’s campaign accused Mr. Romney of having “disdainfully written off half the nation.”
The video surfaced as the campaign enters its final 50 days and as Mr.  Romney sought to restart his campaign with new ads and new messaging, in response to calls in his campaign and from outside for him to be more specific about how his policies would fix the nation’s economy and help the middle class.
Now, the video has raised the possibility that Mr. Romney’s campaign will be sidetracked, with attention focused again on his proposed tax cuts for the wealthy, the release of his personal tax returns and his ability to connect with middle-class voters. With its unvarnished language, the video seems to undermine what aides have argued is an enduring attribute that would appeal to independent voters: a sense that Mr. Romney is, at base, an empathetic and caring man.

First of all, notice in the title of the article there is no qualifying “… and Democrats Pounce.”  Because on the leftist warped narrative, ONLY Republicans are capable of partisan politics.  When a Republican is outraged, it is because they are playing politics; when a Democrat is outraged, it is only and always because Republicans are evil.

But second of all, I want you to notice that whether you like Romney’s remarks or not, HE WAS DEALING WITH SIMPLE FACTS.  Whereas Hillary Clinton deals only with demonic slander and hate.  She doesn’t have a statistic to cite (47% of Trump supporters have physically beaten or lynched a black man…”) because there AREN’T any and because the ONLY people who have physically beaten or lynched ANYONE in this campaign have been DEMOCRATS attacking Republican Trump supporters.

The New York Times’ question – “the video has raised the possibility that Mr. Romney’s campaign will be sidetracked” – was nothing short of a self-fulfilling prophecy stating in advance their intent to do precisely that.  Many experts believe it was that “47 percent” comment that ended Romney’s presidency.  Which was exactly what the mainstream media tried to do by framing the question that way over and over.  And look at that Bloomberg article where they just flat-out state it: “Today Mitt Romney Lost the Election.”

Mitt Romney talked about a FACT relating to 47% of the Democrat Party base; Hillary Clinton talked about a SLANDER of HALF of the Republican base.  In a fair, objective world, Bloomberg would be writing the article titled, “Today Hillary Clinton Lost the Election.”  But you know full damn well they won’t; because to be a “journalist” today is to be a liar who looks at every story and asks, “How do I twist this, slant this, pervert this to my ideology?”

To be a Democrat you have to HAVE a twisted and perverted ideology.  And you need professionally-trained experts in deceit to rewrite the news for the people to get them to swallow those lies.

Hillary Clinton apologized, we’re told.  But really?  She doesn’t apologize for claiming that Trump supporters are racist; she apologizes for suggesting that “half” of them are.  You know, when maybe only “47 percent” are racist.

It was an ugly comment from an ugly human being, a human being who is now proven to be pathologically unfit for the presidency by ANY measurement.

And yeah, Trump is pounding on it the SAME way Obama pounded Romney:

“People like you, you and YOU ‘deplorable,'” the ad correctly points out.

Trump said:

“At first I thought it wasn’t within the realm of possible that she said it,” he said. “She doubled up, because it was said with such anger, such unbelievable anger, and I think this is the biggest mistake of the political season. I really do. When I saw this in its full form, and I saw the anger with which she said it, the way she spoke, I think it’s the single biggest mistake of the political season.” […]

“You cannot run for president if you have such contempt in your heart for the American voter,” she said. “You can’t lead this nation if you have such a low opinion of its citizens.”

In larger context, Trump said in his speech today:

All across this country, I’ve met so many incredible members of both our military and law enforcement community. There’s nothing I’ve enjoyed more than the time I’ve spent with our service members, police officers, and also our firefighters and paramedics.

They embody the goodness and decency of our country.

I was thus deeply shocked and alarmed this Friday to hear my opponent attack, slander, smear and demean these wonderful, amazing people who are supporting our campaign.

Our support comes from every part of America, and every walk of life. We have the support of cops and soldiers, carpenters and welders, the young and the old, and millions of working class families who just want a better future.

These were the people Hillary Clinton so viciously demonized. These were among the countless Americans that Hillary Clinton called deplorable, irredeemable and un-American. She called these patriotic men and women every vile name in the book – she called them racist, sexist, xenophobic, and Islamaphobic.

She called them a “basket of deplorables” in both a speech and an interview. She divides people into baskets as though they were objects, not human beings.

Hillary Clinton made these comments at one of her high-dollar fundraisers in Wall Street.

She and her wealthy donors all had a good laugh. They were laughing at the very people who pave the roads she drives on, paint the buildings she speaks in, and keep the lights on in her auditorium.

Hillary Clinton is an insider, supported by powerful insiders, attacking Americans who have no political power.

Hillary Clinton spoke with hatred and derision for the people who make this country run.

She spoke with contempt for the people who thanklessly follow the rules, pay their taxes, and scratch out a living for their families.

While Hillary Clinton lives a sequestered life behind gates and walls and guards, she mocks and demeans hardworking Americans who only want their own families to enjoy a fraction of the security enjoyed by our politicians.

After months of hiding from the press, Hillary Clinton has revealed her true thoughts.

She revealed herself to be a person who looks down on the proud citizens of our country as subjects for her to rule over.

Her comments displayed the same sense of arrogance and entitlement that led her to violate federal law as Secretary of State, hide and delete her emails, put classified information in the reach of our enemies, lie to Congress, and sell government favors and access through her Foundation.

It’s the same attitude that explains why Hillary Clinton refuses to take accountability for the deadly disasters she helped to create in Iraq, in Syria and in Libya.

To this day, she still won’t take accountability for her role in unleashing ISIS across the Middle East – or for putting Iran on the path to a nuclear weapon.

Hillary Clinton believes she is above the law, that she is above accountability, and that she is above each and every one of you.

Our campaign is about giving voice to the voiceless. It’s about representing the forgotten men and women of this country.

I’m here to represent everyone, but especially those who are struggling against injustice and unfairness.

I am running so that the powerful can no longer beat up on the powerless. I’m running to take on the special interests, the big donors, and the corrupt political insiders.

I am running to be your voice.

If Mitt Romney disqualified himself to be president, Hillary Clinton FAR MORE disqualified herself to be president.

Not by my standard, but by everyone who votes DEMOCRAT.

And the ONLY reason Democrats will vote for Hillary Clinton now is that they are the WORST sort of people there are, vile, twisted hypocrites who will ALWAYS distort the truth and the facts and reality to suit their warped ideology.

Let me ask the question, “What is the FINAL SOLUTION” to Hillary Clinton’s now-repeated claim that Republicans are a “basket of deplorables”???

I mean, put them in death camps, or maybe Stalinistic re-education centers, right?  We can’t have these hateful, awful people free to just run around with this kind of hate and evil in them.

This has ALWAYS been the invariable, inevitable path of leftism.  The socialist communists were far left wing monsters; the Nazis where every damn bit as socialist and were merely to the “right” of the most far leftist communists.  Hitler offered his Nazism as a “third way” between the communism of one side and the free market laissez-faire capitalism that has always been cherished by conservatives.  NAZI stood for “National Socialist German Workers Party.”  And if there were a “National Socialist American Workers Party,” you can’t be stupid enough not to think these wouldn’t be today’s Democrats.

Two days ago my mother told me about a man offering a solar deal coming to their home.  He had lied when my father asked him if there was any investment required, but it quickly turned out that, yes, there was, because it was a “rent to own” deal.  The man said there was no cost to this program; but that was just a lie to get his foot in the door and try to sell something to a couple of stupid old people.  You know, in a program that wouldn’t exist unless the federal government were so massively subsidizing solar that it is beyond unreal.

After learning the truth, my parents swiftly lost interest.  And the guy turned to politics, asking who they were going to vote for.

My parents said they were going to hold their nose and vote for Trump.  And the guy – who said his wife was Hispanic – immediately launched into his attack.  “What are you going to do when the people who do all the jobs you aren’t willing to do aren’t here?”

He attacked my parents’ religion, asking “Are they as mean as you up above?”

Well, it’s a damn good thing for that turd that I wasn’t there.  Because I would have IMMEDIATELY gone after him as the racist bigot that he is.  What is he saying?  He’s flat-out stating that white people are lazy and indolent and incapable of doing any kind of hard labor.  The Democrats have ALWAYS viewed the world through a vile, racist perspective.  They just can’t help themselves.  And they spent 200 years viciously attacking black people and minorities before concluding, “if you can’t beat them, co-opt them and get them on your plantation a different way.”  And so now it’s just the same racism they’ve always held in reverse: now it’s white people who can’t work.

So now he’s telling us that inferior white people would STARVE because there would be no fitter race to pick their food for them.

My mom says he mentioned the guys who climb up into trees and asked my mom if she’d do that.  Well, damn, you fool turd, my mom is eighty years old!!!  What kind of stupid jackass ARE you?  How many 80-year-old Mexicans are climbing up in trees to trim them for a damn living???

I would have been all in his face screaming, “GET OUT of here, you racist pile of bigoted rodent filth!  We don’t need your kind of race-roach crawling around our home!”

Just as we don’t need Hillary Clinton anywhere near the White House.

Hillary Clinton just proved herself to be unfit for the presidency.  She didn’t prove herself to be unfit by Republican standards; she proved herself to be unfit by the very same standard that was applied against Republicans by Democrats just four years ago.

Every vote for Hillary Clinton is a statement about people who support a part that is nothing but hypocritical to its very core.


Democrats Are More ‘NAZI’ Today Than Actual NAZIS As Vicious Democrat Violence CONSTANTLY Physically Attacks Free Speech

June 27, 2016

I’ve got a lot of great show-and-tell pictures to get to, but let me set the context first.

I’ve been saying this for a while now, but it keeps being more and more true: Democrats aren’t merely “Nazis,” they are actually far WORSE than Nazis.

I’ve described this phenomenon two or three times now – and there are literally dozens and dozens of Donald Trump events in which Democrat Party activists have leapt to violence as the first, middle, final and ONLY resort to free speech, the right to peaceably assemble, pretty much everything this nation used to stand for until Obama.

Obama just designated the site of a VIOLENT RIOT by homosexuals AGAINST THE POLICE as a “national monument.”  And I’m thinking, “A national monument to LUCIFER, maybe.”

It’s amazing how much liberals rabidly despise law and order.  At least until they create their own Soviet-like secret police that they can use to viciously suppress their political opponents, anyway.

I remember being a young person when the Skokie, Illinois cases came to the American public’s attention.  A group of Nazis wanted to protest – not just anywhere but in a city characterized by a high-concentration of Jewish Holocaust survivors.  I couldn’t understand as a child why they would let that protest take place, but they did.  Here’s why Nazis were able to protest even in the most Jewish death-camp-survivor-dense town in America:

In 1977 Frank Collin, the leader of National Socialist Party of America, announced the party’s intention to march through Skokie, Illinois. In the predominantly Jewish community, one in six residents was a Holocaust survivor or was directly related to one.[2] Originally, the NSPA had planned a political rally in Marquette Park in Chicago; however the Chicago authorities blocked these plans by requiring the NSPA to post a public safety insurance bond and by banning political demonstrations in Marquette Park.

On behalf of the NSPA, the ACLU challenged the injunction issued by the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois that prohibited marchers at the proposed Skokie rally from wearing Nazi uniforms or displaying swastikas. The ACLU was represented by civil rights attorney Burton Joseph.[3][4] The challengers argued that the injunction violated the First Amendment rights of the marchers to express themselves.

The hero of the Nazis trying to protest in America was none other than the uber-leftist legal organization known as the ACLU.  They championed the Nazis’ right to intentionally provoke an oppressed group on the grounds of “free speech” and “the 1st Amendment.”  The same liberal Supreme Court that gave us Roe v. Wade agreed with their liberal buddies on the ACLU and lifted the injunction against the Nazis, allowing them to march.  The notion was free speech at any price, no matter how offensive that speech might be.

The left has since twisted itself into a moral pretzel, having exploited the “law” to first infiltrate even the most hateful protest under the guise of free speech in order to undermine the system and undermine American morality which had been informed by Judeo-Christianity.  And they kept that tactic up until THEIR ideas were the coin of the realm.  And then good luck getting the right to speak, because Democrat Party thugs will viciously beat you down.

The connections between Democrat Party tactics and Nazi tactics are becoming frighteningly similar.  Nazism was very much into avant garde art in the early years as it sought power. Basically, WHATEVER challenged the established order, including open homosexuality, was fine with them and they actually in fact rose to power using the openly homosexual SA Brownshirts – until they took over and themselves BECAME the established order.  Then anything that could or would challenge them was ruthlessly suppressed and exterminated. Philosophers embracing existentialism (Martin Heidegger) and artists embracing expressionism (Gottfried Benn, Emil Nolde) were open Nazis who ended up on the wrong side of the Nazi Party after their destruction of the social order had served its purpose and was no longer useful as the Nazis set out to impose THEIR new social order which could not be questioned.  And the Nazis went from being an intrinsically violent movement, to a peaceful political movement, back to being an intrinsically violent movement, as was convenient for their goals.

When the Nazis were trying to get to power, they first had to undermine and erode and topple the Judeo-Christian morality that had been the basis of German culture since the days of the Roman Empire.  Proto-Nazis did that, first by undermining confidence in the Bible, then by castigating as evil the people through whom God wrote the Bible, then by attacking the morality and the values themselves.  They used every cultural avant garde expression available to accomplish that evil task.  They used Darwinian evolution.  They used art.  And oh, yes, they used homosexuality.  It stands as a documented historical fact now that “not ten percent of the men who, in 1933, took the fate of Germany into their hands, were sexually normal” (i.e., ninety percent of the Nazis in power practiced homosexuality in spite of the fact that they despised the effeminate men who allowed these Nazis to sodomize them).  The fact of the matter is that the Nazi Party would NEVER have gotten off the ground without homosexuals to provide the sheer viciousness to get the Party over the top.  not ten percent of the men who, in 1933, took the fate of Germany into their hands, were sexually normal.”And then the moment the Nazis gained power, the trap snapped shut and they brutally turned on anything and on anyone who got in the way of their power and their paranoia.

And the Democrat Party is following the same exact script as we speak today.  When the were trying to take down the established moral and social order, hey, anything went; they LOVED free speech!!!  It was in fact their most CHERISHED right and they lectured with intense moral outrage any who would try to take away their right to rail against Judeo-Christian values and traditional morality.  But the moment they got their foot in the door, they turned around and slammed it shut on everyone else.  And that is exactly what the Nazis did.

I can document ad nauseum that the political left – which constitutes the soul of the Democratic Party – is today out to suppress any and all speech they do not like and therefore deem as “hateful.”  They routinely shout down any speech they won’t tolerate in spite of their faux claim that THEY are the bastions of “tolerance.”  Their young elite intellectuals are literally calling for the abolishing of free speechLiberals have purged conservative faculty at universities the same exact way Stalin purged any who he didn’t trust.

And we see that rabid liberal intolerance on display at Donald Trump rally after Donald Trump rally after Donald Trump rally, where liberals show up in force with the intent to shut down free speech and the right to peaceably assemble by any means necessary.

Then we get to the violence.  We’re seeing it at every Donald Trump rally.  But those with historic awareness have seen this organized intent to disrupt by violence the political meetings of opponents before:

“In September 1921, Hitler formed the paramilitary SA (Sturmabteilung) or storm troopers. The SA protected Nazi party meetings and broke up opponents’ political meetings.  The SA men were tough beer-hall thugs, many of whom had fought in Free Corps units.  With their muscle and zeal, they terrorized adversaries.” — [Catherine Epstein, Nazi Germany: Confronting the Myths, p. 27]

Just like we see today as Democrats pursue this exact same tactic at every single Donald Trump rally.

So I’m reading the liberal Los Angeles Times today and I’m looking at the opinion page and the last news page.  On the op-ed section, there’s an opinion piece titled, “The secret life of a Hillary voter.”  And the writer complains about the rabidness of Bernie Sanders DEMOCRATS.  And how oppressed she feels.  And she begins, “Many of my family and friends were so hot with Bernie fever that …”  I mean, she’s not whining about that awful Trump; she’s testifying that her own Democrat-loving family and friends are vicious.  And of course I’m thinking about the pictures I’ve seen at numerous Trump rallies where Trump supporters are left bathed in their own blood by Democrats.  I’m like “Please give me a BREAK!”  Knowing that Democrat thugs ARE giving people like me breaks.  Lots of them.  We’re ending up in emergency rooms with the breaks Democrats are routinely giving us.

And back when it was just Trump supporters who were caught by rabid packs of Democrat hyenas outside of Trump events and beaten, no Democrat was saying SQUAT about the hate and violence.  In fact, we have Hillary Clinton on the record blaming Trump for the violence, blaming Trump for DEMOCRATS coming into his events with hate and viciousness and rabidness and a Nazi intolerance for free speech or peaceful assembly.

You don’t have a RIGHT to complain, Hillary supporter.  Because YOU yourself were PART of it.  And you’ll be PART OF IT AGAIN when Hillary is the nominee and all you Democrat Party Nazis are back at rabidly focusing on Trump again.

Previously, Sanders Democrats literally issued death threats against DNC leaders in Las Vegas.  And then suddenly what had been going on against Trump and against Republicans for MONTHS was WRONG???  And in the same LA Times paper I read about “Cleveland activists saying they’re on the edge” because they want to hold protests that will surely turn into riots at the RNC convention in Cleveland, and Cleveland is like, “We don’t really want your riots.”  So Cleveland is trying desperately to preempt Democrat Party violence at the Republican National Convention.  And the liberal ACLU is out there leading the way to guarantee violence in the very name of “free speech” that the left now HATES.  And in that article, page A14 in the print edition, it points out that:

Cleveland’s radical community had already been on edge — for years.  Five Occupy Cleveland activists were arrested in 2012 after an FBI informant infiltrated the group and provided fake explosives to blow up a bridge.  Prosecutors called it terrorism; activists called it manipulation and entrapment.  Four of the men pleaded guilty and a fifth was convicted.

Just like the prior article on being a poor, oppressed Hillary supporter, the tone of the article is VICTIMHOOD because these radical terrorist violent Democrats are being visited by the same FBI that busted their asses a few years ago.  I mean, I’m sure the Brownshirts complained about how hard it was to bust skulls and blow stuff up and terrorize people into submission, too.

And ah, yes, the lilly white and pathologically violent Occupy Bowel Movement that came out of the Democrat Party prior to the Black Lives Matter Bowel Movement that is spearheading violent protests-cum-riots today.  Because the heart of the political left, the Democrat Party machine, is V.I.O.L.E.N.C.E.  And more violence.  And then more violence.

And these same vicious Democrats look at you with straight faces and declare, “We love peace.”  And they love peace the way Islam loves submission, having previously forced everyone to submit or die horribly.

So let’s get to the fact that these Nazis and KKK guys are racist.

You want to say that the “KKK” or the “Nazis” are racist?  Well, of COURSE they’re racist!!!

But they aren’t ONE SCINTILLA more “racist” than garden variety leftist groups today that align themselves completely with the Democratic Party.  Whether it’s La Raza (“The Race”) or the Black Congressional Caucus or the United Negro College Fund or the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the National Black United Fund, the Black Chamber of Commerce, and on and on, are “racist.”  All these white racist groups want is for white people to use racism to elevate themselves the same exact way people of other (Democrat Party) races are allowed to use racism to elevate themselves.  That’s all.  And the only reason that one group – the white supremacist groups – are “evil” and the black and Hispanic racist groups are “good” is because blatant hypocrisy is a pathological aspect of the human condition and it is particularly pathological among liberals.

All these “racist” white groups want is the same right to be able to organize against other races the way Democrat race groups have been organizing against whites… FOR DECADES.

I despise racism; which is why I so hate the Democrat Party which has campaigned on creating viciously polarized racial divisions for a generation and has created a two-tiered system where what is always racist for thee is never racist for me.  Which is why there will never BE a “Congressional White Caucus” or a “National Association for the Advancement of Caucasian People” or a White Chamber of Commerce,” etc. etc. ad infinitum, ad nauseam.  I despise an organization that calls itself “The Race” and declares, “But it’s not like we’re RACIST.  Even though we constantly try to violently protest and wear brown shirts with our flags and…”

La Raza Brownshirts

and… oops.  That’s just what the Brownshirts did, isn’t it?

I just wish people could understand how PRECISELY and EXACTLY and IDENTICALLY the rise of the Nazis and the rise of the modern Democratic Party machine are paralleling and coalescing into the exact same tactics with the exact same ideology.  Democrats will sit there and tell me, “We’re not the racists; YOU’RE the racist.  YOU’RE the ones who are like the Nazis!”  And it sounds great until you actually comprehend history and understand what Adolf Hitler did.  Because Hitler did EXACTLY what Democrat activists are doing today.  He depicted his Aryan race as the poor, oppressed race who were being exploited by greedy Jews.  Hitler blamed the Jews for damn near everything under the sun.  And any means were justified to the ends of attaining economic fairness and all the same exact crap that liberals spout.  So today our Nazis are blacks and Mexicans and whoever else wants to join the rainbow behind the modern equivalent of the “Pink Swastika” where homosexual thugs beat opponents down at rallies.  And the “Jews” are white people, particularly white males, who are blamed for damn near everything under the sun.  And any means are justified to the ends of attaining economic fairness and all that other garbage that the left blathers to justifies redistributing other people’s hard-earned wealth to themselves the same damn way the Nazis redistributed hard-earned Jewish wealth to themselves.

Anyway, I was curious about just who started the viciousness at a “Nazi” rally in Sacramento in which seven people were stabbed.  From what I’ve heard reported, the Nazis actually canceled the event – for which they had lawfully obtained a permit to hold – when several hundred counter-protesters showed up with obvious viciousness in their hearts.  The counter-protesters didn’t bother to get a permit, of course.  They had hate and violence and righteous liberal ideology in their hearts which was more than enough justification.

So here’s the story:

Police estimated more than 150 counter-protesters showed up to force about 25 neo-Nazis to leave, the Sacramento Bee reported.

The massive brawl between the two groups broke out after people armed with sticks rushed the rally organized by the Traditionalist Worker Party.

The neo-Nazi group obtained a permit from the California Highway Patrol and scheduled the rally from noon to 2 p.m. Sunday.

An ABC10 reporter tweeted chaotic video from the scene, showing masked people — labeled by cops as “anarchists” — chasing down people outside and hitting them with large sticks. Several people in the video are seen holding rainbow and pink flags.

There was a large number of people carrying sticks and rushing to either get into the melee or see what was going on,” fire department spokesman Chris Harvey told reporters. […]

No arrests were made and the wounded were expected to recover, police said early Monday.

The Traditionalist Worker Party organized the protest for other local nationalist groups. Matthew Heimbach, the group’s chairman, chalked the chaos up as a win for his party, claiming that one of their marchers was stabbed in the artery while six of the “anti-fascists” were also stabbed.

Which group outnumbered which group ten to one?  Which group had the weapons?  Which group rushed and attacked which group?  Which group had a permit to peacefully protest and which group just showed up and broke the law and then committed extreme violence against which group?

The mainstream news media of today is no different from Joseph Goebbels’ Ministry of Propaganda.  You read most of the stories of this violent attack and you are intentionally given the sense that it was the Nazis who started all the violence and did all the attacking.  And just as in the days of Hitler, it’s all a lie.

Note that the same cops who did NOTHING to help the group who had obtained all the legal permits, etc. to peacefully protest are the ones calling the “demonstrators” “anarchists.”  When they are in actual reality all DEMOCRAT activists who show up at Trump events with every bit as much rabidness and every bit as much hate and use the exact same tactics.

And note at the core of the viciousness was the homosexual Nazi Brownshirts.

I saw the following from an ABC reporter named Frances Wang that pretty much tells you who was violently attacking who:


You get this? The reporter is saying that an organized, violent liberal mob showed up at a legal protest event in which they had obtained the proper permits for their free speech event and so on and so forth, and the liberals were literally gang-assaulting anybody who they thought even LOOKED like someone they didn’t like.

As the below also underscores:


Poor Nazis.  They got themselves “out-Nazied” by people FAR more vicious and FAR more intolerant and FAR more willing to engage in viciousness in order to violently suppress other people than they were.

Because nobody, but NOBODY can out-hate a Democrat.

Every single one of the people who were stabbed was a Nazi.  Everyone who was violently beaten was a Nazi.  The stabbers and the violent beaters were all Democrat activist thugs who are using those same identical tactics against anyone who disagrees with them.  Because they are FAR more “Nazi” than any other Nazi.

Let me go back to a previous event in Anaheim, in which uniformed KKK people were violently physically attacked in spite of having a permit for a demonstration.  Here are some screen shots of liberal Democrats just unloading rabid, cockroach, Nazi, Stalinist, viciousness on people who had obtained a permit allowing them to exercise free speech.  The KKK guys are wearing black uniforms so it’s pretty darned easy to see who is violently attacking whom.  First you see a KKK guy; he’s just walking alongside a big SUV when … Democrat Party thug-hate BOOM:




Now, you tell me: who is the “hater”?  The guy who got the permit to exercise free speech or the vicious Democrat thug who attacks free speech with a run-from-behind sucker punch to the head???

And the amazing thing – given what happened in Skokie in 1978 when the ACLU ensured that Nazis could march through a town of Jewish death camp survivors – is that we cannot find a single Democrat in the United States who will say that the guy who got the permit to exercise his free speech rights is less evil.

Same event.  And bygosh, it looks like the SAME BLACK THUG gets some hate in here too.  This one takes longer to develop; you see a black-uniformed KKK guy getting shoved down into camera range.  And then attacked by a Democratic Party thug mob that surrounds and beats him.  Notice one Democrat thug plainly seen wielding a heavy steel rod as a weapon:








Same event:



If you watch the video, you’ll see that at the end there are three Democrats beating that guy.  It starts with one Democrat squaring off against him with his fists up, then another Democrat distracts the victim’s attention, and then BOOM.  And they all pile on.

I think of that line from George Orwell’s 1984:

“If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face – forever.”

These are DEMOCRATS.  ALL the violent people we’re seeing today, be it Occupy or Black Lives Matter or Trump protesters or now these thugs, they are ALL DEMOCRATS.  They are organized for political violence the exact same way that the Brownshirts before them were organized for political violence.

Whatever the hell they say, the REAL future that Democrats are fighting for is that right to stomp on their opponents’ faces forever.  And do so with impunity and immunity.

Who are the good guys and who are the bad guys?  And amazingly, the Democrats each and every single time – no matter how evil the other side is – end up being the more evil, the more violent, the more hard-core fascist, the more “Nazi” than their enemy.

Because the ideology of the Democratic Party today is FAR more hateful than the ideology of those ignorant Nazi and KKK pukes who got beat down for daring to think liberals were still “tolerant” or still valued “free speech” or still valued people’s rights.

I don’t know: maybe it’s because they follow this:

Hillary Clinton Vicious

We can now see with absolute crystal clarity that the Democratic Party is seeking to violently and frankly viciously attack Americans who seek their 1st Amendment rights just as Democrats are at the same time trying to take away the 2nd Amendment so that no one will be able to oppose them when they seize power and begin to unleash all the truly monstrous evil that is in their ugly, demonic hearts.

If you are a Democrat, you are a Nazi.  Pure and simple.  In fact you are WORSE than a Nazi and your destiny is to be lower than the Nazis in the lake of fire in hell.  You are riding to power the same exact evil way your intellectual and moral forbearers rode into power.

Again, the parallels between the rise of the Nazi Party and the rise of the modern Democratic Party are as fascinating as they are horrifying to anyone who loves God’s Word and the truth.  Just as it stands as a documented historical fact that the Nazi Party rose with the homosexual SA Storm Troopers, today’s Democrat Party is rising on gay marriage.  An article in USA just yesterday heralds: “One year after historic ruling, gay marriage win propels liberal causes.”  What the Bible plainly describes in Romans Chapter One as being the rock bottom nadir of any civilization and guaranteeing the full wrath of God, is the very SOUL of the wicked, demon-possessed Democrat Party machine.  Democrats learned literally how to do EVERYTHING through the demonic work of Satan in shoving homosexual perversion over the top in American culture.  Homosexuality literally opened the floodgates.  Which is EXACTLY what God DECLARED would happen as a result of your homosexual perversion when He “gave you over” (verse 24, 26, 28) to your depraved lusts in every other area of your wicked soul so you could reap the destruction and ultimate hell that you so richly deserve.  And God HAS given America over.  And so on the downward spiral to total ruin and hell and the Antichrist you will go.

And that USA Today article documents that it was the VERY THING that God said would be the instrumental cause of the downward spiral that is in fact the instrumental cause of the downward spiral.  Because God’s Word is perfect, and He truly declares the end from the beginning.

You have been sowing the wind, and the time is soon coming when you are going to truly reap the whirlwind, Democrat.  Or else God is not the LORD.  And that means very bad things for YOU.

And God is going to one day soon hold you to account for it.  Because you are TEN TIMES the murderers that the Nazis were.  Because again, you Democrats used the same exact tactics the Nazis used.  And just as the Jews were “lebensunwertes leben” you have created your own class of human beings who are “life unworthy of life.”  And you are guilty of a monstrous evil that is ten times the death toll of the Holocaust.  These are HUMAN BEINGS by ANY LEGITIMATE USE OF ACTUAL SCIENCE such as the taxonomic system that precisely classifies every single living thing and which therefore rigorously and precisely classifies the human zygote, the human fetus as “homo sapiens” and nothing BUT “homo sapiens.”   That tiny little baby in her mother’s womb is “human” by virtue of her parents and she is a “being” by virtue of the fact that she exists; SHE IS A HUMAN BEING.  And every single Democrat has personally taken part in her murder and the murder of more than sixty million babies just like her.  You are brutally and wickedly first denying humanity to and then exterminating life deemed unworthy of life in death camps (a.k.a. abortion centers) the exact same way the Nazis did what they did with the exact same reasoning process to justify it.  And the time is coming when you worse-than-Nazis-Democrats will scream in hell for eternity for every single nanosecond of every single one of those sixty million lives you took part in brutally murdering in the abortion mines.  Somebody soon, you’re going to find out the wrathful side of the Jesus who said, “Let the little children come to Me” when you stand before Him guilty of MURDERING those little children.  And you will weep and gnash your teeth when reads Psalm 139 to you and then looks you right in the eye and says, “I never KNEW you; depart from Me, you workers of iniquity.”

Update, June 28, 2016: I see the Los Angeles Times had a main page article on the Sacramento racist hate crime – by which I mean racist Democrats viciously attacked, beat and stabbed members of this “Traditionalist Worker Party” group after that group obtained legal permits to hold a public free speech event and Democrat Party thugs illegally attacked them.  According to the Times:

The Traditionalist Worker Party had obtained a permit for the Sunday event, and the California Highway Patrol said the violence was sparked by counter-protestors.

“If I had to say who started it and who didn’t, I’d say the permitted group didn’t start it,” said CHP Officer George Granada, a spokesman for the agency’s Protective Services Division.  “They came onto the grounds and were met almost instantly with a group of protesters there not to talk.”

Now, having DOCUMENTED which side is literally the good guys and which side are the evil, vicious, rabidly intolerant and physically violent Democrat thugs – and yes, Nazis are “good people” when and ONLY when they are compared to Democrats, because Democrats at this point are so vile that they make even NAZIS look good – consider what the hate organization also-known-as “The Southern Poverty Law Center” had to say about the vicious stabbing and beating:

“Their biggest kind of whine right now is the idea that white people are being subjected to genocide,” Mark Potok, editor of the Sothern Poverty Law Center’s Intelligence Report magazine said of the violence

So, yeah, during the days of the lynchings, I wonder if the Southern Poverty Law Center used words like “whining” to describe the vicious violation of civil rights.  I have a feeling they didn’t.  Basically, you have a right to peacefully protest … if and ONLY if liberals say you have that right.  Otherwise you have the right to shut up or get a beat down.  You know, rabid hate in the name of “tolerance” is really anther word for “love.”  Like Orwell’s boot stomping on that human face is love forever.  We only stomp you because we love you.

And you really have to be utterly SHOCKED that a group of people would use words like “genocide” when they are being subjected to being viciously assaulted featuring attempted murder every time they go out to lawfully publically protest.

The Southern Poverty Law Center is a genocidal organization, to put it simply.  It is an organization that glorifies the vicious physical attacks of a group of people based on the color of their skin as long as that skin is white.  The Southern Poverty Law Center is no different than a Sinn Fein to the IRA, the propagandists justifying terrorist attacks.

I’m so beyond sick of this: take the Brexit vote and the leftist media automatically suggesting beyond “strongly” that it was a racist vote.  The mainstream media are so dishonest in the way they constantly frame their narratives: why was it a racist vote?  Because the island nation of Britain is mostly white.


We’ve got these white Brits and we’ve got these black Democrats: and the problem is the percentage of blacks who vote Democrat is considerably higher than the percentage of whites who voted for Brexit.  So why aren’t blacks racist for voting Democrat given that whites are racist for voting for Brexit???

In the world of journalism, the fecal matter only and always flows from ONE direction; and that is from the LEFT.  And it isn’t about black and white; it’s about wrong and right and it’s about left and right.

If you are a “journalist” today, you are almost without a doubt a pathologically dishonest sniveling fraud-peddler.

In the politically-correct mythological kingdom the left has manufactured, every single racial group on EARTH has the right – even the DUTY – to vote according to RACE.  EXCEPT WHITE PEOPLE.

And if white people shouldn’t be racist, the Democratic Party should properly be labeled as “a racist hate group” just like the Traditionalist Worker Party.  And then let THEM try to get a permit for free speech.


The ‘Trump Can Never Win’ Mantra May Well Be A Leftist ‘And They All Lived Liberally Ever After’ Fairy Tale

May 9, 2016

Let me begin by pointing out that I PREDICTED a Donald Trump would happen FOUR DAMN YEARS AGO.  My words on June 18, 2012:

Obama’s strategy is to set aside and flatly ignore the law for his own political benefit.  Every American who is not deeply troubled by that – troubled enough to not vote for this fascist – is UN-American.

What Obama has done is provide an example of out-and-out lawlessness on the part of the president of the United States.  And when we get a hard-core right wing president the way Obama has been a hard-core left wing president, Obama and the Democrat Party and all of those who voted for Obama and the Democrat Party will be entirely to blame for that president and his extremist actions.  You mark my words.  Because what goes around comes around, and if a Democrat can set aside the law the way Obama has now repeatedly done, well, guess who’s going to be stomping on your necks under your own president’s prior justification???  Conservatives are rising up in a spirit of righteous outrage.  You have repeatedly slapped us in the face through your messiah Obama, and the time is coming when we’re going to punch you hard in the nose and then keep on punching.  And when that day comes, liberals, look to yourselves for blame.

My point is that the anger – THE RAGE – that characterizes this country right now oozed right out of the cockroach soul of an incredibly wicked man named Barack Hussein Obama.  And that rage isn’t just on the right; virtually half of Democrats flatly reject the status-quo Democrat Hillary Clinton and want an openly avowed SOCIALIST to be the next president.

The one thing that about three-quarters of Americans agree upon is that Barack Obama has utterly and absolutely destroyed any trust or confidence whatsoever in the United States government.  And Donald Trump has an awful lot of pure, unadulterated RAGE to tap into.

Liberals are now gleeful at the thought of this horrible, blustering, bigoted buffoon tycoon running as the GOP candidate even as the GOP seems to be fracturing at every possible fissure point over Trump.

They might end up right.  But their demonic, gleeful laughter may turn into the mother of all hysterical crying jags, too.

I found this Washington Post article – keep in mind that WaPo runs reliably leftist – rather intriguing:

Democrats, don’t celebrate Trump’s nomination. Fear it.
By Fred Hiatt Editorial Page Editor
May 8 at 10:03 PM

I know the polls say Donald Trump cannot win. But what if we are looking at the wrong poll question?

What if Trump’s overwhelming negatives don’t matter? Or, to put it another way, what if the country’s negatives matter more?

Right now, about 6 in 10 Americans have an unfavorable view of Trump, and only 36 percent view him positively.

But the country is faring even worse. In the most recent average of polls calculated by RealClearPolitics, 26.9 percent of Americans think the nation is headed in the right direction and 64.9 percent think we are heading down the wrong track.

So what if even voters who respect Hillary Clinton’s competence reject her as the embodiment of business as usual? And what if even voters who do not like Trump’s bigotry or bluster care more that he will, in their view, shake things up?

Sure, these voters might tell themselves, he may be crude, or inconsistent, or ill-informed. He may insult women and Hispanics and other groups. But it’s part of a shtick. He probably doesn’t mean half of it. He’s just an entertainer. The desire to send a message of disgust or disapproval, in other words, could lead voters to overlook, discount, wish away or excuse many Trump sins.

Meanwhile, Clinton cannot shake free of the status quo. You may remember how this bedeviled Al Gore when he asked voters to give the Democratic Party a third straight presidential term in 2000. The vice president managed to achieve the worst of both worlds, alienating Bill Clinton and his most ardent supporters without establishing himself as an entirely new brand.

Unlike Gore, Hillary Clinton is not an incumbent. But she is no less associated with the establishment, having served as first lady, U.S. senator and secretary of state over the past quarter-century. Even if she were inclined to do so, she could not afford to distance herself from President Obama, whose backers she will need to turn out in large numbers.

I know there is an element of irrationality in these fears. I understand that not every dissatisfied American will vote for Trump.

About two-thirds of the country may think we are on the wrong track, after all, but Obama’s approval rating is 51 percent and rising.

Meanwhile, only 4.7 percent of eligible voters have actually cast a ballot for Trump in the party nomination process so far, as an analysis by FairVote shows. Many of the remaining 95.3 percent, no matter how unhappy most are with the performance of their government, will take their responsibility seriously enough that they will not vote for someone who casually threatens the faith and credit of the United States, breezily posits the merits of nuclear proliferation and cheerfully espouses torture as an instrument of U.S. policy.

Republicans are divided, the economy is improving, the demographics are increasingly in Democrats’ favor. The likeliest result of a Trump nomination is a Republican washout up and down the ballot.

I do get all that.

Still, when I hear smart people explaining why Trump cannot win, all I can think is: Aren’t you the ones who told us that he couldn’t top 30 percent, and then 40 percent, and then 50 percent in the Republican primaries? Weren’t you confident that he was finished after he called Mexicans rapists, and insulted prisoners of war, and dished out a menstruation insult?

Did you predict his nomination? If not, we don’t want to hear your certainty about his November defeat.

Nor is it reassuring to read how happy the Clinton camp must be to be facing such a weak opponent. They need to be running scared — smart, but scared — now and for the next six months.

I do have faith in the American voter, I really do. But when two-thirds of the country is unhappy, a rational outcome can’t be taken for granted.

Understand that this editorialist in the course of this article is trying to do what the Hillary Clinton campaign is going to try to do: fearmonger and demonize Donald Trump and say you don’t want an unstable, dangerous guy like this in the White House.

But what if, after the abject ruin of Obama, the American people not only want but DEMAND somebody who will be different???

And at this point, Hillary Clinton has literally tried to insinuate her molecules into the molecules of Obama and is running as the third Obama term.  Versus Donald Trump who says to hell with Bush and wears the Bush-era GOP establishment’s refusal to rally to him as a badge of honor.

It’s a war of Hillary Clinton’s “I’ll be even more like Obama than Obama was!” versus Donald Trump’s “I won’t be anything like those turds Obama OR Bush!”

Now, take me as a conservative.  I didn’t want Trump from the getgo.  And I’ve been watching the coverage of the campaign twist and turn and morph and totally contradict itself.  NOBODY thought Donald Trump was going to succeed to this point.  I mean, even just a couple of weeks ago, liberal journalists were gleefully salivating over the prospect of a brokered convention and the outrage they could manufacture – with Donald Trump’s assistance, of course – over any Republican establishment shenanigans that they might use to try to obstruct and deny Trump from clinching the nomination.  And that was the narrative for weeks and weeks until all of a sudden they were all proven wrong and Ted Cruz and then immediately John Kasich suddenly dropped out.

Mind you, Bernie Sanders hasn’t dropped out.  But then again, the liberal fracturing of the Democratic Party isn’t nearly as interesting for “journalists” to cover as the hype over the divides on the other side.  And so Democrat propagandists – otherwise known as “reporters” – continue to hype the Republican division.  Because to be a liberal is to be a hypocrite who can’t seen the log in their own eyes as they examine the speck in their opponent’s eyes.

Donald Trump has a number of advantages in this postmodern world that Democrats and liberals created that has long-since disregarded truth.  He can run to the right of Hillary Clinton when it suits him and he can run to the left of Hillary Clinton when it suits him.  For instance on the latter, Hillary Clinton is a horrible, failed, warmongering fool: just look at her Iraq War vote that she was all in favor of.  And Donald Trump says he was against that evil war.  And any Democrat who doesn’t want another Iraq War should therefore vote for Trump.  Or here’s another one: the trade agreements that Bernie Sanders has been tearing apart left and right that Hillary loves so much: Trump and Sanders are on the same page there.  Feel that “Bern,” Hillary.

And we’re already starting to see that Donald Trump will punch Hillary Clinton right in the mouth and keep punching her.   He won’t be like the typical Republican nominee who’s afraid to go after a Clinton because she’s a woman or an Obama because he’s black.  And he’s got about a trillion acres of the field of Clinton corruption history to burn to the ground.

Clinton’s emails have yet to surface in this race.  Hillary Clinton is either a corrupt criminal traitor or she is the most incompetent bungling bureaucrat to ever serve in a public office.  There is no other alternative between those two.  So all Hillary Clinton has to go with her incredibly low opinion polls is her record of “competence.”  Which aint very competent.  And meanwhile Clinton is promising the same failed strategy that drove this country right into the ground whereas Trump says whatever the hell Obama did I’ll do just the opposite.

This is going to be the angriest and most bitter election in the history of the American republic.  Because Barack Obama was the worst and most failed and most ideological and the most polarizing president in the history of the American republic.

I know things are going to get really ugly, really nasty, and really mean.  In my own case, I truly hesitated to support Donald Trump: it took the vicious, fascist, Stalinist thugs a.k.a. the Democrat Party who resorted to violence and screaming to shut down and shout down the 1st Amendment to convince me that THE most un-American people on earth are all Democrats.  Anybody who values freedom, freedom of speech, freedom to peaceably assemble and freedom to listen to political speech without Nazi Stormtrooper thugs trying to stop you cannot vote Democrat.  If Donald Trump hates Muslims and illegal immigrant Mexicans, Democrats hate the Constitution and our founding fathers even more.

I have no idea whose going to win.

But I do know that if Donald Trump wins this election, Democrats, that you got just the hell that you voted for when you voted for Obama and then voted to re-elect that slandering demagogue again.

Remember Watching Islamic State Destroy Monuments And People Were Horrified? But Now LIBERALS Are Doing It So It’s OK

July 3, 2015

It wasn’t very long ago that the universal consensus of journalists and news reporters was that it was a terrible, evil, tragic thing that Islamic State thugs were destroying ancient monuments:

I felt sick to my stomach when I first heard the callous disregard – the hatred – for history, for where we’ve come from.  I love history and archeology, and these sites were absolutely irreplaceable.  And they were destroyed by rabid people who are absolutely vicious toward anyone or anything that doesn’t agree with their ideology.

Just like their American brethren, Democrats and liberal progressives, it turns out.

‘Black Lives Matter’ Vandalism Wave Strikes Confederate Memorials Around the Country
by Warner Todd Huston24 Jun 2015

A rash of instances of property destruction, vandalism, and petty crimes have cascaded across the country unleashed by the “Black Lives Matter” movement as families grieve those killed by a lone gunman in a South Carolina church.

The mood was set on Sunday as “Black Lives Matter” protesters gathered to burn the US flag and hoist a black nationalist flag in Charleston, South Carolina on Saturday. A photo of the flag burning was posted to Twitter by professional race agitator DeRay McKesson.

By Tuesday statues and monuments from Maryland and the Carolina Coast down to Texas had been defaced by criminals leaving “Black Lives Matter” messages spray painted upon them.

Charleston, South Carolina itself had at least two monuments defaced. In the first case, Saturday night the Confederate Defenders of Charleston monument in White Point Garden park was defaced with a “Black Lives Matter” message.

In a second incident, on Tuesday a statue dedicated to famed legislator and seventh Vice President of the United States John C. Calhoun was defaced in Charleston’s Marion Square.

The vandalism continued elsewhere. On Monday a statue dedicated to fallen Confederate soldiers was vandalized in Baltimore, Maryland’s Bolton Hill neighborhood.

Another statue, this one in Asheville, North Carolina, was defaced on Tuesday. A monument dedicated to Civil War governor Zebulon Vance, built in 1896, was also desecrated with the “Black Lives Matter” message.

The destruction continued westward where a statue dedicated to former Confederate president Jefferson Davis was vandalized at the University of Texas at Austin.

I guess unlike those other ancient sites all of our Civil War monuments are easily replaceable.  After all, what did the Civil War really cost us?  It only cost America as many dead Americans as all of our other wars COMBINED.

Democrats figure they murder that many American babies in their abortion mills in less than a year, so what’s the big deal?

I particularly find fitting the comparison to the number of soldiers killed in the Civil War with abortion given the unholy outrage of the “racism” of the Confederate cause when Democrats stand for THIS:

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities.  The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” — Margaret Sanger (Hillary Clinton’s hero), in Woman, Morality, and Birth Control (New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12)

Yeah, “colored ministers” such as the “Reverend” Jeremiah Wright, and Oh, yes: how about a a “light-skinned” African American “with no Negro dialect” community organizer?

And oh, yes, let’s not forget Hillary Rodham Clinton’s participation in this liberal progressive holy war against blacks:

Hillary Clinton’s hero’s vision – and the political ideology that BOTH these women have championed – are BOTH stage 5 cancers to black babies to this very day:

Black women are more than 5 times as likely as white women to have an abortion

Here’s a little fact about the modern Confederate Party:

Several years ago, when 17,000 aborted babies were found in a dumpster outside a pathology laboratory in Los, Angeles, California, some 12-15,000 were observed to be black.” — Erma Clardy Craven, Social Worker and Civil Rights Leader

Hillary Clinton’s hero spoke to a Ku Klux Klan rally.  Which ought to be no surprise, given that history reveals that the Democrat Party has been so deep in bed with the Klan that the 1924 Democrat National Convention was called “The Klanbake.”

We can celebrate with Margaret and Hillary because as this headline points out:

Margaret Sanger’s Dream Come True: Eugenics by Abortion

The racist dream came true!  I mean, yay!  Right, liberal hypocrite pervert?  The Democrat Party is EVERY BIT as treasonous and as racist as they ever were; they just found a different form of plantation and a different form of slavery for – well, let’s just call them what Barack Obama called them, NIGGERS – to enjoy.  I guess if Bill Clinton can make blowjobs okay, there’s no reason Barack Obama can’t make the N-word okay for decent society.  Oral sex isn’t sex when a Democrat president gets it in the Oval Office from a young female intern and the N-word isn’t racist when a Democrat president uses it, so there you go.

What is amazing is that as Democrats shrilly demand the Confederate flag – THEIR flag that THEY fought for after THEY attacked the United States of America because Republican Abraham Lincoln defeated THEIR Democrat candidate for presidentare today demanding that Margaret Sanger be on the damned $20 bill.  Apparently because she’s even MORE racist than Democrat Andrew Jackson who used to be on it.

I think of the recent case where a liberal progressive white woman masqueraded as a black activist to suck up benefits that were supposed to go to actual black people.  But what did the black so-called “civil rights” leaders say?  They said:

But on the other hand, those of us who talk about race as a social construct, that’s it’s more complicated.  Bill Clinton is the first black president though he didn’t claim he was black. It means that she may not be African-American, but she certainly could be black in a cultural sense. She’s taking on the ideas, the identities, the struggles. She’s identified with them. I bet a lot more black people would support Rachel Dolezal than would support say Clarence Thomas. So the point is, how do we talk about useful blackness, the utility of blackness and the service of justice, and I think here we haven’t answered that question yet.

Which is another way of saying “‘Black’ equals ‘leftist ideologue.’  And if you don’t think the way we TELL you to think, well, we DENY what science says your DNA is.”  And then we see the REAL ATTITUDE liberals have toward a black man who doesn’t want to live on their plantation: liberals say he should be put to work in the fields, or strung up.  You know, because the “high-tech lynching” when the Democrat Party tried to falsely depict him as a black man – who is therefore an out-of-control sexual beast – didn’t work.


Wouldn’t it be nice if the mainstream media – who love punching Republicans in the face at absolutely EVERY interview with gotcha questions framed to make them look evil – actually just presented these facts and demanded that Hillary Clinton respond to why she’s such a pathological racist???  As we speak, the mainstream media is hounding every Republican presidential candidate to take a position on crap that Donald Trump said when what the hell does that have to do with them?  But hold Hillary Clinton responsible for her publicly expressed support for the intentionally genocidal murder of black babies by abortion?  NEVER.

One of those amazing things about Democrats is that they STILL view themselves as the people and party of tolerance and broad inclusiveness when they are THE most rabidly intolerant people on the face of the earth.  They used free speech and declared that they had a right to say and believe things even though they were unpopular and held those positions as sacrosanct right until the moment that they gained enough power to slam the door of freedom and free speech right in the faces of anyone who disagreed with them.

If you’re a Democrat, you’re not only WORSE than Islamic State, you’re worse than a damn NAZI.  And you’re worse than these other monsters because a) you’ve murdered far, FAR more human beings than both of them put together and b) you are such cockroach hypocrites it is beyond unreal and it is a miracle performed by the devil that your damned heads don’t simply explode from all the rabid contradictions in your demon-possessed skulls.


Charleston Church Hate Criminal Victims Were Martyrs For Jesus Christ FAR MORE Than They Were Martyrs For Their Race

June 18, 2015

Dylann Roof is a demon-possessed turd.  Period.  While consistent Darwinism entails a belief in a master race – or let’s at least agree on Charles Darwin’s “favoured race” – all you have to do is take one look at Dylann Roof’s picture and you ought to instantly see that if there IS such a thing as a “master race,” well, a turd like Dylann Roof clearly doesn’t belong to it.

Is he a racist?  I don’t doubt it for a second.  But he didn’t just go to some black nightclub or one of many other places where he could have found a group of black people; he went to a CHRISTIAN CHURCH and he went to a BIBLE STUDY and PRAYER MEETING and the people he murdered were all CHRISTIANS.

Those murdered Christians aren’t merely “victims”; they’re MARTYRS of the Lord Jesus Christ.

It’s a hate crime, all right.  But it’s yet another hate crime against CHRISTIANS during a time when more Christians are being martyred today than at any time in a history in which millions of Christians have been martyred.

Christianity ALONE unites people:

After this I looked, and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands. — Revelation 7:9

The Word of God ensures and assures us of the same thing over and over again.  Race is NOTHING.  We can all be BROTHERS and SISTERS in Jesus Christ:

  • Here there is no Gentile or Jew, circumcised or uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave or free, but Christ is all, and is in all. — Colossians 3:11
  • For there is no difference between Jew and Gentile–the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on Him — Romans 10:12
  • There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

We have the testimony of St. Peter who visited the home of a Gentile named Cornelius and said to the crowd of Gentiles that were gathered there:

He said to them: “You are well aware that it is against our law for a Jew to associate with or visit a Gentile. But God has shown me that I should not call anyone impure or unclean. — Acts 10:28

As for the people who are making this murder all about race or all about guns, well, they are only serving to perpetuate the very sorts of hatreds and divisions that motivated Dylann Roof to begin with.  Such people are exploiting this tragic event to politicize it as a cynical means to stir up their base and pit one group of people against another in a hope of a “fifty-percent-plus-one” strategy.

If you are hurting by the division and the hate and the violence, I know THE ONLY PLACE where you can find unity and love and peace – in the Prince of Peace, in Jesus.

The Christian men and women massacred by Dylann Roof knew that unity and love and peace.  Which is why they welcomed him into their midst to share their Precious Savior Jesus with him.

And they died for it.  And they will be richly rewarded in heaven for their sacrifice.

The dead would far rather have been known as “Christians” than as “black people.”  These precious saints will all inherit a martyr’s crown for what they suffered for the name of Jesus.  Don’t you dare try to take that away from them.

I just wanted to point that out.  Because the mainstream media has entirely omitted that fact.

Liberal Democrat De Blasio To Blame For Cop Assassinations: The Cops PREDICTED Officers Would Die Because Of Liberals Joining Racist Protestors

December 29, 2014

[Update, 12/30/14: Well, this additional fact didn’t take long to further document the cancerous climate created by our cop-killer-in chief:

A new report out found a sharp rise in the number of police officers killed by guns in 2014, including 15 of what the Associated Press calls “ambush” shootings.

As the Associated Press reports:

The number of law enforcement officers killed by firearms jumped by 56 percent this year and included 15 ambush deaths… In 2011, 73 officers were killed in gunfire, the most in any year in the past decade. The average since 2004 is 55 police deaths annually.

The AP notes that the motivation of these vicious ambush attacks is politics.

The NY Times further collaborates this fact:

As the city was thrust into mourning, with flags lowered and police badges ribboned in black, the way Mr. Brinsley had stalked the officers set off precautions across the department. Officers who in recent weeks had felt besieged by political attacks found themselves contemplating the specter of far greater peril.

Neither “news” source has the basic journalistic integrity to point out the obvious blatant FACT that these “political attacks” are ALL coming from the vile political left.  [end update]

Liberal Democrat Mayor Bill De Blasio is to blame for the assassination of two NYPD police officers.  And the documented facts prove it:

De Blasio had INCREDIBLY vicious and polarizing things about the police who protect society such as said things such as:

“We’re not just dealing with years of racism leading up to it or decades of racism,” de Blasio said. “We are dealing with centuries of racism that have brought us to this day. That is how profound the crisis is.”

He despicably alienated police with his statement that police should not be trusted:

Mayor de Blasio made “moronic” comments Sunday that prove he “doesn’t belong” in New York, a key police union chief said, further inflaming the war of words between Hizzoner and the NYPD.

The comments from Ed Mullins, head of the Sergeants Benevolent Association, came after de Blasio reiterated his concern that his son, Dante, could be harmed by a police officer if he were to make any sudden movements in a hypothetical encounter with cops.

“What parents have done for decades who have children of color, especially young men of color, is train them to be very careful when they have …an encounter with a police officer,” de Blasio said on ABC’s “This Week.”

Mullins ripped right into de Blasio later in the day, calling his comments “really hypocritical and moronic” and suggesting the mayor get out of his own city.

“He has a security detail of New York City police officers assigned to protect his family. And yet he’s making statements that his son shouldn’t feel safe with New York City cops,” Mullins said on John Catsimatidis’ radio show on AM970.

De Blasio – being a liberal and a Democrat and therefore a despicable roach – has an easy to document history of hiring cop-hating staffers to fill his payroll and carry out his vile policies:

The New York Post reported in March 2013 and again this year on Motley’s offensive Twitter comments.

“NYPD fatally shoot knife-wielding man in Times Square.  F–k. The. Police,” Motley wrote on Aug. 11, 2012, of the police shooting death of Darrius Kennedy, The Post reported.

One of the last straws was when de Blasio brought racist, race-baiting race hustler Al Sharpton to a place of high honor and allowed him to demonize the NYPD:

He [de Blasio] took the unusual step — unimaginable under the mayoralties of Rudy Giuliani or Michael Bloomberg — of inviting Sharpton to City Hall, seating him opposite Bratton at a table where the activist proceeded to strongly denounce the police. (“If Dante wasn’t your son, he’d be a candidate for a chokehold. And we got to deal with that reality,” Sharpton said to de Blasio as Bratton looked on.) Last week, de Blasio privately met with organizers of the Garner protests, another moment that antagonized police.

But the action that turned off cops most of all was his defense of City Hall staffer Rachel Noerdlinger, a longtime Sharpton aide whose son and boyfriend posted anti-police messages on their Facebook accounts. The boyfriend allegedly tried to drive a cop off the road in Edgewater, New Jersey, and later pleaded to a lesser offense, according to the New York Post. The mayor stood behind Noerdlinger for weeks until her son was arrested for trespassing – and even then he didn’t fire her. When she left her job, City Hall officials said she was on leave.

“His words and his deeds don’t match,” said veteran cop reporter Leonard Levitt, who runs NYPD Confidential, a website fed by tips from inside the department and widely read by the rank-and-file. “You had Noerdlinger’s son calling cops ‘pigs’ and de Blasio doesn’t think that’s inappropriate? What message are you sending? De Blasio says it’s just the union guys who are angry. It’s not. It’s everybody. I’ve been covering this for 25 years and I have never seen anything like it… The mayor doesn’t have a clue.”

And here – FINALLY – was the police response:

NEW YORK — New York City’s police union, the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association, is urging its members to ban Mayor Bill de Blasio from their funerals, the latest episode in the ongoing clash between the mayor and the city’s law-enforcement power structure.

Officers are encouraged to fill out a form on the union’s website titled “Don’t Insult My Sacrifice” to request that neither de Blasio nor Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito attend their funeral, should they be killed in the line of duty.

The form reads:

I, _____________________, as a New York City police officer, request that Mayor Bill de Blasio and City Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito refrain from attending my funeral services in the event that I am killed in the line of duty. Due to Mayor de Blasio and Speaker Mark-Viverito’s consistent refusal to show police officers the support and respect they deserve, I believe that their attendance at the funeral of a fallen New York City police officer is an insult to that officer’s memory and sacrifice.

Full Story: Police to De Blasio: Don’t attend my funeral



2 N.Y.P.D. Officers Killed in Brooklyn Ambush; Suspect Commits Suicide

Two police officers sitting in their patrol car in Brooklyn were shot at point-blank range and killed on Saturday afternoon by a man who, officials said, had traveled to the city from Baltimore vowing to kill officers. The suspect then committed suicide with the same gun, the authorities said.

The officers, Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos, were in the car near Myrtle and Tompkins Avenues in Bedford-Stuyvesant in the shadow of a tall housing project when the gunman, Ismaaiyl Brinsley, walked up to the passenger-side window and assumed a firing stance, Police Commissioner William J. Bratton said. Mr. Brinsley shot several rounds into the heads and upper bodies of the officers, who never drew their weapons, the authorities said.

There is ABSOLUTELY NO QUESTION that this vicious thug targeted police because of the racist race-baiting race-hustling cockroach vile slander from the left.

He said, “They take 1 of ours…Let’s take 2 of theirs #ShootThePolice #RIPErivGarner #RIPMikeBrown This may be my final post I’m putting pigs in a blanket.” – See more at:

There is a DIRECT correspondence between what liberals said and what this cop murderer believed and literally claimed was his motive for assassinating police officers.

Remember what THE most honored liberal “journalist” wrote when a deranged shooter who had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH EITHER CONSERVATIVES OR CONSERVATIVE STATEMENTS claimed when a Democrat was shot?

When you heard the terrible news from Arizona, were you completely surprised? Or were you, at some level, expecting something like this atrocity to happen?

Put me in the latter category. I’ve had a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach ever since the final stages of the 2008 campaign. I remembered the upsurge in political hatred after Bill Clinton’s election in 1992 — an upsurge that culminated in the Oklahoma City bombing. And you could see, just by watching the crowds at McCain-Palin rallies, that it was ready to happen again.

There was absolutely ZERO connection between the deranged shooter and anything that anyone on the political right said or did.  Loughner was as tuned out to political reality as he was to every other kind of reality.  Unlike the present situation, where there is clearly a one-to-one correlation between the statements of the left and the actions of a cop assassin who acted on the demon-possessed hate of the Democrat Party machine.

And yes, beloved liberal Democrat Roach Al Sharpton – who has been at Barack Obama’s White House over eighty-five racist race-bating times to spew his race-hatred – has the same blood on his demon claws that de Blasio has:

FLASHBACK: Al Sharpton’s Marchers in New York City Chant “What Do We Want? Dead Cops!”
Katie Pavlich | Dec 21, 2014

As Obama civil rights advisor Al Sharpton frantically tries to distance himself from the revenge execution style slayings of two NYPD officers Saturday afternoon in Brooklyn, keep in mind that just one week ago protestors at his march in New York City were chanting, “What do we want? Dead cops! When do what them? Now!”

The protesters were part of Al Sharpton’s “Million Marchers” protest against police violence. The protesters chanted “What do we want?… Dead cops!” as they marched in New York City.

Meanwhile, former NYPD Commissioner Bernie Kerik is accusing Sharpton and NYC Mayor Bill De Blasio of having blood on their hands.

“In this circumstance I believe, I personally feel, that Mayor de Blasio, Sharpton and others like them, they actually have blood on their hands,” Kerik said. “They encouraged this behavior. They encouraged protests. These so-called peaceful protests that, where people are standing out there saying ‘kill the cops.’”

“Well, I hope they’re happy, because they got what they wanted,” Kerik added.

H/T Gateway Pundit

Democrats have divided America by income, by class, by race, by gender, by sexuality, by the desire to murder babies.  And now they are dividing America on the level of criminals vs. police.  And always, ALWAYS Democrats take the side of evil and vileness in a way guaranteed to bring America down and bring on the full wrath of a just and holy God in the last days before they vote for the Antichrist.


As We Survey The Race-Baiting Disaster In Furgusen, MO Caused By Liberals, Remember That The Democrat Party Is THE Party of Evil In America

August 15, 2014

Okay, we’ve got a beef, folks.  So let’s riot and burn down the community and throw Molotov cocktails and get violent and nasty and rabid.

Oh, wait.  What’s that?  Oh, you’re right; we’re NOT liberals.  Which is another way of saying we’re not race-baiting rabid fascists.  So we can’t do that because we’re conservatives.

I remember the frenzied furor that the mainstream media erupted into when that rancher in Texas had Obama and his lawthug Eric Holder in his face and tea partiers started showing up with their rifles to make sure the government acted right.  You know, after Obama’s BLM thugs did crap like THIS.

Who actually fired the gunshots?  None were fired during the Bundy standoff.  But plenty were fired BY LIBERALS in Ferguson.

Nobody was shot.  Oh, except for the cattle who were callously and thuggishly massacred by Obama’s BLM goons.  As best I can remember there were no riots.  There was no looting.  I don’t think the tea partiers threw so much as ONE Molotov cocktail.  No towns burned down.

But the way the fascist propaganda mill covered it, you’d have thought the tea partiers had brought thousands of babies to have mass human sacrifices to their Nazi gods or something.

Of course, the same truth-despising fascist media propaganda tactic was employed against the Tea Party when they were peacefully protesting and the blanket of silence surrounding the vicious, rabidly fascist leftist Occupy Movement defied belief.

Remember how the Tea Party was described as being so WHITE and by implication so RACIST by the leftist media propaganda?  It of course subsequently didn’t matter whatsoever that the beloved Occupy Movement was EVERY BIT as white if not MORE so.

7,775 documented arrests of liberals.  Versus ZERO of conservatives.  But the way the most dishonest propaganda machine since Joseph Goebbels and his Nazi Ministry of Propaganda depicted it, it was the conservatives with their zero arrests who were the side of naked evil.

What is interesting is when you actually consider our murders and our mass shootings, and you consider that the black people and young people who are the backbone of the Democrat Party vote machine are responsible for virtually all the damn crimes and murders in America, this is nothing new.  Which is why liberals refuse to consider the actual facts.

We’ve seen non-stop race-rioting, burning and looting for DAYS in Ferguson, Missouri, and of course its the good guys’ fault because how DARE they try to maintain law and order when secular humanist statist fascists want to riot and burn and loot in the name of “justice”???

But now the details are starting to come out.

We learn that the poor, helpless little boy who was gunned down when he hadn’t even done anything wrong.  And he was even shot in the back, we were told on MSNBC.  Now we know a little bit more about him, too:

A suburban St. Louis police chief on Friday identified the officer whose fatal shooting of an unarmed black teenager ignited days of heated protests, and released documents alleging the teen was killed after a robbery in which he was suspected of stealing a $48.99 box of cigars.

Ferguson, Mo., Police Chief Thomas Jackson said that the robbery took place just before noon on Saturday at a nearby convenience store roughly 10 minutes before a police officer identified as Darren Wilson fired the bullet that killed Michael Brown. Police say that the shot was fired after a struggle touched off by Wilson’s confronting Brown. Jackson said Wilson is a six-year veteran with no disciplinary action on his record.

The news conference came after nearly a week of sometimes-violent protests and calls by many, including President Obama, for local law enforcement to be more transparent about the circumstances surrounding the shooting. Police previously said they withheld Wilson’s identity because of the potential for threats on the officer and his family. The officer has been on administrative leave since the shooting.

Police released still images and were planning to release video from the robbery, at a QuikTrip store in Ferguson. Jackson said Wilson, along with other officers, were called to the area after a 911 call reporting a “strong-arm robbery” at a nearby convenience store. He didn’t immediately release details about the alleged robbery, saying more information would be released later.

Jackson provided few other details about Wilson at the news conference and did not take any questions. Jackson said Swisher Sweets cigars were stolen in the robbery. He was suspected of stealing the box of cigars. The documents released by authorities include surveillance images from the store.

According to the police reports, Brown and his friend, Dorian Johnson, were suspected of taking a box of cigars from a store in Ferguson that morning.

“I am incensed,” Laura Keys, 50, told The St. Louis Post-Dispatch. “I can’t believe this is the tactic they are using, bringing up a robbery to make the victim look like he was the person who created this whole mess.”

Police have said Brown was shot after an officer encountered him and another man on the street. They say one of the men pushed the officer into his squad car, then physically assaulted him in the vehicle and struggled with the officer over the officer’s weapon. At least one shot was fired inside the car before the struggle spilled onto the street, where Brown was shot multiple times, according to police.

But a much different story has been told by Dorian Johnson, who says he was walking down the street with Brown when he was shot. He has said the officer ordered them out of the street, then grabbed his friend’s neck and tried to pull him into the car before brandishing his weapon and firing. He says Brown started to run and the officer pursued him, firing multiple times.

We know that Michael Brown – this poor, helpless little teenage victim – was in reality a 6’4″ 290 lb brutal THUG who strong armed robbed a store after physically assaulting the owner.

So we had the liberal Democrat account of a brutal police officer just randomly harassing and then murdering a poor innocent black kid just for being black.  And then we have the actual fact that the cop who came upon these two thugs was responding to a suspect who had just committed a STRONG ARM ROBBERY that had just taken place.  And then these two hoodlum gangsta thugs attacked him.

At this point details get murky.  This above news report was based on the police chief’s earlier report that the officer in the shooting was responding to the strong arm robbery.  The chief has since clarified that Officer Wilson was not aware of the robbery and actually was stopping them for walking in the middle of the road when the attack on the officer and the subsequent shooting by the officer occurred.

This latter actually makes more sense; because if the officer was responding to a strong arm robbery suspect, he would have immediately held Brown at gunpoint as opposed to allowing him to get close enough to attack him.  The cop was unaware of the fact that Brown had just committed a strong arm robbery, but Brown certainly wasn’t unaware.  Which is why he attacked the officer the first chance he had.

If there’s any question as to whether Brown is a thug, why don’t we ask that owner how helpless this poor little 6’4″ 290 pound black boy was???

And we know that the police officer who confronted and shot Brown was physically injured in the death struggle that Brown initiated as the officer found himself shoved backward into his own squad car and struggling for possession of his weapon.

But here’s the thing: Democrats are THUGS who LOVE THUGS.  So whose side do they take?  Well, after demonizing as some kind of racist cop a guy who turns out to be an impeccable police officer, and after lionizing the poor little boy who turns out to be a violent thug, liberals being liberals and therefore THUGS believe Michael Brown’s thug buddy.

And that is because liberals are EVIL people who routinely side with evil thugs time after time.

This is getting tiring.

This is now the third time Turd Obama has jumped in to side with evil in race-baiting incidents.

I think of Obama stupidly getting on national television – after admitting he was personally ignorant – and accusing the police that responded to the call in Massachusetts that “the police acted stupidly.”

Do you remember that?

Who ‘Acted Stupidly’? The Cop, The Professor, Or The President?

911 Caller In Gates Case Gets Death Threats As ‘Racist’: But Who Are The REAL Racists?

The only two people who truly acted “stupidly” was Henry Louis Gates – who erupted in racist rage when most people would have been glad that a police officer had showed up to investigate a report that someone was trying to break into their home – and one Barack Hussein Obama.

All the poor cop knew – and again, this was an EXEMPLARY cop just like our current cop Darren Wilson is an exemplary cop – was that he had received a report about a man breaking into a house.  That’s all the cop knew; someone had called 911 and reported that a man was trying to get into a house late in the night.  And had the black Harvard professor not had a chip on his shoulder about a mile deep, and had he not been a racist, bitter Democrat turd, the matter would have been easily cleared up.

But no, no, no.  Liberals are vicious, bitter, rabid little fascists.  They cannot help themselves.  And the demons are quick to erupt out of these wicked people.  So Professor Henry Louis Gates went – and the only appropriately descriptive term is “apeshit” –  on the poor officer who had no choice but to arrest the man.

Then we had the Trayvon Martin shooting.  And Obama AGAIN dived into it and sicked his lawthug Eric Holder on George Zimmerman.  Because when a black thug is on top of you beating you, how dare you think you have the right to defend yourself???

The Left Goes Batpoop Over George Zimmerman’s ‘God’s Plan’ Remark. My Thoughts On The Subject.

Obama FBI Thinks It’s A ‘Hate Crime’ That George Zimmerman Bloodied Trayvon Martin’s Knuckles With His Broken Nose And Lacerated Head

Mainstream Media Lynching Of George Zimmerman Pretty Much Confirms Everything I’ve Said About Both Liberalism And ‘Journalism’

ABC News Enhances Zimmerman Arrest Video And FINDS ‘A Pair Of Gashes Or Welts On George Zimmerman’s Head’

Obama Dives Into ‘Racist’ Trayvon Martin Shooting Case (Please Try To Remember That ‘Racist’ Shooter George Zimmerman Is Hispanic)

Trayvon Martin, Racism, The Stand Your Ground Law And Michael Dunn. No Comparison Whatsoever.

A trial that never should have GONE to trial completely exonerated George Zimmerman of having done anything wrong that night.  And Eric Holder – who was determined to punish Zimmerman – by the way, a HISPANIC – in whatever kangaroo court he could create, was humiliated again when we subsequently learned there were no civil rights violations, either.  But that of course was just allowed to dwindle away.

FACTS don’t matter to liberals.  That’s what makes them “liberals.”  They literally couldn’t BE liberals if they cared anything about truth.




What Racist Bigot Donald Sterling Needs To Be Saying: I’m Clearly Not A Racist Because I’m A LIBERAL DEMOCRAT

April 28, 2014

The moment you’ve got an ugly scandal like this one and the word “conservative” or “Republican” isn’t blasted all over the story, you pretty much know the cockroach is a liberal:

Saturday, April 26, 2014

Liberal #Democrat Donald Sterling Caught on Tape Screaming Ugly Racist Epithets

Amazing.It’s been almost like clockwork this last couple of weeks. Leftists got a squirrelly reprieve with the fake Cliven Bundy sideshow, but then the left gets back on track with their racist repertoire of hate. Seriously. It’s too good. You just can’t make up these far-left Democrat Party supporting leftists spewing vile racial epithets, all caught on tape. Clockwork baby.I say it all the time: the Democrat Party is the country’s natural home to racists and ethnic eliminationists. And now we have über liberal real estate mogul and sports owner, Democrat Party contributor and philanthropist, Donald T. Sterling in the news with yet another case of vile leftist racial hatred.Here’s the headline story at Memeorandum, “Clippers Owner Donald Sterling to GF – Don’t Bring Black People to My Games, Including Magic Johnson” and on Twitter:And there’s a YouTube clip at the Independent Journal Review, “Explosive Audio: L.A. Clippers Owner Donald Sterling Shows Us All What Truly Ugly Racism Sounds Like.” As it notes there:

Just for the record, Sterling’s record of political support is for two Democratic politicians: former California Governor Gray Davis and three-term Senator Bill Bradley.

Of course! Sterling’s a liberal leftist Democrat of the first order! Also here, “Follow the Money: Political Contributions of NBA Owners.”

What’s hilarious is none of this is new. Sterling’s far-left racist bigotry has been on the public record for a long time. See this Los Angeles Times report from black liberal Los Angeles Times columnist Sandy Banks in 2010, “Donald Sterling is generous, impolitic and eager to be liked“:

You can’t flip through our newspaper these days without spotting the giant ads Sterling buys promoting his awards and donations, his smiling face plastered among a jumble of names and cut-and-paste photos.

I wangled an invitation because I wanted to meet him. I was curious about the man — and the motives — behind the generosity. Sterling has been dogged for years by claims that he’s a bigot. Was this simple image repair or true redemption, I wondered.

Two months ago, Sterling settled a housing discrimination lawsuit by the U.S. Justice Department for $2.7 million. Four years ago, he spent millions to settle a similar lawsuit brought by a fair housing group.

Both accused him of trying to exclude blacks, Latinos and families with children from renting apartments in buildings he owns.

Yet there he was last week playing Santa, handing out $1 million from his private charitable foundation to 10 high schools in South and East Los Angeles and 20 charities across Los Angeles County.

Like Skid Row’s Para Los Niños, “another fabulous Hispanic charity in Boyle Heights, where I grew up,” Sterling said.

And Roosevelt High, “with all the Hispanic kids,” he said, “where nobody thought they could study and learn calculus until that teacher” — Jaime Escalante — came along.

Oops — Escalante taught at Garfield High, which also received a Sterling grant.

And left-wing author and activist Earl Ofari Hutchinson, back in 2009, hammered Sterling’s racism — and took the NAACP to task for giving the Clippers owner a pass on his disgusting racist bigotry. See, “Put Donald T. Sterling’s NAACP Award on Hold“:

A Google search with the name Donald Sterling and racial discrimination found nearly 12,000 results. Not one of them even remotely had Sterling doing anything to further racial goodwill. The checklist of reported Sterling racial escapades include a Justice Department housing discrimination lawsuit and forced settlement, slurs and gaffes against Hispanics and African-Americans, and that includes two high profile Clipper players, the shooing of minorities away from his pricey Beverly Hills condos and rentals, and an overblown and failed promise to build a Homeless shelter on L.A.s skid row. Then there’s the allegations and lawsuit by former Clipper General Manager Elgin Baylor that Sterling runs his operations like a Southern plantation.

The NAACP airbrushed this away and simply said that Sterling has been a gem in giving oodles of tickets away to needy inner city kids and ladling out some cash to charities and sports camps for them. How any of this ranks as a take the lead, storm the barriers battle against racial injustice is a mystery….

The issue is not what, whether or even if Sterling did anything to further the cause of racial justice and civil rights. He hasn’t. The issue is what the NAACP is doing to further it.

While perhaps Ofari Hutchison’s not persuaded that Sterling’s done much in fact to help the black community, as LAT’s Banks points out, the Clippers owner indeed has a long history of philanthropy for a litany of left-wing causes. Sports Illustrated, back in 2000, ran a major feature story on Sterling, critical of his success as an NBA owner but highlighting his liberal philanthropy, “Up And Down In Beverly Hills“:

Many people believe that Sterling is playing a different game from the rest of the NBA owners. “I don’t know how important winning is to Donald,” says [Carl] Scheer, the team’s general manager Scheer. “He seems more concerned mat his books are balanced, that he runs one of the few NBA franchises with no debt, that he can bring his friends to games.” Those friends—a mix of Friars Clubbers and Merv Era celebs—show up en masse at Sterling’s Malibu White Party, the extravagant tented barbecue-and-bubbly beach bash he often throws at his second home, a neo-Tudor oceanfront bungalow. The party is so named because guests are encouraged to dress all in white, as in The Great Gatsby. “Sterling’s agenda is as much social as professional,” says Los Angeles Times sportswriter Mark Heisler. “He loves the status that owning even a bad team confers.”

He also enjoys the publicity he’s received as a philanthropist. Southern California charities routinely fete Sterling as their Humanitarian of the Year. Since 1997, the title has been accorded him by the Vista Del Mar Orphanage, the Special Olympics, the Los Angeles Yeshiva, the Asthma and Allergy Foundation and the L.A. Police Historical Society. Not that every charity has found it easy to separate Sterling from his swag. Linda McCoy-Murray recognized that last summer when she phoned him to help sponsor a golf tournament in honor of her late husband, venerated L.A. Times sports columnist Jim Murray. Every pro franchise in California, according to McCoy-Murray had forked over at least $5,000 to her foundation, which provides journalism scholarships. Every pro franchise, that is, except the Clippers, which had memorialized Murray on the final page of last season’s media guide. Sterling offered McCoy-Murray two season passes. “You know, that’s wonderful,” she remembers telling him. “but we’re trying to endow a college scholarship fund. We could really use cash.”

Sterling’s a classic Beverly Hills-Hollywood schmoozer and left-wing philanthropist big shot, and the occasional leftist tight wad, heh.

Again, this is just one more case of leftist racism and bigotry, unfortunately too splashy of a celebrity story for the hopelessly biased leftist press to tamp down.

Hillary Clinton has said on multiple occasions that her political heroine is Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood.  On receiving an award from Margaret Sanger’s organization Planned Parenthood, Clinton said:

Now, I have to tell you that it was a great privilege when I was told that I would receive this award. I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision … And when I think about what she did all those years ago in Brooklyn, taking on archetypes, taking on attitudes and accusations flowing from all directions, I am really in awe of her.

Here are some of Margaret’s best lines:

    • …human weeds,’ ‘reckless breeders,’ ‘spawning… human beings who never should have been born.”  Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, referring to blacks, immigrants and poor people
    • “More children from the fit, less from the unfit — that is the chief aim of birth control.” Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12
    • The purpose in promoting birth control was “to create a race of thoroughbreds,” she wrote in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2)
    • “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” she said, “if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America, by Linda Gordon
    • In her “Plan for Peace,” Sanger outlined her strategy for eradication of those she deemed “feebleminded.” Among the steps included in her evil scheme were immigration restrictions; compulsory sterilization; segregation to a lifetime of farm work; etc. Birth Control Review, April 1932, p. 107
    • “The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race (Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)
    • “Eugenic sterilization is an urgent need … We must prevent multiplication of this bad stock.” (Margaret Sanger, April 1933 Birth Control Review)
    • “Eugenics is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems (“The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.” Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5).

The heroine of Hillary Clinton was a freaking Nazi.  And I mean that literally.  Margaret Sanger was an ardent supporter of Hitler’s eugenics program and had a similar “master race” concept (with Aryans clearly being aforementioned “master race” in her warped and depraved mind.

We just saw a giant blowup over Cliven Bundy and his remarks about “the Negro.”  And I want to point out that Bundy is no hero of mine.  But as to the militia who flocked to protect him when the Government began to first confiscate and then to execute his cattle and bury them in mass graves, allow me to respond to liberals’ charges that these conservatives are criminals and “domestic terrorists” by pointing at their own Occupy Movement – which had 7,765 documented arrests including for rape and murder AND terrorism.  And of course we can likewise point out that racism is intrinsic to the left.

Harry Reid basically thought Obama was a “good” negro and that was basically fine with the left.

I mean, yes, liberals like Donald Sterling want to give “other people’s money” to blacks.  But that is because according to liberalism, black people aren’t actually “people” but inferior animals who as “the white man’s burden” need to be cared for on the Democrat Party’s plantation.  All they have to do is keep voting for their masters to get the care which as racial inferiors they clearly cannot provide for themselves.

Donald Sterling doesn’t have a problem with “black people.”  I mean, he hired a black guy as his head coach, right?  He’s only got a problem with black people believing they’re his equals is all.

The Los Angeles Clippers are – as of the moment I write this – getting blown out by the Golden State Warriors.  You have to sympathize with the team: do they play their guts out to the ultimate reward of a racist turd?  Or do they deliberately tank the series after working so hard all year to get to the playoffs?  What the hell are they supposed to do?

Apparently, the black population as a whole doesn’t have much of a problem with Donald Sterling: because they’re going to keep helping the racist turd’s political party – and the plantation system that Sterling endorses – with their votes.

I think of Bill Clinton and what he said to Ted Kennedy when he was trying to persuade him to support Hillary’s nomination over Barack Obama’s:

“A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee,”


 “A few years ago, this guy would have been carrying our bags.”

I mean, white liberals are perfectly happy working with the black people that they own lock, stock and barrel via the welfare system.

I think of Hillary’s attitude toward blacks – via her own sense of entitlement to power as a white liberal – as expressed by liberal Father Pfleger:

“We must be honest enough to expose white entitlement and supremacy wherever it raises its head…. [W]hen Hillary was crying, and people said that was put on, I really don’t believe it was put on. I really believe that she just always thought, ‘This is mine. I’m Bill’s [Bill Clinton‘s]wife. I’m white. And this is mine. I just got to get up and step into the plate.’ And then out of nowhere came, ‘hey, I’m Barack Obama.’ And she said, ‘Oh damn, where did you come from? I’m white. I’m entitled. There’s a black man stealing my show.‘” Pfleger then mimicked Mrs. Clinton crying as the audience gave him a standing ovation. Added Pfleger: “She wasn’t the only one crying. There was a whole lot of white people cryin’.”

It sounds to me like that is what “almost” NAACP-award-winning Donald Sterling was doing: he was perfectly fine with a black man bringing him his coffee.  Just don’t let them stand too close to the woman he bought himself to keep along with his wife.

Did you get that?  Donald Sterling was just about to get an AWARD from the NAACP for his wonderfulness.  They were JUST about to give this racist pile of filth a lifetime achievement award.  Because he’s a liberal and thus his rather lengthy history of previous race issues was irrelevant.  And the only reason they cancelled it was because it would have made them even bigger laughing stocks than they already ARE.

Tell me how close the damn Koch brothers have ever been to being on the receiving end of an award from the NAACP.  Pluto is closer to the sun is than any conservative has ever been to receiving such an award from this leftist hate group masquerading as an equal rights organization.

“Racism” is just a game to these lying liberals.  It’s no different from the National Organization of Women: they don’t represent women in any way, shape or form.  They represent a leftist ideology and if you are a successful, fulfilled, accomplished conservative woman such as Sarah Palin, well, you’re clearly “anti-woman” the same way a Clarence Thomas or a Ben Carson becomes an “Uncle Tom” if they don’t tow the plantation line and pick the cotton the way they’re supposed to as far as doctrinaire liberalism is concerned.

You better stay on your damn plantation, negro.  Especially if you’re not “light-skinned” and “clean” and “articulate” with “no negro dialect” like Obama or Eric Holder.  Otherwise you can count on the left coming after you with all the viciousness and race-hate it can muster – and they can muster a LOT of race-hate as virtually all black conservatives have learned.

Had Donald Sterling not been literally caught on tape by his mistress explaining in detail what a racist he is, this racist scumbag would have been just one more among many other white liberals who got an award from the black establishment that serves as the foremen on the elitist white liberal plantation.

‘Non-Stop’ Liberal Fascism And The Vileness Of Liberalism Which ALWAYS Twists Truth And Reality

April 15, 2014

What the hell – and I DO mean “hell” because hell is IN these people – is wrong with liberals?

Here’s the latest outrage in which liberals “twist” truth and reality by making the real-life villains the victims and the heroes while making the real-life victims and heroes the villains:

On Saturday, reported that the villain in Liam Neeson’s new action thriller, “Non-Stop,” is a 9/11 family member who also served in the military.

“‘Non-Stop’ is a good movie,” John Nolte wrote. “Heck, it is darn near very good. But the left-wing sucker punch at the end is a new low, even for Hollywood.”

Nolte said the villain joined the military after losing a loved on in the terror attack on the World Trade Center, but became disillusioned by the ongoing wars.

So, the veteran decides to blow everyone up on a plane so the air marshal can get blamed, causing airport security to be tightened even further.

Worse yet, Nolte added, the villain’s sidekick turns out to be an American military member willing to murder 150 innocent people for money.

Moreover, Nolte said the “one passenger on the plane who is forever helpful, kind, reasonable, noble, and never under suspicion is a Muslim doctor dressed in traditional Muslim garb including a full beard.”

Glenn Beck also excoriated the movie, according to a post at The Blaze.

“It is really great, until you find out that the killer is U.S. military and a guy who believes in the Constitution,” he said sarcastically. “Oh, darn it. Did I just wreck that movie for everybody? Oh, I didn’t mean to…”

Beck said that even in liberal New York, the ending was met with groans.

“I’m not going to say anymore, except the killer is … a schoolteacher and so you completely dismiss him,” he added. “And there’s a little hole in the bathroom where they do a blow-dart, and they kill the pilot.”

The Blaze added:

Beck said the killer’s rationale was something “nonsensical” along the lines of: “It’s the government that has been putting people like you, you drunkard, on planes and allowing you to be our TSA. And that’s just wrong. So I’m going to blow everything up and take the money. I’ve got a parachute here, so I’m going to live. And I’m going to take all the money, and I’m going to get away with it. A-ha, ha-ha, ha-ha, ha-ha.”

He also said the movie shows that “no amount of research … can help these people in Hollywood,” because they simply do not understand what a “wildly, wildly insulting movie” they made.

Beck’s advise: “Don’t go see Non-Stop.”

Nolte had even harsher words: “Sc**w you, Hollywood.”

“Non-Stop” is rated PG-13 by the Motion Picture Association of America for “intense sequences of action and violence, some language, sensuality and drug references,” and was given two out of four stars by the Associated Press‘ Jake Coyle.

That’s right.  It doesn’t matter if in REALITY Muslims are responsible for 99.99999% of all terrorist attacks and 9/11 victims’ families and the heroes who served are responsible for 0.0000001%.  Because to be “liberal” means to think just the opposite of reality and piss on the truth.

Liberals are the people who constantly assure us that Nazis are “right-wing” because everybody apparently just knows that if there was a “National Socialist American Workers Party” the way Nazi stood for “National Socialist German Workers Party,” it would be a conservative Republican Party.  Because you know how we conservatives adore “socialism” and “workers parties” and how much the left despises them.

Oh, wait.  It’s the other way around.  Not that lying liberals give a damn.

Liberals have managed to assure us that women who want to murder their own babies are heroes and victims and the babies they kill are worthless things that have no right to life.  Babies, liberals assure us, have the duty to die for the convenience of their mommies much the same way that Jews had the duty to die for the convenience of Adolf.

Liberals have managed to assure us that homosexual men who lust after being bending over and being sodomized by another man after sucking him to orgasm are “normal” and the people who recognize that these people are depraved, unnatural perverts are the weirdos.

LIberals have managed to assure us that snarling black men who join the Black Panthers with the following message –

We didn’t come out here to play. There is to much serious business going on in your black community to be sliding through south street with white, dirty cracker whores on your arms. What’s a matter with you black man, you got a doomsday with a white woman on your arm.
“We keep begging white people for freedom. No wonder we’re not free. Your enemy can not make you free fool. You want freedom you’re going to have to kill some crackers. You’re going to have to kill some of their babies.

Let us get our act together. It’s time to wake up, clean up, and stand up.”

I can’t wait for the day that they’re all dead. I won’t be completely happy until I see our people free and Whitey dead.”

“When you have 10 brothers in uniform, suited and booted and ready for war, white folks know these niggas ain’t their niggas. We kick white folks asses. We take it right to the cracker.”

We’re going to keep putting our foot up the white man’s ass until they understand completely. We want freedom, justice and mutha[expletive]‘ equality. Period. If you ain’t gonna give it to us, mutha[expletive], we’re gonna take it, in the name of freedom.”

– aren’t racist at all.  They aren’t racist – morally depraved jackass liberal pseudo-intellectuals tell us – because black people are people who hold both the presidency and the attorney generalship and are therefore victims forever and thus incapable of “racism.”  Do you know who IS racist?  Republicans.  Not ALL Republicans, they tell us out of their fairness and decency.  Just ALMOST all of them:

WASHINGTON — “Not all” Republicans are racist, said Rep. Steve Israel (D-N.Y.) on Sunday, but “to a significant extent, the Republican base has elements that are animated by racism, and that’s unfortunate.”

Israel’s comment was in response to a question from CNN’s Candy Crowley, who asked the chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee about remarks by Attorney General Eric Holder this week. In a speech to a civil rights group, Holder questioned his treatment by Republican lawmakers at a House Judiciary Committee hearing, and implied that race may have played a role.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) also suggested this past week that racism was a factor in the Republican party’s opposition to immigration reform. “I think race has something to do with the fact that they’re not bringing up an immigration bill,” Pelosi told reporters, adding, “I’ve heard them say to the Irish, if it were just you, this would be easy.”

Which of course means that the same “almost” all of the 54% of Americans who voted to have that Republican majority are clearly “racist,” too.

And of course, liberals have assured us that it is “racist” to try to limit or reduce illegal voting in any way, shape or form.  But that it is most definitely NOT “racist” to stand outside a voting place with clubs threatening and mocking voters of the other political party (and see here and here).

Liberals have assured us that Jesus was a socialist who demanded that King Herod and Pontius Pilate be empowered to radically expand big government to “help” the poor with institutionalized welfare rather than saying to His disciples, “YOU feed them.”  In the same vein, liberals have assured us that Barack Obama and Joe Biden – who gave poor people VIRTUALLY NOTHING from their own wealth are “generous” and that men like Mitt Romney and Dick Cheney – who gave 28% and 78% of their respective incomes to charity – are “selfish.”

Democrats and liberals are people who pathologically pervert the truth and slander reality.

I am so sick to my soul of twisted and perverted liberal “morality” that makes a mockery of everything the Word of God declares it is beyond unreal.



Liberal Fascist Hypocrite Joan Walsh Says It’s ‘Racist’ To Go After Obama’s Family – After Viciously Slandering Bush’s Family In 2001.

March 27, 2013

Joan Walsh is a typical liberal hypocrite.  She literally says it’s racist to do what she herself did.  Only of course it wasn’t racist when she did it.

Here’s her article attacking George W. Bush as a father and then attacking his daughters back in 2001 (note that the picture of Bush’s daughter below was a prominent part of the piece) back when it was wonderful to demonize the president:

Thursday, May 31, 2001 01:00 AM PDT
The first family’s alcohol troubles
President Bush downplayed his own drinking problem and hid a DUI. Now his daughters are making news for underage drinking. Is there a connection?
By Joan Walsh

I don’t envy Jenna and Barbara Bush, going off to college under the watchful eye of the Secret Service and the international media. But the sudden flurry of headlines about the first twins’ alcohol-related mishaps raises new questions about the way their father handled his own “young and irresponsible” past.

I always thought it was a bad decision for Bush, as a politician, to refuse to acknowledge his wild youth — which, by his own account, lasted until he was 40. But now it seems it was a bad choice for Bush as a father. After his 1976 drunken-driving arrest was revealed last year, Bush said he didn’t admit it when he decided to run for president because he didn’t want his daughters to know about it. That was a mistake, and the twins’ recent run of bad behavior seems designed to let him know that.

There’s no evidence either twin has a drinking problem, but the string of news items involving their partying and scrapes with the law in the last few months can’t be ignored. First came the tale of Secret Service agents ferrying home Jenna’s boyfriend after he was arrested for public drunkenness. Then there were randy National Enquirer photos of Jenna, a University of Texas freshman, and a beer-drinking pal, and a story about her alleged marijuana use. Yale freshman Barbara, supposedly the studious twin, had a false I.D. confiscated at a New Haven, Conn., bar. In April, the Enquirer featured a lurid tale of Barbara’s drunken spring-break binge in Mexico, and by the end of the month all major newspapers were carrying a story about Jenna being cited by police at an Austin bar for underage drinking, while Secret Service agents waited outside.

Now, barely a week after a court appearance to deal with that alcohol citation, Jenna has been caught again using a false I.D. to buy alcohol at an Austin restaurant, with sister Barbara at her side.

Of course, many of us would have provided lively tabloid fodder in college if we’d been subjected to the scrutiny Barbara and Jenna Bush must endure. And their college drinking doesn’t mean they’ll turn into alcoholics as adults. Most teenage party girls become responsible citizens, eventually. Still, their recklessness in the first months of their father’s presidency suggests their parents screwed up by downplaying and even denying President Bush’s own drinking problem.

Bush’s he-man decision to quit drinking cold turkey is the stuff of legend. The morning after a boozy 40th birthday party in 1986, he woke up at Colorado’s tony Broadmoor Resort and decided, on his own, to get sober. Alcohol had begun to “compete for my affections,” Bush said later. Certainly he didn’t need Alcoholics Anonymous, he told the Washington Post: “I don’t think I was clinically an alcoholic; I didn’t have the genuine addiction. I don’t know why I drank. I liked to drink, I guess.”

But his close friends tell a slightly different story: “Once he got started, he couldn’t, didn’t shut it off,” Bush’s buddy Don Evans, now commerce secretary, told the Washington Post last year. “He didn’t have the discipline.” That sounds a lot like an addiction, though only Bush himself knows for sure.

He refused to discuss details of his drinking or rumored drug use throughout his political campaigns, relying on the stock excuse, “When I was young and irresponsible, I was young and irresponsible.” His parents have also repeatedly denied he had a drinking problem, even after several family crises involving his drinking came to light: an ugly Christmas confrontation with his father in 1972, after Bush drove drunk with his brother Marvin, crashed into a neighbor’s garbage cans and offered to fight “mano a mano” with his father; and the 1976 DUI incident near the family compound in Kennebunkport, Maine, with his then-teenage sister Dorothy in the car.

We know Bush’s problem drinking, including the DUI, was a family secret. The night a reporter broke the DUI story, Laura Bush called both daughters, in Austin and New Haven, to break the news to them. “I made the decision that as a dad I didn’t want my girls doing the kinds of things I did, and I told them not to drink and drive,” Bush told reporters. But he didn’t tell them about his own arrest.

The secrecy, of course, was a mistake. Anyone who works with alcoholics and their families knows honesty is crucial: The drinking parent needs to come clean about his or her problems, and kids need to understand the family dynamics that were established around the drinking. And as teenagers, they need to know that alcoholism is a disease — whether because of psychology or physiology or some combination of the two — that is remarkably hereditary, and think about their own drinking in that context.

“We know for a fact that [Jenna’s] father had a long history of alcohol use and abuse,” Lynn Ponton, a psychiatrist who studies teenage risk-taking, told Salon. “And this is an opportunity for the Bushes … to talk honestly with their children about risk-taking and really provide guidance and increase communication. And I would wonder what type of communication is actually taking place.”

I wonder, too. I’d bet there hasn’t been enough communication in the WASP-y Texas Bush family, and it looks as if the first twins are acting out as a result. Even with a Secret Service detail, there are ways for young women to party, if they’re discreet. Clearly, the first twins aren’t. Their blatant risk-taking and public partying (the Secret Service waits outside the bars where they drink illegally?) seem designed to force a family reckoning that their father’s drinking never triggered.

I’m reluctant to play family therapist for a family I’ve never met, but I’d say that Bush may have gotten past voters with evasiveness about his drinking problem, but he hasn’t satisfied his daughters. And if he sticks to the sanitized, up-from-Broadmoor version of the story, he may someday find he won the White House at the cost of an honest relationship with his daughters.

An earlier version of this story appeared in Bushed! last month.

That was then.  As liberal fascism always declares, it can’t be fascist when we do it.  So liberal roach-thug Walsh apparently gets pissed off about what is actually a pretty straightforward piece at Breitbart and writes this stinking pile of crap that these days passes as “journalism” (note the considerably more flattering picture of Obama’s daughters in which they look considerably less drunk than their choice for Jenna’s pic above).

For the record, I read over the Breitbart piece.  Somehow I missed the parts that Walsh alleges are there about a) the color of Obama’s skin; b) the unfitness of Obama as a parent; or c) the disgracefulness of the president’s daughters.  Please note, however, how Walsh just flat-out poured hate on George W. Bush as a father and slammed his daughters even after acknowledging that she had any actual factual basis for doing so:

Tuesday, Mar 26, 2013 09:51 AM PDT
How not to seem like a racist
A tip for right-wingers angry about charges of racial bias: Try treating the Obama daughters with decency
By Joan Walsh

How not to seem like a racistEnlargeSasha and Malia Obama(Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque)

Writing my piece on Andrew Breitbart and Tucker Carlson, I missed a huge example of overlap between their two sham-empires: the reporter who broke the Caller’s now-disgraced “scoop” about Sen. Robert Menendez patronizing prostitutes, Matthew Boyle, now works for And on Monday he penned the ridiculous story revealing the location of Malia and Sasha’s spring break vacation (which is now at the top of the Drudge Report).

On Twitter Monday and Tuesday, Breitbart fans attacked my focus on their hero’s bizarre racially driven crusades. They continue to insist that they’re being unfairly tarred with the charge of racism, when they’re the real “post-racialists” who just don’t like Barack Obama because he’s a liberal. I have some advice for right-wingers who don’t want it to seem like their anti-Obama animus is racial: Try treating his daughters with respect.

You’ll remember back in December, the NRA went after Sasha and Malia with an ad insisting that the fact that they have armed protection, when the administration was supposedly blocking armed security at America’s schools (actually, it wasn’t), was the height of hypocrisy – ignoring the many threats to their safety faced by the children of presidents and the tradition of Secret Service protection, for all of them.

The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper went even crazier, with a piece alleging that the girls’ school, Sidwell Friends, a Quaker school, had armed guards, too. Anyone familiar with the Quaker tradition of nonviolence found that claim strange, and of course, like most claims about the Obama family that come from the right, it turned out not to be true.

Unfortunately for the untalented Mr. Boyle, journalists have a consensus about not revealing the location of the presidents’ children’s vacations. Reporters don’t write about minor first children except when they’re attending “official or semi-official events.” It’s considered a security risk. As the Washington Post’s Paul Farhi reported last year:

The ban on such coverage has existed through many administrations by informal agreement with the White House Correspondents’ Association, which represents the interests of journalists who cover the president.

“There’s a general feeling among the press corps that it wants to be respectful” of the president’s children, said Caren Bohan, the White House reporter for Reuters who is president of the WHCA.

When Agence-France Presse wrote about Malia’s trip to Mexico last year, a few U.S. outlets picked it up, and the administration tried to get the details removed. Then an earthquake in Mexico made the first daughter’s vacation newsworthy, and other sites, justifiably, reported it.

A year later, along comes the brave Matthew Boyle, fresh off his Menendez humiliation, to tell Breitbart readers about the Obama girls’ vacation. The news hook seems to be that it’s a waste of money.

“It is unclear how long the first daughters will be staying in the Bahamas, or what the cost will be to taxpayers,” Boyle harrumphs. “Earlier this month, the White House canceled public tours as a result of the recent budget sequester, citing Secret Service staffing costs.”

Esquire’s Charlie Pierce put it better than I can:

What possible interest does this serve, except to titillate the dark and envious nether parts of Boyle’s 22 readers? (No link, because fk that pudgy little monster.) There is no possible news value to this. Sooner or later, the frolicks of what my pal [Eric] Boehlert calls the “rightwing entertainment complex” are going to get someone killed.

The theme of most right-wing stories on Sasha, Malia and Michelle Obama’s vacations and leisure-time activities seems to be that they’re entitled princesses, when they do exactly the same kinds of things other presidents’ families have done throughout history. There’s only one difference I can see.

Drudge is also hyping the president’s vacation with the blaring headline “A vacation a month.” That’s another racially tinged trope on the right, that our first black president seems to be a little, well, lazy, because he can’t stop taking vacations. Of course, Obama is on track to take about a fifth of the vacation days George W. Bush did over his two terms. Obama took 131 vacation days in his first term – which would amount to 262 if he kept that pace in his second term. Bush took a staggering 1,060 vacation days over eight years, by far the most vacation in history (he also took the longest single presidential vacation in the modern era, a full five weeks.) Can someone explain why Obama is supposedly the vacation-hog?

Oh, and the comments on Boyle’s story are pretty awesome, too. Here’s a good one:

They will indeed grow up to be monsters. Very, very, angry and vengeful monsters. Just like momma… Especially after they are forced to visit their obamination of a father in a federal penitentiary following his impeachment and conviction for Treason… Although I’d far prefer they visit his plot occasionally following his hanging for treason.

Boyle is perfect for his new employer (although he was a pretty good fit for the Daily Caller, too). In a post explaining why he jumped ship (which didn’t mention the higher salary he got), he bragged about “enlisting in Andrew Breitbart’s army … I’m shipping out today. It’s time to go to war.”

A war on the president’s daughters? Boyle ought to talk to some veterans of actual war. What a putz.

Paul Farhi’s story on the media’s traditional treatment of first children quoted Democratic pollster Celinda Lake on the political appeal of Obama’s family: “The value of the family is enormous. The more you know this family and the more you think of Barack Obama in these terms, the harder it is to vilify him.”

That’s true for the vast majority of Americans. But not the haters and racists who belong to Breitbart’s “army.”

The galling, appalling hypocrisy of liberals and liberalism is disgusting beyond belief.

Hey, maybe if Barbara and Jenna Bush had jetset all over the world on other people’s money the way Obama’s daughters have, they wouldn’t have, they wouldn’t have ever had any issues with alcohol.  That and the fact that the Bush daughters were in their college years rather than their grade school years like Sasha and Malia.

I have documented in the past that being “white” is no more a defense against “racism toward whites” than liberals accord to black conservatives for being immune to racism because they’re black.  Do I seriously need to post articles of liberals going after conservtive blacks in a racist manner?  Condoleeza Rice, Justice Clarence Thomas, Allen West, Michael Steele, Stacey Dash, Dr. Benjamin Carson, pretty much ANY black person who has ever expressed conservative views in his or her life, is labelled “Uncle Tom,” Oreo Cookie and far, far worse.  So blacks can’t be “racist” because of the color of their skin on liberal theory unless they’re conservative blacks – in which case they are the quintessential ESSENCE of racist bigotry regardless of the color of their skin on the view of these self-refuting turds.  And then these hypocrites declare themselves inpeccable – i.e. incapable of sin – while they define their opponents as ONLY capable of nothing BUT sin.

Facts get in the way, of course.

Karl Marx was a self-hating Jew who actively despised Jews in his writings.

If you can be a self-hating black, as liberals assert conservative blacks are by definition and if you can be a self-hating Jew, as Karl Marx clearly was, then just how the hell is it impossible to be a self-hating white???

Thus, by liberals’ vicious attacks against black conservatives as being self-hating blacks, and literally by her own diatribe, Joan Walsh is a far-leftist intolerant racist bigot.  She is a self-hating racist race traitor according to her own demonic views.  In addition to being a truly crappy excuse of a human being.

This is what pisses me off about the left above all else: they constantly drool out the most vicious and self-righteous slanders while demonizing everyone on the other side for doing the tiniest FRACTION of what they hypocritically do.  Unless you actually want to defend her attack against Bush relative to the innocuous piece that she poured her hate on in Breitbart.

It’s time to go, Walsh, you Nazi.  That that your fellow jackbooted stormtroopers right out of the Joseph Goebbels Ministry of Propaganda mold will ever make you leave.  Becuase they’re all as hypocritical and as fascist as YOU are: they’re just not as STUPID as you are in your glaring obviousness as a biased ideologue useful idiot.

Note: AJ Delgado took on the hypocrite Joan Walsh first.