Let’s also be clear where we stand. Just as we refuse to accept smaller European nations being dominated by bigger neighbors in the last century, we reject any talk of spheres of influence today. (Applause.) And just as we never accepted the occupation and illegal annexation of the Baltic nations, we will not accept Russia’s occupation and illegal annexation of Crimea or any part of Ukraine. (Applause.)
Reality flash: Crimea has ALREADY BEEN ANNEXED. Past tense. They already have the new passports to prove it.
It’s DONE. Past tense. It happened. Obama waved bye-bye as the train left the station. He already accepted it. Any words to the contrary are lies from a proven liar.
When Obama says, “Let’s be clear where we stand,” you can count on him uttering something utterly empty and hollow and meaningless.
To remind of one of his speeches (which he plagiarized), it’s “Just words.”
“We take care of those who are grieving and when that’s finished, they should know we will follow them to the gates of hell until they are brought to justice,” Biden said. “Because hell is where they’ll reside.”
How the hell can we do that when the Obama administration won’t even issue the order for our troops to leave their own gates? I will never forget the cowardice and betrayal of Obama and Hillary Clinton when they issued their damned by God “stand down” order as a U.S. ambassador and three American heroes were being murdered in Benghazi. Obama pukes want to claim that no stand down order was ever given; rather, it was nothing more than a weird coincidence that the attack on the Benghazi compound went on for HOURS with no American relief of any kind whatsoever ever bothering to show up in spite of repeated pleas for help.
And all Obama did afterward was factually LIE over and over and over again and claim it was some kind of spontaneous mob uprising and the United States’ fault because of some stupid Youtube video rather than what it was: a planned, coordinated and professionally executed terrorist attack proving that Obama’s “we’ve decimated al Qaeda” and “the terrorists are on the run” garbage was the very worst kind of dishonest politicizing of US national security.
I’ll quote your own “God damn America” “reverend” to you, Obama: “your chickens have come home to roost.”
I mean, we won’t even pursue them to SYRIA, let alone hell:
Why Obama Backed Off More ISIS Strikes: His Own Team Couldn’t Agree on a Syria Strategy
Written by Josh Rogin Eli Lake
After lots of bluster about striking ISIS on Syria, President Obama threw cold water on the idea, disappointing those who wanted him to broaden the war.
After a week of talk of eliminating the “cancer” of ISIS, President Obama said Thursday that he was not planning to significantly expand the war against the Islamic extremist movement anytime soon.
His remarks came after days of heated debate inside the top levels of his own national security bureaucracy about how, where, and whether to strike ISIS in Syria. But those deliberations – which included a bleak intelligence assessment of America’s potential allies in Syria — failed to produce a consensus battle plan. And so Obama, who has long been reluctant to enter into the Syrian conflict, told reporters Thursday that “we don’t have a strategy yet” for confronting ISIS on a regional level.
Those inside the administration advocating for going after ISIS in both Iraq and Syria were sorely disappointed – and lamented their boss’s lack of urgency in rooting out a threat that only days before was being described in near-apocalyptic terms.
“Senior strategists in the U.S. government have been working hard all week to gather multiple options that the president had asked for to strike ISIS in Syria. There was a deep rooted belief among many — especially among military circles — that the ISIS threat can’t be kicked down the road, that it needs to be confronted now, and in a holistic way,” said one Obama administration official who works on the Middle East. “This press conference is going to lead to even more doubt by those that thought that this White House was ready to take meaningful action against ISIS across the board.”
We’re going to pursue ISIS to “the gates of hell,” the Obama fools blather. We’re not going to pursue them at all.
The complaint of an unnamed special operator:
We’re told about Obama’s return to Iraq after his cowardly cut-and-run caused the complete meltdown that has since taken place that “‘frustration and confusion reign’ among Americans on the ground there.”
But all the tough talk from Obama about “cancer” and Biden about the gates of hell must surely mean we’re at war with ISIS. I mean, right?
Asked during a daily press briefing whether the administration considered the reported beheading of Steven Sotloff – the second American journalist killed in that manner by ISIS in two weeks – to be an act of war, [State Department spokeswoman Jen] Psaki said, “I’m not going to put new labels on it.”
So we’re going to pursue them to the gates of hell. We just don’t have the balls to say that we’re at war.
Obama will say one thing and then immediately say the opposite thing. So Obama says we’re going to “destroy” ISIS and then almost immediately after says ISIS is a “manageable problem.” So you can understand why the men who are tasked with putting their lives on the line to carry out Obama’s policy suffer from “frustration and confusion.” It’s a contagious disease they caught from Obama.
I mean, according to Obama pukes, terrorism is really only just “a man-caused disaster” or “workplace violence” and we’ve surrendered in the war on terror and will only participate in “an overseas contingency operation.”
Bow down to your terrorist masters, American. Pray to Allah that they don’t saw your head off. That’s basically the Obama strategy that he won’t tell you about.
So let’s go back to Russia and Ukraine. I mean, even as Obama is blathering the gibberish, “we will not accept Russia’s occupation and illegal annexation of Crimea or any part of Ukraine” – to applause rather than jeers, amazingly – RUSSIA WAS ACTUALLY IN THE PHYSICAL ACT OF INVADING THE REST OF UKRAINE AFTER ANNEXING (AGAIN PAST TENSE) CRIMEA:
NATO Chief, At Summit, Says Russia Attacking Ukraine
on September 04 2014 7:47 AM
(Reuters) – NATO’s top official accused Moscow outright on Thursday of attacking Ukraine as allied leaders gathered for a summit to buttress support for Kiev and bolster defences against a Russia they now see as hostile for the first time since the Cold War.
U.S. President Barack Obama and his 27 allies meeting at a golf resort in Wales will also discuss how to tackle the Islamic State straddling parts of Iraq and Syria, which has emerged as a new threat on the alliance’s southern flank, and how to stabilise Afghanistan when NATO forces leave at year’s end.
“We are faced with a dramatically changed security environment,” NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told reporters on arrival at the summit. “To the east, Russia is attacking Ukraine.”
Okay, to the extent they haven’t ALREADY DONE IT, they’re doing it. But have no worries, because Obama won’t accept it. Even though he already HAS.
I hope he decides not to accept any more bowel movements coming out of his scrawny little butt, too. That way he will explode even MORE jammed packed with weasel feces than he already is.
Obama talked REAL tough about Russia’s next move: a seizure of a NATO member state such as Estonia or Latvia or Lithuania. Putin has the same ready-made strategy that they used and are still using against Ukraine and that Hitler used against the same region: exploit the fact that ethnic Russians are living in these areas and create a crisis as a pretense for invasion. I’m guessing Obama just can’t believe that Russia would actually do that. You know, the way Obama just didn’t believe that Syria would use weapons of mass destruction REPEATEDLY.
Remember his “red line” warning? Remember what happened to Assad as a result? Oh, that’s right: NOTHING. As pointed out in the Washington Post:
When President Obama declared Friday that “there will be costs” for any Russian intervention in Ukraine, you could hear the laughter emanating from the Kremlin — followed by the sound of Russian military vehicles roaring into Crimea and seizing control of the peninsula.
“Costs?” Vladimir Putin must have thought. Just like the “costs” Obama imposed on the Assad regime in Syria?
Just last year none other than Putin helped Obama get out of his pledge to impose costs on Bashar al-Assad’s government for crossing his “red line” and using chemical weapons on its people.
In August 2012, Obama issued a similar warning to Syrian officials, warning that Assad would face consequences if “we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized.” Assad responded by moving and using his chemical weapons — not once but 14 times beginning in December 2012, just four months after Obama declared his red line.
Obama did nothing.
Then Obama began backing away from his declaration, saying, “I didn’t set a red line. The world set a red line.” But when he went to the world and asked them to join him in enforcing “their” red line, the British Parliament voted no and NATO declined to help. Soon, the administration was lowering expectations. A U.S. official was telling the Los Angeles Times that any U.S. strike would be “just muscular enough not to get mocked.” Secretary of State John Kerry declared that any strike would be “unbelievably small” and would not really constitute “war.” Then Obama decided he needed to go to Congress and get approval for his “unbelievably small” strike. And when it became clear that he did have the votes, in stepped Putin to rescue Obama from an embarrassing defeat by offering a deal to have Syria disarm.
Which of course gave Putin prestige that he robbed from Obama and worse yet the United States. And which literally made Putin’s close ally Assad an indispensable ally to Obama necessitating his remaining in power.
Every rogue nation and terrorist army on earth now knows that Barack Obama is a weak, indecisive, coward who will not act or will at worst act incredibly weakly after prolonged dithering.
As we speak, Mexico has seized one of our Marine heroes and imprisoned him for going on six months. Obama has done nothing. Two Americans just had their heads sawed off by ISIS in front of the entire world. Obama has done nothing. Three Americans are being paraded for propaganda purposes in North Korea when they aren’t working in a hard labor camp. Obama has done nothing. Four US military aircraft have been bullied and intimidated by Chinese fighters as China pushes America out of the region. Obama has done nothing. ISIS has seized more than 36,000 square miles of territory, creating a caliphate as large as the United Kingdom. Obama has done nothing. ISIS has become the first true terrorist army that according to Obama’s own experts constitutes the greatest threat to the United States since the rise of Nazism in World War II. Obama has done nothing. ISIS has become the first self-funded terrorist organization and is raising huge sums of money every single day to finance operations such as a coming massive attack against the United States on our soil and Obama has done nothing. Russia has invaded one country that had a treaty protection with the United States and now threatens others. Obama has done and history has now proven will do NOTHING.
We’ve talked about Russia and we’ve talked about the events in Syria that spread across Iraq due to Obama’s pathological weakness and cowardice and ignorance. Let’s talk about the nexus between the two:
Remember when Obama openly mocked Mitt Romney for his statement that Russia constituted America’s biggest geopolitical threat? Remember his “zinger”:
“The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because the Cold War’s been over for 20 years….When it comes to our foreign policy, you seem to want to import the foreign policies of the 1980s, just like the social policies of the 1950s, and the economic policies of the 1920s.”
Who is Syria’s primary ally? Russia, that’s who:
USA Today was forced to admit the following in their headline about Obama’s deal: “Chemical Weapons Deal May End Up Strengthening Assad.”
WASHINGTON — Pursuing a diplomatic resolution that would allow President Bashar Assad to surrender Syria’s chemical weapons stockpile runs the risk of extending his stay in power and undercutting support of rebels who have been fighting his regime with U.S. support, some Syria analysts say.
“Assad is going to come out of this stronger,” said Flynt Leverett, a former National Security Council official who is now a professor at Penn State.
Is that precisely what happened? You betcha.
And so we have this outcome in Syria, thanks to Russia:
President Vladimir Putin, condemned by NATO for annexing Crimea, is now defying the U.S. in Syria by sending more and deadlier arms to help Bashar al-Assad score a string of advances against insurgents, military experts say. […]
“Russia is now doing everything to ensure that Assad wins convincingly,” Alexei Malashenko, a Middle East analyst at the Moscow Carnegie Center, said by phone. “If Russia can show it’s capable of carrying out its own foreign policy, regardless of America’s wishes, it will be a major achievement for Putin.”
Russia wins. Putin wins. Syria wins. Assad wins. America loses and loses big. All thanks to Obama’s foolishness and weakness and cowardice.
What about Iran? Whose their daddy? Russia:
During a televised interview on Feb. 5, President Hassan Rouhani commented on Iran’s international relations, asserting that there will be a new dynamic in Iran-Russia relations. Although Rouhani’s government is in general pursuing the objective of improving relations with immediate neighbors, there is no doubt that Russia occupies a special position in Tehran’s regional and international strategy.
Whose got Iran’s back? Russia, and of course China as our “nightmare” scenario becomes reality under and because of Obama:
A prospective security alliance between Iran, China and Russia will give the cash-strapped United States a nightmare, an Iranian academic tells Press TV.
Russia and Iran are at the heart of an anti-Western alliance. You can literally write a book about it, as has in fact been done.
Obama has taken ALL pressure off of Iran to halt its nuclear program. I still remember how the leftist propaganda “press” celebrated Obama’s “achievement.” Here’s a headline from USA Today, dated November 24, 2013:
A Los Angeles Times headline nearly seven months later on June 17, 2014 undescores the fact that there wasn’t a “deal”:
I mean, wait a minute, I thought Obama had a great deal. Apparently not so much as this headline from July 15, 2014 indicates:
Reuters) – A major speech by Iran’s Supreme Leader has limited the ability of the Iranian delegation at high-level nuclear talks to make concessions with six world powers and this could scuttle chances for Tehran to reach an accord to end sanctions, diplomats said.
In a public address filled with technical detail, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said last week Iran needs to significantly increase its uranium enrichment capacity, clashing with the powers’ push for it to be reduced to minimise the risk of nuclear bombmaking, as July 20 deadline for a deal nears.
So what did Obama do? He arbitrarily extended the deadline, just as he arbitrarily extended so many ObamaCare deadlines. It doesn’t matter if the negotiations will clearly ultimately go NOWHERE as Obama allows Iran to continue to advance its ballistic missile technology without any sanctions whatsoever. And when Iran has the means to deliver its nukes, rest assured they will have their nukes in very short order. Thanks to Obama and thanks to Democrats.
When Iran has the means to reliably deliver a nuclear warhead to America, the world will change in a profound and terrible way. And they ARE BEING ALLOWED TO DEVELOP THAT WEAPON WITHOUT HINDRANCE THANKS TO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRAT PARTY. Reuters points it out:
(Reuters) – Despite apparently reducing illicit purchases that breach U.N. sanctions, Iran is pursuing development of ballistic missiles, a confidential U.N. report says, posing an acute challenge to six powers negotiating with Tehran to rein in its nuclear program.
On Sunday, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei described as “stupid and idiotic” Western expectations for his country to curb its missile development. He decreed mass production of ballistic weapons, striking a defiant tone just before nuclear talks resumed on Wednesday in Vienna.
The high-stakes negotiations aim for a deal by a July 20 deadline to end a long stand-off that has raised the risk of a wider Middle East war.
Tehran’s often repeated view that missiles should not be part of the nuclear talks appears to enjoy the support of Russia, one of the six global powers.
When you realize that Russia is the real power behind Syria and what is going on there and the real power behind Iran and what is going on there which is the power behind Iraq and what is going on there given that Obama cut-and-ran from Iraq after we had WON the war and had a peaceful, secure, stable country if we had just remained there as the top military and intelligence leaders BEGGED Obama to do at the time, you should understand that Obama’s pathetic ignorance of the world constitutes a clear and present danger to America. Putin protected and sheltered Syria’s Assad. We could never get anything accomplished on the international front because Russia would block anything we tried to do against Syria. And again, to quote Jeremiah Wright, “America’s chickens are coming home to roost” because of the fool Obama.
Democrats – I mean, even including the uberleftist Elizabeth Warren – are saying we need to respond more powerfully than anything our Coward-in-Chief is willing to do. But they’re just empty WORDS that mean NOTHING.
Why do I call Obama and other Democrats “cowards.” I call them that because they are fearful of alienating their own base which demands weakness rather than strength. And then when public opinion suitably shifts, they’ll say stuff to reflect opinion. 73% of Americans are concerned with ISIS and 58% disagree with Obama’s pathetic response to the clear threat. But if ANY Democrat were sitting in the White House other than Obama, they would be as weak and as passive because they would have the same damn leftist base that they live in fear of, wouldn’t they?
Remember that it was none other than Hillary Clinton who “reset” our relationship with Russia and gave us the vicious Russian monster that we have now. After Obama begged Russia for time and said in his second term he’d be able to “be more flexible.”