Posts Tagged ‘statistics’

No Riots? Crime In America By Race, And The Statistical Shenanigans Our Justice Department And FBI (Hillary Owes THEM Big) Play

July 12, 2016

I’m just going to state something right here at the outset: are there racist white people?  Yes.  Are there racist white people forming themselves into hate groups?  Yes.  Is it evil?  Yes.  But there is a stark difference going on in our incredibly toxic culture, because here’s the real question: are those racist white people and their racist hate groups demonized by EVERYBODY???  Yes.  Contrast that to the incredible hypocritical racism we now see coming out of vile hate groups from blacks and from Hispanics.  And then think about the whitewash these racist minority groups get every single damn day.  It’s only racist when white people form into groups: when black lives matter forms (think of the holy hell that would have erupted in our media if a “white lives matter” group gained a substantial following in America; when we have an NAACP (think of how it would be treated if “NAACP” stood for “National Association for the Advancement of Caucasian People”); when we have a Black Congressional Caucus (think of the righteous outrage of black congressmen if we had a “White Congressional Caucus”), etc. etc., ad nauseum.  There is such a massive hypocrite double-standard going on, it is UNREAL.

And the now-provably false argument has been if we just allow this massive hypocrite double standard, if we just give black people more power, more of what they want, they will fully join in with American society.  When what we are clearly seeing is BULL CRAP; rather, what they will do is angrily and bitterly demand more and more and more while feeling less and less and less as stakeholders who have duties themselves.  Blacks have been indoctrinated for the last fifty damn years by the Democratic Party and by the liberal media and by every other leftist source there is that they should have no stake whatsoever in this nation; that we owe THEM rather than they owe anybody else anything.    And so black people feel perfectly okay voting on a profoundly racial basis to get what they want for themselves as a race; but they would be hotter than HELL if white people did what they are doing every single damn day.  And so they have as a result of this kid-glove treatment felt not better and better, but rather worse and worse, more and more angry, more and more bitter.  And now more and more violent.

And it’s exploding now.

And it’s almost entirely based on pure lies.

I just came across something that really surprised me, given the fact that I live in a city that has a high percentage of Hispanics and which is beset with a significant Hispanic gang problem: according to Obama’s Justice Department and FBI – you know, the same people who just absolved Hillary Clinton for any criminal wrongdoing in her secret, private, unauthorized server being used to send and receive thousands of classified emails in violation of our national security, failed to send thousands of work-related emails even though it was her duty to do so and even though she swore under oath before Congress that she had made certain she had done, etc. – NO HISPANIC has EVER committed a single crime.

That’s news, of course, to many Donald Trump supporters who have received vicious beatings at the hands of Democrat Party Hispanic thugs:

6

Any Hispanic criminals out there?  “No habla, gringo! Y si, se puede!”

Pretty amazing, considering how often I’ll be watching the local news or reading my local newspaper and see Hispanic men with Hispanic names being either arrested, tried or sought for arrest; pretty amazing given how many times I’ve gone to jury duty and saw the Hispanic suspect sitting there next to his lawyer.

But true, unless we’re being lied to on such a massive scale it is beyond unreal.

How did this fraud happen?

Consider how the FBI breaks down crime by race:

Untitled

Let’s see.  According to the woman who met secretly with Bill Clinton while his wife was under criminal investigation by her department, according to FBI Director Comey who whitewashed her after acknowledging that she committed such acts of gross negligence and incompetence that she should never be allowed to ever hold ANY government job ever again, we’ve got the following racial groups living in America that we ought to track the criminality of: whites (of course Obama would want to keep track of that one); black or African-American (someone please explain the difference that we need that “or” there); American Indian or Alaska Native; Asian; Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander.

That’s it.  No one else from any other race needs to have their crimes tracked.

So let me introduce an outright lie straight from Planet Hell that Obama has redirected our planetary orbit to travel to and which Hillary Clinton now vows to steer the ship of Planet Earth.

Hispanics are white people whenever they commit a crime.  Somehow they only become “Hispanic” when a Democrat like Obama wants to incite them as a distinct racial group to “punish your enemies” (i.e. white people and Republicans).  And so every single time a Hispanic commits a crime, the FBI blames white people for it.  Every single time.  While every single time Democrats and liberals want these same people who are classified as “white” to castigate whites want them to be “Hispanic,” well, presto-bismo they become “Hispanic” again.

Which would mean, if you were honest, liberal, that every single damn time someone gets caught crossing the Mexican border illegally, another white person just got their justice taken away by the Obama administration.  And the government is actually truly out to get white people.  And liberals lie about it the way Hitler lied about his genocides.  It gets just diabolical if you accept this bullcrap statistical shenanigans we’re getting spoon-fed by liberal progressive government bureaucracies.

And if you actually simply identify Hispanics as NOT being white people – which believe me most Hispanic people are hardcore determined to NOT claim as they themselves daily demonize white people as horrible racists bound on enslaving them – NONWHITES ARE ACTUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR 90% OF ALL CRIMES COMMITTED IN THE UNITED STATES.

Every time a Hispanic robs someone, every time a Hispanic rapes someone, every time a Hispanic murders someone, every single Hispanic criminal thug and gang member and drug dealer there is, WHITE PEOPLE GET THE BLAME.

Nonwhites commit ninety percent of the damn crimes.  Amazing,

And so you see blathering bullcrap like this one that I post in its entirety at the bottom of this article in which whites get that leftist hate-blame and Hispanics are NOT EVEN MENTIONED AT ALL.

And here is the article preserved that points out the shocking percentage of our crime that is “nonwhite” and which correctly points out the shenanigans that the government plays to “fundamentally transform” the truth about nonwhite crime:

90% Nonwhite Violent Crime Rate: FBI
November 3, 2015 by TNO Staff— in North America

FBI-2014

Although the FBI and the US Census Bureau does its best to deliberately hide the nonwhite crime plague—by ascribing all Hispanic crime to whites, even this devious tactic cannot hide the full extent of black and Hispanic crime in America.

This fact becomes even more apparent when the crime rates for cities with majority nonwhite populations are compared, and when the FBI’s own “most wanted” lists are studied for racial categorization errors.

The official federal government’s definitions of race—as used by the FBI—only have the following categories: “white,” “black,” “American Indian or Alaska Native,” and “Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. All Hispanics are added to the “white” category, along with all North Africans, Arabs, Middle Easterners, and Jews.

The FBI’s own current (November 2015) list of most wanted murder suspects in the US is a case in point. It contains 71 suspects—of which only six are actually white, as can be seen from their mugshots.

FBi-Murder-wanted

Some 51 of the remaining suspects are nonwhite Hispanics. Nonetheless, the FBI has classified all 51 of these people as “white.” (The remainder are correctly classified as “black.”)

Some examples from the FBI’s “most wanted murderer” list serve to illustrate the point:

1. The FBI wanted list describes one Cesar Villarreal as follows:

DESCRIPTION Hair: Black, Eyes: Brown, Race: White (Hispanic)

cesar-villarreal-FBI

2. Santino Mario Garcia is described as follows:

DESCRIPTION Hair: Black, Eyes: Brown, Race: White (Hispanic)

santino-mario-garcia-FBI

3. Moises Galvan Gonzalez is described as follows:

Hair: Brown, Eyes: Brown, Race: White (Hispanic)

moises-galvan-gonzalez-FBI

The deliberate misclassification is done with the express purpose of boosting the number of crimes which the FBI ascribes to its “white” category.

This is done because the federal statisticians are aware that if they correctly identified these Hispanics as nonwhite, then it would be impossible for even the controlled media to hide the overwhelming nonwhite crime plague.

As the FBI refuses to correctly classify offenders by race, it is only possible to make assumptions based on their own “most wanted” lists.

Using, for example, the FBI’s “most wanted murderer” list, it would seem to be a safe assumption that only a fraction of the suspects identified as “white” by the federal agencies are in fact European-Americans.

FBIfeatured

Using this “most wanted murderer” list, for example, it would not be unreasonable to assume that only 11 percent (or 6 of 51 suspects) of all the murders crimes ascribed to “whites” by the FBI, were in fact committed by European-Americans.

Given the caveat that this assumption is based purely on the FBI’s “most wanted list,” and is therefore subject to a certain degree of variation, it is possible to undertake the following analysis of the FBI’s other statistics as outlined in their latest “Crime in the United States, 2014” report.

READ  Invaders Block Calais Roads

According to the FBI, there were an estimated 1,165,383 violent crimes (murder and non-negligent homicides, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults) in 2014.

For the category of “violent crimes there were a total of 8,730,665 arrests, broken down by the FBI as follows:

“White” 6,056,687 or 69.4%

“Black or African American” 2,427,683 or 27.8%

“American Indian or Alaska Native” 135,599 or 1.6%

Asian 100,067 or 1.1%

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” 10,629 or 0.1%

Using the “11% formula outlined above, it is safe to assume that European-Americans in reality only accounted for 666,235 arrests for violent crimes. This translated to 7.63% of all such arrests.

Nonwhites accounted therefore, for at least 92% of all arrestees for violent crime in 2014.

The FBI statistics for the individual crimes which make up the “violent crime” are as follows:

  1. Murder and non-negligent manslaughter

Total Arrests: 8,230, broken down as follows:

“White” 3,807 or 46.3%

“Black or African American” 4,224 or 51.3%

“American Indian or Alaska Native” 83 or 1.0%

Asian 107 or 1.3%

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” 9, or 0.1%

Once the “11%” formula is applied to these deliberately misclassified figures, it transpires that European-Americans committed 905 murders in 2014, or 10% of all such crimes.

  1. Rape

Total Arrests: 16,326, broken down as follows:

White 10,977 or 67.2%

“Black or African American” 4,888 or 29.9%

“American Indian or Alaska Native” 212 or 1.3%

Asian 222 or 1.4%

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” 27 or 0.2%

Once the “11%” formula is applied to these deliberately misclassified figures, it transpires that European-Americans committed 1,795 rapes in 2014, or 10% of all such crimes.

  1. Robbery

Total Arrests: 74,077, broken down as follows:

“White” 31,354 or 42.3%

“Black or African American” 41,379 or 55.9%

“American Indian or Alaska Native” 616 or 0.8%

Asian 617 or 0.8%

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” 111 or 0.1%

Once the “11%” formula is applied to these deliberately misclassified figures, it transpires that European-Americans committed 8,148 robberies in 2014, or 10% of all such crimes.

  1. Aggravated assault

Total Arrests: 291,600, broken down as follows:

“White” 185,612 or 63.7%

“Black or African American” 96,511 or 33.1%

“American Indian or Alaska Native” 4,372 or 1.5%

Asian 4,507 or 1.5%

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” 598 or 0.2%

Once the “11%” formula is applied to these deliberately misclassified figures, it transpires that European-Americans committed 32.076 robberies in 2014, or 11% of all such crimes.

READ  As Rumors of Immigration Amnesty Increase, Third World Invaders Send their Young Kids to America to Stake Their Claim

Of course, once the disproportionate population figures are taken into account (the fact that whites make up over 60 percent of the entire population), then the nonwhite crime figures leap out of all proportion in relation to their actual population numbers.

The FBI statistics showed further that the cities which are the least white, are the most dangerous. Figures contained in table 6 of the FBI statistics, “Crime in the United States by Metropolitan Statistical area, 2014” reveal the following:

Most Dangerous Cities with populations above 200,000.

No. 1: Detroit (93% nonwhite 2010)

No. 2: Memphis, Tennessee (67% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 3: Oakland, California (75% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 4: St. Louis, Missouri (57% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 5: Birmingham, Alabama (79% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 6: Milwaukee, Wisconsin (67% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 7: Baltimore, Maryland (72% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 8: Cleveland, Ohio (67% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 9: Stockton, California (78% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 10: Indianapolis, Indiana (US Census Bureau does not provide statistics for the city, only for the city and some 368.1 square miles around the city, called the “Indianapolis (city (balance)).” These figures say that the area was 43% nonwhite in 2010. An article in the Indianapolis Recorder of July 3, 2105, reported that “population growth in [Indianapolis] America’s 11th largest city continues to be fueled in large part by African-Americans and to a lesser extent by Hispanics and Asians.”)

Furthermore, the FBI figures showed that the biggest cities with the highest violent crime rates were as follows:

Detroit, Michigan 1988.63 violent crimes per capita

Memphis, Tennessee 1740.51 violent crimes per capita

Oakland, California 1685.39 violent crimes per capita

St. Louis, Missouri 1678.73 violent crimes per capita

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1476.41 violent crimes per capita

Baltimore, Maryland 1338.54 violent crimes per capita

Cleveland, Ohio 1334.35 violent crimes per capita

Stockton, California 1331.47 violent crimes per capita

Indianapolis, Indiana 1254.66 violent crimes per capita

Of America’s three biggest cities, Chicago had the highest violent crime rate at 884.26 violent crimes per capita.

New York City had a rate of 596.7 and Los Angeles had a rate of 490.71.

The biggest cities with the highest murder rates were as follows:

St. Louis, Missouri 49.91 murders per capita

Detroit, Michigan 43.52 murders per capita

New Orleans, Louisiana (70% nonwhite in 2010) 38.75 murders per capita

Baltimore, Maryland 33.84 murders per capita

Newark, New Jersey (90% nonwhite in 2010) 33.32 murders per capita

Buffalo, New York (55% nonwhite in 2010) 23.22 murders per capita

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (36% nonwhite in 2010) 22.43 murders per capita

Memphis, Tennessee 21.38 murders per capita

Atlanta, Georgia (66% nonwhite in 2010) 20.47 murders per capita

Cincinati, Ohio (52% nonwhite in 2010) 20.16 murders per capita

I don’t know if the “90 percent thing is in fact true,” but I DO know for an established, documented FACT that every Hispanic crime gets foisted on to “whites” and that liberals are exploiting that government LIE to demonize white people who are NOT guilty of what they are being slandered for.

I think I have established that a) the government is lying to us and the liberal news media is reporting propaganda as “fact,” and b) leftist ideologues are taking these lies to the streets and exploiting them to create the worst racial unrest this nation has seen in my fifty-year lifetime.  And both my parents likewise say they’ve never seen this kind of hate so widespread across the entire nation in THEIR entire lifetimes.

Obama dishonestly blathers on in Warsaw, Poland about how there we are as united as ever under his magnificent leadership and any one who tries to insinuate we’re divided is a liar out to tarnish his marvelous imperial legacy as emperor:

“You’re not seeing riots, you’re not seeing police going after people who are protesting peacefully,” he said.

Nope.  Nothin’ to see here, folks.  White people, please keep shuffling forward in the line labeled, “This way toward slaughterhouse.”  And don’t get anxious about that sign.  It doesn’t mean what you think it means and if you think it means something bad, it’s just because of your innate white racism.

I want you to stop and reflect what Obama does with this: he says “you’re not seeing riots.”  When yes you ARE.  But he puts a comma there, and adds what he describes would entail if we actually were seeing “riots.”  He says, “you’re not seeing police going after people who are protesting peacefully.”  Which is to say that as far as Obama is concerned, it’s not the viciousness and vileness of the rioter that determines whether there is a “riot”; because “rioting” is actually something he blames on POLICE when they go after peaceful protestors.

Does it matter that there IS no racial bias in police shootings, as proven by a Harvard study???  Of COURSE it doesn’t matter.

This is EXACTLY what Obama has done over and over and over again for the last toxic seven years of his regime: insinuate the real blame upon the police.  He’s done it ever since 2009 when he IMMEDIATELY went out and declared “the policie acted stupidly.”  And demonically “disgraced” and “smeared” the police.   And his Department of Injustice has carried on with his attack against the police every single time any black person was killed by a police officer or even just a citizen on his back being punched in the face over and over and over again.

Obama has created – exploiting race as the gasoline he could ignite – an incredibly vicious anti-police climate.  It’s right out of what the Bible said would happen in the last days, described as “the mystery of lawlessness.”   The Democratic Party is the engine of outright LAWLESSNESS in America today, bar none.

Obama SPAWNED this toxic “black lives matter” movement straight out of his roach soul.  And he’s making sure he never allows a serious riot to go to waste.  Even as he lies that we’re not seeing the riots that we’re clearly seeing.

Let’s contrast what Obama said with the goings-on in St. Paul, Minnesota and the words of the police chief to describe what happened:

 

St Paul MN non-riot

ST. PAUL, Minn. – Police arrested about 100 people in St. Paul during protests of the recent police killings of Philando Castile in Falcon Heights and Alton Sterling in Baton Rouge.

Authorities say 21 St. Paul officers and six state troopers were hurt during the protest that shutdown a part of I-94.

About half the arrests came during a blockade of the interstate.

About 50 arrests were made early this morning in another part of St. Paul.

St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman and Police Chief Todd Axtell both condemn the violence.

AXTELL said: “Last night really was the first time in my 28 years as a police officer that I have observed the level of violence that was directed towards our public servants.

The public servants that are there to protect all of us in this room and all of us in our community. And it’s really a disgrace.

And protestors last night turned into criminals. And I’m absolutely disgusted by the acts of some-not all-but some.”

Nope.  No “riots” under his divine magnificence-in-chief.

No riots here, either:

005

Or here:

001

Or here either:

no riots 1

If you see a riot in this picture, it’s actually a Rorschach test that just proved you’re a racist:

no riots 2

What you talkin’ ’bout rioting, Willis:

no riots 3

This is NOT a “riot,” it’s “lifeplace violence”:

no riots 4

PLEASE tell me you don’t see any “rioting” here:

no riots 5

Come on, WHAT “riots”???  The good citizens of Los Estados Unidos are too busy picking up the gold bricks that were left over from Obama paving all of our streets with gold to “riot.”  Who you been listening to, Fox News???

Oh, and no terrorist attacks, either.  It’s all “workplace violence.”  Probably committed by white people, of course.

Come on, please ignore the fact that under Barack Obama’s policies, terrorism has SKYROCKETED by 800 percent between 2010 and last year:

Deaths Due To Terrorism

Please don’t pay any attention to the fact that by the time Obama leaves office, by simple extrapolation of the previous six years, terrorism will have skyrocketed by 1,700 percent.

Violence is exploding across America.  Violence is exploding across our WORLD.  I am now calling Obama the “Half-mast president.”  Because his presidency is a time of national mourning where our flags are constantly at half-mast as he fails and fails and fails over and over and over again.

But he is a pathologically wicked man and he is like Cain and he is NEVER responsible for anything and it’s always Bush or the Republicans or guns or whatever he can demonize at the time.

It’s just lifeplace violence.  All over the world now.  And NONE of it has anything whatsoever to do with Obama or any of his policies.  And everything that is happening is all Bush’s fault.  And please don’t disturb Pharaoh Obama’s golf game until he’s finished when he will come out and slander the 2nd Amendment and the fundamental right that the American people have ALWAYS had throughout our history to keep and bear arms.

This is exactly what the Bible told us would happen under the demonic Antichrist.  The man will be the most arrogant liar and slanderer in all of human history.  And anybody who says otherwise will be branded by a demonic world and a demonic culture as a “racist” or some kind of horrible person.  Because the truth is horrible to the wicked and they will NEVER receive anything but the lies they want to hear.

So they will twist and distort the Holy Bible to “fundamentally transform” homosexual perversion and abortion-murder and LGBT crap and whatever the hell THIS is that is being forced upon our nation’s warriors who used to be able to protect us –

soldiers high heels

and whatever the hell THIS is that Obama did to our sailors as he sold us out to Iran:

Obama Navy Surrendering to Iran

– into “virtues.”  When the Bible declares “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil” and tells us that these things are “virtues” only to the most wicked kind of people who have placed themselves and their nation under the holy wrath of a righteous God.

There’s no virtues under Obama.  Only wickedness and judgment for our national wickedness that this wicked nation VOTED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR.

Police are openly saying they are on edge right now as they are being systematically targeted for assassination in ambush shootings by black lives matter “protesters.”  Blacks sit there and try to insinuate that police are death squads.  Holy crap, what liars they are: there are 8.7 MILLION arrests every single year as police try to keep our cities and our streets safe; and of those 8.7 million arrests, 1/10,000th of one percent of those end up as police shootings.  I mean, hell, yeah, they’re REALLY death squads, aren’t they???  And then add to that the fact that whites – when the racial distinctions are actually applied – constitute more of those “police shootings” than all the blacks and all the Hispanics COMBINED.

Stop and think about it for one second: you see the statistic that blacks as a percentage of their race are killed three times more than whites as a percentage of their race.  And this is offered as “proof” that police are targeting blacks for genocide.  And that’s exactly how the demonically evil black lives matter activists frame it.  But how about this fact: one out of three young black men are either in prison or on parole or are on probation at any given moment.  What the hell percentage of encounters with the police do you think blacks have as a population relative to whites as a population???  With every single one of these bad encounters adding to the likelihood that a shooting will ensue???

And right now, black lives matter, and Democrats, are forcing every single police officer to be forced to contemplate every single black person as a potential cop murderer.  And their trigger fingers are itchy because they just want to do their jobs and go home to their wives and to their kids.

You’re talking about more than ninety percent of all blacks murdered by other blacks.  And black lives matter and the roach “civil rights” leaders like Al Sharpton don’t give one flying damn about it.

They’re not going into the hell that was Barack Obama’s hometown before he sent his chief-of-staff to be the mayor who led it even further into hell on earth.

Black people feel like they are being singled out by police.  And I can’t deny that they aren’t.  But you’ve got to deal with the fact that police can’t HELP but treat black people different WHEN BLACK PEOPLE KEEP ACTING THE DAMN WAY THEY ARE ACTING.

It’s not “racist” for police to look at black people and be a little more wary any more than it is “racist” for me to look at a gray cloud and think it’s going to probably rain.  Because too many times when I see a cloud like that, rain comes.  Just as too many times when police encounter black people, crime comes.

And the simple fact of the matter is that black lives DON’T matter to “black lives matter.”

Black lives matter??? Seriously???  NOT TO BLACK PEOPLE, THEY DON’T!!!  As a result of their roach allegiance to the Democrat Party and its murder machine a.k.a. “abortion,” 6 out of every 10 black babies are murdered in their wombs by their mothers.  As a result of the Democrat Party and abortion, there almost IS no such thing as “a black family,” with seventy percent of black children growing up in a single parent household.  It is simply a FACT that the term “black father” is a contradiction in terms: and given the logic of abortion it OUGHT TO BE.  Because stop and think about the fact that at the moment of conception, every single person who believes in abortion categorically states that no “child” was “fathered.”  The “father” had NOTHING to do with any child and he is forced into the role of passive observer and is literally forced to sit there and passively watch while HIS VERY OWN CHILD IS MURDERED IN A DEMOCRAT ABORTION FACTORY.

This is TEN TIMES more evil than what the Nazis did.  Democrats have murdered SIXTY MILLION BABIES since they legalized infanticide in 1973.

Six out of ten times a black baby is born, a black woman murders that black baby.  And almost every single time a black person is murdered in America, another black person murdered that victim.

And this is the toxic, vile effect of this toxic, vile, Democrat-Party-OWNED race community is boiling over.

Black people made this bed.  They should either lie in it or get the hell out of it.

Instead, they blame everybody else for it and stay in that diseased bed while they piss in it and crap in it and puke in it.  They will NEVER get out of that bed because the Democratic Party OWNS them and TELLS them what to think and what to believe and what to say and what to do.

They will NEVER take personal responsibility for themselves.  Because you CAN’T take personal responsibility for yourself and be a DEMOCRAT.

Now, don’t think all of the above wasn’t done for a propaganda purpose.

And don’t think the decision to label “Hispanic crimes” as “White crimes” wasn’t done for propaganda purposes, either.

Consider this article that I will preserve lest it suddenly be deleted and purged the way more than 30,000 of Hilary’s emails mysteriously were deleted and purged.  Please understand that the following article is pure, unadulterated DRIVEL and I post it to simply document what abject lying roaches liberals truly are.  I challenge you to find the word “Hispanic” or any similar racial descriptive for “Hispanic” in this piece that lambasts whites for criminality:

The TRUTH About FBI Crime Statistics by Race

As more exposure is being given to the unjustified killings of black men by white police officers, the Black Lives Matter movement is gaining momentum. Consequently, many contend that the movement isn’t warranted because police officers murdering black people isn’t the real issue, but instead crime committed by blacks. As a matter fact, the notion that blacks are perpetrating the most crime in this country is said to be the real reason that police are obligated to scrutinize, even target them.

However, according to FBI crime statistics by race, it isn’t blacks who are driving criminal activity. Actually in 2014, blacks committed only 28.3% of all crimes. And it shouldn’t be bewildering that whites dominated commission of crimes by perpetrating 68.9% of them, considering they denote 77% of U.S. citizenry. But according to the media, blacks are the most perilous, and therefore, susceptible to violence.

In addition to suggesting that blacks commit the most crimes in general, it has become standard for the media to promote the misconception that blacks are overwhelmingly committing the most “violent” crimes in the country. However, according to the FBI, the most violent crimes are murders, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, all of which whites excessively perpetrate. In 2014, 390,233 violent acts were committed and blacks were responsible for only 37% of them. Contrary to what the media suggests, statistics prove that whites execute 59% of violent crimes in the U.S.

What source is the media referencing when proclaiming blacks as being the most criminal? The fact is that there is no such source. The media has used all communicative platforms to define black culture as violent, and therefore, are an imminent threat to white people. They use false statistics of criminality against blacks to reinforce the idea that blacks are lawless, and therefore, deserve every form of violence perpetrated against them.

The media completely circumvent actual facts that are publicly displayed on FBI.gov, in order to promote their racist agenda. Mediums such as Fox News, CNN, etc., commit a major disservice when they refuse to acknowledge and divulge the truth about blacks and crime. Falsely convincing society that black people are the most criminal only proves that this country has contempt for blacks, and consequently, view them all as threatening and inferior. The media’s one-sided, superficial, and exaggerated depiction of black people reduces the real variety, depth, and complexity of the entire race.

Furthermore, when the issue of white police officers murdering black people is addressed, mainstream society conspicuously attempts to deflect from the matter by challenging “why isn’t black on white crime discussed?” Well, let’s discuss it now.

FBI data shows that of all white victims of murders (3,005), only 13% (409) are actually committed by blacks.  84% (2,509) of the killings of white people are committed by white people. This fact is overlooked because by acknowledging it requires accepting that white on white crime is just as prevalent as their favorite topic, “Black on black crime.”

FBI statistics also prove that the highest offense charge is “Drug abuse violations.” The data reveals that approximately 69% of those violations were committed by whites and only 29% by blacks. However, there are more blacks in prison for drug related offenses than whites. Furthermore, how is it even possible for blacks to represent only 13.4% of America’s population, but maintain over 60% of the prison populace? This fact is designed to give the impression that blacks are more susceptible and prone to drug crimes than any other race, especially whites.

But it is a fact that marijuana use is roughly equal among blacks and whites, yet blacks are 3.73 times as likely to be arrested for marijuana possession.  It is also a truth that blacks are more likely to get caught with crack, unlike whites who tend to possess powder cocaine. Consequently, people convicted in federal court of possession of 5 grams of crack cocaine will receive a minimum mandatory sentence of 5 years in federal prison. On the other hand, possession of 500 grams of powder cocaine carries the same sentence.

The media will use the disproportion of mass incarceration of blacks to support their false claims that blacks commit the most drug related offenses. Meanwhile, they circumvent revealing the other side of the coin, which is that the prison industrial complex–a system of racist drug laws, and bias policing and court system used for economical and social advancement–is the primary reason that blacks receive stiffer sentences than whites.

The bottom line is that in America, whites kill whites and blacks kill blacks. Nevertheless, police officers are killing blacks significantly more than they are whites, even when whites prove to be more of a threat. Despite the media’s racist motives, the FBI statistics prove that whites are the most violent, and commit the most criminal acts, including murder and drug related offenses.

I am so beyond sick of the lies and the hypocrisy and the racism and the hate that is coming out of the Democratic Party and those whose souls they own.

 

 

Advertisements

Statistics About Vile Labor Unions That The Left Doesn’t Want You To Know About

May 28, 2012

Wherever unions have gone industries have died.  As much as the left complains about companies relocating offshore, unions and their vile tactics have been more responsible for the movement of US jobs offshore than anything or anyone else.

Whole industries have abandoned America because that was the only way they could survive and compete given that they were otherwise crippled with American labor unions.  But it’s those industries that can’t be shipped overseas – like teaching our kids – that the unions are at their most dangerous to America.  They have a stranglehold on public education even as they have proven that they could frankly care less about teaching our kids, our next generation of workers.

Check out these stats.  I put the ones I found most egregious in red font:

Union Statistics: What You May Not Know
September 15th 2011

The folks at UnionFacts.com have a ‘vital statistics‘ page that provides some good information about unions that many Americans may not know. Here is just some of the information:

Financial Information

Annual Dues Paid to Unions: $8,217,838,676
Total Union Assets: $8,804,794,935
Total Spending
Representational Activities: $4,081,097,858
Political Activities: $579,624,489
External Contributions: $321,121,214
Overhead: $3,905,927,269
Unions that fail to pass Department of Labor audits: 92%

Percentage of Employees that Voted for their union: Less than 10%

Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Labor Relations Board indicates that less than 10 percent of currently unionized employees voted for the union in their workplace.

Union Officials

Total union officers and staff members: 173,503 people
Total compensation paid to union officials and officers: $1,141,540,980
Total compensation paid to union employees: $2,562,757,481

Diversity

Major Unions with White Presidents: 94%
Major Unions with Male Presidents: 89%

Labor Law Violations

Unfair Labor Practices filed against unions in the last 10 years: 65,529
Duty of Fair Representation 32,235
Hiring Halls 2,236
Actions of Picketers 1,742
Union Security Related (including Beck) 1,636
Coercive Statements 1,376

Source: National Labor Relations Board Case Activity Tracking System database.

Union Membership as a percentage of total U.S. Labor Force

Total Union Members: 14.7 Million
Percentage of Workforce that is Unionized: 11.9%
Private Sector Employees: 7.0 million (6.9%)
Public Sector Employees: 7.6 million (36.2%)

Source: UnionStats.com analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics ‘ Current Population Survey.

For more, check out UnionFacts.com

It’s kind of funny – in an ironic, pathetic sort of way – how unions constantly demagogue many of the things that they are in fact the worst offenders at committing, isn’t it?  Unions started out as racist organizations that were geared around keeping black and minority workers out:

Economist Ray Marshall, although a prounion secretary of labor under President Jimmy Carter, made his academic reputation by documenting how unions excluded blacks from membership in the 1930s and 1940s. Marshall also wrote of incidents in which union members assaulted black workers hired to replace them during strikes. During the 1911 strike against the Illinois Central, noted Marshall, whites killed two black strikebreakers and wounded three others at McComb, Mississippi. He also noted that white strikers killed ten black firemen in 1911 because the New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railroad had granted them equal seniority. Not surprisingly, therefore, black leader Booker T. Washington opposed unions all his life, and W. E. B. DuBois called unions the greatest enemy of the black working class. Another interesting fact: the “union label” was started in the 1880s to proclaim that a product was made by white rather than yellow (Chinese) hands.

And nothing’s changed.  And they aren’t much better toward women, are they?

Meanwhile, these hypocrites have a massive war chest of money stockpiled from previous generations that they give almost entirely to Democrats while they simultaneously whine about corporations being allowed to do the same thing that THEY’VE been doing for decades.

As bad as these statistics are, the worst ones of all aren’t included.  Start searching for “unfunded liabilities” particularly of unionized “public sector employees,” and you’ll find a black hole of debt that America will never be able to crawl its way out of.  California alone has a $500 billion unfunded pension bomb waiting to explode:

California’s $500-billion pension time bomb
April 06, 2010|By David Crane

The staggering amount of unfunded debt stands to crowd out funding for many popular programs. Reform will take something sadly lacking in the Legislature: political courage.

The state of California’s real unfunded pension debt clocks in at more than $500 billion, nearly eight times greater than officially reported.

That’s the finding from a study released Monday by Stanford University’s public policy program, confirming a recent report with similar, stunning findings from Northwestern University and the University of Chicago.

Another Democrat blue state, Illinois, is in even worse shape on a per capita basis: with one-third the population of fellow Democrat blue state California, Illinois has nearly half the unfunded union pension liabilities that California does ($210 billion).

Unlike Obama’s God damn America, which can add more zeros to the money supply in the Federal Reserve computers to “make” more money, states have to actually pay their debts.  Which really sucks for them, given the way the unions have sucked the states dry.

And of course labor unions scream at every state or federal budget cut because they are utterly dependent on taxpayer handouts for survival.

So union workers are only less than 7% of the private American workforce, but they’re a massive pain in America’s collective ass.

Obama Destroying Middle Class Right Before Our Eyes – 30 Statistics Mainstream Media Propaganda Aren’t Talking About

January 11, 2012

This one caught my eye – and then made my eyes get real wide given how Obama is constantly out spouting how he’s protecting the middle class:

30 Statistics That Show That The Middle Class Is Dying Right In Front Of Our Eyes As We Enter 2012

Once upon a time, the United States had the largest and most vibrant middle class that the world has ever seen. Unfortunately, that is rapidly changing. The statistics that you are about to read prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the U.S. middle class is dying right in front of our eyes as we enter 2012. The decline of the middle class is not something that has happened all of a sudden. Rather, there has been a relentless grinding down of the middle class over the last several decades. Millions of our jobs have been shipped overseas, the rate of inflation has far outpaced the rate that our wages have grown, and overwhelming debt has choked the financial life out of millions of American families. Every single day, more Americans fall out of the middle class and into poverty. In fact, more Americans fell into poverty last year than has ever been recorded before. The number of middle class jobs and middle class neighborhoods continues to decline at a staggering pace. As I have written about previously, America as a whole is getting poorer as a nation, and as this happens wealth is becoming increasingly concentrated at the very top of the income scale. This is not how capitalism is supposed to work, and it is not good for America.

Today I went over to Safeway and I was absolutely appalled at the prices. I honestly don’t know how most families make it these days. I ended up paying over 140 dollars for about two-thirds of a cart of food. That was after I “saved” 67 dollars on sale items.

When the cost of the basic things that we need – housing, food, gas, electricity – go up faster than our incomes do, that means that we are getting poorer.

Sadly, if you look at the long-term numbers, some very clear negative trends emerge….

-The number of good jobs continues to decrease.

-The rate of inflation continues to outpace the rate that our wages are going up.

-American consumers are going into almost unbelievable amounts of debt.

-The number of Americans that are considered to be “poor” continues to grow.

-The number of Americans that are forced to turn to the government for financial assistance continues to go up.

After you read the information below, it should become abundantly clear that the U.S. middle class is in a whole heap of trouble.

The following are 30 statistics that show that the middle class is dying right in front of our eyes as we enter 2012….

#1 Today, only 55.3 percent of all Americans between the ages of 16 and 29 have jobs.

#2 In the United States today, there are 240 million working age people. Only about 140 million of them are working.

#3 According to CareerBuilder, only 23 percent of American companies plan to hire more employees in 2012.

#4 Since the year 2000, the United States has lost 10% of its middle class jobs. In the year 2000 there were about 72 million middle class jobs in the United States but today there are only about 65 million middle class jobs.

#5 According to the New York Times, approximately 100 million Americans are either living in poverty or in “the fretful zone just above it”.

#6 According to that same article in the New York Times, 34 percent of all elderly Americans are living in poverty or “near poverty”, and 39 percent of all children in America are living in poverty or “near poverty”.

#7 In 1984, the median net worth of households led by someone 65 or older was 10 times larger than the median net worth of households led by someone 35 or younger. Today, the median net worth of households led by someone 65 or older is 47 times larger than the median net worth of households led by someone 35 or younger.

#8 Since the year 2000, incomes for U.S. households led by someone between the ages of 25 and 34 have fallen by about 12 percent after you adjust for inflation.

#9 The total value of household real estate in the U.S. has declined from $22.7 trillion in 2006 to $16.2 trillion today. Most of that wealth has been lost by the middle class.

#10 Many formerly great manufacturing cities are turning into ghost towns. Since 1950, the population of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania has declined by more than 50 percent. In Dayton, Ohio 18.9 percent of all houses now stand empty.

#11 Since 1971, consumer debt in the United States has increased by a whopping 1700%.

#12 The number of pages of federal tax rules and regulations has increased by 18,000% since 1913. The wealthy know how to avoid taxes, but most of those in the middle class do not.

#13 The number of Americans that fell into poverty (2.6 million) set a new all-time record last year and extreme poverty (6.7%) is at the highest level ever measured in the United States.

#14 According to one study, between 1969 and 2009 the median wages earned by American men between the ages of 30 and 50 dropped by 27 percent after you account for inflation.

#15 According to U.S. Representative Betty Sutton, America has lost an average of 15 manufacturing facilities a day over the last 10 years. During 2010 it got even worse. Last year, an average of 23 manufacturing facilities a day shut down in the United States.

#16 Back in 1980, less than 30% of all jobs in the United States were low income jobs. Today, more than 40% of all jobs in the United States are low income jobs.

#17 Most Americans are scratching and clawing and doing whatever they can to make a living these days. Half of all American workers now earn $505 or less per week.

#18 Food prices continue to rise at a very brisk pace. The price of beef is up 9.8% over the past year, the price of eggs is up 10.2% over the past year and the price of potatoes is up 12% over the past year.

#19 Electricity bills in the United States have risen faster than the overall rate of inflation for five years in a row.

#20 The average American household will have spent a staggering $4,155 on gasoline by the end of 2011.

#21 If inflation was measured the exact same way that it was measured back in 1980, the rate of inflation in the United States would be well over 10 percent.

#22 If the number of Americans considered to be “looking for work” was the same today as it was back in 2007, the “official” unemployment rate put out by the U.S. government would be up to 11 percent.

#23 According to the Student Loan Debt Clock, total student loan debt in the United States will surpass the 1 trillion dollar mark at some point in 2012. Most of that debt is owed by members of the middle class.

#24 Incredibly, more than one out of every seven Americans is on food stamps and one out of every four American children is on food stamps at this point.

#25 Since Barack Obama took office, the number of Americans on food stamps has increased by 14.3 million.

#26 In 2010, 42 percent of all single mothers in the United States were on food stamps.

#27 In 1970, 65 percent of all Americans lived in “middle class neighborhoods”. By 2007, only 44 percent of all Americans lived in “middle class neighborhoods”.

#28 According to a recent report produced by Pew Charitable Trusts, approximately one out of every three Americans that grew up in a middle class household has slipped down the income ladder.

#29 In the United States today, the wealthiest one percent of all Americans have a greater net worth than the bottom 90 percent combined.

#30 The poorest 50 percent of all Americans now collectively own just 2.5% of all the wealth in the United States.

Sadly, this article could have been much, much longer. There are so many other statistics about the middle class that could have been included.

For even more insane economic numbers that show just how dramatically the U.S. economy is declining, just check out this article: “50 Economic Numbers From 2011 That Are Almost Too Crazy To Believe“.

What is even more frightening is that this is about as good as things are going to get.

We have already had “the economic recovery”, such as it was.

Now we are heading for another major financial crisis. Just like back in 2008, the entire world is going to feel the pain.

But we never recovered from the last financial crisis. We are like a boxer that is not ready to handle another blow.

And who is going to get hurt the most? It will be those at the bottom of the food chain of course. Tens of millions of Americans that are living in poverty will experience a massive amount of pain, and millions more Americans will fall out of the middle class and will join them.

If you have a good job, do your best to hang on to it. If you don’t have a job, do your best to get one while you still can. Jobs will become very precious in the years ahead.

But also try to do what you can to become less dependent on the system. Almost anyone can find ways to make some extra money on the side. Yes, it will likely cut into your television time. If someday you were to lose your job you don’t want to be left with zero income.

Right now, the U.S. economy is slowly dying and as time goes by the number of middle class Americans it will be able to support will continue to decrease.

Yes, it is like a perverse game of musical chairs, but this is where we are at.

I encourage all of you to think about how you plan to make it through the collapse that is ahead.

Sticking our heads in the sand and pretending that everything is going to be okay is not going to help anyone.

But if we all start planning for the storm that is ahead, and if we get others around us to wake up as well, that is going to do a great deal of good in the long run.

I have written about Obama being the “Cloward and Piven President.”  If you kill the middle class and overwhelm the social support/welfare system, you will get a societal and economic crash.  And a desperate American people will cry to the government to save them.  And Democrats will finally get the Marxism they’ve been trying to create since the last two anti-communist presidents (JFK and LBJ) left office.

Obama Continues Rampant Dishonesty With Stimulus ‘Jobs ‘

November 11, 2009

Want to see how Obama “created or saved” all the jobs he’s claiming?  Here’s how:

In June, the federal government spent $1,047 in stimulus money to buy a rider mower from the Toro Company to cut the grass at the Fayetteville National Cemetery in Arkansas. Now, a report on the government’s stimulus Web site improbably claims that that single lawn mower sale helped save or create 50 jobs.

I bought a new watch the other day; that’s got to be good for at least ten jobs saved or created.

Do you seriously trust these people to run your healthcare?  Are you that idiotic?  I mean, dang.

A newspaper editorial just damns Obama’s dishonesty and deceit the way it deserves to be damned.

Note: I added the html links to the other newspaper articles.

Union-Tribune Editorial
Stimulus dishonesty
Job numbers keep proving to be exaggerated
Wednesday, November 11, 2009 at 12:43 a.m.

First it was The Associated Press refuting the Obama administration’s claims for jobs saved or created nationwide by February’s $787 billion economic stimulus measure. Then it was The Sacramento Bee refuting the claims that state agencies had made for California. Then it was the Chicago Tribune refuting the claims that state agencies had made for Illinois.

The errors were not of a minor or technical nature. They were egregious.

AP reported that “some jobs credited to the stimulus program were counted two, three, four or even more times.” The Bee reported that California State University said “the $268.5 million it received in stimulus funding through October allowed it to retain 26,156 employees” – more than half its statewide work force. The Tribune reported that Illinois education officials grossly inflated job-saved numbers, sometimes saying school districts had saved more jobs than their total number of employees.

This is a scandal and should be treated as such. It’s not government as usual. Instead, it appears to reflect a decision to distort government data collection to support explicitly political agendas.

With U.S. unemployment now topping 10 percent, the Obama administration is struggling more than ever to fashion credible counterarguments to the assertion made by this editorial page and many pundits and economists that the massive stimulus measure was a poorly thought-out pork fest that wouldn’t work. What’s the easiest way to defend the stimulus? Make up claims about its glorious results.

Politics also appears to be driving state agencies in their willingness to prop up this bogus narrative. It helps them make the case that they should get even more borrowed money from the federal government that they never will have to repay.

Such dishonesty should be completely unacceptable – especially at the federal level. We trust the Office of Management and Budget to provide honest figures on the size of the deficit and the national debt. We trust the Labor Department to provide honest statistics on unemployment and job gains and losses by sector. We trust the Commerce Department to provide honest numbers on monthly imports and exports and the gross domestic product. We trust the Environmental Protection Agency to provide an honest accounting of air and water pollution levels.

All of these statistics end up helping shape the public debate on the most crucial issues of the day. If these numbers can’t be trusted, we can’t have an honest debate. When it comes to the economic stimulus package, it sure looks like the Obama White House doesn’t want an honest debate. Instead, it is going to relentlessly push the very dubious claim that the stimulus was a huge success – no matter what.

We are struck yet again by the contrast between the hopeful and idealistic tone of Barack Obama’s presidential campaign and the bare-knuckles Chicago-style politics of his White House. If this hardball approach goes beyond the usual arm-twisting to the routine twisting of government statistics for political purposes, that will be a grim day for America.

The first thing to do is congratulate the editorial board of the Union-Tribune for standing up for the truth.  That hasn’t happened a whole lot in the swooning, “thrill going up my leg” coverage of Obama.

Next, I’d like to begin by citing the complete paragraph that the Union-Tribune cites from AP:

The AP review found some counts were more than 10 times as high as the actual number of jobs; some jobs credited to the stimulus program were counted two and sometimes more than four times; and other jobs were credited to stimulus spending when none was produced.

Then I’ll provide the quote from the Sacramento Bee in its context, which makes it an even more damning indictment:

Up to one-fourth of the 110,000 jobs reported as saved by federal stimulus money in California probably never were in danger, a Bee review has found.

California State University officials reported late last week that they saved more jobs with stimulus money than the number of jobs saved in Texas – and in 44 other states.

In a required state report to the federal government, the university system said the $268.5 million it received in stimulus funding through October allowed it to retain 26,156 employees.

That total represents more than half of CSU’s statewide work force.  However, university officials confirmed Thursday that half their workers were not going to be laid off without the stimulus dollars.

“This is not really a real number of people,” CSU spokeswoman Clara Potes-Fellow said. “It’s like a budget number.”

And then I’ll provide the context for the Chicago Tribune findings:

Gov. Patrick Quinn on Wednesday dispatched officials from a new accountability office to investigate errors in a state database detailing stimulus-funded school jobs promoted by the Obama administration, a day after the Tribune raised questions about the job numbers’ accuracy.

The officials have asked the Illinois State Board of Education to verify the number of jobs created and retained in school districts detailed in the report, said Ashley Cross, a spokeswoman for Quinn’s office. Any necessary adjustments will be incorporated into the next quarterly report on the federal stimulus, she said.

Matt Vanover, a spokesman for board of education, said the flawed database actually had been washed of some glaring errors before being included in the official tabulation, which claimed 14,330 school jobs in Illinois had either been saved or created thanks to $1.25 billion in federal funds.

But the Tribune found that the database claimed far more jobs had been saved in some local school districts than actually existed on district payrolls.

Which is to say that, as egregious as the errors were that the Tribune reported for this story, the school board spokesman said they had actually been much, much more egregious before the Tribune was able to get its hands on the actual data.

When the Union-Tribune editors say:

This is a scandal and should be treated as such. It’s not government as usual. Instead, it appears to reflect a decision to distort government data collection to support explicitly political agendas.

You should recognize that we are talking about historic levels of dishonesty that match this administrations’ historic levels of spending and historic levels of debt.

And when they point out that:

Politics also appears to be driving state agencies in their willingness to prop up this bogus narrative. It helps them make the case that they should get even more borrowed money from the federal government that they never will have to repay.

Such dishonesty should be completely unacceptableespecially at the federal level.

You should realize that – counter to the Obama administration’s and Democrat Party’s demagogic attacks against businesses such as our health insurance companies (which make only modest profits, contrary to the frankly evil attacks repeatedly made by the left) – there is no greater or more powerful or more dishonest “special interest” than big government.

If you’re opposed to special interest, then whatever the HELL you do, don’t let the federal government take over health care.

And this garbage of deceit and lies about jobs and the fact that Obama has done NOTHING to create more of them is going on all over the country.

The Boston Globe says, “Stimulus job boost in state exaggerated, review finds.”  And it is simply damning.

While Massachusetts recipients of federal stimulus money collectively report 12,374 jobs saved or created, a Globe review shows that number is wildly exaggerated. Organizations that received stimulus money miscounted jobs, filed erroneous figures, or claimed jobs for work that has not yet started.

The Globe’s finding is based on the federal government’s just-released accounts of stimulus spending at the end of October. It lists the nearly $4 billion in stimulus awards made to an array of Massachusetts government agencies, universities, hospitals, private businesses, and nonprofit organizations, and notes how many jobs each created or saved.

But in interviews with recipients, the Globe found that several openly acknowledged creating far fewer jobs than they have been credited for.

One of the largest reported jobs figures comes from Bridgewater State College, which is listed as using $77,181 in stimulus money for 160 full-time work-study jobs for students. But Bridgewater State spokesman Bryan Baldwin said the college made a mistake and the actual number of new jobs was “almost nothing.’’ Bridgewater has submitted a correction, but it is not yet reflected in the report.

In other cases, federal money that recipients already receive annually – subsidies for affordable housing, for example – was reclassified this year as stimulus spending, and the existing jobs already supported by those programs were credited to stimulus spending. Some of these recipients said they did not even know the money they were getting was classified as stimulus funds until September, when federal officials told them they had to file reports.

“There were no jobs created. It was just shuffling around of the funds,’’ said Susan Kelly, director of property management for Boston Land Co., which reported retaining 26 jobs with $2.7 million in rental subsidies for its affordable housing developments in Waltham. “It’s hard to figure out if you did the paperwork right. We never asked for this.’’

The federal stimulus report for Massachusetts has so many errors, missing data, or estimates instead of actual job counts that it may be impossible to accurately tally how many people have been employed by the massive infusion of federal money. Massachusetts is expected to receive an estimated $1 billion more in stimulus contracts, grants, and loans.

When Obama was elected, unemployment was at 6.6%.  He promised that his stimulus would prevent unemployment from reaching 8%.  And now it’s 10.2%.
His plan completely failed.  His massive $3.27 trillion stimulus porkulus (according to what the CBO reported Obama’s stimulus would actually cost) did nothing more than create a bunch of pork projects and create a Democrat war chest of slush funds to buy the votes it needs.
Don’t believe me about the slush fund?

To get as far as the bill did so far, it appears the administration might have spread some money around. California Rep. Jim Costa was wavering but told a local newspaper last week that his vote could be contingent on getting some federal money for a new medical school in his district along with help for local hospitals.

When a constituent named Bob Smittcamp e-mailed him to complain about his vote for the House bill, the congressman explained he’d been offered the dollars he was looking for — $128 million in federal money.

“He responded to me by basically saying that he did not like many of the elements there were in the legislation. However, he was able to procure $128m for the University of California medical school in Merced,” Smittcamp told Fox News.

Democrats now have in excess of a trillion dollars in federal money to buy itself the votes it needs to impose the liberal agenda.Rather than actually fix the economy, all Obama has done is a) focus entirely on putting even more of the economy under government control through Obamacare rather than focus on creating jobs; b) make up a bunch of patent lies to make believe his policies are doing anything other than dismally failing; and c) keep blaming Bush for everything.It’s not working out, Obama.  YOU’RE not working out.

Taxes & Stupid: When Less of One Means More of the Other

April 16, 2008

Gallup conducted a survey between 6-9 April, asking, “Are Americans paying Their fair share in federal taxes, paying too much or pay to little?” Here are the results, with the figure on the right representing “too little”:

Middle-income People  4% (pay too little)
Lower-income people 13%
Upper-income people 63%
Corporations               73%

Okay. So that’s what a survey of 1,021 adults thought (with a margin of error at +/- 3%, blah, blah, blah).

Democrats ubiquitiously claim that “It’s time for wealthy Americans and corporations to pay their fair share!” And – judging by this poll, anyway – it appears that they have won the case in the minds of most Americans.

The only problem is that these people are completely wrong.

According to the Congressional Budget Office figures (Historical Effective Federal Tax Rates: 1979-2005, released December 2007) on “Individual Income Taxes”:

The top         1% Pays 38.8%
The top       20% Pays 86.3%
The top       40% Pays 99.5%
The bottom 60% Pays 0.6%

The actual facts are just the opposite from what we are routinely told, aren’t they?  Let me put it in capital letters so you can see it better: THE WEALTHIEST 40% OF AMERICANS PAY 99.5% OF THE INCOME TAXES!!! And they’re not paying their fair share?  The Democrats and the media have won the case in the culture by misrepresenting the truth.

When the Bush tax cuts took effect, it threw a lot of people (in that 60% group) off the tax roles entirely, and created a new lower tax rate (people who’d been paying 15% rate paid a 10% rate, etc).  It is a flat out lie to say that the rich benefitted unfairly from the Bush tax cuts.

Corporations pay a 35% federal tax rate.  Republican Presidential hopeful John McCain wants to reduce that to 25%. Why?  Because he’s trying to make the U.S. more competitive, that’s why! The world average corporate income tax rate for industrial democracies is 24%. The 35% rate – which is the 2nd highest corporate tax rate in the world – makes the U.S. less competitive.  You want to know why jobs are going overseas?  There’s one of the big reasons.  Some of the others are the demands of American labor unions, environmental regulations, the lack of protection from frivilous lawsuits, etc.  But those issues are for another day.

Now, the rare few Democrats who aren’t entirely stupid point to the payroll taxes as evidence that the rich – in spite of what you’ve read above – don’t pay their fair share.  People who earn over $1 million pay 18% of the total federal tax bill; those between $200,000 and $1,000,000 pay 23%; and those between $100,000-$200,000 pay 25% of the total tax. But payroll taxes – which hit middle income people the hardest – are those taxes that pay into Social Security and Medicare.  But in point of fact, the wealthy are virtually banned from these programs (if they use their own retirements funds, they don’t qualify for Social Security and Medicare) – and they certainly don’t get more “benefit” than anyone else in these programs).

Conservatives have frequently talked about lowering payroll taxes – which DO effect the middle class’ bottom line – and who screams about it?  Democrats!  Why?  Because they claim (rightly) that it would hurt Social Security and Medicare.  So they complain about taxes that they have repeatedly refuse to allow Republicans to lower?  That’s nice.

Here’s another issue: the United States currently has a 67,000 plus page tax code!  Does that sound like the pathway to efficiency to anyone?  We have an incredibly non-competitive and inefficient economy because of this idiocy. Democrats have done to our economy what the EPA did to our car engines in the mid-1970s.

What we need to do is to return to the 1986 Bill Bradley – Ronald Reagan Commission compromise that lowered tax rates but removed loopholes. But Democrats in the 22 years that have followed have encouraged unwise behavior by adding tax loopholes (for pet projects such as efficient cars, community colleges, ethanol, etc.). Obviously, Republicans have fed from this trough as well, but let’s not be dumb as to who keeps this mindset going.

We need to return to the Bradley-Reagan mindset to eliminate these breaks and return to a competitive and efficient economy. Every time the government hands out another loophole, they are deliberately encouraging an embrace of an inefficiency.  It’s a way of saying that we (the government bureaucracy) want to turn something that people would not rationally do into a tax break loophole so they will do what they would not do otherwise. That’s not the path to a healthy economy.  It’s the guaranteed path to a dysfunctional, schizophrenic economy.

Democrats and the media outlets rail at the wealthy, and blame “tax breaks that benefit the rich” for virtually every ill facing society.  But stop and ask yourself, “Who gave me my job?” Was it a poor guy, or was it a rich guy? Unless you are working on straight commission for one of those guys on the city street corner who wash car windows at traffic signals, you probably got your job from a rich guy.  Now, as long as that rich guy is making a sufficient profit, you have your job.  But what happens if he isn’t making a profit anymore?  What happens if you decide to vote for people who will raise his taxes, increase his costs and expenses, and lower his profits?  Congratulations: you lose your job.

This demagoguery has got to stop.  The wealthy create jobs by investing in markets that supply funds, by starting businesses themselves, and by managing their assets wisely.  The Democrats – who routinely divide people into groups according to race, gender, and sexual orientation – want to play their Ace card and divide people into economic classes as well.  Realize that’s already been tried by Karl Marx, and it didn’t turn out too well.  John Edwards’ and other Democrats’ talk of “two Americas” is little more than a recasting of the Communists’ tired bourgeoise vs. proletariat class-hatred.

It’s time Americans wised up, stopped playing self-defeating games of class warfare, and got together on tuning up the U.S. economy to perform – for everybody – the way that it is capable of performing.

Abortion Destroys More Than Just A Baby

April 1, 2008

Abortion is a cancer that makes our society sick on every level. It destroys us individually – one baby at a time; it erodes the essential institution of fatherhood by removing fathers from the most basic decision regarding their children; and, ultimately, it creates unstable consequences that damage our nation and our world. And rather than being a necessary industry that protects the weakest and neediest among us, it is in fact a holocaust among the very groups of people we claim to be trying to save.

First of all, abortion clearly results in the death of a child. Do the math: if your beloved mommy had decided to have an abortion during her pregnancy with you, you would not have been born. More specifically, you would have died. Mommy would have killed you. The same you who was once a teen ager, once a toddler, once an infant, was also once a fetus, once an embryo, and once a zygote. Killing you at any point during that continuum would have rendered you every bit as dead. If you don’t believe me, look at your brother or sister; a different egg and sperm produce a totally different child every time. Even in the case of identical twins – where a zygote divides – we end up with two different children. Abortion destroys a child.

But when the Supreme Court looked down from Mount Olympus and divined in the Constitution a woman’s right to choose abortion, it did something else: it destroyed the rights of fathers, and undermined the traditional family structure.

Think about it: if a mother exercises her “right to choose” abortion, it presupposes a duty upon the father of that child to idly sit by while his child is killed. While mommy beams down at her little bundle of joy and says, “I could have chosen to kill you, but let you live because I wanted a baby, daddy is outside somewhere saying, “Well, mommy didn’t decide to kill it, so I guess I’m a father. How can anyone who claims to have an IQ above that of the baby that abortion kills not see how radically abortion undermines the role of the father?

Conversely, if daddy dearest is a “pro-choicer” who doesn’t want anything to do with his child and would very much like to choose death for it, he may well be subjectively compelled by the courts to pay child support. A woman can kill her child at will during pregnancy. That is her right. But if she subjectively decides to keep her baby, the courts impose the burden on a father to support that child whether he wants it or not. That is his duty. Where’s daddy’s “right to choose”? He has no rights at all, only duties selectively imposed upon him by the granting of this bizarre woman’s right. So much for equal rights; so much for equal protection under the law. If daddy desperately wants his child and mommy wants to abort, too bad, so sad, dad. If daddy doesn’t want to be responsible for his kid but mommy wants to keep it, to bad, so sad, dad. Abortion is not only murder, it is also patently unfair by any meaningful standard.

In their infinite wisdom, the courts decided that fatherhood amounted to nothing more than donating sperm and writing checks. A woman kills her child and is regarded as making a choice with all the moral consequence of choosing whether to buy a particular blouse. A father walks away from a liftime commitment of supporting that same kid that momma could have had chopped into little pieces and he becomes a “deadbeat dad.” And the same courts that made all this possible – after creating the chaotic disaster of “no-fault divorce” – have also nearly unanimously decided that fathers shouldn’t get custody of their kids. They’re lucky if they get joint custody! Being a father means being pretty low on the totem poll. And of course, in recent years, we have lesbians actually taking advantage of the latest science to bypass daddy altogether. So much for dads.

Incredibly, the same secular humanists who utterly failed to see the consequences of their utter contempt for fathers have for going on forty years continued to fail to see the clear cause-effect relationship between abortion and the declining participation by fathers. But suprise, suprise. Fathers by the millions recognized and internalized the utter meaninglessness that society clearly impugned upon them and simply walked away. Duties without rights, plus criticism without recognition, is no way to attract men to embrace fatherhood. And, for that matter, rights without duties is no way to attract women to embrace motherhood.

The statistics are overwhelming and inexorable. Abortion. Fatherlessness. Out of wedlock births. Single parent households. Crime. Drugs. Gangs. Prison. Chronic dysfunction. Studies galore support the death of the family with the rise of a sociopathic youth culture. In many major cities, 65% of babies are born to unmarried women. Nationally, 70% of the long-term inmates in prisons who have committed the most violent crimes grew up without fathers. INTERPOL statistics have likewise revealed that single parenthood ratios were strongly correlated with violent crimes. Studies of juvenile offenders have shown that family structure significantly predicts delinquency. Children born out of wedlock are three times more likely to drop out of school than children in two parent households, and they are far more likely to end up on welfare. And study after study has demonstrated that children without fathers are far more likely to abuse alcohol and drugs, far more likely to be sexually, physically, and emotionally abused, far more likely to become obese, and far more likely to perpetuate the vicious cycle by having out of wedlock children themselves. And there is no connective link – NONE! – that more determines poverty than single parenthood.

You want to turn this tide around? Criminalize abortion. The problem isn’t too many children being born; the problem is fatherlessness! Stop the insane double standard. If fathers should have any duty whatsoever to support their children, surely mothers have at the very least the duty to allow their children to live! Hey, guess what? This isn’t a meaningless fetus; it is a precious, valuable human being, and BOTH mother and father have a duty to care for their child. Dad, you brought this little mouth into the world, and you have an obligation to provide for your baby; mom, you conceived this little bundle of joy, and you have an obligation to nurture your baby. But only a fool decrees that mother gets to decide whether a child should count enough to live, and that a father must somehow be duty-bound to completely respect and honor whatever her choice is. That is insane, and it is evil.

If we as a society begin to respect life enough that we begin to recognize that it is worth nurturing, worth, providing for, worth loving, and worth sacrificing for, then we will finally begin to see a turnaround in our society. Decades of terrible statistics will begin to improve as the society that demands that fathers recognize their children itself fundamentally recognizes children.

Abortion by its very design and by its very nature removes fathers from the equation of life. It is time to bring them back.

When fatherhood is trivialized, ignored, and removed as a factor by abortion, chaos follows. That’s what all the trends tell us. And that chaos has had a terribly detrimental impact upon society. The liberals who decry the United States’ involvement in the five-year old Iraq war may well have a point in noting the trillion-dollar debt that the war will cost American society; but they will not for a single nanosecond consider the multi-, multi-, multi-, multi-trillion dollar cost of abortion upon our society as it triggered massive fundamental philosophical and sociological degredations of human life. It is frankly incredible that so many supposedly intelligent people failed to see that the stupid logic that you are human only if you are wanted would not have massive unintended consequences.

And we will increasingly see the result of the international aspect of abortion as well. A June 13, 2007 news story (Infanticide, Abortion Responsible for 60 Million Girls Missing in Asia) begins as follows:

There is a little-known battle for survival going in some parts of the world. Those at risk are baby girls, and the casualties are in the millions each year. The weapons being used against them are prenatal sex selection, abortion and female infanticide — the systematic killing of girls soon after they are born.

According to a recent United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) State of the World Population Report, these practices, combined with neglect, have resulted in at least 60 million “missing” girls in Asia, creating gender imbalances and other serious problems that experts say will have far reaching consequences for years to come.

“Twenty-five million men in China currently can’t find brides because there is a shortage of women,” said Steven Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute in Washington, D.C. “The young men emigrate overseas to find brides.”

The imbalances are also giving rise to a commercial sex trade; the 2005 report states that up to 800,000 people being trafficked across borders each year, and as many as 80 percent are women and girls, most of whom are exploited.

“Women are trafficked from North Korea, Burma and Vietnam and sold into sexual slavery or to the highest bidder,” Mosher said.

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,281722,00.html

Here we have a clearly established link between abortion and sex selection, as well as clear correspondence between abortion and sex slavery as well as a link between abortion and an unstable and unsustainable societal dilemma in a nuclear state. What will be the long-term psychological state of an already rogue nation as hundreds of millions of men begin to come onto the scene who cannot possibly marry or ever enjoy a normal relationship with a woman?

I still recall Senator Hillar Clinton going to a women’s conference in China and lecturing the Chinese on abortion. In her view, although it is perfectly legitimate for American women to abort their progeny out of whatever subjective preference that entered their minds, as long as it is a woman’s “choice.” However, it is immoral for a nation-state to attempt – out of what they perceived as a direct threat to their national survival (i.e. a one child per family edict to control overpopulation) – to control the number of children born. This view is particualarly hypocritical coming from a liberal Democrat who generally favors big government bureaucratic solutions over individual free market ones. If her reasoning process wasn’t already twisted enough, she then proceeded to undermine her whole “abortion is wonderful as long as women choose to do it” by lecturing the Chinese on sex selective abortions, which are done not only in China but in much of the developing world out of long-standing cultural practices that value sons over daughters. In Senator Clinton’s reasoning, abortion is fine as long as it is a woman’s choice, as long as she doesn’t choose to abort her girls.

Sex selective abortions routinely take place throughout Asia, and is also a rampant practice in India and much of Latin America. In a bizarre but talionic twist, “a woman’s right to choose” has resulted in a literal holocaust against women.

And it is not only women who fall prey to the abortion mills. While so many liberals who claim to champion civil rights laud abortion, the fact remains that abortion has cut a terrible swath among black Americans. There is a clear prima facia case to be made that abortion seems to selectively favor the weakest, the poorest, and the most vulnerable members of society. If liberals had a functioning moral compass, they would be troubled by the ramifications of their ideologies. They don’t, and they aren’t.

Last month UCLA students had an actor call Planned Parenthood development centers in seven states asking whether his donation could be specifically targeted to “lower the number of black people.” Each branch agreed to process the racially earmarked donation. None expressed concern about the clearly expressed racist motives for the donation, and some staffers explicitly agreed with the racist reasoning. Planned Parenthood issued a statement that attempted to redirect attention from its profoundly racist staffers. We should likewise forget that 79% of Planned Parenthood abortion facilities are in minority neighborhoods, or that the founder of Planned Parenthood was a prodoundly racist proponent of eugenics. From its inception, Planned Parenthood has readily agreed with the statement, “the less black kids out there, the better,” which was uttered by the UCLA actor in his recorded conversation with Planned Parenthood’s Autumn Kersey. She called his position “understandable,” and indicated her excitement to process the donation. He was acting; the Director of Development at the Idaho Planned Parenthood office was not.

The Rev. Johnny Hunter has bemoaned the plight of black Americans, who are killing themselves off at an incredible rate, and has pointed out that abortion has killed far more blacks than the Klu Klux Klan. Dr. Alveda King, the niece of the famed Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., has used the same analogy, saying, “The great irony is that abortion has done what the Klan only dreamed of.” She quoted her uncle as having said, “It’s time that we remember the sacrifices of men like my father and my uncle who worked and died so that our children could live.” And she said, “It’s time to stop killing the future and keep their dream alive.”

The numbers are simply staggering. Dr. Alveda King says that a full one quarter of the black population is missing from the abortion genocide. “15 million black people have been denied their most basic civil right, the right to life,” she says. Out of 42 million total abortions in the United States, 15 million (35.7%) have been black. Black women are three times more likely than white women to have an abortion, and a nearly half of all black pregnancies are ending in abortion!

If conservatives championed a campaign that would inevitably come to result in the termination of women and blacks in massive numbers, one can only imagine the rhetoric of disgust and righteous outrage that would flood the media ink and airwaves. But the central plank of both liberalism and the Democratic Party has clearly done exactly that, and there is nothing but stony silence.

And may I point out (again) that abortion – which removes fathers from the equation and thus trivializes fatherhood – has anhiliated black fatherhood every bit as much as it has anhiliated their babies. When we look at the shocking statistics regarding black crime, drug use, incarceration, and dysfunction on virtually every level we need to realize that abortion is not the cure, but the disease.

Finally, let me discuss the relationship of abortion with the impending Social Security meltdown. By 2017, Social Security be greater than what it takes in (the definition of bankruptcy, by the way), and the trust fund will be completely emptied by 2041.

In 1950, there were 16 workers for every recipient of Social Security. Today there are only three workers for every recipient. And given current trends, within a few decades there will only be two. There are obviously other factors to account both for this trend and for the overall problems with Social Security in general, but no problem is greater than the fact that we have killed off more than 42 million potential workers since the 1970s. Grandpa’s generation did not exterminate themselves, you see (and all the wars from the Revolutionary War to the war in Iraq haven’t begun to kill off Americans the way abortion has!), and so there are a lot of people to support, and way too few to support them.

Medicare is in even worse shape. By 2014, payroll tax revenue will cover just over half of Medicare’s budget, and the program’s trust fund – which pays for critical medicare care – will be exhausted by 2019. Something dramatic will have to be done to save the program, and liberals’ promises to pump more government money into health care amount to what one of my professors – commenting on students who wrote lengthy answers to exam questions that somehow never arrived at an answer – called “pumping sunshine.” By the time the bickering parties and entrenched interest groups get around to seriously trying to turn around this Titanic, it will be too late to cut benefits, and workers will revolt on a level not seen since the early 1930s if they are called upon to pay the taxes necessary to keep the entitlement programs alive.

My fear is that the younger generation and the government bureaucrats will apply the same twisted reasoning as the thinking that brought us the abortion mills that caused so much of this growing disaster in the first place. If you can kill a baby before it has a chance to be born and become potential burdens upon society, why not kill the elderly before they have a chance to become guaranteed burdens on society? Watch out, grandpa! Because the generation that survived abortion will almost surely come after you!

Liberals despise the Bible, so let me end by quoting it. Proverbs 8:32-26, urging readers to pursue godly wisdom, says, “And now, o sons, listen to me: blessed are those who keep my ways. Hear instruction and be wise, and do not neglect it. Blessed is the one who listens to me, watching daily at my gates, waiting beside my doors. For whoever finds me finds life and obtains favor from the Lord, but he who fails to find me injures himself; all who hate me love death.”

Abortion is the love of death, and the pursuit of death over the pursuit of life. And the end of a culture that loves death is death.