Posts Tagged ‘special election’

Loser Democrats And Media Spend Tens Of Milliions To Come Up Snake-Eyes Again As GOP Winner Thanks Trump And Crowd Goes WILD.

June 21, 2017

Another day, another Trump victory.  That’s 5-0 now in special elections since for you since you became President, President Trump.  Congratulations.

This is footage you might have seen ONCE before the mainstream media cameras could go to commercial break and they’ll never show it again because it refutes their primary “fake news” narrative that Donald Trump is wildly unpopular, that Americans are in a state of “Resistance” to his presidency (a deliberate propaganda attempt to frame Trump as Hitler and Republicans as Nazis by the left), etc. etc. ad nauseum:

GOP Georgia 6th district winner thanks her supporters and then proceeds to thank President Trump for her win.

You know, the same President Trump that media perverters (that’s what I’m calling “reporters” now, because that’s what they do to the news rather than “report” it) and Democrats claimed was this giant drag on the Republican Party and was leading them to disaster.  And the crowd goes wild with support for their president whom the mainstream media has done every Goebbels-style trick to turn the nation against.

Do you want to know which president actually WAS a giant drag on his party and led his party to disaster?  Do you want to know the truth? (just tune out here, Democrats, because we all know that doesn’t include YOU):

Democrats lost over 1,000 seats under Obama
Published December 27, 2016 Fox News

The Democratic Party suffered huge losses at every level during Obama’s West Wing tenure.

The grand total: a net loss of 1,042 state and federal Democratic posts, including congressional and state legislative seats, governorships and the presidency.

The latter was perhaps the most profound example of Obama’s popularity failing to translate to support for his allies. Hillary Clinton, who served as secretary of state under Obama, brought the first family out for numerous campaign appearances. In September, Obama declared that his “legacy’s on the ballot.”

Less than two months later, Americans voted for Donald Trump.

I mean, if it’s bad to bring your party down, let’s face some facts:  Barack Obama said “I may not be on the ballot now, but everything we did is on the ballot.”  He said it twice and lost huge both times.  He lost first the House and then the Senate.  He lost a whole buttload of state governships and state houses.  He lost.  He’s a loser.

And in fact he’s a SORE loser:

An angry Obama puts himself on the ballot
The president delivers a rip-roaring speech to the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation dinner.
By Edward-Isaac Dovere 09/17/2016 11:11 PM EDT

It was part mockery, part shock-to-the-system wake-up call.

Donald Trump is a nasty, hateful charlatan selling a false message to African-Americans and the rest of the country that puts everything President Barack Obama has done in office and stood for at risk, Obama said Saturday night, in a rip-roaring speech to the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation dinner in Washington.

Declaring he would consider it “a personal insult, an insult to my legacy” if black turnout falters for Hillary Clinton, Obama did what he got reamed for doing almost exactly two years ago, in the heat of midterm elections in which disdain for him was the defining force: Yes, he said, he is pretty much on the ballot in November.

“My name may not be on the ballot, but our progress is on the ballot,” Obama said, his voice rising to a shout as he went well beyond what sources familiar with the speech said was a tamer version of the riff in the prepared remarks. “Tolerance is on the ballot. Democracy is on the ballot. Justice is on the ballot. Good schools are on the ballot. Ending mass incarceration, that’s on the ballot right now.”

Tolerance, democracy and justice sure WERE on the ballot.  Which is why you LOST, you intolerant fascist from the party of intolerant fascism.

The “Democratic” Party is the party that pays stormtrooper-goons to beat Trump supporters at 1st-Amendment-protected rallies.  It’s a good thing tolerance, democracy and justice WERE on the ballot.

Democrats now view everything Trump says or does as angry, petty, vain, petulant and arrogant.  But all these dishonorable traits were VIRTUES to them when their pharaoh god-king was running the world into the ground.  I mean, even AFTER he got his skinny ASS thrown at his giant-eared head, Obama STILL actually claimed that even after he put his legacy on the ballot and LOST, he would have won if he could have abolished Constitution and illegally run for a third term.

We think of the violence that has swept the nation, recently culminated in a hard-core DEMOCRAT who gunned down Republicans at a baseball game and would have massacred them if it hadn’t been for the fact that the House majority leader was there and therefore had an armed security detail who fired back.  And then think of Obama depicting the President of the United States as “nasty,” as “hateful,” as a “charlatan” who is a racist targeting black people.  And then understand that all hatred flows from the heart of a man named Barack Hussein Obama.

I want you to understand: the 6th district Georgia race is THE MOST EXPENSIVE HOUSE RACE IN AMERICAN HISTORY.  Democrats outspent Republicans to the tune of a 7-1 advantage.  And still lost.  Most likely because of the Russians.

Oh, wait.  The bulk of the money flowing into Loser Democrat Jon Ossoff’s side came from outside the state of Georgia.  So the Russians in this case, trying to hack another sovereign state’s democratic election, were DEMOCRATS.  Just so you know the wicked, two-faced hypocrite LIARS Democrats are.  I mean, if you think Russia did something evil, why are YOU still openly doing what you say is so damn evil???  Why did Obama do what you say is so evil in Israel when our Slime–in-Chief tried to use American-taxpayer dollars to oust the Israeli Prime Minister???  Why isn’t there an investigation for Obama’s attempt to “hack” the Israeli election???  Why isn’t Obama in jail???

But getting back to Georgia, what do you call people who are that irresponsible and wasteful with people’s money and piss it down the drain rather than spending it wisely?

You call them “Democrats,” which is an acronym meaning, “DEMOnic bureauCRATS.”

That’s $30 million that will never go to helping ONE poor person, right, you party of self-righteous liars???

Now the media is focusing on “how close the race was.”  You know, because all the votes their party paid for to turn “democracy” into an oligarchy where the rich buy as many votes as they need at least partially paid off for the Democrats.

The Democrat running in the race was a carpetbagger if there ever was one: the guy wasn’t even able to vote for himself because he doesn’t live in the district he was trying to sleaze his way into.

And it WASN’T a “close race” when you consider the fact that all the media “experts” were predicting it would go to a run-off because it was going to be so close.  Karen Handel won by a very comfortable 3.8% margin.  Given what the media fake news machine predicted, that’s a blowout.

You have victories ahead of you, Democrat.  The kind of victories you most cherish: victories of godless evil.  Soon enough, you will be rejoicing as the world you want so to unite under your godlessness actually DOES unite in godlessness as the coming Antichrist, the man the Bible says is actually a BEAST, comes to power with your support in the last days.

So keep spending money on your REAL god, Democrats.  Keep spending it on politics because you don’t stand for anything BUT politics and corrupt, dishonest politicians and your agendas of hate.  Year after year, lately, you have given your tithes and offerings to your god.  In 2008 you offered your god Obama over a billion dollars.  That was the more money than had ever been raised in the history of the human race.  But you exceeded it in your worshipful devotion in 2012, again sacrificially giving your tithes and your offerings to your wicked, vile god and worshiped him with homosexual perversion atop a temple formed from the remains of the sixty million babies you have murdered.

Which is to say that you’re not Nazis; you’re actually TEN TIMES WORSE than Nazis.  And just as Jesus warned:

“Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the miracles that were performed in you had been performed in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes.  But I tell you, it will be more bearable for Tyre and Sidon on the day of judgment than for you.  And you, Capernaum, will you be lifted to the heavens? No, you will go down to Hades. For if the miracles that were performed in you had been performed in Sodom, it would have remained to this day.”  Matthew 11:21-23

In the same way the Nazis will one day stand in judgment against you, Democrat, and declare that you were more evil than they EVER were as the flames of God’s chariot throne burn hotter than white hot with righteous rage against you.

But for now, just as Trump called ISIS “losers,” we can rightly lump you into the same category – particularly given the fact that your Obama is personally responsible for helping ISIS by allowing terrorists to increase their death toll by one-thousand, nine-hundred percent during his failed presidency – and call both ISIS AND Democrats “losers.”

 

Advertisements

Massachusetts Senate Race: Republican Scott Brown LEADING Democrat

January 10, 2010

Let me just say this.  If Republican Scott Brown defeats Democrat Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate seat special election on January 19th – as is looking increasingly possible – you can bet that Democrats will be in for the mother of all ass-whoopings in November.

And ObamaCare will likely be DOA as the Democrats lose their filibuster-proof majority eight months and change early.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 9, 2010

Senate Race Competitive

Raleigh, N.C. – The race to replace Ted Kennedy in the US Senate is looking like a toss up, with Republican Scott Brown up 48-47 on Martha Coakley.

Brown is benefiting from depressed Democratic interest in the election and a huge lead among independents for his surprisingly strong standing. Those planning to vote in the special election only report having voted for Barack Obama in 2008 by a 16 point margin, in contrast to his actual 26 point victory in the state.

That decline in turnout from Obama voters plagued Democratic candidates for Governor in Virginia and New Jersey last fall. Beyond that 66% of Republicans say they’re ‘very excited’ about turning out while only 48% of Democrats express that sentiment.

Brown leads 63-31 with independents and is winning 17% of the Democratic vote while Coakley receives only 6% support from GOP voters. Both candidates are relatively popular, with 57% viewing Brown favorably to only 25% unfavorable and 50% with a positive opinion of Coakley to 42% negative.

Those folks planning to vote in the special election are actually opposed to Obama’s health care plan by a 47/41 margin and only narrowly express approval of the President’s overall job performance 44/43.

“The Massachusetts Senate race is shaping up as a potential disaster for Democrats,” said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. “Martha Coakley’s complacent campaign has put Scott Brown in a surprisingly strong position and she will need to step it up in the final week to win a victory once thought inevitable.”

PPP surveyed 744 likely Massachusetts voters from January 7th to 9th. The margin of error is +/-3.6%. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify.

Complete results are attached and can be found at http://www.publicpolicypolling.com.

I don’t know which poll is most accurate, or which candidate will win.  But this is a solid, legitimate poll with all the questions and cross tabs available at the Public Policy Polling site, which features the above summary.

If you haven’t done so, let me make a personal appeal for a donation to the Brown campaign.  If you have done so, thank you, and please do so again.

Join me and donate:

You can also get involved by volunteering from your own home in Brown’s Call From Home Program.

And whether you can afford to donate to this incredibly important race or not, please pray for the wisdom of the Massachusetts voters.  And pray for a Scott Brown victory.

This might be our last/only chance to stop the ObamaCare disaster.

UPDATE January 12: Rasmussen’s latest poll confirms the general accuracy of the PPP poll, putting Brown down by only 2 points (49-47).  And given that just one week ago, the same Rasmussen poll had the Democrat Coakley up by 9, we can readily see who has the momentum and who doesn’t.

Republican Scott Brown answered a question about a Republican taking Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat during the debate last night.  He answered saying, “It’s not Ted Kennedy’s seat, and it’s not the Democrat Party’s seat.  It’s the American people’s seat.”

Laws As Playthings For Democrats’ Partisan Ideology

August 23, 2009

There are people for whom the law represents fixed and objective standards.  They see lady justice as blind; and the law as representing no interest beyond what is right.

And then there are Democrats.

Kennedy Asks for Faster Way to Pick His Successor

By ABBY GOODNOUGH
Published: August 20, 2009

Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, terminally ill with brain cancer, has asked state legislative leaders to change the law and let Gov. Deval Patrick appoint a temporary replacement upon the senator’s death.

Under current law, the seat would be vacant until a special election could be held 145 to 160 days later. But Senator Kennedy, a 77-year-old Democrat, wrote in a letter to the governor that he wanted Massachusetts to have full representation in the Senate during that period.

Although he did not mention the issue in the letter, it is becoming increasingly clear that Democratic votes will be crucial to passing the health care legislation that is the subject of intense Congressional debate. Senator Kennedy has been a passionate supporter of overhauling the nation’s health care system, but his absence from the debate and from public life in recent months has raised speculation that he will not be well enough to cast a vote when the time comes.

Should Senator Kennedy die before then, it is likely that, under current law, his seat would still be vacant when the legislation came up for a vote in the Senate.

Mr. Patrick and legislative leaders, all Democrats, did not immediately offer opinions on the senator’s request, which was first reported in The Boston Globe.

“It’s typical of Ted Kennedy to be thinking ahead and about the people of Massachusetts,” Mr. Patrick said in a statement, “when the rest of us are thinking about him.”

In a joint statement, Robert DeLeo, speaker of the State House of Representatives, and Therese Murray, president of the Senate, said: “We have great respect for the Senator and what he continues to do for our Commonwealth and our nation. It is our hope that he will continue to be a voice for the people of Massachusetts as long as he is able.”

Up until 2004, state law called for the governor to appoint a temporary replacement for a Senate seat that became vacant. But in that year, when Senator John Kerry, a Democrat, was running for president, the Democratic-controlled Legislature wanted to deny the governor at the time — Mitt Romney, a Republican — the power to name a replacement if Mr. Kerry won the presidency.

In his letter, Mr. Kennedy, who has held his seat for 47 years, wrote that he supported the 2004 law, but he added, “I also believe it is vital for this Commonwealth to have two voices speaking for the needs of its citizens and two votes in the Senate during the approximately five months between a vacancy and an election.”

The New York Times, of course, makes it all about what a magnificently wise and noble man Ted Kennedy is, always thinking ahead and thinking of others.  They forget to mention what a blatantly crass partisan political move this would be.

The same people who nominated a “wise Latina” whose rulings would be better than a white male’s – and who frankly don’t give a damn about justice being blind as regard to race, gender, or political affiliation – have struck again.

First they write a law and pass it in order to prevent a Republican governor from being able to appoint a senator if John Kerry was elected president – as the law had previously required – and now they want to change it back for the sake of the same partisan special interest that led them to change it in the first place.

That’s right.  When John Kerry was running for president, Ted Kennedy decided to change Massachusetts law to prevent Republican Governor Mitt Romney from being able to appoint the new US Senator should Kerry win.  It was naked special interest partisan ideology at work, but what the hell.  And now that there’s a Democrat governor, and Ted Kennedy realizes he may not make it, he wants to change the law back to favor Democrat special interest partisan ideology again.

Basically the law is whatever the hell Democrats want it to be at any given moment – which is really the way it’s been ever since Democrats first began to gaze into the constitutional crystal ball and see penumbras and emanations.

These people would be ashamed of themselves – if they had any shame.

Tragically, and shamefully, Americans will probably look the other way while Democrats prove that we are no longer a nation of law, but rather only a nation of partisan politics.