Posts Tagged ‘Rouhani’

Obama Turns On Israel. The Beast Is Coming And Barack Hussein Obama Has Invited Him And Will Soon Congratulate Him And Shake His Hand.

March 19, 2015

In spite of everything that Barack Obama did to undermine the elections in Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu won and won big.

A petty, thin-skinned, vindictive Obama refused to call to congratulate him for his victory.

Do you know who Obama HAS called to congratulate for their victories?

Obama called – BREAKING MORE THAN THREE DECADES OF AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL SILENCE the Ayatollah- and Council of Guardians-approved president of Iran Hassan Rouhani to congratulate him for having been approved by the Ayatollah.

Obama called Mohammed Morsi, the leader of the terrorist group known as the Egyptian Brotherhood who would be overthrown by his own people as a Islamist dictator a year later.  You know, pretty much to congratulate the victory for Islamist terrorism and tyranny that Morsi’s election represented to anyone who loves actual democracy which values human liberty and freedom over sharia law.

Obama called Vladimir Putin, the dictator-thug of Russia, to congratulate the man who would soon be driving his tanks over Ukrainian liberty and murdering political rivals.

Just to name a few dictators he’s called.  And called on the VERY DAY they were elected when it actually mattered.

Harry Truman was THE VERY FIRST leader to recognize the state of Israel.  That recognition and that bond of being first among friends established a precedent that remained until this demonic president of hate came along to pollute the office of the presidency with his betrayal not only of Israel but of American history.

Basically, if you are a leader of a country that the Holy Bible says will one day come to attack Israel in an all-out last-days war of extermination, Obama has probably called to congratulate you.

If you’re the leader of Israel, get ready to be “fundamentally transformed” into a pariah.

I’ll try to be blunt here: Barack Hussein Obama is a wicked, demon-possessed man and the Democrat Party is the party that has brought the red-hot, just and holy and righteous wrath of God upon America.  And if you are a Democrat, you are a walking, talking, breathing middle finger thrust up at Jesus Christ and everything the Word of God stands for.

Oh, God’s Word is crystal clear –

13 You made all the delicate, inner parts of my body
    and knit me together in my mother’s womb.
14 Thank you for making me so wonderfully complex!
    Your workmanship is marvelous—how well I know it.
15 You watched me as I was being formed in utter seclusion,
    as I was woven together in the dark of the womb.
16 You saw me before I was born.
    Every day of my life was recorded in your book.
Every moment was laid out
    before a single day had passed. — Psalm 139:13-16 NLT

– but for you, Democrat, every moment of your existence is just another opportunity to try to kick God off of His throne and replace Him with Obama and your God damned Government.

Sixty million innocent babies are dead having been dissolved without anesthesia by acid or torn apart by forceps and scissors by YOU, Democrat.  Sixty million.  That’s more than ALL the human life both civilian and military on ALL sides caused by the most violent and destructive war in the history of humanity, World War II.  And the blood of those sixty million innocent souls screams out at YOU from the ground, Democrat.

But the cup of the wrath of a just and holy God that is soon going to fill to overbrimming has not yet quite reached its full measure (see Genesis 15:13 for my language here), Democrat.

As vile as abortion is, there is actually one sin that is so vile and so ungodly and so depraved and so contrary to the image of God and such an example of everything that can be perverted in human nature that it stands even over abortion as the sin that guarantees the full wrath of God.  And that sin is the sin of homosexuality.

Which YOU as a Democrat have now imposed on America.

Read God’s justly-imposed death sentence on your for yourself, Democrat:

18 But God shows His anger from heaven against all sinful, wicked people who push the truth away from themselves. 19 For the truth about God is known to them instinctively. God has put this knowledge in their hearts. 20 From the time the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky and all that God made. They can clearly see His invisible qualities — His eternal power and divine nature. So they have no excuse whatsoever for not knowing God. 21 Yes, they knew God, but they wouldn’t worship Him as God or even give him thanks. And they began to think up foolish ideas of what God was like. The result was that their minds became dark and confused. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became utter fools instead. 23 And instead of worshiping the glorious, ever-living God, they worshiped idols made to look like mere people, or birds and animals and snakes. 24 So God let them go ahead and do whatever shameful things their hearts desired. As a result, they did vile and degrading things with each other’s bodies. 25 Instead of believing what they knew was the truth about God, they deliberately chose to believe lies. So they worshiped the things God made but not the Creator himself, who is to be praised forever. Amen. 26 That is why God abandoned them to their shameful desires. Even the women turned against the natural way to have sex and instead indulged in sex with each other. 27 And the men, instead of having normal sexual relationships with women, burned with lust for each other. Men did shameful things with other men and, as a result, suffered within themselves the penalty they so richly deserved. 28 When they refused to acknowledge God, He abandoned them to their evil minds and let them do things that should never be done. 29 Their lives became full of every kind of wickedness, sin, greed, hate, envy, murder, fighting, deception, malicious behavior, and gossip. 30 They are backstabbers, haters of God, insolent, proud, and boastful. They are forever inventing new ways of sinning and are disobedient to their parents. 31 They refuse to understand, break their promises, and are heartless and unforgiving.  — Romans 1:18-31 NLT

They were ignorant liars who pissed in the eye of God.  And Barack Hussein Obama became their messiah.

And now, under your vile messiah who will one day shake the hand of Antichrist and congratulate him on his election victory where he would NEVER do such a thing for the leader of Israel, you have just grabbed the third rail of God’s wrath, Democrat.

You have just abandoned the state of Israel.  And yes you WILL burn in hell for what YOU have done through your narcissistic self-worshiping little pharaoh-god-king.  Don’t think for one second that YOU won’t be held accountable for how you voted in declaration of what you wanted America to be (a sodomy-worshiping nation of baby murderers who abandoned Israel).

The Los Angeles Times article is just beautiful in its moral stupidity:

U.S. support for Israel at the U.N. is in jeopardy, White House says
By Paul Richter and David Lauter
The Los Angeles Times
March 18, 2015, 10:10 PM|Reporting from Washington

The White House on Wednesday pointedly criticized Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s successful reelection campaign and suggested his newly declared opposition to a Palestinian state could jeopardize America’s unwavering support for Israel at the United Nations.

Okay, let’s get this straight: America has “unwavering support for Israel.” But on the other hand, Obama is saying he’s going to revoke the unwavering support. Which means that Obama has officially abandoned “unwavering support” by dumping his ideological conditions for what he wants to falsely label “unwavering.”

Please, PLEASE never allow another Democrat to state his or her “unwavering support for Israel.”  Because that is officially a giant 900-car-train-load of bovine feces from now on.

Point made. Read on to see why the White House is claiming it’s being so pissy and how they intend to turn on Israel at the critical international level:

The blunt comments by Obama administration officials illustrated how the campaign tactics Netanyahu used to win an unexpectedly strong victory in Tuesday’s election have further strained the historic ties between the United States and Israel. After six years of tension, relations between the two governments have frayed to a point not reached in decades.

Netanyahu made opposition to U.S. nuclear negotiations with Iran a centerpiece of his reelection effort. Then, in the closing days of the campaign, he said he would never agree to a sovereign Palestinian state, repudiating the concept of a two-state solution that has been a central element of U.S. policy under Presidents Obama and George W. Bush.

The Israeli leader had said in a major address in 2009 that his “vision of peace” included “two free peoples” living side by side in separate, independent states for Israelis and Palestinians. Many U.S. officials, as well as most Arabs, had questioned his sincerity, but Netanyahu’s public reversal this week nonetheless marked a significant shift that administration officials rebuked Wednesday.

The U.S. would “reevaluate our approach” based on Netanyahu’s “change in his position,” White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters as the president flew to Cleveland to deliver a speech on economic policy.

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki raised the possibility that the reevaluation could include a shift in position at the U.N. She avoided the usual U.S. language about vetoing Security Council resolutions that Israel opposes.

“The prime minister’s recent statements call into question his commitment to a two-state solution,” Psaki told reporters. “We’re not going to prejudge what we would do if there was a U.N. action.”

From this point, the article blathers on and on for three more pages and 841 more words before finally getting to the dilemma faced by Netanyahu and Israeli voters:

Some Netanyahu allies are predicting that the new government and the United States will cooperate to some extent in trying to stabilize the conflict with the Palestinians at a moment when the Palestinian Authority is near collapse.

JUST WHO IN THE HELL – AND I LITERALLY MEAN “HELL” – IS NETANYAHU SUPPOSED TO NEGOTIATE WITH TO CREATE A TWO-STATE SOLUTION???

At this point the entity in charge of the Palestinians is Hamas, a terrorist organization.  Period.

The people in charge are terrorists.  They want to negotiate every Jew murdered or driven into the Red Sea to drown.  And they want to fire about a trillion explosive rockets into Israel until they can accomplish the annihilation of the Jewish people.  Other than that, they don’t want to negotiate.

I want you to please understand the abject hypocrisy, dishonesty and perversion of Barack Hussein Obama.  He is demanding that Netanyahu “negotiate” with people who want every Jewish child screaming in their own blood when this same cockroach has rabidly refused to even ONCE in SIX MISERABLE YEARS to negotiate with Republicans.

How DARE this wicked man make this demand!?!?!?

Further, after Netanyahu appeared to back away from his position that he won’t negotiate with the terrorists who won’t be negotiated with unless it involves Jews being first dumped out of their capital Jerusalem, then dumped out of their nation and then murdered in the Red Sea, the White House pretty much said it’s too late.  The White House blabbermouth said:

“What is apparent is that in the context of the campaign and while he was the sitting prime minister of Israel, he walked back from commitments Israel previously made to a two-state solution,” said at his daily press briefing.

“Words matter, and that is certainly true in this instance,” he added. “The president and the administration take him at his word.”

You know, the same White House Press Secretary who has “clarified” what Obama meant about ten trillion times so far.  As an example, the same damn day that the White House blabbermouth said “words matter” when Netanyahu said them pretty much argued that words DON’T matter when Obama says that people ought to be forced to vote whether they want to or not.

And you know what’s REALLY funny about Obama’s point?  How it twists Democrat “logic” into a pretzel.  Because here Democrats have been arguing all along that poor people can’t even afford to get an ID no matter how free states might make those IDs.  But now Obama is going to fine those same poor people if they don’t vote [for him].  And if they can pay the damn Obama fine they can obviously pay for an ID they frankly need to do damn near everything else in life anyway.  And if that’s not enough, without some kind of ID, HOW IN THE HELL ARE YOU GOING TO ENSURE THAT PEOPLE ARE VOTING AS OBAMA JUST SAID OUGHT TO BE MANDATORY???

So you can understand how the same White House blabbermouth who was just sternly claiming “words matter” when Netanyahu says them would be twisting all over the place to try to tell us that no, words don’t really matter at all when they come out of the mouth of a fool like Obama.  I mean, right?

How about the 22 damn times Obama declared that he did NOT have the authority to issue amnesty by executive order – and would even be an EMPEROR and ANTI-DEMOCRATIC if he did so – before doing the very thing he had said over and over and over again he did not have the authority to do?

So when do “words matter” with this turd Obama who is refusing to listen to Netanyahu clarify his words about a two state solution and siccing the wicked United Nations as his attack dog against Israel and against Jews?

For the record, in the very interview that Netanyahu has gotten so much heat over regarding abandoning the two-state solution he very clearly said he was NOT abandoning what he said in support of the two state solution in 2009.  Rather, he was saying that such a solution is no longer possible when one state rabidly refuses to even recognize that the other state in the two state equation even EXISTS.  But a minimum, if you’re going to allow Obama and his White House spinners to continually re-explain what Obama really meant to say, PLEASE don’t say “words matter” just because a JEW said them.

Not that truth matters to Obama, but still.

Obama is a fulfillment of biblical prophecy in a very, very bad way.

The Word of God declared three thousand years ago:

On that day, when all the nations of the earth are gathered against her, I will make Jerusalem an immovable rock for all the nations. All who try to move it will injure themselves. — Zechariah 12:3 NIV

And that is EXACTLY the moment that Barack Obama is pushing toward, as the United Nations has been proof of the truth of that prophecy for years now and only the United States has stood in the way of the world, the flesh and the devil’s desire to destroy the state of Israel.  Obama has just declared that America has joined the nations that will try to move the immovable rock of Jerusalem.    And America WILL BE INJURED hideously because of this president and because of the Democrats who wickedly voted for him and continue to support him.

The mainstream media propaganda is trying to frame this as “Obama vs. Netanyahu” while insinuating that Obama is the one who is reasonable given that all he wants is to force Israel to negotiate for its life with terrorists who want to wipe it off the map and how can that be wrong?  But unless I misremember what just happened YESTERDAY, it was the Israeli people – and JEWS, for what its worth – who showed up to elect Netanyahu.  Which is to say that this is about Barack Obama vs. the Jews.  And he hates them every bit as much as the devil himself.

That said, this is the Obama who essentially delegitimized the result of his own ass-kicking in the 2014 elections as he declared that lots of people didn’t vote so why the hell should our Constitution matter?  So, you know, it’s not like Obama gives a flying damn about democracy here – so why the hell should he give a damn about democracy in Israel???  He’s a fascist who wants what fascists want, is all.

Barack Obama is – to yet again return to biblical descriptions – just like the Antichrist whose useful idiot he is.  He is determined to burn in hell and he is determined to spread as many lies and as much intrigue and create as much contempt for Israel as he can until the moment when he shakes the Antichrist’s hand and declares that he will be the very first fool to take the Antichrist’s mark:

Obama Is The Devil 666

Barack Obama and the Democrat Party and YES – EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT VOTER WITH OBAMA – has taken part in the demonic trifecta.

The Bible records that the Great Tribulation shall be inaugurated by the state of Israel signing a seven-year peace covenant with the state of Israel.

Because of YOU, Democrat, Israel now faces a world where there is nowhere to turn but to the Antichrist.  Up until NOW, throughout the entire modern history of the state of Israel, the Jewish nation ALWAYS had a strong friend who would support them.  YOU ended that friendship.  And YOU ended any friendship America had with God.  And YOU will pay.

One day Democrats will stand before a glorious King of kings and Lord of lords and say, “But we murdered tens of millions of babies in Your Name.  We exalted homosexuality in your Name.  We purged God from our culture in Your Name and replaced You with a giant Government welfare State in Your Name.  We turned on Israel in Your Name.  We worshiped the Beast Your Word warned us about in Your Name.”  And Jesus will tell them plainly, “I never knew you. Away from Me, you evildoers!”

 

 

 

Advertisements

Thanks For Armageddon: Liberals Implicitly Acknowledge Obama Completely Wrong On Iran And Conservatives Completely Right.

September 18, 2014

Allow me to simply start with the reporting today from the Los Angeles Times on Iran:

A year later: Iranian nuclear talks go from promise to doubt
By Paul Richter  contact the reporter
SHARELINES
▼What went wrong? Diplomats wonder a year after Iranian leader’s U.N. visit held such promise for improved ties
▼Analysts suggest Iran’s supreme leader may have decided he can live with no nuclear deal and more sanctions
September 17, 2014, 2:40 PM|Reporting from Washington

Hassan Rouhani won world leaders’ warm embrace a year ago when he arrived at the United Nations General Assembly in New York as Iran’s new president, speaking of reconciliation and offering a new era in relations between his nation and the West.

But when Rouhani arrives next week for this year’s U.N. session, diplomats will be pondering a different question: What went wrong?

A year after that auspicious beginning, tensions with the West are as high as ever, and 10 months of negotiations over the toughest issue in the relationship — Iran’s nuclear program — are at an impasse. Now Western leaders want to know Iran’s intentions and if Rouhani is even calling the shots in Tehran on the nuclear issue and overall foreign policy.

Since November, when Rouhani’s team signed an interim nuclear accord that seemed to promise a breakthrough, “we’ve actually gotten further away from a deal,” said one Middle Eastern diplomat who spoke on condition of anonymity in discussing sensitive diplomacy.

Negotiators from Iran and six world powers — Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States — will meet Friday in New York in an effort to break the logjam and complete a deal before the Nov. 24 deadline. Next week, foreign ministers from the nations will take up the issue.

Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, declared last year that he was giving his full support to Rouhani to negotiate a nuclear deal that would ease international economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for commitments to keep its nuclear program peaceful.

But in recent months, signs suggest the staunchly anti-Western Khamenei is directly managing the negotiations. He appears determined to sharply increase the country’s uranium enrichment capability in seven years, and not roll it back, as the West demands.

Rouhani, who has lost a series of domestic political battles to conservatives, has taken a harder line on the nuclear talks. In a news conference two weeks ago, he expressed doubt that the U.S. has enough “goodwill” to negotiate an end to the standoff.

In an indication of the changing mood, President Obama plans no contact with Rouhani during the U.N. session, according to White House aides. Last year, the two leaders spoke by phone while in New York, the highest-level contact between the two countries in decades.

The central question for diplomats is whether Iran’s tougher line is only negotiating theatrics, aimed at gaining better terms, or whether Khamenei has decided he can survive a collapse of the talks despite Western threats of tighter sanctions.

Increasing evidence suggests Khamenei believes he can get by without a deal, say diplomats and analysts.

In recent comments, Khamenei portrayed the U.S. as beset by crises, including the standoff with Russia over Ukraine and the conflict with Islamic State militants in Syria and Iraq. He may view American efforts to solicit Iran’s cooperation, at least on nonmilitary matters, in the fight against the militants as a sign of weakness.

At the same time, the conservative Iranian Revolutionary Guard, which is hostile to a deal, is wielding greater public influence because of fears of the Islamic State threat.

Many Western analysts argue that if negotiations fail to produce a deal, U.S and European sanctions would intensify, not collapse, choking off much of Iran’s sales of 1.2 billion barrels of oil a day.

But Khamenei may believe that if the talks collapse, he could persuade Russia, China and perhaps other nations to abandon the sanctions and resume buying Iranian oil, providing the cash his government needs.

“Khamenei is preparing his country for a no-deal outcome,” said Cliff Kupchan, a former State Department official who is with the Eurasia Group risk consulting group.

Diplomats say they expect Iran will try to blame the U.S. during the U.N. sessions for the deadlock in talks, and will try to build support for ending sanctions and allowing Iran to maintain its nuclear infrastructure.

Wendy Sherman, the chief U.S. negotiator, predicted in a speech Tuesday that Iran would try to convince the world that “the status quo, or its equivalent, should be acceptable.”

Gary Samore, Obama’s former top advisor on nuclear proliferation, said Khamenei “seems to be very stubborn and very confident that he can retain his enrichment capability.”

While the Iranian leader may be wrong, “what matters is what he believes,” said Samore, who is now with the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government.

Robert Einhorn, another former member of Obama’s inner circle on nuclear issues, said nuclear negotiators won’t be able to resolve complicated secondary issues by the Nov. 24 deadline unless they solve the bigger question of how much enrichment capability Iran can keep.

“They’re still light-years apart,” said Einhorn, now with the Brookings Institution.

Special correspondent Ramin Mostaghim in Tehran contributed to this report.

As always, whenever liberals are talking, it’s bullcrap, bullcrap and bullcrap to the nth power -NUCELEAR POWERED BULLCRAP, for that matter.  As John Bolton’s article from A YEAR AGO documents.

Notice how this article from the leftist Los Angeles Times begins as I post it below: “Hassan Rouhani won world leaders’ warm embrace a year ago when he arrived … and offered a new era in relations between his nation and the West.”

It’s not Obama’s fault.  Nope.  It’s not the Democrat Party’s fault.  Nope.  It sure can’t be liberalism’s fault.  Uh-uh.  After all, the whole world was fooled by this weasel.

But there’s also the rhetorical question they ask, “what went wrong?”  Well, NOTHING “went wrong.”  From the point of view of any morally intelligent westerner, IT WAS WRONG FROM THE VERY START AND IT’S BECAUSE OF SUCH STUPID UNDERTAKINGS THAT YOU CAN KNOW THERE’S A PERSONAL SATAN BLINDING DEPRAVED LIBERAL HUMAN MINDS THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE INTELLIGENT.  From the point of view of Iran and of every other country that truly hates us and wants to see our beheaded corpses burning in flames, nothing went wrong because everything has worked out beautifully for them.

Let’s contrast the Los Angeles Times’ incredibly idiotic reporting on this Iranian disaster ALL ALONG with what John Bolton predicted for Fox News a year ago:

Hasan Rouhani is no moderate on Iran’s nuclear weapons program
John R. Bolton | Fox News
June 18, 2013

Within days of Hasan Rouhani’s election as Iran’s president, the White House and several European governments were already ecstatic at the possibility of resuming negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear-weapons program.

Of course, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei and the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps actually make key military policy decisions, not Iran’s president, but mere political reality is unlikely to slow down the Obama administration and its European Union (“EU”) counterparts.

Before even more irrational exuberance breaks out over Rouhani’s pledge to make Iranian’s nuclear program more “transparent,” however, some history is in order.

Rouhani’s long, uninterrupted devotion to Iran’s Islamic Revolution includes heading its National Security Council for sixteen years, and he was Tehran’s key nuclear negotiator in 2003-2005.

His actions during that period reveal much about him and the regime.

In September, 2003, Britain, France and Germany (“the EU-3”) made several overtures to open talks with Iran, including offering Iran nuclear-reactor technology on the precondition that it cease uranium-enrichment activities, which the EU-3 believed would effectively halt the nuclear-weapons program.

This proved to be a disastrous mistake.

Iran was to use the next three-and-one-half years to make steady progress, overcoming the scientific and technological difficulties of uranium conversion, uranium enrichment, and other key elements in its nuclear-weapons effort.

Rouhani was central to Iran’s strategy of using protracted negotiations to buy time and legitimacy under diplomatic cover. […]

Bolton’s predictive and frankly even prophetic article ends with these words that points out how the past that liberals are too stupid to comprehend show us the future:

But the catnip effect on Western diplomats of negotiating with Iran never lost its allure, which Rouhani understood as well or better than anyone.  In March, 2006, the New York Times reported on a speech Rouhani made after stepping down as Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator.  Said the Times:

“…in a remarkable admission, Mr. Rouhani suggested in his speech that Iran had used the negotiations with the Europeans to dupe them…..  ‘While we were talking with the Europeans in Tehran, we were installing equipment in parts of the facility in Isfahan [the uranium conversion plant], but we still had a long way to go to complete the project,’ he said.  ‘In fact, by creating a calm environment, we were able to complete the work on Isfahan.’  As a result of the negotiations with Europe, he added, “we are in fact much more prepared to go to the U.N. Security Council.’”

Rouhani deceived, mocked and disdained the West during his time as Iran’s top nuclear negotiator, while the Iranian nuclear-weapons program continued to progress.  There is every reason to believe he will do exactly the same once inaugurated as Iran’s president.

In other words, was there ever any real chance this was going to work?  Only in hell, which is where Obama and the Ayatollah and Rouhani will all one day reside together.

Who was right?  Who was completely WRONG?

To the extent that the Islamic State, or ISIS, or ISIL, or whatever the hell you want to call these vicious murderers, had anything to do with Iran’s new hardline stance, just recognize that this terrorist army grew up and became the powerful terror army that it is completely under Barack Obama and entirely due to his failed policies.

Obama was WRONG.  Hillary Clinton and John Kerry were WRONG.  The Democrat Party was WRONG.  Liberalism is WRONG.

So what happens when the talks with Iran that were idiotic to begin with went nowhere as anybody with any wisdom whatsoever knew would happen?  Obama did the bidding of his masters in Tehran and extended the talks so that Iran could once again draw out negotiations without any agreement.  So that Iran could keep working toward their goal of Armageddon while Obama rewarded them.

Business Insider nailed what it’s easy to now see since happened and what will continue to happen in their article from July:

Obama Is Now Boxed In By The Iranian Nuclear Negotiations

Iran is playing the long game in negotiations over its nuclear program. And it may have already boxed in U.S. President Barack Obama, with help from an increasingly tumultuous state of world affairs.

Iran and six world powers officially agreed on Friday to extend negotiations for at least another four months. Iran has agreed to dilute additional stocks of nuclear material, in exchange for access to nearly $3 billion in assets that have been frozen in the U.S.

Some American officials are skeptical that even a four-month extension in talks will be enough to resolve some of the major sticking points among negotiators. And the reality is that as time goes on, the West will continue to lose leverage as Iran’s economy slowly crawls toward a recovery with limited sanctions relief.

“The extension was expected because Iranian nuclear intransigence is being further emboldened by the reality that Western negotiating leverage is diminishing,” Mark Dubowitz, the executive director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Business Insider.

“The Obama administration’s mid-2013 decision to de-escalate the sanctions pressure, and the direct relief offered at Geneva, have sparked a modest albeit fragile Iranian economic recovery and increased the economy’s resilience to sanctions pressure,” Dubowitz told BI. “Tehran may believe that it can sustain these negotiations for many months if not years, provide only limited and reversible nuclear concessions, while extracting additional direct sanctions relief and solidifying its economic recovery.”

Dubowitz says that if Tehran’s bet turned out to be true, then the nuclear concessions would continue to swing Iran’s way.

“Then the Obama administration is left doing more of what it has done already — namely, defining downwards its nuclear demands until Iran’s leaders have deal terms that give them an industrial-size nuclear capacity, relative immunity from any new sanctions, and the essential elements they need to build nuclear weapons at a time of their choosing,” he said.

And yep, that’s pretty much exactly the way the following year plus has unraveled under the leadership of our Chump-in-Chief.

Look at my own title from a year ago as I asked in September of 2013:

Obama Won’t Negotiate With GOP. So WHY Is He Negotiating With Terrorist State Iran (Declared Terrorist Since 1984)???

Does it sound to you like I was optimistic about this the way the fools of the Los Angeles Times and the Obama administration were?

If you want a more direct statement about that time of a year ago, here’s what I wrote in a different article:

As for Iran, Obama has guaranteed that Iran will be in an economically stronger position to announce that they have joined the nations with nuclear weapons as soon as they have successfully developed the ballistic missile system they need to give their nuclear threat any real teeth.  There is frankly no reason for Iran to develop nuclear weapons until they have the means to deliver those weapons especially to Israel and the United States.

The Iranian president announced that the deal Obama made allows Iran to continue enriching uranium.  And of course it does because Obama won’t do a damn thing to stop it.

Another true statement is that Obama’s deal – again in the Iranian president’s own words – isolates Israel.

Obama is a “leader” who leaves America’s allies twisting in the wind while he makes desperate deals to appease our enemies.  And as a result he will have “peace in our time.”  A completely false and naïve peace just like the last damn time we had such a “peace,” but Obama couldn’t give less of a damn as long as the world doesn’t blow up until he’s out of office.

Let me ask you, WHO WAS RIGHT???  Was I right or was Obama right?  Was I right or was Hillary Clinton and then John Kerry right?  Was conservatism right or was liberalism right?

And for the record, this is what I’ve been pointing out all along:

Make Obama, Biden, Clinton And The Democrat Party Wear Nuclear Iran Like An Albatross Of Shame

It’s liberals’ fault that we even have to be dealing with a nuclear Iran now.  Their weakness and the weakness that liberalism imbued into America emboldened Iran to build for Armageddon and to keep building and building.  Iran can know with certainty that as long as there remains one liberal who has not been hunted down with dogs and burned alive that America will never have the resolve to stop them.

The fact of the matter is that Iran already has sufficient nuclear material to produce five nuclear bombs.  That’s enough to wipe out Israel, which Iran and terrorists refer to as a “two-bomb country.”  Obama has already given Iran the nuclear bomb; this is just a question of how many more bombs they will be able to build and how quickly they will be able to build them.  But to wipe out Israel, Iran wants to first have the means to terrorize and intimidate the United States out of direct retaliation.  Which means they need ballistic missile capability which would give them the ability to strike major U.S. cities and kill tens of millions of Americans.

So Iran invited a man they knew to be a coward and a fool – Barack Obama – to rebuild their economy for them by ending the sanctions and the pressure those sanctions had on their nuclear ambitions and their plan to destroy Israel and start Armageddon.  And thanks to the United States under Obama Iran has been completely free to keep working on the successful ballistic missile technology that will allow them to kill millions of Americans should America ever attempt to stop Iran from carrying out their Armageddon scenario.

I have frequently used “Democrat” as what it truly is: a portmanteau meaning “DEMOnic bureauCRAT.”  That’s what Democrats are: demon-possessed bureaucrats who worship the State rather than God and impose their godless State upon the rest of us with all their government control and their taxes and their regulations and their bureaucracies and their totalitarian fascist crony capitalist ambition to be able who will be winners and who will be losers.

The Bible nails the essence of liberalism:

Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools — Romans 1:22

and as a result they are:

always learning but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth. — 2 Timothy 3:7

Liberalism is the demonic hostility to the truth.  They hate the truth because it exposes them as the liars and frauds and deceivers and slanderers and demagogues that they are.  They constantly fabricate their own realities and when those realities are exposed as false they blame their opponents even though their opponents clearly had warned what would happen if liberals got their way.