Archive for the ‘morality’ Category

Amazing True Facts: Emails Actually MATTER Now To Vile Democrats (That’s ‘DEMOn-possessed bureaCRATS’)

July 24, 2016

I have to go somewhere, but I just can’t resist shouting this from my rooftop:

For over two years now, emails didn’t matter one tiny bit to the vile people otherwise known as Democrats.  They just weren’t morally capable of even the tiniest and most trivial level of honesty, integrity, decency, virtue, character or morality necessary to care about the fact that their candidate for president is as dishonest, corrupt and fascist as they come.

It just got openly revealed to the world that every single thing Hillary Clinton said about her emails and the secret, unauthorized server that she installed to fascistically control access to those emails and keep the public from having any transparency in their leaders, was an outright lie.  The woman is a pathological liar, right down to the tiniest details.

But Democrats no more care about Hillary Clinton’s emails than they do about the fact that they will soon be screaming in the eternal fire of hell for a trillion to the trillionth power years for every single nanosecond they murderously stole from every single one of the sixty million babies that every single Democrat has participated in through their vote for the party of abortion.  Just as the God of the Bible has declared that homosexual perversion is an abomination and a detestable act that will guarantee the wrath of God against any nation that approves of it.

Democrats couldn’t care less that Hillary Clinton treated the national security of the United States like disgustingly-soiled toilet paper so she could hide her corrupt Clinton Foundation shenanigans.

But all of a sudden we find that some Democrats actually care enough about emails proving the Democrat Party is as corrupt and as fascist and as created for insiders as they come.

Everyone who votes for the Democrat Party is already voting to scream in hell, and this is just another proof of that:

Wasserman Schultz sidelined from convention as more emails show Sanders slams
Published July 24, 2016
· FoxNews.com

PHILADELPHIA –  Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz was sidelined from her party convention just hours before the Monday start of the Philadelphia gathering, after leaked emails indicating an anti-Bernie Sanders bias in her operation inflamed the left flank of the party.

The controversial party boss will no longer preside over the convention, and reportedly does not have a speaking role.

The fallout was swift, as even more emails surfaced Sunday showing Schultz personally blasting the Vermont independent senator’s insurgent primary presidential bid against Hillary Clinton.

In one, she practically laughed off Sanders after he vowed to replace her as DNC chairwoman if elected.

“This is a silly story. He isn’t going to be president,” she wrote in the May 21 email.

Following the release of this and numerous other emails in a WikiLeaks document dump, Fox News confirmed Sunday that Wasserman Schultz will not preside over the Democratic convention. The decision was reached amid pressure from the White House and Hillary Clinton campaign.

The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics.
See Latest Coverage →

Rep. Marcia Fudge, D-Ohio, the former chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, will instead preside over the Democratic proceedings as convention chairwoman.

The rapid-fire set of developments ahead of the Philadelphia convention kick-off indicate a party in crisis management mode as officials try to prevent anger over the email leak controversy and other issues from disrupting proceedings. The emails only bolstered claims from Sanders – and Republican nominee Donald Trump – that the system was rigged against the Vermont senator.

Sanders himself blasted the DNC and Wasserman Schultz in interviews Sunday, demanding her resignation as party chairwoman to boot.

“I think [Wasserman Schultz] should resign. Period. And I think we need a new chair who is going the lead us in a very different direction,” Sanders told ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday.

Sanders said “these emails reiterate that reason why she should not be chair.”

Sanders is himself set to speak on the opening night of the Democratic convention, securing an A-list position after a hard-fought, ideological primary battle with Clinton.

But he hasn’t forgiven Wasserman Schultz for an alleged pro-Clinton stance during the campaign. He repeated those claims in the wake of WikiLeaks’ release of roughly 20,000 Democratic National Committee emails.

The leaks, which include emails from January 2015 to May 2016, purportedly came from the accounts of seven DNC officials. In a May 5 email, a DNC employee asked a colleague to collect information on his religious beliefs – claiming it might sway voters in West Virginia and Kentucky. In that particular email, Sanders’ name was not mentioned, but he was the only other candidate in the race at that time against Clinton.

DNC chief financial officer Brad Marshall wrote, “This would make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.”

Others from Wasserman Schultz herself contained very strong language, raising questions about her status as an ostensibly neutral party official.

Responding to Sanders’ complaints the party hasn’t been fair to him, she wrote to a staffer in an April email: “Spoken like someone who has never been a member of the Democratic Party and has no understanding of what we do.”

Responding to the same staffer a month later regarding Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver blaming the Nevada state party for a raucous convention, she wrote, “Damn liar. Particularly scummy that he barely acknowledges the violent and threatening behavior that occurred.”

Sanders will be joined Monday night on stage at the Wells Fargo Center by first lady Michelle Obama and several other speakers, according to the Democratic National Committee.

CNN reported that Wasserman Schultz, however, would not have a speaking role in Philadelphia. Wasserman Schultz is not on the list of speakers released by the DNC.

A Democratic source told the network that she had been “quarantined.”

By contrast, Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus delivered an address on the closing night of the GOP convention in Cleveland.

The Democratic National Committee and Wasserman Schultz already were facing internal unrest over party rules, but the email leak aggravated pro-Sanders Democrats even more.

Sanders, a self-proclaimed democratic socialist, had argued all along that Washington Democrats favored Clinton. Among other decisions, he pointed to Wasserman Schultz’s decision to limit the number of primary debates, which he argued was meant to protect Clinton.

Sanders — who railed against what he called a “rigged” system throughout his campaign — has since endorsed Wasserman Schultz’s primary rival in her re-election bid, in another sign of the acrimony between them.

Clinton chief strategist Joel Benenson, on “Fox News Sunday,” defended the fairness of the primary elections and said the DNC would conduct a full review of the emails. He said people should not jump to conclusions.

“The DNC’s impact in these things is minimal compared to the results. What candidates and campaigns spend and do on the ground, talking to voters day in and day out, that’s what determines who wins,” he said.

That Sanders gets a prime-time speaking spot is also significant, considering the rival campaigns for weeks negotiated his primary exit strategy, with Sanders insisting that at least some of his progressive agenda — including free college education, better international trade deals and more social and economic equality — be included in the party platform.

He ultimately endorsed Clinton a few weeks ago.

Fox News’ Chad Pergram, Garrett Tenney and Jennifer Griffin contributed to this report.

We find through the Wikileaks release that if you are a mainstream media “journalist,” you are nothing but a fascist propagandist the way Joseph Goebbels of the Ministry of Propaganda was a propagandist.

Hillary Clinton is a national disgrace.  The entire PROCESS that led to this unelectable paranoid fascist control-freak winning the Democratic nomination was a fraud controlled by party insiders.

But what a damn surprise that finally, after YEARS, emails DO matter, after all.

Meanwhile, last week I wrote an article about the sheer dishonesty of the mainstream media coverage of the Republican National Convention.  They demonized the open-carry laws of Cleveland and predicted mayhem that never happened; they predicted a giant wave of Republican protest that never happened; they tried to milk every single protest event outside as a narrative to tarnish the convention going on inside to the extent that there would be eighty media surrounding 20 protestors.  They claimed that every time a negative remark was said against Hillary Clinton, that it was reminiscent of a “climate of hate” that forced the “journalists” to remember the rise of the Nazis.

And which party just got busted hating on Jews???  You got it, the REAL Party of Lucifer, the Democrat Party.

And as there are tens of thousands of protesters rightly protesting the fascism endemic to the Democratic National Convention and the entire Democratic Party, as you see all the hateful remarks that will spew out of every speakers’ mouth toward Donald Trump, just know that the media is as dishonest as the sun is hot.

Just another something to chew on: the Clinton campaign is blaming this email leak on Russia.  You mark my words, if you are fool enough to vote for Hillary Clinton, Russia will also have in its database all the thirty-two thousand emails Hillary purged from her secret server beyond the FBI’s ability to recover that will prove her criminal corruption through her corrupt Clinton Foundation.  Russia will blackmail Hillary Clinton into being Vladimir Putin’s slave.  And the United States will be sold down the river by a woman who long ago proved that she was all-too-willing to sell America down the river if the price was right or if it was convenient for her.

No Riots? Crime In America By Race, And The Statistical Shenanigans Our Justice Department And FBI (Hillary Owes THEM Big) Play

July 12, 2016

I’m just going to state something right here at the outset: are there racist white people?  Yes.  Are there racist white people forming themselves into hate groups?  Yes.  Is it evil?  Yes.  But there is a stark difference going on in our incredibly toxic culture, because here’s the real question: are those racist white people and their racist hate groups demonized by EVERYBODY???  Yes.  Contrast that to the incredible hypocritical racism we now see coming out of vile hate groups from blacks and from Hispanics.  And then think about the whitewash these racist minority groups get every single damn day.  It’s only racist when white people form into groups: when black lives matter forms (think of the holy hell that would have erupted in our media if a “white lives matter” group gained a substantial following in America; when we have an NAACP (think of how it would be treated if “NAACP” stood for “National Association for the Advancement of Caucasian People”); when we have a Black Congressional Caucus (think of the righteous outrage of black congressmen if we had a “White Congressional Caucus”), etc. etc., ad nauseum.  There is such a massive hypocrite double-standard going on, it is UNREAL.

And the now-provably false argument has been if we just allow this massive hypocrite double standard, if we just give black people more power, more of what they want, they will fully join in with American society.  When what we are clearly seeing is BULL CRAP; rather, what they will do is angrily and bitterly demand more and more and more while feeling less and less and less as stakeholders who have duties themselves.  Blacks have been indoctrinated for the last fifty damn years by the Democratic Party and by the liberal media and by every other leftist source there is that they should have no stake whatsoever in this nation; that we owe THEM rather than they owe anybody else anything.    And so black people feel perfectly okay voting on a profoundly racial basis to get what they want for themselves as a race; but they would be hotter than HELL if white people did what they are doing every single damn day.  And so they have as a result of this kid-glove treatment felt not better and better, but rather worse and worse, more and more angry, more and more bitter.  And now more and more violent.

And it’s exploding now.

And it’s almost entirely based on pure lies.

I just came across something that really surprised me, given the fact that I live in a city that has a high percentage of Hispanics and which is beset with a significant Hispanic gang problem: according to Obama’s Justice Department and FBI – you know, the same people who just absolved Hillary Clinton for any criminal wrongdoing in her secret, private, unauthorized server being used to send and receive thousands of classified emails in violation of our national security, failed to send thousands of work-related emails even though it was her duty to do so and even though she swore under oath before Congress that she had made certain she had done, etc. – NO HISPANIC has EVER committed a single crime.

That’s news, of course, to many Donald Trump supporters who have received vicious beatings at the hands of Democrat Party Hispanic thugs:

6

Any Hispanic criminals out there?  “No habla, gringo! Y si, se puede!”

Pretty amazing, considering how often I’ll be watching the local news or reading my local newspaper and see Hispanic men with Hispanic names being either arrested, tried or sought for arrest; pretty amazing given how many times I’ve gone to jury duty and saw the Hispanic suspect sitting there next to his lawyer.

But true, unless we’re being lied to on such a massive scale it is beyond unreal.

How did this fraud happen?

Consider how the FBI breaks down crime by race:

Untitled

Let’s see.  According to the woman who met secretly with Bill Clinton while his wife was under criminal investigation by her department, according to FBI Director Comey who whitewashed her after acknowledging that she committed such acts of gross negligence and incompetence that she should never be allowed to ever hold ANY government job ever again, we’ve got the following racial groups living in America that we ought to track the criminality of: whites (of course Obama would want to keep track of that one); black or African-American (someone please explain the difference that we need that “or” there); American Indian or Alaska Native; Asian; Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander.

That’s it.  No one else from any other race needs to have their crimes tracked.

So let me introduce an outright lie straight from Planet Hell that Obama has redirected our planetary orbit to travel to and which Hillary Clinton now vows to steer the ship of Planet Earth.

Hispanics are white people whenever they commit a crime.  Somehow they only become “Hispanic” when a Democrat like Obama wants to incite them as a distinct racial group to “punish your enemies” (i.e. white people and Republicans).  And so every single time a Hispanic commits a crime, the FBI blames white people for it.  Every single time.  While every single time Democrats and liberals want these same people who are classified as “white” to castigate whites want them to be “Hispanic,” well, presto-bismo they become “Hispanic” again.

Which would mean, if you were honest, liberal, that every single damn time someone gets caught crossing the Mexican border illegally, another white person just got their justice taken away by the Obama administration.  And the government is actually truly out to get white people.  And liberals lie about it the way Hitler lied about his genocides.  It gets just diabolical if you accept this bullcrap statistical shenanigans we’re getting spoon-fed by liberal progressive government bureaucracies.

And if you actually simply identify Hispanics as NOT being white people – which believe me most Hispanic people are hardcore determined to NOT claim as they themselves daily demonize white people as horrible racists bound on enslaving them – NONWHITES ARE ACTUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR 90% OF ALL CRIMES COMMITTED IN THE UNITED STATES.

Every time a Hispanic robs someone, every time a Hispanic rapes someone, every time a Hispanic murders someone, every single Hispanic criminal thug and gang member and drug dealer there is, WHITE PEOPLE GET THE BLAME.

Nonwhites commit ninety percent of the damn crimes.  Amazing,

And so you see blathering bullcrap like this one that I post in its entirety at the bottom of this article in which whites get that leftist hate-blame and Hispanics are NOT EVEN MENTIONED AT ALL.

And here is the article preserved that points out the shocking percentage of our crime that is “nonwhite” and which correctly points out the shenanigans that the government plays to “fundamentally transform” the truth about nonwhite crime:

90% Nonwhite Violent Crime Rate: FBI
November 3, 2015 by TNO Staff— in North America

FBI-2014

Although the FBI and the US Census Bureau does its best to deliberately hide the nonwhite crime plague—by ascribing all Hispanic crime to whites, even this devious tactic cannot hide the full extent of black and Hispanic crime in America.

This fact becomes even more apparent when the crime rates for cities with majority nonwhite populations are compared, and when the FBI’s own “most wanted” lists are studied for racial categorization errors.

The official federal government’s definitions of race—as used by the FBI—only have the following categories: “white,” “black,” “American Indian or Alaska Native,” and “Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. All Hispanics are added to the “white” category, along with all North Africans, Arabs, Middle Easterners, and Jews.

The FBI’s own current (November 2015) list of most wanted murder suspects in the US is a case in point. It contains 71 suspects—of which only six are actually white, as can be seen from their mugshots.

FBi-Murder-wanted

Some 51 of the remaining suspects are nonwhite Hispanics. Nonetheless, the FBI has classified all 51 of these people as “white.” (The remainder are correctly classified as “black.”)

Some examples from the FBI’s “most wanted murderer” list serve to illustrate the point:

1. The FBI wanted list describes one Cesar Villarreal as follows:

DESCRIPTION Hair: Black, Eyes: Brown, Race: White (Hispanic)

cesar-villarreal-FBI

2. Santino Mario Garcia is described as follows:

DESCRIPTION Hair: Black, Eyes: Brown, Race: White (Hispanic)

santino-mario-garcia-FBI

3. Moises Galvan Gonzalez is described as follows:

Hair: Brown, Eyes: Brown, Race: White (Hispanic)

moises-galvan-gonzalez-FBI

The deliberate misclassification is done with the express purpose of boosting the number of crimes which the FBI ascribes to its “white” category.

This is done because the federal statisticians are aware that if they correctly identified these Hispanics as nonwhite, then it would be impossible for even the controlled media to hide the overwhelming nonwhite crime plague.

As the FBI refuses to correctly classify offenders by race, it is only possible to make assumptions based on their own “most wanted” lists.

Using, for example, the FBI’s “most wanted murderer” list, it would seem to be a safe assumption that only a fraction of the suspects identified as “white” by the federal agencies are in fact European-Americans.

FBIfeatured

Using this “most wanted murderer” list, for example, it would not be unreasonable to assume that only 11 percent (or 6 of 51 suspects) of all the murders crimes ascribed to “whites” by the FBI, were in fact committed by European-Americans.

Given the caveat that this assumption is based purely on the FBI’s “most wanted list,” and is therefore subject to a certain degree of variation, it is possible to undertake the following analysis of the FBI’s other statistics as outlined in their latest “Crime in the United States, 2014” report.

READ  Invaders Block Calais Roads

According to the FBI, there were an estimated 1,165,383 violent crimes (murder and non-negligent homicides, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults) in 2014.

For the category of “violent crimes there were a total of 8,730,665 arrests, broken down by the FBI as follows:

“White” 6,056,687 or 69.4%

“Black or African American” 2,427,683 or 27.8%

“American Indian or Alaska Native” 135,599 or 1.6%

Asian 100,067 or 1.1%

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” 10,629 or 0.1%

Using the “11% formula outlined above, it is safe to assume that European-Americans in reality only accounted for 666,235 arrests for violent crimes. This translated to 7.63% of all such arrests.

Nonwhites accounted therefore, for at least 92% of all arrestees for violent crime in 2014.

The FBI statistics for the individual crimes which make up the “violent crime” are as follows:

  1. Murder and non-negligent manslaughter

Total Arrests: 8,230, broken down as follows:

“White” 3,807 or 46.3%

“Black or African American” 4,224 or 51.3%

“American Indian or Alaska Native” 83 or 1.0%

Asian 107 or 1.3%

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” 9, or 0.1%

Once the “11%” formula is applied to these deliberately misclassified figures, it transpires that European-Americans committed 905 murders in 2014, or 10% of all such crimes.

  1. Rape

Total Arrests: 16,326, broken down as follows:

White 10,977 or 67.2%

“Black or African American” 4,888 or 29.9%

“American Indian or Alaska Native” 212 or 1.3%

Asian 222 or 1.4%

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” 27 or 0.2%

Once the “11%” formula is applied to these deliberately misclassified figures, it transpires that European-Americans committed 1,795 rapes in 2014, or 10% of all such crimes.

  1. Robbery

Total Arrests: 74,077, broken down as follows:

“White” 31,354 or 42.3%

“Black or African American” 41,379 or 55.9%

“American Indian or Alaska Native” 616 or 0.8%

Asian 617 or 0.8%

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” 111 or 0.1%

Once the “11%” formula is applied to these deliberately misclassified figures, it transpires that European-Americans committed 8,148 robberies in 2014, or 10% of all such crimes.

  1. Aggravated assault

Total Arrests: 291,600, broken down as follows:

“White” 185,612 or 63.7%

“Black or African American” 96,511 or 33.1%

“American Indian or Alaska Native” 4,372 or 1.5%

Asian 4,507 or 1.5%

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” 598 or 0.2%

Once the “11%” formula is applied to these deliberately misclassified figures, it transpires that European-Americans committed 32.076 robberies in 2014, or 11% of all such crimes.

READ  As Rumors of Immigration Amnesty Increase, Third World Invaders Send their Young Kids to America to Stake Their Claim

Of course, once the disproportionate population figures are taken into account (the fact that whites make up over 60 percent of the entire population), then the nonwhite crime figures leap out of all proportion in relation to their actual population numbers.

The FBI statistics showed further that the cities which are the least white, are the most dangerous. Figures contained in table 6 of the FBI statistics, “Crime in the United States by Metropolitan Statistical area, 2014” reveal the following:

Most Dangerous Cities with populations above 200,000.

No. 1: Detroit (93% nonwhite 2010)

No. 2: Memphis, Tennessee (67% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 3: Oakland, California (75% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 4: St. Louis, Missouri (57% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 5: Birmingham, Alabama (79% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 6: Milwaukee, Wisconsin (67% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 7: Baltimore, Maryland (72% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 8: Cleveland, Ohio (67% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 9: Stockton, California (78% nonwhite in 2010)

No. 10: Indianapolis, Indiana (US Census Bureau does not provide statistics for the city, only for the city and some 368.1 square miles around the city, called the “Indianapolis (city (balance)).” These figures say that the area was 43% nonwhite in 2010. An article in the Indianapolis Recorder of July 3, 2105, reported that “population growth in [Indianapolis] America’s 11th largest city continues to be fueled in large part by African-Americans and to a lesser extent by Hispanics and Asians.”)

Furthermore, the FBI figures showed that the biggest cities with the highest violent crime rates were as follows:

Detroit, Michigan 1988.63 violent crimes per capita

Memphis, Tennessee 1740.51 violent crimes per capita

Oakland, California 1685.39 violent crimes per capita

St. Louis, Missouri 1678.73 violent crimes per capita

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1476.41 violent crimes per capita

Baltimore, Maryland 1338.54 violent crimes per capita

Cleveland, Ohio 1334.35 violent crimes per capita

Stockton, California 1331.47 violent crimes per capita

Indianapolis, Indiana 1254.66 violent crimes per capita

Of America’s three biggest cities, Chicago had the highest violent crime rate at 884.26 violent crimes per capita.

New York City had a rate of 596.7 and Los Angeles had a rate of 490.71.

The biggest cities with the highest murder rates were as follows:

St. Louis, Missouri 49.91 murders per capita

Detroit, Michigan 43.52 murders per capita

New Orleans, Louisiana (70% nonwhite in 2010) 38.75 murders per capita

Baltimore, Maryland 33.84 murders per capita

Newark, New Jersey (90% nonwhite in 2010) 33.32 murders per capita

Buffalo, New York (55% nonwhite in 2010) 23.22 murders per capita

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (36% nonwhite in 2010) 22.43 murders per capita

Memphis, Tennessee 21.38 murders per capita

Atlanta, Georgia (66% nonwhite in 2010) 20.47 murders per capita

Cincinati, Ohio (52% nonwhite in 2010) 20.16 murders per capita

I don’t know if the “90 percent thing is in fact true,” but I DO know for an established, documented FACT that every Hispanic crime gets foisted on to “whites” and that liberals are exploiting that government LIE to demonize white people who are NOT guilty of what they are being slandered for.

I think I have established that a) the government is lying to us and the liberal news media is reporting propaganda as “fact,” and b) leftist ideologues are taking these lies to the streets and exploiting them to create the worst racial unrest this nation has seen in my fifty-year lifetime.  And both my parents likewise say they’ve never seen this kind of hate so widespread across the entire nation in THEIR entire lifetimes.

Obama dishonestly blathers on in Warsaw, Poland about how there we are as united as ever under his magnificent leadership and any one who tries to insinuate we’re divided is a liar out to tarnish his marvelous imperial legacy as emperor:

“You’re not seeing riots, you’re not seeing police going after people who are protesting peacefully,” he said.

Nope.  Nothin’ to see here, folks.  White people, please keep shuffling forward in the line labeled, “This way toward slaughterhouse.”  And don’t get anxious about that sign.  It doesn’t mean what you think it means and if you think it means something bad, it’s just because of your innate white racism.

I want you to stop and reflect what Obama does with this: he says “you’re not seeing riots.”  When yes you ARE.  But he puts a comma there, and adds what he describes would entail if we actually were seeing “riots.”  He says, “you’re not seeing police going after people who are protesting peacefully.”  Which is to say that as far as Obama is concerned, it’s not the viciousness and vileness of the rioter that determines whether there is a “riot”; because “rioting” is actually something he blames on POLICE when they go after peaceful protestors.

Does it matter that there IS no racial bias in police shootings, as proven by a Harvard study???  Of COURSE it doesn’t matter.

This is EXACTLY what Obama has done over and over and over again for the last toxic seven years of his regime: insinuate the real blame upon the police.  He’s done it ever since 2009 when he IMMEDIATELY went out and declared “the policie acted stupidly.”  And demonically “disgraced” and “smeared” the police.   And his Department of Injustice has carried on with his attack against the police every single time any black person was killed by a police officer or even just a citizen on his back being punched in the face over and over and over again.

Obama has created – exploiting race as the gasoline he could ignite – an incredibly vicious anti-police climate.  It’s right out of what the Bible said would happen in the last days, described as “the mystery of lawlessness.”   The Democratic Party is the engine of outright LAWLESSNESS in America today, bar none.

Obama SPAWNED this toxic “black lives matter” movement straight out of his roach soul.  And he’s making sure he never allows a serious riot to go to waste.  Even as he lies that we’re not seeing the riots that we’re clearly seeing.

Let’s contrast what Obama said with the goings-on in St. Paul, Minnesota and the words of the police chief to describe what happened:

 

St Paul MN non-riot

ST. PAUL, Minn. – Police arrested about 100 people in St. Paul during protests of the recent police killings of Philando Castile in Falcon Heights and Alton Sterling in Baton Rouge.

Authorities say 21 St. Paul officers and six state troopers were hurt during the protest that shutdown a part of I-94.

About half the arrests came during a blockade of the interstate.

About 50 arrests were made early this morning in another part of St. Paul.

St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman and Police Chief Todd Axtell both condemn the violence.

AXTELL said: “Last night really was the first time in my 28 years as a police officer that I have observed the level of violence that was directed towards our public servants.

The public servants that are there to protect all of us in this room and all of us in our community. And it’s really a disgrace.

And protestors last night turned into criminals. And I’m absolutely disgusted by the acts of some-not all-but some.”

Nope.  No “riots” under his divine magnificence-in-chief.

No riots here, either:

005

Or here:

001

Or here either:

no riots 1

If you see a riot in this picture, it’s actually a Rorschach test that just proved you’re a racist:

no riots 2

What you talkin’ ’bout rioting, Willis:

no riots 3

This is NOT a “riot,” it’s “lifeplace violence”:

no riots 4

PLEASE tell me you don’t see any “rioting” here:

no riots 5

Come on, WHAT “riots”???  The good citizens of Los Estados Unidos are too busy picking up the gold bricks that were left over from Obama paving all of our streets with gold to “riot.”  Who you been listening to, Fox News???

Oh, and no terrorist attacks, either.  It’s all “workplace violence.”  Probably committed by white people, of course.

Come on, please ignore the fact that under Barack Obama’s policies, terrorism has SKYROCKETED by 800 percent between 2010 and last year:

Deaths Due To Terrorism

Please don’t pay any attention to the fact that by the time Obama leaves office, by simple extrapolation of the previous six years, terrorism will have skyrocketed by 1,700 percent.

Violence is exploding across America.  Violence is exploding across our WORLD.  I am now calling Obama the “Half-mast president.”  Because his presidency is a time of national mourning where our flags are constantly at half-mast as he fails and fails and fails over and over and over again.

But he is a pathologically wicked man and he is like Cain and he is NEVER responsible for anything and it’s always Bush or the Republicans or guns or whatever he can demonize at the time.

It’s just lifeplace violence.  All over the world now.  And NONE of it has anything whatsoever to do with Obama or any of his policies.  And everything that is happening is all Bush’s fault.  And please don’t disturb Pharaoh Obama’s golf game until he’s finished when he will come out and slander the 2nd Amendment and the fundamental right that the American people have ALWAYS had throughout our history to keep and bear arms.

This is exactly what the Bible told us would happen under the demonic Antichrist.  The man will be the most arrogant liar and slanderer in all of human history.  And anybody who says otherwise will be branded by a demonic world and a demonic culture as a “racist” or some kind of horrible person.  Because the truth is horrible to the wicked and they will NEVER receive anything but the lies they want to hear.

So they will twist and distort the Holy Bible to “fundamentally transform” homosexual perversion and abortion-murder and LGBT crap and whatever the hell THIS is that is being forced upon our nation’s warriors who used to be able to protect us –

soldiers high heels

and whatever the hell THIS is that Obama did to our sailors as he sold us out to Iran:

Obama Navy Surrendering to Iran

– into “virtues.”  When the Bible declares “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil” and tells us that these things are “virtues” only to the most wicked kind of people who have placed themselves and their nation under the holy wrath of a righteous God.

There’s no virtues under Obama.  Only wickedness and judgment for our national wickedness that this wicked nation VOTED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR.

Police are openly saying they are on edge right now as they are being systematically targeted for assassination in ambush shootings by black lives matter “protesters.”  Blacks sit there and try to insinuate that police are death squads.  Holy crap, what liars they are: there are 8.7 MILLION arrests every single year as police try to keep our cities and our streets safe; and of those 8.7 million arrests, 1/10,000th of one percent of those end up as police shootings.  I mean, hell, yeah, they’re REALLY death squads, aren’t they???  And then add to that the fact that whites – when the racial distinctions are actually applied – constitute more of those “police shootings” than all the blacks and all the Hispanics COMBINED.

Stop and think about it for one second: you see the statistic that blacks as a percentage of their race are killed three times more than whites as a percentage of their race.  And this is offered as “proof” that police are targeting blacks for genocide.  And that’s exactly how the demonically evil black lives matter activists frame it.  But how about this fact: one out of three young black men are either in prison or on parole or are on probation at any given moment.  What the hell percentage of encounters with the police do you think blacks have as a population relative to whites as a population???  With every single one of these bad encounters adding to the likelihood that a shooting will ensue???

And right now, black lives matter, and Democrats, are forcing every single police officer to be forced to contemplate every single black person as a potential cop murderer.  And their trigger fingers are itchy because they just want to do their jobs and go home to their wives and to their kids.

You’re talking about more than ninety percent of all blacks murdered by other blacks.  And black lives matter and the roach “civil rights” leaders like Al Sharpton don’t give one flying damn about it.

They’re not going into the hell that was Barack Obama’s hometown before he sent his chief-of-staff to be the mayor who led it even further into hell on earth.

Black people feel like they are being singled out by police.  And I can’t deny that they aren’t.  But you’ve got to deal with the fact that police can’t HELP but treat black people different WHEN BLACK PEOPLE KEEP ACTING THE DAMN WAY THEY ARE ACTING.

It’s not “racist” for police to look at black people and be a little more wary any more than it is “racist” for me to look at a gray cloud and think it’s going to probably rain.  Because too many times when I see a cloud like that, rain comes.  Just as too many times when police encounter black people, crime comes.

And the simple fact of the matter is that black lives DON’T matter to “black lives matter.”

Black lives matter??? Seriously???  NOT TO BLACK PEOPLE, THEY DON’T!!!  As a result of their roach allegiance to the Democrat Party and its murder machine a.k.a. “abortion,” 6 out of every 10 black babies are murdered in their wombs by their mothers.  As a result of the Democrat Party and abortion, there almost IS no such thing as “a black family,” with seventy percent of black children growing up in a single parent household.  It is simply a FACT that the term “black father” is a contradiction in terms: and given the logic of abortion it OUGHT TO BE.  Because stop and think about the fact that at the moment of conception, every single person who believes in abortion categorically states that no “child” was “fathered.”  The “father” had NOTHING to do with any child and he is forced into the role of passive observer and is literally forced to sit there and passively watch while HIS VERY OWN CHILD IS MURDERED IN A DEMOCRAT ABORTION FACTORY.

This is TEN TIMES more evil than what the Nazis did.  Democrats have murdered SIXTY MILLION BABIES since they legalized infanticide in 1973.

Six out of ten times a black baby is born, a black woman murders that black baby.  And almost every single time a black person is murdered in America, another black person murdered that victim.

And this is the toxic, vile effect of this toxic, vile, Democrat-Party-OWNED race community is boiling over.

Black people made this bed.  They should either lie in it or get the hell out of it.

Instead, they blame everybody else for it and stay in that diseased bed while they piss in it and crap in it and puke in it.  They will NEVER get out of that bed because the Democratic Party OWNS them and TELLS them what to think and what to believe and what to say and what to do.

They will NEVER take personal responsibility for themselves.  Because you CAN’T take personal responsibility for yourself and be a DEMOCRAT.

Now, don’t think all of the above wasn’t done for a propaganda purpose.

And don’t think the decision to label “Hispanic crimes” as “White crimes” wasn’t done for propaganda purposes, either.

Consider this article that I will preserve lest it suddenly be deleted and purged the way more than 30,000 of Hilary’s emails mysteriously were deleted and purged.  Please understand that the following article is pure, unadulterated DRIVEL and I post it to simply document what abject lying roaches liberals truly are.  I challenge you to find the word “Hispanic” or any similar racial descriptive for “Hispanic” in this piece that lambasts whites for criminality:

The TRUTH About FBI Crime Statistics by Race

As more exposure is being given to the unjustified killings of black men by white police officers, the Black Lives Matter movement is gaining momentum. Consequently, many contend that the movement isn’t warranted because police officers murdering black people isn’t the real issue, but instead crime committed by blacks. As a matter fact, the notion that blacks are perpetrating the most crime in this country is said to be the real reason that police are obligated to scrutinize, even target them.

However, according to FBI crime statistics by race, it isn’t blacks who are driving criminal activity. Actually in 2014, blacks committed only 28.3% of all crimes. And it shouldn’t be bewildering that whites dominated commission of crimes by perpetrating 68.9% of them, considering they denote 77% of U.S. citizenry. But according to the media, blacks are the most perilous, and therefore, susceptible to violence.

In addition to suggesting that blacks commit the most crimes in general, it has become standard for the media to promote the misconception that blacks are overwhelmingly committing the most “violent” crimes in the country. However, according to the FBI, the most violent crimes are murders, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, all of which whites excessively perpetrate. In 2014, 390,233 violent acts were committed and blacks were responsible for only 37% of them. Contrary to what the media suggests, statistics prove that whites execute 59% of violent crimes in the U.S.

What source is the media referencing when proclaiming blacks as being the most criminal? The fact is that there is no such source. The media has used all communicative platforms to define black culture as violent, and therefore, are an imminent threat to white people. They use false statistics of criminality against blacks to reinforce the idea that blacks are lawless, and therefore, deserve every form of violence perpetrated against them.

The media completely circumvent actual facts that are publicly displayed on FBI.gov, in order to promote their racist agenda. Mediums such as Fox News, CNN, etc., commit a major disservice when they refuse to acknowledge and divulge the truth about blacks and crime. Falsely convincing society that black people are the most criminal only proves that this country has contempt for blacks, and consequently, view them all as threatening and inferior. The media’s one-sided, superficial, and exaggerated depiction of black people reduces the real variety, depth, and complexity of the entire race.

Furthermore, when the issue of white police officers murdering black people is addressed, mainstream society conspicuously attempts to deflect from the matter by challenging “why isn’t black on white crime discussed?” Well, let’s discuss it now.

FBI data shows that of all white victims of murders (3,005), only 13% (409) are actually committed by blacks.  84% (2,509) of the killings of white people are committed by white people. This fact is overlooked because by acknowledging it requires accepting that white on white crime is just as prevalent as their favorite topic, “Black on black crime.”

FBI statistics also prove that the highest offense charge is “Drug abuse violations.” The data reveals that approximately 69% of those violations were committed by whites and only 29% by blacks. However, there are more blacks in prison for drug related offenses than whites. Furthermore, how is it even possible for blacks to represent only 13.4% of America’s population, but maintain over 60% of the prison populace? This fact is designed to give the impression that blacks are more susceptible and prone to drug crimes than any other race, especially whites.

But it is a fact that marijuana use is roughly equal among blacks and whites, yet blacks are 3.73 times as likely to be arrested for marijuana possession.  It is also a truth that blacks are more likely to get caught with crack, unlike whites who tend to possess powder cocaine. Consequently, people convicted in federal court of possession of 5 grams of crack cocaine will receive a minimum mandatory sentence of 5 years in federal prison. On the other hand, possession of 500 grams of powder cocaine carries the same sentence.

The media will use the disproportion of mass incarceration of blacks to support their false claims that blacks commit the most drug related offenses. Meanwhile, they circumvent revealing the other side of the coin, which is that the prison industrial complex–a system of racist drug laws, and bias policing and court system used for economical and social advancement–is the primary reason that blacks receive stiffer sentences than whites.

The bottom line is that in America, whites kill whites and blacks kill blacks. Nevertheless, police officers are killing blacks significantly more than they are whites, even when whites prove to be more of a threat. Despite the media’s racist motives, the FBI statistics prove that whites are the most violent, and commit the most criminal acts, including murder and drug related offenses.

I am so beyond sick of the lies and the hypocrisy and the racism and the hate that is coming out of the Democratic Party and those whose souls they own.

 

 

Not A Criminal, Just An Incompetent Fool: I Demand To Know Why ANYBODY Thinks That Hillary Clinton Is Fit To Be President

July 7, 2016

Right now, FBI Director Comey is appearing before the House of Representatives in an emergency meeting designed to basically find out just WHAT THE HELL.

It’s just remarkable to me to listen to the Democrats pretend that there’s actually nothing to see here, folks, so please kindly shuffle out of the way and vote for Hillary in November.

FBI Director Comey himself in his Tuesday statement blew up a number of false Hillary Clinton statements made to the American people (and if that link vanishes here’s another one).  Without any legitimate question, it is now established as a FACT that Hillary Clinton not only lied but repeatedly lied to the American people about literally every single facet of her secret server system and the fallout it’s discovery by Republicans entailed.

“When you mishandled classified information, did you know at the time that what you were doing was unlawful?”  That’s the standard that FBI Director Comey is claiming he took regarding whether or not to prosecute Hillary Clinton.  When you were bludgeoning your neighbor to death, did you know it was wrong at the time you were doing the bludgeoning?  He is reading a specific intent into a gross negligence statute that is NOT in that statute.  Which is to say that he is without any question rewriting the law.  We further discover the strange fact that “Washington Has Been Obsessed With Punishing Secrecy Violations — Until Hillary Clinton.”  It is unprecedented for an FBI Director that is not a prosecutor to take a public stand that “no reasonable prosecutor” would prosecute this case.  Particularly given how many prosecutors including (according to Comey’s testimony today before Congress) many of his own personal friends fundamentally disagree with that position, claiming HELL YES they would prosecute.  You add to that the chain of “coincidences” that led up to this refusal to prosecute: President Obama on March 10 that what Hillary did was “careless.”  Lo and behold it would be that EXACT same word that Comey would conclude from his “investigation.”  You have to comprehend the impropriety of Obama putting his finger on the scale.  Also, prior to FBI Director revealing his conclusion of his “investigation,” we have Obama publicly endorsing the subject of a criminal investigation on June 9.  How would that NOT influence the career government investigators who work for Obama’s regime?   Then we get the revelation of a secret, not-disclosed until a local reporter got a tip and forced its disclosure, of a highly inappropriate meeting between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch.  It is quite possible that the purpose of that meeting was for Bill to inform Loretta that she would stay on as Attorney General in an unindicted Hillary Clinton Administration.  As a result of the widespread distrust of that meeting, Lynch said she would accept the recommendation of the FBI.  But the FBI itself had been impugned by that secret meeting: because FBI agents were participating in attempting to cover up that highly inappropriate secret meeting by not allowing any pictures and ordering people nearby to put away their cell phones.  And so you’ve got Comey’s boss having put her thumb on the scale as well.  There was simply no question whatsoever that every single superior of Comey up the chain had made their preferences crystal clear regarding what his “findings” ought to be.

We also know that it is now a matter of settled fact that Hillary Clinton “mishandled information” – specifically top secret, classified information included special compartmented intelligence.  Without any question, for instance, Hillary Clinton gave secured information to individuals who did NOT have the proper security clearances, which is a crime.  These individuals include some of her staff and even personal friends outside the State Department but also include her numerous lawyers who did not have security clearances to follow Clinton’s instructions.  The Clinton campaign has publicly maintained that Hillary’s “attorneys had individually read every email to determine if it was a government document or personal correspondence.” The Clinton campaign has publicly maintained that “Every one of the more than 60,000 emails were read. Period.”  There is absolutely no question whatsoever that her attorneys who did NOT have security clearances were at least handed the content and allowed to read and search for whatever they wanted; she gave them access to what they should by law not have been allowed access to.  But Comey in his testimony before Congress today stubbornly maintains that Hillary’s “intent” was to get good legal representation rather than to violate the law.  Which has been his reasoning process in quibbling over every single indicting detail.  When the better way to phrase it would be “her intent was to violate the law to help her get good legal representation.”  May I offer an analogy of robbing a bank in order to obtain the money to pay for my attorney in a different criminal case?  Would you seriously argue with FBI Director Comey that my “intent was to get good legal representation” rather than to break the law???  She was breaking the law for her own personal needs and her own personal convenience.  That has been her pattern all along.  And to argue that “it wasn’t her intent to break the law,” but rather it was merely her intent to get whatever the hell she wanted is maddening.

Try this trick on the freeway, kids: tell the officer who pulls you over for going 140mph, “But officer, my intent wasn’t to break the law; my intent was merely to get to my destination faster.”  Because in the bizarre universe of Hillary Clinton, that would actually WORK.

I personally think that there were ALL KINDS of shenanigans to obtain a foreordained conclusion regarding whether Hillary would ever be indicted by an administration with Obama at its head, but let’s just set that aside for the sake of argument.

There’s nothing we can do about it.  We have a legal system filled with double-standards where the privileged get treatment that others outside of that elite class will never receive.  And this case is a blatant example of it.  So let’s accept that double-standard and accept the total lack of justice in America today and move on.

Reps. Jason Chaffitz and Trey Gowdy today set the basis for the crime of lying to Congress.  Because Hillary Clinton was under oath when she testified before Congress and if she told the truth to the FBI behind closed doors, there is little question now that she told lie after lie after LIE to Congress with the American people watching.  But that is for another day.

I further said in conclusion in my last article that the thing I would MOST like to see is the transcript of the FBI interview.  Given that Hillary made factual lies in virtually every single statement she made throughout this investigation – including laughably that she even WAS under criminal investigation – I would like very much to see her answers to FBI questions compared to her previous statements made to the American people and made under oath to the people’s representatives in Congress.

Comey is basically saying that Hillary did ALL KINDS of egregious things, but he couldn’t prove she knew beyond a reasonable doubt that she KNEW that she was doing egregious things.  He said that she was “extremely careless” in his statement on Tuesday and exposed THE most classified information within the United States government to hackers and hostile foreign governments.  For the record, today Comey stated again that Hillary was “extremely careless” and added the phrase “that she was negligent” in his testimony before Congress.  In his statement on Tuesday, Comey acknowledged that it was entirely possible that “hostile actors” and “sophisticated agencies” gained access to our most vital secrets.  Comey pointedly admitted that there was no question whatsoever that hostile actors HAD been proven to have gained access to the people whom Hillary was using her secret server to communicate with:

With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account. — FBI Director Comey, July 5, 2016

Which takes it to the realm of DOCUMENTED FACT that classified material fell into the hands of hostile actors and/or sophisticated agencies as a result of Hillary’s secret server system.  And so anybody who wants to continue to maintain the façade that Hillary Clinton did not put our national security in jeopardy is simply a liar at this point.

In today’s testimony before Congress, FBI Director Comey referred to Hillary Clinton’s private server as “an unauthorized server.”  Hillary Clinton had lied to the American people claiming it “was allowed” but no, it is now a matter of settled fact that it was NOT allowed and it was unauthorized and Hillary lied when claiming that what was in fact NOT allowed and which was unauthorized was allowed and authorized.  Further, in answering the specific question, “What was protecting that unauthorized server?” Comey’s answer was “Not much.”  She didn’t have even the most rudimentary security.  Comey stated categorically that it would have been far better had she used a GMail account – which can be hacked for $129.  And Comey stated that Hillary didn’t even have anywhere near THAT security on her unauthorized secret server!!!  His precise words: “None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.”

Let’s get past Hillary Clinton’s oft-repeated lie to the American people and let’s get past Comey’s bizarre reasoning in sparing her from indictment and just ask some questions that every American ought to be asking.

You need to understand that Hillary Clinton was a lawyer herself.  She worked at a top law firm in Arkansas.  Her husband served as the Attorney General for that state.  She later spent eight years in the White House.  Then she spent eight years as a United States Senator, serving on subcommittees including the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities and the Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support.  For the record, she also served between 2001 and 2009 as a commissioner on the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe.  All that before serving as the Secretary of State.

Democrats – including Obama and Hilary Clinton herself – proudly maintain that she is THE most experienced and THE most qualified candidate for president in the entire history of planet earth.

And the obvious question ought to be: then how in the hell did she NOT realize what she was doing, such that she did not have “intent,” as FBI Director Comey maintains in refusing to indict her???

But now get to the basic heart of her argument before the FBI when she answered their questions that clearly fixated on Hillary Clinton’s “intent.”  There is absolutely ZERO question that she broke laws, violated rules, ignored procedures, was “extremely careless,” and yes, “negligent.”  In today’s statement he told Congress that he believed Hillary lacked “sophistication” to know what she was doing was criminal.  Hillary Clinton isn’t merely grossly negligent; now and forever she will be the living, breathing poster  hag for gross negligence.  You will look up “gross negiligence” in a dictionary and see her name in the definition.  In his July 5 presentation, FBI Director Comey stated that “There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.”  So we have it as a factual statement of public record that Hillary Clinton is NOT a “reasonable person” and pointedly did NOT act as a “reasonable person” would act in her position.  So what did Hillary, a lawyer prepped by a battalion of lawyers, do?  They basically steadfastly maintained that Hillary Clinton did not understand what she was doing; could not comprehend the ramifications or effects of her actions; was not competent to form the “intent” that Comey was determined had to be found.

In other words, to put it bluntly, Hillary Clinton maintained that she was simply not competent to understand or comprehend what she was doing.  So no matter how many violations of law, she shouldn’t be charged.  “Not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect,” essentially.  Hillary Clinton and her battalion of lawyers are claiming that her stupidity exonerates her.  And FBI Director Comey agrees.

If she had so much as had a clue that no, you shouldn’t install a secret, unauthorized, unclassified server in a bathroom closet somewhere in Denver; no you shouldn’t totally fail to have even the most rudimentary security for such a secret, unauthorized, unclassified server in that bathroom closet in Denver.  Yes, as a matter of fact, I DID know that I was sending and receiving not merely hundreds but actually thousands of classified emails, including emails at the very highest level of classification the government has.  If she had acknowledged ANY of that or similar admissions, she would have been nailed to the wall like a bug in an entymologist’s collection.  Which isn’t a bad analogy for what a prosecutor ought to be: a BUG hunter.

Hillary Clinton before the FBI says, “You can’t charge me; I had absolutely zero clue what I was doing was actually wrong.”

Hillary Clinton before the American people says something about 20 trillion percent different: “I am THE most experienced, most qualified, most competent technocrat who ever lived.”

Here’s the essence of my point, boiled down: the two above claims are mutually and inherently self-refuting.  They cannot possibly both be true in any universe.  At least one of them must be patently false.

If Hillary Clinton is in fact competent, then she is a criminal who happened to successfully game the system and a pathetically naïve FBI Director.  She is like the child who murders her entire family and then successfully sobs for the judge that he should have leniency and mercy on the grounds that she’s an orphan who has no one to turn to and no one to care for her.  She belongs in prison if she is in fact in any way, shape or form competent.  And it was nothing short of a fundamental miscarriage of justice that she was not prosecuted for her many crimes and her many lies as she tried to cover up her crimes in the court of public opinion.

If on the other hand Hillary is what she maintained to the FBI, then she has absolutely no business EVER being allowed anywhere NEAR the presidency of the United States of America.  She had the briefings and the training but she simply lacks the capacity to comprehend that training any better than an orangutan.  You can’t actually ever hold her accountable because she isn’t smart enough to be accountable.  And she’ll be THE most fascist president we’ve ever had because she has already demonstrated a pathological need for HER secrecy even as she cavalierly dismisses the need for the NATION’S secrecy.  I wouldn’t even wish her ilk on a nasty, third world banana republic, let alone the most important nation in the world.

And one of the two paragraphs above – and quite possibly BOTH of them – is true.

That’s what we need to point out and keep pointing out.  Get past the Comey crapball.  Get past the Loretta lynching of the justice process.  Fixate on the fact that what she did makes her absolutely unqualified on THE most fundamental level of national security to even be allowed to ever work in government again, let alone be president.

 

 

 

 

 

The Stupidest Lie In All Human History: It Has Nothing To Do With Islam When Muslims Force You To Recite Qur’an Or Die

July 5, 2016

I am going to proceed to prove and document that if you are a Democrat, you are a demon-possessed fool of the most depraved sort imaginable.

The Los Angeles Times did a major investigative article on June 26, 2016.  It describes just one bloody month – in other words, just a typical month in our world today – of April in which there wasn’t a single day in which there was not a deadly terrorist attack somewhere in the world.  Interestingly, in this article a chart is featured labeling each group responsible for an attack and the number of casualties.  The groups dominating the top were Islamic State which killed 395 people, the Taliban, which killed 109, Boko Haram, which killed 68, Shabab, which killed 41, the Syrian rebels, who killed 23, Abu SAyyaf, which killed 19.  You have to really get into the WEEDS before you find a group that isn’t officially ISLAMIC.

NINETY-FIVE PERCENT of the murders committed by terrorists groups in this month were committed by MUSLIM GROUPS.  More than 800 people were butchered by Muslims claiming Allah and claiming Islamic theology as their primary motivating force to do what they do.

You cannot keep believing these Democrat Party lies that Islam and terrorism have no legitimate connection or relationship.

Of course, the Los Angles Times, being leftist propaganda drivel, doesn’t point that rather important fact out to you.  Nope.  You’ve got to look up the terrorist groups yourself, find out their ideology and do the tallies and then do the math.  Other than the Indian Maoists, the Kurdistan Workers Party (communist), the Lord’s Resistance Army, Renamo, the New People’s Army (communist),  and the New Irish Republican Army, they’ll all MUSLIM.   And these other terrorist groups are chicken feed compared to the real terrorist monsters who are murdering hundreds at a time.

Meanwhile, Democrats like Obama and like Hillary Clinton keep spouting that the Muslim world hates terrorism and is actually joining with us to fight it.  Bull crap.  Last year it was revealed that in spite of Obama’s ocean of lies, HALF A BILLION DOLLARS was committed to training “four or five” Syrian rebels.  Yeah, those Muslims just can’t WAIT to fight terror, can they?  And just in case you’re wondering, Obama just proved that Muslims are NOT going to fight terrorist Muslims YET AGAIN.  Obama blathers idiotically and demonically about Republicans causing terror by giving terrorists access to guns; the only problem with that is Obama believes that every single American who believes in the U.S. Constitution is a “terrorist” while he has put ALL KINDS of weapons including M1-Abrams main battle tanks into the hands of Islamic State again and again as his “good Muslims” drop their weapons and flee time and time and time again.  In fact, we find out that Obama gave $1 billion in military aid to Islamic State because he abandoned Iraq to the terrorists and they just walked up to Obama, bitch-slapped our weak coward in chief, and took his stuff having made sure there wasn’t so much as a single US soldier to say, “Hey, waitaminute.”

Obama has boasted and boasted and boasted about his “fifty nation coalition.”  It’s a joke.

So Obama and Hillary are out there dishonestly claiming that Islamic terrorism isn’t “Islamic” and that Muslims are our friends.  And they’re just lying right out of their anuses they call their mouths.  Muslims are OVERWHELMINGLY responsible for the vicious terrorism and they can’t even tell us who our enemy is.  And meanwhile they dishonestly pretending that we have allies that we very clearly do not have.

Obama and Hillary Clinton are claiming that their strategy to fight terrorism is somehow working when terrorism has exploded 800 percent under Obama and will have exploded by more than 1,700 percent by the time the disgraced fool leaves office.  Just look at the chart and do your own simple extrapolation of where the trend under Obama is headed:

Deaths Due To Terrorism

Terrorism has doubled exponentially every single two year period while Obama has dishonestly claimed he’s been winning and succeeding.

Obama and Hillary Clinton are claiming that their strategy to contain terrorism is somehow working when more than 65 million Muslims have fled and it is only a matter of time before those 65 million Muslims become embittered wherever they end up and become our future “homegrown terrorists.”

The human race has never witnessed anything like this.  This is not merely “failure,” this is DEMONIC FAILURE.

But THE most dishonest media – even making Joseph Goebbels’ Ministry of Propaganda in the days of Nazi Germany and the TASS of the Soviet days look honest in comparison – are NOT telling the story and they are intentionally NOT connecting the dots so that people can see that Obama has failed them, failed America, failed the world, failed the entire human SPECIES.

Democrats and liberal Muslim contextualizers will stand there and tell us that most of the victims of terrorism are Muslims.  And that’s actually true.  But what does it prove?  Nothing, when Muslims have been the primary murderers of Muslims since Islam split into the two warring factions of Sunni and Shia at the moment that Muhammad died.  The Day of Ashura was a day of massacre in which the followers who became Sunnis massacred the grandson of Muhammad and his companions.  That violence has continued ever since.  During the Iran-Iraq War, more than a million Muslims were murdered by Muslims.  This notion that Muslims are somehow victims because the terrorists who murder also murder Muslims is a great big fat giant fraud.  Muslims will murder anyone they can murder and do so quite gleefully.

You cannot keep believing these Democrat Party lies that Obama has succeeded or that Hillary Clinton will succeed.

On the same day they did their study of the 180 attacks committed in April, the same Los Angeles Times published news of new major attacks on page A4, including a story about Muslim gunmen from Shabab murdering 14 people in Somalia and the Muslim-created “catastrophic humanitarian emergency” for Nigerians.  Tens out thousands of people have fled and are literally starving to death because – as the LA Times notes – “Violence in northern Nigeria fueled by the Islamic extremist group Boko Haram, has forced more than 2.5 million people to flee their homes, according to United Nations statistics.”  Those murders weren’t included in the big story titled “Diary of Terror” that the LA Times featured on the main page without every once singling out Islam for the vicious religion that it is.

And that month wasn’t ANYTHING compared to the month of June, the primary month of Ramadan which ends tomorrow.  We had the attack in Orlando.  But that was merely one bloody attack in one incredibly bloody stretch of Muslim holy month: Iraq just lost 2oo people to Islamic terrorists yesterday.  Islamic State claimed responsibility.  Immediately before that, in Dhaka, Bangladesh, Muslim terrorists seized a restaurant and took hostages, killing at least 20 foreigners.  Those who could recite from the Qur’an were spared:

Dhaka: The attackers involved in the Dhaka restaurant siege had asked their victims to recite from the Quran before deciding on whom to spare, a leading Bangladeshi daily said on its website on Saturday.

“Those who could recite a verse from the Quran were spared, others were tortured,” the Daily Star quoted a rescued hostage as saying.

At least 20 foreigners, including an Indian, were killed in the 10-hour siege at the Holey Artisan Bakery in the diplomatic enclave of the Bangladeshi capital.

The siege ended after the Bangladeshi security forces gunned down six of the attackers and captured one of their associates.

Those who could not recite from the Quran were tortured by the gunmen, said Rezaul Karim, father of Hasnat Karim who was held hostage for over 10 hours.

Sounds exactly like something any card-carrying “religion of peace, charity and justice” would do, right, Barry Hussein???

The funny thing is that I think I could actually pull that one off and recite from the Holy Qur’an:

 And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah (disbelief) is worse than killing. And fight not with them at Al-Masjid-al-Haram (the sanctuary at Makkah), unless they (first) fight you there. But if they attack you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.  But if they cease, then Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.  And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allah (Alone). — Qur’an 2:191-193

Ah, yes, the religion of peace is so peaceful when everyone who would say anything to argue is DEAD.

But there, I recited the evil, hateful, vile, demonic Qur’an for you Muslim murderers, so let me go.

I welcome the Los Angeles Times to do a follow-up story over the months of June and July and see how Islam is faring in it’s Obamaesque version as “the religion of peace, charity and justice.”  And it’s quite a marvelous thing to listen to our Muslim-in-Chief praise Muhammad and his Islam while he insults Jesus Christ and His Christianity.  But then again, Obama actually said “my Muslim faith” and had to be officially corrected as to what his faith was supposed to be according to his previous dishonest blatherings about being a Christian.  I’ll give this to Obama: he isn’t any less Christian than Lucifer.  Or any more Christian, either.

In a previous article, I go into rather great detail comparing the Qur’an to the Holy Bible in terms of commandments to violence.  It’s not that hard, folks.  The Old Testament of the Holy Bible predates Islam by something on the order of 4,000 years.  By the time Muhammad had written the Qur’an, Jesus had appeared some six centuries previous – in fulfillment of the Old Testament prophets to fulfill Judaism – and Jesus taught peace as the Prince of Peace.  He told His followers to put away their swords and allowed Himself to be taken and tortured and crucified to death by violent, evil men.  Not exactly the path that Muhammad took when he took part in over thirty military campaigns of conquest, committed multiple acts of genocide, and had another thirty more planned at the time of his death.  Which by the way was the result of being poisoned by a Jewish woman vengeful over yet another murderous attack against Jews in which he killed the men and enslaved the women and children.

Jesus prophesied His own death; Muhammad turned out to be not so good at it.  But Jesus also prophesied that He would – as God’s powerful Son – be raised from the dead in proof of His deity and His divine message.  “The Prophet” really failed miserably at pulling off that feat.

I simply cannot stand it when an Obama or a Hillary Clinton or a CAIR representative or some other leftist Islamist contextualizer makes the ridiculous statement that “whoever did this terrible deed is not a true follower of Islam.”  Because I would just like to ask that fool one simple question: “Okay, do you think that the Prophet Muhammad was ‘a true follower of Islam’?”  Because it is a simple matter of history to document that the Prophet did all the same damn things that Obama and the leftist Muslim contextualizers today say is so against the teachings of Islam.  You can tell me that according to Islam killing and committing acts of genocide against your enemies is a good thing; but what you CANNOT tell me is that Muhammad didn’t do those things.  Because it is simply a fact of history that he did.

I keep hearing this insane crap about the Muslim terrorist murder of homosexuals and how tolerant Muhammad supposedly was to homosexuals according to these idiotic liberal contextualizers of Islam.  And so they’ll mindlessly quote Sura 5:32 that says, “the killing of an innocent life is like the killing of all mankind, the saving of an innocent life is the saving of all mankind.”  And yeah, Muhammad said that: WHEN HE WAS IN MECCA AND HE WAS THE UNDERDOG.  He said a lot of sweet stuff then when his adversaries were far more powerful than he was.   But when he went to Medina and became the strong man, the gates of hell opened.  And those liberal contextualizers of Islam refuse to quote the vicious stuff Muhammad wrote at the end of his life that according to Islam’s doctrine of abrogation supplants the sweet nice stuff he wrote early when he was afraid of his enemies.

The Qur’an and Islams other accepted holy sources actually are quite explicit how Islam should deal with homosexuals.  And it aint nice.

In any event, in that article of mine I link to four paragraphs above, I point out a very important fact: that while the OLD Testament contains commandments to violence (that were highly specific in that they were given to ONE people at ONE point in time for ONE single act whereas the commandments to violence in Islam are universal and given to every Muslim throughout the centuries), the NEW Testament contains NO commands to commit violence and actually teaches peace.  Just find me ONE command in the New Testament where Christians are commanded to commit murder or violence.  And understand that I point out and demonstrate that even the Old Testament of the Bible anticipates its own replacement, calling for “a New Covenant” (Jeremiah 31:31-34).  Which was fulfilled and inaugurated by Jesus of Nazareth who fulfilled every jot and tittle of the Old Testament (see Matthew 5:18).  As Jesus said in the preceding verse, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.”  And Jesus DID fulfill the Law and the Prophets, and so everything in the Old Testament that isn’t specifically restated is considered fulfilled and done away with – which includes any and all teachings of VIOLENCE.  Compare that to Islam which must feature a doctrine called “abrogation.”  Look at how the reliably leftist Google puts it when you type in the words Islam and abrogation:

abrogation

If Muhammad said two things that appear to be contradictory, you must heed the last command he gave.  And he did that a LOT, by the way.  There are a whole BUNCH of what I call “convenient suras” in which Muhammad contradicted something he had previously said in order to justify getting something he wanted.  And in the case of the history of Muhammad and the Islam he created, there is simply no question: when Muhammad started out in Medina, he was the underdog and even his own tribe refused to follow him and he preached during this phase peace and tolerance and co-existence.  Until he reached Medina and gained power and began to teach the violent subjugation of his enemies.

Let me simply copy and paste here from what I’ve already documented before:

Liberals completely fail to comprehend this: the Bible begins with violence and moves to peace.

Not so the Qur’an.  Not so Muhammad.  When you read a Qur’an, understand that “Muhammad was like two different persons at two different times and the Quran is like two contradictory books pasted together.”  Understand that in Islam you have 1390 Years of Violence and only 10 years of Peace.

When Mohammad first began to proselytize his new religion in Mecca and claim that he was receiving revelations from Allah, he was decidedly the underdog.  And correspondingly all of his revelations centered around peaceful coexistence and tolerance.

But then Mohammad went to Medina in what is today called “Al Hijra.”  He was able to garner followers and became militarily powerful.  And suddenly all of the revelations of his Qur’an took a decidedly violent turn.

The Qur’an was NOT organized in any kind of chronological order; rather, it was organized by length, from the longest to the shortest suras.

When you re-arrange the Qur’an by chronology, you get this order: and you get not violence to peace as the Holy Bible gives, but peace to VIOLENCE.

So, for example, do your own research.  Consider the very first violent Sura 2:191-193 found in the Qur’an which states, And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killingbut if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.   And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.  But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)”.  And lo and behold, when you examine the chronological order and look to the right column to see where it was organized according to the tradition based on length of sura, you find that this edict found in Sura 2 to “kill them wherever you may find them” is the VERY FIRST sura Mohammad conveniently claimed he received from Allah when he arrived in Medina and became the dominant power. 

This is not merely a command for violence; it is a UNIVERSAL COMMAND for violence.  I’ll talk about that more.

Keep going down the list of violent suras and look at where they are found, whether they were written earlier in Mohammad’s Mecca phase or later when he arrived at Medina and became militarily powerful.

You will find that without any question, the vast overwhelming majority of violent sura that commanded violence and death were given in Medina just as the vast overwhelming majority of suras commanding any kind of “peace” was given in Mecca.

A simple historic statement of fact: Mohammad and the Qur’an takes us from peace to viciousness and hate and murder and death and slaughter.

Now, this is bad, but it actually gets WORSE.  Because Islam has a doctrine called “abrogation” by which later suras correct and supercede earlier ones.

In other words, if Mohammad first said “peace” and then he said “war,” the ONLY correct interpretation of the Qur’an MUST BE WAR.

Now, abrogation is not necessarily such a terrible thing; every parent has done it: your child may ask you if she can go to a party, and then you find out something you don’t like about the party that makes you change or mind, or your child misbehaves and you say, “Now you can’t go.”  You’ve abrogated your previous statement.  You’ve said yes and now you’re saying no to the same thing you’d said yes to.  So if your child comes to you and says, “You said on Monday I could go, so I went,” you are enraged as you point out, “But I said on TUESDAY you could NOT go, so you are in a heap of trouble!”

It’s different when it comes to a revelation from God, though: God isn’t supposed to be caught by surprise or change His mind with new information or be wrong and then correct Himself.  How did Mohammad respond to this dilemma?  It seems that Qur’an 2:106 was “revealed” in response to skepticism directed at Muhammad that Allah’s revelations were not entirely consistent over time. Muhammad’s rebuttal was that ”Allah is able to do all things” — even change his mind.

And hence we have examples of blatantly obvious abrogation in the Qur’an such as:

In Surah 58, Al Mujadilah, verse 12, the believers are commanded to give alms before a private consultation with the Messenger. In verse 13 they are told that it is no longer necessary.

In Surah 33, Al Ahzab, verses 50-51 Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) is allowed to marry and divorce an unlimited number of women. In verse 52 he is prohibited to continue to do so.

In Surah 73, Al Muzzammil, verses 2-4, the prophet of Islam is commanded to spend about half of the night in prayer and reading of the Quran. In verse 20 of the same Surah this is changed into what is easy for him and those who followed his example.

But this Islamic view of Allah is in very direct contrast to the Judeo-Christian God of the Bible, and so we have passages like Numbers 23:19: “God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?

Sneering liberal pseudo-intellectuals claim that Christianity has the same issue of abrogation, BUT WE DON’T.  And they are frankly moral idiots of the very lowest order to make such a blatantly false claim.  Here’s why:

  1. In every single example of violence in the Old Testament, it is ALWAYS in EVERY CASE a specific command by God to a specific people to do a specific thing at a specific time for a specific reason.  There is NO universalized commandment by God to always kill everyone the way we see in the Qur’an, no “kill them wherever you find them.”  There are no verses in the Bible that say “Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you…” (Qur’an 2:216), no “Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah” (Qur’an 4:76).  God never gives a universal command that He later has to take back.
  2. If the Bible were given the same way the Qur’an is given, Moses would have commanded peace and Jesus would have come after Moses and subsequently taught, “But I tell you, hate your enemies and slaughter those who persecute you.”  When Jesus, in fulfillment of the New Covenant that even the Old Covenant itself anticipated hundreds of years before Jesus’ arrival on earth, as the Prince of Peace, actually taught, “But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Matthew 5:44).  You need to comprehend how absolutely MASSIVE is the difference between a religion that begins with violence and then moves to peace (Christianity) verses a religion that begins with peace and then ends with commands to universalized violence.
  3. The Old Testament of the Holy Bible pointedly “abrogates” ITSELF in terms of violence because it promises a New Covenant and then it DELIVERS one in the form of the Prince of Peace, Jesus.  The “abrogation” of violence was not for the sake of Jesus’ convenience, the way the abrogation of peace for a call to violence clearly was politically oh-so-very convenient for Mohammad.  Let me put it this way: Jesus told Peter, “Put away your sword” (Matthew 26:52) in order that He could be arrested and beaten and go to the cross where He would die a terrible, humiliating, agonizing death in our place for our sins.  Versus Mohammad who said let’s be peaceful when he was the underdog and then turned on a dime and ordered mass violence the moment his forces gained the upper hand.
  4. The Bible doesn’t “abrogate” violence merely because times had changed and the world was no longer a violent place and the Bible was correcting a problem that was obviously out of step with the rest of the world.  Any such notion is simply FALSE.  The Romans at the time of Christ were as vicious and brutal as ANYONE ever had been; what they did to Jesus itself proves that.  And Jesus’ disciples wrote the New Testament not only in light of what Rome had done to Jesus, but in light of the fact that even as they were writing, Rome was treating Christians viciously.  St. Peter and St. Paul were both executed by Rome, as were many other disciples.
  5. The God of the Bible is a God of wrath just as He is a God of love.  But all of His attributes are perfectly balanced, such that His wrath is manifested in the attribute of justice that ultimately flows from love.  And the toleration of evil results in a lack of justice.  And so God gave His people the sword and used them as an instrument in defined, limited circumstances and only in accordance with His command.  But ultimately He was always preparing for the arrival of His Son, the Prince of Peace.
  6. Finally, the thing that changed in the Bible was this: “But when the set time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those under the law, that we might receive adoption to sonship” (Galatians 4:4-5).  God prophesied a coming Messiah who would epitomize and usher in a “new covenant,” and Jesus came as foretold.
  7. And so Jesus completely fulfilled the Old Covenant (Matthew 5:17).  The various laws and regulations and customs of the Old Testament weren’t “abrogated,” but rather they were fulfilled and served their purpose and were no longer necessary because the promised Messiah took their burden off our necks.  And so Christians have realized even in the time of St. Peter that unless a principle or a command from the Old Covenant is specifically repeated/restated in the New Covenant, it was fulfilled by Christ and no longer applies to New Covenant believers.  We can compare the Old Covenant and the New to the abacus vs. the computer or the horse vs. the automobile: the former things weren’t “abrogated” and declared wrong; rather they served their purpose and we now use the superior things.  Christ is the Superior which fulfilled the inferior and the inferior that served as a type or a shadow of the Superior (see for example Colossians 2:17Hebrews 8:5) is therefore no longer needed.

It is for this reason that I point out the fact and hereby state for the historical record that Penn State religious history professor Philip Jenkins is an abject moral idiot and the worst kind of intellectual fraud.  He is, as are all progressive liberals, a pathologically ignorant fool masquerading himself as someone who is wise and knowledgeable when he in fact teaches the precise opposite of wisdom and knowledge.  Jenkins is not only utterly blind to what is actually going on all around him in the real world as Muslim terrorists murder and bomb innocent people in the name of Allah, but as I have just proven he is just as utterly blind to the religious theology that he claims that he is an expert in.

A passage from Colossians sums these liberal fools up well: “Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ.” – Colossians 2:8.  Tragically, modern universities teach very little BUT “empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense.”

The fact that the Qur’an does NOT begin with violence and then end with peace, but rather the opposite, and the fact that abrogation forces true Muslims to accept that the later “revelations” to Mohammad supercede previous ones, puts Islam in a deep, dark pit of endless violence that is NOT true of Christianity.

Which is why Christianity and Christ are attacked all the damn TIME by liberals and Christians don’t unleash waves of violent hate the way Muslims routinely do the moment they even THINK their Prophet might be getting insulted.

We are left with a giant problem of Islam: we find that Islam, Mohammad and the Qur’an spent ten years deceiving people by preaching peace and tolerance in order to grow strong and powerful, and then the rest of history practicing force and violence and terror the moment they were able to gain the upper hand.

We find that Islam does NOT mean “peace” as liberals love to adoringly say; it means “submission.”  AND YOU WILL SUBMIT OR ELSE YOU WILL BE KILLED.

A historical study of Mohammad’s life reveals that the “Prophet of Peace” had fought in over thirty violent military campaigns and had at least another thirty campaigns planned at the time of his death in 632 AD.  In fact I can quote you Islamic sources that state, “that the Prophet waged jihad operations 77 times in the first 10 years as head of the Muslim community in Medina.”  But it is a fact of history that when Mohammad showed up at Medina, he became a violent terrorist warmonger who waged unrelenting war until he defeated and subjugated everyone around him.  What you will also find is that Islam did NOT practice peace after Mohammad’s death; in fact it split due to terrifying, graphic and vicious violence that continues to this very day as the viciousness created Sunni and Shiite Islam.  But within 100 years of Mohammad’s death, warring, violent Muslims were attacking Christian Europe and had killed an looted and pillaged their way all across the entirety of Europe before finally being crushed by Charles “the Hammer” Martel at the Battle of Tours in France in 732.  Preceding that, in the late 7th century, the most intolerant religion on earth built the Dome of the Rock directly on top of the most holy site of Judaism where the Jewish Temple had been built, where Abraham had been told to take his son Isaac as a sacrifice but God had provided a ram in place of Isaac.  By then, violent warring Muslims had already poured across Africa and seized the Christian realms established by St. Augustine.  All of the vast peaceful Christian provinces of North Africa had fallen to the bloody sword of Allah by 711.  Violent, warring Muslims poured into Christian Spain to be finally defeated by El Cid.  Violent, warring Muslims poured into the Christian Byzantine Empire and besieged Constantinople and the Christian Emperor pleaded with the Pope to send Christian warriors to defend a Christian realm from Muslim conquest in what became known as the Crusades.

As we celebrate our Declaration of Independence – which contains obvious references to the God of the Christian Bible that the Democratic Party, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama repudiate and dishonestly claims has no bearing upon our nation that Abraham Lincoln called “this nation, under God,” understand that uor Founding Fathers were still dealing with Islam when the Barbary Pirates were committing acts of terror against our ships and our sailors in the late 18th century.

Again, it is so damn simple and Democrats are so damned, rabidly dishonest: our founding fathers in the Declaration of independence stated their reason to separate from England: namely that the King of England was usurping rights:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

The Declaration of Independence could not put the case much more clearly: 1) God ordained man with certain rights; 2) to secure these God-ordained rights, governments are instituted among men; 3) any government that violates or usurps these God-ordained rights can be overthrown; 4) the king of England has indeed violated these God-ordained rights; and therefore 5) we are separating from England.  And the Constitution that came after we successfully fought to separate from England proceeds to describe a government that does NOT violate the rights that God had ordained in mankind.  At least until Democrats came along, murdered sixty million innocent human beings in a vicious and vile process known as “abortion” in which every single father has the right to the life of his very own child stripped from him.  And homosexuality was erected in place of Christian morality and socialist human Government that has gone FAR BEYOND any damn thing the king of England ever did was imposed and worshiped in place of Christianity.

George Washington, the father of our country, put it this way:

“Of all the habits and dispositions which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.” — George Washington, Farewell Address

If you want your politics to prosper, the two things you will not separate will be religion and morality. If you want your government to work well, if you want American exceptionalism, if you want the government to do right, if you want all this, then you won’t separate religion and morality from political life. And America’s greatest patriot gave a litmus test for patriotism. He says in the very next sentence (immediately continuing from the quote above):

“In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars.” — George Washington

Washington says, Anyone who would try to remove religion and morality from public life, I won’t allow them to call themselves a patriot. Because they are trying to destroy the country.

Founding father John Adams said:

“We have no government armed with the power capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and true religion. Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

You simply cannot take the Christian out of America and keep America.  OR the Constitution that was itself based on morality and the true religion of Christianity.  Our nation will collapse and our founding fathers understood that.  And Democrats are traitors and fools for their pathological ignorance and frankly their pathological depravity.

But I digress from my primary message that Democrats are demon-possessed whackjobs who rabidly despise reality and are literally saying that the ninety-five percent of terrorist attacks committed in the name of Allah by Muslims according to the teachings of the Qur’an according to the life example of Muhammad somehow have nothing whatsoever to do with Islam.

Islam could NOT be more clear: kill your enemy.  Kill him wherever you may find him.  Any so-called “peaceful sura” was abrogated and replaced with the command to violently kill.  Muhammad, the paradigm of Islam, proved that and demonstrated that and documented that in the blood of his victims throughout his wicked and vicious life.

Please stop denying simple reality.

If you want true peace, you turn to the religion that every single Democrat radically despises: biblical Christianity.

Democrats, as I’ve said again and again and again, are “DEMOnic bureuaCRATS.”  Democrats are demon-possessed worshipers of the human State that murders God’s babies to the tune of TEN TIMES MORE EVIL than the Nazi Holocaust while worshiping homosexual perversion as they strip away God’s ordained morality and replace it with immorality directly out of the depraved heart of the devil.  And they actually do so claiming they are doing God’s work!!!

Read Romans 1:18-32 and begin to understand the last-days horror of hell that is the Democratic Party:

Unbelief and Its Consequences

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth [a]in unrighteousness, 19 because that which is known about God is evident [b]within them; for God made it evident to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. 21 For even though they knew God, they did not [c]honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and [d]crawling creatures.

24 Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. 25 For they exchanged the truth of God for [e]a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed [f]forever. Amen.

26 For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is [g]unnatural, 27 and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing [h]indecent acts and receiving in [i]their own persons the due penalty of their error.

28 And just as they did not see fit [j]to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, 30 slanderers, [k]haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; 32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them.

Number one, if you are a Democrat, you suppress the truth in unrighteousness.  That is what you are and that is what you do.  Don’t tell me that isn’t a fundamental fact about the Democratic PartyDon’t tell me that Democrats have abandoned God as Creator.  You have replaced the truth about a Creator God with godless evolution.  You have replaced the truth that human beings are created from the womb in the image of a holy God and you have monstrously and wickedly replaced it with sixty million abortions.

And as a result, what is SELF-EVIDENT, such as recognizing a Creator God, such as recognizing obvious reality about the nature of Islam and the nature of Islamic terrorism, is denied and rejected no matter how damned beyond obvious it is.  And so every damn wicked thought you have is futile and false.

And because of that, GOD HAS GIVEN YOUR PARTY OVER TO WICKEDNESS.  It is amazing that every time in the Book of Romans that you see the phrase, “God gave them over,” you can trace the content of that phrase DIRECTLY to the Democratic Party platform.

The Democratic Party is the Party that God gave over to wrath.

2 Thessalonians 2:11 couldn’t make what has happened to the Democratic Party more plain:

For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie.

Stop believing the lie.  Stop believing the Democratic Party when they tell you lie after lie after LIE.

 

Why It Really Is EASY To Vote For Donald Trump In The General Election (Because The Other Side Is Openly STALINIST)

April 29, 2016

They say a picture is worth a thousand words.  And in this case it’s true: because this one picture describes EVERYTHING you need to know as you vote in the general election after the primary circus is over:

Liberal Fascism-Trump

There is actually a political party today – the Democrat Party – that widely believes that viciously punching people in the face merely because they went to a political rally and supported a major political candidate at that rally – are good, decent, tolerant people.

When ONE Donald Trump supporter punched a fascist free-speech hater who decided that Donald Trump didn’t have the right to speak and thousands of supporters didn’t have the right to hear him speak, hundreds if not thousands of “journalists” IMMEDIATELY held Donald Trump personally accountable for the actions of that one man.  But THOUSANDS of leftist thugs have been organized and literally bussed in to violently protest free speech political rallies and suddenly nobody is responsible in an amazing act of last-days stunning moral hypocrisy.

They say that Donald Trump is somehow responsible for inciting violence because of his “hateful rhetoric” about groups that the left adores: terrorist Muslim immigrants, vicious criminal illegal immigrants, baby-butchers, feminist-Nazis.  But what about the incredibly hateful rhetoric used to condemn and demonize him?

Let me get this straight: YOU’RE NOT GOING TO ENGAGE IN THE KIND OF LANGUAGE HE USES????  WELL WHAT THE HELL KIND OF LANGUAGE ARE YOU USING!!!???

Doesn’t that “hateful rhetoric” inflame the left?  Very clearly it DOES: BECAUSE THEY KEEP SHOWING UP AND ACTING VIOLENTLY AT TRUMP RALLIES, DON’T THEY???

This is merely something called “the truth.”  This is merely something called “a FACT,” which I know already has the legions of demons inhabiting every single Democrat soul squirming and twitching.  How many times has Donald Trump incited his supporters to go to a Hispanic event, or a Muslim event, or a Democrat Party event, etc., etc., and violently disrupt it?  The answer is ZERO.  And yet DOZENS OF TIMES NOW Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders have incited vile, venomous, vicious VIOLENCE against Donald Trump and his supporters at rallies as they demonstrate again and again and again their Stalinist contempt for free speech and the right of the American people to hear all sides of a debate without stormtrooper Nazi THUGS showing up to scream them down and in fact BEAT them down.

I’ve defined this term multiple times, but let us examine again “political correctness” and see how it works:

Political correctness is not just a leftist way to make overly-sensitive people feel better. It was designed by early Marxists in Russia and the left continues to execute the Orwellian tactic today: if you can control words, you can control thought; if you can control thought, you can control actions.  “PC” is an enormous, sophisticated and highly-coordinated effort by elitist intellectuals to “fundamentally transform” Western culture as we know it by  redefining it – by shaping the “acceptable” language people are allowed to use – and thereby dictating the parameters of cultural arguments.  And people with incredibly radical agendas have been exploiting this tactic for decades and it has succeeded.

This movement is grounded in the philosophy espoused by this Harvard leftist writing for the Harvard newspaper:

“Let’s give up on academic freedom in favor of justice,” states the subtitle of her Feb. 18 column, in which she insists Harvard stop guaranteeing students and professors the right to hold controversial views and conduct research putting liberalism in a negative light.

“If our university community opposes racism, sexism, and heterosexism, why should we put up with research that counters our goals?”

“It is tempting to decry frustrating restrictions on academic research as violations of academic freedom. Yet I would encourage student and worker organizers to instead use a framework of justice. After all, if we give up our obsessive reliance on the doctrine of academic freedom, we can consider more thoughtfully what is just.”

WHOSE “justice”???? OURS and ONLY ours.  And the ends justifies the means.  And my side can scream you down and even BEAT you down.  While YOUR side doesn’t even have the right to complain about it.

Basically, all YOUR organizations that say anything I don’t like and I refuse to tolerate are “hateful.”  So I can demonize you and even physically attack you merely for supporting something I don’t like.  But meanwhile, all MY organizations are totally off limits to you.  So if you say anything “conservative” about illegal immigration, if you say anything “Christian” about abortion, if you say anything “pro-national security” about the very real phenomena of Islamic terrorism, I have not only the right but even the duty to demonize you and yes, even physically attack you and the ends justifies the means as I stop you from even exercising the right to speak.

According to the Democrat Party today, free speech ought to be crushed in the gears of leftist political correctness and the Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders big government combine harvester machine.

It’s remarkable.  Under the thug dictator regime of Barack Hussein Obama, it is the official position of the “United States,” under the Democrat Party, it is the political position of the Party, under the leftist administrations of most colleges and universities, under Hollywood, it is the doctrinaire propaganda position of virtually every actor and every movie or TV program… to demonize one group of people while simultaneously claiming that even speech directed at your side is “hate.”  The last time we saw this was in a place called Nazi Germany, where every single aspect of a depraved culture was directed at one group of people.  And every act of violence against that group of people was excused, if not condoned, if not outright celebrated.

And so here we are yet again this time in California as Democrats attack the Constitution and its guarantee of protecting freedom of speech:

Violence follows California Trump rally, 17 arrested
By GILLIAN FLACCUS and AMY TAXIN
Apr. 29, 2016 12:58 PM EDT

COSTA MESA, Calif. (AP) — Raucous protesters of Donald Trump took to the streets in California in violent demonstrations leading to 17 arrests as the Republican presidential contender brought his campaign to conservative Orange County.

While Trump held a rally at a fairgrounds amphitheater, dozens waved anti-Trump signs outside in mostly peaceful protests and traded insults with masses of the candidate’s supporters who had lined up to see him. Later in the evening, however, the protests swelled and grew rowdy and spilled into the streets.

One Trump supporter had his face bloodied in a scuffle as he tried to drive out of the arena. One man jumped on a police car, leaving its front and rear windows smashed and the top dented and other protesters sprayed graffiti on a police car and the Pacific Amphitheatre’s marquee.

Dozens of cars — including those of Trump supporters trying to leave — were stuck in the street as several hundred demonstrators blocked the road, waved Mexican flags and posed for selfies. Some protesters badgered Trump’s fans as they walked to their cars in the parking lot.

Police in riot gear and on horseback pushed the crowd back and away from the venue. There were no major injuries and police did not use any force. The crowd began dispersing about three hours after the speech ended.

Seventeen people were arrested, said Costa Mesa police Sgt. Mike Manson.

Earlier in the evening, a half-dozen anti-Trump protesters taunted those waiting to get into the venue. Trump supporters surrounded one man who waved a Mexican flag and shouted “Build that wall! Build that wall!” — a reference to Trump’s call to create a barrier between the United States and Mexico to stop illegal border crossings.

At one point, seven shirtless women wearing Bernie Sanders stickers over their breasts entered the square outside the amphitheater. They said they were protesting Trump’s lack of engagement on issues of gender equality and women’s rights.

“I feel like he wants to make America great again, but certainly not for women, for the LBGTQ community or for the lower class,” said one of the women, Tiernan Hebron, referencing the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community. “He has, like, done nothing to help with gender equality or women’s rights or reproductive rights or anything.”

Trump has drawn large crowds across the country as he has campaigned for the White House and some of his events have been marred by protests and scuffles. The Pacific Amphitheatre was filled to its capacity of about 8,000 and a couple thousand more were turned away, said Orange County Sheriff’s Lt. Mark Stichter.

Earlier this week, a Trump rally in nearby Anaheim turned contentious when his supporters and protesters clashed, and several people were hit by pepper spray. Trump was not present.

Ly Kou, 47, of Ontario, said she likes Trump because he has vowed to put the country first.

“It’s obvious that America loves Trump,” said Kou, who is from Laos, as she pointed at the waiting throng. “This thing about him being racist? Look around the crowd.”

Trump was traveling from the rally site to the state’s Republican convention in Burlington in the San Francisco Bay area.

And not long after Democrats mailed what they wanted people to think was anthrax to Donald Trump’s own FAMILY they’re at it again:

9:20 p.m. [April 28, 2016]

Thousands of supporters have turned out for Donald Trump as the Republican presidential brought his campaign to Southern California, predictably sparking shouting matches with counter-demonstrators.

Heated words were exchanged after people wearing expletive-laden anti-Trump shirts began to taunt people waiting in line to attend Trump’s speech in an amphitheater at the Orange County Fairgrounds in Costa Mesa…

9:40 p.m.

Six people are being evaluated by emergency medical crews after an envelope containing a white powdery substance was mailed to a Donald Trump campaign office in New York City.

Emergency crews were called to Trump Tower in Manhattan around 8 p.m. Thursday.

Police say a Trump staffer opened the letter containing the powder and immediately called police. It was unclear if the envelope also contained a letter.

The six people who were isolated and evaluated at the scene included five Trump staffers and a police officer who responded to the call.

In March, an envelope containing a non-hazardous white power and a threatening letter was sent to the Manhattan apartment of Donald Trump’s son, Eric.

As we speak right now this moment, fascist, stormtrooper THUGS from the National Socialist American Workers Party – a.k.a. the Democrat Party, the NAZI Party in the world today, are doing absolutely every fascist thing they can to urinate and defecate on the free speech rights that USED to be SACRED in America until the Democrat Party became toxic enough and treasonous enough to devour everything our founding fathers stood for.

Fox News just played footage of a leftist “protestor” (read “Nazi, fascist THUG”) viciously attacked a Trump supporter wearing a “Make America Great Again” shirt from behind:

One Trump supporter was punched in the back of the head after confronting a group of protesters. After engaging in some heated rhetoric with the group, the man, who was wearing a “Make America great again” hat, turned to walk away when a protester in a black hoodie punched him a few times as other protesters yelled at the assailant to stop. The Trump supporter made his way to a barricade, after a great deal of pushing and shoving, and was escorted by police into the hotel.

I didn’t see or hear “other protestors” yelling at the man to stop.  But without any question nobody stopped the thug from beating a man guilty of the First Amendment and therefore worthy of being physically beaten because he believed in the First Amendment.  And the Nazi Democrat who conducted that beating was not arrested.

Trump supporters are being physically attacked, having eggs thrown at them, spat upon.  by Nazis otherwise known as “Democrats.”  Welcome, New Jews, to rabid Democrat Party Nazi-style hate.  The “protestors” are also throwing eggs at police who are trying to maintain order as Nazis try to physically and violently stop people from exercising their First Amendment freedoms.

I sit in stunned amazement when I read this account of Donald Trump – the now presumed GOP nominee – trying to enter an event to speak to his supporters:

Donald Trump’s Secret Service detail and private bodyguards had the last laugh on Friday as hundreds of protesters swarmed at the front of a San Francisco airport hotel trying to block him from coming in for a speech at the state Republican Party’s annual convention.

Instead of partnering with uniformed police in riot shields trying to push the hordes back, they did a law-enforcement head fake – leading the billionaire across a grass highway median and in a back-door loading dock at the Hyatt Regency hotel in the suburb of Burlingame.

The move left Trump feeling ‘like I was crossing the border, actually.’

When Hillary Clinton has to crawl under a chain-link fence on her belly to get to an event to speak because thug conservatives are determined to stop her using whatever violence is necessary, that will be funny.  Right now, it is proof of something truly demonic having taken over the entire Democrat Party and everything the Democrat Party stands for.

There is one political party and ONLY one political party that is truly EVIL.

As Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party rose to power, he had his Sturmabteilung, his SA, his Brownshirts, who:

would march in Nazi rallies, assault political opponents, and intimidate voters during elections.

And now we’re seeing them again from the thug ranks of the Democrat Party.

And this naked, liquid hate is happening at virtually every Trump event as outright Nazi thugs show up to support their Democrat Party in an open war against the Constitution of the United States of America.

I simply mock liberals because to be a liberal is to be such an appalling, abject moral hypocrite it is beyond UNREAL to the point of padded-cell-straitjacket-hysterical-demented-psychosis.

As a result of the political correctness that I above defined and showed examples of, this culture has become NAZIFIED.

Democrats are demon-possessed people, and all we have to do is examine the fruits of these Nazi Brownshirts, these Stalinist Commissars, who thuggishly attack people for exercising First Amendment rights that until now every American used to deem sacred.

Democrats are demon-possessed people, and all we have to do is examine the fruits of these baby killers who are TEN TIMES MORE MURDEROUS than the Nazis when it comes to denying basic, fundamental humanity and then butchering human life on a scale never before seen in all of human history.  Because every child is human by virtue of its parents and a being by virtue of the simple fact that it exists: IT IS A HUMAN BEING.  That precious little soul that every single Democrat has personally participated in murdering SIXTY MILLION TIMES OVER since 1973 is according to the taxonomic system that has classified every single living thing that has ever existed: That “fetus” (which is merely Latin for “baby” by the way, if you merely look at the ORIGIN of the word: Origin of Fetus: “Middle English, from Latin, act of bearing young, offspring; akin to Latin fetus newly delivered, fruitful“) is classified as follows: Kingdom-Animal; Phylum-Chordata; Class-Mammalia; Order-Primate; Family-Hominid; Genus-Homo; and Species-Sapiens.  Homo Sapiens, just like EVERY human being made in the image of God which every single Democrat Party member on earth is guilty of murdering.

Democrats are demon-possessed people, and all we have to do is examine the fruits of these sodomy-worshiping depraved perverts, sexually twisted perverts who exalt “lifestyles” that are not only immoral and utterly depraved according to every major religious tradition and in fact to all of human history prior to this time the Bible prophetically called “the last days,” but even according to the Darwinian evolution they claim to believe in as “science.”  Because Darwinian evolution very clearly tells us that homosexuality is a biological dead-end for a species every bit as much as the Bible tells us it is the most depraved path to hell and eternal destruction.

The Bible that corrupt, dishonest, demonic, heretic Democrats like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama claim to follow couldn’t be more crystal clear about the vile “lifestyles” they have blasphemously enshrined in our soon-to-be-destroyed culture:

The New Testament says that homosexuality is a “shameful lust” (Romans 1:26), a “shameful act,” an abandonment of “natural relations” (Romans 1:27), a “wrongdoing” (1 Corinthians 6:9), and “sexual immorality and perversion” (Jude 1:7). Homosexuality carries a “due penalty” (Romans 1:27), “is contrary to the sound doctrine” (1 Timothy 1:10), and is listed among the sins that bar people from the kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 6:9). Despite the attempts of some to downplay these verses, the Bible could not be clearer that homosexuality is a sin against God.

Homosexuality is not the cause of a society’s decline, but it is a symptom of it; it is the result of people making themselves the final authorities. Romans 1 gives the natural digression of a society that has chosen idolatry and sinful pleasure instead of obedience to God. The downward spiral begins with denying that God has absolute authority over His creation (Romans 1:21–23).

The result of a society’s rejection of God’s rule in their lives is that God gives “them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator” (Romans 1:24–25). Verses 26 and 27 say, “Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.” The phrase “God gave them over” means that when we insist on shaking our fists at God, He finally lets us have the perversion we demand. And that is a judgment in itself. Homosexual behavior is the result of ignoring God and trying to create our own truth. When we defy God’s clear instruction, we reap the “due penalty” of our disobedience (2 Thessalonians 1:8–9; Revelation 21:8).

What the wicked, vile Democrats teach is NOT ONLY anathema to Christianity, to Islam, to every major religion on the face of the earth, and to every single culture that ever existed in the entire history of the human race before our end-times, last-days, terminal generation, it is ALSO anathema to the very “science” the left claims to embrace:

Natural selection is the process by which individuals with characteristics that are advantageous for reproduction in a specific environment leave more offspring in the next generation, thereby increasing the proportion of their genes in the population gene pool over time. Natural selection is the principal mechanism of evolutionary change, and is the most important idea in all biology. Natural selection, the unifying concept of life, was first proposed by Charles Darwin, and represents his single greatest contribution to science.

If homosexuality and feminism aren’t Darwinian dead-ends, then “science” is either a monkey or just a naked liberal fool throwing his feces at a wall and declaring “scientific” whatever happens to stick.

Today, we are seeing a Democrat Party that has embraced the worst kind of Nazi Brownshirt tactics.  We are seeing the embrace of a Marxist ideological tactic having Nazified our society as Democrats define themselves as pure and their opponents as foul and embrace the ends-justifies-the-means to destroy everything our Constitution enshrined to impose themselves.  We see a mainstream media propaganda machine that exemplifies Joseph Goebbels’ Ministry of Propaganda refuse to cover the actual facts.

And I will crawl over broken glass to vote.  Even if I have to go through a gauntlet of Democrat Party Nazi thugs to do so.

 

Liberal, Thy Name Is HYPOCRITE. Not To Mention Fascist Thug: You Make Wrongs ‘Rights’ While You Take Away Legitimate Rights.

April 14, 2016

There are the sacred words of God recorded in Scripture:

20Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter! 21Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes And clever in their own sight!… — Isaiah 5:20-21

And there are the depraved words of depraved men like Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton and every single depraved American who vote for them.

I read this in the Los Angeles Times

Conventions have been canceled, rock concerts scrubbed, and corporations have yanked their business from North Carolina to protest a state law that critics say discriminates against gay, lesbian and transgender people.

Even the porn site xHamster.com is confronting users with a question: “Do you support the anti-LGBT bill in North Carolina?” Users who click yes are notified, via pop-up, that their access has been blocked.

These are tough days for the Republican North Carolina lawmakers who passed a law last month limiting legal protections for LGBT people at hotels, shops and restaurants. The law also restricted which bathrooms and locker rooms transgender people can use.

Now, as North Carolina faces the possibility of more business lost to corporate and celebrity protests, Republican Gov. Pat McCrory is trying to douse national criticism — without significantly changing the law.

– and had one question:

How the hell come liberals can do all of this unglued crap but the moment a Christian baker or a Christian wedding photographer try to take a stand the other way they are literally destroyed???

Why is it that the ONLY people who have any right to believe or practice according to their consciences are LIBERALS.

Why is it that the very position that Barack Obama FALSELY and DISHONESTLY claimed in 2008 about marriage is now quite literally a CRIME?

“I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. Now, for me as a Christian, it is also a sacred union. God’s in the mix.”

Barack Obama was as much a demon-possessed LIAR when he said he was a Christian as he was when he said that he believed in legitimate marriage.  Obama’s own senior campaign advisor later acknowledged that Barack Obama was lying when he said that.  But of course to be a Democrat today means you are nothing but the worst kind of liar, anyway.

But now we must all believe as Obama believes whatever the hell he believes, or the Nazi Party should go after us like the American-equivalent of European Jews.

Why is it that these liberals are no different than the Nazis, as I am seeing on television once more as liberals demonstrate their disgust of free speech by trying yet again to escalate to violence as they try to stop another Republican political rally?

Now, notwithstanding that 99% of all porn-addicted perverts are LIBERALS, and this is therefore not a brave stand but liberals just declaring that they will ONLY cater to their fellow disgusting pervert liberals who are basically the only damn ones using their damn product anyway, how does this porn site have the right to force their customers to take a Hitler-esque loyalty oath declaring their allegiance to degenerate sexual perversion lest they cease providing their “service” but that wedding photographer and that baker don’t even have a right to stand up for their own values???

Why is it that Bruce Springsteen can refuse to perform his service that he had already contractually obligated himself to, but that poor bastard baker is forced to repudiate his Bible-based Christian faith for every single sexually-perverted “couple” that comes in to their business???

Why is it that Disneyland – “the most depraved place on earth” now – can boycott a state, but the Boy Scouts get broken if they try to go the other way???  What happened to basic religious freedom???

I can tell you why our freedom has gone to the devil: it is because the Democrat Party has become the party of rabid, intolerant evil in America today.  And it is because the Bible foretold that the mystery of lawlessness would reach critical mass just before the very last days.

There’s a passage in Scripture that I rarely ever forget anymore:

The law has become paralyzed, and there is no justice in the courts. The wicked far outnumber the righteous, so that justice has become perverted. — Habakkuk 1:4

And today in America, we know how to put “perverted” in all CAPS.  Because literally no culture in the entire history of planet earth has become as PERVERTED as ours has become.

That was the lament of godly prophet Habakkuk.  And the LORD God responds by saying, “Behold ye among the heathen, and regard, and wonder marvellously: for I will work a work in your days, which ye will not believe, though it be told you.  For, lo, I raise up the Chaldeans, that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwelling places that are not theirs.” — Habakkuk 1:5-6.

This nation is going to get what it has coming to it.

The fact of the matter is that never before in the entire history of planet earth has “gay marriage” been a widespread part of any culture.  EVER.  It’s an interesting thing to read the history of homosexual “marriages” where two people of the same sex considered themselves “married.” But it had to be a SECRET.  Because the society said “NO WAY IN HELL.”

Oh, we have examples of men marrying men.  For example, Nero, quite possibly the most depraved of all emperors, married at least two men. He wed Pythagoras in a formal same-sex wedding by first putting on a bridal veil that made Nero the “bride” and Pythagoras the “groom.”  But homosexual marriage was NOT legal in the Roman Empire.  The same thing is true in any civilized culture you care to name.

Now, I hear the left and I hear homosexuals describe their “love” and “God’s love.”  As to the latter, they say that God loves homosexuals.  And it is true, to the extent that the Bible rightly says that true love is from God and God is love.  But what of it?  By the same token, God also loves the pedophile; God loves the rapist; God loves the torturer, God loves the murderer.  This is no different from being the most horrible and horrifying human being who ever lived, but claiming, “my mother loves me,” as though that pardons all those vile and hateful actions.  But God is also a God who HATES the wicked (Psalm 5:5; Psalm 11:5, Lev. 20:23, Prov. 6:16-19, Hosea 9:15).  God is morally perfect, and when He hates His attributes are in perfect balance such that His hate doesn’t overwhelm His love or vice versa.  Which makes Him the ultimate, perfect Judge of all Creation.  And in that same manner I hear about how “homosexual couples love each other.”  And I don’t doubt it for a second.  But again, so what?  I can show you all kinds of things that people love –

but you are the very ones who hate good and love evil. You skin my people alive and tear the flesh from their bones. — Micah 3:2

The merchant uses dishonest scales and loves to defraud. — Hosea 12:7

When the rulers of Israel finish their drinking, off they go to find some prostitutes. They love shame more than honor. — Hosea 4:18

“When I found Israel, it was like finding grapes in the desert; when I saw your ancestors, it was like seeing the early fruit on the fig tree. But when they came to Baal Peor, they consecrated themselves to that shameful idol and became as vile as the thing they loved. — Hosea 9:10

This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. — John 3:19

– but it doesn’t make that love good.  Does the fact that there are people who love evil and hate good make evil good?  Does the fact that there are merchants who genuinely love to cheat people make cheating people good?  So what if they love each other; it doesn’t make their love a good thing any more than a pedophile loving the boy he molests makes pedophilia a good thing.  The Book of Hosea has as one of its themes the fact that the people had become wicked and loved wicked things more than they loved what was right.  And so they kept turning back to the wicked things they loved rather than loving what was right rightly.

Continuing on, homosexuality has always existed, because there have always been depraved perverts even before God destroyed a place called “Sodom” famous for you-guessed-it:

Sodom and Gomorrah Destroyed

Genesis 19 1 The two angels arrived at Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gateway of the city. When he saw them, he got up to meet them and bowed down with his face to the ground. “My lords,” he said, “please turn aside to your servant’s house. You can wash your feet and spend the night and then go on your way early in the morning.”

“No,” they answered, “we will spend the night in the square.”

But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate. Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom—both young and old—surrounded the house. They called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them.”

Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him and said, “No, my friends. Don’t do this wicked thing. Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don’t do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof.”

“Get out of our way,” they replied. “This fellow came here as a foreigner, and now he wants to play the judge! We’ll treat you worse than them.” They kept bringing pressure on Lot and moved forward to break down the door.

10 But the men inside reached out and pulled Lot back into the house and shut the door. 11 Then they struck the men who were at the door of the house, young and old, with blindness so that they could not find the door.

12 The two men said to Lot, “Do you have anyone else here—sons-in-law, sons or daughters, or anyone else in the city who belongs to you? Get them out of here, 13 because we are going to destroy this place. The outcry to the Lord against its people is so great that he has sent us to destroy it.”

Utterly dishonest liberals claim that the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing to do with homosexuality, but rather with their being “inhospitable to strangers” (which apparently at least confirms that butt-raping two men would be “inhospitable”).  So forget all the other passages that confirm such facts as:

“‘You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.” — Leviticus 18:22

“If a man practices homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman, both men have committed a detestable act. They must both be put to death, for they are guilty of a capital offense.” — Leviticus 20:3

“In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.” — Romans 1:27

Don’t you realize that those who do wrong will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Don’t fool yourselves. Those who indulge in sexual sin, or who worship idols, or commit adultery, or are male prostitutes, or practice homosexuality, or are thieves, or greedy people, or drunkards, or are abusive, or cheat people–none of these will inherit the Kingdom of God. — 1 Corinthians 6:9-10

“… for the sexually immoral, for those practicing homosexuality, for slave traders and liars and perjurers–and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine” — 1 Timothy 1:10

It’s not like it’s not crystal clear.  It’s rather crystal clear that Democrats and the Democratic Party have rabid contempt for God and His ways.

God will destroy America, too.  Or God is NOT the LORD according to Romans, chapter one:

 18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth [a]in unrighteousness, 19 because that which is known about God is evident [b]within them; for God made it evident to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. 21 For even though they knew God, they did not [c]honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and [d]crawling creatures.

24 Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. 25 For they exchanged the truth of God for [e]a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed [f]forever. Amen.

26 For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is [g]unnatural, 27 and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing [h]indecent acts and receiving in [i]their own persons the due penalty of their error.

28 And just as they did not see fit [j]to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, 30 slanderers, [k]haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; 32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them.

We have degenerated down to the lowest possible point imaginable.  If you are a Democrat today, you are a rabid, screaming fanatic defiantly screaming for the wrath of a just and holy God to fall upon your head, the heads of your children and the neck of your entire nation.  You are someone who will not be satisfied until you are first worshipping the beast of the Book of Revelation and second screaming in eternal agony in the lake of fire forever and ever and ever.

Going on two decades ago, I had a powerful prophetic sense that I would one day find myself in prison over homosexuality.  Not because I had done anything wrong or hurt anyone, but merely because I had taken a stand for what the Bible declares and has ALWAYS declared about this “abomination.”

It’s already happened in Sweden, and in London, England.  It happened right next door to us in Canada.  And it has now officially happened in the United States of Obama, as well:

Idaho city’s ordinance tells pastors to marry gays or go to jailBy Cheryl K. Chumley – The Washington Times – Monday, October 20, 2014

Coeur d‘Alene, Idaho, city officials have laid down the law to Christian pastors within their community, telling them bluntly via an ordinance that if they refuse to marry homosexuals, they will face jail time and fines.

The dictate comes on the heels of a legal battle with Donald and Evelyn Knapp, ordained ministers who own the Hitching Post wedding chapel in the city, but who oppose gay marriage, The Daily Caller reported.

A federal judge recently ruled that the state’s ban on gay marriage was unconstitutional, while the city of Coeur d‘Alene has an ordinance that prevents discrimination based on sexual preference.

The Supreme Court’s recent refusal to take on gay rights’ appeals from five states has opened the doors for same-sex marriages to go forth.

The Knapps were just asked by a gay couple to perform their wedding ceremony, The Daily Caller reported.

“On Friday, a same-sex couple asked to be married by the Knapps, and the Knapps politely declined,” The Daily Signal reported. “The Knapps now face a 180-day jail term and a $1,000 fine for each day they decline to celebrate the same-sex wedding.”

In Houston, a homosexual mayor is using the system to attempt to crush Christian pastors who dare to follow Christ:

City of Houston demands pastors turn over sermons
Todd Starnes
By  Todd Starnes
·Published October 14, 2014
· FoxNews.com

The city of Houston has issued subpoenas demanding a group of pastors turn over any sermons dealing with homosexuality, gender identity or Annise Parker, the city’s first openly lesbian mayor. And those ministers who fail to comply could be held in contempt of court.

“The city’s subpoena of sermons and other pastoral communications is both needless and unprecedented,” Alliance Defending Freedom attorney Christina Holcomb said in a statement. “The city council and its attorneys are engaging in an inquisition designed to stifle any critique of its actions.”

We are ALREADY SEEING THIS IN AMERICA, and you’re a fool if you don’t think it’s going to get worse and worse unless America renounces the Democrat Party en masse.

I restate for the record that a homosexual man has the same right that I have, to marry any woman who will have him.  That he doesn’t want to exercise his right isn’t my fault.

Nearly twenty years ago I had the prophetic sense that that would be me, one day.  And when that time comes, I have already resolved to take my stand on the Word of God.  And when the Democrats who jeer at me from the gates of hell worship their god the State by offering me up as a sacrifice to their demonic system, well, as the Book of Revelation in 13:10 declares would happen to Christians, “Anyone who is destined for prison will be taken to prison.”

But now we’re already off one pervert battlefield and on to fight for the even worse perverts that want to wear their perversion as openly and defiantly and brazenly as possible.  AND FORCE EVERYONE AROUND THEM TO NOT ONLY CONDONE BUT CELEBRATE THEIR PERVERSION.  That’s what “LGBT” is; it is the next step into rabid, defiant, brazen, godless perversion.

One of the interesting things is that when the homosexual “Rainbow Coalition” first emerged, one of the organizations they approved and demanded rights be recognized for was the “North American Man-Boy Love Association,” or NAMBLA.  As I pointed out and documented once before:

Gays want the right to marry.  The North American Man/Boy Love Association wants the right to have men marry boys.  Unlike homosexuals, pedophiles actually have something approaching a historic case: the Roman world had something called pederasty, in which men gave boys mentoring and help with their futures in exchange for the boys giving up their virginal backsides.

The liberal culture says a twelve year old girl has the right to an abortion on demand without her parents’ consent.  That’s a very adult decision, not unlike a very similar adult decision to have a relationship with the adult who impregnated her in the first place.  Why not give NAMBLA what it wants?  It’s not fair to allow two people who love each other not to marry, after all, right?  That’s the argument we keep hearing, so let’s be consistent.  Why are we denying the right of men and boys to marry whomever they choose?

NAMBLA once actually had United Nations status, due to its membership with the “legitimate” International Lesbian and Gay Association.

NAMBLA has been a member of the International Lesbian and Gay Association for 10 years. We’ve been continuously active in ILGA longer than any other US organization. NAMBLA delegates to ILGA helped write ILGA’s constitution, its official positions on the sexual rights of youth, and its stands against sexual coercion and corporal punishment. We are proud of our contributions in making ILGA a stronger voice for the international gay and lesbian movement and for sexual justice.

Today the gay community excludes NAMBLA as a matter of pure political expediency.  Harry Hay, the founder of the first gay organization in America, ultimately condemned the “gay community” and “reviled what he saw as the movement’s propensity for selling out its fringe members for easy, and often illusory, respectability.” The simple fact is that the gay community is just a bunch of narrow-minded, intolerant bigots and naked political opportunists who want to deny others the basic rights they demand for themselves.

And, of course, President Obama appointed a pro-NAMBLA guy to be the “Safe Schools Czar,” so we have a pretty high-level endorsement right there, don’t we?  We’re talking mainstream stuff here, these days.

Given the fact that judges can usurp the clearly expressed will of the people and impose their own “morality” as they choose, it is guaranteed that we will legalize the buggery of young boys down the road.  Secular humanism  simply doesn’t have the moral resources to prevent it.

Who are you not to allow your little boy to get married to some forty-year old “lover,” you intolerant pig?

People who defend traditional marriage have an easy and powerful defeater for these objections.  Gay marriage proponents have none.  If I’m wrong, then just finish this thought: “A marriage of three people will never be allowed by a court to happen because…”.  And don’t say that it won’t ever happen because marriage is a particular type of thing, because that was our argument, and you ran roughshod over it.

Now that the “LGBT movement” is in its height of glory such that our culture is being FORCED to bow down to males who are openly parading themselves around as females, there is no question that we are very much ready to finally enter the moral sewer that the homosexual rights movement ALREADY ENSHRINED in the past: pedophiles being allowed to openly molest young children.  Because after all, a child can get an abortion without a parents’ consent which is a very mature – and SEXUALLY MATURE – decision for that child to make.  And if those children can be allowed to legally have an abortion without their parents’ consent or even notification, why on earth should they not be allowed to legally do the thing that makes abortion necessary in the first place???

It is OBVIOUS by the homosexual’s own “logic” that pedophiles didn’t “choose to be” that way.  Which means they were BORN that way.  Which means that they’re sodomizing your little baby is RIGHT and YOU are just INTOLERANT for not approving of it and SHAME ON YOU.

That is the very obvious dive into the sewer that the Democratic Party is taking given the demonic speed with which they have already approved first homosexual marriage and now every single thing the depraved LGBT perverts want.

We are racing faster and faster to worse and worse wickedness.

Until 1974 the American Psychological Association properly diagnosed homosexuality as a sociopathic personality disorder.  Until 2008 even DEMOCRAT presidential candidates had to at least lie through their roach fangs and declare that they renounced gay marriage.  And now look where we are!!!

And Democrats aren’t going to stop until they are worshiping Satan himself in the eternal lake of fire itself.  That is beyond obvious now.

I don’t have to be like Obama’s “reverend” for 23 years and scream “God damn America!” over and over again the way he did.  Because the Word of God ITSELF declares that the Democrat Party and everyone who votes for that Party has brought damnation upon America.

This nation is going to go down harder and faster than any nation that ever existed.  Because this nation once called itself “one nation, under God.”  Because this nation once called upon the name of the LORD that they now openly revile.

And then the beast of Revelation is going to come, and then he will implement his mark which amounts to the worship of an all-powerful totalitarian state that has seized control of the economy just as liberals have dreamed.  And ultimately liberals will get theirs.  And when they get it its going to last forever and ever and ever.

The Nazis Are Already At It AGAIN: In These Last Days Before The Beast, Democrats are Sons And Daughters Of Hell, Pure And Simple

March 21, 2016

“I ask of you that that which I say to you in this circle be really only heard and not ever discussed. We were faced with the question: what about the women and children? – I decided to find a clear solution to this problem too. I did not consider myself justified to exterminate the men – in other words, to kill them or have them killed and allow the avengers of our sons and grandsons in the form of their children to grow up. The difficult decision had to be made to have this people disappear from the earth. For the organisation which had to execute this task, it was the most difficult which we had ever had. […] I felt obliged to you, as the most superior dignitary, as the most superior dignitary of the party, this political order, this political instrument of the Führer, to also speak about this question quite openly and to say how it has been. The Jewish question in the countries that we occupy will be solved by the end of this year. Only remainders of odd Jews that managed to find hiding places will be left over.”  — Heinrich Himmler, regarding the Jewish question

Thus I have basically given the order to also kill the wives and children of these partisans, and commissars. I would be a weakling and a criminal to our descendants if I allowed the hate-filled sons of the sub-humans we have liquidated in this struggle of humanity against subhumanity to grow up. — Heinrich Himmler

It was a difficult thing, the murder of six million Jews, but it had to be done because the Jewish race was evil and had to be exterminated for the good of the Reich.  It would require very strong, dedicated men who could endure the necessary tasks that had to be undertaken toward this end.  But clearly the ends justify the means.  We cannot be weaklings, we must be strong, we must be willing to endure whatever it requires.  That was Himmler’s message to his SS guards who were heroically murdering Jewish men, women and children first by the thousands, then the tens of thousands, ultimately the millions.  That is what it required to be a member of the Nazi Party.

Why do I point that history out?  Because ugly history repeats itself whenever moral idiots and fools are involved.  And Democrats are moral idiots and fools.

What does it require to be a member of the Democrat Party in regards to a Donald Trump or to ANY conservative who wants a voice at a university where they routinely get shouted down or suffer threats of horrible violence?  The identical same attitude and willingness to set all higher principles, all democracy, all freedom, all of our Constitutional guarantees, aside.  Because they have defined Donald Trump as evil, just as the Nazis defined the Jews as evil, in accordance with their own principles and values, and both party organizations therefore took on the wicked and godless mindset that there are no moral limits to what they are entitled to do to stamp out their “evil.”  They will do ANYTHING and congratulate themselves as heroes for their undertaking.

And of course if a Jew were to respond violence for violence and attack the Nazis, Joseph Goebbels’ Ministry of Propaganda would seize upon it and declare, “Look at these terrible Jews! Look what they are doing to us!  We must STOP them!”

Which is to say that nothing is different today in what used to be the United States of America.  Same ends-justifies-means mentality, same declaration that the other side must be evil and there are no sacred principles that prevent us from doing whatever is necessary to stop them, etcetera etcetera.

I think of the Joseph Goebbels’ mainstream American media and how they kept holding Donald Trump responsible for what people who supported him did.  That might be fine, as long as they did the same to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.  But how many “journalists” have drawn that moral connection between Trump supporters who have punched protestors and Democrat supporters who have violated every principle of free speech and violently forced their way into events for the sole purpose of preventing that speech???

Oh, that Goebbels’ Ministry media machine excoriated Donald Trump when a racist nobody had heard about for thirty years came out and endorsed Donald Trump.  But how many “reporters” are reporting that Hillary Clinton was just endorsed by the Grand Dragon of the Klu Klux Klan?  How many “journalists” are in her face citing her own criticism of Trump’s alleged connection to David Duke and demanding that she explain what kind of hater she is that the KKK supports her???

The crickets are chirping.

What I keep hearing from the left is that the violence that surrounds Trump events (because the left keeps trucking its Brownshirt thugs into them to break them up) is Trump’s fault because he says things that incite rage.  Okay, damn near everything that Obama, Clinton and Sanders say incites my rage.  So I now have a moral right to stop them from saying what incites me, right?

Wrong, of course.  Because the violence machine only works one way: it only works for Democrats who have the right of roaches to brutally suppress Republican speech.  You must not ever believe it can possibly work the exact same way with the teams switched around.

There is necessarily in any free society the right of the speaker to speak, the right of the listeners to hear, along with the right of the protestor to protest.   The protestors should have the right to write articles, the right to hold protest events – but not the right to violate the right of the speaker to speak or the listeners to hear.  Stay the hell outside, and in fact keep a respectable distance from the rival event so that protest won’t turn into a riot.

And so I simply state a tried and true principle: whichever side strays into the other side’s territory IS THE NAZI.

And the Democrats have now been the Nazis over and over and over again.

Let me just point something out: I’ve been writing about this for YEARS no.  I started in a scholarly way by describing postmodernism and its explicit connection to fascism.  Allow me to point out that DEMOCRATS ARE POSTMODERNISTS:

How Postmodernism Leads To Fascism (part 1)

How Postmodernism Leads To Fascism (part 2)

How Postmodernism Leads To Fascism (part 3)

I wrote those articles back in May of 2008.  I saw this day coming.  I spake as a prophet.

Ladies and gentlemen, that is precisely, without any equivocation, what we are seeing from the left, from the Democrat Party of today, in pursuit of their goal to destroy Donald Trump whatever the cost, whatever the difficulty, whatever questionable moral conduct they must heroically endure.  Himmler and his boss would be so proud of them, so proud that the spirit of the Brownshirt lives on.

We’re to the point where every single Democrat in America is as vicious as Cynthia Soto’s Daughter of Hell.  These people are just in your face fascist Nazi thug EVIL.

As we speak, Democrats have hacked Donald Trump, they have literally threatened to murder his family with terrorist chemicals (they used a white powder this time, basically said it would be anthrax next time).  They have now threatened to murder Donald Trump’s sister – A FEDERAL JUDGE – unless Donald Trump drop out of the race.

I want you to think about that: Donald Trump has a nine-year-old kid.  I just want you to contemplate the HELL you liberals would have unleashed if right-wing haters had threatened the lives of Sasha and Malia Obama.  Or Chelsea Clinton.

Note: here is a case where a GOP staffer was forced to RESIGN because she criticized classless behavior on the part of the daughters of the first family.  That’s the vicious way the left protects their spawn but refuses to do for anyone else’s kids.  Also note that nowhere and at no time did that GOP staffer threaten to murder the daughters with anthrax.  THAT is something apparently reserved exclusively for pathologically Democrats to do.

And STILL YET AGAIN a rabid mob of Democrats were as determined as the hell they are from and will surely go to suppress free speech Nazi thug style, this time in Utah.

Quote from ABC:

Hundreds of people chanted “Dump Trump” and “Mr. Hate Out of Our State” as police in riot gear blocked the entrance to the Salt Lake City building, after protesters tried to rush the door and got into dozens of screaming matches with Trump supporters who didn’t make into the venue.

And the very next day (Saturday) in Arizona they were without any moral or legal restraint as they blocked roads, shut down traffic – literally chained themselves to their vehicles and endangering anyone who required emergency medical assistance – to usurp and destroy the free speech rights of every single American who wanted to hear what Donald Trump had to say.

And then look how the Goebbels-owned-and-operated AP (which stands for the anal orifice more it stands anything else today) characterizes what happened in its headline: “Trump kicks out protesters at Arizona rally.”  In the course of the article you learn that there were about two dozen Democrats who righteously believed that they had the holy and sacred duty to destroy all free speech and political freedoms of THOUSANDS of Americans.

And where is the Democrat Party on this?  Solidly with the protesters just like the Nazis they truly are.

Democrats can do ANYTHING that they feel is necessary to stop Donald Trump whatever the cost.  Sieg Hillary!  Sieg Hillary!!!  SIEG HILLARY!!!!

You vicious Nazis.  The Democrat Party is to free speech what Adolf Hitler was to Jews.

You sit there and equivocate – those few of you who are willing to pretend that you don’t condone these fascist suppressions of the 1st Amendment free speech guarantee – because, after all, Donald Trump is bringing this hated on himself, right?

Wrong.  There was once a time – I think it was 1977 – when liberals said that even the ugliest speech had to be protected and in fact protected MOST because you don’t HAVE to protect speech that everyone wants to hear.  And so they demanded that the American Nazi Party be allowed to march – in deliberate provocation – through a town that was composed primarily of Jewish Holocaust survivors.

But that same Democrat Party has degenerated into roaches who will simply crawl over ANYTHING.

Donald Trump isn’t instigating violence against ANYONE.  He’s not calling on his followers to go outside his event and hurt people.  No, that’s all being done by YOU, liberal, in your fascist determination to oppose him using any means necessary the same way Himmler was determined to use any means necessary to stop HIS enemies the Jews.  YOU’RE the ones who go outside your events into others’ events and try to forcibly take them over.  The Trump campaign is legally renting facilities to hold 1st Amendment protected free political assemblies and these NAZIS are determined to prevent democracy regardless of how much violence it takes.

I have not been a Trump guy, and there was a time when I questioned in my heart whether I could pull the level for him and actually vote Trump.  But one thing that makes me different from now every single Democrat Party member in America: I support free speech, and therefore I support his right to speak to any audience that will listen to him without interruption, without fascists trying to use Nazi tactics to shout him down, without Nazi Brownshirt tactics to go into his events and disrupt them with violent tactics.

You can go back over all the articles I’ve written since Obama first horrified me: I never ONCE called for violence against his ability to campaign, or for people to show up to shout him down.  That’s the kind of thing only fascists – by which I mean DEMOCRATS – seem to do.

And because you Democrats have no such respect for freedom, liberty, our Constitution, you have resolved my issues with Trump.  I will GLADLY cast a ballot for him (just not in the primary, where I’m voting for Ted Cruz).  Because you are the far greater evil, Democrat.  You are literally on the wrong side of democracy, the wrong side of free speech, the wrong side of basic liberty and human dignity.

YOU DEMOCRATS who gave rise to Trump because you allowed Obama to enrage tens of millions to the tune of half the nation, YOU are the ones who gave me the resolve to vote for Trump with your hatred of the 1st Amendment.

You rabid fools need to understand something: TENS OF MILLIONS OF AMERICANS like myself despise Hillary Clinton every scintilla as much as you hate Donald Trump; in fact we’ve despised her far longer because she has been an incompetent and destructive fascist in our nation’s government FAR longer than Donald Trump.  Hillary Clinton literally has blood on her fangs.

That said, we are AMERICANS and you are fascists.  So we respect the freedom of speech of others – even those others we disagree with and frankly despise – whereas YOU are rabid Nazis and you therefore hate freedom and the free speech that is quintessential TO freedom.  To be a Democrat means to be entirely without any kind of personal honor.

Which is frankly why you love Hillary Clinton – who is the EMBODIMENT of dishonor and standing for NOTHING but the raw pursuit of power – to begin with.  If you people HAD any honor, you would be out in the streets screaming for Hillary Clinton to turn over transcripts of her speeches that she got paid millions of dollars to give to the crony capitalist financial institutions she now claims she’s going to oppose.  But nope, even the most vocal Democrats like Sen. Elizabeth Warren are now COMPLETELY IN FAVOR of a corrupt insider who is OWNED by the big banks not being accountable for what she said to them behind closed doors.  Because again, to be a Democrat is to be nothing but a complete abject moral hypocrite as well as a Nazi.

You people would be ashamed of yourselves, but shame is a virtue and you have no virtues of any kind.

We’ve seen this behavior over and over again from the left: we’ve seen Harvard liberals literally calling for the outright destruction of any speech they disagree with.  I mean holy hell, THIS is what the leftist intellectual elite is actually SAYING:

“Let’s give up on academic freedom in favor of justice,” states the subtitle of her Feb. 18 column, in which she insists Harvard stop guaranteeing students and professors the right to hold controversial views and conduct research putting liberalism in a negative light.

“If our university community opposes racism, sexism, and heterosexism, why should we put up with research that counters our goals?”

“It is tempting to decry frustrating restrictions on academic research as violations of academic freedom. Yet I would encourage student and worker organizers to instead use a framework of justice. After all, if we give up our obsessive reliance on the doctrine of academic freedom, we can consider more thoughtfully what is just.”

Just imagine conservative Republicans doing that to YOU.  But again, you’re the Nazis and conservatives are the Jews, and there’s this arrogant superiority in your knowledge that you alone are truly evil and the other side would NEVER do to you what you do to them on a regular basis.

We’ve got leftist professors – and not just that but JOURNALISM professors – calling for some “muscle” to violently eject reporters from covering vile leftist activist protests.

The Democrat organizer like any terrorist offered a terrorist statement: “Our resolution is that Trump should be afraid.”  Because they are the worst Nazis since people who loved freedom finally rose up against them in the 1940s, and Trump ought to be afraid.

Black Lives Matter – and I’m literally talking about THE guy who organized the vicious race-hate event in which the mob changed “Pigs in a blanket, fry ’em like bacon” – you know, in honor of the police officers who had just been ASSASSINATED – said that his mob was just being “playful” and that his group hadn’t suppressed Trump’s free speech because, after all, Trump could have gone ahead with the event.

I am a little brother.  So I know the game this “Black Lives DON’T Matter To Black Lives Matter” thug is playing.  See, you get on top of your little brother, then you grab his hands and start hitting him with his own hands.  And the little brother is shouting, “Stop hitting me!”  And the big brother is saying, “What are you talking about?  I’m not even touching you!  You’re hitting YOURSELF!”

Liberals play their word games all the time.  Being politically correct is not just an attempt to make people feel better. It’s a large, coordinated effort to change Western culture as we know it by  redefining it. Early Marxists designed their game plan long ago and continue to execute it today — and now liberals are picking up the same tactic: to control the argument by controlling the “acceptable” language. Those with radical agendas understand the game plan and are taking advantage of an oversensitive and frankly overly gullible public.  Politically correct speech came from the Marxists who were determined to literally impose ideology by shaping the allowed speech of the surrounding culture.  For example, I proudly declare my status as a “Native American.”  I was born in America.  Both my parents were born in America.  All four of my grandparents were born in America.  And all but one of my great grandparents were born in America.  If I’m not a “native American,” well, where the hell am I a native of???  Where do I get to go to claim I’M a native???  That status was seized from me by leftist ideologues employing the communist-fascist tactic to use speech to shape the narrative.  How dare I deny this status to American Indians?  But on the other hand, wasn’t that status seized and stolen from ME and every single American like me???

And when they get their words in, well, THEN they have the right to act in riotous, violent manner to ensure that their PC words and phrases get imposed.

And so we get gay marriage, when “gay” and “marriage” are literally a contradiction in terms, a self-refuting phrase.  Because marriage is the union between one MAN and one WOMAN.  That’s what “marriage” has always been in every culture throughout all recorded history.  And so now thanks to Marxist PC thug tactics, I’m depicted as the one trying to seize something away, when THEY were the ones who stripped it away from ME.  But my rights – and this is a FACT now that Christian wedding photographers, Christian bakers, etc. have been destroyed because they tried to exercise their religious liberty – have been trampled on in favor of “rights” that were literally fabricated.

Donald Trump, in cancelling that event in Chicago, proved that he is THE most peaceful man in America.  At least compared to ANY Democrat in this country.  Because at event after event, Democrats are doing everything they can to provoke violence.  We’ll either going to let them take away our rights or there’s going to be violence.  And either way, fascist thug Democrats believe they win.  Because evil knows evil, and Democrat fascist thugs know exactly how THE most dishonest media that ever existed bar none will cover any violence they start once they get inside the event.

These are professional Democrat Nazi thugs paid by Democrat Nazi organizations to suppress free speech of anyone they disagree with.

One of the interesting things is the bookend of Nazi Democrat TERRORISTS: Bill Ayers – the same Bill Ayers who gave birth to Barack Obama’s political career – was spotted crawling around one of the To Hell With The First Amendment “protests.”

And that takes us right to Obama.  And again, if I and other conservatives were anywhere NEAR as Nazi as you liberals, we would be doing everything we could to kill him, to murder his family, to forcibly barge into every speaking event he gave and create havoc hoping for violence just so we could falsely depict ourselves as victims of violence while we peddled lies to the world through endless propaganda.

There is absolutely no question our culture has become so much more rabid and so much more toxic thanks to Obama.  It started with the Occupy Movement and just got more toxic as Obama felt more free to be more and more wicked.  It went to Black Lives Matter and literally the assassinations of numerous police officers who are now terrified to do their jobs and enforce laws because you people are LAWLESS fascist thugs.  Obama has been utterly lawless.  He told us over and over and over again that if he took certain actions it would constitute an anti-democratic act of a king, an emperor – and then he did it anyway.  He literally actually makes jokes about his lawlessness.  Hillary Clinton is revealing an even more viciously hateful lawless heart and a determination to do whatever the hell – and I mean HELL – she wants to do:

Hillary Clinton shouted “Call off your fucking dogs!” to Obama demanding that he call off the FBI from investigating her now blatant crimes now documented more than 2,ooo times over in which far greater people like war hero General Petraeus and far lesser individuals have not only been destroyed but gone to prison for committing tiny fractions of what we already know Clinton committed.  And mind you, we now have DOCUMENTED that she was REPEATEDLY TOLD THE RISKS TO NATIONAL SECURITY OF WHAT SHE WAS DOING BUT DID IT ANYWAY.  Which is to say that she not only committed numerous federal crimes but knew in advance that she was committing them.

An indictment very clearly looms, but it’s up to Obama whether to allow a Democrat to be prosecuted and be just or be a traitor to our entire way of life and be political and ideological and unjust and criminal himself.  Obama LIED and claimed that he knew nothing about Hillary Clinton’s secret fascist private server, but now we have the FACT that he knew and so he is declaring his emails to the site he claims he didn’t know anything about secret.  And oh, for the record, there is a long, documented history of the most non-transparent and corrupt administration in human history conveniently “losing” anything that would embarrass it or any evidence of crimes it has committed.  And so Obama thugs simply won’t release the evidence of her obvious treasonous crimes against the security of the American people.

Just look at the timeline of Clinton’s treasonous emails compiled by one of the few reporters who actually is NOT a propagandist today and it is so obvious that Hillary Clinton is a liar and a criminal and that Obama is a liar and a criminal co-conspirator it is beyond unreal.

We’re a banana republic now thanks to these lawless, immoral roaches.

It used to be that the FBI and the Justice Department represented “dogs” of JUSTICE who would pursue crime and corruption; now whether JUSTICE is done is literally up entirely to Obama who is the most corrupt and pathologically dishonest man who ever contaminated the White House with his evil.

So let’s zero in on Barack Hussein Obama and the virulent cancer this wicked man has been on the presidency and on the nation.  How HE gave birth to the rage that created Donald Trump.

This is a man who never ONCE in his entire cockroach presidency EVER tried to unify America or transcend the political divide as he dishonestly and wickedly promised the American people.  The entire Democrat Party machine is based on dividing people by race, by income, by gender, by sexual preference, by you name it.  The Democrat Party took God out of their platform in 2012  – and then cynically and cravenly put Him back in in obvious and blatant violation of their own rules and against their own delegates because they are the most cynically wicked group of people on earth today – and they are nothing but wicked and corrupt when God looks down at the Democrat Party this happens:

Now the [Democrat Party] was corrupt in God’s sight and was full of violence [against babies and against literally EVERY Donald Trump campaign rally]. — see Genesis 6:11

Now the [political party] of Sodom was wicked and was sinning greatly against the LORD. – see Genesis 13:13

Okay, okay.  I added a couple of words.  But in this case I didn’t change the meaning one iota.  I made it applicable to America today.

You think I’m going too far?  Obama and his Democrat filth have made all of America “Sodom”.  There is no question that we are now officially “the United States of Sodomy.”   That is a fact that every single Democrat who defiantly lusts for the wrath of God according to Romans 1:18-32 desire as much as they lust for perverted sodomy.  There is a rabid hate on the part of the Democrat Party for God, for His ways, and for the United Stateshttp://stonethepreacher.com/60-million-dead-and-unwanted/ of America that was once “One Nation Under God.”

And let me close with the words of Obama’s own spiritual leader Jeremiah Wright that it is a good thing America burn to the ground, because – and I quote Obama’s reverend – “NOT God bless America! God DAMN America!”

I find it amazing.  Jeremiah Wright said “God damn America for killing innocent people!”

Now, Obama’s reverend, like Obama himself, is a wicked man.  But he stands in the same role as Obama’s priest as Caiaphas stood in as the High Priest at the time of Jesus.  There’s an amazing passage in John 11:49-52:

Then one of them, named Caiaphas, who was high priest that year, spoke up, “You know nothing at all!  You do not realize that it is better for you that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish.”  He did not say this on his own, but as high priest that year he prophesied that Jesus would die for the Jewish nation, and not only for that nation but also for the scattered children of God, to bring them together and make them one.

In other words, Caiaphas – as cynical and self-serving and wicked as he was with his self-serving logic – was nevertheless speaking prophetically as he tried to murder Jesus – the Lamb of God who gave His life for the sins of the world.

And in the exact same manner, Jeremiah Wright – America’s high priest by virtue of the cancerous Obama presidency – prophetically invoked God’s damnation on America because this incredibly wicked nation has now murdered ten innocent human beings for every single ONE Jew the Nazis brutally murdered.  And God DAMN us for it.

Every single Democrat on earth will one day stand before a just and holy God as flames of wrath billow from His chariot throne and each one will be tried and convicted of the murder of now SIXTY MILLION babies.  And I tell you the truth, you will scream in hell for a trillion times a trillion millennia for every single NANOSECOND that you viciously and callously and inhumanly STOLE from every single one of the lifetimes those precious souls should have lived and would have lived if it were not for the evil YOU VOTED FOR AND KEPT VOTING FOR.

To be a “Democrat” is to be the worst mass murderer in the entire history of planet earth.  And hell cannot last long enough for you to pay for your moral crimes against life itself.

And I state for the historic record that it was THE DEMOCRAT PARTY that turned away thousands of Jews who were thus consigned to the death camps when they had literally reached the very shores of freedom.

Every wicked sin of the Democrat Party – from the genocidal Trail of Tears to the Civil War Democrats started over their determination to impose slavery to that awful moment when Democrat President FDR sent Jews to be murdered in the Holocaust to all of the wickedness of your Cockroach-in-Chief Obama will be laid on your heads, Democrat.

I’ve already pointed out that when REPUBLICAN President Abraham Lincoln was elected president, EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT STATE SECEDED AND STARTED THE VICIOUS CIVIL WAR in which 750,000 Americans were killed.  But let’s keep going: because it just so happens that World War One was waged under Democrat Woodrow Wilson – who worshiped the State and government power – which resulted in the deaths of 116,516 Americans.  World War Two was waged under Democrat Socialist New Dealer FDR, which resulted in the deaths of 405,399.  The Korean War was waged due to the negligence of the only leader who has ever used atomic bombs, as 36,516 Americans perished.  Then we come to the Vietnam War, waged under LBJ which ultimately claimed the lives of another 58,209 Americans.  And in that war the Democrat Party became the first traitors in the history of the republic as they ultimately turned on their own soldiers whom they themselves had consigned to war beginning a trend of traitorous betrayal that has continued unabated ever since.

Let’s see, I add that Democrat hell total up, sixty million murdered babies plus all their wars, and I get, let me see here, carry the one… 61,366,,640 dead Americans thanks to the Democrat Party.  Now, I added up all the wars Republicans have started and I ended up with 5,817.  That includes all the dead from Iraq – given the despicable fact that Democrats like Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden and John Kerry and Harry Reid treacherously and traitorously turned on that war after VOTING for it – but only includes the deaths from Afghanistan up to 2008 given Obama’s utterly insanely stupid handling of the war which caused the US death toll to skyrocket (from 630 under Bush to 1751 and counting under Obama).

Let me push this connection between abortion deaths and war deaths a little further.  There’s an interesting comparison I came across between how the communist/socialist Soviet Union viewed their soldiers’ lives versus the United States:

General Eisenhower, in his conversations with Marshal Zhukov, was struck by the different value that Soviet and American leaders placed on their soldiers’ lives.  In one instance, Zhukov explained that minefields were best cleared by marching soldiers through them, reasoning that a few losses to mines were acceptable to maintain the momentum of an attack.  Eisenhower noted in his memoirs that such methods, regardless of their tactical utility, had no place in the armies under his command.  “Americans assess the cost of war in terms of human lives,” he wrote, “the Russians on the overall drain on the nation.”  Throughout American history, from Antietam to Hamburger Hill, a victory won with too many lives was not a victory at all. — Firepower in Limited War, pg. 4, by Robert H. Scales, Jr.

I’m simply going to state for the record that both Antietam and Hamburger Hill occurred before Roe v. Wade.  That event in 1973 and the sixty million babies murdered under its horror since leads me to conclude one fact: that Democrats are like the communists in many, MANY ways, least of which is their horrific doctrine of their own people.  Because don’t TELL me you value the lives of the American people, Democrat: YOU CAN’T EVEN VALUE YOUR VERY OWN CHILDREN’S LIVES.  And the closer you get to “Democrat” the closer you get to HELL: to wit, black people are THE most faithful constituents of the Democrat Party, and they murder six out of every ten of their own children in the abortion mills.

It’s no wonder that Democrats build well over three out of every four of their abortion clinics in black neighborhoods, because to quote Margaret Sanger of Planned Parenthood fame, “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” she said, “if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” Because to quote Ruth Bader Ginsburg, “Frankly I had thought that at the time [that abortion was legalised], there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

Liberalism is the pursuit of hell.  And the closer you are to the Democrat Party, the closer you are to hell on earth.  It is as if you yearn for what you will one day receive the same way devout Christians yearn for  heaven.  And just as Jesus taught His disciples to pray, “Thy Kingdom come on earth as it is in heaven,” Democrats pray for their kingdom to come on earth as it is in HELL.  And they are hard at work trying to actualize hell right here on earth.

You want to blame the Republican Party?  You go ahead.  But you add up the 60 million babies you’ve murdered plus the death tolls of all your wars, and I wouldn’t want to be you trying to say anything other than the fact that the Democrat Party always HAS been the party of death and always WILL BE the party of death.

But oh, I could go on.  According to Democrat sources, as many as 2.4 million black slaves from Africa were killed being transported to America.  We could add that to the Democrat Party hell total given their utter devotion to slavery leading up to and causing the Civil War.  And we could likewise add up the six million Jews FDR never bothered to lift a damn finger to save during the Holocaust of his World War Two.  I think that’s only fair, given how he turned away Jews to be murdered in the death camps when they were RIGHT HERE.  We could certainly add the horror of Rwanda when Bill Clinton’s cowardly refusal to use the simple word “genocide” resulted in the ghastly murder of 800,000 people.  It wasn’t just that Bill Clinton morally wickedly refused to use the word “genocide” even as hundreds of thousands of Africans were being viciously murdered in a GENOCIDE.  But Clinton also did everything in his power to prevent paid professional soldiers such as those at Executive Outcomes to prevent that slaughter which that organizations documented history proves they could have prevented.  Because while Bill Clinton said the words, “The era of big government is over,” he always loved his precious big government, and he didn’t want private military organizations to be allowed to prevent genocides just because his precious big government refused to do the damn job.  And we likewise ought to add up the slaughter toll due to Obama’s terrifyingly failed foreign policy.  Because you ought to be held accountable for your omissions as well as your commissions.  And MILLIONS have been killed in Syria and the rest of the Middle East since Obama became our Roach-in-Chief and refused to do more than blather useless idiocy while people perished by the thousands.  As we speak, Obama – like Bill Clinton before him – is an abject COWARD for refusing to use the word “genocide” to apply to the shocking nightmare that is being inflicted by Islamic State (which itself Obama gave birth to).

Because of Obama’s uselessness, because of the abject FAILURE of his foreign policy, because all this cynical, wicked coward cares about is political posturing and political shenanigans, we now witness the worst refugee crisis in the entire documented history of the planet.  We can bookend the horror of Democrat’s abortion toll of 60 million with 60 million human beings with nowhere to go thanks to Obama’s fail.  And that number has skyrocketed since thanks to your wicked president who arrogantly, steadfastly and defiantly refuses to do what is right.

And Democrats are responsible for ALL of it.

I tell you the truth, Democrat, Obama’s wicked sins will be laid upon your  head.  You will SCREAM IN HELL for what your false messiah did.

I would literally not vote Democrat for all the money in the world.  I would not vote Democrat if someone were to put a loaded gun to my head and tell me he would shoot me unless I voted Democrat.  Because “What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul?” (Matthew 16:26).

I would rather be a roach than a Democrat, with the caveat that it is frankly nearly impossible to tell one apart from the other.

“[Democrats] are of their father, the devil, and they want to carry out their fathers desires.  He was a [baby] murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for their is no truth in him.  When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.” — See John 8:44

There is a saying, “Better to starve free than be a fat slave.”  But I submit to you that in Hillary Clinton’s very words Obama has already proven that to be not quite true: because fat slaves under socialism don’t get to remain fat for very long.

We live in a time where the very worst of history repeats itself because Democrats have now repeatedly and routinely proven that they will stop at absolutely NOTHING to impose their will on other people, just as the Nazis did before them, even using the same damn thug tactics to do it.  We live in the time just before the Antichrist, the beast, comes.

And we can now easily see why every single Democrat will worship the beast and take his mark on their right hands, or on their foreheads.

Critical Obama Supreme Court Nomination Fact Confirmed: Every Single Democrat In America Is A Pathologically Dishonest HYPOCRITE

March 17, 2016

I wrote about this once before (and have introduced a great many new facts that have appeared since then), but I will write about this again now that Obama has actually done it and officially started yet another vicious political fight by nominating a pick for the Supreme Court.  Today Obama nominated Merrick Brian Garland for the SCOTUS.

And then I’ll just rant on Democrats for awhile because it’s just so easy to do given the abject despicable moral hypocrites these people truly are.

Again, the Republican Party position is rather simple: Obama’s pick be damned because: a) the Democrats themselves have in their own repeated history justified ignoring Obama’s pick and b) because the American people ought to have the right to decide which Supreme Court Justice enters the SCOTUS by being able to vote for the president who makes that selection as well as the Senate who gets to confirm it within the short span of less than eight months.

Obama in his lame-duck status should not have the right to “fundamentally transform” America by “fundamentally transforming” the composition and subsequent philosophy of the Supreme Court this close to an election in which the American people would be able to say aye or nay to their own future path.

Let me further state that for Obama to wrap himself in the mantle of righteous outrage as the protector of all things Supreme Court is a JOKE given his record in which he’s been slammed down by unanimous SCOTUS decisions against him more than, well, anyone.  Humorously, the only other president who begins to compare to Obama’s pathetic toll of unanimous Supreme Court decisions against him was one William Jefferson Clinton.  Because there’s just something FASCIST in the water that Democrat presidents drink.

This just really and truly boggled the mind when I heard Obama was doing this several weeks ago:

Megyn Kelly stated Thursday evening on The Kelly File that she can find no instance in history where a sitting president of the United States has failed to attend the funeral of a sitting Supreme Court Justice. It’s an unprecedented move on the part of Obama, who once again fails to uphold his duty as president, represent the country and set an example for the American people.

I admit that I didn’t agree with the whole “car czar” program, but I finally agree with something that Obama’s handpicked car czar, Steven Rattner, said:

“If we want to reduce partisanship, we can start by honoring great public servants who we disagree with.”

But Barack Obama, our Divider-in-Chief, showed once again that he has nothing but DISHONOR in his wicked soul.

Obama thus becomes the very first American president to shirk attending a funeral of a sitting Supreme Court Justice while simultaneously  demanding that he has the divine right of kings and gods to be able to replace that Justice on the Court.  All I can say is  that I suppose history continues unbroken – BECAUSE BARACK OBAMA IS NOT AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT; HE IS AN UNAMERICAN PRESIDENT.

Obama basically told us that himself in his own biography, which he titled “Dreams FROM My Father.”  He’s not referring to dreams that he had of his father; rather he’s referring to the dreams that his father bequeathed him.  And what were Barack Obama Sr.’s dreams?  He was a MARXIST who despised countries like America.  Dinesh D’Souza very clearly documents the content of the terrible and un-American dreams that Barack Obama received from his pathologically dishonest communist daddy.

There is no question that it is technically true – and all sides affirm that fact – that Obama has “the constitutional right” to nominate someone for the Supreme Court if there is a vacancy.  Just as I have the similar constitutional right to walk into any black establishment and scream the N-word over and over and over again according to my 1st Amendment rights.  But 1) the mere fact that you have the “right” to do something doesn’t mean you ought to do it.  I have the righto to step in front of a damn bus, but if I have any brains I would realize that those brains would be splattered allover the pavement and there are consequences to my exercising my rights.  And 2) Obama had every bit as much of a right and a duty to honor the Justice he was demanding to replace at his funeral.  And he didn’t bother to show, so why should the Senate bother to show up to his nominee’s hearing???  How about instead if the U.S. Senate treats Merrick Garland the same damn way Obama treated Antonin Scalia and just refuses to show up even when they – just like Obama – easily could have done so in the name of “bipartisanship”???

Bipartisanship isn’t a river and it doesn’t flow in one direction; if you want it you have to give it.  Barack Obama is in the final year of his two-term presidency and he NEVER ONCE acted like he ever understood that or cared about even trying to understand it.  And please stop stupidly pretending otherwise, liberals.  Because to whatever extent you can show Republican representatives or senators not being properly bipartisan in a way that I can’t easily document YOUR representatives and senators not likewise being, please understand that it is uniquely a president’s duty to rise above that – and there is absolutely no question that Obama sank to new depths rather than rose to new heights in the partisan wars that he mostly ignited and inflamed with both his hostile words and his tyrannous actions.

If that isn’t enough, and frankly it is already, there is also a sacred constitutional principle called “the separation of powers.”  Each branch of government is co-equal and has the right to make its own rules that inform and govern its conduct within the Constitution.

And so also for the record, the United States Senate has the constitutional right and duty to “advise and consent” on ANY presidential nomination.  The Senate in this process has every bit as much of a constitutional right NOT to do something as Obama has to do it.  In fact, anyone who understands history should KNOW that: James Madison called the Senate “the great anchor” that dragged and prevented bad things from happening; George Washington called the Senate a cooling chamber, such as was used to cool down tea that was too hot.  The Senate as a body was more designed to prevent things from happening than it was designed to do things.  And therefore the Senate likewise has the right and duty to ADVISE Obama NOT to exploit this death by nominating anyone and the right and duty to absolutely REFUSE to consent to anybody Obama nominates.

This is called a basic fact of American history.

The SAME Constitution that gives a president the right to nominate a Supreme Court Justice to fill a vacancy gives the Senate the right to say, “Up yours!” to a presidential nomination.

As a Senator himself, Barack Obama FILIBUSTERED a Republican nominee to the Supreme Court:

However, the truth is that, when they were senators, Obama, Biden, and Clinton all tried to filibuster Justice Alito’s nomination to the court – and other Democratic party leaders such as NY Senator Chuck Schumer reveled in the idea that they were able to block every Bush #43 nomination to the federal courts.

We also have the example of Obama’s vice president, Joe Biden who in 1992 said when there was just a POSSIBILITY that George H.W. Bush MIGHT be able to nominate a Supreme Court Justice:

“It is my view that if the president goes the way of Presidents Fillmore and Johnson and presses an election year nomination the Senate Judiciary Committee should seriously consider not scheduling confirmation hearings on the nomination until ever — until after the political campaign season is over.” — Sen. Joe Biden, June 25, 1992

President George H.W. Bush was in office until January 20, 1993.  So Biden didn’t even say this in a presidential election year – the way it is now with Obama demanding the divine right to replace Scalia – rather Biden said this applied even in the year BEFORE the election year.

So all you’ve got to do is just refer to this as “the Biden Rule.”  But it’s a rule and it was started by Democrats.  And now they’re screaming at us for following THEIR rules.

And so let the Democrats hang on their own petard.

Democrats have a LONG history of doing the very thing they now claim is so evil:

While Democrats in the upper chamber – including Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York and former Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, both of which called for blocking former President George W. Bush’s nominations – have slammed the GOP for its decision not to consider a nominee until after a new president is elected, Democrats have not always held that stance. The Democrat-controlled Senate passed a resolution in 1960 preventing a recess appointment, much to the dismay of Republicans.

As first reported by The Washington Post – S.RES. 334, also known as Expressing the Sense of the Senate That The President Should Not Make Recess Appointments to the Supreme Court, Except to Prevent or End a Breakdown in the Administration of the Court’s Business – passed the Senate in a 48-33 vote in an attempt to prevent former President Dwight Eisenhower from filling a seat last-minute.

Democrats have frequently played this same game.   New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, now the Senate Minority Leader and leader of all the Senate Democrats, said when a Republican was president that the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush “except in extraordinary circumstances.”

“We should reverse the presumption of confirmation,” Schumer told the American Constitution Society convention in Washington. “The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito.”

And so this incredibly dishonest claim from Obama and the Democrats is so much nonsense it is beyond unreal: if anything, it IS unprecedented, other than all the damn times THEY did the very thing they now so loudly and dishonestly and hypocritically insist that Republicans would be violating sacred precedent to do.

If you are a Democrat, you are an evil being who belongs to the Party of Evil Beings.  Period.  There is nothing honest about you, or decent about you, or virtuous about you whatsoever.  You are a moral cockroach.

Here’s another thing: the Senate is now firmly in Republican hands (after disgraceful Democrats were caught being evil maybe a million times too often).  But when Democrats owned the Senate, they shoved their crap right down the Republicans’ throats and changed the damn Senate rules to do it with a process that was so toxic to the Constitution that it was called “the nuclear option.”

On November 21, 2013, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid declared that “unbelievable, unprecedented obstruction” by Republican filibusters had made the confirmation process “completely unworkable.”[1] As a result, he said, Democrats were forced to eliminate virtually all nomination filibusters. […]

For nearly all of its history, proceeding to a final vote on a matter before the Senate required a supermajority.

But not when Democrats stole the show.  No, no, no, the rules of all propriety and decency and civility go right out the damn window every damn time it pleases them.  Just like the Nazi Party and Jews, the Democrat Party calls the Republicans “evil” and then justifies the most wildly partisan and cynical “final solutions.”

Ever since the Supreme Court became a “super legislature” thanks to the wicked Democrat Party, where they ruled by imposing massive societal change by finding “penumbras and emanations” that justified whatever the HELL they wanted to do, the SCOTUS has become a political branch.  And Obama just started another vicious war while blathering dishonest words that he was somehow above doing the very thing he is clearly doing.

And oh, I can go on.  The Democratic Party is the party that turned the name of a Supreme Court nominee into a verb by so utterly pouring out their demonic hate to poison the nomination that the process became known as “Borking.”  It had never been done before the Party of Cockroach Fascism started it.  This infamous Ted Kennedy slander was the worst of the slanders:

“Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government, and the doors of the federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is often the only protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy.”

Robert Bork was a good man and eminently qualified to sit on the Court.  But Democrats are truly breathtakingly evil and hypocritical people.

And so, all the Obama crap about it being beyond the pale for a Senate to treat a nomination to the Supreme Court this way, all I can say in response is eat my fecal matter right out of the toilet bowl, you wicked hypocrite LIAR.

NO Democrat EVER has the right to question how Republicans treat a Supreme Court nominee or the entire nomination process after the same Democrats who have themselves refused to prevent appointments or allow confirmations of SCOTUS nominees also crawled into the gutter and invented the process of “borking” qualified nominees.

Speaking of “being qualified,” Barack Obama actually openly ACKNOWLEDGED that Judge Roberts was qualified.  But that didn’t MATTER then:

Obama admitted that Roberts was eminently qualified. He praised him highly.

“There is absolutely no doubt in my mind Judge Roberts is qualified to sit on the highest court in the land. Moreover, he seems to have the comportment and the temperament that makes for a good judge. He is humble, he is personally decent, and he appears to be respectful of different points of view. It is absolutely clear to me that Judge Roberts truly loves the law. He couldn’t have achieved his excellent record as an advocate before the Supreme Court without that passion for the law…”

But, no he wasn’t going to vote for him anyway.

“I ultimately have to give more weight to his deeds and the overarching political philosophy that he appears to have shared with those in power than to the assuring words that he provided me in our meeting. The bottom line is this: I will be voting against John Roberts’ nomination.”

In short, Obama chose to vote against Roberts because of his perceived conservative politics. Nothing else.

I mean, understand this in terms of what Obama said today as I write this:

To suggest that someone as qualified and respected as Merrick Garland doesn’t even deserve a hearing, let alone an up-or-down vote, to join an institution as important as our Supreme Court, when two-thirds of Americans believe otherwise — that would be unprecedented,”

Gag me.  Just gag me.  It might have been “unprecedented” if it hadn’t been for YOU, Obama, you miserable roach.

Okay, so I just recorded the FACT that Obama voted AGAINST John Roberts EVEN AFTER HIMSELF ACKOWLEDGING THAT ROBERTS WAS “ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT IN MY MIND” QUALIFIED TO BE A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE.  Not only that, but Obama actually joined in a FILIBUSTER ATTEMPT to prevent Judge Samuel Alito’s nomination from ever seeing the light of day.  And the fact that the man is sitting on the SCOTUS this very day is historical proof that Alito was “qualified” to sit on the bench.

So in other words, just treat this guy Merrick Garland the same damn way that our Hypocrite-in-Chief treated Republican-appointed judges to the court when HE was a nothing Senator.  That and just burn in hell, hypocrites.

Republicans have the SAME right and duty to reject any judge Obama nominates simply because they don’t agree with Obama’s “overarching political philosophy.”  Period.  And you people are nothing but cockroach vile hypocrites to say otherwise.

In the same vein, Obama said in the same speech:

“At a time when our politics are so polarized, at a time when norms and customs of political rhetoric and courtesy and comity are so often treated like they’re disposable, this is precisely the time when we should play it straight,” Mr. Obama told an audience

And maybe, just maybe, our politics are so divided right now because the current occupant of the White House degenerated discourse to the point where he actually slandered Republicans by claiming that Republicans were actively trying to seek dirtier air, dirtier water, less people with health insurance.  Obama actually slandered Republicans by insinuating that they wanted to kill off “grandparents who couldn’t afford to go to nursing homes, poor children with Down syndrome, and autism, and the profoundly disabled.” As the US News & World Report article points out, Obama is literally willing to say ANYTHING when it comes to viciously slandering his opponents.

Obama is our Thug-in-Chief who actually said when HE was a candidate for president, “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” is now actually hypocrite enough to criticize Donald Trump – who correct me if I’m wrong but I don’t recall ever having commanded his followers to shoot their opponents with guns – for his “violence.”

But oh, when Obama dishonestly and hypocritically starts blathering patently false words about “courtesy and comity,” we are supposed to saw off the top of our skulls and scoop out our damn brains and believe this lying turd.

Or how about instead I realize that our politics are polarized because Barack Obama is a wicked man who polarized them, and then say, “Right back down your scrawny little weasel neck, you liar!”

I came across something Wednesday night that is just so illustrative of the left: I saw an article from USA Today titled, “Clinton Caught On Hot Mic Unknowingly Shares Good Things.”  And I’m thinking, what sweetness and light did Hillary Clinton share in her hot mic moment?  And I clicked on it obviously assuming that she’d said something nice and positive about somebody.

LIE.  Here’s all the article revealed about Clinton’s hot mic comments as Clinton talked to leftist propagandist Chris Matthews:

“You guys can’t stop covering (Trump),” Clinton said to Matthews. “He is a dangerous presence.”

Matthews seemed to put the onus on the viewer. “Nobody can tell what people want to watch,” he said. “They laugh at him.”

The conversation then shifted to Christie, with Clinton asking why he’s supporting Trump. “Did he have a debt?” she asked.

Seriously.  There were NO “good things” at all.  Unless you’re a hater to the nth power.  Does anyone seriously think for one second that Donald Trump thought that “dangerous presence” remark was a “good thing”?  Do you think Chris Christie thought Clinton’s mockery was?  Do you think ANY of Trump’s supporters think it was a “good thing”?

I’m just saying that the leftist media characterizing Clinton’s obviously polarizing and hostile comments to Donald Trump as a “good thing” reveals something that is just psychopathic in its delusion about the left in general.  Obviously, I say negative things about people; but I have the ability that Democrats very clearly lack to realize that I’m saying negative things rather than “good things.”  For some bizarre reason that again I can only see as a psychotic disconnect from reality, Democrats believe that Obama is this positive spirit when he has said so many hateful things about the Republican Party it is beyond unreal.  And I will challenge any Democrat out there to post all the hateful remarks George W. Bush made about the left and I’ll post all the hateful remarks Barack Obama has made about the right, and we’ll just see right quick who is the “positive spirit” and who is the true hater.  And I can guarantee you, Democrat, you won’t be happy with the result.  Because George W. Bush was for the most part a gracious man, whereas Barack Obama has been far too often a dark, bitter, hateful man who has stirred up rage in this nation as no other president before him.

The Bible teaches that Satan masquerades as an angel of light (2 Corinthians 11:4).  I don’t think the devil wears his angel of light costume as mere disguise; rather, this warped, ugly, deluded, hateful being actually thinks of himself that way.  He’s the good guy and God is evil.  Just as Democrats who worship homosexual perversion on an altar of murdered babies think that God is evil for being so intolerant for being opposed to the holocaust of His babies and of fatherhood in general, or to the perversion against nature itself that homosexuality truly is.

And who is the dark, evil, perverted force?  It’s the people who believe that human beings are of incommensurate, literally infinite value, who value LIFE.  It’s the people who honor God and pursue His ways.  And that is just one of the many ways that Democrats are the living embodiment of Isaiah 5:20 – “Woe to those who say that evil is good and good is evil, that dark is light and light is dark, that bitter is sweet and sweet is bitter.”

You people literally have NO idea whatsoever what a dark and bitter and divisive force that you are.  You keep pushing and pushing and imposing and imposing; you shove homosexual marriage down our throats when no civilization in the entire history of the human race had ever done such an evil thing; just as you shoved abortion down our throats when likewise all of human history viewed children as a good thing for society and NEVER an evil thing.  And then after shoving these things down our throats – and I can go on, ObamaCare, the massive and foolish $862 billion “stimulus” that was actually a $3.27 trillion waste of money, pretty much ALL of Obama’s executive power-grabs, the dozens of times Obama has been voted down unanimously by the Supreme Court for his illegitimate and immoral power grabs, etc. – you call us “obstructionists” and “intolerant” just for standing in the way of your pursuit of hell.  Because change is good, after all.

Well, Donald Trump sure represents “change,” all right; and all of a sudden it’s a marvelous thing to be obstructionist and intolerant of change.

It is an amazing thing, how this label “obstructionist” has persisted throughout the liberal propaganda media for these years of Obama.  There was a time when Democrats controlled all three branches of elected government, and the Republicans couldn’t do anything.  But due to the Democrats’ unpopular and failed vision, the GOP won first the House and then the Senate.  We dominate in governors and in state governments.  But even now when they have firm control of two out of the three elected branches of government, they are STILL called “obstructionist,” because liberals believe with all their hearts that Obama is a Führer if not a god, and that to deny him anything amounts to unholy blasphemy.

There is frankly no other explanation for this; because when Democrats were the ones in the same exact position, they had a decidedly different view.

This article represents a classic example of this being not uncharacteristic, but ENTIRELY in harmony with the twisted, deluded, pathologically hypocrite roaches Democrats are.

But Democrats are the kind of people who say – and more frighteningly actually believe – “It’s never fascist when we do exactly what we accuse you of being fascist for doing.”

Yes, yes, good things.  Nothing but sweetness and light.  I mean, how can you imagine any “bad things” coming out of this rabid, toxic, vile witch???

Hillary Clinton Vicious

If you are a Democrat, I call you out as a Nazi because you are TEN TIMES as murderous as the Nazis ever were, you baby butchering monsters.  Sixty million babies have been murdered with every single Democrat held to account for that Holocaust of life.  Even just as the Nazi brownshirts, you are utterly rife with homosexual perversion.  And in the same manner, you are about a thousand times the hypocrites that they were.  And so no thank you to your Supreme Court appointment who would make even more of that hell possible.

The Republican majority Senate will do what the hell it wants and the Democrat minority will shut the hell up.  By the Democrats’ own damn rules.  And if Obama and Democrats now say those rules were wrong, then Obama and Democrats should kindly burn in hell for having imposed them in the first place.

If Obama gave a flying damn about the unity of the United States that he has so fractured and broken that on the Republican side we have Donald Trump and on the Democratic side we have socialist Bernie Sanders, he would yield in this election year and allow the incoming president to nominate a Justice with the support of a majority of the people.

But Obama DOESN’T give a flying damn about uniting America.  That was, as I pointed out only months into his dishonest presidency, merely one of his signature lies.

Obama has broken and torn any hope for unity in this nation apart by his wicked rule.  And because of Barack Obama and because of the vote and support of every single Democrat who sided with Obama in the most cynically ideological and divisive wars this nation has ever seen since Democrats started the damn Civil War in 1861, this nation will be at one another’s throats until it burns to the ground.

So LET this nation burn due to your continued pushing toward more and more divisiveness, Obama, but we will NOT be ruled by a tyrant one more minute.  I want nothing whatsoever to DO with a nation whose God is NOT the LORD, and I demand that Republicans stand up in the name of the last decent American citizen left – even if there is only ONE of us left – and stop Obama from appointing another tyrannous judge who will strip away my God-given and constitutionally-guaranteed freedoms.

It is just another amazing lie from the party of amazing liars that we’re told that Merrick Garland is a “moderate” when his own judicial history betrays him as anything but.  But to be a Democrat means to have no part in the truth.

 

 

Depraved Divider-In-Chief Barack Obama FIRST POTUS In ENTIRE HISTORY OF REPUBLIC To Refuse To Honor Funeral Of Sitting Justice

February 20, 2016

This just really and truly boggles the mind:

Megyn Kelly stated Thursday evening on The Kelly File that she can find no instance in history where a sitting president of the United States has failed to attend the funeral of a sitting Supreme Court Justice. It’s an unprecedented move on the part of Obama, who once again fails to uphold his duty as president, represent the country and set an example for the American people.

I admit that I didn’t agree with the whole “car czar” program, but I finally agree with something that Obama’s handpicked car czar, Steven Rattner, said:

“If we want to reduce partisanship, we can start by honoring great public servants who we disagree with.”

The first American president to shirk attending a funeral of a sitting Supreme Court Justice (while demanding he be able to replace that Justice on the Court).  All I can say is  that I suppose history continues unbroken – BECAUSE BARACK OBAMA IS NOT AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT; HE IS AN UNAMERICAN PRESIDENT.

An incredibly Obama has said over and over since Scalia’s death that he has the right and the duty to nominate a replacement for Scalia.

That’s actually technically true, and all sides affirm that fact.  But Obama had every bit as much of a right and a duty to honor the Justice he was demanding to replace at his funeral.

And since Obama callously and cynically and decisively shirked that particular right and duty, the United States Senate – which has the right and duty to “advise and consent” on ANY presidential nomination, has the right and duty to ADVISE Obama NOT to exploit this death by nominating anyone and the right and duty to absolutely REFUSE to consent to anybody Obama nominates.

The SAME Constitution that gives a president the right to nominate a Supreme Court Justice to fill a vacancy gives the Senate the right to say, “Up yours!” to a presidential nomination.

As a Senator himself, Barack Obama FILIBUSTERED Republican nominees to the Supreme Court:

However, the truth is that, when they were senators, Obama, Biden, and Clinton all tried to filibuster Justice Alito’s nomination to the court – and other Democratic party leaders such as NY Senator Chuck Schumer reveled in the idea that they were able to block every Bush #43 nomination to the federal courts.

We also have the example of Obama’s vice president, Joe Biden who in 1992 said when there was just a POSSIBILITY that George H.W. Bush MIGHT be able to nominate a Supreme Court Justice:

“It is my view that if the president goes the way of Presidents Fillmore and Johnson and presses an election year nomination the Senate Judiciary Committee should seriously consider not scheduling confirmation hearings on the nomination until ever — until after the political campaign season is over.” — Sen. Joe Biden, June 25, 1992

So all you’ve got to do is just refer to this as “the Biden Rule.”  But it’s a rule and it was started by Democrats.  And now they’re screaming at us for following THEIR rules.

Democrats have a LONG history of doing the very thing they now claim is so evil:

While Democrats in the upper chamber – including Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York and former Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, both of which called for blocking former President George W. Bush’s nominations – have slammed the GOP for its decision not to consider a nominee until after a new president is elected, Democrats have not always held that stance. The Democrat-controlled Senate passed a resolution in 1960 preventing a recess appointment, much to the dismay of Republicans.

As first reported by The Washington Post – S.RES. 334, also known as Expressing the Sense of the Senate That The President Should Not Make Recess Appointments to the Supreme Court, Except to Prevent or End a Breakdown in the Administration of the Court’s Business – passed the Senate in a 48-33 vote in an attempt to prevent former President Dwight Eisenhower from filling a seat last-minute.

Democrats have frequently played this same game.   New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, now the Senate Minority Leader and leader of all the Senate Democrats, said when a Republican was president that the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush “except in extraordinary circumstances.”

“We should reverse the presumption of confirmation,” Schumer told the American Constitution Society convention in Washington. “The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito.”

And oh, I can go on.  The Democratic Party is the party that turned the name of a Supreme Court nominee into a verb by so utterly pouring out their demonic hate to poison the nomination that the process became known as “Borking.”  It had never been done before the Party of Cockroach Fascism started it.  This infamous Ted Kennedy slander was the worst of the slanders:

“Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government, and the doors of the federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is often the only protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy.”

Robert Bork was a good man and eminently qualified to sit on the Court.  But Democrats are truly breathtakingly evil and hypocritical people.

Speaking of “being qualified,” Barack Obama actually openly ACKNOWLEDGED that Judge Roberts was qualified.  But that didn’t MATTER then:

Obama admitted that Roberts was eminently qualified. He praised him highly.

“There is absolutely no doubt in my mind Judge Roberts is qualified to sit on the highest court in the land. Moreover, he seems to have the comportment and the temperament that makes for a good judge. He is humble, he is personally decent, and he appears to be respectful of different points of view. It is absolutely clear to me that Judge Roberts truly loves the law. He couldn’t have achieved his excellent record as an advocate before the Supreme Court without that passion for the law…”

But, no he wasn’t going to vote for him anyway.

“I ultimately have to give more weight to his deeds and the overarching political philosophy that he appears to have shared with those in power than to the assuring words that he provided me in our meeting. The bottom line is this: I will be voting against John Roberts’ nomination.”

In short, Obama chose to vote against Roberts because of his perceived conservative politics. Nothing else.

Republicans have the SAME right and duty to reject any judge Obama nominates simply because they don’t agree with Obama’s “overarching political philosophy.”  Period.

Democrats are abject, disgusting, despicable hypocrite vermin.  And their past actions need to now catch up to them.  They need to be exposed for what they are.

Here’s another thing: the Senate is now firmly in Republican hands (after disgraceful Democrats were caught being evil maybe a million times too often).  But when Democrats owned the Senate, they shoved their crap right down the Republicans’ throats and changed the damn Senate rules to do it with a process that was so toxic to the Constitution that it was called “the nuclear option.”

On November 21, 2013, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid declared that “unbelievable, unprecedented obstruction” by Republican filibusters had made the confirmation process “completely unworkable.”[1] As a result, he said, Democrats were forced to eliminate virtually all nomination filibusters. […]

For nearly all of its history, proceeding to a final vote on a matter before the Senate required a supermajority.

But not when Democrats stole the show.

Now, quite simply, they should be allowed to eat the fecal matter that forced down the throats of everyone who disagreed with them when they were in control.

The Republican majority Senate will do what the hell it wants and the Democrat minority will shut the hell up.  By the Democrats’ own damn rules.

If Obama gave a flying damn about the unity of the United States that he has so fractured and broken that on the Republican side we have Donald Trump and on the Democratic side we have socialist Bernie Sanders, he would yield in this election year and allow the incoming president to nominate a Justice with the support of a majority of the people.

But Obama DOESN’T give a flying damn about uniting America.  That was, as I pointed out only months into his dishonest presidency, merely one of his signature lies.

And Barack Obama just officially DISQUALIFIED himself from having ANY right to nominate Justice Antonin Scalia’s replacement by his pretty, cheap, and depraved refusal to honor that great man.

I think it’s beyond safe to say that were it Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s funeral, Barak Obama would have bothered to at least pretend he is a legitimate president and shown up.

But Obama is a rabid ideologue, so the demons that control every move he makes would not allow him to step into that cathedral to honor Justice Antonin Scalia.

For the record, I actually have far more respect for BOTH Ginsburg (whose opinions I despise) as WELL as Scalia (whose opinions I affirmed): because both of them were able to do what Barack Obama has NEVER ONE SINGLE TIME IN HIS LIFE been able to do; they were able to look past their differences and find the things they held in common and unite as dear friends around those things.  That says a lot to praise about both of these figures.

Just as it says a lot about just how petty and vindictive a figure Barack Obama is.

Antonin Scalia believed that “there is no conflict between loving God and loving one’s country.”  But Barack Obama is a malignant narcissist blasphemer who believes that HE is God and that to serve anyone or anything BUT Obama is sin.

The funeral is over.  Obama never bothered to show up.  Because Obama is a disgrace to the presidency and a disgrace to the United States of America that Justice Antonin Scalia spent his life faithfully serving.  And even Ruth Bader Ginsburg would affirm that fact.

 

 

 


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 653 other followers