Obama told us he was going to fundamentally transform America:
And, of course, he has.
This year, more than 46 million (15% of all Americans) will get food stamps. That’s 45% higher than when Obama took office, and twice as high as the average for the previous 40 years. This surge was driven in part by the recession, but also because Obama boosted the benefit amount as part of his stimulus plan.
Government-dependency benefits:
According to the Census Bureau 49% now live in homes where at least one person gets a federal benefit — Social Security, workers comp, unemployment, subsidized housing, and the like. That’s up from 44% the year before Obama took office, and way up from 1983, when fewer than a third were government beneficiaries
Direct government payments to the permanent welfare class that Obama has massively increased:
The amount of money the federal government hands out in direct payments to individuals steadily increased over the past four decades, but shot up under Obama, climbing by almost $600 billion — a 32% increase — in his first three years. And Obama’s last budget called for these payments to climb another $500 billion by 2016, at which point they would account for fully two-thirds of all federal spending.
Judi McLeod of the Canada Free Press points out the fact that:
“Most know by now that Obama dedicates his time to the end of America as it presently exists.”
One of the ways to illustrate what has happened in America is the flak that Newt Gingrich has taken for talking about a vision to not only put a man on the moon, but have a space station there. There is doubt, skepticism and outright mockery of him in the mainstream media (“Newt Skywalker“?).
Greta Van Sustern asked Newt about why that was. And Newt went right after Obama for killing America’s dreams and her future.
Gingrich pointed out that JFK in 1961 offered an even MORE audacious vision of putting a man on the moon when not only had no man ever been on the moon but when only the Soviet Union had ever even sent a man into orbit. JFK said we would put a man on the moon within ten years. And while he did not live to see the day because a leftist socialist assassinated him, we DID put a man on the moon within ten years of that famous speech.
Why can’t we now?
Because Obama has “fundamentally transformed America” into a country that can’t do anything and knows it can’t do anything, that’s why. And of course how could we with such pathetic, failed leadership? How could we possibly ever thrive under the wings of a man whose only talent is reading off a pair of teleprompter screens?
And the naysayers are completely right: nothing great is possible under this fool.
Only real leadership can get us to the Jetsons.
Newt Gingrich is dreaming of a day when America isn’t under the disgraced and failed leadership of “the Failure-in-Chief.”
Obama is taking us to the Flintstones. And the sad fact is that the dinosaurs we’ll encounter won’t be anywhere near as friendly as that cartoon described when we get to where Obama is taking us.
Please vote for the destruction of America and a future that takes us – and in particular our children – down into collapse and depression. Please give us more Obama because we simply don’t deserve to continue the way we’re going.
P.S. Hat tip to Fox News’ Greg Gutfeld for his “Jetsons-Flintstones” analogy.
Tags: direct payments, food stamps, moon, Newt Gingrich, Obama, welfare
January 30, 2012 at 8:02 am
The permanent welfare class needs to be abolished. If it is not abolished, then everyone will be on welfare. This will mean that the United States has ended its journey to Third World Status.
Please analyze before commenting.
Censorship is evil.
January 30, 2012 at 3:57 pm
Solutions777,
We can’t abolish a “class” of people, but we can certainly abolish a depraved political and economic system such as the welfare state.
For the factual record, America NEVER had federal welfare until FDR. And even FDR and Democrats of his era believed that just giving people money to sit on their couches was morally depraved.
But Democrats have become more and more and more morally depraved every day.
So we had a system degerate into the epitomy of moral hazard, where government policy ends up doing the very thing it is ostensibly designed to ease: namely in this case, creating and sustaining perpetual dependency.
I have quoted Burton Folsom on this subject as he pointed out:
The worst thing in the world is for welfare to be usurped by an out-of-control federal government.