Of the sons of Issachar, men who understood the times, with knowledge of what Israel should do, their chiefs were two hundred; and all their kinsmen were at their command — 1 Chronicles 12:32
How many blatant, obvious lies can an accuser who has ZERO corroborating evidence and who was literally refuted by all of her own witnesses tell and still be believed?
The answer should be one lie is way too many to believe such an accuser, especially when someone’s entire life and entire career is hanging on that accuser’s credibility alone.
One tweet simply referred tot he transcript of the interview between the prosecutor Mitchell and Blasey Ford:
Mitchell: How did you get to Washington, D.C., today?
Ford: On an airplane.
Mitchell: When were here in August, how did you get here?
Ford: On an airplane.
Mitchell: You’ve been to Hawaii and Tahiti?
Ford: Yes.
Mitchell: How’d you get there?
Ford: On an airplane.
It is a testimony to how truly bad our news media is that this isn’t front-page and leading news in newspapers and news programs across the nation, but here is the gist:
During her public testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday, Christine Blasey Ford admitted that she has flown often for business and pleasure in recent years despite citing her fear of flight in requesting that the hearing regarding her allegations against Brett Kavanaugh be delayed.
In explaining why their client could not grant Committee chairman Chuck Grassley’s request that she travel to Washington, D.C. to testify on September 17, Ford’s lawyers cited her unwillingness to fly, which they claimed stemmed from her fear of enclosed spaces. Ford’s attorney’s further alleged her claustrophobia was brought on by the alleged assault.
Rachel Mitchell, the Arizona sex-crimes prosecutor retained by the Committee to ask questions of Ford and Kavanaugh, established during the hearing that Ford traveled by plane to Washington, D.C. to testify regarding her claim that Kavanaugh pinned her down and tried to remove her clothes when they were in high school.
“May I ask, Dr. Ford, how did you get to Washington?,” Mitchell asked.
“By airplane,” Ford responded.
“I ask that because it’s been reported by the press that you would not submit to an interview with the Committee because of your fear of flying, is that true?” Mitchell asked.
“Well I was hoping that they would come to me but then I realized that was an unrealistic request,” Ford responded.
Mitchell went on to establish that Ford flies frequently as part of her work for an Australian consulting firm, to visit family on the East coast, and to pursue her interests in Hawaiian culture, oceanography, and surfing.
“In fact, you fly fairly frequently for your hobbies and you’ve had to fly for your work, is that true?” Mitchell asked.
“Correct, unfortunately,” Ford answered.
So citing this “fear of flying” which her attorneys represented as being directly due to her alleged sexual assault by high-school kid Brett Kavanaugh, Christine Blasey Ford claims she can’t possibly fly to Washington to testify for any hearing because flying reminds her of the tight, enclosed space reminiscent to her sexual assault. And, of course, as much turmoil as it is going to cause an entire nation and as much personal pain as a week-plus delay going to cause Brett Kavenaugh, Blasey Ford cannot possibly fly. It’s just too traumatic.
Unless she’s going on vacation, of course. Then she can fly for hours no problem.
I mean, Christine Blasey Ford is saying I don’t give a flying damn about the rest of the United States, I’m not flying, I’m just to afraid of flying because I’m the victim of a sexual assault. But, you know, if it’s my vacation, or if there is pretty much ANY other reason to fly, I’m fine with it.
But of course impossible when the entire United States of America is breathlessly waiting for you to show up and spew your spewage if the rabidly and vindictively partisan Democratic Party wants you to use every cheap and dishonest trick in the book to stall.
You liar. You lying liar.
Democrats got ten days of stall and delay out of that dishonest bit of credibility destruction. And because Blasey Ford calls herself the most pathetic of all victims who ever endured victimhood, the fact that she’s a personally dishonest liar who lied out of sheer political partisan expediency isn’t being reported.
Rather, the focus of most mainline media reports – otherwise known as “propaganda” – is that “fear of flying doesn’t mean that Ford can’t fly.” And very intentionally skipping the part that goes, “Really? Then why couldn’t she fly to Washington and testified ten days earlier???”
If she can fly for all of these other reasons,, surely the woman was capable of sucking it up to prevent the nation from twisting in the wind in this debacle for over a week, right?
Judge Kavanaugh in his highly emotional hearing testified that this fraud perpetuated by his bogus accuser literally tortured him, his wife, his daughters and his mother as all kinds of the most disgusting hell imaginable was unleashed on him and on his family during these days while Ford was lying about why she couldn’t be there.
And again, her lie is tied directly to her testimony about her alleged sexual assault.
On Sept. 21, the Judiciary Committee published the text of a proposal sent to Ford’s lawyers offering to fly committee members to California to speak with Ford:
“The Chairman has offered the ability for Dr. Ford to testify in an open session, a closed session, a public staff interview, and a private staff interview. The Chairman is even willing to fly female staff investigators to meet Dr. Ford and you in California, or anywhere else, to obtain Dr. Ford’s testimony.”
In the hearing, when Ford was asked if anyone, including her lawyers, had relayed to her the committee’s offer to visit her in California, Ford refused to answer when her lawyer objected:
Question: “Okay. Was it communicated to you by your counsel or someone else that the committee had asked to interview you, and that they offered to come out to California to do so?”
Counsel: “I’m going to object, Mr. Chairman, to any call for privileged conversation between counsel and Dr. Ford.”
Question: “Could you validate that the offer was made, without her saying a word? Is it possible for that question to be answered without violating any counsel relationships?
Ford: “Can I say something to you? Do you mind if I say something to you directly? I just appreciate that you did offer that. I wasn’t clear on what the offer was. If you were going to come out to see me, I would have happily hosted you and been happy to speak with you out there. I just did not — it was not clear to me that that was the case.”
If Blasey Ford is telling the truth here and not lying – just as she also lied and destroyed her personal credibility when she lied about her fear of flying as an excuse to do PRECISELY what the most partisan Democrats have been demanding from the moment Kavanaugh was nominated and delay, delay, delay some more – then her attorneys chosen by Sen Diane Feinstein are THE nastiest species of cockroaches ever identified under any disgusting fecal matter on planet earth.
This just goes to the narrative that, whatever the hell this woman’s issues are, the Democratic Party has been professing to care so deeply about her, only to cynically leak her letter at the most cynical possible Democrat-favorable moment when she supposedly begged for privacy and confidentiality, and then refused to inform her that she could spare herself not to mention her country a world of pain by having her testimony conducted in her private residence.
What you see clearly revealed here – if Christine Blasey Ford isn’t simply telling another credibility shattering lie – is the genuinely evil and depraved soul of the Democratic Party machine.
Which all further goes to utterly discredit her sexual assault at the hands of Brett Kavanaugh as nothing more than the very ugliest and very most cynical stunt by the most hateful people who ever lived, I’m not so sorry to say.
This is all so damn wrong in so many damn ways.
Christine Blasey Ford sent her letter to Dianne Feinstein on July 30.
President Trump had nominated Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court on July 9.
The 2012 notes, even in redacted form, are relevant because they are the first time Ford says she described the alleged assault in any detail. According to the Washington Post, the notes say that there were four male attackers–a discrepancy Ford attributes to the therapist–and did not mention Kavanaugh by name. Ford’s husband told the Post that she mentioned Kavanaugh at the time in 2012 and expressed concern Kavanaugh might be nominated to the Supreme Court. Kavanaugh had been profiled in the New Yorker that year, when Ford was piecing together memories of the alleged assault, as the most likely next Supreme Court justice if a Republican won the 2012 presidential election.
So the reason the notes haven’t been revealed is because, apparently, Blasey Ford did NOT reveal Kavanaugh by name. The ONLY person we have saying she had EVER said Brett Kavanaugh had attacked her is her husband, who I am frankly not inclined to trust as a non-biased source for very obvious reasons.
But, let’s go with the husband’s story just for the sake of argument: why the hell didn’t Blasey Ford write this letter the day Trump was elected???? Think about it: if Christine Blasey Ford actually did NOT want Brett Kavanaugh to actually ever be confirmed, don’t you think the time for her to write her stupid letter would have been BEFORE Trump actually nominated her alleged attacker??? If the Trump team had had any kind of heads-up whatsoever that this accusation was coming, do ya think they might have nominated somebody the hell ELSE????
This is a woman who named four witnesses to her alleged attack, one her closest friend. All four say they frankly don’t know what the hell Blasey Ford is talking about, that they never attended such a party; one says there is no possible way that Kavanaugh ever did anything like this, and her best friend says she doesn’t even remember ever even MEETING Kavanaugh.
3) Worse, the four other people she identified as attending the party, including Kavanaugh, all deny knowledge of the gathering in question, including Leland Ingham Keyser, who she calls a “lifelong friend.”
Keyser’s lawyer told the Senate Judiciary Committee: “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with or without Dr. Ford.”
The other two potential witnesses — Mark Judge and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth — also deny any recollection of attending such a party. The committee took their sworn statements “under penalty of perjury.” “These witnesses directly contradict Professor Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley advised Ford’s attorneys last week.
There very simply comes a point where YOU SHOULD NOT BELIEVE SOMEBODY. And Christine Blasey Ford crosses that line and then some.
Now, I can’t not fail to point out just how slanderingly dishonest the mainstream media is when it professes to “fact check” something. The AP has such a piece that professes to fact check Kavanaugh and says this highly respected jurist “misrepresented the record” when he said Blasey Ford’s three witnesses refuted her allegation. Which is to say they manage to use rhetorical ju jitsu to switch the story from what it actually is – that Ford states that these people were at the party where she was assaulted and in fact all four unequivocally state that they were not at such a party and did not see any such assault as Ford describes – into a highly technical word-game. Because, given the fact that Ford refuses to ever actually say WHAT party or WHERE the party was located, it is therefore impossible for any honest witness to say “no attack ever happened.” I mean, how the hell could they possibly say such a thing unless they knew precisely which party was the party in question which they don’t know because Ford didn’t specify???
Let’s just say for the categorical record that Ford says witnesses saw something that not one of them saw. And it is amazing how dishonest the AP was in their rhetorical quibble piece.
The last of the so-called “allegations” against Kavanaugh released by Creepy Porn Lawyer of Kavanaugh having a “gang rape ring” and having a minimum of ten gang rape parties is so shockingly and so transparently false that it ought to forever end the bogus narrative that no woman would ever falsely make a charge of sexual assault. I mean, think about it: the FBI did six separate background checks on this guy and asked all the people in his inner circle, all of his friends and acquaintainces about him, all of his neighbors, over and over, and you’d kind of think the “Well, he DID have that gang rape ring” would have come out. I mean, this woman claims she herself went to TEN of Kavanaugh’s “gang rape ring” parties. And you’ve kind of got to ask, “Just how many gang rape ring parties do you think YOU would have gone to – you know, especially after you yourself had been gang raped – before realizing that this wasn’t your scene??? And this wouldn’t just be a testimony to Brett Kavanaugh’s criminality; his whole TOWN, hell his whole STATE of Maryland, would have been revealed in shocking criminality. This is the kind of thing you send in the United Nations forces to stop because all legitimate law and order has broken down.
In other words, this is so laughably false it’s beyond unreal.
And when we stop and think about all the ways – apparently at least eight of them from that story I cite above – Blasey Ford’s story collapses, so is hers.
We come to what the Democrats demanded over and over again: an FBI investigation. Because I’m sure the Democrats are hoping this honest, unbiased FBI agent investigates Kavanaugh:
“The next person who refers to an FBI report as being worth anything obviously doesn’t understand anything. FBI explicitly does not, in this case or any other case, reach a conclusion, period. Period.”
To be a Democrat is to be a hypocrite. One cannot BE a Democrat and not be a hypocrite.
What do the Democrats want? Well, Diane Feinstein sat on the Blasey Ford allegation and even repeatedly talked to Kavanaugh and never once mentioned Blasey Ford in any of her questions. There was a bipartisan investigative process within the Judiciary Committee that would have kept the matter confidential, but that wasn’t in Feinstein’s naked partisan interest.
They didn’t want an investigation two months ago when there could have and maybe even should have been one because they KNOW FULL DAMN WELL an FBI investigation won’t turn up anything that would disqualify Judge Kavanaugh. I mean, again, Joe Biden said it himself. Again, think about it: Maryland does not have a statute of limitations on sexual assault, so Christine Blasey Ford could walk in – you know, because she claimed she was so dang terrified of flying in, I mean, right? – to the police department and file a complaint. But do you know what would happen if she did that? Absolutely NOTHING. Because Blasey Ford doesn’t provide enough detail of a specific crime to even justify an arrest warrant, let alone a successful prosecution.
They want time. They want time because they believe they can take enough of the Senate 38 days from now on November 6 to make a Kavanaugh confirmation impossible. And these cynical, professional liars know that if they have that extra time, more and more liars like Creepy Porn Lawyer’s client will crawl out of the woodwork.
I think the FBI ought to investigate why Christine Blasey Ford said she couldn’t fly to testify in Washington because she was so afraid of flying when she is obviously not very afraid of flying given how many other times in FAR less important situations she has flown. I think the FBI ought to investigate how the hell that doesn’t destroy this accuser’s credibility and render her story moot. I think the FBI ought to investigate whether Blasey Ford is lying or if her highly partisan Democrat Party activist legal team was demonically exploiting her by not telling her that the Judiciary Committee would have traveled to her house. On Blasey Ford’s own characterization, this was a betrayal of her, but it was just what the rabidly partisan Democrats wanted. I think the FBI ought to be investigating precisely who leaked Blasey Ford’s letter and why the letter was leaked when it was in a manner that, again, just happens to correspond to THE most cynical partisan Democrat goal.
So if you’re going to actually “investigate,” FBI, PLEASE INVESTIGATE.
On the demonically insane belief of the Democratic Party, they need a new FBI investigation because of course the last SIX FBI investigations into Judge Kavanaugh were so incompetent that they missed a gang rape ring that was operating right under their noses and gang raped scores of young girls. And so the Democrats are putting their bets on the FBI that missed this godawful gang rape ring to finally get an investigation right this time.
Either that, or every single Democrat is insane and evil.
It was a terrible event that forever scarred my life: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagen once fondled me at a party. I can’t recall where the party was or what year the party happened, I don’t remember how I got there or how I got home. And all the witnesses I name whom I say saw it happen actually swear under oath that they hadn’t seen any such thing and my story is “nuts.” But these three judges need to step down and resign. After all, an accusation was made, and an accusation by itself ought to be more than enough to destroy someone’s life because, after all, these three justices cannot prove that they WEREN’T at a place I claim I can’t remember during a time I claim I can’t recall. This is the very black roach heart of lawlessness that violates every due process protection that is at the heart of what makes our Constitution great. And cockroach fascist Democrats are pissing all over those protections as we speak.
Give me your name and I’ll find someone to accuse you of a terrible, despicable sexual act, date unspecified, time unspecified, place unspecified, and if you cannot prove that you were never at a date that isn’t specified and a time that isn’t specified and a location that isn’t specified, by your very own toxic ideology you ought to be destroyed if you cannot prove what is impossible for you to prove no matter whether you’re completely innocent or not. How can you prove you weren’t at a particular place when your accuser won’t tell you where the place is? Or how can you prove you weren’t even at a damn party on a particular night because you can show you were somewhere else when your accuser doesn’t have to bother to say when the alleged assault took place?
And so yes, we actually have the direct quote of the Democrat Party’s current strategy: “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime.” These boastful words that come right out of current Democrat activist thought were spoken by Joseph Stalin’s deputy premier, Lavrentiy Beria. Stalin frequently stayed up late into the night signing thousands – ultimately millions – of death sentences based on evidence such as is being proferred by these Democratic activists. They just made up crimes for whoever they wanted to based on their political needs at the moment.er how innocent you actually are of the allegation.
In Communist China, which cockroach Democrats yearn to have here, the accused is guilty until proven innocent as an essential component of their legal system. And if the State wants you to be guilty, you are guilty regardless of whether you are innocent or not. That is precisely what Democrats want here.
Democrats keep claiming “this isn’t a trial.” Yeah, right. It’s way more akin to this:
This scene from “The Crucible” was written by a man named Arthur Miller who was using witchhunts as political analogy to describe what was going on during a period we today call “McCarthyism,” when just an accusation was enough to get a completely innocent person destroyed.
Brett Kavanaugh is being used in a vicious, partisan, toxically-political way as the stand-in for EVERY female accusation. If ANY woman EVER has EVER ONCE been sexually assaulted, then Brett Kavanaugh is somehow guilty and ought to be destroyed.
Any woman who has a father, or a brother, or a little boy, desperately needs to go out and vote Republican in droves. Or watch their men be destroyed by a rabidly evil Democrat Party system of “justice.”
I want you to realize that the Democrats who are saying “This isn’t a trial are the very people who as Senators have the privilege of confirming JUDGES. And what Democrats are screaming right now is that the rule of law is not necessary for any judge to bother following; the presumption of innocence is not necessary for any judge to follow; due process is not necessary for any judge to follow. If the Senate that confirms judges doesn’t have any such requirements, then the judges they confirm sure as hell don’t, either. Good damn luck if you appear before a traffic court judge who has chosen to follow Democrat Party standards and judged you guilty just because that judge didn’t need any actual evidence to destroy your life.
It’s not enough to suggest that Judge Brett Kavanaugh would be convicted on the so-called “evidence” presented against him that he is a would-be rapist; he wouldn’t even be ARRESTED by any legitimate legal process given the fact that there have been ZERO damn facts and ZERO damn witnesses presented to corroborate ANYTHING these slanderers have claimed.
Our Constitution enshrines two concepts as sacred to our legal proceedings: due process and a presumption of innocence until proven guilty. The fact that Democrats are rabidly attacking BOTH of these sacred aspects of our Constitution ought to terrify any decent human being. These people are now far worse than McCarthyism ever was and are on the verge of reaching the psychotic level of the French Revolution just before the Reign of Terror when a meritless accusation meant a death sentence.
Democrats have also thrown out in addition to due process and presumption of innocence the rule of law. Let’s consider that Dianne Feinstein made an incredibly cynical and vile decision to sit on this allegation for seven full weeks. What should she have done if the rule of law were followed rather than the mystery of lawlessness being revealed?
When Senator Dianne Feinstein received very serious allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, she could have—and should have—handled those concerns through the committee’s normal protocols. This process, which applies not just to Supreme Court nominees but to hundreds of judicial and Justice Department appointments, is specifically designed to protect the interests of both accusers and nominees. The process is both confidential and bipartisan. Its goal is to pursue the truth, not political advantage. That Senator Feinstein inexplicably chose not to handle the serious allegation Dr. Christine Blasey Ford made against Judge Kavanaugh according to these procedures has had terrible consequences for all the individuals involved and has done lasting damage to the Senate and the Supreme Court as institutions.
The Democrats chose to “fundamentally transform” what was supposed to be an orderly process into a monkey-poop-throwing contest. What they have proven is that they are rabid perverts of everything our nation was supposed to stand for when it came to how accused people are constitutionally required to be treated.
But there is so much more in this toxic betrayal by Democrats out of very simple, visceral political ideology and tactics: Dr. Ford through her legal team has steadfastly been demanding that Judge Kavanaugh be required to speak first and then she be allowed to speak afterward and rebut whatever he says.
That method of “getting to the truth” actually DOES have historical precedent: it was how Spain handled accusations during a very grim, very dark period known as “The Spanish Inquisition.” The accused would be required to defend himself or herself against accusations that had not yet formally been made. Which means it was nearly impossible for any kind of defense. It was a wicked time. And Democrats very badly want to go back to the periods and tactics of the very most wicked regimes and periods in history. Democrats are literally invoking the same standard used in the Spanish Inquisition to produce the same wicked results the Inquisition produced. That’s who these vile people are.
How is Judge Kavanaugh supposed to defend himself against a charge that he did something, time never mentioned, time never mentioned, place never mentioned. How is he supposed to have any chance whatsoever to prove that he wasn’t at that particular place at that particular time???
Imagine this was your son being destroyed like this, liberal. And for the record, I mean, imagine this happened to one of our sons that you DIDN’T murder in the abortion mills. I mean, imagine you had any capacity for any human love for your offspring at all. Oh, what the hell, I’m wasting my time asking for human empathy for Democrats: they’re bugs. They murder their own babies. They have bug souls. Of course they cannot be reached with any human appeal to empathy.
Amazingly, Democrats demand that we throw out actual convictions on the basis that the prosecutors or the judge or the jury was somehow “racist” or “biased,” even as they themselves right now are demanding that an entire group of people – men – are guilty merely by virtue of the fact that they are “men” “and we all know how them people are.” The Democrats and their rabid media propagandist have slobbered all over themselves framing the Republicans as “a bunch of white men.” What the hell does this have to do with RACE??? Both the accused and the accusers are WHITE. But Democrats are the very worst kind of demagogues and they play every red-herring fiddle they have in their arsenal of demonic tricks whether those demonic tricks have anything the hell to do with their case at hand or not. So they use the word “white” just because they know they can inflame their followers with even more rabid hate than these haters already have. And the funniest thing of all is, virtually every Democrat playing the “white” card were THEMSELVES WHITE!!!
I’m going to put the essence of the world the left wants to create in terms of the Aryan and the Jew: when an Aryan accuses a Jew of committing a crime – any crime with or without any evidence whatsoever – the Jew is presumed guilty even if there is some way to prove the Jew innocent. And all you’ve got to do is substitute a couple of words to see that what I’m claiming is true: exchange “Aryan” for “feminist woman” and “Jew” for “conservative man.”
If a liberal woman accuses a conservative man of rape or sexual harassment or just being a bad man, that woman is to be believed regardless of any or all lack of evidence and even if that woman’s accusation is literally destroyed by any witnesses she claims saw the alleged event. Which is precisely what is happening to Judge Kavanaugh.
Still another issue that needs to be mentioned is the Democrats’ demand that this allegation be investigated by the FBI, which has made a public statement that the FBI doesn’t the hell investigate these kind of political charges. It should at this point be mentioned that the Democrats have been rabidly screaming themselves into padded-rubber-room hysteria crying for any delay they can call for since Kavenaugh was brought forward to begin the confirmation process. The fact is that Democrats were screaming to delay the process from the moment the process began even before anyone (but Diane Feinstein, who concealed the allegations for obvious political reasons I’m about to point out) KNEW about any sexual allegations. Which amounts to a cynical opportunity from the most cynical people on the face of the earth to cynically scream for the same cynical delay they’ve already been screaming for. They have been stalling and stalling, hoping they can draw out the nomination process long enough for the upcoming election to change the political landscape in a manner that would mean that Judge Brett Kavenaugh never be confirmed.
And so Diane Feinstein sat on allegations that should have gone to the subcommittee for a fair and impartial hearing and investigation had there been any fairness or impartiality in any Democrat on the face of the earth. Had they actually given ONE FLYING DAMN about any actual investigation, they would not have wasted SEVEN WEEKS THAT COULD HAVE AND WOULD HAVE BEEN SPENT INVESTIGATING. Instead, they pissed away any ability the Republicans had to be able to spend significant time investigating just so they could frame Republicans with the bogus and false charge of refusing to investigate. These people are the worst kind of liars and the worst kind of manipulators there are or ever have been.
But it gets better, because had the FBI actually DONE an investigation, we have these words from former Senator and former Obama Vice President Joe Biden;
Joe Biden snarled back then:
“The next person who refers to an FBI report as being worth anything obviously doesn’t understand anything. FBI does not in this or any other case reach a conclusion…”
So why do they want what they mocked when the FBI investigated the bogus sexual allegations against the last Justice the wicked pervert Democrats tried to demonically frame??? The same damn reason Diane Feinstein threw the rule of law and 230 years of Senate custom out the window when she sat on allegations for seven weeks, had multiple opportunities to question Brett Kavanaugh about these allegations herself and refused to mention the allegations at any time to any one during the entire conformation hearing, only to leak them after the hearing had already ended: to create as much of a climate of rabid, toxic hatred as this wicked woman from a wicked party could possibly foment. To stall for time, using the cheapest, most dishonest, most vile imaginable stuns to do what the legitimate democratic process and Constitution prevents them from doing and destroy a Supreme Court nominee with the worst slanders.
Another witness that Ford says was there – Patrick J. Smyth – also says Ford is simply not telling the truth:
“I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post,” Smyth says in his statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.”
Both men have now sworn under oath, under penalty of perjury, that what Dr. Ford claims to have happened did not happen as she claims. Because she claims they were there and they say under penalty of perjury that that is false.
These men and Judge Kavanaugh himself were questioned under penalty of perjury. You would think Democrats would want to be part of such a session, but they were completely and utterly disinterested in truth or anything close to searching for the truth. Not one single Democrat appeared at the hearing because there is literally not one single decent or honest Democrat.
Another person claimed by Christine Blasey Ford to have attended a gathering decades ago during which, Ford claims, she was sexually assaulted by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh has denied any recollection of having attended the party.
In an email to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Saturday, Leland Ingham Keyser, a former classmate of Ford’s at the Holton-Arms all-girls school in Maryland, said she doesn’t know Kavanaugh or remember being at the party with him.
“Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford,” lawyer Howard J. Walsh III of Bethesda, Md., conveyed in an email to the committee that was obtained by Fox News.
At what point do you dismiss Ford’s fake allegation as what it is – a politically-motivated slander – and vote to confirm a justice who has an unimpeachable record??? At NO point, if you are a demon-possessed cockroach, A.K.A. a Democrat.
Amazingly, the Democrats’ main talking point is that “Dr. Ford has no motivation to lie!” Which is as false as the claim that they have no motivation to lie. Let me just put it this way: is it literally the claim of every Democrat that the Democratic Party and the left are NOT fired up in protest of the Kavanaugh nomination??? Are they actually pretending that leftist women like Dr. Ford couldn’t care less whether Justice Kavanaugh would take away abortion rights??? Not only are these leftists surrounding Ford demonstration that, yes, Dr. Ford and these leftists SURE AS HELL DO have a motivation to lie, but that in fact they are actually LYING when they claim they don’t have a motivation to lie.
Dr. Ford testifies that she is afraid of flying as a result of her horrible attack by that horrible man, Judge Brett Kavanaugh. She stole a week of the nation’s time stalling – strangely EXACTLY like the Democrats want her to do which is strange unless she’s a militant liberal activist … oh, that’s right, she IS a militant liberal activist! – claiming that she couldn’t fly to Washington D.C.BUT STRANGELY THAT DIDN’T BOTHER HER WHEN SHE MOVED TO HAWAII and apparently forgot all about this lifelong trauma that made her so terrified of doing what she made a conscious decision to do and get on an airplane and FLY when it was convenient.
Abortion and the other liberal issues like abortion are what this is all about. And so all of a sudden a judge who had just sailed through his nomination hearing is viciously slandered with an attack that he attacked a woman at a party, place unknown, year unknown, but let’s not let facts get in the way of our slander of a judge who has an unimpeachable record and who has gone through six different FBI background checks in his life.
My contention, for the record, is this: Dr. Ford might possibly be telling the truth recounting some sexual assault she experienced at some point in her life, but she is flagrantly lying about who her assaulter was. It was NOT Brett Kavanaugh, and the reason she has to “disremember” every single other relevant detail other than her contention that she was assaulted is that Kavanaugh was never anywhere where he could have assaulted her. My contention is that Ford is lying because she literally believes it is noble to lie if lying will stop Judge Kavanaugh from becoming a Supreme Court Justice and overturning the political values we know for a FACT Ford espouses.
What party is Ford talking about? Well, that’s kind of impossible to be certain about, given that Ford does not have to say what party, or where the party supposedly was, or what day the party was on, or what month the party happened, or even what dang freaking YEAR the party happened.
Other than a naked political show trial, I doubt very much that a single prosecutor would take on such a detail-free case without any ability to verify or substantiate any part of her story, or that any judge would agree to hold court to such a case. The FBI doesn’t want anything whatsoever to do with it, arguing completely correctly that taking on such an investigation is not part of their lawful perview because the alleged act would be a state rather than federal crime. But the Democrats claim that President Trump should do something that is nothing more than a hardcore partisan Democrat delaying tactic and order the FBI to investigate. And I don’t doubt that Democrats also demand that disgraced and fired Trump-hating former FBI agent Peter Strzok and his paramour Lisa Page be the lead investigators, too. This is that damn ridiculous.
Interestingly, Prof. Christine Blasey Ford initially claimed she wanted to have the right to be heard. But when the Republicans gave her the opportunity, all of a sudden the story changed, and she didn’t want to be heard as she ignored not one but more than ELEVEN SEPARATE ATTEMPTS TO REACH HER TO GIVE HER PRECISELY THE OPPORTUNITY SHE HAD CLAIMED SHE WANTED. No, her lawyers were taking their orders from the Democratic Party which was demanding a full FBI investigation that would take months and delay the nomination until after the election when they believe they will have the numbers to block it forever. Not that Ford or any of her lawyers have any political motivation whatsoever, of course (just gag me).
Another fun claim by the left is that Dr. Ford passed “a lie detector test.” For the record, there is no such thing as a “lie detector test.” It is a polygraph, which does NOT measure whether a person is lying, but rather measures physiological responses such as blood pressure, pulse, respiration, and skin conductivity while under questioning. Basically, all a polygraph actually does is measure how physiologically threatened a subject feels during the procedure. It is actually based on a theory that is itself not even proven: There is no actual evidence that any pattern of physiological reactions is unique to deception; and an honest person may therefore be nervous when answering truthfully while a dishonest person may be non-anxious. It is not admissible in courts because it has been proven over and over again to be unreliable as an indicator of whether a subject is actually being truthful or deceitful. It most definitely can be beaten if someone knows the tricks of the test. It HAS been beaten and has been documented to have been beaten.
Do you know who would be in the best position to defeat a polygraph? Think hard. A trained psychologist, like Dr. Christine Blasey Ford.
Christine Blasey Ford was a year or so behind me. I did not know her personally but I remember her. This incident did happen. Many of us heard a buzz about it indirectly with few specific details. However Christine’s vivid recollections should be more than enough for us to truly, deeply know that the accusation is true.
Hi all, deleted this because it served its purpose and I am now dealing with a slew of requests for interviews from The Wash Post, CNN, CBS News. Organizing how I want to proceed. Was not ready for that, not sure I am interested in pursuing. Thanks for reading.
Then, Miranda wrote this (now deleted): “To all media, I will not be doing anymore interviews. No more circus. To clarify my post: I do not have first hand knowledge of the incident that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford mentions, and I stand by my support for Christine. That’s it. I don’t have more to say on the subject.”
Why Delete It?
So why would Miranda delete her posts? Most likely, because Ford, as the Washington Post reported on Sunday in its story that revealed her identity, “told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband.”
Oopsie. Did a woman just prove the lie that “no woman would EVER lie about sexual assault”??????????????
Yes, it turns out WOMEN LIE.
Tawana Brawley LIED about being raped. This notion that no woman would EVER tell a lie about a sexual assault is ITSELF A LIE. Democrats are demon-possessed liars. That’s what “Democrat” means: DEMOnic bureauCRAT.
FACT: it’s NOT just men who lie; women lie just as much and just as bad. And we have numerous factual proofs that yes, women will make up false accounts of sexual assaults. We just had an example of this in the news as the Oregon Innocent Project freed a man convicted of sexual assault of his daughter and sentenced to fifty years in prison. Only his daughter LIED and they could PROVE that she LIED.
We have a WOMAN LIAR just in this Judge Kavanaugh story ALONE. It is just as easy for Dr. Ford to lie as it is for Miranda to have lied as we KNOW she lied. This woman who claimed to back up Ford’s story is a LIAR just as Ford is lying.
And, again, we now as a matter of FACT that Dr. Ford has EVERY ideological MOTIVATION to lie in order to prevent Judge Kavanaugh from sitting on the Supreme Court.
Deborah Ramirez actually was calling Yale classmates and asking if any of them remembered anything and stated that she herself could not remember:
“Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself,” The New York Times reported.
“The Times had interviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story, and could find no one with firsthand knowledge,” the report also stated.
Ah, hell, he’s obviously guilty anyway.
But amazingly, it gets even MORE whackjob. There is no end to Democrat hate, Democrat hypocrisy, or Democrat psychosis.
This woman named Swetnick claims that Judge Kavenaugh while a high school student actually operated a gang rape ring. She says she went to ten of Kavenaugh’s gang rape parties apparently expecting maybe next time she WOULDN’T be raped, according to her story, but of course she was each and every time. I mean, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and getting raped every time you keep doing the same thing over and over.
I’m being facetious here, but this is beyond nuts.
This woman Swetnick by her own account is a criminal who should immediately be arrested for her role in the rapes of numerous underage girls. On her own account, she was a legal adult, and children were being raped all around her, and she never said ANYTHING such that more girls kept getting raped.
Another problem is that Creepy Porn Lawyer’s client’s story is laughably false. I mean, imagine having a rape ring and gang raping girls at a minimum of ten different gang rape parties. The problem is that if nobody knew about it, then how could anyone actually show up??? And if anyone knew about it, then EVERYONE knew about it. I mean, “gang rape ring party” isn’t the kind of topic that inspires yawns and disinterest. But in more than 35 years, NOBODY but this demented freak woman know about them!!!
“We have seen reports today that Julie Swetnick, who says she graduated from Gaithersburg High School, submitted a declaration to the Committee alleging that Brett participated in horrific conduct during high school, including targeting girls for gang rape,” reads the letter addressed to Chairman Chuck Grassley and ranking committee Democrat Dianne Feinstein from 64 classmates.
“Nonsense. We never witnessed any behavior that even approaches what is described in this allegation. It is reprehensible.”
The group said none of them recall meeting an individual named Julie Swetnick.
“Brett Kavanaugh is a good man. He has always treated women with respect and decency,” the classmates said. “He is a man of honor, integrity, and compassion. These shameful attacks must end. This process is a disgrace and is harming good people.”
Ah, what the hell, he’s obviously guilty. I mean, if a billion people say you’re a wonderful human being and one Democrat says you’re evil, you can count on the mainstream media “news” report to confirm that you are evil as a fact confirmed by witnesses.
So much for Creepy Porn Lawyer’s demented client. Hopefully Swetnick will gang rape Creepy Porn Lawyer all the way to being elected president. This nation apparently deserves a rat bastard like Creepy Porn Lawyer as president, judging on how we are treating Judge Brett Kavenaugh.
Pretty much EVERY lawyer involved with Judge Kavanaugh fake victims is a creepy porn lawyer.
Let’s take Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s creepy porn lawyer, Debra Katz. You can see through the creepy porn lawyers that represent Kavanaugh’s bogus victims how partisan, how truly demonically political, these creepy Democratic Party porn lawyers truly are.
Debra Katz proves what the Democratic Party REALLY thinks about women and about sexual harassment and sexual violence in who ELSE she has represented. And she was as a good creepy Democratic Party porn lawyer perfectly willing to viciously side AGAINST female victims when the accused piece of filth was a DEMOCRAT:
But while her client’s claims have raised bipartisan concerns about Kavanaugh, Katz, a longtime Democratic donor known for representing sexual harassment accusers, also has a history of downplaying or dismissing accusations made by women against Democratic politicians — including former President Bill Clinton and former Minnesota Sen. Al Franken.
“Paula Jones’ suit is very, very, very weak,” Katz said on CNN’s “Talkback Live” in March 1998 in a discussion about Jones’ claims against Clinton, according to a show transcript. “She’s alleged one incident that took place in a hotel room that, by her own testimony, lasted 10 to 12 minutes. She suffered no repercussions in the workplace.”
Jones, who worked as a government employee in Arkansas, accused Clinton, while governor of Arkansas in 1991, of propositioning her for sex. Clinton settled a lawsuit with Jones in 1998. …
”If a woman came to me with a similar fact pattern, that is someone in the company above her propositioned her but only once and she suffered no tangible job detriment,” Katz told The New York Times in 1998, ”I would probably tell her that I’m sorry, it’s unfair, but you don’t have a case.” …
In more recent years, Katz also downplayed the wave of sexual misconduct allegations against Franken, who denied some of the allegations but eventually resigned from the Senate over them.
“Context is relevant,” Katz said of Franken, who was a comedian before his election to the Senate. “He did not do this as a member of the U.S. Senate. He did this in his capacity of someone who was still functioning as an entertainer.”
By the very standard that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s own damn creepy Democratic Party porn lawyer has used before, Ford doesn’t have any case whatsoever. After all, Ford’s allegations don’t even have Kavanaugh doing anything for anywhere near ten to twelve minutes, and of course, not only was Kavanaugh not a member of the U.S. Senate, he wasn’t a judge. Hell, he would have been a high school kid. No harm, no foul, move on.
But a characteristic of a creepy Democratic Party porn lawyer is a constantly-shifting double-standard.
“I got one better than that, Shifty,” said Ms. Broaddrick in a Friday tweet. “[Your] party elected a sexual predator/rapist as President & when the evidence was put under their nose, they refused to read it.”
She referred to the 1999 impeachment hearings against President Bill Clinton that ended with all Senate Democrats — including Sens. Dick Durbin, Dianne Feinstein and Patty Murray — siding with the Democratic president, despite multiple allegations of sexual misconduct.
Ms. Broaddrick said Senate Democrats refused to read her deposition in which she accused Mr. Clinton of raping her in a Little Rock hotel room during his 1978 campaign for Arkansas governor, an allegation which he has denied.
Democrats have a vile, despicable tradition ignoring their own brutality and rape toward women whenever it suits them. This tradition of vileness is at least as old as Ted Kennedy, “the lion of the Senate,” who left a helpless woman to slowly and miserably die so he could live on to invent the vicious cockroach tactic known as “Borking” whereby good Republican Supreme Court nominees are slandered with lies by pathetic little roach pukes like Ted Kennedy. It survived fat and healthy through the Bill Clinton rapist years, and continued through the Hillary Clinton rapist-enabling years. And now we have a brand new breed of sexual predators such as Keith Ellison.
And we’re also seeing the literal destruction of 2000 years’ of Western Civilization and nearly 250 years of Constitutional governance in order to do it.
So the New York Slimes comes out with this bombshell story that Rod Rosenstein – basically the Attorney General given that the supposed A.G. Jeff Sessions made himself ridiculously irrelevant basically immediately after being confirmed when he recused himself from doing the hell his job – wanted to wear a wiretap and record the President of the United States in order to get him to say something insane so the sane players in the Trump administration would have grounds to invoke the 25th Amendment and get rid of the whackjob-in-chief.
All of this is based on completely anonymous sources, mind you, with the only actually quoted source being Rosenstein himself saying the New York Times is fake news gibberish featuring the slanders of ideologues with an axe to grind:
“The New York Times’s story is inaccurate and factually incorrect,” he said in a statement. “I will not further comment on a story based on anonymous sources who are obviously biased against the department and are advancing their own personal agenda. But let me be clear about this: Based on my personal dealings with the president, there is no basis to invoke the 25th Amendment.”
So which side is correct, I ask: the side that is yet another of by now a thousand proofs that there is a leftist unelected and untouchable “deep state” within our bureaucracy that is pathologically un-American (in the sense that nobody elected these bozos to rule and reign over us and undermine our elected president) and fascist (in the sense that these people are vicious and rabidly dishonest thugs who will stop at NOTHING to undermine our elected president)??? Or the Rosenstein version, that the New York Times truly is just fake news that will report any lie no matter how anonymously “sourced” if it makes Donald Trump or the Trump administration look bad???
No matter what, the left is composed of rabidly evil bugs. The only question is whether the rabidly evil bugs at issue in this particular case are the deep state bureaucrat bugs or the New York Times fake news propagandist slandering bugs.
So, basically, liberals are bugs.
Attorney General Rod Rosenstein – and I say that because the one man who is most definitely NOT “Attorney General” is the sad, pathetic disgrace who was supposed to be holding that job – is very clearly pointing out that “there is no basis to invoke the 25th Amendment.”
Which is to say that if Rosenstein himself were actually being serious – which is the heart of the New York Times story if these pathologically dishonest fools are to actually be taken seriously – he was the one who was actually a whackjob, rather than Donald Trump. He would be on this particular version of the narrative a paranoid, delusional power-mad goon unfit for this job or basically any other significant position in even suggesting something that he is now forced to admit has “no basis.”
Now, there is another possibility that really and truly makes the New York Slimes look so bad – yet again – that it is frankly amazing that anyone would actually still hold a subscription to something that by now has less validity than the National Enquirer at its very worst moment.
NBC’s reporting holds that Rosenstein made this “what do you want me to do? Wear a wiretap? Invoke the 25th Amendment?” comment because an FBI roach named Andrew McCabe – who is both a documented liar and a documented anti-Trump deep state fascist goon – was pushing Rosenstein hard to get vicious with the POTUS and Rosenstein was resisting.
For the record, the version of the story that the New York Slimes in its rabid ideological bias decided to go with was the Andrew McCabe version for the simple reason that basically any fascist thug who is trying to take out the President of the United States is a friend of the left, as long as that president is a Republican.
While McCabe’s memos assert both the recording and 25th amendment conversations occurred at a meeting within days of Comey’s firing, another person at the meeting, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, insisted the recording comment was said in a moment of sarcasm, and that the 25th amendment was not discussed.
That person said the wire comment came in response to McCabe’s own pushing for the Justice Department to open an investigation into the president. To that, Rosenstein responded with what this person described as a sarcastic comment along the lines of, “What do you want to do, Andy, wire the president?”
That person insisted the statement was never discussed with any intention of recording a conversation with the president.
Another official at the meeting, then-FBI lawyer Lisa Page, wrote her own memo of the discussion which does not mention any talk of the 25th amendment, according to a second person who was familiar with her account.
A third person familiar with the discussions said McCabe had privately asserted previously that Rosenstein suggested invoking the 25th amendment and the idea of a senior law enforcement officials wearing a wire while talking to Trump.
So we have the McCabe version that the New York Slimes is swearing by in spite of the fact that Andrew McCabe is disgraced, fired and facing very likely criminal charges for criminal behavior in his fascist attempts to enable his fellow deep state conspirators Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Bruce Ohr, etc. When you actually start questioning other sources, the first says that it was bloody damn obvious Rosenstein’s comment was spoken in sarcasm, which makes the New York Slimes, well, slime, in its reporting. The second person is Lisa Page, hardly a reputable source herself, but even she says the 25th Amendment was never discussed, making the story again worthless for anything other than yellow journalism. And the third says that it was actually surprise, surprise, McCabe himself who was the fascist whackjob who was pouting the insanity of the 25th Amendment delusional psychosis.
Do you know how BAD this ought to make the New York Slimes look??? They literally select THE most dishonest and most biased source they can find to “substantiate” their fake news hit piece of a story.
So it is by now an obvious fact that, yes there is a deep state that is fascist at its core and doesn’t give a flying f-word about the Constitution or democracy or the will of the American people or anything else. They are a Fifth Column, a Nazi-version of the Praetorian Guard, and they are rabid and ugly and dangerous and dishonest and toxic to any republic or any democracy. We now frankly know that there is a deep state thanks to the New York Slimes’ own “reporting” given their infamous op-ed by a deep-stater who wrote:
I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump AdministrationI Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration: I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.
We see again the echoes of this fascist attempt to remove President Trump with the 25th Amendment, which for the record was passed in the immediate trauma of President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, when it was feared that a president could be in a coma unable to carry out his duties. Check out this dangerous, rabid, fascist quote that implies violence to the President of the United States:
Given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for removing the president. But no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis. So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over.
Project Veritas further confirmed the frightening, Nazi deep state that exists not to do the work of our legitimate, elected government but rather to subvert the will of the American people and the Constitution. They found multiple deep state goons who were actually willing to go on camera and be interviewed and boast that they are part of the “resistance” to our nationally and constitutionally elected government.
Amazingly, Donald Trump claimed that there was a deep state within the U.S. government that was out to subvert our legitimate government, and the very deep-state and the news outlets that rely on these deep-state fascists for their anonymous hit pieces mocked Donald Trump and claimed he was literally insane to think such a thing.
But Trump WASN’T crazy; he was right.
And now these Fifth Column Nazis who need to be hunted down with dogs and burned alive if we are to actually have a constitutional republic who said that Trump was crazy for believing there was a deep state are now saying that there is a deep state only because Trump is crazy. But the fact remains that they are now all proven to be rabid liars. And we are very much on the verge of having the fear Abraham Lincoln ended his famous Gettysburg Address with come to pass: that a government of the people, by the people and for the people actually WILL perish from the earth.
These Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Bruce Ohr and yeah, quite possibly Rod Rosenstein-types are no different than Nazis, because by definition they hate the United States of America, its Constitution, and its people even as they falsely claim to be acting for the very things they most rabidly hate.
And, just to make it even WORSE, is the fact that our “news media,” our so called “journalists,” are every bit as bad as the deep state they are assisting every single day with “anonymous-sourced stories” from these deep state embedded Nazis. The New York Times supposedly is the flagship, the Gray Lady, of “journalism.” But they are far more like Pravda, the Soviet-era communist “newspaper” that reported nothing but propaganda and lies. Do you know what “Pravda” means in Russian? It means “The Truth.”
But ALL of these people hate the truth.
It’s so damn funny, and when I am in heaven and every single liberal is screaming in agony in the eternal fire of hell, I am sure I will laugh uproariously at the joke of it all. This story, like virtually every single other story that has slimed President Trump, is based on anonymous leaks. The leftist media LOVES these leaks. Which makes it all the more laughable in its pathological hypocrisy that when President Trump seeks to declassify memos that would actually expose THE TRUTH, the leftist media that loves government leaks so much is coming unglued.
These people are all as dishonest and as evil as hell is hot. And one day they will discover just how hot hell truly is.
And that’s why we are in the times we are in right now, where the economy is at an all-time high but Nazi-baby-murdering-holocaust-homosexual-perverts are trying to slander the President and the Republicans so their communist roach Democrats can slither their way back into power. Our jobless rate just fell to a 49-year low under this president, but all the media can talk about is fake sexual assault claims from a leftist ideologue woman from 36 years ago and a made-up fake news story.
Fact One: An overwhelming majority of Democrats – to the tune of 57% to 47% – now “favor” Marxist communist socialism that has enslaved every people foolish enough to try it economically, politically and morally over the free market capitalism that made our nation the great land of the free and the home of the brave:
47% of Democrats view capitalism positively, down from 56% in 2016
57% of Democrats now view socialism positively, little changed from 2010
Republicans very positive about capitalism; 16% positive on socialism
WASHINGTON, D.C. — For the first time in Gallup’s measurement over the past decade, Democrats have a more positive image of socialism than they do of capitalism. Attitudes toward socialism among Democrats have not changed materially since 2010, with 57% today having a positive view. The major change among Democrats has been a less upbeat attitude toward capitalism, dropping to 47% positive this year — lower than in any of the three previous measures. Republicans remain much more positive about capitalism than about socialism, with little sustained change in their views of either since 2010.
Views About Capitalism and Socialism: by Party
Positive view of capitalism
Positive view of socialism
%
%
Democrats/Leaners
2018
47
57
2016
56
58
2012
55
53
2010
53
53
Republicans/Leaners
2018
71
16
2016
68
13
2012
72
23
2010
72
17
Gallup
These results are from Gallup interviewing conducted July 30-Aug. 5. Views of socialism among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents are particularly important in the current political environment because many observers have claimed the Democratic Party is turning in more of a socialist direction.
the fact that the intellectuals are more totalitarian in outlook than the common people.
And now combine these two facts: that intellectuals are people – unlike plumbers or carpenters or engineers – who live in a world of ivory tower egghead pure theory and who never have to actually have their ideas tested in the laboratory of reality no matter how profoundly wrong their ideas are; with the fact that these same intellectuals always tend to lean toward totalitarianism which all the ordinary people who live in the real world shun in horror. Add those two things up and we get this amazing fact:
That’s why. Because to be a liberal IS to be a totalitarian and to be a totalitarian is to pursue Stalinist purges of anyone who might think differently from the totalitarian. Liberal progressives are THE most rabidly intolerant people on the face of the earth, and their purge of conservatives from academia speaks for itself as to what and who these people truly are. Colleges and universities have become nothing more than left-wing echo chambers where any concept they disagree with is even allowed to be presented or considered. They are brainwashing centers rather than mind-expanding centers.
The saddest thing is that liberal progressives have and always have a rabid contempt for the very people they most indoctrinate (these victims are called “students”). This is proven by the fact that:
And amazingly, the fact that depraved leftists have skyrocketed the costs of college tuition is THE reason leftists say we should follow the depraved leftists into more depraved leftism by socializing our colleges and universities (even more than they already have been). Because in every single communist society, EVERY SINGLE ONE, you have your version of the elite inner party member who live a lives of luxury in their Black Sea dachas. It’s a game that works every single time because these socialist-elitist predators leave their victims more desperate, and more willing to embrace fool solutions that only give the socialist-elitist predators still more power to oppress with their “solutions.” to the very crises they themselves manufactured. By analogy, if I viciously punch you on the left side of your face, I can balance out the damage by viciously punching you on the right side of your face, you see. As government-worshiping liberal progressives cry for more and more student loans, these same hard-core greedy rat bastards simply raise the costs of their tuitions every time the amount of the loans increase. And so in the same way, the liberals who undermined American wages by encouraging tens of millions of unskilled illegal immigrant laborers to flood our labor markets proceed to demand that businesses be forced to pay massively hire wages for these unskilled workers whether their businesses can afford such costs or not. Because every single time these totalitarian egghead intellectual ideas fail, they merely propose an even more sweeping totalitarian egghead intellectual “solution” to liberally-progressively create an even bigger problem, ad nauseum, ad infinitum.
The Bible has a lot to say about how people who were ostensibly created in God’s image come to believe incredibly stupid things:
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools (Romans 1:22)
always learning but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth (2 Timothy 3:7)
Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ (Colossians 2:8)
These socialist-elitist leftist progressives don’t care about you; you are nothing more than a means to an end to them.
At this point, the Democratic Party has degenerated to a point where it is a truly evil entity.
It truly never ceases to be amazing to me how in FACT Democrats have spiraled into the most perverted wickedness in the history of our nation, yet somehow manage (with their propagandist media fake-news allies in the press) to create some myth that it’s the Republicans who have gone “radical.” The simple fact of the matter is that Democrats are now actively embracing and supporting a philosophy that has literally failed every single time it has ever been tried. People under socialism become impoverished in every possible sense of the term. Socialism crushes the dignity and value of the human spirit. You are not an individual special creation of a loving God who made you in His image; you are nothing more than a cog in a human-created perversion machine. There are so many examples of this it boggles the mind:
“There are two kinds of mines; one is the personnel mine and the other is the vehicular mine. When we come to a mine field our infantry attacks exactly as if it were not there. The losses we get from personnel mines we consider only equal to those we would have gotten from machine guns and artillery if the Germans had chosen to defend that particular area with strong bodies of troops instead of with mine fields. The attacking infantry does not set off the vehicular mines, so after they have penetrated to the far side of the field they form a bridgehead, after which the engineers come up and dig out channels through which our vehicles can go.” — Field Marshall Georgy Zhukov to General Eisenhower, p.467/8, Crusade in Europe, John Hopkins University, 1997. One of the reasons Soviet losses were so appalling during World War II was that Stalin was so monstrously uncaring about the lives of millions of his own people. Soviet doctrine valued their equipment over the lives of their soldiers. That’s the crystalline essence of socialism: the dignity and rights of “the person” are irrelevant compared to the needs of “the people.”
Or let’s try this one from Chairman Mao: An episode titled “The One Above All” showed footage of Mao speaking at the World Communist Representative Meeting in Moscow in November 1957, giving his famous speech, “American Imperialism Is a Paper Tiger.”
Mao’s exact words were: “I’m not afraid of nuclear war. There are 2.7 billion people in the world; it doesn’t matter if some are killed. China has a population of 600 million; even if half of them are killed, there are still 300 million people left. I’m not afraid of anyone.” That’s the true roach-heart of socialism speaking. Socialists are bugs who would eagerly eat their own babies much the same way Democrats have murdered sixty million of their own babies in their abortion mills. This vileness of poisoned human spirit through the wretched wickedness of human depravity is nothing new. It is as old as Cain and Able, and St Paul the apostle described the modern Democrat Party very well in Romans chapter one.
Democrats have become truly rabidly toxic.
Which leads me to Fact Two: the return of the Communist Show Trial in a genuine depravity of anything remotely resembling “justice.” This was impossible in our American system until Democrats became so completely morally depraved that they were incapable of manifesting or exhibiting a single virtue of character. Democrats first gave the middle-finger salute to God and His Word the Bible and “progressively” defecated on the very concept of the image of God until they became no morally different than bugs. Look at the ant to see how much you as an individual are valued by a society that embraces Democratic Party philosophy.
How many unskilled illegal immigrants pushing down wages and soaking up taxpayer benefits is enough? How many tens of millions more can we afford? For that matter, since they won’t ever acknowledge there is any problem with unstopped illegal immigration, how many hundreds of millions more can we afford as a society??? When will today’s Stalinist Democrats “Build the damn wall”??? And the answer is, “When illegal immigrants start voting Republican, and not a second before.”
The next time Democrats get power, just like Stalin, just like Mao, just like the Kims in North Korea, they will never relinquish it. They will stop at nothing and will do anything no matter how destructive it is to their own oppressed nation to guarantee they never give up power again. They need non-citizens who have no love if not open contempt for the United States of America to impose their will, and they’re going to get their way or else. It is their bug nature.
I’m watching the trial of Paul Manafort and literally watching a real-life communist show trial on my own soil in my own country. This is a case that on its face had absolutely NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with either Donald Trump or Russia or any form of “collusion” – whatever the hell that even is – with Russia. Mueller is viciously and vindictively pursuing socialist show trial witch hunt tactics to break Paul Manafort in blatant and contemptuous disregard of “justice.” As an example, Mueller’s “star witness” was Manafort’s BUSSINESS PARTNER who was EVERY BIT AS GUILTY in any 2005 tax fraud case as Manafort was. The Democrats’ star roach was not only directly participating in every shady deal Manafort was part of, but all the while he was stealing money from his business partner in order to finance his adultery and his own lavish lifestyle. And by Mueller’s deal with him, Manafort’s business partner Rick Gates would go away scot free while Manafort will spend the rest of his life in prison. Does that sound like “justice” to you??? But we see in this shocking disregard of “justice” what Mueller believes Paul Manafort’s REAL crime was: being part of Donald Trump’s successful presidential campaign. THAT was Paul Manafort’s crime. THAT is the ONLY reason this man is on trial.
This is “justice” to Democrats because Democrats are now by definition bugs incapable of “justice.”
Please understand how obviously a “show trial” this is: the Democrats – by which I mean the “Special Counsel” investigation of Robert Mueller who appointed a team consisting ENTIRELY of Democrats. The Daily Caller News Foundation first reported that there were 13 registered Democrats and zero Republicans known to work for Mueller in February. The probe then brought on a 14th Democrat in May. What are the damn odds of this? Fourteen Democrats, NINE of whom gave significant donations to Democrats, not ONE Republican??? The Wall Street Journal reported in December 2017 that one of the leading Mueller lawyers, Andrew Weissmann, actually attended the election night party for presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Revelations that FBI agent Peter Strzok, a former member of the team, exchanged anti-Trump text messages with an FBI lawyer including this one:
Amazingly, in a bug-morality world of socialist show trials, the lead investigator’s statement that “We’ll stop Trump from becoming president” was not considered “bias.” In any other world, it literally amounts to an obvious statement of crystal-clear intent. But in the world of bug-morality socialist show trials, it is irrelevant because it obviously doesn’t create the “guilty” verdict that is all that matters.
Mr. Strzok sent fellow FBI employee Lisa Page, whom with he was having an affair, a text in August of 2016 referencing an “insurance policy” discussed in a meeting between the two of them with “Andy,” who Mr. Horowitz identified as Mr. McCabe.
The text read: “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”
Upon Mr. Horowitz’s investigation and discovery of the text messages, Mr. McCabe denied ever attending the meeting, but Mr. Strzok told the inspector general the former FBI deputy director was there.
So the lead agent in the socialist show trial witch-hunt who said he would stop Trump from becoming president in obvious statement of his intent was part of a conspiracy with the number two man at the highest level of the FBI to have an “insurance policy” to prevent that Trump presidency from happening.
We can keep going: Lead FBI agent Peter Strzok stated that “he could smell the Trump support.” Well, the STENCH of deep-state not only criminal but treasonous conspiracy continues with a Justice Department high official named Bruce Ohr. Basically, Christopher Steele – the source of the ant–Trump “dossier” financed by the Hillary Clinton campaign in collusion with Russia that we now know was THE centerpiece of the socialist show trial witch hunt investigation – had actually been FIRED by the FBI for being untrustworthy. And his “dossier” was rightly contaminated and discredited into uselessness by his firing. But, you see, Bruce Ohr’s wife was employed by Fusion GPS, the source of the “dossier”. And so this tainted, discredited, contaminated document was “laundered” back into use through Bruce Ohr and the back channels he criminally manufactured such that an obvious LIE became the “truth” once again long enough to open a socialist show trial witch hunt.
Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr joins the list of FIRED officials who were rabidly biased and who were conspiring against the will of the American people to bring down an elected president of the United States though illegitimate and bogus socialist show trial witch hunt fake charges. They succeeded in their plot: get an investigation started such that a “special counsel” with socialist show trial witch hunt powers would assemble a team of hard-core Democratic lawyers to dig up every shred of dirt over the course of Donald Trump’s entire life regardless of how “limited” the original mandate of looking ONLY into the fake news case of “Russian collusion” was.
You’ve got Trump people like Paul Manafort and Carter Page (who didn’t do a damn thing wrong but was surveilled by a deeply corrupt Obama administration anyway) and Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn (see also here) and former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen who were broken by rabid prosecution regardless of whether they committed any crime or not. Contrast that with seventy Hillary Clinton co-collaborators and co-conspirators who were as a matter of routine given “immunity” and let off regardless of how many laws they broke. Somehow Hillary Clinton was exonerated IN WRITING before anyone even bothered to interview either her or any other of the principal characters most of whom had already received sweetheart immunity deals without having to testify against ANYBODY. No one who is not a BUG can look at the whitewash of the Hillary investigation and the rabid pursuit of the Trump witch hunt and not see a deeply disturbing double-standard by a blatantly politicized FBI and Justice Department.
Here is the real collusion with Russia. And Barack Obama and every single Democrat ought to be arrested, prosecuted, convicted and punished to the fullest extent of the law for their part in it.
We see here the deep state in action. Such a thing only became possible when half of the American people became bugs incapable of human morality or human integrity or human decency or human virtue or human honesty. Socialists are people who voluntarily degenerate themselves into bugs. And by their fruits ye shall know them for the bugs they are.
The June 2016 Trump Tower meeting between high-ranking members of the Republican presidential campaign staff and a Russian lawyer with Kremlin ties remains the cornerstone of claims that Donald Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election.
A growing body of evidence, however, indicates that the meeting may have been a setup — part of a broad effort to tarnish the Trump campaign involving Hillary Clinton operatives employed by Kremlin-linked figures and Department of Justice officials. This view, that the real collusion may have taken place among those who arranged the meeting rather than the Trump officials who agreed to attend it, is supported by two disparate lines of evidence pulled together for the first time here: newly released records and a pattern of efforts to connect the Trump campaign to Russia.
The first line of evidence includes emails, texts, and memos recently turned over to Congress by the Department of Justice. They show how closely senior Justice Department officials and the Federal Bureau of Investigation worked with employees of Fusion GPS, a Washington-based research firm reportedly paid $1 million by Clinton operatives to dig up dirt on the Trump campaign.
You have to read the whole article to believe it. What the article documents is that the meeting was a setup by Democrats and by Russia to “to substantiate the Clinton-funded dossier alleging that Trump was taking dirt on his rivals from the Russians.” What was said at the meeting was irrelevant; they just needed some kind of meeting to launch the accusation and get some kind of investigation going that would never end and would never stop at anything until it found some kind of dirt on Donald Trump no matter what it took.
Barack Hussein Obama did something truly shocking and truly horrifying during his presidency that makes Watergate look like a parking ticket. Obama literally wiretapped the other party’s candidate for president and lied about it (see also here), worse than ANYTHING Nixon did. He weaponized our “justice” system into an entity that looks EXACTLY like the Soviet Union’s NKVD protectorate of socialist ideology. And Hillary Clinton’s campaign actively conspired with Russia to do this. And an American media system, heralding back to its yellow-journalism roots and looking at the Soviet Union’s TASS as their example to follow, proceeded to hypocritically frame the target of this Democrat-Russian conspiracy as “colluding with Russia.”
Barack Obama weaponized the remaining vestiges of our democracy into an engine of destruction against our democracy. And he did so by relying on giant and massively powerful federal democracies staffed by hard-core SEIU leftists that have NOTHING to do with our constitutional system of government to do it.
What we have here is the end-game of the Cloward and PIven strategy to use our very institutions against our democracy and our Constitution and the citizens of the United States of America in order to accomplished the cherished goal: the goal of socialism, by which I mean the goal of communism.
I can’t disagree overly much with a number of media folk who are criticizing Trump as offering bizarre remarks following his meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Ultimately, the ONLY thing Russia, or for that matter China or North Korea or anyone else, respects is raw American power and the willingness to ruthlessly deploy that arsenal of economic, diplomatic and military power to achieve our objectives and get these nations to abandon their objectives as not worth the price they will pay.
For the record, the Democratic Party has made that tactic entirely impossible. Because any foreign thug leader surveying the American political landscape sees nothing but a divided United States with a fanatic opposition fanatically opposed to its own president. Donald Trump cannot operate from any genuine position of strength and our enemies know it. The ally of Putin and every other dictator on earth is the Democratic Party, because they want our worst enemies to succeed rather than to give Trump ANY victory or potential claim of victory.
Let me put it this way: the Democrats are basically screaming that if Trump doesn’t declare World War III and send our entire arsenal of nukes blasting off toward Russia, he must be a Russian puppet. But of course if he does anything like that, the same people who demand war will blame Trump for going to the war that they demanded he initiate to retaliate for this “election meddling.” It’s actually truly insane.
Democrats – and their media allies who are propagandists rather than “journalists” due to their bias and due to their agenda of helping one side with its narratives while attacking and freezing the other side with negative narratives – are declaring that President Trump shouldn’t meet or even be allowed to meet with the Russian president; notwithstanding that every single American president from FDR during WWII on have routinely met with the Russians even in the very worst days of the Cold War. Because both sides realized we need to have top-level executive dialogue with the other greatest nuclear power on the face of the earth. When Democrats are trying to weaken Trump to the point where he can’t even have a meeting, there is no question that a Putin will smell that division and the weakness that is created by that division and act like a bad player.
Democrats are screaming in rage that Trump wants to have some kind of positive relationship with Russia. Let’s contrast that with these Democrat hypocrites when Obama was running for re-election and in one of his debates with Mitt Romney – after Romney declared that Russia was America’s “number one geopolitical foe” – arrogantly lectured Romney with these words:
OBAMA: “Governor Romney, I’m glad that you recognize that al-Qaeda’s a threat because a few months ago when you were asked, what’s the biggest geopolitical threat facing America, you said Russia – not al-Qaeda, you said Russia. And the 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because, you know, the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.” (Barack Obama, 2012 Presidential Debate , Boca Raton, FL, 10/22/12)
Remember, to be a Democrat is to be the very worst form of hypocrite imaginable. According to every single damn Democrat today – if these roaches were capable of any kind of honesty or decency – Obama was not only an incompetent moron who was clearly unfit to be president, and clearly who should have been impeached rather than re-elected, but he was also just as clearly a puppet of Vladimir Putin. We have to ask what it was that Putin had on Obama that he would say something that by current standards was so treasonous when the Republican candidate stated
In his final press briefing in 2017, President Barack Obama was asked about whether he could have done or said more about the Russian hacking that happened on his watch. Obama said:
“It’s not like Putin’s going around the world publicly saying ‘look what we did wasn’t that clever.’ He denies it. So the idea somehow that public shaming is gonna be effective I think doesn’t read the thought process in Russia very well.”
Obama said Putin denies it. There’s no point screaming about it. We need to move on. Which is to say that Trump didn’t take any tone during his “infamous” meeting with Putin that Obama hadn’t taken.
“There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America’s elections, there’s no evidence that that has happened in the past or that it will happen this time, and so I’d invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and make his case to get votes,”
For the sake of history, allow me to point out that EVERY SINGLE ACT OF RUSSIAN ELECTION MEDDLING OCCURRED UNDER BARACK OBAMA’S WATCH, UNDER HILLARY CLINTON’S WATCH, UNDER JOHN BRENNAN’S WATCH, UNDER JAMES CLAPPER’S WATCH, UNDER JAMES COMEY’S WATCH. Obama said to stop whining about election interference.
And Democrats have been not merely whining, but hysterically crying like babies thrown into boiling water ever since.
The hypocrisy of it all. This psychosis of rabid hypocrisy simply has to stop.
I still remember how every single Democrat and every single “news reporter” yawned as Barack Obama in a hot mic moment actually told the stooge sitting in for President-for-life Vladimir Putin that “After my election I’ll have more flexibility.”
Why the hell was it okay for Obama to literally get caught on VIDEO telling Vladimir Putin how “flexible” he would be in giving Russia and Putin what they wanted but so evil for Trump to do nothing that even pales in comparison with Obama’s “I’ll be your willing slave if you just allow me to be president again” moment???
Maybe this might be a good time to mention the fact that the Clintons’ clearly colluded and conspired with Vladimir Putin and Russia and actually accepted something like $150 million in bribes to give Putin U.S. uranium. Even the leftist Washington Post holds that the Clintons ought to have been investigated. But it’s not fascist to collude with Russia if you are a Democrat and your name is Barack Obama or Bill or Hillary Clinton.
Pardon me for shrugging when these Democrats who pulled all this fascist, anti-American, Russian-colluding crap now say that Donald Trump who has done nothing even CLOSE to these roaches ought to be investigated and castigated.
You really have to marvel at the rabid hypocrisy of the Democratic Party and the willingness of the mainstream media to follow the Joseph Goebbels Ministry of Propaganda model for Democrats.
But when the hell did this start happening??? What caused it???
Take a trip down memory lane to the days just before and during the period when the Democratic Party began to turn truly evil and truly anti-American.
IN ONLY TWO BRIEF YEARS -1964 and 1965 – Lyndon B. Johnson did more to advance the cause of black Americans than any American President since Abraham Lincoln, and initiated a program for the enrichment of American life as revolutionary and far-reaching as the New Deal. ”We are entering a new era of good feeling,” pontificated The Washington Post in 1964, ”and Lyndon Johnson is the gargantuan figure making it all possible.”
Maybe it was because this giant civil rights accomplishments were advanced largely through cooperation with the Republican Party:
It was after this that a cancer truly began to metastasize in the Democratic Party. And the question is what happened that this giant of civil rights was destroyed by his own party?
And he pointed out that his own party was growing toxic right out from under him as it betrayed the United States of America for a decidedly anti-American communist ideology that had put the United States “in more danger” “from these left-wing influences” “than we’ve ever been in” and said “and they’re working in my party from within.” That’s the DEMOCRATIC Party, mind you:
“We just had hell [with] these college students…I’ve had Hoover in after them… They marched here, and we arrested 600 of them, and we gave 29 of them pretty rough times. We found most of them were mentally diseased. Hoover’s taken 256 that turned in supposedly their draft cards…So you’re dealing with mental problems…I think we talk too damn much about civil liberties and constitutional rights of the individual and not enough about the rights of the masses…I think your government’s in trouble, general…I think it’s—I don’t want to say this–but I think we’re in more danger from these left-wing influences now than we’ve ever been in the thirty-seven years I’ve been here. And they’re working in my party from within.”—Lyndon Johnson as recorded in a telephone conversation with former President Dwight Eisenhower, October 1967. From Episode Five of The Vietnam War.
”Why, that draft protest last week that got everyone so excited. According to the F.B.I. report, out of the 256 who were supposed to have burned their draft cards, a substantial number were crazy people who had a previous history in mental institutions. . . . One of our informants in the Communist Party . . . reported that the Communists decided to do all they could to encourage demonstrations against the draft.”
Johnson removed his hand from his wife’s grasp, leaned forward, the intensity returning: ”Now I don’t want to be like a McCarthyite. But this country is in a little more danger than we think. And someone has to uncover this information.” — LBJ, in conversation with his wife as reported by the New York Times, August 21, 1988
LBJ, as reported from that same that same New York Times article;
”It’s all a few intellectuals and columnists,” Johnson confided to a few members of the White House staff sitting with him in the Oval Office. ”The people loved me, and they believed in me. You just go down to the White House basement. You’ll see them. Boxes full of letters, all praising me for doing the right thing. They spread the doubt – every morning I wake up and see another column attacking me, or some professor on television. Naturally, people get confused with all these voices shouting and hollering about how awful I am.
And:
”Not just in the press. I was always getting advice from my top advisers after they had been in contact with someone in the Communist world. Hell, you can always find Dobrynin’s car” -Anatoly F. Dobrynin, then Soviet Ambassador – ”in front of a columnist’s house the night before he blasts me on Vietnam.”
The New York Times attempts to frame LBJ as a man who lost his way and frankly went crazy, but you keep reading and watch how totally right this man who did more for genuine civil rights than ANY Democrat had ever done before or has ever done since truly was.
History records that the Democratic Party rabidly turned on LBJ in a way that would have stunned rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth dogs. LBJ saw it developing, watched helplessly as the communist influence extended further and further into his own party that he loved and had invested his life and career advancing, but was powerless to stop it. Until the rabid fringe metastasized into a powerful enough cancer to destroy its own president.
History records that the 1968 Democratic Party National Convention was one of the ugliest, most anti-American events in American political history. Even the reliably leftist Washington Post said: “The 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago was an infamous, violent, unprecedented disaster.” Democrats were violently rioting in American cities and on college campuses. Much the same damn treasonous way they are now. And the riots have the same rabidly leftist and frankly COMMUNIST point of origin that LBJ correctly identified and as a decent American was horrified by.
the Vietnam War stands as the absolute nadir of American military history. That war has scarred and in Obama’s words “fundamentally transformed” every single American war effort ever since. Because every single enemy we have since had knows that all they have to do is somehow hold out for as long as possible, because it is simply a fact that it is now in the DNA of Democrats to betray America and side with the worst enemies of humanity in the history of the world. There is absolutely no question that the Democratic Party politically manufactured and caused our defeat in the Vietnam War in which American troops never lost so much as a single battle. Democrats sided with the communists because that is what they themselves have become, and divided America against itself, and in Lincoln’s words which were a quote from Jesus’ words, “a house divided against itself cannot stand.” And so every single enemy we have fought since knows as a fact that the Democratic Party will ultimately betray America, betray their own warriors, betray their own people, and create a military defeat. And so quagmire after quagmire has occurred as a result of the hope and confidence that Democrats have instilled in all the worst enemies of humanity.
LBJ saw this rabid, Democratic Party communist hate rising and spreading and beginning to take over his own party from within, but he couldn’t stop the hate from rising. Because he also saw how the hate was groomed and skillfully propagandized by the mainstream media and by the university faculties.
And that’s were we are today, folks. And that’s where Donald Trump is today.
Washington (CNN)Former US intelligence chiefs expressed astonishment and condemnation Monday in response to President Donald Trump’s comments at Monday’s news conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin, with former CIA Director John Brennan calling the US President’s performance “nothing short of treasonous.”
Following his one-on-one meeting with Putin in Helsinki, Finland, Trump declined to endorse the US intelligence community’s assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election over Putin’s denial, saying the Russian President was “extremely strong and powerful” in his denial.
“Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki rises to & exceeds the threshold of ‘high crimes & misdemeanors.’ It was nothing short of treasonous,” Brennan, a frequent critic of Trump who served as CIA chief from 2013 through January 2017, tweeted during the event. “Not only were Trump’s comments imbecility, he is wholly in the pocket of Putin. Republican Patriots: Where are you???”
No, you vile communist cockroach, Trump didn’t commit treason. Rather, YOU JUST COMMITTED SEDITION.
Really, all I need is John Brennan to prove that Donald Trump most definitely should NOT trust “US Intelligence” given the infiltration by Obama communist ideologues into the deep bowels of our once American intelligence apparatus.
Speaking of outright sedition, another Democrat actually called for a military coup:
Democrat Steve Cohen tried to walk it back, saying “When I called for the military to step in and stop Trump I wasn’t suggesting a coup.” Really? What the hell else WERE you suggesting, you demonic liar??? We are talking about the Democratic Party going rabid batpoop psychotic to the point of both sedition and treason. Just like the same wicked political party did in the days of Lincoln when they went so rabidly full of hate toward a Republican president named Lincoln they actually abandoned the United States and declared war against her. And waged that war with a rabid hate that stunned the world. These Democrats are the exact same wicked lunatics now.
“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office – that there’s no way he gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk,” Strzok texted in August 2016. “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”
There is absolutely no legitimate or reasonable question at this point that there is in fact a “deep state” that is out to destroy Donald Trump and we also know that this deep state includes and involves numerous former Obama appointees to the U.S. intelligence establishment and in fact many faceless bureaucrats like Strzok and Page who are just radically leftist unionized roaches using their power to attack, to stall, to illegitimately “whistleblow” to reveal scandals that they themselves manufactured to target Trump appointees.
As an example, the FBI agents who interviewed Trump official Lt. Gen Michael Flynn stated that they saw absolutely no indications that Flynn had lied. But somehow the same FBI that refused to hand down ONE indictment in the 72 people who committed multiple serious felonies covering up the Hillary Clinton scandal still nailed Lt. Gen. Flynn to the wall like a bug for “lying to the FBI.”
All of this is deep state, deep state, DEEP STATE, DEEP STATE. It is treason and sedition against our nation, our Constitution, our American people. And Democrats have proven in their rabid defense that they are entirely involved in this treason and sedition.
Now, I don’t quite comprehend what exactly the hell President Trump is doing with some of his statements with Vladimir Putin, but Trump is completely right when he points out that somehow the same Democrats who rabidly attack Trump conspired to destroy tens of thousands of incriminating emails implicating Hillary Clinton and refused to turn over their party’s own Russian-hacked server that quite likely ended up the same exact way as Hillary Clinton’s own server and pretty much all of her BleachBit-acid-washed hard drives and hammer-smashed cell phones.
We now know that basis of this “investigation” was tainted by a “dossier” that rival political candidate Hillary Clinton paid a foreign agent to get from the very Russia they claim Trump colluded with, which amounts to Democratic collusion with Russia to destroy an opponent. We now know that the dossier is filled with so many factual falsehoods that it is beyond unreal. We now know that the FBI and our oh-so-trustworthy-and-reliable intelligence community somehow never once questioned regarding the information or the source of that information.
Independence Days celebrates the first move toward driving out the British, Cinco de Mayo celebrates the Mexicans driving out the French.
We’ve got a problem. We’re being invaded right now today.
I watched with great interest a program focusing on Mao’s Cultural Revolution which resulted in the deaths on untold millions and likely tens of millions. Mao’s leftist policies had failed so blatantly and so appallingly – some 50 million perished of starvation during his so-called “Great Leap Forward” – that the top Communist party leadership realized that this fool needed to be bypassed for the sake of the nation. But Mao was a totally self-serving tyrant, rather than a leader who gave a flying damn about his own people. He was completely wiling to launch a bloodbath that would burn half of his nation to the ground if he could rule the other half. Mao had lost control of his own government, but not his power to poison with his propaganda. Claiming that current Communist leaders were taking the party, and China itself, in the wrong direction, Mao called on the nation’s youth to purge the “impure” elements of Chinese society and revive the revolutionary spirit. He basically authorized children to torture and murder their own parents, school children to torture and murder their own teachers and professors, and so on. The Red Guard were everywhere, torturing and killing and burning. It was a ten year long bloodbath the entire purpose of which was to restore Mao’s fanatic hold over a society that would have found the setting of Orwell’s “1984” a peaceful, serene place.
The point that I am making is that you ought to consider that today’s Democrats are truly no different in their poisonous, completely selfish and self-centered spirit than Chairman Mao. Like Mao, the Democrats are dictatorial demagogues who truly do not care about anything but their own power and their own raw political self-interests. And they will do whatever is necessary to achieve their ends no matter how destructive are the means. And to liberals, being that they have no God as the transcendent source for morality or genuine ethics that come from morality, the ends always justify the means. We’ve already seen nascent versions of the Red Guard from our own communist left: the Tea Party never had one riot, never got so much as one ticket, let alone had one of their own arrested. But the Red Guard spirit of the left launched the Occupy Wall Street bowel Movement, launched the bitter, seething Black Lives Matter bowel movement, and from their launched dozens of violent FASCIST attacks on Trump supporters merely for believing that in a democracy they had the freedom to support their party’s candidate for president.
Oh, we’ve got our own Democratic Party Red Guard today as something that literally JUST HAPPENED illustrates:
And guess what? This particular vicious fascist has the name of Kino Jimenez. Democrats have been importing his ilk by the millions.
Just like the Red Guard, these vicious, fascist young people believe they not only have the right, but in fact the duty, to do these hateful things. And they have been set upon decent people by the Mao-tse-tungs of liberalism, the Democratic Party and their propaganda machine, the mainstream media, telling -frankly screaming – at us on such a regular basis that Trump is so evil that we need to have our own Cultural Revolution to restore what Trump destroyed in America.
You’re going to see below that I’m now out to lay blame on the people who are trying to get into this country. I’m very much out to point out that we have a treasonous, profoundly anti-American group of people who are doing everything possible to bring immigrants in by whatever means they can, legal or otherwise, to load the dice for the cynical, frankly wicked game they want to play with the American people powerless to stop them from playing it as they rig the system using Saul Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals from within of every branch of government and every bureaucracy of our government. Just think of the liberal “judges” who think that the manufactured “right” of abortion based on invented “penumbras” and “emanations” is somehow “settled law” when the same wicked judges who clearly don’t give a damn about our Constitution believe the clear text of the 2nd Amendment can be overturned. Over and over again, these fascist leftist judges have issued psychotic rulings that are as partisan as hell is hot. Or try this one: Think of the top brass Obama installed in the FBI who texted each other with fascist treason such as this exchange between high-level FBI officials deeply involved with both the Hillary Clinton whitewash and the Donald Trump witch hunt:
PAGE: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”
STRZOK: “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.”
This is what we’re up against. And when I say “we” I mean the American people.
A liberal author named David Faris wrote a Book titled, “It’s Time to Fight Dirty.” Not that the Democrats have ever fought any other way, as it were. But here’s what he said:
Republicans have always feared that immigration would change the character of American society. Democrats should reward them with their very worst nightmare.
Tucker Carlson on his program pointed out, “Remember that paragraph. It is the blueprint for what we are about to see.” And in fact what we have already BEEN seeing. Carlson went on to say, “They’re going to tell you it’s about civil rights, or about some other principle that they pretend to care about, but they are lying. It’s about seizing power and holding it. That’s their only aim.”
Let’s get one thing straight: a supposedly “American” political party that is intentionally loading up our nation with foreigners who have nothing to do with American values certainly and clearly don’t give one flying damn about “American society.” They want to replace “American society.” And they have lost the American people and so they have to import voters who AREN’T American in order to do it. They’re actually even starting to admit that fact.
Please remember a key fact about Democrats and the Democratic Party: they are nakedly evil. That might sound extreme, but the Democratic Party has ALWAYS been at the forefront of wickedness and racism in America. Always. It is an easily documented fact of history. And the fact of the matter is that they still are today. An interesting article I came across bears the title, “23 maps that explain how Democrats went from the party of racism to the party of Obama.” What is the Democratic Party? It is the party of Andrew Jackson. It was the party of Indian removal. The Democratic Party was THE party of “Manifest Destiny.” The Democratic Party was the party of slavery and literally treasonously seceded from the United States when ant-slavery candidate and Republican Abraham Lincoln was elected (yes, history repeats itself in the current climate of rabid hate toward a Republican president). The Democratic Party was purely and simply the party that waged the vicious Civil War against the United States of America. Rabid Democratic Party ideologues assassinated Abraham Lincoln. The Democratic Party was the incredibly racist political organization that dominated the racist South during the era of so-called “Reconstruction.” Which was in reality Democrats “reconstruction” of the very same racist hate and racist policies that they had held before Republicans defeated them in the Civil War that Democrats started and were able to put in place once they had murdered a powerful, victorious president. The Democratic Party was the party of the Ku Klux Klan, which is rightly defined as the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party and was organized to terrorize blacks and white Republicans. We can go on and on. The Democratic Party was the party of President Woodrow Wilson who literally fired all the blacks in the federal government and RE-segregated the military that Republicans had DE-segregated as Democrats were still very much the hard-core party of hard-core racism into the 20th century. Woodrow Wilson, the godfather of the progressive movement, was a hard core racist and even the very leftist Atlantic acknowledges that fact of history. The Democratic Party was the Party of “Klanbake,” the 1924 Democratic National Convention that was utterly dominated by the Ku Klux Klan a full 60 years after their defeat in the Civil War for the same racist hate. The Democratic Party was the party of the racist FDR who cynically exploited the racist labor unions who excluded racial minorities with a vengeance (and the left acknowledges that unions are STILL “f-ing rabidly racist”, btw); the party that put Japanese-Americans into camps; the party that started the godawful Tuskegee experiment in which black men were intentionally and deceitfully left untreated with syphilis so the government could track the progression of the horrible disease. As this nation continued into the 1950s, it was still the Democratic Party that was largely THE party of racist discrimination. And as we enter the 1960s, the Democrats were still primarily racist and ONLY passed the most significant Civil Rights laws with the overwhelming supporting votes of Republicans (who somehow have been dishonestly denied credit for that fact ever since).
The bait-and-switch of a party that never changed its spots from its former days of evil to its modern days of evil can be summed up in a statement of President Lyndon Baines Johnson before two governors in 1963:
“These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days and that’s a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference… I’ll have them niggers voting Democratic for the next two hundred years”.
But this was the period, matching the period of the time when the Democratic Party truly turned evil and violent as shown in its utter disgrace of a 1968 Democratic National Convention. Democrats were losing a majority of whites because most whites weren’t and AREN’T racist, and this party with its utterly wicked history needed a new voter block to remain in power. And they needed to create a plantation of socialist “entitlement” spending to build that plantation so the slaves would willingly come and happily remain. The REAL Klan, the Klan that always has been and always will be a Democratic Party monster, had a new plantation for blacks and welcomed them onto that plantation just like Mr. Roarke at the beginning of a Fantasy Island episode. It sounded so good, but there was something so damn sinister behind literally making naked pandering (“vote for us and we’ll give you other people’s money and food that other people paid for and places to live that other people are forced to pay for”) the very heart of their wicked political philosophy. But what has that done for black people? They get some money and food and a place to live, which creates an innate existential crisis as it saps their will to work and produce anything for themselves. Other people have to work hard for their money and their food and a place to live, and that work-ethic ennobles them and allows them to build something better. Add to that disincentive to work, understand that the Democrats have also propagandized and demagogued blacks into believing that whitey has rigged the system against them so there is no point in trying. But here’s our plantation you can live on forever. And so blacks vote and keep voting for the very people who are actually most keeping them down. And the ruin of American blacks is complete as they succumb to drugs, to abortion to the tune of murdering 60% of their own babies, to fatherlessness, to gangs, to prison, at rates shockingly higher than any other group of Americans. The cynical wickedness of the Democratic Party and the ramifications that wickedness has had on the very constituencies Democrats most claim to care about is beyond tragic.
Black unemployment has plunged to the lowest level in HISTORY under Donald Trump. But there is literally not one single Democrat – and most especially not one rabid, toxic, race-hating, demagogue on the Congressional Black Caucus – who cares about black Americans. Blacks are nothing but votes and a political platform to step on for these bugs who murder millions of babies. If they start working for themselves, start earning their OWN money, they will get “uppity” and believe that they should be able to keep more of what they earn rather than have the all-knowing and all-good government decide they can spend it more wisely and forcibly confiscate it. And maybe they’ll even realize as they create homes for themselves and families for themselves that their children ARE NOT bugs that can be murdered in a holocaust wherein 60% of black babies are butchered in the Democratic Party abortion mills. And they will start voting the way their ancestors who were freed by Republicans FROM Democrats used to vote.
Let me give you one lower-than-roach example: Rep. Maxine Waters. She’s calling for a massive campaign of intolerance and hate for all Trump supporters. She demands that Trump supporters be shamed into using the back entrances of restaurants. Maybe she wants separate drinking fountains and separate bathrooms for Trump supporters. I guarantee she wants to force Trump supporters to sit in the back of the bus and give up their seat if a leftist wants it. Blacks of ALL people should be aware of what a low, dark, dangerous platform this vicious demagogue hater is spewing. Because if it’s right to do that to us, it was right to do it to you and damn you it will be right to do it to you AGAIN. The Black Caucus that supports this riot-spewing-hater needs to be banned and abolished. Or at least stop being racist hypocrites and demand the creation of a Congressional White Caucus that will openly preach the same race hate that Maxine Waters is allowed to preach in the halls of Congress from the white side. That ought to give any decent person pause. But there aren’t any decent people on the left.
One example of the fact that Democrats literally and simply do not care about the American people is in the economic numbers. For instance, the manufacturing index hit a high that Obama never saw once in his entire miserable fool presidency. As Trump cuts taxes, guts regulations, prevents the EPA from declaring economic warfare on job creators, guess what? Factories are opening and jobs are being offered. But Democrats don’t want you to work; they need you to be dependent on them. They don’t want you to have a job and don’t want you to think that anyone will even offer you a damn job. Stay dependent on us; remain wards of the state forever. Keep voting for us. Believe our damn lies. And so hey, everybody, let’s look over here at the bright shiny thing we’re constantly screaming about. Don’t look over there at how well your country is actually finally working under the man we despise.
Please don’t get fooled for one second: the Democratic Party was still very much a party of racism and the very same damn cockroach Democrats who are at the very forefront of screaming about Republican “hate” today were doing the exact same thing not too terribly long ago. Let’s take a trip down memory lane and look at socialist California and its socialist governor, Jerry Brown, just for one example.
Despite today’s outrage over President Donald Trump’s refugee executive order, many liberals in 1975 were part of a chorus of big name Democrats who refused to accept any Vietnamese refugees when millions were trying to escape South Vietnam as it fell to the communists.
They even opposed orphans.
The group, led by California’s Gov. Jerry Brown, included such liberal luminaries as Delaware’s Democratic Sen. Joe Biden, former presidential “peace candidate” George McGovern, and New York Congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman.
The Los Angeles Times reported Brown even attempted to prevent planes carrying Vietnamese refugees from landing at Travis Air Force Base outside San Francisco. About 500 people were arriving each day and eventually 131,000 These people arrived despite protests from liberal Democrats. In 2015, the Los Angeles Times recounted Brown’s ugly attitude, reporting, “Brown has his own checkered history of demagoguery about refugees.”
Back in 1975, millions of South Vietnamese who worked for or supported the U.S. found themselves trapped behind the lines when the communists took over the country. Vietnamese emigre Tung Vu, writing in Northwest Asian Weekly, recalled the hardships the Vietnamese faced in 1975 as they tried to escape the communists.
“After the fall of Saigon, many Vietnamese chose to leave by any means possible, often in small boats. Those who managed to escape pirates, typhoons, and starvation sought safety and a new life in refugee camps,” Tung wrote.
Ironically, Republicans led by former President Gerald Ford were the political figures who fought for the refugees to enter the United States.arrived in the United States between 1975 and 1977.
Julia Taft, who in 1975 headed up Ford’s Inter-agency Task Force on Indochinese refugee resettlement, told author Larry Engelmann in his book, “Tears Before the Rain: An Oral History of the Fall of South Vietnam,” “The new governor of California, Jerry Brown, was very concerned about refugees settling in his state.”
National Public Radio host Debbie Elliott retraced Brown’s refusal to accept any refugees in a January 2007 interview with Taft. According to a transcript, which was aired on its flagship program, “All Things Considered,” Taft said, “our biggest problem came from California due to Brown.” She called his rejection of Vietnamese refugees “a moral blow.”
“I remember at the time we had thousands and thousands of requests from military families in San Diego, for instance, who had worked in Vietnam, who knew some of these people,” she told NPR.
Taft recalled another dark reason the liberals opposed the refugees: “They said they had too many Hispanics, too many people on welfare, they didn’t want these people.”
Did you notice that part about Republicans and military veterans in the spirit of the party of Lincoln who were the heroes of this terrible period of rabid, toxic, psychotic, evil Democrat Party and the People’s Republic of Californiastan and Jerry Brown hate???
So it turns out that the same hypocrite California and the same Cockroach King governor Jerry Brown were at the forefront of what they now claim was the very worst, very ugliest kind of hatred and racism and bigotry. Not that there is one honest, virtuous, decent Democrat in California or in America, for that matter: they reelected Jerry Brown and gleefully allowed that self-proven demagogue to demagogue once again.
Let me simply report a naked FACT: if Hispanics voted Republican, the Democrats would literally be screaming in the streets and rioting chanting for their violent deaths. Because to be a Democrat is to be a cockroach. These people aren’t capable of any genuine empathy any more than they are capable of any genuine morality: they murder their own babies. Bugs do that. These Democrats who drove God out of our nation and literally put Jesus Christ in a jar of urine and shamefully displayed Him in the guise of government-funded “art” long-ago betrayed any vestige of the image of God. They chose to claim they had instead evolved from bugs. The only problem is that they DEvolved from that point, rather than Evolved. They’re not capable of human nobility and the only human emotions they have are also shared in common with the bug.
Democrats don’t give any more of a flying damn for illegal immigrants than they do for the 60 million innocent babies they viciously murdered in the womb. One day, I tell you, the Nazis will stand in judgment against every single Democrat. pointing out the fact that they only denied the humanity of 6 million Jews and murdered them whereas Democrats are 10 times more evil.
On Sunday, photos of children laying inside a chain-link fence cage starting flying around the internet. New York Times Magazine editor-in-chief Jake Silverstein forwarded it to his followers, saying that “all of these photos are disturbing, but the first two are especially awful.”
CNN’s Hadas Gold described the pictures as “First Photos of separated migrant children at holding facility.”
Outrage quickly followed.
“This is happening right now,” said former Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau. “Speechless. This is not who we are as a nation,” said Antonio Villaraigosa, who is running for California governor. Actress Rosanna Arquette called it a “sick crime against Humanity”
Turns out the photos were taken in 2014 — when, ahem, President Obama was in the White House, a fact that nobody bothered to check before blowing a gasket. Once word of that fact got out, many of these same people deleted their tweets, rather than admit that the “sick crime” happened under their beloved Obama.
Next, there was a picture showing a bus outfitted with child safety seats being used at an ICE family detention center in Karnes County, Texas. ABC Houston reporter Antonio Arellano tweeted the picture on Sunday, describing it as “a prison bus just for babies.”
Again, outrage ensued.
“Unconscionable and inhumane, “said Texas Sen. Sylvia Garcia. “This is what we’ve come to under Donald Trump,” said Stephen King. Others tweeted: “your new gestapo at work,” “this is what fascism looks like,” “we live in a dark period of American history,” “moral abomination.” Etc., etc.
Oops. Turns out this picture, too, was taken when Obama was president. And, the bus was actually used to take the children on field trips to places like the San Antonio Zoo, a nearby park, the movies, as well as for medical treatment and court appointments.
So much for the Trump-era inhumane prison bus for babies.
There was not a single prominent Democrat who publicly attacked Barack Hussein Obama for his horrifying racist hatred toward poor Hispanic children. And it is a telling and appalling fact that they had to go back to the now acknowledged vileness of their own Obama to fake-news slime the man they rabidly hated.
Again, the entire border crisis that Democrats have had a hysterical Nazi meltdown over was THEIR crisis just a couple of years ago and they did NOTHING to try to resolve it when they had not only the damn White House, but the House of Representatives AND a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. These demagogic purveyors of hate did NOTHING when they could have changed the entire immigration system if they had cared enough about Hispanics or about illegal immigrants to lift so much as a damn pinky finger. And anyone with a scintilla of historical awareness knows that these very same Democratic cockroach hypocrites did the very same thing that they are claiming is tantamount to Nazism to the Vietnamese who had fought to help us fight communism and who were physically suffering FAR more than any immigrant crossing into the United States from Mexico is today. Which is to say that these bugs are demon-possessed cockroach evil not by my standards, but now by their OWN standards.
The blockquoted article above continues to expose patently demagogic lies that come from the colluding conspiracy between the Democratic Party and the mainstream media who have brought back the very worst days of William Randolph Hearst’s “yellow journalism.” You know, where the powers-that-be gin up fake outrage and literally start wars with blatant propaganda.
We could see that from literally the very first day of the Trump presidency, when a “journalist” propagandist masquerading as a White House correspondent fake-news reported that Trump had removed the bust of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Is anyone truly stupid enough to think had the same turd “journalist” had his view of the bust blocked by a security guard during the Obama presidency he would have reported that Obama had booted MLK from the White House? We saw on the very first day the patent, absurd bigotry of these “correspondents” that if anything got worse every day since. It was the bigotry of a reporter who expected to see bigotry and saw exactly what he wanted to see regardless of what the actual damn facts were. This is the essence of fake news: these people “report” what they want to see the way they want to “report” it. This is exactly what they do a hundred times a day about a hundred stories a day every single day. They report what they want to see the way they want to see it, rather than stepping back and taking time to look at things with the detached objectivity that any legitimate journalist would actually have.
The fact of the matter is, that even the despicable Obama administration fought against the wicked open-borders policies that the Democratic Party now openly embraces. The Obama administration actually fought the ridiculous 9th Circuit Court ruling that made it virtually impossible by judicial tyrannous fiat to keep out the hordes of illegal immigrants who were pouring into this country. Because at some point the man realized that to abandon our border security was to end the nation. Even Obama understood the twin pillars of CRIMINALITY and SECURITY that current Democrats have forgotten and abandoned in their rabid hatred of Trump, of Republicans and frankly of basic decency and the ability of a nation to sustain itself. Ideologue that Obama was, even he didn’t want the nation to collapse under the weight of illegal immigration under his watch. But now that Trump is president, these traitorous vermin would like nothing more than to see America collapse so they can blame him for what they did.
Our modern immigration framework has its roots in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, which was signed into law by Clinton. It instituted many of the hallmarks of the criminalization regime, upping the number of people eligible for deportation while shrinking the opportunities to gain legal status. The law hasn’t aged well in progressive circles: During the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton had to denounce her own husband’s policies.
I personally call this an act of treason against the United States of America, the citizens of this nation, and the Constitution.
Today’s Democrats are both open borders AND socialist. Does anyone with half a functioning brain comprehend what that means, as we allow MILLIONS, TENS OF MILLIONS, HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS – because I DEFY any liberal to tell me a NUMBER of exactly how many illegal immigrants is ENOUGH so that we start cracking down and kicking them the hell out of our country – to enter our nation and then receive a host of benefits that hard-working Americans will be forced to pay for. It is by any sane definition unsustainable: to be a Democrat is to demand the implosion of America as a nation. Again, this is the kind of thing BUGS do. These aren’t people who are capable of loving their children and caring about their futures: they MURDER their children. That is who they are by definition of what they most rabidly stand for (abortion on demand). If you are a Democrat, you necessarily think of your child as a bug you could have killed and remained a “good” person because you were merely following a cherished doctrine of your bug religion.
Stop and consider the ugliness of the future Democrats have for this nation: BILLIONS of people living here, having long-since destroyed our way of life, our culture, our democracy, and consumed our wealth like a vast locust horde invading a field once green with crops but now stripped barren. And again, liberal, if you want to argue with me about this, please document for me the prominent members of your wicked political party who have stated the number of immigrants who would be too many and what we would do to stop this invasion.
I wrote this piece a while back detailing how liberals are intentionally trying to crowd millions of people into densely-rat-packed cities and keep them helpless and dependent on government because that’s the only way their hateful, horrible policies can prevail. The 1984-Orwellian character of what the Democratic Party has planned for this nation is truly stunning and terrifying. It is an easy-to-prove FACT that liberals only win when they can jam people into packed cities and kill the American way of life.
And no, this is NOT a theoretical issue: this has already happened in Europe and in the United Kingdom as millions of Muslims have poured into these countries and changed the very culture and way of life of its citizens who are now afraid to walk the streets of their own cities. Europeans are increasingly realizing that their “tolerant” immigration policies are completely unsustainable. The problem is that this realization has probably come too late: these countries will never be the same and things are going to get far uglier and far nastier as a result as a rising percentage of unassimilated people already prone to bitterness and violence become increasingly unemployed and increasingly resentful and increasingly willing to pursue violent jihad as a result.
I’ve heard this number of 11 million illegal immigrants as the “official estimate” reported seemingly forever, at least since the 1980s. We’re supposed to believe that just as many voluntarily go home every year as come here??? And where do these numbers come from that make them reliable? The government? Seriously? I think of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the incredibly erroneous estimates they provided just with ObamaCare and basically every budget they’ve ever “scored.” These people are fools and clowns and yes, ideologues. The number of illegal immigrants hasn’t risen whatsoever in forty years, but in my decades of life in the state of California, somehow I am now surrounded by people who speak only Spanish when that was simply not true when I was a child. But government-worshiping Democrats reassure me, “Don’t believe what your racist eyes and ears tell you.”
Only I believe I’ve already proven that it’s THESE bugs who are the actual RACISTS and all they’ve done is “fundamentally transformed” the targets of their racist hate. The new target of Democratic Party racism shifted from the black man to the white male; the new target of hate has shifted from the Jew to the Evangelical Christian. Just compare the number of Christians and even just plain religious people or people who believe in an objective source for morality between liberal godlessness and conservative belief in God and morality. 78% of conservatives believe in God with absolute certainty and another 14% believe with fair certainty. 83% of conservatives believe in heaven and 72% believe in hell. And 48% of conservatives believe there are clear objective standards for what is right and what is wrong. That is shockingly low, until you compare it with liberals. Only 45% of liberals believe in God with “certainty” and only 24% believe with “fair certainty.” Only 18% of liberals rely on religion for guidance on right versus wrong and only 19% of liberals believe that there is any clear, objective right or wrong with 79% of liberals believing that morality depends on a relative situation and whatever the hell they want right or wrong to mean. And significantly more liberals don’t believe in hell than believe in it. Which explains why they can be as evil as they are and not believe there will ever be any consequences for it.
The problem with secular humanist liberalism is that there is no moral “oughtness” to it. There is no ultimate, transcendent, objective moral source of authority that tells me that I ought to do one thing and that I ought not do another thing. They do what they want and they do whatever they want. Which is why communism, which is simply the more common name for “official state atheism” that communism is, has as its central dictate in every single form it metastasizes in (Soviet communism versus Maoism, etc.) is that “the ends justifies the means.” There simply are no moral compunctions for a liberal. They can even murder 60 million of their own babies and feel as serene in their act of genocide as the baby they arbitrarily allow to survive feels sleeping in a crib. But let us never forget that baby sleeping peacefully in a crib is merely a thing that could have been brutally and callously killed and that no human being has a transcendent right even to live, let alone to anything else. In the same way, abortion demands that there is no such thing as a “father,” because if there was that father would certainly have the basic right to not have his child murdered against his will while the state forced him into a state of moral helplessness. And so we understand that just as Democrats murdered 60 million of the very most innocent human beings, they also murdered fatherhood. And millions of fathers walk away from their children because Democrats indoctrinated them to walk away and provided them with no right to do anything else.
These Democrats are simply appalling. They have created the very worst and the very ugliest of the immigration debacle in this country with their stupid laws and their wicked judicial rulings. They have created an arbitrary Catch-22 in which Donald Trump can either allow millions of immigrants to enter the country and simply fail to ever show up for their deportation hearings or hold them indefinitely while they wait for court hearings the left has decided everyone who comes to the border has the right to have. And if you criminally charge the parent such that they can be subsequently deservedly can be charged with a felony for trying to illegally enter the United States twice, you have to separate the child from the parent in the same way that any American put in jail must be separated from his or her children. This is simply true. But the Democrats and their mainstream media propagandist fake news allies intentionally and deliberately distort and outright lie as they create a fake news picture with the hopes of dishonestly and cynically benefitting from a disastrous mess that they themselves created and will do nothing to help fix and change.
Democrats falsely claim to represent those who are helpless and cannot speak for themselves? Tell that to the 60 million innocent helpless babies who couldn’t speak for themselves that these butchers callously murdered and literally murdered with PRIDE. You ONLY matter to these bugs if there’s a naked political interest for you to matter to them. Otherwise they couldn’t care less. Like when they had total control of the White House, a filibuster-proof domination of the Senate and the House and illegal immigrants and their poor children didn’t matter one bit.
Think of it this way: whose constituents do Democrats claim Hispanics are part of, Republicans or theirs? Theirs, obviously. And so given that Hispanics and all of these illegal immigrants are THEIR constituency, THEIR group, shouldn’t they be willing to do something to help these people they claim to represent? Shouldn’t they be willing to negotiate and compromise with Republicans to secure certain rights and privileges for the group they claim to represent? But they DON’T. They do NOTHING but demonize and demagogue and slander and lie. They don’t give one flying damn about these people at ALL; they just cynically exploit them in the most grievous way, literally intentionally creating a situation in which they will suffer in order to point a finger at Republicans and blame them for the suffering that they actually have significantly themselves created. Because the ends justify the means and the means are surely justified by the end to these godless immoral vermin.
We can only hope that this pathologically wicked party goes so over the top in its rabidity that enough people turn away from them to hand them the mother of all defeats.
And the most typical victims of these bug-monsters are Hispanics, and most typically illegal immigrant Hispanics. Which amounts to yet another of so many proofs that Democrats don’t give one flying damn about the people they fake-news claim to care about.
We truly need a border wall and we truly need enforcement of our laws and a resistance against the lawlessness of Democrats who believe in their “ends justify the means” Stalinist mindset that they are entitled to only follow the rule of law if they feel like it but they are free to ignore any laws they don’t like even as they resist assisting Republicans in simply trying to govern and create a better system from the cynical, rigged, chaotic mess they have made it.
This nation and its citizens need to fight for their right to survive. And July 5th is a great day to start fighting back.
I’ll make my point right here, if it wasn’t already crystal-clear enough in my title: if Roseanne Barr’s tweet about Valerie Jarrett being the baby resulting from the Muslim Brotherhood and Planet of the Apes was “racist” and an attack against all people of color, then Samantha Bee’s CBS network-aired spewage about the President of the United States’ daughter being a “feckless cunt” is misogynistic and an attack against all women, And CBS is misogynistic and hateful to women for not having already fired her. It is as simple as that.
So Roseanne Barr makes a stupid, and yeah, frankly racist comment about former top Obama advisor Valerie Jarrett. Among the many reasons it was just beyond stupid is that Roseanne Barr frankly shouldn’t be throwing stones in glass houses when it comes to how other women look. I also must personally confess that I remember finding “Dr. Zira” strangely attractive when I first saw her in the original movie. But that’s another story.
And then, immediately after ABC proved it has a zero-tolerance attitude for anyone who could be perceived as a Republican saying anything nasty, Samantha Bee had this to say in viciously attacking President Trump’s daughter:
CBS rightly took some responsibility for the comment, because the word appeared on their network show which is NOT broadcast live. Which means the entire network actively participated in Samantha Bee’s vile comment. Whereas while the left and their many allies masquerading as “journalists” tried to make it appear – fake-news-style- that Donald Trump was to blame. When in actuality it was only Roseanne and her Ambien, or whatever she was on.
It doesn’t bother me that Roseanne was fired. Yeah, what she said was beneath contempt.
What bothers me is to be a liberal is to be a pathological hypocrite. And progressive liberals are now every bit as much the combination of self-righteousness and hypocrisy as the Pharisees and Sadducees of Jesus’ day ever were.
In addition to Samantha Bee, who said something on a network and directly involved her network when Roseanne Barr did no such thing, we also have a Democrat named Dan Helmer who is running an ad on these same self-righteous television networks that directly compares the President of the United States to Osama bin Laden. Now, what makes that funny in a pathologically self-righteous hypocrite sort of way, is that Roseanne Barr’s exact tweet was, “muslim brotherhood & planet of the apes had a baby=vj.” And so we literally just had a trifecta of hypocrisy: Bee’s “cunt” remark is FAR more hateful than Barr’s “planet” remark; Dan Helmer’s “Osama bin Laden” ad was far more beyond the pale than Barr’s “Muslim Brotherhood” was; and Valerie Jarrett actually went to CBS which hosts Bee and participated in “cunts” to pontificate about Roseanne Barr’s unacceptable words.
We’ve got Kathy Griffen rescinding her non-apology after doing a photo of herself holding an incredibly lifelike severed head of the President of the United States. And amazingly in terms of self-righteous hypocrisy, she rescinded her so-called apology on an ABC program. Somehow, I don’t think that taking back of an apology that was never sincere to begin with would have been quite so-okay had Roseanne Barr did the same ugly thing a few years ago with Barack Obama’s gory, severed head. Any more than it would have been okay for Barr to hatefully attack – and even using the word “cunt” – against Obama’s daughter.
President Trump on Tuesday slammed Democrats who shared pictures of child migrants sleeping in cages to knock his immigration policies, only to backtrack after realizing the photos were taken during the Obama administration.
“Democrats mistakenly tweet 2014 pictures from Obama’s term showing children from the Border in steel cages,” Trump tweeted. “They thought it was recent pictures in order to make us look bad, but backfires.”
One photo of children in a cell was shared numerous times over the weekend amid outrage over Trump administration policies of separating illegal immigrant parents from their children at the southern border.
Trump opponents who shared the photo included activists, journalists and former Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau, who said: “This is happening right now, and the only debate that matters is how we force our government to get these kids back to their families as fast as humanly possible.”
Tucker Carlson ran a beautiful segment about how the progressive left incredibly hypocritically kowtows to human-rights abusing China. When it comes to human rights, human freedom and human dignity, China is the greatest monster in the history of the world, but ALL the liberal progressive communications entities literally aid and abet China in its destruction of the human soul as a matter of routine. And it’s easy to document:
The left doesn’t care about humanity or human decency. These people stand for nothing. They don’t care about black people. They don’t care about women. They don’t care about illegal immigrants. They don’t care about anyone but themselves. They never have stood for anything but themselves. And everything has always been nothing more than an ends-justifies-the-means means to and end to these people whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron.
It’s hard for me to get too angry or upset about Roseanne’s racism when it’s so easy to demonstrate that the people who are the most “outraged” by it are themselves incapable of decency, or integrity, or honesty, or virtue of any kind. It’s nothing but a game. And in this game the progressive left constantly moves the goal posts and controls all the referees. And when I condemn a Roseanne Barr, I am merely playing the game on their terms, because they will never condemn in the same manner their Samantha Bees, their Keith Olbermann’s, their Kathy Griffens, their Michelle Wolfs. I merely participate with them in destroying my players, but they will never participate in any way, shape or form in destroying their players.
We stand for what’s right. But the left will NEVER stand for what is right.
The Word of God prophetically described these people and this end-times generation that would be both hateful and lawless just before the coming of the beast whom they will worship because they are evil. And here we are.
Anyway, when Barr appeared on leftist-whackjobber Jimmy Kimmel’s show, this exchange took place:
“I am shocked because I know you are a socially liberal person in general,” Kimmel said.
“I’m still the same! You all moved,” she said.
“We did?” Kimmel asked.
“You all went so fucking far out you lost everybody,” Barr said.
“You’re probably right, by the way,” Kimmel reacted.
“Seriously, a lot of your audience, and including me — I just want to say this, a lot of this, no matter who we voted for we don’t want to see our president fail, you know?” she said to tepid applause.
“You want Pence for the freakin’ president?” she asked Kimmel
“No,” he said.
“Well then zip that fucking lip,” she told him.
That is exactly right, and it is what is most disastrously and dangerously wrong with liberalism and with the Democratic Party that is now owned lock, stock and barrel by the most radical ideologues. Stop and think about Roseanne Barr’s last obviously true point: if you get rid of Trump, do you know who you’ll be calling “Mister President”???? The arch-conservative Mike Pence, that’s who. But the left is so animalistic, if not bug-like, in it’s roach-hate that it is incapable of any manner of introspection whatsoever, and so, in wild, rabid contradiction to their own interests, they are trying to do everything imaginable to impeach and boot the non-ideological Donald Trump as president and thereby install Mike Pence who would not only be able to carry Trump voters, but get the mainstream conservatives behind him as well and guarantee a Republican victory in 2020. Or, in other words, no thinking liberal would want Mike Pence as president; but the only problem is that there is no such THING as a “thinking liberal.” Such creatures went extinct quite a while ago, as I can continue to prove and document.
MAGA may actually mean Making America Gun-Free Again.
Remington was once among the nation’s largest gun and ammunition makers – it was founded in 1816, when there were only 19 U.S. states. But due to sliding sales and mounting debt, the company announced over the weekend that it was filing for bankruptcy. […]
One of the main reasons for the sales downturn was ironically the election of President Donald Trump. During his campaign, Trump claimed that “Hillary Clinton wants to take your guns away and she wants to abolish the Second Amendment.”
As such, gun enthusiasts began stockpiling rifles in fear of a Clinton victory. But after Trump won, sales cooled—consumers likely thought a president who was endorsed by the National Rifle Association wouldn’t infringe on their rights.
So Remington, expecting a Hillary win because that’s what everybody from the damn fake news mainstream media assured us was going to happen, gambled huge on a Clinton gun-grabber win and massively ramped up production so panicked citizens could buy guns while America was still America and we still had a viable Constitution and people still had rights in this country. But instead Donald Trump – contrary to all the egghead liberals who were wrong and have been wrong every damn since – won. And comforted people relaxed and didn’t buy all the guns Remington expected them to buy. And now they had all this inventory on hand that they suddenly couldn’t sell. Because it turns out that most Americans don’t necessarily want to have a gun; they just want to be able to buy one if they believe they need it. And that the last thing they want is a fascist gun-grabber who does what ALL fascist totalitarians have done throughout history and strips the people of their right to defend themselves from tyranny so of course tyranny can reign supreme.
It is simply a fact that no rational intellect can dispute: Barack Hussein Obama did more for gun sales than any American president in the entire history of the republic.
President Barack Obama has glibly been awarded the title of the World’s Greatest Guns Salesman during his seven years in office, and it appears that his eighth and final year will be his most successful ever.
According to the FBI, the NICS background check system, which serves as a proxy for gun sales, reported 1,870,000 background checks in the month of May, the highest in recorded history and enough to re-equip the entire United States military. That is 290,000 more background checks than last May, 440,000 more than May of 2014, and 850,000 less than Obama’s first May in office in 2009.
Again, the problem is that there is no such thing as a liberal or Democrat who is not pathologically insane. They all went extinct, killed off by their own rabid, hysterical batpoop craziness.
Liberals went too far. WAY too far. And because they rabidly abandoned the Imago Dei, the image of God, they became mindless roaches and mindlessly created the exact opposite state of affairs that they would have wanted if they just had functioning humanity within them.
Which is to say that there is going to be a very special place at the very bottom of hell for Barack Obama. This piece of filth was truly a monster – especially by the left’s own rhetoric.
And the left would truly despise this hypocrite fascist: IF there existed such a thing as a liberal capable of moral consistency, that is. But the last liberal capable of moral consistency faded away into extinction long ago and it is highly unlikely that the magic force of unicorn fairy-dust evolution will be able to produce another such creature ever again.
Liberal, Democrat-appointed Supreme Court Justice (retired) John Paul Stevens just publicly came out demanding a repeal of the 2nd Amendment and I demand a litmus test for any candidate for president swear that they will never appoint such a Justice. But as I’m going to show you below, to be a Democrat is to be a lying swindling hypocrite who plays word-games with reality and with the truth and who cannot be trusted in anything whatsoever. So these lying weasels will smugly declared, “Oh, I’m not in favor of doing the thing that I actually am totally in favor of doing.” They’ll play the imbecilic game that the 2nd Amendment was written at a time when all we had were muskets, and so all we’re allowed is muskets. Okay, fine, you hypocrite Luddite frauds, we’re also not allowed telephones or televisions or automobiles or computers or phones or damn near anything else we didn’t have back in 1787. And to make it even crazier, the Constitution doesn’t guarantee the right to ANY of the things but it DOES guarantee “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.”
I must point out a previous article I wrote and it’s title:
And way, way back in May of 2012 I predicted that there would be a giant backlash due to Barack Obama’s rabidly fascist policies that no liberal saw as anything other than mainstream and wonderful because they are such deluded, pathologically fascist narcissists:
Obama’s strategy is to set aside and flatly ignore the law for his own political benefit. Every American who is not deeply troubled by that – troubled enough to not vote for this fascist – is UN-American.
What Obama has done is provide an example of out-and-out lawlessness on the part of the president of the United States. And when we get a hard-core right wing president the way Obama has been a hard-core left wing president, Obama and the Democrat Party and all of those who voted for Obama and the Democrat Party will be entirely to blame for that president and his extremist actions. You mark my words. Because what goes around comes around, and if a Democrat can set aside the law the way Obama has now repeatedly done, well, guess who’s going to be stomping on your necks under your own president’s prior justification??? Conservatives are rising up in a spirit of righteous outrage. You have repeatedly slapped us in the face through your messiah Obama, and the time is coming when we’re going to punch you hard in the nose and then keep on punching. And when that day comes, liberals, look to yourselves for blame. — My words on June 18, 2012
Obama gave us Trump. Now the left wants to take Trump back and give us Pence instead. So they can go even more rabid with frothing hate while demonically and hypocritically calling themselves the party of “tolerance.” What the hell kind of “tolerance” do these whackjob hypocrites have???? We can literally win a national election and STILL be dismissed in terms of the most stupid, most deluded, most absurd strawman in the leftist arsenal. If my point of view isn’t valid after a national election victory, then please explain to me why I ought to even remotely consider ANY point of view that you clowns offer.
I suppose I simply could have said what Roseanne Barr said to Jimmy Kimmel: the left went too damn far. So damn far it was beyond UNREAL.
It is an amazing thing to view the sheer number of policies that the left now screams are the most evil things in existence that they themselves were declaring just a few years ago: whether it was on abortion, or on illegal immigration, or on homosexuality and marriage.
SEN. OBAMA: I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. (Applause.) Now, for me as a Christian, it’s also a sacred union. You know, God’s in the mix. (Applause.)
But one political party was pathologically dishonest and lied and reneged on what it claimed so it could “fundamentally transform” what it had previously claim was the truth.
Barack Obama claimed that marriage was between one man and one woman and that he wasn’t for gay marriage “as a Christian.” As a Christian, the Democratic Party will burn in hell forever and ever and ever according to these words that they falsely claimed they believed. Because to be a Democrat is to be a demon-possessed lying hypocrite pathologically incapable of honesty or integrity or decency or virtue or any other good thing.
PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON: “All Americans, not only in the States most heavily affected but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country.
The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use impose burdens on our taxpayers.
That’s why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens.
In the budget I will present to you, we will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace…
We are a nation of immigrants. But we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it.” (Bill Clinton, Remarks At State Of The Union, Washington, D.C., 1/24/95)
There is simply no question whatsoever that the Democratic Party of today stands condemned as the most vile kind of traitorous vermin as rightly judged by the Democratic Party of 1995. Working class Americans realized Obama and the Democrats were literally at WAR with them, literally intentionally giving illegal immigrants their jobs and devaluing their work if they did have jobs because of the millions of people Democrats had artificially added to the labor force competition through illegal immigration. But Democrats don’t give a flying damn about working class Americans; they need voters. And they’re fine illegally importing foreigners to cynically get what they cynically want.
I could go on and on about all the stuff that Democrats used to acknowledge as simply true facts but now rabidly despises as worse than the Nazis. It’s remarkable how these fools’ heads don’t explode from trying to contain all the contradictions. I mean, we have the new “Me Too” movement and oh, are they ever trying to give Trump hell about alleged affairs that the so-called “victims” themselves claim were entirely consensual. Let’s forget about the legitimate allegations of rape, of overt sexual harassment, that Bill Clinton was guilty of.
George Stephanopoulos is the honored, esteemed anchor of ABC News. Let’s go back down memory lane of George overtly threatening a journalist – oh, and a female journalist at that – who had uncovered numerous women who were claiming that not only had they had sex with Bill Clinton, but in some cases he’d even fathered their babies. Let’s watch this living emobiement of the fact that to be a liberal is to be a pathological hypocrite in every imaginable way possible:
Why are you hypocrite fools so self-righteously coming out against Donald Trump’s lawyer for doing anything to contain any allegations of ANYTHING or allegedly making any kind of a threat to anyone to stop reporting anything? When there’s this giant log named George Stephanopoulos and basically the entire Democratic Party of just a few years ago blocking your damn view of the speck in Donald Trump’s eye???
Keep in mind, this election was a bipolar choice between Hillary or Donald Trump. People chose. And married women, and in particular white married women, chose for Donald Trump over Hillary. Why did they do that???
“[Democrats] do not do well with white men and we don’t do well with married, white women,” Clinton explained. “And part of that is an identification with the Republican Party, and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should.”
Which is to say that women are strong, tough and decisive. But of course, simultaneously, they are weak, pathetic and think whatever thought they are allowed to think if and only if their husbands give them permission. Now, proceeding from Hillary’s rationale (as a white woman), she would had she been elected president only done what her husband told her to do. But her husband is a rapist and serial sexual predator.
I hope you see the sheer ridiculousness of this idiocy. But Hillary Clinton in mutual contradiction ran her campaign carpetbagging simultaneously on her husband’s coattails and on the mantras of feminism both at the same time. And also in mutual contradiction, she was this strong, tough, decisive woman whenever it suited her; but every time she was criticized she instantaneously transformed into a helpless victim. And that is exactly how feminism itself works: they are mutual exclusively self-referentially contradictory things at the same time.
This capacity to say things and believe things that simply fly in the face of any and all credibility should help inform you to try to comprehend how anyone could believe what follows:
When it comes to the craziest example of whackjob, pathological liberal moral insanity, I saved the very best for last. I had to create a transcript of Tucker Carlson’s interview with University of Toronto psychology professor, Jordan Peterson. He offered this in response to the now at least 71 different “gender options” we supposedly now have:
The radical left insists that gender is a social construct and that’s just simply not true. So the scientific data on that are absolutely crystal clear. No reasonable scientist disagrees. And so they’re all foaming at the mouth because I’m poking holes in their cherished notions. And they like to think that people are completely malleable because that means that people can be made over in their ideological image.
Peterson points out that his views are “more common than you think,” stating that “My views on gender are shared widely in the personality community. Anyone who understands personality and is a credible scientist knows the difference between men and women in personality should be contributed primarily to biological factors. This isn’t contentious. The only people its’ contentious around are gender ideologues. They’ve already lost the scientific battle, so they’re taking it to the legislative front to enforce their views. So, they’re really not contentious viewpoints, they’re mainstream science. And we’re criticized all the time for spouting pseudo-science. It’s not pseudo-science; it’s mainstream science. And people who know the literature aren’t disputing this: it’s been known at least since the 1990s.
The Canadian government built a social-constructivist view of gender into the law. And that’s just incorrect. The idea that biological sex, gender expression, gender identity and sexual preference have no relationship to one another, that they vary independently, there’s almost nothing you can claim that’s more false than that. But now it’s being written into the law. It’s just patently absurd. It’s actually a telling commentary on the state of political discourse across the West, that something like that can actually happen. But I think that it’s equality of outcome that’s the real pathological desire. That’s the bad one.
Well then, Tucker asked, why are people whose views are not rooted in science, but instead in emotion and superstition, dominating our public conversation, and punishing anyone who doesn’t disagree? How did they get so much power?
Look, I actually think there’s a technical reason for that. It’s obvious that things can go too far on the right and they can go too far on the left. And it’s kind of easy to put a box around people who go too far on the right: you can just look at claim’s of racial superiority. But it’s not so easy to put a box around people who go too far on the left. There’s not a single thing you can point to that they do that has the same sort of red flag nature as claims of racial superiority. So it’s hard for people who are left-leaning, say I’m concerned with inequality and that sort of thing, to dissociate themselves from those who have clearly gone too far. And the problem is we really don’t know where the red flags are in leftist territory. Now for me it’s equality of outcome that is a good so-called equity. That’s a red flag. But it doesn’t seem as immediately pathological as claims of racial superiority. So it’s harder for people on the left to dissociate themselves from the people who, well, would do everyone in, essentially.
This in contrast to the college professor, the moderator to all the “tolerance” that the left preaches it is so good at, for trying to humiliate and ultimately rabidly “intolerating” the student who raised the question that hey, maybe there were only TWO genders, the way actual scientific biology says there are. This crap happens all the time with ZERO consequences for these rabid ideologue professors; contrast that with the living hell Laura Ingraham is being put through for going after David Hogg (“How COULD you??? He’s just a CHILD!!!”). Liberals are the worst hypocrites on earth. And there is no one on earth, including ISIS terrorists, more extremist and totalitarian and Stalinist in their views than the liberal progressive. You will agree with them or they will bury you, destroy you, and utilize raw official power to do so. Liberal progressives are now the most self-righteous, the most Pharisaical, beings in all existence. And when the entirety of all human history opposes them (they imposed by rabid fiat within the last few years what had never previously existed in any civilization in all history), when any kind of legitimate science opposes them (when they find the 69 other chromosomes besides “X” and “Y” maybe they’ll begin to have some kind of legitimate case), they follow the same mentality as the IED-wearing terrorist and simply go batpoop until whoever their target for hate is is publicly destroyed by a demonic cultural process.
This “equality of outcome” has ALWAYS been THE most cherished goal of the most wicked ideology in the entire history of the human race. We’re all going to be so “equal” that we’ll all be equal in that we’ll all be JUST AS DEAD AS EVERYONE ELSE.
Pause in horror to consider the hell on earth Mao unleashed as he sought to impose the liberal dream and socialist goal of “equality of outcome” so everyone would be the same:
Chairman Mao:
“The atom bomb is nothing to be afraid of,” Mao told Nehru, “China has many people. . . . The deaths of ten or twenty million people is nothing to be afraid of.” A witness said Nehru showed shock. Later, speaking in Moscow, Mao displayed yet more generosity: he boasted that he was willing to lose 300 million people, half of China’s population.”
Chairman Mao:
LEE EDWARDS, CHAIRMAN, VICTIMS OF COMMUNISM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: In 1959 to 1961 was the so-called “great leap forward” which was actually a gigantic leap backwards in which he tried to collectivize and communize agriculture.
And they came to him after the first year and they said, “Chairman, five million people have died of famine.” He said, “No matter, keep going.” In the second year, they came back and they said, “Ten million Chinese have died.” He said, “No matter, continue.” The third year, 20 million Chinese have died. And he said finally, “Well, perhaps this is not the best idea that I’ve ever had.”
CHANG: When he was told that, you know, his people were dying of starvation, Mao said, “Educate the peasants to eat less. Thus they can benefit – they can fertilize the land.”
Frankly, the fact of the matter is that Nazism itself came from the left: “NAZI” stood for “National Socialist German Workers Party.” You tell me if there was a “Socialist American Workers Party,” which side of the political spectrum it would be on? The fact of the matter is that the Nazis were a “rightwing” party ONLY in the sense that they were the “far right” of the whackjob hard core radical LEFT. Hitler and his Nazis were avowed Darwinists and just like Marx and the communists, the Nazis got their doctrines of hate from Darwinism. Hitler stated in the beginning of his rise to power that, “A stronger race will drive out the weaker ones, for the vital urge in its ultimate form will break down the absurd barriers of the so called humanity of individuals to make way for the humanity of nature which destroys the weak to give their place to the strong.” Pure Darwinism. Hitler stated as his Darwinian-survival-of-the-fittest-based Nazi regime was coming crashing down that, “If the German Volk is not strong enough and is not sufficiently prepared to offer its own blood for its existence, it should cease to exist and be destroyed by a stronger power.” As the disastrous war based on Darwinism came to a vicious end, Hitler issued what has infamously become known as his “Nero Decree,” saying, “There is no […] need to worry about saving what is necessary for the German people to survive. … On the contrary, it is much better that we ourselves destroy everything. […] Our people has shown that it is the weakest; the future belongs exclusively to the people of the east, which is the strongest.” All of these statements are Darwinian to the core. Just as was the garbage about purifying the race so that the German Arian would be the strongest and most dominant race. Hearken to Darwin’s less-famous subtitle for his “Origin of the Species:” “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.”
The principle rationale for the Holocaust was that the Jews were biologically inferior, and interfered with the Nazi scientists’ efforts to aid evolution by creating a master race.
Listen to these words and tell me who wrote them:
“At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”
It was none other than Charles Darwin himself (Darwin, C.R., “The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex,” [1871], John Murray: London, 1874, Second Edition, 1922, reprint, pp.241-242). Charles Darwin literally predicted that someone would come along and extend his Darwinism to its logical conclusion – and thus literally predicted both the Holocaust AND the motivations FOR the Holocaust. Charles Darwin spake as a prophet, and Adolf Hitler was the messiah who fulfilled the demonic prophecy. But it wasn’t just the Jew that Hitler was willing to exterminate as being “biologically inferior.” Adolf Hitler – who had made the Holocaust of the “biologically unfit” and “sub human” Jew the centerpiece of his campaign to create a “Master” Aryan race – ultimately made his “master race” the victim of his hateful Darwinian views. The simple fadt of the matter is that Adolf Hitler thought in entirely Darwinian terms and his total war was an example of Darwinian survival of the fittest in action. He decreed the Jew had failed the test of Darwinism, and ultimately believed that if the German people could not prevail in his war that THEY TOO should be exterminated and replaced by a more fit race just as Darwinism taught.
And this atheist and Darwinist crap is all pumped out of the vile soul of the ideological LEFT. The left has followed the same script that the communists gave them: identify what people realize is evil and demonize their ideological opponents for it – even though they practice the very identical same evil themselves; and even in fact when they are the ONLY ONES who practice that evil. So the left says the Nazis were “right wing” because they were militaristic, demonically ignoring the fact that the largest militaries ever assembled were assembled by COMMUNISTS. Think of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. whose military dwarfed our own; think the People’s Republic of China; think of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. No one other than a fool or a liar would claim that “militarism” is “right wing.” Similarly, they claim that “nationalism” makes a regime right wing, again demonically ignoring the fact that throughout his fight against Hitler, Stalin miraculously transformed his communism into nationalism, urging his people to fight for “Mother Russia” again and again and again. And today for that matter, the communist People’s Republic of China is FIERCELY nationalistic and is economically employing a model far more similar to socialist fascism that pure communism. Or they will with straight faces lecture us that the Nazis were “right wing” because they were “racist.” Again, the model of demonizing whatever is most evil as belonging exclusively to their ideological enemies. The U.S.S.R. murdered tens of millions of non-Russian people; today the Chinese still persecute non-Chinese ethnic peoples such as the Tibetans. Our own “progressive left” in the United States has frequently employed hard core racism, and I still remember a leftist SEIU union head telling his very own union workers as “so fucking rabidly racist.” In my very own family, one of the few rabid Democrats in 2008 refused to vote for Barack Obama. Why? Because he said, “I won’t vote for that fucking nigger.” When I would have happily voted for Herman Cain, or later for Ben Carson.
I still remember a true ideological coward named Barack Hussein Obama dishonestly, vindictively and hypocritically attacking the Republicans as being “social Darwinists.” When he himself is the true Darwinist. Social Darwinism is logically and morally ENTAILED if Darwinism is true because the weak die out and the most fit survive. And if that is true in the whole cosmos, then without any logical or moral question it would necessarily be true of any society that correctly followed this universal law of the universe. Evolution and Darwinism logically and consistently applied would apply as an axiom the policy that the weak need to perish so the stronger can better survive, end of story. But to be a Democrat is to be the worst and the most despicable kind of moral coward. They constantly play the rhetorical game of deceiving people that they don’t believe what they clearly believe. And so Democrats believe in evolution while simultaneously implicitly recognizing that theirs is an utterly evil ideology. Stalin murdered at least forty million of his own people and Mao murdered as many as eighty million of his own people: but neither did so until they had total power over their people and until they had that total control abetted by leftist gun seizure laws that left the people weaponless and defenseless they constantly talked about how they cared about the people.
But not even the most ardently ideological, the most whackjob Nazi, Maoist or Stalinist, ever dared to dream that we could screw around with the very nature of gender and sexual identity. That required a level of shocking human depravity that dwarfed even the most wild imaginings of even these most wicked bugs.
As of today, Democrats are directly responsible for the mass murder of SIXTY MILLION of THE most innocent human beings in their abortion mills. Democrats will one day stand before God condemned as being ten times more evil than the damn Nazis; and every single Democrat will scream in the agony of the lowest pit of hell for a trillion times a trillion millennia for every single NANOSECOND that they callously ripped from these 60 million babies employing the same damned-by-God “logic” that the Nazis employed arguing that Jews weren’t fully human and therefore could be exterminated.
Abortion is a war of extermination not just against babies, but more directly against FATHERHOOD. If that baby in the womb isn’t a baby, isn’t a human being, then what the hell IS a “father”??? What the hell did he “father”??? A lifeless lump of goop, Democrats assure us. A thing that can be exterminated without thought or consequences, they assure us. If that is in any way true, then any father can simply walk away from his kid without any thought or any consequence just as easily as any mother can murder the innocent human life growing in her womb as a result of what she and that father participated in creating.
The Democrat Party has made war on fathers and on fatherhood for a generation now. And it is amazing how sick and toxic a place they have “fundamentally transformed” our society into as a direct result of their war on fatherhood, their war on children, their hell on earth policies that every single one of them will one day have to stand before God Almighty and give an account for.
And if you’re going to go to total, Hitler-style war-of-extermination-style wars on fatherhood and fathers and children, well, in bowling-analogy terms you’ve simply got to try to pick up the spare and similarly declare total war on so-called “toxic masculinity” and on boys.
It is frankly a truly amazing thing that has the left screeches about the crisis of “toxic masculinity,” in actual scientific fact men’s sperm counts have quite literally PLUMMETED. “Sperm counts dropped by more than half over nearly four decades,” a massive scientific study recently found. Which is to say to whatever extent there IS a crisis of “toxic masculinity,” it is quite literally the very OPPOSITE of what the left falsely claims it is. What is in actual scientific fact “toxic” is that males AREN’T getting more masculine; they are getting less and less and LESS so. Here’s the ACTUAL crisis of toxic masculinity:
The assessment, one of the largest ever undertaken, brings together the results of 185 studies between 1973 and 2011.
Dr Levine, an epidemiologist, told the BBC that if the trend continued humans would become extinct.
Liberalism is a mindless phenomenon, just as a colony of roaches is a mindless phenomenon. These bugs will just do what they do. They will not quit. They have been programmed to mindlessly advance much the way Mao’s communist army mindlessly charged the U.S. military at the Chosin Reservoir in Korea in 1950. And if these leftist ideologues fail to charge screaming machine-gun toting commissars will gun them down from behind. Because the left only wants to seize guns from the people, not from the commissar-class who gets to control the people. The left will not stop until males are extinct and the last feminist triumphantly dances on the last male’s grave, freed from the God-given burden of bringing the last baby into the world. THAT is the assured result of liberalism, the cherished goal, the dream.
As the REAL toxic crap from leftist ideologues calling themselves “educators” persecuted boys and demonized maleness and manhood and basically indoctrinated a culture of boys being ashamed to be what they were biologically – even as the same rabid fools dismissed the very notion of “biology” itself in their Stalinist rather than scientific assessment that gender is a social construct – boys have simply been first falling behind, then dropping behind, then dropping out. The left is literally targeting and attacking as unacceptable even the very words “man” and “male,” let alone being a man or being encouraged or even allowed to ACT like one. As an example, the widely-used online writing and grammar resource by Purdue University encourages college students to avoid ‘generic use of MAN and other words with masculine markers.’
And as a result of this war, the very group that denies the reality of biology has created a species-threatening biological reality. We have diminished sperm counts. That is NOT a sign of masculinity, but rather the exact freaking OPPOSITE. But that’s just reality, and liberalism is a rabid denial of reality.
And yes, the sad, assured result of these liberal policies which have utterly destroyed the American middle class primarily by destroying men, young men are increasingly becoming bitter, resentful, angry. And they are increasingly acting out. And that means more and more violence. Because males have been treated like animals and what the hell do you expect animals to do???
Yeah. The left went too far. WAY too far.
The only problem is that the time to stop them was nearly forty years ago. Because everything that has followed since Roe v. Wade in 1973 was the equivalent of a snowball running downhill until it became an avalanche.
And now it may very well be too late for our species.
So I’m reading my paper and seeing all the butthurt and anger over the fact that a researcher named Aleksandr Kogan gave a research company named Cambridge Analytica access Facebook users’ data. Which used that data to help Donald Trump win the presidential election. And Facebook is now claiming that Cambridge Analytica had “violated its rules” and suspended them. But now, the entire planet is alarmed that Facebook is armed with so much data on so many of its addicted users and that it might actually give such information to a Republican presidential campaign to help them win. I mean, its truly evil.
And so now Facebook’s stock has plummeted to the tune of a $40 billion loss and Mark Zuckerberg is out confessing how terribly wrong it is hoping to avoid regulation the way the makers of other highly addictive products are regulated and the way other monopolies are regulated. And authorities are climbing all over Cambridge Analytica for its worse-than-what-the-Nazis-did crime against humanity.
Personally, I would be thrilled if Facebook and Google were broken up. But that would require the political left being morally consistent for once in its roach-collective existence, and that will never happen.
But here’s the rub: Facebook did the exact same thing back in the 2012 campaign and helped Obama win.
Townhall – in an article titled, “Former Obama Staffer: Facebook Allowed Us To Break User Data Rules Because They Were On Our Side,” put it this way:
Well, one former data officer for the Obama campaign, Carol Davidsen, admitted that Facebook allowed them to break the rules because they were on their side.
First, she tweeted a Time magazine piece showing what the 2012 campaign did to gather information:
In the final weeks before Election Day, a scary statistic emerged from the databases at Barack Obama’s Chicago headquarters: half the campaign’s targeted swing-state voters under age 29 had no listed phone number. They lived in the cellular shadows, effectively immune to traditional get-out-the-vote efforts.
For a campaign dependent on a big youth turnout, this could have been a crisis. But the Obama team had a solution in place: a Facebook application that will transform the way campaigns are conducted in the future. For supporters, the app appeared to be just another way to digitally connect to the campaign. But to the Windy City number crunchers, it was a game changer. “I think this will wind up being the most groundbreaking piece of technology developed for this campaign,” says Teddy Goff, the Obama campaign’s digital director.
That’s because the more than 1 million Obama backers who signed up for the app gave the campaign permission to look at their Facebook friend lists. In an instant, the campaign had a way to see the hidden young voters. Roughly 85% of those without a listed phone number could be found in the uploaded friend lists. What’s more, Facebook offered an ideal way to reach them. “People don’t trust campaigns. They don’t even trust media organizations,” says Goff. “Who do they trust? Their friends.”
Davidsen then detailed on Twitter how representatives from the social media company were surprised how much data they mined, adding that they were “very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.”
And Townhall didn’t merely make up an “unnamed source” the way the leftist media gets their sources for their fake news hit pieces on Trump; they actually posted former Obama campaign director Carol Davidsen’s own words:
So Obama’s 2012 campaign director publicly stated that the Facebook crack dealers “were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.” She said that Facebook was surprised that Obama roaches “were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn’t stop us once they realized that was what we were doing.”
FACT: The Obama campaign harvested user data from MILLIONS of Facebook users in the 2012 campaign. It literally gave Obama victory.
FACT: none oft he people who are so rabid and so angry and so bitter gave a flying damn that Obama did the very thing that is so terrible and so inexcusable and so evil now.
FACT: Facebook even benignly assisted Obama, as opposed to merely not realizing that one of its researchers had done for a pro-Trump organization what the entire organization had done for Obama.
FACT: to be a liberal is to be the very worst manner of hypocrite vermin there is; to be a liberal means to be a being incapable of virtue, or integrity, or honesty, or decency, or any kind of good thing whatsoever.
One of the lines that I have borrowed from radio talk show host Dennis Prager is this: “I prefer clarity to agreement,” which means that I would rather we both honestly understand one another’s true positions even when we fundamentally disagree with one another than that we come to some misleading politically-worded compromise following a “dialogue.”
I came across the following today and thought it worth posting. The author is a Democrat politician and clearly reveals his own personal bias at the outset. But he also points out that even his own side has “routinely disappointed” him and then proceeds to offer five very fair questions for both sides in the gun control debate. I will interact with him on the questions he poses for my position, in which I state my own bias that the 2nd Amendment exists for a very important reason and that as long as we intend to remain in any meaningful way connected to our Constitution, we need to safeguard the right for citizens to keep and bear arms and fight efforts to infringe on that right:
My father was murdered by a handgun-wielding assailant, so the firearms debate is personal for me. And I’m routinely disappointed by how disingenuous it is on both sides. I worry that each party just wants to mobilize its base and raise campaign funds rather than solve tough policy problems.
Next time you hear a politician offer a simplistic solution, here are some questions to ask.
If the politician favors gun control:
1. What will tougher laws accomplish when there are already roughly two guns in circulation for every American adult? Are you proposing the mass seizure of firearms? It’s not just the 2nd Amendment that’s at issue, but the 5th, which prohibits the taking of private property without compensation.
2. You say you favor an “assault weapon” ban, but most murders in the U.S. are committed using handguns. Do you have a separate plan to address handgun violence (which occurs daily)?
3. For that matter, do you realize that there is no sound legal or technical definition of an “assault weapon?” The 1994 ban, which expired in 2004, was rife with loopholes. Rather than political catchwords, explain your intentions using terms that have a precise meaning, like “semiautomatic.”
4. You’ve suggested that the 2nd Amendment should be read to protect only the muskets and rudimentary rifles extant at the time the Constitution was drafted. Do you realize how problematic this logic is? Do you believe the 1st Amendment should protect print newspapers but not television broadcasts, web-based journalism, or social-media posts?
5. The Constitution belongs to the people of the United States, and if the requisite supermajorities agree, the people can amend it to reflect changing mores. So have the guts to be honest: Do you believe we should repeal the 2nd Amendment?
If the politician does not favor gun control:
1. You’ve offered “thoughts and prayers” for the victims. Do you realize how trite that sounds? Could you please take the initiative to change your phrasing once in a while? And is there anything besides thinking and praying that you believe you can do?
2. You say you believe the solution is not to pass more gun laws, but to enforce the ones we already have on the books. So what have you done to insist that the relevant agencies do just that?
3. According to the National Rifle Assn., only a good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun. You’ve extended that logic to schools, advocating that we arm teachers. But most mass shootings happen so fast, there isn’t much time to react. I can’t imagine my first-grade teacher stopping a determined killer, and I don’t believe parents want schools to look like prisons. Besides, is it fair to turn teachers into security guards? Do you really believe arming educators is the solution?
4. The 2nd Amendment confers a right to bear arms, but no constitutional right, even free speech, is absolute. So if you make blanket statements about the 2nd Amendment, why don’t you tell us where you draw the line?
5. Background checks won’t end gun violence. But they can stop a portion of the mentally ill population (or criminals or domestic abusers) from purchasing guns legally. How can you argue that a better system won’t prevent at least some crimes?
Even under pressure, I fear politicians on both sides are neither honest nor realistic on this issue.
But here’s what we can do. The low-hanging fruit if we want to lower rates of gun violence is to address drug use and mental health problems. Large percentages of those incarcerated for violent crimes committed those acts under the influence of drugs or to obtain money to buy drugs. And a large percentage of mass shooters are mentally ill. So try to notice the signs of mental illness and addiction, and do whatever possible to get friends and family the help they need.
Meanwhile, by all means, ask politicians those tough questions.
Mike Gatto, a Democrat, served four terms in the California Assembly. He is an attorney and legislator in residence at USC’s Unruh Institute of Politics. Twitter: @mikegatto
I have not met Mike Gatto and frankly have never heard of him. But I have respect for this man because I believe he tries to be equally tough on both sides in this debate and I have the sense that he too prefers clarity to bogus agreements that are nothing but words loaded with loopholes intended to deceive the public into believing that something was done when in fact it wasn’t.
I will deal with Mike Gatto’s “If the politician does not favor gun control” point-by-point:
FIRST, “thoughts” are surely trite, but “prayers” are not to anyone who believes in God and believes that He created us in His image and loves us. Is this an open acknowledgement that Democrats don’t believe in God or in the power of prayer? Because it frankly seems obvious to me at this point that the Democratic Party has radically turned into a secular humanist party and “God” is a nice-sounding thing for these people to say much the way Adolf Hitler referred to God and Christianity as a cynical way to cloak a clearly ungodly thing with the language of pseudo-religiousity.
But having stated that, let me proceed from there: we are at an impossible point with the mainstream Democrat Party – by which I now mean radically liberal (when even the reliably liberal Dianne Feinstein is not NEARLY “liberal” enough for this radical Democratic Party today) – in which they very CLEARLY want to first erode and undermine and ultimately strip the 2nd Amendment of having any actual force or meaning. And so in this climate, every single thing we give them is simply one step closer to what I truly believe is a fascist goal: every single on of the 22 former totalitarian communist regimes and currently including the five current totalitarian communist regimes stripped their people of the right to keep and bear arms. Every single one of them. And when 82% of communist countries are “former” communist countries, I submit that this is just one of many powerful evidences that this system does not work. Adolf Hitler stated, “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subjugated races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subjugated races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police.” This is the clear totalitarian mindset, to strip people who could be a threat to your regime – such as the people you intend to work to death in death camps – to have access to weapons to fight back against tyranny.
The framers of the Constitution enshrined the 1st Amendment first because free speech which is the heart of all true freedom was their most cherished goal; and they enshrined the 2nd Amendment right after it because they correctly viewed the right of the individual to keep and bear arms as the greatest safeguard of the 1st Amendment. The 2nd Amendment was a reaction against government tyranny.
But let me get back to the paragraph that precedes the immediately above: we are seeing our society devolve – I believe because of the secular humanism and atheism and the abortion mentality that have created a zeitgeist of nihilism. Nothing is sacred, there is no ultimate judgment, and if I am unhappy there is no reason why I shouldn’t “exercise my right to choose” and “my right to my own body” and start killing as many people as I can just like I learned to do on television programs and movies and video games created by liberals have taught me to do. They have desensitized us to violence because they claimed they had a right to do that even when no, they did NOT have such a right! And now they want to take away the most necessary rights that were guaranteed by our Constitution. Sixty million innocent human beings are now dead, making the Democratic Party ten times more murderous than were the Nazis with the Jews in the Holocaust. Democrats have an absolutely morally vicious agenda. And so, even as Democrats have in fact caused people to become more violent by taking away God and divine morality, I still prefer the violence that they have unleashed to the greater violence they surely WILL unleash in the years that would follow when I wouldn’t have the means to resist them when they come after me the same way Hitler came after Jews and Democrats came after babies.
And so when every single “gun control” measure is merely one more small step toward the giant step for repealing the 2nd Amendment (just like Lenin and Stalin did, just like Hitler did, just like Chairman Mao did, just like the Kim dynasty did), I will fight it tooth and nail. It comes down to this: if you want us to come your way with more common-sense gun control measures, then YOU have to come our way with more definitive pro-2nd Amendment measures. As long as any repeal of the 2nd Amendment is on the damn table, as long as Democrat activists are allowed to keep agitating to something that Hitler and Stalin and Mao failed to be able to do in this country, as you keep hysterically screaming that we need to “do something” no matter how irrational and useless that something is.
SECOND, are you seriously trying to tell me that the refusal to follow the damn law as it already exist on the damn books is somehow OUR fault, you who rabidly fly in the face of THE LAW when it comes to illegal immigration???? Are you seriously that dishonest, that much of a hypocrite???? It’s not just illegal immigration; you did the same thing with our drug laws and a whole host of other laws. We’re now entering the rabid hysterical madness of the leftist “Me Too” movement, but the liberals driving this movement conveniently forget great moments in history when they were the ones fighting FOR powerful sexual predators, such as when Roman Polanski was cheered with a standing ovation by Hollywood liberals for drugging and sodomizing a 13-year old minor girl. Such as when first Ted Kennedy literally abandoned a young girl to die a miserable death and then returned to his party and such as when Bill Clinton was demonstrated to be a serial sexual predator for years and then was protected by Democrats after saying, “It depends on what the meaning of the word is is,” incredibly telling the American people that since he wasn’t in fact actually having sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky at the precise nanosecond that he claimed he hadn’t had sex, that in fact he was somehow being honest in saying there is no sexual relationship. The fact of the matter is that Democrats have been the anti-law and the anti-order party for a generation. The fact is that Obama mass-pardoned gun-toting criminals on a regular basis. The fact is that Obama simply refused to prosecute criminals for violating all kinds of gun laws even as he routinely whined for more gun laws. And the fact is that liberal-and-Democrat-dominated cities such as Chicago are notorious for refusing to prosecute gun criminals. So don’t you Democrats damn refuse to apply the law in your Democrat Party bastions and then blame me for it.
In other words, Mike Gatto’s number 2 FAR more applies to Democrats than it does to Republicans. Don’t you DARE pin that on us. As Jesus put it, look at the damn log in your OWN eye before you mention the speck in mine. So there are actually SIX objections to gun control that Democrats have to answer and only four we have to respond to – EVEN FROM A LIBERAL.
THIRD, are you seriously trying to claim that since gun violence can happen quickly, that there is therefore no reason to try to react to that violence as quickly as possible? There isn’t much time to react, so let’s not react at all. That would be insane, but that is your prima facie argument. No, let’s react. Let’s get that good guy with a gun in as quickly as humanly possible to stop any bad guy with a gun. If you’re going to lecture me that the only way to deal with this is to take away everybody’s right to own a gun as the only possible way to deal with the possibility of a bad guy getting a gun, please refer to the Constitution. That is not an option. And a far better option that actually IS Constitutional is to end “gun free zones” given the fact that 98% of all mass shootings in our history have happened in gun free zones. There’s a reason psychos are attracted to gun free zones for the same reason that there’s a reason that burglars don’t enter homes with the owner pointing shotguns at their faces. Like the death penalty that Democrats refuse to allow, armed citizens is a deterrent to tyranny. It simply is. And so, no, while I am not demanding that every single 1st grade teacher strap a .44 magnum to their belts, I AM saying that there surely ARE teachers and staff members who would be willing to be armed to protect their children.
This argument that “I am a teacher and teaching is fundamentally incompatible with protecting children” is again frankly morally insane. I frankly would prefer a teacher who would be willing to protect me to one who militantly refuses to protect me. Yes, please give me the teacher who loves his or her students enough to protect them. And the state of Texas is just one state that believe it or not already found that yes there are TOO teachers who are willing to protect their students.
We can install metal detectors and that would do some good. But when you start paying full-time active-duty police officers to be on site at a school all day, you will drive up the cost of education. And maybe homeschooling kids is then the best option and we should simply fire all ya’all teachers if you won’t lift a finger to protect kids and teach our children in the safety of our homes since you insist on remaining a gun-free zone where 98% of all shootings have happened.
So yes, it IS fair to turn our teachers into security guards. At least if they’re going to claim that they care about their kids rather than their damn leftist Stalinist ideology. Okay?
Or maybe an even MORE unacceptable alternative to these same leftist teachers is that they return to teaching about God and about the divine morality that we used to teach back in the day when our schools weren’t shooting galleries????
FOURTH, this idea that “the 2nd Amendment isn’t absolute” is actually quite laughable when you consider something called “facts.” You see, I happen to know that we already have ALL DAMN KINDS OF LIMITS on the 2nd Amendment. Or else, for instance, I’d have a damned machine gun and I’d be free to shoot any liberal who pissed me off. We have at least TEN MAJOR FEDERAL GUN LAWS not to mention the thousands of state gun laws.
But here’s the funny thing, since you don’t believe in “absolute rights” then I’m glad to hear you’re willing to have a Voter ID card!!!! No? Because you actually DO believe in “absolute rights” even for illegal immigrants and even for felons???? Hey, Nazis, did you know the Nazi Party was ELECTED by voters???? Did you know that the Palestinian people used their right to vote to elect a terrorist group as their leaders????
The fact is that we conservatives and even we conservative NRA members are FAR more likely to limit the right to keep and bear arms than you have been with all your wicked rights. Capeesh????
I’ll take to you about sensible limits on guns the day AFTER you stop believing that any of your fellow liberals should have any right to believe you have “absolute rights,” let alone the absolute right to keep seeking to take away my constitutionally enshrined rights even as you invent right after right after right to murder your own babies, practice immoral and depraved behaviors, etc.
FIFTH, background checks. We’ve already got them, flying in the face of your frankly incredibly ridiculous argument number 4. above. But at this point, we aren’t allowed to go into somebody’s medical records because fascist liberal judges who dreamed of a world with 60 million murdered babies in America invented “the right to privacy.” At least, unless I want to be “private” about my 2nd Amendment RIGHT which unlike the “right” to abortion actually IS a right.
Hey, Democrat, my mental health is as much a private matter between me and my doctor as your abortion is a private matter between you and your doctor. I’m crazy and you’re a murderer and we’re both about to do something truly evil and take another human being’s life.
And maybe you moral monsters should end this vicious cycle.
So let’s END abortion privacy rights which would cause the “right” to abortion to topple like a rotten, termite-infested foundation that it is. And then we can go into the medical records of people requesting to buy a gun and say, “Wait a minute! This man is NUTS! Oh, HELL no!”
So Democrats, being fascist hypocrites, of course want “the right to privacy” to murder babies, but they want to take away the same right so they can take away the 2nd Amendment. Bullcrap. Just bullcrap.
But until then, let us understand that liberals gave the next shooter the right to privacy, the right to choose, the freedom over his own body. And their acts are merely retroactive abortions.
On these issues, kindly deal with the great big fat giant logs in your own eyes, Democrats.
Start Thinking Right 