Posts Tagged ‘Nazis’

Why It Is Now So Beyond Obvious That Fascist, Unhinged Democrats Will Rabidly Desire The Mark Of The Beast And Worship Their Führer

January 23, 2017

I’m attacked because of my tone.  But the only problem with that is that everything I say below is the documented, God’s-honest-TRUTH.

And there are too many people who have nothing but hostility, contempt and even hatred for the truth.

What is America going to be like when the Antichrist, the beast of the Book of Revelation comes to power and implements a mark that everyone will be forced to take as an act of worship in “Dear Leader”?

We already get to see hints of it today that reveal all the “who, what, when, why and where” details of that day that journalists ask.

For example:

Why is Taylor Swift’s tweet about the Women’s March so controversial?
The Washington Post
Emily Yahr
1/23/17

While hundreds of thousands of people participated in Women’s Marches around the world on Saturday, many celebrities showed up as well, joining in with those protesting President Trump’s controversial campaign and election, particularly his treatment of women. The long list of stars included Miley Cyrus, Rihanna, Ariana Grande, Amy Poehler, Lena Dunham and many more; celebs including Madonna and Alicia Keys made speeches and performed in Washington.

Some A-listers didn’t attend the march, but tweeted support. Pop star Taylor Swift, for example, wrote this:

taylor-swift-tweet

While many fans praised her for speaking out, the backlash started almost immediately; over the weekend, publications rounded up the critical comments. (Buzzfeed: “Taylor Swift Didn’t Go To The Women’s March And People Are Mad.” Cosmopolitan: “Taylor Swift Is Being Epically Dragged on Twitter By Her Fans.” PopCrush: “Taylor Swift Faces Backlash Following Too Little, Too Late Women’s March Support.”) But why is Swift’s tweet so controversial?

There are two elements to the criticism. The first is that Swift, 27, was silent about the controversial, divisive presidential campaign until Election Day, when she posted a picture of herself in line to vote, urging her 83 million Twitter followers to do the same. It’s clear that many were interested in her views: “Who is Taylor Swift voting for?” was a popular Google search term last fall.

Swift has always remained mum about her political leanings. “I don’t talk about politics because it might influence other people. And I don’t think that I know enough yet in life to be telling people who to vote for,” she told Time magazine in 2012. Yet her wide-ranging influence is exactly why people wanted her to speak up this past election about Trump’s attitude toward women, given that Swift has become an outspoken advocate for feminism. […]

I support what you women are doing, Taylor says.

NOT rabidly ENOUGH, snarl the leftists.  NOT with enough ANGER or enough HATE or enough VIOLENCE.

It’s not ENOUGH with leftists to offer verbal support for one of their Nazi rallies; no, you’ve got to personally swear a blood oath of allegiance to the death to the Führer.  THAT’S now what it means to be a “Democrat” today.

You won’t be allowed to offer token lip service when the Antichrist comes to power.  The Democratic Party will never allow that.  Democrats will sniff you out and out you if you don’t support the Antichrist with adequate enthusiasm.

The women who attended that hate rally in Washington D.C. – and just imagine if that many Republicans had organized to gather in our nation’s capitol to demonstrate their hatred and contempt for Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton, and how the Joseph Goebbels-style Ministry of Propaganda that is our leftwing mainstream media would have covered that gathering of conservatives – did NOT represent “women.”  Not one woman I know was at that event; and furthermore not one woman I know, including numerous Hispanic women, fwiw, would have gone to that pro-infanticide witch conclave at the point of a loaded rifle with a bayonet attached.

I could start blathering that I speak for all humanity, or I speak for all American men, or whatever, and if I did that I would be fit to be dragged away and fit with a jacket that featured sleeves that tie behind my back before being deposited in a rubber room.  The ONLY person right now who has anything CLOSE to the mandate to speak for all Americans is the man who just got inaugurated president – which Democrats told us every single day of the Obama presidency.

But what we are seeing now is the full demonic spirit of the Democrat Hypocrite Machine on full display: again, you tell ME how the leftist mainstream media, the Democrat Party, the supporters of the Democrat Party in general, would have reacted to a violent RIOT with 230 people arrested most of whom would face felony rioting charges:

felony-rioting

Inauguration Day marks the historically unparalleled event in world history in which there is a peaceful transfer of power following a democratically-held election of all adult citizens.   But it is now a statement of fact that “Democrats” are fascists and Nazis who have already murdered TEN TIMES as many innocent human beings in their abortion mills as the Nazis murdered Jews in the Holocaust.  “Democrats” have already murdered more innocent human beings than the total number that was killed – military and civilian alike, by act of war or by disease alike – of all human beings in our worst war in all of human history (WWII).  And these are the worst sort of hypocrite fascists who tell us with straight faces that when THEY do something they would demonize their opponents for if they did the same thing, that they are actually acting in noble cause.

The women’s march on Washington D.C. was primarily about ABORTION and the right of a woman to force her own child to die for the sake of her irresponsible and depraved convenience.  From the New York Times:

Views on Abortion Strain Calls for Unity at Women’s March on Washington
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERGJAN. 18, 2017

WASHINGTON — As a self-described feminist and law student who wants to correct racial wrongs in the criminal justice system, Maria Lyon agrees with Hillary Clinton that “women’s rights are human rights.” But when thousands of women march on the capital the day after Donald J. Trump is inaugurated as president, she will not be there.

The reason: She opposes abortion.

“It’s hard, because right now it feels like if you’re pro-life, you’re anti-woman,” said Ms. Lyon, 23, who studies law at the University of Wisconsin. “That’s kind of the traditional rhetoric. It’s like if you care about women and you care about women’s rights then you should be pro-choice.”

Ms. Lyon is not the only feminist agonizing. Across the country, women who oppose abortion — including one in six women who supported Hillary Clinton, according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Centerare demanding to be officially included in Saturday’s Women’s March on Washington. But those requests have been spurned, creating a bitter rift among women’s organizations, and raising thorny questions about what it means to be a feminist in 2017.

“If you want to come to the march you are coming with the understanding that you respect a woman’s right to choose,” Linda Sarsour, a Brooklyn-born Palestinian-American Muslim racial justice and civil-rights activist, and one of four co-chairwomen of the march, said in an interview on Tuesday.

Oh, yeah.  Sounds like all women were invited to celebrate womankind to me.  As long as “womankind” is defined as far leftist radical rabidly intolerant fascists, anyway.

This march that hypocritically and dishonestly framed itself as “inclusive” BANNED women who believe that women in the womb deserve rights, too.

The “Women’s March” was this:

abortion-subsidiary

This was what it felt like to be a pro-life woman who tried to march with their fellow “feminists”:

While hundreds of thousands of marchers felt like they were getting their message out during the Washington D.C. Women’s March Saturday, not everyone enjoyed the experience.

“It was a brutal day,” Kristina Hernandez, director of communications for the anti-abortion organization Students for Life, told USA TODAY after the march.

Hernandez said that the group of around 50 people she was marching with were harassed because of the signs they were carrying which said “Abortion betrays women.

“I did not feel safe at all,” Hernandez continued. She added that the unexpectedly large turnout for the march made it “so overwhelming.”

“One of our girls was spit at, someone tore my sign in multiple pieces, we had people just yell at us but the main response was people just said ‘my body my choice’ when they walked past us,” said Reagan Barklage, the Western regional director for the group.

Again, just imagine if conservatives had rallied huge numbers of violent people to swear they would burn the White House to the ground before they would allow Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton to be their president and had physically assaulted and spat at groups supporting leftist causes would have been depicted in the mainstream media.

I have a feeling such a march would not have been framed so nicely.

Again, IF you are a Democrat, you are a hypocrite without decency, without virtue, without honesty and without honor of any kind.  If you are a Democrat, you are the moral equivalent of a roach.

It’s beyond laughable how the left tries to frame Donald Trump with Adolf Hitler.  But here’s what the actual Nazi Germany looked like as it was exterminating an entire population of people in 1/10th as murderous of a manner as modern-day Democrats:

Loyalty to the Third Reich, and Adolph Hitler in particular, was essential to the Nazi Party. Reichsführer Rudolph Hess said, “The National Socialism of all of us is anchored in uncritical loyalty, in the surrender to Der Führer that does not ask for the why…but in the silent execution of his orders. We believe that Der Führer is obeying a higher call…There can be no criticism of this belief.” Hitler exacted from the officers and soldiers of the armed forces an oath of allegiance to himself, rather than to Germany, which included the words, “I will render unconditional obedience to Adolph Hitler…and to risk my life at any time for this oath.” As a symbol of that loyalty, they – and everyone in Germany – were obliged to give the “Heil Hitler” salute.

Sorry, Taylor Swift.  Your crime was that you didn’t raise your hand quite high enough and scream your “Heil Hitler!” loud enough.

Democrats have no respect for people who support Donald Trump, no respect for people who did not support Hillary Clinton, no respect for people who didn’t or will not publicly hate Donald Trump or support the right to murder babies loudly or demonically enough for their taste.

I personally started out opposing Donald Trump.  And you can see what I said and why I said it here.  I was literally questioning if I could in my own conscience vote this man or in any way, shape or form support his candidacy.

But Hillary Clinton and her roach-army of Democratic Party supporters proved to be so beneath VILE that I realized that in this election, this binary choice between one of two candidates who would be our next president, that I had to support awful in order to avert EVIL.  It was as simple of a choice as this: given the “choice” between having my right arm chopped off or all four of my limbs chopped off, and rightly believing that one of those two “choices” was going to happen whether I liked it or not, I would choose to have my right arm chopped off.

I’ve pointed out more than once that I actually PREDICTED the rise of a candidate like Donald Trump and accurately explained the reasons why there would be so much anger in response to the truly fascist Barack Obama presidency:

Obama’s strategy is to set aside and flatly ignore the law for his own political benefit.  Every American who is not deeply troubled by that – troubled enough to not vote for this fascist – is UN-American.

What Obama has done is provide an example of out-and-out lawlessness on the part of the president of the United States.  And when we get a hard-core right wing president the way Obama has been a hard-core left wing president, Obama and the Democrat Party and all of those who voted for Obama and the Democrat Party will be entirely to blame for that president and his extremist actions.  You mark my words.  Because what goes around comes around, and if a Democrat can set aside the law the way Obama has now repeatedly done, well, guess who’s going to be stomping on your necks under your own president’s prior justification???  Conservatives are rising up in a spirit of righteous outrage.  You have repeatedly slapped us in the face through your messiah Obama, and the time is coming when we’re going to punch you hard in the nose and then keep on punching.  And when that day comes, liberals, look to yourselves for blame.My words on June 18, 2012

Don’t blame anyone but YOURSELVES and YOUR OWN DEMOCRATIC PARTY for the rise of Donald Trump, Democrats.  YOU did this.  YOU poisoned the well.

As an example, consider Obama’s words and the GOP’s response to his words:

Obama said: “I do have an obligation to make sure that I am following some of the rules,” Obama said in October 2010. “I can’t simply ignore laws that are out there. I’ve got to work to make sure that they are changed.”

The Republican response was: “What incentive do we have to work with him?” complained one Republican Senate aide. “He is just doing whatever he wants. It doesn’t matter what the country wants.”

“Some of the rules.”  Well, as the angriest black leftists say, “That’s mighty white of you” – to selectively and arbitrarily follow ONLY the laws that you like while ignoring all the ones you don’t.

For eight, miserable years Obama URINATED in the eyes of tens of millions of the American people after hypocritically and dishonestly running on a platform of unity and saying there were no red states and blue states but only the United States.  And he did it so often that in the end he turned firmly blue states Republican RED.  Hillary Clinton won fewer than 500 counties; Donald Trump won more than 2,600 counties; and Donald Trump won 209 counties that had voted for Barack Obama.  Obama began his fascist presidency with a FILIBUSTER-proof Senate majority and an overwhelming superiority in the House of Representatives.  He started with a majority of the state governorships, a majority of the state legislatures.  And he pissed them all away.  And THIS is what the nation looks like today as a result of Obama and his policies:

2016-election-map-by-county

So why did I vote for Trump?

Here are the articles I wrote that again provide the factual documentation of what I witnessed happening:

Why It Really Is EASY To Vote For Donald Trump In The General Election (Because The Other Side Is Openly STALINIST)

Democrats Truly Are Nazis, Or How The Left Actually Started Turning Me Into A Trump Supporter.

Democrats Are More ‘NAZI’ Today Than Actual NAZIS As Vicious Democrat Violence CONSTANTLY Physically Attacks Free Speech

Mobs of brutal Democrats – and let’s just call them what they are: vicious Brownshirt fascist thugs – descended upon people who believed that the 1st Amendment of our Constitution provides the right of free speech and the right to peaceably assemble to hear that free speech.

But Democrats are no longer people who are capable of TOLERATING free speech or the results of a democratic system.  They will violently riot.  They will scream you down.  They will spit on you and physically beat you.

We’re already seeing that in spades.

And it’s beyond obvious that they are going to get worse and worse.  Because the Democratic Party is the Proto-Party for the Coming Antichrist.

Democrats are becoming more hysterical, more angry, more rabid, more hateful and more violent by the day, if not by the hour as the political party of sociopathy becomes increasingly psychotic.

 

Democrats Are More ‘NAZI’ Today Than Actual NAZIS As Vicious Democrat Violence CONSTANTLY Physically Attacks Free Speech

June 27, 2016

I’ve got a lot of great show-and-tell pictures to get to, but let me set the context first.

I’ve been saying this for a while now, but it keeps being more and more true: Democrats aren’t merely “Nazis,” they are actually far WORSE than Nazis.

I’ve described this phenomenon two or three times now – and there are literally dozens and dozens of Donald Trump events in which Democrat Party activists have leapt to violence as the first, middle, final and ONLY resort to free speech, the right to peaceably assemble, pretty much everything this nation used to stand for until Obama.

Obama just designated the site of a VIOLENT RIOT by homosexuals AGAINST THE POLICE as a “national monument.”  And I’m thinking, “A national monument to LUCIFER, maybe.”

It’s amazing how much liberals rabidly despise law and order.  At least until they create their own Soviet-like secret police that they can use to viciously suppress their political opponents, anyway.

I remember being a young person when the Skokie, Illinois cases came to the American public’s attention.  A group of Nazis wanted to protest – not just anywhere but in a city characterized by a high-concentration of Jewish Holocaust survivors.  I couldn’t understand as a child why they would let that protest take place, but they did.  Here’s why Nazis were able to protest even in the most Jewish death-camp-survivor-dense town in America:

In 1977 Frank Collin, the leader of National Socialist Party of America, announced the party’s intention to march through Skokie, Illinois. In the predominantly Jewish community, one in six residents was a Holocaust survivor or was directly related to one.[2] Originally, the NSPA had planned a political rally in Marquette Park in Chicago; however the Chicago authorities blocked these plans by requiring the NSPA to post a public safety insurance bond and by banning political demonstrations in Marquette Park.

On behalf of the NSPA, the ACLU challenged the injunction issued by the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois that prohibited marchers at the proposed Skokie rally from wearing Nazi uniforms or displaying swastikas. The ACLU was represented by civil rights attorney Burton Joseph.[3][4] The challengers argued that the injunction violated the First Amendment rights of the marchers to express themselves.

The hero of the Nazis trying to protest in America was none other than the uber-leftist legal organization known as the ACLU.  They championed the Nazis’ right to intentionally provoke an oppressed group on the grounds of “free speech” and “the 1st Amendment.”  The same liberal Supreme Court that gave us Roe v. Wade agreed with their liberal buddies on the ACLU and lifted the injunction against the Nazis, allowing them to march.  The notion was free speech at any price, no matter how offensive that speech might be.

The left has since twisted itself into a moral pretzel, having exploited the “law” to first infiltrate even the most hateful protest under the guise of free speech in order to undermine the system and undermine American morality which had been informed by Judeo-Christianity.  And they kept that tactic up until THEIR ideas were the coin of the realm.  And then good luck getting the right to speak, because Democrat Party thugs will viciously beat you down.

The connections between Democrat Party tactics and Nazi tactics are becoming frighteningly similar.  Nazism was very much into avant garde art in the early years as it sought power. Basically, WHATEVER challenged the established order, including open homosexuality, was fine with them and they actually in fact rose to power using the openly homosexual SA Brownshirts – until they took over and themselves BECAME the established order.  Then anything that could or would challenge them was ruthlessly suppressed and exterminated. Philosophers embracing existentialism (Martin Heidegger) and artists embracing expressionism (Gottfried Benn, Emil Nolde) were open Nazis who ended up on the wrong side of the Nazi Party after their destruction of the social order had served its purpose and was no longer useful as the Nazis set out to impose THEIR new social order which could not be questioned.  And the Nazis went from being an intrinsically violent movement, to a peaceful political movement, back to being an intrinsically violent movement, as was convenient for their goals.

When the Nazis were trying to get to power, they first had to undermine and erode and topple the Judeo-Christian morality that had been the basis of German culture since the days of the Roman Empire.  Proto-Nazis did that, first by undermining confidence in the Bible, then by castigating as evil the people through whom God wrote the Bible, then by attacking the morality and the values themselves.  They used every cultural avant garde expression available to accomplish that evil task.  They used Darwinian evolution.  They used art.  And oh, yes, they used homosexuality.  It stands as a documented historical fact now that “not ten percent of the men who, in 1933, took the fate of Germany into their hands, were sexually normal” (i.e., ninety percent of the Nazis in power practiced homosexuality in spite of the fact that they despised the effeminate men who allowed these Nazis to sodomize them).  The fact of the matter is that the Nazi Party would NEVER have gotten off the ground without homosexuals to provide the sheer viciousness to get the Party over the top.  not ten percent of the men who, in 1933, took the fate of Germany into their hands, were sexually normal.”And then the moment the Nazis gained power, the trap snapped shut and they brutally turned on anything and on anyone who got in the way of their power and their paranoia.

And the Democrat Party is following the same exact script as we speak today.  When the were trying to take down the established moral and social order, hey, anything went; they LOVED free speech!!!  It was in fact their most CHERISHED right and they lectured with intense moral outrage any who would try to take away their right to rail against Judeo-Christian values and traditional morality.  But the moment they got their foot in the door, they turned around and slammed it shut on everyone else.  And that is exactly what the Nazis did.

I can document ad nauseum that the political left – which constitutes the soul of the Democratic Party – is today out to suppress any and all speech they do not like and therefore deem as “hateful.”  They routinely shout down any speech they won’t tolerate in spite of their faux claim that THEY are the bastions of “tolerance.”  Their young elite intellectuals are literally calling for the abolishing of free speechLiberals have purged conservative faculty at universities the same exact way Stalin purged any who he didn’t trust.

And we see that rabid liberal intolerance on display at Donald Trump rally after Donald Trump rally after Donald Trump rally, where liberals show up in force with the intent to shut down free speech and the right to peaceably assemble by any means necessary.

Then we get to the violence.  We’re seeing it at every Donald Trump rally.  But those with historic awareness have seen this organized intent to disrupt by violence the political meetings of opponents before:

“In September 1921, Hitler formed the paramilitary SA (Sturmabteilung) or storm troopers. The SA protected Nazi party meetings and broke up opponents’ political meetings.  The SA men were tough beer-hall thugs, many of whom had fought in Free Corps units.  With their muscle and zeal, they terrorized adversaries.” — [Catherine Epstein, Nazi Germany: Confronting the Myths, p. 27]

Just like we see today as Democrats pursue this exact same tactic at every single Donald Trump rally.

So I’m reading the liberal Los Angeles Times today and I’m looking at the opinion page and the last news page.  On the op-ed section, there’s an opinion piece titled, “The secret life of a Hillary voter.”  And the writer complains about the rabidness of Bernie Sanders DEMOCRATS.  And how oppressed she feels.  And she begins, “Many of my family and friends were so hot with Bernie fever that …”  I mean, she’s not whining about that awful Trump; she’s testifying that her own Democrat-loving family and friends are vicious.  And of course I’m thinking about the pictures I’ve seen at numerous Trump rallies where Trump supporters are left bathed in their own blood by Democrats.  I’m like “Please give me a BREAK!”  Knowing that Democrat thugs ARE giving people like me breaks.  Lots of them.  We’re ending up in emergency rooms with the breaks Democrats are routinely giving us.

And back when it was just Trump supporters who were caught by rabid packs of Democrat hyenas outside of Trump events and beaten, no Democrat was saying SQUAT about the hate and violence.  In fact, we have Hillary Clinton on the record blaming Trump for the violence, blaming Trump for DEMOCRATS coming into his events with hate and viciousness and rabidness and a Nazi intolerance for free speech or peaceful assembly.

You don’t have a RIGHT to complain, Hillary supporter.  Because YOU yourself were PART of it.  And you’ll be PART OF IT AGAIN when Hillary is the nominee and all you Democrat Party Nazis are back at rabidly focusing on Trump again.

Previously, Sanders Democrats literally issued death threats against DNC leaders in Las Vegas.  And then suddenly what had been going on against Trump and against Republicans for MONTHS was WRONG???  And in the same LA Times paper I read about “Cleveland activists saying they’re on the edge” because they want to hold protests that will surely turn into riots at the RNC convention in Cleveland, and Cleveland is like, “We don’t really want your riots.”  So Cleveland is trying desperately to preempt Democrat Party violence at the Republican National Convention.  And the liberal ACLU is out there leading the way to guarantee violence in the very name of “free speech” that the left now HATES.  And in that article, page A14 in the print edition, it points out that:

Cleveland’s radical community had already been on edge — for years.  Five Occupy Cleveland activists were arrested in 2012 after an FBI informant infiltrated the group and provided fake explosives to blow up a bridge.  Prosecutors called it terrorism; activists called it manipulation and entrapment.  Four of the men pleaded guilty and a fifth was convicted.

Just like the prior article on being a poor, oppressed Hillary supporter, the tone of the article is VICTIMHOOD because these radical terrorist violent Democrats are being visited by the same FBI that busted their asses a few years ago.  I mean, I’m sure the Brownshirts complained about how hard it was to bust skulls and blow stuff up and terrorize people into submission, too.

And ah, yes, the lilly white and pathologically violent Occupy Bowel Movement that came out of the Democrat Party prior to the Black Lives Matter Bowel Movement that is spearheading violent protests-cum-riots today.  Because the heart of the political left, the Democrat Party machine, is V.I.O.L.E.N.C.E.  And more violence.  And then more violence.

And these same vicious Democrats look at you with straight faces and declare, “We love peace.”  And they love peace the way Islam loves submission, having previously forced everyone to submit or die horribly.

So let’s get to the fact that these Nazis and KKK guys are racist.

You want to say that the “KKK” or the “Nazis” are racist?  Well, of COURSE they’re racist!!!

But they aren’t ONE SCINTILLA more “racist” than garden variety leftist groups today that align themselves completely with the Democratic Party.  Whether it’s La Raza (“The Race”) or the Black Congressional Caucus or the United Negro College Fund or the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the National Black United Fund, the Black Chamber of Commerce, and on and on, are “racist.”  All these white racist groups want is for white people to use racism to elevate themselves the same exact way people of other (Democrat Party) races are allowed to use racism to elevate themselves.  That’s all.  And the only reason that one group – the white supremacist groups – are “evil” and the black and Hispanic racist groups are “good” is because blatant hypocrisy is a pathological aspect of the human condition and it is particularly pathological among liberals.

All these “racist” white groups want is the same right to be able to organize against other races the way Democrat race groups have been organizing against whites… FOR DECADES.

I despise racism; which is why I so hate the Democrat Party which has campaigned on creating viciously polarized racial divisions for a generation and has created a two-tiered system where what is always racist for thee is never racist for me.  Which is why there will never BE a “Congressional White Caucus” or a “National Association for the Advancement of Caucasian People” or a White Chamber of Commerce,” etc. etc. ad infinitum, ad nauseam.  I despise an organization that calls itself “The Race” and declares, “But it’s not like we’re RACIST.  Even though we constantly try to violently protest and wear brown shirts with our flags and…”

La Raza Brownshirts

and… oops.  That’s just what the Brownshirts did, isn’t it?

I just wish people could understand how PRECISELY and EXACTLY and IDENTICALLY the rise of the Nazis and the rise of the modern Democratic Party machine are paralleling and coalescing into the exact same tactics with the exact same ideology.  Democrats will sit there and tell me, “We’re not the racists; YOU’RE the racist.  YOU’RE the ones who are like the Nazis!”  And it sounds great until you actually comprehend history and understand what Adolf Hitler did.  Because Hitler did EXACTLY what Democrat activists are doing today.  He depicted his Aryan race as the poor, oppressed race who were being exploited by greedy Jews.  Hitler blamed the Jews for damn near everything under the sun.  And any means were justified to the ends of attaining economic fairness and all the same exact crap that liberals spout.  So today our Nazis are blacks and Mexicans and whoever else wants to join the rainbow behind the modern equivalent of the “Pink Swastika” where homosexual thugs beat opponents down at rallies.  And the “Jews” are white people, particularly white males, who are blamed for damn near everything under the sun.  And any means are justified to the ends of attaining economic fairness and all that other garbage that the left blathers to justifies redistributing other people’s hard-earned wealth to themselves the same damn way the Nazis redistributed hard-earned Jewish wealth to themselves.

Anyway, I was curious about just who started the viciousness at a “Nazi” rally in Sacramento in which seven people were stabbed.  From what I’ve heard reported, the Nazis actually canceled the event – for which they had lawfully obtained a permit to hold – when several hundred counter-protesters showed up with obvious viciousness in their hearts.  The counter-protesters didn’t bother to get a permit, of course.  They had hate and violence and righteous liberal ideology in their hearts which was more than enough justification.

So here’s the story:

Police estimated more than 150 counter-protesters showed up to force about 25 neo-Nazis to leave, the Sacramento Bee reported.

The massive brawl between the two groups broke out after people armed with sticks rushed the rally organized by the Traditionalist Worker Party.

The neo-Nazi group obtained a permit from the California Highway Patrol and scheduled the rally from noon to 2 p.m. Sunday.

An ABC10 reporter tweeted chaotic video from the scene, showing masked people — labeled by cops as “anarchists” — chasing down people outside and hitting them with large sticks. Several people in the video are seen holding rainbow and pink flags.

There was a large number of people carrying sticks and rushing to either get into the melee or see what was going on,” fire department spokesman Chris Harvey told reporters. […]

No arrests were made and the wounded were expected to recover, police said early Monday.

The Traditionalist Worker Party organized the protest for other local nationalist groups. Matthew Heimbach, the group’s chairman, chalked the chaos up as a win for his party, claiming that one of their marchers was stabbed in the artery while six of the “anti-fascists” were also stabbed.

Which group outnumbered which group ten to one?  Which group had the weapons?  Which group rushed and attacked which group?  Which group had a permit to peacefully protest and which group just showed up and broke the law and then committed extreme violence against which group?

The mainstream news media of today is no different from Joseph Goebbels’ Ministry of Propaganda.  You read most of the stories of this violent attack and you are intentionally given the sense that it was the Nazis who started all the violence and did all the attacking.  And just as in the days of Hitler, it’s all a lie.

Note that the same cops who did NOTHING to help the group who had obtained all the legal permits, etc. to peacefully protest are the ones calling the “demonstrators” “anarchists.”  When they are in actual reality all DEMOCRAT activists who show up at Trump events with every bit as much rabidness and every bit as much hate and use the exact same tactics.

And note at the core of the viciousness was the homosexual Nazi Brownshirts.

I saw the following from an ABC reporter named Frances Wang that pretty much tells you who was violently attacking who:

030

You get this? The reporter is saying that an organized, violent liberal mob showed up at a legal protest event in which they had obtained the proper permits for their free speech event and so on and so forth, and the liberals were literally gang-assaulting anybody who they thought even LOOKED like someone they didn’t like.

As the below also underscores:

031

Poor Nazis.  They got themselves “out-Nazied” by people FAR more vicious and FAR more intolerant and FAR more willing to engage in viciousness in order to violently suppress other people than they were.

Because nobody, but NOBODY can out-hate a Democrat.

Every single one of the people who were stabbed was a Nazi.  Everyone who was violently beaten was a Nazi.  The stabbers and the violent beaters were all Democrat activist thugs who are using those same identical tactics against anyone who disagrees with them.  Because they are FAR more “Nazi” than any other Nazi.

Let me go back to a previous event in Anaheim, in which uniformed KKK people were violently physically attacked in spite of having a permit for a demonstration.  Here are some screen shots of liberal Democrats just unloading rabid, cockroach, Nazi, Stalinist, viciousness on people who had obtained a permit allowing them to exercise free speech.  The KKK guys are wearing black uniforms so it’s pretty darned easy to see who is violently attacking whom.  First you see a KKK guy; he’s just walking alongside a big SUV when … Democrat Party thug-hate BOOM:

000

003

005

Now, you tell me: who is the “hater”?  The guy who got the permit to exercise free speech or the vicious Democrat thug who attacks free speech with a run-from-behind sucker punch to the head???

And the amazing thing – given what happened in Skokie in 1978 when the ACLU ensured that Nazis could march through a town of Jewish death camp survivors – is that we cannot find a single Democrat in the United States who will say that the guy who got the permit to exercise his free speech rights is less evil.

Same event.  And bygosh, it looks like the SAME BLACK THUG gets some hate in here too.  This one takes longer to develop; you see a black-uniformed KKK guy getting shoved down into camera range.  And then attacked by a Democratic Party thug mob that surrounds and beats him.  Notice one Democrat thug plainly seen wielding a heavy steel rod as a weapon:

010

011

012

013

014

015

016

Same event:

020

021

If you watch the video, you’ll see that at the end there are three Democrats beating that guy.  It starts with one Democrat squaring off against him with his fists up, then another Democrat distracts the victim’s attention, and then BOOM.  And they all pile on.

I think of that line from George Orwell’s 1984:

“If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face – forever.”

These are DEMOCRATS.  ALL the violent people we’re seeing today, be it Occupy or Black Lives Matter or Trump protesters or now these thugs, they are ALL DEMOCRATS.  They are organized for political violence the exact same way that the Brownshirts before them were organized for political violence.

Whatever the hell they say, the REAL future that Democrats are fighting for is that right to stomp on their opponents’ faces forever.  And do so with impunity and immunity.

Who are the good guys and who are the bad guys?  And amazingly, the Democrats each and every single time – no matter how evil the other side is – end up being the more evil, the more violent, the more hard-core fascist, the more “Nazi” than their enemy.

Because the ideology of the Democratic Party today is FAR more hateful than the ideology of those ignorant Nazi and KKK pukes who got beat down for daring to think liberals were still “tolerant” or still valued “free speech” or still valued people’s rights.

I don’t know: maybe it’s because they follow this:

Hillary Clinton Vicious

We can now see with absolute crystal clarity that the Democratic Party is seeking to violently and frankly viciously attack Americans who seek their 1st Amendment rights just as Democrats are at the same time trying to take away the 2nd Amendment so that no one will be able to oppose them when they seize power and begin to unleash all the truly monstrous evil that is in their ugly, demonic hearts.

If you are a Democrat, you are a Nazi.  Pure and simple.  In fact you are WORSE than a Nazi and your destiny is to be lower than the Nazis in the lake of fire in hell.  You are riding to power the same exact evil way your intellectual and moral forbearers rode into power.

Again, the parallels between the rise of the Nazi Party and the rise of the modern Democratic Party are as fascinating as they are horrifying to anyone who loves God’s Word and the truth.  Just as it stands as a documented historical fact that the Nazi Party rose with the homosexual SA Storm Troopers, today’s Democrat Party is rising on gay marriage.  An article in USA just yesterday heralds: “One year after historic ruling, gay marriage win propels liberal causes.”  What the Bible plainly describes in Romans Chapter One as being the rock bottom nadir of any civilization and guaranteeing the full wrath of God, is the very SOUL of the wicked, demon-possessed Democrat Party machine.  Democrats learned literally how to do EVERYTHING through the demonic work of Satan in shoving homosexual perversion over the top in American culture.  Homosexuality literally opened the floodgates.  Which is EXACTLY what God DECLARED would happen as a result of your homosexual perversion when He “gave you over” (verse 24, 26, 28) to your depraved lusts in every other area of your wicked soul so you could reap the destruction and ultimate hell that you so richly deserve.  And God HAS given America over.  And so on the downward spiral to total ruin and hell and the Antichrist you will go.

And that USA Today article documents that it was the VERY THING that God said would be the instrumental cause of the downward spiral that is in fact the instrumental cause of the downward spiral.  Because God’s Word is perfect, and He truly declares the end from the beginning.

You have been sowing the wind, and the time is soon coming when you are going to truly reap the whirlwind, Democrat.  Or else God is not the LORD.  And that means very bad things for YOU.

And God is going to one day soon hold you to account for it.  Because you are TEN TIMES the murderers that the Nazis were.  Because again, you Democrats used the same exact tactics the Nazis used.  And just as the Jews were “lebensunwertes leben” you have created your own class of human beings who are “life unworthy of life.”  And you are guilty of a monstrous evil that is ten times the death toll of the Holocaust.  These are HUMAN BEINGS by ANY LEGITIMATE USE OF ACTUAL SCIENCE such as the taxonomic system that precisely classifies every single living thing and which therefore rigorously and precisely classifies the human zygote, the human fetus as “homo sapiens” and nothing BUT “homo sapiens.”   That tiny little baby in her mother’s womb is “human” by virtue of her parents and she is a “being” by virtue of the fact that she exists; SHE IS A HUMAN BEING.  And every single Democrat has personally taken part in her murder and the murder of more than sixty million babies just like her.  You are brutally and wickedly first denying humanity to and then exterminating life deemed unworthy of life in death camps (a.k.a. abortion centers) the exact same way the Nazis did what they did with the exact same reasoning process to justify it.  And the time is coming when you worse-than-Nazis-Democrats will scream in hell for eternity for every single nanosecond of every single one of those sixty million lives you took part in brutally murdering in the abortion mines.  Somebody soon, you’re going to find out the wrathful side of the Jesus who said, “Let the little children come to Me” when you stand before Him guilty of MURDERING those little children.  And you will weep and gnash your teeth when reads Psalm 139 to you and then looks you right in the eye and says, “I never KNEW you; depart from Me, you workers of iniquity.”

Update, June 28, 2016: I see the Los Angeles Times had a main page article on the Sacramento racist hate crime – by which I mean racist Democrats viciously attacked, beat and stabbed members of this “Traditionalist Worker Party” group after that group obtained legal permits to hold a public free speech event and Democrat Party thugs illegally attacked them.  According to the Times:

The Traditionalist Worker Party had obtained a permit for the Sunday event, and the California Highway Patrol said the violence was sparked by counter-protestors.

“If I had to say who started it and who didn’t, I’d say the permitted group didn’t start it,” said CHP Officer George Granada, a spokesman for the agency’s Protective Services Division.  “They came onto the grounds and were met almost instantly with a group of protesters there not to talk.”

Now, having DOCUMENTED which side is literally the good guys and which side are the evil, vicious, rabidly intolerant and physically violent Democrat thugs – and yes, Nazis are “good people” when and ONLY when they are compared to Democrats, because Democrats at this point are so vile that they make even NAZIS look good – consider what the hate organization also-known-as “The Southern Poverty Law Center” had to say about the vicious stabbing and beating:

“Their biggest kind of whine right now is the idea that white people are being subjected to genocide,” Mark Potok, editor of the Sothern Poverty Law Center’s Intelligence Report magazine said of the violence

So, yeah, during the days of the lynchings, I wonder if the Southern Poverty Law Center used words like “whining” to describe the vicious violation of civil rights.  I have a feeling they didn’t.  Basically, you have a right to peacefully protest … if and ONLY if liberals say you have that right.  Otherwise you have the right to shut up or get a beat down.  You know, rabid hate in the name of “tolerance” is really anther word for “love.”  Like Orwell’s boot stomping on that human face is love forever.  We only stomp you because we love you.

And you really have to be utterly SHOCKED that a group of people would use words like “genocide” when they are being subjected to being viciously assaulted featuring attempted murder every time they go out to lawfully publically protest.

The Southern Poverty Law Center is a genocidal organization, to put it simply.  It is an organization that glorifies the vicious physical attacks of a group of people based on the color of their skin as long as that skin is white.  The Southern Poverty Law Center is no different than a Sinn Fein to the IRA, the propagandists justifying terrorist attacks.

I’m so beyond sick of this: take the Brexit vote and the leftist media automatically suggesting beyond “strongly” that it was a racist vote.  The mainstream media are so dishonest in the way they constantly frame their narratives: why was it a racist vote?  Because the island nation of Britain is mostly white.

Except, what if a vote had taken place and the voters were BLACK: WOULD THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA HAVE SUGGESTED THAT IT WAS JUST A BUNCH OF BLACK PEOPLE AND THEREFORE THEY WERE RACIST AND THEIR VOTE COULD BE DISCOUNTED AND IGNORED???

We’ve got these white Brits and we’ve got these black Democrats: and the problem is the percentage of blacks who vote Democrat is considerably higher than the percentage of whites who voted for Brexit.  So why aren’t blacks racist for voting Democrat given that whites are racist for voting for Brexit???

In the world of journalism, the fecal matter only and always flows from ONE direction; and that is from the LEFT.  And it isn’t about black and white; it’s about wrong and right and it’s about left and right.

If you are a “journalist” today, you are almost without a doubt a pathologically dishonest sniveling fraud-peddler.

In the politically-correct mythological kingdom the left has manufactured, every single racial group on EARTH has the right – even the DUTY – to vote according to RACE.  EXCEPT WHITE PEOPLE.

And if white people shouldn’t be racist, the Democratic Party should properly be labeled as “a racist hate group” just like the Traditionalist Worker Party.  And then let THEM try to get a permit for free speech.

 

The Choice Is Now Clear, America: It’s Donald Trump Or It’s NAZISM. The Democrat Party Is THE Party Of Fascist, Nazi Thugs

June 3, 2016

This is where now we are at as a nation today: and are YOU on the side of people who want the freedoms that our nation used to cherish, or are you on the side of violent, rabid Nazi Democrat THUGS who beat people down because progressive liberalism shares its view of “tolerance” with Islamic State???

Just again and again and again contemplate and consider the rabid, vile, demonic HYPOCRISY of the left.  Remember how an elderly Trump supporter punched a man who had come in to break up a free-speech rally and try to single-handedly deprive thousands of people of their right to peaceably assemble and listen to a major political figure speak at his own event at a forum he had provided?  Do you remember how the media held Donald Trump personally responsible for that “violence”???

WHERE IS THE MEDIA HOLDING DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAVAGE ACTS OF VIOLENCE BY THEIR PEOPLE???  Especially when as violent as Democrats want to claim Trump and those who support him are, NOT ONE OF THEM HAS DONE ANYTHING CLOSE TO WHAT TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DEMOCRATS HAVE NOW DONE!!!.

I read the article below, where some anti-Trump people are claiming to be peaceful and saying, “You can’t fight hate with hate.”  But the thing is that there is only ONE side practicing true hate.  And that is the Democrat side that has now employed violence and viciousness and a rabid hatred of free speech virtually every single time Donald Trump shows up anywhere.  And that is because to be a Democrat is no different than being a Nazi.  And maybe there were Nazis saying, “I love my Fuehrer’s ideas for a better Germany, but I don’t like all the violence.”  But the actual fact of the matter is that these “peaceful Nazis” were ultimately every bit as responsible for bringing about the horror as the violent ones.  And in point of fact these so-called “peaceful demonstrators” are doing nothing but providing the cover for the vicious thugs to attack people and then retreat back into the crowd of “peaceful demonstrators” so they can do it again and unleash more violent hate at the next Trump event.

This garbage, this vile crap, about a Democrat bashing somebody in the head with a sack of rocks and then stomping on him because, you know, he’s standing up for “tolerance,” is literally straight out of the heart of hell and every single vicious movement in the history of the world originated from exactly where the toxic, rabid Democrat Party has degenerated to today.

This is an election of either-or.  Either Trump will win or Hillary will win.  And so there is no practical question at all that every single one of these vicious thugs has chosen to embrace the campaign of Hillary Clinton.  And if the media were even slightly honest rather than being identical to Goebbels’ Ministry of Propaganda, every question to Hillary that was NOT directed at her paranoid fascist determination to create a secret email server so she could be totally immune from transparency or openness would be this question: Why is the Democrat Party so inherently and pathologically VICIOUS???”

A record that I preserved from the Washington Post:

Ugly, bloody scenes in San Jose as protesters attack Trump supporters outside rally
By Sean Sullivan and Michael E. Miller
June 3 at 3:38 AM

1

SAN JOSE, Calif. —Protests outside a Donald Trump rally in downtown San Jose spun out of control Thursday night when some demonstrators attacked the candidate’s supporters.

Protesters jumped on cars, pelted Trump supporters with eggs and water balloons, snatched signs and stole “Make America Great” hats off supporters’ heads before burning the hats and snapping selfies with the charred remains.

Several people were caught on camera punching Trump supporters. At least one attacker was arrested, according to CNN, although police did not release much information.

“The San Jose Police Department made a few arrests tonight after the Donald Trump Rally,” police said in a statement. “As of this time, we do not have specific information on the arrests made. There has been no significant property damage reported. One officer was assaulted.”

In one video circulating widely on social media, two protesters tried to protect a Trump supporter as other protesters attacked him and called him names.

Another video captured a female Trump supporter taunting protesters before being surrounded and struck in the face with an egg and water balloons.

Police eventually cleared the protest, which they called an “unlawful assembly.”

2

The incidents were the latest in a series of increasingly violent altercations between protesters, Trump supporters and police at the presumptive Republican nominee’s campaign events. A week ago, it was Albuquerque descending into chaos as the city was shaken by raucous riots and arrests outside a Trump rally. A month earlier it was Costa Mesa, Calif.

Thursday was San Jose’s turn to take center stage in what is quickly becoming a traveling fiasco.

Before the event, the San Jose Police Department issued a press release saying it “recognizes and respects everyone’s right to express their First Amendment [rights], and we will do everything possible to ensure the event is safe for all attendees and surrounding neighborhoods.”

As the night unfolded, however, it became clear that the chaos seen at Trump campaign stops across the country had found its way to San Jose.

Trump supporters were surrounded and, in several cases, attacked as they left the rally.

In one incident captured on camera, a Trump supporter was struck hard over the side of the head as he was walking away from a group of protesters. The attack left him with blood streaming down his head and onto his shirt.

3

“I was walking out with a Trump sign and he grabbed my Trump sign, saying I was like a racist and stuff,” the man told bystanders and local media. “Then he followed me, like, spit on me.”

The Trump supporter said all he had done was chant the candidate’s name before trying to walk away.

Another Trump supporter was also bloodied after being attacked, his shirt torn almost completely off his body. Videos circulating on social media showed swirling, furious fights spilling from street corner to street corner, often with no police in sight.

Marcus DiPaola, a freelance photographer following the Trump campaign, posted video of someone getting punched violently in the face.

4

Reached by phone Thursday night, DiPaola said the sucker punch happened at 8:08 p.m. just outside the convention center where the Trump rally was held.

“It wasn’t completely unprovoked,” he said. “The guy with the flag was waving it in front of the victim’s face. The victim kind of pushed the flag out of the way and then walked quickly away. You saw what happened next.”

DiPaola said he called 911 but was put on hold and so hung up. He said he told one police officer about the beating but was told SJPD “didn’t have the manpower” to intervene.

“Morons,” he said. “How do you not staff 911 for an event of this size?”

DiPaola wasn’t the only journalist to condemn the cops’ handling of the protest.

5

Many of the protesters were peaceful. Some waved Mexican flags in an apparent response to Trump calling Mexican immigrants “rapists.”

According to the San Jose Mercury News, many of the protesters were Latinos from East San Jose opposed to what they saw as racism from the GOP candidate.

6

“We’re here to support Latinos, black people; we’re not rapists,” Cindy Zurita, a 23-year-old student, told the Mercury News as she held a sign reading: “Mr Hate leave my state.”

ABC reporter Tom Llamas, however, said that some of the protesters were “throwing up gang signs.”

“There were [people] who came to demonstrate & some who just wanted to brawl,” he tweeted, calling it “the most violent demonstrations we’ve seen.”

At times, protesters began to fight among themselves. In one instance, two female protesters pleaded for nonviolence while trying to protect a Trump supporter from an angry crowd. Despite their efforts, someone snatched the Trump supporter’s hat.

7

A handful of the bright red “Make America Great Again” hats were set on fire by protesters, who then snapped photos of the scene or hung the charred hats from street signs.

Some protesters said they were disappointed to see violence undermine their message.

“It’s sad to see San Jose representing like this,” student Martha Garcia told the Guardian. “Trump is the one igniting the hate. You can’t fight fire with fire.”

7a

8

Perhaps the most jarring scene was that of a young female Trump supporter being attacked by a crowd of protesters.

In multiple videos of the incident, the woman initially appeared to be happily posing in her Trump football jersey in front of the mostly male protesters, some of whom can be heard whistling and shouting at her.

Then an anonymous arm rises over the crowd and tosses an egg at the woman, striking her in the head and eliciting howls and laughter from the crowd.

A second later, a red water balloon bursts against the woman’s arm.

At first, the woman tries to shrug off the attacks, smiling while appearing to reach out toward the Mexican flags that some protesters are waving.

Objects keep crashing into the convention center windows behind her, however, and protesters can be heard screaming expletives at her.

9

Suddenly, another projectile strikes her hard in the face. Eventually, someone comes to help her and, after she indicates that she is having trouble seeing, she is ushered back inside the convention center.

The ugly scenes of violence toward Trump supporters Thursday appeared to be the inverse of similar incidents earlier in the campaign in which Trump protesters, not supporters, were targeted.

The sucker punch captured by DiPaola, for instance, echoed an incident in March when a 78-year-old Trump supporter sucker-punched a protester at a rally in Fayetteville, N.C.

Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders’s campaigns both condemned the violence in San Jose. John Podesta, chairman of Hillary Clinton for America, tweeted that “violence against supporters of any candidate has no place in this election.”

Mike Casca, Sanders’s rapid response director, tweeted that “we cannot stop Trump’s violent rhetoric with violence — only peaceful protest in a voting booth can do that.”

Blame for the attacks circulated almost as rapidly as images of the violence, with Trump supporters accusing Democrats and members of the media of having a double standard.

Many liberals, meanwhile, including the Democratic mayor of San Jose, suggested that Trump’s angry and divisive rhetoric made him at least partly responsible for the violence at his events.

“At some point Donald Trump needs to take responsibility for the irresponsible behavior of his campaign,” Mayor Sam Liccardo told the Associated Press, praising the city’s police while adding that “we’re all still holding our breath to see the outcome of this dangerous and explosive situation.”

I’ve written before that there is an intellectual pedigree that unites Democrats with terrorists.  And we see here very plainly that Democrats ARE ACTUAL, GENUINE TERRORISTS.

This deterioration into rabid viciousness didn’t happen overnight to the Democrat Party.  But I can tell you EXACTLY where it came from: it came from the Democratic Party’s defiant determination to be the party of GODLESSNESS under the banner of the separation of church and state.

The Book of Ecclesiastes best describes the project of the Democratic Party.  It is the Party of Life Under the Sun; that party that has radically rejected a transcendent God or His ways.

If you are a Democrat, I tell you this fact: there IS a God, and one day you will scream in hell for 60 million millennia for every single NANOSECOND of every single life that you participated in stealing from every single one of the sixty million innocent human beings whose murder you cheered.  Hell literally cannot last long enough for you to pay for your moral crimes.  And it doesn’t matter if you regard the lives of those innocent babies that you participated in murdering as unworthy to be lived any more than the Nazis regarded the Jews they murdered as “lebensunwertes leben,” or life unworthy of life.  They used the same WORDS that came out of the same vile, hateful spirit.  It is an astonishing thing to contemplate that as murderous and as vile as the Nazis were, a Nazi was only ONE-TENTH as murderous and vile as a member of the Democratic Party today.

In the very same way, the Democratic Party has first pushed – and in fact IMPOSED – homosexual sodomy perversion that the Holy Bible condemns in every passage where the practice is so much as mentioned.  The Book of Romans, chapter one couldn’t be more clear: the Democratic Party has invoked the full wrath of God upon the once-great United States of America (and God’s wrath HAS come upon us).  And the time will come when every single Democrat who brought this wrath down upon America will ultimately cower before a holy God as terrifying flames of His wrath billow forth from His war chariot throne (e.g. Daniel 7:9Isaiah 66:15; Psalm 50:3).

Every day and in every way the Democratic Party has done everything they could to disconnect and sever people from the God of the Bible and exalt the State in God’s place.  And as a result they have in every way possible championed evil against the good: they have championed illegal immigrants against American citizens.  They have championed homosexual perversion over God’s created order of male and female in which we were created.  They have championed transgender bisexuals over the 99.7% of ordinary Americans such that we must all accept and even celebrate this depraved “lifestyle” whether we want to or not.  They have championed criminals over law-abiding Americans, such that they claim that criminals are “victims” if law-abiding people think they have the right to be informed about a criminals’ lawless past.  They champion drug addicts and drug dealers over decent citizens who know that altered states of consciousness lead to immorality and wickedness and the death of any society.  They champion people who celebrate the Mexican flag and literally BURN the American flag as their own cockroach presidents Apologizes for America defeating vicious Japanese fascism and claims that Veterans of Foreign Wars are a bunch of haters.

If it is wicked, Democrats think it is good; if it is good, Democrats think it is evil.

That’s what the Democratic Party is today: the party of demonic evil masquerading as “tolerance” and light.  The Bible describes Democrats perfectly in the words of St. Paul in 2 Corinthians 11:13-14: “For such people are false apostles, deceitful workers, masquerading as apostles of Christ.  And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.”  Isaiah also described you Democrats perfectly in Isa. 5:20 when he wrote, “Woe to you who call evil good and good evil; who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter; who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness.”

The reason Democrats have been so determined to impose the false doctrine of “separation of church and state” is because they have had a plan to first kick God out of America, then kick His morality out of America; then impose their own perverted, twisted, vile “morality” in place of the holy God’s whom they hated and His holy ways that they hated.

The Word of God has prophetically told God’s people that in the last days, terrible times would come (2 Timothy 3:1).  And that passage goes on to describe the sheer vileness of that last, perverted generation and the terrible things they would do.  And these people are thriving today; they are called “Democrats” and where they are not doing the worst kind of evil, they are allowing others such as the monsters of Islamic State to do the worst kind of evil.  And more Christians have been viciously tortured and murdered these last eight years under Obama than have suffered in all the centuries before combined because of the abject wickedness that is Obama.  And the day is coming when every single Democrat will answer for every single one of those murders committed because they supported the most wicked American president who ever lived.

The Book of Revelation basically describes the apparent success but ultimate and total destruction of the Democratic Party and every single Democrat who sides against God with the State of the government beast.

If you are a Democrat today, you are a wicked person who champions wickedness.  I would literally rather die than vote for a Democrat, because I’m going with Christ and His ways are my ways; whereas Democrats are going the way of their god, the god of this world, and their destiny is eternal hell.

Every single time there is a Trump rally, we get to WATCH WITH OUR OWN EYES what Democrats are truly like.  A great Trump campaign ad would be a voice over saying, “Hillary Clinton says Donald Trump incites violence, but this is what she says about Donald Trump”: and then a spewage of Hillary slanders.  And then the voice over comes back on and says, “And this is what Democrats are actually doing after they listen to their Democrat leaders’ hate: and then footage of Democrats punching women who support Trump.  I think a lot of people would start to get the true stakes of this election.

Democrats want to treat everyone who doesn’t think exactly like they do the way they want to treat any baby they don’t want.

Progressive Liberalism Is Responsible For The Spread Of Islamic State Among U.S. Youth

May 21, 2015

Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ – Colossians 2:8

I vividly recall a former professor of mine who described the personal impact of his visit to Auschwitz.  The thing that hit him hardest, he said, was when he looked into the rooms where the Nazis had collected all the possessions of the death camp victims: a giant room filled with suitcases here, another room filled with human hair there.  And the thing that hit him at that moment was that ideas have consequences, and that the virus that created Auschwitz and all the camps like it had emerged decades before they were constructed.  It was ideas like atheism, Darwinism, Nietzscheism, existentialism and deconstructionism that became the intellectual foundation upon which those camps were built.  The virus began in the halls of academia – just as our most cancerous and most toxic ideas spread here and now – and spread throughout a German culture which had abandoned belief in God beyond any culture around it.  Because of the work of German liberal theologians such as Julius Wellhausen, Franz Delitzsch, Gerhard Kittel, Paul Althous, Emanual Hirsch, among others, the reliability and integrity of the Bible was stunningly undermined to the degree that the Bible was nothing more than a collection of myths and fables.  Oh, there were true Christian intellectuals such as the great Dietrich Bonhoeffer – who himself would perish in the camps – but these were too few and far between to counter the toxic avalanche of secular humanism all around them.  And as the impact of the vile philosophy and theology of Nazism began to spread, there was simply nothing substantial to counter it.

THAT is precisely where our culture is today and it is coming from the same theological and philosophical traditions.

Martin Heidegger was and actually remains a darling among liberal academia.  It is only a slightly embarrassing fact that the man’s existentialist philosophy enabled him and even drove him to be one of the most ardent Nazis in Germany – such that he first became a member of THE most radical Nazi faction and ultimately lost his rectorate at Frieburg after his political patrons were purged for being TOO extreme before Hitler was ready to take the next step.  Heidegger formally abandoned his Catholicism – which conflicted with both his philosophy and his Nazi politics.  His existentialism drove him to determine to break with “Hebraism” as well as all “metaphysics,” “But to achieve such a rupture, Christian and humanist values would have to be discarded too” [from The German Churches Under Hitler: Background, Struggle, and Epilogue by Ernst Christian Helmreich, 1979, p. 215].

Christian humanism and secular humanism went to war – and secular humanism won in pre-World War II Germany.  And then proceeded to murder all its Christian rivals.

Martin Heidegger was a profound influence upon many of THE most prominent atheists over at least the next thirty years.

Another example of this very same phenomenon is seen in the deconstructionist philosopher Paul De Man.  His work in deconstructionism was adored by the political left and the man was a devout Nazi

And then you’ve got Ezra Pound, the famous literary theorist – and Nazi – who denounced Christianity as something “riddled with semitism” as Hitler himself directly quoted in his Mein Kampf.

These men, along with Hitler, had the project of first tearing Christianity down and ultimately tearing it out by its roots and burning it.  They construed a conflict between “nature” and “anti-nature” (which is one of the reasons why Nazism – and its adherents such as Heidegger – was an environmentalist movement.  On their narrative, Judaism and Christianity were both “anti-nature” because of their focus on a transcendent God and transcendent moral values that restricted the freedom of man and nature.  Whereas nature is immanent.  The Nazi project was to forge a counter-spirituality that would enable the people to find fulfillment even as the Nazis were freed to exercise their power of will.  The Nazis attacked Christianity from hypocritical premises: on the one hand, they assailed Judeo-Christianity for its intolerance and its fostering of guilt even as they, on the other hand, attacked it for its altruism, for its protecting the weak against the strong, for its clear political implications resulting in liberty and equality.  Ezra Pound argued that there was “no sense of social order in the teachings if the irresponsible protagonist of the New Testament” (quoted in The Geneology of Demons, Anti-Semitism, Fascism, and the Myths of Ezra Pound by Robert Castillo, 1988, p. 95].  The Nazis blamed the Protestant Reformation for the revival of Hebrew texts (the Bible) and ways of thinking, and thus for the decline of Europe.  Even though the so-called “Enlightenment” began AFTER and BECAUSE OF the Protestant Reformation.

When the epidemic virus of Nazism became a full-fledged pandemic in German culture, it was because Judeo-Christianity had been weakened, if not eradicated, and because there was no competing intellectual, philosophical, religious, theological alternative to prevent, stop, or even slow down its rise.

And the same thing not only IS happening but already HAS happened in the United States.  And we are seeing the consequences all around us as the National Socialist German Workers Party is reborn as the National Socialist American Workers Party driven by the identical philosophical and religious notions.

The same philosophical traditions – if not the same actual philosophers themselves – that enabled the rise of Nazism continue to dominate the leftist intellectual tradition today: postmodernism, existentialism, deconstructionism, logical positivism, religious liberalism.

It’s all too easy to document the American progressive liberal disdain for Judeo-Christianity and for the integrity and reliability of the Bible which informs it and is its source and foundation:

Obama mockingly asks, “Whose Christianity would we teach in the schools?”  Because Christianity is nothing more than a man-made religion and it is completely relative and totally bound by culture and subject to constant change for the simple reason that there is and can be no eternal, everlasting God to make it permanent.  And Obama mocks, “Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy?”  Because the Word of God is nothing more than the word of man and bigoted, intolerant, racist man at that.  And it is immoral to allow Judeo-Christianity or the Bible to have ANY role in our culture as a result.

And we all shouted, “Sieg Heil!  Sieg Heil!  Sieg Heil!  Heil Obama!  Heil Obama!  Heil Obama!”  Because there is nothing left BUT Obama to hold this culture or this nation together.  Or to put it another way: if this nation has a God or a moral code that Obama has NOT mocked and undermined and ignored, I’d like to know who He or she or it is.  (In this age where the left has embraced the transgender man-woman shemale, I suppose you have to consider all the myriad possibilities).

So we’re seeing the same deterioration of “God” in the American political socialist left that we observed in the German political socialist left as it rose to power.  Just like Obama, Hitler began talking about his “Christianity,” but it sure didn’t take long before – the same way Obama promised that “as a Christian” he was opposed to same-sex marriage to imposing the very thing he said that “as a Christian” he was opposed toHitler told his inner circle that he was a devout atheist who had abandoned any notions of a God other than himself.  What he said in his speeches wasn’t any more true than what Obama said in his speeches.  And Christianity has been annihilated in America much the way it was in Germany leading up to the Nazis who took the next logical step with the worldview of Darwinism.

I also find it striking how liberal Democrats are exploiting race versus how the Nazis exploited race.  Both rose to power by making race and racism an issue and encouraging people of race to politically rise against another race due to perceived injustices.  The Nazis screamed, “The Jews have usurped power and they’re oppressing you!”  The liberal Democrats scream, “The whites (particularly white men) have usurped power and they’re oppressing you!”

Now we’re seeing the assured results of leftist-progressive Democrat Party rule as criminality and violence skyrocket wherever liberalism touches.  Liberals are demagoguing race to turn our justice system against our system of justice – and justice is being raped and tortured and murdered as a result.

I mean, “why is white America so reluctant to identify white college males as a problem population?”  I mean, after all, Hitler showed us how to do it with the Jews.

The Jesus whom the Nazis and whom Obama mocked told us, “In the last days, race will rise against race.”  but what did that white-male-embraced Jew know, anyway?

Crucify Him!  At least that’s what the Nazis did.  That’s what Islamic State is doing now.  And as for liberal Democrats, they not only are fine with crucifying Jesus, they’ll stick Him in a jar of urine while they do it.

Progressive liberals demanded that – back when America was STILL overwhelmingly Christian and believed in God – that in the cause of “free speech” we allow such vileness.

Now the same liberals who demanded the right to immerse Christ in piss demand that now that they’ve got the upper hand free speech should be abolished.  It’s who they are.  Again, because they’re just like the Nazis.  Who are just like Islamic State.

The Christianity of our founding fathers – and our very founding fathers themselves – – have been torn down in scorn.  And so the Constitution based on that Christian worldview is the next casualty.

“I think we can say that the Constitution reflected an enormous blind spot in this culture that carries on until this day, and that the Framers had that same blind spot. I don’t think the two views are contradictory, to say that it was a remarkable political document that paved the way for where we are now, and to say that it also reflected the fundamental flaw of this country that continues to this day.” — Barack Obama, Sept. 6, 2001

To me it is absolutely no surprise whatsoever that our first president to classify America as “a Muslim nation” prophetically declared the complete separation between America and its founding fathers and their Constitution a matter of FIVE DAYS before the very Islam that he would embrace and elevate to a status directly alongside Christianity would attack us.

The rise of Islamic State and the rise of Obama are hand-in-hand.  The former could never have arisen without the latter.

The men who wrote our Constitution declared in their basis for it – the Declaration of Independence – that our rights come from God, not from any government.  But that didn’t work for liberal Democrats who wanted sodomy-perversion marriage and sixty million murdered babies.  So they agreed with the Nazis that there is “no sense of social order in the teachings if the irresponsible protagonist of the New Testament” and threw Christianity out.  So that “social order” could be whatever THEY declared it to by exercising the same power of the human will that Hitler exalted.

Precisely what is it that our liberal-Democrat-hijacked public schools are teaching our children about our God or our culture that will provide a powerful force for them to fight for what is right and fight against what is wrong?  Or to put it in Obama’s mocking terms, “Whose morality would we teach in the schools?”  Do we teach the morality of an everlasting God or do we teach the constantly adapting Darwinian bug morality of Obama?

We are watching the world unravel from without even as we are watching our very cities unravel from within.  Because this is a nation that stands for NOTHING that is transcendent just as Nazi Germany stood for nothing that was transcendent before us.  And we rabidly reject the very NOTION of transcendence because it interferes with our adoration of homosexual sodomy erected upon our altar of sixty million murdered babies.

Kids in liberal Democrat public indoctrination centers aren’t being taught to revere our foundations – they have been taught to mock and despise them.

So why not embrace the values of Islamic State?

Violence is encouraged by liberal Democrats.  First the rioters were given literal permission to riot.  The police were ordered to stand down and allow them to riot.  Then it became racist to criticize the rioters.

Hey, if you like violence you’ll LOVE Islamic State.  Why not join up and spread the love?  You can burn and loot and murder to your heart’s content.

In the rise of Islamic State, we are watching what the liberal-Democrats of Hollywood created: a culture of violence that stands for NOTHING BUT DEATH act out its “values.”

I keep seeing snippets of the numerous videos that Islamic State recruiters are spreading all over the internet.  And you know what I keep seeing?  I keep seeing a video game.  The Islamic State videos look just like what I see when I see the snippets of the video games that liberal Democrats of Hollywood and Silicone Valley pumped into our kids’ brains.

Hey, kids!  You can live our your video game fantasies!  Join Islamic State and you can actually BE in the video game world!

And why not?  Why shouldn’t you?  I mean, murder isn’t really all that “wrong” given that we’ve murdered sixty million babies and that’s “right,” right?  And the same intolerant Christian God who says murder is wrong also says homosexuality is wrong and we ALL know that’s right, right?  And I mean, seriously, whose version of Christianity are we going to teach?  Whose passages of Scripture should guide our public policy?

Come on, why not try the Qur’an instead, kids?  I mean, after all, this IS a Muslim nation, you know.

I’ve been talking about how the liberal-progressive Democrat WORLDVIEW has actually directly participated in the rise of terrorism.  But let’s not forget Obama’s miserable national security and foreign policy performance that have allowed Islamic State to rise from a virtually unheard of tiny offshoot group based in Syria when Bush was president to owning the largest terrorist caliphate in the history of the world because of Obama.  I’ll quote one of my own titles that I back up with facts ad nauseam: No One On EARTH More Responsible For Rise In Islamic Terrorism Than Our Own Terrorist-in-Chief, Barack Hussein Obama.  And it is an easy-to-document FACT that Barack Obama DIRECTLY enabled Islamic State to spread by refusing to deal with Syria after cowardly retreating from his own “red line” AFTER cutting-and-running from Iraq in abandonment of EVERYTHIG his own generals WARNED WOULD HAPPEN if Obama did what Obama in fact did.

You need to go back and remember history – something IMPOSSIBLE for a liberal to do – to see how Obama and his mouthpieces claimed credit for the Arab Spring (and see here and here for more proof of that) that the terrorists used to massively advance their own cause.  It is also a matter of history that the Arab Spring that Obama claimed so much credit for actually WERE the result of Obama in the form of FOOD RIOTS he created throughout the Middle East due to the fact that all the Arab states that sell oil have to be tied to the U.S. dollar – with Obama’s massive debt massively devaluing the values of Arab currencies leading to rioting.

It doesn’t matter HOW you slice it: it comes up Obama and the vicious failure of liberal progressive Democrat Party ideology.

What I’m saying here is that the fact that for all practical purposes, Barack Obama and the Democrat Party have completely surrendered to radical Islam – whether you talk about Obama allowing and even outright encouraging Islamic State to spread by a) doing NOTHING in the Syria that now thanks to Obama controls more than half of that country and b) Obama’s completely cutting-and-running from Iraq in abandonment of EVERYTHING our generals demanded we do to preserve the security of that country; or whether you talk about Obama allowing and even outright encouraging Iran to develop a nuclear bomb and the ballistic missile system to deliver it and therefore encourage nuclear proliferation in the remaining Muslim countries as they talk about their bomb – the real crisis was already present and already metastasizing in our culture.

Islamic State is rising.  And neither so-called “moderate Islam” itself or the defiled formerly “One Nation Under God” America that is now “God Damn America” have anything to fight it with.

Which is why the once greatest nation in the history of the world – a nation that uniquely called upon the God of the Bible – will go down so hard, so violently, in such an ugly, awful manner.

It’s funny.  Progressive liberals claim to be anti-rape, but as a direct result of their moral system, we have seen rapes and sexual assaults SKYROCKET.  And I’m sure it’s a complete surprise to you, unless you first consider that it’s kind of obvious that the inevitable result of teaching children that they are NOT created in the image of God, that they WILL act like the animals their teachers claim they are.  I mean, Muslims love to slander Jews by labeling them “the descendants of apes and pigs.”   But according to evolutionary theory we are that and worse: the descendants of flies and roaches.  And surprise, surprise that our kids would start acting like what liberal progressives have said they are all along.

In the same manner, it’s the same way with the economy: should we really be surprised when the liberal progressive Democrats’ embrace of an economic system based entirely on atheistic godlessness (where omnipotent Government takes the place of God), class-warfare-incited envy and bitterness would necessarily fail every single time it is tried no matter how many times it has failed before?  And yet here we are, with Obama’s miraculous “wreckovery” sinking America year-by-year under Obama into the WORST labor participation rates – measuring the percentage of working-age Americans who actually have a job – we have seen in forty years.  Right now the labor participation rate – six years into Obama’s so-called “recovery” – has more than 93 million Americans without a job and little hope of ever finding one in a rate that is the worst we’ve seen since Jimmy Carter’s socialism was destroying America in 1977.  I wrote about the metastatic spread of the Obama economic cancer in a nice little summary in a different article I wrote in 2013:

Again, I talked about that when I pleaded with the American people to NOT choose stupidity and suicide in the 2012 election:

In 2010 – and this was AFTER we supposedly were out of the recession in Obama’s “wreckovery” –  the labor participation rate was 64.5%, which was at a 25-year low (i.e., lower than it had EVER been under Bush).

In 2011, the labor participation rate dropped to 63.9%, the lowest level in 27 years.

Last year in 2012 under Obama’s failed policies it fell to the lowest level in 30 years.

And here we are today.  You’ve got to go back to the dismal failure of the Carter era in the late 1970s to get such an awful participation rate.  It’s now the worst its been in 34 years.

Now it stands as the worst America has seen in 38 years.  But who does Obama demonize for his fail?  Bush.

It is a fact that “If the workforce participation rate today were as high as it was on the day Barack Obama was inaugurated, the unemployment rate in this country would be 9.7 percent.”  His current unemployment rate is based entirely on statistical shenanigans and outright lies.  Under Barack Obama’s economic miracle “The yearly income of a typical US household dropped by a massive 12 percent, or $6,400.”  Obama has literally robbed us blind while telling us he’s making us rich – and pure fools believe his lies.  Meanwhile, in spite of the fact that Obama has demagogued class-warfare more than any president in history, his actual record has produced the widest gap between the rich and the poor in his economy EVER MEASURED.  Meanwhile, Obama’s destruction of our health care system is closing down hospitals, driving doctors out of medicine and leaving the poor with “insurance” that leaves them unable to get healthcare outside of clogging up our emergency rooms.  The scourge of chronic homelessness is a giant plague beyond anything we’ve seen in the most liberal-Obama-friendly citiesHomeless camps are sprawling across the city of the Angles.   In fact, “the number of tents, makeshift encampments and vehicles occupied by homeless people soared 85%, to 9,535, according to biennial figures from the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority.”  Cities are going BANKRUPT with debt in numbers not seen since the Great Depression under Obama.    I wrote about that massive problem in 2012.  It was still a massive problem in 2013.  It’s still a massive problem now as Chicago goes bankrupt under one of Obama’s chief acolytes due of course to Obama-style debt and insane socialist spending policies.  Cities like Detroit look like World War II bombed out war zones.  Race riots dominate the Obama presidency as the vile, toxic bitterness of the left metastasizes in violence.  I wrote about the liberal stupidity of liberal Baltimore  and how liberals have proved last-days prophecy is coming upon us – and look at the impact of their foolish, wicked “management” of the crisis they created.  Obama depicting himself or his policies as being the savior to the poor is rather akin to Adolf Hitler depicting himself and his Third Reich as the savior for Jews.  And I state that as a categorical FACT that I just documented at length above if you look at the FACTS.

To the extent that the economy or jobs has anything to do with the rise of terrorism and the Islamic State, as liberal progressives keep telling us, again, look no farther than at THEM for producing the miserable economy and the awful jobs performance.

The beast is coming.  And he is coming because liberal progressives have “fundamentally transformed” America into a nation that WILL NOT reflect the image of a good God, but will rather exalt their will over Him.  Which is a prescription for judgment and doom.

 

God Is Real. And The World’s Treatment Of Israel Is All The Proof You Need That Satan Is Real

August 2, 2014

I believe in God.  Now, that in and of itself is a pure no-brainer.  It is literally the abominable fool who denies it, according to God’s Word in Psalm 14:1-3.  It is not faith to believe in God, merely a matter of sheer common sense.  Romans 1:18-20 makes this point abundantly clear:

“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them.  For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse.  For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened.  Professing to be wise, they became fools…”

James 2:19 clearly points out that mere intellectual assent to God’s reality is nothing:

“You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that–and shudder.”

Thus the struggle of faith is not in believing that God exists; that is literally a thing to be taken for granted.  Rather the struggle of faith is to realize that the Creator of the universe and everything in it is truly good and truly loves you and has a beautiful plan for your life.  Sometimes that doesn’t seem so obvious – particularly when we see the evil in the world – and that is when we must practice faith.

“Faith” is trust.  We’re facing a difficult situation, things don’t seem to be going well, and we make the decision and the commitment to trust God.

That aspect of faith emerges in Hebrews 11:1, which states “Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.”  It’s not just heaven I haven’t seen; I haven’t seen what God will do in my life the rest of today.

What about the devil?  Is it hard to believe in the reality of the devil?

Not when I look at the way the world is judging Israel and taking the side of the terrorists who have intentionally burrowed themselves into the population so as to kill as many of their own people as possible while they try to murder as many Jews as possible, it isn’t.

It’s an interesting thing, evil.  I remember reading an influential article by the former mistress of Nazi philosopher Martin Heidegger about what she described as the banality of evil.  What does it mean to be banal?  It means to be trivial, obvious, predictable, to be devoid of originality.  There’s a boring “been there, seen that” aspect to evil.  And Hannah Arendt was making this point not about something mundane, like the man who urinates all over a public toilet seat and leaves his filthy mess for someone else to clean up, but rather the Final Solution of the Holocaust.

The men who carried out the Holocaust weren’t monsters with blood dripping off their fangs; they were bureaucrats who carried out sterile-sounding government policies.  Jews were declared to be non-human – precisely the way babies in the womb are to this day – and were regarded in official government language basically as a disposal dilemma that could be resolved with the application of bureaucracy.  You could read the Nazi documents and it wouldn’t be that much different from reading how the Environmental Protection Agency of the U.S. is attempting to dispose of some toxin that is polluting a river.  Only in this case the “river” was Europe and the “toxin” was Jews.  And sterile bureaucrats sterilely carried out sterile policies in such a manner that producing millions of corpses was a boring, commonplace industrial activity.

Hannah Arendt was pointing out that thousands and thousands of faceless bureaucrats and functionaries somehow all played their trivial, unimaginative, boring roles that collectively resulted in an evil so monstrous that the primary reason it is denied to this day is because it is simply too astonishingly horrifying to believe it actually happened in our modern, civilized age.  But of course it DID happen.  And how could something that evil have happened when none of the people who carried it out had the fangs of vampires or the claws of werewolves?

I submit that there is something transcendent about evil just as there is something transcendent about good.  Just as there is good that proves that there is a Higher God – because no human being could act so selflessly, so compassionately on his or her own, there is a similar quality about evil, such that there is evil that defies all reasonable capacity to explain it.

I’ll put it this way: as stupid, as blind and as depraved as humans are, there are some things that simply beyond human evil.  To wit: people cannot possibly be this stupid, this blind, this depraved on their own.  There has to be a superhuman will involved to twist us into such a depth of mindboggling stupidity, blindness and depravity.

I look at how fools condemn Israel in their fight against a Hamas organization that literally publically states its intention to murder every Jew on earth according to Article 7 of their charter and I realize that no human mind can possibly be this stupid, this blind and this depraved on its own.

Let me provide a specific, concrete example.  When Nancy Pelosi said:

“And we have to confer with the Qataris, who have told me over and over again that Hamas is a humanitarian organization. Mbe they could use their influence to–”

I contend that as a human being created in the image of a intelligent, aware, moral God that she is simply not capable of being that stupid, that blind and that depraved on her own to believe what came out of her own mouth.  There has to be a devil at work to produce that degree of unreality.

Just as I contend that when the senior spokesperson for Nancy Pelosi’s “humanitarian organization” urged the Palestinian people to serve as human shields

The [Hamas] Ministry of the Interior and National Security calls on our honorable people in all parts of the [Gaza] Strip to ignore the warnings [to vacate areas near rocket launching sites before Israel bombs them] that are being disseminated by the Israeli occupation through manifestos and phone messages, as these are part of a psychological war meant to sow confusion on the [Palestinian] home front, in light of the [Israeli] enemy’s security failure and its confusion and bewilderment.”

[Facebook page of Hamas Ministry of Interior spokesman Iyad Al-Buzum,
July 12, 2014]

– there simply has to be a Satan to delude a man to say such an incredible thing and there has to a Satan to delude mothers and fathers to allow their children to die as human shields for the cause of terror.

As I quoted from the Los Angeles Times Hamas intentionally and deliberately built a vast terrorist tunnel complex right under hospitals, schools and mosques as well as the most densely populated residential neighborhoods on earth in order to intentionally and deliberately force Israel to kill as many helpless civilians as possible in response to Hamas’ thousands of brutally inhuman rocket attacks:

Troops operating in and near Gaza have tracked 36 tunnels with dozens of access points, Deputy Foreign Minister Tzachi Hanegbi said Wednesday, as the Israeli offensive in Gaza entered its fourth week. Miles of passageways, many stocked with weapons and reinforced against explosions from above, pass near or directly beneath schools, mosques and hospitals, threading their way under some of the most densely populated terrain on Earth. — Los Angeles Times, July 30, 2014

Many of those tunnels have entrances directly TO the mosques, the hospitals, the schools such that Hamas fighters can use those “positions” to attack Israel with deadly weapons fire and then retreat safely and expose the helpless Palestinian civilians to death that Hamas and their tools cynically exploit as propaganda.

Hamas and its stooges such as Nancy Pelosi cannot be that callous, that stupid, that blind or that depraved all on their own.  It simply defies human ability to be that callous, that stupid, that blind and that depraved.  Human hearts and minds simply weren’t made for that.

Israel cares so much more about trying to prevent the deaths of helpless Palestinian civilians that Hamas or the Palestinian Authority or for that matter the Palestinian people themselves it is beyond unreal.  One side is trying to protect their citizens; the other side is trying to kill as many of their own people as possible merely so they can point at the other side and cry, “Look what they did!”  One side tries desperately to warn every Palestinian of an impending attack even down to the level of trying to call each home (and it is mindboggling what an organizational effort Israel must pursue to do such a thing) before an attack; the other side is ordering civilians to remain in their homes so they will be killed.

But which side is being condemned by the world?

It defies belief.  There is simply no way in this world what is happening can possibly be happening.  But it’s happening.

There is a Satan.  How Israel is being condemned and demonized while the most evil organization on the planet is enabled to continue intentionally exploiting its own people as human shields proves it beyond the shadow of a doubt to anyone capable of wisdom.

2 Corinthians 4:4 says “The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.”  That god is Satan.  And he and his demons are alive and well and working to blind every human being on earth.

There is simply no other rational explanation for what we are seeing.

God’s Word prophetically declared the resurrection of Israel from the graveyard of history in Ezekiel chapter 37.  The Bible went so far as to declare that Israel would literally be created in one day.  That happened exactly according to God’s Word in Isaiah 66:8 on May 14, 1948 by an act of the United Nations in response to the horror of the Holocaust.  And God’s Word also declared repeatedly that every single nation on earth would be against Israel.  We have now already seen that come to pass, as well.  And we know that it will only grow worse.

I become dismayed as I see evil prevailing while the few righteous people can seemingly do nothing to prevent it.  I and those who have the illumination of the Holy Spirit can see the world moving toward the worship of the beast all around us; yet we can do nothing to prevent it as more and more human beings are being deluded by Satan to make the choice to burn in hell and literally take their whole world to hell with them.  But God knew that it would happen and foretold it to His people.  And events are unfolding in these last days exactly according to His Word given to us millennia ago.

God’s Word according to 2 Thessalonians 2:3 puts it quite clearly:

Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction.

God told us – guaranteed us – that the world would turn radically evil and rebel against God, God’s people and God’s righteousness in the last days just before the Antichrist came.  And that’s where we are, folks.

There is a God.  There is a Satan.  The players in this drama for sovereignty over the human race are real.  And the drama of the struggle is foretold in the prophecies of Scripture.

I am on the Lord’s side, as was Joshua before me.  In spite of the banality – the commonplace, trivial, obvious, predictable, even boring in its nearly all-encompassing nature – of evil, God will prevail in this struggle as He declared in His Word.

 

 

 

I Keep Pointing It Out: The ESSENTIAL Nature Of Homosexual Liberalism Is Pure Rabid FASCISM. And Here It Is Again…

April 24, 2014

Let me point out that these homosexuals are Nazis.  And I mean that LITERALLY, given the historic connection between the rise of Nazism and homosexuality and that Nazism would not have risen had it NOT BEEN for homosexuals who served as Hitler’s brownshirted stormtrooper thugs and beat down the opposition.

And nothing has changed.  Homosexuals are every bit as violent and as hateful as ever.  Look at the history of the “gay rights” movement.  Their “movement” began with violence at Stonewall and the White Night riots.  Today our prisons are CLOGGED with violent and vicious homosexuals who rape one another every chance they get.  And homosexual domestic violence is FAR higher than among heterosexual couplesEven studies that are clearly pro-gay acknowledge this fact.  Gays routinely threaten violence against those who don’t agree with them.

Nazism has its philosophical roots in philosophical worldviews that abandoned truth.  And once truth is dismissed as a possibility, anything and everything is allowed to fill the void.  And homosexuals have that in common with the Nazis, in that the philosophical systems they cling to abandon any and all notion of “truth” as held by classical foundationalism.  It really is no surprise that the two (homosexuality and Nazism) would be so inextricably inter-connected.  I documented this (liberal) philosophical worldview in depth six years ago as Obama was getting elected and these people have obviously become even worse since then.  There are so many examples of it happening it is beyond unreal.

Back on November 22, 2008 I wrote this article: Gay Rights Groups Using Vile Intimidation Tactics To Attack Prop 8 Backers

These people are true fascists.  They are identical to the Nazis – especially the homosexual Nazis who BEGAN Nazism in the first place.

And with that, here we are, detailing AGAIN how homosexuals act identically with NAZIS as they clearly haven’t changed one damn bit, have they?

MSNBC Panel Members Find ‘Disturbing Level’ of Gay Rights Interest in ‘Targeting People’
By Brad Wilmouth | April 19, 2014 | 16:27

On the Friday, April 18, All In show, during a discussion of the firing of former Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich for simply donating to a political campaign opposing same-sex marriage, guest Richard Kim of the far left The Nation magazine intoned that he found it “disturbing” that gay activist friends of his have expressed interest in “targeting” more people who have made similar donations, and who have declared they should “find out where they live.” Kim:

Here’s a disturbing thing. I did ask some of my gay activist friends, I was like, “Look, here’s a list; 6,500 people gave the same amount that he did or more in California. Should we go down the list and sort of start targeting all these people?” And I asked this facetiously, and people were like, “Let’s do it. Let’s find out where those people live. It’s all-” To me, that’s a disturbing level of targeting people.

Hayes, who had earlier expressed reservations about Eich’s firing, exclaimed, “Yes,” to Kim’s view that such talk was “disturbing.”

As he brought up the discussion, the MSNBC host seemed skeptical of the former Mozilla CEO’s firing: “And there was part of me that did not know how to feel about how this whole thing unfolded.”

A bit later, as panel member and MSNBC host Karen Finney defended the practice of pressuring company heads about their political views, Hayes brought up President Obama’s previous history of opposing same-sex marriage. Hayes: “Barack Obama in 2008 was opposed to marriage equality.”

Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Friday, April 18, All In with Chris Hayes on MSNBC, with critical portions in bold:

CHRIS HAYES: So here’s the other interesting part of this, and I want to use this to segue to the Brendan Eich story because what you hear and see here are changing social norms, right? It is legal in South Carolina to fire someone because they’re gay. Increasingly, that is not viewed as socially acceptable, right? And rightly so. We agree everyone at the table agrees that is wrong.

But, now, there’s also social norms about whether it is socially acceptable to have the belief that gay folks can’t get married or to oppose gay equality. And this came to a head in the tale of Brendan Eich, who was the CEO of the firm, Mozilla, which makes a very popular Web browser. People found out that he had given a contribution to the wrong side in Prop 8, which was the anti-equality side. It was in a public record.

And there was a campaign that basically got rid of him, basically saying this is an unacceptable view for the CEO of a major firm to have. And there was part of me that did not know how to feel about how this whole thing unfolded. What was your thinking?

RICHARD KIM, THE NATION: Yeah, so I, first of all, say I don’t think anybody’s rights were violated.

HAYES: Nobody has a right to be a CEO.

KIM: Right, exactly, exactly. I do, on the level of proportion, question this. So this guy gave one $1,000 donation six years ago to a campaign that 7 million Californians voted for, that 6,500 people gave a donation at his level or higher. Mozilla has an anti-gay discrimination policy. He had no intent to change that. Marriage in California is settled law.

So there’s a question of whether or not all the sort of fury targeted at him and this one sort of, you know, attempt to oust him is in proportion to any threat that he represents to gay people in the future.

CATHY HENNA, LGBT ACTIVIST: It’s somehow, it’s how the culture works, too. This is a major tech company in Northern California, and, you know, as we were talking about before, you know, this is not just about gay people anymore. This is about allies. I mean, the second this went on social media, on Facebook, on Twitter, people just find this unacceptable. It’s no longer acceptable to be anti-gay.

HAYES: But did they find it unacceptable, there was a weird kind of advertising of one’s own enlightenment that this was part of. You know what I mean? It felt to me a little bit like, “I can like this, I can get behind this because this is a kind of, it’s no skin off my back, you know? Like, I don’t care who the CEO of Mozilla is.” And this shows — that’s what conservatives were saying, right? Conservatives were saying that this is basically hounding people, this is totally “il-liberal.”

HENNA: (INAUDIBLE) -to say that when it works for them because what their big thing is, “Oh, it’s about the free market.” Well, in this case it was the free market. People are making decisions about what they do and what they buy and what the organizations and the companies they support and the decisions they make as consumers voting with their wallets based on the leadership of those companies.

KAREN FINNEY, MSNBC HOST: It’s the little bit of power that we have as consumers. And you hear Karl Rove and the right wing. What do they always say about the companies that give to right-wing causes. We don’t want to have to publish our names. They’re afraid of a backlash. Well, guess what: I can decide I don’t want to spend my money at, with your company if I don’t approve how you spend that money. I can decide-

HAYES: Barack Obama in 2008 was opposed to marriage equality.

FINNEY: And he still got elected, you know, that’s the process.

HAYES: The point, but this guy gave them-

KIM: Here’s a disturbing thing. I did ask some of my gay activist friends, I was like, “Look, here’s a list; 6,500 people gave the same amount that he did or more in California. Should we go down the list and sort of start targeting all these people?” And I asked this facetiously, and people were like, “Let’s do it. Let’s find out where those people live. It’s all-” To me, that’s a disturbing level-

HAYES: Yes.

KIM: -of targeting people.

FINNEY:  But is part of it because Prop 18 is so, it became such a heated issue in this country, and it sort of became, I think, and it is a sort of either you’re on the right side or the wrong side, and, ironically, even the lawyer in the case has been evolving as he’s planning his daughter’s wedding.

I defy you liberals to show me ONE case of a corporate board firing their CEO because he gave money to the “No on Prop 8” campaign.  Because that never happened.  Only the LEFT is capable of that kind of rabid fascist intolerance.

In the same vein, show me ONE case of “Yes on 8” supporters viciously targeting their opponents the way the homosexual liberals did.

Who has been caught over and over and over again being rabidly intolerant of allowing people to have free speech?  The left.  Who routinely shouts down speakers if they don’t agree with those speakers to prevent ideas from being presented?  The left.  Who obeys the dog whistle whenever it is blown by chanting slogans rather than engaging in debate?  The left.  Who has been caught over and over again attempting to indoctrinate students in what amount to unhinged political rants in college/university classrooms (hell, this garbage happens all the damn time – here’s another one) and even in public elementary schools?  The left.  Who actually used the IRS as a thug ideological force to punish people with whom they politically disagreed?  The left.  Who systematically suppresses journalists?  The left.  The left is simply and purely intrinsically fascist.

Do you want to know which side routinely “outs” homosexuals publicly?  The left.  You see, certain homosexuals have decided that outing homosexuals is “a moral act, a means to prevent gays from participating in their own oppression.”

That is the essence of who these people are: YOU don’t have any rights; THEY have all the rights.  You have the right to sit down and shut up while they impose their agenda on you.  And if you don’t like it, they’ll come after you with a viciousness and a rabid hate that is beyond stunning.

The thing about the left is that they are pathologically incapable of seeing themselves for what they truly are.  They are your classic projectionists: the more rabidly intolerant they become, the more they project their own viciousness onto their enemies.  And since these people are true fascists, and with true fascists the end always justifies the means, this rabid hate and intolerance that is THEIRS but which they hypocritically project onto their opponents “justifies” them to be more and more evil and use any and every means to attack.

And just like the brutal Nazi stormtrooper thugs who used every tactic to ensure that their opponents were intimidated – if not physically beaten – into silence, the homosexual left is showing that they are the same damn Nazis they were in the 1930s.

 

How Secular Humanists And Progressive Liberals Have Always Exempted Themselves From The Darwinian Evolution They Inflict On Everybody Else

January 21, 2013

I was watching a Military History program called “No Surrender: German and Japanese Kamikazes” about the birth of the Japanese kamikaze pilots of WW2 yesterday.

If you have knowledge of the dilemma of the German generals – with a fanatic Führer screaming orders and a fanatic youth who would have lined the generals up and shot them for treason or cowardice if they’d failed to continue to wage the war – you shouldn’t be surprised to learn that the exact same dilemma slapped the Japanese admirals in the face.  We find that neither top military leadership could stop the war or even de-escalate the atrocities.

First let’s talk briefly about Nazi Germany.  Germany was the official seat of the Protestant Revolution with Martin Luther nailing his 95 Theses to the church door in Wittenberg.  But well before the end of the 19th century, Germany had strayed far from God, indeed.  It had in fact become the most atheistic nation in all of Europe and in all of Christendom and in all of Western Civilization.

The perversion and degradation of German culture began in the minds of the German intellectuals.  Even in the very last days of Nazi Germany, with thousands of bombers devastating helpless German cities every single day, Germany led the world in science and philosophy.  What we found – or at least what we should have found – is that science and academia and vicious, murderous barbarism could easily come together to the worst horror imaginable.  We also should have found that ideas have consequences.

It turns out that Japanese admirals were in a very similar bind coming from the younger Japanese officers.  When the admirals first watched the first kamikaze pilots ignore their orders and fly their planes into American navy ships, they were utterly horrified.  Imperial Japan was not at least not initially a nation in which the old ordered the young to their deaths from behind the safety of the front lines; it was a war in which a fanatic youth with the best modern Darwinian educations breathed in the toxic ideas they had been fed throughout their entire lives and took those ideas to their natural conclusion.

It was the young pilots who had been the best students in science and technology who alone had the sheer fanaticism to transform themselves into human bombs.  Darwinism didn’t stop them from barbarism; it informed their barbarism and made them barbarous.  More than 4,000 of the most “scientific” and technically literate minds in Japan died committing suicide in order to try to kill their enemies.  These young fanatic officers ignored their older superiors and forced the admiralty to embrace total war to the death.

Because ideas have consequences.  And these young minds that had been so thoroughly poisoned by evolution and Darwinism rose up and lived out the implications of what they had been indoctrinated in.

Let’s put it this way, if you’re a secular humanist or a Darwinist, please explain to me how Darwinism does not entail Social Darwinism.  I mean, if Darwinian evolution is in fact true, if there is no God, no heaven or hell, no judgment, if we are random byproducts of a purposeless, meaningless, valueless universe that will ultimate swallow us up again the same random way it spat us out, then just why should we love and sacrifice for one another when it is far easier and far more profitable to crush and kill them instead?  All Social Darwinism really is is consistently living out the consequences of scientific Darwinism.  There is no Creator to whom we will be held to account on Judgment Day; there is no Imago Dei; we are nothing more than animals; and the animal world is a world in which the strong dominate and the weak die out.

Darwinian morality is as vicious as it is violent.

Let’s start with the fact that evolutionists claim that their system of Darwinism is simply the way the world works.  Assume that’s true for a moment.  And then look at the world around you.  Because like it or not, Darwinism entails social Darwinism.  What is true for nature must be true for the individual and society.  If nature progresses by competition for survival, and the victory of the strong over the weak, then all progress must come the same way.  If the law of the bloody claw is not entailed evolution, just how is it not entailed? How does the 4 billion year history of earth as envisioned by Darwinians not demonstrate that might makes right and it is far better to kill your enemy than it is to turn the other cheek to it? If life is an unceasing struggle for existence, and its outcome is the survival of the fittest, as Darwin claimed, then that is how we ought to function as individuals and as a society.

Modern Darwinians want to use their system to violently club God to death, then drop that club and say, “Now that Darwinism has killed God and religion, let’s not live as if our system that says life is a struggle for existence in which only the fittest survive and the weak are a threat to the rest of the herd is actually true.”  Like so many other elements of Darwinian thought, there is a massive self-contradiction.

Richard Dawkins has laid war and death on the back of religion, but he refuses to accept the far greater holocaust of death on the back of his atheism.  When we rightly point out that atheistic communism was responsible for the murder of more than 110 million people during peacetime alone, Dawkins claims that communism and atheism have nothing to do with each other.  But as I showed last week, that simply is false: atheism was at the very core of Marxism.  If you look up “state atheism,” you find that it is virtually identical with communism.  And it is no coincidence that not only did Karl Marx identify with Charles Darwin as strongly supporting his theory of class struggle and write that Darwinism was “the basis in natural history for our views,” but Nazism was also little more than applied Darwinism – with the rationale of both creating a master race and exterminating the Jews being profoundly Darwinian.  Hitler even made his own people the victims of his Darwinism, stating, “If the German Volk is not strong enough and is not sufficiently prepared to offer its own blood for its existence, it should cease to exist and be destroyed by a stronger power.”  That is profoundly Darwinian.  Now intellectual frauds like Richard Dawkins are trying to go back and rewrite history to expunge the incredibly tragic results of Darwinism being applied to the actual world and society.

And the horror that results in society is equally true of the individual who lives by Darwinism.

Why do we as individuals rape, murder and sleep around?  Becauserape is (in the vernacular of evolutionary biology) an adaptation, a trait encoded by genes that confers an advantage on anyone who possesses them. Back in the late Pleistocene epoch 100,000 years ago, men who carried rape genes had a reproductive and evolutionary edge over men who did not: they sired children not only with willing mates, but also with unwilling ones, allowing them to leave more offspring (also carrying rape genes) who were similarly more likely to survive and reproduce, unto the nth generation. That would be us. And that is why we carry rape genes today. The family trees of prehistoric men lacking rape genes petered out.”  Darwinism is “a scientific idea that, if true, consigns traditions of self-restraint, loyalty, the very basis of family life, to the shredder.”  Now go ye and do likewise.  Unless something inside of you screams “NO!  I will NOT live in accordance with that terrible, wicked, demonic theory of Darwinian evolution!”

As was once stated in Time Australia Magazine:

Japan, war, and evolution
Source: TIME Australia, August 14, 1995 (p. 83). First published in CREATION Magazine Volume 18 number 2. Pages 7 to 9. December 1995 – February 1996.

This century has seen countless millions killed –more than in all known wars of human history put together – in the name of ideologies that owe their inspiration and justification directly to evolution.

The Nazis used this ‘science falsely so-called’ to justify treating other races as sub-human. Engaging in war, even genocide, could hardly be wrong, so they thought, since it made their version of the ‘fittest’ more likely to survive.

Communism’s dialectic materialism required belief in evolution for intellectual respectability. Stalin’s butchery is directly linked to his renunciation of God (and thus all notions of sin and judgment) after reading Darwin’s book. Mao Zedong, responsible for the deaths of tens of millions, listed Darwin and Huxley as his two favourite authors.

Few have realized, however, the degree to which Japanese thinking leading up to and during World War II was also heavily influenced by Darwin.

Japanese thought blended the theistic with the evolutionary. They were a chosen people because the Emperor was a descendant of the sun goddess; they were a master race because they were more highly evolved. Japanese biologists ‘produced studies decrying the apish physical features of other races (hairiness, long arms) and noting the highly evolved characteristics of the Japanese’ (which included milder body odour).

The horrors of Changi, the Burma railroad, and the various death marches of World War II showed a people renowned for cultural gentility treating their wartime captives as totally subhuman. Once you have made any group of people less than human in your thinking, backed up by the authority of ‘science’, it becomes a powerful justification for plain old sin.

If instead of Darwinism, the scientific world had been disseminating the truth that we are all closely related, being the descendants of Adam and Eve through Noah, what a difference we could have seen in the history of the last hundred years!

So yeah, evolution and Darwinism.  And Imperial Japan, Nazi Germany, Stalinist Russia and Maoist China. Like peas in a pod.

I would submit that it’s not merely that through Adam and Eve “we are all closely related,” but that we have a Creator to whom we are accountable for how we treat one another that ultimately matters.  Because if someone is about to rob and murder you, do you really think they would stop if you just told them that we all randomly mutated from some common ape ancestor?

I saw something in the Los Angeles Times editorials.  Jon Wiener wrote on January 18:

Your editorial calling on Egyptian President Mohamaed Morsi to apologize for describing Zionists as ‘descendents of apes and pigs’ is only half right.  We are all descendents of apes, more or less.

Morsi is congratulated for embracing the theory of evolution at a time when so many of our own Christian leaders reject it.  No apology is necessary there. It’s the pigs that are the problem.

The following day, in the paper’s “Mailbag” section, writers explained away the insulting comparison to the pigs, too.  No harm calling Jews descendents of apes and pigs, no foul.

Here’s the thing: Wiener and those who piled on after him completely missed the point of Morsi’s claim and proceeded to make the same error themselves.  Morsi was most decidedly NOT saying that Arabs are likewise the descendents of apes and pigs; he was clearly saying that Jews ARE such descendents but that he and those who think like him are not.  And Jon Wiener, good liberal secular humanist that he is, likewise thinks that while all human beings are the random by-products of the union of mindless and soulless apes, he and his fellow liberal secular humanists are not.

It’s the same mistake, of course, that the Nazis and the Japanese committed: they believed in Darwinism for everybody else, but somehow exempted themselves from the animal state that they so so clearly in their millions of victims.

Gleason Archer exposed the moral and logical idiocy of secular humanism with the following:

“But it should be pointed out that consistent atheism, which represents itself to be the most rational and logical of all approaches to reality, is in actuality completely self-defeating and incapable of logical defense. That is to say, if indeed all matter has combined by mere chance, unguided by any Higher Power of Transcendental Intelligence, then it necessarily follows that the molecules of the human brain are also the product of mere chance. In other words, we think the way we do simply because the atoms and molecules of our brain tissue happen to have combined in the way they have, totally without transcendental guidance or control. So then even the philosophies of men, their system of logic and all their approaches to reality are the result of mere fortuity. There is no absolute validity to any argument advanced by the atheist against the position of theism.

On the basis of his won presuppositions, the atheist completely cancels himself out, for on his own premises his arguments are without any absolute validity. By his own confession he thinks the way he does simply because the atoms in his brain happen to combine the way they do. If this is so, he cannot honestly say that his view is any more valid than the contrary view of his opponent. His basic postulates are self-contradictory and self-defeating; for when he asserts that there are no absolutes, he thereby is asserting a very dogmatic absolute. Nor can he logically disprove the existence of God without resorting to a logic that depends on the existence of God for its validity. Apart from such a transcendent guarantor of the validity of logic, any attempts at logic or argumentation are simply manifestations of the behavior of the collocation of molecules that make up the thinker’s brain.”

You see, these communists, these fascists, these secular humanists, these progressive liberals, they claim that we’re all just meat puppet herd animals.  But somehow they exempt themselves and believe that they – who are just as much mindless random-chance by-products of evolution as everyone around them, can and somehow should still make all of the decisions for the rest of us.

I just wish that the evolutionists and Darwinians who argue that we are the random-chance product of mindless apes would confine their hateful ideology to themselves and leave the rest of us out of it.  But they actually do far worse; they make it ALL about the rest of us and leave themselves out of it.  That way we have the master race bureaucrats to make all our rules for us.

The doctrine of evolution intrinsically dehumanizes.  There is no God who lovingly created man in His own image, there is no God-given moral nature.  There is no meaning, no purpose and no value.  There is only nature and bloody violence and then more and more and more violence.  And ultimately there is only extinction in the cold depths of space as the mindless process that randomly spawned human beings just as mindlessly swallows it all back up again.

It’s interesting that in Revelation 15, when angels preach to the human race during the Tribulation, they say, “Fear God and give Him glory, because the hour of His judgment has come, and worship Him who made heaven and earth, the sea and the springs of water” (Rev 15:7).  Just as World War Two was the product of mindless evolutionary dogma, so also will Armageddon be the result of the same dogma.

And that’s why the beast is coming.

Nazis, Socialists, Communists, Liberals, Democrats, Obama, Media Propaganda ALL Support Occupy Wall Street

October 17, 2011

In preamble to the following article, I disagree with David Martosko that having Nazis and liberals together in any way counts as “strange bedfellows.”  If you understand the platform that brought the Nazis to power in the first place, and if you understand that “Nazi” itself stands for “National SOCIALIST German WORKERS Party,” and if you understand that Nazism was all about big government socialist tyranny, you know that it is absolutely within the character of the Nazis to support yet another leftwing movement.  Just as it is absolutely within the character of the left to embrace the support of the most vile organizations on earth.

Red, White and Angry
: Communist, Nazi parties endorse ‘Occupy’ protests
By David Martosko Published: 12:31 AM 10/17/2011 | Updated: 4:28 PM 10/17/2011

In a move that may redefine the term “strange bedfellows,” the American Nazi Party issued an official endorsement of the Occupy Wall Street protest movement on Sunday afternoon. The announcement put the organization, a self-described “National Socialist” political party, in company with the Socialist Party USA, which explained its own support for the left-wing protesters in a nationwide conference call last Tuesday night, crediting organized labor with the protests’ strength and sophistication to date.

The American Nazi Party is the most politically sophisticated U.S. remnant — but by no means the only one — of white supremacist Adolph Hitler’s murderous 20th century movement, which sought to establish socialism for Aryans, and to subjugate non-Aryans. The party calls Hitler’s Mein Kampf “an ideological blueprint for healthy Aryan survival.”

In its statement on Sunday, the Westland, Mich.-based Nazi party wrote that the Occupy Wall Street protests are “TAYLOR [sic] MADE for National Socialists, as well as WN [White Nationalists] who are serious about DOING SOMETHING.”

“I urgently URGE all of you,” the statement’s unnamed author added, “to TAKE PART and JOIN IN when these protests hit your neck of the woods. Produce some flyers EXPLAINING the ‘JEW BANKER’ influence — DON’T wear anything marking you as an ‘evil racist’ — and GET OUT THERE and SPREAD the WORD!”

While Nazis seem unenthusiastic about visibly linking their flagship organization to the vocal protests that have popped up in dozens of U.S. cities, the same can’t be said of the Communist Party USA.

John Bachtell, an Illinois-based community organizer and Communist Party USA board member, addressed the “Occupy Chicago” protest on Saturday.

“I bring greetings and solidarity from the Communist Party,” Bachtell said to hoots and applause. “We are here, marching side-by-side. We’ll sleep here. We’ll be with this movement ’til the very – ’til we make all the changes that we know we have to make.”

This is a movement that believes that sustantially believes that the U.S. government is no better than Al Qaeda.

There have been hundreds of arrests in this movement.  In fact, at least EIGHT HUNDRED leftists have been arrested at Occupy Wall Street events.  Versus almost ZERO arrests for the Tea Party – which has been demonstrating for going on three years.  And yet the liberal hypocrite cockroaches in both the mainstream media and the Democrat Party deceitfully depicted the Tea Party movement as “violent” while they depict the Occupy Wall Street movement as positive.  In the same way, the Tea Party was denounced as “racist” because the Tea Party demonstrators were mostly white; while the fact that the Occupy Wall Street movement is almost entirely white has gone completely unnoticed in the dishonest mainstream media propaganda machine.  Because they are liars without a scintilla of shame or integrity or honor.

I’ve been pointing out that Nazism was leftwing for years now:

Liberal Rallies Pimp Hard-Core Totalitarian Socialism

Why I Call Obama A Fascist

Mainstream Media Propaganda Machine Turns Other Way As Democrats Now Want To ‘Get A Little Bloody’

Leftwing Violence And Media Propaganda/Coverup Continues Unabated

Lest We Forget: Liberal Progressive ‘Science’ Was At The Core Of The Holocaust

Helen Thomas, Liberal Journalist, Useful Idiot And Typical Progressive Bigot

Liberals Really WOULD Like To Live Under Kim Jong Il’s Regime

The Democrat Party Is Different From The Communist Party How, Exactly???

The Manhattan Declaration As The New Barmen Declaration

Democrats’ Pseudo-Demonization Again On Display

Health Care Debate: As Charges of Nazism Abound, Which Side Is Right?

How Postmodernism Leads To Fascism (part 1)

Jeremiah Wright’s Stupid Views on Black and White Learning

It’s nice to have the validation of the American Nazi Party helping me prove my case.

14 Wisconsin Democrat Deserters: ‘Jobs? We Don’t Need No Stinking Jobs!’

February 28, 2011

“I don’t think it does anybody any good when public employees are denigrated or vilified or their rights are infringed upon,” said totally-in-da-pocket-of-da-unions Barry Hussein.

Okay, so it’s bad to denigrate or vilify public employees.

Except the governor of the state, who is a public employee whom the public UNION employees have damned as Adolf Hitler and as a Nazi.  Barry could care less about vilifying the governor as Hitler.  Because if he had one more particle of hypocrite inside of him it would explode right out of his thin skin.

Barry Hussein’s on the side of chief AFL-CIO thug Richard Trumka, you see.  And since Scott Walker is a public employee who ISN’T in the union’s pocket, it’s FINE to tee off on him in the most hateful way imaginable:

Union Chief Doesn’t Condemn Comparisons of Wisconsin’s Walker to Hitler
Published February 27, 2011
| FoxNews.com

Fox News Channel

The head of one of the nation’s most powerful labor unions did not condemn the violent rhetoric in placards and signs held by union supporters demonstrating in Wisconsin despite two direct attempts Sunday to get him on the record declaring them inappropriate.

On several occasions over the past two weeks of demonstrations in the Wisconsin capital of Madison news media have zeroed in on signs that liken Republican Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker to Nazi leader Adolf Hitler and recently ousted Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak

Appearing Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka was twice asked whether he found the tone at the nearly two-week long demonstrations “wrong” or “inappropriate.”

Trumka did not answer […]

Apparently it is PERFECTLY okay to denigrate public employees.  At least by Barry Hussein’s twisted standards.  That’s the way scumbags like Trumka and Obama roll.

That’s one lie from Barry Hussein.  Another one is that he gives a damn about jobs.  Because his rigid union ideology is about to cost at least a thousand of them tomorrow:

Governor gives Wisconsin Democrats an ultimatum
By David Bailey

MADISON, Wisc. | Mon Feb 28, 2011 5:41pm EST

MADISON, Wisc. (Reuters) – Republican Gov. Scott Walker on Monday gave absent Democratic lawmakers an ultimatum to return to Wisconsin within 24 hours and vote on a proposal to reduce the power of public sector unions or the state would miss out on a debt restructuring.

Walker stepped up the pressure on 14 Senate Democrats who fled the state to avoid a vote on the bill as he prepared to unveil on Tuesday a two-year state budget that he said cuts $1 billion from funding to local governments and schools.

What began as one small state trying to rewrite the rules of labor relations has blown up into what could be the biggest confrontation with American labor unions since then President Ronald Reagan fired striking air traffic controllers in 1981.

For the second time since the controversy erupted, President Barack Obama weighed into the debate on Monday criticizing the Wisconsin plan without mentioning it by name.

“I don’t think it does anybody any good when public employees are denigrated or vilified or their rights are infringed upon,” Obama told the nation’s governors gathered in Washington.

Wisconsin’s Walker immediately issued a response, saying: “I’m sure that President Obama simply misunderstands the issues in Wisconsin.”

Pro-union demonstrators continued to occupy the State Capitol building on Monday after some of them refused to leave on Sunday night. Capitol police, who had allowed the protesters to stay in the building for more than a week, on Monday prevented more from entering even though it was a week day.

So far the police have been tolerant of the protesters and no arrests have been made.

Walker’s budget proposal brought out the biggest protest crowd since the Vietnam War in Madison over the weekend.

A new poll released on Monday suggested that if the 2010 election could be replayed the Wisconsin governor might lose. The Public Policy Polling survey found that if the election were repeated the result would flip with Walker’s Democratic opponent Tom Barrett getting 52 percent and Walker 45 percent. Walker won with 52 percent in November. The shift came mainly from union households.

The Wisconsin proposal would require public sector employees to pay more for pensions and health care, strip some of their unions of bargaining rights except for wages up to the rate of inflation and require yearly recertification votes.

The proposal was approved by the state Assembly last week but is stalled in the Senate because the 14 Democrats have fled the state to avoid a vote.

The proposal includes a restructuring of the state’s debt that Walker said would save $165 million. Walker said this restructuring deal was in doubt if the Democrats did not return.

“Failure to return to work and cast their votes will lead to more painful and aggressive spending cuts in the very near future,” Walker’s said in a statement.

Under Walker’s proposal, Wisconsin’s general obligation bonds would be restructured and that would push debt service payments due by March 15 into future years.

Democrats differed from Walker’s estimate, quoting on Monday a report from state fiscal analyst Al Runde saying that the restructuring Walker wants would add more than $42 million of interest payments over the long term.

In an interview broadcast on Sunday, Walker said he hoped to delay sending layoff notices to state workers if the legislature makes progress on fixing the budget deficit, according to website wispolitics.com.

But to postpone the layoffs, Walker said it will be necessary that his budget repair bill, including the move to end collective bargaining, go into effect by April 1.

There has been speculation that Walker would send out layoff notices to more than 1,000 state workers if no progress was made soon on the budget.

(Additional reporting by Stefanie Carano in Madison and Wendell Marsh in Washington; Editing by Greg McCune)

For what it’s worth, “Public Policy Polling” is rather like asking what Media Matters thinks about something.  It is very left leaning with Democrat connections.  Try most accurate Rasmussen and you get a dramatically different result.

I mean, everyone I talked to says Walker is right-on.  And the fact that I only talked to Republicans really doesn’t have anything to do with anything.

The most important thing for the moment is tomorrow’s deadline for Democrats to return.  We can take the first two and last two sentences of the Reuters article to cut to the chase:

MADISON, Wisc. (Reuters) – Republican Gov. Scott Walker on Monday gave absent Democratic lawmakers an ultimatum to return to Wisconsin within 24 hours and vote on a proposal to reduce the power of public sector unions or the state would miss out on a debt restructuring.

Walker stepped up the pressure on 14 Senate Democrats who fled the state to avoid a vote on the bill as he prepared to unveil on Tuesday a two-year state budget that he said cuts $1 billion from funding to local governments and schools. […]

But to postpone the layoffs, Walker said it will be necessary that his budget repair bill, including the move to end collective bargaining, go into effect by April 1.

There has been speculation that Walker would send out layoff notices to more than 1,000 state workers if no progress was made soon on the budget.

The fact of the matter is that Walker may have to end up laying off 6,000 workers, not just 1,000:

Wisconsin is broke. The current budget is already $137 million in the red. The 2011–2013 biennial budget faces a $3.6 billion hole. So Governor Walker has called the legislature into special session and presented them with an emergency budget. His plan closes the deficit without raising taxes.

Government employees in Wisconsin get amazing benefits. They get a generous defined-benefit pension with minimal contributions on their part. They also only pay 6 percent of the cost of their health-care premiums. Few taxpayers enjoy anything this generous.

Government employees get these benefits because of the special privileges government unions enjoy. Government workers in many states — including Wisconsin — must pay union dues or lose their jobs. The state subsidizes their fundraising by using its payroll system to collect these forced dues.

This gives the union movement billions of dollars, which it uses to elect favored candidates. The American Federation of State and County Municipal Employees (AFSCME) spent more than any other outside group in the last election. Government unions have used this political clout to hijack state government to serve their interests.

Governor Walker could have raised taxes or fired 6,000 state employees. Instead, like Governor Christie, he decided to actually fix the problems that brought Wisconsin to this point. His budget limits government collective bargaining to just wages, taking benefits and work rules off the bargaining table. He would also require voters to approve any raises above inflation. Walker would prevent government unions from forcing taxpayers to cough up for their gold-plated benefits.

Democrats don’t give a damn about creating jobs.  They only care about UNION jobs. 

And it looks like tomorrow they’ll prove it.

Why FDR Would Have Denounced The Modern Democrat Party As Un-American

February 25, 2011

Democrats and the Democrat Party they form have become truly despicable.

I can cite former Democrats such as Dennis Prager who has frequently called himself “a Kennedy liberal.”  He has pointed out, “I didn’t leave the Democrat Party; the Democrat Party left me.”

I can cite Ronald Reagan himself as such a man:

Reagan began his political career as a liberal Democrat, admirer of Franklin D. Roosevelt, and active supporter of New Deal policies, but in the early 1950s he shifted to the right and, while remaining a Democrat, endorsed the presidential candidacies of Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1952 and 1956 as well as Richard Nixon in 1960.[54] His many GE speeches—which he wrote himself—were non-partisan but carried a conservative, pro-business message; he was influenced by Lemuel Boulware, a senior GE executive. Boulware, known for his tough stance against unions and his innovative strategies to win over workers, championed the core tenets of modern American conservatism: free markets, anticommunism, lower taxes, and limited government.[55] Eventually, the ratings for Reagan’s show fell off and GE dropped Reagan in 1962.[56]  That year Reagan formally switched to the Republican Party, stating, “I didn’t leave the Democratic Party. The party left me.”[57]

One of the things that undoubtedly resulted in these two brilliant political thinkers’ sense of abandonment was the fact that they clearly HAD BEEN abandoned by the Democrat Party as it continued to “evolve” (liberals love that word, worshiping it in place of a God who stays the same) into a degenerate spiral.  And it was that profound abandonment of key Democrat liberal views – the abandonment of classical liberalism into something that can only be described today as a hybrid of Marxism and fascism – that then led these men to question their entire political presuppositions that had resulted in their being Democrats in the first place.

Yes, I know, liberals always confidently assure us that Nazism and fascism are right wing.  But how, exactly?  If they say militarism, then how was it that the Soviet Union had the largest and most powerful military machine in the world?  If they say racism, then – apart from their own bigotry – how do they escape their own racism?  If you want to talk about anti-Semitism of the Nazis, it turns out that Democrats are actually far more anti-Semitic than Republicans.  And, again, the genocide of the leftwing Soviet Union dwarfs even that of the Nazis.

So, what exactly is it that makes Nazism “right wing”?  Well, maybe the left would say that the Nazis were “Christian” and left wing ideologies are secular.  But that is hardly true, either.  I document in a previous article (“Hitler Wasn’t ‘Right Wing’, Wasn’t ‘Christian’; And Nazism Was Applied Darwinism“) that Nazism and Christianity had virtually nothing to do with one another, and that in fact Hitler was an acknowledged atheist.

I did not know at the writing of that article that in fact Hitler actually wanted to kidnap Pope Pius XII, and that the SS officer placed in charge of the operation understood that Hitler would have murdered him following his capture.  I don’t see how that doesn’t do anything more than strengthen my case that Hitler was hardly a “Catholic.”

When it comes to Nazi ideology and Nazi policies (not the least of which was the sort of abortion and Darwinian eugenics that liberal progressive and modern-day Democrat Icon Margaret Sanger engaged in), Nazism was far more in line with liberal progressivism than anything remotely conservative.  A couple quick statements by Margaret Sanger, the patron saint of Hillary Clinton:

In Pivot of Civilization, Sanger referred to immigrants and poor folks as “human weeds,” “reckless breeders,” “spawning  … human beings who never should have been born.”

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” she said, “if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” (Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America, by Linda Gordon)

In her “Plan for Peace,” Sanger outlined her strategy for eradication of those she deemed “feebleminded.” Among the steps included in her evil scheme were immigration restrictions; compulsory sterilization; segregation to a lifetime of farm work; etc. (Birth Control Review, April 1932, p. 107)

And I also show in a comment to that article that Nazism was far, FAR more in line with Democrat Party liberalism than it ever could be Republican Party conservatism when it came to big government and big government policies.

Jonah Goldberg points out that Nazism was in fact “far right.”  But only in the sense that the Nazi Party, i.e. the National Socialist German Workers Party, was the far right of the extreme left.

A good article I recently found on the subject of socialism and fascism is available here.  Basically, the latter is simply a particular species of the former.

American conservatism calls for a strong military defense, yes.  But as we shall see, so also did FDR.  And in every other aspect, consistent conservatism calls for limited and small national government.  Which was the diametric opposite of Adolf Hitler’s Nazi project, which controlled every sphere of life the same way the Democrat Party tried to do during the last two years when they had power.

If you think for so much as an instant that Adolf Hitler wanted less centralized power for himself and more control in the hands of the states/districts and the individual people – as Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich, Rush Limbaugh and conservatives constantly talk about – you simply couldn’t be any more ignorant.

That said, just what are the two fundamental issues I claim in my title that FDR would have denounced in the Democrat Party of today?

They are military power and the willingness to use it (i.e., the heart of any foreign policy) and government or public employee unions (i.e., the heart of Democrat’s domestic agenda).

These are no small matters: the former is central to any rational foreign policy and the latter has become central to Democrat domestic policy.

I describe FDR’s fundamental opposition to government unions and the reasons he was opposed to them here.  And I provide FDR’s very own words and his very own reasoning.  Suffice it to say that as pro-union as FDR was, he was profoundly opposed to government/public sector employees having the very sort of collective bargaining rights that Democrats today routinely demand for the public sector unions which constitute the bulk of union power today, and which massively contributes almost exclusively to the Democrat Party machine.  FDR realized that these employees were employees not of some unfair private company, but of the American people.  He also recognized that the government becomes a monopoly unto itself, and that government unions striking 1) exploited that monopoly power in an unfair and un-American way, and 2) was a defacto attack against the American people.

Please read the article above for more.

That leaves the other issue, the foreign policy issue of military power and the willingness to use it to deal with threats to the nation.

A speech by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill could have been given today to expose the American liberal views of Democrats basically since Lyndon Baines Johnson refused to seek re-election after liberals turned on him.  It certainly powerfully applies to the Democrat positions in the war on terror – that Obama once refused to even acknowledge – of today.  Churchill began:

I have but a short time to deal with this enormous subject and I beg you therefore to weigh my words with the attention and thought which I have given to them.

As we go to and fro in this peaceful country with its decent, orderly people going about their business under free institutions and with so much tolerance and fair play in their laws and customs, it is startling and fearful to realize that we are no longer safe in our island home.

For nearly a thousand years England has not seen the campfires of an invader. The stormy sea and our royal navy have been our sure defense. Not only have we preserved our life and freedom through the centuries, but gradually we have come to be the heart and center of an empire which surrounds the globe.

It is indeed with a pang of stabbing pain that we see all this in mortal danger. A thousand years has served to form a state; an hour may lay it in dust.

What shall we do? Many people think that the best way to escape war is to dwell upon its horrors and to imprint them vividly upon the minds of the younger generation. They flaunt the grisly photograph before their eyes. They fill their ears with tales of carnage. They dilate upon the ineptitude of generals and admirals. They denounce the crime as insensate folly of human strife. Now, all this teaching ought to be very useful in preventing us from attacking or invading any other country, if anyone outside a madhouse wished to do so, but how would it help us if we were attacked or invaded ourselves that is the question we have to ask.

Would the invaders consent to hear Lord Beaverbrook’s exposition, or listen to the impassioned appeals of Mr. Lloyd George? Would they agree to meet that famous South African, General Smuts, and have their inferiority complex removed in friendly, reasonable debate? I doubt it. I have borne responsibility for the safety of this country in grievous times. I gravely doubt it.

But even if they did, I am not so sure we should convince them, and persuade them to go back quietly home. They might say, it seems to me, “you are rich; we are poor. You seem well fed; we are hungry. You have been victorious; we have been defeated. You have valuable colonies; we have none. You have your navy; where is ours? You have had the past; let us have the future.” Above all, I fear they would say, “you are weak and we are strong.”

Churchill gave that speech back in 1934.  Just imagine how much unparalleled human suffering would never have happened if only the weak and appeasing policies of the leftist bleeding hearts had not triumphed!  The left wrongly claim to stand for peace and compassion and every good thing.  But the exact opposite is true, as they have in fact murdered millions and millions of innocent human beings with their naive and morally stupid policies.  And to whatever extent liberals have good intentions, the road to hell is paved with liberal intentions.

Think back to Obama’s positions as a candidate in which he demonized Bush’s war in Iraq and his surge strategy.  Think of Obama’s incredibly naive and incredibly failed policy of talking to Iran without preconditions.

I could go on all day about Democrats taking on the views that Churchill condemned; that our enemies really aren’t that evil and how we can talk to them and reach some kind of accord short of fighting them.  It is as naive and morally idiotic today as it was in the era of Churchill and – yes – Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

I did not realize this until I watched a program I viewed on the Military History Channel called “Decisions That Shook the World.”  But FDR rapidly became what we would today call a neo-conservative.

In the late 1930s, FDR began to watch with growing horror as the Nazis began to take over Europe.  In secret letters to Winston Churchill, he offered his moral support to the Allies.  FDR knew that if the people – who did NOT want to become entangled in what they saw as a European war – were to find out about these letters, they would turn against him in outrage.  The American people in the 1930s and early 1940s were crystal clear that they did not want to become involved in another world war in Europe.  As it was, at the very time that the American people were the most worried about FDR secretly getting involved in the war behind their backs, FDR was in fact secretly corresponding with Churchill to do that very thing.  FDR also – again secretly – ordered his military commanders to devise a secret military plan with Great Britain for when FDR was able to involve America in the war against Hitler in Europe.

Now, today, it would be very easy to condemn FDR as duplicitous.  And he WAS incredibly duplicitous.  FDR was a man – we find out in the words of the historians who narrated the “Decisions” program – who had no problem saying and doing things in private that he very much did not want to be known in public.  As an example, FDR, in direct defiance of the United States Supreme Court – directed his Attorney General to wiretap suspected spies.  That was literally an impeachable offense.  FDR was breaking the law to deal with what he saw as a growing threat against America.

Rep. Wendell Wilkie, the Republican candidate for president in the 1940 election – warned the American people, “If you elect FDR, he will get you into a war you don’t want.”  And FDR, deceitfully, in a speech, said, “That charge is contrary to every fact, every purpose of the past eight years.”  It was, as history documents, a complete lie.

Another lie FDR told the people came on the eve of the 1940 election.  FDR told mothers, “I have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and again: Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars.”  And it is hard to imagine a more dishonest promise, given that he was at the moment he said those words doing everything he knew how to get America into the war in Europe.

One of the points the historians made clear is that, “If all of Roosevelt’s acts were publicly known, he likely would have been impeached.”  He most certainly would NOT have been re-elected in 1940.

FDR was reelected on the promise that he would not do what in fact he was determined to do.

In 1940, the “anti-war” candidate was the Republican, Wendell Wilkie.  He had the virtue of being honest, but likely on the wrong side of history (we can’t know for sure what would have happened had the United States not become involved in World War II, but it doesn’t look pretty).  Democrat FDR may have had the virtue of being right, but he was certainly profoundly dishonest.

Now, I could write how FDR was quite constant with other modern liberal presidents who say one thing and do the exact opposite (I’m speaking directly about Barack Obama, the examples of which are now already legion).  But that isn’t my project here.  My project is to point out that, when it came to being prepared for war and then fighting that war, FDR was fundamentally in opposition to the modern Democrat Party agenda.

That briefly stated, it was the Republican Party which ultimately came to realize that FDR was correct in his views of the military and the need to vigorously defend American national security.  And it was the Democrats who came to turn on FDR’s realization and abandon his views.

They didn’t do so all at once, or right away.  As much as modern liberals tried to attack Ronald Reagan as putting the world on the brink of nuclear war in his Cold War stand against the powerful Soviet Union, one President John F. Kennedy was every bit the cold warrior that Reagan ever was.  And, again, any liberal who doubts this is simply a fundamentally ignorant human being.  That said, it was during the Kennedy presidency that JFK cynically – and by executive fiat rather than any vote by Congress – allowed the government unions that came to own the Democrat Party lock, stock and barrel to collectively bargain as a means to help the Democrat Party.  And the moral collapse of the Democrat Party was incredibly precipitous after that.

At this point in time, anyone who doubts that radical Islam is easily capable of not only destabilizing the world, but plunging it into economic depression and global war is delusional.  The mere prospect of a collapse of the Libyan government alone could spell enormous problems in the likely event of a civil war in that country.  Oil prices could literally more than double, which would simply obliterate any potential global economic recovery.  If Iran is able to obtain the bomb – which is most assuredly will if it hasn’t already – we will see a rise in Islamic fundamentalism, jihadism and terrorism such that the world has never seen as the Iranian regime rightly sees itself as impervious to any meaningful international action against it.  If that isn’t bad enough, we would also see a nuclear arms race quickly escalate in the craziest region in the history of the planet as Sunni Muslim regimes tried to protect themselves against the Shiite Iranian threat.

For what it’s worth, even as mainstream liberals celebrate and rejoice in the overthrow of one Arab leader after another, it is IRAN which is most benefitting from the chaos.  From the New York Times:

MANAMA, Bahrain — The popular revolts shaking the Arab world have begun to shift the balance of power in the region, bolstering Iran’s position while weakening and unnerving its rival, Saudi Arabia, regional experts said.

I have been warning and warning about this.  But the world listens to Obama, not me.

But in light of Obama’s policy of appeasement, of asking for meetings of minds with no preconditions, allow me to rephrase Churchill’s words to suit our modern-day situation:

Would the invaders consent to hear Barack Obama’s exposition, or listen to the impassioned appeals of Hillary Clinton? Would they agree to meet that famous African, Kofi Annan, and have their inferiority complex removed in friendly, reasonable debate? I doubt it.

Allow me to share with you the consensus view of liberalism today at one of its elite headquarters of Columbia University:

Columbia University is holding a series of public hearings on whether or not to allow ROTC back on campus now that DADT has been repealed. A wounded Iraq veteran who recently enrolled at Columbia took to the microphone and asked fellow students to support ROTC. He was booed, jeered, and called a racist.

Columbia University students heckled a war hero during a town-hall meeting on whether ROTC should be allowed back on campus.

“Racist!” some students yelled at Anthony Maschek, a Columbia freshman and former Army staff sergeant awarded the Purple Heart after being shot 11 times in a firefight in northern Iraq in February 2008. Others hissed and booed the veteran.

The former soldier responded to the jeers with this awesome statement:

“It doesn’t matter how you feel about the war. It doesn’t matter how you feel about fighting,” said Maschek. “There are bad men out there plotting to kill you.”

The despicable so-called “Americans” in the audience only laughed and jeered more.

Anthony Maschek was a staff sergeant with the Army’s 10th Mountain Division. He was shot 11 times and spent two years recovering at Walter Reed. He’s an American hero and those thugs at Columbia are a disgrace. This is no different than those pieces of crap who spit on veterans coming back from Vietnam. It’s disgusting that in 2011 our veterans should have to be heckled by cowards.

Read more: http://www.thehotjoints.com/2011/02/21/wounded-veteran-booed-and-jeered-at-columbia-university/#ixzz1Evn0A8qL

FDR would have turned his back on this Democrat Party as a bunch of contemptible and despicable traitors to the United States of America.  He would have looked at the government unions that today are the sine qua non – the “that without which” – of the Democrat Party machine.  And he would have been disgusted that the entire Democrat Party rests today upon an inherently un-American foundation.  Then this president who risked so much to keep America and the world safe from tyranny would have looked upon the modern Democrat Party and its repeated denunciation of those who would fight America’s most terrifying enemies even as those enemies grew stronger and stronger while we have grown weaker and weaker, and he would have vomited in contempt for the party that he had such a profound role in shaping.

By the very standards of the figures that you cite as your greatest heroes, I denounce you as the pathetic, vile, un-American fools that you truly are, Democrats.

I would say that you should be ashamed of yourselves, but I doubt that you are capable of that virtue in this house-of-card world that you are building now.  And the problem with houses of cards is not merely that they fall; it is also that they tend to burn furiously when a match is struck.

And when the Antichrist warned of by the Scriptures for more than 2,600 years comes (as described in the Books of Daniel and Revelation), it will be Democrats, the quintessential fools, who welcome him with cheers and adoration.