I’ll just say up front where I’m going with this. We obviously have a problem with sexual harassment and abuse, but if you think Republicans are bad, just realize that Democrats are proving themselves to be truly evil. You won’t find a story describing the number of Republicans facing charges of harassment or abuse compared to the number of Democrats currently facing those charges because there are a LOT of Democrats currently facing those charges and the media protects and shelters Democrats just as they did when Bill Clinton was being accused of these things and much, much worse. And, to continue, if you think it’s bad in America, go to a country that does not have a Judeo-Christian tradition to see what sexual harassment and abuse truly looks like – and you will be shocked at how good America is by comparison. I am going to submit to you that the problem is sin and our sin nature, and that sexuality is deep within the beast that is man, and the only way to get the man to reign in the beast is to literally scare the hell out of him. Which is impossible when that man has been steeped in a worldview that ridicules hell. Again, sexuality burns hot and deep in the beast that is man; and if there is no God, if there is no heaven and no hell, then there is nothing – NOTHING – beyond your opinion versus my opinion. A partisan vote or a media propaganda poll or for that matter a legitimate vote or opinion poll among human beings has NOTHING to do with what is right or wrong: a majority doesn’t make right any more than might makes right. But when we return to the realization that yes, we ARE all truly created in the Imago Dei, and that male and female He created us, then we have the basis for not only returning to a culture that veers back from the vile sexual values that secular liberal human progressives have been perverting us into, but a true foundation built on God and upon eternal truths that are truly right and there are things that are truly evil. And that abusing a girl or a woman created in God’s image is in the category of evil even if a lot of people disagree. We have a degenerate problem and we desperately need a transcendent solution. That’s my synopsis.
It wasn’t all that long ago that Vice President Mike Pence made a statement that shouldn’t have garnered him anything but respect and even praise, but instead resulted in widespread ridicule and condemnation: he said that he would not be alone with a woman not his wife and would never attend any event with alcohol if his wife were not with him.
And he was actually condemned and demonized for that.
The liberal Washington Post argued as it’s headline title that “Pence’s unwillingness to be alone with a woman is a symptom of a bigger problem.” And stated:
It’s easy to make jokes about, and it’s also easy to argue that this is nobody’s business but the Pences’. But there’s a deeply troubling worldview at work here, one that has profound implications for policy — and we’re already seeing it play out at both the state and federal levels.
Let’s take just a moment to consider this pair of rules Mike Pence has for himself. He obviously thinks that every interaction he has with a woman is so sexually charged that it’s safe to be around them only if there are other people there, too. Unless someone might be drinking, in which case even the presence of a crowd isn’t enough to prevent … something from happening. There’s little distance between that perspective and that of the ultra-Orthodox Jews who refuse to sit next to a woman on an airplane, or the fundamentalist Muslims who demand that women be covered head to toe to contain the unstoppable sexual allure that renders men unable to control their urges.
That was March 30 of this year.
Pence was stating that he would never allow himself to be in a position where he could harass or abuse a woman, nor would he ever allow himself to be in a position where he could ever be accused either rightly or wrongly for having harassed or abused a woman. He would represent himself as a man of integrity. And truly despicable people slimed him for it.
May I offer something that no liberal progressive will never comprehend called “moral clarity”??? The accusation that Mike Pence stating that he made a moral decision to govern his own behavior is akin to Islamic culture forcing women to cover themselves displays a degree of such moral idiocy and frankly such political bias that it is so far beneath contempt to be unreal. When it comes to morality and moral decency, liberal progressives are literally both schizophrenic and psychotic. They have no grasp of moral reality whatsoever.
What Mike Pence did is wrong, not allowing himself to be alone with a woman who isn’t his wife. Restraining his own conduct that way. Far, FAR better to be a liberal like Matt Lauer and have a damn button on his desk he can push to lock a door so he CAN be alone with a married woman who is not his wife and rape her until she passes out.
All the moral wisdom and moral clarity of liberalism in one bite.
The Washington Post is a discredited partisan witch-hunting band of propagandist hacks, but let’s take the roof off of what they were claiming in light of the avalanche of sexual harassment charges that began since one of the Democratic Party’s biggest donors got revealed as basically a serial rapist.
I’m going to say a few things about Roy Moore now: first being that, very unlike Democrats with first Al Franken (even with photographs of the turd in the act proving his guilt) and then John Conyers (who acknowledged his guilt in a legal settlement for sexual harassment), Republicans IMMEDIATELY distanced themselves from Roy Moore. Oh, no, you did NOT have a Majority Leader Mitch McConnell attempt to justify Moore hanging around the way we awkwardly watched a Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi try to justify the unjustifiable.
Now, Roy Moore’s people have poked some serious holes in many of the accuser’s verifiable statements. Interestingly, I wouldn’t mind if the entire case against Moore stood or fell on the alleged yearbook signature that it is claimed Moore signed in the high school yearbook of the woman making the most serious accusation. Her attorney, famous legal hack Gloria Allred, refuses to allow ANY legitimate unbiased inspection of that yearbook, acknowledges as an officer of the court that she refused to ask her client if she actually saw Roy Moore sign her yearbook, because the answer might destroy her case, and refused Wolf Blitzer’s repeated demand to claim whether or not the signature is legitimate. Multiple other witnesses have specifically refuted the account of a different Roy Moore accuser who claims Moore sexually assaulted her behind a restaurant. There comes a point when maybe you’ve got a valid right to question 40 year-old claims of sexual abuse that come out one month before a critical US Senate race when one side claims to have evidence that it WILL NOT release to prove or disprove assertions.
Amazingly, ABC News immediately “reached out” to all 52 Republicans for their reaction to the allegations against Roy Moore. I could find no example of any major media outlet attempting to pin down THE 46 Democrats and the 2 supposedly “independents” who always cast their vote with the Democrats on their reaction to Al Franken and the numerous allegations against him. Some of which are evidenced by PHOTOGRAPHS of Franken IN THE ACT. The Republican example was THE very top hit on the page to answer my Google search. Whereas I looked through six pages of Google hits when I changed the search phrase from Senators Republicans respond Roy Moore to Senators Democrats respond Al Franken. The closest thing I could find was from a source called “conservativereview.com.” Which pointed out that at the time of its article, not ONE Democrat Senator had called for Al Franken to resign. Rather, the only call was for a “Senate ethics investigation” which has never ONCE failed to expel a Senator since 1861 no matter how heinous any Senator ever acted. For the record, the one “journalistic” news agency that most definitely did NOT “reach out” to all the Democrats in the Senate over Al Franken was ABC News which immediately played that trick to Republicans over Moore.
It’s this shameless trick the mainstream media plays over and over again, dating back to Walter Cronkite and even way before Old Man Walter who we found out was a doctrinaire liberal and slanted the news like a doctrinaire liberal before another doctrinaire liberal named Dan Rather tried to falsely frame George W. Bush with doctored documents.
The reason Republicans are so often utter cowards is because whenever anybody says or does anything offensive in our culture, you can bet that the media will cavalry itself over to every single Republican for a reaction and force them to go on the record fer or agin. You never see that behavior with the media when the offensive words or deeds would embarrass Democrats.
But wait, you say. Liberalism means respect for women.
Tell that to Al Franken and his now six so-far sexual assault accusers. In uberleftist California, tell that to the 140 women who have described “a pervasive culture of misconduct in state government” by liberal Democrats such as Raul Bocanegra and Tony Mendoza. Tell that to the multiple staffers of Rep. John Conyers. Oh, wait, I’m sorry, fellow black Democrat James Clyburn says all those women were all white, and you know how them cracker bitches all lie. So scratch them because Democrats are now as racist as they are rapist. It was because cracker bitches are all stupid liars that prompted House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi to give an utterly incoherent defense of Conyers. But she’s been a holier-than-thou faux feminist Democrat who only sees evil in conservatives all her life.
Or we can take a trip down the pages of history and tell the story of liberals’ championing women. Tell that to “the Lion of the Senate,” Ted Kennedy, who abandoned a woman to horribly and slowly die alone in the dark and cold of a watery grave. A better term for Senator Kennedy would be “the senator of sleaze who was a drunk sexual bully.” Tell that to Bill Clinton, hard-core sexual predator and rapist as even the New York Times is being forced to acknowledge by the standards that liberals tried to exclusively apply only to others. We can take that same memory train when liberal progressives FIERCELY defended rapists and even child rapists like Roman Polanksi – who was adored and defended and celebrated and eulogized after drugging and sodomizing a 13-year old girl (something Roy Moore has not been accused of doing, fwiw). Hey, let’s watch Hollywood adore this child rapist and tell me the likelihood of whether Judge Roy Moore who didn’t sodomize any young girls to the best of my knowledge would get such an ovation from this crowd:
“But he’s… he’s an ARTIST!” the left says. You know, because Beyoncé shouldn’t be forced to write or sing music condemning homosexuality the way that other artists like wedding photographers and bakers and custom-designers ought to be forced to condone the homosexuality that flagrantly flies in the face of their Christian biblical values. Because “art” is subjective, you see, and only liberalism qualifies as the sole critic of “art.” Mind you, Hollywood has been as racist as they have been religiously bigoted, with back-to-back years of all white nominees until political correctness forced them to pick some token negroes.
You have to apply a different standard to liberal progressives. They’re better than everyone else, you see. They deserve special treatment. In fact, the class that creates “entitlements” are “entitled” to special treatment. I know that Hitler ruined the term “master race” for everyone, and so we have to come up with a different name to describe what liberal progressives think of themselves.
Harvey Weinstein was one of damn near every single liberal progressive male in THE most liberal progressive industry in the world who routinely sexually abused women. Think back to Bill Cosby, who endorsed Barack Obama in 2008 and said that those who opposed Barack Obama were “racists” in 2013. Before his 2015 criminal charges. What a damn miserable loathsome roach you are, Dr. Huckstable.
As we think of how vile the mainstream media is – and it is VILE, isn’t it NBC anchor Matt Lauer, CBS anchor Charlie Rose, NPR news chief Michael Oreskes, New York Times political reporter Glenn Thrush, and political analyst Mark Halperin – consider the fact that 96 percent of media political campaign donations went to Hillary Clinton. Remember this of Halperin and the in-your-FACE bias of ABC:
And now ABC News has left in place its Political Director Mark Halperin. ABC has done this despite the network’s acknowledgement that Halperin wrote a memo that to many seems to direct ABC reporters, anchors and producers to slant its coverage by downplaying the misstatements of Democratic presidential candidate Senator John Kerry and by viewing negatively any misstatements by Republican candidate Bush.
I’ve been saying it for years now. These people are as dishonest as the sun is hot.
Not that the sun has anything whatsoever to do with global warming, mind you. Heat, as we all know, is entirely produced by man and specifically through CO2 – a substance that scientifically stupid people idiotically believe is necessary for trees and for life – but really is a poison that should be banned even though anthropogenic CO2 is responsible for less than 0.1 of one percent of the greenhouse effect.
And now think of who was administering that bias. Take a moment to realize that when conservatives called these people “fake news,” it amounted to FLATTERY compared to what they truly are and always have been. Because all these people who are such miserable roaches it is beyond unreal get to write our news for us. These morally-diseased slimebags get to tell us what is true and what is false.
And now we all know why: because all the damn liberal progressives were systematically abusing women, too.
Just remember what the Democratic Party taught us just in the 90s alone: that a young woman getting on her knees to give a powerful man blowjobs in the workplace office is perfectly A-OK, and that all the women who accuse such powerful men of any misconduct are trailer trash and you can patently disregard anything they say.
Women are good for one thing and to do that one thing they need to do only two things: get on their knees and open their mouths. But not to talk. Every single Democrat – EVERY SINGLE ONE – taught America that fact in 1999.
And the mainstream media helped them write that truth and repackage it into something entirely different than what it actually was.
Let’s not leave out another very top Democrat Party machine: the tech industry. Like all the rest of liberal progressives, the tech industry is a woman-abusing machine, too.
Ninety-nine percent of the woman-abusing tech industry’s campaign donations went to Hillary Clinton.
We can look at the college and university campuses that are steeped in secular humanist progressive liberalism and see the shocking statistics of sexual assault. Their very own worldview created this toxic system. There’s been a more than 200% increase in assaults on college campuses; and women are more likely to be sexually assaulted on those bastions of secular humanist progressive liberal values than damn near anywhere else.
We can now also look – sadly – at our military and see how the secular humanist, liberal progressive policies of Barack Obama made our military machine a stinking bed of sexual assault and sexual harassment. It absolutely SKYROCKETED under Obama’s watch, most especially during Obama’s 2nd term – where as he told the Russian president while he was colluding with Russia on a hot microphone, “This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.” And Obama EXPLOITED that “flexibility” in incredibly vile ways. The dishonest mainstream media says that Obama was “fighting” sexual harassment/assault. Baloney: both SKYROCKETED under him because of his policies as Obama abandoned all history, all tradition, all religion, all science about human biology, and imposed politically correct dogma as some kind of “solution.”
Just like in the Obama military, the vile record of sexual assault on secular humanism-dominated college campuses TRIPLED during Obama’s second term.
Now the amazing thing is that most women vote for this.
Now, I have just in the space above categorically demonstrated and documented that liberal progressives have absolutely no right and no platform to lecture anyone about the treatment of women or what is good or bad for women. They themselves are a massive part of the damn problem.
If liberal progressives or Democrats want to pretend that the answer lies in education or “sexual harassment training,” allow me to simply state from the outset that the very ones “training” everyone else are themselves sexual predators and sexual harassers.
And anyone who wants to tell me that “we need more women” has to deal with the fact that women have overwhelmingly voted for these horrible, awful people. Women are part of this too. And women are corrupt. I think of all the women who knew damn well what was going on and kept their mouths shut because the rapists and the sexual harassers were Democrats and they were ideologues who put their politics first and everything else second.
I think of liberal “journalist” Cokie Roberts who said that she knew for YEARS that John Conyers was a serial sexual harasser or worst and that “We all knew to avoid getting in an elevator with Rep. Conyers.” But he was a Democrat, so we just took the stairs, let him prey on the stupid girls who didn’t know not to get in that elevator, and kept our mouths shut. Because to open our mouths around Democrat men involves a penis being shoved in. But we sure weren’t going to out this Democrat.
And the reason is that liberal-progressive so-called “feminists” have indoctrinated the belief that “being a woman” is numerically identical to “being a baby murderer,” such that if you don’t murder babies or believe that human life ought to have any sacred dignity whatsoever, you cannot qualify as a “woman.”
Mind you, these same liberal-progressive so-called “feminists” have arbitrarily decided that any man who decides he’s a woman IS a woman.
Understand that there are consequences to the idea that there is nothing whatsoever that is sacred about the dignity of human life.
Just like Nazism, an idea that began decades before the death camps and Zyclon B, ideas have consequences.
You cannot deny humanity and not have that evil ultimately emerge.
According to evolution, there is nothing special or sacred or dignified about you. According to evolution:
humans are a tiny little twig representing one species among so many millions on this enormous arborescent tree of life
And any unwillingness to accept evolution merely:
represent our unwillingness to give up on the notion that there is meaning out there expressed in human terms, which is a kind of ultimate hubris.
Try to comprehend that any “morality” is a fabrication:
Asian Homo erectus died without issue and does not enter our immediate ancestry (for we evolved from African populations); Neanderthal people were collateral cousins, perhaps already living in Europe while we emerged in Africa… In other words, we are an improbable and fragile entity, fortunately successful after precarious beginnings as a small population in Africa, not the predictable end result of a global tendency. We are a thing, an item of history, not an embodiment of general principles.
Certainly the Jew is also a Man, but the Flea is also an Animal.
Stephen Jay Gould phrased the worldview bluntly, stating that “there’s no reason humans are ‘higher’ life forms than bacteria or insects” [in Biography Magazine, March 1998, page 110].
A female is a human being, but the embryo is also a Homo Sapiens. And that argument is actually true where Goebbels’ is intellectual evolutionary gibberish only if evolution is true and God is not. Otherwise, we make up our own rules: the Jew is human if we allow the Jew to be human and the Jew is not human if we decide by popular vote or by dictator’s decree is not. Barack Obama gave us all a classic example of this when he assured us that marriage was between one man and one woman until he decided it wasn’t.
It’s not enough to say that there is no meaning, no value and no purpose apart from a Creator God: there is no POSSIBILITY of any ultimate meaning, value or purpose apart from God. And that is a rigorously proven fact.
In a recent book, A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion,10 authors Randy Thornhill and Craig T. Palmer claim that rape is “a natural, biological phenomenon that is a product of the human evolutionary heritage,” just like “the leopard’s spots and the giraffe’s elongated neck.” In other words, rape is a biological “adaptation” that allows undesirable males the opportunity to pass on their genes. According to Randy Thornhill, “Every feature of every living thing, including human beings, has an underlying evolutionary background. That’s not a debatable matter.” According to the anthropology department at the University of California Santa Barbara, “That rape might be an adaptation is a reasonable hypothesis to pursue, and the proper framework is intersexual conflict.”11 If rape is just an evolutionary adaptation, then how can it be immoral?
The Bible says that morality is a result of choices that people make, and not the result of some conditioned evolutionary response. Is there any experimental evidence supporting this viewpoint? In a newly released book, Three Seductive Ideas, Harvard University psychologist, Jerome Kagan, makes the claim (and backs it up with experimental evidence) that humans are radically different from every other species of life on earth. Dr. Kagan refutes the ideas of evolutionary psychologists, including “infant determinism” (the idea that all human behavior is set by age 2) hedonism (the idea that all human behavior is motivated by a desire to maximize pleasure and minimize pain), and “abstractionism” (the idea that all human behavior is controlled by a limited set of laws or rules). He points out that men who committed terrible atrocities had loving parents during their childhood years and that “evolutionary arguments are used to cleanse greed, promiscuity, and abuse of stepchildren of moral taint.” Instead, Dr. Kagan shows that humans are a special creation, endowed with a spiritual nature, and motivated by a desire to maintain a feeling of virtue, which is unique among sentient animals. He points out that there are no non-human animal models for human pride, shame, and guilt. Humans also appreciate the difference between moral right and wrong. According to Dr. Kagan, “Not even the cleverest ape could be conditioned to be angry upon seeing one animal steal food from another.” According to a recent review of the book in Science, “The idea of the duality of human nature (of meaning over and above mechanism, or mind over and above mechanism, of angel over and above beast), and of the remarkable discontinuity of human nature from everything that came before, is alive and well for Kagan precisely because he has such a high regard for facts.”12
The Bible makes a startling claim about human nature and it makes that startling claim over and over again:
- Now the earth was corrupt in the sight of God, and the earth was filled with violence. God looked on the earth, and behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted their way upon the earth — Genesis 6:11-12
- For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God — Romans 3:23
- “When they sin against You (for there is no man who does not sin) and You are angry with them and deliver them to an enemy, so that they take them away captive to the land of the enemy, far off or near — 1 Kings 8:46
- as it is written, “THERE IS NONE RIGHTEOUS, NOT EVEN ONE — Romans 3:10
- For all of us have become like one who is unclean, And all our righteous deeds are like a filthy garment; And all of us wither like a leaf, And our iniquities, like the wind, take us away. — Isaiah 64:6
- Indeed, there is not a righteous man on earth who continually does good and who never sins. — Ecclesiastes 7:20
I could go on and on. Interestingly, there are far more verses that point out that sin is universal to human nature and that we are all sinners than there are in the New Testament. Look at these passages for yourselves.
There is a God. That is why we are held to an objective moral standard which does not change the way secular – or should I now start calling it “sexular” – humanist liberal progressive pseudo-morality changes practically every damn day. There simply is no such thing as “objective morality” to a liberal. There are zero grounds for that. “Morality” for them is an opinion poll, and usually from a doctored survey, at that. And so, no, there is nothing objectively morally wrong with rape or any other kind of sexual harassment with liberal progressives, according to their moral system. And to whatever extent they even actually HAVE a “moral system,” they are so hypocritical and filled with so many perverted double-talking double standards that we are right to mock these self-righteous preening modern-day Pharisees for whatever “morality” they now claim to stand for.
There IS something called “sin,” and we are ALL guilty of it. Some of us are more guilty than others, and yes, I truly do believe that there will be levels of reward in heaven and there will be levels of suffering in hell. But there is something called “sin,” and sin is anything we think, say or do that is in violation with the character of God because:
God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. — Genesis 1:27
And our holy, righteous Creator holds us each and every one accountable to the image of God, the Imago Dei, that He instilled every single human being with.
That is why we are ALL valuable as human beings, male and female, and it is why Democrats are murderers to the tune of 60 million babies which is tenfold more murderous than the Nazis in the Holocaust and counting.
The Bible tells us that “it is appointed for men to die once and after this comes judgment” (Hebrews 9:27). The Bible tells us that “God sees not as man sees, for man looks at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart” (1 Samuel 16:7). We’re told that God “will bring every act to judgment, everything which is hidden, whether it is good or evil” (Ecclesiastes 12:14). On the last day, on Judgment Day, that every human being whether small or great will face, every act, every thought, every intent, every word will be revealed and will be judged. And God will not allow even ONE sin, one sinner whose sins are detected, into His heaven. Atheists and Secular humanist liberal progressives mock this and viciously attack the God of the Bible. They call Him “judgmental,” which is a VERY JUDGMENTAL thing for them to do, especially given HE has the right to judge them as their Creator and they don’t have the right to judge HIM. But the reality of heaven and the reality of the other destiny of hell are the basis for any true morality. Why should I be good and not evil? Why should I be good and not evil if I am powerful in this world and can get away with it? One reason: because “you may be sure that your sin will find you out” (Numbers 32:23).
Let me contrast this with the teachings of Jesus. Most people don’t know this, and the disinformation-hate-spewing dogma toward Christianity by the secular humanist liberal progressive “education system” will never tell you: but Jesus had FEMALE disciples. Matthew chapter 28 and Luke chapter 24 records that the very first eyewitnesses to the Resurrected Jesus were WOMEN. We have several of these women named in Luke 24:10: Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James, as well as other women who followed Jesus. What is interesting is that women were not allowed to testify in Jewish court during the time of Jesus, but Jesus allowed the honor that his very first witnesses be women. Jesus TAUGHT women, which was UNHEARD Of for a Jewish rabbit during the time of Jesus. The word for “disciple” is used in its feminine form to describe female Christians in Acts 9:36. Jesus was a true revolutionary who restored to women the rights and freedoms they should have had as co-image-bearers of God (Gen 1:27). The New Testament repeatedly warns Christians, most especially men, to avoid things like “fornication” and “adultery” that secular humanist liberal progressives openly mock and revile and ridicule.
Women do not need secular humanist progressive liberalism or the Democratic Party that champions that vile worldview: what women need is JESUS and the Christianity that truly seeks to follow their Lord and their Savior.
One of the things that liberalism gave us is rampant pornography and the pornification of our culture. There are ALL KINDS of studies that document on this degraded and despicable act of Democratic Party liberalism upon our culture and upon the male mind. Quote from a Harvard study:
The first way in which pornography undermines some males’ internal inhibitions against acting out their desires to rape is by objectifying women.
To whatever extent that “feminists” today are starting to turn on pornography as a demon that feeds male lust and reduces male inhibitions to carry out the desires they were taught watching degrading pornography, the same school of “feminism” was saying the EXACT opposite thing, claiming that “we have a right to our bodies!” and with the assistance of Democrat-appointed judges who professed abject moral stupidity in being unable to see a difference between porn and art they imposed this incredibly toxic, cancerous worldview and sexually-depraved view on our culture. When Christians who wanted to follow the clear teachings of the Holy Bible pleaded with secular humanist liberal progressives, please don’t DO this awful thing!
Please understand, the Greek/New Testament word translated “fornication” that secular humanist progressive liberals and Democrats have mocked and ridiculed is “pornea.” You’re not that dumb to not see where I’m clearly going, and where Christians went in the 1970s when morally depraved and morally stupid liberals declared it to be harmless and a right (even as they argued that the clear rights given to Americans in the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution are NOT rights!). Liberal justices invented this “right” out of perverted ideology. And it has toxified our culture. And today the same Democrats who began the process of degrading and perverting our culture continue full-speed ahead as they ignore all legitimate biological science to similarly INVENT new sexual genders and orientations on a nearly daily basis now. For the record, God created TWO and ONLY two: they are called “male and female.”
For the scientific record, that same legitimate biological science also tells us that when a male sperm cell and a female egg are joined together, they form a genetically unique human being that is therefore genetically different from the mother or the father. It is NOT “your body.” It is a separate and unique child’s body. That zygote is a being by virtue of the fact that it is alive and it is human by virtue of its parents: IT IS A HUMAN BEING. And any legitimate scientific analysis of the cells of that human being would reveal an organism that is rigorously scientifically classified in the following manner:
Kingdom-Animal
Phylum-chordata
Class-Mammalia
Order-Primate
Family-Hominid
Genus-Homo
Species-Sapiens
Just like you and me, pal. A zygote is a human being in an embryonic stage as much as a teenager is a human being in an adolescent stage. And any parent can tell you there is FAR more justifiable reason to kill the latter than there is the former.
Abortion, pornography, easy divorce all contributed to abort fatherhood in our culture.
Abortion is based on the premise that at the moment of conception – and literally even up to the very moment of delivery – that is NOT a baby in the womb; that is NOT a precious human being. It’s a thing inside a woman’s body and so it’s her property and so she can kill it. And so at the moment of conception, does a father father a child? No! Not if abortion is legitimate!!! He has merely contributed to an inanimate, nonsentient lump of goop and nothing more. And what is his “fatherhood” worth when the thing he conceived is a worthless thing that can be killed at a whim?
In Satan’s hatred for God and contempt for Fatherhood, fathers are NOT fathers and have NO right to their children. Given that fatherhood has been trivialized to nothing, given that fathers are now denied the most basic right to even the very life of their own children, given the destruction of what was once the sacred bond of marriage, the glue that kept fathers cemented to their families has been dissolved.
In our popular culture pumped out by Hollywood, men and particularly fathers are further reduced to useless imbeciles only good for mockery. Males and masculinity is pretty much blamed for every ill there is. Our leftist politicians and academics have pitted women against men and declared that men are responsible for every evil in the world. In the public schools we have seen secular humanism’s war against men warp into a war against boys. And these forces have combined to fundamentally distort and warp our very notion of what it even means to be a male, to be a man. While increasingly there IS no father at home to tell these children anything different: 39% of America’s children between first and twelfth grade live in homes without a father today.
Let me tell you something: Democrats LOVE the fact that they have warped our culture into one composed of single, unmarried women who live in homes without the father of their child/ren. Because they have exploited these women their policies created such that 70% of single, unmarried women vote DEMOCRAT.
Understand something, single, unmarried woman: Democrats are sick, twisted, perverted, warped people who do not WANT you to be happy, do not WANT your children to grow up stable, do not WANT you to have a dream of living in your own home with your loving husband who is the father of your beautiful, well-adjusted children. Because you would vote these DemocRats right out of office. And that is simply a statistical fact. The longer DEMOn-possessed-bureauCRATS can keep you down, women, the longer they can isolate you, keep you without a husband and a father to your kids, the longer they can keep you in grinding poverty, on welfare, desperate, without a true man to love you and keep you and stay beside you, the longer you will keep giving them what they want.
Anyway, the problem is something that secular humanist liberal progressives mock is spelled S-I-N. And we are ALL sinners. So let me get back to Roy Moore. Yes, it is possible he did what the women accusers claim he did going back forty years ago. Sin extends to all human beings. Even Christians. The Bible teaches that unbelievers have a sin nature and believers have two natures: the godly nature that comes from the Holy Spirit and the old human natures. And we have to learn how to reign in our old sinful natures that remain with us. And that includes our sexual “issues.”
We are sinners, and sinners need a Savior. We need Jesus. The Bible assures us that God created us in His image, and part of that image is eternity. The Bible says that God set eternity in our hearts (Ecclesisates 3:11). God created heaven and God created hell. Both are real. Our destiny is to be in one or the other. And the thing is that God cannot allow any sin – ANY sin – into heaven or heaven, which is perfect, cannot be heaven. And so everyone and everything that is allowed into heaven will be morally pure and perfect.
But the Bible says quite clearly that we are all sinners. Which is quite a problem for us, one that we cannot solve or hope to solve on our own. God created us and created us in HIS image. And we are held accountable to that image.
But the Bible also teaches us that the very God who created us in His image assumed OUR image, added a human nature to His deity, and came to earth to represent sinful humanity. And while we all sinned, Christ Jesus never sinned once in anything He ever thought, said or did. He perfectly represented the sinless, pure righteousness of a holy Creator God. And we can have our sins washed away by His blood because after living that perfect life on our behalf, representing me, He died to pay for my sins. Because the wages of sin is death (Romans 3:23). And so Jesus conquered the power of sin, and because He is God and death cannot hold God, Jesus rose again bodily from the dead. And He conquered the power of sin and the power of death. And therefore my eternal destiny is heaven because my sins do not exist when God looks at me through the perfect righteousness of Christ.
And when I believe that, when I believe that Christ died for my sins according to the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:3), and that He rose again from the dead according to the Scriptures (1 Cor 15:4), and I declare that with my mouth in faith, something happens. Yes, you can still sin, but now there is also a new nature implanted within you, a nature that unlike your sin nature does NOT want to sin, but to obey the Christ who placed that nature within you. Jesus told us that the Holy Spirit within us convicts us of sin and righteousness and judgment (John 16:8-10). Unlike the “righteousness” of secular humanist liberal progressives, this righteousness and sin and judgment are NOT based on constantly shifting human standards that mean nothing, but come from the character and nature and power of the Living Creator God who will one day hold every single human being who has ever been born to account.
And when I truly believe these things, when I truly have God’s Spirit living within me, there is simply something inside me that won’t let me do the things we see in our culture.
If there is no hell, there are no consequences for evil. And there is absolutely no reason not to allow evil to have free reign. The bottom line is this: all atheism requires is to believe there is no God and all agnosticism requires is to doubt God; in either case, there IS no moral system. There IS no moral disqualification to atheism or agnosticism. Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Chairman Mao, Pol Pot and the Kim dynasty in North Korea were and are all perfectly fulfilled atheists who murdered well over 100 million innocent human beings JUST IN PEACETIME ALONE. One can be a perfectly consistent atheist or agnostic and be a complete moral monster in a way that is impossible to be a Christian claiming to truly follow Jesus and be a moral monster. Because Jesus was righteous and calls upon His followers to be righteous. Any and all “moral” rules these people come up with are first of all self-serving and hypocritical and second of all nothing but shifting sand that will change as the winds of political correctness blow. Which is why Bill Clinton was never guilty of rape even though he had credible accusers and numerous instances of sexual assault and sexual harassment even though there were numerous accusers, but today Roy Moore was pilloried as guilty merely because women said something and therefore had to be believed. Even Hillary Clinton has implicitly acknowledged that by the standard that she currently espouses, her husband and the man who still most represents the Democratic Party and Democrat values belongs in a prison cell doing hard time for his outrageous and depraved violence toward women. Back then, Democrats claimed that all the women who said Bill assaulted them or worse should NOT be believed, and mocked them by claiming that they were trailer trash.
If you think all this crap that you are seeing going on all around you is wrong, then you turn to the antidote to sin: you turn to the only way out of sin, past sin, through sin. You turn to Jesus.
Liberal progressives have now thoroughly proven that their way may seem right to them and even to a depraved culture, but in the end it is the way of death (Proverbs 14:12). The Bible warns about them and their ways: they say what God declares is evil and what they declare is good, but they are in for a terrifying end (Isaiah 5:20).
That’s the bottom line. And liberals are themselves proving that what the Word of God declared centuries ago remains as true today as when God first declared it.