Posts Tagged ‘Sandra Fluke’

Why Do Liberals Keep Ginning Up Racial And Feminist Outrage Based Entirely On LIES? Because That’s Just Who They Are, That’s Why

July 6, 2015

A few days ago I was riding the exercise bike at my gym and CNN was on.  The entire 35 minutes I was riding that stupid bike, CNN was “reporting” on the story that in the aftermath of the shooting in , racist white people were burning down six or seven black churches.

I went home assuming that all hell had been unleashed and white people were rising up in the kind of racist rage that they’d seen black people rise up in in city after city across the nation.

But, golly gee, later that night I turn on Megyn Kelly’s program and she points out the, you know, FACTS that NONE of the fires had actually linked to arson, that a rash of churches that primarily white people belonged to had burned down (due to lightning strikes), and that in the few actual cases OF arson against black churches, the arsonist was BLACK.

It takes at least two points to connect a line, but when liberal propaganda is concerned, it doesn’t even take ONE fact to draw a conclusion.

A few days after I saw the “news” story on CNN, I look at this on CNN’s website:

Why are black church fires associated with acts of hate?
By Eliott C. McLaughlin, CNN
Updated 6:51 PM ET, Thu July 2, 2015

(CNN)It’s a visceral and involuntary reaction, perhaps even knee-jerk: A black church burns in the South and our minds race immediately to hatred.

It must be arson. It must be the handiwork of some despicable white supremacist.

That was the sentiment on display across social and traditional media these past two weeks. The NAACP, while acknowledging only three of the recent fires were suspected arsons, called for vigilance, saying the blazes require “our collective attention.”

“For centuries, African-American churches have served as the epicenter of survival for many in the African-American community. As a consequence, these houses of faith have historically been the targets of violence. We will use every tool in our advocacy arsenal to preserve these beloved institutions,” Cornell William Brooks, the group’s president, said in a statement.

Brooks also cited the recent church massacre in South Carolina.

On June 17, Dylann Roof allegedly killed nine members of Charleston’s Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church. Four days later, black churches began burning across the South. To date, seven in five states have caught fire.

Are the events linked? It’s unclear, as investigators continue to gather details. Early indications are that most of the fires were not arson, let alone hate crimes.

But that doesn’t mean we haven’t connected the events in our minds, and that colors how we digest news that another African-American house of worship has gone up in flames, experts say.

“It isn’t unreasonable to speculate that at least some of the black churches are acts of arson, especially coming in the aftermath of the horrific massacre of nine people in a black church,” said Jack Levin, a professor emeritus at Northeastern University who has studied hate crimes for 30 years and serves as co-director of the Brudnick Center on Violence and Conflict. […]

But yes it is damn well TOO “unreasonable,” if you call yourself a “reporter” or a “journalist.”

REAL journalists and reporters have a natural skepticism.  Everyone else ASSUMES but they demand the FACTS.  And they don’t say “Good morning” unless they’ve fact-checked the weather.

The problem is that liberalism did to journalism what it did to babies.  It just plain slaughtered them.  And today journalism is DEAD.

In the same vein, I’ve watched city after city burn down in rioting perpetuated by the mainstream media’s blatantly false depictions of so-called police brutality.

The facts that actual JOURNALISTS and REPORTERS would wait for?

Well, I saw this in the newspaper on July 3rd:

California sees fewest complaints filed against police officers since since 1990

I’ll bet you anything that what is true in our largest state with over 30 million people is true across the nation.  There are giant cities and there are tiny towns and California is so vast and so diverse that it has been frequently suggested that it be broken up into six different states.

But again, every damn time a police officer shoots a black man – pretty much no matter HOW much justification there is – you can count on the mainstream media to run to Al Sharpton and report his race-baiting hatred as “news.”

And then wonder of wonders, their cameras are conveniently there to report the next “protest” (a synonym for “race riot” consisting of burning, looting, and the terrorist sniper-attacks of police officers).

Black people are being murdered at an astonishing rate.  But they’re being murdered by other black people.  And they’re frequently murdered in gun-free zones.  But let’s not report actual FACTS.  Let’s keep ginning up black rage.

The attitude of lies and dishonesty and deception are most manifest in the Democrat politicians that the media cover-up for.  As an example, the liberal-progressive mayor of Baltimore DENIES saying she gave the black rioters “space to destroy”:

“I never said, nor would I ever say, that we are giving people space to destroy our city. So my words should not be twisted.” — Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, April 27, 2015

Judge for yourself:

Hmmm. “We also gave those who wished to destroy space to Do That as well.”

“Let them loot, it’ only property,” she is on the documented factual record as having said.

That’s bad enough, of course, but it hardly ends there.  The SAME liberal-progressive Democrat mayor is on the record DENYING that she issued stand down orders.  The police commanders under her stated that no such orders had been issued.

But damn them damn facts:

Baltimore police commanders acknowledge that they ordered officers not to engage rioters multiple times on the day of Freddie Gray‘s funeral but said they did so to protect officers and citizens as they prioritized life over property.

In an interview with The Baltimore Sun, police Commissioner Anthony W. Batts and six top commanders who directed deployments on April 27 denied that they gave blanket orders to do nothing as rioters looted, raided businesses and even attacked officers with impunity.

The story ONLY changed because the audio of the police commanders issuing the stand-down orders became public – something that will NEVER happen to the emails Hillary Clinton purged from her private server to destroy the evidence of her myriad crimes.

Frankly, most Democrats – including President Obama himself – along with most reporters, should be arrested, tried, convicted and imprisoned for inciting riots.  Al Sharpton incites them on a regular basis, and he’s sitting next to Obama in the White House when he’s not fomenting racial hate.

Even when the underlying “facts” that initiated the riots are proven to have been lies, Obama has been able to exploit the lies to enact sweeping policies that impose more fascist totalitarian federal raw naked power.

In the same way, liberals are screaming about the “war on women” and a “rape culture.”  And they have completely seized control of university policies as a result.  To what effect?  Well, don’t count on MSNBC or NBC or CNN or ABC to report this stuff for you, but what has been “fundamentally transformed” into a ruthless war on young white men is terrifying.

First of all, the very basis for seizing control of the college and university policies was based ENTIRELY on false reporting and lies, we can now document:

New DOJ Data On Sexual Assaults: College Students Are Actually Less Likely To Be Victimized
December 11, 2014 By The Federalist Staff

A new report on sexual assault released today by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) officially puts to bed the bogus statistic that one in five women on college campuses are victims of sexual assault. In fact, non-students are 25 percent more likely to be victims of sexual assault than students, according to the data. And the real number of assault victims is several orders of magnitude lower than one-in-five.

The full study, which was published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, a division within DOJ, found that rather than one in five female college students becoming victims of sexual assault, the actual rate is 6.1 per 1,000 students, or 0.61 percent (instead of 1-in-5, the real number is 0.03-in-5). For non-students, the rate of sexual assault is 7.6 per 1,000 people.

BJS SA Study Highlights

The higher rate of victimization among non-students is important due in large part to recent accusations that U.S. colleges and universities are hotbeds of so-called “rape culture,” where sexual assault is endemic, and administrators and other students are happy to look the other way. The bogus “1 in 5″ statistic, which was the product of a highly suspect survey of only two universities and which paid respondents for their answers, has been repeatedly used as evidence of this pervasive rape culture on college campuses across the country.

Even more striking is that according to the BJS data, the likelihood of sexual assault has actually been trending downward across the board since 1997.

BJS SA Trends 1997[…]

People capable of actual thought – rather than spouting left-wing screaming points – would understand that if one-in-five women are raped on university campuses, THEY WOULD BE BEING RAPED BY OBAMA-VOTING LIBERAL PUKES.  Because it’s those same college pukes voting Democrat more reliably than damn near any other group.  But, of course, either way it proves what swine liberals are: either they’re rapists, or they’re lying about being raped.  And either way, they’re horrible people.

But, that fact aside, because of that bogus “one-in-five college women are sexually assaulted” reporting, the Obama White House imposed the most fascist policies on sexual assault since Adolf Hitler was running a government.  To the extent that we now have a government policy imposed on colleges and universities that white men are guilty even AFTER they have been proven innocent.

I only recently wrote up a story about a young man who got EXPELLED from Amherst for a rape there is no question never occurred. And in fact HE was the victim of a sexual assault, given the definition that to be drunk is to be unable to turn down a sexual encounter and therefore it qualifies as sexual assault.  Because of Obama Administration Hitlerian NAZISM, that young man was not allowed the right to have an attorney, was not allowed the right to have any kind of trial by his peers, was not allowed to have any discovery process, was not allowed to face his accuser, and his accuser’s story was taken at face-value and entirely believed to be truthful even after evidence was offered that showed she was lying like you wouldn’t believe.

The same thing just basically happened to a male student at Columbia University as “mattress girl” became a media darling and a guest of a Democrat Senator.  The same thing happened at Vassar.

Which is to say, the same liberal-progressive propagandists masquerading as “journalists” and “reporters” who don’t need a single FACT to “report” arson fires in black churches blatantly ignore actual fact-after-fact-after-fact that proves their previous reporting on the so-called “rape culture” was a great big fat giant lie.

We’ve got the infamous Duke Lacrosse case and we’ve got a slew of other cases of a vicious war on men based on dishonest women and manufactured into an issue for dishonest politicians by dishonest reporters.

We’ve got the bogus story of Sandra Fluke – who was basically the heroine “mattress girl” was seeking to emulate and receive the same adoration – who just flat-out LIED to make a bogus claim about birth control.

But, true to form, Obama has cynically exploited the lies his ideologue army of cockroach “journalists” and “reporters” provided for him and issued sweeping fascistic controls to impose his agenda by fiat.

It goes back to the liberal progressive fascist theory of “You never want a serious crisis go to waste.”  Because for liberals, every crisis – especially they ones THEY created with their stupid, wicked policies – is another opportunity to expand the power of demonic government.

To be a liberal means to be a liar, and if you are a “journalist” or a “reporter” these days, you’re just a liar with a microphone and a camera.

As we speak, every reporter or journalist is shoving a microphone into the faces of every Republican presidential candidate they can find and demanding they give their position on Donald Trump’s remarks.  And the obvious response from the other candidates would be, “What the hell does that have to do with me?  Why don’t you ask me about MY positions and talk to Donald Trump about his own damn problems?”  But that’s not how the system works when the Grand Old Party is concerned.  The media says they do this because controversy sells and they are equal opportunity when controversy rears its head.

I’d love to be able to interview Hillary Clinton.  I’d love to ask her, “Do you believe that every political figure ought to be able to install his or her own private server and purge all their communications that would or could politically destroy or even criminally indict them the way you did? How are you NOT a damn fascist?”  I’d love to ask, “Given your enthusiastic support for Margaret Sanger, an avowed racist who was successful in building Planned Parenthood into a genocidal machine to exterminate negro babies, why shouldn’t you be called anything other than the worst kind of racist scum?”  No mainstream media reporter has or ever WILL ask Hillary Clinton such confrontational questions.  So no they AREN’T equal opportunity.

Why won’t the same media that goes after Republican politicians who oppose gay marriages as “intolerant” go after Democrats who support gay marriage as hating the Bible and despising biblical Christianity?  Because they are pathologically biased and unfair, that’s why.

Reporters and journalists are people who believe the 1st Amendment gives conservatives, Republicans and Christians the right to shut up and bow down to political correctness or be prepared to be targeted for slander.

I’ve been hitting it over and over and over again, I know.  But the Democrat Party is the party of deceit and slander and lies.  The Democrat Party is the party of the coming Antichrist.  The Democrat Party is the party of the deception and the mystery of lawlessness that the Bible foretold would characterize the last days.

Advertisements

The REAL ‘War On Women’ Party Rears Its Ugly, Mysoginist Head (Um, That’s The Democrat Party, You Know)

July 17, 2013

“War on women.”  That’s what Democrats and liberal feminists said of the Republican Party.  Because the Republican Party didn’t want to pay for liberal activist Sandra Fluke’s birth control.  The fact that Sandra Fluke outright lied about the cost of birth control (she dishonestly and frankly idiotically claimed that it cost $3,000 when in reality it cost $324 to cover the same period) didn’t matter.  Nor did it matter that in fact she easily could have accessed FREE birth control in the form of condoms from numerous sources.  The fact that Sandra Fluke as a Georgetown law school student was willing to pay $23,432.50 PER SEMESTER for her hoity-toity college but felt that birth control for $5 a month at Sam’s Club was too expensive and an outrage for women to have to buy didn’t matter.  The fact that an average Georgetown law school graduate starts out at $165,000 a year and what she was demanding was in fact a subsidy for the wealthy didn’t matter.  And of course it most certainly did not matter that Sandra Fluke literally enrolled in Georgetown – a CATHOLIC university – just so she could be a treacherous fifth column and sue them from within.  All that mattered was that demon-possessed Democrats had a slanderous rhetorical assertion and liberals are the kind of people who would much rather believe slanderous rhetorical accusations than actual reality.

You want to see which party is the real “War on Women” party in terms of the actual reality that every liberal must steadfastly ignore so they can continue to believe all the crap they believe instead?

You guessed it.  The Democrat Party.  It was true last year and it is every bit as true this year.  The Party of Weiner and the Party of Spitzer is the DEMOCRAT Party.  It’s okay to stomp on women.  Just as long as you’re a liberal.

Liberal journalist Nina Burleigh once had this to say about Bill Clinton:

“I would be happy to give him a blowjob just to thank him for keeping abortion  legal. I think American women should be lining up with their presidential  kneepads on to show their gratitude for keeping the theocracy off our backs.”

And of course, Bill Clinton would have happily thrown down the knee pads for Nina so she could serve and service her master.  The only problem was he was too busy receiving just worship from the lips of a young female intern named Monica Lewinsky whose father had donated money to Clinton’s campaign.

Pardon me for editorializing here, but that ugly mindset really encompasses liberalism.  Liberals are people who want the government to step in and do everything for them in exchange for their worship of the state and their vote for the party that seeks more and more and more power for that State.  They want your vote, of course, but a vote and getting down on your knees to give a blowjob is the true manifestation of liberalism’s worship of power and those who hold power.

I think of the utterly warped and frankly demonic and hateful worldview of Nina Burleigh and all the liberal feminists just like her.  I think of how abortion is “pro-woman” any more than it is “pro-child” to murder a child.  Do you know who abortion kills?  Today, there are more than 60 million women “missing” in Asia alone because of sex-selective abortion.   Millions of men in China – more than 24 million – will never have the possibility of having wives because so many women have been murdered via abortion that there is a radical imbalance in the gender populations.  So many girls have been murdered and simply do not exist that it cost ten years’ worth of income to have a wife in that “pro abortion society.”  And no matter what pro-abortion people may tell you, they are very much FOR forced abortions that terrorize and maim hundreds of millions of women.  400 million women have been forced to have abortions against their will in China alone, leaving a bloody path of misery and suicide and suffering OF WOMEN in its wake.  People like Nina Burleigh who want legal abortion are the guarantors of this vile demonic crime against women.  Particularly given the fact that liberal feminists are every bit as “pro-big government” as they are “the right to choose” abortion.  And if a woman should have the right to choose,” then on what basis does the state not have the right to choose?  Particularly in the leftist totalitarian societies where the state has been given the power to “choose” everything else???  And to take that stand because you are “pro-woman” is insane to the point of being demon-possessed.

“Real women” are wives and mothers; they are not single sluts whining about the need for their ultimate Man, their Savior, big government, to provide birth control for them.  And they most certainly aren’t women who murder their babies.  And to drive the point home, “real women” are most definitely NOT women who put down their damn kneepads for Bill Clinton or for any other big government bureaucrat for that matter.

We go back to the father of progressivism, Woodrow Wilson, for the genesis of this perverted party.  Wilson acknowledged in Congressional Government that “I cannot imagine power as a thing negative and not positive.”  And it was his many statements like that prompted historian Walter McDougall to sum up Woodrow Wilson thus: “If any trait bubbles up in all one reads about Wilson, it is this: he loved, craved, and in a sense glorified power.”  Wilson argued as president that he was the right hand of God and that to stand against him was to thwart the divine will.  Whereas conservatives believed that power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely, the father of the progressive movement exalted in power and then more power, and believed that power accrued to whoever was truly on God’s side.

Jonah Goldberg summed it up this way:

“Doctrinaire fascism, much like communism, sold itself as an unstoppable force of divine or historical inevitability.  Those who stood in the way – the bourgeoisie, the “unfit,” the “greedy,” the “individualistic,” the “traitor,” the kulak, the Jew – could be demonized as the “other” because, at the end of the day, they were not merely expendable, nor were they merely reluctant to join the collective, they were by their very existence blocking the will to power that gave the mob and the avant-garde which claimed to speak for it their reason for existence.

Liberal men receive that worship, and liberal women can’t wait to throw down their kneepads and give it to them in one form or another.

That, for the record, is called “women’s liberation” by liberals.  I call it the lowest form of servitude imaginable.

I know that I would rather die than stand in some line with my “presidential kneepads.”  Which is what separates me from liberals.  I demand a government that stays off my damn back, not one that I should slavishly worship.  And I don’t have to thank my government for getting off my back and allowing me my freedom because the Declaration of Independence of MY founding fathers declares that my government OWES that to me.

I know, I know.  That’s just me.

Anyway, end of digression.  Let’s get back to this realization that if you want to look at the party of true “war on women,” look no further than at the Democrat Party.

Consider this editorial from a liberal in the liberal Los Angeles Times:

Women to L.A. City Hall: Remember us?
Deplorably, as of today is not a single elected woman in Los Angeles city government.

Since the LA Times staff butchered the grammar so badly, I’ll quote Lindsay Bubar and yes, our heroine Sandra Fluke:

Now, women must once again ask the city’s leaders to “remember the ladies” because, deplorably, there is not a single elected woman in Los Angeles city government.

Democrats have OWNED Los Angeles for decades.  They have OWNED it.  And just like Obama’s inner circle, no damn chicks are allowed.  Not without the proper knee-attire, anyway.  Democrats in a city that they own don’t have a single woman in office.

And women on the Democrat Party’s actual view of the world frankly ought to throw down their kneepads, get down on their knees, and shut the hell up: because Anthony Weiner says that it is inconsiderate and frankly rude to try to talk when you’re satisfying “The Weiner.”

And, with that, let’s consider the very first Democrat Mayor of San Diego in over 20 years.  And what a misogynist swine he is.  This turd’s own supporters are bringing up these charges.  The young fiance of this old piece of garbage broke up with him citing the fact that Filner “became increasingly abusive toward her and began sending sexually explicit text messages to other women in her presence.”

Frankly, according to the tenants of Bob Filner’s liberalism, I don’t know what Filner did wrong: he was merely demanding what he was entitled to, after all.  You get your welfare check, and he gets his something-something.  And Bob Filner is most certainly pro-abortion and therefore every bit as entitled to the adoration of liberal women like Nina Burleigh as Bill Clinton was.

But again, don’t ask me: ask Bill Clinton and his blowjob servant cum “journalist” Nina Burleigh.  But don’t bother trying to ask the city of Los Angeles or the administration of Barack Obama unless you’re a guy – because they won’t let you in the door.

Don’t tell me that the Republican Party is the party of war on women.  At least not until every single Democrat on earth has been hunted down, anyway.

Update: It turns out that Bob Filner CO-FOUNDED the Democrat Party’s Congressional Progressive Caucus alongside Nancy Pelosi.  This turd is classic, uberliberal through-and-through.

And Democrats knew FULL DAMN WELL about what was going on and the real party of the “war on women” couldn’t have given less of a damn.  Quote:

Former assemblywoman Lori Saldana: San Diego Democrats previously warned about Bob Filner
Past party leaders aware of allegations by women
Posted: 07/13/2013 Last Updated: 3 days ago

SAN DIEGO – Former state assemblywoman Lori Saldana told Team 10 she warned San Diego Democrats about Mayor Bob Filner’s treatment of women.

On Friday, she said she took her concerns directly to the party’s chairman.

I went to the leader, the elected leader of the county party,” Saldana said. “I expressed to him my concerns. Did he take strong enough action to make sure things would improve Apparently not.”

What did the Democrat Party completely not give a flying damn about?  Here’s a partial list:

  • the mayor has a modus operandi, a way of getting women alone and forcibly kissing and touching them
  • Filner grabbed the woman’s breast, putting his hand beneath her bra, and forced his tongue down her throat.
  • Gonzalez described certain moves Filner had that earned names among those who know him, like the “Filner dance” and the “Filner headlock.” The former was the dance they allege Filner did when he kissed a woman who was pulling away; the headlock, an overly friendly way of pulling women close to him so he could isolate them.
  • Gonzales related details from the victim who was in Filner’s employ — he said early on in the mayor’s term, she complimented the mayor, telling him he was doing a good job. The mayor responded that he would do a better job if she gave him a kiss. She laughed it off as a joke, Gonzalez said, but he said she soon became aware that the mayor was serious, continuing to harass her and others both physically and verbally.
  • “There is no circumstance under which it would be appropriate for the mayor to enter into an elevator with my client or any person who he employed and to tell them that they would do a better job on that floor if they worked without their panties on,” but that, Gonzalez said, is precisely what happened.
  • Victim Donna Frye called him “tragically unsafe for any woman to be around.”

Anybody who wants to tell you that the Republican Party has a “war on women” because Republicans believe that FEMALE babies ought to have their right to live are simply evil.  Period.

Update, July 23: I suppose I invoked the demonic little turd by saying his name, didn’t I?  But it turns out that Anthony Weiner is at it again.  Yes, at least a FULL YEAR after getting busted for “sexting” any woman who would lower herself to online sex with a rodent, Weiner got busted again.  This time – under his online name “Carlos Danger” – Weiner promised a young woman a condo and even suggested he could get her a job at liberal “news” source Politico.   The address of the condo is known: 1235 S. Prairie Ave.  Weiner wanted to set her up so he could meet her there for sex.

That is so damn Democrat Weiner – who is staying in the race because he knows that Democrats are moral cockroaches – that he ought to be praised by the Democrat Party.  All Weiner wants is to be able to selfishly exploit a young woman in return for providing her welfare.  THAT IS THE DEMOCRAT WAY.  THAT IS ALL DEMOCRATS STAND FOR.

The fact that it is demonic is entirely besides the point.

Update, July 25: Anthony Weiner says he won’t pull out of the race; like this turd would ever “pull out” of ANYTHING once he’s got his little weiner in it.  This is the story that just keeps showing us the REAL face of the Democrat Party.  We now know the name of ONE (there being about a half a dozen other new women) who came forward: Sydney Leathers.  And we know she’s an uber liberal.  First off, let’s go back and establish the pattern of liberal women showering their liberal government gods with sexual worship.  Remember our “journalist” Nina Burleigh and what she said of her government-as-savior-and-lord god Bill Clinton?

“I would be happy to give him a blowjob just to thank him for keeping abortion  legal. I think American women should be lining up with their presidential  kneepads on to show their gratitude for keeping the theocracy off our backs.”

And I said in this article, published days before the Weiner sexting scandal part TWO broke that was just so damn typical of liberal feminists it wasn’t even funny.  And so we’ve got our case in point example of the day in Sydney Leathers, who said of Anthony Weiner:

“I basically worship the ground you walk on.”

And:

“He’s [Weiner] my hero.”

And, just like Barack Hussein Obama and every OTHER Democrat cockroach who keeps crawling into government life, Leathers now says that Weiner made her “very lofty promises” – and utterly failed to keep them.

I think of our liar-in-chief and all the stinking pile of lies he told just to impose his fascist takeover of the healthcare system: if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor; if you like your health plan, you’ll be able to keep your health plan; my Obamacare will cut the cost of your health care; my Obamacare won’t increase the deficit; my Obamacare will create millions of jobs.  Liberal women LOVE to be lied to; it’s only the truth and those who tell it that they despise.

It must be wonderful to be a Democrat male.  You get to be worshipped by stupid, morally-depraved women.  You get to get all sorts of “weiner benefits” in exchange for making all kinds of promises that you never have to actually keep.  And that gravy train is going to continue until you either die or until the REAL Messiah returns.  At which time you will burn in hell along with all your stupid floozies who kept voting for you.

Liberals Rejoice At The Destruction Of The Last ‘He-Man.’ When America Needs Him And He Is Nowhere To Be Found, Don’t Forget Who Banished Him.

March 18, 2013

I came across an amazing piece of rubbish in the rubbish that is the Los Angeles Times.  It is amazing how incredibly deceitful and deliberately disingenuous these propagandists are.  But I’ll wait to respond until after you’ve read this pile of drivel from the “senior culture editor” of the LA Slimes:

Schwarzenegger, your He-Man days have come and gone
March 17, 2013 | 5:00 a.m.

Arnold Schwarzenegger’s recent decision to return as executive editor of Muscle & Fitness and Flex magazines makes one thing abundantly clear: The former bodybuilder, movie star and California governor can’t seem to grasp the simple fact that his era is over.

He tried to ride out the revelation that he had secretly fathered a child with his housekeeper by penning an autobiography that was long on self-aggrandizement and short on introspection. Then he ventured back to the big screen with “The Last Stand,” prompting critics to declare him too old, too odd-looking (who knew Austrians turned orange as they aged?) and too mired in scandal to resurrect his action hero career.

Now he plans to return to his bodybuilding roots because he just doesn’t get it: The He-Man is dead, and few mourn his passing.

While Schwarzenegger was governating, the cultural landscape changed. Women, led by Lara Croft, Buffy and Nikita, gained muscles and martial arts skills on the big screen and small, while men learned how to talk and even (gasp) intuit.

Dr. Gregory House and Don Draper became the objects of serial desire while the cinematic action hero morphed into Robert Downey Jr., more mind and mouth than muscle. James Bond still thrives, but it is Daniel Craig’s scarred, haunted and human Bond, weeping tears of salt, not vermouth. Sylvester Stallone tried to get back in the game too, and “Bullet to the Head” bombed even faster than “The Last Stand.”

It isn’t just anatomy, it’s attitude. Social, economic and environmental concerns have turned on the in-your-face consumer-machismo that Schwarzenegger and other big men made their signature. Bodybuilding, Hummers, the Cuban cigars, the triple Scotches, the wild nights and womanizing are no longer the accoutrement of A-list masculinity.

Nowadays, real men drive hybrids, extol super-foods and worry more about core muscles and resting heart rates than the size of their pecs. Smart is the new sexy, struggling the new strong, insecurity a form of seduction. It helps if you can sing.

The He-Man did not go quietly. Roused to fury by the feminist movement and the quiche-eating New Male, the He-Man took power in the 1980s, both politically and culturally — it’s no coincidence that Schwarzenegger’s film career launched during the Reagan years. Subsequently, he found sustenance in both the “Fast and Furious” video-game generation and the new political right.

But the rise of the woman warrior, both real and fictitious, the increasing acceptance of gay Americans with their richly diverse definitions of masculine and feminine, and a digitally led shift toward Steve Jobs-cerebral over blue-collar-physical forced the classic He-Man into a very real Last Stand.

It all but defined this past election. Mitt Romney, no one’s definition of a He-Man, was recast as Mr. Fix-It, a can-do guy with money-making smarts who might be good to have around the house. Meanwhile, some of his supporters seemed intent on taking up the machismo slack with a game of gender-political chicken.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Vista) convened a House panel on birth control that was all male. Rush Limbaugh called law student Sandra Fluke a “slut” because she thought insurance companies should cover birth control. Then-Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.) tried to argue that women could not get pregnant in cases of “legitimate rape” in last year’s GOP primary for a U.S. Senate seat. In the Indiana Senate race, Republican Richard Mourdock insisted that abortion not be allowed in cases of rape because such births are in fact a “gift from God.” (Both Akin and Mourdock lost their races.)

Coming from hard-line conservatives, none of these views were new or even surprising, but the response of bipartisan outrage certainly was. The gender gap has been a political reality for years, but during this past election many voters seemed intent on sending a message: “Knock it off, guys.” Smug and sexist just doesn’t fly even among conservative women.

So for another four years we have a president whose wife has better biceps than he does, a man more visually associated with a library than a ranch. In many ways, Barack Obama is the quintessential third-millennium alpha, the antithesis of such He-Man presidents as Ronald Reagan or Bill Clinton (who, after a life-saving diet of veganism and spousal deference, has also changed with the times).

Obama may be commander in chief of two wars and the man who brought down Osama bin Laden, but unlike most of his predecessors he is rarely seen handling a firearm (and then only shooting at clay targets). He does not yell; he has been known to sing.

Indeed, prompted by the Sandy Hook tragedy, one of the first big fights of his second term is against the National Rifle Assn., arguably the most powerful embodiment of Old Guard masculinity in the country. Certainly NRA Chief Executive Wayne LaPierre followed the He-Man script to the letter when he finally broke his silence after 20 children and six adults were slain by a lone gunman in a matter of minutes. The obvious solution, he said, happily stepping back into a time when men were men and women didn’t have the vote, was to arm all the teachers.

And it isn’t just an American phenomenon. All over the world, in countries where male authority is socially and politically institutionalized, the old models of masculinity are being reconsidered. The recent gang rape and killing of a female student in New Delhi sparked a national uproar that resulted in a government panel examining the widespread abuse of women in India and calling for an end to “a culture of masculinity, a cult of aggression.” In Pakistan, the shooting of 15-year-old Malala Yousafzai by members of the Taliban infuriated by her insistence that girls should receive an education caused international outrage.

Not even the pope, arguably the world’s most spiritual He-Man — head of the most famous patriarchy, defined by his position as infallible, speaking literally in edicts — is immune. Beset by scandal, including and especially the revelations that the Catholic Church has, for decades, ignored and covered up the rape and sexual abuse of children by pedophile priests, the now-former Pope Benedict XVI recently acknowledged that, beset by health issues and general frailty, he was no longer the man for the job and became the first pontiff in centuries to resign.

So out of style is the concept of He-Man masculinity that History, in publicizing its much-anticipated series “The Vikings,” is pushing not only the role of women (did you know they were allowed to own property and go into battle?) but intellectual curiosity. The lead character may be named for a famous Norse pirate, but he’s portrayed as just as interested in acquiring knowledge and technology as he is in slaughter and booty.

If Ragnar the Viking realizes the age of the He-Man is over, perhaps it’s time Arnold Schwarzenegger did too.

– Mary McNamara, Senior Culture Editor

What are her data points?  What actual facts does she offer?  Well, a couple of frankly elderly men tried to make movie comebacks which didn’t go so well.  That, plus a load of lies such as all conservative he-men are pro-rapist, was her basis for declaring that real men are dead, and good riddance to them.

Mary McNamara says that the fact that 66-year-old Schwarzenegger and nearly 67-year-old Stallone can no longer play macho he-men in the movies somehow proves that “he-men” have been vanquished from culture.  What does this idiot think; that if “he-men” were still viable, these two would be able to continue to flex their biceps on the big screen into their nineties???

That proposition is nearly – but not quite – as dishonest as her use of failed Republican Senate candidate Todd Akin and the revulsion of a gang rape in India as “evidence” that real conservative he-men are dead and gone.  Did you know that conservative muscle men all supported gang rape?  Because that was sure as hell news to me.  Did you know that all conservative muscle men cheered when Todd Akin made his stupidly worded statement?  Because damn it I sure didn’t.  I also wasn’t aware that all muscular men everywhere think that all women should be denied an education the way McNamara assures me they do.

Just to point out a little thing called the truth, by the time Arnold Schwarzenegger left office in humiliation, he had long since been a pawn for pretty much ever arrow in the liberal quiver: global warming, ObamaCare, homosexuality and gay marriage, abortion and embryonic stem cell research.  To frame “the Governator” as some kind of right winger is dishonest nonesense squared.

Let’s just call this Los Angeles Times piece what it is: infantile propaganda for stupid, ignorant, wicked minds.

It’s kind of interesting: I want you to notice that McNamara somehow utterly fails to mention the Navy SEAL Team that went in and killed Osama bin Laden.  I mean, this woman even goes to Pakistan in her propaganda piece, but not to those masculine anachronisms otherwise known as the Navy SEALs.  Because on her dishonest worldview, “he-men” Navy SEALS didn’t really do that job; girl-man Barack Hussein Obama did:

Obama as Superman

America doesn’t need real actual he-men when we’ve got a posturing coward in our White House.

Those “he-men” Navy SEALs are useless to liberalism.  They’ve been killed off to make way for liberal heroes such as:

Lara Croft – like this anorexic woman is going to kick ass?

and 98-pound weakling – literally! – Buffy:

Yeah, these women are just as tough as any man.  I know it’s true because I saw it on television.

Not only does it not matter that these two pencil thin pencil-necked women would be knocked right on their asses if they tried to take Joe Biden’s advice and fire a shotgun

– but facts, truth and reality itself don’t matter.  Liberalism urinates on these three things every single day.  And for the record liberalism squats to pee on them.  Because standing up for pretty much ANYTHING is beyond these fools.

Mary McNamara cites Rush Limbaugh.  She deliberately mischaracterizes him, of course.  Limbaugh in point of fact most certainly did NOT say Sandra Fluke was a slut “because she thought insurance companies should cover birth control.”  Rather, Limbaugh said she was a slut for claiming that she and her fellow women at a high-priced Ivy League university – women who would soon be earning six figure salaries – were on Fluke’s testimony having so much out-of-control sex that they were going through $3,000 worth of birth control every single year.  That’s an awful lot of condoms for one girl to need in a year, you know.  Sandra Fluke dishonestly testified that birth control cost $3,000 when in reality it costs $9 per month at Wal-Mart.  Sandra Fluke dishonestly testified that women who were paying $24,000 per SEMESTER at Georgetown University Law School somehow couldn’t possibly afford to pay that nine bucks a month to fund their own personal responsibility.  THAT is why Limbaugh jumped all over Sandra Fluke, all ye dumbasses.  But the truth doesn’t sound as good to Mary McNamara, so so much the worse for the truth.

Anyway, Rush Limbaugh has been predicting that liberals were killing off real men and replacing them with feminist girly men for YEARS now.  And Mary McNamara’s biased piece of crap is actually all the proof you need to know that Limbaugh was right and McNamara is wrong.

I did point out that liberals and truth, facts and reality are like east and west with never the twain meeting.

Which is why I go back to the Navy SEALs – whom Mary McNamara thinks are dead and gone – as evidence that she is both a liar and a fool.  Because, contrary to this idiot LA Times propagandists, these are men who frankly don’t care about making their abs look pretty.  They actually stand for something; which is why they’ve got to go.  After all, these are the guys who go into buildings when negotiations break down and there are people inside who need to be killed.  You don’t get more “he-man” than that; which for the record is why actors like Schwarzenegger and Stallone pretend to be guys like this in their films.

McNamara for whom Hollywood is all the reality she will ever understand – cites Robert Downy Jr. as proof that real men and real man muscle are dead and gone.  But it’s kind of funny that she somehow omitted somebody from her own damn Hollywood genre.  Because apparently she’s never heard of “The Hulk.”

Does this look like a fellow who is “worrying more about core muscles and resting heart rates than the size of his pecs” to you???

I guess you’re right, Mary, you half-wit; clearly this guy was only focusing on his “core” rather than building those stupid muscles you believe are so offensive and useless.

The first Incredible Hulk movie was number one at the box office and grossed more than a quarter BILLION dollars.  And we’ve seen the Hulk in a couple more huge grossing movies since.  And what do you know the Hulk actually appeared right alongside McNamara’s sissified Robert Downy Jr. as Tony Stark in The Avengers.  And I could have sworn that the Hulk’s other fellow co-stars Thor and Captain America had spent more than a little time in the gym concentrating on their pecs in that the third highest grossing movie of ALL TIME.  Maybe somebody could have considered THOSE muscles rather than the near-septuagenarian muscles of fossilized Schwarzenegger and Stallone that McNamara dishonestly wanted us to fixate upon for the sake of her bogus point.

And let’s consider McNamara’s example of current 007 Daniel Craig.  Is this idiot seriously trying to tell me that Craig was less concerned about his “pecs” than was former very non-muscular Bond Roger Moore????  Seriously???

Outside of the fake bubble that is Hollywood, I have memberships at two different gyms (World’s and Gold’s) because the considerably better equipped gym is also considerably farther away.  And at both gyms what I see actual men doing is focusing so much on their chests and their arms that they are ignoring their legs.  It is decidedly easier to work out one’s abs and legs than it is one’s chest and arms because the latter equipment is nearly constantly in use.  This fool woman knows absolutely NOTHING about “he-men” or pretty much any other kind of man.

Of course, outside of Mary McNamara’s incredibly contrived examples was Vladimir Putin, who literally won reelection in Russia by taking off his shirt and showing us, yes, his “pecs.”  I’m sure that former KGB thug would have a different view than our resident LA Times idiot.

Again, this woman is a dishonest, biased, liberal turd propagandist who is so selective in her “facts” and so deceitful in her conclusions that it is shocking even by the Los Angeles Times’ “standards.”

I hate lies, which is why I hate liberalism so much.

I don’t have a doubt that Limbaugh will be highlighting Mary McNamara’s gibberish in his radio program.  Without trying to replace my opinions for his, I have a feeling that he’s going to be pointing out THE FACT that he’s been saying over and over again for YEARS that liberals viscerally despise strong men.  Women can’t have powerful muscles, so men shouldn’t be allowed to have them either.  And no decent man would ever try to build something that women can’t have every bit as much of, including muscles.  Social justice requires pathetically weak men, albeit pathetically weak men with slim, trim waists.

That’s why we’re heading toward women being pushed into combat by a few feminists.  Whether their FAR physically weaker women’s bodies can handle the stress of it or not.  That’s simply a fact attested to by a Marine Corps captain (named Katie Petronio) who knows from personal and painful experience that it is a fact.

Again, facts don’t matter one freaking DAMN to these people.  They are people who are determined to substitute a lie for the truth until their lie BECOMES the “truth.”

And that’s why we’re gutting our physical fitness standards for male military recruits.  Because if men are stronger and have greater endurance than women, well, that doesn’t help the cause of liberalism.  So strength must be weakened, and then weakened again and again and again until women can pass the same “standards.”

No woman on earth could be a Navy SEAL.  Or a Delta Force operator.  Or a Green Beret.  Or an Army Ranger.  Or a Marine Force Recon member.  Or an Air Force Pararescue member.  Etcetera.  Etcetera.  The requirements are simply too physically difficult for women because men and women aren’t the same.  And the idea that a man is capable of being something – anything – that a woman can’t be is just anathema to these leftist turds for whom ideology must trump reality.

I watched a young Marine doing standing military presses with 245 lbs.  Try that at home, girls.  That would be almost as much fun as watching Angelina Jolie and Sarah Michelle Gellar shooting 12 gauge shotgun slugs.

Liberals are gutting strength.  They are gutting honor.  They are gutting courage.  And most of all they are gutting the truth.  And they are replacing these qualities – which Americans used to reverence in their real heroes and in the men like John Wayne who depicted those heroes on film – with the weak, limp-wristed feminist pseudo-men that liberals are baiting and switching us with on a pretty much daily basis with their Hollywood drivel even as they cite that selfsame drivel as some kind of proof.

When the real “he-men” are gone, we’re going to need them.  And they won’t be there to help you.  But if it helps you to feel better, just remember that Georgetown law school students will get free birth control off the sweat of people who won’t earn a twentieth what these entitlement whores will earn in their law careers.

Remember who killed our real men and rejoiced at their demise on the day that it results in our own national demise.

Real men tell the truth and stand up courageously for what is right.  Which is precisely why real liberals despise them so damn much and will continue to do everything they can do to discredit and destroy them until their propaganda war on reality succeeds.

All The Proof You’ll Ever Need To Prove That Democrats’ ‘War On Women’ Rhetoric Campaign Hides Their Own War Against Women

September 6, 2012

In honor of the fact that liberal activist and now professional serial liar Sandra Fluke gave a speech at the DNC, the Fark description of the story below is beyond priceless:

War-on-women rhetoric falls slient as feminist NY Democrats give a resounding no-comment and hey-look-at-the-time to secret hush money payments to sexually harassed female Democrat assembly staffers

Gee, I wonder if uberliberal feminist activist Sandra Fluke (“feminist” these days being defined as dependent women whining for some man to pay for her birth control because she’s too damn dependent to pay for her own) will talk about THIS while she’s whining about Republicans “warring on women”:

August 30, 2012
Assembly Democrats Support Speaker Over Settlement
By DANNY HAKIM

ALBANY — Assembly Democrats rallied around Speaker Sheldon Silveron Thursday, as he faced an inquiry into his handling of sexual harassment allegations made against a prominent lawmaker and continued attacks from a lawyer who represented some of the women.

In Brooklyn political circles, lawmakers were discussing how to force Assemblyman Vito J. Lopez, the central figure in the sex scandal, to relinquish his seat.

He has already said he will give up his role as the borough’s Democratic Party leader. But even a longtime ally thought likely to succeed Mr. Lopez as chairman of the Brooklyn Democratic Party, Frank R. Seddio, said it was time for Mr. Lopez to resign after new descriptions of sexual language and harassment in his office.

In one indication of his precarious position, Mr. Lopez has not been calling around to other Assembly members to gauge his level of support — something he would surely do if he were maneuvering to stay, said one member who is close to him.

For Mr. Silver, the fallout from the scandal continues. For 18 years, he has led the State Assembly, and presided as the Legislature’s most powerful Democrat. But he now faces an investigation by the state’s Joint Commission on Public Ethics, which is controlled by appointees and allies of Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, a fellow Democrat with whom he has had an uneasy relationship. Last year, state lawmakers approved the governor’s plan to expand the jurisdiction of the ethics commission to encompass the Legislature; the investigation of Mr. Silver’s office represents a largely unprecedented incursion by the executive branch into his chamber.

More immediately, Mr. Silver continued to be attacked on Thursday by Gloria Allred, the Los Angeles lawyer who was part of a team that represented two women who brought claims against Mr. Lopez. In a lengthy statement, she said, “It appears that the Assembly speaker, in an effort to divert attention from the Assembly’s conduct, is attempting to blame the women who brought claims against Mr. Lopez and then agreed to a settlement.”

New documents released Thursday night by the state attorney general’s office revealed that Ms. Allred and her co-counsels initially sought $1.2 million for the two women they represented, later offered to accept $600,000, but eventually settled for $135,000 and an unspecified amount of back pay and benefits. According to a draft agreement, one of the women was to receive a cash payment of $60,786 and the other woman $20,262. The two law firms involved were to equally split $54,032.

Mr. Silver’s spokesman, Michael Whyland, said in response to Ms. Allred’s statement on Thursday, “At all times, the Assembly has acted to protect the privacy of the victims and has deferred to their preferences in this matter.”

The scandal erupted last Friday, when the Assembly’s bipartisan ethics committee substantiated claims that Mr. Lopez had harassed two women. Mr. Silver censured Mr. Lopez, 71, one of the city’s last powerful political bosses, taking away his committee chairmanship and barring him from employing interns or anyone under the age of 21. A letter signed by Mr. Silver described “pervasive unwelcome verbal conduct” and said that Mr. Lopez had verbally harassed, groped and kissed two of his staff members without their consent.

Over the next few days, The New York Times reported that Mr. Silver and Mr. Lopez authorized a secret payment of $135,000 in June, mostly with state money, to settle prior allegations against Mr. Lopez from two other women — allegations that were never referred to the ethics committee. Mr. Silver has said that that was a mistake that would not happen again.

Assembly Democrats defended the speaker — saying he had been put in a very difficult situation by Mr. Lopez — and praised him for accepting blame.

“I am a total supporter of the speaker as a leader,” said Shelley Mayer, a Yonkers Democrat who served as the counsel for the New York State Senate before winning a special election to the Assembly this year. “As someone who lived through some very difficult times in the Senate, I know how difficult leadership can be. I think he has exhibited great leadership.”

Assemblyman Joseph D. Morelle, the chairman of the Democratic Party in Monroe County, said, “People in our conference not only have great affection for Shelly, there’s a lot of respect for his skills as a leader, as a speaker, and as an attorney.”

Mr. Morelle, who is close to Mr. Cuomo, has been seen as a potential successor to Mr. Silver, but laughed off the suggestion on Thursday, adding, “He remains strongly supported.”

The ethics commission has begun a preliminary review, though a vote of the full commission, including Mr. Silver’s appointees, will be required before a formal investigation can proceed.

A formal complaint filed by Common Cause New York and the New York City chapter of the National Organization for Women asked the commission to examine potential violations of two sections of the state’s Public Officers Law.

One section relates to using one’s “official position to secure unwarranted privileges or exemptions,” while the other says an official should behave in ways “which will not raise suspicion among the public that he is likely to be engaged in acts that are in violation of his trust.”

Another group, Citizens Union, is also expected to file a formal complaint.

“One would hope that it would be without any political agenda, that it would simply look at whether there is a better way to address things,” said Assemblywoman Deborah J. Glick, a Manhattan Democrat, who also expressed strong support for Mr. Silver while calling the handling of the settlement “a mistake.”

David Grandeau, the state’s former top lobbying regulator and a critic of the fledgling commission, said, “You passed this legislation a year ago because you wanted to get the public ‘atta boys’ for doing ethics reform,” adding, “Of course there was going to come the day when the governor’s handpicked investigators were going to be investigating members of the Legislature. That day is here.”

In Brooklyn, much of the talk focused on whether Mr. Lopez would be forced to leave the Assembly.

A few days ago, people who either talked to him directly, or were briefed by people who did, said that he fiercely maintained that the accusations were untrue, and that he would remain in office. But after several former Lopez female staff members were quoted in The Times on Thursday describing a hostile work environment and episodes of harassment, several Brooklyn Democrats said that Mr. Lopez’s days in office were numbered.

One Assembly member, speaking on condition of anonymity, doubted that Mr. Lopez would ever return to Albany as an elected official. The Assembly member, who has spoken to Mr. Lopez in the last week, said one telltale sign that Mr. Lopez felt embattled was that “he hasn’t called around to members.” A second Assembly member said he and another member had even raised the possibility of initiating formal proceedings to remove Mr. Lopez, but that is not yet being broadly discussed.

Mr. Lopez seems to have shut out even his closest allies.

Mr. Seddio, who sat with Mr. Lopez Monday night urging him to relinquish his party chairmanship, said he was going to tell Mr. Lopez on Thursday afternoon he needed to resign his position in the Assembly as well. Mr. Seddio said he placed a call to Mr. Lopez on Thursday morning after he read the accounts in The Times and The New York Post. Mr. Lopez has not returned his calls.

“If what you guys reported is true, it’s atrocious and unspeakable,” Mr. Seddio said. He acknowledged that Mr. Lopez considered him part of his inner circle. But he was not sure whether Mr. Lopez would listen to him.

“I don’t know what leverage he has,” he added. “Even if stays as an assemblyman — once you are tarred with this brush, it damages your credibility with people.”

David W. Chen and Liz Robbins contributed reporting from New York.

Democrats fight the war on women with hush money to hide Democrats’ war on women.

The REAL war on women is being waged by liberals.  That is simply a damn fact.  And it would be really nice if the Democrat Party would finally stop condescending to women and treat the female of the species like a creature capable of attributes like reason and independence from the government dole.

Michelle Obama’s Speech: Red And Yellow Black And White, All Are Precious In Jesus-Obama’s Sight. Barry Loves The Little Tea Partiers Of The World.

September 5, 2012

Michelle Obama gave a nice speech, I’m sure (I preferred to gag myself with a giant spoon to watching it, but that’s another story).

I have to admit that as I was really choking on that damn spoon, there was a point when it actually occurred to me that maybe listening to Michelle’s speech might be more fun.

Having heard some of her top lines, I now know that I made the right choice gagging on that damn spoon.

Damn did that woman invent her own crazy reality:

“I love that for Barack, there is no such thing as “us” and “them” – he doesn’t care whether you’re a Democrat, a Republican, or none of the above…he knows that we all love our country…and he’s always ready to listen to good ideas…he’s always looking for the very best in everyone he meets.”

I mean, holy crap.  Barry Hussein loves us all the same?  Seriously???

When Rush Limbaugh stated that hard core liberal activist Sandra Fluke was a “slut” for saying that she used so much damned birth control that she was spending $3,000 on it when for ordinary people it cost $9 a month, Barack Obama called her to say how sorry he was for such harsh dialogue.  Just as he called Sarah Palin every time Bill Maher called Her a “cunt” or a “dumb twat” or every time David Letterman said Sarah Palin’s 14-year old daughter was a little slut, right?  I mean, right?

Oops.  Barry doesn’t love Sarah Palin quite as much as he loves Sandra Fluke, after all.  As I pointed out at the damn time.

Wrong.  Not only did Obama not treat Sarah Palin like Sandra Fluke even though Palin was viciously assaulted a thousand times worse, but Obama happily took the million dollars that Bill Maher gave him in what amounts to an endorsement of what Maher said (most times when a slimebag gives a campaign contribution the candidate returns it or gives it to a charity).

Charles Krauthammer, brilliant psychologist as always, hit the reason Michelle Obama was so damn crazy right on the nutty head:

Her whole task was to say why. And her answer was,“Why? Because essentially he’s a saint.”

Because of his upbringing and because of his emotions and because of his humanity. He does of this because he cares. And the brilliance of it is this: It drained Obama of any, either, ideological motivation, or any having to do with self interest or ambition, which I think is sort of a more plausible explanation.

He’s a man highly who is liked and highly ideological. A man of the left who sees the role of the government as ordering, the reorderering, of society in a way to make it more just, as he understands it . And also, extremely ambitious. A self made man who makes himself out of nothing, rises out of nowhere. But all of that, in her telling, doesn’t even exist. The only reason he does what he does, he cares about women, he cares about immigrants, he cares about the poor. He cares about the unemployed. He cares, he cares, he cares.

She told the story of a Gandhi. And, you know, looking at the scene, looking at how he’s conducted himself in the presidency and particularly in the campaign, with ruthlessness and determination and drive, it’s not quite a plausible story. I’m sure in the arena, it was a plausible story. I saw the tears, but I’m afraid, I thought it was a great speech, but I didn’t buy a line of it.

Krauthammer was being too kind.  Michelle wasn’t implying that Obama was any mere saint.  The Obamas are far too grandiose in their narcissism to settle for such mendacity.  She was letting us know that Barack is our messiah, our Jesus.  And “black Jesus” – as Obama campaign manager David Axelrod calls him – loves us all the same.  Because he’s a messiah, he’s a god, and he’s just that much better than you are, you trifling mortal.

The president who used the incredibly vile term of “tea baggers” to describe the Tea Party, the president who is on the record saying that Republicans are despicable people who want dirtier air and dirtier water, as people who want more children born with Autism and Down Syndrome, the same president who once told Hispanics to racially rise up and punish their white Republican enemies, etc. etc. etc., is a black Jesus who is really saying of Republicans, “Forgive them, Great Barack in the Sky, for they know not what they do.”

The marketing of Obama as “Jesus” is as demonic as it is widespread from the left:

Artwork Likens Obama to Jesus
Sep 4, 2012
By Todd Starnes

Street vendors across downtown Charlotte are selling posters and artwork depicting President Obama as Jesus Christ and the Democratic National Convention is expected to feature a stained-glass window backdrop during their meeting.

FOLLOW TODD ON FACEBOOK FOR CULTURE WAR NEWS. CLICK HERE!

One poster features an image of the president in prayer with the headline, “Prophecy Fulfilled.”

“Barak is of Hebrew origin and its meaning is ‘flash of lightning,” the poster notes, referencing a passage in in the Old Testament book of Judges.

Hussein, they allege, is a Biblical word meaning “good and handsome.”

“So you see, Barak was destined to be a good and handsome man that would rise like a flash of lightning to win victory in a battle against overwhelming odds,” the poster read.

The posters were being sold outside security zones at the Democratic National Convention. The posters are not sanctioned by the DNC.

An Obama calendar, obtained by Fox News, features two religious images of the Commander-in-Chief.

The month of August includes a photograph of Obama’s birth certificate with the words “Heaven sent.”

The president was born on Aug. 4th.

The entry also includes a photograph of Obama along with a passage of Scripture from the New Testament.

“For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life,” the entry read — referencing John 3:16.

The month of November includes an image of individuals with their hands on Obama’s back — with the words “The Lord is my Shepherd, I shall not want.”

Fox News also obtained a photograph of a DNC stage design. It resembled a giant stained glass window. It’s unclear what the imagery will be used for.

The comparisons to Jesus Christ have brought strong condemnation from some evangelicals — including Robert Jeffress, pastor of the First Baptist Church in Dallas, TX.

“If Barack Obama is the promised Messiah, I think there are going to be many Christians who are profoundly disappointed,” Jeffress told Fox News. “One only has to look at Obama’s record to understand that he is absolutely, positively not the promised One.”

Todd Starnes is the author of “Dispatches From Bitter America.” The book is endorsed by Sarah Palin, Mark Levin and Sean Hannity. Click here to get your copy!

But there’s that nasty truth that has Lady MacBeth I mean Michelle saying, “Out, damn spot!”

 ** Obama: “They Bring a Knife…We Bring a Gun”
 ** Obama to His Followers: “Get in Their Faces!”
 ** Obama on ACORN Mobs: “I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”
 ** Obama to His Mercenary Army: “Hit Back Twice As Hard”
 ** Obama on the private sector: “We talk to these folks… so I know whose ass to kick.“
 ** Obama to voters: Republican victory would mean “hand to hand combat”
 ** Obama to lib supporters: “It’s time to Fight for it.”
 ** Obama: “My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks.”
 ** Obama: “I will be happy to see the Republicans test whether or not I’m itching for a fight on a whole range of issues. I suspect they will find I am.”
 ** Obama: “It’s tempting not to negotiate with hostage takers”
 ** Obama: “We’re going to punish our enemies”
 ** Obama: “Those aren’t the kinds of folks who represent our core American values.”

Since there’s no “us and them” when it comes to Barack Obama, I am counting on Obama to look at his audience of Democrats tomorrow night and say, “You aren’t the kind of folks who represent our core American values.”  Because it sure seemed to be pretty damned “us” and “them” when Obama said that about Republicans.

Glad I chose to gag on that spoon.  Because lies make me a lot more nauseous than any stupid spoon could.

Somebody Had To Pay For All That ‘Free’ Stuff Obama Stuck Into ObamaCare; Turns Out It’s Companies And Their Workers

August 28, 2012

Sandra Fluke.  Remember her?  She’ll be a prime-time speaker at the Democratic National Convention.  Just to remind you about her, she was the liberal activist who got into Georgetown Law School – a Catholic institution – just so she could sue them.  As a Georgetown law school graduate, if she’s just AVERAGE, she’ll earn $165,000 a year her very first year out of school.  But she expects you to pay for her birth control, the cost of which she lied about (falsely claiming what cost $9 a month would cost $3,000 – unless you consider condoms which she could have got for free).

The Democrat Party is the party of elitists, liars and entitlements.  So why not have lying elitist future 1 percenter Sandra Fluke come to the Democrat Convention to talk about more entitlements?

Obama and the Democrat Party love to pretend they’re Santa Clause and give away lots of “free” stuff.  By “free stuff” I mean they like to force private companies to give things away that actually cost them a lot of money.

And pathologically stupid people, a.k.a. Democrats, just LOVE the free stuff.  Because they don’t have to pay for it and frankly since they don’t have to pay for it they really don’t care who DOES pay for it.

Now, increasingly, of course, Democrats are freeloading slackers who don’t have jobs.  The Democrat Party today is the Party of the Occupy Movement.  But it turns out that the money to pay for all of this “free stuff” that Obama has given away to try to get reelected is coming right out of businesses that do most of the hiring in this country.  And more to the point, it is coming out of employees who work at those companies.

Just remember, dishonest Democrats and their Liar-in-Chief swore up and down that their ObamaCare would bring costs DOWN.  They lied, because at their cockroach cores they are lying liars:

Rising insurance costs crimping companies’ plans
By Jonathan D. Epstein
Updated: August 26, 2012, 6:52 PM

Western New York’s three big health insurers are again seeking to jack up rates by significant amounts in some cases – and some employers are taking desperate measures as a result.

BlueCross BlueShield of Western New York is asking for double-digit hikes for most plans, while Independent Health Association and Univera Healthcare are seeking increases of mostly less than 10 percent.

The price hikes, detailed in the carriers’ filings with the state Department of Financial Services, mark another year in which premiums are rising much faster than the rate of inflation or household income.

That adds to the burden on households and businesses already straining from past increases. And it shows that, at least so far, the efforts by insurers, employers and medical providers to control the spiraling costs are having limited effect.

“The train wreck continues. It’s unfortunate, but it seems that whatever products the carriers develop, whatever wellness programs they put together, it just doesn’t seem like they can get a lot of answers that people are looking for,” said Gregory D. Leifer, director of life and employee benefits at brokerage firm Scott Danahy Naylon.

“It’s pretty much the same old story from year to year,” said Howard N. Silverstein, CEO of Choice Employee Benefits Group LLC in Williamsville. “The community-based products just are obviously a burden to many of the employers.”

That’s forcing many to make tough decisions, such as dropping or reducing coverage, or shifting entirely to newer plans with high deductibles and cost-sharing that puts much more of the burden on employees. Traditional HMOs or similar plans, with low co-pays, are becoming dinosaurs.

Some companies are slowing or delaying hiring to control health care costs.

“If they’re really looking to reduce their expenses, they’re going into these plans where there’s unfortunately more of an out-of-pocket cost to the employee or consumer,” said Nick Siradas, account manager for small groups at Lawley Insurance.

The new rates are not final yet. Under state law, the insurers’ rate requests are still subject to review by the state, which can approve them, reduce them or reject them. Last year, the state trimmed many rate hike requests across the state, though not so much for Western New York’s three carriers.

Consumers and business owners are writing to regulators to protest what they see as unreasonable hikes, and demand the state block them:

“I know of no one that is receiving these kinds of rate increases in their pay,” wrote one consumer. “I strongly encourage [you] to not consider any rate increase at this time.”

“This is ridiculous and is creating such a hardship not only on me but my employees and my payroll,” another wrote. “New York State cannot allow this … This is unconscionable.”

Meanwhile, carriers, businesses and consumers await the promised benefits of the Obama administration’s Affordable Care Act.  While some provisions have taken effect – such as expanded benefits for dependents until age 26 – they are more likely to drive up health care costs, not lower them, because they expand coverage.

The health insurance exchanges are supposed to help with expenses by bringing an estimated 32 million uninsured Americans into the system, so costs can be spread over a larger base with more competition.

But those provisions don’t kick in until 2014, and the details remain vague. So businesses are guessing about the impact, and many are skeptical the exchanges will yield desired results.

“They’re really not optimistic,” Silverstein said. “They’re in fear of these exchanges.”

“A lot of my clients are taking a wait-and-see attitude,” Siradas said. “Until the exchanges are in place, we won’t know what they’re going to do.”

Ron Alsheimer learned the rates for his company’s BlueCross BlueShield plans could go up 12 percent, after a similar hike this year. The premium for family coverage for Traditional Blue is now $3,700 a month.

Already, that’s crimped any plans for growing his company, Buffalo-based commercial real estate developer Plaza Group, which has 11 employees. Between health and workers compensation insurance, the costs of adding staff are prohibitive. “I wouldn’t consider hiring anybody else now, anybody who would need health insurance. It just isn’t worth it,” he said.

He turned to Buffalo-based HR Benefit Advisors to find a less expensive provider for the half-dozen employees that get coverage. “I’ve had enough. It’s just lunacy,” he said. “I want him to look into something that’s going to put a cap on this nonsense.”

[…]

Absolutely everything this wicked president promised has been a total lie.

We’ve ALL paid for Obama’s “free stuff.”  The median household income under Obama has been so godawful that Obama has actually cost the average family nearly DOUBLE than the “Great Recession” did.  During the recession, which officially lasted from June 2007 to June 2009, household incomes fell by 2.6%.  But since then, under Obama’s “recovery,” household incomes have plummeted 4.8%.

We need a president who will quit making bogus promises and start delivering results.  And history has proven that that president is definitely NOT Barack Obama.

The Terrible Truth Behind Obama’s Super PAC Ad: Over Nine Million People Are Now DEAD Because Of Barack Obama.

August 9, 2012

Over 2,420,000 Americans die every year.  Over Obama’s four years in office, that is more than nine million people who have died.

And by the logic of Obama’s wicked super pac, Barack Obama is worse than Hitler.  Obama is responsible for every single one of those 9 million-and-counting deaths.  Because if Mitt Romney is responsible for Joe Soptic’s wife’s death, then Barack Obama is every damn bit as responsible for those nine million deaths that occurred during his watch.

In fact, Obama will still be responsible for those 2.42 million Americans who die every year for SEVEN YEARS after he’s out of office given that this woman died seven years after Romney left Bain.  Which means that Obama is going to ultimately be responsible for 26 million dead Americans by the logic of his own evil and frankly psychotic ad.

The facts reveal how genuinely despicable and depraved this pro-Obama ad campaign is.

  • Mitt Romney left Bain Capital in February 1999.  Joe Soptic lost his job two years later during a period when the entire steel industry crashed due to Asian dumping.
  • Every single one of the American steel companies that went under were unionized, so it is far more likely that unions were the problem rather than Bain Capital.
  • At the time that Soptic lost his job, his wife had a job of her own that had health benefits.  She in fact continued to have her own insurance until 2003.  And she wasn’t diagnosed with cancer until 2006.
  • Mrs. Soptic died five years AFTER Soptic lost his job and SEVEN years after Romney left Bain.  This article provides an excellent timeline of the events.
  • Joe Soptic is nothing more than a serial liar and a vicious union thug.  And for him to cynically deceitfully use his wife’s death as a dirty political cheap shot is utterly beneath contempt.

Now, to the sheer vileness of Joe Soptic and the sheer lawbreaking dishonest corruption of the Obama campaign:

If Soptic looks familiar that’s because he was one of the narrators of the ads the Obama campaign launched in May. You may remember it as the ad where one of Soptic’s co-workers compares Bain Capital to a “vampire.” The new ad is by Priorities USA, an Obama approved SuperPAC. Priorities USA is prevented by law from coordinating its activity with the Obama campaign, but this ad is clearly meant to look like a continuation of the previous Obama campaign ad. Soptic is even wearing the same grey shirt he wore in the previous ad. And the claim about the death of his wife has been part of an Obama for America slideshow for months.

Here’s the skinny on Fluke:

Sandra Fluke is an abject liar. She is claiming that women are spending $3,000 on birth control: WOMEN CAN BUY GENERIC BIRTH CONTROL AT WAL-MART FOR $9 A MONTH. That’s $324 over three years – kind of a long way from $3,000.

Oh, and I understand she could get birth control at Sam’s for $5.

Oh, and for what it’s worth, she could get condoms for FREE.

Which is to say that $3,000 birth control is just another demonic lie from the demonic left. Liberals like Sandra Fluke and Nancy Pelosi who brought this liar in to falsely testify have no honesty or integrity and they simply lie like the hell they are going to go to to manipulate stupid people.

Further, since Sandra Fluke is trying to force universities – and in particular THE PRIVATE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY THAT SHE CHOSE TO GO TO – to provide birth control, let’s point out the fact that Georgetown law school costs $23,432.50 PER SEMESTER. NOT COUNTING TEXTBOOKS, fwiw. Forty seven thousand dollars a year is no problem for this “slut,” but that $108 she has to spend on birth control for her own private business is just busting her tiny little balls.

Rather than demonize and attack the Catholic Church and her universities, why doesn’t Sandra Fluke go after the REAL crisis facing university students: THE OUT OF CONTROL TUITION INFLATION which is even WORSE at public colleges and universities that are completely dominated by the left???

So you’ve got one of the most vicious, one of the most vile, one of the most pathologically dishonest ads EVER RUN IN POLITICS by the Obama super PAC Priorities USA Action blaming a woman’s death on Mitt Romney, and then IMMEDIATELY you’ve got “women’s health activist” Sandra Fluke – a documented liar – opening a new attack against Romney over “women’s health.”

The dishonesty of Barack Obama is simply mindboggling.  And Obama’s reliance on an activist who made a name for herself lying in congressional testimony along with what he’s doing through his super PAC are just two of thousands of proofs.

Then again, what can you expect from a man who has now murdered more than 9 million people???

The day I head about the toxic, racist, Marxist, anti-American church that Barack Obama attended for over twenty years, I knew that he was a genuinely evil man.  Barack Obama is a liar without shame, without honor, and without any decency at all.

THIS crap is why Mitt Romney should NOT release ANY more of his tax returns.  You’ve got demon-possessed cockroaches displaying over and over again that honesty and reality don’t matter to them.  If Romney gives them more of his records, they will have more to distort and make up lies about.

Update 8/9/12: This anti-Romney ad is so evil, so vile, and so utterly dishonest that even vicious union thug Joe Soptic is now trying to walk it back:

In an interview, Mr. Soptic said he thought the ad was fair. But he also said of Mr. Romney: “I’m not blaming him for her death. I wouldn’t do that.”

You watch that damn demonic ad and you tell me how the whole damn POINT of that ad is not to demonize Mitt Romney for Ilyona Soptic’s death.  Soptic has made demonizing Mitt Romney his career now that there’s a market for it.  Of course, with Obama’s Marxist economic policies, about the ONLY damn time “the market” gets to demand anything is when “the market” is his re-election campaign.

But the facts are out, you damn liberal roaches. And boy are you roaches ever a lousy bunch of roaches.

Now we find out that Joe Soptic actually got a different job after the steel plant closed down and before his wife got sick and had the option of putting her on the plan – but turned it down:

Mr. Soptic said that after he lost his job, he found work as a school custodian about six months later and had the option to put her on his insurance plan. But he opted not to, he said, because he could not afford the more than $350 monthly premium on the $25,000 salary he was making, on top of paying his mortgage and a daughter’s college tuition. Ilyona Soptic was diagnosed with cancer in 2006 and died that year.

Of course, it’s Romney’s fault Joe Soptic refused to cover his family.  His and Bush’s!!!

That ad was so completely evil and so ridiculously false it is unreal.  The Democrat Party is at sewer freaking bottom and there’s no way it will ever come back up until the Party denounces and renounces their worst and most demonic president in history.

Now we know that there are intimate links between the “independent” Obama super PAC that produced this ad and Joe Soptic and the Obama campaign:

Obama camp denies knowledge of cancer tale it told in May
By Olivier Knox, Yahoo! News | The Ticket – Wed, Aug 8, 2012

Oops? President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign washed its hands Wednesday of an independent group’s vicious (and misleading) ad effectively blaming Mitt Romney for the death of a laid-off steelworker’s wife from cancer. Campaign officials flatly denied any knowledge of the facts in the case—but it turns out the widower told the same story on an Obama campaign conference call in mid-May. (The Obama campaign responded late in the day: See update below).

“We have nothing, no involvement, with any ads that are done by Priorities USA. We don’t have any knowledge of the story of the family,” Obama campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters aboard Air Force One on Wednesday.

The ad features Joe Soptic, who lost his job and his health benefits after Romney’s Bain Capital closed the GST Steel plant in Kansas City, Mo., in 2001. Soptic later told CNN that his wife had health insurance through her own employer from that point to 2002 or 2003, when she left that job because of an injury—a detail that undermines the ad’s heartbreaking narrative.

“I don’t know the facts about when Mr. Soptic’s wife got sick, or the facts about his health insurance,” deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter told CNN on Wednesday.

But there’s a problem. As Politico first reported, Soptic told essentially the same story in a May 14, 2012, conference call hosted by the Obama campaign. Here’s what he said then, according to a partial recording of the call passed along by a Republican official:

After we lost our jobs, we found out that we were going to lose our health insurance, and that our pensions hadn’t been funded like Bain promised they would be. I was lucky to find another job as a custodian in a local school district. They gave me some health insurance, but I couldn’t afford to buy it for my wife. A little while later she was diagnosed with lung cancer. I had to put her in a county hospital because she didn’t have health care, and when the cancer took her away, all I got was an enormous bill. That put a lot of stress on me: I thought I’d be paying it off until I died myself. That probably wouldn’t have happened if Bain kept its promise and I was allowed to keep our health insurance.

“It’s upsetting what Mitt Romney and his partners did to us,” he added.

The revelation drew an immediate rebuke from Romney campaign spokesman Ryan Williams, who said Obama and his campaign “are willing to say and do anything to hide the president’s disappointing record.”

“But they’re not entitled to repeatedly mislead voters,” he said.

You need to understand that the same deputy Obama campaign manager Stephanie Cutter who said, “I don’t know the facts about when Mr. Soptic’s wife got sick, or the facts about his health insurance” is the SAME deputy Obama campaign manager Stephanie Cutter who was WITH Joe Soptic only a month ago when he told her and a bunch of other Democrats all about when Mr. Soptic’s wife got sick and the “facts” about his health insurance.

You also need to understand that the Obama campaign did NOT “wash its hands” of this ad.  Rather, reporters repeatedly tried to get the Obama campaign to denounce it and Team Obama pointedly refused to do so every single time (see here and here).  They COULD have washed their hands of it and denounced the ad, but pointedly refused to do so.

In fact, it is now a documented FACT that the Obama campaign used the Joe Soptic “Mitt Romney murdered my wife!” charge before his Super PAC did. Here is a screenshot from an OBAMA ad:

So Obama would be washing his own toxic shit off their hands if he ever bothered to wash his hands.

The Obama campaign is now caught red-handed in a documented, vicious lie.

And this follows Harry Reid – the leader of the United States Senate – using openly Orwellian fascist tactics to say that in Reid’s and in Obama’s and in the Democrat Party’s America, the left can make vicious, unsupported allegations and it then becomes incumbant upon the target of the slander to prove that the attack is not true.  And the Obama White House endorses that tactic.  And every single Democrat who votes for his or her party is on record supporting said open, Orwellian fascism.  THAT is what the Democrat Party now stands for.

Update, 8/10/12: Here’s a good summary of the lies and critical omissions that are involved on this Obama ad:

The lies in the video are unbelievable! (Soptic Cancer Video)

Lie Number One: Mitt Romney closed the Plant.

Truth: Bain Capital closed the plant two whole years AFTER Romney left Bain Capital.

Lie Number Two: Mrs. Soptic died because she lost her insurance when Mr. Soptic lost his job.

Truth: Mrs. Soptic had a job and had health insurance of her own at the time GST Steel was closed by Bain Capital.

Lie Number 3: Mr Soptic said he couldn’t get insurance at his replacement job.

Truth: He was offered insurance for his wife at his new job (she had lost her job and lost her insurance) but he instead chose to pay for his daughter’s college tuition.

Lie Number 4: The video sequence makes it seem like Mrs. Soptic died soon after Bain Capital closed GST Steel.

Truth: She died 22 days After she found out she had Cancer BUT GST steel closed 6 YEARS EARLIER!

Lie Number 5: In the video Mr. Soptic makes it seem like Bain Capital just closed the plant and let everyone go.

Truth: Bain Capital offered to buy out their jobs prior to the plant closing by Mr. Soptic’s own admission yet its not mentioned in the video.

.

One Journalist Boycotts Mainstream Media That Celebrates Comic Who Attacks Conservative Women FAR Worse Than Rush Limbaugh Ever Did

March 9, 2012

So there’s at least one journalist who got invited to the 68th annual Radio and Television Congressional Correspondents’ Dinner who wasn’t an abject hypocrite.

Greta Van Sustern is probably literally the ONLY one who has any integrity whatsoever, however:

Free Republic Gets Results! Fox’s Greta to Boycott Media Dinner Over Palin Sex Slurs Comic
Thursday, March 8, 2012 | Kristinn

Fox News host Greta Van Susteren announced this eveningthat she will be boycotting the 68th annual Radio and Television Congressional Correspondents’ Dinner over the selection of a comic to headline the dinner who has repeatedly attacked Sarah Palin using vile sexual terms.

Another pig….and a media association has hired the pig, Louis C.K., to be their headliner for the big media dinner? Really? I am not going. I refuse to go. Everyone in the media should join me in this boycott.

The headliner of this year’s Radio and Television Correspondents Dinner is “comedian” Louis C.K. Comedian? I don’t think so. Pig? yes.

He uses filthy language about women…..yes, the C word…and yes, even to describe a woman candidate for Vice President of the United States. It isn’t just Governor Palin he denigrates. He denigrates all women and looks to the crowd to laugh.

I refuse to show any support for this guy or for the Radio and Television Correspondents Association Dinner Committee who hired him. I think the organization that hired him is just as bad as he is. It is no secret that he denigrates women.

SNIP

Free Republic brought to prominence the matter of Louis CK hosting the dinner by keeping an original article on the dinnerpublished in Breaking News. The article was picked on Twitter and by several bloggers.

The article picked up on news about the dinner reported by Brent Bozell at Newsbusters. Bozell had mentioned the dinner earlier that day but had buried it in a column about the Rush Limbaugh-Sandra Fluke controversy.

Van Susteren is showing more courage than one would expect, as the 2012 chairman of the RTCA is a Fox D.C. colleague, John L. Wallace III.

To read edited for profanity versions of Louis CK’s vile attacks on Palin, click the link to the GretaWire or the original article linked herein.

Or you can listen to an unedited YouTube recording.

It is astonishing: Sandra Fluke – who was too poor to afford birth control – has been jetting all over the country to be adoringly interviwed as a “victim of Rush Limbaugh’s bigotry” by the very same people who will be going to an event featuring a man who said garbage that was a THOUSAND TIMES WORSE about Sarah Palin than ANYTHING Rush Limbaugh ever said.

Barack Obama personally called Sandra Fluke – because the Armageddon that will occur when Iran gets the bomb is clearly not worth bothering with – after Rush Limbaugh mocked her as a “slut” because she demands that other people have to pay for her to have sex.  But he is all to happy to support the million dollar donation of Bill Maher, who similarly called Sarah Palin a “cunt” and a “dumb twat.”

Instead of calling it the “Radio and Television Congressional Correspondents’ Dinner” let’s just call it what it is: “the Joseph Goebbels Media Meal.”

Liberals are the most dishonest hypocrites on the planet today.

Sarah Palin To Barack Obama: If Rush Limbaugh Was Offensive, Then WHY Are You Taking Money And Help From Bill Maher???

March 6, 2012

Reposted from Free Republic and Buzzfeed:

Sarah Palin To Obama: If Rush Was Offensive, Why Are You Taking Money From Bill Maher
buzzfeed.com | March 6 2012
Posted on Tuesday, March 06, 2012 1:18:08 PM by NoLibZone

Sarah Palin calls on Obama to ask his Super PAC to return $1 million donation from Bill Maher. Maher used the C-word for Palin.

The Democrat Party LIKES this scumbag who calls women cunts and dumb twats:

Read up on liberal media personalities and what they have said about women.  And then demand that Barack Obama call Sarah Palin and apologize to her the way he did with the incredibly dishonest Sandra Fluke.

Barack Obama is a hypocrite weasel without a scintilla of shame or honor.  He invoked his daughters to demonize Rush LimbaughHey, Obama: SARAH PALIN is someone’s daughter, and SHE has daughters too!

Oh, which reminds me about the Obama supporter (David Letterman) saying that Sarah Palin’s 14 year-old daughter was a trampy little slut getting knocked up by A-Rod the baseball playerALL THAT CRAP IS FINE WITH YOU, OBAMA.

Obama Slams Rush Limbaugh For Calling Sandra Fluke A ‘Slut.’ It’s Strange That He Forgot To Denounce David Letterman For Calling Sarah Palin A ‘Slut.’

March 2, 2012

My first comment by way of referencing the below story is that Rush Limbaugh did NOT call Sandra Fluke a “slut” for “her views on contraception.”  He called her a slut because, according to her own testimony, she and all the women she was speaking for were having sex three times a day every single day, according to her “$3,000” example.  And whether you like it or not, if Sandra Fluke was getting mounted three times a day every single day by myriad boys, she most definitely qualifies for the technical descriptive term “slut.”

Another article correctly reports the Sandra Fluke testimony as, “Sex-crazed co-eds going broke buying birth control.”  That is simply factually accurate reporting of Sandra Fluke’s testimony.

Limbaugh also points out that if Sandra Fluke wants us to pay her for having all of this sex, she fully qualifies for the label “prostitute” as well.  And, probably crassly, he says that if America is supposed to pay for Sandra Fluke to have sex three times a day every single day, the least she could do is set up a video camera in her dorm room so we can watch as a return on our investment.

You can argue that Rush Limbaugh was actually respecting Sandra Fluke.  Based on her testimony and the numbers she provided, she is either an abject slut or a pathological liar.  And he assumed that she wasn’t a pathological liar.

Well, anyway, Barack Obama, the community-agitator-in-chief, decided to invoke the full weight of the presidency of the United States in this crisis.  Because if he’s spending his time on this issue, he can keep procrastinating dealing with the only slightly less important crisis of Iran on the verge of nuclear weapons and the whole Armageddon thing:

Rush Limbaugh condemned by Barack Obama for ‘slut’ remarks
Georgetown student Sandra Fluke was called a ‘slut’ and a ‘prostitute’ by Limbaugh because of her views on contraception
Ryan Devereaux
guardian.co.uk, Friday 2 March 2012 15.46 EST

President Barack Obama has offered his support to a US law student called a “slut” on Wednesday by rightwing talkshow host Rush Limbaugh because of her views on contraception.

According to White House spokesman Jay Carney, the president called Georgetown University student Sandra Fluke on Friday and expressed his disappointment that she was the target of Limbaugh’s personal attacks. Obama reportedly thanked Fluke for supporting his administration’s policy of requiring health insurance coverage of contraceptives for women.

The call came moments before Fluke was set to appear on the TV news network MSNBC. Speaking to host Andrea Mitchell about the president’s call, Fluke said: “What was really personal for me was [that] he said to tell my parents that they should be proud.”

Limbaugh called Fluke a “slut” and a “prostitute” on Wednesday after she expressed her support for the administration’s policy in an informal testimony on Capitol Hill.

Then, on Thursday, on his nationally syndicated radio show, he added: “So, Miss Fluke, if we are going to … pay for you to have sex, we want something for it. We want you to post the videos online so we can all watch.”

Limbaugh’s outburst has already prompted some advertisers to pull their support for his controversial show. Following heavy pressure from the Democrats, House speaker John Boehner described Limbaugh’s comments as “inappropriate”. Boehner argued, however, that the Democrats were using the incident as an opportunity to raise money.

On Friday, Boehner’s spokesman, Michael Steel, echoed the concerns, saying: “The speaker obviously believes the use of those words was inappropriate, as is trying to raise money off the situation.”

At last month’s hearing, Fluke pointed out that her fellow Georgetown students pay as much as $1,000 a year for contraceptives that are not covered by student health plans.

On his show on Wednesday, Limbaugh equated the payment to prostitution.

“What does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute,” he said.

“She wants to be paid to have sex … She’s having so much sex she can’t afford contraception,” Limbaugh added.

Georgetown – itself a Jesuit school – has, along with a number of other Catholic institutions, denounced the Obama administration’s contraception policy as an infringement on their religious rights.

Rather than apologize, Limbaugh has stood by his inflammatory rhetoric. On his Thursday show, he referred to a controversial joke made by Rick Santorum’s wealthy backer, Foster Friess, suggesting women should hold aspirin tablets between their knees in order to remain abstinent.

“I will buy all of the women at Georgetown University as much aspirin to put between their knees as they want,” Limbaugh said.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is gathering signatures for an online petition calling on Republican leaders to “denounce Rush Limbaugh’s cruel tirade against women”.

Fluke responded to Limbaugh in a written statement, saying: “No woman deserves to be disrespected in this manner. This language is an attack on all women, and has been used throughout history to silence our voices.”

Obama’s choices about who he calls and who he doesn’t is actually rather fascinating: he never bothered to pick up the phone and call the parents of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry who was murdered as a result of Obama’s Fast And Furious gun scandal, for instance.

If that isn’t outrageous enough, allow me to also point out that the same Obama who is outraged by Rush Limbaugh’s calling Sandra Fluke a “slut” just accepted $1 million from Bill Maher AFTER Maher called Sarah Palin a “cunt.”

Barack Obama’s outrage is purely hypocritical and purely ideological. That is simply a documented fact.

Well, something seems to be worth remembering about all of these self-righteous liberals as we contemplate the horror of Rush Limbaugh calling a woman who spends $1,000 a year on her out-of-control sexual addiction; it wasn’t all that terribly long ago that David Letterman called Sarah Palin a slut.  And somehow that outraged telephone call from Barack Obama never came:

David Letterman Calls Sarah Palin A Slut
Jan 10, 2009
Posted by Tory Aardvark

The Liberal media purveyors of Political Correctness and moral judges of what is it acceptable to say, and what is not acceptable say. This normally translates in to say anything you want about a right wing person, but, and this is a very big but, say anything against a Liberal Left person and you are immediately guilty of a range adjectives ending in “ist”.

As with any left wing agenda, be it AGW, Political Correctness, immigration et al, there is always rank and blatant hypocrisy from those that seek to convince us they know better.

The left has long championed the cause of women to be treated as equals and not pieces of meat, yet the very first to indulge in sexually demeaning and degrading slurs on female politicians are the very same left, that claim to champion their cause.

David Letterman sinks to a new low, even for an East Coast liberal broadcaster when he suggests that “Sarah Palin should update her slutty air stewardess look

And the point of making such a remark politically, or for any other reason is?

In Aardvarks experience “slut” is a term used by the micro dicked to deal with rejection #justsaying

I hope Sarah Palin isn’t waiting by the phone for the president to call, thinking it’s the least he could do to NOT show what a hypocrite ideologue divider he is.  Because Obama is very much all of those things, and there won’t be a call coming.

Oh, and by the way, Sarah Palin’s FOURTEEN YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER might be hanging around by the phone waiting for that Obama phone call, too: David Letterman accused her of slutting around and getting knocked up by baseball player A-Rod.

I don’t know.  It is still theoretically possible that the left will have a self-righteous outraged hissy fit about something they didn’t already do first to a conservative.  Highly unlikely, I know.  But you have to admit it is theoretically possible by the sheer statistical probabilities involving random chance that it could happen.

Sandra Fluke is an abject liar.  She is claiming that women are spending $3,000 on birth control: WOMEN CAN BUY GENERIC BIRTH CONTROL AT WAL-MART FOR $9 A MONTH.  That’s $324 over three years – kind of a long way from $3,000.

Oh, and I understand she could get birth control at Sam’s for $5.

Oh, and for what it’s worth, she could get condoms for FREE.

Which is to say that $3,000 birth control is just another demonic lie from the demonic left.  Liberals like Sandra Fluke and Nancy Pelosi who brought this liar in to falsely testify have no honesty or integrity and they simply lie like the hell they are going to to manipulate stupid people.

Further, since Sandra Fluke is trying to force universities – and in particular THE PRIVATE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY THAT SHE CHOSE TO GO TO – to provide birth control, let’s point out the fact that Georgetown law school costs $23,432.50 PER SEMESTERNOT COUNTING TEXTBOOKS, fwiw.  Forty seven thousand dollars a year is no problem for this “slut,” but that $108 she has to spend on birth control for her own private business is just busting her tiny little balls.

Rather than demonize and attack the Catholic Church and her universities, why doesn’t Sandra Fluke go after the REAL crisis facing university students: THE OUT OF CONTROL TUITION INFLATION which is even WORSE at public colleges and universities that are completely dominated by the left???

Bottom line: if Sandra Fluke wants to slut around and live in a universe of outright lies, the very least she can do is go to one of the many leftist public colleges that love that garbage.

What’s most fascinating is how often liberals lie out of every orifice in their bodies and conservatives still end up being the ones who have to apologize.

Updated March 4, 2012

Kirsten Powers wrote a piece from the liberal side denouncing the left for its abject hypocrisy available here.

There’s also these facts about Sandra Fluke and her “testimony”:

Fluke, who was portrayed as a 23 year-old co-ed, is actually 30 years old and by her own admission chose to attend Georgetown precisely so she could battle their insurance policy since it does not cover contraceptives. What a handy witness she turned out to be last week on behalf of Obama’s contraception mandate. So important was she to Obama’s theater show that he personally called her to apologize for things Rush Limbaugh said on his program concerning her testimony.

Fluke testified that she and her classmates have to spend $3,000 during their time at Georgetown on contraception, and it’s simply an unbearable financial burden for them. If they paid top-dollar for birth control pills, that would be about $600 a year; $1,800 for three years. A box of condoms ranges from about $4.00 to $15.00. That’s maybe another $100 a year, but still nowhere close to $3,000.

Updated March 5. 2012