Archive for the ‘philosophy’ Category

What’s Wrong With Hillary Clinton’s Economic Plan? Plenty, But Here’s The Bottom Line

August 11, 2016

So Hillary Clinton’s basic economic pitch is that she is going to “level the playing field” by punishing Wall Street and big businesses and allowing all those horrible profits to be shared by the American people.  And it will be oh, so good for us and oh, so bad for those terrible, greedy, evil Wall Street firms and corporations.

Sounds good.  At least it sounds good to people who either aren’t that honest, or aren’t that bright, or are neither honest nor bright.

For one thing, Hillary Clinton has taken more filthy, greedy money from Wall Street than ANY politician in the ENTIRE HISTORY OF THE WORLD has EVER taken.  To express it in the form of a headline, “Clinton is the Wall Street candidate based on donation figures.”  Hillary Clinton has been bought and paid for by Wall Street.   She was paid millions – a total of at least $153 million with a shocking percentage coming not only from foreign entities but from the worst rogue nations on planet earth – to give speeches and Wall Street was one of the top U.S. entities.  And recordings or transcripts those Wall Street speeches, unlike any national security secret which she treated with cavalier disdain, are top secret classified never to see the light of day.  Even the leftist-oriented Huffington Post puts it this way: “Release of Clinton’s Wall Street Speeches Could End Her Candidacy For President.”

Hillary Clinton was paid MILLIONS to tell Wall Street what her presidency would do to benefit them.  She made very sure that all reporters were BARRED from her speeches to Wall Street firms.  Why did she do that???  She allowed NO RECORDING DEVICES other than her own recording for her own use which of course is in a vault somewhere.  Why did she do that???  And lastly, when Hillary Clinton was a Senator from New York, she was “hands off” on Wall Street in spite of the fact that Wall Street happens to be in HER state where SHE should have been in control of regulating what they did in HER district.  But she never bothered.  Why do you seriously believe she will bother now when our enemies can find out every single national security secret Hillary Clinton knew, but NOBODY can find out so much as a single word she said to Wall Street in speeches that she was paid as much as $675,000 to give???  She wouldn’t even allow PLACARDS on tables for fear that a photo might leak and the American people could see an image of who Hillary Clinton was being paid MILLIONS of dollars to talk to.  Why would she do that???

A Wall Street pay-to-play player said, “It was pretty glowing about us,” one person who watched the event said. “It’s so far from what she sounds like as a candidate now. It was like a rah-rah speech. She sounded more like a Goldman Sachs managing director.”  And that’s exactly why we will NEVER hear her speeches as she betrays the American people and betrays as a lie every single thing she now says in her campaign rhetoric.

Hillary Clinton has proven herself more than any politician who has ever LIVED that she will be a crony capitalist fascist who will do insider deals with those who offer her something in return.  She will sell out the American people for a nickel if that’s the going rate.  You can absolutely trust Hillary Clinton to sell out your interests for larger, more powerful interests every single time.  That is simply the story of her life.

The notion that this candidate is going to actually reform Wall Street in a way that would benefit anyone but Wall Street is so beyond laughable that it is beyond unreal.  You literally have to be a fool to believe that.  Mind you, there ARE plenty of intellectuals who are just such fools indeed.  Famous prophetic novelist George Orwell said, “There are some ideas so absurd that only an ‘intellectual’ could believe them,” because no ordinary man was capable of being such a fool.”   And the point he was making is that these people live in a giant ivory tower vacuum and none of their ideas actually have to ever be proven or even be provable in the real world to be believed.  They live in a world of theories, not in a world of facts.  They build nothing and have no grasp whatsoever on how TO build anything.  They are nothing more than eloquent ideologues consumed by hidden agendas.  Whereas people who must face reality every single day can never be so disconnected from the truth because unlike the intellectuals they would STARVE in the COLD.  I came across a meme on Karl Marx that ought to be illustrative how such foolishness contaminates minds:

Karl Marx

Why one earth would not merely millions but BILLIONS believe so passionately in the theories of this man, who had never in his lifetime actually produced ANYTHING in the actual, real world and whose theories have failed in every single “laboratory of reality” in which they have EVER been tried???

Karl Marx was precisely one of the fools that the great author of 1984 and Animal Farm was describing.  In  fact, both books were written by a horrified Orwell as he contemplated totalitarian socialism.  The Marxist theory continues because of the sheer, ponderous weight of all the other ivory tower egghead fools who have absolutely no grasp whatsoever of actual reality.

Hillary Clinton is another such fool.  She accomplished exactly NOTHING in spite of her so-called record of accomplishment.   Even her own State Department had to REDACT her list of “achievements.” 

But as bad as that indictment of Hillary Clinton is, that actually isn’t the “bottom line” fallacy that I am describing regarding Hillary Clinton’s economic plan.  I merely cite that to try to undercut her own claims and the claims of other fools on her behalf.  Just realize that the pile of intellectual manure that is laid out comes from the minds and the belief-systems of the very worst form of fools whom no ordinary man could ever be capable of becoming because they are forced to deal with actual real-world realities that prevent them from ever being such fools.

So what is it that I am describing about what is so truly wrong with Hillary’s plan???

It boils simply down to this: Hillary Clinton is saying she will tax and regulate and force Wall Street to be more “fair” or more “just.”  And ignorant people believe that any regulation or tax or coercion on the part of government must surely be a good thing.

That’s where the bait-and-switch takes place.

What you need to understand is that Wall Street and mega-big corporate business actually WANTS higher taxes and punitive regulations and difficult compliance benchmarks.  That sentence very likely shocks you and your mind may say, “No way!”  But let me explain and hopefully you will agree with me when I lay it out.

I googled the phrase “percentage of jobs created by small businesses” and got this result:

According to the SBA’s Office of Advocacy: “Small firms accounted for 63 percent of the net new jobs created between 1993 and mid-2013 (or 14.3 million of the 22.9 million net new jobs). Since the end of the recession (from mid-2009 to mid-2013), small firms accounted for 60 percent of the net new jobs.

So you need to simply first understand that Wall Street and mega-big business are in direct competition with small businesses.

The second thing you need to understand is the crony-capitalist mindset that invariably prefers a larger share of a smaller piece of the pie than a much smaller share of a much larger piece of the pie.  Every truly awful leader understands and exemplifies this mindset, with Kim Jong-un being possibly the very best example.

Let me show you a couple of satellite images of North Korea at night compared to South Korea at night to drive home my point:

North Korea at night 1

North Korea at night 2

South Korea is far more like what Republicans envision where laissez-faire free market enterprise is allowed to flourish; North Korea is far more like what the Democrats envision of a State-controlled economy.  Guess which one ends up being DARK AT NIGHT because THERE’S NOTHING.

And you say, why on earth would they want that?  Why wouldn’t they want a more open and free economy where they have less power, but far more is actually produced and it is better for all the people?  And the simple answer is, “Because they wouldn’t have as much control and as much power.”

The word “fascism” comes from the Roman/Latin word, “to bundle together.”  The image was of a bundle of sticks with an axe head protruding, the concept being that when the people are all bundled together, there is power.  And of course, who controlled that bundle?  The State, the emperor.   That is what the Democratic Party wants: they want to bundle us together like sticks, so that THEY and THEY alone can control the bundle.

There’s a line from Milton’s Paradise Lost that I always remember: when Satan says, “Better to rule in hell than to serve in heaven.”  That’s the mindset of the left: better to have totalitarian rule over a small, impoverished economy than to be a smaller, weaker part of a large, powerful economy.

That is the quintessential essence of progressive liberalism: they want the power to dictate; they want to have the power to determine who wins and who loses, who pays and who receives, who is taxed and who is tax-exempt.

And what about Wall Street and what about the giant corporate entities.  Don’t they just want more profit for their shareholders?

You need to understand: what if we allowed small business to truly flourish?  What would happen to the market share of those great big giant corporate entities and the Wall Street that I’ve already established and documented owns Hillary Clinton and flourishes off of trading those giant corporate entities???

Now let me ask you a follow-up question: which would have an easier time paying higher taxes, great big corporations or small business owners???  Think about this and ANSWER it before you go on: who has an easier time coming up with an extra ten, twenty thousand dollars???  Who is going to be hurt more: the big corporation or the little business?  Let me go on: which would have an easier time complying with a dizzying array of regulations and compliance burdens and costs???  Would the great big corporation or the small business owner have an easier time hiring a full-time compliance officer???

When you actually THINK about it, these are no-brainers.  Just as it is a historic no-brainer that tax cuts increase revenues and have ALWAYS increased revenues as businesses are allowed to keep more of their own money and expand and grow and it is ultimately good for everyone in the form of more wealth and more opportunity for all.

It is BEYOND OBVIOUS that that great big business has a considerably easier time dealing with the increased costs imposed by Democrats than the small business owner.

Small businesses are CRIPPLED by these costs.

Which is why entrepreneurship is at an all-time low because of the Obama administration.

Which is why new small business start-ups are at an all-time low because of the Obama administration.

Our labor participation rate – the measure of the percentage of working-age Americans who actually have a damn JOB – is basically at the lowest rate in history, given that in 1977 which is the last time it was as low as Obama has made it now, we had far more stay-at-home moms as dad went off to work.  A hundred million working-age Americans AREN’T.

Home ownership has declined to its lowest level in 51 years under Obama.  Which like the labor participation rate is basically in the entire history of the statistic being kept.

You find that under Obama, the rich got way, WAY richer and everyone else got poorer as the income gap soared to heights we’ve never seen.  Even Bernie Sanders got that.  And Politifact was forced to agree that under Obama things are worse than they’ve ever been going back to the damn 1920s.

HuffPo has an article titled, “Middle Class Jobs, income, Quickly Disappearing.”  The New York Times says, “Middle Class Shrinks Further as More Fall Out Instead of Climbing Up.”  MSNBC has an article titled, “The Vanishing of the Middle Class.”

These aren’t right-wing sources.  And if they WERE actually FAIR they would depict their articles the way they would if a REPUBLICAN were in the White House, a la “Obama’s War on the Middle Class: The real story behind “hope” and “change.”

This Forbes article probably best nails the dilemma that Obama and the Federal Reserve that is struggling to monetize Obama’s failed policies have placed the United States in.

These are things called facts and I am explaining to you precisely WHY they are facts.

It is like this by design.  You’ve been sold out.  Obama was bought and sold and Hillary Clinton is more bought and more sold than any human being who ever lived.

Over the last eight years, Barack Obama – and now Hillary Clinton is actually promising to do even worse for another eight years- and those under them who control the “bundle of sticks” that we all now ARE thanks to these policies have sold our collectivist souls to the devil.

Let me get back to that all-telling statistic involving entrepreneurship and new business start-ups being DESTROYED by this president like we have never seen.

Would the market share of the giant firms go up or down if the smaller businesses were allowed to actually be unleashed as they were allowed to keep more of their profits and put those profits back into their businesses and be forced to comply with fewer stupid regulations that incur thousands of hours of compliance paperwork???  And the answer is that the pie would grow larger, but the Wall Street- and the corporate-share of that pie would grow much smaller as small businesses grew and grew and grew and were ultimately large enough to become big players themselves.

So let me just quickly lay it out for you: when a Barack Obama or a Hillary Clinton – who are owned lock, stock and barrel by Wall Street and by the mega-corporations – gets into power, they create laws and taxes and regulations and compliance factors that they invite the great big giant entities to write on a pay-to-play basis.

And the biggest players write the laws to shut out their smaller competition, understanding that if they can strangle those smaller businesses and stop them from being able to build and grow and compete with them, that they will get to remain at the top of the heap for decades, even for generations.

The economic purpose of the Democrat Party is to ensure that the very biggest players remain the very biggest players and the smaller competitors are never truly allowed to compete.  The giant Wall Street and corporate dinosaurs don’t want that smarter, more agile mammal to come along and eat their eggs and finish off their road to extinction.  No.  they will continue to maintain the Democratic Party as the engine to maintain the status quo so that that new mammal can never evolve to threaten them.

If you elect Hillary Clinton, you WILL get more of the same; you WILL get a smaller pie with the largest players – who each paid the system for the privilege of remaining the largest players – having the giant share.  And you WILL get fewer jobs, fewer opportunities, and lower wages as a result.

THAT is what is wrong with Hillary Clinton’s economic plan, just as it was wrong with Obama’s economic plan.  Because it’s the same damn tired plan that is nothing more than a watered-down version of Marxism.

 

The Stupidest Lie In All Human History: It Has Nothing To Do With Islam When Muslims Force You To Recite Qur’an Or Die

July 5, 2016

I am going to proceed to prove and document that if you are a Democrat, you are a demon-possessed fool of the most depraved sort imaginable.

The Los Angeles Times did a major investigative article on June 26, 2016.  It describes just one bloody month – in other words, just a typical month in our world today – of April in which there wasn’t a single day in which there was not a deadly terrorist attack somewhere in the world.  Interestingly, in this article a chart is featured labeling each group responsible for an attack and the number of casualties.  The groups dominating the top were Islamic State which killed 395 people, the Taliban, which killed 109, Boko Haram, which killed 68, Shabab, which killed 41, the Syrian rebels, who killed 23, Abu SAyyaf, which killed 19.  You have to really get into the WEEDS before you find a group that isn’t officially ISLAMIC.

NINETY-FIVE PERCENT of the murders committed by terrorists groups in this month were committed by MUSLIM GROUPS.  More than 800 people were butchered by Muslims claiming Allah and claiming Islamic theology as their primary motivating force to do what they do.

You cannot keep believing these Democrat Party lies that Islam and terrorism have no legitimate connection or relationship.

Of course, the Los Angles Times, being leftist propaganda drivel, doesn’t point that rather important fact out to you.  Nope.  You’ve got to look up the terrorist groups yourself, find out their ideology and do the tallies and then do the math.  Other than the Indian Maoists, the Kurdistan Workers Party (communist), the Lord’s Resistance Army, Renamo, the New People’s Army (communist),  and the New Irish Republican Army, they’ll all MUSLIM.   And these other terrorist groups are chicken feed compared to the real terrorist monsters who are murdering hundreds at a time.

Meanwhile, Democrats like Obama and like Hillary Clinton keep spouting that the Muslim world hates terrorism and is actually joining with us to fight it.  Bull crap.  Last year it was revealed that in spite of Obama’s ocean of lies, HALF A BILLION DOLLARS was committed to training “four or five” Syrian rebels.  Yeah, those Muslims just can’t WAIT to fight terror, can they?  And just in case you’re wondering, Obama just proved that Muslims are NOT going to fight terrorist Muslims YET AGAIN.  Obama blathers idiotically and demonically about Republicans causing terror by giving terrorists access to guns; the only problem with that is Obama believes that every single American who believes in the U.S. Constitution is a “terrorist” while he has put ALL KINDS of weapons including M1-Abrams main battle tanks into the hands of Islamic State again and again as his “good Muslims” drop their weapons and flee time and time and time again.  In fact, we find out that Obama gave $1 billion in military aid to Islamic State because he abandoned Iraq to the terrorists and they just walked up to Obama, bitch-slapped our weak coward in chief, and took his stuff having made sure there wasn’t so much as a single US soldier to say, “Hey, waitaminute.”

Obama has boasted and boasted and boasted about his “fifty nation coalition.”  It’s a joke.

So Obama and Hillary are out there dishonestly claiming that Islamic terrorism isn’t “Islamic” and that Muslims are our friends.  And they’re just lying right out of their anuses they call their mouths.  Muslims are OVERWHELMINGLY responsible for the vicious terrorism and they can’t even tell us who our enemy is.  And meanwhile they dishonestly pretending that we have allies that we very clearly do not have.

Obama and Hillary Clinton are claiming that their strategy to fight terrorism is somehow working when terrorism has exploded 800 percent under Obama and will have exploded by more than 1,700 percent by the time the disgraced fool leaves office.  Just look at the chart and do your own simple extrapolation of where the trend under Obama is headed:

Deaths Due To Terrorism

Terrorism has doubled exponentially every single two year period while Obama has dishonestly claimed he’s been winning and succeeding.

Obama and Hillary Clinton are claiming that their strategy to contain terrorism is somehow working when more than 65 million Muslims have fled and it is only a matter of time before those 65 million Muslims become embittered wherever they end up and become our future “homegrown terrorists.”

The human race has never witnessed anything like this.  This is not merely “failure,” this is DEMONIC FAILURE.

But THE most dishonest media – even making Joseph Goebbels’ Ministry of Propaganda in the days of Nazi Germany and the TASS of the Soviet days look honest in comparison – are NOT telling the story and they are intentionally NOT connecting the dots so that people can see that Obama has failed them, failed America, failed the world, failed the entire human SPECIES.

Democrats and liberal Muslim contextualizers will stand there and tell us that most of the victims of terrorism are Muslims.  And that’s actually true.  But what does it prove?  Nothing, when Muslims have been the primary murderers of Muslims since Islam split into the two warring factions of Sunni and Shia at the moment that Muhammad died.  The Day of Ashura was a day of massacre in which the followers who became Sunnis massacred the grandson of Muhammad and his companions.  That violence has continued ever since.  During the Iran-Iraq War, more than a million Muslims were murdered by Muslims.  This notion that Muslims are somehow victims because the terrorists who murder also murder Muslims is a great big fat giant fraud.  Muslims will murder anyone they can murder and do so quite gleefully.

You cannot keep believing these Democrat Party lies that Obama has succeeded or that Hillary Clinton will succeed.

On the same day they did their study of the 180 attacks committed in April, the same Los Angeles Times published news of new major attacks on page A4, including a story about Muslim gunmen from Shabab murdering 14 people in Somalia and the Muslim-created “catastrophic humanitarian emergency” for Nigerians.  Tens out thousands of people have fled and are literally starving to death because – as the LA Times notes – “Violence in northern Nigeria fueled by the Islamic extremist group Boko Haram, has forced more than 2.5 million people to flee their homes, according to United Nations statistics.”  Those murders weren’t included in the big story titled “Diary of Terror” that the LA Times featured on the main page without every once singling out Islam for the vicious religion that it is.

And that month wasn’t ANYTHING compared to the month of June, the primary month of Ramadan which ends tomorrow.  We had the attack in Orlando.  But that was merely one bloody attack in one incredibly bloody stretch of Muslim holy month: Iraq just lost 2oo people to Islamic terrorists yesterday.  Islamic State claimed responsibility.  Immediately before that, in Dhaka, Bangladesh, Muslim terrorists seized a restaurant and took hostages, killing at least 20 foreigners.  Those who could recite from the Qur’an were spared:

Dhaka: The attackers involved in the Dhaka restaurant siege had asked their victims to recite from the Quran before deciding on whom to spare, a leading Bangladeshi daily said on its website on Saturday.

“Those who could recite a verse from the Quran were spared, others were tortured,” the Daily Star quoted a rescued hostage as saying.

At least 20 foreigners, including an Indian, were killed in the 10-hour siege at the Holey Artisan Bakery in the diplomatic enclave of the Bangladeshi capital.

The siege ended after the Bangladeshi security forces gunned down six of the attackers and captured one of their associates.

Those who could not recite from the Quran were tortured by the gunmen, said Rezaul Karim, father of Hasnat Karim who was held hostage for over 10 hours.

Sounds exactly like something any card-carrying “religion of peace, charity and justice” would do, right, Barry Hussein???

The funny thing is that I think I could actually pull that one off and recite from the Holy Qur’an:

 And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah (disbelief) is worse than killing. And fight not with them at Al-Masjid-al-Haram (the sanctuary at Makkah), unless they (first) fight you there. But if they attack you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.  But if they cease, then Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.  And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allah (Alone). — Qur’an 2:191-193

Ah, yes, the religion of peace is so peaceful when everyone who would say anything to argue is DEAD.

But there, I recited the evil, hateful, vile, demonic Qur’an for you Muslim murderers, so let me go.

I welcome the Los Angeles Times to do a follow-up story over the months of June and July and see how Islam is faring in it’s Obamaesque version as “the religion of peace, charity and justice.”  And it’s quite a marvelous thing to listen to our Muslim-in-Chief praise Muhammad and his Islam while he insults Jesus Christ and His Christianity.  But then again, Obama actually said “my Muslim faith” and had to be officially corrected as to what his faith was supposed to be according to his previous dishonest blatherings about being a Christian.  I’ll give this to Obama: he isn’t any less Christian than Lucifer.  Or any more Christian, either.

In a previous article, I go into rather great detail comparing the Qur’an to the Holy Bible in terms of commandments to violence.  It’s not that hard, folks.  The Old Testament of the Holy Bible predates Islam by something on the order of 4,000 years.  By the time Muhammad had written the Qur’an, Jesus had appeared some six centuries previous – in fulfillment of the Old Testament prophets to fulfill Judaism – and Jesus taught peace as the Prince of Peace.  He told His followers to put away their swords and allowed Himself to be taken and tortured and crucified to death by violent, evil men.  Not exactly the path that Muhammad took when he took part in over thirty military campaigns of conquest, committed multiple acts of genocide, and had another thirty more planned at the time of his death.  Which by the way was the result of being poisoned by a Jewish woman vengeful over yet another murderous attack against Jews in which he killed the men and enslaved the women and children.

Jesus prophesied His own death; Muhammad turned out to be not so good at it.  But Jesus also prophesied that He would – as God’s powerful Son – be raised from the dead in proof of His deity and His divine message.  “The Prophet” really failed miserably at pulling off that feat.

I simply cannot stand it when an Obama or a Hillary Clinton or a CAIR representative or some other leftist Islamist contextualizer makes the ridiculous statement that “whoever did this terrible deed is not a true follower of Islam.”  Because I would just like to ask that fool one simple question: “Okay, do you think that the Prophet Muhammad was ‘a true follower of Islam’?”  Because it is a simple matter of history to document that the Prophet did all the same damn things that Obama and the leftist Muslim contextualizers today say is so against the teachings of Islam.  You can tell me that according to Islam killing and committing acts of genocide against your enemies is a good thing; but what you CANNOT tell me is that Muhammad didn’t do those things.  Because it is simply a fact of history that he did.

I keep hearing this insane crap about the Muslim terrorist murder of homosexuals and how tolerant Muhammad supposedly was to homosexuals according to these idiotic liberal contextualizers of Islam.  And so they’ll mindlessly quote Sura 5:32 that says, “the killing of an innocent life is like the killing of all mankind, the saving of an innocent life is the saving of all mankind.”  And yeah, Muhammad said that: WHEN HE WAS IN MECCA AND HE WAS THE UNDERDOG.  He said a lot of sweet stuff then when his adversaries were far more powerful than he was.   But when he went to Medina and became the strong man, the gates of hell opened.  And those liberal contextualizers of Islam refuse to quote the vicious stuff Muhammad wrote at the end of his life that according to Islam’s doctrine of abrogation supplants the sweet nice stuff he wrote early when he was afraid of his enemies.

The Qur’an and Islams other accepted holy sources actually are quite explicit how Islam should deal with homosexuals.  And it aint nice.

In any event, in that article of mine I link to four paragraphs above, I point out a very important fact: that while the OLD Testament contains commandments to violence (that were highly specific in that they were given to ONE people at ONE point in time for ONE single act whereas the commandments to violence in Islam are universal and given to every Muslim throughout the centuries), the NEW Testament contains NO commands to commit violence and actually teaches peace.  Just find me ONE command in the New Testament where Christians are commanded to commit murder or violence.  And understand that I point out and demonstrate that even the Old Testament of the Bible anticipates its own replacement, calling for “a New Covenant” (Jeremiah 31:31-34).  Which was fulfilled and inaugurated by Jesus of Nazareth who fulfilled every jot and tittle of the Old Testament (see Matthew 5:18).  As Jesus said in the preceding verse, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.”  And Jesus DID fulfill the Law and the Prophets, and so everything in the Old Testament that isn’t specifically restated is considered fulfilled and done away with – which includes any and all teachings of VIOLENCE.  Compare that to Islam which must feature a doctrine called “abrogation.”  Look at how the reliably leftist Google puts it when you type in the words Islam and abrogation:

abrogation

If Muhammad said two things that appear to be contradictory, you must heed the last command he gave.  And he did that a LOT, by the way.  There are a whole BUNCH of what I call “convenient suras” in which Muhammad contradicted something he had previously said in order to justify getting something he wanted.  And in the case of the history of Muhammad and the Islam he created, there is simply no question: when Muhammad started out in Medina, he was the underdog and even his own tribe refused to follow him and he preached during this phase peace and tolerance and co-existence.  Until he reached Medina and gained power and began to teach the violent subjugation of his enemies.

Let me simply copy and paste here from what I’ve already documented before:

Liberals completely fail to comprehend this: the Bible begins with violence and moves to peace.

Not so the Qur’an.  Not so Muhammad.  When you read a Qur’an, understand that “Muhammad was like two different persons at two different times and the Quran is like two contradictory books pasted together.”  Understand that in Islam you have 1390 Years of Violence and only 10 years of Peace.

When Mohammad first began to proselytize his new religion in Mecca and claim that he was receiving revelations from Allah, he was decidedly the underdog.  And correspondingly all of his revelations centered around peaceful coexistence and tolerance.

But then Mohammad went to Medina in what is today called “Al Hijra.”  He was able to garner followers and became militarily powerful.  And suddenly all of the revelations of his Qur’an took a decidedly violent turn.

The Qur’an was NOT organized in any kind of chronological order; rather, it was organized by length, from the longest to the shortest suras.

When you re-arrange the Qur’an by chronology, you get this order: and you get not violence to peace as the Holy Bible gives, but peace to VIOLENCE.

So, for example, do your own research.  Consider the very first violent Sura 2:191-193 found in the Qur’an which states, And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killingbut if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.   And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.  But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)”.  And lo and behold, when you examine the chronological order and look to the right column to see where it was organized according to the tradition based on length of sura, you find that this edict found in Sura 2 to “kill them wherever you may find them” is the VERY FIRST sura Mohammad conveniently claimed he received from Allah when he arrived in Medina and became the dominant power. 

This is not merely a command for violence; it is a UNIVERSAL COMMAND for violence.  I’ll talk about that more.

Keep going down the list of violent suras and look at where they are found, whether they were written earlier in Mohammad’s Mecca phase or later when he arrived at Medina and became militarily powerful.

You will find that without any question, the vast overwhelming majority of violent sura that commanded violence and death were given in Medina just as the vast overwhelming majority of suras commanding any kind of “peace” was given in Mecca.

A simple historic statement of fact: Mohammad and the Qur’an takes us from peace to viciousness and hate and murder and death and slaughter.

Now, this is bad, but it actually gets WORSE.  Because Islam has a doctrine called “abrogation” by which later suras correct and supercede earlier ones.

In other words, if Mohammad first said “peace” and then he said “war,” the ONLY correct interpretation of the Qur’an MUST BE WAR.

Now, abrogation is not necessarily such a terrible thing; every parent has done it: your child may ask you if she can go to a party, and then you find out something you don’t like about the party that makes you change or mind, or your child misbehaves and you say, “Now you can’t go.”  You’ve abrogated your previous statement.  You’ve said yes and now you’re saying no to the same thing you’d said yes to.  So if your child comes to you and says, “You said on Monday I could go, so I went,” you are enraged as you point out, “But I said on TUESDAY you could NOT go, so you are in a heap of trouble!”

It’s different when it comes to a revelation from God, though: God isn’t supposed to be caught by surprise or change His mind with new information or be wrong and then correct Himself.  How did Mohammad respond to this dilemma?  It seems that Qur’an 2:106 was “revealed” in response to skepticism directed at Muhammad that Allah’s revelations were not entirely consistent over time. Muhammad’s rebuttal was that ”Allah is able to do all things” — even change his mind.

And hence we have examples of blatantly obvious abrogation in the Qur’an such as:

In Surah 58, Al Mujadilah, verse 12, the believers are commanded to give alms before a private consultation with the Messenger. In verse 13 they are told that it is no longer necessary.

In Surah 33, Al Ahzab, verses 50-51 Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) is allowed to marry and divorce an unlimited number of women. In verse 52 he is prohibited to continue to do so.

In Surah 73, Al Muzzammil, verses 2-4, the prophet of Islam is commanded to spend about half of the night in prayer and reading of the Quran. In verse 20 of the same Surah this is changed into what is easy for him and those who followed his example.

But this Islamic view of Allah is in very direct contrast to the Judeo-Christian God of the Bible, and so we have passages like Numbers 23:19: “God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?

Sneering liberal pseudo-intellectuals claim that Christianity has the same issue of abrogation, BUT WE DON’T.  And they are frankly moral idiots of the very lowest order to make such a blatantly false claim.  Here’s why:

  1. In every single example of violence in the Old Testament, it is ALWAYS in EVERY CASE a specific command by God to a specific people to do a specific thing at a specific time for a specific reason.  There is NO universalized commandment by God to always kill everyone the way we see in the Qur’an, no “kill them wherever you find them.”  There are no verses in the Bible that say “Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you…” (Qur’an 2:216), no “Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah” (Qur’an 4:76).  God never gives a universal command that He later has to take back.
  2. If the Bible were given the same way the Qur’an is given, Moses would have commanded peace and Jesus would have come after Moses and subsequently taught, “But I tell you, hate your enemies and slaughter those who persecute you.”  When Jesus, in fulfillment of the New Covenant that even the Old Covenant itself anticipated hundreds of years before Jesus’ arrival on earth, as the Prince of Peace, actually taught, “But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Matthew 5:44).  You need to comprehend how absolutely MASSIVE is the difference between a religion that begins with violence and then moves to peace (Christianity) verses a religion that begins with peace and then ends with commands to universalized violence.
  3. The Old Testament of the Holy Bible pointedly “abrogates” ITSELF in terms of violence because it promises a New Covenant and then it DELIVERS one in the form of the Prince of Peace, Jesus.  The “abrogation” of violence was not for the sake of Jesus’ convenience, the way the abrogation of peace for a call to violence clearly was politically oh-so-very convenient for Mohammad.  Let me put it this way: Jesus told Peter, “Put away your sword” (Matthew 26:52) in order that He could be arrested and beaten and go to the cross where He would die a terrible, humiliating, agonizing death in our place for our sins.  Versus Mohammad who said let’s be peaceful when he was the underdog and then turned on a dime and ordered mass violence the moment his forces gained the upper hand.
  4. The Bible doesn’t “abrogate” violence merely because times had changed and the world was no longer a violent place and the Bible was correcting a problem that was obviously out of step with the rest of the world.  Any such notion is simply FALSE.  The Romans at the time of Christ were as vicious and brutal as ANYONE ever had been; what they did to Jesus itself proves that.  And Jesus’ disciples wrote the New Testament not only in light of what Rome had done to Jesus, but in light of the fact that even as they were writing, Rome was treating Christians viciously.  St. Peter and St. Paul were both executed by Rome, as were many other disciples.
  5. The God of the Bible is a God of wrath just as He is a God of love.  But all of His attributes are perfectly balanced, such that His wrath is manifested in the attribute of justice that ultimately flows from love.  And the toleration of evil results in a lack of justice.  And so God gave His people the sword and used them as an instrument in defined, limited circumstances and only in accordance with His command.  But ultimately He was always preparing for the arrival of His Son, the Prince of Peace.
  6. Finally, the thing that changed in the Bible was this: “But when the set time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those under the law, that we might receive adoption to sonship” (Galatians 4:4-5).  God prophesied a coming Messiah who would epitomize and usher in a “new covenant,” and Jesus came as foretold.
  7. And so Jesus completely fulfilled the Old Covenant (Matthew 5:17).  The various laws and regulations and customs of the Old Testament weren’t “abrogated,” but rather they were fulfilled and served their purpose and were no longer necessary because the promised Messiah took their burden off our necks.  And so Christians have realized even in the time of St. Peter that unless a principle or a command from the Old Covenant is specifically repeated/restated in the New Covenant, it was fulfilled by Christ and no longer applies to New Covenant believers.  We can compare the Old Covenant and the New to the abacus vs. the computer or the horse vs. the automobile: the former things weren’t “abrogated” and declared wrong; rather they served their purpose and we now use the superior things.  Christ is the Superior which fulfilled the inferior and the inferior that served as a type or a shadow of the Superior (see for example Colossians 2:17Hebrews 8:5) is therefore no longer needed.

It is for this reason that I point out the fact and hereby state for the historical record that Penn State religious history professor Philip Jenkins is an abject moral idiot and the worst kind of intellectual fraud.  He is, as are all progressive liberals, a pathologically ignorant fool masquerading himself as someone who is wise and knowledgeable when he in fact teaches the precise opposite of wisdom and knowledge.  Jenkins is not only utterly blind to what is actually going on all around him in the real world as Muslim terrorists murder and bomb innocent people in the name of Allah, but as I have just proven he is just as utterly blind to the religious theology that he claims that he is an expert in.

A passage from Colossians sums these liberal fools up well: “Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ.” – Colossians 2:8.  Tragically, modern universities teach very little BUT “empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense.”

The fact that the Qur’an does NOT begin with violence and then end with peace, but rather the opposite, and the fact that abrogation forces true Muslims to accept that the later “revelations” to Mohammad supercede previous ones, puts Islam in a deep, dark pit of endless violence that is NOT true of Christianity.

Which is why Christianity and Christ are attacked all the damn TIME by liberals and Christians don’t unleash waves of violent hate the way Muslims routinely do the moment they even THINK their Prophet might be getting insulted.

We are left with a giant problem of Islam: we find that Islam, Mohammad and the Qur’an spent ten years deceiving people by preaching peace and tolerance in order to grow strong and powerful, and then the rest of history practicing force and violence and terror the moment they were able to gain the upper hand.

We find that Islam does NOT mean “peace” as liberals love to adoringly say; it means “submission.”  AND YOU WILL SUBMIT OR ELSE YOU WILL BE KILLED.

A historical study of Mohammad’s life reveals that the “Prophet of Peace” had fought in over thirty violent military campaigns and had at least another thirty campaigns planned at the time of his death in 632 AD.  In fact I can quote you Islamic sources that state, “that the Prophet waged jihad operations 77 times in the first 10 years as head of the Muslim community in Medina.”  But it is a fact of history that when Mohammad showed up at Medina, he became a violent terrorist warmonger who waged unrelenting war until he defeated and subjugated everyone around him.  What you will also find is that Islam did NOT practice peace after Mohammad’s death; in fact it split due to terrifying, graphic and vicious violence that continues to this very day as the viciousness created Sunni and Shiite Islam.  But within 100 years of Mohammad’s death, warring, violent Muslims were attacking Christian Europe and had killed an looted and pillaged their way all across the entirety of Europe before finally being crushed by Charles “the Hammer” Martel at the Battle of Tours in France in 732.  Preceding that, in the late 7th century, the most intolerant religion on earth built the Dome of the Rock directly on top of the most holy site of Judaism where the Jewish Temple had been built, where Abraham had been told to take his son Isaac as a sacrifice but God had provided a ram in place of Isaac.  By then, violent warring Muslims had already poured across Africa and seized the Christian realms established by St. Augustine.  All of the vast peaceful Christian provinces of North Africa had fallen to the bloody sword of Allah by 711.  Violent, warring Muslims poured into Christian Spain to be finally defeated by El Cid.  Violent, warring Muslims poured into the Christian Byzantine Empire and besieged Constantinople and the Christian Emperor pleaded with the Pope to send Christian warriors to defend a Christian realm from Muslim conquest in what became known as the Crusades.

As we celebrate our Declaration of Independence – which contains obvious references to the God of the Christian Bible that the Democratic Party, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama repudiate and dishonestly claims has no bearing upon our nation that Abraham Lincoln called “this nation, under God,” understand that uor Founding Fathers were still dealing with Islam when the Barbary Pirates were committing acts of terror against our ships and our sailors in the late 18th century.

Again, it is so damn simple and Democrats are so damned, rabidly dishonest: our founding fathers in the Declaration of independence stated their reason to separate from England: namely that the King of England was usurping rights:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

The Declaration of Independence could not put the case much more clearly: 1) God ordained man with certain rights; 2) to secure these God-ordained rights, governments are instituted among men; 3) any government that violates or usurps these God-ordained rights can be overthrown; 4) the king of England has indeed violated these God-ordained rights; and therefore 5) we are separating from England.  And the Constitution that came after we successfully fought to separate from England proceeds to describe a government that does NOT violate the rights that God had ordained in mankind.  At least until Democrats came along, murdered sixty million innocent human beings in a vicious and vile process known as “abortion” in which every single father has the right to the life of his very own child stripped from him.  And homosexuality was erected in place of Christian morality and socialist human Government that has gone FAR BEYOND any damn thing the king of England ever did was imposed and worshiped in place of Christianity.

George Washington, the father of our country, put it this way:

“Of all the habits and dispositions which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.” — George Washington, Farewell Address

If you want your politics to prosper, the two things you will not separate will be religion and morality. If you want your government to work well, if you want American exceptionalism, if you want the government to do right, if you want all this, then you won’t separate religion and morality from political life. And America’s greatest patriot gave a litmus test for patriotism. He says in the very next sentence (immediately continuing from the quote above):

“In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars.” — George Washington

Washington says, Anyone who would try to remove religion and morality from public life, I won’t allow them to call themselves a patriot. Because they are trying to destroy the country.

Founding father John Adams said:

“We have no government armed with the power capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and true religion. Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

You simply cannot take the Christian out of America and keep America.  OR the Constitution that was itself based on morality and the true religion of Christianity.  Our nation will collapse and our founding fathers understood that.  And Democrats are traitors and fools for their pathological ignorance and frankly their pathological depravity.

But I digress from my primary message that Democrats are demon-possessed whackjobs who rabidly despise reality and are literally saying that the ninety-five percent of terrorist attacks committed in the name of Allah by Muslims according to the teachings of the Qur’an according to the life example of Muhammad somehow have nothing whatsoever to do with Islam.

Islam could NOT be more clear: kill your enemy.  Kill him wherever you may find him.  Any so-called “peaceful sura” was abrogated and replaced with the command to violently kill.  Muhammad, the paradigm of Islam, proved that and demonstrated that and documented that in the blood of his victims throughout his wicked and vicious life.

Please stop denying simple reality.

If you want true peace, you turn to the religion that every single Democrat radically despises: biblical Christianity.

Democrats, as I’ve said again and again and again, are “DEMOnic bureuaCRATS.”  Democrats are demon-possessed worshipers of the human State that murders God’s babies to the tune of TEN TIMES MORE EVIL than the Nazi Holocaust while worshiping homosexual perversion as they strip away God’s ordained morality and replace it with immorality directly out of the depraved heart of the devil.  And they actually do so claiming they are doing God’s work!!!

Read Romans 1:18-32 and begin to understand the last-days horror of hell that is the Democratic Party:

Unbelief and Its Consequences

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth [a]in unrighteousness, 19 because that which is known about God is evident [b]within them; for God made it evident to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. 21 For even though they knew God, they did not [c]honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and [d]crawling creatures.

24 Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. 25 For they exchanged the truth of God for [e]a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed [f]forever. Amen.

26 For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is [g]unnatural, 27 and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing [h]indecent acts and receiving in [i]their own persons the due penalty of their error.

28 And just as they did not see fit [j]to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, 30 slanderers, [k]haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; 32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them.

Number one, if you are a Democrat, you suppress the truth in unrighteousness.  That is what you are and that is what you do.  Don’t tell me that isn’t a fundamental fact about the Democratic PartyDon’t tell me that Democrats have abandoned God as Creator.  You have replaced the truth about a Creator God with godless evolution.  You have replaced the truth that human beings are created from the womb in the image of a holy God and you have monstrously and wickedly replaced it with sixty million abortions.

And as a result, what is SELF-EVIDENT, such as recognizing a Creator God, such as recognizing obvious reality about the nature of Islam and the nature of Islamic terrorism, is denied and rejected no matter how damned beyond obvious it is.  And so every damn wicked thought you have is futile and false.

And because of that, GOD HAS GIVEN YOUR PARTY OVER TO WICKEDNESS.  It is amazing that every time in the Book of Romans that you see the phrase, “God gave them over,” you can trace the content of that phrase DIRECTLY to the Democratic Party platform.

The Democratic Party is the Party that God gave over to wrath.

2 Thessalonians 2:11 couldn’t make what has happened to the Democratic Party more plain:

For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie.

Stop believing the lie.  Stop believing the Democratic Party when they tell you lie after lie after LIE.

 

Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, The Grand FOOLS Who Defy Reality, Will NEVER Call Out Our True Enemy By Name

June 29, 2016

It is by now beyond pathological.

You read my blog.  Eight years of stuff.  And a lot of that stuff is on terrorism, calling out Barack Obama and the Democrat Party’s beyond insane, beyond immoral and beyond foolish policies and describing again and again and again the encroaching aftermath of the stupid policies and what they produced.

Obama and Hillary mocked the Republicans for insisting that we use “magic words” like “Islamic terrorism” to describe the thousands of attacks that are taking place all over the world under Obama’s regime.  Obama and Hillary are lecturing us that words don’t matter.  Unless it was words like “war on terror” that THEY changed to “overseas contingency operations” or “terrorism” which THEY changed to “man-caused disasters” or “Allah” which THEY just changed to “God” and of course the words like “jihad” and “sharia” that are part of any legitimate vocabulary except the vocabulary of the Obama regime to comprehend what the hell is going on.  Oh, and let’s not forget Obama’s very favorite magic word to dismissively wave away terrorist attack after terrorist attack on U.S. soil: “workplace violence.”

Obama and Hillary Clinton LOVE magic words.  They just hate REALITY.

I don’t have time now, but I’ll come back later and in place of this paragraph add in some of the things I was saying over the last eight years.

[Update, 7/1/2016: Let me first say WE JUST HAD ANOTHER TERRORIST ATTACK, this time in Bangladesh.  It will be bloody and bad, but no indications of how horrible yet.  But once again, Muslim terrorists screaming “Allahu Akbar!” committed the attack in a restaurant.  Surprise, surprise, ye “this has nothing to do with Islam” demon-possessed-whackjobs.

Second, if you look at my archives, you will first see I’ve got 361 articles that I’ve linked to “terrorism” as a category.  It’s hard to do a thorough search, but look what I was writing about in June of 2009:

Islamist Anti-U.S. Terrorism Rejuvenated Under Obama Weakness

Look what I was saying throughout Obama’s first year in office:

Obama’s Political Correctness The Gateway Drug To Terrorism

The Heinous Failure Of The Obama Administration Against Terrorism

I have been decrying Obama as a voice crying out in the wilderness.  While Obama was presenting himself in Egypt as doing to terrorism what he claimed he would do when he so pompously said:

this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on Earth.

And who was right?  WHO THE HELL WAS RIGHT???  [End update.]

Because here we are now: under Obama from 2010 to last year, terrorism has skyrocketed by 800 percent.  And by the time this foul, wicked FOOL leaves office, terrorism will have increased by more than one-thousand, seven-hundred percent.  All you have to do is look at the chart –

Deaths Due To Terrorism

– and do the math.  Because it is at LEAST doubling every single year.  It is becoming EXPONENTIAL.  And so what is thirty thousand deaths a year now will without any question be over sixty thousand next year.  Which would be at least a one-thousand, seven-hundred percent increase.

How in the HELL can an Obama or a Hillary Clinton stand there and tell us with straight faces that they haven’t so wildly and insanely and wickedly failed that it is beyond UNREAL???!!!???  And yet that is exactly what they do.

And because of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party and their wicked hatred of God and of simple reality, we now have more than sixty-five MILLION refugees with nowhere to go because Barack Obama would not allow them to be safe ANYWHERE in their own part of the world.  Do you understand how VILE that is???

What we needed to do was go where these roaches are and fight them.  What we needed to do was create safe regions where refugees could come in their own regions and protect them.  Obama failed to do either.  He failed.  And Hillary Clinton failed right along with him and even now spouts the same failed line Obama continues to spout.

At this point, it is difficult not to believe that Barack Obama had a plan: to 1) passively allow militant Islam to spread and 2) and exploit that crisis to actively spread Islam by creating a refugee crisis that would see hundreds of millions of Muslims come to every other part of the world.  And it is only a matter of time before those Muslim refugees become embittered and become radical and become terroristic.

And that is EXACTLY what has already happened in France, has happened in Belgium, and will surely happen HERE if we elect Hillary Clinton.

At this point in time, women are the driving force behind Hillary, supporting her by 17 points over Trump.  If it were up to men, Trump would win.  If women can be made to understand that a vote for Hillary is a vote for women and for their children to have their heads sawed off by an Allahu Akbar-screaming terrorist, they would “fundamentally transform” their vote.

Trump needs to do what the facts show he can do: make the case that terrorism skyrocketed by going on 2,000 percent under Obama, and it will skyrocket 4,000 percent, 6,000 percent, 10,000 percent under a President Hillary Clinton.  And that a vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote for a terrorist to treat you women the same way you treated your fetuses and viciously murder them without even thinking for a second that they might be innocent human beings because American women’s ideology with the babies in their wombs is no different from Islamic terrorists’ ideology with the people they callously murder.

But we are not allowed to notice that.  And most of all, we are not allowed to see that of the hundreds of terrorist attacks that terrorize our planet, virtually every single one of them with the minutest exceptions are committed by MUSLIMS in the name of ISLAM.

Muslim terrorists are committing violence as a religious act and it takes a truly demonic fool not to understand that they are doing so because they believe they will go to Paradise if they blow themselves up or die killing infidels.  They are NOT secular humanists who think they will take a damn dirt nap and cease to exist.

And again, the depraved, foolish, immoral WICKEDNESS of Barack Obama and of Hillary Clinton are breathtaking.

It is just a weird coincidence that the holiest month of the Islamic religious calendar (Ramadan) is the epicenter of terrorist violence.  BUT IT DOESN’T HAVE ANYTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH ISLAM because liberalism is being so open-minded your brains fell out and then you stomped on them because they looked like they might be spreading global warming gases.

Hillary and Obama told us with righteous indignation that the terrorism was because of Gitmo.  Well, dang, the last I checked, Paris and Brussels and the other day Istanbul and today Bangladesh don’t HAVE a Gitmo.  This has been a completely false and frankly demonic narrative pimped by Obama and by Hillary Clinton for the last eight years.

We’re told that terrorism is because of guns, not Islam.  Notice how we’re not talking about guns today because the MUSLIMS used BOMBS.  And when they DO use guns, of course, they get their hands on the guns in the states which have the very toughest gun laws in the damn country, and they attack Obama’s and Clinton’s “gun-free zones” every single damn time to maximize our stupid, pathetic, despicable helplessness.

How can you possibly fight and enemy when you cannot even say who your enemy is?

And we see in their speeches that Obama and Clinton are literally more angry and vengeful at the people who clearly SEE what Islam is doing on a daily damn basis than they are at the vicious Muslim terrorists who are murdering thousands of people in hundreds of attacks.

Are there brave, courageous Muslims who are trying to fight this spirit of Islamist terror?  You BET there are.  Take the President of Egypt, who said:

JERUSALEM—In a speech on New Year’s day, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi called for a “religious revolution” in Islam that would displace violent jihad from the center of Muslim discourse.

“Is it possible that 1.6 billion people (Muslims worldwide) should want to kill the rest of the world’s population—that is, 7 billion people—so that they themselves may live?” he asked. “Impossible.”

Speaking to an audience of religious scholars celebrating the birth of Islam’s prophet, Mohammed, he called on the religious establishment to lead the fight for moderation in the Muslim world. “You imams (prayer leaders) are responsible before Allah. The entire world—I say it again, the entire world—is waiting for your next move because this umma (a word that can refer either to the Egyptian nation or the entire Muslim world) is being torn, it is being destroyed, it is being lost—and it is being lost by our own hands.”

He was speaking in Al-Azhar University in Cairo, widely regarded as the leading world center for Islamic learning.

“The corpus of texts and ideas that we have made sacred over the years, to the point that departing from them has become almost impossible, is antagonizing the entire world. You cannot feel it if you remain trapped within this mindset. You must step outside yourselves and reflect on it from a more enlightened perspective.” […]

Although the Muslim Brotherhood and its Hamas supporters have been Sisi’s principal targets since assuming power, his talk made it clear that his concern over radical Islam extends to the entire Muslim world, particularly adherents of the Islamic State, and the non-Muslim world beyond.

“We have to think hard about what we are facing,” he said. “It’s inconceivable that the thinking that we hold most sacred should cause the entire Islamic world to be a source of anxiety, danger, killing, and destruction for the rest of the world. Impossible.”

The Egyptian president was an incredibly brave man who was calling out HIS ENTIRE RELIGION.  He was saying, “This isn’t just something we should ignore the way Obama and Hillary tell us that none of this violence has anything whatsoever to do with our ‘great’ and ‘peaceful’ religion.  Obama and Hillary are liars; religious people claiming our religion are doing these hateful things.  And we have to rise up and stop them or we will end up ultimately joining them in jihad.”

That was an opportunity for the world to rally behind the TRUTH and begin go force Islam to do what will necessarily be a very painful self-examination.

It’s like the alcoholic or the drug addict; there is NO WAY in HELL that these people will EVER be able to overcome their problem until they admit that THEY have the damn problem.  That it’s not the rest of the world that needs to change, as Obama and Hillary keep arguing, but that THEY need to change.  Muslims must look at themselves, at their history, at their Prophet and at their Qur’an and their Ahadith.

But they will never DO that self-examination and we will have a rabidly and radically metastasizing cancer continue to exponentially spread because the very worst kind of fools in the entire history of the human species will not allow that examination to take place.

If you voted for Barack Obama or if you are even considering voting for Hillary Clinton, you are a hater of reality, a hater of truth.  Because it doesn’t matter how many Islamic terror attacks are waged across the globe with the terrorists screaming “Allahu Akbar!” as they slaughter people when the Obamas and the Clintons of the world call it “workplace violence” and say it has nothing to do with Islam even as they ban words like “jihad” and “sharia” from being allowed to be spoken in official government reports.

I picked up the Los Angeles Times print edition and saw the main page headline heralding, “No Case Against Clinton In GOP Report” because the report didn’t single her out.  But if the report HAD singled her out, the LA Times would have spun it as, “Partisan GOP Report Attacks Clinton.”  Because they WILL NOT be fair or objective or honest.  The “spin” always spins in ONLY one direction.  If you look at what that GOP report says, there is NO QUESTION that Hillary Clinton utterly failed to lead before, during and after the attack.  During the attack, there was a meeting at which Hillary Clinton was the most senior official present.  And fully half the meeting was engaged in a stupid video that it is now a known, documented FACT had nothing to whatsoever to do with the attack on the US compound in Benghazi.  And it is also a known, documented FACT that Hillary Clinton KNEW the stupid video had nothing to do with that terrorist attack and yet she directed participated in a lie to deceive the American people about the most sacred duty of our leaders, our national security.  We now know that under Hillary Clinton, the American rescue force that was never even allowed to so much as turn their wheels in the compass direction of Benghazi were ordered to change out of and back into their uniforms FOUR TIMES because all Hillary and Obama cared about were politics and appearance rather than the lives of our heroes:

State Department officials on an emergency conference call during the Benghazi attack brought up concerns about whether Marines that might have been deployed should wear uniforms — something officials previously said could hurt diplomacy in the region, according to House Benghazi investigators.

The final GOP-authored House Benghazi report released Tuesday included new details of a two-hour video teleconference call the night of the attack, a session led by White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough. Clinton and top Defense officials were also on the call, which was supposed to center on how to get Americans out of harm’s way.

But a substantial part of the discussion, GOP investigators said, centered on how and why the attack happened rather than narrowly examining potential rescue plans. Half of the action items people wrote down in the meeting didn’t have to do with evacuation; many of them were about an anti-Islam video, which the administration would incorrectly blame for the violence.

And that ought to make you understand why fully eight hours after the attack began, nothing had been done and “not a single wheel of a single U.S. (military) asset had turned toward Libya.”  Because all Hillary Clinton really cared about was how to deflect responsibility and couldn’t make up her mind what outfit the rapid deployment force troops who should have already been there six hours earlier should wear.

Hillary Clinton was THE senior official in the room during that meeting that went on as the attack took place.  And you can plainly see right now why after thirteen damn hours not one thing was done to help our Americans who were desperately fighting for their lives.  Because all Hillary Clinton and the Obama White House cared about was political appearances and coming up with some kind of cover story to deceive the American people out of realizing that terrorists had just waged a successful attack against the United States flag on United States sovereign soil against American personnel.  And it was in Obama’s and Hillary’s cynical, despicable political interests to manufacture a completely unrelated video as the cause of a “spontaneous uprising” rather than a premeditated terrorist attack that we had been warned about but due to incompetence and disinterest had done NOTHING to prevent or react to.

We know that Hillary Clinton lied; and then LIED about lying.  We know she lied to the mothers and the fathers of dead heroes literally over their bodies in flag-draped coffinsIt wasn’t one family’s relatives; it wasn’t two; THREE families’ testify that Hillary Clinton directly lied to them while at the same time she was telling the truth that it WAS a terrorist attack and NOT the video or any spontaneous uprising to her own daughter and to foreign governments.

There had been ALL KINDS of warnings BEFORE the terrorist attack on the American Benghazi compound that Hillary Clinton and Obama ignoredDURING the attack, you have to be a demon-possessed fool not to understand how both Obama and Hillary not only failed but were guilty of treason.  And after the attack, that treason in the form of lie after lie to the American people over the sacred issue of their national security continued.

It simply stuns me that Democrats are people not capable of caring about actual reality.

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are people who manufacture false reality when we desperately need to see and to know the TRUTH.  Our lives literally depend on it.

We have to clearly see the enemy for what it is, what is motivating and inspiring the enemy, or we can’t even begin to fight.

And these utter, pathologically demon-possessed FOOLS like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and John Kerry can come out and say that Muslims terrorists are only successfully inflicting so many vicious attacks that are killing so many of us all over the world because LIBERALISM IS WINNING.

And if Obama and Hillary Clinton did so damn well, why have murderous terrorist attacks exploded under their watch???  Why was the very first terrorist caliphate in human history created under THEIR watch???  Why are there more refugees fleeing those terror attacks than there have EVER been in the entire history of the planet???

Let me assure you of something: Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are every bit as evil and as demon-possessed as the Islamic State butchers; they merely have a different role to play in Satan’s team as they enable evil and prevent anything from being done to stop it as it rises and spreads out of control.  There satanic people who murder and butcher, and there are satanic people who defend those murderers and allow them to continue murdering.  And both are an equal part of the devil.

 

Does God hear our prayers? When God says, ‘You ALWAYS have My attention; do I have YOUR attention now?’

June 29, 2016

Sometimes you should simply begin at the beginning when you tell a story.

Two days ago I was hiking with my best dog friend and my best human friend.  I’m up ahead, my best human friend is in the rear and my best dog friend is in the middle.  And as we were well on the way up the first of several blind canyons we go up and down on this ten mile hike, my best human friend believes she sees something wrong with my best dog friend.

I looked and didn’t see anything that looked wrong.  And a few minutes later, after we’d got to the top of the box canyon and were on our way back down, the dog RACES past us showering the two slow-moving humans with sand.  She looked find.

The rest of the hike the dog seemed fine.  But after getting home, I thought I might have seen a bit of a limp.

The next day there was no question: she was periodically limping fairly badly.

Well, I ALWAYS take the dog for the hike.  And just in case you are wondering what “butthurt” looks like, it looks like my dog if she doesn’t go with her master on that hike.  One time I took my nephew shooting, and geared up pretty much the same I would as if I were hiking, and I heard her howling piteously.  If it were left up to her, she’d do her “Black Knight” impression and tell me, “Tis just a flesh wound!”  And it wasn’t a terrible limp.  But I made the call to leave her at home and give her leg a better chance to heal up.

I actually took her treats into the back room of the house, gave her one, ran out and took out my gear, then gave her more and ran out of the house so either a) she wouldn’t know I was leaving her to go hiking or b) so I wouldn’t have to see the look on her face as I betrayed her like a Judas-class traitor.  You decide which.

Anyway, as I’m hiking  I briefly talk to my best human friend on the phone.  I’ll call her “Gabriela,” since I’ve always liked that name and also since it actually happens to BE my friend’s name.  And I tell my friend Gabriela the shocking news that I didn’t take my dog.

Gabriela reminds me that she DID see something the night before.  And I said, “Maybe you did, but remember how she seemed fine afterward and for the rest of the walk?”

And Gabriela said something that turned out to be very fascinating: she said she might have been seeing it prophetically, pointing out that she’d never asked me if the dog was all right before on any of the other hikes we’d taken.

Do you believe that someone who is sensitive to the movement of the Holy Spirit can see something that the Spirit is about to do?  Maybe you do and maybe you don’t.  But let me continue with the story.

I’m walking up the same first blind canyon where Gabriela had believed she’d seen something wrong with my dog, and a thought suddenly occurs to me: “If you’re going to allow any rattlesnakes, Lord, let them come tonight when I don’t have my dog with me.”

You need to understand: I’m an old former soldier and I have literally walked through tens of thousands of miles of bushes in my life.  On my own, I’m not terrified of rattlesnakes.  They are deadly and you better be careful if you’re going to mess with one; but I’m pretty confident in my ability to spot them because I generally keep to the trails and I am constantly watching for them.  What freaks me out – as I’ve pointed out in the past – is my fear for my dog.  She’s my baby.  If every parent loved their child at least as much as I love my dog, the world would be a much sweeter place.

On my own, I tend toward being pretty brave; but I’ve had encounters with rattlesnakes involving my dog that had me literally sick and shaking with fear.  The parent who just saw his or her little kid run out into the street right in front of a car understands that terror.  And what is your instinct as a parent?  You jump right in front of that car and you block your child with your very own body and you don’t even think twice about it, either.

So I’m saying to the LORD, “If you have any rattlesnakes to put in my path, put them here now.”

Immediately after saying that, I understand that if I’m going to ask the LORD to allow a deadly serpent in my path, I’d BETTER be prayed upRattlesnakes are deadly poisonous, and when they move, they move so fast and so quick they stun you.  They go from zero mph to full astonishing speed INSTANTLY.  if you’re close enough to hurt them, believe me, they are close enough to hurt you.  You try to hit them and you miss, and they suddenly slither your way, you aren’t going to be able to get out of the way.  And so I prayed and confessed all my sins.  And not just my sins, but my transgressions, my iniquities, my rebellions against God and His lordship over my life.  I asked my God for forgiveness through the perfect life lived in my place and the ultimate sacrificial death given in my place by my Lord Jesus.  And I prayed that the LORD would protect me, and deliver me, and keep me safe from the world and from the flesh and from the devil.  I prayed that the LORD would shut up the mouth of the serpent so that it could not bite or strike, and that the LORD would deliver it into my hand so that I could kill it.

And no sooner – and I mean not one SECOND AFTER – I prayed that prayer, what did I see?

Two years ago I encountered a dozen rattlesnakes in one year.  Last year it was like eight.  But I’ve only seen one this year and it was back in February.

But yeah.  AS IF ON CUE, a rattlesnake was just all of a sudden there.

P1130914

I took the picture AFTER I killed it.  And I staged the picture from behind to conceal the smashed-head part.  I’m afraid I’m not of this generation where the first thing you think of is taking a selfie with something that you ought to either be killing or fleeing.  Fight or flight first, photo afterward.

And no, that rattlesnake will never threaten my dog again.  And it’s kids won’t have a chance to, either.  It won’t bite any other hiker or harm any child.

I know there are some environmentalists out there who are recoiling in horror that whenever I see a rattlesnake, I kill it dead, DEAD, DEAD.  Whereas I not only don’t kill constrictor snakes; I step over ant mounds and stink bugs.  It’s actually kind of weird who the radical environmentalist thinks, because on the one hand they believe that humans are merely part of nature, as part of the same evolutionary process that spawned everything else; but at the same time we humans are somehow apart from nature in spite of the fact that, no, we actually are NOT apart from nature on their own view.  If we are merely part of evolution, then how is everything we do not merely part of “nature” too?  This is merely one of the ways those who don’t believe in God literally self-refute their own foundations!  Whereas I believe that God truly made us different from every other creature and that ultimately we are HIS image-bearers created in HIS spiritual and moral likeness.  And the God who created us in His image gave us dominion over the earth.

I don’t kill rattlesnakes because I enjoy it.  I know I’m doing so at risk to myself.  One mistake on my part, one aggressive move on their part, and I’m out in the middle of nowhere very likely by myself out of cell range screaming in pain and in a life-threatening situation.  But they are incredibly dangerous predators.  They are literally living land mines.  And I’ll simply put it this way: you threaten my little girl – as rattlers have in the past – and I will END you.

Thank GOD my dog wasn’t there to be the first one to encounter that venomous serpent on the trail – and hampered with a hurting leg.

I truly believe if she hadn’t had that sore leg – that my dear friend Gabriela anticipated prophetically – and had I not made that gut-informed decision not to take her when I ALWAYS take her on my hikes, that rattlesnake would have bit my beautiful, beloved dog.

It was for Gabriela to prophetically see so she could be a witness to the power of God; it was for me directly experience so I could testify to the power of God who knows the end from the beginning and who delivers His people.  And their little dogs, too!

So in the aftermath, I was praising God, thanking my LORD, adoring Jesus my Savior, wondering in awe of my infinite Creator God who is omniscient and omnipresent and omnipotent and who surrounds me and goes before me and places His holy angels all around me and before me.

No it was NOT a simple coincidence that I asked the LORD that something would happen that hadn’t happened since February 17 and it happened AS I PRAYED FOR IT.  Judy as it was no coincidence that my friend Gabriela noticed something wrong with my dog when to physical eyes she seemed fine at the time.

Because there is a God who speaks to His people, and who LISTENS to His people when they seek His face and call out to Him.

Some verses of Scripture I’ve memorized come to mind here:

And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose.  — Romans 8:28

“For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the LORD, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.”  — Jeremiah 29:11

I love Thee, O LORD, my strength.  The LORD is my rock and my fortress and my deliverer, my God, my rock in whom I take refuge; my shield and the horn of my salvation, my stronghold.  I call upon the LORD who is worthy to be praised, and I am saved from my enemies. — Psalm 18:1-3

I prayed to the LORD, and He answered me.  He freed me from all my fears.  Those who look to Him for help will be radiant with joy; no shadow of shame will darken their faces.  In my desperation I prayed, and the LORD listened; He saved me from all my troubles.  For the Angel of the LORD is a guard; He surrounds and defends all who fear Him.  Taste and see that the LORD is good.  Oh, the joys of those who take refuge in Him!  — Psalm 34:4-8

The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want.  He makes me to lie down in green pastures; He leads me beside the still waters.  He restores my soul; He leads me in the paths of righteousness for His name’s sake.  Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I shall fear no evil, for You are with me.  Your rod and your staff, they comfort me.  You prepare a table before me in the presence of my enemies.  You anoint my head with oil; my cup runs over.  Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life; and I will dwell in the house of the LORD forever. — Psalm 23

As for me, I know that my Redeemer lives, and at the last He will take His stand on the earth.  Even after my skin is destroyed, yet from I flesh I shall see God; whom I myself shall behold, and whom my eyes will see, and not another.  — Job 19:25-27

But in all these things we overwhelmingly conquer through Him who loved us.  For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus, our Lord.  — Romans 8:37-39

I don’t know what will happen in your future.  I don’t even know what will happen in my OWN future.  Sometimes God allows seemingly bad things to happen – such as my dog coming up with a bum leg – but He has a good purpose in allowing that thing to happen.  Sometimes we can see what that good thing is in hindsight, sometimes we can’t see or the good thing unfolds on behalf of someone else.  I also know that there is something called “the fear of the LORD,” which “is the beginning of wisdom.”  That’s Proverbs 9:10.  I’ve been forced to ponder that verse as I do my daily ten milers, because I hike in areas where rattlesnakes are hardly the only threat; there are plenty of human rattlesnakes, too, as well as coyotes, cougars, bobcats, scorpions, pests and pestilence where we even have to live in fear of mosquitos, and many other things.  I go out into that desert and I pray every single night.  Because I know that I am in the LORD’s hand, and I can NOT deliver myself from every danger that is out there and I can’t deliver my dog from every danger that is out there.

There are things that I would do, sins that I would commit, thoughts that I would have, that I don’t allow myself to do or commit or have; because I have the fear of the LORD and I don’t want to go out there having rebelled against my God who holds me in His hand.  That is the fear of the LORD.  But it is only the BEGINNING of wisdom; not the end.  It is only in that place where you truly and fully realize that you are in the hands of God who holds your life and your future in His hands that you truly even CAN begin to experience genuine wisdom.

That’s one of the things that keeps me determined to go on those nightly hikes; it’s not merely physical exercise; it’s God as He “leads me in the paths of righteousness for His name’s sake.”

God heard me last night.  And God heard me last night because God hears me EVERY night; there is never a moment when He does not see me and hear me.  And care about me.

Thank you for ALWAYS having me as the object of Your attention.  And thank you for ensuring that You have MY attention!!!

 

 

 

Why Saying The ‘Magic Word’ ‘Radical Islam’ Matters: Even Obama’s Own CIA Says Obama Has Done NOTHING To Slow Down Islamic State

June 17, 2016

Just understand in preface that Barack Obama is a liar at heart and if he can’t lie about the nature of the “JayVee” threat of Islamic State terrorism because now hundreds of thousands of people have been tortured and murdered by beheading, by crucifixion, by being burned alive, just as they are dying in unprecedented numbers by bombs and shootings – if he can no longer minimize that horror – then he will lie about the extent to which that horror has succeeded by falsely and dishonestly claiming he has minimized a threat that in fact has EXPLODED because of his failed policies.  And if that doesn’t work he will lie yet again and claim it isn’t terrorism but guns.  Obama will argue that it is our founding fathers murdering us from the grave; it’s our Constitution that is murdering us; it is our Bill of Rights and specifically our 2nd Amendment that is murdering us.  And our only hope is to dive into the wisdom of Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin and Chairman Mao and confiscate the people’s right to defend themselves against the true threat that Obama has done NOTHING to so much as slow down.

And all the while this failed fool plays demonic games with WORDS to conceal REALITY.

If you don’t know who your enemy is, you can’t fight him, let alone have any chance of defeating him.  You can’t even know who he is or what he is doing.  What Obama has had us doing the last seven years is tantamount to a fighter putting a blindfold over his eyes and then going into the ring and swinging wildly in all directions while his opponent lines up his jaw for a vicious knockout.

Obama is denouncing “magic words.”  I can document that Obama has used more “magic words” than ANYBODY.  And this fascist thug is now upset that somebody else would dare use “magic words”???  And the difference between OUR words and Obama’s “magic words” is that OUR words are DESCRIPTIVE and describe REALITY whereas Obama’s “magic words” are DISINGENUOUS and mask reality.

Obama says:

(CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama rejected calls Tuesday for him to use the phrase “radical Islam” when talking about the war on terrorism, calling it “a political talking point” and “not a strategy.”

“There’s no magic to the phrase radical Islam. It’s a political talking point. It’s not a strategy, and the reason I am careful about how I describe this threat has nothing to do with political correctness and everything to do with actually defeating extremism,” Obama said in reaction to criticism by Republicans and notably presumptive GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump.

It is NOT “magic words” to denounce ISLAMIC TERROR as “Islamic terror.”  It is rather for the first time accurately describing the nature of our enemy so we can expose him for who and what he is and begin to combat our true enemy.

You keep reading and I’ll show you how Obama the prince of hypocrisy LOVES “magic words” when it comes to dealing with terrorism.  You need to understand why that statement is so beyond-pathologically stupid that it amounts to proof that Satan is alive and well for the simple reason that no human being could be that damn FOOLISH without a truly evil demonic intelligence using him like a puppet.

There’s that Dr. Phil question, “How’s that working out for you?”  So let’s examine the fruit of this failed fool’s “strategy”:

Terrorism Toll 800% Higher Since 2010
“I don’t think people have grasped how significant these numbers are.”
3.29.2016 |
News | Mark Tapson

A new report blames the rapid expansion of Islamist groups across the Middle East and Africa for the booming death toll of terrorism worldwide: a nearly 800 percent rise since 2010.

According to Fox News, terrorism expert Steven Emerson’s nonprofit Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) found that an average of nearly 30,000 people per year have been killed by terrorists since 2010, when terrorism’s death toll was 3,284. The study identifies two troubling trends: more attacks are happening, and they are deadlier than ever.

Emerson, the executive director of IPT, said,

“Everyone has known that terrorist attacks have generally been increasing yearly since 9/11. But the magnitude of the increase of the attacks surprised us, especially in the past five years. Even if you look back at the annual reports issued by the most senior analysts in the top five intelligence and counter-terrorism agencies, there is not one report that predicted or forecasted that we would likely see such a massive escalation of attacks.”

The study credits the rise in part to the fact that Islamist terror groups like Boko Haram in Nigeria, Al Shabaab in Somalia, a resurgent Taliban, Palestinian terrorists, and President Obama’s JB team ISIS are operating in more countries than ever, especially in the Middle East and Africa.

Fox reports:

IPT’s report used data collected by the University of Maryland’s Global Terrorism Database. Looking at various intervals following the 9/11 attacks, and sorting out deaths caused by clear acts of terrorism — not simply war involving known terrorist groups — IPT found annual terror deaths have jumped 774 percent since the 2007-11 average.

‘[The numbers] are striking when you take into account where the numbers were at the beginning period,” said Pete Hoekstra, who chaired the House Intelligence Committee when he represented Michigan in the U.S. Congress. “I don’t think people have grasped how significant these [death toll] numbers are.” […]

You keep reading and you’ll see WHY there hasn’t been “one report that predicted or forecasted” the stunning massive escalation of attacks.  Because Obama sugar-coated America’s intelligence so it would make this degenerate liar falsely appear to be succeeding when in actual fact he was radically failing.

If that isn’t enough, consider this from the UN News Centre:

UN warns of ‘record high’ 60 million displaced amid expanding global conflicts

18 June 2015 – The international community is experiencing a dramatic shift in the situation facing the world’s refugees as a global surge in war, conflict and persecution has caused a record number of people to flee their homes in search of safety, the United Nations refugee agency reported today.

According to data gathered by Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) over the course of 2014, the number of people forcibly displaced during the reporting year swelled to a staggering 59.5 million people compared to the 51.2 million from the previous year. The figures, collected by the UN agency for its latest Global Trends: World at War, suggest that one in every 122 humans is now either a refugee, internally displaced, or seeking asylum. If this were the population of a country, says UNHCR, it would be the world’s 24th largest.

“We are witnessing a paradigm change, an unchecked slide into an era in which the scale of global forced displacement as well as the response required is now clearly dwarfing anything seen before,” UN High Commissioner for Refugees António Guterres declared in a press release issued earlier today and marking the report’s release.

“It is terrifying that on the one hand there is more and more impunity for those starting conflicts, and on the other there is seeming utter inability of the international community to work together to stop wars and build and preserve peace,” he added.

In a detailed analysis exploring the range of conflicts that have given rise to the current mass diaspora of refugees, the UNHCR report notes that in the past five years, at least 15 conflicts have erupted or reignited.

Our enemies have never been more emboldened and our allies have never been stunned and shocked into worse apathy.  And Obama has done NOTHING but incite our enemies’ viciousness and degenerate our allies into cowardice.

It’s not enough to say that Barack Obama has utterly failed America; it’s not even enough to say that this fool has failed the world any more:  Barack Obama has failed the entire human species; he has failed any semblance of reason or morality whatsoever.  Barack Obama standing between those Greek columns as a god was literally Lucifer spreading his wings across the planet.

SO HOW HAS OBAMA’S OWN “STRATEGY” WORKED???  I MEAN, JUST HOW DAMNFOOL STUPID ARE YOU PEOPLE???!!!???

When you click on that graph and seriously consider it, one thing very quickly leaps out: terrorism has essentially been doubling every 2 years throughout the entire cancer a.k.a. the Obama presidency.  And so between 2012 and 2013 there were 15,000 deaths each year when there had been only 3,000 deaths a year back in 2010 before Obama’s failed policies had taken hold.  Compared with 30,000 deaths each year by 2014 and 2015.  So it is a simple matter of extrapolation to know how many deaths there will be each year due to terrorism by the next period of 2016 and 2017.  We are looking at 60,000 deaths a year and a 1,700-PLUS percent increase under Obama by the time this arrogant, depraved, degenerate, metastatic fool leaves office.

I mean, understand, if terrorism had merely doubled and increased a hundred percent, it would have proved Obama had utterly failed and Bush’s strategy worked and his didn’t.  But one thousand-seven hundred percent???

So let’s get to Obama’s love affair with “magic words”:

It is frankly beyond stunning even to me that the Democratic Party has become so pathologically demon-possessed that they actually view Obama’s wild FAIL as “success” in the “overseas contingency operation” against “man-caused disasters” that has mysteriously [to them] found our shores and is attacking us here.

This goes to show you how yes words DO matter.  Would you like to see what “magic words” actually look like?  Just consider it was OBAMA who refused to acknowledge we were in a “war on terror” and instead coined the euphemistic phraseology “overseas contingency operations” to replace it.  And now terrorism has SKYROCKETED.

Obama decided that if he quit referring to “terrorist attacks” and instead used the PC-phrase “man-caused disasters” it would somehow make the world a prettier place.  And we can now acknowledge the FACT that “prettier” here means fifty mangled bodies in an American nightclub gunned down by an “Allahu Akbar” laughing fanatic Muslim terrorist.

Now, those terrorism statistics are simply a grim FACT.  They are what liberals most despise because they are actual, cold-blooded REALITY.

Consider another reality: even Obama’s own hand-picked CIA Director now says unequivocally that Obama has wildly failed and his “strategy” amounts to a load of unicorn poop:

CIA director grave warning: ISIS dangerous as ever
By Barbara Starr, CNN Pentagon Correspondent and Ryan Browne
Updated 7:09 PM ET, Thu June 16, 2016

(CNN) — ISIS can draw on a “large cadre of Western fighters” that could attack in the U.S. and the terror threat posed by the group remains as dangerous as ever despite efforts to crush it militarily, the director of the CIA said Thursday.

“Unfortunately, despite all our progress against ISIL on the battlefield and in the financial realm, our efforts have not reduced the group’s terrorism capability and global reach,” CIA Director John Brennan testified to Congress using another acronym for the group.

“The resources needed for terrorism are very modest, and the group would have to suffer even heavier losses of territory, manpower and money for its terrorist capacity to decline significantly,” Brennan added. “In fact, as the pressure mounts on ISIL, we judge that it will intensify its global terror campaign to maintain its dominance of the global terrorism agenda.”

Brennan warned that the group already is preparing more attacks, including by infiltrating refugees into western nations.

“We judge that ISIL is training and attempting to deploy operatives for further attacks,” he said. “ISIL has a large cadre of Western fighters who could potentially serve as operatives for attacks in the West. And the group is probably exploring a variety of means for infiltrating operatives into the West, including refugee flows, smuggling routes, and legitimate methods of travel.”

The CIA director, appearing just days after the massacre in Orlando that left 49 people dead, told the Senate Intelligence Committee that lone wolf attackers who are inspired by but not under the direct control of terror groups represent “an exceptionally challenging issue for the intelligence community.”

Two giant, key admissions from Director Brennan: 1) Islamic State – which exploded into being under Obama and which Obama has done nothing to so much as slow down – is as powerful as EVER; and 2) Islamic State is using Obama’s Muslim refugee immigration program to infiltrate TERRORISTS into America.

Obama is even now plotting to escalate the pipeline of Syrian refugees into America.  And Hillary Clinton defiantly says she wants to massively INCREASE THE NUMBER OF TERRORISTS BROUGHT INTO AMERICA.  Now BOTH the CIA and FBI Directors have said that the terrorists will exploit this program, but Democrats literally don’t give a rat’s hairy ass how many mangled American bodies it causes; their political correctness trumps all rational thought.  FBI Director Comey has repeatedly said there is NO WAY we can screen the wave of Muslims Obama and Hillary are hell-bent on bringing into America.

So what does Obama do?  Fast-track the refugee process such that he’s let in more “refugees” in weeks than had been allowed in over months even though the FBI says there is absolutely no way to vet these people who have no papers especially when Islamic State has their own passport machines and thousands of blank official Syrian passports which they seized so they can make their own documents.  Democrats say no refugees have committed a terrorist attack here YET.  It doesn’t MATTER that “refugees” have already launched massive terror attacks in Europe and have boasted that they’re coming here and will be using Obama’s and Hillary’s refugee system to bring in terrorist killers.

Now, what does Obama do with the gargantuan refugee crisis that HE CREATED???  Remember the Democrat Party adage, “Never allow a serious crisis to go to waste” (especially when THEY created it); Democrats are now exploiting the crisis they created to export Muslim terrorism all over the world, including to America.

And so now let’s get to precisely WHYthere is not one report that predicted or forecasted that we would likely see such a massive escalation of attacks.”

What we find is that Obama and the Obama administration have been LYING to us about their “success” on what they for years even refused to acknowledge was “terror” and even now won’t rightly call “Islamic terror.”  Obama mocked Islamic State and called them “JayVee” EVEN WHILE THEY WERE OWNING HIS WORTHLESS ASS.

Then we found that somehow, somebody had ordered U.S. intelligence analysts to doctor their intelligence reports to make it falsely appear Obama was succeeding while in reality he was failing:

More than 50 intelligence analysts working out of the U.S. military’s Central Command have formally complained that their reports on ISIS and al Qaeda’s branch in Syria were being inappropriately altered by senior officials, The Daily Beast has learned.

The complaints spurred the Pentagon’s inspector general to open an investigation into the alleged manipulation of intelligence. The fact that so many people complained suggests there are deep-rooted, systemic problems in how the U.S. military command charged with the war against the self-proclaimed Islamic State assesses intelligence.

“The cancer was within the senior level of the intelligence command,” one defense official said.

Two senior analysts at CENTCOM signed a written complaint sent to the Defense Department inspector general in July alleging that the reports, some of which were briefed to President Obama, portrayed the terror groups as weaker than the analysts believe they are. The reports were changed by CENTCOM higher-ups to adhere to the administration’s public line that the U.S. is winning the battle against ISIS and al Nusra, al Qaeda’s branch in Syria, the analysts claim.

That complaint was supported by 50 other analysts, some of whom have complained about politicizing of intelligence reports for months. That’s according to 11 individuals who are knowledgeable about the details of the report and who spoke to The Daily Beast on condition of anonymity.

The accusations suggest that a large number of people tracking the inner workings of the terror groups think that their reports are being manipulated to fit a public narrative. […]

Any one who doesn’t realize that Obama is behind this is a pure fool.  HE IS THE ONE SPOUTING THE NARRATIVE.  HE IS ORDERING ANALYSTS TO LIE SO HE CAN REPORT THEIR LIES AS HIS TRUTH.

Still other intelligence analysts in other Obama Administration departments say the same thing, that they were and are being ordered to ignore reality to conform to an obviously LEFTIST political narrative that has been time-and-time again proved FALSE and DISHONEST.

News reports are just coming out now that FIFTY senior State Department officials in Obama’s OWN administration have signed a document notifying this failed fool of a president that his entire foreign policy is in absolute shambles.

And this apparently came BEFORE it was learned that Russia just cluster-bombed US-backed Syrian troops in total contempt of the United States and our totally failed commander-in-chief.  We find that the second massive Russian airstrike came AFTER a panic-stricken U.S. used all emergency channels to contact Russia and plead with them to stop.  But Russia couldn’t give less of a damn, because Obama deserves absolutely zero respect whatsoever from ANYONE wishing to do America harm.

The wheels of Obama are starting to come flying off as the United States of America under Obama struck another iceberg and is taking on water fast.

So now let’s go back to the article that describes the explosion of terrorist killings to the tune of over 800 percent and consider the quote, “if you look back at the annual reports issued by the most senior analysts in the top five intelligence and counter-terrorism agencies, there is not one report that predicted or forecasted that we would likely see such a massive escalation of attacks.”  Why is that?  Because Obama wouldn’t ALLOW his intelligence to produce an accurate report that depicted the situation the way it actually was.  He pimped the numbers because he is a liar and the father of lies.

Obama’s handpicked Attorney General – the same one whom we can safely say WON’T indict corrupt Hillary Clinton for her CRIMES AGAINST NATIONAL SECURITY – is on public record having directly threatened anyone who says anything bad about Islam.  In San Bernardino, citizens were AFRAID to speak out about what they knew.  We don’t DARE cross a demonic Barack Obama and his satanic Attorney General.  We now see the same damn thing as warnings were either ignored by the government or people were terrorized into silence by Obama and his leftist PC thugs.

The heroes who weren’t heroes because their warnings went ignored by the Obama Administration was a NON-PC GUN SHOP because they saw this Muslim terrorist was a psychotic murderer and refused to sell him ammunition and called the FBI to report him.

Warning after warning after warning went ignored because Barack Obama is our Terrorist-in-Chief and political correctness is the official religion of his realm.

Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee noted that Omar Mateen had been under not one but TWO FBI investigations that had both been dropped and forgotten.  Nothin’ to see here, folks.  And in spite of ALL KINDS of warning signs and people trying to warn the government about this radical Muslim thug, nothing was done.  Why?  Because he was a MUSLIM, that’s why.  Huckabee asks:

“So why in the world did they drop the investigation and walk away after 10 months? They bought his claim that he was teasing his co-workers because he thought they were trying to marginalize him for his Muslim faith,” Huckabee said.

And then Huckabee put the reality of the Obama administration’s “strategy” this way:

To sum up the Obama Administration’s counter-terrorism strategy in 13 words:

Feds: “If you see something, say something!”

Citizen: “I see something.”

Feds: “Bigot!”

We go back in time and in 2009 a terrorist Muslim Major named Nidal Hasan shot up his Army base screaming “Allahu Akbar!” and murdered thirteen soldiers and wounded another 30 and it was “workplace violence” to the Obama Administration even after it became known he was spouting terrorist gibberish to his fellow officers who were afraid to speak out due to political correctness; even after it became known he had been in email contact with known terrorist mastermind Anwar Awlaki; even after it became known that he was walking around with business cards identifying himself as a “Soldier of Allah.”  And we’ve seen these despicable lies and denials from Obama and his regime over and over and over again since then, because the truth is a very inconvenient thing when everything Democrats believe are lies, LIES, LIES.

And so ALL the Democrats have is a diversionary tactic: THEY HAVE FAILED AND IT IS OBVIOUS THEY HAVE FAILED AND ALL THEY CAN DO IS TRY TO DISTRACT STUPID PEOPLE FROM REALIZING THEY HAVE FAILED by waving a completely different red-herring in front of the news cameras (the 2nd Amendment and the guns our Constitution and our American way of life guarantees).

Howard Stern nailed it yesterday:

Howard Stern Dismantles Calls for Gun Control After Orlando Attack With Chilling ‘Sheep’ and ‘Wolves’ Analogy
Jun. 16, 2016 10:14am   Dave Urbanski

In the wake of the deadly Orlando terrorist attack, radio icon Howard Stern spent part of his Wednesday program berating those calling for gun control as the way to prevent further carnage in the future.

“I’m so upset about Orlando and what went down,” Stern said, “but I can’t believe these people would come out afterward and their answer to Orlando is to take away guns from the public. It’s f***ing mindblowing to me.”

Stern then illustrated his point with an analogy equating the public to sheep, the terrorists to wolves and the military and police as sheepdogs. And even as Stern humorously imitated a generally passive, sheep-like populace with bleating noises — baaaa — his analogy was chilling at a deeper level.

“Now, let’s say I walked up literally to a sheep herd, and they know that every night the wolves pick off a couple of them,” Stern said. “What if I went up to the sheep and I said, ‘You wanna have a shot at the wolves? I’m gonna give you a pistol. You can actually even the playing field with these wolves whose fangs are out — you could shoot them and save your family.’”

Stern then took on the role of the passive sheep: “Well, baaaa. We’re not gonna do that. We don’t want to fight baaaack. He didn’t hurt uuuus. He only hurt the family down the streeet. And the shepherd will protect us, the sheepdogs are out there, they’ll protect us.”

Stern’s hypothetical reply? “Well, the sheepdogs are protecting you, but some of them can’t be with you all day. There’s not a sheepdog for every citizen, and a wolf is still eating one of you every night.”

Against that backdrop, Stern continued the analogy with the sheep insisting on their guns being taken away as a way to protect themselves:

Now, why would the sheep — baaaa — say, “Oh, we’ve got an answer to all the terrorism, all these bad wolves that are coming after us. We’ll hand in all our guns. We’re gonna hand ‘em in. Baaaa. You know who’ll protect us? The government. Or the police. Baaaa.”

Stern then declared — now out of sheep mode — “That’s a baaaad f***ing idea.”

“I don’t like violence — I don’t like any of this stuff — but I consider myself a sheep, and I want the police to protect me. I support the police. And I want the government to protect me,” he explained. “But guess what? Most of your politicians … all have private security. … So they’re OK. Those are sheep that are very well protected. You on the other hand, you’re a sitting duck.”

“If you’re a sitting duck,” he asked, “do you want a fighting chance or not?”

“I’m not for taking away people’s rights. I’m not,” Stern continued. “I think the answer doesn’t lie in taking any kind of ability of the sheep to protect themselves from the wolves. I really don’t. I wish it was that simple.”

“In France they’ve done it very effectively,” he added, “the population is not armed — but unfortunately the wolves are.”

If you think that gun control works, then how do you explain the fact that it has wildly failed everywhere it’s been tried???  Chicago has gun-control laws as tough as any in the nation, but there are at least 3,000 shootings every single damn year because the criminals and gang members have been emboldened with the knowledge that THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES WITH ANY GUNS.  And it should not be shocking that liberalism failed to solve those gun crimes NINETY PERCENT OF THE TIMEIn San Bernardino, California kept the assault weapons ban, and yet somehow the terrorist had no trouble getting his hands on one.  In related recent news, we find that leftist Oakland – whose police department has been under federal control for the entire Obama presidency because of abuses and scandals up the whazoo – just fired their third police chief in about a week.  How does this not prove that “federal oversight” not a complete joke???

Meanwhile, the police in most of the rest of the nation are TERRIFIED to do their jobs and POLICE their neighborhoods because of a bowel movement spawned out of the wicked heart of Obama and the left called “Black Lives Matter.”  They have rioted all over everywhere and the FBI Director refers to the total police passivity in the aftermath of liberal cities cracking down not on the criminals but the cops as “the Ferguson Effect.”

In my own local newspaper JUST THIS MORNING we have this:

Authorities arrested 22 suspects on Thursday during the final sweep of a nine-month investigation that targeted gangs, guns and drugs in Desert Hot Springs.

Operation Desert Impact, the latest anti-gang effort in the Coachella Valley, led to the confiscation of 23 weapons – including semi-automatic military-style rifles, sawed-off shotguns and a silenced submachine gun – plus two empty rocket launchers. Most of these guns were bought by undercover police officers during months of investigation, but the final few were seized during early morning raids. [… The Desert Sun, Friday, June 17, 2016, p. 1A]

This is California where we have the toughest gun laws in the nation.  This is the Palm Springs area where we have the toughest local gun control laws in California.  HOW THE HELL DID THESE GANG MEMBERS GET THESE GUNS???  Are you a stupid enough Democrat jackass to believe that these criminal gang members bought them legitimately???  They had a silenced submachine gun.  Dude, it’s ILLEGAL to have a silencer OR a submachine gun.  They had a couple ROCKET LAUNCHERS.  Do you have any idea how freaking illegal those things are???

Criminals can get their hands on anything they want because there is something called a black market that law abiding people don’t have access to and they don’t obey laws BECAUSE THEY ARE CRIMINALS.  And these gangs have plenty enough guns of their own; these weapons are being SOLD to any criminal who wants to buy them.

The ONLY people who will be denied guns because of liberal gun laws is law-abiding people.  Because to be a Democrat is to demand that rich people like Hillary Clinton can afford to have armed body guards while the rest of us cower in fear praying to our god Obama to protect us.

So yeah, turn over your guns.  That way you can rest assured that the bullets will only be coming from ONE direction.  The bad news is it WON’T be from yours.

So the leftist argument is that what spectacularly fails to work locally and regionally ought to be imposed nationally so we can spectacularly fail nationally.  Because “Democrat” means “DEMOnic bureauCRAT” and these liberal fools are truly evil.

There is frankly only one possibility these days: the left – which on the one hand has practically shut down local law enforcement even as they are going after the 2nd Amendment right of the people to own and bear guns and protect themselves – is determined to create a national police force similar to the old Soviet-style People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs (NKVD).  That way an Obama or a Hillary Clinton can do to the “police” what Obama did to the IRS and turn it into an Internal Revenge Service against the left’s political enemies.

Democrats are just that evil these days.

I denounce these fools with the Word of God that they mock:  Isaiah 28:15 says, “You boast, we have struck a bargain to cheat death and we have made a deal to dodge the grave.  The coming destruction can never touch us, because we have built a strong refuge made of lies and deception.”  Colossians 2:8 says, “Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ.”  Everything these failed fools say amounts to “empty philosophies” and “high-sounding nonsense” if there ever was ANYTHING that has EVER amounted to nonsense.  Every so-called “strategy” these failed fools are spouting is nothing more than a bargain to cheat death and a deal to dodge the grave.  Barack Obama’s and Hillary Clinton’s ways are DEMONIC.  They are leading us to our doom.

We are literally voting this November on whether we want to continue to survive as a nation, or whether we want to perish by PC.

And PC was a rhetoric tactic invented by COMMUNISTS.  And it was the COMMUNISTS and the NAZIS who first took away guns from their people so they could terrorize their disarmed people who no longer had the power or capability to resist.

Hillary Clinton is pointing to her “experience” to argue that she would make a better president.  BUT SHE PRESIDED OVER THIS SKYROCKETING TERRORISM, SHE PERSONALLY FAILED IN BENGHAZI, AND HER “EXPERIENCE” IS GETTING EVERYTHING IMAGINABLE WRONG OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND VOWING TO REMAIN STUCK ON THE SAME SETTING OF DEMONICALLY STUPID.

 

Why Are Blacks Fleeing Liberal Cities? The Answer Ought To Destroy The Lie That Is The Democrat Party.

May 4, 2016

If Donald Trump marshaled facts like this, he would easily smash Hillary Clinton.  But recent Republican presidential nominees have a rather piss-poor track record of marshaling facts.

But here is the path to destroying the Democratic Party in November: pointing out their actual record and the devastation left in the wake of their stupid and frankly wicked policies.

Let’s just look at blacks for a moment.  Look at what a pompous, arrogant, fact-free, utterly dishonest Obama said:

“Like the rest of America, black America, in the aggregate, is better off now than it was when I came into office.”

And then look at the results of this fool-president’s fool-policies regarding blacks in America:

Here are some basic facts about life in black America under President Barack Obama:

  1. In spite of Obama’s $275 billion in housing-market bailouts, home ownership has waned.
  2. In the first quarter of 2009, 67.3% of Americans owned homes. By 1Q 2014, the Census Bureau figure was 64.8%.
  3. Black home ownership has sagged from 46.1% in 2009 to 43.3% in 2014.
  4. The poverty rate for blacks is now 25.8%.
  5. Fewer than half of young black men are working a full-time job.
  6. The black workforce is decreasing, down from 58.6% in June 2007 to 52.8% in August 2012.
  7. The median minority family’s income is now almost fifth lower than it was when Obama took office with a net worth of just $18,100.
  8. In contrast, white median wealth has increased by 1% to $142,000.
  9. In 2009, white households were 7 times richer than black households. Now, white households are 8 times richer.

Tavis Smiley – no friend whatsoever to conservatives – said this about Barack Obama when asked the following direct question by Donald Trump’s bane, Megyn Kelly:

Megyn Kelly: On the subject of race, are we better off today that seven years ago?

Tavis Smiley: I’m not sure we are and I think ultimately the president missed a moment… On every leading economic issue, in the leading economic issues Black Americans have lost ground in every one of those leading categories. So in the last ten years it hasn’t been good for black folk. This is the president’s most loyal constituency that didn’t gain any ground in that period.

Blacks have lost ground ON EVERY SINGLE ECONOMIC CATEGORY ACROSS THE BOARD.  A vote for a Democrat is a vote to cut your own throat, especially if you are in one of the racial classes that racist Democrats most racially demagogue.

So I came across an article that described the massive black exodus from the liberal West Coast cities mostly to the GOP-bastion southern states, and every black person ought to be told about this.  What is going on?  It’s pretty simple: if you want to live your life as a worthless loser on the dole, the Democrat Party is the “massah” for you.  Don’t you worry, jigaboos, the white man knows you are his burden and you’ll get your meager portion of gruel.  The only downside to this arrangement is that that is ALL you will ever be allowed to get for the rest of your lives; because it is literally in the interest of the Democrat Party to keep you down, to keep you poor, because otherwise you would have your own wealth and you not only won’t need the Democrat dole machine, but you would actually become a threat to them as you start voting in such a manner to protect what you earn from your hard work from government taxes; you’ll resent the government regulations that strangle your economic growth.  Massa can’t have that on his plantation.

Again, I can point to reliably leftist sources to acknowledge my basic facts.  Take the very-left leaning Atlantic title and subtitle:

Why Middle-Class Americans Can’t Afford to Live in Liberal Cities: Blue America has a problem: Even after adjusting for income, left-leaning metros tend to have worse income inequality and less affordable housing.

The article begins thus:

On April 2, 2014, a protester in Oakland, California, mounted a Yahoo bus, climbed to the front of the roof, and vomited onto the top of the windshield.

If not the year’s most persuasive act of dissent, it was certainly one of the most memorable demonstrations in the Bay Area, where residents have marched, blockaded, and retched in protest of San Francisco’s economic inequality and unaffordable housing. The city’s gaps—between rich and poor, between housing need and housing supply—have been duly catalogued. Even among American tech hubs, San Francisco stands alone with both the most expensive real estate and the fewest new construction permits per unit since 1990.

But San Francisco’s problem is bigger than San Francisco. Across the country, rich, dense cities are struggling with affordable housing, to the considerable anguish of their middle class families.

San Francisco’s problem is bigger than San Francisco. Across the country, rich, dense cities are struggling with affordable housing, to the considerable anguish of their middle class families.

Among the 100 largest U.S. metros, 63 percent of homes are “within reach” for a middle-class family, according to Trulia. But among the 20 richest U.S. metros, just 47 percent of homes are affordable, including a national low of 14 percent in San Francisco. The firm defined “within reach” as a for-sale home with a total monthly payment (including mortgage and taxes) less than 31 percent of the metro’s median household income.

If you line up the country’s 100 richest metros from 1 to 100, household affordability falls as household income rises, even after you consider that middle class families in richer cities have more income.

So this brings us to the story of the Democrat Party’s demand for “fair wages” by imposing a $15 minimum wage on every single business whether it can afford it or not.  I most recently wrote about that on April 4 of this year.  And in that article I documented what happens every single time the left pulls one of these shenanigans.  It raises costs on businesses FAR BEYOND the minimum wage, because just for starters it increases the wages of every single worker across the board (i.e., imagine you were making $2 an hour above the minimum wage workers below you at a business; are you now going to earn less than the minimum wage workers, or are you now going to get $17 an hour?  It goes up the scale, which is why the unions wanted it and fought so hard for it even though these hypocrite weasels themselves continued to pay substandard wages to the workers they hired to picket and demagogue the cities and states to impose those wages.

It’s not just true of blacks, it’s true of Hispanics as well; it’s true of poor people in general.  If you take Democrat’s demagogic policies on illegal immigration, for instance, just consider a fundamental principle of economics known as “the law of supply and demand.”  The greater the supply of something, the lower demand for that thing will be.  Realize that when you massively increase the supply of poor, unskilled labor, the value of poor, unskilled labor goes down dramatically.  Which is why wages for unskilled labor have so plummeted, thank you, liberals.

And so the same damnfools who forced your wages down are now attempting to arbitrarily force them up.  So they devastated you by gutting your earning power, and now they’re going to respond by devastating you again by sending already high costs of living into the stratosphere.

Some businesses will go out of businesses, many others will lay off quite a few of their workers and strip their operation down to the bone to stay alive.  But of the business that remain, one thing is FOR CERTAIN: they will raise their prices and pass their increased costs onto their customers.  And that is merely one of myriad ways that liberals force the cost of living to go up and up and up again and then up some more.  Your groceries will cost more and your housing will cost more; and your costs will increase significantly more than the meager boost in wages because Democrats boosted the cost of everything all the way up the chain.

No president has ever been better for the filthy rich than the most dishonest president in American history, Barack Obama.  Under his incredibly dishonest and hypocritical regime, income inequality – the gap between the richest and poorest Americans – skyrocketed.  Again, I turn to a reliably leftist source in the Huffington Post:

Income Inequality Worse Under Obama Than George W. Bush
04/11/2012 06:19 pm ET
Alexander Eichler

President Obama may talk a big game about economic fairness, but his record on the issue doesn’t quite match up.

There are lots of reasons to think so — and we’ll touch on several in just a minute — but the most recent comes from Matt Stoller, blogging at Naked Capitalism, who points us toward a recent bit of number-crunching from Emmanuel Saez, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley.

Saez, who’s known for his work on the income gap, has highlighted a surprising and discouraging fact: during the post-recession period of 2009 and 2010, the rich snagged a greater share of total income growth than they did during the boom years of 2002 to 2007.

In other words, inequality has been even more pronounced under Obama than it was under George W. Bush.

This news may not come as a shock if you’re one of the many Americans who lost their job during the recession and couldn’t find another that paid as well. It also might not surprise you if you’re one of the 46 million people living in poverty — a record number, as it happens — or among the millions of Americans who can get by week to week, but would be ruined by a single financial emergency.

You might likewise not be surprised if you already knew that some household-goods companies are catering to this new reality by quietly neglecting their mid-price product lines, focusing instead on their high-end and budget offerings, since wages are diverging so much. Or if you knew that the U.S. ranks closer to China, Serbia and Rwanda than any other country in the developed world when it comes to income inequality.

Here’s an article that you just can’t take a quote from because every paragraph is just so devastating to Democrat stupidity.

Even Bernie Sanders is openly acknowledging that under Obama, income inequality is the worst NOT since the first decade of the 21st century under Bush, but the worst its ever been going back to 1928.

The disease of Obama is similar to the disease of alcoholism; you’re dying because you kept turning more and more to what was in fact killing you.  If you’re a Democrat – and especially if you’re a poor Democrat and most especially if you’re a racial minority Democrat – you’ve succumbed to a diseased pattern of thinking; you have been deceived into believing that what is in actual fact poisoning you and killing you is somehow helping you.

And I believe the metaphor of addiction best describes why so many groups cling to what is killing them: because the more Democrat poison they imbibe, the weaker and sicker they become, the less able to make good decisions.  To the end result that it doesn’t matter how horrible this crap is for you, you keep taking it.  You’ve lost the will and the ability to do anything else.  If you’re a drug addict, you give up your volition to your substance; if you’re a Democrat, you give up your volition to your government.  And either way you end up with your soul sucked out of you.

Democrats need you to depend on them; they need you to be flat on your back.  They will NEVER allow you to get off your back and earn your own way because if that happened you would vote those weasels out of office who want to seize what you earn and redistribute your wealth to other deceived people.  Because these are the kinds of things you have to be fool enough to believe to keep being a Democrat:

  • If Democrats raise my taxes, I’ll have more money
  • If Democrats bring in 12-20 million more illegal immigrants to compete for my job, my labor will be worth more
  • If Democrats raise the cost of living, I’ll be better off
  • If Democrats impose restrictive planning regulations, my house or apartment will cost less
  • If Democrats regulate my business, I’ll have more opportunities
  • The path to freedom is more and more government

Obama and Democrats have destroyed the Middle ClassAverage incomes have plummeted under Obama.

Your life sucks because you’re an Obamaholic and your substance is poisoning you body and soul.

Here is that article on blacks fleeing liberal cities in favor of GOP-dominated southern states:

Why has there been an exodus of black residents from West Coast liberal hubs?
By Aaron Renn
May 1, 2016, 5:00 AM

he Black Lives Matter movement has brought the challenges facing black America to the fore, and introduced racially conscious quality-of-life questions into the national debate. How are black residents in America’s cities faring? And how are those cities doing in meeting the aspirations of their black residents, judged especially by the ultimate barometer: whether blacks choose to move to these cities, or stay in them?

Though results vary to some extent, the broad trend is clear: West Coast progressive enclaves are either seeing an exodus of blacks or are failing to attract them. Midwestern and Northeastern urban areas are attracting blacks to the extent that they are affordable or providing middle class economic opportunities. And Southern cities are now experiencing the most significant gains.

Portland is part of the fifth-whitest major metropolitan area in America. Almost 75% of the region is white, and it has the third-lowest percentage of blacks, at only 3.1%. (America as a whole is 13.2% black.) Portland proper is often portrayed as a boomtown, but the city’s shrinking black population doesn’t seem to think so. The city has lost more than 11.5% of its black residents in just four years. It’s similar to Seattle, where the central city’s black population has fallen as the overall region’s has grown.

Lower down the coast, the San Francisco Bay area has lost black residents since 2000, though recent estimates suggest that it may have halted the exodus since 2010. San Francisco proper is only 5.4% black, and the rate is falling. The Los Angeles metro area, too, has fewer black residents today than in 2000.

If these figures merely reflected black consumer choice, they wouldn’t necessarily matter; but the evidence suggests that specific public policies in these cities are to blame. Primary among them are restrictive planning regulations, common along the West Coast, that make it hard to expand the supply of housing. In a market with rising demand and static supply, prices go up.

As a rule, a household should spend no more than three times its annual income on a home. But in West Coast markets, housing-price levels far exceed that benchmark — a hardship that more severely affects blacks than whites because blacks start from further behind economically. Black median household income is only $35,481 a year, compared with $57,355 for whites. The wealth gap is even wider, with median black household wealth at only $7,133, compared with $111,146 for whites.

According to the Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey, the “median multiple” — the median home price divided by the median household income — should average about 3.0. But the median multiple is 5.1 in Portland, 5.2 in Seattle, 9.4 in San Francisco and 8.1 in Los Angeles.

“West Coast progressive enclaves are either seeing an exodus of blacks or are failing to attract them.”

Even some on the left recognize how development restrictions hurt lower- and middle-income people. Liberal commentator Matt Yglesias has called housing affordability “Blue America’s greatest failing.” Yglesias and others criticize zoning policies that mandate single-family homes, or approval processes, like that in San Francisco, that prohibit as-of-right development and allow NIMBYism to keep out unwanted construction — and, by implication, unwanted people.

These commentators, however, ignore the role of environmental policy in creating these high housing prices. Portland, for example, has drawn a so-called urban-growth boundary that severely restricts land development and drives up prices inside the approved perimeter. The development-stifling effects of the California Environmental Quality Act are notorious. California also imposes some of the nation’s toughest energy regulations, putting a financial burden on lower-income (and disproportionately black) households. Nearly 1 million households in the state spend 10% or more of their income on energy bills, according to a Manhattan Institute report by Jonathan Lesser.

It’s not just liberal Western cities that are losing their black residents — many economically struggling Midwestern cities have the same problem. Detroit, Cleveland, Flint, and Youngstown all have declining black populations.

The greatest demographic transition is taking place in Chicago. A black population loss of 177,000 accounted for the lion’s share of the city’s total shrinkage during the 2000s. Another 53,000 blacks have fled the city since 2010. In fact, the entire metro Chicago area lost nearly 23,000 blacks in aggregate, the biggest decline in the United States.

But in northern cities with more robust middle-class economies, black populations are expanding. Since 2010, for example, metro Indianapolis added more than 19,000 blacks (6.9% growth), Columbus more than 25,000 (9%), and Boston nearly 40,000 (10.2%). New York’s and Philadelphia’s black population growth rates are low but positive, in line with slow overall regional growth.

The somewhat unlikely champion for northern black population growth is Minneapolis-St. Paul. Since 2010, the black population in the city has grown by 15,000 people, or 23%. The region added 30,400 black residents, growing by 12.1%.

Like Portland and Seattle, Minneapolis is considered a liberal stronghold. But, unlike those West Coast cities, it has cultivated a development environment that keeps housing affordable, with a home-price median multiple of only 3.2.

Similarly, in Columbus (with a median multiple of 2.9) and Indianapolis (also 2.9), black families can afford the American dream. (Boston, with its high housings costs, is an outlier.)

Where else are black Americans moving? One destination dominates: the South. A century ago, blacks were leaving the South to go north and west; today, they are reversing that journey, in what the Manhattan Institute’s Daniel DiSalvo dubbed “The Great Remigration.” DiSalvo found that black Americans now choose the South in pursuit of jobs, lower costs and taxes, better public services (notably, schools) and sunny weather for retirement.

Historically, Southern blacks lived in rural areas. A large rural black population remains in the South today, often living in the same types of conditions as rural whites, which is to say, under significant economic strain. But the new black migrants to the South are increasingly flocking to the same metro areas that white people are — especially Atlanta, the new cultural and economic capital of black America, with a black population of nearly 2 million. The Atlanta metro area, one-third black, continues to add more black residents (150,000 since 2010) than any other region.

In Texas, Dallas has drawn 110,000 black residents (11.3% growth) and Houston just under 100,000 (9.2%) since 2010. Miami, with its powerful Latino presence that includes Afro-Latinos, also added about 100,000 blacks (8.3%). Today, Dallas, Houston, and Miami are all home to more than 1 million black residents.

Many smaller southern cities — including Charlotte, Orlando, Tampa, and Nashville — are seeing robust black population growth as well.

Not surprisingly, these southern cities are extremely affordable. A combination of pro-business policies combined with a development regime that permits housing supply to expand as needed has proved a winner. (Among these southern cities, only Miami, with its massive influx of Latin American wealth, is rated as unaffordable, with a median multiple of 5.6.)

When it comes to how state and local policies affect black residents’ choices about where to live, cities with the West Coast model of liberalism are the worst performing.

These results should be troubling to progressives touting West Coast planning, economic, and energy policies as models for the nation. If wealthy cities like San Francisco and Portland — where progressives have near-total political control — can’t produce positive outcomes for working-class and middle-class blacks, why should we expect their approach to succeed anywhere else?

Aaron M. Renn is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a contributing editor of City Journal. This piece has been adapted from the Manhattan Institute’s City Journal.

Who would have guessed that pro-business policies, zoning laws that prefer people over leftist environmentalist whining, fewer regulations, and the abandonment of leftist (Stalinist) top-down planning would win?  Other than anyone who is NOT A DAMN FOOL???

Democrats guarantee that they will make black people poorer and more dependent.  And all Democrats have is demagoguery and lies piled on top of more demagoguery and more lies.  But I’ll just end by quoting Forrest Gump:

Okay, that’s good but it doesn’t quite go far enough to describe why we’re where we’re at today.  So let me instead end with John Wayne:

.

Liberalism: The Gateway Ideological Drug That ‘Fundamentally Transformed’ Islam Into A Terrorist Threat

April 15, 2016

If you listen to a liberal, the West and in particular the United States deserves to be destroyed.

If you listen to a radical Muslim, they completely agree with the liberal and in fact justify their jihad by citing liberal “experts” to justify their hatred and their violence.

Osama bin Laden was a huge Noam Chomsky fan.  Both of these men shared the same passionate hatred.  And the latter was ideological fodder to the former.

Noam Chomsky claimed he didn’t view the killing of bin Laden any different than he would have viewed the killing of George W. Bush:

We might ask ourselves how we would be reacting if Iraqi commandos landed at George W. Bush’s compound, assassinated him, and dumped his body in the Atlantic.

One of the interesting things you might ask yourself as you read this venomous bile is, why did Chomsky cite George Bush’s name when Barack Obama was the one who ordered the “assassination” and has publicly praised himself for it over and over and over again?  And the answer is that to be a liberal is to be a hypocrite without shame and without honesty and without virtue of any kind.  And so to the poisonous, toxic, vile soul of a liberal, it frankly doesn’t even MATTER if Obama did it and took credit for it, it’s STILL Bush’s fault and Bush should pay for the crime.

America is a wicked, evil place.  Just ask the man Obama made his mentor and spiritual leader for 23 years:

“The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God Bless America.’ No, no, no, God damn America, that’s in the Bible for killing innocent people,” he said in a 2003 sermon. “God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme.” — Jeremiah Wright

Barack Obama has a long history both with radical Islam and the Noam Chomsky-types who fuel their already poisonous ideology into “righteous hatred.”  He would be IMPEACHED if the Los Angeles Times were to ever release the video of an event Obama willingly attended featuring radical Islamist and PLO operative, Rashid Khalidi.  The same newspaper that sent reporters digging through the trash to find every email they could from Sarah Palin and published 24,000 of them has refused for the entire presidency of Barack Obama to release the video of Obama toasting a known terrorist murderer.

Liberals and Democrats will protect Barack Obama from being exposed by the truth to the very bitter end.

That is the truly wicked heart of the man who is now the president of the United States.  Obama falsely and dishonestly promised that he would transcend the political divide and”unite” America.  And in every other way he failed but this: we can now all agree that the United States of America is an evil place that truly deserves complete and utter destruction.  Barack Obama spent 23 years stockpiling his soul with that belief; and if it had bothered him in the slightest, he wouldn’t have stayed in that hellish place.

Barack Obama has spent his entire life believing that the United States and Israel should be wiped off the map for their moral crimes.

So I came across this article and it is absolutely spot on.  I love the title, a play on “radical Islam” given the fact that it is NOT merely “Islam” that has become “RADICAL”:

Islam and the Radical West
The political orthodoxy of the left is the gateway drug to jihad.
By Bret Stephens
April 11, 2016 7:18 p.m. ET

Years ago I had a chat with three young Muslim men as we waited in a Heathrow airport lounge to board a flight to Islamabad. I was going to Pakistan to report on the fallout from a devastating earthquake in Kashmir. They were going there to do what they vaguely described as “charitable work.” They dressed in white shalwar kameez, wore their beards in salafist style and spoke in south London accents.

I tried to steer the conversation to the earthquake. They wanted to talk about politics. Had I seen  Michael Moore’s “Fahrenheit 9/11”? I avoided furnishing an opinion about a film they plainly revered. The unvarnished truth about Amerika—from an American. Authority and authenticity rolled into one.

I think of that exchange whenever the subject of Islamist radicalization comes up. There’s a great deal of literature about how young Muslim men—often born in the West to middle-class and not particularly religious households—get turned on to jihad. Think of  Mohammed Emwazi, the University of Westminster graduate later known as Jihadi John. Or Maj.  Nidal Malik Hasan, of Fort Hood infamy. Or Najim Laachraoui, who studied electrical engineering at the prestigious Catholic University of Louvain before blowing himself up last month in Brussels. Or Boston’s Tsarnaev brothers and San Bernardino’s Syed Farook.

It’s a long list. And in many cases investigators are able to identify an agent of radicalization. Maj. Hasan corresponded with extremist cleric  Anwar al-Awlaki. Laachraoui seems to have come under the spell of a Molenbeek preacher named  Khalid Zerkani. The Tsarnaevs took their bomb-building tips from “Inspire,” an online English-language magazine published by al Qaeda’s branch in Yemen.

But the influence of the Awlakis of the world can’t fully account for the mind-set of these jihadists. They are also sons of the West—educated in the schools of multiculturalism, reared on the works of  Noam Chomsky and perhaps Frantz Fanon, consumers of a news diet heavy with reports of perfidy by American or British or Israeli soldiers. If Islamism is their ideological drug of choice, the political orthodoxies of the modern left are their gateway to it.

Take the most recent issue of Inspire. Mixed in with step-by-step photos on how to build a timed hand grenade and an analysis of the Charlie Hebdo massacre, there’s a long article on the oppression of blacks in America, starting with the killing of Ferguson’s  Michael Brown. The Spring 2013 issue contains a “message to the American nation” from al Qaeda Commander  Qassim Ar-Reimy in which he asks whether “meddling in our affairs and installing whomever tyrant agents and lackeys you want who kill and oppress [is] forgivable?”

“Leave us with our religion, land and nations and mind your own internal affairs,” the commander—now Emir—writes. “Save your economy, look after your concerns, for it is better than what you currently are.”

This isn’t the language of Islam, with its impressive tradition of conquest. It’s the language of the progressive left, of what  Jeane Kirkpatrick at the 1984 Republican convention called the “Blame America First” crowd. It fits the left’s view of the West as the perennial sinner and the rest of the world as its perpetual victim. It is the language of turning the page on a decade of war, of focusing on nation building at home.

It strikes us as radical only because it comes from the pen of a terrorist. If it had appeared as an op-ed in the Guardian, it would elicit nodding approval from many readers, a dismissive shrug from others, but no big whoop either way.

In the early 1990s my former columnist colleague  Thomas Frank came up with the clever phrase “commodification of dissent” to explain how capitalism turned all kinds of countercultural beliefs and radical ideas into just another product in a box, to be sold and distributed through the usual channels. “Fahrenheit 9/11” might have been a political revelation or even a call to arms for some impressionable young Muslims from Tower Hamlets, but to Hollywood it was $222.5 million of box office gold. That made it a winner in the marketplace of ideas, and who can quarrel with that?

The commodification of dissent may have the effect of blunting the impact of all kinds of extreme notions. But it can dull us to their extremism, leaving us astonished when someone turns notion into action. The catharsis of violence seems like an interesting idea in the pages of “The Wretched of the Earth.” In practice, it’s scores of young men and women gunned down in a Paris concert hall.

We’ve become lazy in our thinking about Islam and the West. Whether the Islam practiced by al Qaeda or ISIS is “radical” or merely traditional isn’t the question. It’s whether the West can recognize that the moral nihilism of today’s Jihadi Johns is the logical outgrowth of the moral relativism that is the default religion of today’s West.

I’ve been trying to describe this direct ideological connection between radical Islam and American liberal progressivism for some time.  As some examples:

In May of last year I wrote: Progressive Liberalism Is Responsible For The Spread Of Islamic State Among U.S. Youth

Back in February 2015 I wrote this: Why Do Liberals Hate ‘Intolerant’ Christianity But Embrace Viciously Intolerant Islam? Liberals Just Hate Jesus, Just As Jesus Said They Would.

If that doesn’t go back far enough, let’s try February of 2011 when I wrote this: Crisis In Egypt Underscores The Problem Of Islam – AND LIBERALISM.  I also wrote this the same month: Liberals Seeking To Bring Chaos Of Islamic World To America

Maybe you want to go back to June 2009 when I made a rather bold, prophetic prediction that I submit to you has CLEARLY come to pass to any with eyes to see and ears to hear when I wrote this:Islamist Anti-U.S. Terrorism Rejuvenated Under Obama Weakness

Or let’s go back all the way to just before Obama got elected president when I wrote this in October 2008: Why Islamic Extremists Support Democrats and Obama

History has proven me right.  History has utterly and savagely refuted the moral idiocy otherwise known as “liberalism” or “Democrat Party policies.”  Terrorism has UTTERLY EXPLODED under our Terrorist-in-Chief, Barack Obama.  And it doesn’t matter if we elect Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton, they are both joined to the hip and the neck to “I’m with Stupid” when it comes to foreign policy.

I recently laid out the only hope for reform within Islam: Islam’s ONLY Hope For True Reform Comes From A Surprising Source. And What Of America’s Only Hope For Reform?  In that article, I go into detail and explain the reason that Islam has an inseparable connection with VIOLENCE that Christianity does not have and never has had.

But to be a Democrat is to be a true moral idiot who cannot and will not see truth.  Which is why Barack Hussein Obama demonized Christianity for a false narrative of something that happened a thousand years ago while absolving Islam today: Obama Newsflash: Terrorism Has NOTHING To Do With Islam, Folks. But, Hey, Let’s Blame Christianity For Crusades A THOUSAND Years Ago

It comes down to the mindset of self-destruction that the prophets described far longer than a thousand years ago which fits the Democrat Party and liberalism to a “T”:

You boast, “We have struck a bargain to cheat death and have made a deal to dodge the grave. The coming destruction can never touch us, for we have built a strong refuge made of lies and deception.” — Isaiah 28:15

It doesn’t matter how many times liberalism and Democrats are refuted by reality: because they hate truth and they hate the One who came to testify to the truth.

If Democrats Weren’t Dishonest Hypocrites, They Would Spread The Orwellian Body Camera Wealth To All THEIR Sacred Cow Jobs

April 6, 2016

I came across this article and the sheer, common-sense logic and the gigantic hypocrisy of the left flabbergasted me:

Body cameras have become the solution of the day for stomping out discriminatory behavior against minorities by police officers. Cameras provide a neutral record of events, so we have a better idea what happened during an encounter. Some research even suggests that the presence of body cameras steeply reduce the use of force by officers and the number of citizens’ complaints.

But that raises a question: what’s to limit this type of solution only to police officers? It’s a slippery slope to an Orwellian future, where Big Brother could be watching all of us — for our own good, of course.

Consider health care, another interaction which produces potentially life-or-death outcomes. In general, African Americans and other people of color receive inferior medical treatment, leading to higher death rates. David R. Williams, a professor of public health at Harvard, who has researched this issue writes that blacks and other minorities receive fewer diagnostic tests, fewer treatments, and overall poorer-quality care — even after adjusting for variations in insurance, facilities, and seriousness of illness.

Leaving aside patient outcomes, there are also highly credible accusations that medical staff have groped and sexually abused sedated patients. Body cameras on doctors and nurses might well prevent such incidents, or provide evidence if they did occur.

If the doctor’s office is off-limits, what about the classroom?

U.S. Department of Education data shows that black students are suspended or expelled at rates three times higher than whites, even though no studies examining the relationship between race, behavior and suspension have proven that black students misbehave more often. Currently, parents who insist their children are innocent or are being excessively punished for minor offenses have no evidence.

Make teachers wear body cameras, and parents would see and hear exactly what the teacher heard and saw. An overreaction? Keep in mind, a growing body of evidence shows that school punishments do long-term damage Students who are expelled or suspended are less likely to graduate, and more likely to end up involved with the criminal justice system.

Perhaps even our politicians should be required, by law, to wear body cameras at all campaign and fundraising events while they’re in, or running for, office. If that sounds unnecessary, recall that it was only because of a surreptitious recording that voters found out that 2012 GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney thinks there are 47% of Americans who “are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it.”

But this isn’t partisan. Personally, I’d welcome video or audio of what Hillary Clinton has to say to the people paying $353,000 to sit next to her and George Clooney at an upcoming fundraising dinner.

Sure, the officials, professionals or politicians could simply turn off their cameras — but that break in the recording log will be interpreted as evidence that the person was hiding something, and probably up to no good.

A recent article in an American Bar Association magazine summed up the legal landscape: “The battle for workplace privacy is over; privacy lost.” Employers have a right to monitor employees (provided the employees are aware of it) to measure productivity, prevent theft, promote workplace safety and so on. Advances in digital technology that vastly reduced the cost of cameras just accelerated this trend. Mass monitoring has begun where the need is critical (e.g., police stops) but also where the workers are least able to resist (sanitation workers, truck drivers, Amazon warehouse employees, and so on).

Higher-paid professionals mistakenly assume increased workplace surveillance will be confined to the hoi polloi. In reality, given the technology is available (and improving) all it may take is a high-profile incident or two. Imagine something analogous to the police shooting an unarmed person happening in a school or hospital, and how quickly that could trigger for demands for wider personal surveillance like body cameras. Already the ubiquity of smartphones has made ad hoc recording by employers, customers or colleagues almost effortless.

I simply state this as a categorical fact: IF you are a Democrat, YOU PERSONALLY are a pathologically dishonest hypocrite liar, because you support Hillary Clinton who is the FIRST government official to do all her “business” on a secret private server and then PURGED thousands of emails so that no one could see what she was up to.  But because you are just flat-out hypocrite depraved, it’s “Body cameras for thee, but never for me.”

You want cops to wear body cameras?  I want to know what Hillary Clinton is up to such that this hyper-secretive, paranoid fascist witch resorted to a secret server: I don’t just want her to wear a camera that reveals everything she’s typing, everything she’s hearing and everything she’s saying, I want a body camera shoved right up her A$$ so I can know her proctologic status 24/7.  I want to know what is going on inside “the vast, criminal conspiracy” otherwise known as the Clinton Foundation.

So since you Democrats love Orwellian fascism so damn much, let’s go for it.  Just be honest and consistent for ONCE in your miserable, loathsome lives and apply the same damn “logic” to everyone that you apply to your enemies.

Which is why we have Donald Damn Trump right now.  Donald Trump’s core support comes from liberal and moderate factions.  His strongest supporters are REGISTERED DEMOCRATS.  In fact, the primary indicator of whether or not you support Donald Trump is whether you love the AUTHORITARIAN approach of people who believe that government ought to become more powerful and be used in a more activist manner.  Because Democrat crap is going to ultimately coat absolutely everything.

So wear your cameras, Democrats.  So we can start seeing how utterly evil and vile you are.

Minimum Wage Gain, Maximum Poverty Pain

April 4, 2016

The left is using the politically correct term “living wage” to describe their intent to impose their thug government on small businesses who are barely getting by as it is.

I’ve defined the term many times, but let’s consider “PC” again:

Political correctness is not just a leftist way to make overly sensitive people feel better. It was designed by early Marxists in Russia and the left continues to execute the Orwellian tactic today: if you can control words, you can control thought; if you can control thought, you can control actions.  “PC” is an enormous, sophisticated and highly coordinated effort by elitist intellectuals to “fundamentally transform” Western culture as we know it by  redefining it – by shaping the “acceptable” language people are allowed to use – and thereby dictating the parameters of cultural arguments.  And people with incredibly radical agendas have been exploiting this tactic for decades and it has succeeded.

Was George Orwell right in his 1984 first published in 1945 or was he right in his Animal Farm first published in 1949?  And the answer is that Orwell rightly understood that you have to have the ignorance of Animal Farm to get to the true tyranny of 1984.

This is how Cliffs Notes sums up Animal Farm:

Orwell‘s satire on equality, where all barnyard animals live free from their human masters’ tyranny. Inspired to rebel by Major, an old boar, animals on Mr. Jones’ Manor Farm embrace Animalism and stage a revolution to achieve an idealistic state of justice and progress. A power-hungry pig, Napoleon, becomes a totalitarian dictator who leads the Animal Farm into “All Animals Are Equal / But Some Are More Equal Than Others” oppression.

That’s where we are, sheople of America.

Democrats have incited a massive, profound hatred and bitterness to the so-called “white establishment.”  These tyrants have so much power, according to the leftist narrative, that even the mighty Obama, the divine messiah himself, has been unable to free the slaves.  And of course your Hillary Clintons and your Bernie Sanders have to pay lip homage to the Pharaoh god-king Obama while simultaneously irrationally claiming that the last eight years of suffering had nothing to do with Obama and his miserable policies; oh, no, they were inflicted on you by “Mr. Jones.”  And if you just give our power-mad government all the power in the world, we will pursue “economic justice” and thereby “achieve an idealistic state of justice and progress.”

Orwell realized that you cannot get to 1984 without a people stupid enough and wicked enough to buy the lie that enables Animal Farm.  First you must have a people willing to surrender their liberty so that a powerful State can give them whatever they promise in order to get to a slave state.

As Edward R. Murrow put the same idea, “A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.”

And when a people gives themselves over to a giant government system, that people deserves to perish.

And so the Democrat Party is well on its way to its cherished goal of ushering in the Antichrist, the beast of the Book of Revelation.  They will NOT rest until every man and woman has been forced by the government to take the economic mark of the beast without which no one will be able to buy or sell.

So let’s consider the Democrat ruse on “living wages” otherwise known as the minimum wage hike.  Understand that I’ve written about this often enough before:

Teen Unemployment Another Proof Of How Desperately Wrong Obama, Democrat Policies Are And How Much They Hurt Little People

Miniumum Wage Increase Means Maximum Employment Decrease

The Party Of Genuine Evil And The Destruction Of America: In 39 States, Democrat Welfare Pays Better Than A Secretary’s Job

Realize That Obama Has ‘Fundamentally Transformed’ America Into A Failed Marxist State. Just Ask Poor People And Liberals

The Union Label Is Hypocrisy: Unions Hire Minimum Wage Non-Union Workers To Do Their Picketing For Them

Obama: Adding 11 Million Low-Skilled Illegal Immigants To America’s Dependency Roles Will Strengthen Middle Class Rather Than Depressing Wages

The Singularity Of ‘Solutions’ Proposed By Liberal Thinkers Is Only Surpassed By Their Abject HYPOCRISY

Democrats’ War On Poverty Has Been A War On America That Has Done NOTHING To Help The Poor

Obama’s ‘Hope and Change’ In Action: Poverty At Highest Number In 52 Years Census Bureau Has Tracked It

Inflation Back On The Table As Part Of Obama’s ‘Hope and Change’ Misery Buffet

It’s funny how Democrats invented a right to “privacy” in the Constitution that somehow ONLY applied to homosexual sex and abortion.  Why can’t people have a right to “privacy” when they hire someone to do a job?  What right does a government have to interfere with my business?  And on the flip side, why should I be barred from working for somebody if I want to work and I’m willing to do a job for the pay they are offering?

It is simply a FACT that when you artificially raise a wage and force every business to pay that wage regardless of what their employees are doing, or how much profit they actually contribute to a business, that many businesses will decide that job is simply no longer worth offering.  This is simply a fact of basic common sense: otherwise kindly explain to me why we don’t make the minimum wage $1,800 an hour (the hourly billing rate of the lawyer who hit the homerun for homosexual marriage)???  Why don’t we try that and find out how many people would have a damn job the next day.

So obviously it might be good for SOME people and it’s bad for many others.  And the left frankly doesn’t give a damn about those people who lose their jobs any more than they cared about the people who were victims of Obama’s health care law who found out that “If you like your plan, you’ll be able to keep your plan.  If you like your doctor, you’ll be able to keep your doctor” was a cynical lie.

Here’s a synonym for “minimum wage jobs”: ENTRY LEVEL jobs.  The idea is that you work, you develop experience, you prove you are capable of showing up and performing, and you leverage your job history toward increasingly better and better paying jobs.  In the past, at least before Obama got his roach hands into everything, it was mostly teenagers and young people who worked for minimum wage.  To the extent that Obama has made it harder than its ever been to get out of the minimum wage rung, the obvious answer is to repudiate Obama and Democrats rather than change the wage system.  It has always been in the interests of businesses to keep their good-performing people rather than see them go elsewhere; and offering better pay is one of those ways.  The ONLY people who want you to stay in the quagmire of minimum wage pay are DEMOCRATS.  And what Democrats do is force businesses to “spread the wealth” to the underperforming workers because I can’t give Wonderful William the raise he deserves because I was just just forced to give Lousy Lou and Terrible Tom a raise that they didn’t deserve.

The unions that bankroll the Democrat Party exemplify the Democrat mindset: whether you’re the best worker who ever worked or whether you’re the suckiest worker who ever conned his way into a job, you should get the same pay.  Democrats and their thug flunkies literally DEMAND that high-performing workers should NOT be able to get paid for their superior performance.  That’s something called a “documented fact.”  And that’s what’s going on here, rather than Democrats giving one miserable flying damn for good workers.

I loved this quote:

Everything we ever needed to know about collective unions we learned in Kindergarten. Why run around gathering up all the Easter Eggs – if they are just going to be reassembled in a big pile at the end of the hunt and equal amounts given to each ?

But that is precisely what is at the very heart of unions and wage control laws: the notion of forcibly redistributing good workers’ pay to lousy workers.

Then you add to that the problem that I explore further below where by forcing business to raise their wages across the board, they have no choice but to raise their prices.  So now everything cost more; and how did that actually help the worker who now gets to pay more for everything he or she purchases?

The hypocrisy on minimum wages on the part of the left is beyond appalling: liberals demand it, they impose it, and then they exempt themselves from it citing it would create an undue hardship on them to abide by what they force everybody else to abide by.  So you have unions that serve as the Democrat Party’s Brownshirt thugs exempting themselves from the minimum wages they are the stormtroopers in imposing:

Editorial L.A. labor leaders’ hypocrisy on minimum wage hike
By The Times Editorial Board
▼ Los Angeles labor leaders fought for a minimum wage hike; now they want to be exempt from it
▼ L.A. County Federation of Labor is being hypocritical in its stance on raising the minimum wage
May 29, 2015, 5:00 AM

No, employers with a unionized workforce should not be allowed to pay less than Los Angeles’ proposed minimum wage. It’s stunning that after leading the fight for a $15 citywide minimum wage and vehemently opposing efforts to exempt restaurant workers, nonprofits and small businesses from the full wage hike, the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor is now lobbying for an exemption for employers with union contracts. That’s right — labor leaders are advocating that an employer should have the right to pay union members less than the minimum wage.

This is hypocrisy at its worst, and it plays into the cynical view that the federation is more interested in unionizing companies and boosting its rolls of dues-paying members than in helping poor workers. Such an exemption would create an incentive for companies to allow unions in — but rather than helping workers, it would undermine the purpose of the minimum wage ordinance, which is to set a new, higher pay floor in order to help lift the greatest number of low-wage Angelenos out of poverty.

You have the Hollywood that gave nearly 20-to-1 to Obama over Romney in 2012 demanding and receiving tax credits from Democrats:

LA Times Op-Ed To keep ‘Hollywood’ in Hollywood, tax incentives are key

New Tax Credits Boost Filming In L.A. In Q3

And how about the liberal universities?  Consider what I wrote about the sick trend to skyrocket costs on poor students I ranted about in September 2014 right along with the above fascist liberal power-brokers:

This Labor Day, Demand Leftists Professors And Universities Have Their Salaries And Tuition Redistributed To Poor Working Students
September 1, 2014

I am so sick of the left.

On a daily basis, you have the left screaming for a higher and higher minimum wage, beyond what most businesses can afford to pay entry-level and unskilled workers.

The unions want it because they will then demand a wage hike for THEIR workers; after all, if that unskilled slob is now earning twice what he used to, surely that union worker ought to earn twice as much, too, right???

It doesn’t matter how much it hurts the little people who both struggle to run small businesses and struggle to find jobs as they are literally priced out of the market as it simply doesn’t pay to hire them anymore.

So I’m watching the television and there’s this leftist professor demanding higher minimum wages.

Let it come out of HER wages.  Because as a liberal professor, she represents THE most depraved money-hungry predator of ALL:

Between 2002 and 2012, prices for new textbooks rose 82%, while tuition and fees increased about 89% during that period, and overall consumer prices grew 28%, according to a 2013 report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office.

That according to the Los Angeles Times dated TODAY.

Tuition is skyrocketing.  The cost of college textbooks is skyrocketing.  And who runs that vile system lock, stock and barrel?  Cockroach liberals who say “other people ought to be forced to pay more.”

THEY ought to be forced to pay more.

I propose college tuition and books be reduced at the expense of college/university faculty and staff.

I further propose that any “living wage” increase ought to come right out of the wages of union workers who want to force other people to get gouged to pay for.

Let’s call it the “If you want it, YOU effing pay for it!” law.

Has this trend stopped?  Has it even slowed down?  Hell NO:

Over the last 20 years, the average published price for a year of tuition and fees at a private four-year college has increased from $11,719 to $31,231, an increase of 166%, an increase two and a half times the 61% rise in the Consumer Price Index. Adjusting for inflation, the price of tuition and fees has escalated by 67% at four-year private colleges and by 60 percent at two-year public colleges. Reflecting decreased government funding, the price has more than doubled at four- year public colleges. (Trends in College Pricing 2014 p.16) During this same period, the median family income in the U.S., also adjusted for inflation, has increased 5.2% from $51,006 to $53,657, but it has actually declined by more than 7% since 1999 when it peaked at $57,843.

The implications are clear—list price has made a college education appear unattainable to an ever-increasing proportion of the population, as indicated by several recent studies.

If liberals had one shred of honesty or integrity in them, they would have long ago treated colleges and professors like oil companies and CEOs.  But of course they don’t have any decency in them.  So they keep rigging the system to hand colleges and universities more government money and the colleges and universities keep taking that money and jacking up tuitions and expenses.

And Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are both loudly demanding we quadruple down on stupid.

Another word for “liberal” is FOOL.  Liberals are fools who keep going back to the same people who keep ripping us off and trusting them so that they’ll keep having better opportunities to rip us off even more.  Whether they turn to union thugs or university Marxists or Hollywood moguls, it’s the same damn mindset doing the same damn thing: pathologically greedy, dishonest hypocrites rigging the system for themselves at the expense of the poor who keep trusting them because they’re stupid, ignorant sheople who have been Pavlovian-trained to a particular flavor of racist, misandrist, ant-religious, anti-moral, fascist demagoguery.

And the left contemptuously knows that they keep coming back to that same Pavlovian formula.  No matter how many times it fails.

So we contemplate the minimum wages that unions fought fang and claw to impose and then absolved and exempted themselves from.

I just want you to consider what even the damn leftist Los Angels Times understands (even as they push for it).  All you have to do is read the full story:

Security guard Kenneth Lofton was among the workers who benefited last year when this East Bay city hiked its hourly minimum wage to nearly $15 for employees at large companies.

The jump was almost 50% more than what he used to make in nearby Oakland when he was paid $10 an hour. But it’s not enough for Lofton, 62, to move closer to work — he still has to commute nearly 20 miles from Hayward and back each day.

“It’s somewhat better, but not much,” Lofton said Tuesday morning while eating breakfast and manning the security gate at an Emeryville parking lot. “The high cost of living here takes a big bite out of whatever monetary increase you get, so it’s like not getting an increase at all.” [….]

A similar scenario played out in Emeryville, where some restaurants have increased prices to make up for the higher minimum wage.

On a Tuesday morning, hip cafe Farley’s is buzzing with young professionals from nearby companies. Despite its popularity, the eatery is still subject to the “razor thin” profit margins common in the food service industry, said co-owner Chris Hillyard.

After Emeryville’s wage increase, Hillyard said he had to increase the price of menu items by 5% to 20%. A roasted turkey and avocado sandwich that once cost $9 is now priced at $10. A latte went up 50 cents, to $4.

Hillyard also had to eliminate two positions from the cafe and end the cafe’s baking program. Farley’s now outsources its baking to a vendor.

“The council had good intentions when it increased the minimum wage, but that was one of the unintended consequences,” Hillyard said.

He said the additional wage hike this July will be difficult, as he’s still trying to navigate where his business is now. Farley’s has 12 employees.

“It’s going to be a challenge because we just raised prices,” Hillyard said. “At some point, we won’t be able to do that because there’s only so much people are willing to spend on a cup of coffee or a sandwich.”

So far, he said, customers haven’t minded the higher prices since they’re comparable to those in nearby Oakland and Berkeley.

Down the street from Farley’s, prices have also gone up at Los Moles, a popular Mexican restaurant.

Chef and owner Lito Saldana said he bumped up the price of every menu item by 10% to offset rising food and labor costs. Prior to the minimum wage increase, he said, Los Moles’ servers made $9 an hour, while kitchen staff averaged $13.50 to $14 an hour.

As costs have risen across the board, Saldana said the minimum wage increase hasn’t helped his employees.

“Even my employees who live in Oakland are saying it is now too expensive for them,” he said.

Seattle workers interviewed by the minimum wage study researchers said they were happy to get the higher wages. For some, it made a “fundamental difference in their quality of life,” said Vigdor, of the university.

At the same time, many workers said they were nervous about whether price increases would eat up their higher paychecks.

“The minimum wage, when it works well, is really a tool for transformational change in people’s lives,” Vigdor said. “And the worry is that it doesn’t always work well.”

The ONLY “successful” example the LA Times could find was a high-end restaurant owner (whose wealthy customers demonstrate how well-to-do they are by paying outrageous prices as a rule) who nevertheless said, “If I have to close some restaurants, so be it. If I have to restructure, so be it. I would rather pay a living wage.”  Versus the rest of the businesses who’d actually prefer to survive and be able to take care of their employees by continuing to provide them a JOB.

The minimum wage law has an incredibly sordid history, just as the progressive left that imposed it in the first place:

When California legislators voted to raise the statewide minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2022, labor activists cheered. Discounting fears that a $15 minimum might cost some low-wage workers their jobs, activists and their political allies celebrated a victory for fairness and economic justice.

Progressive labor activists took a very different view 100 years ago, when 15 states established America’s first minimum wages. Labor reformers then believed that a legal minimum would hand a raise to deserving white Anglo-Saxon men, and a pink slip to their undeserving competitors: “racially undesirable” immigrants, the mentally and physically disabled, and women. The original progressives hailed minimum-wage-caused job losses among these groups as a positive benefit to the U.S. economy and to Anglo-Saxon racial integrity.

Two overarching characteristics have always been true of progressive activists: 1) they are genuinely evil people and 2) they have always believed in the raw, naked power of their God, the State, to impose their evil on the rest of the country.  Function has always followed form with the left.

Just so you understand what happens when liberals artificially drive up prices by fascist fiat, there’s another article the same day in the same issue of the LA Times.  It begins:

More rent-controlled buildings are being demolished to make way for pricier housing
By Ben Poston and Andrew Khouri•Contact Reporters
April 2, 2016, 3:00 AM

Looking to cash in on a booming real estate market, Los Angeles property owners are demolishing an increasing number of rent-controlled buildings to build pricey McMansions, condos and new rentals, leading to hundreds of evictions across the city.

More than 1,000 rent-controlled apartments were taken off the market last year — a nearly threefold increase since 2013, according to a Times analysis of housing data. Evictions from such units have doubled over the same time.

You jack up the wages by dictatorial fiat, YOU PAY MORE FOR EVERYTHING.

AND YOU SHOULD PAY MORE FOR EVERYTHING.

It’s just like the colleges and universities that liberals keep giving more billions of dollars to by jacking up the limits of “financial aid”: “Hey, stupid-ass student, you’ve got more borrowed money now, so we can jack up tuition even higher, can’t we?”

And so liberal bureaucrats in cahoots with the colleges say, “Oh, no!  We’d better increase the amount students can borrow.”

And so colleges raise their tuition again.  And then again.  And again and again.

The same vicious cycle has been going on for decades.  And stupid liberals never learn because YOU KNOW PEOPLE ARE STUPID BECAUSE THEY CAN’T LEARN EVEN AFTER THEY’VE MADE THE SAME STUPID MISTAKE FIFTY TIMES.

So here we are artificially jacking up wages.  And it might seem like a boon to those who KEEP their job (it’s not a boon to those who lose their jobs because the wages government liberals force them to pay does not justify that job any more), but it’s an ILLUSION: because the price of everything just got jacked up to pay for the artificial wage increase.

Meanwhile, landlords say, “Oh, you’re earning 50% more?  Well, well, well, I guess that means we can jack up your rent by that amount.”

But will they learn?  Nope.  They’ll just vote for even more Democrats who impose even worse crap until:

And I heard a voice from among the four living beings say, “A loaf of wheat bread or three loaves of barley will cost a day’s pay. And don’t waste the olive oil and wine.” — Revelation 6:6

But that comes after Democrats have already voted for the Antichrist and his mark of the beast where Democrats’ dream government finally seizes total control of the economic system.

Trump, Abortion And Democrats Who Say Only MEN And BABIES Should Be ‘Punished’ When A Child Is Conceived

March 31, 2016

[Update, April 1, 2016]: The soul of the Democrat Party swims in lies, with lying liberals routinely demagoguing and outright slandering conservative/Republican positions that they literally invented out of their own warped and perverted minds.  Unfortunately, Donald Trump just makes that dishonest Democrat tactic all too easy.

Take abortion: do you know how many women have been “punished” by even the most pro-life Republican states in the entire history of the republic?  The answer will likely surprise you, given what the Democrat Party says and what their propaganda machine – a.k.a. the mainstream media – report: in the entire 20th century, exactly two women have gone to any criminal court in any state for participating in their own abortions.  While it was a criminal offense in 31 states, it simply wasn’t done for the very simple reason that the pro-life movement has ALWAYS regarded the mother as one of the victims of abortion.  The first case, in 1911, was thrown out by the trial court outright.  The second case was thrown out by a higher court, which said in doing so, “the woman who commits an abortion on herself is regarded rather as the victim than the perpetrator of the crime.”

In other words, the pro-life movement and the pro-life Republican Party have NEVER punished or targeted women over abortion.

But the ignorance and demagoguery of Donald Trump, combined with the rabid deceit of liberals, makes it easy to fabricate a bogeyman where none does and none has EVER truly existed.

I think of Bruce – now “Caitlyn” – Jenner.  It’s interesting.  I disagree with what Bruce Jenner did to himself; but I’m nowhere even CLOSE to the hate of liberals in terms of intolerance.  Let me quote Jenner on that:

“I have gotten more flak for being a conservative Republican than I have for being trans,” Jenner said.

To wit: conservative evangelical Christians think that Bruce Jenner is sadly confused and wrong for advancing his transgender issues; liberals believe that being a Republican is EVIL and they go after us with a viciousness that we’ve NEVER used against them.  Which is why we’re seeing such fascist leftist hate being directed at Trump rallies and Trump supporters now; with liberals going INSIDE Trump events to violently disrupt them (like Brownshirt Nazis of Hitler’s day) and with liberals using the “system” to attack Trump supporters (which was what the Nazis did when they had the power to do so).  And as the liberal-leaning Atlantic points out, these fascist liberals are literally generating more Trump support because increasingly more and more people are just beyond fed up with rabid leftist fascism.

The fact of the matter is that conservatives have NEVER attacked liberals and used a fascist system to impose “law” and “justice” on those who break their rules the way liberals have routinely done.  So conservatives say, “We think you’re wrong, but we won’t take away your rights,” whereas liberals say, “You’re EVIL, and we’re entitled to do ANYTHING to stop you!”  And so while liberals are now literally using the power of the state to destroy Christians who are resolved to follow their Bibles and refuse to participate in homosexual marriage against their consciences, conservatives have never twisted the law to work the other way.    [End update].

So Donald Trump came out with a policy on abortion that lasted for like an hour before he came out with a completely different policy on abortion.  Let’s start with what he just said and then move to what he just said that wildly flies in the face of what he just said (sorry if you’re confused, but I wrote it correctly):

Trump said:

Trump’s initial comments on Wednesday came after a lengthy exchange with MSNBC host Chris Matthews, who pressured the Republican to give a yes or no answer to the question, “should abortion be punished.”

“There has to be some form of punishment,” Trump said during a televised town hall event.

“For the woman?” Matthews asked, to which Trump replied, “Yes.”

Trump declined to specify how women should be punished if they underwent an illegal abortion.

And then right after that Trump said:

Donald Trump scrambled to clarify his position on abortion Wednesday after he said women who undergo the procedure should face “some form of punishment” should the practice be outlawed.

Several hours later — after widespread condemnation from Trump’s presidential rivals and even leading anti-abortion groups — he walked back his remarks, releasing a statement in which he said that women who obtain abortions are victims and that doctors who perform the service are the ones who should be punished.

“If Congress were to pass legislation making abortion illegal and the federal courts upheld this legislation, or any state were permitted to ban abortion under state and federal law, the doctor or any other person performing this illegal act upon a woman would be held legally responsible, not the woman,” Trump said. “The woman is a victim in this case as is the life in her womb. My position has not changed — like Ronald Reagan, I am pro-life with exceptions.”

And Trump has previously said:

Trump had previously declined to answer the question about what penalties he would support for women who undergo abortions or doctors who perform them.
“I just don’t want to talk about that right now,” Trump said during a news conference January in Iowa. “Everybody knows my views and I think my views are very plain,” Trump said.

But before Trump previously said that he previously said this:

Throughout his campaign, Trump has faced questions about the authenticity of his position on abortion. He said he was “pro-choice in every respect” in a 1999 interview, though he said he hated the “concept of abortion.”

So what’s Donald Trump’s actual position on abortion?  Who the hell knows???  Donald Trump’s view on abortion is as clear as feces.

The mainstream media propaganda mill wants to frame the Republican Party with every stupidly-worded utterance that comes out of Trump’s mouth, but in point of fact both the rival GOP candidates immediately denounced Trump’s “women should be punished” statement.

That that “see how evil the ‘anti-abortion’ conservatives are?” meme flies in the face of actual reality doesn’t mean a flying DAMN to the left as this quote from the same CNN article on Trump and abortion that I cite above shows:

His comments on Wednesday appeared to be the latest in Trump’s persistent efforts to court the support of socially conservative voters. But his efforts backfired as three leading anti-abortion groups swiftly criticized Trump’s comments.
March for Life released the toughest statement of the three groups, calling Trump’s remarks “completely out of touch with the pro-life movement.”
“Being pro-life means wanting what is best for the mother and the baby. Women who choose abortion often do so in desperation and then deeply regret such a decision. No pro-lifer would ever want to punish a woman who has chosen abortion. This is against the very nature of what we are about,” the president of the group’s education and defense fund, Jeanne Marcini, said in a statement.
The National Right to Life Committee noted in a statement that it has never supported penalties against women who undergo abortions.
The Susan B. Anthony List chalked up Trump’s comments to his recent opposition to abortion rights and said punishments should only be dished out to “the abortionist.”

“Donald Trump said…” is hardly a statement anyone ought to believe.

This is rather like Donald Trump being “strong” on ISIS – after saying the United States has no role in the Middle East and we should sit back and allow Russia to deal with the terrorist monster.  You know, until San Bernardino, when he started saying the precise opposite.

GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump late Monday offered his approach for fighting with the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

“Why are we knocking ISIS, and yet at the same time we’re against [Syrian President Bashar] Assad? Let them fight, take over the remnants,” Trump said on CNN’s “Out Front,” calling Syria a “total catastrophe.”

“But more importantly, let Russia fight ISIS, if they want to fight them, in Syria,” Trump said. “We can fight them in Iraq,” Trump added.

“Let ISIS and Syria fight. And let Russia, they’re in Syria already, let them fight ISIS,” Trump said. “Let Russia take care of ISIS.” – Donald Trump, September 29, 2015

Versus:

I would just bomb those suckers, and that’s right, I’d blow up the pipes, I’d blow up the refineries, I’d blow up ever single inch, there would be nothing left. – Donald Trump, November 13, 2015

This is rather like Donald Trump being “strong” on allowing Syrian refugees to pour into the United States on humanitarian grounds.  You know, until after San Bernardino when he started blathering the exact opposite:

The United States should take in some refugees from Syria, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said Tuesday night.

“I hate the concept of it, but on a humanitarian basis, you have to,” Trump said in his first Fox News appearance in two weeks, appearing on “The O’Reilly Factor.” – Donald Trump, Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Versus what he says now:

Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump called President Obama a “fool” this week for his plans to resettle thousands of Syrian refugees in the U.S.

“Well look, if the president is somebody, you know — you could say he’s a fool, in a certain way — because everybody is saying don’t do it,” Trump said Thursday night on Fox News.
“He’s very arrogant, he’s very stubborn, he doesn’t want to listen to anybody, and he’s so wrong,” the business mogul added during the interview with host Sean Hannity.  – Donald Trump, December 2015

Jonah Goldberg previously said something to this effect and it’s true: on abortion and many of these other issues, Donald Trump is a liberal who is pretending to be a conservative and saying things that a liberal believes conservatives think.  The reason this cynical, hypocritical tactic has worked so well for him is simply this: most of his supporters are NOT conservative, but are in fact liberals and moderates.

But that underscores my two biggest problems with Trump.  He’s NOT a genuine conservative and has never been one, and my biggest problem with Donald Trump of all is that he’s been on the opposite damn side of EVERYTHING UNDER THE SUN.  Anyone who believes he’ll do any particular thing is an idiot.  Because he’s said the precise opposite and very likely not very long ago.

In this way, Trump is like Obama when Obama says something like, “As I’ve said” or “As I’ve been saying,” he is saying something markedly different from what he actually WAS saying.  And then there are the legions of “roachellectuals” who will explain what Obama actually meant to say when he said something that flies in the face of honesty or reality.

Let’s not forget the 37 documented times Obama said one thing and did the opposite on ObamaCare; let’s not forget all the other DOZENS of lies Obama told about ObamaCare.  Let’s not forget the 22 documented times Obama said one thing and did the opposite of what he said on illegal immigration and executive amnesty in flagrant violation of our nation’s laws.  An d all the other weasel games this fascist tyrant has played with our laws because he is not an honest man.

And Trump aint no different.

So we get to abortion and we can plainly see that Donald Trump doesn’t have a real core on this issue; he just winged it and then so what if he said the exact opposite???  So what if a man who said for DECADES that he was “pro-choice” in every respect” is now mouthing a position more extreme than anybody who actually dearly holds the position?  The fact of the matter is that Trump has never thought this issue through, that it is NOT a deeply-held conviction for him; but that he is merely saying whatever he thinks the itching ears of the people he is trying to fool want to hear so he can clinch the nomination and win the contest.

This is why Jimmy Carter basically said, “We can work with this guy Trump because he stands for NOTHING but Donald Trump”:

Former President Jimmy Carter told the British Parliament on Wednesday that if he had to choose between Republican candidates Donald Trump and Ted Cruz, he’d prefer to see Trump win the White House.

“I think I would choose Trump,” the liberal former president said to the House of Lords, when asked about the U.S. presidential race, “which may surprise some of you, but the reason is Trump has proven already that he’s completely malleable. I don’t think he has any fixed opinions that he would really go to the White House and fight for.”

By contrast, Mr. Carter said, “Ted Cruz is not malleable. He has far right-wing policies, in my opinion, that would be pursued aggressively if and when he would become president.”

What does Trump stand for?  Whatever is convenient for him to stand for at any particular moment.  You know, until he can bargain and horse-trade sacred positions in his “art of the deal.”

So no, conservatives don’t want to punish women.  The only people who DO want to actually punish women and damn near everyone else are LIBERALS, which is precisely what Donald Trump has been for nearly all of his life before he decided to turn the GOP nomination into a circus freak show.

I’ve written about Political Correctness and keep my description in a file so I can spit it out without agonizing over how to word the idiocy:

Being politically correct is not just a leftist way to make overly-sensitive people feel better. It was designed by early Marxists in Russia and the left continues to execute the tactic today: if you can control words, you can control thought; if you can control thought, you can control actions.  “PC” is an enormous, sophisticated and highly-coordinated effort to change Western culture as we know it by  redefining it, by controlling the cultural arguments by shaping the “acceptable” language people are allowed to use. And people with incredibly radical agendas have been exploiting this tactic for decades and it has succeeded.

I open a newspaper or watch a mainstream media news broadcast and I can’t be “pro-life.”  Read that CNN article I cite above again: they’re not “pro-life groups” on CNN’s description; rather they are “anti-abortion” groups.  If we were actually allowed to be “pro”-something it would depict a positive movement; and the left won’t have that.  The same thing with my being “pro-marriage”; I’m not “anti-gay,” I merely continue to hold the SAME VIEW OF MARRIAGE THAT EVERY SINGLE SOCIETY ON EARTH HELD FROM CREATION UNTIL A FEW YEARS AGO.  But for the wicked people who imposed a wicked view on society that had never existed in ANY civilization up to now re-wrote the lexicon so that I’m not “pro-marriage” but rather “anti-gay.”  It’s an unrelenting effort, and stupid people have fallen for it.

And this is a stupid nation on a planet full of stupid people.

The Democrat Party is so hateful it is pure-and-simple ANTI-LIFE.  That’s what “pro-abortion” actually means, that you are a rabid hater and exterminator of human life.  And thus you have directly participated in the torture-murder of sixty million innocent human beings since 1973.

I always am amazed at the moral AND intellectual vapid stupidity of the left.  They tell me that an unborn baby is not a human being.  Let’s consider something called “logic”: it is “human” by virtue of its parents; it is a “being” by virtue of the fact that it is a living, existing thing: IT IS A HUMAN BEING.  Let’s try something called “science”: Let’s run through the taxonomic system that classifies every single living thing that ever existed on planet earth with our unborn baby: That “fetus” (which is Latin for “unborn child” by the way) is classified as Kingdom-Animal; Phylum-Chordata; Class-Mammalia; Order-Primate; Family-Hominid; Genus-Homo; and Species-Sapiens.  Just like every human being whose life is precious.

And finally, let’s consider God’s Word which resolves any and all conflict for anyone capable of true morality:

You made all the delicate, inner parts of my body
and knit me together in my mother’s womb.

Thank You for making me so wonderfully complex!
Your workmanship is marvelous—how well I know it.

You watched me as I was being formed in utter seclusion,
as I was woven together in the dark of the womb.

You saw me before I was born.
Every day of my life was recorded in Your book.

Every moment was laid out
before a single day had passed. — Psalm 139:13-16

There’s a reason that the fire of hell is eternal, Democrat.  In fact, YOU are the reason.  Because eternity itself won’t last long enough for you to suffer for all the horror you are guilty of as you scream for a trillion times a trillion millennia to the trillionth power for every single NANOSECOND that you brutally stole from every single ONE of those innocent children you personally participated in murdering.

There’s going to come a reckoning when you ultimately stand before a Great White Throne and discover that God created that soul and you will be sentenced for every single one of those sixty-plus million times that you determined that YOU were god over that soul and brutally snuffed out innocent human life.

So let’s get to the gist of this: Democrats like Hillary Clinton trot out with such righteous indignation at Donald Trump wanting to “punish” women.

When they want to punish MEN, punish FATHERS.

Contemplate with me the “logic” of abortion.  At the moment of conception, frankly lasting until even AFTER the baby emerges living and breathing from the womb as far as many Democrats are concerned, a baby is NOT a “baby,” but rather something called “by-products of conception.”

It is an immoral injustice to fathers and to fatherhood every bit as much as it is a rabid deprivation of life of an innocent human being who deserved LIFE and was deprived of that life by a Democratic Party that is now TEN TIMES more guilty of moral crimes than the Nazis were.

Because to be a Democrat is to be a rabid hater of truth and reality just as you are a rabid hater of life.  And so in the same way your citizen-of-hell judges gazed into the Constitution like it was some kind of crystal ball and found “penumbras” formed by “emanations” to create a “right” literally out of thin air where none had ever existed before, you in the same manner created DEATH out of thin air when every society before you treasured human life and thanked God or the gods for it.

That’s why the Hippocratic Oath that every true doctor follows to this day says “I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy. In purity and holiness I will guard my life and my art.”  At least until you “created” a blasphemy of the original to mock the sacred intent of the original.  Now blasphemous Democrats have blasphemous “doctors” murdering people and dedicating their “art” to death.

As the Word of God declares:

There is a way that appears to be right, but in the end it leads to death. — Proverbs 14:12

The road to hell is paved with Democrats and their “good intentions.”  And Democrats call their intentions “good” because:

Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter! – Isaiah 5:20

But their “good intentions” aside, their way is LITERALLY the way of death.  And to vote Democrat today is to declare, “If there is a God, let me scream in the endless suffering of God’s agonizing fiery hell forever and ever and ever.”  You know – as Jesus put it THREE TIMES for emphasis – “where ‘the worms that eat them do not die, and the fire is not quenched'” (Mark 9:44, Mark 9:46 and Mark 9:48).

But you go ahead, Democrat.  You vote for hell.

But let’s continue with the “logic” of abortion: that baby is NOT a baby, but a non-human “by-product of conception.”  Okay, so mommy can kill it.  Because she’s NOT a mommy, is she?  To be a “mommy,” that thing in her womb would have to be a human being, and of course every single bound-for-screaming-hell Democrat knows that it’s NOT a human being.

Ah, but that “logic” swiftly evaporates when it comes to “daddy.”  Because what was that thing when “daddy” last had anything whatsoever to do with it?  It was NOT a baby, was it?  No, it was a non-human “by-product of conception” and worthy of death and destruction and quite literally the dumpster.  On Democrat-devil-logic.

But do Democrats let “daddy” off the hook?  NOOOOOOO.  Rather they scream with ever fiber of their rabid hate, “PUNISH HIM!  HOLD HIM RESPONSIBLE!  MAKE HIM PAY!!!”  The woman isn’t held responsible for her pregnancy; only the man is.  According to the “punishment” logic of the Democrat Party.

And this same man who is very clearly NOT a “father” by the identical same Democrat-devil-logic that was fabricated to allow a woman to murder her own baby is somehow held fully accountable for that “child” that he clearly could not have had anything to do with “fathering.”

That poor bastard has no say whatsoever in whether a baby lives or whether it dies.  But if “mommy” arbitrarily decides that what the hell, I flipped a damn coin and I’m keeping the baby,” well, then, he is PUNISHED by Democrats and by Democrat-devil-logic for the next eighteen years as he is legally compelled to pay “child support” for that thing which by their own devil logic was “by-products of conception” when he last had anything whatsoever to do with anything.

It’s either a child at the moment of conception or “the father” isn’t the father and CAN’T be “the father” and shouldn’t be held responsible in any way for anything.

Think about it: Democrats say that the FATHER ought to be forcibly compelled to provide child support.  For a child they rabidly denied WAS a child in the first place while they denied that the “father” was the FATHER of that child.

Should a father be compelled to support his child?  Of course he should; but that strictly implies that he is RECOGNIZED as “the father” of “a child” to BEGIN WITH.

The rabid Democrat denial of fatherhood has destroyed the family.  Every man who has sexual relations with a woman with the result that for some mysterious reason something called “by products of conception” that weirdly coincides on a one-to-one basis with a CHILD has the Democrat Party pseudo-logic to fall back to: “I’m not the father of anything.  I’m outta here.”

If I’m a “father,” then that’s MY kid in the womb where only Adam and Eve of all human beings who ever lived didn’t begin their lives.  That’s MY kid.  And if I am a “father” in any way, any shape or any form, I have a RIGHT to whether my kid lives or dies.  And it is therefore rather obvious the resentment and bitterness and subsequent abandonment that “fathers” have implemented in giant numbers since they were told that a) they WEREN’T fathers and had NO rights to their children unless b) the “mother” of that child made the arbitrary, random decision that she wanted to keep that child in which case c) some irrational and immoral “legal” process determines that wait-a-minute, it’s in our interests to label you the “father” after all: so pay up.

So please don’t misunderstand because devil-logic now permeates the rotting carcass of American pseudo-civilization: it’s not that Democrats are opposed to “punishment” at ALL; in fact they LOVE punishment.

Democrats merely demand that the baby be punished and the father be punished and the role of fatherhood itself be punished and any hint of traditional, sacred, godly marriage be punished.

The Democrat Party has ALWAYS been the party of Satan, since it fought a vicious war over slavery when their demonic “good intentions” led them to declare that black people were not “human beings.”

Watch as the mainstream media propaganda mill asks every Republican if he or she thinks “women should be punished.”  It’s a nice “gotcha question” and “reporters” LOVE hammering Republicans with gotcha questions.  But they won’t ever ask Hillary Clinton why she said Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood) is her hero when Margaret Sanger said that “We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”  Just as you won’t see them asking Hillary Clinton or any other Democrat why they hold a fundamentally irrational and immoral position that punishes “fathers” for the children they conceive while simultaneously holding that they are “fathers” who therefore have rights over their children to begin with.

The fact of the matter is that from the very moment of conception, we are human beings and as human beings we possess infinite, incommensurable value and that to ignore that fact and murder an innocent human being is a terrible moral crime against the very God who created us in His image.  The fact of the matter is, that every single father owes his child his SUPPORT and every single father owes her child LIFE.

And the fact of the matter is that the Democrat Party IS the party of wickedness in America and one day there most surely WILL be “some form of punishment.”

In this world, you go ahead and mock me, Democrat.  But your destiny is to ultimately stand before the Great White Throne (Revelation 20:11-15) and I wouldn’t be you for all the money and for all the pleasure in this world.

 


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 629 other followers