The words of Democrat Congressma John Dingell regarding ObamaCare:
“Let me remind you this has been going on for years. We are bringing it to a halt. The harsh fact of the matter is when you’re going to pass legislation that will cover 300 American people in different ways it takes a long time to do the necessary administrative steps that have to be taken to put the legislation together to control the people.” — Rep. John Dingell (D-MI)
The words of Nancy Pelosi also regarding ObamaCare:
“But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it…”
Mind you, not one single Democrat actually READ THE DAMN BILL before they imposed it on the American people:
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said Tuesday that the health-care reform bill now pending in Congress would garner very few votes if lawmakers actually had to read the entire bill before voting on it.
“If every member pledged to not vote for it if they hadn’t read it in its entirety, I think we would have very few votes,” Hoyer told CNSNews.com at his regular weekly news conference.
Hoyer was responding to a question from CNSNews.com on whether he supported a pledge that asks members of the Congress to read the entire bill before voting on it and also make the full text of the bill available to the public for 72 hours before a vote.
In fact, Hoyer found the idea of the pledge humorous, laughing as he responded to the question. “I’m laughing because a) I don’t know how long this bill is going to be, but it’s going to be a very long bill,” he said.
And:
(CNSNews.com) – During his speech at a National Press Club luncheon, House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.), questioned the point of lawmakers reading the health care bill.
“I love these members, they get up and say, ‘Read the bill,’” said Conyers.
“What good is reading the bill if it’s a thousand pages and you don’t have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill?”
And:
“I don’t think you want me to waste my time to read every page of the health care bill. You know why? It’s statutory language,” Baucus said. “We hire experts.”
“Experts.” You know, like the Nazi scientists we kept out of prison so they would help us build better rockets and stuff.
What does the most interesting man in the world have to say about all this?
Let’s have another Democrat explain why on earth Democrat voters would actually support a criminally insane party that rammed that crap down our now collectivist throats:
“Ideologies aren’t all that important. What’s important is psychology.
The Democratic constituency is just like a herd of cows. All you have to do is lay out enough silage and they come running. That’s why I became an operative working with Democrats. With Democrats all you have to do is make a lot of noise, lay out the hay, and be ready to use the ole cattle prod in case a few want to bolt the herd.
Eighty percent of the people who call themselves Democrats don’t have a clue as to political reality. What amazes me is that you could take a group of people who are hard workers and convince them that they should support social programs that were the exact opposite of their own personal convictions. Put a little fear here and there and you can get people to vote any way you want.
The voter is basically dumb and lazy. The reason I became a Democratic operative instead of a Republican was because there were more Democrats that didn’t have a clue than there were Republicans.
Truth is relative. Truth is what you can make the voter believe is the truth. If you’re smart enough, truth is what you make the voter think it is. That’s why I’m a Democrat. I can make the Democratic voters think whatever I want them to.” — James Carville, career Democrat operative most famously during the Clinton years.
And because a picture is worth a thousand words, here’s a picture too:
I’ve always said that Democrats were truly stupid people. It begins with their moral stupidity and spreads like a cancer to their brains with the assured result of liberalism being mindless moral idiocy in action.
Tags: because there were more Democrats that didn't have a clue than there were Republicans, Eighty percent of the people who call themselves Democrats don't have a clue as to political reality, James Carville, John Dingell, nobody read ObamaCare bill before vote, Obamacare, The Democratic constituency is just like a herd of cows
Start Thinking Right 
October 12, 2012 at 12:22 pm
James Carville says “the truth is what you can make people believe is the truth.” Man o man! Then last night I got to hear Joe Biden blather on about Iran having fissile material is no big deal. “You gotta have a bomb to put it in.” Democrats are disgustingly stupid. Too stupid to even realize how stupid Joe Biden assumes they are.
Same as saying, Oh, having explosives is no big deal. You gotta have a bomb to put it in.
October 12, 2012 at 7:31 pm
James Carville hit the nail square on the head with that one. However, I prefer to call them sheep instead of cows. Growing up in rural America, I often found cows to be stubborn and slightly smarter than sheep. If a cow got loose, it was often a struggle to get it back inside the fence. Sheep, on the other hand, were just plain stupid. So stupid, you really didn’t need a fence, as the fence was more for their protection than that of keeping them in. When it came time for slaughter, you could always sense that the cows knew what was coming; the sheep, on the other hand, were totally clueless. Can you see the picture I am painting?
It seems that America is increasingly becoming a land of sheep with lying, liberal-democrat politicians their shepherd. You can probably thank our useless public-school system and incompetent, godless parents for that. Each year they turn out more rejects than an assembly line at a Chrysler plant. If the trend continues, we are about a half-a-generation away from conservatism becoming extinct and the masses ripe for that man of sin. In reality, we are probably even closer than that. In the beginning, deception does take time, though, but in the end, the fleecing happens quick.
Each day I am confronted by multitudes of sheep. I try to bring reason and light into their minds, but, too often, it is in vain, my ministry is in vain! Sometimes I want to take a blunt object to their skull; sometimes I want to do the same to mine, because I can’t take it. I’ve always been a contrarian, maintaining that mainstream is usually wrong, and that truth is often hidden somewhere behind layers of skillfully crafted lies. Most people, unfortunately, accept things at face value and never develop any level of discernment. It started out as children with Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny and just kept evolving. Lies, everybody believes lies. Of course, this was prophesied in the Bible, that in the last days, the people would believe lies rather than the truth. I do think that there is more here to deception and lies than stupid people believing them, that this comes down to an ancient and ongoing battle in the spirit realm between lies and truth, good and evil.
October 12, 2012 at 8:51 pm
FMC,
Democrats are probably more like a sheep-cow hybrid that maximizes the very worst tendencies of each species.
Carville was getting at the gluttony instinct of the cow (and they are a very large and quite round animal and got that way for a reason :)
His point was that you could wave something Democrats wanted or had been taught to believe they should want and they’d vote however you wanted.
But maybe sheep are self-centered gluttons, too. Dang it, I wish I knew my farm animals better so I could better understand the psychology of Democrats…
I’ve explained my approach to dealing with liberals before. It comes from Proverbs:
I interpret that the following way: if you waste too much time arguing with a fool, passerby won’t be able to tell the difference between you. It is simply foolish to try to persuade a fool of wisdom or truth or fact. They are no more capable of understanding such than a cockroach is capable of understanding rocket science.
So when I realize I’ve got a fool, I do my best to make it as short a conversation as I possibly can.
At the same time, the Proverb says that a fool should be refuted. And not only to prevent him from “being wise in his own eyes,” but because if you don’t refute big lies people tend to believe them. So on this blog, when a fool presents a fool’s argument, I patiently interact with the argument and refute it, and then I block that fool so I will never have to waste another moment of my life on them ever again.
It’s harder to do in real life, of course. But I try to follow the same principle, but put my emphasis on wasting as little time as possible on a fool rather than the “refute the fool” part.
September 28, 2013 at 11:31 am
wow empty insults from people who have such low self esteem they feel the need to verbally attack others. If you follow a political party explicitly you already have issues in thinking for yourself. If you think any or everyone is either a liberal or conservative, then you lack cognitive thinking. People have their own opinions and if they just adapt what they are told I feel bad for them. Think for yourself refuse to be a stereotypical sheep for any party or ideal. people are not conservative or liberal in their views, they are both depending on the particular issue at hand.
October 4, 2013 at 12:50 pm
Bah Humbug,
That’s a quite dishonest summary of this article, Bah Humbug.
I don’t merely spout “empty insults.” As the title itself indicates, I interact with Democrats who prove the truth/facts as to everything then go on to “insult.”
When I can quote top Democrats who state that the goal of ObamaCare was “to put the legislation together to control the people.” When I can quote top Democrats who told us, “we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.” When I can quote top Democrats as saying, “What good is reading the bill if it’s a thousand pages and you don’t have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill?” When I can document the proof that NOBODY READ THE OBAMACARE BILL BEFORE THEY VOTED FOR IT, I think my “insults” aren’t “empty” at ALL. Because if that isn’t stupid farm animal herd mentality, there is no such as farm animals.
I PROVE that Democrats voted for a bill that “controlled the people” and hijacked the most critical one-sixth of our economy without having a single individual brain among them. They voted as a stupid herd, and we have a stupid and immoral law that seizes health care as a result of that stupid Democrat farm animal vote.
Do you want to know what IS “empty”??? Your vacuous “wah somebody said something mean and I’m such a whiny pathetic victim!” garbage. You people make me just want to barf. As we speak, top Democrats are calling Republicans “terrorists” and “jihadists” and “anarchists” and accusing us of literal CRIMES such as hostage taking and extortion and even MURDER. And you have the tiny little mosquito balls to whine about “verbally attacking others” when you are WAAAAAAAAYYYYY to personally dishonest and hypocritical to acknowledge that if everyone who insulted anyone were suddenly zapped by lightening, pretty much every Democrat on earth would be tennis shoes and ashes.
I also find in you a vacuous mind because, for the trillionth time on this blog, here is a worthless drive-by empty-head who doesn’t even so much as TRY to in ANY way interact with my points or the proofs I support them with.
Please get lost now. Because “I feel bad” for YOU and your obvious inability to look at yourself and realize that you are far worse than the people you are talking smack about.
December 15, 2013 at 6:26 pm
Take the time and research and see if the person actually said it….otherwise your no better than the person calling tea party racist.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/carville.asp
December 16, 2013 at 8:35 am
Anonymous,
Well, what’s interesting here is you got me – but you got yourself pretty dang good too.
Here’s the thing: I wrote this article on October 12 of 2012. You can date my article not only from the http link, but also from my first response which came that same day. Your snopes article is dated on Nov 26, 2012 – a full month and a half AFTER I wrote my piece.
Had you done YOUR damn “time and research,” you would have realized that there was no way – apart from having your benefit of either time travel or 20/20 hindsight – that I COULD have “taken the time and research to see” something that DID NOT EXIST YET.
At the time that I wrote this, there WAS no such piece by Snopes or anybody else. Because it did seem a little too good to be true, just like these statements from Obama that seemed too good to be true but are in fact all too true (here and here). Sometimes politicos just say stupid things.
So you’re really no better, either, Mr. 20/20 hindsight. Because if you’re going to chastise me with my failure to do due diligence, at least have the decency to post something THAT ACTUALLY EXISTED THAT I COULD HAVE DONE MY DUE DILIGENCE WITH.
That said, I will stand corrected. I do TRY to check sources. And as an honest person I also post corrections like yours – which puts me a far bit ahead of all the nastiest vermin at the bottom of the internet.