Posts Tagged ‘Democrats’

Trump, Abortion And Democrats Who Say Only MEN And BABIES Should Be ‘Punished’ When A Child Is Conceived

March 31, 2016

[Update, April 1, 2016]: The soul of the Democrat Party swims in lies, with lying liberals routinely demagoguing and outright slandering conservative/Republican positions that they literally invented out of their own warped and perverted minds.  Unfortunately, Donald Trump just makes that dishonest Democrat tactic all too easy.

Take abortion: do you know how many women have been “punished” by even the most pro-life Republican states in the entire history of the republic?  The answer will likely surprise you, given what the Democrat Party says and what their propaganda machine – a.k.a. the mainstream media – report: in the entire 20th century, exactly two women have gone to any criminal court in any state for participating in their own abortions.  While it was a criminal offense in 31 states, it simply wasn’t done for the very simple reason that the pro-life movement has ALWAYS regarded the mother as one of the victims of abortion.  The first case, in 1911, was thrown out by the trial court outright.  The second case was thrown out by a higher court, which said in doing so, “the woman who commits an abortion on herself is regarded rather as the victim than the perpetrator of the crime.”

In other words, the pro-life movement and the pro-life Republican Party have NEVER punished or targeted women over abortion.

But the ignorance and demagoguery of Donald Trump, combined with the rabid deceit of liberals, makes it easy to fabricate a bogeyman where none does and none has EVER truly existed.

I think of Bruce – now “Caitlyn” – Jenner.  It’s interesting.  I disagree with what Bruce Jenner did to himself; but I’m nowhere even CLOSE to the hate of liberals in terms of intolerance.  Let me quote Jenner on that:

“I have gotten more flak for being a conservative Republican than I have for being trans,” Jenner said.

To wit: conservative evangelical Christians think that Bruce Jenner is sadly confused and wrong for advancing his transgender issues; liberals believe that being a Republican is EVIL and they go after us with a viciousness that we’ve NEVER used against them.  Which is why we’re seeing such fascist leftist hate being directed at Trump rallies and Trump supporters now; with liberals going INSIDE Trump events to violently disrupt them (like Brownshirt Nazis of Hitler’s day) and with liberals using the “system” to attack Trump supporters (which was what the Nazis did when they had the power to do so).  And as the liberal-leaning Atlantic points out, these fascist liberals are literally generating more Trump support because increasingly more and more people are just beyond fed up with rabid leftist fascism.

The fact of the matter is that conservatives have NEVER attacked liberals and used a fascist system to impose “law” and “justice” on those who break their rules the way liberals have routinely done.  So conservatives say, “We think you’re wrong, but we won’t take away your rights,” whereas liberals say, “You’re EVIL, and we’re entitled to do ANYTHING to stop you!”  And so while liberals are now literally using the power of the state to destroy Christians who are resolved to follow their Bibles and refuse to participate in homosexual marriage against their consciences, conservatives have never twisted the law to work the other way.    [End update].

So Donald Trump came out with a policy on abortion that lasted for like an hour before he came out with a completely different policy on abortion.  Let’s start with what he just said and then move to what he just said that wildly flies in the face of what he just said (sorry if you’re confused, but I wrote it correctly):

Trump said:

Trump’s initial comments on Wednesday came after a lengthy exchange with MSNBC host Chris Matthews, who pressured the Republican to give a yes or no answer to the question, “should abortion be punished.”

“There has to be some form of punishment,” Trump said during a televised town hall event.

“For the woman?” Matthews asked, to which Trump replied, “Yes.”

Trump declined to specify how women should be punished if they underwent an illegal abortion.

And then right after that Trump said:

Donald Trump scrambled to clarify his position on abortion Wednesday after he said women who undergo the procedure should face “some form of punishment” should the practice be outlawed.

Several hours later — after widespread condemnation from Trump’s presidential rivals and even leading anti-abortion groups — he walked back his remarks, releasing a statement in which he said that women who obtain abortions are victims and that doctors who perform the service are the ones who should be punished.

“If Congress were to pass legislation making abortion illegal and the federal courts upheld this legislation, or any state were permitted to ban abortion under state and federal law, the doctor or any other person performing this illegal act upon a woman would be held legally responsible, not the woman,” Trump said. “The woman is a victim in this case as is the life in her womb. My position has not changed — like Ronald Reagan, I am pro-life with exceptions.”

And Trump has previously said:

Trump had previously declined to answer the question about what penalties he would support for women who undergo abortions or doctors who perform them.
“I just don’t want to talk about that right now,” Trump said during a news conference January in Iowa. “Everybody knows my views and I think my views are very plain,” Trump said.

But before Trump previously said that he previously said this:

Throughout his campaign, Trump has faced questions about the authenticity of his position on abortion. He said he was “pro-choice in every respect” in a 1999 interview, though he said he hated the “concept of abortion.”

So what’s Donald Trump’s actual position on abortion?  Who the hell knows???  Donald Trump’s view on abortion is as clear as feces.

The mainstream media propaganda mill wants to frame the Republican Party with every stupidly-worded utterance that comes out of Trump’s mouth, but in point of fact both the rival GOP candidates immediately denounced Trump’s “women should be punished” statement.

That that “see how evil the ‘anti-abortion’ conservatives are?” meme flies in the face of actual reality doesn’t mean a flying DAMN to the left as this quote from the same CNN article on Trump and abortion that I cite above shows:

His comments on Wednesday appeared to be the latest in Trump’s persistent efforts to court the support of socially conservative voters. But his efforts backfired as three leading anti-abortion groups swiftly criticized Trump’s comments.
March for Life released the toughest statement of the three groups, calling Trump’s remarks “completely out of touch with the pro-life movement.”
“Being pro-life means wanting what is best for the mother and the baby. Women who choose abortion often do so in desperation and then deeply regret such a decision. No pro-lifer would ever want to punish a woman who has chosen abortion. This is against the very nature of what we are about,” the president of the group’s education and defense fund, Jeanne Marcini, said in a statement.
The National Right to Life Committee noted in a statement that it has never supported penalties against women who undergo abortions.
The Susan B. Anthony List chalked up Trump’s comments to his recent opposition to abortion rights and said punishments should only be dished out to “the abortionist.”

“Donald Trump said…” is hardly a statement anyone ought to believe.

This is rather like Donald Trump being “strong” on ISIS – after saying the United States has no role in the Middle East and we should sit back and allow Russia to deal with the terrorist monster.  You know, until San Bernardino, when he started saying the precise opposite.

GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump late Monday offered his approach for fighting with the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

“Why are we knocking ISIS, and yet at the same time we’re against [Syrian President Bashar] Assad? Let them fight, take over the remnants,” Trump said on CNN’s “Out Front,” calling Syria a “total catastrophe.”

“But more importantly, let Russia fight ISIS, if they want to fight them, in Syria,” Trump said. “We can fight them in Iraq,” Trump added.

“Let ISIS and Syria fight. And let Russia, they’re in Syria already, let them fight ISIS,” Trump said. “Let Russia take care of ISIS.” – Donald Trump, September 29, 2015

Versus:

I would just bomb those suckers, and that’s right, I’d blow up the pipes, I’d blow up the refineries, I’d blow up ever single inch, there would be nothing left. – Donald Trump, November 13, 2015

This is rather like Donald Trump being “strong” on allowing Syrian refugees to pour into the United States on humanitarian grounds.  You know, until after San Bernardino when he started blathering the exact opposite:

The United States should take in some refugees from Syria, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said Tuesday night.

“I hate the concept of it, but on a humanitarian basis, you have to,” Trump said in his first Fox News appearance in two weeks, appearing on “The O’Reilly Factor.” – Donald Trump, Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Versus what he says now:

Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump called President Obama a “fool” this week for his plans to resettle thousands of Syrian refugees in the U.S.

“Well look, if the president is somebody, you know — you could say he’s a fool, in a certain way — because everybody is saying don’t do it,” Trump said Thursday night on Fox News.
“He’s very arrogant, he’s very stubborn, he doesn’t want to listen to anybody, and he’s so wrong,” the business mogul added during the interview with host Sean Hannity.  – Donald Trump, December 2015

Jonah Goldberg previously said something to this effect and it’s true: on abortion and many of these other issues, Donald Trump is a liberal who is pretending to be a conservative and saying things that a liberal believes conservatives think.  The reason this cynical, hypocritical tactic has worked so well for him is simply this: most of his supporters are NOT conservative, but are in fact liberals and moderates.

But that underscores my two biggest problems with Trump.  He’s NOT a genuine conservative and has never been one, and my biggest problem with Donald Trump of all is that he’s been on the opposite damn side of EVERYTHING UNDER THE SUN.  Anyone who believes he’ll do any particular thing is an idiot.  Because he’s said the precise opposite and very likely not very long ago.

In this way, Trump is like Obama when Obama says something like, “As I’ve said” or “As I’ve been saying,” he is saying something markedly different from what he actually WAS saying.  And then there are the legions of “roachellectuals” who will explain what Obama actually meant to say when he said something that flies in the face of honesty or reality.

Let’s not forget the 37 documented times Obama said one thing and did the opposite on ObamaCare; let’s not forget all the other DOZENS of lies Obama told about ObamaCare.  Let’s not forget the 22 documented times Obama said one thing and did the opposite of what he said on illegal immigration and executive amnesty in flagrant violation of our nation’s laws.  An d all the other weasel games this fascist tyrant has played with our laws because he is not an honest man.

And Trump aint no different.

So we get to abortion and we can plainly see that Donald Trump doesn’t have a real core on this issue; he just winged it and then so what if he said the exact opposite???  So what if a man who said for DECADES that he was “pro-choice” in every respect” is now mouthing a position more extreme than anybody who actually dearly holds the position?  The fact of the matter is that Trump has never thought this issue through, that it is NOT a deeply-held conviction for him; but that he is merely saying whatever he thinks the itching ears of the people he is trying to fool want to hear so he can clinch the nomination and win the contest.

This is why Jimmy Carter basically said, “We can work with this guy Trump because he stands for NOTHING but Donald Trump”:

Former President Jimmy Carter told the British Parliament on Wednesday that if he had to choose between Republican candidates Donald Trump and Ted Cruz, he’d prefer to see Trump win the White House.

“I think I would choose Trump,” the liberal former president said to the House of Lords, when asked about the U.S. presidential race, “which may surprise some of you, but the reason is Trump has proven already that he’s completely malleable. I don’t think he has any fixed opinions that he would really go to the White House and fight for.”

By contrast, Mr. Carter said, “Ted Cruz is not malleable. He has far right-wing policies, in my opinion, that would be pursued aggressively if and when he would become president.”

What does Trump stand for?  Whatever is convenient for him to stand for at any particular moment.  You know, until he can bargain and horse-trade sacred positions in his “art of the deal.”

So no, conservatives don’t want to punish women.  The only people who DO want to actually punish women and damn near everyone else are LIBERALS, which is precisely what Donald Trump has been for nearly all of his life before he decided to turn the GOP nomination into a circus freak show.

I’ve written about Political Correctness and keep my description in a file so I can spit it out without agonizing over how to word the idiocy:

Being politically correct is not just a leftist way to make overly-sensitive people feel better. It was designed by early Marxists in Russia and the left continues to execute the tactic today: if you can control words, you can control thought; if you can control thought, you can control actions.  “PC” is an enormous, sophisticated and highly-coordinated effort to change Western culture as we know it by  redefining it, by controlling the cultural arguments by shaping the “acceptable” language people are allowed to use. And people with incredibly radical agendas have been exploiting this tactic for decades and it has succeeded.

I open a newspaper or watch a mainstream media news broadcast and I can’t be “pro-life.”  Read that CNN article I cite above again: they’re not “pro-life groups” on CNN’s description; rather they are “anti-abortion” groups.  If we were actually allowed to be “pro”-something it would depict a positive movement; and the left won’t have that.  The same thing with my being “pro-marriage”; I’m not “anti-gay,” I merely continue to hold the SAME VIEW OF MARRIAGE THAT EVERY SINGLE SOCIETY ON EARTH HELD FROM CREATION UNTIL A FEW YEARS AGO.  But for the wicked people who imposed a wicked view on society that had never existed in ANY civilization up to now re-wrote the lexicon so that I’m not “pro-marriage” but rather “anti-gay.”  It’s an unrelenting effort, and stupid people have fallen for it.

And this is a stupid nation on a planet full of stupid people.

The Democrat Party is so hateful it is pure-and-simple ANTI-LIFE.  That’s what “pro-abortion” actually means, that you are a rabid hater and exterminator of human life.  And thus you have directly participated in the torture-murder of sixty million innocent human beings since 1973.

I always am amazed at the moral AND intellectual vapid stupidity of the left.  They tell me that an unborn baby is not a human being.  Let’s consider something called “logic”: it is “human” by virtue of its parents; it is a “being” by virtue of the fact that it is a living, existing thing: IT IS A HUMAN BEING.  Let’s try something called “science”: Let’s run through the taxonomic system that classifies every single living thing that ever existed on planet earth with our unborn baby: That “fetus” (which is Latin for “unborn child” by the way) is classified as Kingdom-Animal; Phylum-Chordata; Class-Mammalia; Order-Primate; Family-Hominid; Genus-Homo; and Species-Sapiens.  Just like every human being whose life is precious.

And finally, let’s consider God’s Word which resolves any and all conflict for anyone capable of true morality:

You made all the delicate, inner parts of my body
and knit me together in my mother’s womb.

Thank You for making me so wonderfully complex!
Your workmanship is marvelous—how well I know it.

You watched me as I was being formed in utter seclusion,
as I was woven together in the dark of the womb.

You saw me before I was born.
Every day of my life was recorded in Your book.

Every moment was laid out
before a single day had passed. — Psalm 139:13-16

There’s a reason that the fire of hell is eternal, Democrat.  In fact, YOU are the reason.  Because eternity itself won’t last long enough for you to suffer for all the horror you are guilty of as you scream for a trillion times a trillion millennia to the trillionth power for every single NANOSECOND that you brutally stole from every single ONE of those innocent children you personally participated in murdering.

There’s going to come a reckoning when you ultimately stand before a Great White Throne and discover that God created that soul and you will be sentenced for every single one of those sixty-plus million times that you determined that YOU were god over that soul and brutally snuffed out innocent human life.

So let’s get to the gist of this: Democrats like Hillary Clinton trot out with such righteous indignation at Donald Trump wanting to “punish” women.

When they want to punish MEN, punish FATHERS.

Contemplate with me the “logic” of abortion.  At the moment of conception, frankly lasting until even AFTER the baby emerges living and breathing from the womb as far as many Democrats are concerned, a baby is NOT a “baby,” but rather something called “by-products of conception.”

It is an immoral injustice to fathers and to fatherhood every bit as much as it is a rabid deprivation of life of an innocent human being who deserved LIFE and was deprived of that life by a Democratic Party that is now TEN TIMES more guilty of moral crimes than the Nazis were.

Because to be a Democrat is to be a rabid hater of truth and reality just as you are a rabid hater of life.  And so in the same way your citizen-of-hell judges gazed into the Constitution like it was some kind of crystal ball and found “penumbras” formed by “emanations” to create a “right” literally out of thin air where none had ever existed before, you in the same manner created DEATH out of thin air when every society before you treasured human life and thanked God or the gods for it.

That’s why the Hippocratic Oath that every true doctor follows to this day says “I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy. In purity and holiness I will guard my life and my art.”  At least until you “created” a blasphemy of the original to mock the sacred intent of the original.  Now blasphemous Democrats have blasphemous “doctors” murdering people and dedicating their “art” to death.

As the Word of God declares:

There is a way that appears to be right, but in the end it leads to death. — Proverbs 14:12

The road to hell is paved with Democrats and their “good intentions.”  And Democrats call their intentions “good” because:

Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter! – Isaiah 5:20

But their “good intentions” aside, their way is LITERALLY the way of death.  And to vote Democrat today is to declare, “If there is a God, let me scream in the endless suffering of God’s agonizing fiery hell forever and ever and ever.”  You know – as Jesus put it THREE TIMES for emphasis – “where ‘the worms that eat them do not die, and the fire is not quenched'” (Mark 9:44, Mark 9:46 and Mark 9:48).

But you go ahead, Democrat.  You vote for hell.

But let’s continue with the “logic” of abortion: that baby is NOT a baby, but a non-human “by-product of conception.”  Okay, so mommy can kill it.  Because she’s NOT a mommy, is she?  To be a “mommy,” that thing in her womb would have to be a human being, and of course every single bound-for-screaming-hell Democrat knows that it’s NOT a human being.

Ah, but that “logic” swiftly evaporates when it comes to “daddy.”  Because what was that thing when “daddy” last had anything whatsoever to do with it?  It was NOT a baby, was it?  No, it was a non-human “by-product of conception” and worthy of death and destruction and quite literally the dumpster.  On Democrat-devil-logic.

But do Democrats let “daddy” off the hook?  NOOOOOOO.  Rather they scream with ever fiber of their rabid hate, “PUNISH HIM!  HOLD HIM RESPONSIBLE!  MAKE HIM PAY!!!”  The woman isn’t held responsible for her pregnancy; only the man is.  According to the “punishment” logic of the Democrat Party.

And this same man who is very clearly NOT a “father” by the identical same Democrat-devil-logic that was fabricated to allow a woman to murder her own baby is somehow held fully accountable for that “child” that he clearly could not have had anything to do with “fathering.”

That poor bastard has no say whatsoever in whether a baby lives or whether it dies.  But if “mommy” arbitrarily decides that what the hell, I flipped a damn coin and I’m keeping the baby,” well, then, he is PUNISHED by Democrats and by Democrat-devil-logic for the next eighteen years as he is legally compelled to pay “child support” for that thing which by their own devil logic was “by-products of conception” when he last had anything whatsoever to do with anything.

It’s either a child at the moment of conception or “the father” isn’t the father and CAN’T be “the father” and shouldn’t be held responsible in any way for anything.

Think about it: Democrats say that the FATHER ought to be forcibly compelled to provide child support.  For a child they rabidly denied WAS a child in the first place while they denied that the “father” was the FATHER of that child.

Should a father be compelled to support his child?  Of course he should; but that strictly implies that he is RECOGNIZED as “the father” of “a child” to BEGIN WITH.

The rabid Democrat denial of fatherhood has destroyed the family.  Every man who has sexual relations with a woman with the result that for some mysterious reason something called “by products of conception” that weirdly coincides on a one-to-one basis with a CHILD has the Democrat Party pseudo-logic to fall back to: “I’m not the father of anything.  I’m outta here.”

If I’m a “father,” then that’s MY kid in the womb where only Adam and Eve of all human beings who ever lived didn’t begin their lives.  That’s MY kid.  And if I am a “father” in any way, any shape or any form, I have a RIGHT to whether my kid lives or dies.  And it is therefore rather obvious the resentment and bitterness and subsequent abandonment that “fathers” have implemented in giant numbers since they were told that a) they WEREN’T fathers and had NO rights to their children unless b) the “mother” of that child made the arbitrary, random decision that she wanted to keep that child in which case c) some irrational and immoral “legal” process determines that wait-a-minute, it’s in our interests to label you the “father” after all: so pay up.

So please don’t misunderstand because devil-logic now permeates the rotting carcass of American pseudo-civilization: it’s not that Democrats are opposed to “punishment” at ALL; in fact they LOVE punishment.

Democrats merely demand that the baby be punished and the father be punished and the role of fatherhood itself be punished and any hint of traditional, sacred, godly marriage be punished.

The Democrat Party has ALWAYS been the party of Satan, since it fought a vicious war over slavery when their demonic “good intentions” led them to declare that black people were not “human beings.”

Watch as the mainstream media propaganda mill asks every Republican if he or she thinks “women should be punished.”  It’s a nice “gotcha question” and “reporters” LOVE hammering Republicans with gotcha questions.  But they won’t ever ask Hillary Clinton why she said Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood) is her hero when Margaret Sanger said that “We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”  Just as you won’t see them asking Hillary Clinton or any other Democrat why they hold a fundamentally irrational and immoral position that punishes “fathers” for the children they conceive while simultaneously holding that they are “fathers” who therefore have rights over their children to begin with.

The fact of the matter is that from the very moment of conception, we are human beings and as human beings we possess infinite, incommensurable value and that to ignore that fact and murder an innocent human being is a terrible moral crime against the very God who created us in His image.  The fact of the matter is, that every single father owes his child his SUPPORT and every single father owes her child LIFE.

And the fact of the matter is that the Democrat Party IS the party of wickedness in America and one day there most surely WILL be “some form of punishment.”

In this world, you go ahead and mock me, Democrat.  But your destiny is to ultimately stand before the Great White Throne (Revelation 20:11-15) and I wouldn’t be you for all the money and for all the pleasure in this world.

 

Cockroach Democrats Go From Supporting Bush’ War On Terror, To Claiming Being Like Bush Is Evil, To Claiming We’re Just Like Bush

December 30, 2015

If you are a Democrat, you are the lowest form of hypocrite there is, there ever has been or there ever will be.

Let me simply point out the fact that the Democrat Party voted to support George Bush’s War on Terror after the 9/11 attack, and then treasonously cut-and-ran on their duty WHILE OUR TROOPS WERE IN THE FIELD FIGHTING FOR THE WAR THEY VOTED FOR.  In fact, now-President Obama and President wanna-be Hillary Clinton BOTH voted to cut off all funding for our troops while they were still in the field fighting on foreign soil while hoping that traitors wouldn’t abandon them at home.  And at this point it is beyond obvious that the only way the United States will actually be able to end this war on terror with victory will be to hunt down every single Democrat  with dogs and burn them all alive.

Allow me to present the list of Democrat Senators who voted for George Bush’s Iraq War Resolution.  I made the list easier to see by pasting in only those Democrats who voted “yes.”  Note that the final tally of 29 Democrats voting yes – which represents very nearly 60% of all Democrats in the U.S. Senate – is cited:

Senate Roll Call: Iraq Resolution

Friday, October 11, 2002

Following is an alphabetical listing by state of how each senator voted on President Bush’s Iraq resolution. A “yes” vote was a vote to grant President Bush the power to attack Iraq unilaterally. A “no” vote was a vote to defeat the measure. Voting “yes” were 29 Democrats and 48 Republicans. Voting “no” were 1 Republican, 21 Democrats, and 1 Independent.

Arkansas Blanche Lincoln (D): Yes
California Dianne Feinstein (D): Yes
Connecticut Christopher Dodd (D): Yes Joseph Lieberman (D): Yes
Delaware Joseph Biden (D): Yes Thomas Carper (D): Yes
Florida Bill Nelson (D): Yes
Georgia Max Cleland (D): Yes Zell Miller (D): Yes
Indiana Evan Bayh (D): Yes
Iowa Tom Harkin (D): Yes
Louisiana John Breaux (D): Yes Mary Landrieu (D): Yes
Massachusetts John Kerry (D): Yes
Missouri Jean Carnahan (D): Yes
Montana Max Baucus (D): Yes
Nebraska Ben Nelson (D): Yes
Nevada Harry Reid (D): Yes
New Jersey Robert Torricelli (D): Yes
New Mexico
New York Hillary Clinton (D): Yes Charles Schumer (D): Yes
North Carolina John Edwards (D): Yes
North Dakota Byron Dorgan (D): Yes
South Carolina Ernest “Fritz” Hollings (D): Yes
South Dakota Thomas Daschle (D): Yes Tim Johnson (D): Yes
Washington Maria Cantwell (D): Yes
West Virginia Jay Rockefeller (D): Yes
Wisconsin Herb Kohl (D): Yes

Notice also that all of the top Democrats of the time voted “yes” including Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Joe Biden and Harry Reid.

But just like Bush?  Not on your life.  Bush stayed the course; Democrats cut and ran like the cut-and-run roaches that they are.  Bush had integrity; Democrats had cynical exploitation.

And let me point out the fact that to the extent that George W. Bush failed in his war on terror, maybe – just maybe – we ought to do something DIFFERENT and not follow in the same basic fallacy that Bush pursued.  I submit that Bush made two fundamental mistakes: 1) he refused to consider the religious motivation of the Islamic jihadists and confront Islam with its profound and possibly pathological problem of religious-inspired violence; and 2) Bush wrongly believed that “democracy” was an intrinsic good and that any people who voted would vote for freedom when the fact of the matter is that bad and ignorant people will vote in a bad and ignorant way.  And I further submit that since Barack Obama’s strategy has now failed about a thousand times worse than Bush’s – realize that Islamic State emerged COMPLETELY out of the failure of Obama to fight the “war on terror” that he steadfastly refused to even acknowledge and we’ve paid DEARLY for his foolish mistake – maybe we need to pursue a completely different policy and recognize Islamic terrorism and the roots that are sustaining it for what it clearly is.

Anyway, here’s the current story framed the way Democrats want you  to see things now:

On Muslims, Democrats Find an Unlikely Ally: George W Bush
By josh lederman, associated press
·WASHINGTON — Dec 25, 2015, 1:00 PM ET

Taunted by Republicans to declare war on “radical Islamic terrorism,” Democrats are turning to an unlikely ally: George W. Bush.

President Barack Obama, under pressure to be more aggressive on terrorism, regularly cites his predecessor’s refusal to demonize Muslims or play into the notion of a clash between Islam and the West. It’s a striking endorsement from a president whose political rise was predicated on opposition to the Iraq war and Bush’s hawkish approach in the Middle East.

As Hillary Clinton put it, “George W. Bush was right.”

Don’t you DARE try to grab hold of Bush’s coattails now, you miserable ROACHES.

I just want to keep pointing out what I’ve been saying for the official record. Go back in time to early 2011 – when Obama was claiming he had healed the planet – and you’ll find me having said this.  Note in particular the bold-face and italicized paragraph:

Basically, the Judeo-Christian worldview – “Christendom,” if you like – has been treated like a salad bar in the Western Civilization that had been forged by Christianity, and secular humanists can pick out the parts that they like and throw away the rest.  But it’s not a salad bar; Judeo-Christianity as both a religion and a worldview is far more like the foundations of a great building.  And what these secular humanists have been doing is pulling out the foundational pillars one block at a time until there is nothing left to sustain the surrounding structure.

Which is precisely why the West – which used to be called “Christendom” – is now on the verge of complete collapse on virtually every level.

I see the war on terror, and from the start I have seen the glaring flaw in our strategy (yes, even when George Bush was waging it).  Basically, we have confronted totalitarian Islam on the military, political and economic fronts.  But we have utterly ignored the religious front – which is precisely the major front by which totalitiarian Islam has been attacking us.  Like it or not, 9/11 was a religious act.  And there has been no major movement whatsoever – either by the Western powers or by the movements within Islam itself – to confront the religious grounds of the totalitarian Islamists.

And the reason is because we have nothing to confront them with.  Secular humanists/atheists have undermined public religious expression at every turn, while cultural relativists have contextualized religion in such a way to strip it of any spiritual power whatsoever.  Now when we truly need true spiritual power to confront the demonic power motivating radical Islam, basically all we’ve got is allegorical dirt clods.

In the sphere of Islam, jihadists have the superior Qu’ranic argument that it is THEY who are carrying out Muhammad’s vision for Islam, not the liberal Westernized contextualizers who want to make very clear claims of Muhammad into metaphors and allegories representing something else.  Muhammad was a man of genuine violence; he had been in some thirty military campaigns in his life; he had committed numerous genocidal campaigns against “infidels”; and he had another thirty military campaigns planned at the time of his death, including the conquest of Western Europe as the means to spread Islam (“submission”) and the call of Allahu Akbar (a comparative which means “Allah is greater”).  If Muhammad is in any way, shape or form a representative paradigm of what it means to be “Muslim,” then the jihadists are right.

And liberalism – whether it be religious/theological or political/cultural liberalism – has exactly what to answer that?  Other than mocking or trivializing it?

Did political liberals – like the liberal rabbis from the LA Times article above – truly believe that we overcome the threat of terrorism by simply changing the name to “overseas contingency operation” from “war on terror”?

As bad as the religion of Allah may be for a free society, it has a great deal of force when the competition is cultural nothingness, the decaying leftovers of “salad bar pseudo-Judeo-Christianity.”

Notice I point out I’d argued this many times before, but I just don’t have the time to go back and search for my earliest argument for the fact that ignoring the very clearly Islamic tie to terrorism is and has been a giant mistake and that we cannot win if we don’t understand why our enemy keeps wanting to see us spitting blood as they jubilantly cut our heads off.

And Bush was also fundamentally wrong in his insistence that bringing “democracy” to the Middle East would make that region a better place given the simple fact that bad people will vote in a bad way.  I’ll simply put it in the words of founding father James Madison who said, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”  And I’ll further point out that while Islam might be “religious” it is NOT “moral” by any Judeo-Christian standard that values human dignity and freedom.  It is no accident that while democracy emerged out of Judeo-Christianity and every single “Christian” nation has become a democracy, not one single Islamic country has EVER become a democracy in the 1,500 year history of Islam.  Asking Muslims to create a democratic republic is like asking elephants to build a space ship.  Neither is going to happen without a massive transformation in either the elephant or the Muslim.

So I just want to point out for the factual record that I don’t CARE what Bush said.  BUSH WAS WRONG.  I said it YEARS ago back when it mattered.  I said it before Obama’s horrible, godawful foreign policy that made Bush’s look like the greatest thing since sliced bread had the wheels completely fall off and we started watching in horror as Obama has since kept trying to drag the wheel-less cart by sheer undying moral idiocy rather than simply admit he was wrong.

Here are a number of article titles I came across while I was searching for the above quote that highlight rather key differences between Bush and Obama and conservatives and liberals:

On the article from the liberal “journalist” who wishes a terrorist had been a conservative tea party member, let’s just realize how COMMON that vile attitude is among liberals.  Samual L. Jackson, actor, liberal and demonic turd, just got through telling the world that when he heard about the San Bernardino terror attack, his very first thought was “how much I really wanted that to just be another, you know, crazy white dude, and not really some Muslims.”  Because like ALL Democrats he is a pathological RACIST BIGOT who hates Americans and therefore lives in an alternate reality where it is the American white people he so despises who are guilty of all the sins in the world.  He goes on to label the sort of people who just murdered 14 human beings as ” the new young black men.”

No, don’t be comparing Obama to Bush or Democrat-fool foreign policy to Republicans.  Just DON’T.  You damn hypocrite liars.  You damn and damnable liberals are SO wrapped up and enmeshed in the Muslim Monsters who are trying to murder us it makes me sick.  You both want the same damn thing: the State worshipped as God and the people trampled upon as they are compelled to do your bidding by force.

Also keep in mind that President George W. Bush PREDICTED the meltdown in Iraq if a future fool were to try to undo what Bush had at great cost managed to finally do:

“I know some in Washington would like us to start leaving Iraq now. To begin withdrawing before our commanders tell us we are ready would be dangerous for Iraq, for the region and for the United States. It would mean surrendering the future of Iraq to al Qaeda. It would mean that we’d be risking mass killings on a horrific scale. It would mean we’d allow the terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq to replace the one they lost in Afghanistan. It would mean increasing the probability that American troops would have to return at some later date to confront an enemy that is even more dangerous.” — President Bush, 2007

Which is EXACTLY what happened because our Fool-in-Chief began his fool presidency doing the following:

US-IRAQ: Generals Seek to Reverse Obama Withdrawal Decision
By Gareth Porter

WASHINGTON, Feb 2 2009 (IPS) – CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus, supported by Defence Secretary Robert Gates, tried to convince President Barack Obama that he had to back down from his campaign pledge to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months at an Oval Office meeting Jan. 21.

But Obama informed Gates, Petraeus and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen that he wasn’t convinced and that he wanted Gates and the military leaders to come back quickly with a detailed 16-month plan, according to two sources who have talked with participants in the meeting.

Obama’s decision to override Petraeus’s recommendation has not ended the conflict between the president and senior military officers over troop withdrawal, however. There are indications that Petraeus and his allies in the military and the Pentagon, including Gen. Ray Odierno, now the top commander in Iraq, have already begun to try to pressure Obama to change his withdrawal policy.

A network of senior military officers is also reported to be preparing to support Petraeus and Odierno by mobilising public opinion against Obama’s decision.

Petraeus was visibly unhappy when he left the Oval Office, according to one of the sources. A White House staffer present at the meeting was quoted by the source as saying, “Petraeus made the mistake of thinking he was still dealing with George Bush instead of with Barack Obama.”

So don’t EVER let ANY Democrat cite Obama now.

Bush didn’t do that.  Bush warned AGAINST doing that.  It was OBAMA who foolishly abandoned Iraq against every single one of his generals’ recommendations and them demonically and deceitfully tried to blame it on Bush and on a status of forces agreement that had NOTHING to do with Obama’s stupid decision-making.

Bush WON the war in Iraq: Vice President Joe Biden claimed that fact, saying:

“I am very optimistic about — about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You’re going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You’re going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government,” said Biden.

Bush WON the war in Iraq.  Barack Obama claimed that fact, claiming in 2009 “an Iraq that is sovereign, stable, and self-reliant.”

Bush WON the war in Iraq.  Even Bush’s terrorist enemies acknowledged it by saying in their radio transmissions that were intercepted, “We are defeated, don’t send any more foreign fighters.”

Bush WON the war in Iraq.  OBAMA LOST IT BECAUSE OBAMA IS A WICKED FOOL.

Terrorism has EXPLODED under Obama by EVERY metric you want to use.  Deaths from terrorism have already QUADRUPLED under Obama; and the wicked fool’s still got over a year left that we can already see are going to be so much worse it’s not even REAL.  Realize that in the first five years of Obama’s failed rule, terrorism exploded 150 percent.   But that’s NOTHING because terrorism under Obama exploded by ANOTHER 81 percent just last year alone.  How do you think 2015 is going to look, you Democrat FOOL???

Because Barack Obama is the most demon-possessed FOOL who has EVER LIVED, we are now seeing the worst refugee crisis in the entire recorded history of planet earth.

No, Barack Obama is NOTHING like George Bush.

And the Democrat Party is the party of Satan himself.  And Satan is laughing and laughing and maniacally laughing as evil EXPLODES because he owns the soul of every single Democrat.  And that is why these sodomy-worshiping baby butchering Marxists are one day going to share Satan’s ultimate eternal destiny.

So just to recap, Democrats who demonically, treacherously and in fact treasonously betrayed and back-stabled their commander-in-chief and the troops they had voted to authorized to fight under him before they abandoned their duty are cowards and liars of the very lowest sort to now try to argue that they are the ones who are the true bearers of Bush’s mantle.

 

Barack Obama Is A Liar. And The American People Know He’s A Liar. The Question Is, Does Anybody Give A Damn About Truth Anymore?

April 17, 2014

Do the American people believe Obama’s dishonest bullcrap any longer?

Not so much:

Poll: Most Americans believe Obama lies on important issues
By Charles Hoskinson  | APRIL 17, 2014 AT 10:53 AM

How much do Americans trust President Obama? Not much, according to a Fox News poll.

Sixty-one percent of respondents in the poll released Thursday said Obama lies at least some of the time on important issues. An additional 20 percent said he lies every now and then.

Only 15 percent believe the president is completely truthful.

“Lies” as in DELIBERATELY says things that he KNOWS are false.  Obama knows he’s looking you right in the eye and lying to your face, but he does it anyway.

The article points out that there is some political bias going on in the perception:

Predictably, Republicans were more likely to believe Obama is a liar, with 85 percent saying he lies some or most of the time. Thirty-one percent of Democrats said the president is always truthful.

Two things.  Thing one: “Thirty-one percent of Democrats”?  Less than a third of the man’s own damn party???  That aint so good.  I’m sure other roaches have a far higher opinion about their lead roach.  And thing two, well, I’ll let the article say it and just comment afterward:

What’s interesting is that independents were slightly more likely to believe Obama lies at least some of the time — 63 percent, compared with 61 percent for the total sample.

Yeah, Independents are actually MORE likely to believe Obama is a dishonest lying sack of bovine filth than Republicans are.

So, it really turns out that the only truly “biased” people are the Democrats who rabidly insist on believing their lying Führer no matter what.  We’ve seen that rabid mindset before.  But the fact is that not only are Independent voters with the Republicans, but they are actually even MORE with Republicans than Republicans are in that they are even more likely to point a finger in Obama’s face and snarl, “YOU LIAR!”

By the way:

The April 13-15 poll of 1,012 registered voters had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. Democrats were 39 percent of the sample, Republicans 38 percent and independents 20 percent.

Which is to say (again) that the only people who would find “bias” in this poll are the biased Democrats who are totally out of step with reality and with the rest of the universe.

Here’s the thing.  It wasn’t all that long ago that Obama would have been done with this kind of perception.  His own party would have turned against him, the way Nixon was done when his own Republican Party said, “That’s it.  We’re better than this and we’re definitely better than YOU, Tricky Dick.”  Not long ago, Obama would have been giving his final pathetic wave as president as he flew away before the people showed up with pitchforks and torches to burn the monster.

This isn’t – or at least it shouldn’t be – just about the lies by which Obama sold ObamaCare to the American people and then got re-elected based on the same lies told over and over and over again.  This is a man who began his campaign with lie after lie.  He slandered his predecessor based on lies, such as his attack on George Bush as “irresponsible” and “unpatriotic” for allowing the debt to increase by $4 trillion during his eight years only to increase it himself by nearly $8 trillion in only five years.  This is a man who demonized his opponents in the GOP for voting against his debt ceiling increase when HE HIMSELF voted against the debt increase when he was a Senator.  This is a man who routinely demonizes and slanders his opponents for their “war on women” when HE HIMSELF is far more vicious against women in HIS OWN “boy’s club” and in HIS OWN “gender gap” “wage disparity” than his opponents have EVER been.

Barack Obama is a lying, dishonest, cynical political opportunist without shame, without honor, without virtue and without decency.  And he always HAS been from his first day on the campaign trail.  Obama literally BEGAN his campaign for the presidency with a lie having broken his promise:

MR. RUSSERT: When we talked back in November of ‘04, after your election, I said, “There’s been enormous speculation about your political future. Will you serve your full six-year term as a United States senator from Illinois?”

Obama: “Absolutely.”

SEN. OBAMA: I will serve out my full six-year term. You know, Tim, if you get asked enough, sooner or later you get weary and you start looking for new ways of saying things, but my thinking has not changed.

MR. RUSSERT: But, but—so you will not run for president or vice president in 2008?

SEN. OBAMA: I will not.

And in being the first major party nominee to refuse to accept matching funds, Obama didn’t just fundamentally transform the nature of American campaigns by blowing open the doors to money as has never been seen in politics, but he LIED:

In November 2007, Obama answered “Yes” to Common Cause [and to a questionnaire by the Midwest Democracy Network] when asked “If you are nominated for President in 2008 and your major opponents agree to forgo private funding in the general election campaign, will you participate in the presidential public financing system?”

versus:

Barack Obama made it official today: He has decided to forego federal matching funds for the general election, thereby allowing his campaign to raise and spend as much as possible.

By so doing, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee becomes the first candidate to reject public funds for the general election. The current system was created in 1976 in reaction to the Watergate scandal.

Barack Obama has ALWAYS been a liar.  And those who hate the truth have always been his most ardent supporters.

Obama has spent his career slandering and demonizing his opponents with his “war on women” slander and has “my opponents want dirtier air, dirtier water and children born with Down Syndrome and Autism” vileness.

That, too, is just another lie from hell from a liar from hell.  Lest you have conveniently forgotten, Barack Obama’s “signature promise” to the American people was that he would “transcend the political divide.”  He lied.  And the only people who believe that the political climate that has become more bitter than ever is the Republicans’ faults are the pure, rabid, toxic liars who have supported Obama and his ocean of lies.

Obama’s pathological dishonesty has taken it’s toll on America’s national security.  Obama is the man who issued a “red line” warning if Syria used chemical weapons.  And then did NOTHING as they used them repeatedly.  And now Obama is threatening Vladimir Putin on an almost daily basis if Putin keeps doing what Putin keeps doing.  Because nobody believes a thing our Empty-Suit-in-Chief says anymore.

Obama has already been kissing the dirt of Nixon with his own poll numbers.  And that is with the most dishonest propaganda mill since the Soviet Union’s TASS and the Nazi Party’s Ministry of Propaganda spinning the news for their messiah.

But times have changed.  America is a much fouler place.

We are a nation of Pontius Pilates, a nation who skeptically asks, “What IS truth?”

And just like Pilate, we have turned out backs on the Man who is truth’s very embodiment.  And that is because we turned out backs on the values of that Man that made discerning truth even possible.

From the Great City on a hill that many of our founding fathers envisioned, we are a nation that is in darkness just as Israel was in a darkness of wickedness and moral relativism in their darkest days.  We are a people who do that which is right in our own eyes, rather than in God’s.

We find out that our president is a wicked, dishonest man and our response is to yawn in boredom and stuff another handful of potato chips in our faces.

God is patient, yes He is.  I already would have handed out “Flood, Part Deux” were I in God’s place.  And that’s just one of many reasons why I praise and honor God for being God.  But that said, we also know that God is not mocked as those who are deceived think He can be.  What a man sows, that he will also reap.  And what a nation plants, it will surely harvest.  Which is why Longfellow pointed out the truth that “Though the mills of God grind slowly; Yet they grind exceeding small.”

And that is why we are a nation on the way out.  It is why when we collapse, there will be no part of what used to be America big enough to survive.  And it is why it will be no shame when we go the way of the failed empires before us.

God is going to judge this nation as a nation that tolerates lies and that tolerates wicked policies based on those lies.  And as I look around, I see a people and a nation that is ALREADY being ground down.

America has lived by lies, and it will surely perish because of those lies.

 

‘Non-Stop’ Liberal Fascism And The Vileness Of Liberalism Which ALWAYS Twists Truth And Reality

April 15, 2014

What the hell – and I DO mean “hell” because hell is IN these people – is wrong with liberals?

Here’s the latest outrage in which liberals “twist” truth and reality by making the real-life villains the victims and the heroes while making the real-life victims and heroes the villains:

On Saturday, Breitbart.com reported that the villain in Liam Neeson’s new action thriller, “Non-Stop,” is a 9/11 family member who also served in the military.

“‘Non-Stop’ is a good movie,” John Nolte wrote. “Heck, it is darn near very good. But the left-wing sucker punch at the end is a new low, even for Hollywood.”

Nolte said the villain joined the military after losing a loved on in the terror attack on the World Trade Center, but became disillusioned by the ongoing wars.

So, the veteran decides to blow everyone up on a plane so the air marshal can get blamed, causing airport security to be tightened even further.

Worse yet, Nolte added, the villain’s sidekick turns out to be an American military member willing to murder 150 innocent people for money.

Moreover, Nolte said the “one passenger on the plane who is forever helpful, kind, reasonable, noble, and never under suspicion is a Muslim doctor dressed in traditional Muslim garb including a full beard.”

Glenn Beck also excoriated the movie, according to a post at The Blaze.

“It is really great, until you find out that the killer is U.S. military and a guy who believes in the Constitution,” he said sarcastically. “Oh, darn it. Did I just wreck that movie for everybody? Oh, I didn’t mean to…”

Beck said that even in liberal New York, the ending was met with groans.

“I’m not going to say anymore, except the killer is … a schoolteacher and so you completely dismiss him,” he added. “And there’s a little hole in the bathroom where they do a blow-dart, and they kill the pilot.”

The Blaze added:

Beck said the killer’s rationale was something “nonsensical” along the lines of: “It’s the government that has been putting people like you, you drunkard, on planes and allowing you to be our TSA. And that’s just wrong. So I’m going to blow everything up and take the money. I’ve got a parachute here, so I’m going to live. And I’m going to take all the money, and I’m going to get away with it. A-ha, ha-ha, ha-ha, ha-ha.”

He also said the movie shows that “no amount of research … can help these people in Hollywood,” because they simply do not understand what a “wildly, wildly insulting movie” they made.

Beck’s advise: “Don’t go see Non-Stop.”

Nolte had even harsher words: “Sc**w you, Hollywood.”

“Non-Stop” is rated PG-13 by the Motion Picture Association of America for “intense sequences of action and violence, some language, sensuality and drug references,” and was given two out of four stars by the Associated Press‘ Jake Coyle.

That’s right.  It doesn’t matter if in REALITY Muslims are responsible for 99.99999% of all terrorist attacks and 9/11 victims’ families and the heroes who served are responsible for 0.0000001%.  Because to be “liberal” means to think just the opposite of reality and piss on the truth.

Liberals are the people who constantly assure us that Nazis are “right-wing” because everybody apparently just knows that if there was a “National Socialist American Workers Party” the way Nazi stood for “National Socialist German Workers Party,” it would be a conservative Republican Party.  Because you know how we conservatives adore “socialism” and “workers parties” and how much the left despises them.

Oh, wait.  It’s the other way around.  Not that lying liberals give a damn.

Liberals have managed to assure us that women who want to murder their own babies are heroes and victims and the babies they kill are worthless things that have no right to life.  Babies, liberals assure us, have the duty to die for the convenience of their mommies much the same way that Jews had the duty to die for the convenience of Adolf.

Liberals have managed to assure us that homosexual men who lust after being bending over and being sodomized by another man after sucking him to orgasm are “normal” and the people who recognize that these people are depraved, unnatural perverts are the weirdos.

LIberals have managed to assure us that snarling black men who join the Black Panthers with the following message –

We didn’t come out here to play. There is to much serious business going on in your black community to be sliding through south street with white, dirty cracker whores on your arms. What’s a matter with you black man, you got a doomsday with a white woman on your arm.
……
“We keep begging white people for freedom. No wonder we’re not free. Your enemy can not make you free fool. You want freedom you’re going to have to kill some crackers. You’re going to have to kill some of their babies.

Let us get our act together. It’s time to wake up, clean up, and stand up.”

I can’t wait for the day that they’re all dead. I won’t be completely happy until I see our people free and Whitey dead.”

“When you have 10 brothers in uniform, suited and booted and ready for war, white folks know these niggas ain’t their niggas. We kick white folks asses. We take it right to the cracker.”

We’re going to keep putting our foot up the white man’s ass until they understand completely. We want freedom, justice and mutha[expletive]‘ equality. Period. If you ain’t gonna give it to us, mutha[expletive], we’re gonna take it, in the name of freedom.”

– aren’t racist at all.  They aren’t racist – morally depraved jackass liberal pseudo-intellectuals tell us – because black people are people who hold both the presidency and the attorney generalship and are therefore victims forever and thus incapable of “racism.”  Do you know who IS racist?  Republicans.  Not ALL Republicans, they tell us out of their fairness and decency.  Just ALMOST all of them:

WASHINGTON — “Not all” Republicans are racist, said Rep. Steve Israel (D-N.Y.) on Sunday, but “to a significant extent, the Republican base has elements that are animated by racism, and that’s unfortunate.”

Israel’s comment was in response to a question from CNN’s Candy Crowley, who asked the chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee about remarks by Attorney General Eric Holder this week. In a speech to a civil rights group, Holder questioned his treatment by Republican lawmakers at a House Judiciary Committee hearing, and implied that race may have played a role.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) also suggested this past week that racism was a factor in the Republican party’s opposition to immigration reform. “I think race has something to do with the fact that they’re not bringing up an immigration bill,” Pelosi told reporters, adding, “I’ve heard them say to the Irish, if it were just you, this would be easy.”

Which of course means that the same “almost” all of the 54% of Americans who voted to have that Republican majority are clearly “racist,” too.

And of course, liberals have assured us that it is “racist” to try to limit or reduce illegal voting in any way, shape or form.  But that it is most definitely NOT “racist” to stand outside a voting place with clubs threatening and mocking voters of the other political party (and see here and here).

Liberals have assured us that Jesus was a socialist who demanded that King Herod and Pontius Pilate be empowered to radically expand big government to “help” the poor with institutionalized welfare rather than saying to His disciples, “YOU feed them.”  In the same vein, liberals have assured us that Barack Obama and Joe Biden – who gave poor people VIRTUALLY NOTHING from their own wealth are “generous” and that men like Mitt Romney and Dick Cheney – who gave 28% and 78% of their respective incomes to charity – are “selfish.”

Democrats and liberals are people who pathologically pervert the truth and slander reality.

I am so sick to my soul of twisted and perverted liberal “morality” that makes a mockery of everything the Word of God declares it is beyond unreal.

 

 

Even More Defiant Of Reality Than Adolf Hitler: Evil, Insane Obama Budget Rejected By House 413-2 (That Means Democrats Too, Bozo)

April 14, 2014

Is Barack Obama a “leader” or is he Adolf Hitler raving crazily in his bunker having led his nation into ruin with nobody listening to his crazed idiocy?

If a budget is any indication – and yeah, it really IS given the fact that governments must function on budgets – Obama is actually more out-of-touch with reality and more ignored by his fellow fascists than Hitler was in his bunker.

You might want to read my article:

Obama, After His 2012 Budget Was Voted Down 97-0 and His 2013 Budget Was Voted Down 414-0 BY EVERY DEMOCRAT, Has Chutzpah To Demonize GOP Budget As ‘Radical’

to see what a crazed, radical ideologue fascist Obama has been from the outset of his Führership.  He has been a man who has pathologically refused to work toward any kind of consensus whatsoever – frankly even within his own Nazi Party – depending instead on lies, demagoguery, slander and executive orders.

In that 2012 article, after documenting the facts, I wrote:

So the only meaningful question is whether we should be talking about Obama’s 0-97 “support” last year or his 0-414 “endorsement” this year.

Let’s just get one thing clear, Barack Obama, who had his 2012 budget handed back to him with 0-97 support from his own Senate and his 2013 budget handed back to him with 0-414 support from Congress, is frankly un-American and pathologically socialist.

A statement from Obama when the Republican leadership approached him in January 2009 says it all:

After the last election, when the “so called Messiah” was elected, John McCain had the temerity to ask him if he was going to work with the republicans. Obama said, “I won the election, John. Elections have consequences.”  This statement was the precursor of what was to come.

Obama proceeded to ram through a massively failed $862 billion stimulus (actually $3.27 trillion, according to a CBO analysis) and a wildly unconstitutional, wildly failed and wildly unpopular ObamaCare as his two signature acts.  Obama rammed these monstrosities through larded with pork, partisan boondoggles and gimmicks of every kind with virtually ZERO Republican support.

I just want you to understand what a dishonest and frankly evil man Barack Obama is before moving forward.

That said, let’s see what this radical socialist ideologue – who has not received so much as even a SINGLE vote from his own party in two years of lies and demagoguery, has to say about Paul Ryan’s budget

Has Obama learned a damn thing?  Is this fool capable of learning a damn thing?

So Close: House Rejects Obama Budget 413-2
Guy Benson | Apr 10, 2014

UPDATE– The House has passed the Ryan budget 219-205. The ‘Path to Prosperity’ received 217 more votes than the president’s budget. You can read the GOP’s plan here. My summary is here.
*** Original Post ***
Last we checked in on the budget battle in DC, our post-partisan president was smirkingly denouncing House Republicans’ fiscal blueprint as a “stink burger” and “meanwich.” The wit! The erudition! With Congress’ lower chamber poised to pass Paul Ryan’s ‘Path to Prosperity‘ — which reduces the rate of federal spending increases, reforms Medicare and balances within ten years — the House first took up President Obama’s budget proposal. Might this qualify as a “stink burger?”

The House on Wednesday handily rejected a GOP budget alternative based on President Obama’s 2015 spending blueprint. It was defeated 2-413, following a pattern seen in recent years in House votes to overwhelmingly reject Obama’s budget proposals. Today’s vote is just slightly better than the unanimous vote against Obama’s budget in 2012. The two “yes” votes came from Reps. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio) and Jim Moran (D-Va.), who is retiring…An Obama administration official agreed with House Democrats that the GOP substitute was not an accurate reflection of Obama’s budget plan. “The Administration would welcome votes on the actual provisions of President’s Budget,” said Office of Management and Budget spokesman Steve Posner. “That is not what this amendment represents, and a vote for or against this amendment is not a vote for or against the President’s policies.” But Republicans rejected these complaints, and defended the idea of consider Obama’s latest proposal as a way to let the House consider all budget options. “Any time the president of the United States takes the time to produce a budget, it merits a debate,” Mulvaney said. “I think it’s a valid discussion we should have every year.” Mulvaney also offered the president’s budget as a mock alternative in 2012, which was rejected 0-414. Republicans could not offer it last year because the president’s budget was submitted late — instead, Mulvaney tried to offer a blank sheet of paper to represent Obama’s budget, but it was not made in order.

I must have missed Mulvaney’s blank page budget gambit last year, which deserves points for being amusing and for highlighting the fact that the Obama White House can’t be bothered to meet statutory budget deadlines. He might try the same thing as a proxy for Senate Democrats’ FY 2015 proposal, which does not and will not exist. Harry Reid’s caucus has declined to participate in the legally-mandated budgeting process for the fourth time in five years. The White House and House Democrats can claim that the GOP’s version of Obama’s budget wasn’t an “accurate reflection” of the original document, but it essentially lifted Obama’s entire vision and dropped it into legislative language. In reality, all but two Democrats — one of whom was this guy — chose not to attach themselves to the president’s plan, which calls for the following:

President Obama’s 2015 Budget Proposal:(1) Never balances. Ever.

(2) Increases spending, ballooning the national debt by $8.3 trillion over the budget window — $1 trillion beyond than the unsustainable current trajectory. Under Obama’s plan, the red ink on the above chart would be steeper, sooner.

(3) Raises taxes by an additional $1.8 trillion (and again, never balances).

(4) Makes no attempt at reforming the gathering tidal wave of unfunded promises that Obama has admitted in the past are driving a long-term debt crisis.

To their credit, and unlike their Senate colleagues, House Democrats will offer an alternative budget of their own. But Phil Kerpen notices that it’s missing something:

The section on Obamacare ends with this defiant statement of policy: “the law of the land should support making affordable health care coverage available to every American family, and therefore the Affordable Care Act should not be repealed.” And that’s it. Don’t repeal it. Don’t acknowledge any of the problems. Don’t do anything to help any of the people whose lives have been thrown into disarray. And certainly don’t do anything to “fix it.” It couldn’t be clearer: members who vote for this budget think Obamacare does not need to be fixed. Indeed it’s hard to read the Democratic budget as anything but a celebration of Obamacare exactly as it is – and that adds insult to the many Americans who have been injured by the law.

In other words, House Democrats’ budget reflects the opinion of those six percent of Americans who believe Obamacare is working well as is. For all their public assurances about “fixing Obamacare” (which didn’t pay dividends for them in Florida), Democrats oppose one of the most popular fixes to the law, their party chairwoman can’t think of a single change she’d make, and their governing document offers zero fixes. Seems legit.

Obama is a creature – a monster, to be more specific – of his own fascist party.  In 2011, I documented the fact that:

Today Is the 900th Day Since Democrats Bothered To Pass a Budget

Well after that, Democrats FINALLY bothered to obey the damn law and the Constitution just long enough to actually pass a budget which they had refused to do for YEARS.

Democrats are people – and this is simply a fact beyond legitimate question – who defy the law, defy process, defy the Constitution (specifically in this case Article I of the Constitution).  And then they fascistically govern by tyranny rather than by any legitimate rule of law.

 

Liberals Put ‘God’ Back In Platform Over Boos. As A Pure Rhetorical Tactic Only, Obviously

September 8, 2012

Ah, the toxic, rabid, toxic Democrat Party has found its voice, I see.

Cardinal Dolan prayed.  What more do Democrats need to pour their hate on him?

You’ll have to excuse the language.  What can I say?  I’m quoting Democrats, and they are only capable of speaking Cockroach:

Liberals cuss out Archbishop Timothy Cardinal Dolan
Posted at 12:56 am on September 7, 2012 by Twitchy Staff

I just gotta say it: Fuck you, Dolan. No, seriously. Fuck you.

As Twitchy reported earlier, New York Archbishop Timothy Cardinal Dolan’s closing benediction was the DNC speech of the night.

Despite being unable able to watch Dolan’s prayer on most networks, liberals didn’t waste any time making clear their displeasure:

Glad I’m not watching Cardinal Dolan, because fuck that guy.

@SheCallsMeLarry Was very disappointed in the change of platform yesterday by the dems, not to mention how it was changed. Just disgusting.

 
 

@anothermarc Same here. And pardon my French, but what the FUCK was Timothy Dolan doing there?!

Fuck you, Dolan, you pedophile-nurturing dickweasel

@JoeMyGod: And FUCK Tim Dolan right in the motherfucking ear.” Yeah, @fakedansavage I agree. And what you said, Joe. Ugh.

Amen, sister! RT @KailiJoy: I just gotta say it: Fuck you, Dolan. No, seriously. Fuck you.

Go fuck yourself Timothy Dolan—
Jason Bradford (@Iasthai1283) September 07, 2012

The fuck is this? Why does the end in a prayer? Ugh, and it had to be Tim Dolan.

And FUCK Tim Dolan right in the motherfucking ear.

Dolan just slammed gays and others. Fuck him.

I grew up Catholic, converted to Buddhism, and still love Jesus, Mary, and religion in general. But Dolan can fuck off.—
Joshua Eaton (@joshua_eaton) September 07, 2012

What the FUCK is Timothy Dolan doing there? I was so inspired – then I wanted to vomit. Thank god it turned off :D
ティアラ (@dozing_reverse) September 07, 2012

Keep it classy, people.

Good luck with that “classy” thing when the left is involved.

I loved this headline:

Democratic Theology Explained: There Is A God and They Hate Him

And how.

Jesus said, “You will deny Me three times.”  He spake as a prophet when it came to the DNC in their THIRD vote to put God back into the party platform after deliberately purging it:

For the record, here is the prayer that had all the demons inside the Democrat Party (that’s “Demonic Bureaucrat”) crawling inside their skins:

With a “firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence,” let us close this convention by praying for this land that we so cherish and love:

Let us Pray.

Almighty God, father of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, revealed to us so powerfully in your Son, Jesus Christ, we thank you for showering your blessings upon this our beloved nation. Bless all here present, and all across this great land, who work hard for the day when a greater portion of your justice, and a more ample measure of your care for the poor and suffering, may prevail in these United States. Help us to see that a society’s greatness is found above all in the respect it shows for the weakest and neediest among us.

We beseech you, almighty God to shed your grace on this noble experiment in ordered liberty, which began with the confident assertion of inalienable rights bestowed upon us by you: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Thus do we praise you for the gift of life. Grant us the courage to defend it, life, without which no other rights are secure. We ask your benediction on those waiting to be born, that they may be welcomed and protected. Strengthen our sick and our elders waiting to see your holy face at life’s end, that they may be accompanied by true compassion and cherished with the dignity due those who are infirm and fragile.

We praise and thank you for the gift of liberty. May this land of the free never lack those brave enough to defend our basic freedoms. Renew in all our people a profound respect for religious liberty: the first, most cherished freedom bequeathed upon us at our Founding. May our liberty be in harmony with truth; freedom ordered in goodness and justice. Help us live our freedom in faith, hope, and love. Make us ever-grateful for those who, for over two centuries, have given their lives in freedom’s defense; we commend their noble souls to your eternal care, as even now we beg the protection of your mighty arm upon our men and women in uniform.

We praise and thank you for granting us the life and the liberty by which we can pursue happiness. Show us anew that happiness is found only in respecting the laws of nature and of nature’s God. Empower us with your grace so that we might resist the temptation to replace the moral law with idols of our own making, or to remake those institutions you have given us for the nurturing of life and community. May we welcome those who yearn to breathe free and to pursue happiness in this land of freedom, adding their gifts to those whose families have lived here for centuries.

We praise and thank you for the American genius of government of the people, by the people and for the people. Oh God of wisdom, justice, and might, we ask your guidance for those who govern us: President Barack Obama, Vice President Joseph Biden, Congress, the Supreme Court, and all those, including Governor Mitt Romney and Congressman Paul Ryan, who seek to serve the common good by seeking public office. Make them all worthy to serve you by serving our country. Help them remember that the only just government is the government that serves its citizens rather than itself. With your grace, may all Americans choose wisely as we consider the future course of public policy.

And finally Lord, we beseech your benediction on all of us who depart from here this evening, and on all those, in every land, who yearn to conduct their lives in freedom and justice. We beg you to remember, as we pledge to remember, those who are not free; those who suffer for freedom’s cause; those who are poor, out of work, needy, sick, or alone; those who are persecuted for their religious convictions, those still ravaged by war.

And most of all, God Almighty, we thank you for the great gift of our beloved country.

For we are indeed “one nation under God,” and “in God we trust.”

So dear God, bless America. You who live and reign forever and ever.

Amen!

I know, I know.  It’s hard to believe that nice people like these have murdered over 54 million innocent little babies.

The Democrat Party is the party of genuine evil.  It will be Democrats who worship the coming beast and take his mark on their hands or on their foreheads before they burn in hell.

Voter Fraud Is Real: And Barack Obama, Eric Holder And EVERY Democrat In America Is A Dishonest Cockroach

March 14, 2012

Project Veritas put out an undercover video showing how easy it is to get a ballot and vote under someone else’s name without showing any photo ID:

That video is part of a series of investigative articles on voter fraud and how easy it is to undermine the democratic process.  I accessed it through this one:

Project Veritas Investigates: Voter Fraud
January 11, 2012

Dead men tell no tales, but as Project Veritas found in New Hampshire, they can still vote.

On New Hampshire Primary Day, Project Veritas sent a team of investigators into polling places with a list of deceased voters to see if they would be permitted to vote.

We tested more than a dozen polling places, simply walking up and stating the name of the deceased, and in all but one instance — where an alert poll worker actually knew the recently deceased — we were handed ballots.

While our investigators cast no votes and returned the ballots, there was nothing stopping our team, or anyone else, from illegally influencing the outcome of a presidential primary.

In fact, as shown in the video, Project Veritas investigators insisted on presenting identification in order to vote, but were told repeatedly, “you don’t need it.”

With the 8 vote margin in the 2012 Iowa Caucus, it is clear that voter fraud can influence the outcome of an election. It is important to note that Project Veritas’ team had the ability to cast more than a dozen votes in this latest investigation.

Watch the video for yourself here.

More to come . . .

(Unlike the establishment media, Project Veritas works to release full, unedited versions of its investigations and stories. To see the unedited videos from part one of the Voter Fraud investigation, click here.)

We just had an example of a Democrat Sheriff pleading guilty to voter fraud:

Former West Virginia sheriff, county clerk plead guilty to attempting to steal election
By Eric Shawn
Published March 07, 2012 | FoxNews.com

As the sheriff of Lincoln County, W.Va., Jerry Bowman is sworn to uphold the law. But the 58-year-old law enforcement veteran stood in a federal courtroom in Charleston on Wednesday and pleaded guilty in a shocking voter fraud case that has stripped him of his job and could send him to prison for a decade.

Prosecutors say Bowman and former Lincoln County Clerk Donald Whitten, 62, were part of a scheme to steal the May 2010 Democratic primary by stuffing ballot boxes with illegal absentee ballots.

Bowman admitted to falsifying more than 100 of the absentee ballot applications and even voting with some of the ballots himself, while Whitten, who also pleaded guilty Wednesday, acknowledged lying to investigators about the plan to try to throw the election.

“It makes you mad,” said Charles Brumfield, who ran against Bowman for Lincoln County circuit clerk, about having the election stolen from him. “It was hurtful. You just didn’t think that would happen in today’s society.”

Brumfield told Fox News that on election night, he was ahead by about 235 votes. That is, until additional batches of absentee ballots started mysteriously appearing, repeatedly, throughout the evening.

“We knew something was wrong, because the post office closes at 4:30 … you don’t go to the post office at 9 o’clock at night and find ballots.”

But for several hours on election night, “They kept coming out and saying ‘we found some more ballots’ … and they did this about three times from 7 to 11 p.m., and when the final tally was taken, we lost,” Brumfield said.

Brumfield was suspicious leading up to election night because he says he heard that more then 800 absentee ballot applications had been requested for the race, nearly six times more than normal number. He took the case to court, and after a judge threw out more than 300 ballots, he was declared the winner and was sworn in as the Lincoln County circuit clerk.

“An absentee ballot is a good thing, if it’s used correctly, the way it’s supposed to. And it wasn’t used that way,” Brumfield said.

The voter fraud allegations were investigated by U.S. Attorney Booth Goodwin in West Virginia and West Virginia Secretary of State Natalie Tennant. An FBI agent and an investigator from Tennant’s office even allegedly had a gun pulled on them by one absentee ballot voter who is charged with making threats to kill them.

“We won’t tolerate elections violations,” Tennant told Fox News. “It makes me angry that someone would take our process, which is a good process, and attempt to manipulate it for their own good. … It is disappointing.”

“Voter fraud in southern West Virginia goes far and wide. It’s been bad my whole life,” the Lincoln County Republican Party Chairwoman Lisa Ramey said. She is now running for sheriff, and told Fox News that she once “saw someone buy a vote and get a bottle,” meaning whiskey.

“I’m appalled, disgusted,” she says. “We have good citizens in Lincoln County and we would like to have one, decent, fair election in our county, but I’m not sure that will be able to occur unless the federal government takes over the election process.”

She calls this voter fraud case, “the tip of the iceberg.”

[…]

After the plea hearing, Goodwin issued a statement saying, “A citizen’s right to vote is at the very foundation of our constitutional democracy. When votes are bought, sold or obtained by fraud, democracy itself is in peril.”

Some other stories I’ve done in the past about Democrat voter fraud:

Obama’s Chicago Political Way Continues To Play: Democrats Engaged In Massive Voter Fraud In New York

Mainstream Media Propagandists Refuse To Do Their Jobs; Up To A College Kid To Expose Democrat 2008 Election Cheating In Indiana

Wisconsin Judge Election: City Caught Destroying Uncounted Ballots

Democrats Abandon All Respect For American Voter And Electoral Integrity

Democrats Caught Cheating, Undermining Democracy, In New Jersey Race

Philadelphia: Liberal Judge Removes GOP Poll Watchers While lack Black Panthers Intimidate Voters

Obama’s $Half Billion In Small Donations Masking SERIOUS FRAUD.

Barack Obama’s ACORN Registers Dallas Cowboys To Vote In Nevada

Obama: From ACORN Organizer to Audacious Hypocrite

And my own personal favorite title:

Election Fraud: If You Vote Democrat, You Are A Corrupt Dishonest Cheat By Proxy

Because you are.

And yet Obama Attorney General Eric Holder is bitterly fighting to prevent Texas from upholding it’s already passed and signed into law voter ID law.  Even though the Supreme Court has already ruled that voter ID laws are 100 percent legal and legitimate.

I say it again: if you vote Democrat, you are a corrupt and dishonest cheat and you want corrupt dishonest cheats to trample over America.

And all you have to do to prove me wrong is to (finally!!!) demand measures to weed out voter fraud.  But you won’t: because you are corrupt dishonest cheats right down to the cores of your shriveled little depraved cockroach souls.  And you want to benefit from fascist election theft because fascism is at the very core of your being.

And just to throw it in, if you are a Democrat, you are un-American according to scientific studies:

Just a brief exposure to an image of the American flag shifts voters, even Democrats, to Republican beliefs, attitudes and voting behavior.

A new Harvard University study finds that July 4th parades energize only Republicans, turn kids into Republicans, and help to boost the GOP turnout of adults on Election Day.

And there’s a damn good reason for that, you treasonous roaches.

Gasoline Prices Have Nearly DOUBLED In Just Three Years Of Failed Obama Presidency – Exactly As Conservatives (And Obama) SAID WOULD HAPPEN.

February 21, 2012

When we say that Democrats deserve all the demonization that they handed out, we meant it.

Let no one ever forget how Democrats – including Barack Obama – demonized Bush when gasoline prices went up:

What Ever Happened to All Those ‘Price-Gouging’ Investigations by Democrats?
by Wynton Hall

With gas prices now almost double what they were on the first day of President Barack Obama’s presidency, we’re left to wonder: what ever happened to all those “price gouging” investigations Democrats launched four years ago to relieve pain at the pump?

In 2006, Rep. Nancy Pelosi promised that Democrats would enact plans to bring down the price of gas. But as this GOP ad makes clear, that didn’t happen.

Then, with the presidential election heating up in May 2007, Rep. Nancy Pelosi rolled out the tried and true “blame Bush” tactic and said that high gas prices were the result of “the Bush Administration’s failure to enact a comprehensive energy strategy.” Furthermore, Rep. Pelosi said that the Democratic Congress would “take America in a new direction” and “make up for years of inaction” by Republicans. The San Francisco Congresswoman went on to tout the actions taken by the Democratic Congress within the first 100 hours of their taking power.

The day Rep. Pelosi made those comments, the national average price for a gallon of gas was $3.07. Today, in 2012, it’s $3.39 a gallon.

Rep. Pelosi, however, was not alone in promising to right the wrongs of the “two oil men in the Oval Office.” Then-candidate Barack Obama promised that, if he were elected president, gas prices would plunge because he would impose a “windfall profits tax” on any oil producer who sold oil above $80 a barrel. But no sooner did he win the presidency than did Mr. Obama ditch the proposal altogether, even going so far as to remove mention of it from his Transition Team’s website.

Of course, anyone who was paying careful attention in 2008 to then-candidate Barack Obama should hardly be surprised that energy prices have skyrocketed on his watch. After all, during the last presidential election, Mr. Obama admitted that he was perfectly aware that his own energy policies would result in skyrocketing prices–and that he was fine with that.

Indeed, Mr. Obama flatly stated that he preferred that gas prices rise–albeit “gradually”–in order to reduce American reliance on oil.

But the Democratic sound and fury over removing our pain at the pump signified nothing. With just 10 months until the 2012 presidential election, gas prices are almost twice what they were when that oil-loving meany George Bush left office.

Why? Because oil prices hinge on basic supply and demand, not a price-fixing conspiracy by George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and the owner of your local gas station, as many Democrats would have voters believe. To be sure, OPEC has an enormous influence on the price of a barrel of oil. But Energy Forum Director Amy Myers Jaffe of the Baker Institute for Public Policy at Rice University says that so-called price-gouging investigations are just a political shell game. “That’s just camouflage,” Ms. Jaffe told CNN. “That’s just ‘I want to pretend I’m doing something even, though I’m doing nothing.’”

With petroleum analysts now predicting that the price of a gallon of gas may well reach $4 a gallon by summer, Mr. Obama’s reelection hopes may rest on whether he can make manifest the promises he made four years ago to relieve America’s pain at the pump. If so, he better hurry. Summer gas prices will soon be here–and will further underscore Mr. Obama’s failure to make good on yet another campaign promise.

So with that record of Democrat demonization, let us just point out that these people deserve to get punched right in the mouth as nobody ever deserved to get punched right in the mouth.

Consider the following facts:

Gas prices are highest ever for a February
by Chris Kahn – Feb. 19, 2012 12:43 AM
Associated Press

NEW YORK – Gasoline prices have never been higher this time of the year.
 
At $3.53 a gallon, prices are already up 25 cents since Jan. 1. And experts say they could reach a record $4.25 a gallon by late April.
 
“You’re going to see a lot more staycations this year,” says Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy & Economic Research. “When the price gets anywhere near $4, you really see people react.”

Already, W. Howard Coudle, a retired machinist from Crestwood, Mo., has seen his monthly gasoline bill rise to $80 from about $60 in December. The closest service station is selling regular for $3.39 per gallon, the highest he’s ever seen.
 
“I guess we’re going to have to drive less, consolidate all our errands into one trip,” Coudle says. “It’s just oppressive.”

February follows January, of course, and according to an LA Times headline, January 2012 was similarly THE MOST EXPENSIVE JANUARY FOR GASOLINE IN AMERICAN HISTORY:

2012 begins with highest January gasoline prices ever

Well, let’s get in our time machine and go back to last year (2o11) and see how Obama fared in gas prices:

Gasoline prices were higher last year in America than they had EVER been:

U.S. drivers spend record amount on gasoline in 2011
Despite lower demand, more than $448 billion has been paid so far for fuel — $100 billion more than in 2010. Consistently high oil prices are blamed.
December 09, 2011|By Ronald D. White, Los Angeles Times

American drivers this week broke a record that will bring them no joy.

They collectively spent more than $448 billion on gasoline since the beginning of the year, according to the Oil Price Information Service, putting the previous record for gas expenditures — set in 2008 — in the rearview mirror with weeks of driving still to go.

It’s also a huge jump over last year, when U.S. drivers spent more than $100 billion less on gas.

The major reason for the record-setting gas spending in 2011 was that oil prices were consistently high all year. And that probably brought joy at the other end of the pipeline. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries is on pace to top $1 trillion in net oil exports for the first time, or 29% more than last year.

But suddenly the same mainstream media and the same Democrat Party that demonized George W. Bush every single day that gasoline prices were high say none of this catastrophically high gas price business can possibly be messiah Obama’s fault.  Even though I pointed out that this was all simply the stated fruition of Obama all along:

You remember that quip Obama gave us that under his policies, energy prices “would necessarily skyrocket“?

Remember that Obama appointed an energy secretary named Steven Chu who said, “Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe”??? With gasoline prices in Europe consistently hovering between $7 and $10 a gallon??? Steven Chu said that in explaining the Obama policy of “progressively” making gasoline more and more expensive in order to force Americans to turn to alternative energy sources. And one of the ways Obama wants to accomplish that dream (which amounts to a nightmare for working Americans) is to tax Americans for driving by the mile.

As you contemplate $4 and even $5 a gallon gasoline prices, let me just say one word: KEYSTONE.

(Hypocrite Alert): Why Is The Democrat Party Of FDR, JFK And John Kerry Attacking Mitt Romney Over His Wealth?

January 24, 2012

I have said it many times – and the reason I keep saying it is because it keeps proving true – that hypocrisy is the quintessential ingredient of a Democrat.  If you took all of the hypocrisy out of a Democrat, he or she would simply cease to exist.

Here’s an interesting headline:

Romney: Said he expected attacks on his wealth from Democrats. ‘.. will not apologize for being successful’

It brings back a flood of memories of the abject hypocrisy of Democrats.

Remember four years ago when Democrats attacked John McCain for not knowing how many houses he owned?  The mainstream media played that “gaffe” all over the airwaves to ensure you would think that John McCain was as out of touch as possible.

It didn’t matter that McCain didn’t actually own ANY houses (his wife owned them, with some of them being in a trust); it was just an opportunity for the media to dishonestly pile on top of a Republican and do what they do best – propaganda to demonize their ideological enemies.

Fast forward back four years prior to that, when John Kerry, the wealthiest man who ever ran for president, was campaigning.  How many damn houses did HE own?  Ooops.  Somehow the media never dredged that up.

The issue of personal wealth never came up with the mainstream media, in spite of the fact that John Kerry was worth $240 million – very nearly as much as Romney.  Ooops again.

Notice that John McCain is nowhere on the list of the ten wealthiest candidates for president.  John Edwards is.  Bill Clinton is.  Hillary Clinton is.  Al Gore is.  And John Kerry – the 2004 Democrat candidate for president – most assuredly is.  But the issue of their wealth and how they got it doesn’t matter; only Mitt Romney’s does.

The Democrat Party and their mainstream media allies are crawling all over Mitt Romney’s tax returns to demagogue his tax rate.  The figure 13.9% is raging; that’s the percentage the media claims Romney paid.  They intentionally omit the fact that if you remove Romney’s charitable donations, he’s actually paying a rate of 42%.

What rate did John Kerry pay at?  Oh, that doesn’t matter and never did because he’s a Democrat and therefore was immune to such inconvenient questions from the media propaganda?  I’m oh-so very sorry for asking. 

The fact that Obama gave less than 1% of his wealth to charity versus the fact that Romney gave 15% of his wealth to charity is also not on the mainstream media radar.  That’s not the kind of discussion the Democrat Party or their media allies want you to have around the water cooler or the coffee pot.

Two of the names that most Democrats would readily say were the greatest American presidents were filthy rich: John F. Kennedy and Franklin Delano Roosevelt.  But none of that matters.

Here’s what great Democrat President John F. Kennedy said about taxes:

“It is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now … Cutting taxes now is not to incur a budget deficit, but to achieve the more prosperous, expanding economy which can bring a budget surplus.”

– John F. Kennedy, Nov. 20, 1962, president’s news conference


“Lower rates of taxation will stimulate economic activity and so raise the levels of personal and corporate income as to yield within a few years an increased – not a reduced – flow of revenues to the federal government.”

– John F. Kennedy, Jan. 17, 1963, annual budget message to the Congress, fiscal year 1964

“In today’s economy, fiscal prudence and responsibility call for tax reduction even if it temporarily enlarges the federal deficit – why reducing taxes is the best way open to us to increase revenues.”

– John F. Kennedy, Jan. 21, 1963, annual message to the Congress: “The Economic Report Of The President”


“It is no contradiction – the most important single thing we can do to stimulate investment in today’s economy is to raise consumption by major reduction of individual income tax rates.”

– John F. Kennedy, Jan. 21, 1963, annual message to the Congress: “The Economic Report Of The President”


 “Our tax system still siphons out of the private economy too large a share of personal and business purchasing power and reduces the incentive for risk, investment and effort – thereby aborting our recoveries and stifling our national growth rate.”

– John F. Kennedy, Jan. 24, 1963, message to Congress on tax reduction and reform, House Doc. 43, 88th Congress, 1st Session.


“A tax cut means higher family income and higher business profits and a balanced federal budget. Every taxpayer and his family will have more money left over after taxes for a new car, a new home, new conveniences, education and investment. Every businessman can keep a higher percentage of his profits in his cash register or put it to work expanding or improving his business, and as the national income grows, the federal government will ultimately end up with more revenues.”

– John F. Kennedy, Sept. 18, 1963, radio and television address to the nation on tax-reduction bill


 “I have asked the secretary of the treasury to report by April 1 on whether present tax laws may be stimulating in undue amounts the flow of American capital to the industrial countries abroad through special preferential treatment.”

– John F. Kennedy, Feb. 6, 1961, message to Congress on gold and the balalnce of payments deficit


“In those countries where income taxes are lower than in the United States, the ability to defer the payment of U.S. tax by retaining income in the subsidiary companies provides a tax advantage for companies operating through overseas subsidiaries that is not available to companies operating solely in the United States. Many American investors properly made use of this deferral in the conduct of their foreign investment.”

– John F. Kennedy, April 20, 1961, message to Congress on taxation


“Our present tax system … exerts too heavy a drag on growth … It reduces the financial incentives for personal effort, investment, and risk-taking … The present tax load … distorts economic judgments and channels an undue amount of energy into efforts to avoid tax liabilities.”

– John F. Kennedy, Nov. 20, 1962, press conference


“The present tax codes … inhibit the mobility and formation of capital, add complexities and inequities which undermine the morale of the taxpayer, and make tax avoidance rather than market factors a prime consideration in too many economic decisions.”

– John F. Kennedy, Jan. 23, 1963, special message to Congress on tax reduction and reform


“In short, it is a paradoxical truth that … the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now. The experience of a number of European countries and Japan have borne this out. This country’s own experience with tax reduction in 1954 has borne this out. And the reason is that only full employment can balance the budget, and tax reduction can pave the way to that employment. The purpose of cutting taxes now is not to incur a budget deficit, but to achieve the more prosperous, expanding economy which can bring a budget surplus.”

– John F. Kennedy, Nov. 20, 1962, news conference


“The largest single barrier to full employment of our manpower and resources and to a higher rate of economic growth is the unrealistically heavy drag of federal income taxes on private purchasing power, initiative and incentive.”

– John F. Kennedy, Jan. 24, 1963, special message to Congress on tax reduction and reform


“Expansion and modernization of the nation’s productive plant is essential to accelerate economic growth and to improve the international competitive position of American industry … An early stimulus to business investment will promote recovery and increase employment.”

– John F. Kennedy, Feb. 2, 1961, message on economic recovery


 “We must start now to provide additional stimulus to the modernization of American industrial plants … I shall propose to the Congress a new tax incentive for businesses to expand their normal investment in plant and equipment.”

– John F. Kennedy, Feb. 13, 1961, National Industrial Conference Board


 “A bill will be presented to the Congress for action next year. It will include an across-the-board, top-to-bottom cut in both corporate and personal income taxes. It will include long-needed tax reform that logic and equity demand … The billions of dollars this bill will place in the hands of the consumer and our businessmen will have both immediate and permanent benefits to our economy. Every dollar released from taxation that is spent or invested will help create a new job and a new salary. And these new jobs and new salaries can create other jobs and other salaries and more customers and more growth for an expanding American economy.”

– John F. Kennedy, Aug. 13, 1962, radio and television report on the state of the national economy


“This administration pledged itself last summer to an across-the-board, top-to-bottom cut in personal and corporate income taxes … Next year’s tax bill should reduce personal as well as corporate income taxes, for those in the lower brackets, who are certain to spend their additional take-home pay, and for those in the middle and upper brackets, who can thereby be encouraged to undertake additional efforts and enabled to invest more capital … I am confident that the enactment of the right bill next year will in due course increase our gross national product by several times the amount of taxes actually cut.”

– John F. Kennedy, Nov. 20, 1962, news conference

But none of that matters to the media or to the modern Democrat Party – which embraced the communism that JFJK spent his presidency fighting – either.

Our mainstream media that gets to decide what stories get reported and fixated upon are the propaganda wing of the Democrat Party.  And they WILL NOT report fairly or add proper context to their stories to communicate the truth.

The beast is coming, and the mainstream media will ignore his personal wealth, too, as he rules over the human race as the man who will fulfill all of liberals and Democrats big government dreams.

Ted Nugent Reflects On Dumb Deer And Dumber Democrats

November 29, 2011

How Deer Think

 
Great Quote!
Deer Hunting Story…even if you don’t care about hunting…Gotta Love Ted!Ted Nugent, rock star and avid bow hunter from Michigan , was being interviewed by a liberal journalist, an animal rights activist. The discussion came around to deer hunting. The journalist asked, ‘What do you think is the last thought in the head of a deer before you shoot him? Is it, ‘Are you my friend?’ or is it ‘Are you the one who killed my brother?

Nugent replied, ‘Deer aren’t capable of that kind of thinking. All they care about is, what am I going to eat next, who am I going to screw next, and can I run fast enough to get away. They are very much like the Democrats in Congress.’

The interview ended.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 633 other followers