Of the sons of Issachar, men who understood the times, with knowledge of what Israel should do, their chiefs were two hundred; and all their kinsmen were at their command — 1 Chronicles 12:32
At the 1:48 mark the black liberal repeatedly says to the children, “You’re going to burn in hell for this. You’re going to burn in hell.”
This apparently took place at an event set up by a Republican Senate candidate in New York who was outraged over a school’s banning the singing of “God Bless the USA” by children.
Nothing makes a Democrat’s skin crawl like children singing about God when they should be shouting chants about corporations killing the earth or celebrating homosexuality.
These children should be singing about Obama. HE’S the “messiah.” Why don’t these children realize that Obama has replaced God? Like these kids:
That little girl “gets it.” She’s got an altar set up right next to her and she’s singing her songs of praise and adoration in worship.
In both cases above – and in many, many other documented cases – children were indoctrinated to worship their messiah Obama BY NAME.
What were those kids singing at the event that makes the liberals come so completely unglued? Were they singing songs adoring a man? Nope. Just God. Just asking God – you know, GOD, not the deceitful weasel otherwise known as Obama – to bless their country.
To be a liberal is to be guilty of such stunning abject personal hypocrisy it is utterly beyond belief.
To be a liberal is to go so far over the top it is utterly unreal and then amazingly demonize conservatives for taking even the tiniest steps in the direction they themselves had already gone MILES.
This is why I long since concluded that you can’t “be reasonable” with Democrats; you simply have to defeat them. Because they are pathologically incapable of not being stark raving HYPOCRITES. And there is no possible way to have any kind of a reasonable discussion with fundamentally dishonest people.
9/11 should be a time for every American to ponder the events of that fateful and horrific day in 2001.
We had just suffered more casualties from a foreign enemy in an act of war than had ever been sustained by America on its own soil in its entire history – including the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812, and the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Most Americans were angry and demanded action. Fully 90% supported George Bush as he laid out his plans to respond to the attack. And that support was still above 70% when President Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq in March, 2003. We passed the Patriot Act with wide margins in both branches of Congress in October of 2001. Only ONE Senator – Russ Feingold – voted against it.
And then, slowly at first, and then precipitously, Americans began to turn against the president they had supported, against the wars they had supported, and against the Patriot Act they had supported.
You can see in collections of quotes from Democrats regarding Iraq and the underlying justifications of the war how Democrats were “for that war before they were against it” as declining American support made undermining the war effort itself more and more politically advantageous.
Today, as we pause to reflect over 9/11, we no longer have a “war on terror.” Now we have an “overseas contingency operation.” We no longer want our Central Intelligence Agency to aggressively pursue terrorists and seek out any and all information to help us prevent the next attack. Now we want to criminalize those operatives who tried to keep us safe as a warning to any future CIA personnel who might be so foolish as to violate liberal morays. Better to lose a city or two than to waterboard a terrorist.
As I reflect on the hours of that terrible day of 9/11, I remember Palestinians cheering and dancing in the streets and holding up ‘V for Victory’ gestures. I remember people leaping to their deaths from the top floors of the skyscrapers rather than endure the heat that would have murdered them even more agonizingly. I remember Democrats and Republicans arm-in-arm singing “God Bless America” on the steps of the Capitol Building – at least until Democrats determined to undermine virtually everything they had previously supported.
On the anniversary of 9/11, I just wonder what will happen if we are attacked again. How will we respond? What will we want? How will we demand our president act?
I hope that Americans soberly reflect how they would respond to the next massive terrorist attack today. Because virtually every expert agrees that another such attack is surely coming. And rather than swing wildly and frankly psychotically between extremes, perhaps we might come to a considered and committed path based on the real will of the American people.
Ask yourself this: if we are attacked again, would you want a President Bush, or would you want a President Obama? Would you want to handled the next massive attack in which thousands, or tens of thousands (or even more) Americans die to be handled as an act of war, or as a law enforcement investigation? Would you prefer to go to war against any nation that threatens us, or would you prefer to talk and negotiate instead? Would you prefer a president who fights our enemies, or a president who voted against fighting and who in fact voted for undermining the war effort in order to stop it?
Just what is it you want your commander in chief to do in response to a massive terrorist attack? What is it you expect your commander in chief to do in order to prevent such an attack from ever happening in the first place?
Let us realize that the next “Iraq” is rushing toward us in the form of a nuclear-weaponized Iran. Is such a country a threat? Should we allow them to develop their weapons of mass destruction, or should we use all means – including military power – to stop them? The media first reports that Iran’s nuclear weapons program has been dramatically slowed down, then reports that they can literally make a bomb whenever they want within the space of a couple of weeks’ time. One thing seems quite sure: Iran is inexorably working toward nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them. What do we want our president to do about it? Everything? Nothing?
To the extent that the American people are even capable of genuine self-reflection and wise contemplation of the future, I hope we take this opportunity to do so today.
I also hope that every single American – regardless of political party – takes a moment to thank God for our troops and pray for their safety and for their victory.
It’s not like this story is news. But it sure is a punctuation on an old story.
Barack Obama and Freddy Krueger really like going after kids.
We can call the movie, “A Nightmare on EVERY Street.” [Image credit to Resistnet].
“Don’t forget your homework, children. Write an essay titled, ‘How to help President Obama.’ And as you know, I will severely dock your grade if it isn’t sufficiently worshipful. After you turn in your papers, we’ll have an indoctrination – I, er, mean a discussion – of how you will help Dear Leader Obama triumph over the evilmonger Republicans so he can establish a glorious One Thousand Year Reich.”
Bush had his “No Children Left Behind.” Under Obama, it’s “No Child Left Alone.”
If Obama just wanted to do a brief public service announcement and call upon kids to stay in school and study harder, nobody would have a problem with it. But that isn’t what Obama had in mind at all.
President Obama’s plan to inspire the nation’s schoolchildren with a video address next week erupted into controversy Wednesday, forcing the White House to pull out its eraser and rewrite a government recommendation that teachers nationwide assign students a paper on how to “help the president.”
Presidential aides acknowledged the White House helped the U.S. Education Department craft the proposal, which immediately was met by fierce criticism from Republicans and conservative organizations who accused Mr. Obama of trying to politicize the education system.
White House aides said the language was an honest misunderstanding in what was supposed to be a inspirational, pro-education message to America’s youths.
Among the activities the government initially suggested for prekindergarten to sixth-grade students: that they ” write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president.”
Another task recommended for students immediately after listening to the speech: to engage in a discussion about what “the president wants us to do.”
This was about getting kids to ask “how can I help Obama?” As Obama tanks with grownups, Obama is switching to the people who literally were born yesterday to sell himself and his message. This is about getting our children to join Obama’s personality cult and push his agenda to their parents.
We’re assured that this was all just an honest mistake, and it is only the most bizarre of coincidences that it basically comes right out of Hitler’s Little Brown Book for Brownshirts.
The fact that no Republican president has ever even come close to anything even remotely resembling such a fascist “misunderstanding” isn’t worth mentioning. And the fact that Democrat parents would have RIGHTLY come completely unglued if George W. Bush had ever done anything like this is completely beside the point, as well.
It’s not that Barack Obama doesn’t realize that this is intrinsically fascist behavior; it’s frankly just that he doesn’t give a damn.
Remember your liberal mantra:
Just like it wasn’t fascism for public school teachers to so indoctrinate kids that they found themselves doodling like hate notes like this when Bush was president:
That note was found and its image posted by a liberal walking his dog outside of a middle school in Raleigh, North Carolina (the link to the liberal’s blog is available here, and was still active as of today). He thought it was great. He said, “I know – EVERYONE hates that a*****e Bush – but I haven’t seen it expressed quite so well by a kid before!”
And silly conservative parents worry that unionized government teachers might indoctrinate their kids.
For those who actually buy the “honest misunderstanding” line that Team Obama Forever offered, let’s take a trip down memory lane.
Adolf Hitler is our Saviour, our hero
He is the noblest being in the whole wide world.
For Hitler we live, for Hitler we die.
Our Hitler is our Lord who rules a brave new world.
And ah, what the heck. Chairman Mao deserves honorable mention, too:
I’ve purged and murdered millions of their parents, but what can I say? The kids still love me!
And you’ve really just got to have a video these days, you know: Go, you little Brownshirts, march and chant in cadence to your Dear Leader:
And of course, a Merry Heil, Obama! to you, too!
You remember that terrible little kid whose warmonger soldier father abused him into supporting John McCain? Thank Government (because we know who our god really is, don’t we?) that a devoted public school teacher was around to indoctrinate – I mean, to um, teach – that little monster and turn him into a productive future member of our new utopia:
So don’t worry, parents. Your public school teachers won’t take advantage of the Obamathon at your children’s school. They will teach your kids to love and fear Dear Leader Obama, just like they’re supposed to.
Our Government teachers are loyally teaching children to pledge allegiance to their Dear Leader:
A school principal has apologized for showing a video at an assembly that a politically conservative group leader is calling “radical, leftist propaganda.”
Children at Eagle Bay Elementary School in Farmington were shown a short video called “I pledge” on Aug. 28. The video opens with an image of President Barack Obama and part of a speech in which he says, “Let us summon a new spirit of patriotism, of responsibility where each of us resolves to pitch in and work harder and look after not only ourselves but each other.” The video then features celebrities making pledges about how they will help the president and the world — and that’s where some say the problem lies…
… Gayle Ruzicka, president of conservative Utah Eagle Forum, said the video was blatantly political. She said other offensive pledges included, “I pledge to be of service to Barack Obama” [at 3:17 into the video], “I pledge allegiance to the funk, to the united funk of funkadelica,” and pledges to not use plastic grocery bags and not flush the toilet after urinating.
“It’s very inappropriate to show a radical, leftist propaganda piece that political to children,” Ruzicka said. “If parents want their children to learn about those things and do them in the home, wonderful, fine, but it’s not the place of the school to show a one-sided propaganda piece to children without parents knowing about it.”
Cieslewicz said such values should be decided in the home, not at school.
Well, of COURSE public school teachers should be indoctrinating children into a radical leftist political agenda. It’s the logical extension of using Darwinism to teach them there’s no God. The little darlings need a replacement.
The video features graphics of Obama, and a short stint from a speech. And then it shows dozens of well-known celebrities who were so profoundly inspired by Dear Leader that they vowed to change the world in wonderful and environmentally-friendly ways – and of course to serve Barack Obama. Obama wants us all to pledge – and then all the beautiful and famous people start pledging. Joseph Goebbels couldn’t have polished it better.
Never mind the poop storm that would necessarily follow had George Bush powerfully called people to action and called upon them to pledge to help him enact his agenda – and then celebrities and culture leaders lined up to pledge to fulfill the Bush vision.
Many of the celebrities – inspired by Barack Obama – “pledge” to view and use energy the way that Obama would want them to. What is not stated is how central energy is to Obama’s vision to fundamentally transform America into a different society. And global warming is central to his goal to redistribute wealth. If you don’t believe me, believe Obama’s environmental czar (and admitted communist) Van Johnson.
So say your pledge of allegiance, kids and young adults:
I will get things done for America –
to make our people safer,
smarter, and healthier.
I will bring Americans together
to strengthen our communities.
Faced with apathy,
I will take action.
Faced with conflict,
I will seek common ground.
Faced with adversity,
I will persevere.
I will carry this commitment
with me this year and beyond.
I am an AmeriCorps member,
and I will get things done.
And just use your “2 and 2 make 5” logic your public school teacher taught you so you won’t think about how incredibly Marxist all of this sounds.
Remember how wonderful it was for you kids at the Kids’ Inaugural.
Of COURSE Obama isn’t trying to indoctrinate kids. That is just so silly.
I keep thinking, “It can’t get any creepier” – and then it just keeps getting creepier.
Let me center myself:
“We’re gonna spread happiness! We’re gonna spread freeeeedom! Obama’s gonna change it, Obama’s gonna lead ‘em…” – so help me Marx.
Okay. I’m all better now…
The Obama speech to the children will very likely sound innocent and innocuous. But in the liberal public schools – which are and have been laboratories for leftist activism, it won’t be innocent or innocuous at all. Unionized Government Teachers will be free to spin their own agendas onto Obama’s speech.
This isn’t happening now because Obama is worried that your six-year-old is going to decide to drop out of school.
The timing of this event isn’t happening by accident. Don’t be naive. Barack Obama’s healthcare agenda is under attack, and frankly in danger of becoming a major disaster for him. The fact that Obama has already been busted for using a plant in the form of a cute 11-year old girl named Julia Hall (whose mother – Kathleen Manning – was a top state-level Obama campaign member) comes into play. His administration has used children to advance his agenda before, and they will do so again.
If your kid comes home from school after ObamaDay and starts bugging you about health care, you’ll know why: it will be because Barack Obama despicably degenerated into trying to turn your child into his propagandist.
joining the ranks of the V. I. Lenin All-Union Pioneer Organization,
in the presence of my comrades solemnly promise:
to love and cherish my Motherland passionately,
to live as the great Lenin bade us,
as the Communist Party teaches us,
as require the laws of the Young Pioneers of the Soviet Union.
And let’s not forget the rules. Rules are important, you know:
Young Pioneer is a young communism builder, labours for the welfare of the Motherland, prepares to become its defender.
Young Pioneer is an active fighter for peace, a friend to Young Pioneers and workers’ children of all countries.
Young Pioneer follows communists’ example, prepares to become a Komsomol member, leads Little Octobrists.
Young Pioneer upholds the honour of the organization, strengthens its authority by deeds and actions.
Young Pioneer is a reliable comrade, respects elder, looks after younger people, always acts according to conscience.
Young Pioneer has a right to elect and be elected to Young Pioneer self-government institutions, to discuss the functioning of the Young Pioneer organization on Young Pioneer gatherings, meetings, gatherings of Soviets of Young Pioneer detachments and Young Pioneer groups, in the press; to criticize shortcomings; to submit a proposal to any Soviet of the Young Pioneer organization, including the Central Soviet of the V. I. Lenin All-Union Pioneer Organization; to ask for a recommendation of the Soviet of Young Pioneer group to join VLKSM.
Yes. We need more of THAT kind of thing. That’s why we so desperately need the Obama Youth now. I had this brilliant idea of militarizing the Obama Youth into little fascist Brownshirts. But – as the the following video demonstrates – someone beat me to it. Those nice boys sure do adore their fuhrer, don’t they?
Adolf Hitler is our Saviour, our hero
He is the noblest being in the whole wide world.
For Hitler we live, for Hitler we die.
Our Hitler is our Lord who rules a brave new world.
I have never heard children singing the praises of Reagan, or either Bush. But there were freakish children crawling out of the woodwork to sing about their messiah Obama. This bizarre devotion to a politician is as mystifying as it is terrifying to a student of history.
I remember this political re-education camp for kindergartners:
“You are the instruments that God is gonna use to bring about universal change, and that is why Barack has captured the youth. And he has involved young people in a political process that they didn’t care anything about. That’s a sign. When the Messiah speaks, the youth will hear, and the Messiah is absolutely speaking.”
It means that this is a whole new world. I think…I’ve been saying this before. You can divide history. BB Before Barack. AB After Barack.
I don’t know about you, but that’s how I date things now. It’s the year One AB. It helps me better understand why the Mayans predicted the cataclysmic apocalypse on December 21, 2012 (according to that old “pre-BB/AB” calender). Unfortunately, Spike Lee’s Before Barack-After Barack calender only has four years in it before liberals completely ruin the world. It’ll be just like the Ghostbusters said: “Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling! Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes! The dead rising from the grave! Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together… mass hysteria!”
Okay, maybe it will just be no jobs, no economy, government control over all health care and all use of energy, and a bunch of weird fanatic kids running around taking over the world for Dear Leader Obama.
But the bill’s opponents — and there are only a few in Congress — say it could cram ideology down the throats of young “volunteers,” many of whom could be forced into service since the bill creates a “Congressional Commission on Civic Service.”
NO! Cram ideology down the throats of young “volunteers”? PREPOSTEROUS!Never gonna happen. Okay, maybe it will happen just a little bit…
Americorps has a recruitment ad (which your dollars paid for) that is pure propaganda, associating themselves with people and events that have nothing whatsoever to do with them as they attempt to leech more and more government funding.
Now, all that sounds well and good. But just consider that the communist Young Pioneers depicted themselves as loving and cherishing the Motherland passionately; being a builder and labouring for the welfare of the Motherland; being an active fighter for peace; being a friend to workers’ children of all countries; upholding the honor of the organization, and strengthening its authority by deeds and actions; being a reliable comrade; respecting elders, looking after younger people, and always acting according to conscience. It all just sounds so good; can I sign up and be a communist Young Pioneer or join Americorps too?
Now, Glenn Beck came out with a theory which would sound preposterous unless you watched some of the videos above and realize a few key facts:
2) Americorps is competing for the same people in the same age group. “Volunteers” are actually paid to perform activities which are in fact political.
3) MICHELLE OBAMA on 2/18/2008 is on the record preaching, “Barack Obama will require you to work. Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed.”
Glenn Beck says,
They are steering our youth into community service. Ted Kennedy and his ilk are even pushing the idea of forced service. They’re incentivizing working for the government with promises of paying off college loans. The catch, of course, is you have to federalize your loan before they’ll pay it. He wants you to be a bureaucrat slave to government.
It’s hard to believe that a President of the United States would deliberately torpedo minimum wage jobs to force young people out of the private workplace and into one of his government “volunteer” service organizations. But it was awfully hard for me to believe a lot of things I’ve seen this president do.
Obama has incredibly radical theoretical constructs:
“But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as people tried to characterize the Warren court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can’t do to you, it says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf.
Even the Warren Court wasn’t radical enough for what Obama wanted to do. He wanted to radically take the country further away from the founding fathers.
But to implement such “transformation” requires an army of leftist foot soldiers (preferably foot soldiers who are paid by federal funding, such as ACORN and AmeriCorps). You need to have mobs to protest every “lack of government social resources”, to challenge the status quo at every turn, to push for the liberal social agenda. You need those foot soldiers implanted in neighborhoods and cities across the country who are at the call of Team Obama – whether it’s answering the call to shake down banks, or form a housing entitlement mob, or foster voter fraud, or create statistical shenanigans with the census. You need community organizers and the bitter mobs they organize.
“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
Michelle Malkin has just written Culture of Corruption to explore “ObamaCorps” and how this army is being created.
There is another, even more sinister cospiracy. Because all of this reminds me of the Cloward-Piven strategy:
In their 1966 article, Cloward and Piven charged that the ruling classes used welfare to weaken the poor; that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Poor people can advance only when “the rest of society is afraid of them,” Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970. Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would “the rest of society” accept their demands.
The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven’s early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. “Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” Alinsky wrote in his 1972 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judaeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist “rule book” with a socialist one.
I genuinely believe that Barack Obama – a follower of Saul Alinsky as well as the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate when he belonged to it to go along with a long and deep relationship with leftist radicals – is pursuing a “heads we win, tails you lose” strategy. If the economy somehow picks up under all of this massive spending and even more massive debt, then Democrats win big and Republicans lose. If – much more likely – the economy crashes under its own massive weight due to hyperinflation as interest payments on the debt soar, then a starving, terrified people will scream for help from their government. And Democrats will win the pure-socialist totalitarian state they have always envisioned. Either way, Obama liberals believe they will win big.
When Bill Clinton was president, I disagreed with many of his policies. But I have no memory of being literally creeped out by any bizarre cult-like followings. And I certainly didn’t constantly have to suffer legitimate fears that he was trying to fundamentally transform the very essence of America.
People who trust the Bible have known he was coming: the false Messiah, the Antichrist (1 John 2:18), the Beast of Revelation (Rev 13:1) and the little horn of Daniel (Dan 7:8). And now we can know that he is coming soon, if he is not already among us even now.
But Louis Farrakhan nailed it on the head: Barack Hussein Obama is The Messiah:
“You are the instruments that God is gonna use to bring about universal change, and that is why Barack has captured the youth. And he has involved young people in a political process that they didn’t care anything about. That’s a sign. When the Messiah speaks, the youth will hear, and the Messiah is absolutely speaking.”
We can add that to the glossy-eyed little brainwashed children singing praised to Obama. One little girl – in a big-liberal-money-assisted “community event” sang, “We’re gonna spread happiness! We’re gonna spread freeeeedom! Obama’s gonna change it, Obama’s gonna lead ‘em…”
John McCain hasn’t appeared in Reuters or the AP bearing a beatific halo. Children haven’t sung praises to him. He hasn’t been described as a messiah. And he certainly hasn’t been proclaimed to be “the Messiah” by Louis Farrakhan.
The REAL Messiah won’t come until after the false one has appeared to deceive the world (Revelation 13:1 cf. 19:11). And boy is the world ripe for the false one! In the age of the internet and the explosion of information, we are seeing propaganda in amounts that boggle the mind from the mainstream media.
Antichrist won’t come during a time when everything is going well; he’ll come during a time of global crisis; he’ll appear to “solve all our problems” even as he sets up the world for persecution, disaster, and holocaust like the world has never seen.
Is Barack Obama the Antichrist? There sure are a lot of signs that he is in the media! But I believe that he is just one of the false messiahs (Matthew 24:24). Rather than being THE Antichrist, I believe that Obama is just one of the false messiahs who will so completely screw up the United States and the world that Antichrist will be able to emerge to “save the day.”
The United States isn’t mentioned in Bible prophecy. Now we begin to see why: we wont’ matter because our economy will be in ruins. And we certainly won’t be the kind of nation that will be willing to come to Israel’s aid against the Beast when they need us most.
Last days, here we come. The race toward Armageddon (Revelation 16:16) begins.
Start Thinking Right 